1
|
Geurts SME, Ibragimova KIE, Ding N, Meegdes M, Erdkamp F, Heijns JB, Tol J, Vriens BEPJ, Dercksen MW, Aaldering KNA, Pepels MJAE, van de Winkel L, Peters NAJB, van de Wouw AJ, Maaskant SAJG, Teeuwen-Dedroog NJA, van Nijnatten TJA, de Boer M, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Time trends in real-world treatment patterns and survival in patients diagnosed with de novo HER2+ metastatic breast cancer: an analysis of the SONABRE registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-023-07235-0. [PMID: 38381274 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07235-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim was to determine whether the real-world first-line progression-free survival (PFS) of patients diagnosed with de novo human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) has improved since the introduction of pertuzumab in 2013. In addition to PFS, we aimed to determine differences in overall survival (OS) and the use of systemic and locoregional therapies. METHODS Included were patients systemically treated for de novo HER2+ ABC in ten hospitals in 2008-2017 from the SONABRE Registry (NCT-03577197). First-line PFS and OS in 2013-2017 versus 2008-2012 was determined using Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modelling. First-given systemic therapy and the use of locoregional therapy within the first year following diagnosis were determined per period of diagnosis. RESULTS Median and five-year PFS were 26.6 months and 24% in 2013-2017 (n = 85) versus 14.5 months and 10% in 2008-2012 (n = 81) (adjusted HR = 0.65, 95%CI:0.45-0.94). Median and five-year OS were 61.2 months and 51% in 2013-2017 versus 26.1 months and 28% in 2008-2012 (adjusted HR = 0.55, 95%CI:0.37-0.81). Of patients diagnosed in 2013-2017 versus 2008-2012, 84% versus 60% received HER2-targeted therapy and 59% versus 0% pertuzumab-based therapy as first-given therapy. Respectively, 27% and 23% of patients underwent locoregional breast surgery, and 6% and 7% surgery of a metastatic site during the first year following diagnosis. CONCLUSION The prognosis of patients with de novo HER2 + ABC has improved considerably. Since 2013 one in four patients were alive and free from progression on first-given therapy for at least five years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra M E Geurts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW- School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Khava I E Ibragimova
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW- School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nan Ding
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW- School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marissa Meegdes
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW- School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Erdkamp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Joan B Heijns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Jolien Tol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit E P J Vriens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marcus W Dercksen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manon J A E Pepels
- Department of Internal Medicine, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Agnes J van de Wouw
- Department of Internal Medicine, Viecuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nathalie J A Teeuwen-Dedroog
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW- School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thiemo J A van Nijnatten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, GROW, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW- School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW- School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Voorwerk L, Isaeva OI, Horlings HM, Balduzzi S, Chelushkin M, Bakker NAM, Champanhet E, Garner H, Sikorska K, Loo CE, Kemper I, Mandjes IAM, de Maaker M, van Geel JJL, Boers J, de Boer M, Salgado R, van Dongen MGJ, Sonke GS, de Visser KE, Schumacher TN, Blank CU, Wessels LFA, Jager A, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Schröder CP, Linn SC, Kok M. PD-L1 blockade in combination with carboplatin as immune induction in metastatic lobular breast cancer: the GELATO trial. Nat Cancer 2023; 4:535-549. [PMID: 37038006 PMCID: PMC10132987 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00542-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the second most common histological breast cancer subtype, but ILC-specific trials are lacking. Translational research revealed an immune-related ILC subset, and in mouse ILC models, synergy between immune checkpoint blockade and platinum was observed. In the phase II GELATO trial ( NCT03147040 ), patients with metastatic ILC were treated with weekly carboplatin (area under the curve 1.5 mg ml-1 min-1) as immune induction for 12 weeks and atezolizumab (PD-L1 blockade; triweekly) from the third week until progression. Four of 23 evaluable patients had a partial response (17%), and 2 had stable disease, resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 26%. From these six patients, four had triple-negative ILC (TN-ILC). We observed higher CD8+ T cell infiltration, immune checkpoint expression and exhausted T cells after treatment. With this GELATO trial, we show that ILC-specific clinical trials are feasible and demonstrate promising antitumor activity of atezolizumab with carboplatin, particularly for TN-ILC, and provide insights for the design of highly needed ILC-specific trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Voorwerk
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olga I Isaeva
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara Balduzzi
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maksim Chelushkin
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Noor A M Bakker
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Elisa Champanhet
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hannah Garner
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karolina Sikorska
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inge Kemper
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A M Mandjes
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel de Maaker
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jasper J L van Geel
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jorianne Boers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marloes G J van Dongen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karin E de Visser
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ton N Schumacher
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Carolien P Schröder
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marleen Kok
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rugo HS, Im SA, Cardoso F, Cortes J, Curigliano G, Musolino A, Pegram MD, Bachelot T, Wright GS, Saura C, Escrivá-de-Romaní S, De Laurentiis M, Schwartz GN, Pluard TJ, Ricci F, Gwin WR, Levy C, Brown-Glaberman U, Ferrero JM, de Boer M, Kim SB, Petráková K, Yardley DA, Freedman O, Jakobsen EH, Gal-Yam EN, Yerushalmi R, Fasching PA, Kaufman PA, Ashley EJ, Perez-Olle R, Hong S, Rosales MK, Gradishar WJ. Margetuximab Versus Trastuzumab in Patients With Previously Treated HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer (SOPHIA): Final Overall Survival Results From a Randomized Phase 3 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:198-205. [PMID: 36332179 PMCID: PMC9839304 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Final overall survival (OS) in SOPHIA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02492711), a study of margetuximab versus trastuzumab, both with chemotherapy, in patients with previously treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer, is reported with updated safety. Overall, 536 patients in the intention-to-treat population were randomly assigned to margetuximab (15 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks; n = 266) plus chemotherapy or trastuzumab (6 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks after a loading dose of 8 mg/kg; n = 270) plus chemotherapy. Primary end points were progression-free survival, previously reported, and OS. Final OS analysis was triggered by 385 prespecified events. The median OS was 21.6 months (95% CI, 18.89 to 25.07) with margetuximab versus 21.9 months (95% CI, 18.69 to 24.18) with trastuzumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.17; P = .620). Preplanned, exploratory analysis of CD16A genotyping suggested a possible improvement in OS for margetuximab in CD16A-158FF patients versus trastuzumab (median OS, 23.6 v 19.2 months; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.00) and a possible improvement in OS for trastuzumab in CD16A-158VV patients versus margetuximab (median OS, 31.1 v 22.0 months; HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.12). Margetuximab safety was comparable with trastuzumab. Final overall OS analysis did not demonstrate margetuximab advantage over trastuzumab. Margetuximab studies in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer with different CD16A allelic variants are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hope S. Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA,Hope S. Rugo, MD, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1825 Fourth St, 3rd Floor, PO Box 1710, San Francisco, CA 94158; e-mail:
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Javier Cortes
- Quironsalud Group, International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Madrid and Barcelona, Spain,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Antonino Musolino
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy,Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy,Gruppo Oncologico Italiano di Ricerca Clinica (GOIRC), Parma, Italy
| | - Mark D. Pegram
- Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Gail S. Wright
- Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, New Port Richey, FL
| | - Cristina Saura
- Medical Oncology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Santiago Escrivá-de-Romaní
- Medical Oncology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michelino De Laurentiis
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS “Fondazione Pascale,” Naples, Italy
| | - Gary N. Schwartz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | | | | | - William R. Gwin
- Division of Medical Oncology/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Christelle Levy
- Centre François Baclesse, Institut Normand du Sein, Caen, France
| | - Ursa Brown-Glaberman
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Katarína Petráková
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Denise A. Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | - Orit Freedman
- RS McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Einav Nili Gal-Yam
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Breast Oncology Institute, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Rinat Yerushalmi
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A. Kaufman
- Breast Oncology, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT
| | | | - Raul Perez-Olle
- MacroGenics, Inc, Rockville, MD,Former Employees of MacroGenics, Inc, Rockville, MD
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Simons JM, van Nijnatten TJA, van der Pol CC, van Diest PJ, Jager A, van Klaveren D, Kam BLR, Lobbes MBI, de Boer M, Verhoef C, Sars PRA, Heijmans HJ, van Haaren ERM, Vles WJ, Contant CME, Menke-Pluijmers MBE, Smit LHM, Kelder W, Boskamp M, Koppert LB, Luiten EJT, Smidt ML. Diagnostic Accuracy of Radioactive Iodine Seed Placement in the Axilla With Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:991-999. [PMID: 36069889 PMCID: PMC9453629 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Several less-invasive staging procedures have been proposed to replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with initially clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer, but these procedures may fail to detect residual disease. Owing to the lack of high-level evidence, it is not yet clear which procedure is most optimal to replace ALND. Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of radioactive iodine seed placement in the axilla with sentinel lymph node biopsy (RISAS), a targeted axillary dissection procedure. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective, multicenter, noninferiority, diagnostic accuracy trial conducted from March 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Patients were included within 14 institutions (general, teaching, and academic) throughout the Netherlands. Patients with breast cancer clinical tumor categories 1 through 4 (cT1-4; tumor diameter <2 cm and up to >5 cm or extension to the chest wall or skin) and pathologically proven positive axillary lymph nodes (ie, clinical node categories cN1, metastases to movable ipsilateral level I and/or level II axillary nodes; cN2, metastases to fixed or matted ipsilateral level I and/or level II axillary nodes; cN3b, metastases to ipsilateral level I and/or level II axillary nodes with metastases to internal mammary nodes) who were treated with NAC were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed from July 2020 to December 2021. Intervention Pre-NAC, the marking of a pathologically confirmed positive axillary lymph node with radioactive iodine seed (MARI) procedure, was performed and after NAC, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with excision of the marked lymph node (ie, RISAS procedure) was performed, followed by ALND. Main Outcomes and Measures The identification rate, false-negative rate (FNR), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for all 3 procedures: RISAS, SLNB, and MARI. The noninferiority margin of the observed FNR was 6.25% for the RISAS procedure. Results A total of 212 patients (median [range] age, 52 [22-77] years) who had cN+ breast cancer underwent the RISAS procedure and ALND. The identification rate of the RISAS procedure was 98.2% (223 of 227). The identification rates of SLNB and MARI were 86.4% (197 of 228) and 94.1% (224 of 238), respectively. FNR of the RISAS procedure was 3.5% (5 of 144; 90% CI, 1.38-7.16), and NPV was 92.8% (64 of 69; 90% CI, 85.37-97.10), compared with an FNR of 17.9% (22 of 123; 90% CI, 12.4%-24.5%) and NPV of 72.8% (59 of 81; 90% CI, 63.5%-80.8%) for SLNB and an FNR of 7.0% (10 of 143; 90% CI, 3.8%-11.6%) and NPV of 86.3% (63 of 73; 90% CI, 77.9%-92.4%) for the MARI procedure. In a subgroup of 174 patients in whom SLNB and the MARI procedure were successful and ALND was performed, FNR of the RISAS procedure was 2.5% (3 of 118; 90% CI, 0.7%-6.4%), compared with 18.6% (22 of 118; 90% CI, 13.0%-25.5%) for SLNB (P < .001) and 6.8% (8 of 118; 90% CI, 3.4%-11.9%) for the MARI procedure (P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this diagnostic study suggest that the RISAS procedure was the most feasible and accurate less-invasive procedure for axillary staging after NAC in patients with cN+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine M. Simons
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Thiemo J. A. van Nijnatten
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands
| | - Carmen C. van der Pol
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J. van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Boen L. R. Kam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc B. I. Lobbes
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul R. A. Sars
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, the Netherlands
| | - Harald J. Heijmans
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Group Twente, Breast Clinic Oost-Nederland, Hengelo, the Netherlands
| | - Els R. M. van Haaren
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter J. Vles
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Léonie H. M. Smit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Treant Zorggroep Hospital, Hoogeveen, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy Kelder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marike Boskamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Wilhelmina Hospital, Assen, the Netherlands
| | - Linetta B. Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ernest J. T. Luiten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
- Tawam Breast Care Center, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Surgery College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates
| | - Marjolein L. Smidt
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Deparment of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meegdes M, Geurts SME, Erdkamp FLG, Dercksen MW, Vriens BEPJ, Aaldering KNA, Pepels MJAE, van de Winkel LMH, Teeuwen NJA, de Boer M, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. The implementation of CDK 4/6 inhibitors and its impact on treatment choices in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients: A study of the Dutch SONABRE Registry. Int J Cancer 2022; 150:124-131. [PMID: 34460112 PMCID: PMC9290870 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In August 2017, cyclin‐dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have been reimbursed in the Netherlands for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study evaluates the implementation of CDK4/6 inhibitors and changes in treatment choices in the Netherlands. All patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2− ABC in 2009 to 2018 in seven hospitals were selected from the Southeast Netherlands Advanced Breast cancer (SONABRE) registry. The 2‐year cumulative use of CDK4/6 inhibitors since reimbursement date (August 2017) was assessed using competing‐risk methodology in two cohorts. The first cohort included patients with ABC diagnosis between August 2017 and December 2018. The second cohort included patients with ABC diagnosis between 2009 and August 2017, and still alive on August 1, 2017. In addition, treatment choices in the first three lines of therapy in calendar years 2009 to 2018 were evaluated for the total study population. Among patients diagnosed since August 2017 (n = 214), 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43‐57) received CDK4/6 inhibitors within 2 years beyond diagnosis. Of eligible patients diagnosed before August 2017 (n = 417), 31% (95% CI = 27‐36) received CDK4/6 inhibitors within 2 years following reimbursement. Another 20% of both cohorts are still CDK4/6 inhibitor naïve and on first‐line therapy. The use of chemotherapy decreased in first two lines of therapy between 2009 and 2018 (first‐line: 29%‐13%; second‐line: 26%‐19%). The implementation rate of CDK4/6 inhibitors since reimbursement is currently 50% within 2 years beyond diagnosis and is expected to increase further. The implementation of targeted therapy decreased the use of chemotherapy as first‐line therapy.
What's new?
In the Netherlands, inhibitors of cyclin‐dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) are eligible for reimbursement by health insurers. The present report describes implementation patterns of CDK4/6 inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer since 2017, based on data and observations collected from seven hospitals across the Southeast Netherlands. Analyses show that about half of patients with HR+/HER2‐ metastatic breast cancer are treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Following the implementation of these therapies, use of first‐line chemotherapy decreased significantly. Reduced chemotherapy use may have beneficial effects on quality of life for patients, adding value to overall gains in survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Meegdes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra M E Geurts
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans L G Erdkamp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Birgit E P J Vriens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manon J A E Pepels
- Department of Internal Medicine, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nathalie J A Teeuwen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aarnoutse R, Hillege LE, Ziemons J, De Vos-Geelen J, de Boer M, Aerts EMER, Vriens BEPJ, van Riet Y, Vincent J, van de Wouw AJ, Le GN, Venema K, Rensen SS, Penders J, Smidt ML. Intestinal Microbiota in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients and Controls. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246200. [PMID: 34944820 PMCID: PMC8699039 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Besides the already known factors that increase the risk of breast cancer, like hormonal treatment, heredity, and obesity, growing evidence exists that intestinal microbiota can influence breast cancer carcinogenesis. Current clinical information into the role of the intestinal microbiota in breast cancer patients is limited. This study aimed to see whether there are differences in intestinal microbiota richness, diversity, and composition between oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients and controls. We concluded that the intestinal microbiota richness, diversity, and composition were not different between breast cancer patients and postmenopausal controls. An increased relative abundance of Dialister and Veillonellaceae was observed in breast cancer patients scheduled for adjuvant treatment, which might be caused by a relative decrease in other bacteria due to surgery associated factors rather than an absolute increase. For future studies, we strongly advise a more homogeneous group of breast cancer patients of preferably treatment-naive patients. Abstract Background: Previous preclinical and clinical research has investigated the role of intestinal microbiota in carcinogenesis. Growing evidence exists that intestinal microbiota can influence breast cancer carcinogenesis. However, the role of intestinal microbiota in breast cancer needs to be further investigated. This study aimed to identify the microbiota differences between postmenopausal breast cancer patients and controls. Patients and methods: This prospective cohort study compared the intestinal microbiota richness, diversity, and composition in postmenopausal histologically proven ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients and postmenopausal controls. Patients scheduled for (neo)adjuvant adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (AC), and docetaxel (D), or endocrine therapy (tamoxifen) were prospectively enrolled in a multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands. Patients collected a faecal sample and completed a questionnaire before starting systemic cancer treatment. Controls, enrolled from the National Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Programme, also collected a faecal sample and completed a questionnaire. Intestinal microbiota was analysed by amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4 gene region. Results: In total, 81 postmenopausal ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients and 67 postmenopausal controls were included, resulting in 148 faecal samples. Observed species richness, Shannon index, and overall microbial community structure were not significantly different between breast cancer patients and controls. There was a significant difference in overall microbial community structure between breast cancer patients scheduled for adjuvant treatment, neoadjuvant treatment, and controls at the phylum (p = 0.042) and genus levels (p = 0.015). Dialister (p = 0.001) and its corresponding family Veillonellaceae (p = 0.001) were higher in patients scheduled for adjuvant treatment, compared to patients scheduled for neoadjuvant treatment. Additional sensitivity analysis to correct for the potential confounding effect of prophylactic antibiotic use, indicated no differences in microbial community structure between patients scheduled for neoadjuvant systemic treatment, adjuvant systemic treatment, and controls at the phylum (p = 0.471) and genus levels (p = 0.124). Conclusions: Intestinal microbiota richness, diversity, and composition are not different between postmenopausal breast cancer patients and controls. The increased relative abundance of Dialister and Veillonellaceae was observed in breast cancer patients scheduled for adjuvant treatment, which might be caused by a relative decrease in other bacteria due to prophylactic antibiotic administration rather than an absolute increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy Aarnoutse
- GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.A.); (J.Z.); (J.D.V.-G.); (M.d.B.)
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Lars E. Hillege
- GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.A.); (J.Z.); (J.D.V.-G.); (M.d.B.)
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence: (L.E.H.); (M.L.S.); Tel.: +31-(0)43-3877477 (M.L.S.)
| | - Janine Ziemons
- GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.A.); (J.Z.); (J.D.V.-G.); (M.d.B.)
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Judith De Vos-Geelen
- GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.A.); (J.Z.); (J.D.V.-G.); (M.d.B.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.A.); (J.Z.); (J.D.V.-G.); (M.d.B.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elvira M. E. R. Aerts
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Birgit E. P. J. Vriens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands;
| | - Yvonne van Riet
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands;
| | - Jeroen Vincent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elkerliek Hospital, P.O. Box 98, 5700 AB Helmond, The Netherlands;
| | - Agnes J. van de Wouw
- Department of Medical Oncology, VieCuri Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1926, 5900 BX Venlo, The Netherlands;
| | - Giang N. Le
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands; (G.N.L.); (J.P.)
| | - Koen Venema
- NUTRIM—School of Nutrition and Translational Research In Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (K.V.); (S.S.R.)
- Euregional Microbiome Center, Maastricht University, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Centre for Healthy Eating & Food Innovation, Maastricht University-Campus Venlo, P.O. Box 8, 5900 AA Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Sander S. Rensen
- NUTRIM—School of Nutrition and Translational Research In Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (K.V.); (S.S.R.)
| | - John Penders
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands; (G.N.L.); (J.P.)
- NUTRIM—School of Nutrition and Translational Research In Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (K.V.); (S.S.R.)
| | - Marjolein L. Smidt
- GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (R.A.); (J.Z.); (J.D.V.-G.); (M.d.B.)
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence: (L.E.H.); (M.L.S.); Tel.: +31-(0)43-3877477 (M.L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schmitz RSJM, Geurts SME, Ibragimova KIE, Tilli DJP, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, de Boer M. Healthcare Use during the Last Six Months of Life in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215271. [PMID: 34771434 PMCID: PMC8582356 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In the last decades, new treatment options for advanced (breast) cancer have resulted in increased use of health care resources near the end of life. We assessed health care use near the end of life of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). In this study, we have shown that ICU admission, and CPR occurred rarely during the last six months of life of ABC patients. However, hospital admissions occurred often, especially in patients who received new chemotherapy within 30 days of end of life. Those patients were also more likely to die in the hospital. However, death was most often due to disease progression. To improve quality of life near the end of life of advanced breast cancer patients, it is vital to develop tools to help clinicians identify those patients who will benefit from chemotherapy at the end of life. Abstract New treatment options in cancer have resulted in increased use of health care resources near the end of life. We assessed health care use near the end of life of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). From the Southeast Netherlands Breast cancer (SONABRE) registry, we selected all deceased patients diagnosed with ABC in Maastricht University Medical Center between January 2007 and October 2017. Frequency of health care use in the last six months of life was described and predictors for health care use were assessed. Of 203 patients, 76% were admitted during the last six months, 6% to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 2% underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Death in hospital occurred in 25%. Nine percent of patients received a new line of chemotherapy ≤30 days before death, which was associated with age <65 years and <1 year survival since diagnosis of metastases. In these patients, the hospital admission rate was 95%, of which 79% died in the hospital, mostly due to progressive disease (80%). In conclusion, the frequency of ICU-admission, CPR or a new line of chemotherapy ≤30 days before death was low. Most patients receiving a new line of chemotherapy ≤30 days before death, died in the hospital.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
AbstractThe unification of statistical (data-driven) and symbolic (knowledge-driven) methods is widely recognized as one of the key challenges of modern AI. Recent years have seen a large number of publications on such hybrid neuro-symbolic AI systems. That rapidly growing literature is highly diverse, mostly empirical, and is lacking a unifying view of the large variety of these hybrid systems. In this paper, we analyze a large body of recent literature and we propose a set of modular design patterns for such hybrid, neuro-symbolic systems. We are able to describe the architecture of a very large number of hybrid systems by composing only a small set of elementary patterns as building blocks. The main contributions of this paper are: 1) a taxonomically organised vocabulary to describe both processes and data structures used in hybrid systems; 2) a set of 15+ design patterns for hybrid AI systems organized in a set of elementary patterns and a set of compositional patterns; 3) an application of these design patterns in two realistic use-cases for hybrid AI systems. Our patterns reveal similarities between systems that were not recognized until now. Finally, our design patterns extend and refine Kautz’s earlier attempt at categorizing neuro-symbolic architectures.
Collapse
|
9
|
Granzier RWY, Ibrahim A, Primakov SP, Samiei S, van Nijnatten TJA, de Boer M, Heuts EM, Hulsmans FJ, Chatterjee A, Lambin P, Lobbes MBI, Woodruff HC, Smidt ML. MRI-Based Radiomics Analysis for the Pretreatment Prediction of Pathologic Complete Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13102447. [PMID: 34070016 PMCID: PMC8157878 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This retrospective study investigated the value of pretreatment contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based radiomics for the prediction of pathologic complete tumor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients. A total of 292 breast cancer patients, with 320 tumors, who were treated with neo-adjuvant systemic therapy and underwent a pretreatment MRI exam were enrolled. As the data were collected in two different hospitals with five different MRI scanners and varying acquisition protocols, three different strategies to split training and validation datasets were used. Radiomics, clinical, and combined models were developed using random forest classifiers in each strategy. The analysis of radiomics features had no added value in predicting pathologic complete tumor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients compared with the clinical models, nor did the combined models perform significantly better than the clinical models. Further, the radiomics features selected for the models and their performance differed with and within the different strategies. Due to previous and current work, we tentatively attribute the lack of improvement in clinical models following the addition of radiomics to the effects of variations in acquisition and reconstruction parameters. The lack of reproducibility data (i.e., test-retest or similar) meant that this effect could not be analyzed. These results indicate the need for reproducibility studies to preselect reproducible features in order to properly assess the potential of radiomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée W. Y. Granzier
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands; (S.S.); (E.M.H.); (M.L.S.)
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (A.I.); (S.P.P.); (M.d.B.); (A.C.); (P.L.); (M.B.I.L.); (H.C.W.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-43-388-1575
| | - Abdalla Ibrahim
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (A.I.); (S.P.P.); (M.d.B.); (A.C.); (P.L.); (M.B.I.L.); (H.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital of Liège and GIGA CRC-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, 4000 Liege, Belgium
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Sergey P. Primakov
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (A.I.); (S.P.P.); (M.d.B.); (A.C.); (P.L.); (M.B.I.L.); (H.C.W.)
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sanaz Samiei
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands; (S.S.); (E.M.H.); (M.L.S.)
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (A.I.); (S.P.P.); (M.d.B.); (A.C.); (P.L.); (M.B.I.L.); (H.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Thiemo J. A. van Nijnatten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Maaike de Boer
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (A.I.); (S.P.P.); (M.d.B.); (A.C.); (P.L.); (M.B.I.L.); (H.C.W.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M. Heuts
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands; (S.S.); (E.M.H.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Frans-Jan Hulsmans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, P.O. Box 5500, 6130 MB Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands;
| | - Avishek Chatterjee
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (A.I.); (S.P.P.); (M.d.B.); (A.C.); (P.L.); (M.B.I.L.); (H.C.W.)
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (A.I.); (S.P.P.); (M.d.B.); (A.C.); (P.L.); (M.B.I.L.); (H.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc B. I. Lobbes
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (A.I.); (S.P.P.); (M.d.B.); (A.C.); (P.L.); (M.B.I.L.); (H.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, P.O. Box 5500, 6130 MB Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands;
| | - Henry C. Woodruff
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (A.I.); (S.P.P.); (M.d.B.); (A.C.); (P.L.); (M.B.I.L.); (H.C.W.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L. Smidt
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands; (S.S.); (E.M.H.); (M.L.S.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schneider PP, Ramaekers BL, Pouwels X, Geurts S, Ibragimova K, de Boer M, Vriens B, van de Wouw Y, den Boer M, Pepels M, Tjan-Heijnen V, Joore M. Direct Medical Costs of Advanced Breast Cancer Treatment: A Real-World Study in the Southeast of The Netherlands. Value Health 2021; 24:668-675. [PMID: 33933235 PMCID: PMC8105643 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Policy makers increasingly seek to complement data from clinical trials with information from routine care. This study aims to provide a detailed account of the hospital resource use and associated costs of patients with advanced breast cancer in The Netherlands. METHODS Data from 597 patients with advanced breast cancer, diagnosed between 2010 and 2014, were retrieved from the Southeast Netherlands Advanced Breast Cancer Registry. Database lock for this study was in October 2017. We report the observed hospital costs for different resource categories and the lifetime costs per patient, adjusted for censoring using Lin's method. The relationship between patients' characteristics and costs was studied using multivariable regression. RESULTS The average (SE) lifetime hospital costs of patients with advanced breast cancer were €52 709 (405). Costs differed considerably between patient subgroups, ranging from €29 803 for patients with a triple-negative subtype to €92 272 for patients with hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive cancer. Apart from the cancer subtype, several other factors, including age and survival time, were independently associated with patient lifetime costs. Overall, a large share of costs was attributed to systemic therapies (56%), predominantly to a few expensive agents, such as trastuzumab (15%), everolimus (10%), and bevacizumab (9%), as well as to inpatient hospital days (20%). CONCLUSIONS This real-world study shows the high degree of variability in hospital resource use and associated costs in advanced breast cancer care. The presented resource use and costs data provide researchers and policy makers with key figures for economic evaluations and budget impact analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Peter Schneider
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Bram L Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Xavier Pouwels
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Geurts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Khava Ibragimova
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rugo HS, Im SA, Cardoso F, Cortés J, Curigliano G, Musolino A, Pegram MD, Wright GS, Saura C, Escrivá-de-Romaní S, De Laurentiis M, Levy C, Brown-Glaberman U, Ferrero JM, de Boer M, Kim SB, Petráková K, Yardley DA, Freedman O, Jakobsen EH, Kaufman B, Yerushalmi R, Fasching PA, Nordstrom JL, Bonvini E, Koenig S, Edlich S, Hong S, Rock EP, Gradishar WJ. Efficacy of Margetuximab vs Trastuzumab in Patients With Pretreated ERBB2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:573-584. [PMID: 33480963 PMCID: PMC7823434 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 197] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Question Does margetuximab plus chemotherapy prolong progression-free survival and/or overall
survival of patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer, relative to
trastuzumab plus chemotherapy? Findings In the SOPHIA phase 3 randomized clinical trial of 536 patients with pretreated
ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer, margetuximab plus chemotherapy generated a
statistically significant 24% relative risk reduction in the hazard of progression vs
trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. After the second planned interim analysis of 270 deaths,
median OS was 21.6 months with margetuximab vs 19.8 months with trastuzumab, and final
analysis of OS will be reported subsequently. Meaning This trial demonstrates a head-to-head advantage of margetuximab (an Fc-engineered
ERBB2-targeted antibody) compared with trastuzumab in a pretreated ERBB2-positive
advanced breast cancer population. Importance ERRB2 (formerly HER2)–positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) remains typically
incurable with optimal treatment undefined in later lines of therapy. The chimeric
antibody margetuximab shares ERBB2 specificity with trastuzumab but incorporates an
engineered Fc region to increase immune activation. Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of margetuximab vs trastuzumab, each with
chemotherapy, in patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive ABC. Design, Setting, and Participants The SOPHIA phase 3 randomized open-label trial of margetuximab plus chemotherapy vs
trastuzumab plus chemotherapy enrolled 536 patients from August 26, 2015, to October 10,
2018, at 166 sites in 17 countries. Eligible patients had disease progression on 2 or
more prior anti-ERBB2 therapies and 1 to 3 lines of therapy for metastatic disease. Data
were analyzed from February 2019 to October 2019. Interventions Investigators selected chemotherapy before 1:1 randomization to margetuximab, 15 mg/kg,
or trastuzumab, 6 mg/kg (loading dose, 8 mg/kg), each in 3-week cycles. Stratification
factors were metastatic sites (≤2, >2), lines of therapy (≤2, >2), and
chemotherapy choice. Main Outcomes and Measures Sequential primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by central blinded
analysis and overall survival (OS). All α was allocated to PFS, followed by OS.
Secondary end points were investigator-assessed PFS and objective response rate by
central blinded analysis. Results A total of 536 patients were randomized to receive margetuximab (n = 266)
or trastuzumab (n = 270). The median age was 56 (27-86) years; 266 (100%)
women were in the margetuximab group, while 267 (98.9%) women were in the trastuzumab
group. Groups were balanced. All but 1 patient had received prior pertuzumab, and 489
(91.2%) had received prior ado-trastuzumab emtansine. Margetuximab improved primary PFS
over trastuzumab with 24% relative risk reduction (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI,
0.59-0.98; P = .03; median, 5.8 [95% CI, 5.5-7.0] months vs
4.9 [95% CI, 4.2-5.6] months; October 10, 2018). After the second planned interim
analysis of 270 deaths, median OS was 21.6 months with margetuximab vs 19.8 months with
trastuzumab (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.13; P = .33;
September 10, 2019), and investigator-assessed PFS showed 29% relative risk reduction
favoring margetuximab (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86;
P < .001; median, 5.7 vs 4.4 months; September 10,
2019). Margetuximab improved objective response rate over trastuzumab: 22% vs 16%
(P = .06; October 10, 2018), and 25% vs 14%
(P < .001; September 10, 2019). Incidence of
infusion-related reactions, mostly in cycle 1, was higher with margetuximab (35 [13.3%]
vs 9 [3.4%]); otherwise, safety was comparable. Conclusions and Relevance In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, margetuximab plus chemotherapy had
acceptable safety and a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared with
trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in ERBB2-positive ABC after progression on 2 or more prior
anti-ERBB2 therapies. Final OS analysis is expected in 2021. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02492711
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hope S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Breast Unit, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Javier Cortés
- IOB Institute of Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain.,Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Division of Early Drug Development, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Musolino
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Medical Oncology and Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Mark D Pegram
- Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Gail S Wright
- Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, New Port Richey
| | - Cristina Saura
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Medical Oncology Service, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Santiago Escrivá-de-Romaní
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Medical Oncology Service, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michelino De Laurentiis
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Christelle Levy
- Centre François Baclesse, Institut Normand du Sein, Caen, France
| | - Ursa Brown-Glaberman
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Katarína Petráková
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Denise A Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville
| | - Orit Freedman
- RS McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Bella Kaufman
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Breast Oncology Institute, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Rinat Yerushalmi
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ibragimova KIE, Geurts SME, Croes S, Erdkamp F, Heijns JB, Tol J, Vriens BEPJ, Aaldering KNA, Dercksen MW, Pepels MJAE, Peters NAJB, van de Winkel L, Tilli DJP, Vriens IJH, de Boer M, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Survival before and after the introduction of pertuzumab and T-DM1 in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, a study of the SONABRE Registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 188:571-581. [PMID: 33743103 PMCID: PMC8260428 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06178-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Immediate and proper implementation of a new and more potent therapy is important to ensure that the patient achieves the best possible outcome. This study aimed to examine whether the real-world overall survival (OS) has improved in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2 +) advanced breast cancer (ABC) since the market release of pertuzumab and T-DM1. Furthermore, we aimed to assess the implementation and survival rates per hormone receptor (HR) subtype. Patients and methods We included 493 systemically treated patients consecutively diagnosed with HER2 + ABC in 2008–2017 from the SOutheast Netherlands Advanced BREast cancer (SONABRE) Registry. Median OS was obtained using the Kaplan–Meier method and differences between periods (2008–2012 versus 2013–2017) were tested using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. The 3-year implementation rates were estimated for any HER2-targeted therapy, pertuzumab, and T-DM1 by using the competing risk method and calculated from the date of diagnosis of ABC to start of HER2-targeted therapy of interest. Results The median OS in 2008–2012 versus 2013–2017 was 28.3 versus 39.7 months in all patients (adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 0.85, 95%CI 0.66–1.08), 29.9 versus 36.3 months in patients with HR + /HER2 + disease (adjHR 0.97, 95%CI 0.72–1.32), and 22.7 versus 40.9 months in patients with HR-/HER2 + disease (adjHR 0.59, 95%CI 0.38–0.92). Any HER2-targeted therapy was used in 79% of patients in 2008–2012 and in 84% in 2013–2017. The use of pertuzumab and T-DM1 in 2013–2017 was 48% and 29%, respectively. For patients diagnosed with HR + /HER2 + and HR-/HER2 + disease, implementation rates in 2013–2017 were , respectively, 77% and 99% for any HER2-targeted therapy, 38% and 69% for pertuzumab, and 24% and 40% for T-DM1. Conclusion The survival of patients with HER2 + ABC improved since the introduction of pertuzumab and T-DM1. There is room for improvement in implementation of these HER2-targeted therapies, especially in patients with HR + /HER2 + disease. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-021-06178-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khava I E Ibragimova
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra M E Geurts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander Croes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Erdkamp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Joan B Heijns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Jolien Tol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit E P J Vriens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marcus W Dercksen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Manon J A E Pepels
- Department of Internal Medicine, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Dominique J P Tilli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ingeborg J H Vriens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Im SA, Cardoso F, Cortes J, Curigliano G, Pegram MD, Rugo HS, Brown-Glaberman U, Yardley DA, Kim SB, de Boer M, Nowecki Z, Glavicic V, Wolf I, Claes N, Sohn JH, Bachelot T, Kaufman PA, Baughman J, Hong S, Jacobs K, Rock E, Gradishar WJ. Abstract PS10-12: Integrated safety summary of single agent and combination margetuximab in phase 1, 2, and 3 studies of HER2-positive advanced cancers and metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ps10-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Margetuximab (M) is an investigational Fc-engineered anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody that targets the same epitope as trastuzumab (T). Compared with T, M has higher affinity for both the 158V (high-binding) and 158F (low-binding) allotypes of the activating Fc receptor CD16A. M enhances innate immunity more effectively than T in vitro, including CD16A-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Samples collected from patients (pts) before and after single-agent treatment also demonstrate that M induces HER2-specific adaptive immune responses, including both T- and B-cell responses. The SOPHIA trial (NCT02492711) in pts with pretreated HER2+ MBC showed that M+chemotherapy (chemo) improved progression-free survival vs T+chemo, with comparable safety. A pooled analysis of M safety across 3 clinical trials is presented. Methods Study 01 (NCT01148849), an ongoing Phase 1 dose-finding/safety study of M monotherapy, enrolled 66 pts with advanced HER2+ carcinomas, including 27 with MBC. Study 02 (NCT01828021), a completed Phase 2 study of M monotherapy in low-expressing HER2+ MBC, enrolled 25 pts. Study 04 (NCT02492711), an ongoing Phase 3 study in pts with pretreated HER2+ MBC to compare M + chemo vs T + chemo, randomized 536 pts, of whom 264 and 265 received M and T, respectively. The pooled safety population includes all pts who received any M in Study 01 (cutoff 01Oct2015), Study 02 (cutoff 02Aug2017), and Study 04 (cutoff 10OCT2018). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), defined as AEs that began or worsened in severity on or after first dose of study drug through an End of Treatment Visit or 28 days after last study treatment, are reported. Results Of 355 pts that received at least 1 dose of M, 295 received 15 mg/kg Q3W, and 60 received other doses from 0.1 - 18 mg/kg. Median (mean, range) number of cycles for all dose levels was 5.0 (6.6, 1-43), higher on Study 04 (6.0) than Study 01 (1-3 across dose groups) or Study 02 (2.0). Most pts (347 [97.7%]) experienced at least 1 AE, and about half (173 [48.7%]) had at least 1 Grade >/= 3 AE. Serious AE (SAE) incidence across studies was low (58 [16.3%]), and 21 pts (5.9%) discontinued M due to AEs. Most frequently reported AEs (>/= 20%) were fatigue (124 [34.9]), nausea (103 [29.0%]), diarrhea (75 [21.1%]), and neutropenia (75 [21.1%]). Blood/lymphatic system disorders were the most frequent events by SOC, and largely restricted to Study 04. Increased neutropenia on M (26.1%), relative to T (20.4%), was observed in Study 04 yet both febrile neutropenia (M 3.0%, T 4.5%) and infections (M 36.4%, T 39.6%) were higher on T. By contrast, Study 01 and Study 02 revealed no tendency of M monotherapy to cause neutropenia. Overall, infusion related reactions (IRRs) were observed in 51 pts (14.4%), primarly at first infusion, including serious IRRs in 5 (1.4%). Also, 34 pts (9.6%) had > 15% reduction in LVEF with a median time to > 15% reduction of 49 days. In all pts with complete follow-up, these LVEF reductions were asymptomatic and reversible. No M-induced cardiac conduction abnormalities were noted. In Study 04, similar proportions in both groups experienced AEs (M 97.7%, T 96.2%), including Grade >/= 3 AEs (M 52.3%, T 48.3%), SAEs (M 14.8%, T 17.4%), discontinuations due to AEs (M 3.0%, T 2.6%), and deaths due to AEs (M 0.8%, T 0.8%). As of the 23Feb2020 safety update, 2 pts remain on M in Study 01, after 116 and 109 cycles (6.7 and 6.3 years), respectively. In Study 04, 16 pts (6%) continued on M, and 7 (2.6%) remained on T. Discussion M has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile across Phase 1, 2, and 3 studies. It has been administered for over 6 years without long-term cumulative safety issues. Combined M plus chemotherapy Q3W demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability, similar to that for T plus chemotherapy Q3W in Study 04.
Citation Format: Seock-Ah Im, Fatima Cardoso, Javier Cortes, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mark D. Pegram, Hope S. Rugo, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Denise A. Yardley, Sung-Bae Kim, Maaike de Boer, Zbigniew Nowecki, Vesna Glavicic, Ido Wolf, Nele Claes, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Thomas Bachelot, Peter A. Kaufman, Jan Baughman, Shengyan Hong, Kenneth Jacobs, Edwin Rock, William J. Gradishar. Integrated safety summary of single agent and combination margetuximab in phase 1, 2, and 3 studies of HER2-positive advanced cancers and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seock-Ah Im
- 1Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- 2Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Javier Cortes
- 3IOB Institute of Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Madrid & Barcelona; Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- 4University of Milano, European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Division of Early Drug Development, Milan, Italy
| | - Mark D. Pegram
- 5Stanford Women’s Cancer Center, Breast Cancer Oncology Program, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- 6University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Denise A. Yardley
- 8Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Maaike de Boer
- 10Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Vesna Glavicic
- 12Department of Oncology, Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Ido Wolf
- 13Oncology Division, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nele Claes
- 14Oncological Day Hospital, AZ Sint-Jan AV Hospital, Brugge, Belgium
| | - Joo Hyuk Sohn
- 15Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pouwels XGLV, Ramaekers BLT, Geurts SME, Erdkamp F, Vriens BEPJ, Aaldering KNA, van de Wouw AJ, Dercksen MW, Smilde TJ, Peters NAJB, van Riel JMGH, Pepels MJ, Heijnen-Mommers J, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, de Boer M, Joore MA. An economic evaluation of eribulin for advanced breast cancer treatment based on the Southeast Netherlands advanced breast cancer registry. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1123-1130. [PMID: 32544366 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1775289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: In 2013, eribulin was reimbursed under a coverage with evidence development (CED) as third or later chemotherapy line for advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients in the Netherlands because of uncertain cost effectiveness. In 2016, the final decision of reimbursing eribulin was taken without considering the evidence collected during CED research. We analysed the cost effectiveness of eribulin versus non-eribulin chemotherapy, using real-world data.Methods: A three health states (progression-free, progressed disease, dead) partitioned survival model was developed. The SOuth East Netherlands Advanced BREast Cancer (SONABRE) registry informed the effectiveness and costs inputs. Health state utility values were obtained from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the eribulin and matched non-eribulin chemotherapy was estimated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were performed. The financial risk (i.e., the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) plus the expected monetary loss (eML) associated with reimbursing eribulin) and budget impact associated with reimbursing eribulin were calculated.Results: Eribulin led to higher health benefits (0.07 quality-adjusted life year (QALY)) and costs (€15,321) compared with non-eribulin chemotherapy. This resulted in an ICER of €220,608. At a €80,000 per QALY threshold, the risk of reimbursing eribulin was €9,791 per patient (EVPI €13, eML €9,778). Scaled up to the Dutch population, the estimated annual budget impact was €1.9 million and the annual risk of reimbursing eribulin was €2.7 million.Conclusion: From a Dutch societal perspective, eribulin is not cost effective when considering its list price as third and later chemotherapy line for ABC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier G. L. V. Pouwels
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L. T. Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra M. E. Geurts
- School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Erdkamp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - M. W. Dercksen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke J. Smilde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - J. M. G. H. van Riel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Manon J. Pepels
- Department of Internal Medicine, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | - Jose Heijnen-Mommers
- School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen
- School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A. Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Willemsen AECAB, Tol J, van Erp NP, Jonker MA, de Boer M, Meek B, de Jong PC, van Moorsel C, Gerritsen WR, Grutters JC, van Herpen CML. Prospective Study of Drug-induced Interstitial Lung Disease in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Everolimus Plus Exemestane. Target Oncol 2020; 14:441-451. [PMID: 31325105 PMCID: PMC6684805 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-019-00656-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Everolimus-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) (also: pneumonitis) poses a difficulty for physicians, as it is hard to discriminate ILD from other causes of respiratory symptoms and to decide on safe treatment continuation. OBJECTIVE We investigated the capability of pulmonary function tests (PFT), plasma biomarkers, everolimus pharmacokinetics, and FDG-PET to discriminate between everolimus-related ILD and other causes of respiratory problems and to predict the severity of ILD. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women starting treatment with everolimus plus exemestane for advanced breast cancer were included. At baseline and during the first 3 months, respiratory symptoms, PFT with diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide corrected for hemoglobin (DLCOc) and forced vital capacity, serum plasma biomarkers (including SP-D and YKL-40), everolimus trough concentration, and 18F-FDG-PET were prospectively recorded. RESULTS Twenty-seven (out of 29 included) patients were evaluable for analysis. Fifteen patients (56%) developed everolimus-related respiratory signs or symptoms and four patients (15%) needed everolimus discontinuation and received corticosteroids. Change in DLCOc differentiated ILD from alternative diagnoses with 0.91 sensitivity and 0.78 specificity. Decrease in DLCOc (non-significant) was greatest in patients who needed everolimus discontinuation. Serum SP-D and YKL-40 could differentiate ILD from alternative diagnoses with 0.83 and 0.83 sensitivity, and 0.85 and 0.62 specificity, respectively. 18F-FDG-PET abnormalities did not precede clinical symptoms. No relationship between ILD and everolimus trough concentration was found. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that everolimus-related ILD occurs frequently. Prospective monitoring of DLCOc in combination with measurement of serum SP-D and YKL-40 appear useful to discriminate ILD from other causes of respiratory symptoms. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01978171.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelieke E C A B Willemsen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, route 452, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jolien Tol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, P.O. Box 90153, 5200 ME, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Nielka P van Erp
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne A Jonker
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bob Meek
- Department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital, Centre of Interstitial Lung Diseases, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Paul C de Jong
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Coline van Moorsel
- Department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital, Centre of Interstitial Lung Diseases, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Division Heart & Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Winald R Gerritsen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, route 452, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan C Grutters
- Department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital, Centre of Interstitial Lung Diseases, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Division Heart & Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla M L van Herpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud university medical center, route 452, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vriens IJH, Ter Welle-Butalid EM, de Boer M, de Die-Smulders CEM, Derhaag JG, Geurts SME, van Hellemond IEG, Luiten EJT, Dercksen MW, Lemaire BMD, van Haaren ERM, Vriens BEPJ, van de Wouw AJ, van Riel AMMGH, Janssen-Engelen SLE, van de Poel MHW, Schepers-van der Sterren EEM, van Golde RJT, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Preserving fertility in young women undergoing chemotherapy for early breast cancer; the Maastricht experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 181:77-86. [PMID: 32236826 PMCID: PMC7182539 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05598-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We assessed the uptake of fertility preservation (FP), recovery of ovarian function (OFR) after chemotherapy, live birth after breast cancer, and breast cancer outcomes in women with early-stage breast cancer. Methods Women aged below 41 years and referred to our center for FP counseling between 2008 and 2015 were included. Data on patient and tumor characteristics, ovarian function, cryopreservation (embryo/oocyte) and transfer, live birth, and disease-free survival were collected. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed for time-to-event analyses including competing risk analyses, and patients with versus without FP were compared using the logrank test. Results Of 118 counseled women with a median age of 31 years (range 19–40), 34 (29%) chose FP. Women who chose FP had less often children, more often a male partner and more often favorable tumor characteristics. The 5-year OFR rate was 92% for the total group of counseled patients. In total, 26 women gave birth. The 5-year live birth rate was 27% for the total group of counseled patients. Only three women applied for transfer of their cryopreserved embryo(s), in two combined with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) because of BRCA1-mutation carrier ship. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 91% versus 88%, for patients with versus without FP (P = 0.42). Conclusions Remarkably, most women achieved OFR, probably related to the young age at diagnosis. Most pregnancies occurred spontaneously, two of three women applied for embryo transfer because of the opportunity to apply for PGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingeborg J H Vriens
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Elena M Ter Welle-Butalid
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christine E M de Die-Smulders
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Josien G Derhaag
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra M E Geurts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Irene E G van Hellemond
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Wouter Dercksen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Bea M D Lemaire
- Department of Surgery, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | - Els R M van Haaren
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit E P J Vriens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes J van de Wouw
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Ron J T van Golde
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Hellemond IEG, Smorenburg CH, Peer PGM, Swinkels ACP, Seynaeve CM, van der Sangen MJC, Kroep JR, de Graaf H, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FLG, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, de Roos WK, Linn SC, Imholz ALT, de Boer M, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Breast cancer outcome in relation to bone mineral density and bisphosphonate use: a sub-study of the DATA trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 180:675-685. [PMID: 32124136 PMCID: PMC7103013 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05567-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The phase III DATA study compared 6 and 3 years of adjuvant anastrozole following 2–3 years of tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. This pre-planned side-study assessed the relationship between a reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and evaluated the effect of bisphosphonates on DRFS. Methods We selected all patients with a BMD measurement within 3 years after randomisation (landmark) without any DRFS events. Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used for analyses. Results Of 1860 eligible patients, 1142 had a DEXA scan before the landmark. The BMD was normal in 436 (38.2%) and showed osteopenia in 565 (49.5%) and osteoporosis in 141 (12.3%) patients. After a median follow-up of 5.0 years from the landmark, neither osteopenia nor osteoporosis (compared with normal BMD) were associated with DRFS in both the 6-year [osteopenia HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.45–1.49), osteoporosis HR 1.10 (95% CI 0.26–4.67)] and the 3-year arm [osteopenia HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.40–1.42), osteoporosis HR 1.86 (95% CI 0.43–8.01)]. Moreover, bisphosphonate use did not impact DRFS. Conclusion No association was observed between a reduced BMD and DRFS. Neither did we observe an impact of bisphosphonates on DRFS. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05567-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene E G van Hellemond
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Petronella G M Peer
- Biostatistics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid C P Swinkels
- Clinical Research Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline M Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hiltje de Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Aafke H Honkoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Frans L G Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wilfred K de Roos
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Geurts SM, Ibragimova KIE, Erdkamp F, Vriens BEPJ, Dercksen MW, den Boer MO, Pepels MJAE, Tilli D, de Boer M, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Abstract P2-08-06: Initial systemic treatment choices by subtype of advanced breast cancer in 2007-2017, a study of the southeast Netherlands advanced breast cancer (SONABRE) registry. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p2-08-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to determine the subtype conversion rate and the initial systemic treatment choices by subtype for patients diagnosed with advanced breast cancer since 2007 who were included in the SONABRE Registry. Patients and methods Patients diagnosed with advanced breast cancer in 2007-2017 in six (one academic, three teaching, two non-teaching) hospitals in the Netherlands were selected from the ongoing SOutheast Netherlands Advanced BREast Cancer (SONABRE) Registry (NCT-03577197). We registered patient, primary tumor, recurrent and metastatic disease characteristics, and (neo-)adjuvant and palliative treatment choices. Follow-up was collected until September 2018. To determine the subtype, we assessed the hormone receptor (HR) and the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 status from the initial metastatic site(s). If not available, biopsy results from the locoregional recurrence or the primary breast cancer were used. Initial systemic treatment choices were presented by subtype (HR+/HER2-, HER2+, and triple negative (TN) disease). In this abstract, we present the findings for the period 2007-2017, at the SABCS 2019, we will present the results for the period 2007-2018. Results Of the 2288 patients included, 67% had HR+/HER2-, 16% HER2+, 15% TN disease and 2% of patients had unknown subtype. The HR and HER2 status were based on pathology of the metastasis in 48% and 40% of patients, respectively. In 41% and 25% of patients, the HR and HER2 status was determined for both the primary tumor and the initial metastatic sites. Of these latter patients, HR status changed from HR+ to HR- in 10% of patients and from HR- to HR+ in 2% of patients. HER2 status changed from HER2+ to HER2- in 6% of patients and from HER2- to HER2+ in 4% of patients. Among patients with HR+/HER2- disease, 78% received endocrine-based and 17% received chemotherapy-based therapy as initial systemic therapy, and 5% of patients deceased without receiving any systemic therapy. For patients with HER2+ disease, 57% received HER2-targeted based therapy as initial systemic treatment, 22% received endocrine monotherapy, 8% received chemotherapy alone and 13% deceased without receiving systemic therapy. In patients with TN disease, 71% received chemotherapy as initial systemic treatment, 4% received endocrine therapy and 25% received no systemic therapy. Overall, 6% of patients received initial systemic therapy as part of a clinical trial. Conclusions For only half of the patients, HR and HER2 receptor status of the metastasis were determined at initiation of initial systemic therapy. Since one in ten tested patients showed a conversion of subtype, and thus impacting treatment decisions, it is important to reassess subtype upon diagnosis of metastatic disease whenever possible. With a few exceptions, initial systemic treatment choices were in line with guideline recommendations. Only 6% of patients were treated as part of a clinical trial, confirming the highly selected patient population included in these trials, highlighting the importance of real life studies to evaluate the outcomes of systemic treatment for advanced breast cancer.
Citation Format: Sandra M.E. Geurts, Khava IE Ibragimova, Frans Erdkamp, Birgit EPJ Vriens, M. Wouter Dercksen, Marien O den Boer, Manon JAE Pepels, Dominique Tilli, Maaike de Boer, Vivianne CG Tjan-Heijnen. Initial systemic treatment choices by subtype of advanced breast cancer in 2007-2017, a study of the southeast Netherlands advanced breast cancer (SONABRE) registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Frans Erdkamp
- 2Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Dominique Tilli
- 1Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- 1Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
van Hellemond IEG, Smorenburg CH, Peer PGM, Swinkels ACP, Seynaeve CM, van der Sangen MJC, Kroep JR, de Graaf H, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FLG, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, de Boer M, de Roos WK, Linn SC, Imholz ALT, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Assessment and management of bone health in women with early breast cancer receiving endocrine treatment in the DATA study. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:1325-1333. [PMID: 30748011 PMCID: PMC6767695 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The phase III DATA study investigates the efficacy of adjuvant anastrozole (6 vs. 3 year) in postmenopausal women with breast cancer previously treated with 2–3 years of tamoxifen. This planned side‐study assessed patterns of care regarding detection and treatment of osteopenia/osteoporosis, and trends in bone mineral density (BMD) during and after therapy. We registered all BMD measurements and bisphosphonate‐use. Time to osteopenia/osteoporosis was analysed by Kaplan Meier methodology. For the trend in T‐scores we used linear mixed models with random patients effects. Of 1860 eligible DATA patients, 910 (48.9%) had a baseline BMD measurement. Among patients with a normal baseline BMD (n = 417), osteopenia was observed in 53.5% and 55.4% in the 6‐ and 3‐year group respectively (p = 0.18), during follow‐up. Only two patients (3‐year group) developed osteoporosis. Of the patients with osteopenia at baseline (n = 408), 24.4% and 20.4% developed osteoporosis respectively (p = 0.89). Three years after randomisation 18.3% and 18.2% used bisphosphonates in the 6‐ and 3‐year groups respectively and 6 years after randomisation this was 23.7% and 20.9% respectively (p = 0.90) of which the majority used oral bisphosphonates. The yearly mean BMD‐change during anastrozole in the lumbar spine showed a T‐score decline of 0.075. After bisphosphonate addition the decline became less prominent (0.047 (p < 0.001)) and after anastrozole cessation, while continuing bisphosphonates, the mean BMD yearly increased (0.047 (p < 0.001)). In conclusion, extended anastrozole therapy was not associated with a higher incidence of osteoporosis. Anastrozole‐use was associated with a BMD decrease; however, the decline was modest and partially reversible after anastrozole cessation. What's new? Loss of bone mineral density (BMD) is a side effect of aromatase inhibitor treatment, a class of drugs that stops estrogen production in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Here the authors examined BMD loss during and after extended adjuvant endocrine therapy, following a 2‐3 year treatment with tamoxifen, subsequent aromatase inhibitor treatment was associated with BMD decrease, but the decline was modest and partially reversible after treatment cessation. The authors concluded that extended endocrine therapy was not associated with a higher incidence of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene E G van Hellemond
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Petronella G M Peer
- Biostatistics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid C P Swinkels
- Clinical research department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation IKNL, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline M Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hiltje de Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Aafke H Honkoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Frans L G Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wilfred K de Roos
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Hellemond IEG, Vriens IJH, Peer PGM, Swinkels ACP, Smorenburg CH, Seynaeve CM, van der Sangen MJC, Kroep JR, de Graaf H, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FLG, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Kitzen JJEM, de Boer M, de Roos WK, Linn SC, Imholz ALT, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Ovarian Function Recovery During Anastrozole in Breast Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Function Failure. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 109:3858846. [PMID: 29546343 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are given as adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women, also to those with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure. The current analysis reports on endocrine data of patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure who were included in the phase III DATA study assessing different durations of adjuvant anastrozole after tamoxifen. Methods We identified all patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure. Women who underwent a bilateral ovariectomy or used luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists before random assignment were excluded. Plasma estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were monitored until 30 months after random assignment at local laboratories. We aimed to determine the ovarian function recovery (OFR) rate during AI use by the cumulative incidence competing risk method and analyzed the trend of estradiol levels during AI use by a nested case-control approach in which a subset of control subjects were compared with the OFR patients excluding the value at OFR diagnosis. Results The 329 eligible patients had a median age of 50.0 years (range = 45-57 years) at random assignment. Thirty-nine patients developed OFR, corresponding with a 30-month recovery rate of 12.4%. Of these, 11 (28.2%) were age 50 years or older at AI initiation. The estradiol level decreased statistically significantly by 37.8% (95% CI = 27.4% to 46.7%) over the initial 30 months of AI treatment in both groups. However, the estradiol levels in the women who experienced OFR remained statistically significantly higher (difference = 20.6%, 95% CI = 2.0% to 42.7%) prior to OFR diagnosis compared with those who did not experience OFR. Conclusions The risk of OFR during AI treatment in breast cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure is relevant, even beyond 45 years. Furthermore, women experiencing OFR had statistically significant higher estradiol levels during AI treatment (before OFR) than those without, with potential consequences regarding efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene E G van Hellemond
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ingeborg J H Vriens
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Petronella G M Peer
- Biostatistics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid C P Swinkels
- Clinical Research Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation IKNL, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Caroline M Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hiltje de Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Aafke H Honkoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Frans L G Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jos J E M Kitzen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wïlfred K de Roos
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
van Hellemond IEG, Vriens IJH, Peer PGM, Swinkels ACP, Smorenburg CH, Seynaeve CM, van der Sangen MJC, Kroep JR, de Graaf H, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FLG, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, de Boer M, de Roos WK, Linn SC, Imholz ALT, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Efficacy of anastrozole after tamoxifen in early breast cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:274-283. [PMID: 30588619 PMCID: PMC6590217 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Revised: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The DATA study (NCT00301457) compared 6 and 3 years of anastrozole in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer after 2-3 years of tamoxifen. Patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure (CIOFF) were also eligible, but could be at risk of ovarian function recovery (OFR). The current analysis compared the survival of women with CIOFF with definitely postmenopausal women and examined the influence of OFR on survival. Therefore, we selected patients from the DATA study aged 45-57 years at randomization who had received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. They were classified by reversibility of postmenopausal status: possibly reversible in case of CIOFF (n = 395) versus definitely postmenopausal (n = 261). The former were monitored by E2 measurements for OFR. The occurrence of OFR was incorporated as a time-dependent covariate in a Cox-regression model for calculating the hazard ratio (HR). We used the landmark method to calculate residual 5-year survival rates. When comparing CIOFF women with definitely postmenopausal women, the survival was not different. Among CIOFF women with available E2 follow-up values (n = 329), experiencing OFR (n = 39) had an unfavorable impact on distant recurrence-free survival (HR 2.27 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-5.25; p = 0.05] and overall survival (HR 2.61 [95% CI 1.11-6.13; p = 0.03]). After adjusting for tumor features, the HRs became 2.11 (95% CI 0.89-5.02; p = 0.09) and 2.24 (95% CI 0.92-5.45; p = 0.07), respectively. The residual 5-year rate for distant recurrence-free survival was 76.9% for women with OFR and 92.1% for women without OFR, and for 5-year overall survival 80.8% and 94.4%, respectively. Women with CIOFF receiving anastrozole may be at increased risk of disease recurrence if experiencing OFR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene E G van Hellemond
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ingeborg J H Vriens
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Petronella G M Peer
- Biostatistics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid C P Swinkels
- Clinical Research Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Caroline M Seynaeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hiltje de Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Aafke H Honkoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Frans L G Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wilfred K de Roos
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vriens BEPJ, Keymeulen KBMI, Kroep JR, Charehbili A, Peer PG, de Boer M, Aarts MJB, Heuts EM, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Axillary staging in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in two Dutch phase III studies. Oncotarget 2018; 8:46557-46564. [PMID: 28177921 PMCID: PMC5542292 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary aim of our study was to assess the impact of timing of sentinel node procedure, pre- versus post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, on final pathologic node-negative rate (pN0) in patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer. Secondary endpoint was the usability of the sentinel node procedure in patients with clinically node-positive disease that converted to cN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were enrolled in two sequentially conducted Dutch phase III trials, studying the impact of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy schedules and use of zoledronic acid on complete pathologic response rate. For the present analyses, patients were excluded if they had not undergone surgical axillary staging. RESULTS In total 439 patients were included, of whom 230 (52%) had pre-treatment cN0. In this group, pN0 status was seen in 58% (N = 23) of patients with a sentinel node biopsy post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to 51% (N = 83) pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including the axillary lymph node dissection whenever performed. In multivariable analysis, timing of sentinel node procedure (pre- versus post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy) was, however, not significantly associated with final pN0/pN0(i+) status, with an odds ratio of 1.18 (95% CI 0.64 - 2.18) after correction for age, clinical tumor status, histology, grade, hormone- and HER2 receptor. Of patients with clinically node-positive disease only 15% had a final pN0 status, with a false-negative rate of the sentinel node of 30%. CONCLUSION In breast cancer patients with cN0 disease, sentinel node procedure performed post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy led to nodal down staging, although not statistically significant after multivariate correction for patient and tumor characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit E P J Vriens
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kristien B M I Keymeulen
- Department of Surgery, GROW-school for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ayoub Charehbili
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella G Peer
- Biostatistics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M Heuts
- Department of Surgery, GROW-school for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vriens IJH, De Bie AJR, Aarts MJB, de Boer M, van Hellemond IEG, Roijen JHE, van Golde RJT, Voogd AC, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. The correlation of age with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure in breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 2017; 8:11372-11379. [PMID: 28076330 PMCID: PMC5355271 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the incidence of chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure (COFF) based on estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) monitoring in premenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer treated with second and third generation (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS We identified 115 eligible women. Two years after start of chemotherapy, COFF was significantly more often present in women ≥ 40 years (85.6%) as compared to women < 40 years (8.7%). Only age was significantly associated with COFF two years after start of chemotherapy (HR 12.26; 95% CI 5.21-28.86). In 50% of the patients, premenopausal hormone levels were the first or only evidence of ovarian function recovery (OFR). MATERIALS AND METHODS We included all premenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, with or without taxanes, in our university hospital in the Netherlands in the years 2005-2013. Patients were 3-monthly monitored for ovarian function. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the predictive impact of various parameters on the occurrence of COFF. CONCLUSIONS After second- or third generation (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy, COFF was still present in 8.7% of patients < 40 years after two years. FSH and estradiol monitoring may be relevant for those in whom ovarian function suppression is considered an additional effective endocrine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingeborg J H Vriens
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ashley J R De Bie
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Irene E G van Hellemond
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce H E Roijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ron J T van Golde
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Aarts MJ, Vriens BE, de Boer M, Peters FP, Mandigers CM, Dercksen MW, Stouthard JM, Tol J, van Warmerdam LJ, van de Wouw AJ, Jacobs EM, van der Rijt CCD, Smilde TJ, van der Velden AW, Peer N, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Neutrophil Recovery in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Docetaxel-Containing Chemotherapy with and without Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Prophylaxis. Oncology 2017; 93:323-328. [PMID: 28848182 DOI: 10.1159/000479067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary outcome of the current study is, whether there is a protective effect of prior chemotherapy or of prior granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the next cycle blood cell counts. METHODS Hematologic toxicity was evaluated, based on a randomized phase III study in breast cancer patients (n = 167) with >20% risk of febrile neutropenia. The primary endpoint was the nadir blood cell counts for patients treated with G-CSF given during all 6 chemotherapy cycles or limited to the first 2 chemotherapy cycles only. RESULTS For the present analyses, 47 patients were eligible. In the G-CSF 1-6 arm, the median white blood cell count (WBC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir slowly decreased from 10.8 × 109/L in cycle 1 to 7.5 × 109/L in cycle 6 and from 7.1 × 109/L to 5.5 × 109/L, respectively. The median WBC nadir in the G-CSF 1-2 arm decreased from 1.2 × 109/L in cycle 3 to 0.9 × 109/L in cycle 6 and the ANC nadir showed a grade 4 neutropenia of 0.1 × 109/L in cycles 3-6. All patients had ANC recovery to normal levels (≥1.5 × 109/L) without delay on day 1 of the next cycle. CONCLUSION We conclude that there is no protective effect of prior G-CSF or prior chemotherapy use on nadir blood cell counts in subsequent cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen J Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
van Nijnatten TJ, Simons JM, Smidt ML, van der Pol CC, van Diest PJ, Jager A, van Klaveren D, Kam BL, Lobbes MB, de Boer M, Verhoef K, Koppert LB, Luiten EJ. A Novel Less-invasive Approach for Axillary Staging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Axillary Node-positive Breast Cancer by Combining Radioactive Iodine Seed Localization in the Axilla With the Sentinel Node Procedure (RISAS): A Dutch Prospective Multicenter Validation Study. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 17:399-402. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Revised: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
26
|
Goorts B, van Nijnatten TJA, de Munck L, Moossdorff M, Heuts EM, de Boer M, Lobbes MBI, Smidt ML. Clinical tumor stage is the most important predictor of pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 163:83-91. [PMID: 28205044 PMCID: PMC5387027 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4155-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathological complete response (pCR) is the ultimate response in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). It might be a surrogate outcome for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). We studied the effect of clinical tumor stage (cT-stage) on tumor pCR and the effect of pCR per cT-stage on 5-year OS and DFS. METHODS Using the Netherlands Cancer Registry, all primary invasive breast cancer patients treated with NCT from 2005 until 2008 were identified. Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of cT-stage on pCR, stepwise logistic regression analysis to correct for potential confounders and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses to calculate OS and DFS after five years. RESULTS In 2366 patients, overall pCR rate was 21%. For cT1, cT2, cT3, and cT4, pCR rates were 31, 22, 18, and 17%, respectively. Lower cT-stage (cT1-2 vs cT3-4) was a significant independent predictor of higher pCR rate (p < 0.001, OR 3.15). Furthermore, positive HER2 status (p < 0.001, OR 2.30), negative estrogen receptor status (p = 0.062, OR 1.69), and negative progesterone receptor status (p = 0.008, OR 2.27) were independent predictors of pCR. OS and DFS were up to 20% higher in patients with cT2-4 tumors with pCR versus patients without pCR. DFS was also higher for cT1 tumors with pCR. CONCLUSIONS The most important predictor of pCR in breast cancer patients is cT-stage: lower cT-stages have significantly higher pCR rates than higher cT-stages. Patients with cT2-4 tumors achieving pCR have higher OS and DFS compared to patients not achieving pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briete Goorts
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Thiemo J A van Nijnatten
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda de Munck
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martine Moossdorff
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M Heuts
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
van Abbema D, van Vuuren A, van den Berkmortel F, van den Akker M, Deckx L, Buntinx F, van Kampen R, Lambooij E, de Boer M, de Vos-Geelen J, Tjan-Heijnen VC. Functional status decline in older patients with breast and colorectal cancer after cancer treatment: A prospective cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol 2017; 8:176-184. [PMID: 28159513 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Revised: 12/17/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study was to disentangle the impact of age and that of cancer diagnosis and treatment on functional status (FS) decline in older patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with breast and colorectal cancer aged 50-69years and aged ≥70years who had undergone surgery, and older patients without cancer aged ≥70years were included. FS was assessed at baseline and after 12months follow-up, using the Katz index for activities of daily living (ADL) and the Lawton scale for instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). FS decline was defined as ≥1 point decrease on the ADL or IADL scale from baseline to 12months follow-up. RESULTS In total, 179 older patients with cancer (≥ 70years), 341 younger patients with cancer (50-69years) and 317 older patients without cancer (≥ 70years) were included. FS decline was found in 43.6%, 24.6% and 28.1% of the groups, respectively. FS decline was significantly worse in older compared to younger patients with cancer receiving no chemotherapy (44.5% versus 17.6%, p<0.001), but not for those who did receive chemotherapy (39.4% versus 30.8%, p=0.33). Among the patients with cancer, FS decline was significantly associated with older age (OR 2.63), female sex (OR 3.72), colorectal cancer (OR 2.81), polypharmacy (OR 2.10) and, inversely, with baseline ADL dependency (OR 0.44). CONCLUSION Cancer treatment, and older age are important predictors of FS decline. The relation of baseline ADL dependency and chemotherapy with FS decline suggest that the fittest of the older patients with cancer were selected for chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris van Abbema
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Arnée van Vuuren
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC Heerlen-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Franchette van den Berkmortel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC Heerlen-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan van den Akker
- Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Peter Debyelaan 1, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, PB 7001 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laura Deckx
- Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, PB 7001 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Frank Buntinx
- Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Peter Debyelaan 1, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, PB 7001 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roel van Kampen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC Heerlen-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Els Lambooij
- Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Center, De Run 4600, 5504, DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
van Roozendaal LM, Smit LHM, Duijsens GHNM, de Vries B, Siesling S, Lobbes MBI, de Boer M, de Wilt JHW, Smidt ML. Risk of regional recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer patients: a Dutch cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 156:465-472. [PMID: 27013474 PMCID: PMC4837212 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3757-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer is associated with early recurrence and low survival rates. Several trials investigate the safety of a more conservative approach of axillary treatment in clinically T1-2N0 breast cancer. Triple-negative breast cancer comprises only 15 % of newly diagnosed breast cancers, which might result in insufficient power for representative results for this subgroup. We aimed to provide a nationwide overview on the occurrence of (regional) recurrences in triple-negative breast cancer patients with a clinically T1-2N0 status. For this cohort study, 2548 women diagnosed between 2005 and 2008 with clinically T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Follow-up data until 2014 were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 2486 patients, and (completion) axillary lymph node dissection in 562 patients. Final pathologic nodal status was pN0 in 78.5 %, pN1mi in 4.5 %, pN1 in 12.3 %, pN2–3 in 3.6 %, and pNx in 1.1 %. During a follow-up of 5 years, regional recurrence occurred in 2.9 %, local recurrence in 4.2 % and distant recurrence in 12.2 %. Five-year disease-free survival was 78.7 %, distant disease-free survival 80.5 %, and 5-year overall survival 82.3 %. Triple-negative clinically T1-2N0 breast cancer patients rarely develop a regional recurrence. Their disease-free survival is more threatened by distant recurrence, affecting their overall survival. Consequently, it seems justified to include triple-negative breast cancer patients in randomized controlled trials investigating the safety of minimizing axillary staging and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori M van Roozendaal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Leonie H M Smit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gaston H N M Duijsens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart de Vries
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Registration and Research, Comprehensive Cancer Organisation the Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA Institute for Technical Medicine and Biomedical Technology, University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Devision of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Seferina SC, de Boer M, Derksen MW, van den Berkmortel F, van Kampen RJW, van de Wouw AJ, Joore M, Peer PGM, Voogd AC, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Cardiotoxicity and Cardiac Monitoring During Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Daily Dutch Practice: A Study of the Southeast Netherlands Breast Cancer Consortium. Oncologist 2016; 21:555-62. [PMID: 27009939 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2015] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We assessed the incidence and timing of first cardiac events, impact on trastuzumab prescription, and role of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) monitoring in daily practice of trastuzumab-treated patients with human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer. METHODS We included all patients with stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed in the early years (2005-2007) after the introduction of adjuvant trastuzumab in five hospitals in Southeast Netherlands. We studied the incidence and timing of cardiotoxicity in patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab, using similar cardiac endpoints as in the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. RESULTS Of 2,684 included patients, 476 (17.7%) had a HER2-positive tumor. Of these, 269 (56.9%) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, and of these, 230 (85.5%) also received trastuzumab. Cardiotoxicity was observed in 29 of 230 patients (12.6%). Twenty of the 230 patients (8.7%) had symptomatic cardiotoxicity, defined as a drop in LVEF of at least 10 percentage points and to below 50%, accompanied by symptoms of congestive heart failure. Trastuzumab was definitely discontinued because of supposed cardiotoxicity in 36 patients (15.6%), of whom only 15 (6.5%) had a significant LVEF drop. Of the 36 patients who prematurely discontinued trastuzumab (including the 29 in whom cardiotoxicity was observed), 84.8% stopped in the first 6 months. No cardiac deaths were seen. CONCLUSION In the first years after implementation of trastuzumab for treatment of early breast cancer, physicians frequently based their decision to discontinue treatment on patient symptoms apart from LVEF outcome. We suggest that focusing LVEF monitoring on the first 6 months might be more cost-effective without compromising patient safety. Nonetheless, further research is needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Knowledge of when cardiotoxicity occurs in daily practice will help shape the best follow-up method for cardiac monitoring in trastuzumab-treated patients with human epidermal growth receptor 2-positive early breast cancer. In the first years after implementation of trastuzumab for treatment of early breast cancer, physicians frequently based their decision to discontinue treatment on patient symptoms apart from left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) outcome. When cardiotoxicity was found in daily practice, it occurred mainly in the first 6 months after start of trastuzumab. This study suggests that focusing LVEF monitoring on the first 6 months might be more cost-effective without compromising patient safety. This insight stresses the relevance of performing real-world analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanly C Seferina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M Wouter Derksen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Roel J W van Kampen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Agnès J van de Wouw
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela Joore
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella G M Peer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands Radboud Institute for Health Science, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vriens BEPJ, de Vries B, Lobbes MBI, van Gastel SM, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Smilde TJ, van Warmerdam LJC, de Boer M, van Spronsen DJ, Smidt ML, Peer PGM, Aarts MJ, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Ultrasound is at least as good as magnetic resonance imaging in predicting tumour size post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2015; 52:67-76. [PMID: 26650831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Revised: 08/30/2015] [Accepted: 10/15/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of clinical imaging of the primary breast tumour post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) related to the post-neoadjuvant histological tumour size (gold standard) and whether this varies with breast cancer subtype. In this study, results of both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) were reported. METHODS Patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled in the INTENS study between 2006 and 2009. We included 182 patients, of whom data were available for post-NAC MRI (n=155), US (n=123), and histopathological tumour size. RESULTS MRI estimated residual tumour size with <10-mm discordance in 54% of patients, overestimated size in 28% and underestimated size in 18% of patients. With US, this was 63%, 20% and 17%, respectively. The negative predictive value in hormone receptor-positive tumours for both MRI and US was low, 26% and 33%, respectively. The median deviation in clinical tumour size as percentage of pathological tumour was 63% (P25=26, P75=100) and 49% (P25=22, P75=100) for MRI and US, respectively (P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS In this study, US was at least as good as breast MRI in providing information on residual tumour size post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, both modalities suffered from a substantial percentage of over- and underestimation of tumour size and in addition both showed a low negative predictive value of pathologic complete remission (Gov nr: NCT00314977).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit E P J Vriens
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart de Vries
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Tineke J Smilde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maaike de Boer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella G M Peer
- Biostatistics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen J Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Seferina SC, Lobbezoo DJA, de Boer M, Dercksen MW, van den Berkmortel F, van Kampen RJW, van de Wouw AJ, de Vries B, Joore MA, Peer PGM, Voogd AC, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Real-Life Use and Effectiveness of Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Early Breast Cancer Patients: A Study of the Southeast Netherlands Breast Cancer Consortium. Oncologist 2015; 20:856-63. [PMID: 26099745 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of drug prescriptions in real life as opposed to strict clinical trial prescription is only rarely assessed, although it is well recognized that incorrect use may harm patients and may have a significant impact on health care resources. We investigated the use and effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in daily practice compared with the effectiveness in clinical trials. METHODS We included all patients with stage I-III invasive breast cancer, irrespective of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, diagnosed in five hospitals in the southeast of The Netherlands in 2005-2007. We aimed to assess the actual use of adjuvant trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast and its efficacy in daily practice. RESULTS Of 2,684 patients included, 476 (17.7%) had a HER2-positive tumor. Of these, 251 (52.7%) patients had an indication for trastuzumab treatment of which 196 (78.1%) patients actually received it. Of the 225 patients without an indication, 34 (15.1%) received trastuzumab. Five-year disease-free survival was 80.7% for (n = 230) patients treated with versus 68.2% for (n = 246) patients not treated with trastuzumab (p = .0023), and 5-year overall survival rates were 90.7% and 77.4%, respectively (p = .0002). The hazard ratio for disease recurrence was 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.06) for trastuzumab when adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSION This study shows that in real life, patients treated with trastuzumab in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer had a 5-year disease-free and overall survival comparable to prior randomized trials. For informative decision making, real-life data are of additional value, providing insight on outcome of patients considered ineligible for treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanly C Seferina
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dorien J A Lobbezoo
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M Wouter Dercksen
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Franchette van den Berkmortel
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel J W van Kampen
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Agnès J van de Wouw
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart de Vries
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella G M Peer
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Pathology, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, and Epidemiology and GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Medical Centre Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands; Biostatistics, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tjan-Heijnen VC, Vriens IJ, Beijers AJ, Aarts MJ, de Boer M, Royen JH, van Golde RJ. Abstract P5-21-08: One-tenth of patients younger than 40 years develop a permanent chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure after receiving adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without taxanes. Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-p5-21-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To assess the incidence and predictors of (permanent) chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure (COFF) in premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.
Patients and methods
In our university hospital, patients with COFF and hormone-receptor positive breast cancer are monitored for ovarian function recovery by 3-monthly FSH and estradiol blood levels (serum estradiol is measured by direct immunoassay). In this present study, we collected data from the medical records of all premenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, with or without the addition of taxanes, who were diagnosed in the years 2005-2012. To meet the definition of COFF, the amenorrhea and ovarian function suppression had to last ≥24 weeks since the last menstruation before or during chemotherapy. Patients with hormone-receptor negative breast cancer were excluded.
Results
We identified 135 eligible women. Initial oral hormonal therapy consisted of tamoxifen (n= 116) or aromatase inhibitors (AI, n=16, of whom 1 patient younger than 40 years). Median follow-up of the included patients was 25 months (range 3-69 months). The majority of women was older than 40 years (80%). Permanent or temporary COFF was present in 95.6% of patients; that is, in 97.2% of patients of ≥ 40 years versus in 88.8% of patients < 40 years of age, which was not different between age-groups. However, permanent COFF was significantly more often present in women ≥ 40 years (75%) as compared with 11.1% of women < 40 years ( P < 0.03). Patients who developed a permanent COFF had a mean age of 47.4 (SD 3.9) years, whereas patients who developed a temporary COFF had a mean age of 38.0 (SD 6.5).
In 57% of the patients, premenopausal hormone levels were the first evidence of ovarian function recovery. The second-last FSH and estradiol values of patients who had an ovarian function recovery were still clearly in postmenopausal range (Figures will be shown at the meeting).
Conclusion
COFF is seen in 89% of patients < 40 years, but in the majority it was reversible. This is reassuring for those with a childwish. As in a significant proportion of patients FSH and estradiol values are the first sign of ovarian function recovery, close monitoring of ovarian function is required if ovarian function suppression is considered an additional effective hormonal treatment, and with respect to indication of non-hormonal contraceptive devices. We would not recommend AI as single hormonal treatment in young patients with COFF.
Citation Format: Vivianne C Tjan-Heijnen, Ingeborg J Vriens, Ashley J Beijers, Maureen J Aarts, Maaike de Boer, Joyce H Royen, Ron J van Golde. One-tenth of patients younger than 40 years develop a permanent chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure after receiving adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without taxanes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-08.
Collapse
|
33
|
Tjan-Heijnen VC, Vriens BE, Aarts MJ, Kroep JR, van de Velde CJ, Liefers GJ, Charehbili A, Peer PG, de Boer M. Abstract P2-01-03: Sentinel node procedure before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinically node negative or positive patients; results from 3 phase III studies of the Dutch breast cancer trialists' group (BOOG). Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-p2-01-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, the timing of the sentinel node (SN) procedure in patients with clinically node-negative disease (cN0) at diagnosis and the role of the SN procedure after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with initially clinical node-positive disease (cN+) still remains to be elucidated.
Methods
Between February 2006 and May 2012, 657 patients were enrolled in three clinical trials on neoadjuvant systemic therapy under the auspices of the Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG). In the INTENS and NEO-ZOTAC study, patients were treated with TAC or AC-T neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (doxorubicin (A), cyclophosphamide (C) and docetaxel (T)). In the TEAM IIa trial, patients were treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (exemestane for 6 months). Timing of the SN procedure in cN0 disease mainly depends on local policy and period of inclusion. We compared the pN0 rate after SN procedure performed before versus after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, in patients with cN0 disease at initial diagnosis. Further, we assessed the SN negative and the false-negative sentinel node rate in patients with initially cN+ breast cancer and conversion to cN0 when treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy. The false-negative rate was obtained by dividing the number of patients who were SN-negative but non-SN positive by the number of patients who had a positive SN or a positive non-SN.
Results
In total, 271 patients (n=93 INTENS, n=107 NEOZOTAC, n= 71 TEAM IIa) underwent a SN procedure (n=233 cN0; n=38 cN+). Of patients with cN0 breast cancer at diagnosis, 131 (56%) underwent the SN procedure before and 102 (44%) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, with ypN0(sn) or ypN0(i+)(sn) in 90/131 (69%) and 69/102 (68%) patients, respectively. Patients with initially cN+ disease who converted to cN0 disease after systemic therapy had a negative SN in 29% (11/38) of cases. The false-negative rate was 20% (6 of 30). More detailed analyses will be presented at the meeting.
Conclusion
To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing the impact of the timing of the sentinel procedure in patients with cN0 disease. We showed, that irrespective of the timing of the SN procedure - before or after neoadjuvant systemic therapy - in patients with cN0 breast cancer at diagnosis, two-third of patients had a negative sentinel node. In patients who converted after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from cN+ to cN0 the false negative sentinel node rate was 20%.
Citation Format: Vivianne C Tjan-Heijnen, Birgitte E Vriens, Maureen J Aarts, Judith R Kroep, Cock J van de Velde, Gerrit-Jan Liefers, Ayoub Charehbili, Petronella G Peer, Maaike de Boer. Sentinel node procedure before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinically node negative or positive patients; results from 3 phase III studies of the Dutch breast cancer trialists' group (BOOG) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-03.
Collapse
|
34
|
Willemsen AECAB, De Vos FY, Jansen A, de Boer M, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Herpen CML. Diagnostic challenges of respiratory adverse events during everolimus treatment. Target Oncol 2014; 9:287-91. [DOI: 10.1007/s11523-014-0310-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2013] [Accepted: 02/18/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
35
|
Vincent J, de Boer M, Lobbezoo DJA, Smeets REH, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. [Combination of exemestane and everolimus may produce toxic side effects: a new treatment option for metastatic hormone-sensitive breast cancer]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2014; 158:A7523. [PMID: 25115205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
The combination of exemestane and everolimus is a new treatment option for metastatic hormone-sensitive breast cancer. This treatment is used after progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors. The treatment is generally well tolerated, but sometimes leads to minor or even serious side effects. It is important to be aware of these side effects and to treat them. We describe two patients who had to cope with various forms of toxicity: a 73-year-old woman with aphthous mouth lesions and a 49-year-old woman with pneumonitis. We then discuss the efficacy of the combination exemestane and everolimus and its positioning in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Finally, some common and some potentially serious side effects will be discussed, along with recommendations for their management and indications for distinguishing side effects from disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen Vincent
- Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, afd. Medische oncologie, Maastricht
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lobbezoo DJA, van Kampen RJW, Voogd AC, Dercksen MW, van den Berkmortel F, Smilde TJ, van de Wouw AJ, Peters FPJ, van Riel JMGH, Peters NAJB, de Boer M, Borm GF, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer subtypes: the hormone receptor/HER2-positive subtype is associated with the most favorable outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 141:507-14. [PMID: 24104881 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2711-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2013] [Accepted: 09/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Contrary to the situation in early breast cancer, little is known about the prognostic relevance of the hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in metastatic breast cancer. The objectives of this study were to present survival estimates and to determine the prognostic impact of breast cancer subtypes based on HR and HER2 status in a recent cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients, which is representative of current clinical practice. Patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer between 2007 and 2009 were included. Information regarding patient and tumor characteristics and treatment was collected. Patients were categorized in four subtypes based on the HR and HER2 status of the primary tumor: HR positive (+)/HER2 negative (-), HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+ and triple negative (TN). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic impact of breast cancer subtype, adjusted for possible confounders. Median follow-up was 21.8 months for the 815 metastatic breast cancer patients included; 66 % of patients had the HR+/HER2- subtype, 8 % the HR-/HER2+ subtype, 15 % the TN subtype and 11 % the HR+/HER2+ subtype. The longest survival was observed for the HR+/HER2+ subtype (median 34.4 months), compared to 24.8 months for the HR+/HER2- subtype, 19.8 months for the HR-/HER2+ subtype and 8.8 months for the TN subtype (P < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, subtype was an independent prognostic factor, as were initial site of metastases and metastatic-free interval. The HR+/HER2+ subtype was associated with the longest survival after diagnosis of distant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorien J A Lobbezoo
- Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
van Diest PJ, de Boer M, van Deurzen CH, Tjan-Heijnen VC. Micrometastases and Isolated Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer Are Indeed Associated With Poorer Outcome. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:e140; author reply e141-2. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.26.7575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J. van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute for Growth and Development, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vivianne C.G. Tjan-Heijnen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute for Growth and Development, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Pepels MJ, de Boer M. Prognostic impact of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes of breast cancer patients. Breast Dis 2010; 31:107-113. [PMID: 21368373 DOI: 10.3233/bd-2010-0302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
With the introduction of the sentinel node (SN) procedure, the detection frequency of nodal isolated tumor cells and micrometastases has increased. We reviewed the literature on prognostic significance of these small nodal metastases. All studies before the SN era and all studies using the SN procedure that reported outcome in relation to presence of isolated tumor cells and/or micrometastases were included. Studies before the SN era were divided in 'cohort' and 'occult metastases' studies. The SN studies were divided in single-centre studies and in one multicentre cohort study. In the pre-SN cohort studies, axillary lymph node metastases of 2 mm or less were associated with reduced overall survival with an adjusted pooled hazard ratio of 1.44 (95%CI 1.29-1.62). In the pre-SN occult metastases studies, occult nodal metastases were associated with a pooled relative risk of deaths after 5 years of 1.45 (95%CI 1.11-1.88). In single-centre SN studies, using multivariate analyses, the presence of micrometastases was associated with a hazard ratio for disease events of 1.43 to 1.89 as compared to node-negative disease. The largest SN study, including nearly 2000 patients with isolated tumor cells or micrometastases, reported an adjusted hazard ratio for disease-events of 1.50 (95%CI 1.15-1.94) and 1.56 (95%CI 1.15-2.13), respectively, in patients who had not received systemic therapy. We conclude that isolated tumor cells and micrometastases are associated with increased risk of disease-events of about 1.5 compared to node-negative disease. Therefore, we recommend to consider the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Tjan-Heijnen VC, de Boer M. Minimal lymph node involvement and outcome of breast cancer. The results of the Dutch MIRROR study. Discov Med 2009; 8:137-139. [PMID: 19833061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Even when a breast cancer patient has only minimal lymph node involvement, additional therapy is needed. If women are not treated with adjuvant systemic therapy like chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy, disease-free survival is reduced by 10% at 5-year follow-up. These are the main results from the MIRROR study, a Dutch cohort study in which all hospitals from The Netherlands have participated. The results were recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine (de Boer, 2009). The study was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (945-06-509).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivianne C Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Limburg 6202AZ, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
de Boer M, van Deurzen CHM, van Dijck JAAM, Borm GF, van Diest PJ, Adang EMM, Nortier JWR, Rutgers EJT, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers MBE, Bult P, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Micrometastases or isolated tumor cells and the outcome of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:653-63. [PMID: 19675329 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa0904832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 384] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in regional lymph nodes with the clinical outcome of breast cancer is unclear. METHODS We identified all patients in The Netherlands who underwent a sentinel-node biopsy for breast cancer before 2006 and had breast cancer with favorable primary-tumor characteristics and isolated tumor cells or micrometastases in the regional lymph nodes. Patients with node-negative disease were randomly selected from the years 2000 and 2001. The primary end point was disease-free survival. RESULTS We identified 856 patients with node-negative disease who had not received systemic adjuvant therapy (the node-negative, no-adjuvant-therapy cohort), 856 patients with isolated tumor cells or micrometastases who had not received systemic adjuvant therapy (the node-positive, no-adjuvant-therapy cohort), and 995 patients with isolated tumor cells or micrometastases who had received such treatment (the node-positive, adjuvant-therapy cohort). The median follow-up was 5.1 years. The adjusted hazard ratio for disease events among patients with isolated tumor cells who did not receive systemic therapy, as compared with women with node-negative disease, was 1.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 1.94); among patients with micrometastases, the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.56 (95% CI, 1.15 to 2.13). Among patients with isolated tumor cells or micrometastases, the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.73) in the node-positive, adjuvant-therapy cohort, as compared with the node-positive, no-adjuvant-therapy cohort. CONCLUSIONS Isolated tumor cells or micrometastases in regional lymph nodes were associated with a reduced 5-year rate of disease-free survival among women with favorable early-stage breast cancer who did not receive adjuvant therapy. In patients with isolated tumor cells or micrometastases who received adjuvant therapy, disease-free survival was improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike de Boer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Deurzen CHM, de Boer M, Monninkhof EM, Bult P, van der Wall E, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Diest PJ. Non-sentinel lymph node metastases associated with isolated breast cancer cells in the sentinel node. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100:1574-80. [PMID: 19001602 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
There are many reports on the frequency of non-sentinel lymph node involvement when isolated tumor cells are found in the sentinel node, but results and recommendations for the use of an axillary lymph node dissection differ among studies. This systematic review was conducted to give an overview of this issue and to provide recommendations for the use of an axillary lymph node dissection in these patients. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases from January 1, 2002, through November 27, 2007, for articles on patients with invasive breast cancer who had isolated tumor cells in the sentinel lymph node (according to the sixth edition of the Cancer Staging Manual of the American Joint Committee on Cancer) and who also underwent axillary lymph node dissection. Of 411 selected articles, 29 (including 836 patients) were included in this review. These 29 studies were heterogeneous, reporting a wide range of non-sentinel lymph node involvement (defined as the presence of isolated tumor cells or micro- or macrometastases) associated with isolated tumor cells in the sentinel lymph node, with an overall pooled risk for such involvement of 12.3% (95% confidence interval = 9.5% to 15.7%). This pooled risk estimate was marginally higher than the risk of a false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy examination (ie, 7%-8%) but marginally lower than the risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with micrometastases (ie, approximately 20%) who are currently eligible for an axillary lymph node dissection. Because 36 (64%) of the 56 patients with isolated tumor cells in their sentinel lymph node also had non-sentinel lymph node macrometastases, those patients with isolated tumor cells in the sentinel lymph node without other indications for adjuvant systemic therapy might be candidates for axillary lymph node dissection.
Collapse
|
42
|
Desar IM, de Boer M, Bens CC, Jacobs JA, Mouton JW, Dofferhoff AS, Klaassen CH. Rapid and reliable identification of Streptococcus anginosus group isolates to the species level by real-time PCR and melting curve analysis. J Microbiol Methods 2008; 75:372-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2008] [Revised: 06/23/2008] [Accepted: 06/27/2008] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|