Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma: a multicenter single-arm phase II study

TNPO1-Mediated Nuclear Import of FUBP1 Contributes to Tumor Immune Evasion by Increasing NRP1 Expression in Cervical Cancer

Far upstream element binding protein 1 (FUBP1), a DNA-binding protein, participates in diverse tumor-promoting behaviors by regulating the expression of oncogenes in the nucleus, but the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. In the present study, we found that FUBP1 mRNA and protein expressions were markedly upregulated and closely linked with poor prognosis in cervical cancer. In vitro, functional experiments showed that knockdown of FUBP1 inhibited CC cell proliferation and migration. Therefore, FUBP1 plays a prooncogenic function in CC progression. Further investigations for the first time demonstrated that nuclear localization of FUBP1 regulated the gene expression of immune checkpoint NRP1. Moreover, our work demonstrated that FUBP1 translocated into the nucleus which was mediated by interacting with Transportin-1 (TNPO1). Collectively, this study revealed that FUBP1 might be a potential therapeutic target for the restriction of tumor progression.

Gastrointestinal disorders as immune-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibitors, programmed cell death 1 inhibitors and programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitors, have recently emerged as novel drugs in the anti-cancer therapy. Their use in different types of advanced cancer has shown good results and an increase in survival rates. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are frequent and often require special care. IrAEs may affect all the organs, but they are most commonly seen in skin, lungs, endocrine glands and in the gastrointestinal tract where small bowel, colon, the liver and/or the pancreas can be involved. Despite being usually mild and self-resolving, irAEs may present in severe and life-threatening forms, causing the withdrawal of anti-cancer therapy. IrAEs, therefore, represent a challenging condition to manage that often requires the cooperation between the oncologists and the gastroenterologists in order to identify and treat them adequately.

Pseudoprogression and Hyperprogression as New Forms of Response to Immunotherapy

Indications of immunotherapy in oncology are continuously expanding, and unconventional types of response have been observed with these new treatments. These include transient progressive disease followed by a partial response, described as pseudoprogression, that raises the question of treatment beyond progression; and rapid disease progression associated with clinical decline, reported as hyperprogression. However, there are currently no consensual definitions of these phenomena and their impact on daily practice remains unclear. We reviewed existing data on pseudoprogression and hyperprogression with a focus on the definitions, incidence, predictive factors, potential biological mechanisms, and methods published to help distinguish pseudoprogression from progression and hyperprogression. The incidence of pseudoprogression ranged from 0 to 15%, with some authors also including disease stabilization after a first progression. For hyperprogression, incidence ranged from 4 to 29% with various definitions, and several authors reported a correlation with worse survival. Both phenomena were observed in a large panel of cancer types. Several radiological and biological methods have been reported to help distinguish pseudoprogression from progression and hyperprogression, such as analysis of radiomics, and circulating-tumor DNA or cell-free DNA, but these need to be confirmed in larger prospective cohorts. In conclusion, pseudoprogression and hyperprogression are both frequent types of responses under immunotherapy, and there is a need to better characterize these to improve the management of cancer patients. Treatment beyond progression should always be considered with caution and necessitates close clinical monitoring. In case of suspected hyperprogression, immunotherapy should be stopped early.

The side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy on the endocrine system

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a relatively newer class of drugs approved for the treatment of malignancies such as melanoma, renal, bladder and lung cancer. Immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) involving the endocrine system are a common side effect of these drugs. The spectrum of endocrine adverse events varies by the drug class. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 inhibitors commonly cause hypophysitis/hypopituitarism, whereas the incidence of thyroid disease is higher with programmed cell death (PD)-1/ ligand (PD-L) protein 1 inhibitors. The focus of this review is to describe the individual endocrinopathies with their possible mechanisms, signs and symptoms, clinical assessment and disease management. Multiple mechanisms of IrAEs have been described in literature including type II/IV hypersensitivity reactions and development of autoantibodies. Patients with pre-existing autoimmune endocrine diseases can have disease exacerbation following ICI therapy rather than de novo IrAEs. Most of the endocrinopathies are relatively mild, and timely hormone replacement therapy allows continuation of ICIs. However, involvement of the pituitary–adrenal axis could be life-threatening if not recognized. Corticosteroids are helpful when the pituitary–adrenal axis is involved. In cases of severe endocrine toxicity (grade 3/4), ICIs should be temporarily discontinued and can be restarted after adequate hormonal therapy. Endocrinologists and general internists need to be vigilant and maintain a high degree of awareness for these adverse events.

Automated digital TIL analysis (ADTA) adds prognostic value to standard assessment of depth and ulceration in primary melanoma

Accurate prognostic biomarkers in early-stage melanoma are urgently needed to stratify patients for clinical trials of adjuvant therapy. We applied a previously developed open source deep learning algorithm to detect tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images of early-stage melanomas. We tested whether automated digital (TIL) analysis (ADTA) improved accuracy of prediction of disease specific survival (DSS) based on current pathology standards. ADTA was applied to a training cohort (n = 80) and a cutoff value was defined based on a Receiver Operating Curve. ADTA was then applied to a validation cohort (n = 145) and the previously determined cutoff value was used to stratify high and low risk patients, as demonstrated by Kaplan–Meier analysis (p ≤ 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed using ADTA, depth, and ulceration as co-variables and showed that ADTA contributed to DSS prediction (HR: 4.18, CI 1.51–11.58, p = 0.006). ADTA provides an effective and attainable assessment of TILs and should be further evaluated in larger studies for inclusion in staging algorithms.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Overview

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) face a common type of cancer, which is amongst the most deadly types of cancer worldwide. The therapeutic options range from curative resection or ablation to loco regional therapies in palliative setting and last but not least, systemic treatment. The latter group underwent major changes in the last decade and a half. Since the introduction of sorafenib in 2007, many other systemic treatments have been investigated. Most without success. It took more than ten years before lenvatinib could be added as alternative first-line treatment option. Just recently a new form of systemic treatment, immunotherapy, entered the field of therapeutic options in patients with HCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are becoming the new standard of care in patients with HCC. Several reviews reported on the latest phase 1/2 studies and discussed the higher response rates and better tolerability when compared to current standard of care therapies. This review will focus on elaborating the working mechanism of these checkpoint inhibitors, give an elaborate update of the therapeutic agents that are currently available or under research, and will give an overview of the latest trials, as well as ongoing and upcoming trials.

Pembrolizumab for the treatment of uveal melanoma: A case series

Uveal melanoma is a rare disease. Up to 50% of the patients will develop metastases for which the treatment options are limited. No randomized controlled data for the treatment of uveal melanoma patients are available. In this study we describe the clinical course of nine uveal melanoma patients included in the pembrolizumab expanded access program (EAP) in Belgium. Nine uveal melanoma patients were treated in the EAP with 2mg/kg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks. Patients received pembrolizumab as first or second-line treatment. Baseline characteristics and tumor responses were prospectively collected. During a median follow-up of 40 weeks, the estimated median PFS was 18 weeks (95% CI 0.7–35) and median OS was 46 weeks (95% CI 33–59%). Four patients had stable disease (SD) for more than 20 weeks (PFS of 21, 22, and 27 weeks respectively) and 1 patient presented with SD for 119 weeks. No objective responses according to irRC were observed. One grade 3 hepatitis occurred which was reversible with the administration of high doses oral corticosteroids. Even though treatment with pembrolizumab is well tolerated, clinical benefit is disappointing. Nevertheless long-term diseases control can be achieved in selected cases

Limb arteriolar vasculitis induced by pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in a patient with lung cancer

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are becoming more common; however, irAEs involving blood vessels are rare. We report a patient with limb arteriolar vasculitis induced by pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. He was 60-year-old man who received first-line treatment with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for postoperative lung cancer recurrence. Two weeks after the first administration, he experienced Raynaud's phenomenon. We initiated a vasodilator, but his symptoms worsened, and we considered an irAE. We initiated oral prednisolone, and his symptoms gradually improved. A few weeks later, we performed skin biopsies of both of the patient's feet, and pathological examination revealed arteriolar thrombosis with slight perivascular lymphocytic infiltration. Infiltration of neutrophils with karyorrhexis in the subendothelium was also seen. He also developed acute kidney injury, likely owing to thrombosis. Physical examination of bilateral fingers and toes in patients with lung cancer should be performed carefully after administering pembrolizumab therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Immunotherapy in Combination with Chemotherapy for Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background

The prognosis of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is poor. Adding an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) to chemotherapy may exert a synergistic effect and improve survival outcomes. However, for treatment-naive extensive-stage SCLC patients, the efficacy of immunotherapy in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy remains controversial.

Objective

To evaluate the benefits and risks of the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy and to assess the comparative effectiveness of different first-line treatment strategies for extensive-stage SCLC.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized clinical trials studying different immunotherapeutics for patients with previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC up to Feb 16, 2020. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events.

Results

We identified 141 published records, and 4 studies (comprising 2202 patients) were included in the analysis. Immunotherapy (including ipilimumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab) plus chemotherapy was associated with better OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.93; risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-1.00) and PFS (HR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99) than placebo plus chemotherapy. The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy showed similar improvement in ORR, DCR, and adverse events versus placebo plus chemotherapy. On the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) analysis, the anti-PD-L1 agent, atezolizumab, had the highest likelihood of achieving improved OS (93.4%) and PFS (95.0%).

Conclusion

In the first-line setting, combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy is better than standard chemotherapy in terms of OS and PFS. Across the eligible studies, PD-L1 inhibitors might be preferred. Further explorations of more ICIs in the first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC patients should be needed.

Efficacy of ipilimumab after anti-PD-1 therapy in sequential treatment of metastatic melanoma patients - Real world evidence

PURPOSE

Immunotherapy has become a standard treatment option for patients with metastatic melanoma, and the use of checkpoint inhibitors significantly improves the treatment outcomes in this group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 116 patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled in the study. In the first line, they were treated with an anti-PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab), following which ipilimumab was used as the second-line therapy.

RESULTS

BRAF mutation was detected in 12 patients (10%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of ipilimumab treatment was 2.8 months, the overall survival (OS) was 5.1 months. The rate of 6-month survival was 45%, 1-year survival was 24%, and 2-year survival was 3%. The responses to treatment were: complete response in 2 cases (2%), partial response in 7 cases (6%), stable disease in 39 cases (34%). In multivariate analysis, normal levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were associated with a longer median OS and PFS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.009, respectively), while 2 or less number of metastatic locations and the presence of BRAF mutations were correlated with a longer OS (p = 0.041 and p = 0.024, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Ipilimumab could be considered after anti-PD-1 treatment. Treatment with ipilimumab following anti-PD-1 therapy showed beneficial effects in patients with normal levels of LDH, 2 or less number of metastatic locations, and BRAF-mutated melanoma. However, further studies are required to confirm our results as the study included a low number of patients with BRAF mutation-positive melanoma. No significant increase in toxicity was detected with the use of ipilimumab after anti-PD-1 therapy.

Immune Response Evaluation and Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Beyond Clinical Progression: Response Assessments for Cancer Immunotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a comprehensive assessment of recent literature reports describing atypical response patterns observed with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), modifications to response evaluation criteria for ICIs, and treatment beyond progression in clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Certain response patterns such as durable response, pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, and dissociated responses can be seen with ICI treatment. These patterns carry differing prognoses and are associated with varied factors. There are multiple modifications of standard Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) that have been proposed to better characterize immunotherapy response; however, standard RECIST1.1 remains most commonly used in clinical trials. Treatment beyond progression varies in frequency and benefit depending on assessment criteria and cancer type. Future research incorporating modified imaging criteria and biomarker assessments may serve to clarify who will benefit most from treatment beyond progression.

Renal adverse effects following the use of different immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens: A real-world pharmacoepidemiology study of post-marketing surveillance data

BACKGROUNDS

Although kidney impairments have been reported following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical studies, there are few pharmacoepidemiology studies to compare the occurrences, clinical features, and prognosis of renal adverse effects.

METHODS

Disproportionality and Bayesian analysis were used in data mining to screen the suspected renal adverse effects after the administration of different ICIs, based on FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2004 to September 2019. The time to onset, fatality and hospitalization rates of renal adverse effects were also investigated.

RESULTS

We identified 1444 reports of renal adverse effects. Affected patients tended to be older than 65 years (52.7%). Renal effects were most commonly reported in nivolumab monotherapy (33.24%). Atezolizumab appeared the strongest association among six ICI monotherapies, based on the highest reporting odds ratio (ROR = 144.38, two-sided 95% CI = 123.08 -169.37), proportional reporting ratio (PRR = 139.13, χ²  = 21 425.38), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM = 131.75, one-sided 95% CI = 115.28). The combination treatments showed higher RORs, PRRs, and EBGMs, compared with either nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy. The median onset time of renal adverse effects was 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 18.75-121.25) days after the monotherapies of ICI regimens. Patients treated with the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab were younger than receivers in nivolumab monotherapy (63.81 ± 12.03 vs 66.39 ± 11.53, P = .004); The fatality rate of renal adverse effects appeared lower in the combination group, compared to nivolumab monotherapy (18.53% vs 27.50%, P = .004). The top hospitalization rates due to renal effects occurred in patients with combination therapies.

CONCLUSION

Based on the FAERS database, we profiled renal adverse effects after various ICIs with real-world data in occurrences, clinical characteristics, and prognosis. Renal effects should be tightly monitored, especially within the first several months after ICIs administration. Particular concern should be paid for patients with a tendency for kidney impairments, such as old age.

Meta-analysis of immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of up to 50% has prevented their widespread use. With the increase in the use of ICIs alone or as combination therapy, clinicians are required to have a better understanding of irAEs and be able to manage them systematically. In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence of irAEs associated with ICIs.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science databases, and also included relevant literature references to widen our search. The relevant data with inclusion criteria were performed using RevMan 3.6.0 for meta-analysis. We undertook a systematic literature search which included published data up to December 2019.

RESULTS

Overall, 147 articles and 23 761 cancer patients with 11 different ICI treatment-related (grade 1-5 and 3-5) irAEs were included in the study. There were 46 articles on pembrolizumab (6598 patients), 27 on nivolumab (3576 patients), 13 on atezolizumab (2787 patients), 12 on avelumab (3213 patients), 10 on durvalumab (1780 patients), 22 on ipilimumab (4067 patients), eight on tremelimumab (1158 patients), three on JS001 (223 patients), four on camrelizumab (SHR-1210) (178 patients), one on sintilimab (96 patients), and one on cemiplimab (85 patients). Grade 1-5 irAEs were: cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) (82.87%), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) (71.89%), and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) (58.95%). Subgroup analysis was: Avelumab (44.53%), durvalumab (66.63%), pembrolizumab (67.25%), atezolizumab (68.77%), nivolumab (76.25%), Ipilimumab (82.18%), and tremelimumab (86.78%). Grade 3-5 irAEs were: CTLA-4 (27.22%), PD-1(17.29%), and PD-L1(17.29%). Subgroup analysis was: Avelumab (5.86%), durvalumab (13.43%), atezolizumab (14.45%), nivolumab (15.72%), pembrolizumab (16.58%), tremelimumab (22.04%), and ipilimumab (28.27%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis confirmed that anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 inhibitors had a lower incidence of irAEs compared with anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors: Key trials and an emerging role in breast cancer

This review focuses on immune checkpoint inhibitors - immunomodulatory agents that aim to relieve tumour-mediated immune-cell suppression. Immune checkpoint proteins can be expressed on the tumour-cell or immune-cell populations. Immune checkpoint proteins dampen the immune response by inactivating immune cells capable of tumour destruction. Blockade of immune checkpoints has shown impressive results in a range of solid cancers, particularly melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. The potential benefit of this class of drugs is widespread across most cancer types and an unprecedented number of clinical studies are underway to examine the benefit of these agents. The aims of this review are to: provide an overview of the key early immune checkpoint inhibitor trials involving drugs targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) in multiple disease types; provide an overview of emerging therapies aimed at these targets; and provide a detailed exploration of the status of immune checkpoint inhibitors in breast cancer.

Scientifically based combination therapies with immuno-oncology checkpoint inhibitors

The discovery of immune checkpoints and their role in modulating immune response have revolutionised cancer treatment in recent years. The immune checkpoints, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand, programmed cell death-ligand 1, have been extensively studied. Currently 7 monoclonal antibodies targeting these immune checkpoints are approved for treatment of various cancers. Inhibiting immune checkpoints has shown some success in clinic, however, a proportion of patients do not benefit from this treatment. Several other inhibitory molecules, in addition to lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and programmed cell death protein 1, are known to be involved in regulating immune response. To further improve patient outcomes, studies have examined targeting these inhibitory molecules through combination therapies. This review discusses the current landscape of combination therapies of checkpoint inhibitors.

Vitamin D, autoimmunity and immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors

In addition to its quintessential role in bone homeostasis, vitamin D also plays an important role in regulating the immune system. As such, many studies have demonstrated the therapeutic benefit of vitamin D in treating autoimmune diseases. This immunomodulatory activity of vitamin D has recently attracted more attention due to the rapid development of immunotherapies for cancers, including melanoma. Patients on cancer immunotherapies can suffer from immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can involve any organ system and range from common dermatological reactions to extremely severe cases of fatal myocarditis in metastatic melanoma patients. Since there are currently no effective approaches to predict or prevent irAEs, it is attractive to potentially leverage the intriguing immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D within this context. This review will discuss recent research investigating the possibility of using vitamin D to alleviate autoimmunity and irAEs with the hope of improving outcomes for patients on cancer immunotherapies, especially within the context of dermatology.

Dermatologic toxicities to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A review of histopathologic features

Antineoplastic agents that use the immune system have revolutionized cancer treatment. Specifically, implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies that block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, programmed cell death protein 1, or programmed cell death ligand 1 show improved and sustained responses in patients with cancer. However, these agents are associated with a plethora of adverse events, many manifesting in the skin. As the clinical application of cancer immunotherapies expands, understanding the clinical and histopathologic features of associated cutaneous toxicities becomes increasingly important to dermatologists, oncologists, and pathologists to ensure timely diagnosis and appropriate care. This review discusses cutaneous reactions to immune checkpoint inhibitors, focusing on histopathologic features.

Hepatobiliary Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used for multiple cancer types. Hepatotoxicity is a reported adverse event of ICI treatment. It can present as asymptomatic elevation of aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase or symptomatic hepatitis with fever, malaise, and even death in rare cases. The diagnosis of ICI-induced hepatitis is made after exclusion of other etiologies based on medical history, laboratory evaluation, and imaging and histological findings. Treatment of ICI-induced hepatitis consists of ICI discontinuation and immunosuppression in severe cases. Pancreatic injury as asymptomatic lipase elevation or acute pancreatitis-like disease with abdominal pain and evidence on imaging has been documented as a toxicity of ICI therapy. Appropriate treatment of pancreatitis still needs further investigation. Few cases, reports, and series documented cholecystitis and cholangitis as possible adverse events related to ICI therapy as well.

TCMIO: A Comprehensive Database of Traditional Chinese Medicine on Immuno-Oncology

Advances in immuno-oncology (IO) are making immunotherapy a powerful tool for cancer treatment. With the discovery of an increasing number of IO targets, many herbs or ingredients from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) have shown immunomodulatory function and antitumor effects via targeting the immune system. However, knowledge of underlying mechanisms is limited due to the complexity of TCM, which has multiple ingredients acting on multiple targets. To address this issue, we present TCMIO, a comprehensive database of Traditional Chinese Medicine on Immuno-Oncology, which can be used to explore the molecular mechanisms of TCM in modulating the cancer immune microenvironment. Over 120,000 small molecules against 400 IO targets were extracted from public databases and the literature. These ligands were further mapped to the chemical ingredients of TCM to identify herbs that interact with the IO targets. Furthermore, we applied a network inference-based approach to identify the potential IO targets of natural products in TCM. All of these data, along with cheminformatics and bioinformatics tools, were integrated into the publicly accessible database. Chemical structure mining tools are provided to explore the chemical ingredients and ligands against IO targets. Herb–ingredient–target networks can be generated online, and pathway enrichment analysis for TCM or prescription is available. This database is functional for chemical ingredient structure mining and network analysis for TCM. We believe that this database provides a comprehensive resource for further research on the exploration of the mechanisms of TCM in cancer immunity and TCM-inspired identification of novel drug leads for cancer immunotherapy. TCMIO can be publicly accessed at http://tcmio.xielab.net.

Article Commentary: Cancer Immunotherapy for the General Surgeon

Progress in the arena of cancer immunotherapy has been immense in recent years. The fact remains that most of the cancer resections in the United States are performed by general surgeons and not oncologic specialists. A busy practice in general surgery will invariably make it difficult to keep pace with such rapid advancement. This review offers a concise summary of the major concepts and trials that have driven the immunotherapy revolution and their implications for surgeons who deliver cancer care.

Limited-duration anti-PD-1 therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma

Purpose: To date, no clinical study has reported on the optimal treatment duration of PD-1 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Worldwide, concern has been expressed that due to the high cost of anti-PD-1 therapy, it is not available for all patients. After approval of anti-PD-1 therapy as a first-line treatment, the Helsinki University Hospital institutional board for new drugs decided to treat the first patient cohort within a limited treatment duration program in order to offer this treatment to as many patients as possible.Patients and methods: The first 40 patients with metastatic melanoma initiating treatment at Helsinki University Hospital were to be treated within a six months maximum limited duration program. Patient follow-up was systematic according to a prospectively planned treatment protocol to enable evaluation of treatment efficacy and the safety of this treatment approach.Results: Thirty-eight patients were treated within the program. Seventeen out of these 38 patients completed the six-month regimen. Five discontinued treatment early due to toxicity, and 16 discontinued due to progressive disease. The response rate (RR) for all patients was 39%, but only 33% of these responses are ongoing. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients who completed the six-month therapy was 12 months (range, two to 44 months), and median overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached.Conclusions: Although RR is comparable to published data, the response duration is shorter. Based on our results, limiting treatment to only six months may increase the risk of shortening response duration.

Immune Response Checkpoint Inhibitors: New Risks of a New Class of Antitumor Agents

The introduction into clinical practice of immune checkpoint inhibitors that block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), has improved the prognosis of patients with malignant neoplasms of diff erent localisation. The antitumour eff ect of immune checkpoint inhibitors is based on blocking CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathways and enhancing lymphocyte antitumour activity. However, inhibition of immune checkpoints may lead to dysregulation of immune responses and appearance of a new type of adverse reactions resulting from changes in the activity of immunocompetent cells. The aim of the study was to analyse adverse reactions associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. It was demonstrated that the structure of immune-mediated adverse reactions varied depending on the class of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The incidence of immune-mediated adverse reactions was higher with CTLA-4 inhibitors as compared with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and increased signifi cantly in the case of combination therapy. The treatment with CTLA-4 inhibitors most often resulted in skin reactions (rash, itching), gastrointestinal tract reactions (diarrhea, colitis), and endocrine gland problems (hypophysitis). The treatment with PD-1 inhibitors most often led to respiratory disorders (pneumonitis), and in some cases to gastrointestinal disorders (diarrhea, colitis), skin reactions (rash, itching), and endocrine gland problems (hypothyroidism), but they were less common. The treatment with PD-L1 inhibitors was associated with the development of pneumonitis. The development of immune-mediated adverse reactions may require discontinuation of treatment and administration of immunosuppressants, therefore early diagnosis and timely treatment of complications are important prerequisites for successful antitumour therapy. Further study of the mechanisms of immune-mediated adverse reaction development will optimise antitumour therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. 

Current Advances in the Treatment of BRAF-Mutant Melanoma

Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer. Melanoma is usually curable with surgery if detected early, however, treatment options for patients with metastatic melanoma are limited and the five-year survival rate for metastatic melanoma had been 15-20% before the advent of immunotherapy. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors has increased long-term survival outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma to as high as 50% although individual response can vary greatly. A mutation within the MAPK pathway leads to uncontrollable growth and ultimately develops into cancer. The most common driver mutation that leads to this characteristic overactivation in the MAPK pathway is the B-RAF mutation. Current combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors that have demonstrated improved patient outcomes include dabrafenib with trametinib, vemurafenib with cobimetinib or encorafenib with binimetinib. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has met challenges as patient responses began to drop due to the development of resistance to these inhibitors which paved the way for development of immunotherapies and other small molecule inhibitor approaches to address this. Resistance to these inhibitors continues to push the need to expand our understanding of novel mechanisms of resistance associated with treatment therapies. This review focuses on the current landscape of how resistance occurs with the chronic use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutant melanoma and progress made in the fields of immunotherapies and other small molecules when used alone or in combination with BRAF and MEK inhibitors to delay or circumvent the onset of resistance for patients with stage III/IV BRAF mutant melanoma.

Potential Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Monotherapy and Combination Therapy of Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, and Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The use of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab as monotherapies or in combination has transformed the management of advanced melanoma even though these drugs are associated with a new profile of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The incidence of irAEs from clinical trials of these agents is an important factor for clinicians when treating patients with advanced melanoma. In the current study, we aimed to profile the incidence of potential irAEs of these agents when used as monotherapy and as combination therapy. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases; clinicaltrials.gov; and websites of regulatory agencies in the USA, Europe, Australia, and Japan for phase 1-3 trials of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma. Random effect meta-analysis was utilized to profile the incidence of potential irAEs. Results: A total of 58 reports of 35 trials including 6,331 patients with advanced melanoma and reporting irAE data were included in the meta-analyses. We found higher incidences of potential irAEs in combination therapies vs. monotherapies for most of the types of irAEs. Among the monotherapies, ipilimumab users had the most frequent incidence of potential irAEs related to the gastrointestinal system (diarrhea, 29%; and colitis, 8%) and skin (rash, 31%; pruritus, 27%; and dermatitis, 10%), with hypophysitis in 4% of the patients. The most frequent potential irAEs among nivolumab users were maculopapular rash (13%), erythema (4%), hepatitis (3%), and infusion-related reactions (3%), while they were arthralgia (12%), hypothyroidism (8%), and hyperglycemia (6%), among pembrolizumab users. Conclusion: Especially the combination therapies tend to elevate the incidence of potential irAEs. Clinicians should be vigilant about irAEs following combination therapy as well as gastrointestinal and skin irAEs following ipilimumab therapy, in addition to being aware of potential irAEs leading to hyperglycemia, thyroid, hepatic, and musculoskeletal disorders following nivolumab and pembrolizumab therapy.

The Monoclonal Antibody NEO-201 Enhances Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity Against Tumor Cells Through Blockade of the Inhibitory CEACAM5/CEACAM1 Immune Checkpoint Pathway

Background: Natural killer (NK) cells are essential to innate immunity and participate in cancer immune surveillance. Heterophilic interactions between carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) on tumor cells and carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) on NK cells inhibit NK cell cytotoxicity against tumor cells. NEO-201 is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that recognizes members of CEACAM family, expressed specifically on a variety of human carcinoma cell lines and tumor tissues. This investigation was designed to determine whether the binding of NEO-201 with CEACAM5 on tumor cells can block the CEACAM5/CEACAM1 interaction to restore antitumor cytotoxicity of NK cells. Materials and Methods: In vitro functional assays, using various human tumor cell lines as target cells and NK-92 cells as effectors, were conducted to assess the ability of NEO-201 to block the interaction between CEACAM5 on tumor cells and CEACAM1 on NK cells to enhance the in vitro killing of tumor cells by NK-92. NK-92 cells were used as a model of direct NK killing of tumor cells because they lack antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity activity. Results: Expression profiling revealed that various human carcinoma cell lines expressed different levels of CEACAM5⁺ and NEO-201⁺ cells. Addition of NEO-201 significantly enhanced NK-92 cell cytotoxicity against highly CEACAM5⁺/NEO-201⁺ expressing tumor cells, suggesting that its activity is correlated with the level of CEACAM5⁺/NEO-201⁺ expression. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that NEO-201 can block the interaction between CEACAM5 on tumor cells and CEACAM1 on NK cells to reverse CEACAM1-dependent inhibition of NK cytotoxicity.

Immune-related adverse reactions in the hepatobiliary system: second-generation check-point inhibitors highlight diverse histological changes

AIMS

Immune check-point inhibitors are known to cause immune-mediated adverse liver injury, but our knowledge is mainly based on cases treated with ipilimumab or nivolumab.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinicopathological features of 10 patients with hepatobiliary adverse reactions caused by second-generation drugs, pembrolizumab (n = 6) and atezolizumab (n = 4), were reviewed. Liver dysfunction developed during a median period of 3.5 weeks after administration of the check-point inhibitor (3 days-1 year). Antinuclear antibodies were detected in two patients at a low titre (1/80), and serum IgG concentrations were also only mildly elevated in two patients. Liver biopsies showed panlobular hepatitis (n = 5), cholangiopathic changes (n = 2), granulomatous injury (n = 2) and bland cholestasis (n = 1). Two cases of cholangiopathy (both pembrolizumab-treated) showed diffuse sclerosing cholangitis on imaging, and one also presented lymphocytic cholangitis resembling primary biliary cholangitis on biopsy. In two atezolizumab-treated cases, Küpffer cells were hyperplastic and aggregated, forming microgranulomas. Confluent necrosis and eosinophilic or plasma cell infiltration were rare. On immunostaining, the ratio of CD8⁺ /CD4⁺ cells was 12.2 ± 5.1, which was significantly higher than that in autoimmune hepatitis (2.7 ± 1.1; P < 0.001) or idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (5.0 ± 1.1; P = 0.014). All patients responded to steroid therapy, but it was less effective in patients with sclerosing cholangitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Pembrolizumab and atezolizumab manifested not only lobular hepatitis but also sclerosing cholangitis, lymphocytic duct injury and granulomatous hepatitis, probably representing various impaired cellular functions in CD8⁺ lymphocytes and macrophages due to blockage of PD-1-PD-L1 interaction.

Pathology of immune-mediated tissue lesions following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune check point inhibitor (CPI) therapy has revolutionized treatment paradigms for several cancers, but at the cost of triggering a diverse spectrum of immune-mediated injury to non-cancer tissues. The complex biology of these toxicities remains incompletely understood, partly because tissue acquisition from affected areas can be challenging to retrieve, thus hindering development of targeted therapy. Here, we review the literature describing pathology of immune-mediated tissue lesions including gastrointestinal, skin, rheumatic, pulmonary, cardiac, renal and hepatic lesions and highlight key immunological insights.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pituitary-adrenal dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

With the growing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), case reports of rare yet life-threatening pituitary-adrenal dysfunctions, particularly for hypopituitarism, are increasingly being published. In this analysis, we focus on these events by including the most recent publications and reports from early phase I/II and phase III clinical trials and comparing the incidence and risks across different ICI regimens. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to April 2019 for clinical trials that reported on pituitary-adrenal dysfunction. The rates of events, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using random effects meta-analysis. The analyses included data from 160 trials involving 40 432 participants. The rate was 2.43% (95% CI, 1.73%-3.22%) for all-grade adrenal insufficiency and 3.25% (95% CI, 2.15%-4.51%) for hypophysitis. Compared with the placebo or other therapeutic regimens, ICI agents were associated with a higher incidence of serious-grade adrenal insufficiency (OR 3.19, 95% CI, 1.84 to 5.54) and hypophysitis (OR 4.77, 95% CI, 2.60 to 8.78). Among 71 serious-grade hypopituitarism instances in 12 336 patients, there was a significant association between ICIs and hypopituitarism (OR 3.62, 95% CI, 1.86 to 7.03). Substantial heterogeneity was noted across the studies for the rates of these events, which in part was attributable to the different types of ICIs and varied phases of the clinical trials. Although the rates of these events were low, the risk was increased following ICI-based treatment, particularly for CTLA-4 inhibitors, which were associated with a higher incidence of pituitary-adrenal dysfunction than PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

An update on adjuvant systemic therapies in melanoma

There is a global increase in the incidence of melanoma, with approximately 300,000 new cases in 2018 worldwide, according to statistics from the International Agency for Research on Cancer. With this rising incidence, it is important to optimize treatment strategies in all stages of the disease to provide better patient outcomes. The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected stage 3 melanoma is a rapidly evolving field. Interferon was the first agent shown to have any utility in this space, however, recent advances in both targeted therapies and immunotherapies have led to a number of practice changing adjuvant trials in resected stage 3 disease.

Immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a novel scenario of new toxicities and their management

Checkpoint inhibitors can cause an imbalance in immune tolerance that may clinically manifest as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These events may involve many organs and tissues, including the skin, gastrointestinal (GI) tract, liver, endocrine system, kidneys, central nervous system (CNS), eyes and lungs. The incidence of irAEs appears to be lower with anti-programmed death antigen-1/programmed death antigen-ligand-1 agents than with the anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 antibody ipilimumab. Combined immunotherapy does not appear to be associated with novel safety signals compared with monotherapy, but more organs may be involved. Increased experience and the use of algorithms for the most common irAEs have resulted in severe toxicity and related deaths being reduced. However, continuous vigilance, especially regarding less common events, is needed to better characterize the wide spectrum of clinical manifestations.

The potential mechanism, recognition and clinical significance of tumor pseudoprogression after immunotherapy

As immunotherapy has gained increasing interest as a new foundation for cancer therapy, some atypical response patterns, such as pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, have garnered the attention of physicians. Pseudoprogression is a phenomenon in which an initial increase in tumor size is observed or new lesions appear, followed by a decrease in tumor burden; this phenomenon can benefit patients receiving immunotherapy but often leads to premature discontinuation of treatment owing to the false judgment of progression. Accurately recognizing pseudoprogression is also a challenge for physicians. Because of the extensive attention on pseudoprogression, significant progress has been made. Some new criteria for immunotherapy, such as irRC, iRECIST and imRECIST, were proposed to accurately evaluate the response to immunotherapy. Many new detection indexes, such as ctDNA and IL-8, have also been used to identify pseudoprogression. In this review, the definition, evaluation criteria, mechanism, monitoring, management and prognosis of pseudoprogression are summarized, and diagnostic and treatment processes for patients with progression but with a suspicion of pseudoprogression are proposed; these processes could be helpful for physicians in clinical practice and enhances the understanding of pseudoprogression.

Overview of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and The ITA.LI.CA Cohort Derived Estimate of Amenability Rate to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clinical Practice

Despite progress in our understanding of the biology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), this tumour remains difficult-to-cure for several reasons, starting from the particular disease environment where it arises-advanced chronic liver disease-to its heterogeneous clinical and biological behaviour. The advent, and good results, of immunotherapy for cancer called for the evaluation of its potential application also in HCC, where there is evidence of intra-hepatic immune response activation. Several studies advanced our knowledge of immune checkpoints expression in HCC, thus suggesting that immune checkpoint blockade may have a strong rationale even in the treatment of HCC. According to this background, initial studies with tremelimumab, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor, and nivolumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, showed promising results, and further studies exploring the effects of other immune checkpoint inhibitors, alone or with other drugs, are currently underway. However, we are still far from the identification of the correct setting, and sequence, where these drugs might be used in clinical practice, and their actual applicability in real-life is unknown. This review focuses on HCC immunobiology and on the potential of immune checkpoint blockade therapy for this tumour, with a critical evaluation of the available trials on immune checkpoint blocking antibodies treatment for HCC. Moreover, it assesses the potential applicability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the real-life setting, by analysing a large, multicentre cohort of Italian patients with HCC.

Harnessing immune checkpoints for cancer therapy

Immunomodulatory antibodies that directly trigger and reawaken suppressed T-cell effector function are termed 'checkpoint inhibitors'. CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 molecules are the most studied inhibitory immune check points against cancer and because of this therapeutic property have entered the clinic for treating a variety of tumor types. The results so far demonstrate a positive impact on cancer remission. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that targeting a number of other T-cell surface molecules including both positive and negative immune regulators, also possesses strong antitumor activity. Some of these molecules have already entered clinical trials. In this report, we briefly highlight the status of these immune checkpoint inhibitors and discuss their side effects and future directions for their use.

Checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury: A novel form of liver disease emerging in the era of cancer immunotherapy

Liver injury triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors has been increasingly seen in clinical practice, and the incidence is likely to rise further in the next several years because of expanded indications for cancer immunotherapy. Tissue damage driven by disrupted immune tolerance against self-antigens is called an immune-related adverse event (irAE). irAEs in the liver histologically presents panlobular hepatitis (∼70%), isolated central zonal necrosis (∼20%), primarily granulomatous hepatitis (∼5%), and other minor forms of tissue injury (∼5%). Infiltrating cells are mainly lymphocytes and occasional eosinophils. Unlike classic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), plasma cell infiltration is not conspicuous. Immunostaining reveals a large number of CD8+ T lymphocytes and a markedly smaller number of CD4+ cells or CD20+ B lymphocytes. The unique CD3+/CD20+ and CD4+/CD8+ ratios shifted in favor of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes are helpful to discriminate irAEs from other conditions (e.g., AIH, idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury). Another hepatobiliary manifestation of irAEs is sclerosing cholangitis clinically characterized by elevations of biliary enzymes, diffuse duct wall thickening, and duct dilatation. Lymphocytic infiltration can be observed by endoscopic biopsies from the thick extrahepatic bile ducts, and liver needle biopsies may also show severe lymphocytic cholangitis resembling primary biliary cholangitis. An important differential diagnosis of irAEs is previously asymptomatic or subclinical liver disease unmasked by cancer immunotherapy, which is often challenging and requires close clinicopathological correlations.

A Review of Efficacy and Safety of Checkpoint Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as positive modulators of immune response have revolutionized the treatment of cancer and have achieved impressive efficacy in melanoma and numerous solid tumor malignancies. These agents are being investigated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to further enhance response rate as induction therapy and to improve relapse-free survival (RFS) post chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. PD-1 and CTLA-4 are the two most actively investigated checkpoint receptors, which play a role in different stages of anti-tumor immune response. This study reviews data from ongoing phase I, II clinical trials evaluating PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors on AML patients and discusses especially efficacy and adverse events as well as prospects of these drugs in treating AML. Single anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody infusion shows rather modest clinical efficacy. While combinations of PD-1 inhibitor with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) represent encouraging outcome for relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients as well as for elderly patients as first-line therapy option. Adding PD-1 inhibitor to traditional induction therapy regimen is also safe and feasible. CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab exhibits specific potency in treating relapsed AML patients with extramedullary disease in later post-transplantation stage. In terms of side effects, irAEs found in these trials can mostly be appropriately managed with steroids but are occasionally fatal. More rationally designed combinational therapies are under investigation in ongoing clinical trials and will further advance our understanding of checkpoint inhibitors as well as lead us to the most appropriate application of these agents.

Autoimmune Endocrine Dysfunctions Associated with Cancer Immunotherapies

Immune checkpoint inhibitors block the checkpoint molecules. Different types of cancer immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved recently: CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (as ipilimumab); anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (as pembrolizumab and nivolumab); and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies (as atezolizumab, avelumab, and durmalumab). We collect recent published results about autoimmune endocrine dysfunctions associated with cancer antibody immunotherapies. These agents cause a raised immune response leading to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), varying from mild to fatal, based on the organ system and severity. Immune-related endocrine toxicities are usually irreversible in 50% of cases, and include hypophysitis, thyroid dysfunctions, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and adrenal insufficiency. Anti-PD-1-antibodies are more frequently associated with thyroid dysfunctions (including painless thyroiditis, hypothyroidism, thyrotoxicosis, or thyroid storm), while the most frequent irAE related to anti-CTLA-4-antibodies is hypophysitis. The combination of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies is associated with a 30% chance of irAEs. Symptoms and clinical signs vary depending on the target organ. IrAEs are usually managed by an oncological therapist, but in more challenging circumstances (i.e., for new onset insulin–dependent diabetes, hypoadrenalism, gonadal hormones dysfunctions, or durable hypophysitis) an endocrinologist is needed.

Molecular Mechanisms and Countermeasures of Immunotherapy Resistance in Malignant Tumor

Tumor immunotherapy inhibits the proliferation and invasion of tumor cells by inducing or enhancing anti-tumor immune responses in active or passive ways. It is the fourth therapeutic method with efficiency and safety in addition to surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. At present, anti-tumor immune related clinical trials have made promising achievements in prolonging progression free survival and overall survival, therefore, FDA approved a variety of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab. However, primary or acquired resistance results in massive perplexity to oncologist and patients. In order to bring further clinical benefit to tumor patients, study on mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance is extremely urgent. This review summarizes related mechanisms of tumor immunotherapy resistance, including MITF suppression, Ezh2 upregulation, TIM-3 upregulation, microRNA-driven deregulation of cytokine expression and et al. Genetic mutations such as PTEN loss, JAK1/2 loss-of-function mutations and Cbl-b deficiency are also involved. Moreover, we have discussed feasible countermeasures, for instance, combining ICBs with PRRs agonists, ARNAX, CpG oligonucleotide, oncolytic peptide LTX-315 and indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase inhibitors, respectively. Other methods include combined ICBs with radiotherapy, combined ICBs with blockade of PI3K-AKT, TIM-3 pathway; blockade of Fcγ receptors before anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies administration and modulation of the gut microbiome, et al. Mechanisms and countermeasures of immunotherapy resistance still requires further exploration, in expectation to provide novel ideals and basis for tolerant patients.

Five-year survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-001

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab demonstrated robust antitumor activity and safety in the phase Ib KEYNOTE-001 study (NCT01295827) of advanced melanoma. Five-year outcomes in all patients and treatment-naive patients are reported herein. Patients whose disease progressed following initial response and who received a second course of pembrolizumab were also analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with previously treated or treatment-naive advanced/metastatic melanoma received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient/investigator decision to withdraw. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Objective response rate and PFS were based on immune-related response criteria by investigator assessment (data cut-off, September 1, 2017).

RESULTS

KEYNOTE-001 enrolled 655 patients with melanoma; median follow-up was 55 months. Estimated 5-year OS was 34% in all patients and 41% in treatment-naive patients; median OS was 23.8 months (95% CI, 20.2-30.4) and 38.6 months (95% CI, 27.2-not reached), respectively. Estimated 5-year PFS rates were 21% in all patients and 29% in treatment-naive patients; median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.8-11.1) and 16.9 months (95% CI, 9.3-35.5), respectively. Median response duration was not reached; 73% of all responses and 82% of treatment-naive responses were ongoing at data cut-off; the longest response was ongoing at 66 months. Four patients [all with prior response of complete response (CR)] whose disease progressed during observation subsequently received second-course pembrolizumab. One patient each achieved CR and partial response (after data cut-off). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 86% of patients and resulted in study discontinuation in 7.8%; 17% experienced grade 3/4 TRAE.

CONCLUSIONS

This 5-year analysis of KEYNOTE-001 represents the longest follow-up for pembrolizumab to date and confirms the durable antitumor activity and tolerability of pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827.

Prognostic and Predictive Immunohistochemistry-Based Biomarkers in Cancer and Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has drastically improved the prognosis of many patients with cancer, but it can also lead to severe immune-related adverse events. Biomarkers, which are molecular markers that indicate a patient's disease outcome or a patient's response to treatment, are therefore crucial to helping clinicians weigh the potential benefits of immunotherapy against its potential toxicities. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has thus far been a powerful technique for discovery and use of biomarkers such as CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. However, IHC has limited reproducibility. Thus, if more IHC-based biomarkers are to reach the clinic, refinement of the technique using multiplexing or automation is key.

Management of immune-related adverse events resulting from immune checkpoint blockade

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now a standard of care in the treatment of many cancers leading to durable responses in patients with metastatic disease. These agents are generally well tolerated but may lead to the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As any organ may be affected, clinicians should be aware of the broad range of clinical manifestations and symptoms and keep in mind that toxicities may occur late, at any point along a patient's treatment course. Although the most common irAEs are rarely severe, some of them may be associated with great morbidity and even become life-threatening. The rate of occurrence, type and severity of irAEs may vary with the type of ICI; thus, grade 3 and 4 irAEs are reported in more than 55% of patients treated with the combination of ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and nivolumab 1 mg/kg. Area covered: This review presents the management of irAEs resulting from checkpoint blockade, with a focus on rare irAEs. Expert commentary: With the development of immuno-oncology and the expanding role of ICI, physicians have learnt to diagnose and treat most of the irAEs that can occur. This review provides an overview of current guidelines, previously published studies and our multidisciplinary team based practices.

Risk and incidence of fatal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Given the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a concomitant rise in adverse events is inevitable. In a recent Phase III trial of ICIs versus placebo, we found the staggering difference of incidence of fatal adverse events (FAEs). Hence, we should determine the risk of FAEs in ICIs.

Objective

To address the risks of FAEs associated with each ICI regimen, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials with the Food and Drug Administration-approved ICI regimens in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

Literature searching was based on PubMed before April 15, 2018. The numbers of FAEs in both study group and placebo group were collected. We assessed the risk of fatal adverse reactions associated with ICIs on Pooled Peto OR and associated 95% CI.

Results

Twelve trials were identified. OR value of FADs in all ICIs was 2.32 (95% CI: 1.33, 4.05; P=0.003). The incidence of FAE in ICI in all included studies were up to 3.2%. OR value of clinical trials of prostate cancer was 3.71 (95% CI: 1.12, 12.26; P=0.03). Among the ICI cohorts, the common FAEs were gastrointestinal toxicity (n=12, 25%), pulmonary toxicity (n=10, 20%), cardiac toxicity (n=5, 10%), and hepatic toxicity (n=5, 10%).

Conclusion

The cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors have a significantly higher risk of FAE (P=0.01), whereas programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors were not. The most common CTLA-4-related FAE was gastrointestinal toxicity, and the most common PD-1-related FAE was pulmonary toxicity. Moreover, we have shown that ipilimumab has significant dose-dependent lethal toxicity.

Nivolumab and ipilimumab: immunotherapy for treatment of malignant melanoma

As recently as 10 years ago, a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma was considered fatal, with a prognosis of typically 6 months or less from diagnosis. The development of checkpoint inhibitors, such as ipilimumab and nivolumab, which modulate the effects of the CTLA-4 and PD-1, respectively, has revolutionized outcomes for these patients. Monotherapy improves metastatic disease survival, but dual therapy provides greater benefit with 58% of patients alive at 3 years. Combination immunotherapy is even active in brain metastases. In the adjuvant setting, data show that at 1 year over 70% patients remain disease-free with PD-1 blockade. Immunotherapy is generally safe and well tolerated. However, treatment-related endocrinopathies require long-term medications. Nowadays, advanced cutaneous melanoma is a more manageable disease.

Revolutionizing treatment of advanced melanoma with immunotherapy

Until immunotherapy was developed, a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma was most often fatal. Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) antibodies have been shown to work synergistically to treat metastatic disease throughout the body and brain. Today, over half of patients diagnosed with stage IV disease are alive after 3 years. In the adjuvant setting, 70% patients remain disease free with PD-1 blockade after 1 year. These treatments are generally safe and well tolerated. However, treatment-related endocrinopathies require long-term medications. With better therapies producing more durable responses, advanced cutaneous melanoma is dramatically more manageable now than ever before.

Malignant Melanoma: Diagnostic and Management Update

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Summarize the changes to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Melanoma Staging System. 2. List advances in genetic, molecular, and histopathologic melanoma diagnosis and prognostication. 3. Recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy and appropriate surgical margins based on individualized patient needs. 4. Recognize the currently available treatments for in-transit metastasis and advanced melanoma. 5. Describe current and future therapies for melanoma with distant visceral or brain metastases.

SUMMARY

Strides in melanoma surveillance, detection, and treatment continue to be made. The American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Cancer Staging System has improved risk stratification of patients, introduced new staging categories, and resulted in stage migration of patients with improved outcomes. This review summarizes melanoma advances of the recent years with an emphasis on the surgical advances, including techniques and utility of sentinel node biopsy, controversies in melanoma margin selection, and the survival impact of time-to-treatment metrics. Once a disease manageable only with surgery, a therapeutic paradigm shift has given a more promising outlook to melanoma patients at any stage. Indeed, a myriad of novel, survival-improving immunotherapies have been introduced for metastatic melanoma and more recently in the high-risk adjuvant setting.

Incidence of Ipilimumab-Related Serious Adverse Events in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Little is known about the incidence of ipilimumab-related serious adverse events (SAEs) across various tumor types, drug doses and treatment regimens.

Methods: PubMed database was searched up to November, 2017 to identify prospective clinical trials of ipilimumab therapy for adult patients with cancer. Comparisons of the incidence were based on the χ² test in univariate analysis and the logistic regression model in multivariate analysis.

Results: Twenty-four studies (4549 patients) with 35 independent study cohorts (21 melanoma, 6 prostate cancer, 5 NSCLC, and 3 SCLC cohorts) of ipilimumab were included in the meta-analysis. The overall incidence of SAEs during ipilimumab mono-therapy was 26.1% (95% CI, 21.1%-31.8%). SAEs were more frequent in the 10 mg/kg groups than in the 3 mg/kg groups (35.9% vs 17.3%; P < 0.001). Combination therapy showed significantly higher incidence than mono-therapy in melanoma (33.8% vs 25.0%; P = 0.002). After adjustment for potential confounders, multivariable analyses demonstrated lower odds of SAEs in NSCLC (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.69, P < 0.001) and SCLC (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.31-0.54, P < 0.001) compared with melanoma. The 10mg/kg cohort presented significantly higher odds than the 3mg/kg (OR 2.84, 95% CI 2.35-3.43, P < 0.001). The combination therapy showed significantly higher odds than the mono-therapy (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.71, P = 0.003).

Conclusions: The incidence of ipilimumab-related SAEs was higher in melanoma, the 10mg/kg group and during combination therapy. Clinicians should enhance awareness of these risk factors in clinical practice and carefully monitor patients.