Characteristics of heart failure patients associated with good and poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a PROSPECT (Predictors of Response to CRT) sub-analysis

Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has modified the prognosis of chronic heart failure (HF) with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. However, 30% of patients do not have a favorable response. The big question is how to determine predictors of response.

AIMS

To identify baseline characteristics that might influence echocardiographic response to CRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a prospective single-center hospital-based cohort study of consecutive HF patients selected to CRT (NYHA class II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% and QRS complex ≥120 ms). Responders were defined as those with a ≥5% absolute increase in LVEF at six months. Clinical, electrocardiographic, laboratory, echocardiographic, autonomic, endothelial and cardiopulmonary function parameters were assessed before CRT device implantation. Logistic regression models were used. Seventy-nine patients were included, 54 male (68.4%), age 68.1 years (standard deviation 10.2), 19 with ischemic etiology (24%). At six months, 51 patients (64.6%) were considered responders. Although by univariate analysis baseline tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and serum creatinine were significantly different in responders, on multivariate analysis only TAPSE was independently associated with response, with higher values predicting a positive response to CRT (OR=1.13; 95% CI: 1.02-1.26; p=0.020). TAPSE ≥15 mm was strongly associated with response, and TAPSE <15 mm with non-response (p=0.005). Responders had no TAPSE values below 10 mm.

CONCLUSION

From a range of clinical and technical baseline characteristics, multivariate analysis only identified TAPSE as an independent predictor of CRT response, with TAPSE <15 mm associated with non-response. This study highlights the importance of right ventricular dysfunction in CRT response. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02413151.

Relation of Myocardial Contrast-Enhanced T1 Mapping by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Myocardial scar is known to be associated with limited left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, the impact of diffuse myocardial interstitial fibrosis, as assessed with myocardial T₁ mapping cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), has not been studied in patients with CRT. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating the association between diffuse myocardial interstitial fibrosis, in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients, and LV reverse remodeling after CRT. A total of 40 patients (61 ± 11 years) with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent CMR before CRT implantation were included. Myocardial T₁ mapping was performed using an inversion-recovery Look-Locker sequence after gadolinium injection. Myocardial contrast-enhanced T₁ time values were assessed from segments without delayed contrast enhancement and normalized for heart rate. At 6-month follow-up, LV reverse remodeling was assessed by the reduction in LV end-systolic volume. Before CRT implantation, mean myocardial contrast-enhanced T₁ time was 351 ± 46 ms. At 6-month follow-up, LV end-systolic volume decreased by 24 ± 21%. Myocardial contrast-enhanced T₁ time showed a significant correlation with LV reverse remodeling (r = 0.5, p = 0.001) together with hemoglobin level, renal function, LV dyssynchrony, and presence of delayed contrast enhancement. Multivariate regression analysis identified myocardial contrast-enhanced T₁ time (β -0.160, p = 0.022), LV dyssynchrony (β -0.267, p = 0.002), and renal function (β -0.334, p = 0.021) as independent associates of LV reverse remodeling. In conclusion, in nonischemic cardiomyopathy, diffuse interstitial myocardial fibrosis quantified with T₁ mapping CMR is independently associated with LV reverse remodeling after CRT and might, therefore, be used to optimize patient selection.

Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Transient Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) changes at 6 months and clinical status are useful for assessing responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Regression of the LVESV following CRT has not been described beyond 6 months. This study aimed to assess the proportion, predictors, and clinical outcomes of responders whose LVESVs had regressed.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 104 consecutive CRT patients. A responder was defined as a patient with a relative reduction in the LVESV ≥15% at 6 months after CRT. Fifty-six responders participated in this study. A transient responder was defined as a responder without a relative reduction in the LVESV ≥15% at 2 years after CRT or who died of cardiac events during the 24-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Of the 56 responders, 16 (29%) were transient responders. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that chronic atrial fibrillation (odds ratio [OR] = 19.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.93, 190], P = 0.012) and amiodarone usage (OR = 60.9, 95% CI [4.18, 886], P = 0.003) were independent predictors of transient responses. Hospitalizations for heart failure were significantly higher among the transient responders than among the lasting responders during a mean follow-up period of 7.6 years (log-rank P < 0.001), and all-cause mortality tended to be higher among the transient responders (log-rank P = 0.093).

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of the responders were transient responders at 2 years after CRT, and their long-term prognoses were poor. Careful attention should be paid to maintain the reduction in LVESV especially in patients with chronic AF.

A new use for maximum deflection index: Detection of intraventricular dyssynchrony

AIM

CRT has been shown to be very beneficial for patients with reduced LVEF, symptomatic HF and increased QRS width. But many patients do not benefit from CRT. Maximum deflection index (MDI) is a quantitive measure of the rapidity of depolarization of the myocardium. In previous studies, high MDI was found to indicate epicardial origin of ventricular tachycardia. We aimed to detect the relationship between echocardiographic intraventricular dyssynchrony and MDI.

METHODS

We included 144 patients with HF, QRS≥120ms, LBBB, NYHA II-IV, LVEF<35% and scheduled for CRT (90 male, 54 female; mean age 65.3±9.9years). Septal-lateral >60ms delay for the beginning of systolic velocity in TDI and septum-posterior >130ms delay in M-mode were accepted as intraventricular dyssynchrony. The MDI was calculated by dividing the time from onset of the QRS complex to the earliest point of maximum deflection in V5-V6 by the QRS duration.

RESULTS

Septal-lateral delay was associated with MDI and QRS width in bivariate analysis. In logistic regression analysis, MDI (beta=0,264, p=0.001) and QRS width (beta=0,177, p=0.028) were found to be independent parameters for predicting significant septal-lateral delay. MDI was also associated with significant septum-posterior delay in bivariate correlations and ROC curve (p<0.05 for all). In bivariate analysis MDI was associated with intraventricular dyssynchrony in both non-strict LBBB (r=0.261, p=0.010) and strict LBBB (r=0.305, p=0.035) groups.

CONCLUSION

MDI is closely associated with all echocardiographic intraventricular dyssynchrony parameters. We suggest that MDI may be used as a marker to detect patients with increased intraventricular dyssynchrony. It may be useful to integrate MDI to CRT patient selection procedure in order to minimize nonresponders.

Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction-Recent Developments

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) represents at least half of the cases of heart failure, which is a syndrome defined as the inability of the heart to supply the body's tissues with an adequate amount of blood under conditions of normal cardiac filling pressure. HFrEF is responsible for high costs and rates of mortality, morbidity, and hospital admissions, mainly in developed countries. Thus, the need for better diagnostic methods and therapeutic approaches and consequently better outcomes is clear. In this article, we review the principal aspects of pathophysiology and diagnosis of HFrEF, with focus on emerging biomarkers and on recent echocardiographic methods for the assessment of left ventricular function. Furthermore, we discuss several major developments in pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment of HFrEF in the last years, including cardiac resynchronization therapy, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and the recent and promising drug LCZ696, focusing on current indications, unanswered questions, and other relevant aspects.

High Left Ventricular Lead Sensing Delay Predicts QRS Narrowing and Good Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was shown to improve heart failure (HF) prognosis. But many patients do not benefit from CRT. Optimization of left ventricular (LV) lead position to the latest activated LV area is important to increase CRT response. We aimed to detect the relationship between LV lead sensing delay and echocardiographic and electrocardiographic response to CRT treatment.

METHODS

We prospectively included 156 consecutive patients with HF diagnosis, QRS ≥ 120 ms, left bundle branch block, New York Heart Association II-IV, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%, and scheduled for CRT (100 male, 56 female; mean age 65.8 ± 10.06 years). Echocardiographic CRT response was defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV). LV lead sensing delay was calculated as the time interval from the onset of surface QRS wave to the onset of depolarization wave recorded from the LV lead by using the LV pacing lead as a bipolar electrode.

RESULTS

LVESV reduction was associated with baseline QRS width (r = 0.292, P = 001), QRS narrowing (r = 0.332, P < 001), and LV lead sensing delay (r = 0.454, P < 001) in bivariate analysis. In logistic regression analysis, LV lead sensing delay was found to be the only independent parameter for predicting significant LVESV reduction (β = 0.423, P < 0.001). LV lead sensing delay was also found to be significantly associated with LVEF increase (r = 0.320, P < 0.001) and QRS narrowing (r = 0.345, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LV lead sensing delay is the only independent predictor for significant reduction in LVESV and was found to be significantly associated with LVEF increase and QRS narrowing after CRT treatment. We suggest that LV lead sensing delay may be used as a marker to predict the favorable response to CRT.

Long-Term Echocardiographic Outcome in Super-Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and the Association With Mortality and Defibrillator Therapy

Super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with significant left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and improved clinical outcome. The study aimed to: (1) evaluate whether LV reverse remodeling remains sustained during long-term follow-up in super-responders and (2) analyze the association between the course of LV reverse remodeling and ventricular arrhythmias. Of all, primary prevention super-responders to CRT were selected. Super-response was defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction of ≥30% 6 months after device implantation. Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the association of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) as time-dependent variable with implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy and mortality. A total of 171 super-responders to CRT-defibrillator were included (mean age 67 ± 9 years; 66% men; 37% ischemic heart disease). Here of 129 patients received at least 1 echocardiographic evaluation after a median follow-up of 62 months (25th to 75th percentile, 38 to 87). LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, and LVEF after 6-month follow-up were comparable with those after 62-month follow-up (p = 0.90, p = 0.37, and p = 0.55, respectively). Changes in LVEF during follow-up in super-responders were independently associated with appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.98; p = 0.005) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.00; p = 0.04). A 5% increase in LVEF was associated with a 1.37 times lower risk of appropriate ICD therapy and a 1.30 times lower risk of mortality. In conclusion, LV reverse remodeling in super-responders to CRT remains sustained during long-term follow-up. Changes in LVEF during follow-up were associated with mortality and ICD therapy.

Prognostic Role of Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Because 20% to 40% of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) do not respond to it, identification of potential factors predicting response is a relevant research topic.

HYPOTHESIS

There is a possible association between right ventricular function and response to CRT.

METHODS

We analyzed 227 patients from the Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Modular Registry (CRT-MORE) who received CRT according to current guidelines from March to December 2013. Response to therapy was defined as a decrease of ≥15% in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 6 months.

RESULTS

The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) value that best predicted improvement in LVESV (sensitivity 68%, specificity 54%) was 17 mm. Stratifying patients according to TAPSE, LVESV decreased ≥15% in 78% of patients with TAPSE >17 mm (vs 59% in patients with TAPSE ≤17 mm; P = 0.006). At multivariate analysis, TAPSE >17 mm was independently associated with LVESV improvement (odds ratio: 1.97, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-3.80, P < 0.05), together with ischemic etiology (odds ratio: 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.75, P < 0.01). These results were confirmed for New York Heart Association class III to IV patients (79% echocardiographic response rate in patients with TAPSE >17 mm vs 55% in patients with TAPSE <17 mm; P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline signs of right ventricular dysfunction suggest possible remodeling after CRT. A TAPSE value of 17 mm was identified as a good cutoff for predicting a better response to CRT in patients with both mildly symptomatic and severe heart failure.

Clinical utility of speckle-tracking echocardiography in cardiac resynchronisation therapy

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) can profoundly improve outcome in selected patients with heart failure; however, response is difficult to predict and can be absent in up to one in three patients. There has been a substantial amount of interest in the echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony, with the ultimate aim of reliably identifying patients who will respond to CRT. The measurement of myocardial deformation (strain) has conventionally been assessed using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), which is limited by its angle dependence and ability to measure in a single plane. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography is a technique that provides measurements of strain in three planes, by tracking patterns of ultrasound interference ('speckles') in the myocardial wall throughout the cardiac cycle. Since its initial use over 15 years ago, it has emerged as a tool that provides more robust, reproducible and sensitive markers of dyssynchrony than TDI. This article reviews the use of two-dimensional and three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in the assessment of dyssynchrony, including the identification of echocardiographic parameters that may hold predictive potential for the response to CRT. It also reviews the application of these techniques in guiding optimal LV lead placement pre-implant, with promising results in clinical improvement post-CRT.

Time to left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy: Better late than never

INTRODUCTION

Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR), defined as reduction of end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and improvement of ejection fraction, is associated with the prognostic implications of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The time course of LVRR remains poorly characterized. Nevertheless, it has been suggested that it occurs ≤6 months after CRT.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the long-term echocardiographic and clinical evolution of patients with LVRR occurring >6 months after CRT and to identify predictors of a delayed LVRR response.

METHODS

A total of 127 consecutive patients after successful CRT implantation were divided into three groups according to LVRR response: Group A, 19 patients (15%) with LVRR after >6 months (late LVRR); Group B, 58 patients (46%) with LVRR before 6 months (early LVRR); and Group C, 50 patients (39%) without LVRR during follow-up (no LVRR).

RESULTS

The late LVRR group was older, more often had ischemic etiology and fewer patients were in NYHA class ≤II. Overall, group A presented LVRR between group B and C. This was also the case with the percentage of clinical response (68.4% vs. 94.8% vs. 38.3%, respectively, p<0.001), and hospital readmissions due to decompensated heart failure (31.6% vs. 12.1% vs. 57.1%, respectively, p<0.001). Ischemic etiology (OR 0.044; p=0.013) and NYHA functional class <III (OR 0.056; p=0.063) were the variables with the highest predictive value for late LVRR.

CONCLUSIONS

Late LVRR has better clinical and echocardiographic outcomes than no LVRR, although with a suboptimal response compared to the early LVRR population. Ischemic etiology and NYHA functional class <III are predictors of late LVRR.

The risk of ventricular arrhythmias in a Dutch CRT population: CRT-defibrillator versus CRT-pacemaker

Background

Patients eligible for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) have an indication for primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. However, response to CRT might influence processes involved in arrhythmogenesis and therefore change the necessity of ICD therapy in certain patients.

Method

In 202 CRT-defibrillator patients, the association between baseline variables, 6-month echocardiographic outcome (volume response: left ventricular end-systolic volume decrease < ≥15 % and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ >35 %) and the risk of first appropriate ICD therapy was analysed retrospectively.

Results

Fifty (25 %) patients received appropriate ICD therapy during a median follow-up of 37 (23–52) months. At baseline ischaemic cardiomyopathy (hazard ratio (HR) 2.0, p = 0.019) and a B-type natriuretic peptide level > 163 pmol/l (HR 3.8, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the risk of appropriate ICD therapy. After 6 months, 105 (52 %) patients showed volume response and 51 (25 %) reached an LVEF > 35 %. Three (6 %) patients with an LVEF > 35 % received appropriate ICD therapy following echocardiography at ± 6 months compared with 43 patients (29 %) with an LVEF ≤ 35 % (p = 0.001). LVEF post-CRT was more strongly associated to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias than volume response (LVEF > 35 %, HR 0.23, p = 0.020).

Conclusion

Assessing the necessity of an ICD in patients eligible for CRT remains a challenge. Six months post-CRT an LVEF > 35 % identified patients at low risk of ventricular arrhythmias. LVEF might be used at the time of generator replacement to identify patients suitable for downgrading to a CRT-pacemaker.

What We Can Learn from "Super-responders"

This review discusses the state of the art of knowledge to help decision making in patients who are candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and to analyze the long-term total and cardiac mortality, sudden death, and CRT with a defibrillator intervention rate, as well as the evolution of echocardiographic parameters in patients with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of greater than 50% after CRT implantation. Owing to normalization of LV function in super-responders, the need for a persistent defibrillator backup is also considered.

Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Ventricular Electrical Remodeling in Patients With Heart Failure

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reverses structural remodeling of the left ventricle. We investigated whether CRT reverses left-ventricular electrical remodeling.Eighty patients were enrolled and implanted with CRT-devices. Echocardiography and electrocardiography data were obtained from each patient prior to implantation and two years after implantation. At two years after implantation, the patients were classified into a responder group and a non-responder group based on echocardiography.Over the next 2 years, 75 patients completed follow-up, and 5 patients had died. Echocardiography results showed that 23 patients could be classified as non-responders and 52 as responders. Larger numbers of non-responders were diagnosed with either ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD). The intrinsic QRS duration was not changed in responders, patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, or in the patient categories of male and female. However, the intrinsic QRS duration was significantly prolonged in non-responders and patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (P = 0.041). The mean left ventricular end-diastolic diameter in the responder group was significantly decreased by CRT (P < 0.05), while there was no significant change in intrinsic QRS duration.While CRT does not reduce the intrinsic QRS duration, it can delay negative ventricular electrical remodeling. Continuous CRT is necessary.

Sex differences in device therapy for heart failure: utilization, outcomes, and adverse events

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies of heart failure patients demonstrated significant improvement in exercise capacity, quality of life, cardiac left ventricular function, and survival from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but the underenrollment of women in these studies is notable. Etiological and pathophysiological differences may result in different outcomes in response to this treatment by sex. The observed disproportionate representation of women suggests that many women with heart failure either do not meet current clinical criteria to receive CRT in trials or are not properly recruited and maintained in these studies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review through May 2014 of clinical trials and registries of CRT use that stratified outcomes by sex or reported percent women included. One-hundred eighty-three studies contained sex-specific information.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of the studies evaluated included ≤ 35% women. Fifty-six articles included effectiveness data that reported response with regard to specific outcome parameters. When compared with men, women exhibited more dramatic improvement in specific parameters. In the studies reporting hazard ratios for hospitalization or death, women generally had greater benefit from CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review confirms women are markedly underrepresented in CRT trials, and when a CRT device is implanted, women have a therapeutic response that is equivalent to or better than in men, while there is no difference in adverse events reported by sex.

Identification of Genetic Markers for Treatment Success in Heart Failure Patients

Background—

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve ventricular size, shape, and mass and reduce mitral regurgitation by reverse remodeling of the failing ventricle. About 30% of patients do not respond to this therapy for unknown reasons. In this study, we aimed at the identification and classification of CRT responder by the use of genetic variants and clinical parameters.

Methods and Results—

Of 1421 CRT patients, 207 subjects were consecutively selected, and CRT responder and nonresponder were matched for their baseline parameters before CRT. Treatment success of CRT was defined as a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume >15% at follow-up echocardiography compared with left ventricular end-systolic volume at baseline. All other changes classified the patient as CRT nonresponder. A genetic association study was performed, which identified 4 genetic variants to be associated with the CRT responder phenotype at the allelic ( P <0.035) and genotypic ( P <0.031) level: rs3766031 ( ATPIB1 ), rs5443 ( GNB3 ), rs5522 ( NR3C2 ), and rs7325635 ( TNFSF11 ). Machine learning algorithms were used for the classification of CRT patients into responder and nonresponder status, including combinations of the identified genetic variants and clinical parameters.

Conclusions—

We demonstrated that rule induction algorithms can successfully be applied for the classification of heart failure patients in CRT responder and nonresponder status using clinical and genetic parameters. Our analysis included information on alleles and genotypes of 4 genetic loci, rs3766031 ( ATPIB1 ), rs5443 ( GNB3 ), rs5522 ( NR3C2 ), and rs7325635 ( TNFSF11 ), pathophysiologically associated with remodeling of the failing ventricle.

Clinical Long-Term Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is Independent of Persisting Echocardiographic Markers of Dyssynchrony

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to prove the concept that correction of established parameters of dyssynchrony is a requirement for favorable long-term outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), whereas patients with persisting dyssynchrony should have a less favorable response.

METHODS

After CRT implantation and optimization of dyssynchrony parameters, we evaluated whether correction or persistence of dyssynchrony predicted long-term outcome. Primary endpoint was a combination of cardiac mortality/heart transplantation and hospitalization due to worsening heart failure, and secondary endpoint was NYHA class.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-eight consecutive patients (mean age 68 ± 10 years) undergoing CRT with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 27±9% were followed for 27 ± 19 months. All cause mortality was 17.2%, cardiac mortality was 7.8% and 3.1% had to undergo heart transplantation. Rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure was observed in 14.8%. NYHA class before CRT implantation was 2.8 ± 0.8 and improved during follow-up to 2.0 ± 0.8 (P < 0.001). A clinical response was observed in 76% (n = 97) and an echocardiographic response was documented in 66% (n = 85). After individually optimized AV and VV intervals with echocardiography, atrioventricular dyssynchrony was still present in 7.2%, interventricular dyssynchrony in 13.3% and intraventricular dyssynchrony in 16.4%. Despite persistent atrioventricular, interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony at long-term follow-up, the combined primary and secondary endpoints did not differ compared to the group without mechanical dyssynchrony (P = ns). QRS duration with biventricular stimulation did not differ between responders vs. nonresponders.

CONCLUSION

After successful CRT implantation, clinical long-term response is independent of correction of dyssynchrony measured by echocardiographic parameters and QRS width.

Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular remodeling and dyssynchrony in patients with left ventricular noncompaction and heart failure

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a rare cardiomyopathy with high incidence of heart failure (HF). It is unclear whether LVNC patients with desynchronized HF would benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In order to evaluate the effect of CRT on LVNC, this study explored left ventricular (LV) remodeling and mechanical synchronicity before and after CRT in LVNC patients, and compare with that in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. We collected 15 LVNC and 30 matched DCM patients. All the patients underwent clinical evaluation,electrocardiogram and echocardiography before CRT and ≥6 months later. LV response was defined as ≥15 % decrease in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV). Longitudinal synchronicity was quantified by YU-index using tissue Doppler imaging. The time delay of peak radial strain from anteroseptal to posterior wall, which derived from speckle tracking imaging, was used to quantify radial synchronicity. In LVNC group, LV ejection fraction increased from 27.6 ± 5.5 to 39.1 ± 7.0 % (P < 0.01) during follow-up, but LV volumes did not change significantly (both P > 0.05). Five LVNC patients (33.3 %) responded to CRT, and all of them were super-responders (reduction in LVESV > 30 %). In addition, the number of noncompacted segments and the thickness ratio of noncompacted to compacted myocardium decreased (both P < 0.05). Inter-ventricular, longitudinal and radial intra-ventricular dyssynchrony also reduced significantly (all P < 0.05). Compared with DCM group, there was no significant difference in LV response rate (33.3 vs. 60.0 %, P = 0.092), improvement of LV function and dyssynchrony index (all P < 0.05). In conclusion, CRT improved heart function, morphology and mechanical dyssynchrony in LVNC patients.

Left ventricular ejection fraction normalization in cardiac resynchronization therapy and risk of ventricular arrhythmias and clinical outcomes: results from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial

BACKGROUND

Appropriate guideline criteria for use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) do not take into account potential recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients treated with CRT-defibrillator.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients randomized to CRT-defibrillator from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial who survived and had paired echocardiograms at enrollment and at 12 months (n=752) were included. Patients were evaluated by LVEF recovery in 3 groups (LVEF ≤35% [reference], 36%-50%, and >50%) on outcomes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs), VTA ≥200 bpm, ICD shock, heart failure or death, and inappropriate ICD therapy by multivariable Cox models. A total of 7.3% achieved LVEF normalization (>50%). The average follow-up was 2.2±0.8 years. The risk of VTA was reduced in patients with LVEF >50% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.82; P=0.023) and LVEF of 36% to 50% (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.68; P<0.001). Among patients with LVEF >50%, only 1 patient had VTA ≥200 bpm (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.02-1.51), none were shocked by the ICD, and 2 died of nonarrhythmic causes. The risk of HF or death was reduced with improvements in LVEF (LVEF >50%: HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97; P=0.045; and LVEF of 36%-50%: HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.69; P<0.001). For inappropriate ICD therapy, no additional risk reduction for LVEF>50% was seen compared with an LVEF of 36% to 50%. A total of 6 factors were associated with LVEF normalization, and patients with all factors present (n=42) did not experience VTAs (positive predictive value, 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who achieve LVEF normalization (>50%) have very low absolute and relative risk of VTAs and a favorable clinical course within 2.2 years of follow-up. Risk of inappropriate ICD therapy is still present, and these patients could be considered for downgrade from CRT-defibrillator to CRT-pacemaker at the time of battery depletion if no VTAs have occurred.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271.

Interventricular lead separation is critical for NT-proBNP reduction after cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS

Effective cardiac resynchronization therapy may depend upon the distance between left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) pacing leads. We assessed the influence of lead separation upon circulating NT-proBNP.

MATERIALS & METHODS

In total, 132 patients underwent assessment, including NT-proBNP assay, before and after cardiac resynchronization therapy. 3D lead separation was calculated from postero-anterior and lateral chest radiography.

RESULTS

Lead separation correlated with NT-proBNP reduction (r = 0.25; p = 0.004). Circulating NT-proBNP only fell in those with lead separation in the upper two quartiles. Deteriorating NT-proBNP occurred in 44 patients. Lead separation was less in these patients compared with those with an improvement (corrected 3D lead separation: 148.0 ± 5.38 and 170.5 ± 4.21 mm, respectively; p = 0.0018).

CONCLUSION

Left ventricular-right ventricular lead separation correlates with postcardiac resynchronization therapy improvements in circulating NT-proBNP, a powerful marker of heart failure status and prognosis. Attention should be paid to achieving maximal lead separation at implantation.

Clinical characteristics and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a combination of predictive factors

BACKGROUND

Patients with greater improvement of cardiac function after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation are identified as "super-responders." However, it remains unclear which kind of preimplant assessments could accurately predict outcomes after CRT. Thus, we aimed to examine the essential predicting factors for super-response to CRT, and to construct an accurate predictable model.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the CRT patients who underwent implantation at Nagoya University Hospital. Super-responders are defined as those who show a relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥30% after 6 months of CRT.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (mean age, 67.8 ± 10.2 years) were included. Twenty-two patients received upgrading procedure to CRT implantation. Six months after the implantation, 29 patients (36%) were super-responders. Multiple logistic regression analysis shows that consistent right ventricular pacing with a previous device (odds ratio [OR] 7.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-34.9; P = 0.013), lack of prior history of ventricular arrhythmia (OR 5.32, 95% CI 1.52-18.6; P = 0.009), and smaller left atrial diameter (LAD) (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.98; P = 0.014) are independent predictors for CRT super-responders. The use of a combination of these predictive factors could increase the certainty with which a greater response to CRT is predicted and the presence of such a combination could improve prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Greater response to biventricular pacing occurs more frequently in patients with consistent right ventricular pacing, lack of prior history of ventricular arrhythmia, and smaller LAD. An association between patient background characteristics and a super-response to CRT was also identified.

Predictors for cardiac resynchronization therapy response: the importance of QRS morphology and left ventricular lead position

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well-established treatment for a subset of patients with chronic heart failure, a considerable proportion of eligible patients still fail to benefit from this treatment. The aim of this study was to identify potential independent predictors for being a responder to CRT. A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted in 193 consecutive patients with heart failure and wide QRS complex who successfully underwent CRT device implantation from January 2006 to October 2012. Clinical characteristics, left ventricular lead position (LV-Ps), electrocardiography and echocardiography were evaluated before and 12 months after CRT. Response to CRT was defined as an absolute increase of ≥ 5% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with baseline at 12 months after CRT implantation without heart failure rehospitalization or any cause of death. There were 132 responders (68%) and 61 nonresponders (32%). By univariate logistic analysis, the presence of non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) and QRS duration, chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), history of ventricular tachycardia (VT), degree of tricuspid regurgitation and left atrium dimension (LAD) at baseline, ΔQRS duration, and LV-Ps were associated with predicting a response to CRT. However, on multivariate analysis, only optimal LV-Ps and presence of non-LBBB remained independently predictive for a CRT response, with an odds ratio of 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-5.66, P = 0.023), 0.15(95% CI: 0.05-0.45, P = 0.001), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with nonoptimal LV-Ps or non-LBBB morphology had a significantly higher rate of mortality or heart failure rehospitalization as compared with those with optimal LV-Ps or LBBB morphology (P < 0.05).

Impact of etiology on the outcomes in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been extensively demonstrated to benefit heart failure patients, but the role of underlying heart failure etiology in the outcomes was not consistently proven. This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether efficacy and effectiveness of CRT is affected by underlying heart failure etiology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were conducted to identify RCTs and observational studies that reported clinical and functional outcomes of CRT in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients. Efficacy of CRT was assessed in 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 7072 patients and effectiveness of CRT was evaluated in 14 observational studies with 3463 patients In the pooled analysis of RCTs, we found that CRT decreased mortality or heart failure hospitalization by 29% in ICM patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 21% to 35%), and by 28% (95% CI, 18% to 37%) in NICM patients. No significant difference was observed between the 2 etiology groups (P = 0.55). In the pooled analysis of observational studies, however, we found that ICM patients had a 54% greater risk for mortality or HF hospitalization than NICM patients (relative risk: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.30-1.83; P<0.001). Both RCTs and observational studies demonstrated that NICM patients had greater echocardiographic improvements in the left ventricular ejection fraction and end-systolic volume, as compared with ICM patients (both P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

CRT might reduce mortality or heart failure hospitalization in both ICM and NICM patients similarly. The improvement of the left ventricular function and remodeling is greater in NICM patients.

The effects of dobutamine stress on cardiac mechanical synchrony determined by phase analysis of gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in a canine model

BACKGROUND

Precise identification of left ventricular (LV) systolic mechanical dyssynchrony may be useful in optimizing the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure (HF) patients. However, LV dyssynchrony is mostly measured at rest; patients often suffer from the HF symptoms during exercise.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to examine the impacts of stress on LV synchronism with phase analysis of gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (GMPS) within a normal animal cohort.

METHODS

Stress was induced with different levels of dobutamine infusion in six healthy canine subjects. Hemodynamic properties were assessed by LV pressure measurements. Also, LV mechanical synchronism (coordination of LV septal and lateral wall at the time of contraction) was determined by phase analysis of GMPS using commercially available QGS software and in-house MHI4MPI software, with the thickening- and displacement-based method. Synchrony indexes in MHI4MPI included the septal-to-lateral delay and homogeneity index, derived from each of the two methods. Also, bandwidth, SD, and entropy (synchrony indexes) of the QGS software were assessed.

RESULTS

LVEF increased from 36.7% ± 8.7% at rest to 53.67% ± 12.34% at 20 μg · kg(-1) · minute(-1) (P < .001). Also, cardiac output increased from 3.67 ± 1.0 L · minute(-1) at rest to 8.4 ± 2.6 L · minute(-1) at 10 μg · kg(-1) · minute(-1) (P < .001). The same trend was observed for dP/dt max which increased from 1,247 ± 382.7 at rest to 5,062 ± 1,800 mm Hg · s(-1) at 10 μg · kg(-1) · minute(-1) (P < .01). Entropy decreased from 55.2% ± 8% at baseline to 43.5% ± 8.5% at 5 and 43.0% ± 3.7% at 10 μg · kg(-1) · minute(-1) dobutamine (P < .01). Thickening homogeneity index showed a difference from 91.7% ± 5.53% at rest to 98.2% ± 0.75% at 20 μg · kg(-1) · minute(-1) (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dobutamine stimulation could amplify the ventricular synchronism, and the thickening-based approach is more accurate than wall displacement for assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony in GMPS.

Role of nuclear cardiology for guiding device therapy in patients with heart failure

Heart failure is a dynamic condition with high morbidity and mortality and its prognosis should be reassessed frequently, particularly in patients for whom critical treatment decisions may depend on the results of prognostication. In patients with heart failure, nuclear cardiology techniques are useful to establish the etiology and the severity of the disease, while fewer studies have explored the potential capability of nuclear cardiology to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and to select patients for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Left ventricular synchrony may be assessed by radionuclide angiography or gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. These modalities have shown promise as predictors of CRT outcome using phase analysis. Combined assessment of myocardial viability and left ventricular dyssynchrony is feasible using positron emission tomography and could improve conventional response prediction criteria for CRT. Preliminary data also exists on integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography approach for assessing myocardial viability, identifying the location of biventricular pacemaker leads, and obtaining left ventricular functional data, including contractile phase analysis. Finally, cardiac imaging with autonomic radiotracers may be useful in predicting CRT response and for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death, therefore potentially offering a way to select patients for both CRT and ICD therapy. Prospective trials where imaging is combined with image-test driven therapy are needed to better define the role of nuclear cardiology for guiding device therapy in patients with heart failure.

Temporal trends in quality of care among recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry

BACKGROUND

The ICD Registry was established in 2006 in part to measure quality of care in patients undergoing implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs); however, whether outcomes have improved since initiation of the registry is unknown. Our objective was to examine changes over time in 3 quality metrics available from the registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed an observational study of 367 153 patients who received new ICD implants from April 2006 to March 2010. Three quality metrics were selected: Adverse events (in-hospital complications or mortality), optimal medical therapy (OMT), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OMT was defined as prescription of β-blocker and either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker in eligible patients. CRT eligibility was determined by QRS ≥120 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and New York Heart Association class III/IV. Observation periods were divided into four 12-month intervals. We analyzed changes over time and used hierarchical logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders. Adverse events decreased over time (3.7% to 2.8%, P<0.001). Among eligible patients, rates of OMT and CRT increased over time (OMT: 69.0% to 74.3%, P<0.001; CRT: 80.5% to 84.2%, P<0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, patients were significantly less likely to experience adverse events in year 4 than in year 1 (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.79) and significantly more likely to receive OMT (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.32) and CRT (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Since initiation of the ICD Registry, adverse events have been decreasing, and rates of OMT and CRT among eligible patients have been increasing, although there is still significant room for improvement.

Discrepancy between echocardiographic and patient-reported health status response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the PSYHEART-CRT study

AIMS

The current study examined the degree of agreement between echocardiographic and patient-reported health status response to CRT 6 months after implantation, and evaluated the differences in pre-implantation characteristics of patients with concordant and discordant echocardiographic and health status responses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutively implanted CRT-defibrillator patients (n = 109, mean age = 65.4 ± 10.1 years, 74 men) were recruited from the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. Prior to implantation and 6 months post-implantation, all patients underwent echocardiography and completed the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Echocardiographic response was defined as a relative reduction of ≥15% in LV end-systolic volume; an improvement of ≥10 points in KCCQ score indicated a health status response. In the 54 patients with discordant responses, 25 (22.9%) had an echocardiographic response but no health status response and 29 (26.6%) had a health status response but no echocardiographic response. Patients with concordant and discordant responses differed on various pre-implantation characteristics, including sex, employment status, LV volumes, and pre-implantation KCCQ score. In multivariable analysis, pre-implantation KCCQ score [odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.88-0.95, P < 0.001] and QRS duration (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01-1.06, P = 0.009) were the only characteristics associated with health status response to CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show a large discrepancy between echocardiographic and patient-reported health status response to CRT. The most important predictor of health status response was the pre-implantation health status score. These results emphasize that disease-specific health status measures may have additional value over 'objective' measures of CRT response and should be incorporated in clinical practice.

Sex and gender differences in myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy

Heart failure due to nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) contributes significantly to the global burden of cardiovascular disease. Myocarditis is, in turn, a major cause of acute DCM in both men and women. However, recent clinical and experimental evidence suggests that the pathogenesis and prognosis of DCM differ between the sexes. This seminar provides a contemporary perspective on the immune mediators of myocarditis, including interdependent elements of the innate and adaptive immune response. The heart's acute response to injury is influenced by sex hormones that appear to determine the subsequent risk of chronic DCM. Preliminary data suggest additional genetic variations may account for some of the differences in epidemiology, left ventricular recovery, and survival between men and women. We highlight the gaps in our knowledge regarding the management of women with acute DCM and discuss emerging therapies, including bromocriptine for the treatment of peripartum cardiomyopathy.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is certainly cardiac therapy, but how much resynchronization and how much atrioventricular delay optimization?

Cardiac resynchronization therapy has become a standard therapy for patients who are refractory to optimal medical therapy and fulfill the criteria of QRS >120 ms, ejection fraction <35% and NYHA class II, III or IV. Unless there is some other heretofore unrecognized effect of pacing, the benefits of atrio-biventricular pacing on hard outcomes observed in randomized trials can only be attributed to the physiological changes it induces such as increases in cardiac output and/or reduction in myocardial oxygen consumption leading to an improvement in cardiac function efficiency. The term “Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy” for biventricular pacing presupposes that restoration of synchrony (simultaneity of timing) between left and right ventricles and/or between walls of the left ventricle is the mechanism of benefit. But could a substantial proportion of these benefits arise not from ventricular resynchronization but from favorable shortening of AV delay (“AV optimization”) which cannot be termed “resynchronization” unless the meaning of the word is stretched to cover any change in timing, thus, rendering the word almost meaningless. Here, we examine the evidence on the relative balance of resynchronization and AV delay shortening as contributors to the undoubted clinical efficacy of CRT.