A serological investigation of BK virus and JC virus infections in recipients of renal allografts

BK virus nephropathy and kidney transplantation

Nephropathy from BK virus (BKV) infection is an evolving challenge in kidney transplant recipients. It is the consequence of modern potent immunosuppression aimed at reducing acute rejection and improving allograft survival. Untreated BKV infections lead to kidney allograft dysfunction or loss. Decreased immunosuppression is the principle treatment but predisposes to acute and chronic rejection. Screening protocols for early detection and prevention of symptomatic BKV nephropathy have improved outcomes. Although no approved antiviral drug is available, leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, and intravenous Ig have been used. Retransplantation after BKV nephropathy has been successful.

Detection and typing of BKV, JCV, and SV40 by multiplex nested polymerase chain reaction

A multiplex nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was developed for detecting and differentiating simultaneously the DNA of polyomaviruses JC, BK, and SV40 in a single tube. In the first amplification step the same set of primers was used to amplify a conserved DNA region of the large T antigen gene of JCV, BKV, and SV40. The second round was carried out using a set of primers designed to obtain products of different size for each related virus. Subsequently, the sensitivity of the multiplex nested PCR was maximized by optimizing parameters such as primer, magnesium, and dNTP concentrations. The sensitivity of the method ranged between 1 and 10 copies of the polyomavirus genome. The assay was then used for detecting polyomavirus DNA in urine, serum, and biopsy specimens from renal transplant recipients. Based on the results obtained, the multiplex nested PCR developed in our study represents a useful tool for supporting the diagnosis of polyomavirus infection and could be used for epidemiological purposes and to better define the role of polyomaviruses in human pathology.

Monitoring of polyomavirus BK virus viruria and viremia in renal allograft recipients by use of a quantitative real-time PCR assay: one-year prospective study

We have developed a real-time quantitative PCR (rt-QPCR) assay to detect and kinetically monitor BK virus viruria and viremia in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). A total of 607 urine and 223 plasma samples were collected from 203 individuals including those with BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) (n = 8), those undergoing routine posttransplant surveillance (SV) (n = 155), those with nontransplant chronic kidney disease (NT-CKD) (n = 20), and healthy living kidney donors (LD) (n = 20). The rt-QPCR assay was found to be highly sensitive and specific, with a wide dynamic range (2.4 to 11 log(10) copies/ml) and very good precision (coefficient of variation, approximately 5.9%). There was a significant difference in the prevalences of viruria and viremia between the BKVAN (100% and 100%) and SV (23% and 3.9%) groups (P < 0.001). No viruria or viremia was detected in LD or in NT-CKD patients. The median (range) peak levels of BK virus viruria and viremia, in log(10) copies/ml, were 10.26 (9.04 to 10.83) and 4.83 (3.65 to 5.86) for the BKVAN group versus 0 (0 to 10.83) and 0 (0 to 5.65) for the SV group, respectively (P < 0.001). When the BK virus load in the urine was <7.0 log(10) copies/ml, no BK virus viremia was detected. When the BK virus load in the urine reached 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, and > or =10.0 log(10) copies/ml, the corresponding detection of BK virus viremia increased to 20, 33, 50, and 100%, respectively. We propose monitoring of BK virus viruria in RTRs, with plasma BK virus load testing reserved for those with viruria levels of > or =7.0 log(10) copies/ml.

Polyomaviruses and human diseases

Polyomaviruses are small, nonenveloped DNA viruses, which are widespread in nature. In immunocompetent hosts, the viruses remain latent after primary infection. With few exceptions, illnesses associated with these viruses occur in times of immune compromise, especially in conditions that bring about T cell deficiency. The human polyomaviruses BKV and JCV are known to cause, respectively, hemorrhagic cystitis in recipients of bone marrow transplantation and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in immunocompromised patients, for example, by HIV infection. Recently, transplant nephropathy due to BKV infection has been increasingly recognized as the cause for renal allograft failure. Quantitation of polyomavirus DNA in the blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine, identification of virus laden "decoy cells" in urine, and histopathologic demonstration of viral inclusions in the brain parenchyma and renal tubules are the applicable diagnostic methods. Genomic sequences of polyomaviruses have been reported to be associated with various neoplastic disorders and autoimmune conditions. While various antiviral agents have been tried to treat polyomavirus-related illnesses, current management aims at the modification and/or improvement in the hosts' immune status. In this chapter, we provide an overview of polyomaviruses and briefly introduce its association with human diseases, which will be covered extensively in other chapters by experts in the field.

Discovery and epidemiology of the human polyomaviruses BK virus (BKV) and JC virus (JCV)

Although discovered over thirty years ago, many aspects of the epidemiology of BKV and JCV in the general population, such as the source of infectious virus and the mode of transmission, are still unknown. Primary infection with both BKV and JCV is usually asymptomatic, and so age seroprevalence studies have been used to indicate infection. BKV commonly infects young children in all parts of the world, with the exception of a few very isolated communities, adult seroprevalence rates of 65-90% being reached by the age of ten years. In contrast, the pattern of JCV infection appears to vary between populations; in some anti-JCV antibody is acquired early as for BKV, but in others anti-JCV antibody prevalence continues to rise throughout life. This indicates that the two viruses are probably transmitted independently and by different routes. Whilst BKV DNA is found infrequently in the urine of healthy adults, JCV viruria occurs universally, increasing with age, with adult prevalence rates often between 20% and 60%. Four antigenic subtypes have been described for BKV and eight genotypes are currently recognized for JCV. The latter have been used to trace population movements and to reconstruct the population history in various communities.

Renal Donor Implication in the Origin of BK Infection: Analysis of Genomic Viral Subtypes

BK virus (BKV) reactivation in immunocompromised kidney transplant patients can produce a tubulointerstitial nephropathy (BKVN). Molecular tools that test for DNA-BKV provide early detection and assist in management, but some aspects of the pathogenesis of this infection, such as donor causality, remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2004 and January 2006, 55 Spanish kidney donors were studied for BK infection. A quantitative PCR assay was performed on urine and serum to detect BKV. To determine the origin of the viral infection, a transcription control region of the BK polymorphism sequence was designed to identify the viral subtype.

RESULTS

Fifteen of 55 (27%) donors were BK-PCR positive: 13 in urine and 2 in serum and urine. Moreover, monitoring of recipient pairs detected BK-PCR positivity in 14 of 73 recipients. We studied eight BK-PCR positive recipients (corresponding to four pairs) and their respective donors. The same viral genome was observed in the four pairs, namely, the A250-1-a, WW-like, AS, and JL genotypes. Interestingly, one of the four pairs showed the donor and the two recipients to display exactly the same JL genotype.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our preliminary results analyzing the molecular fingerprints of donor and recipient pairs, we have presented new data implicating the donor, in at least some cases, as the source of BK infection.

BK virus infection in transplant recipients: an overview and update

BK virus infection after kidney transplantation has been a subject of great interest in the past decade. This article traces the discovery of BK virus and the subsequent development of our knowledge about this emerging pathogen. The pathobiology of the virus is summarized with particular reference to epidemiology, interactions with host cell receptors, cell entry, cytoplasmic trafficking and targeting of the viral genome to the nucleus. This is followed by a discussion of clinical features, laboratory monitoring and therapeutic strategies. Finally, we present potential cellular mechanisms that explain the basis of virus-mediated damage to the human kidney.

BK viral reactivation in cardiac transplant patients: evidence for a double-hit hypothesis

BACKGROUND

BK nephropathy is a significant cause of renal dysfunction in renal allograft recipients. The question of whether BK viral infection plays a role in renal dysfunction in cardiac transplantation patients remains to be answered.

METHODS

We prospectively examined the prevalence of BK viral reactivation in the setting of cardiac transplantation and performed a cross-sectional analysis of 111 cardiac transplantation patients. We also assessed the prevalence of viremia in a cohort of 29 renal transplant recipients.

RESULTS

We found urinary decoy cells in 28 cardiac transplantation patients. Of these, 14 patients had evidence of BK viral DNA in the urine. None, however, had evidence of BK viremia. Mean age, gender, levels of pre- and post-transplant serum creatinine, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and ischemic time were not significantly different between the groups. We found that 7 of 29 renal transplant recipients studied had BK viral DNA in their urine.

CONCLUSION

These findings are evidence of BK virus reactivation in the setting of cardiac transplantation at a percentage similar to that seen in renal allograft recipients. In contrast to renal allograft recipients, none had evidence of viremia. Thus, even in the setting of established BK virus reactivation, immunosuppression in combination with renal allograft dysfunction and renal ischemic injury is usually insufficient to cause BK viremia and nephropathy, and it appears that a second, organ-specific hit is necessary, such as kidney inflammation, kidney ischemia, or donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen mismatch.

The prevalence of BK viremia and urinary viral shedding in a pediatric renal transplant population: a single-center retrospective analysis

Polyomavirus-induced nephropathy has emerged as an important cause of renal graft dysfunction. Limited pediatric data are available for this disease. We therefore reviewed the results of the first year of polyomavirus screening in our pediatric renal transplant recipients to determine the prevalence of polyomavirus viremia and urinary shedding. Screening included detection of polyomavirus in plasma by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in urine by electron microscopy (EM). In patients with a positive screening test, an assessment of graft dysfunction was made. Fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Urinary EM was performed in 205 samples and polyomavirus was detected in 10 patients, representing 19% of the study population. PCR was performed on 222 samples and was positive for the BK virus in plasma from seven patients or 13.4% of the study population. Eight patients had a positive screening test and increased creatinine. All these patients underwent renal transplant biopsy. This revealed evidence of polyomavirus nephropathy in four patients. Our findings reveal a high prevalence of polyomavirus in both urine and plasma that is frequently associated with graft dysfunction. These findings support the routine screening of pediatric post-renal transplant patients for polyomavirus replication.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy: update on BK virus-specific immunity

The human polyomavirus type 1, also called BK virus (BKV), causes polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) in 1-10% of renal transplant recipients, with graft loss in over 50% of cases. The risk factors for PVAN are not conclusively defined and likely involve complementing determinants of recipient, graft, and virus. A central element seems to be the failing balance between BKV replication and BKV-specific immune control, which can result from intense triple immunosuppression, HLA-mismatches, prior rejection and anti-rejection treatment, or BKV-seropositive donor/seronegative recipient pairs. Consistent with this general hypothesis, the timely reduction of immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients reduced graft loss to less than 10% of cases. However, the BKV-specific humoral and cellular immune response is not well characterized. Recent work from several groups suggest that changes in antibody titers and BKV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells may help to better define the risk and the course of PVAN in renal transplant patients.

The pathobiology of polyomavirus infection in man

This article traces the discovery of polyomaviruses and outlines investigations, which shed light on potential modes of transmission of this increasingly important group of human pathogens. The pathobiology of the virus is summarized with particular reference to interactions with host cell receptors, cell entry, cytoplasmic trafficking, and targeting of the viral genome to the nucleus. This is followed by a discussion of sites of viral latency and factors leading to viral reactivation. Finally, we present biochemical mechanisms that could potentially explain several key elements of tissue pathology characteristic of BKV mediated damage to human kidney.

BK virus nephritis after renal transplantation

BK viremia and nephritis are increasing problems in renal transplant recipients. The exact cause of the increasing prevalence of this condition remains poorly understood. Increasing prevalence has been correlated with newer immunosuppressive agents and the decline in acute rejection rates in recent years. The clinical manifestation varies from the asymptomatic state of viremia and nephritis to clinical renal dysfunction. The diagnosis of this infection is based on the combination of the presence of urinary decoy cells, virus in the urine/blood, and typical renal histological findings of interstitial nephritis. Routine post-transplant screening for BK viremia and viruria prior to the occurrence of nephritis and the reduction in immunosuppressive therapy for subjects with viremia appear to be attractive approaches. The treatment of BKV nephritis (BKVN) consists of reduction in immunosuppressive therapy and antiviral therapy with cidofovir or leflunomide or a combination of both. Approximately 30-60% of subjects with BKVN experienced irreversible graft failure. However, in recent years, the combinations of early detection, prompt diagnosis, and appropriate reduction in immunosuppressive therapy have been associated with better outcome. The pathogenesis of BK virus infection in renal transplant recipients needs to be explored. The source of BKV infection (donor as opposed to recipient), the role of host humoral, and cellular immunity to BKV, and the role of alloimmune activation in renal graft to the occurrence of nephritis are discussed in this review.

Detection of CD8+ T cells sensitized to BK virus large T antigen in healthy volunteers and kidney transplant recipients

BK virus (BKV) infections after renal transplantation are increasingly recognized. Development of immune monitoring strategies against BKV requires definition of antigenic epitopes. Hence, T cells from HLA-A02-positive healthy subjects and kidney transplant recipients were stimulated by BKV lysate pulsed on mature autologous dendritic cells and screened against four different T antigen peptides or against BKV lysate. IFN-gamma production was measured by ELISPOT assays. The peptide BKV362-371 (MLTERFNHIL) was naturally processed and recognized by five of six healthy subjects (39 +/- 11 IFN-gamma spots/100,000 cells) and five of seven kidney transplant recipients (21 +/- 12 IFN-gamma spots). Less frequent and weaker CD8+ T-cell responses were detected against three other peptides. Thus, BKV large T antigen is a target for CD8+ T-cell immunity. T-antigen-specific T-cytotoxic cells circulate in healthy blood donors, implying that transient expression of T antigen presumably occurs at sites of viral latency and helps maintain a constant pool of circulating CD8+ T memory cells.

Treatment of Renal Allograft Polyoma BK Virus Infection with Leflunomide

BACKGROUND

Polyoma BK virus produces an aggressively destructive nephropathy in approximately 3% to 8% of renal allografts, is associated with graft loss within one year in 35% to 67% of those infected and there is no therapy of proven efficacy. Leflunomide is an immune suppressive drug with anti viral activity in vitro and in animals.

METHODS

We treated twenty-six patients with biopsy proven NK virus nephropathy (BKN) with either leflunomide alone (n=17) or leflunomide plus a course of cidofovir (n=9) and followed them for six to forty months. Leflunomide was dosed to a targeted blood level of active metabolite, A77 1726, of 50 microg/ml to 100 microg/ml (150 microM to 300 microM). Response to treatment was gauged by serial determinations of viral load in blood and urine (PCR), serum creatinine, and repeat allograft biopsy.

RESULTS

In the 22 patients consistently sustaining the targeted blood levels of active drug, blood and urine viral load levels uniformly decreased over time (P<.001). Mean serum creatinine levels stabilized over the first six months of treatment, and with 12 months or more of follow-up in 16 patients the mean serum creatinine has not changed significantly from base line. Four patients who did not consistently have blood levels of active drug (A77 1726) above 40 microg/ml did not clear the virus until these levels were attained or cidofovir was added.

CONCLUSIONS

Leflunomide inhibits Polyoma virus replication in vitro and closely monitored leflunomide therapy with specifically targeted blood levels appears to be a safe and effective treatment for Polyoma BK nephropathy.

Identification of gangliosides GD1b and GT1b as receptors for BK virus

Gangliosides have been shown to be plasma membrane receptors for both murine polyomavirus and SV40, while JC virus uses serotonin receptors. In contrast, little is known of the membrane receptor and entry pathway for BK virus (BKV), which can cause severe disease in immunosuppressed bone marrow and renal transplant patients. Using sucrose flotation assays, we investigated BKV binding to and interaction with human erythrocyte membranes and determined that this interaction was dependent on a neuraminidase-sensitive, proteinase K-resistant molecule. BKV was found to interact with the gangliosides GT1b and GD1b. The terminal alpha2-8-linked disialic acid motif, present in both of these gangliosides, is likely to be important for this interaction. We also determined that the addition of GD1b and GT1b to LNCaP cells, which are normally resistant to BKV infection, made them susceptible to the virus. In addition, BKV interacted with membranes extracted from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and infection was blocked by the addition of brefeldin A, which interferes with transport from the ER to the Golgi apparatus. These data demonstrate that BKV uses the gangliosides GT1b and GD1b as receptors and passes through the ER on the way to the nucleus.

BK virus-specific antibodies and BKV DNA in renal transplant recipients with BKV nephritis

We evaluated twenty renal transplant subjects at various stages of BKV nephritis (BKVN) for BKV-specific IgG and IgM antibodies using ELISA technique and BKV-DNA using PCR. They were divided as early onset (n = 7), stabilizing (n = 3), resolved (n = 8) and late onset (n = 2) BKVN. BKV-specific antibodies and BKV-DNA were simultaneously determined. The mean BKV-specific IgG level in early onset and stabilizing BKVN were 64 and 39 EIA units, and were significantly lower than 138 EIA units seen in resolved BKVN, P = 0.007, P = 0.008. The mean BKV-specific IgM levels in stabilizing BKVN was higher than resolved BKVN (130 vs 51 EIA units), P = 0.006. Mean plasma BKV loads for each group were 955,925, 5642 and 42 copies/mL of plasma, respectively. Prospective study in six BKVN cases revealed mean IgG, IgM levels and BKV-DNA at the time of diagnosis of BKVN as 39, 110 EIA units and 586,758 copies/mL of plasma, respectively. After a mean period of 5.2 months, IgG level increased to 120 EIA units (p = 0.0058) and had no detectable viral copies in circulation. Recovery from BKVN and elimination of BKV is associated with the development of BKV-specific IgG antibodies and this provides insight into the role of humoral immunity to BKV in the pathogenesis of BKVN.

A comparative study of BK and JC virus infections in organ transplant recipients

JC virus (JCV) rarely causes kidney disease, whereas BK virus (BKV) is a known cause of viral nephropathy. Existing studies on prevalence of JCV in healthy and transplanted subjects have reported only qualitative detection of viral DNA. We used quantitative PCR (qPCR) to assess JC viral load in transplant recipients and non-immunosuppressed controls, and compared JCV loads to BKV loads. JC viruria was seen in 8/23 (34.7%) controls, 23/103 (22.3%) renal, and 10/44 (22.7%) liver transplant patients. No patient developed JC viremia. BK viruria was seen in 2/23 (8.7%) controls, 36/103 (34.9%) renal, and 7/44 (15.9%) liver transplant patients. BK viremia was seen only in the kidney (8/103 = 7.7%) patients. The mean BKV urinary load was higher in kidney compared to liver patients and controls (4.22E + 07 vs. 2.88E + 05 vs. 4.39E + 02 copies/ml), whereas JC viral load was similar for all three patient groups (1.55E + 06 vs. 2.66E + 06 vs. 2.13E + 06 copies/ml). JCV viral loads were surprisingly high in all patient categories studied, but did not result in viremia or viral nephropathy. Although both BKV and JCV are widely latent in patients accepted for transplantation, concurrent reactivation of both viruses was infrequent. BKV viremia was seen in kidney but not liver recipients. The mechanisms underlying these notable phenomena remain to be investigated.

Donor origin of BK virus in renal transplantation and role of HLA C7 in susceptibility to sustained BK viremia

In a previous study, we performed serial BK virus (BKV), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and detected active BKV infection in 70 (35.4%) of 198 renal transplant recipients. In the current study, pre-transplant donor and recipient samples were analyzed for BKV antibody titer and HLA alleles. Donor antibody titer was inversely proportional to onset of viruria, p<0.001, directly proportional to duration of viruria, p=0.014 and directly proportional to peak urine viral titer p=0.005. Recipient pairs receiving kidneys from the same donor were concordant for BKV infection, p=0.017, and had matched sequences of segments of the NCCR and VP1 genes that tended to vary among recipients of kidneys from different donors. We did not see an association of HLA A, B, or DR, HLA allele mismatches or total HLA mismatches and BK infection. However, all 11 recipients with sustained BK viremia received kidneys from donors lacking HLA C7, and 10 recipients also lacked C7. These findings derive from the largest and most comprehensive prospective study of BKV infection in renal transplant recipients performed to date. Our data support donor origin for early BKV infection in kidney transplant recipients, and suggest that a specific HLA C locus may be associated with failure to control BKV infection.

Polyomavirus nephropathy after renal transplantation: A single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus associated nephropathy (PVN) in renal transplant recipients has been observed with increasing frequency recently and has emerged as a cause of allograft failure linked to highly potent new immunosuppressive regimens containing tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

METHODS

Polyomavirus associated nephropathy was identified in nine out of 182 patients who received renal transplantation between October 1998 and July 2003. PVN was confirmed by allograft biopsy. The clinical records of these nine patients were reviewed, as were all of the allograft biopsies. Electron microscopy was performed in all nine cases. After the diagnosis of PVN, maintenance immunosuppression was reduced. The clinical course and outcome of the PVN patients were reviewed in relation to manipulation of immunosuppressive agents.

RESULTS

There were nine cases of PVN in renal transplant recipients and the incidence of PVN was 4.9%. All patients with PVN were under triple immunosuppression comprising tacrolimus and MMF. The mean time to a diagnosis of PVN was 7.8 months after transplantation. Three of the nine patients received antirejection therapy prior to PVN. Seven out of nine PVN patients presenting acute allograft dysfunction were initially treated with high-dose intravenous steroid pulse or OKT3 before reduction of the immunosuppression. After reduction of the immunosuppression, seven patients stabilized their renal function. Two (22%) lost their grafts due to persistent PVN and chronic rejection. Two (22%) patients later developed acute rejection after reduction of the immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

PVN can cause allograft dysfunction and graft loss. Renal allograft recipients who are at risk of PVN should be routinely screened with urine cytology and quantitative measurements of viral load in the blood, particularly patients who had graft dysfunction. Early diagnosis and judicious alteration of immunosuppressive agents might permit a superior prognosis and reduce the graft loss from PVN in renal transplant recipients.

Polyomavirus nephropathy in kidney transplantation

Polyomavirus nephropathy has become an important complication in kidney transplantation, with a prevalence of 1% to 8%. Unfortunately, the risk factors for polyomavirus nephropathy and renal allograft loss are not well defined. The definitive diagnosis is made through assessment of a kidney transplant biopsy. Recently, noninvasive urine and serum markers have been used to assist in polyomavirus nephropathy diagnosis and monitoring. Primary treatment is immunosuppression reduction, but must be balanced with the risks of rejection. No antiviral treatments for polyomavirus nephropathy have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Although cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against murine polyomaviruses, and has been effective in some patients, it is associated with significant nephrotoxicity. Graft loss due to polyomavirus nephropathy should not be a contraindication to retransplantation; however, experience is limited. This review presents potential risk factors, screening, diagnostic and monitoring methods, therapeutic management, and retransplantation experience for polyomavirus nephropathy.

BK viral infection in an Australian pediatric renal transplant population

BK virus (BKV) is recognized as a significant cause of renal allograft dysfunction in adults, and there is growing awareness of its importance in the pediatric population. Eighteen pediatric renal transplant recipients and 18 age-matched controls were prospectively studied. Anti-BKV immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM titres were assayed in all subjects at entry to the study. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for BKV DNA was performed on urine and serum at entry, and prospectively tested again at 4, 8 and 12 months. Mean age +/- s.d. of transplant recipients and controls was 14.6 +/- 3.3 and 13.9 +/- 0.33 yr respectively [not significant (NS)]. Transplant patients were studied at a mean time of 5.6 +/- 4.2 yr post-transplant. 56% of transplant patients and 39% of controls were seropositive (+ve BKV IgG) (NS). Plasma BKV PCR was positive in one transplant patient (who also had positive urine PCR) and in none of the controls. The prevalence of positive urine PCR in transplant patients was greater than in controls (33% vs. 0%, p = 0.02). Positive urine BKV PCR was more commonly found in patients treated with mycophenolate than azathioprine (p = 0.04). We conclude that the prevalence of BKV seropositivity and viral activation in this Australian pediatric renal transplant population is similar to that reported in adult and pediatric populations in other countries. BK viruria was more common in children with greater immunosuppression, suggesting that this group is at higher risk of BKV induced nephropathy.

Dendritic cells pulsed with polyomavirus BK antigen induce ex vivo polyoma BK virus-specific cytotoxic T-cell lines in seropositive healthy individuals and renal transplant recipients

Polyoma BK virus (BKV)-associated interstitial nephritis has emerged as a relevant complication of immunocompromise after kidney transplantation, leading to reduced survival of the renal allograft. The limitations of current antiviral treatment and the high probability of rejection in kidney graft recipients when control of viral replication is attempted by reduction of immunosuppression warrant further efforts to develop alternative therapeutic tools. Cellular immunotherapy has proved to be a successful approach for prevention and/or treatment of other viral complications in the immunocompromised host. For assessing the feasibility of translating this strategy to the prevention of BKV-associated disease, a procedure for ex vivo reactivation of BKV-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTL) was developed from BKV-seropositive healthy donors and allograft recipients through stimulation with dendritic cells pulsed with inactivated BKV. The CTL lines thus obtained showed BKV specificity, as an efficient lysis of BKV-infected targets was accompanied by little or no reactivity against mock-infected autologous or allogeneic targets. In vitro killing of allogeneic BKV-infected targets, likely as a result of populations of TCRgammadelta+/CD3+ displaying MHC class I unrestricted cytotoxicity, was also displayed. Application of this culture system may allow a preemptive therapy approach to BKV-related complications in transplant recipients, based on CTL treatment guided by BKV DNA levels.

Polyoma nephropathy and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in a renal transplant recipient

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is a progressive and ultimately fatal white-matter disease of the brain that is associated with polyomavirus infection. It is uncommon in the general population, and even in the immunosuppressed patient, who is inherently at greatest risk for active infection with the virus, it is rare. The causative agent in progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, JC virus, has become increasingly important in recent years as its role in nephropathy in the renal transplant recipient has become better understood. We present a young renal transplant patient who developed nephropathy with renal biopsy changes consistent with polyomavirus lesions and then developed mental status changes and was diagnosed with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Retransplantation in patients with graft loss caused by polyoma virus nephropathy

The characteristics and outcome in 10 patients who underwent retransplantation after losing their renal grafts to BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKAN) are described. The patients underwent retransplantation at a mean of 13.3 months after failure of the first graft. Nephroureterectomy of the first graft was performed in seven patients. Maintenance immunosuppression regimens after the first and second grafts were similar, consisting of a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. BKAN recurred in one patient 8 months after retransplantation, but stabilization of graft function was achieved with a decrease in immunosuppression and treatment with low-dose cidofovir. After a mean follow-up of 34.6 months, all patients were found to have good graft function with a mean creatinine of 1.5 mg/dL. From this collective experience from five transplant centers (although the follow-up after retransplantation was not extensive), it can be concluded that patients with graft loss caused by BKAN can safely undergo retransplantation. The risk of recurrence does not seem to be increased in comparison with the first graft.

Polyomavirus BK

Polyomavirus hominis 1, better known as BK virus (BKV), infects up to 90% of the general population. However, significant clinical manifestations are rare and limited to individuals with impaired immune functions. BKV has been associated with diverse entities such as haemorrhagic cystitis, ureteric stenosis, vasculopathy, pneumonitis, encephalitis, retinitis, and even multi-organ failure. In addition, BKV has been implicated in autoimmune disease and possibly cancer. Due to high prevalence and frequent reactivation, the role of BKV in some of these pathologies has been difficult to define. Development of BKV diseases is likely to require complementing determinants in the host, the target organ, and possibly the virus, that are subject to modulators such as immunosuppression. These complex aspects are highlighted in polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PAN), an emerging disease in renal allograft recipients that may jeopardise the progress in renal transplantation accomplished in the past 10 years. Intervention is difficult due to the lack of specific antivirals and relies mostly on improving immune control. Diagnostic strategies using urine cytology and BKV load measurements in plasma have led to earlier diagnosis of PAN, which increased the success rate of intervention. Case series suggest that cidofovir might be effective, especially when combined with reduced immunosuppression.

Influence of surveillance renal allograft biopsy on diagnosis and prognosis of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an increasingly prevalent cause of allograft dysfunction.

METHODS

In 18 histologically proven cases of PVAN managed by reduced immunosuppression, monitoring of serum creatinine, and repeated biopsy, graft outcomes were correlated with clinical and histologic indices. Six months postdiagnosis the status of each graft was classified as poor (N = 7) or satisfactory (N = 11). Poor transplant status was defined as graft loss, increased severity of PVAN on repeat biopsy, or serum creatinine>3.0 mg/dL. Diagnosis resulted from either surveillance allograft biopsies (N = 8) or biopsies performed for increased serum creatinine (nonsurveillance, N = 10).

RESULTS

The surveillance biopsy group was more likely than the nonsurveillance group to have satisfactory graft status at 6 months (eight of eight vs. three of ten, P = 0.004) and had significantly lower serum creatinine at diagnosis, 3, and 6 months. Histologic scoring for chronic interstitial and tubular injury was lower in diagnostic surveillance biopsies compared to nonsurveillance biopsies (P = 0.01). Satisfactory transplant status was also associated with reduced or absent virus on repeat biopsy (P = 0.01). Poor transplant status was associated with a higher frequency of recipientneg/donorpos cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology (71% vs. 9%, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Surveillance allograft biopsy provides an important means for earlier detection of PVAN and permits timely alterations to immunosuppression. Early diagnosis is associated with a lesser degree of interstitial fibrosis at diagnosis and lower baseline and subsequent serum creatinine.

Renal transplantation and polyomavirus infection: recent clinical facts and controversies

Although many articles have been published on polyomavirus-induced pathologies in transplant recipients, our knowledge regarding their clinical aspects remains relatively limited. In fact, the number of questions and controversies on the subject seems even to be increasing as new publications continue to appear. This article presents some of these controversies through a brief review of recent clinical facts about the three polyomaviruses that infect humans--JC virus, simian virus 40, and BK virus--as they relate to renal transplantation.

Polyomavirus BK infection in pediatric kidney-allograft recipients: a single-center analysis of incidence, risk factors, and novel therapeutic approaches

BACKGROUND

Although a growing body of literature regarding polyoma BK virus (BKV) infection and associated interstitial nephritis in kidney-allograft recipients is becoming available, the impact of BKV infection in the pediatric population has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, we performed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for BKV DNA in serum and urine samples from 100 pediatric kidney-allograft recipients referred to our institution in the last 5 years.

RESULTS

BKV viruria was observed in 26 of 100 patients, whereas BKV viremia was demonstrated in 5 patients. Serum creatinine was significantly higher in recipients with positive BK viremia compared with BKV DNA-negative patients (mean 2.66 vs. 1.14 mg/100 mL). Renal biopsy performed in 3 of 5 patients showed graft damage consistent with interstitial nephropathy. In the univariate analysis, negative antibody status of the recipient and the presence of mycophenolate mofetil in baseline immunosuppression were the two factors predictive of active BKV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that BKV-associated nephropathy is a relevant complication in the pediatric kidney transplantation setting also. Identification of patients at risk of developing virus-associated nephropathy, through prospective quantification of viral load, could improve clinical outcome by allowing the use of timely preemptive therapy guided by BKV DNA levels.

Renal allograft loss as the result of polyomavirus interstitial nephritis after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation: results with kidney retransplantation

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus (PV) infection in kidney transplant patients has been reported to cause interstitial nephritis and subsequent graft loss. The cornerstone of current therapy is a reduction in immunosuppression, which can subsequently lead to kidney allograft rejection. This dilemma becomes even more challenging in the setting of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation, because a reduction in immunosuppression may result in rejection of the pancreas allograft. Antiviral therapy has not been shown to be clinically successful in decreasing the risk of graft loss secondary to PV infection. Furthermore, because of limited experience, the decision to perform retransplantation in patients who lost their primary kidney grafts to PV interstitial nephritis becomes a difficult one.

METHODS

Retrospective review and case studies.

RESULTS

We report two successful living donor kidney retransplants in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant patients who lost their first kidney grafts to PV infection. Both patients are receiving rimantadine therapy and performing well, with functioning kidney and pancreas grafts and no evidence of recurrent PV interstitial nephritis 22 and 37 months after retransplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although follow-up is limited, our initial experience would indicate that graft loss secondary to PV interstitial nephritis is not an absolute contraindication for kidney retransplantation.

Quantitative viral load monitoring and cidofovir therapy for the management of BK virus-associated nephropathy in children and adults

BACKGROUND

BK virus (BKV)-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) has been increasingly recognized as an important cause of renal transplant dysfunction. We report the role of quantitative viral load monitoring in the management of BKVAN.

METHODS

We developed a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for BKV detection in urine and plasma. Four renal allograft recipients, including two children, with BKVAN were treated with low-dose cidofovir and followed prospectively.

RESULTS

The PCR assay showed a detection limit of 10 viral copies with an intra-assay coefficient of variation of 19%. All four patients with BKVAN demonstrated intranuclear inclusions on allograft biopsy and a progressive rise in serum creatinine; three patients underwent multiple biopsies before the diagnosis of BKVAN was made. Three of the patients experienced a "viral syndrome" before the onset of renal dysfunction. One child also demonstrated an echogenic renal mass. All of the patients demonstrated strongly positive urinary PCR values (>100,000 copies/microL). BKV DNA was also detected in the plasma of three patients. All the patients were treated with intravenous low-dose cidofovir (0.25-1 mg/kg per dose, every 2-3 weeks, without probenecid). BK viruria resolved within 4 to 12 weeks (after 1-4 doses) of the cidofovir therapy, and all patients remain with stable renal function 6 to 26 months posttherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative PCR for BKV is a sensitive and reliable method for following the course of the infection in renal transplant patients. In addition, cidofovir therapy may be useful in the treatment of some of these patients, and its role needs to be investigated further.

Urinary Tract Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients

Infection of the urinary tract is the most common infectious complication of renal transplantation. The microbiology of post-transplant urinary tract infections is similar to what is seen in the general population, although transplant patients may develop infections due to unusual or opportunistic pathogens. The optimal management of urinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients is poorly studied, but recommendations for treatment are available. Antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the risk of bacterial infection of the urinary tract post-transplant but is not used in all transplant centers. The influence of urinary tract infection on graft survival requires further study.

Pathogenesis and management of polyomavirus infection in transplant recipients

Polyomaviruses (JC virus [JCV], BK virus [BKV], and simian virus 40 [SV40]) establish subclinical and persistent infections and share the capacity for reactivation from latency in their host under immunosuppression. JCV establishes latency mainly in the kidney, and its reactivation results in the development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. BKV causes infection in the kidney and the urinary tract, and its activation causes a number of disorders, including nephropathy and hemorrhagic cystitis. Recent studies have reported SV40 in the allografts of children who received renal transplants and in the urine, blood, and kidneys of adults with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, which is a cause of end-stage renal disease and an indication for kidney transplantation. Clinical syndromes related to polyomavirus infection are summarized in the present review, and strategies for the management of patients who receive transplants are discussed.

Successful retransplantation after renal allograft loss to polyoma virus interstitial nephritis

BACKGROUND

Although polyoma virus infection is being increasingly recognized as a cause of renal allograft dysfunction and failure, the risk of polyoma recurrence in a subsequent transplant is unknown. We present the first reported case of successful retransplantation after polyoma virus-induced renal allograft loss.

CASE REPORT

A 40-year-old Caucasian woman received a cadaveric kidney transplant. Baseline immunosuppression included corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. Her post-transplant clinical course was complicated by an early acute rejection episode on posttransplant day (PTD) 6, that warranted treatment with OKT3. A biopsy performed on PTD 154 to evaluate a rise in creatinine revealed polyoma virus interstitial nephritis. Despite reduction in immunosuppression, the renal function progressively worsened and dialysis was initiated by PTD 160, followed by transplant nephrectomy on PTD 184. Four months later, she received a living related kidney from her sister. Immunosuppression was initiated with prednisone, azathioprine, and tacrolimus. She had immediate graft function with a decrease in serum creatinine from 12.8 to 1.1 mg/dl. Three and one-half years after her second renal transplant, her allograft functions well, with a serum creatinine of 1 mg/dl. Both quantitative and qualitative assays of blood and urine (by PCR) remain negative for BK virus, indicating the absence of virus reactivation.

CONCLUSION

Judicious retransplantation should be considered as a therapeutic option in the management of polyoma virus induced graft failure. Previous graft loss secondary to polyoma virus infection is not a contraindication to retransplantation.

[Hemorrhagic cystitis caused by BK and JC polyomavirus in patients treated with bone marrow transplantation: clinical features and urologic management]

INTRODUCTION

Differential diagnosis of hematuria after bone marrow transplantation (B.M.T.) may include polyomavirus (BK and JC)-associated haemorrhagic cystitis. Many reports have implied BK virus as the major pathogen in the development of hemorrhagic cystitis after BMT. BK viruria is also associated with ureteric stenosis in renal allografts recipients. Viral urinary tract infections are uncommon in healthy individuals, but we can find them frequently in patients under immunosuppressive conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 123 consecutive B.M.T. recipients in the period from 1995 to 2000, evaluating those with polyomavirus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis. We present patient's characteristics, primary disease, clinical features, diagnosis aspects and treatment of these "hidden hosts of urinary tract".

RESULTS

7 patients (5.7% of B.M.T.) developed BK or JC virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis; 3 men and 4 women; median patient age was 29 years (range 14 to 45 years). Bacterial, mycobacterial and parasitic urine cultivates had negative results in all of them. The clinical course was characterized by a late onset of haemorrhagic cystitis (days +30 to +132 after BMT). All 7 patients developed macroscopic haematuria (duration 3 to 30 days). In 6 cases Graft Versus Host Disease (G.V.H.D.) criteria were found. Ultrasonographic studies revealed diffuse thickening of bladder wall in 5 patients. Hematuria was managed by hyperhydratation, blood transfusions, transurethral catheter and evacuation of blood clots, continuous bladder irrigation, urine alkalinization and antiviral therapy. No other more aggressive measures were required to stop the bleeding. Only 1 case of transient elevated creatinine.

CONCLUSIONS

Polyomavirus-associated haemorrhagic cystitis must be considered in differential diagnosis of hematuria in bone marrow transplantation recipients. Urological management, according with the severity and duration of hematuria, is frequently required.

Rapid kidney allograft failure in patients with polyoma virus nephritis with prior treatment with antilymphocyte agents

Interstitial nephritis owing to polyoma virus infection (PVi) mimics acute allograft rejection. The risk factors for graft failure associated with PVi are unknown. This prompted us to analyse the relationship between the use of antilymphocyte agents (ALA) and graft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients with PVi. Renal transplant recipients who were diagnosed to have PVi nephritis at the Medical College of Wisconsin were included in this study. PVi nephritis was confirmed by urine cytology and characteristic renal histological findings in a total of 14 cases. Other viruses were excluded by immunohistochemistry studies. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 7) received ALA (OKT3/ATGAM) as treatment for presumptive acute rejection and Group B (n = 7) did not receive ALA therapy. The progression of renal function (GFR) was estimated by a 100/ plasma creatinine and an actuarial kidney survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The demographics (age, gender, race, retransplant and kidney versus. kidney/pancreas), prior treatment with steroids for presumptive acute rejection, and renal function at the time of PVi diagnosis were similar betwoen groups. The fall in GFR/month was 6 mL/min/month with prior ALA therapy compared with 1 mL/min/month in those who did not receive ALA, p = 0.002. All seven grafts were lost in the ALA group compared with only two of seven grafts in the other group, p = 0.005. The use of ALA was associated with a rapid fall in GFR and graft failure in patients with PVi nephritis. Careful diagnosis of PVi is warranted in renal allograft recipients prior to initiating ALA therapy.

Polyomavirus BK nephropathy: a (re-)emerging complication in renal transplantation

Persisting polyomavirus replication is now widely recognized as a (re-)emerging cause of renal allograft dysfunction. Up to 5% of renal allograft recipients can be affected about 40weeks (range 6-150) post-transplantation. Progression to irreversible failure of the allograft has been observed in up to 45% of all cases. The BK virus strain is involved in the majority of the cases. Risk factors may include treatment of rejection episodes and increasing viral replication under potent immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus, sirolimus or mycophenolate. The diagnosis requires the histological demonstration of nuclear polyomavirus inclusions in affected tubular epithelial cells. Interstitial inflammatory infiltrates and fibrosis become more prominent in the persisting disease and may be difficult to distinguish from (coexisting) rejection. Detection of polyomavirus-inclusion bearing cells ('decoy cells') in the urine and quantification of BK virus DNA in the plasma have been proposed as surrogate markers for polyomavirus replication and allograft disease, respectively. Antiviral treatment is not yet established; however, reports of treatment with cidofovir are encouraging. Current management aims at the judicious modification and/or reduction of immunosuppression which, in view of preceding or concurrent rejection, is not without risk.

BK virus in solid organ transplant recipients: an emerging syndrome

BK virus is a human polyomavirus associated with a range of clinical presentations from asymptomatic viruria with pyuria to ureteral ulceration with ureteral stenosis in renal transplant patients or hemorrhagic cystitis in bone marrow transplant recipients. Infection of renal allografts has been associated with diminished graft function in some individuals. Fortunately, however, the majority of patients with BK virus infections are asymptomatic. The type, duration, and intensity of immunosuppression are major contributors to susceptibility to the activation of BK virus infection. Histopathology is required for the demonstration of renal parenchymal involvement; urine cytology and viral polymerase chain reaction methods are useful adjunctive diagnostic tools. Current, treatment of immunosuppressed patients with polyomavirus viruria is largely supportive and directed toward minimizing immunosuppression. Improved diagnostic tools and antiviral therapies are needed for polyomavirus infections.

Bk virus: a clinical review

We present a review of the clinically oriented literature about BK virus, a relative of JC virus, which is the etiologic agent of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). The kidney, lung, eye, liver, and brain have been proposed as sites of BK virus-associated disease, both primary and reactivated. BK virus has also been detected in tissue specimens from a variety of neoplasms. We believe that BK virus is most often permissively present in sites of disease in immunosuppressed patients, rather than being an etiologic agent that causes symptoms or pathologic findings. There is, however, strong evidence for BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis and nephritis, especially in recipients of solid organ or bone marrow transplants. Now that BK virus can be identified by use of specific and sensitive techniques, careful evaluation of the clinical and pathologic presentations of patients with BK virus will allow us to form a clearer picture of viral-associated pathophysiology in many organ systems.

POLYOMA VIRUS INFECTION AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1

BACKGROUND

Polyoma virus infection is characterized by lymphocytic interstitial infiltrate in the kidney, and it mimics acute rejection. The purpose of this study is to estimate renal allograft outcome with this infection and characterize the lymphocytic infiltrates in polyoma virus-infected renal allografts.

METHODS

Patients who had polyoma virus inclusions in renal allograft biopsies were identified. Other viral inclusions were excluded by immunohistochemistry. The lymphocytic infiltrates of six cases of polyoma virus infection were compared with six cases of definite acute rejection by immunostaining for T and B cells.

RESULTS

There were 10 cases of polyoma virus infections in renal transplant recipients. Immunosuppressants consisted of mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus in eight cases and mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine in two. The median time of diagnosis of polyoma virus infection after transplantation was 9.5 months, and the time to graft failure after the diagnosis was 4 months. Reduced allograft survival was seen in patients who had polyoma virus infection. Immunostaining for T and B cells revealed marked increase in the B cells (CD20) in renal allografts with polyoma virus infection of 21% (range, 5-40%) compared with 6% (range, 0-10%) in those with acute rejection (P=0.039). Reduced cytotoxic T cells (TIA-1: median, 7%; range, 2-15%) were seen in polyoma virus-infected allografts compared with 24% (range, 15-30%) in those patients who had acute rejection (P=0.0159).

CONCLUSION

Irreversible graft failure is more prevalent with polyoma virus infection. Enhanced immunosuppressants with mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus may play a role in the development of this infection. An increase in CD20 and a decrease in cytotoxic T cells in allografts is characteristic of polyoma virus infection.

Testing for polyomavirus type BK DNA in plasma to identify renal-allograft recipients with viral nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of polyomavirus type BK (BK virus) is increasingly recognized as a cause of severe renal-allograft dysfunction. Currently, patients at risk for nephropathy due to infection with the BK virus are identified by the presence of cells containing viral inclusion bodies ("decoy cells") in the urine or by biopsy of allograft tissue.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, we performed polymerase-chain-reaction assays for BK virus DNA in plasma samples from 9 renal-allograft recipients with BK virus nephropathy; 41 renal-allograft recipients who did not have signs of nephropathy, 16 of whom had decoy cells in the urine; and as immunocompromised controls, 17 patients who had human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection (stage C3 according to the classification of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and who had not undergone transplantation.

RESULTS

In all nine patients with BK virus nephropathy, BK virus DNA was detected in the plasma at the time of the initial histologic diagnosis (a mean [+/-SD] of 46+/-28 weeks after transplantation) and during the course of histologically diagnosed, persistent BK virus disease. In three of the six patients with nephropathy who were studied serially after transplantation, BK virus DNA was initially undetectable but was detected 16 to 33 weeks before nephropathy became clinically evident and was confirmed by biopsy. Tests for BK virus DNA in plasma became negative and the nephropathy resolved after the doses of immunosuppressive drugs were decreased in two patients and after removal of the renal allograft in three patients. BK virus DNA was found in the plasma of only 2 of the 41 renal-allograft recipients who had no signs of nephropathy and in none of the patients with HIV-1 infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing for BK virus DNA in plasma from renal-allograft recipients with use of the polymerase chain reaction is a sensitive and specific method for identifying viral nephropathy.

Diagnosis and management of BK polyomavirus interstitial nephritis in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Interstitial nephritis caused by BK polyomavirus is a recognized complication of renal transplantation. A study of renal transplant recipients at Duke University Medical Center was undertaken to evaluate diagnostic modalities and assess clinical outcomes in transplant polyomavirus infections.

METHODS

Polyomavirus nephritis was identified in 6 of 240 patients who received renal transplants between January 1996 and June 1998 and an additional patient who underwent transplantation in 1995. The clinical records of these seven patients were reviewed, as were all renal biopsy and nephrectomy specimens. Electron microscopy (EM) was performed on negatively stained urine samples from 6 patients with polyomavirus infection and 23 patients with other diagnoses.

RESULTS

Patients with polyomavirus infection shared several clinical features, including ureteral obstruction (5/7 patients), lymphocele (3/7), bacterial urinary tract infection (3/7), hematuria (3/7), cytomegalovirus infection (3/7), and immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil (6/7). All patients experienced elevations in serum creatinine, which stabilized or decreased in four patients with altered or decreased immunosuppression. The diagnosis of polyomavirus infection was established by renal biopsy and EM of urine in five patients, by biopsy alone in one, and by EM alone in one. Sequential examinations of urine by EM were used to monitor the course of infection in six patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial nephritis due to BK polyomavirus occurred in 2.5% of patients receiving renal transplants at our center since 1996. Polyomavirus infection can cause transplant dysfunction and graft loss, but progression of the infection can frequently be abrogated with alterations in immunosuppressive therapy. Both renal biopsy and EM of urine samples are useful in the diagnosis and monitoring of polyomavirus infections.

Polyomavirus infection of renal allograft recipients: from latent infection to manifest disease

Polyomavirus (PV) exceptionally causes a morphologically manifest renal allograft infection. Five such cases were encountered in this study, and were followed between 40 and 330 d during persistent PV renal allograft infection. Transplant (Tx) control groups without PV graft infection were analyzed for comparison. Tissue and urine samples were evaluated by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, and PCR. The initial diagnosis of PV infection with the BK strain was made in biopsies 9+/-2 mo (mean +/- SD) post-Tx after prior rejection episodes and rescue therapy with tacrolimus. All subsequent biopsies showed persistent PV infection. Intranuclear viral inclusion bodies in epithelial cells along the entire nephron and the transitional cell layer were histologic hallmarks of infection. Affected tubular cells were enlarged and often necrotic. In two patients, small glomerular crescents were found. In 54% of biopsies, infection was associated with pronounced inflammation, which had features of cellular rejection. All patients were excreting PV-infected cells in the urine. PV infection was associated with 40% graft loss (2 of 5) and a serum creatinine of 484+/-326 micromol/L (mean +/- SD; 11 mo post-Tx). Tx control groups showed PV-infected cells in the urine in 5%. Control subjects had fewer rejection episodes (P<0.05) and stable graft function (P = 0.01). It is concluded that a manifest renal allograft infection with PV (BK strain) can persist in heavily immunosuppressed patients with recurrent rejection episodes. PV mainly affects tubular cells and causes necrosis, a major reason for functional deterioration. A biopsy is required for diagnosis. Urine cytology can serve as an adjunct diagnostic tool.