3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3)

Extracellular vesicle-mediated transport: Reprogramming a tumor microenvironment conducive with breast cancer progression and metastasis

•

Extracellular vesicles’ (EVs) role in breast tumor microenvironment and pre-metastatic niche development.

•

Breast cancer EV-mediated transmission of pro-metastatic and drug-resistant phenotypes.

•

Precision medicine with EVs as biomarkers and delivery vehicles for drug and anticancer genetic material.

Breast cancer metastatic progression to critical secondary sites is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. While existing therapies are highly effective in combating primary tumors, metastatic disease is generally deemed incurable with a median survival of only 2, 3 years. Extensive efforts have focused on identifying metastatic contributory targets for therapeutic antagonism and prevention to improve patient survivability. Excessive breast cancer release of extracellular vesicles (EVs), whose contents stimulate a metastatic phenotype, represents a promising target. Complex breast cancer intercellular communication networks are based on EV transport and transference of molecular information is in bulk resulting in complete reprogramming events within recipient cells. Other breast cancer cells can acquire aggressive phenotypes, endothelial cells can be induced to undergo tubule formation, and immune cells can be neutralized. Recent advancements continue to implicate the critical role EVs play in cultivating a tumor microenvironment tailored to cancer proliferation, metastasis, immune evasion, and conference of drug resistance. This literature review serves to frame the role of EV transport in breast cancer progression and metastasis. The following five sections will be addressed: (1) Intercellular communication in developing a tumor microenvironment & pre-metastatic niche. (2) Induction of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). (3). Immune suppression & evasion. (4) Transmission of drug resistance mechanisms. (5) Precision medicine: clinical applications of EVs.

Survival Benefit of Surgical Treatment Added Into Systemic Treatment for Isolated Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Compared with systemic treatment alone, whether surgical treatment combined with systemic treatment can improve survival outcomes of patients with isolated breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) is still controversial. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment for patients with isolated BCLM.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to May 13, 2021 was conducted for relevant studies. The primary outcome was overall survival. The meta-analysis was performed using R software. The quality of the pooled study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots and Begg's and Egger's tests. Fixed- and random-effects models were applied according to heterogeneity.

Results: 9 retrospective studies involving 13 cohorts (7 unmatched cohorts and 6 matched cohorts) were included in this study. The surgical cohorts had better overall survival than the systemic cohorts in the pooled analysis of all the included studies, in the subgroup analysis of liver resection, and in the subset of the matched cohorts.

Conclusions: Compared with systemic treatment alone, surgical treatment combined with systemic treatment was proven to be associated with superior survival outcomes, which should be considered in selected patients with isolated BCLM.

Palbociclib versus abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: an indirect comparison of patient-reported end points

Aim: To assess the relative impact of palbociclib plus fulvestrant (PAL + FUL) and abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (ABEM + FUL) on patient-reported outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer. Patients & methods: Anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were conducted using individual patient data from PALOMA-3 (PAL + FUL) and summary-level data from MONARCH-2 (ABEM + FUL). Outcomes included the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer-specific module (QLQ-BR23). Results: Significantly different changes from baseline favoring PAL + FUL compared with ABEM + FUL were observed in global quality of life (6.95 [95% CI: 2.19-11.71]; p = 0.004) and several functional/symptom scales, including emotional functioning, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, diarrhea and systemic therapy side effects. Conclusion: PAL + FUL was associated with more favorable patient-reported outcomes than ABEM + FUL in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

Breast Cancer CAFs: Spectrum of Phenotypes and Promising Targeting Avenues

Activationof the tumor-associated stroma to support tumor growth is a common feature observed in different cancer entities. This principle is exemplified by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), which are educated by the tumor to shape its development across all stages. CAFs can alter the extracellular matrix (ECM) and secrete a variety of different molecules. In that manner they have the capability to affect activation, survival, proliferation, and migration of other stromal cells and cancer cell themselves. Alteration of the ECM, desmoplasia, is a common feature of breast cancer, indicating a prominent role for CAFs in shaping tumor development in the mammary gland. In this review, we summarize the multiple roles CAFs play in mammary carcinoma. We discuss experimental and clinical strategies to interfere with CAFs function in breast cancer. Moreover, we highlight the issues arising from CAFs heterogeneity and the need for further research to identify CAFs subpopulation(s) that can be targeted to improve breast cancer therapy.

Healthcare Use during the Last Six Months of Life in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

In the last decades, new treatment options for advanced (breast) cancer have resulted in increased use of health care resources near the end of life. We assessed health care use near the end of life of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). In this study, we have shown that ICU admission, and CPR occurred rarely during the last six months of life of ABC patients. However, hospital admissions occurred often, especially in patients who received new chemotherapy within 30 days of end of life. Those patients were also more likely to die in the hospital. However, death was most often due to disease progression. To improve quality of life near the end of life of advanced breast cancer patients, it is vital to develop tools to help clinicians identify those patients who will benefit from chemotherapy at the end of life.

Abstract

New treatment options in cancer have resulted in increased use of health care resources near the end of life. We assessed health care use near the end of life of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). From the Southeast Netherlands Breast cancer (SONABRE) registry, we selected all deceased patients diagnosed with ABC in Maastricht University Medical Center between January 2007 and October 2017. Frequency of health care use in the last six months of life was described and predictors for health care use were assessed. Of 203 patients, 76% were admitted during the last six months, 6% to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 2% underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Death in hospital occurred in 25%. Nine percent of patients received a new line of chemotherapy ≤30 days before death, which was associated with age <65 years and <1 year survival since diagnosis of metastases. In these patients, the hospital admission rate was 95%, of which 79% died in the hospital, mostly due to progressive disease (80%). In conclusion, the frequency of ICU-admission, CPR or a new line of chemotherapy ≤30 days before death was low. Most patients receiving a new line of chemotherapy ≤30 days before death, died in the hospital.

MINDY1 promotes breast cancer cell proliferation by stabilizing estrogen receptor α

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignant tumor among females. Estrogen receptor α (ERα) is initially expressed in 70% of breast cancers and is a well-known target of endocrine therapy for ERα-positive breast cancer. In the present study, we identified MINDY1, a member belongs to the motif interacting with Ubcontaining novel DUB family (MINDY), as a potential deubiquitylase of ERα in breast cancer. There was a positive correlation between ERα and MINDY1 protein levels in human breast cancer tissues. We found that high expression of MINDY1 was associated with poor prognosis. MINDY1 interacted with ERα, thereby mediating the deubiquitination of ERα and increased its stability in a deubiquitylation activity-dependent manner. MINDY1 depletion significantly decreased the ERα protein level and ERα signaling activity in breast cancer cells. Specifically, MINDY1 associated with the N-terminal of ERα via its catalytic domain, thus inhibiting K48-specific poly-ubiquitination process on ERα protein. In addition, MINDY1 depletion led to growth inhibition and cell cycle arrest of ERα-positive breast cancer cells. Finally, overexpression of ERα could rescue the MINDY1 depletion-induced growth inhibition both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that MINDY1 promotes breast carcinogenesis through increasing ERα stability. Overall, our study proposed a novel post-translational mechanism of ERα in supporting breast cancer progression. Targeting the MINDY1 may prove to be a promising strategy for patients with ERα-positive breast cancer.

Fulvestrant-Palbociclib vs Letrozole-Palbociclib as Initial Therapy for Endocrine-Sensitive, Hormone Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole has become a standard first-line treatment for patients with endocrine-sensitive, hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer. Meanwhile, the antiestrogen fulvestrant was shown to be superior to anastrozole in the absence of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibition for this patient population.

Objective

To assess whether fulvestrant is superior to letrozole when combined with palbociclib in the first-line scenario.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this international, randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical study conducted from July 30, 2015, to January 8, 2018, patients with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer with no prior therapy in the metastatic setting and endocrine-sensitive criteria were recruited from 47 centers in 7 countries. Data were analyzed from February 11 to May 15, 2020.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive palbociclib with either fulvestrant or letrozole. Stratification factors were type of disease presentation (de novo vs recurrent) and the presence of visceral involvement (yes vs no).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

Results

A total of 486 women (median age, 63 years [range, 25-90 years]; 3 Asian women [0.6%]; 4 Black women [0.8%]; 461 White women [94.9%]; 18 women of unknown race [3.7%]) were randomized (243 to fulvestrant-palbociclib and 243 to letrozole-palbociclib). Median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 27.9 months (95% CI, 24.2-33.1 months) in the fulvestrant-palbociclib group vs 32.8 months (95% CI, 25.8-35.9 months) in the letrozole-palbociclib group (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89-1.45; P = .32). This result was consistent across the stratification factors. No significant differences were observed in objective response rate (46.5% vs 50.2%) and 3-year overall survival rate (79.4% vs 77.1%) for fulvestrant-palbociclib and letrozole-palbociclib, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events were comparable among treatment groups, and no new safety signals were identified. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although fulvestrant-palbociclib demonstrated significant antitumor activity, this randomized clinical trial failed to identify an improvement in progression-free survival with this regimen over letrozole-palbociclib in patients with endocrine-sensitive, hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02491983.

Real-World Efficacy of Fulvestrant Monotherapy as the First Treatment or Maintenance Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background

Fulvestrant 500 mg monotherapy is recommended as the first-line endocrine treatment in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It is also used in MBC maintenance treatment. However, few studies have compared the efficacy of fulvestrant during the initial treatment with that during maintenance treatment.

Patients and Methods

MBC patients who were treated with fulvestrant either as initial therapy for metastatic disease or after progression following one line of chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2017 were identified from the database of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

The study included 135 MBC patients who were treated with fulvestrant; 116 patients who received fulvestrant as first-line treatment were divided into 2 groups: the no-chemotherapy treatment (NCT) group received fulvestrant as initial therapy during disease progression, and the chemotherapy treatment (CT) group received fulvestrant as maintenance following disease stabilization or response to previous chemotherapy. The median PFS was 16 months in NCT patients and 8 months in the CT group. Patients who had a longer disease-free survival, no visceral metastasis and one metastasis site, benefited from fulvestrant as first-line treatment during disease progression. Patients with 2 or more metastasis sites benefited from chemotherapy as first-line treatment and fulvestrant as maintenance treatment.

Conclusions

Fulvestrant monotherapy showed good clinical activity and safety in patients with MBC who were treated upon disease progression and in those receiving maintenance therapy.

Investigation of the Definition of De Novo Oligometastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Background

The prognosis of metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) is highly heterogeneous. As a special stage of distant metastasis of mNPC, quite a few oligometastatic NPC (omNPC) patients can still achieve a long-term survival after treatment. However, there is no uniform standard for the definition of omNPC until now.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the survival data of 191 patients with de novo mNPC at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University between 2010 and 2017 and specifically analyzed the clinical outcomes associated with the number of metastatic organs/lesions and tried to find a cohort with relatively better prognosis to define as omNPC.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) of the entire group of patients was 21.5 months (95% CI 15.0–28.0), and the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates were 72.2%, 46.1%, and 34.3%, respectively. Multiple-organ metastases (P < 0.001) and >5 metastatic lesions (P < 0.001) were adverse influencing factors of prognosis, and the number of metastatic lesions (P < 0.001) was the independent factor influencing the prognosis of de novo mNPC. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with ≤5 metastatic lesions were significantly better than those of patients with >5 metastatic lesions.

Conclusion

Patients with ≤5 metastatic lesions presented a better survival, and this criterion may be a definition standard for the de novo omNPC.

Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics signatures for predicting endocrine resistance in hormone receptor-positive non-metastatic breast cancer

Background

One-third of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancers fail to respond to hormone therapy, and some patients even progress within two years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) toward primary endocrine resistance. However, there is no effective way to predict endocrine resistance.

Objective

To build a model that incorporates the radiomic signature of pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinical information to predict endocrine resistance.

Methods

Clinical data of non-metastatic breast cancer patients diagnosed between May 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 and preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) were retrospectively collected from three hospitals in China. The significant clinicopathological characteristics and radiomic signatures were included in multivariable logistic regression to establish a combined model to predict endocrine resistance in the training set, and validate the internal and external validation set.

Results

A total of 744 female non-metastatic breast cancer patients from three hospitals in China were included. In the training cohort, the AUC of the Radiomic-Clinical combined model to predict endocrine resistance was 0.975, which was higher than clinical model (0.849), IHC4 model (0.682) and similar as radiomic model (0.941). Also, the AUC of the combined model in the internal (0.921) and external validation cohort (0.955) were higher than clinical model and IHC4 model. The sensitivity of combined model was higher than radiomic alone, and got the best thresholding of the AUC.

Conclusion

This study developed and validated a pretreatment multiparametric MRI-based radiomic-clinical combined model and showed good performance in predicting endocrine resistance.

•

This study first established a model to predict endocrine resistance in non-metastatic breast cancer based on radiomic.

•

This model was a combined model that contain multiparametric MRI radiomics features and clinical features.

•

The AUC of the combined model to predict endocrine resistance was 0.975 , with great potential in clinical applications.

Efficacy of Fulvestrant in Women with Hormone-Resistant Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC): A Canadian Province Experience

Simple Summary

Fulvestrant is a medication that is approved as first and second-line treatment in patients with hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer. In clinical practice, fulvestrant is still used beyond the second line of treatment. This study investigated the use of fulvestrant in a Saskatchewan population of women with advanced breast cancer. We found that fulvestrant is effective when used in both the early and later lines of treatment, although the benefit is more pronounced in the earlier line of therapy. Women with disease affecting their visceral organs such as lung, liver or peritoneum had decreased disease control and survival on fulvestrant. Women who had received chemotherapy after fulvestrant and had a clinical response to fulvestrant had better survival.

Abstract

Introduction: Fulvestrant has demonstrated efficacy in hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC), both in first-and second-line settings. In clinical practice, however, fulvestrant has been used as a later-line therapy. This study assessed the efficacy of fulvestrant in women with mBC in early-versus later-line therapy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed Saskatchewan women with HR+ mBC who received fulvestrant between 2003–2019. A multivariate Cox proportional survival analysis was performed. Results: One hundred and eighty-six women with a median age of 63.5 years were identified—178 (95.6%) had hormone-resistant mBC, 57.5% had visceral disease, and 43.0% had received chemotherapy before fulvestrant. 102 (54.8%) women received ≤2-line-therapy, and 84 (45.2%) received ≥3 line-therapy before fulvestrant. The median time to progression (TTP) was 12 months in the early-treatment vs. 6 months in the later-treatment group, p = 0.015. Overall survival (OS) from the start of fulvestrant was 26 months in the early-treatment group vs. 16 months in the later-treatment group, p = 0.067. On multivariate analysis, absence of visceral metastasis, HR: 0.70 (0.50–0.99), was significantly correlated with better TTP, whereas post-fulvestrant chemotherapy, HR: 0.32 (0.23–0.47), clinical benefit from fulvestrant, HR: 0.44 (0.30–0.65), and absence of visceral metastasis, HR: 0.70 (0.50–0.97), were correlated with better OS. Conclusions: Fulvestrant has demonstrated efficacy as both early-and later-line therapy in hormone-resistant mBC. Our results show that women with clinical benefit from fulvestrant, who received post-fulvestrant chemotherapy, or had non-visceral disease, had better survival.

Real-world clinical profile, treatment patterns and patient-reported outcomes in a subset of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients with poor prognostic factors: data from an international study

Background

Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and disease-related poor prognostic factors are not well characterized. We aimed to describe patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment patterns and patient-reported outcomes in a subset of HR+/HER2− ABC patients with these factors [at the time when cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors were being introduced] and understand how these factors informed treatment decisions at the time of the survey.

Methods

Real-world data were derived from a large, multinational, point-in-time survey of oncologists and their consulting patients with HR+/HER2− ABC in the EU5 and USA over March-June 2017, at the start of the changing treatment landscape. Analysis focused on four poor prognostic factors: visceral metastases, liver metastases (subset of visceral metastases), progesterone receptor-negative status and high tumor grade.

Results

In total, 2259 patients with HR+/HER2− ABC had records eligible for this analysis. At least one poor prognostic factor was present in 63% of patients (most common visceral metastases; least common progesterone receptor-negative status), with varying degrees of overlap between factors. For physician-reported outcomes, pain increased, whereas performance status and activities of daily living declined with presence of poor prognostic factors, especially liver metastases. No clear trends were observed for patient-reported outcomes. Treatment with combined endocrine therapy plus CDK4 and 6 inhibitors was infrequent, as these agents were entering the market.

Conclusions

More than 60% of the HR+/HER2− ABC Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme™ sample had ≥1 disease-related poor prognostic factor, and patients appeared to be heterogeneous regarding occurrence and distribution of these factors. These patients typically have increased pain and reduced performance status, highlighting the importance of implementing effective therapy with CDK4 and 6 inhibitors. Future studies could inform how the treatment landscape has evolved over time with respect to patients with poor prognostic factors.

•

Some 63% of HR+/HER2− ABC patients in this sample had ≥1 disease-related factors more likely to confer a poorer prognosis

•

Patients with these factors typically had increased pain and reduced performance status

•

Chemotherapy was prescribed more frequently in patients with poor prognostic factors

•

Introduction of CDK4 and 6 inhibitors saw more patients with poor prognostic factors receive endocrine therapy-based regimens

•

This study is a baseline to understand the impact of these new treatments on prognosis and aggressive disease

A small-molecule activator of the unfolded protein response eradicates human breast tumors in mice

Metastatic estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive breast cancer is presently incurable. Seeking to target these drug-resistant cancers, we report the discovery of a compound, called ErSO, that activates the anticipatory unfolded protein response (a-UPR) and induces rapid and selective necrosis of ERα-positive breast cancer cell lines in vitro. We then tested ErSO in vivo in several preclinical orthotopic and metastasis mouse models carrying different xenografts of human breast cancer lines or patient-derived breast tumors. In multiple orthotopic models, ErSO treatment given either orally or intraperitoneally for 14 to 21 days induced tumor regression without recurrence. In a cell line tail vein metastasis model, ErSO was also effective at inducing regression of most lung, bone, and liver metastases. ErSO treatment induced almost complete regression of brain metastases in mice carrying intracranial human breast cancer cell line xenografts. Tumors that did not undergo complete regression and regrew remained sensitive to retreatment with ErSO. ErSO was well tolerated in mice, rats, and dogs at doses above those needed for therapeutic responses and had little or no effect on normal ERα-expressing murine tissues. ErSO mediated its anticancer effects through activation of the a-UPR, suggesting that activation of a tumor protective pathway could induce tumor regression.

An Exploration of Heart Failure Risk in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Anthracyclines with or without Trastuzumab in Thailand: A Retrospective Study

Anthracycline-based regimens with or without anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 agents such as trastuzumab are effective in breast cancer treatment. Nevertheless, heart failure (HF) has become a significant side effect of these regimens. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and factors associated with HF in breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines with or without trastuzumab. A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with breast cancer who were treated with anthracyclines with or without trastuzumab between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. The primary outcome was the incidence of HF. The secondary outcome was the risk factors associated with HF by using the univariable and multivariable cox-proportional hazard model. A total of 475 breast cancer patients were enrolled with a median follow-up time of 2.88 years (interquartile range (IQR), 1.59-3.93). The incidence of HF was 3.2%, corresponding to an incidence rate of 11.1 per 1000 person-years. The increased risk of HF was seen in patients receiving a combination of anthracycline and trastuzumab therapy, patients treated with radiotherapy or palliative-intent chemotherapy, and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction <65%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in other risk factors for HF, such as age, cardiovascular comorbidities, and cumulative doxorubicin dose. In conclusion, the incidence of HF was consistently high in patients receiving combination anthracyclines trastuzumab regimens. A reduced baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, radiotherapy, and palliative-intent chemotherapy were associated with an increased risk of HF. Intensive cardiac monitoring in breast cancer patients with an increased risk of HF should be advised to prevent undesired cardiac outcomes.

Stereotactic Radiofrequency Ablation of Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Short- and Long-Term Results with Predicting Factors for Survival

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety, local oncological control, long-term outcome and potential prognostic factors of stereotactic RFA (SRFA) for the treatment of BCLMs.

METHODS

Between July 2003 and December 2019, 42 consecutive female patients with median age 54.0 years were treated with SRFA at our institution for 110 BCLMs in 48 ablation sessions. Median tumor size was 3.0 cm (0.8-9.0). Eighteen (42.9%) patients had extrahepatic metastasis at initial SRFA.

RESULTS

Technical success rate was 100%, i.e., all coaxial needles were inserted with appropriate accuracy within 10 mm off plan and 107/110 (92.3%) BCLMs were successfully ablated at initial SRFA. Four Grade 1 (8.3%, 4/48) and one Grade 2 (2.1%, 1/48) complications occurred. No perioperative deaths occurred. Local recurrence developed in 8 of 110 tumors (7.3%). Overall survival (OS) rates of all patients at 1, 3, and 5 years from the date of the first SRFA were 84.1%, 49.3%, and 20.8% with a median OS of 32.3 months. Univariable cox regression analyses revealed age > 60 years and extrahepatic disease (without bone only metastases) as significant predictors of worse OS (p = 0.013 and 0.025, respectively). Size and number of metastases, hormone receptor status and time onset did not significantly affect OS after initial SRFA.

CONCLUSIONS

SRFA is a safe, minimally invasive treatment option in the management of BCLMs, especially in younger patients without advanced extrahepatic metastasis, including those with large liver tumors.

A clinical calculator to predict disease outcomes in women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer treated with first-line endocrine therapy

PURPOSE

Endocrine therapy (ET) is an effective strategy to treat hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) but nearly all patients eventually progress. Our goal was to develop and validate a web-based clinical calculator for predicting disease outcomes in women with HR+ABC who are candidates for receiving first-line single-agent ET.

METHODS

The meta-database comprises 891 patient-level data from the control arms of five contemporary clinical trials where patients received first-line single-agent ET (either aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) for ABC. Risk models were constructed for predicting 24-months progression-free survival (PFS-24) and 24-months overall survival (OS-24). Final models were internally validated for calibration and discrimination using ten-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

Higher number of sites of metastases, measurable disease, younger age, lower body mass index, negative PR status, and prior endocrine therapy were associated with worse PFS. Final PFS and OS models were well-calibrated and associated with cross-validated time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) of 0.61 and 0.62, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed ABC calculator is internally valid and can accurately predict disease outcomes. It may be used to predict patient prognosis, aid planning of first-line treatment strategies, and facilitate risk stratification for future clinical trials in patients with HR+ABC. Future validation of the proposed models in independent patient cohorts is warranted.

Sacituzumab Govitecan for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Overview and Management of Potential Toxicities

Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer have a poor prognosis. Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) is an antibody-drug conjugate that contains the irinotecan active metabolite, SN-38, linked to a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2, which is overexpressed in many solid tumors. In a basket design phase I/II study, sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated promising single-agent therapeutic activity in multiple cancer cohorts, leading to accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (TRODELVY) for the treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who had received at least two prior therapies in the metastatic setting. Recently, results of the phase III trial, ASCENT, were confirmatory. There is limited available information on the adverse event management with sacituzumab govitecan needed to maximize the dose and duration of effective therapy while maintaining patient quality of life. This review summarizes the clinical development and the practical management of patients receiving sacituzumab govitecan. Sacituzumab govitecan has a well-defined and manageable toxicity profile, and rapid recognition and appropriate early and proactive management will allow clinicians to optimize sacituzumab govitecan treatment for patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Sacituzumab govitecan (TRODELVY) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate composed of the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN-38) conjugated to a monoclonal antibody targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2, an epithelial cell surface antigen overexpressed in many cancers. Because of the rapid approval of sacituzumab govitecan, there is limited available information on adverse event (AE) management with this agent. As such, this article reviews the clinical development of the drug, the AE profile, and provides recommendations regarding AE management to help optimize therapy with sacituzumab govitecan.

Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: How to Manage It?

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer among women and represents the second leading cause of cancer-specific death. A subset of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) presents limited disease, termed 'oligometastatic' breast cancer (OMBC). The oligometastatic disease can be managed with different treatment strategies to achieve long-term remission and eventually cure. Several approaches are possible to cure the oligometastatic disease: locoregional treatments of the primary tumor and of all the metastatic sites, such as surgery and radiotherapy; systemic treatment, including target-therapy or immunotherapy, according to the biological status of the primary tumor and/or of the metastases; or the combination of these approaches. Encouraging results involve local ablative options, but these trials are limited by being retrospective and affected by selection bias. Systemic therapy, e.g., the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER-2 negative BC, leads to an increase of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in all the subgroups, with favorable toxicity. Regardless of the lack of substantial data, this subset of patients could be treated with curative intent; the appropriate candidates could be mostly young women, for whom a multidisciplinary aggressive approach appears suitable. We provide a global perspective on the current treatment paradigms of OMBC.

European trends in breast cancer mortality, 1980-2017 and predictions to 2025

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer mortality in European women has been falling for three decades. We analysed trends in mortality from breast cancer in Europe over the period 1980-2017 and predicted number of deaths and rates to 2025.

METHODS

We extracted death certification data for breast cancer in women for 35 European countries, between 1980 and 2017, from the World Health Organisation database. We computed the age-standardised (world standard population) mortality rates per 100,000 person-years, by country and calendar year. We obtained also predictions for 2025 using a joinpoint regression model and calculated the number of avoided deaths over the period 1994-2025.

RESULTS

The mortality rate declined from 15.0 in 2012 to 14.4 in 2017 per 100,000 women (-3.9%) for the European Union (EU)-27. This fall was greater in the EU-14 (-5.2%), whereas rates rose in the transitional countries during this period by 1.9%. Mortality rate predictions across Europe are expected to reach relatively uniform levels in 2025. During the studied period, favourable trends in mortality emerged in most countries, with the greatest decrease in Denmark, whereas Poland and Romania showed an upward trend. The largest predicted decrease in breast cancer mortality was estimated for the United Kingdom (12.2/100,000 women in 2025), leading to the estimated avoidance of 150,000 breast cancer deaths over the period 1994-2025 and 470,000 in the EU-27.

CONCLUSIONS

Favourable trends in breast cancer mortality were observed in most European countries, and they will continue to fall in the coming years. Less favourable patterns were still observed among the transitional countries than other European areas.

A review on diverse heterocyclic compounds as the privileged scaffolds in non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors

Breast cancer, emerging malignancy is common among women due to overexpression of estrogen. Estrogens are biosynthesized from androgens by aromatase, a cytochrome P450 enzyme complex, and play a pivotal role in stimulating cell proliferation. Therefore, deprivation of estrogen by blocking aromatase is considered as the effective way for the inhibition and treatment of breast cancer. In recent years, various non-steroidal heterocyclic functionalities have been extensively developed and studied for their aromatase inhibition activity. This review provides information about the structural-activity relationship of heterocycles (Type II) towards aromatase. This aids the medicinal chemist around the significance of different heterocyclic moieties and helps to design potent aromatase inhibitors.

Sarcopenia and serum biomarkers of oxidative stress after a 6-month physical activity intervention in women with metastatic breast cancer: results from the ABLE feasibility trial

Purpose

Sarcopenia has been identified as an important prognostic factor for patients with cancer. This study aimed at exploring the potential associations between a 6-month physical activity intervention and muscle characteristics, sarcopenia, oxidative stress and toxicities in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

Women newly diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (N = 49) participated in an unsupervised, personalized, 6-month physical activity intervention with activity tracker. Computerized tomography images at the third lumbar vertebra were analysed at baseline, three months and six months to assess sarcopenia (muscle mass index < 40 cm²/m²) and muscle quality (poor if muscle attenuation < 37.8 Hounsfield Units). Oxidative markers included plasma antioxidant enzymes (catalase, glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities), prooxidant enzymes (NADPH oxidase and myeloperoxidase activities) and oxidative stress damage markers (advanced oxidation protein products, malondialdehyde (MDA) and DNA oxidation.

Results

At baseline 53% (mean age 55 years (SD 10.41)) were sarcopenic and 75% had poor muscle quality. Muscle cross sectional area, skeletal muscle radiodensity, lean body mass remained constant over the six months (p = 0.75, p = 0.07 and p = 0.75 respectively), but differed significantly between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients at baseline and 6-months. Sarcopenic patients at baseline were more likely to have an increase of MDA (p = 0.02) at 6 months. Being sarcopenic during at least one moment during the 6-month study was associated with a higher risk of developing severe toxicities (grade > 2) (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

This study suggests potential benefits of physical activity for maintenance of muscle mass. Sarcopenia can alter many parameters and disturb the pro and antioxidant balance.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06238-z.

Computing Metal-Binding Proteins for Therapeutic Benefit

Over one third of biomolecules rely on metal ions to exert their cellular functions. Metal ions can play a structural role by stabilizing the structure of biomolecules, a functional role by promoting a wide variety of biochemical reactions, and a regulatory role by acting as messengers upon binding to proteins regulating cellular metal-homeostasis. These diverse roles in biology ascribe critical implications to metal-binding proteins in the onset of many diseases. Hence, it is of utmost importance to exhaustively unlock the different mechanistic facets of metal-binding proteins and to harness this knowledge to rationally devise novel therapeutic strategies to prevent or cure pathological states associated with metal-dependent cellular dysfunctions. In this compendium, we illustrate how the use of a computational arsenal based on docking, classical, and quantum-classical molecular dynamics simulations can contribute to extricate the minutiae of the catalytic, transport, and inhibition mechanisms of metal-binding proteins at the atomic level. This knowledge represents a fertile ground and an essential prerequisite for selectively targeting metal-binding proteins with small-molecule inhibitors aiming to (i) abrogate deregulated metal-dependent (mis)functions or (ii) leverage metal-dyshomeostasis to selectively trigger harmful cells death.

Long-term outcomes of oligometastatic breast cancer patients treated with curative intent: an updated report

BACKGROUND

Oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) is characterized by limited metastatic tumor numbers and sites. We have reported a 20-year overall survival (OS) rate and relapse-free rate (RFR) of 34.1% and 27.4%, respectively, in a retrospective analysis of OMBC patients treated with curative intent including a multidisciplinary approach. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is generally incurable; however, OMBC might be a potentially curable subset. The previous analysis included isolated locoregional recurrence (ILRR) cases, which differs from distant metastasis in treatment strategies. Therefore, in this study, we excluded ILRR cases and provided an update on clinical outcomes. We also performed a detailed subgroup analysis of OMBC patients by introducing new prognostic variables.

METHODS

Data of 73 OMBC patients, including 10 ILRR cases, treated in our institution between 1980 and 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. OMBC was defined as the presence of metastatic lesions in 1-2 organs, < 5 lesions per metastasized organ, and lesion diameter < 5 cm.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 151 (range 12-350) months. Twenty-eight (44%) patients received local therapy. Excluding ILRR cases, the OS rates were 28.3% and 18.9% and RFRs were 26.7% at 20 and 25 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, single-organ involvement and three or fewer metastatic lesions per organ were associated with a longer progression-free and relapse-free interval (RFI).

CONCLUSIONS

Relapse-free interval reached a plateau after 20 years at approximately 25% probability. Patients with long-term survival without disease relapse are considered cured. Curative-intent therapy should be considered for OMBC patients, especially those with low tumor volume.

Japanese subpopulation analysis of MONARCH 2: phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant for treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy

BACKGROUND

This was a Japanese subpopulation analysis of MONARCH 2, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC).

METHODS

Eligible women had progressed on (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), ≤ 12 months from end of adjuvant ET, or on first-line ET for ABC, and had not received chemotherapy for ABC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo plus fulvestrant. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), pharmacokinetics (PK), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety.

RESULTS

In Japan, 95 patients were randomized (abemaciclib, n = 64; placebo, n = 31). At final PFS analysis (February 14, 2017), median PFS was 21.2 and 14.3 months, respectively, in the abemaciclib and placebo groups (hazard ratio: 0.672; 95% confidence interval: 0.380-1.189). Abemaciclib had a higher objective response rate (37.5%) than placebo (12.9%). PK and safety profiles for Japanese patients were consistent with those of the overall population, without clinically meaningful differences across most HRQoL dimensions evaluated. The most frequent adverse events in the abemaciclib versus placebo groups were diarrhea (95.2 versus 25.8%), neutropenia (79.4 versus 0%), and leukopenia (66.7 versus 0%). At a second data cutoff (June 20, 2019), median OS was not reached with abemaciclib and 47.3 months with placebo (hazard ratio: 0.755; 95% confidence interval: 0.390-1.463).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the Japanese subpopulation were consistent with the improved clinical outcomes and manageable safety profile observed in the overall population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02107703; U.S. National Library of Medicine: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02107703 .

The Role of Chemotherapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Isolated Locoregional Recurrence of Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: The role of chemotherapy for isolated locoregional recurrence (iLRR) of breast cancer has not been firmly established after local therapies. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis to evaluate the clinical implications of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with HER2-negative iLRR. Results: Of a total of 277 patients, 146 (52.7%) received chemotherapy for iLRR. Median follow-up duration was 56.1 months. Eighty-six (31.0%) patients had luminal B-like and 100 (36.1%) had TNBC iLRR. There was a trend of longer disease free survival (DFS) in the chemotherapy group (4-year DFS: 70.4 vs. 59.5%, HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.45-1.02, log-rank p = 0.059). When adjusted with clinically relevant factors, DFS was significantly prolonged with chemotherapy (adjusted HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.94, p = 0.023). Subgroup analyses for DFS showed patients with disease free interval (DFI) <5 years or prior chemotherapy had a benefit from chemotherapy (adjusted HR = 0.57, p = 0.018; adjusted HR = 0.51, p = 0.005, respectively). Regarding the molecular subtypes, a longer DFS with chemotherapy was observed both in luminal B-like (4-year DFS: 77.8 vs. 55.0%, HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.99, log-rank p = 0.048) and in TNBC patients (4-year DFS: 61.9 vs. 42.8%, HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-1.02, log-rank p = 0.056), but not in luminal A-like. Conclusions: The chemotherapy for iLRR of breast cancer should be individualized for each patient, considering DFI, prior chemotherapy, and molecular subtypes.

Desarrollo de una estrategia holística para la valoración de la calidad de vida en pacientes con cáncer de mama en las distintas etapas de la enfermedad

Introducción: El cáncer de mama es considerado una enfermedad crónica que impacta de modo importante en la calidad de vida (QoL) de las pacientes. En la actualidad no se dispone de un sistema de evaluación totalmente satisfactorio que refleje la complejidad del cáncer de mama. Además, la mayoría de instrumentos están más orientados a la enfermedad en estadios iniciales que a la enfermedad avanzada. Objetivo: Describir la metodología utilizada para evaluar la calidad de vida y las estrategias de afrontamiento en un grupo representativo de cáncer de mama que incluye tanto pacientes metastásicas como no metastásicas. Método: Estudio prospectivo en pacientes con cáncer de mama del Servicio de Oncología Médica del Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO) en diferentes estadios de la enfermedad, previo consentimiento informado. Se les aplica un protocolo de aproximadamente una hora de entrevista presencial donde se recoge su información sociodemográfica, y se contestan varios cuestionarios de calidad de vida como el cuestionario QLCA-AFex Font, QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23 HADS, DME, BRCS, MINI-MAC, LOT-R y OE, que se completan con una entrevista semiestructurada. Resultados: De junio de 2017 a marzo de 2020, 257 pacientes han sido incluidas en el estudio. La media de edad es de 57,9 años (SD 10,1), la mayoría son mujeres (98,8%), con hijos (87,9%) y casadas (65,4%). Respecto al estadiaje clínico 75,5% son no-metastásicas y 24,5% metastásicas. El cumplimiento del protocolo se consiguió en más del 90% de los cuestionarios sin diferencias entre pacientes metastásicas y no metastásicas. Conclusión: Este protocolo multidimensional permite hacer una evaluación integral de la calidad de vida, así como reflejar las necesidades no atendidas y las preocupaciones que muestran las pacientes tanto en estadio precoz como avanzado, complementando los sistemas de valoración actualmente disponibles. Después del análisis de los resultados de este estudio sería interesante poder obtener un cuestionario único con las preguntas más relevantes que pudiera ser aplicado a la práctica clínica.

Advances in Oral Oncolytic Agents for Breast Cancer and Recommendations for Promoting Adherence

Hormone receptor positivity and early stage diagnosis are generally considered signs of good prognosis in breast cancer. However, breast cancer all too frequently can become resistant to hormone-based therapies, and women can experience recurrence of their breast cancer decades after the diagnosis of early stage disease. To address the therapeutic needs for advanced and metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, a number of new drugs have been tested and approved for this indication, including the class of drugs that works as cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors. These drugs, often combined with other hormone-based therapy, have demonstrated considerable success in clinical trials and are now being used widely in oncology practices. Because all of the currently approved CDK4/6 inhibitor agents (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) are given orally, issues of patient comprehension of and adherence to prescribed regimens should be at the forefront of practitioners' concerns about these drugs. In addition, ways to support and facilitate decision-making by patients related to this class of agents and other therapies recently approved for the same indication require focused attention by health-care providers. Oncology has continued to move toward a more patient-specific, precision medicine approach. Likewise, advanced practitioners have the opportunity to identify patient characteristics, preferences, and needs that are unique to individual patients to enhance precision treatment.

Comparison between nab-paclitaxel and solvent-based taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To compare the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) and solvent-based taxanes (sb-taxanes) as neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, published in English, about the comparison between nab-paclitaxel and sb-taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer were searched up to September 2019.

Results

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with pathological complete response (pCR, defined as ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0). Other main outcomes included long-term survival and adverse events (AEs). Seven studies (five RCTs and two cohorts) and 2949 patients were included. Neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel improved pCR compared with sb-taxanes (ypT0 ypN0: OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.27–1.83, P < 0.001; ypT0/is ypN0: OR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.17–1.68, P < 0.001). The benefits of nab-paclitaxel on pCR were persistent in HER2-negative, hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (OR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.07–2.19, P = 0.020), triple-negative breast cancer (weekly/every 2 weeks regimen; OR = 2.95, 95%CI: 1.54–5.67, P < 0.001), and tumors with Ki-67 > 20% (OR = 1.63, 95%CI: 1.26–2.12, P < 0.001). Patients treated with nab-paclitaxel had better event-free survival (EFS; HR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.57–0.85, P < 0.001) than with sb-taxanes. There were no differences in most of grade > 3 AEs between nab-paclitaxel and sb-taxanes (all P > 0.05), besides of any grade hypersensitivity (OR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.11–0.72, P = 0.008), any grade (OR = 2.10, 95%CI: 1.37–3.23, P = 0.001) and grade > 3 (OR = 4.01, 95%CI: 2.51–6.41, P < 0.001) neuropathy.

Conclusion

Nab-paclitaxel is effective for the treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting. Nab-paclitaxel could improve pCR rate and EFS compared with sb-taxanes and with reasonable toxicities.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07831-7.

Survival analysis of bevacizumab plus taxane treatment in luminal metastatic breast cancer

Background

The treatment of luminal metastatic breast cancer is based on endocrine therapy and chemotherapy treatment is limited to the progression of this treatment.

Materials & methods

We analyzed the efficacy of treatment with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel in 43 patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Discussion

Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab combination is a useful treatment in metastatic luminal breast cancer with an impressive overall survival of 31 months, similar to combination to endocrine therapy and targeted therapy in first line. In patients with hormone resistance, endocrine therapy saw worse results thus the taxol plus bevacizumab combination could be a better option. This combination does not influence the results of subsequent treatments; therefore, it could provide a good option for patients.

A novel humanized Frizzled-7-targeting antibody enhances antitumor effects of Bevacizumab against triple-negative breast cancer via blocking Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiogenic therapy has been widely applied to the clinical treatment of malignant tumors. However, the efficacy of such treatments has been called into question, especially in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Bevacizumab, the first anti-angiogenic agent approved by FDA, actually increases invasive and metastatic properties of TNBC cells, resulting from the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in response to hypoxia. As a critical receptor of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, Frizzled-7 (Fzd7) is aberrantly expressed in TNBC, indicating Fzd7 a potential target for developing drugs to be combined with anti-angiogenic agents.

METHODS

Hybridoma technique and antibody humanization technique were utilized to generate a Fzd7-targeting antibody (SHH002-hu1). Biolayer interferometry (BLI) assay and near infrared (NIR) imaging were conducted to detect the affinity and targeting ability of SHH002-hu1. Next, whether SHH002-hu1 could suppress the invasion and migration of TNBC cells induced by Bevacizumab were validated, and the underlying molecular mechanisms were elucidated by luciferase reporter and western blot assays. The nude-mice transplanted TNBC models were established to assess the anti-TNBC activities of SHH002-hu1 when combined with Bevacizumab. Then, the effects on putative TNBC stem-like cells and Wnt/β-catenin signaling were evaluated by immunofluorescence (IF). Further, the tumor-initiating and self-renew capacity of TNBC cells were studied by secondary nude mouse xenograft model and sphere formation assay. In addition, the effects of SHH002-hu1 on the adaptation of TNBC cells to hypoxia were evaluated by the detection of vasculogenic mimicry (VM) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) transcriptional activity.

RESULTS

The novel humanized antibody targeting Fzd7 (SHH002-hu1) exhibited extremely high affinity with Fzd7, and specifically targeted to Fzd7⁺ cells and tumor tissues. SHH002-hu1 repressed invasion, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal cell transformation (EMT) of TNBC cells induced by Bevacizumab through abating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. SHH002-hu1 significantly enhanced the capacity of Bevacizumab to inhibit the growth of TNBC via reducing the subpopulation of putative TNBC stem-like cells, further attenuating Bevacizumab-enhanced tumor-initiating and self-renew capacity of TNBC cells. Moreover, SHH002-hu1 effectively restrained the adaptation of TNBC cells to hypoxia via disrupting Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

CONCLUSION

SHH002-hu1 significantly enhances the anti-TNBC capacity of Bevacizumab, and shows the potential of preventing TNBC recurrence, suggesting SHH002-hu1 a good candidate for the synergistic therapy together with Bevacizumab.

Metronomic therapy in advanced breast cancer and NSCLC: vinorelbine as a paradigm of recent progress

INTRODUCTION

Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is based on frequent dosing of the drug. . This leads to pharmacologically active but low plasma concentrations that reduce toxicity. MCT seems to work primarily via indirect effects on tumor cells and their microenvironment, rather than direct antitumor effects. Oral vinorelbine is one of the most widely studied MCT approaches in both advanced breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

MCT with vinorelbine has proven efficacy, tolerability and quality of life benefits both as monotherapy and in combination with other MCTs or targeted agents, in first-line therapy and in previously treated patients. Key populations are emerging who may be particularly well suited to metronomic vinorelbine, including those with indolent disease, older individuals, and those with multiple comorbidities and/or bone metastases. Ongoing trials should help to further delineate these target groups. Additional work is needed to better understand the optimal vinorelbine regimen, particularly when used in combination or in non-Caucasian patients. Markers are also required to help identify individuals who are most likely to respond. Nonetheless, the efficacy and tolerability of MCT, allied to improved patient convenience, reduced need for medical engagement and lower cost, make it an appealing option - particular in resource-constrained healthcare environments.

Alpelisib in the treatment of metastatic HR+ breast cancer with PIK3CA mutations

Since the US FDA approval of everolimus/exemestane in July 2012, and of the first CDK 4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, combined with endocrine treatment in February 2015, a third class of therapeutic compounds, the PI3K inhibitors, has been introduced to the arsenal of targeted therapies overcoming endocrine resistance in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Alpelisib (PIQRAY®) is the first of these novel agents yielding promising clinical results, giving an impetus to further development of tailored endocrine anticancer treatments. Herein, we review its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, safety and efficacy data, as well as Phase III SOLAR-1 trial, prompting FDA approval of alpelisib in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer harboring PIK3CA mutations. Furthermore, implications for clinical use and current research will also be discussed.

Practical consensus recommendations regarding the use of hormonal therapy in metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is cancer that has spread from the breast to another part of the body or has come back in another distant location. Treatment options for MBC depend on several factors. One of these factors is the levels of hormone receptors (HRs) in the tumor. Cancers with high levels of HRs, called HR-positive, use the hormones estrogen and progesterone to grow and spread. Hormonal therapy is a type of treatment specifically for HR-positive breast cancer. This expert group used data from published literature, practical experience and opinion of a large group of academic oncologists to arrive at these practical consensus recommendations in regards with the use of hormonal therapy and the management of HR-positive MBC for the benefit of community oncologists.

The Impact of [C16Pyr][Amp] on the Aggressiveness in Breast and Prostate Cancer Cell Lines

Breast (BrCa) and prostate (PCa) cancers are the most common malignancies in women and men, respectively. The available therapeutic options for these tumors are still not curative and have severe side effects. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more effective antineoplastic agents. Herein, BrCa, PCa, and benign cell lines were treated with two ionic liquids and two quinoxalines and functional experiments were performed-namely cell viability, apoptosis, cytotoxicity, and colony formation assays. At the molecular level, an array of gene expressions encompassing several molecular pathways were used to explore the impact of treatment on gene expression. Although both quinoxalines and the ionic liquid [C2OHMIM][Amp] did not show any effect on the BrCa and PCa cell lines, [C16Pyr][Amp] significantly decreased cell viability and colony formation ability, while it increased the apoptosis levels of all cell lines. Importantly, [C16Pyr][Amp] was found to be more selective for cancer cells and less toxic than cisplatin. At the molecular level, this ionic liquid was also associated with reduced expression levels of CPT2, LDHA, MCM2, and SKP2, in both BrCa and PCa cell lines. Hence, [C16Pyr][Amp] was shown to be a promising anticancer therapeutic agent for BrCa and PCa cell lines.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

The discovery of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression in 15-20% of gastric adenocarcinomas has been a key advance in the global care of this disease. Validated by the ToGA trial in the first-line setting of advanced HER2-positive (+) gastric cancer (GC), trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAb), was the first therapeutic agent to significantly improve the prognosis of these patients. Since these results, many attempts have been made to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2+ GC. However, all the other HER2-targeting molecules have failed to show a survival benefit in large phase III studies. The value of continuing trastuzumab after disease progression has been suggested by several retrospective studies. However, recent results of a randomized phase II trial showed no benefit from this strategy. On the other hand, novel therapeutic methods, such as immunotherapy, are emerging as new tools in the strategy of care of advanced GC, even if their benefit in the specific HER2+ population remains undetermined. Furthermore, substantial progress has been made in the understanding of the mechanisms leading to resistance to anti-HER2 therapies, and in the screening methods to detect them, thus opening new perspectives. The aim of this review was firstly to summarize the existing data on the specific strategy of care of HER2+ advanced GC, and secondly, to describe current knowledge regarding the potential mechanisms of resistance to HER2-targeting therapies. Lastly, we report the prospects for overcoming these potential obstacles, from future therapeutic strategies to new detection methods.

A Phase II Study of Fulvestrant 500 mg as Maintenance Therapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer After First-Line Chemotherapy

LESSONS LEARNED

Fulvestrant 500 mg maintenance therapy showed a clinical benefit rate of 76% and median progression-free survival of 16.1 months in patients who achieved objective responses or disease control after first-line chemotherapy. Adverse events with fulvestrant maintenance therapy were consistent with the known safety profile of the drug.

BACKGROUND

Evidence for maintenance hormonal therapy after chemotherapy for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg maintenance therapy in patients after first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

We enrolled postmenopausal women with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who attained tumor responses or disease control with four to eight cycles of chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Fulvestrant 500 mg was injected on days 1, 15, and 29 and every 28 (±3) days thereafter. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR); the secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

RESULTS

We included 58 patients; the median follow-up duration was 32.6 months. The CBR since commencing fulvestrant maintenance therapy was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63%-86%), and ORR was 14% (95% CI, 6%-25%); eight patients achieved partial response. The median PFS for fulvestrant maintenance therapy was 16.1 months (95% CI, 10.3-21.0 months). Thirty-nine patients (67%) reported at least one adverse event, of which most were grade 1/2, whereas three patients (5%) reported grade 3 adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Fulvestrant 500 mg is a feasible and promising hormonal maintenance strategy in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have no disease progression after first-line chemotherapy.

Aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review about efficacy, safety and early clinical development

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacotherapy has a key role in endometriosis treatment and management, however, a significant proportion of patients have only intermittent or limited benefits with current treatment options. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are necessary.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review provides an overview of the efficacy and safety of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as monotherapies and combination therapies for endometriosis. A systematic literature search was performed from January 1990 to April 2020 in the electronic database MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on the critical role of estrogens and the rate-limiting step in the production of the estrogens represented by the aromatase enzyme, AIs are a potential therapeutic option for women affected by endometriosis. Nevertheless, further research is needed to clarify the efficacy of AIs in this setting. Adverse effects need to be investigated to clarify the preventive role of add-back therapy. On that basis, AIs should be adopted only as second-line therapy in patients who are refractory to standard treatments in the setting of scientific research. Further studies should define best dosages, appropriate add-back therapies, administration routes, treatment length, and which patients may benefit more from AIs.

Nomogram-derived prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT)

BACKGROUND

Previous research results on the predictive factors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) efficacy in breast cancer are inconsistent, suggesting that the ability of a single factor to predict efficacy is insufficient. Combining multiple potential efficacy-related factors to build a model may improve the accuracy of prediction. This study intends to explore the clinical and biological factors in breast cancer patients receiving NCT and to establish a nomogram that can predict the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of NCT.

METHODS

We selected 165 breast cancer patients receiving NCT from July 2017 to May 2019. Using pretreatment biopsy materials, immunohistochemical studies to assess estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), and Ki-67 expression. The correlation between biological markers and pCR was analyzed. These predictors were used to develop a binary logistic regression model with cross-validation and to show the established predictive model with a nomogram.

RESULTS

The nomogram for pCR based on lymphovascular invasion, anemia (hemoglobin≤120 g/L), ER, Ki67 expression levels and NCT regimen had good discrimination performance (area under the curve [AUC], 0.758; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.675-0.841) and calibration coordination. According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, the calibration chart showed satisfactory agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities. The final prediction accuracy of cross-validation was 76%.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a nomogram based on multiple clinical and biological covariations that can provide an early prediction of NCT response and can help to quickly assess the individual benefits of NCT.

Electrochemotherapy of skin metastases from breast cancer: a systematic review

Skin metastases occur in 5-30% of breast cancer (BC) patients. Standard treatments include systemic therapies (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and immunotherapy) and local treatments (surgery and radiotherapy). Electrochemotherapy (ECT) could be another option in this setting based on preclinical and clinical studies. Aim of this review was to analyze the available evidence on ECT in skin metastases from BC. Studies reporting on ECT in skin metastases from BC were included in this review. Studies not reporting toxicity or tumor response or not reporting results separately from other primary cancers were excluded. The search was based on Medline, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library databases. Eleven studies including 464 patients were analyzed. ECT was performed using intravenous/intratumoral bleomycin (10 studies) or intratumoral cisplatin (one study). Complete and overall pooled response rates were 46.2% (_95%CI 33.2-59.4 and 74.6% (_95%CI 60.6-86.4) in studies reporting results on a per patient basis and 61.9% (_95%CI 53.8-69.6) and 86.9% (_95%CI 80.0-92.6) in studies reporting results on a per lesion basis, respectively. Worse response rates in larger lesions were observed in three studies. The incidence of toxicity was heterogeneous but adverse events were mild and manageable in all studies. One- and 3-year local progression-free survival was 86.2% and 81.0% in two studies, respectively. ECT is tolerable and effective in terms of response in BC skin metastases especially in less advanced lesions. Further studies are justified to compare ECT with other treatments in this setting.

Impact of Hormone Receptor Status on the Behaviour of HER2+ Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The study aimed to evaluate differences in the overall survival of HER2+ breast cancer patients treated with regard to their hormone receptors negativity or positivity. We evaluated a cohort of patients treated with trastuzumab in the Czech Republic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present study is a retrospective analysis of patients whose data were recorded in a nationwide non-interventional, post-authorisation database BREAST. After propensity score matching of data, the cohort included 4,532 patients.

RESULTS

A significant difference in overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was found between patients with and without hormone dependence. The OS was significantly higher in the group of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumours in the following cohorts: patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy, patients with advanced disease, G2 tumours, stage III and IV and in patients with stage II and III of G2 tumours.

CONCLUSION

Increased OS rates were found in several subgroups of patients with HR+/HER2+ tumours compared to those with HR-/HER2+ tumours. Better outcomes of HR+/HER2+ patients were only observed in the first four/five years of follow-up, and the differences disappeared over time.

Relevance and Effectiveness of Molecular Tumor Board Recommendations for Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Rare or Complex Mutational Profiles

PURPOSE

Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) provide physicians with a treatment recommendation for complex tumor-specific genomic alterations. National and international consensus to reach a recommendation is lacking. In this article, we analyze the effectiveness of an MTB decision-making methodology for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with rare or complex mutational profiles as implemented in the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG).

METHODS

The UMCG-MTB comprises (pulmonary) oncologists, pathologists, clinical scientists in molecular pathology, and structural biologists. Recommendations are based on reported actionability of variants and molecular interpretation of pathways affected by the variant and supported by molecular modeling. A retrospective analysis of 110 NSCLC cases (representing 106 patients) with suggested treatment of complex genomic alterations and corresponding treatment outcomes for targeted therapy was performed.

RESULTS

The MTB recommended targeted therapy for 59 of 110 NSCLC cases with complex molecular profiles: 24 within a clinical trial, 15 in accordance with guidelines (on label) and 20 off label. All but 16 recommendations involved patients with an EGFR or ALK mutation. Treatment outcome was analyzed for patients with available follow-up (10 on label and 16 off label). Adherence to the MTB recommendation (21 of 26; 81%) resulted in an objective response rate of 67% (14 of 21), with a median progression-free survival of 6.3 months (interquartile range, 3.2-10.6 months) and an overall survival of 10.4 months (interquartile range, 6.3-14.6 months).

CONCLUSION

Targeted therapy recommendations resulting from the UMCG-MTB workflow for complex molecular profiles were highly adhered to and resulted in a positive clinical response in the majority of patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Targeting Autophagy in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease consisting of different biological subtypes, with differences in terms of incidence, response to diverse treatments, risk of disease progression, and sites of metastases. In the last years, several molecular targets have emerged and new drugs, targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR and cyclinD/CDK/pRb pathways and tumor microenvironment have been integrated into clinical practice. However, it is clear now that breast cancer is able to develop resistance to these drugs and the identification of the underlying molecular mechanisms is paramount to drive further drug development. Autophagy is a highly conserved homeostatic process that can be activated in response to antineoplastic agents as a cytoprotective mechanism. Inhibition of autophagy could enhance tumor cell death by diverse anti-cancer therapies, representing an attractive approach to control mechanisms of drug resistance. In this manuscript, we present a review of autophagy focusing on its interplay with targeted drugs used for breast cancer treatment.

Eribulin monotherapy in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients in real life

Background and Aim

Our retrospective, single-center study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of eribulin in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in routine clinical practice.

Subjects and Methods

Twenty-eight patients treated with eribulin for MBC between May 2014 and November 2017 were included in our study. Clinical and biological assessment of toxicity was controlled at each visit. Tumor response was evaluated every three cycles of treatment.

Results

Median age at eribulin treatment was 52.5-year. Tumors were hormone receptor positive (71.4%), HER2-positive (10.7%), and triple negative (TN) (25%). Most of the patients (92.8%) presented with visceral metastases, mainly in the lymph nodes (57.1%) and liver (53.6%). Median previous metastatic chemotherapy line was 4 [1-7]. Median number of metastatic sites were 3 (1-4). Median number of eribulin cycles was 4. At the end of follow-up period, 36% of the patients were still alive. Eighteen patients died due to disease progression. The objective response rate was 21.5% with a 42.9% clinical benefit rate. Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 4 (95% CI: 2.7-5.2) and 14 (95% CI: 11.8-16.1) months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. None of the patients discontinued eribulin treatment due to toxicity. The most commonly reported toxicities were asthenia (71.4%), peripheral neuropathy (67.9%), and neutropenia (46.4%).

Conclusion

Eribulin is an effective new treatment option in heavily pretreated MBC, with a manageable toxicity profile. Our results confirm that treatment with eribulin is feasible and safe in real-world patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Fulvestrant 500mg in Hormone-receptor Positive Human Epidermal Receptor 2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Real-world Study in China

Background: Fulvestrant 500mg has proved its clinical effectiveness in previous trials as primary or second line treatment of hormone receptor positive, human epidermal receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) post-menopausal advanced breast cancer. This real-world study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Fulvestrant in HR+/HER2- Chinese advanced breast cancer patients. Method: HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients who received Fulvestrant 500mg from January 2015 to December 2018 in Beijing Cancer Hospital were enrolled in this retrospective study. Progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) of Fulvestrant were investigated. Result: In total 303 enrolled patients [median age was 51 years (range: 21-82)], 255 (84.2%) patients were at postmenopausal status at the start of Fulvestrant treatment and 264 patients (87.1%) had advanced breast cancer. The median PFS (95% confidence interval) was 14.1 months (10.1-18.0) for the first-line, 11.2 months (2.2-20.3) for the second-line and 6.7 months (4.8-8.5) for ≥third-line of Fulvestrant. The ORR and CBR were 3.8% and 86.8% for the first-line, 5.5% and 75.4% for the second-line, 1.1% and 61.1% for ≥third-line of Fulvestrant. The multivariate subgroup analyses showed, PFS was significantly longer for the patients with light tumor burden, less palliative chemotherapy before Fulvestrant and long disease-free interval. For patients receiving Fulvestrant after palliative chemotherapy, the median PFS was numerically greater in maintenance treatment group than those who progressed after chemotherapy. Only 5.0% of patients (15/303) experienced adverse events and majority were grade 1-2. The most common adverse event was headache and palpitation, with merely one patient had severe adverse event (pulmonary embolism). Conclusion: Fulvestrant is an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment regimen in endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Light tumor burden, less palliative chemotherapy before Fulvestrant and long disease-free survival (DFS) might be the ideal condition of Fulvestrant treatment. Fulvestrant can be effective for premenopausal patients with drug-induced menopause. Patients of different luminal subtypes can benefit from Fulvestrant. For patients with visceral metastases, presence of liver metastases rather than lung metastases was poor prognostic factor. Fulvestrant may also be considered as a maintenance treatment after first-line palliative chemotherapy.

Axillary surgical approach in metastatic breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the benefit of an axillary surgical approach on overall survival and secondarily of breast surgery amongst patients with metastatic breast cancer which is considered to be an incurable disease. However, an axillary surgical approach showed no association with overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The true impact of locoregional therapies on long-term outcomes remains unknown, and randomised clinical trials are needed.

Optimal duration of prior endocrine therapy predicts the efficacy of Fulvestrant in a real-world study for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

Fulvestrant 500 mg is standard of care for endocrine therapy-naive or pretreated women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study was conducted to explore the potential factors and duration of last endocrine therapy as predictors for the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg on Chinese patients in real-world practice. Two hundred and fifty-two MBC patients who were treated with fulvestrant 500 mg consecutively between January 2011 and December 2015 in our institute were included in this study. Efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). The optimal cut-off value for duration of last endocrine therapy was determined by survival ROC analysis. Adverse events were graded according to NCI-CTC AE 4.0. Fulvestrant 500 mg demonstrated a median PFS of 5.8 months (95%CI 4.6-6.9), and a median OS of 35.9 months (95%CI 30.2-41.4). CBR was 41.3% (95%CI 35-47). Liver metastasis, bone alone metastasis, lines of endocrine therapy for MBC, and sensitivity to last endocrine therapy were statistically significant in the Cox multivariate analysis (P values of 0.022, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.038, respectively). The optimal cut-off values for duration of last endocrine therapy to predict the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg were 25.08 months for adjuvant endocrine therapy and 5.17 months for first-line endocrine therapy, which showed no difference in prediction power with ABC clinical definition. Patients with prior adjuvant endocrine therapy ≥25.08 months or first-line therapy≥5.17 months reached a longer PFS of fulvestrant (p = 0.04). Six patients discontinued the treatment due to intolerable adverse events. Patients with the duration of prior endocrine therapy longer than optimal cut-off points indicate better PFS of fulvestrant. Liver metastasis, bone alone metastasis, line of fulvestrant, and sensitivity to last endocrine therapy were also predictors for response of fulvestrant. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03708432.

Tolerance-based capecitabine dose escalation after DPYD genotype-guided dosing in heterozygote DPYD variant carriers: a single-center observational study

OBJECTIVE

Certain polymorphisms of the DPYD gene encoding for the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme are associated with fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity. Dose reductions of the fluoropyrimidine prodrug capecitabine are recommended for patients carrying these DPYD variants to prevent toxicities. Capecitabine dose escalation after an initial genotype-guided dose reduction is advocated when treatment is well tolerated. However, practical guidelines on how to implement these dose escalations are lacking. We implemented a protocol for tolerance-guided capecitabine dosing in DPYD variant carriers and aimed to explore its effect on toxicity of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy for different types of solid tumors were identified retrospectively. Capecitabine doses were reduced in case of a DPYD variant (DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, DPYD*13, or c.1236G>A) and subsequently adjusted on the basis of tolerance. Outcome was evaluated by clinical chart review and dosing characteristics from the hospital pharmacy. Results were compared with a cohort of capecitabine-treated DPYD wild-type patients.

RESULTS

Of 185 patients eligible for analysis, 11 patients were heterozygous for a DPYD variant. A median dose escalation of 8.5% was achieved using the prespecified protocol. One DPYD variant carrier experienced a grade 3 toxicity after a dose escalation. Overall, DPYD variant carriers did not experience more, or more severe toxicities than DPYD wild-type patients. The total prevalence of severe toxicities in the wild-type group was 43.1% and is comparable with the literature.

CONCLUSION

Tolerance-based capecitabine dose escalation did not lead to more toxicity in DPYD variant carriers compared with wild-type patients. Our results can guide future prospective research.

Health-Related Quality of Life in MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib plus an Aromatase Inhibitor as Initial Therapy in HR+, HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

MONARCH 3, a phase III trial (NCT02246621) of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), previously demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival in patients receiving abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). This study evaluated patient-reported outcomes, including global health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functioning, and symptoms.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily; n = 328) or placebo (n = 165), plus 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole daily. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Breast Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire HRQoL instruments were administered at baseline, every two cycles during cycles 2 through 19 (each cycle being 28 days), every three cycles thereafter, and once at a short-term posttherapy follow-up visit (approximately 30 days after discontinuation). Longitudinal mixed regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated postbaseline change and time to sustained deterioration (TTSD), respectively.

RESULTS

Baseline scores were similar between treatment arms. Although select scores statistically favored the placebo arm, global HRQoL, most symptoms, and functioning scales did not meet the threshold for clinically meaningful differences between treatment arms. Only diarrhea favored the placebo arm with statistically and clinically meaningful differences. There were no TTSD differences between treatment arms for global HRQoL, most symptoms (except diarrhea), or functioning.

CONCLUSION

Over a 2-year period, there were no clinically meaningful differences in global HRQoL, functioning, and most symptoms for patients receiving abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with NSAI alone. Only diarrhea favored the placebo arm, consistent with prior safety data, which has been shown to be manageable and reversible. Combined with clinical efficacy, results support treatment with abemaciclib plus NSAI for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) was not associated with a clinically meaningful detriment in patient-reported global health-related quality of life, functioning, and most symptoms in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Prior studies have also demonstrated clinical efficacy of abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with NSAI alone, including improved progression-free survival and objective response rate. These results also complement previously reported toxicity data, as measured by investigator-assessed adverse events. Taken together, these results support treatment with abemaciclib plus NSAI for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC.