1
|
Elschot EP, Joore MA, Rouhl RPW, Lamberts RJ, Backes WH, Jansen JFA. The added value of risk assessment and subsequent targeted treatment for epileptic seizures after stroke: An early-HTA analysis. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 151:109594. [PMID: 38159505 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The development of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is related to a worse clinical outcome in stroke patients. Adding a biomarker to the clinical diagnostic process for the prediction of PSE may help to establish targeted and personalized treatment for high-risk patients, which could lead to improved patient outcomes. We assessed the added value of a risk assessment and subsequent targeted treatment by conducting an early Health Technology Assessment. METHODS Interviews were conducted with four relevant stakeholders in the field of PSE to obtain a realistic view of the current healthcare and their opinions on the potential value of a PSE risk assessment and subsequent targeted treatment. The consequences on quality of life and costs of current care of a hypothetical care pathway with perfect risk assessment were modeled based on information from a literature review and the input from the stakeholders. Subsequently, the maximum added value (the headroom) was calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of this result to variation in assumed input parameters, i.e. the accuracy of the risk assessment, the efficacy of anti-seizure medication (ASM), and the probability of patients expected to develop PSE. RESULTS All stakeholders considered the addition of a predictive biomarker for the risk assessment of PSE to be of value. The headroom amounted to €12,983. The sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the headroom remained beneficial when varying the accuracy of the risk assessment, the ASM efficacy, and the number of patients expected to develop PSE. DISCUSSION We showed that a risk assessment for PSE development is potentially valuable. This work demonstrates that it is worthwhile to undertake clinical studies to evaluate biomarkers for the prediction of patients at high risk for PSE and to assess the value of targeted prophylactic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elles P Elschot
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands; MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob P W Rouhl
- MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe/Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob J Lamberts
- MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Walter H Backes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands; MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands; CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus F A Jansen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, the Netherlands; MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geerts M, Hoeijmakers JG, van Eijk-Hustings Y, Brandts L, Gorissen-Brouwers CM, Merkies IS, Joore MA, Faber CG. Cost of illness of patients with small fiber neuropathy in the Netherlands. Pain 2024; 165:153-163. [PMID: 37556388 PMCID: PMC10723644 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Neuropathic pain is associated with substantial healthcare costs. However, cost-of-illness studies of small fiber neuropathy (SFN) are scarce. Our aim was to estimate the healthcare, patient and family, and productivity costs of patients with SFN in the Netherlands from a healthcare and societal perspective. In addition, the association of costs with age, pain impact on daily life, anxiety, depression, and quality of life (Qol) were examined. Cost questionnaires were completed by 156 patients with confirmed SFN. The average annual total health care and societal cost (€, 2020) was calculated at patient, SFN adult population, and societal level. The average annual healthcare, patient and family, and productivity costs per patient with a Pain Impact Numerical Rating Scale of 0 to 3 (mild), 4 to 6 (moderate), and 7 to 10 (severe) were calculated by using the cost questionnaire data. Quality of life was determined by the EuroQol 5D utility scores. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Associations of all costs were analyzed using linear regression analyses. At the patient level, the average annual SFN healthcare and societal cost of SFN was €3614 (95% confidence interval [CI] €3171-€4072) and €17,871 (95% CI €14,395-€21,480). At the SFN population level, the average healthcare costs were €29.8 (CI €26.4-€34.2) million, and on a societal level, these were €147.7 (CI 120.5-176.3) million. Severe pain was associated with significant lower Qol and higher depression scores, higher healthcare, patient and family, and productivity costs ( P < 0.001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot Geerts
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke G.J. Hoeijmakers
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne van Eijk-Hustings
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lloyd Brandts
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla M.L. Gorissen-Brouwers
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ingemar S.J. Merkies
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Curacao Medical Center, J. H. J. Hamelbergweg, Willemstad, Curacao
| | - Manuela A. Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Catharina G. Faber
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grimm SE, Pouwels XGLV, Ramaekers BLT, Wijnen B, Grutters J, Joore MA. Response to "UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT IN REGULATORY AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT DECISION-MAKING ON DRUGS: GUIDANCE OF THE HTAi-DIA WORKING GROUP". Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e70. [PMID: 37822085 DOI: 10.1017/s026646232300260x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Elisabeth Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Maastricht Health Economics and Technology Assessment Centre, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Xavier G L V Pouwels
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Maastricht Health Economics and Technology Assessment Centre, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Wijnen
- Trimbos-instituut, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Grutters
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Maastricht Health Economics and Technology Assessment Centre, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Otten TM, Grimm SE, Ramaekers B, Joore MA. Comprehensive Review of Methods to Assess Uncertainty in Health Economic Evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 2023; 41:619-632. [PMID: 36943674 PMCID: PMC10163110 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01242-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Uncertainty assessment is a cornerstone in model-based health economic evaluations (HEEs) that inform reimbursement decisions. No comprehensive overview of available uncertainty assessment methods currently exists. We aimed to review methods for uncertainty assessment for use in model-based HEEs, by conducting a snowballing review. We categorised all methods according to their stage of use relating to uncertainty assessment (identification, analysis, communication). Additionally, we classified identification methods according to sources of uncertainty, and subdivided analysis and communication methods according to their purpose. The review identified a total of 80 uncertainty methods: 30 identification, 28 analysis, and 22 communication methods. Uncertainty identification methods exist to address uncertainty from different sources. Most identification methods were developed with the objective to assess related concepts such as validity, model quality, and relevance. Almost all uncertainty analysis and communication methods required uncertainty to be quantified and inclusion of uncertainties in probabilistic analysis. Our review can help analysts and decision makers in selecting uncertainty assessment methods according to their aim and purpose of the assessment. We noted a need for further clarification of terminology and guidance on the use of (combinations of) methods to identify uncertainty and related concepts such as validity and quality. A key finding is that uncertainty assessment relies heavily on quantification, which may necessitate increased use of expert elicitation and/or the development of methods to assess unquantified uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Michael Otten
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), P. Debyelaan 25, Oxford Building, PO Box 5800a, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
| | - Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), P. Debyelaan 25, Oxford Building, PO Box 5800a, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), P. Debyelaan 25, Oxford Building, PO Box 5800a, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), P. Debyelaan 25, Oxford Building, PO Box 5800a, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schreurs RHP, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Ten Cate H, Joore MA. Budget Impact of Three Improvement Targets for Compression Therapy for Patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis in The Netherlands. Pharmacoecon Open 2023; 7:479-491. [PMID: 37074590 PMCID: PMC10169940 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00403-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Compression therapy following deep venous thrombosis in the Netherlands is suboptimal. We assessed the budget impact of targeted care improvements. METHODS We calculated the per-patient and population healthcare resource use and costs concerning 26,500 new patients each year in the Netherlands for the current pathways in region North Holland (divided into two parts: NH-A and NH-B) and region Limburg. Next, we assessed the impact of three improvement targets: optimizing initial compression therapy, early consultation of an occupational therapist, and tailored duration of elastic compression stocking therapy. Inputs were based on interview (n = 30) and survey data (n = 114), literature, and standard prices. The robustness of the results was tested by sensitivity analyses. RESULTS The current per-patient costs for a 2-year episode were €1046 (NH-A), €947 (NH-B), and €1256 (Limburg). The improvements led to direct savings for region Limburg (€4.7 million). Population costs increased in the first year for NH-A (+ €3.5 million) and NH-B (+ €6.4 million), and decreased in the second and third year resulting in a cost reduction for NH-A (- €2.2 million) but not for NH-B (+ €0.6 million). Workload for occupational therapists and internists in North Holland increased, and workload for home care nurses decreased in all regions. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a detailed insight into current costs and healthcare resource use associated with compression therapy and the potential impact of implementing three improvement targets. We showed that the improvements resulted in considerable cost savings within 3 years after implementation for region NH-A and Limburg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel H P Schreurs
- Thrombosis Expert Centre Maastricht and Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Arina J Ten Cate-Hoek
- Thrombosis Expert Centre Maastricht and Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo Ten Cate
- Thrombosis Expert Centre Maastricht and Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Heubel-Moenen FCJI, Ansems LEM, Verhezen PWM, Wetzels RJH, van Oerle RGM, Straat RJMHE, Megy K, Downes K, Henskens YMC, Beckers EAM, Joore MA. Effectiveness and costs of a stepwise versus an all-in-one approach to diagnose mild bleeding disorders. Br J Haematol 2023; 200:792-801. [PMID: 36444397 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
The diagnostic work-up of patients referred to the haematologist for bleeding evaluation is performed in a stepwise way: bleeding history and results of screening laboratory tests guide further diagnostic evaluation. This can be ineffective, time-consuming and burdensome for patients. To improve this strategy, the initial laboratory investigation can be extended. In a model-based approach, effectiveness and costs of a conventional stepwise versus a newly proposed all-in-one diagnostic approach for bleeding evaluation were evaluated and compared, using data from an observational patient cohort study, including adult patients referred for bleeding evaluation. In the all-in-one approach, specialized platelet function tests, coagulation factors, and fibrinolysis tests were included in the initial investigation. Final diagnosis, hospital resource use and costs and patient burden were compared. A total of 150 patients were included. Compared to the stepwise approach, in the all-in-one approach, 19 additional patients reached a diagnosis and patient burden was lower, but total costs per patient were higher [€359, 95% bootstrapped confidence interval (BCI) 283-518, p = 0.001]. For bleeding evaluation of patients referred to the haematologist, an all-in-one diagnostic approach has a higher diagnostic yield and reduces patient burden, at a higher cost. This raises the question what costs justify the diagnosis of a bleeding disorder and a less burdensome diagnostic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor C J I Heubel-Moenen
- Department of Hematology, Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Loes E M Ansems
- Department of Hematology, Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul W M Verhezen
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Unit for Hemostasis and Transfusion, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rick J H Wetzels
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Unit for Hemostasis and Transfusion, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rene G M van Oerle
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Unit for Hemostasis and Transfusion, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ron J M H E Straat
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Unit for Hemostasis and Transfusion, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Karyn Megy
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) BioResource, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kate Downes
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) BioResource, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.,Cambridge University Hospitals Genomic Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, UK
| | - Yvonne M C Henskens
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Unit for Hemostasis and Transfusion, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A M Beckers
- Department of Hematology, Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boudewijns EA, Otten TM, Gobianidze M, Ramaekers BL, van Schayck OCP, Joore MA. Headroom Analysis for Early Economic Evaluation: A Systematic Review. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2023; 21:195-204. [PMID: 36575333 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00774-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The headroom analysis is an early economic evaluation that quantifies the highest price at which an intervention may still be cost effective. Currently, there is no comprehensive review on how it is applied. This study investigated the application of the headroom analysis, specifically (1) how the headroom analysis is framed (2) the analytical approach and sources of evidence used, and (3) how expert judgement is used and reported. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EconLit, and Google Scholar on 28 April 2022. Studies were eligible if they reported an application of the headroom analysis. Data were presented in tabular form and summarised descriptively. RESULTS We identified 42 relevant papers. The headroom analysis was applied to medicines (29%), diagnostic or screening tests (29%), procedures, programmes and systems (21%), medical devices (19%), and a combined test and device (2%). All studies used model-based analyses, with 40% using simple models and 60% using more comprehensive models. Thirty-three percent of the studies assumed perfect effectiveness of the health technology, while 67% adopted realistic assumptions. Ten percent of the studies calculated an effectiveness-seeking headroom instead of a cost-seeking headroom. Expert judgement was used in 71% of the studies; 23 studies (55%) used expert opinion, 6 studies (14%) used expert elicitation, and 1 study (2%) used both. CONCLUSIONS Because the application of the headroom analysis varies considerably, we recommend its appropriate use and clear reporting of analytical approaches, level of evidence available, and the use of expert judgement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther A Boudewijns
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Thomas M Otten
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariam Gobianidze
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Onno C P van Schayck
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Asselt ADI, Armstrong N, Kimman M, Peeters A, McDermott K, Stirk L, Ahmadu C, Govers TM, Hoentjen F, Joore MA, Grimm SE. Filgotinib for Treating Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2023; 41:239-251. [PMID: 36725788 PMCID: PMC9929013 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01244-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence invited the manufacturer (Galapagos) of filgotinib (Jyseleca®), as part of the Single Technology Appraisal process, to submit evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of filgotinib for treating moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in adults who have had an inadequate response, loss of response or were intolerant to a previous biologic agent or conventional therapy. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre+, was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group. This paper summarises the company submission, presents the Evidence Review Group's critical review on the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the company submission, highlights the key methodological considerations and describes the development of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance by the Appraisal Committee. The company submission included one relevant study for the comparison of filgotinib versus placebo: the SELECTION trial. As there was no head-to-head evidence with any of the comparators, the company performed two separate network meta-analyses, one for the biologic-naïve population and one for the biologic-experienced population, and for both the induction and maintenance phases. The Evidence Review Group questioned the validity of the maintenance network meta-analysis because it assumed all active treatments to be comparators in this phase, which is not in line with clinical practice. The economic analysis used a number of assumptions that introduced substantial uncertainty, which could not be fully explored, for instance, the assumption that a risk of loss of response would be independent of health state and constant over time. Company and Evidence Review Group results indicate that at its current price, and disregarding confidential discounts for comparators and subsequent treatments, filgotinib dominates some comparators (golimumab and adalimumab in the company base case, all but intravenous and subcutaneous vedolizumab in the Evidence Review Group's base case) in the biologic-naïve population. In the biologic-experienced population, filgotinib dominates all comparators in both the company and the Evidence Review Group's base case. Results should be interpreted with caution as some important uncertainties were not included in the modelling. These uncertainties were mostly centred around the maintenance network meta-analysis, loss of response, health-related quality-of-life estimates and modelling of dose escalation. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommended filgotinib within its marketing authorisation, as an option for treating moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in adults when conventional or biological treatment cannot be tolerated, or if the disease has not responded well enough or has stopped responding to these treatments, and if the company provides filgotinib according to the commercial arrangement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette D I van Asselt
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), PO Box 30.001, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Merel Kimman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Peeters
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lisa Stirk
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | | | - Tim M Govers
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Simons MJHG, Uyl-de Groot CA, Retèl VP, Mankor JM, Ramaekers BLT, Joore MA, van Harten WH. Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Future Developments With Whole-Genome Sequencing for Patients With Lung Cancer. Value Health 2023; 26:71-80. [PMID: 35973926 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness, budget impact (BI), and impact of uncertainty of future developments concerning whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as a clinical diagnostic test compared with standard of care (SoC) in patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS A total of 3 likely scenarios to take place within 5 years (according to experts) were simulated using a previously developed, peer reviewed, and published decision model. The scenarios concerned "WGS results used for treatment selection" (scenario 1), "WGS-based biomarker for immunotherapy" (scenario 2), and "off-label drug approval for WGS results" (scenario 3). Two diagnostic strategies of the original model, "SoC" and "WGS as a diagnostic test" (base model), were used to compare our scenarios with. Outcomes were reported for the base model, all scenarios separately, combined (combined unweighted), and weighted by likelihood (combined weighted). Cost-effectiveness, BI, and value of information analyses were performed for WGS compared with SoC. RESULTS Total costs and quality-adjusted life-years for SoC in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were €149 698 and 1.235. Incremental outcomes of WGS were €1529/0.002(base model), -€222/0.020(scenario 1), -€2576/0.023(scenario 2), €388/0.024(scenario 3), -€5041/0.060(combined unweighted), and -€1715/0.029(combined weighted). The annual BI for adopting WGS for this population in The Netherlands ranged between €682 million (combined unweighted) and €714 million (base model). The consequences of uncertainty amounted to €3.4 million for all scenarios (combined weighted) and to €699 000 for the diagnostic yield of WGS alone (combined weighted). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that it is likely for WGS to become cost-effective within the near future if it identifies more patients with actionable targets and show the impact of uncertainty regarding its diagnostic yield. Modeling future scenarios can be useful to consider early adoption of WGS while timely anticipating on unforeseen developments before final conclusions are reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn J H G Simons
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Care And Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Carin A Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management/Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne M Mankor
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Care And Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Care And Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Makadzange EE, Peeters A, Joore MA, Kimman ML. The effectiveness of health education interventions on cervical cancer prevention in Africa: A systematic review. Prev Med 2022; 164:107219. [PMID: 36007752 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Low levels of knowledge and awareness on cervical cancer play a role in limiting cervical cancer prevention uptake. This systematic review aimed to identify effective educational interventions to increase cervical cancer awareness, knowledge, and subsequently screening or vaccination uptake in African women. A literature search was conducted in Medline and EMBASE databases. We examined original, peer-reviewed English literature published between 2005 and 2020. Nineteen studies examining health education interventions' impact on awareness, knowledge, and screening or vaccination uptake in African women were included. Ten studies were controlled trials, nine performed pre- and post-measurements in one group. Most studies were published between 2015 and 2020 (86%), many were from Nigeria (47%). Studies were mostly set up in communities and schools. The most frequently used intervention was lectures, alone or combined with videos and practical demonstrations. Sixteen studies evaluated knowledge or awareness, and all showed a statistically significant improvement following the intervention. Of the ten studies that evaluated screening uptake, either as the single outcome or combined with knowledge or awareness, six found a significant rise in screening uptake after intervention. Educational interventions increased knowledge and awareness in African women, some boosted uptake of cervical cancer screening, especially when using peer health educators and culturally tailored methods. Innovative approaches such as self-collected HPV testing and mHealth also demonstrated a potential to increase uptake of screening. More research is needed to identify and analyse barriers to screening uptake, which can still be present even after a successful educational intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evidence Eve Makadzange
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care And Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Andrea Peeters
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care And Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care And Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Merel L Kimman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care And Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schreurs RHP, Joore MA, ten Cate H, ten Cate-Hoek AJ. Development of a Consensus-Based Cross-Domain Protocol for the Management of Elastic Compression Stocking Therapy in Patients With Deep Venous Thrombosis and Chronic Venous Disease: A Modified Delphi Study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:891364. [PMID: 35665269 PMCID: PMC9160232 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.891364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Elastic compression stocking (ECS) therapy is commonly used in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and chronic venous disease (CVD). The provision of ECS therapy is complex, and studies indicate a lack of practical guidance and suboptimal collaboration among health care professionals. We aimed to reach consensus on critical issues of ECS therapy among the involved health care professionals and patients. Methods A three-round modified Delphi analysis was performed in the Netherlands in which 56 health care professionals (internists, dermatologists, general practitioners, emergency room nurses, home care nurses, medical stocking suppliers, and occupational therapists) and seven patients were invited. The 21 statements included in this analysis were based on information collected from a previously conducted Functional Resonance Analysis Method and Realist Evaluation. We used 7-point Likert scale questions and a 75% threshold for consensus. Results Of the 63 persons invited for this study, 59 (94%) agreed to participate and responded in the first questionnaire round; of whom 52 were health care professionals and seven were patients (five DVT and two CVD). The overall response rate for the three questionnaire rounds was 91%. After completion of the rounds, full consensus was achieved on 19 out of 21 statements. No consensus was reached on the need for a follow-up appointment for CVD patients and who should be responsible to determine the ECS type (custom-made or standard). Conclusion We identified 19 consensus-driven recommendations on treatment decisions and collaboration in ECS therapy among an interdisciplinary panel of health care professionals and patients. These recommendations form a basis for consensus-driven optimization of ECS therapy and should ideally be incorporated in a general cross-domain protocol for ECS therapy in patients with DVT and CVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel H. P. Schreurs
- Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Thrombosis Expert Centre Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Rachel H. P. Schreurs,
| | - Manuela A. Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
- CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Hugo ten Cate
- Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Thrombosis Expert Centre Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Arina J. ten Cate-Hoek
- Laboratory for Clinical Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Thrombosis Expert Centre Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Grimm SE, Witlox W, Wolff R, Chalker A, Hiligsmann M, Wijnen B, Ahmadu C, Ryder S, Armstrong N, Duffy S, Syndikus I, Kleijnen J, Joore MA. Mogamulizumab for Previously Treated Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2022; 40:509-518. [PMID: 34664200 PMCID: PMC9095533 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01098-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer (Kyowa Kirin) of mogamulizumab (Poteligeo®), as part of the single technology appraisal process, to submit evidence for its clinical and cost-effectiveness for previously treated mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS). Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre, was commissioned to act as the independent evidence review group (ERG). This paper summarises the company submission (CS), presents the ERG's critical review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the CS, highlights the key methodological considerations and describes the development of the NICE guidance by the Appraisal Committee. Based on a systematic literature review, one randomised controlled trial, MAVORIC, was identified showing favourable results in patients with MF and SS. However, MAVORIC compared mogamulizumab to vorinostat, which is not standard care in the NHS, and there is uncertainty due to the study design, specifically crossover of patients. Based on a "naïve comparison of results from the vorinostat arm of the MAVORIC study and the physician's choice arm (methotrexate or bexarotene i.e. United Kingdom [UK] standard treatments) of the ALCANZA study as well as comparison to Phase II bexarotene data", the company considered vorinostat to be "a reasonable proxy for current standard of care in the NHS". The ERG considered, based on the limited data available, that the comparability of vorinostat (MAVORIC) and physician's choice (ALCANZA) could not be established. In response to the Appraisal Consultation Document, the company provided an unanchored matched adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of mogamulizumab with UK standard care by analysing Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. However, given the high risk of bias of an unanchored MAIC, these results needed to be regarded with a considerable degree of caution. The economic analysis suffered from uncertainty because there was no trial evidence on the comparator in the England and Wales National Health Service (NHS), and it was unclear to what extent the trial (MAVORIC) comparator (vorinostat) was comparable to standard care, referred to as established clinical management (ECM) in the NHS. The evidence for overall survival had not reached maturity and was confounded by treatment switching, for which different crossover adjustment methods produced large variations in life years. Caregiver utilities were applied in the analysis, but there was a lack of guidance on their application and whether these were indicated in this appraisal. After consultation, the company updated the economic analysis with the MAIC. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing mogamulizumab against ECM were (depending on whether the HES or MAVORIC comparison were used) £31,030 or £32,634 per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained according to the company's base case and £38,274 or £80,555 per QALY gained according to the ERG's base case. NICE did not recommend mogamulizumab for treating MF or SS in adults who have had at least one previous systemic treatment. This decision was subsequently appealed, and an appeal decision has been reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Willem Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Wijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Isabel Syndikus
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grimm SE, Witlox W, Wolff R, Chalker A, Hiligsmann M, Wijnen B, Ahmadu C, Ryder S, Armstrong N, Duffy S, Syndikus I, Kleijnen J, Joore MA. Correction to: Mogamulizumab for Previously Treated Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2022; 40:575. [PMID: 35364758 PMCID: PMC9095516 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01144-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Willem Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Wijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Isabel Syndikus
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grimm SE, Wijnen B, Riemsma R, Fayter D, Armstrong N, Ahmadu C, Brandts L, Misso K, Kirwan JR, Kleijnen J, Joore MA. Filgotinib for Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2021; 39:1397-1410. [PMID: 34448148 PMCID: PMC8599377 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01080-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer (Gilead) of filgotinib (JyselecaTM), as part of the single technology appraisal process, to submit evidence for its clinical and cost effectiveness for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre, was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). This paper summarises the company submission (CS), presents the ERG's critical review of the clinical- and cost-effectiveness evidence in the CS, highlights the key methodological considerations, and describes the development of the NICE guidance by the NICE Appraisal Committee. The evidence for filgotinib was based on two good-quality international randomised controlled trials. In FINCH 1, filgotinib was compared with placebo, and in FINCH 2, filgotinib was compared with adalimumab and placebo. As there was no head-to-head evidence with most active comparators, the company performed two separate network meta-analyses (NMAs), one for the conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-inadequate response population and one for the biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-inadequate response population. The outcomes analysed were American College of Rheumatology response criteria at weeks 12 and 24, and European League Against Rheumatism response criteria at 24 weeks. The statistical methods used to perform the NMAs were valid and were in line with previous NICE appraisals. Results of the NMAs are confidential and cannot be reported here, but they were uncertain due to heterogeneity of the included studies. The economic analysis of the patient population with moderate RA suffered from limited evidence on the progression from moderate to severe health states. For the moderate RA population, the final analyses comparing filgotinib, with or without methotrexate, against standard of care resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of around £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained in the company's and ERG's base-case and scenario analyses. NICE recommended filgotinib in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy when methotrexate is contraindicated, or if people cannot tolerate it, for patients with moderate RA whose disease had responded inadequately to two or more conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). For the severe RA population, in view of the higher or similar net health benefits that filgotinib provided versus its comparators, NICE recommended filgotinib with or without methotrexate for patients whose disease had responded inadequately to two or more conventional DMARDs, who had been treated with one or more biological DMARDs, if rituximab was not an option, or after treatment with rituximab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ben Wijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Lloyd Brandts
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kate Misso
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | - John R Kirwan
- Emeritus Professor of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Simons MJHG, Retèl VP, Ramaekers BLT, Butter R, Mankor JM, Paats MS, Aerts JGJV, Mfumbilwa ZA, Roepman P, Coupé VMH, Uyl-de Groot CA, van Harten WH, Joore MA. Early Cost Effectiveness of Whole-Genome Sequencing as a Clinical Diagnostic Test for Patients with Inoperable Stage IIIB,C/IV Non-squamous Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer. Pharmacoeconomics 2021; 39:1429-1442. [PMID: 34405371 PMCID: PMC8599348 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01073-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbours many genetic aberrations that can be targeted with systemic treatments. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can simultaneously detect these (and possibly new) molecular targets. However, the exact added clinical value of WGS is unknown. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the early cost effectiveness of using WGS in diagnostic strategies compared with currently used molecular diagnostics for patients with inoperable stage IIIB,C/IV non-squamous NSCLC from a Dutch healthcare perspective. METHODS A decision tree represented the diagnostic pathway, and a cohort state transition model represented disease progression. Three diagnostic strategies were modelled: standard of care (SoC) alone, WGS as a diagnostic test, and SoC followed by WGS. Treatment effectiveness was based on a systematic review. Probabilistic cost-effectiveness analyses were performed, and threshold analyses (using €80,000 per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) was used to explore the early cost effectiveness of WGS. RESULTS WGS as a diagnostic test resulted in more QALYs (0.002) and costs (€1534 [incremental net monetary benefit -€1349]), and SoC followed by WGS resulted in fewer QALYs (-0.002) and more costs (€1059 [-€1194]) compared with SoC alone. WGS as a diagnostic test was only cost effective if it was priced at €2000 per patient and identified 2.7% more actionable patients than SoC alone. Treating these additional identified patients with new treatments costing >€4069 per month decreased the probability of cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis suggests that providing WGS as a diagnostic test is cost effective compared with SoC followed by WGS and SoC alone if costs for WGS decrease and additional patients with actionable targets are identified. This cost-effectiveness model can be used to incorporate new findings iteratively and to support ongoing decision making regarding the use of WGS in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn J H G Simons
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522 NH, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier Butter
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne M Mankor
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marthe S Paats
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zakile A Mfumbilwa
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center-Location VUmc, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Science Park 408, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center-Location VUmc, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carin A Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management/Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522 NH, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schreurs RHP, Joore MA, Ten Cate H, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ. Using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method to explore how elastic compression therapy is organised and could be improved from a multistakeholder perspective. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048331. [PMID: 34642192 PMCID: PMC8513256 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Elastic compression stocking (ECS) therapy is an important treatment for patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). This study aimed to provide insight into the structure and variability of the ECS therapy process, its effects on outcomes, and to elicit improvement themes from a multiple stakeholder perspective. DESIGN Thirty semi-structured interviews with professionals and patients were performed. The essential functions for the process of ECS therapy were extracted to create two work-as-done models using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM). These findings were used to guide discussion between stakeholders to identify improvement themes. SETTING Two regions in the Netherlands, region Limburg and region North-Holland, including an academic hospital and a general hospital and their catchment region. PARTICIPANTS The interviewees were purposely recruited and included 25 healthcare professionals (ie, general practitioners, internists, dermatologists, nurses, doctor's assistants, occupational therapists, home care nurses and medical stocking suppliers) and 5 patients with DVT or CVI. RESULTS Two FRAM models were created (one for each region). The variability of the functions and their effect on outcomes, as well as interdependencies between functions, were identified. These were presented in stakeholder meetings to identify the structure of the process and designated variable and uniform parts of the process and its outcomes. Ultimately, six improvement themes were identified: dissemination of knowledge of the entire process; optimising and standardising initial compression therapy; optimising timing to contact the medical stocking supplier (when oedema has disappeared); improving the implementation of assistive devices; harmonising follow-up duration for patients with CVI; personalising follow-up and treatment duration in patients with DVT. CONCLUSIONS This study provided a detailed understanding of how ECS therapy is delivered in daily practice by describing major functions and variability in performances and elicited six improvement themes from a multistakeholder perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Hellen Petra Schreurs
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo Ten Cate
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Heart and Vascular Center and Thrombosis Expertise Center, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Arina J Ten Cate-Hoek
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Heart and Vascular Center and Thrombosis Expertise Center, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Witlox WJA, Ramaekers BLT, Lacas B, Pechoux CL, Sun A, Wang SY, Hu C, Redman M, van der Noort V, Li N, Guckenberger M, van Tinteren H, Groen HJM, Joore MA, De Ruysscher DKM. Association of different fractionation schedules for prophylactic cranial irradiation with toxicity and brain metastases-free survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from three randomized trials. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:163-166. [PMID: 34619235 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
We assessed the impact of different PCI fractionation schedules (30 Gy in 10 versus 15 fractions) on brain metastases-free survival (BMFS) and toxicity in stage III NSCLC. Our results suggest that 30 Gy in 10 fractions is associated with increased toxicity, while no conclusive evidence of improving BMFS was seen with this schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem J A Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands.
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Lacas
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Cecile Le Pechoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexander Sun
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Si-Yu Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chen Hu
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, United States; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Mary Redman
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Harm van Tinteren
- Trial and Data Center, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J M Groen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk K M De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grimm SE, Pouwels X, Ramaekers BLT, Wijnen B, Otten T, Grutters J, Joore MA. State of the ART? Two New Tools for Risk Communication in Health Technology Assessments. Pharmacoeconomics 2021; 39:1185-1196. [PMID: 34278550 PMCID: PMC8476369 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01060-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Outcomes of health technology assessments (HTA) are uncertain, and decision-making is associated with a risk. This risk, consisting of the probability of making a wrong decision and its impact, is rarely considered in HTA. This hampers transparent and consistent risk assessment and management. The aim of this study was to develop risk communication tools in the context of health technology decision-making under uncertainty. METHODS We performed a scoping review of tools for uncertainty and risk communication within HTA using citation pearl-growing. We developed two tools, drawing on existing publications on risk and uncertainty communication for inspiration. Individual semi-structured interviews with HTA stakeholders were performed to identify potential improvements in usefulness, user-friendliness, and information adequacy. Tools were amended and further evaluated in a real-world HTA and workshop with HTA stakeholders. RESULTS The identified risk communication tools did not include non-quantified uncertainties, and did not link to risk management strategies. We developed two tools: the Assessment of Risk Table (ART), for a summary of quantified and non-quantified uncertainties and the resulting risk assessment, and the Appraisal of Risk Chart (ARCH), for linking net benefit and risk outcomes to appropriate risk management strategies. Stakeholders appreciated the usefulness of the tools. They also highlighted that more information on local policy options was required for optimal risk management use, and HTA processes may need adapting. CONCLUSION The risk communication tools presented here can help assess risk, facilitate communication between analysts and decision-makers, and guide the appropriate use of available risk management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Xavier Pouwels
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, P.O. box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Wijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Otten
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Grutters
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Post 133, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Grimm SE, Pouwels X, Ramaekers BLT, van Ravesteyn NT, Sankatsing VDV, Grutters J, Joore MA. Implementation Barriers to Value of Information Analysis in Health Technology Decision Making: Results From a Process Evaluation. Value Health 2021; 24:1126-1136. [PMID: 34372978 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Value of information (VOI) analysis can support health technology assessment decision making, but it is a long way from being standard use. The objective of this study was to understand barriers to the implementation of VOI analysis and propose actions to overcome these. METHODS We performed a process evaluation of VOI analysis use within decision making on tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for use in the Dutch breast cancer population screening. Based on steering committee meeting attendance and regular meetings with analysts, we developed a list of barriers to VOI use, which were analyzed using an established diffusion model. We proposed actions to address these barriers. Barriers and actions were discussed and validated in a workshop with stakeholders representing patients, clinicians, regulators, policy advisors, researchers, and the industry. RESULTS Consensus was reached on groups of barriers, which included characteristics of VOI analysis itself, stakeholder's attitudes, analysts' and policy makers' skills and knowledge, system readiness, and implementation in the organization. Observed barriers did not only pertain to VOI analysis itself but also to formulating the objective of the assessment, economic modeling, and broader aspects of uncertainty assessment. Actions to overcome these barriers related to organizational changes, knowledge transfer, cultural change, and tools. CONCLUSIONS This in-depth analysis of barriers to implementation of VOI analysis and resulting actions and tools may be useful to health technology assessment organizations that wish to implement VOI analysis in technology assessment and research prioritization. Further research should focus on application and evaluation of the proposed actions in real-world assessment processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Xavier Pouwels
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Valérie D V Sankatsing
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Grutters
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Grimm SE, Pouwels X, Ramaekers BLT, Wijnen B, Knies S, Grutters J, Joore MA. Correction to: Building a trusted framework for uncertainty assessment in rare diseases: suggestions for improvement (Response to "TRUST4RD: tool for reducing uncertainties in the evidence generation for specialised treatments for rare diseases"). Orphanet J Rare Dis 2021; 16:320. [PMID: 34281581 PMCID: PMC8287680 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-01938-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| | - Xavier Pouwels
- University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522 NH, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ben Wijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Saskia Knies
- Zorginstituut Nederland, Eekholt 4, 1112 XH, Diemen, Netherlands
| | - Janneke Grutters
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Post 133, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Petersohn S, Grimm SE, Ramaekers BLT, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Joore MA. Exploring the Feasibility of Comprehensive Uncertainty Assessment in Health Economic Modeling: A Case Study. Value Health 2021; 24:983-994. [PMID: 34243842 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Decision makers adopt health technologies based on health economic models that are subject to uncertainty. In an ideal world, these models parameterize all uncertainties and reflect them in the cost-effectiveness probability and risk associated with the adoption. In practice, uncertainty assessment is often incomplete, potentially leading to suboptimal reimbursement recommendations and risk management. This study examines the feasibility of comprehensive uncertainty assessment in health economic models. METHODS A state transition model on peripheral arterial disease treatment was used as a case study. Uncertainties were identified and added to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis if possible. Parameter distributions were obtained by expert elicitation, and structural uncertainties were either parameterized or explored in scenario analyses, which were model averaged. RESULTS A truly comprehensive uncertainty assessment, parameterizing all uncertainty, could not be achieved. Expert elicitation informed 8 effectiveness, utility, and cost parameters. Uncertainties were parameterized or explored in scenario analyses and with model averaging. Barriers included time and resource constraints, also of clinical experts, and lacking guidance regarding some aspects of expert elicitation, evidence aggregation, and handling of structural uncertainty. The team's multidisciplinary expertise and existing literature and tools were facilitators. CONCLUSIONS While comprehensive uncertainty assessment may not be attainable, improvements in uncertainty assessment in general are no doubt desirable. This requires the development of detailed guidance and hands-on tutorials for methods of uncertainty assessment, in particular aspects of expert elicitation, evidence aggregation, and handling of structural uncertainty. The issue of benefits of uncertainty assessment versus time and resources needed remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Petersohn
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Arina J Ten Cate-Hoek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
van de Ven M, Simons MJHG, Koffijberg H, Joore MA, IJzerman MJ, Retèl VP, van Harten WH. Whole genome sequencing in oncology: using scenario drafting to explore future developments. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:488. [PMID: 33933021 PMCID: PMC8088550 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08214-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In oncology, Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) is not yet widely implemented due to uncertainties such as the required infrastructure and expertise, costs and reimbursements, and unknown pan-cancer clinical utility. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate possible future developments facilitating or impeding the use of WGS as a molecular diagnostic in oncology through scenario drafting. Methods A four-step process was adopted for scenario drafting. First, the literature was searched for barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of WGS. Second, they were prioritized by international experts, and third, combined into coherent scenarios. Fourth, the scenarios were implemented in an online survey and their likelihood of taking place within 5 years was elicited from another group of experts. Based on the minimum, maximum, and most likely (mode) parameters, individual Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) probability density functions were determined. Subsequently, individual opinions were aggregated by performing unweighted linear pooling, from which summary statistics were extracted and reported. Results Sixty-two unique barriers and facilitators were extracted from 70 articles. Price, clinical utility, and turnaround time of WGS were ranked as the most important aspects. Nine scenarios were developed and scored on likelihood by 18 experts. The scenario about introducing WGS as a clinical diagnostic with a lower price, shorter turnaround time, and improved degree of actionability, scored the highest likelihood (median: 68.3%). Scenarios with low likelihoods and strong consensus were about better treatment responses to more actionable targets (26.1%), and the effect of centralizing WGS (24.1%). Conclusions Based on current expert opinions, the implementation of WGS as a clinical diagnostic in oncology is heavily dependent on the price, clinical utility (both in terms of identifying actionable targets as in adding sufficient value in subsequent treatment), and turnaround time. These aspects and the optimal way of service provision are the main drivers for the implementation of WGS and should be focused on in further research. More knowledge regarding these factors is needed to inform strategic decision making regarding the implementation of WGS, which warrants support from all relevant stakeholders. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08214-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel van de Ven
- Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn J H G Simons
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik Koffijberg
- Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. .,Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Rijnstate General Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Oosterhoff M, Jolani S, De Bruijn-Geraets D, van Giessen A, Bosma H, van Schayck OC, Joore MA. BMI trajectories after primary school-based lifestyle intervention: Unravelling an uncertain future. A mixed methods study. Prev Med Rep 2021; 21:101314. [PMID: 33537184 PMCID: PMC7841358 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
This mixed methods study aimed to examine plausible body mass index (BMI) trajectories after exposure to a primary school-based lifestyle intervention to aid in estimating the long-term intervention benefits. BMI trajectories for children at control schools (mean 7.6 years of age) were modelled until 20 years of age through extrapolating trial evidence (N = 1647). A reference scenario assumed that the observed 2-year effects of the 'Healthy Primary Schools of the Future' (HPSF) and 'Physical Activity Schools' (PAS) were fully maintained over time. This was modelled by applying the observed 2-year BMI effects until 20 years of age. Expert opinions on likely trends in effect maintenance after the 2-year intervention period were elicited qualitatively and quantitatively, and were used for developing alternative scenarios. Expert elicitation revealed three scenarios: (a) a constant exposure-effect and an uncontrolled environment with effect decay scenario, (b) a household multiplier and an uncontrolled environment with effect decay scenario, and (c) a household multiplier and maintainer scenario. The relative effect of HPSF at 20 years of age was -0.21 kg/m2 under the reference scenario, and varied from -0.04 kg/m2 (a) to -0.06 kg/m2 (b), and -0.50 kg/m2 (c). For PAS, the relative effect was -0.17 kg/m2 under the reference scenario, and varied from -0.04 kg/m2 (a, b), to -0.21 kg/m2 (c). The mixed methods approach proved to be useful in modelling plausible BMI trajectories and specifying uncertainty on effect maintenance. Further observations until adulthood could reduce the uncertainty around future benefits. This trial was retrospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02800616).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije Oosterhoff
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA) Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Shahab Jolani
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Daisy De Bruijn-Geraets
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA) Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Anoukh van Giessen
- Center for Prevention and Health Services, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Bosma
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Onno C.P. van Schayck
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Manuela A. Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA) Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Witlox WJA, Ramaekers BLT, Lacas B, Le Pechoux C, Pignon JP, Sun A, Wang SY, Hu C, Redman M, van der Noort V, Li N, Guckenberger M, van Tinteren H, Groen HJM, Joore MA, De Ruysscher DKM. Individual patient data meta-analysis of prophylactic cranial irradiation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 158:40-47. [PMID: 33587968 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was compared to observation in several randomized trials (RCTs), and a reduction greater than 50% was shown regarding the incidence of brain metastases (BM). However, none of these studies showed an improvement of overall survival (OS), possibly related to relatively small sample sizes and short follow-up. The aim of this meta-analysis was therefore to assess the impact of PCI on long term OS for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to observation based on the pooled updated individual patient RCT data. METHODS Seven RCTs were eligible, and data from the four most recent trials (924 patients) could be retrieved. The log-rank observed minus expected number of events and its variance were used to calculate individual and overall pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) with a fixed effects model. Inter-trial heterogeneity was studied using the I2 test. In addition, the 5-year absolute survival difference between arms was calculated for all endpoints. The pre-specified toxicities were reported descriptively. RESULTS The median follow-up was 97 months (74-108). Compared to observation, no statistically significant impact of PCI on OS was observed (HR 0.90 [0.76-1.07] p = 0.23, 5-year absolute difference 1.8% [-5.2-8.8]). PCI significantly prolonged progression-free survival (HR 0.77 [0.66-0.91] p = 0.002) and BM-free survival (HR 0.82 [0.69-0.97] p = 0.02). The number of patients with high-grade (≥3) toxicity was 6.4% (21/330) for PCI. CONCLUSION No OS benefit by PCI was observed, but PCI prolonged the progression-free survival and BM-free survival at an increased risk of late memory impairment and fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem J A Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands.
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Lacas
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Cecile Le Pechoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Pignon
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexander Sun
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Si-Yu Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chen Hu
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, United States; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Mary Redman
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Harm van Tinteren
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J M Groen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk K M De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Center(+), GROW Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Witlox WJA, Grimm SE, Riemsma R, Armstrong N, Ryder S, Duffy S, Carrera VH, Posadzki P, Worthy G, Pouwels XGLV, Ramaekers BLT, Kleijnen J, Joore MA, van Asselt ADI. Lenalidomide with Rituximab for Previously Treated Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2021; 39:171-180. [PMID: 33145711 PMCID: PMC7867510 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00971-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer (Celgene) of lenalidomide (Revlimid®), as part of the Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process, to submit evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lenalidomide in combination with rituximab (MabThera®), together referred to as R2, for the treatment of adults with treated follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre+, was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). This paper summarises the company submission (CS), presents the ERG's critical review on the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence in the CS, highlights the key methodological considerations, and describes the development of the NICE guidance by the Appraisal Committee. The CS included one relevant study, for the comparison of R2 versus rituximab monotherapy (R-mono): the AUGMENT trial. In addition, the company performed an unanchored indirect comparison of R2 versus rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) and rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CVP), using data for R2 from the AUGMENT trial and pooled data for R-CHOP/R-CVP from the Haematological Malignancy Research Network (HMRN) database. During the STA process, the company provided an addendum containing evidence on only the FL population, in line with the marketing authorisation obtained at that time, which did not include MZL. The probabilistic incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) presented by the company were £27,768 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for R2 versus R-CHOP, £41,602 per QALY gained for R2 versus R-CVP, and £23,412 per QALY gained for R2 versus R-mono. The ERG's concerns included the validity of the unanchored comparison, the unavailability of a state transition model to verify the outcomes of the partitioned survival model, substantial uncertainty in survival curves, and potential over-estimation of utility values. The revised ERG base case resulted in ICERs ranging from £16,874 to £44,888 per QALY gained for R2 versus R-CHOP, from £23,135 to £59,810 per QALY gained for R2 versus R-CVP, and from £18,779 to £27,156 per QALY gained for R2 versus R-mono. Substantial uncertainty remained around these ranges. NICE recommended R2 within its marketing authorisation, as an option for previously treated FL (grade 1-3A) in adults, contingent on the company providing lenalidomide according to the commercial arrangement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem J A Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Xavier G L V Pouwels
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Antoinette D I van Asselt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Grimm SE, Pouwels X, Ramaekers BLT, Wijnen B, Knies S, Grutters J, Joore MA. Building a trusted framework for uncertainty assessment in rare diseases: suggestions for improvement (Response to "TRUST4RD: tool for reducing uncertainties in the evidence generation for specialised treatments for rare diseases"). Orphanet J Rare Dis 2021; 16:62. [PMID: 33522936 PMCID: PMC7849113 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01666-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this letter to the editor is to provide a comprehensive summary of uncertainty assessment in Health Technology Assessment, with a focus on transferability to the setting of rare diseases. The authors of "TRUST4RD: tool for reducing uncertainties in the evidence generation for specialised treatments for rare diseases" presented recommendations for reducing uncertainty in rare diseases. Their article is of great importance but unfortunately suffers from a lack of references to the wider uncertainty in Health Technology Assessment and research prioritisation literature and consequently fails to provide a trusted framework for decision-making in rare diseases. In this letter to the editor we critique the authors' tool and provide pointers as to how their proposal can be strengthened. We present references to the literature, including our own tool for uncertainty assessment (TRUST; unrelated to the authors' research), apply TRUST to two assessments of orphan drugs in rare diseases and provide a broader perspective on uncertainty and risk management in rare diseases, including a detailed research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| | - Xavier Pouwels
- University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522 NH, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ben Wijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Saskia Knies
- Zorginstituut Nederland, Eekholt 4, 1112 XH, Diemen, Netherlands
| | - Janneke Grutters
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Post 133, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ramaekers BLT, Wijnen B, Armstrong N, Petersohn S, Feenstra T, Wang J, Joore MA. Comment on "External Validation of the Core Obesity Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions". Pharmacoeconomics 2021; 39:133-135. [PMID: 33251571 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00985-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ben Wijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Center for Economic Evaluation and Machine Learning, Trimbos Institute (Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Svenja Petersohn
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Pharmerit International, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Talitha Feenstra
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services Research, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Junfeng Wang
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services Research, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Retra JGA, Essers BAB, Joore MA, Evers SMAA, Dirksen CD. Age dependency of EQ-5D-Youth health states valuations on a visual analogue scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:386. [PMID: 33308228 PMCID: PMC7733269 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01638-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Examine whether the use of different ages has an impact on the valuation of EQ-5D-Y health states for a hypothetical child or adolescent. Methods A survey was administered during regular classes among a convenience sample of university students in the Netherlands. Respondents first valued 6 EQ-5D-Y health states (2 mild, 2 moderate, 2 severe) describing a hypothetical child/adolescent of a certain age on a visual analogue scale (VAS). After 1 h respondents valued the same six health states again but this time the age of the child was different. Age differed between 4, 10 and 16 year old. Results Number of respondents was 311. No significant differences in valuation of the six health states were found between the age of 10 and 16. One moderate health state was valued significantly better for a 4-year old compared to a 10 and a 16 year old. The same applied for one severe health state that was valued higher for a 4-year old compared to a 16-year old. Conclusion Our study shows that, except for one moderate and one severe health state, other EQ-5D-Y health states were not valued significantly different when description of age differed. It is possible that problems in specific health domains are considered more severe for older children/adolescents compared to younger children who might still be dependent on their caregivers. Future research should examine whether our findings are also present in a broader set of EQ-5D-Y health states, with a choice-based method like TTO or DCE, and a more heterogeneous sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim G A Retra
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte A B Essers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute for Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen D Dirksen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Oosterhoff M, Over EAB, van Giessen A, Hoogenveen RT, Bosma H, van Schayck OCP, Joore MA. Lifetime cost-effectiveness and equity impacts of the Healthy Primary School of the Future initiative. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1887. [PMID: 33297992 PMCID: PMC7724829 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09744-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study estimated the lifetime cost-effectiveness and equity impacts associated with two lifestyle interventions in the Dutch primary school setting (targeting 4-12 year olds). METHODS The Healthy Primary School of the Future (HPSF; a healthy school lunch and structured physical activity) and the Physical Activity School (PAS; structured physical activity) were compared to the regular Dutch curriculum (N = 1676). An adolescence model, calculating weight development, and the RIVM Chronic Disease Model, calculating overweight-related chronic diseases, were linked to estimate the lifetime impact on chronic diseases, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), healthcare, and productivity costs. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the additional costs/QALY gained and we used €20,000 as threshold. Scenario analyses accounted for alternative effect maintenance scenarios and equity analyses examined cost-effectiveness in different socioeconomic status (SES) groups. RESULTS HPSF resulted in a lifetime costs of €773 (societal perspective) and a lifetime QALY gain of 0.039 per child versus control schools. HPSF led to lower costs and more QALYs as compared to PAS. From a societal perspective, HPSF had a cost/QALY gained of €19,734 versus control schools, 50% probability of being cost-effective, and beneficial equity impact (0.02 QALYs gained/child for low versus high SES). The cost-effectiveness threshold was surpassed when intervention effects decayed over time. CONCLUSIONS HPSF may be a cost-effective and equitable strategy for combatting the lifetime burden of unhealthy lifestyles. The win-win situation will, however, only be realised if the intervention effect is sustained into adulthood for all SES groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02800616 ). Registered 15 June 2016 - Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije Oosterhoff
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center MUMC+/ Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Eelco A B Over
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Anoukh van Giessen
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Rudolf T Hoogenveen
- Expertise Center for Methodology and Information Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Bosma
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Onno C P van Schayck
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center MUMC+/ Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Brozek JL, Canelo-Aybar C, Akl EA, Bowen JM, Bucher J, Chiu WA, Cronin M, Djulbegovic B, Falavigna M, Guyatt GH, Gordon AA, Hilton Boon M, Hutubessy RCW, Joore MA, Katikireddi V, LaKind J, Langendam M, Manja V, Magnuson K, Mathioudakis AG, Meerpohl J, Mertz D, Mezencev R, Morgan R, Morgano GP, Mustafa R, O'Flaherty M, Patlewicz G, Riva JJ, Posso M, Rooney A, Schlosser PM, Schwartz L, Shemilt I, Tarride JE, Thayer KA, Tsaioun K, Vale L, Wambaugh J, Wignall J, Williams A, Xie F, Zhang Y, Schünemann HJ. GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 129:138-150. [PMID: 32980429 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of the study is to present the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) conceptual approach to the assessment of certainty of evidence from modeling studies (i.e., certainty associated with model outputs). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Expert consultations and an international multidisciplinary workshop informed development of a conceptual approach to assessing the certainty of evidence from models within the context of systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and health care decisions. The discussions also clarified selected concepts and terminology used in the GRADE approach and by the modeling community. Feedback from experts in a broad range of modeling and health care disciplines addressed the content validity of the approach. RESULTS Workshop participants agreed that the domains determining the certainty of evidence previously identified in the GRADE approach (risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision, reporting bias, magnitude of an effect, dose-response relation, and the direction of residual confounding) also apply when assessing the certainty of evidence from models. The assessment depends on the nature of model inputs and the model itself and on whether one is evaluating evidence from a single model or multiple models. We propose a framework for selecting the best available evidence from models: 1) developing de novo, a model specific to the situation of interest, 2) identifying an existing model, the outputs of which provide the highest certainty evidence for the situation of interest, either "off-the-shelf" or after adaptation, and 3) using outputs from multiple models. We also present a summary of preferred terminology to facilitate communication among modeling and health care disciplines. CONCLUSION This conceptual GRADE approach provides a framework for using evidence from models in health decision-making and the assessment of certainty of evidence from a model or models. The GRADE Working Group and the modeling community are currently developing the detailed methods and related guidance for assessing specific domains determining the certainty of evidence from models across health care-related disciplines (e.g., therapeutic decision-making, toxicology, environmental health, and health economics).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan L Brozek
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster GRADE Centre & Michael DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health. PhD Programme in Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain; Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elie A Akl
- Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - James M Bowen
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Bucher
- National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Weihsueh A Chiu
- Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Mark Cronin
- School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Benjamin Djulbegovic
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Outcome Research, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Maicon Falavigna
- Institute for Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Gordon H Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster GRADE Centre & Michael DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Raymond C W Hutubessy
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judy LaKind
- LaKind Associates, LLC, Catonsville, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Veena Manja
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA, USA
| | | | - Alexander G Mathioudakis
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Joerg Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg-am-Breisgau, Germany; Cochrane Germany, Freiburg-am-Breisgau, Germany
| | - Dominik Mertz
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roman Mezencev
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rebecca Morgan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gian Paolo Morgano
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster GRADE Centre & Michael DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Reem Mustafa
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Martin O'Flaherty
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Grace Patlewicz
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John J Riva
- McMaster GRADE Centre & Michael DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margarita Posso
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrew Rooney
- National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul M Schlosser
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Lisa Schwartz
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian Shemilt
- EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jean-Eric Tarride
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristina A Thayer
- Department of Medicine, Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA, USA
| | - Katya Tsaioun
- Evidence-Based Toxicology Collaboration, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Luke Vale
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John Wambaugh
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Feng Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Health Quality Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster GRADE Centre & Michael DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bosma H, Oosterhoff M, Vermeiren AP, Willeboordse M, Joore MA, van Schayck OCP. Can school-based, health behavioural interventions tackle health inequities in childhood? Eur J Public Health 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To improve the health situation of children in primary school, many school-based interventions that are aimed at changing health behaviours, are being set up. Prior to knowing the (long-term) effectiveness of such intervention, we set out to examine whether there is room for such interventions to also tackle the health gap between children from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds.
Methods
Data from the Dutch quasi-experimental Health Primary School of the Future were used. All children from eight primary schools were included in the period 2015-2019. In the first cross-sectional phase, we studied whether there were socioeconomic differences in various health outcomes (e.g. body mass index) and whether these were smaller in children in the oldest groups (highest classes). In a two-year longitudinal approach, it was studied how socioeconomic differences in health outcomes developed in two years time and whether health behaviours could “explain” any socioeconomic differences in the outcomes. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used, including multilevel variants thereof, as well as mediation analyses.
Results
Both the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses indicated substantial and consistent socioeconomic differences in various health outcomes. The socioeconomic differences in health appeared stronger in the oldest children (highest classes). Due to only small socioeconomic differences in health behaviours, such behaviours did not mediate the socioeconomic differences in the children's health outcomes.
Conclusions
The findings indicate substantial socioeconomic differences in health in primary school. That being longer at school did not attenuate the socioeconomic differences in health and that health behaviours did not mediate the socioeconomic differences in health suggests that there might not be much room for school-based, health behaviour interventions to easily tackle socioeconomic differences in health in childhood.
Key messages
We found substantial socioeconomic differences in child health in the Netherlands. But we found only little evidence that primary school-based, health behavioural interventions will easily tackle socioeconomic differences in child health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Bosma
- Social Medicine, Maastricht University, Social Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - M Oosterhoff
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - A P Vermeiren
- Social Medicine, Maastricht University, Social Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - M Willeboordse
- Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - M A Joore
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pouwels XGLV, Ramaekers BLT, Geurts SME, Erdkamp F, Vriens BEPJ, Aaldering KNA, van de Wouw AJ, Dercksen MW, Smilde TJ, Peters NAJB, van Riel JMGH, Pepels MJ, Heijnen-Mommers J, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, de Boer M, Joore MA. An economic evaluation of eribulin for advanced breast cancer treatment based on the Southeast Netherlands advanced breast cancer registry. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1123-1130. [PMID: 32544366 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1775289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: In 2013, eribulin was reimbursed under a coverage with evidence development (CED) as third or later chemotherapy line for advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients in the Netherlands because of uncertain cost effectiveness. In 2016, the final decision of reimbursing eribulin was taken without considering the evidence collected during CED research. We analysed the cost effectiveness of eribulin versus non-eribulin chemotherapy, using real-world data.Methods: A three health states (progression-free, progressed disease, dead) partitioned survival model was developed. The SOuth East Netherlands Advanced BREast Cancer (SONABRE) registry informed the effectiveness and costs inputs. Health state utility values were obtained from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the eribulin and matched non-eribulin chemotherapy was estimated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were performed. The financial risk (i.e., the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) plus the expected monetary loss (eML) associated with reimbursing eribulin) and budget impact associated with reimbursing eribulin were calculated.Results: Eribulin led to higher health benefits (0.07 quality-adjusted life year (QALY)) and costs (€15,321) compared with non-eribulin chemotherapy. This resulted in an ICER of €220,608. At a €80,000 per QALY threshold, the risk of reimbursing eribulin was €9,791 per patient (EVPI €13, eML €9,778). Scaled up to the Dutch population, the estimated annual budget impact was €1.9 million and the annual risk of reimbursing eribulin was €2.7 million.Conclusion: From a Dutch societal perspective, eribulin is not cost effective when considering its list price as third and later chemotherapy line for ABC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier G. L. V. Pouwels
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L. T. Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra M. E. Geurts
- School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Erdkamp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - M. W. Dercksen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke J. Smilde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - J. M. G. H. van Riel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Manon J. Pepels
- Department of Internal Medicine, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | - Jose Heijnen-Mommers
- School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C. G. Tjan-Heijnen
- School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- School of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A. Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sankatsing VDV, Juraniec K, Grimm SE, Joore MA, Pijnappel RM, de Koning HJ, van Ravesteyn NT. Cost-effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Population-based Breast Cancer Screening: A Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis. Radiology 2020; 297:40-48. [PMID: 32749212 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundDigital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a promising screening test, but its outcomes and cost-effectiveness remain uncertain.PurposeTo determine if biennial DBT is cost-effective in a screening setting, when compared with digital mammography (DM) in the Netherlands, and to quantify the uncertainty.Materials and MethodsIn this study, performed from March 2018 to February 2019, the MIcrosimulation SCreening ANalysis model was used to conduct a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), consisting of 10 000 model runs with 1 000 000 women simulated per run. The Bayesian Cost-Effectiveness Analysis package and the Sheffield Accelerated Value of Information tool were used to process PSA outcomes. Two simulated cohorts born in 1970 were invited to undergo biennial screening between ages 50 and 74 years-one cohort was assigned to DM screening, and one was assigned to DBT screening. DM input parameters were based on data from the Dutch breast cancer screening program. DBT parameters were based on literature and expert opinion. Willingness-to-pay thresholds of €20 000 ($22 000) and €35 000 ($38 500) per life-year gained (LYG) were considered. Effects and costs were discounted at 3.5% per year.ResultsDBT resulted in a gain of 13 additional life-years per 1000 women invited to screening (7% increase, 13 of 193), followed over lifetime, compared with DM and led to 2% (four of 159) fewer false-positive results. DBT screening led to incremental discounted lifetime effects of 5.09 LYGs (95% confidence interval: -0.80, 9.70) and an increase in lifetime costs of €137 555 ($151 311) per 1000 women (95% confidence interval: €31 093 [$34 202], €263 537 [$289 891]) compared with DM, resulting in a mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €27 023 ($29 725) per LYG. The probability of DBT being more cost-effective was 0.36 at €20 000 and 0.66 at €35 000 per LYG.ConclusionSwitching from digital mammography to biennial digital breast tomosynthesis is not cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20 000 per life-year gained, but digital breast tomosynthesis has a higher probability of being more cost-effective than digital mammography at a threshold of €35 000 per life-year gained.© RSNA, 2020Online supplemental material is available for this article.See also the editorial by Slanetz in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie D V Sankatsing
- From the Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands (V.D.V.S., K.J., H.J.d.K., N.T.v.R.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands (S.E.G., M.A.J.); Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); and Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Karolina Juraniec
- From the Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands (V.D.V.S., K.J., H.J.d.K., N.T.v.R.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands (S.E.G., M.A.J.); Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); and Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Sabine E Grimm
- From the Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands (V.D.V.S., K.J., H.J.d.K., N.T.v.R.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands (S.E.G., M.A.J.); Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); and Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Manuela A Joore
- From the Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands (V.D.V.S., K.J., H.J.d.K., N.T.v.R.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands (S.E.G., M.A.J.); Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); and Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- From the Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands (V.D.V.S., K.J., H.J.d.K., N.T.v.R.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands (S.E.G., M.A.J.); Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); and Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Harry J de Koning
- From the Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands (V.D.V.S., K.J., H.J.d.K., N.T.v.R.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands (S.E.G., M.A.J.); Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); and Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Nicolien T van Ravesteyn
- From the Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands (V.D.V.S., K.J., H.J.d.K., N.T.v.R.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands (S.E.G., M.A.J.); Dutch Reference Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); and Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pouwels XGLV, Petersohn S, Carrera VH, Denniston AK, Chalker A, Raatz H, Armstrong N, Witlox W, Worthy G, Noake C, Riemsma R, Kleijnen J, Joore MA. Response to Comment on "Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant for Treating Recurrent Non-Infectious Uveitis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal". Pharmacoeconomics 2020; 38:649-651. [PMID: 32249398 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00900-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Svenja Petersohn
- Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alastair K Denniston
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Heike Raatz
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- European Centre of Pharmaceutical Medicine, Basel University, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Willem Witlox
- Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Caro Noake
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | | | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pouwels XGLV, Petersohn S, Carrera VH, Denniston AK, Chalker A, Raatz H, Armstrong N, Shah D, Witlox W, Worthy G, Noake C, Riemsma R, Kleijnen J, Joore MA. Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant for Treating Recurrent Non-infectious Uveitis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2020; 38:431-441. [PMID: 31701471 PMCID: PMC7176320 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00851-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited Alimera Sciences, the company manufacturing fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (FAc) 0.19 mg (tradename ILUVIEN®), to submit evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of FAc for treating recurrent non-infectious uveitis. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre + , was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). This paper contains a summary of the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence submitted by the company, the ERG's critique on the submitted evidence, and the guidance issued by the NICE Appraisal Committee (AC). The company submission (CS) was mainly informed by the PSV-FAI-001 trial in which FAc was compared with (limited) current practice [(L)CP], which was not considered to be representative of UK clinical practice by the ERG. There was no comparison of FAc to any treatment listed in the final scope, and especially to the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (dexamethasone), which was considered to be a relevant comparator by the AC. The primary outcome of the PSV-FAI-001 was recurrence of uveitis in the treated eye. Most of the events for the primary outcome were imputed during the PSV-FAI-001 trial, which probably led to an overestimation of the number of recurrences of disease, and a biased estimate of the relative effectiveness of FAc versus (L)CP. Finally, the place of FAc in the treatment pathway was not clearly defined by the company. Substantial uncertainty surrounded the cost-effectiveness results due to the shortcomings of the clinical evidence. Additionally, the quality of life of patients was not measured during the PSV-FAI-001 trial and long-term effectiveness data of FAc were lacking. The ERG adjusted several issues identified in the CS and added dexamethasone as a comparator in the decision analytic model. The ERG presented multiple analyses as base-cases because several elements of the assessment remained uncertain. The fully incremental ERG results ranged from dexamethasone (extendedly) dominating FAc (when assuming a hazard ratio of 1 or 0.7 for dexamethasone versus FAc) to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £30,153 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for FAc versus (L)CP [when assuming a hazard ratio of 0.456 for dexamethasone versus (L)CP]. The ICER of FAc versus (L)CP ranged from £12,325 to £30,153 per QALY gained. After a second AC meeting where alternative company scenarios comparing FAc with dexamethasone were considered by the AC, the AC concluded that "the results of the company's analyses ranged from the fluocinolone acetonide implant being dominant (that is, it was more effective and costs less), to an ICER of £29,461 per QALY gained, and most of the ICERs were below £20,000 per QALY gained". Therefore, the AC recommended FAc as a cost-effective use of National Health Service (NHS) resources for treating recurrent non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye in the final TA590 guidance (published July 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Svenja Petersohn
- Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alastair K Denniston
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Heike Raatz
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- European Centre of Pharmaceutical Medicine, Basel University, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Willem Witlox
- Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Caro Noake
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | | | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Witlox WJA, van Asselt ADI, Wolff R, Armstrong N, Worthy G, Chalker A, Buksnys T, Stirk L, Kleijnen J, Joore MA, Grimm SE. Durvalumab for the Treatment of Locally Advanced, Unresectable, Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2020; 38:317-324. [PMID: 31814080 PMCID: PMC7080309 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00870-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
As part of the Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer (AstraZeneca) of durvalumab (IMFINZITM) to submit evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of durvalumab for the treatment of patients with locally advanced, unresectable, stage III non-small cell lung cancer whose tumours express programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on ≥ 1% of tumour cells and whose disease has not progressed after platinum-based chemoradiation therapy. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre, was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). This paper summarises the company submission (CS), presents the ERG's critical review on the clinical- and cost-effectiveness evidence in the CS, highlights the key methodological considerations, and describes the development of the NICE guidance by the Appraisal Committee. The CS included a systematic review that identified one randomised controlled trial, comparing durvalumab with SoC. Participants with tumours expressing PD-L1 on ≥ 1% of tumour cells accounted for approximately 40% of the total participants. In this subgroup, a benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.63] and overall survival (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.81) was reported. Adverse events were comparable between both treatments, but more serious adverse events were reported for durvalumab (64/213 [30%] vs. 18/90 [20%]). The ERG's concerns regarding the economic analysis included a likely overestimation of PFS for the durvalumab arm, the choice of timepoint for treatment waning, as well as the way treatment waning was incorporated in the model, and potential overestimation of utility values without applying an age- or treatment-related decrement. The revised ERG base-case resulted in a deterministic incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £50,238 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, with substantial remaining uncertainty. NICE recommended durvalumab as an option for use within the Cancer Drugs Fund only in a subpopulation (concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation therapy) with a commercially managed access agreement in place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem J A Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Antoinette D I van Asselt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lisa Stirk
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
van Hoof M, Wigren S, Ivarsson Blechert J, Molin M, Andersson H, Mateijsen DJM, Bom SJH, Calmels MN, van der Rijt AJM, Flynn MC, van Tongeren J, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Anteunis LJC, Marco Algarra J, Stokroos RJ, Joore MA. A Multinational Cost-Consequence Analysis of a Bone Conduction Hearing Implant System-A Randomized Trial of a Conventional vs. a Less Invasive Treatment With New Abutment Technology. Front Neurol 2020; 11:106. [PMID: 32231633 PMCID: PMC7082879 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: It is hypothesized that, for patients with hearing loss, surgically placing an implant/abutment combination whilst leaving the subcutaneous tissues intact will improve cosmetic and clinical results, increase quality of life (QoL) for the patient, and reduce medical costs. Here, incremental costs and consequences associated with soft tissue preservation surgery with a hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated abutment (test) were compared with the conventional approach, soft tissue reduction surgery with an all-titanium abutment (control). Methods: A cost-consequence analysis was performed based on data gathered over a period of 3 years in an open randomized (1:1) controlled trial (RCT) running in four European countries (The Netherlands, Spain, France, and Sweden). Subjects with conductive or mixed hearing loss or single-sided sensorineural deafness were included. Results: During the first year, in the Netherlands (NL), France (FR), and Spain (ES) a net cost saving was achieved in favor of the test intervention because of a lower cost associated with surgery time and adverse event treatments [NL €86 (CI -50.33; 219.20), FR €134 (CI -3.63; 261.30), ES €178 (CI 34.12; 97.48)]. In Sweden (SE), the HA-coated abutment was more expensive than the conventional abutment, which neutralized the cost savings and led to a negative cost (SE €-29 CI -160.27; 97.48) of the new treatment modality. After 3 years, the mean cost saving reduced to €17 (CI -191.80; 213.30) in the Netherlands, in Spain to €84.50 (CI -117.90; 289.50), and in France to €80 (CI -99.40; 248.50). The mean additional cost in Sweden increased to €-116 (CI -326.90; 68.10). The consequences in terms of the subjective audiological benefit and Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were comparable between treatments. A trend was identified for favorable results in the test group for some consequences and statistical significance is achieved for the cosmetic outcome as assessed by the clinician. Conclusions: From this multinational cost-consequence analysis it can be discerned that health care systems can achieve a cost saving during the first year that regresses after 3 years, by implementing soft tissue preservation surgery with a HA-coated abutment in comparison to the conventional treatment. The cosmetic results are better. (sponsored by Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB; Clinical and health economic evaluation with a new Baha® abutment design combined with a minimally invasive surgical technique, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01796236).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc van Hoof
- Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Department, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Stina Wigren
- Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB, Mölnlycke, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | - Steven J H Bom
- ENT Department, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - M N Calmels
- ENT Department, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Mark C Flynn
- Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB, Mölnlycke, Sweden
- Research and Innovation, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Joost van Tongeren
- Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Department, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Isala Clinics, Department of ENT, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | - Janny R Hof
- Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Department, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jan Wouter Brunings
- Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Department, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Lucien J C Anteunis
- Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Department, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Robert Jan Stokroos
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Brain Center Rudolph Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
van Hoof M, Wigren S, Ivarsson Blechert J, Joore MA, Mateijsen DJM, Bom SJH, Stalfors J, Eeg-Olofsson M, Deguine O, van der Rijt AJM, Flynn MC, Algarra JM, Stokroos RJ. Clinical Outcomes of Soft Tissue Preservation Surgery With Hydroxyapatite-Coated Abutments Compared to Traditional Percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implant Surgery-A Pragmatic Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Surg 2020; 7:5. [PMID: 32211417 PMCID: PMC7066494 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Soft tissue preservation using a hydroxyapatite-coated abutment in bone conduction hearing implant surgery may lead to improved clinical outcomes over the short (1 year) and long term (3 years). Methods: In this open multi-center, randomized (1:1), controlled clinical trial, subjects with conductive, mixed hearing loss or single-sided sensorineural deafness were randomly assigned to receive the conventional intervention, a titanium abutment with soft tissue reduction surgery (control), or a new intervention, a hydroxyapatite-coated abutment with soft tissue preservation surgery (test). The primary efficacy outcome was the combined endpoint of numbness, pain, peri-abutment dermatitis, and soft tissue thickening/overgrowth after 1 and 3 years. Results: The Intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 52 control subjects and 51 test subjects. The difference between the groups after 1 year of follow-up as measured by the primary efficacy outcome was not statistically significant (p = 0.12) in the ITT population (n = 103), but did reach statistical significance (p = 0.03) in the per-protocol (PP) population (n = 96). It showed an advantage for the test group, with over twice as many subjects (29%) without these medical events during the first year compared to the control group (13%). After 3 years, the difference between the two groups had declined and did not reach statistical significance (24 vs. 10%, ITT p = 0.45). Secondary outcome measures which showed a statistical significant difference during the first year, such as surgical time (15 vs. 25 minutes, p < 0.0001), numbness (90 vs. 69% of subjects experienced no numbness at 1 year, p < 0.01), neuropathic pain at 3 months (p = 0.0087) and the overall opinion of the esthetic outcome (observer POSAS scale at 3 months, p < 0.01) were favorable for the test group. More soft tissue thickening/overgrowth was observed at 3 weeks for the test group (p = 0.016). Similar results were achieved for the long term follow up. Conclusions: Soft tissue preservation with a hydroxyapatite-coated abutment leads to a reduction in the combined occurrence of complications over the first year which is not statistically significant in the ITT population but is in the PP population. This effect decreased for the long-term study follow up of 3 years and did also not reach statistical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M van Hoof
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHENS), Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Department, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - S Wigren
- Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB, Mölnlycke, Sweden
| | | | - M A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - S J H Bom
- ENT Department, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - J Stalfors
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Måns Eeg-Olofsson
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - O Deguine
- ENT Department, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - M C Flynn
- Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB, Mölnlycke, Sweden.,University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - J Marco Algarra
- ENT Department, Clinical University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - R J Stokroos
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Brain Center Rudolph Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Grimm SE, Pouwels X, Ramaekers BLT, Wijnen B, Knies S, Grutters J, Joore MA. Development and Validation of the TRansparent Uncertainty ASsessmenT (TRUST) Tool for Assessing Uncertainties in Health Economic Decision Models. Pharmacoeconomics 2020; 38:205-216. [PMID: 31709496 PMCID: PMC7081657 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00855-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of technologies are obtaining marketing authorisation based on sparse evidence, which causes growing uncertainty and risk within health technology reimbursement decision making. To ensure that uncertainty is considered and addressed within health technology assessment (HTA) recommendations, uncertainties need to be identified, included in health economic models, and reported. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to develop the TRansparent Uncertainty ASsessmenT (TRUST) tool for systematically identifying, assessing, and reporting uncertainties in decision models, with the aim of making uncertainties and their impact on cost effectiveness more explicit and transparent. METHODS TRUST was developed by drawing on the uncertainty and risk assessment literature. To develop and validate this tool, we conducted HTA stakeholder discussion meetings and interviews and applied it in six real-world HTA case studies in the Netherlands and the UK. RESULTS The TRUST tool enables the identification and categorisation of uncertainty according to its source (transparency issues, methodology issues, and issues with evidence: imprecision, bias and indirectness, and unavailability) in each model aspect. The source of uncertainty determines the appropriate analysis. The impact of uncertainties on cost effectiveness is also assessed. Stakeholders found using the tool to be feasible and of value for transparent uncertainty assessment. TRUST can be used during model development and/or model review. CONCLUSION The TRUST tool enables systematic identification, assessment, and reporting of uncertainties in health economic models and may contribute to more informed and transparent decision making in the face of uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E Grimm
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Xavier Pouwels
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Wijnen
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Knies
- Zorginstituut Nederland, Willem Dudokhof 1, 1112 ZA, Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Grutters
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Post 133, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Oosterhoff M, van Schayck OCP, Bartelink NHM, Bosma H, Willeboordse M, Winkens B, Joore MA. The Short-Term Value of the "Healthy Primary School of the Future" Initiative: A Social Return on Investment Analysis. Front Public Health 2020; 8:401. [PMID: 32974255 PMCID: PMC7472552 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This study examines the social return on investment (SROI) of the "Healthy Primary School of the Future" initiative after 2 years. Methods: Healthy Primary Schools of the Future (HPSF) provide a healthy lunch and daily structured physical activity sessions, whereas Physical Activity Schools (PAS) focus on physical activity only. We evaluated the 2-years investments and effects (N = 1,676 children) of both school environments (four schools) compared to control schools (four schools). Investments and outcomes were grouped within the healthcare, education, household & leisure, and labor & social security sector. Outcomes that could be expressed in monetary terms were used for the calculation of social return on investment. Results: HPSF and PAS created outcomes for the healthcare sector by favorable changes in health behaviors, body mass index [both significant], and medical resource use [not significant]. Outcomes for the education sector included a favorable impact on perceived social behaviors and school satisfaction, and absenteeism from school [latter not significant], and more engagement with the community was experienced. The per child investments, €859 (HPSF) and €1017 (PAS), generated a benefit of €8 (HPSF) and €49 (PAS) due to reduced school absenteeism and medical resource use. Conclusions: Within 2 years of intervention implementation, the HPSF initiative created outcomes in several sectors, but the benefits did not outweigh the investments. Follow-up assessments as well as modeling long-term outcomes are needed to assess the total value of the interventions. Until then, the SROI framework can inform strategies for obtaining stakeholder support and intervention implementation. Trial registration: The study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database on 14 June 2016 (NCT02800616).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije Oosterhoff
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Onno C P van Schayck
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Nina H M Bartelink
- Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Hans Bosma
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Maartje Willeboordse
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Grimm SE, Fayter D, Ramaekers BLT, Petersohn S, Riemsma R, Armstrong N, Pouwels X, Witlox W, Noake C, Worthy G, Kleijnen J, Joore MA. Pembrolizumab for Treating Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:1195-1207. [PMID: 30895564 PMCID: PMC6713293 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00792-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
As part of its Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer (Merck Sharp & Dohme; MSD) of pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) to submit evidence of its clinical and cost effectiveness for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (RRcHL) who did not respond to treatment with brentuximab vedotin. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre+, was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). The ERG produced a detailed review of the evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of the technology, based on the company's submission to NICE. According to the NICE scope, pembrolizumab was compared with single or combination chemotherapy. Comparisons were undertaken in two populations: patients who did and did not receive prior autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT; populations 1 and 2, respectively). Despite it having been recommended by NICE in population 1 at the time the ERG received the company submission, nivolumab was not included as a comparator. No studies directly comparing pembrolizumab and its comparators were identified. One ongoing, single-arm study of the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-087) and one comparative observational study (Cheah et al., 2016) were used to inform the comparative effectiveness of pembrolizumab and standard of care (SoC), using indirect comparisons in both populations. Almost all analyses showed significant PFS and overall response rate benefits for pembrolizumab versus SoC, but due to being based on indirect comparison, were likely to contain systematic error. The economic evaluation therefore suffered from substantial uncertainty in any estimates of cost effectiveness. Furthermore, there was a lack of evidence on the uptake and timing of allogeneic stem cell transplant, and alternative assumptions had a significant impact on cost effectiveness. Immature survival data from KEYNOTE-087 exacerbated this issue and necessitated the use of alternative data sources for longer-term extrapolation of survival. Some issues identified in the company's analyses were amended by the ERG. The revised ERG deterministic base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on the company's second Appraisal Consultation Document response for pembrolizumab versus SoC (with a commercial access agreement) for populations 1 and 2 were £54,325 and £62,527 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. There was substantial uncertainty around these ICERs, especially in population 2. NICE did not recommend pembrolizumab as an option for treating RRcHL in population 1, but recommended pembrolizumab for use within the Cancer Drugs Fund in population 2.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/economics
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy
- Hodgkin Disease/economics
- Humans
- Quality-Adjusted Life Years
- Technology Assessment, Biomedical
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Debra Fayter
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Svenja Petersohn
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Riemsma
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Nigel Armstrong
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Xavier Pouwels
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Caro Noake
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Gillian Worthy
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
A uniform approach for costing school-based lifestyle interventions is currently lacking. The objective of this study was to develop a template for costing primary school-based lifestyle interventions and apply this to the costing of the "Healthy Primary School of the Future" (HPSF) and the "Physical Activity School" (PAS), which aim to improve physical activity and dietary behaviors. Cost-effectiveness studies were reviewed to identify the cost items. Societal costs were reflected by summing up the education, household and leisure, labor and social security, and health perspectives. Cost inputs for HPSF and PAS were obtained for the first year after implementation. In a scenario analysis, the costs were explored for a hypothetical steady state. From a societal perspective, the per child costs were €2.7/$3.3 (HPSF) and €- 0.3/$- 0.4 (PAS) per day during the first year after implementation, and €1.0/$1.2 and €- 1.3/$- 1.6 in a steady state, respectively (2016 prices). The highest costs were incurred by the education perspective (first year: €8.7/$10.6 (HPSF) and €4.0/$4.9 (PAS); steady state: €6.1/$7.4 (HPSF) and €2.1/$2.6 (PAS)), whereas most of the cost offsets were received by the household and leisure perspective (first year: €- 6.0/$- 7.3 (HPSF) and €- 4.4/$- 5.4 (PAS); steady state: €- 5.0/$- 6.1 (HPSF) and €- 3.4/$- 4.1 (PAS)). The template proved helpful for costing HPSF and PAS from various stakeholder perspectives. The costs for the education sector were fully (PAS) and almost fully (HPSF) compensated by the savings within the household sector. Whether the additional costs of HPSF over PAS represent value for money will depend on their relative effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije Oosterhoff
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans Bosma
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Onno C P van Schayck
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Oosterhoff M, Joore MA, Bartelink NHM, Winkens B, Schayck OCP, Bosma H. Longitudinal analysis of health disparities in childhood. Arch Dis Child 2019; 104:781-788. [PMID: 30948361 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Combatting disparities in health outcomes among children is a major public health concern. This study focuses on two questions: (1) To what extent does socioeconomic status (SES) contribute to disparities in health outcomes? and (2) To what extent can social inequalities in health outcomes be explained by differences in children's health behaviours? DESIGN This study included 2-year follow-up data of 1259 children (4-12 years of age) who participated in the 'Healthy Primary School of the Future' project (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02800616). SES was measured by maternal and paternal education and household income (adjusted for family size). Health outcomes were body mass index (BMI) z-score, health resource use, school absenteeism, health-related quality of life and psychosocial health, measured over 2 years of follow-up (2015-2017). Health behaviours included physical activity, and consumption of fruits, vegetables and sweetened beverages. Associations between SES and baseline health behaviours were examined, and mixed models for repeated measures were used to assess associations between SES and health outcomes over 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS A high socioeconomic background was significantly associated with better health outcomes (all outcomes). For example, children with a low SES had higher BMI z-scores (beta coefficient: 0.42, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.62) and higher consumption healthcare costs (ratio of mean costs: 2.21, 95% CI 1.57 to 3.10). Effects of SES changed very little after controlling for health behaviours. DISCUSSION Our findings strongly suggest that socioeconomic background has a pervasive impact on disparities in child health, but gives little support to the idea that social inequalities in child health can be tackled by means of lifestyle interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije Oosterhoff
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+)/Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+)/Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nina H M Bartelink
- Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Onno C P Schayck
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Bosma
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pouwels XGLV, Grutters JPC, Bindels J, Ramaekers BLT, Joore MA. Uncertainty and Coverage With Evidence Development: Does Practice Meet Theory? Value Health 2019; 22:799-807. [PMID: 31277827 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Revised: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In theory, a successful coverage with evidence development (CED) scheme is one that addresses the most important uncertainties in a given assessment. We investigated the following: (1) which uncertainties were present during the initial assessment of 3 Dutch CED cases, (2) how these uncertainties were integrated in the initial assessments, (3) whether CED research plans included the identified uncertainties, and (4) issues with managing uncertainty in CED research and ways forward from these issues. METHODS Three CED initial assessment dossiers were analyzed and 16 stakeholders were interviewed. Uncertainties were identified in interviews and dossiers and were categorized in different causes: unavailability, indirectness, and imprecision of evidence. Identified uncertainties could be mentioned, described, and explored. Issues and ways forward to address uncertainty in CED schemes were discussed during the interviews. RESULTS Forty-two uncertainties were identified. Thirteen (31%) were caused by unavailability, 17 (40%) by indirectness, and 12 (29%) by imprecision. Thirty-four uncertainties (81%) were only mentioned, 19 (45%) were described, and the impact of 3 (7%) uncertainties on the results was explored in the assessment dossiers. Seventeen uncertainties (40%) were included in the CED research plans. According to stakeholders, research did not address the identified uncertainty, but CED research should be designed to focus on these. CONCLUSIONS In practice, uncertainties were neither systematically nor completely identified in the analyzed CED schemes. A framework would help to systematically identify uncertainty, and this process should involve all stakeholders. Value of information analysis, and the uncertainties that are not included in this analysis should inform CED research design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier G L V Pouwels
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Jill Bindels
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ramaekers BLT, Riemsma R, Grimm S, Fayter D, Deshpande S, Armstrong N, Witlox W, Pouwels X, Duffy S, Worthy G, Kleijnen J, Joore MA. Arsenic Trioxide for Treating Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:887-894. [PMID: 30426463 PMCID: PMC6559128 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0738-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited Teva, the company manufacturing arsenic trioxide (ATO; tradename Trisenox®), to submit evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of ATO for untreated and relapsed or refractory acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd (KSR), in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Center, was commissioned as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). This paper presents a summary of the company submission (CS), the ERG's critical review of the clinical and cost effectiveness evidence in the CS, key methodological considerations and the development of the NICE guidance by the Appraisal Committee (AC). The CS presented three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two of these were trials in newly diagnosed APL (APL0406 and AML17) and the third trial was in patients with relapsed APL. Results from APL0406 showed that more people having AATO [ATO plus all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)] were alive at 50 months compared with people having AIDA (ATRA in combination with idarubicin) (99% vs. 93%; p = 0.007). There was also a statistically significant lower cumulative incidence of relapse with AATO compared with AIDA at 50 months (2% vs. 14%; p = 0.001). At 4 years, results from AML17 showed a significant difference in event-free survival (91% vs. 70%; p = 0.002) favouring AATO but not in overall survival (93% vs. 89%; p = 0.250). The only trial presented for relapsed/refractory patients compared AATO with ATO, which was not a relevant comparison according to the NICE scope. The AC concluded that AATO was effective for untreated APL while for relapsed or refractory APL the effectiveness of ATO was considered uncertain and the long-term safety remains unexplored. In the CS base-case, AATO was less expensive (£31,088 saved) and more effective (2.546 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained) than AIDA and thus the dominating strategy for newly diagnosed low- to intermediate-risk APL. However, the ERG's critical assessment highlighted a number of concerns, including deviations from the NICE reference case and a lack of detailed description and justification of parameters and assumptions related to (the extrapolation of) treatment effectiveness. However, it was reassuring that AATO for untreated APL remained dominant in the ERG base-case, and that the worst-case scenario produced by the ERG resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £21,622. The AC concluded that although there was uncertainty in the model, it could recommend ATO for both untreated and relapsed or refractory APL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Sabine Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Willem Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Xavier Pouwels
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
In the article, 'A Cost Analysis of School-Based Lifestyle Interventions', we calculated the societal costs of two school-based lifestyle interventions: 'the Healthy Primary School of the Future' and 'the Physical Activity School'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije Oosterhoff
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans Bosma
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Onno C P van Schayck
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Grimm SE, Armstrong N, Ramaekers BLT, Pouwels X, Lang S, Petersohn S, Riemsma R, Worthy G, Stirk L, Ross J, Kleijnen J, Joore MA. Nivolumab for Treating Metastatic or Unresectable Urothelial Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:655-667. [PMID: 30293207 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0723-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
As part of its single technology appraisal (STA) process, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer (Bristol-Myers Squibb) of nivolumab (Opdivo®) to submit evidence of its clinical and cost effectiveness for metastatic or unresectable urothelial cancer. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre+, was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG), which produced a detailed review of the evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of the technology, based on the company's submission to NICE. Nivolumab was compared with docetaxel, paclitaxel, best supportive care and retreatment with platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin plus gemcitabine, but only for patients whose disease has had an adequate response in first-line treatment). Two ongoing, phase I/II, single-arm studies for nivolumab were identified, but no studies directly compared nivolumab with any specified comparator. Evidence from directly examining the single arms of the trial data indicated little difference between the outcomes measured from the nivolumab and comparator studies. A simulated treatment comparison (STC) analysis was used in an attempt to reduce the bias induced by naïve comparison, but there was no clear evidence that risk of bias was reduced. Multiple limitations in the STC were identified and remained. The effect of an analysis based on different combinations of covariates in the prediction model remains unknown. The ERG's concerns regarding the economic analysis included the use of a non-established response-based survival analysis method, which introduced additional uncertainty. The use of time-dependent hazard ratios produced overfitting and was not represented in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The use of a treatment stopping rule to cap treatment cost left treatment effectiveness unaltered. A relevant comparator was excluded from the base-case analysis. The revised ERG deterministic base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on the company's Appraisal Consultation Document response were £58,791, £78,869 and £62,352 per quality-adjusted life-year gained versus paclitaxel, docetaxel and best supportive care, respectively. Nivolumab was dominated by cisplatin plus gemcitabine in the ERG base case. Substantial uncertainties about the relative treatment effectiveness comparing nivolumab against all comparators remained. NICE did not recommend nivolumab, within its marketing authorisation, as an option for treating locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults who have had platinum-containing therapy, and considered that nivolumab was not suitable for use within the Cancer Drugs Fund.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine E Grimm
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Nigel Armstrong
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Xavier Pouwels
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Shona Lang
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Svenja Petersohn
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Riemsma
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Gillian Worthy
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Lisa Stirk
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Janine Ross
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, 6 Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, York, YO19 6FD, UK
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Petersohn S, Ramaekers BLT, Olie RH, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Daemen JWHC, Ten Cate H, Joore MA. Comparison of three generic quality-of-life metrics in peripheral arterial disease patients undergoing conservative and invasive treatments. Qual Life Res 2019; 28:2257-2279. [PMID: 30929124 PMCID: PMC6620242 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02166-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the effect of revascularisation for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) on QoL in the first and second year following diagnosis, to compare the effect depicted by Short Form Six Dimensions (SF-6D) and EuroQoL five Dimensions (EQ-5D) utilities, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and to analyse heterogeneity in treatment response. METHODS Longitudinal data from 229 PAD patients were obtained in an observational study in southern Netherlands. Utility scores were calculated with the international (SF-6D) and Dutch (EQ-5D) tariffs. We analysed treatment effect at years 1 and 2 through propensity score-matched ANCOVAs. Thereby, we estimated the marginal means (EMMs) of revascularisation and conservative treatment, and identified covariates of revascularisation effect. RESULTS A year after diagnosis, 70 patients had been revascularised; the EMMs of revascularisation were 0.038, 0.077 and 0.019 for SF-6D, EQ-5D and VAS, respectively (always in this order). For conservative treatment these were - 0.017, 0.038 and 0.021. At 2-year follow-up, the EMMs of revascularisation were 0.015, 0.077 and 0.027, for conservative treatment these were - 0.020, 0.013 and - 0.004. Baseline QoL (and rest pain in year 2) were covariates of treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS We measured positive effects of revascularisation and conservative treatment on QoL a year after diagnosis, the effect of revascularisation was sustained over 2 years. The magnitude of effect varied between the metrics and was largest for the EQ-5D, which may be most suitable for QoL measurement in PAD patients. Baseline QoL influenced revascularisation effect, in clinical practice this may inform expected QoL gain in individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Petersohn
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renske H Olie
- Department of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Arina J Ten Cate-Hoek
- Department of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem H C Daemen
- Department of Vascular surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo Ten Cate
- Department of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Amin EE, ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Bouman AC, Meijer K, Tick L, Middeldorp S, Mostard G, ten Wolde M, van den Heiligenberg S, van Wissen S, van de Poel M, Villalta S, Serné E, Otten HM, Klappe E, Prandoni P, Prins MH, ten Cate H, Joore MA. Individually shortened duration versus standard duration of elastic compression therapy for prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis. The Lancet Haematology 2018; 5:e512-e519. [DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(18)30151-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2018] [Revised: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
50
|
Oosterhoff M, Bosma H, van Schayck OCP, Evers SMAA, Dirksen CD, Joore MA. A systematic review on economic evaluations of school-based lifestyle interventions targeting weight-related behaviours among 4-12 year olds: Issues and ways forward. Prev Med 2018; 114:115-122. [PMID: 29959951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Current guidelines for economic evaluations do not provide specific recommendations for the evaluation of school-based lifestyle interventions. This study examined and discussed the key aspects in the design of economic evaluations on school-based interventions targeting weight-related behaviours among 4-12 year olds. The PubMed and CRD databases (NHS EED) were searched. Grey literature was identified from reference lists and websites of relevant organizations. Full economic evaluations on school-based interventions targeting physical activity, sedentariness, or diet were selected. Key aspects included the objective, audience, intervention, comparator, population, type of analysis, perspective, costs, outcomes, and time horizon. Information was also extracted on measuring and valuing costs and outcomes, linking and extrapolating outcomes, and the maintenance of intervention effects. The 23 included studies reported on cost-effectiveness (CEAs) (N = 12), cost-utility (CUAs) (N = 9), social cost benefit (SCBA) (N = 2), and social return on investment (SROI) (N = 1) analysis. The usual practice comparator was generally not clearly defined. The SROI analysis was the single study that included outcomes in other persons than the child. Healthcare costs (N = 14), productivity costs (N = 4), and costs to the household (N = 3), or education (N = 2) sector were examined. The outcome in trial-based CEAs consisted of a variety of weight-related measures. Seven distinctive models were used to extrapolate health and/or productivity costs. To enhance the usefulness of economic evaluations on school-based lifestyle interventions in allocating public health budgets, transparent reporting on key aspects, broadening the scope of economic evaluations, and standardizing the measurement, valuation, and extrapolation of costs and outcomes should be improved. This study was conducted in Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije Oosterhoff
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), KEMTA, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Hans Bosma
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Social Medicine, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Onno C P van Schayck
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Family Medicine, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Health Services Research, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Trimbos, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Trimbos, P.O. Box 725, 3500, AS, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carmen D Dirksen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), KEMTA, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), KEMTA, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|