New insights in the association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype, aortic configuration and valve haemodynamics

Are normal-sized ascending aortas at risk of late aortic events after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve disease?

OBJECTIVES

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated aortopathy has been proposed to progress after isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery, which has been traditionally used as an argument against a TAVR procedure in this clinical subset. Still, more than half of BAV patients have a normal-sized proximal aorta at the time of AVR surgery. We aimed to analyse the long-term risk of adverse aortic events after isolated conventional AVR surgery for BAV and normal-sized proximal aorta.

METHODS

A total of 200 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 13 years, 73% men) with BAV disease and ascending aortic diameter of <40 mm underwent isolated conventional AVR from 1995 through 2008 and were identified from our institutional BAV database. Long-term follow-up data (a total of 1532 patient-years) were obtained for all hospital survivors. Composite adverse aortic/cardiovascular events were defined as the need for redo aortic surgery, the occurrence of aortic dissection/rupture, or sudden cardiac death during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 25 (13%) patients died after a mean follow-up of 8.5 ± 5 years post-AVR surgery, which resulted in an overall survival rate of 75 ± 6 and 87 ± 7% at 15 years postoperatively, for BAV-aortic stenosis and BAV-aortic regurgitation, respectively (P = 0.6). An adverse aortic event occurred in 1 (0.5%) study patient, while 5 (2.5%) further patients suffered sudden cardiac death. Only 1 patient required redo aortic surgery. No documented aortic dissection/rupture occurred. Redo AVR surgery due to endocarditis or structural valve degeneration was performed in 6 (3%) patients. The rate of freedom from composite adverse events was 92 ± 5 and 95 ± 4% at 15 years, for the AS and AR subgroups, respectively (P = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

BAV patients with aortic valve dysfunction and normal-sized ascending aorta are at considerably low risk of late adverse aortic events after isolated AVR.

New Insights Into Unicuspid Aortic Valve Disease in Adults: Not Just a Subtype of Bicuspid Aortic Valves

BACKGROUND

The clinical presentation, echocardiographic features, and patterns of aortic dilatation in unicuspid aortic valves (UAVs) are not well defined.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2015, all data from adult patients with confirmed UAVs (n = 42) who underwent aortic valve surgery were reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 33.9 ± 1.7 years; 33 were male (78%). Mixed aortic valve disease (stenosis and regurgitation) was the most common mode of presentation (n = 25; 59%). Preoperative diagnosis of UAV was made in only 6 patients (14%). Preoperative transesophageal echocardiography in the operating room increased the diagnosis to 69% of the patients. The peak and mean aortic gradients were 80 ± 29 mm Hg and 50 ± 20 mm Hg, respectively. The aortic valve area was 1.1 ± 0.4 cm(2). Overall, 21% of patients (n = 9) had aortic dilatation (> 45 mm): 6 patients (14%) had isolated ascending aortic dilatation, 1 patient (2%) had isolated aortic root dilatation, and 2 patients (5%) had combined aortic root and ascending aortic dilatation. In contrast, 71% of patients (n = 30) had a dilated aortic annulus (> 25 mm). Mean aortic diameters measured using transesophageal echocardiography were: aortic annulus: 25.8 ± 3.4 mm; sinus of Valsalva: 32.1 ± 5 mm, sinotubular junction: 28.1 ± 5 mm, and ascending aorta: 36.2 ± 5 mm. The valve was repaired using a bicuspidization technique in 8 patients (19%) and replaced using a Ross procedure in 34 patients (81%).

CONCLUSIONS

UAVs remain significantly underdiagnosed in young adults with aortic valve disease. UAVs are associated with a distinct pattern of aortic dilatation, which is mainly present at the level of the aortic annulus. In a small proportion of patients, the valve can be surgically repaired.