Treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated gram-positive skin and skin structure infections: two randomized, multicentre studies of quinupristin/dalfopristin versus cefazolin, oxacillin or vancomycin. Synercid Skin and Skin Structure Infection Group

Outcomes analysis of daptomycin use in a community hospital

This study was conducted to assess clinical and cost outcomes associated with the use of daptomycin. This objective was addressed through a consecutive patient chart review of the first 50 inpatients treated with daptomycin. Type of infection, identity of isolated pathogens, prior therapy, duration of therapy, length of hospitalization, cost of antibiotics, adverse events, and outcomes were evaluated. The analysis showed that mean patient age was 64 y, and mean length of hospitalization was 9.2 d. A total of 62% of patients had confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. The mean duration of daptomycin therapy was 7.5 d; however, in patients given treatment for complicated skin and skin structure infections, the mean duration of therapy was 6.1 d (n=15) and 7.1 d (n=16) for first- and second-line daptomycin therapy, respectively. The average course of daptomycin cost $727 (n=38) and $390 (n=11), respectively, in the subset of patients with renal insufficiency. In patients who did not respond to prior antibiotic treatment for a Gram-positive bacterial infection (n=26), the mean duration of prior therapy with antibiotics was 6.0 d and the cost was $287. For patients who were transitioned to outpatient daptomycin therapy (n=14), hospital charges were reduced by an estimated $102,340. In 48 patients (96%), infection was resolved with daptomycin therapy. Daptomycin was effective in resolving Grampositive infection in this aged patient population. Earlier identification of antibiotic failure, first-line use of daptomycin in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections, and outpatient daptomycin therapy provided cost savings and improved clinical outcomes at this facility.

An infectious disease update on antibiotics: emerging resistance

Podiatric physicians often encounter infectious processes in the lower extremity in inpatient and outpatient settings. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a growing concern for clinicians treating these infections, especially in complex patients who have immune compromise such as diabetes. Although a number of antibiotic options are available for the treatment of lower-extremity soft tissue and bone infections, a careful examination of bacterial susceptibilities, drug resistance, and treatment efficacy can result in better patient care and limb salvage.

Treatment ofStaphylococcus aureusinfections: new issues, emerging therapies and future directions

Infections due to Staphylococcus aureus are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Antimicrobial resistance in strains of S. aureus is a continually evolving problem, including widespread methicillin resistance in hospitals, increasing methicillin resistance in community strains, and the recent acquisition of glycopeptide resistance. New antimicrobials with activity against S. aureus have recently entered the market or are in the late stages of development. In addition, there has been significant interest in the development of novel and immune-based strategies for prevention or treatment of S. aureus infections. This review describes established and emerging therapies for S. aureus infections, and considers the safety profiles and likely impact on present treatment standards of novel agents either undergoing clinical development or emerging onto the market.

Coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections in the neonate and child: an update

Coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CONS) infection is the most common bloodstream infection treated in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units and significantly impacts patient mortality and morbidity. Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common CONS species isolated clinically and investigated for its pathogenicity and virulence. Difficulties exist in the differentiation of CONS infection from culture contamination in clinical specimens, as CONS is a common skin commensal. Most CONS isolates have the mecA gene and exhibit beta-lactam resistance. The glycopeptide antibiotics, such as vancomycin, are the mainstay in therapy, although resistance has been reported. Arbekacin, linezolid, and streptogramins are newer antibiotics being evaluated as alternatives to glycopeptides. Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies have been developed against the cell-wall components of staphylococcus and may hold promise for immune prophylaxis and treatment of CONS infection.

[Staphylococcus aureus infections: new challenges from an old pathogen]

Staphylococcus aureus is a versatile organism with several virulent characteristics and resistance mechanisms at its disposal. It is also a significant cause of a wide range of infectious diseases in humans. S. aureus often causes life-threatening deep seated infections like bacteremia, endocarditis and pneumonia. While traditionally confined mostly to the hospital setting, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is now rapidly becoming rampant in the community. Community-acquired MRSA is particularly significant because of its potential for unchecked spread within households and its propensity for causing serious skin and pulmonary infections. Because of the unfavorable outcome of many MRSA infections with the standard glycopeptide therapy, new antimicrobial agents belonging to various classes have been introduced and have been evaluated in clinical trials for their efficacy in treating resistant staphylococcal infections. A number of preventive strategies have also been suggested to contain the spread of such infections. In this review, we address the recent changes in the epidemiology of S. aureus and their impact on the clinical manifestations and management of serious infections. We also discuss new treatment modalities for MRSA infections and emphasize the importance of preventive approaches.

Staphylococcal skin infections in children: rational drug therapy recommendations

Staphylococcus aureus remains one of the most common and troublesome of bacteria causing disease in humans, despite the development of effective antibacterials and improvement in hygiene. The organism is responsible for over 70% of all skin and soft tissue infections in children and accounts for up to one-fifth of all visits to pediatric clinics. Skin and soft tissue infections that are predominantly caused by S. aureus include bullous and non-bullous impetigo, folliculitis, furunculosis, carbunculosis, cellulitis, surgical and traumatic wound infections, mastitis, and neonatal omphalitis. Other skin and soft tissue infections may also be caused by S. aureus but are often polymicrobial in origin and require special consideration. These include burns, decubitus ulcers (particularly in the perianal region), puncture wounds of the foot, as well as human and mammalian bites. Treatment of staphylococcal skin infections varies from topical antiseptics to prolonged intravenous antibacterials, depending on severity of the lesions and the health of the child. The treatment of choice for oral antibacterials remains the penicillinase-resistant penicillins such as flucloxacillin. Cefalexin and erythromycin are suitable cost-effective alternatives with broader cover, although care must be taken with the use of macrolides because of development of resistance to multiple families of antibacterials, particularly the lincosamides. Other cephalosporins such as cefadroxil and cefprozil are also effective, can be given once daily and have a better tolerability profile -- while azithromycin has a further advantage of a 3-day course. However, all of these agents are more expensive. Although the antibacterials have been given for 10 days in most clinical trials, there is no evidence that this duration is more effective than a 7-day course. In children requiring intravenous therapy, ceftriaxone has a major advantage over other antibacterials such as sulbactam/ampicillin and cefuroxime in that it can be given once daily and may, therefore, be suitable for outpatient treatment of moderate-to-severe skin infections. Newer-generation cephalosporins and loracarbef are also effective and have a broader spectrum of activity, but do not offer any added benefit and are significantly more expensive. Skin and soft tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are still relatively uncommon in children. Well children with community-acquired MRSA infections can be treated with clindamycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole), but must be observed closely for potentially severe adverse effects. In severe infections, vancomycin remains the treatment of choice, while intravenous teicoplanin and clindamycin are suitable alternatives. Linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin are currently showing great promise for the treatment of multi-resistant Gram-positive infections. While the choice of antibacterial is important, supportive management, including removal of any infected foreign bodies, surgical drainage of walled-off lesions, and regular wound cleaning, play a vital role in ensuring cure.

Antibiotics for treatment of resistant gram-positive coccal infections

Vancomycin is considered the workhorse for the treatment of most drug-resistant gram-positive bacterial infections. However, concerns have been raised regarding the increasing rates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and the clinical shortcomings of vancomycin in the treatment of invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections. Resources have been committed to the development of antimicrobial agents with activity against these organisms. This review will focus on the newer antibacterial agents that have been developed for the treatment of resistant gram-positive pathogens. Included in this review are the agents: quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, daptomycin, telithromycin, and tigecycline.

Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Once-Weekly Dalbavancin versus Twice-Daily Linezolid Therapy for the Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

BACKGROUND

Dalbavancin, a novel lipoglycopeptide with a pharmacokinetic profile that allows weekly dosing, is active against gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The efficacy of dalbavancin for treatment of skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) was demonstrated in a phase 2 study.

METHODS

In a phase 3 noninferiority study, patients with complicated SSSIs, including infections known or suspected to involve MRSA, were randomized (ratio, 2 : 1) in a double-blind manner to receive dalbavancin (1000 mg given intravenously on day 1 and 500 mg given intravenously on day 8) or linezolid (600 mg given intravenously or intravenously/orally every 12 h for 14 days). Efficacy was assessed by determining clinical and microbiological responses at the end of therapy and at the test-of-cure visit. Relapses were identified by additional follow-up approximately 1 month later.

RESULTS

MRSA was identified in 51% of patients from whom a pathogen was isolated at baseline. Dalbavancin and linezolid demonstrated comparable clinical efficacy in the clinically evaluable population at the test-of-cure visit (88.9% and 91.2% success, respectively). The rate of clinical success at the end of therapy was >90% in both arms. Less than 1.0% of patients in either treatment arm experienced relapse after the test-of-cure visit. Both treatments yielded successful microbiological response in excess of 85% among microbiologically evaluable patients at end of therapy and at the test-of-cure visit for all pathogens combined, for all S. aureus strains, and for MRSA. Gastrointestinal symptoms were among the most common adverse events in both arms. A higher proportion of patients in the linezolid arm reported adverse events that were judged by the investigator to be probably/possibly related to treatment (dalbavancin arm, 25.4% of subjects; linezolid arm, 32.2% of subjects).

CONCLUSIONS

Two doses of dalbavancin (1000 mg given on day 1 followed by 500 mg given on day 8) were as well tolerated and as effective as linezolid given twice daily for 14 days for the treatment of patients with complicated SSSI, including those infected with MRSA.

Antimicrobial Management of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections in the Era of Emerging Resistance

BACKGROUND

Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) are among the most common infections treated in the hospital setting. The mainstays of treatment continue to be antimicrobial therapy combined with appropriate surgical intervention. Due to increasing resistance among pathogens commonly implicated in cSSSIs, the objectives of this review were to describe the potential pathogens causing skin infections, the implications of resistance to currently used drug therapy, and the role of new antibiotics with activity for pathogens causing cSSSIs.

METHODS

Relevant information from the primary literature and review articles were identified through a MEDLINE search of the medical literature (1980 to the present) using the terms abscess, wound infection, skin and skin structure infection, antibiotics, resistance, quinupristin- dalfopristin, linezolid, daptomycin, tigecycline, oritavancin, and dalbavancin. Meeting posters and slides were identified from the Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1998-2004) for supplemental data.

RESULTS

The most commonly implicated pathogens in cSSSIs include gram-positive bacteria, specifically Staphylococcus aureus. Gram-negative and mixed organisms are additionally encountered in serious cSSSI. Antimicrobial resistance among both gram-positive and gramnegative bacteria has increased significantly during the last decade, with methicillin resistance among S. aureus approaching 60% in hospitals and becoming more frequent in the community as well. As a result, resistance is the driving factor for treatment failure and rising costs for infection management. Few antimicrobial agents are available currently to treat resistant bacteria in cSSSIs; vancomycin is currently the drug of choice against resistant grampositive cocci; however, resistance to this agent has appeared in enterococci and S. aureus. Several new antibiotics such as linezolid and daptomycin are now available for the management of cSSSIs. Other agents such as tigecycline are under investigation and should be available soon to increase treatment options for cSSSIs caused by resistant bacteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the resistance of cSSSI pathogens is problematic, new antibiotics with broad-spectrum activity against resistant gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria are promising for the management of severe cSSSIs.

Epidemiology, treatment, and prevention of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections

Since first described In 1961, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a common nosocomial pathogen. Substantial increases in MRSA infections among nonhospitalized patients are being reported. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus is the most common isolate from skin and soft tissue infections in selected centers in the United States. Community-acquired MRSA strains differ from nosocomial strains in clinically relevant ways, such as in their propensity to cause skin and soft tissue infection and severe necrotizing pneumonia. Clinicians in numerous specialties, particularly primary care physicians, will likely evaluate patients presentIng with community-acquired MRSA and should become familiar with the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of and evolving therapeutic and preventive strategies for this infection.

Impact of community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on management of the skin and soft tissue infections in children

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are common illnesses that have a significant impact on health care management. Community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections have been documented among healthy individuals without predisposing risk factors. The appearance and spread of CA-MRSA represent a new challenge in pediatric medicine and have important clinical implications for therapy of infections caused by S. aureus. This article provides a review of recent changes in the epidemiology of CA-MRSA, pathogenic potential, and therapeutic considerations in the management of SSTIs in children.

What's New in Antibiotics?

Antibiotics are important agents in dermatologic practice. New drugs have expanded the therapeutic approach to uncomplicated skin infections and complicated infections involving deeper soft tissue or infections that require surgical intervention. This article reviews new antibiotics of dermatologic importance, including daptomycin (cyclic lipopeptide), linezolid (oxazolidinone), quinupristin-dalfopristin (streptogramins), moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin (fluoroquinolones), and dalbavancin and oritavancin, which are presently under investigation.

Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin is commonly used to treat staphylococcal infections, but there has not been a definitive analysis of the pharmacokinetics of this antibacterial in relation to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) that could be used to determine a target pharmacodynamic index for treatment optimisation.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify relationships between vancomycin dosage, serum concentration, MIC and antimicrobial activity by using data gathered from a therapeutic monitoring environment that observes failures in some cases.

METHODS

We investigated all patients with a Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infection at a 300-bed teaching hospital in the US during a 1-year period. Clinical and pharmacokinetic information was used to determine the following: (i) whether steady-state 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) divided by the MIC (AUC24/MIC) values for vancomycin could be precisely calculated with a software program; (ii) whether the percentage of time vancomycin serum concentrations were above the MIC (%Time>MIC) was an important determinant of vancomycin response; (iii) whether the time to bacterial eradication differed as the AUC24/MIC value increased; (iv) whether the time to bacterial eradication for vancomycin differed compared with other antibacterials at the same AUC24/MIC value; and (v) whether a relationship existed between time to bacterial eradication and time to significant clinical improvement of pneumonia symptoms.

RESULTS

The median age of the 108 patients studied was 74 (range 32-93) years. Measured vancomycin AUC24/MIC values were precisely predicted with the A.U.I.C. calculator in a subset of our patients (r2 = 0.935). Clinical and bacteriological response to vancomycin therapy was superior in patients with higher (> or = 400) AUC24/MIC values (p = 0.0046), but no relationship was identified between vancomycin %Time>MIC and infection response. Bacterial eradication of S. aureus (both methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant) occurred more rapidly (p = 0.0402) with vancomycin when a threshold AUC24/MIC value was reached. S. aureus killing rates were slower with vancomycin than with other antistaphylococcal antibacterials (p = 0.002). There was a significant relationship (p < 0.0001) between time to bacterial eradication and the time to substantial improvement in pneumonia score.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin AUC24/MIC values predict time-related clinical and bacteriological outcomes for patients with lower respiratory tract infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an evidence-based review

OBJECTIVE

In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and improve outcome in severe sepsis.

DESIGN

The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee.

METHODS

The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591.

CONCLUSION

Since the prompt institution of therapy that is active against the causative pathogen is one of the most important predictors of outcome, clinicians must establish a system for rapid administration of a rationally chosen drug or combination of drugs when sepsis or septic shock is suspected. The expanding number of antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral agents available provides opportunities for effective empiric and specific therapy. However, to minimize the promotion of antimicrobial resistance and cost and to maximize efficacy, detailed knowledge of the likely pathogens and the properties of the available drugs is necessary for the intensivist.

New therapeutic agents for resistant Gram-positive infections

Gram-positive bacteria are an increasingly common cause of community acquired and nosocomial infections, and their resistance to antibiotics is increasing. The recent reports from several continents of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced glycopeptide-susceptibility is of grave concern. New agents are required to meet these threats and several classes of compounds are under development. This review focuses on agents that have been recently licensed or are presently in clinical development for the treatment of serious multidrug-resistant staphylococcal, enterococcal and pneumococcal infections, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Considerations in Clinical Trials of Combination Antifungal Therapy

The cure rate for serious fungal diseases with currently available agents used as monotherapy is not optimal. The introduction of new classes of antifungal drugs in the last few years naturally leads to the hypothesis that antifungal drugs used in combination may be more effective than the same drugs used alone. The design and interpretation of combination therapy studies raise challenges beyond those encountered when drugs are studied as monotherapy in the treatment of a disease. The definition of combination therapy, the study design, the selection of appropriate patient populations, and the selection of end points, as well as practical considerations, are all important in the design and interpretation of clinical trials of combination therapies. Although combination therapies hold the promise of improved efficacy, it is important to prove this hypothesis, because they also may be associated with increased toxicity and increased drug costs. A careful consideration of study design factors before the initiation of a trial will help obtain the most useful information for patients in this important area.

Novel antibacterial agents for skin and skin structure infections

With the continuing development of clinical drug resistance among bacteria and the advent of resistance to the recently released agents quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid, the need for new, effective agents to treat multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections remains important. With treatment options limited, it has become critical to identify antibiotics with novel mechanisms of activity. Several new drugs have emerged as possible therapeutic alternatives. This review focuses on agents newly introduced and those presently in clinical development for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and daptomycin have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Two newer compounds, oritavancin and dalbavancin, are in clinical development for this indication. In addition, the quinolones moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin recently were approved for cutaneous infections.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should be familiar with the modes of action, clinical indications, dosage regimens, and contraindications and cautions for several novel antibacterial agents for skin and skin structure infections.

The Safety and Efficacy of Daptomycin for the Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infections

Daptomycin is the first available agent from a new class of antibiotics, the cyclic lipopeptides, that has activity against a broad range of gram-positive pathogens, including organisms that are resistant to methicillin, vancomycin, and other currently available agents. Daptomycin (4 mg/kg intravenously [iv] every 24 h for 7-14 days) was compared with conventional antibiotics (penicillinase-resistant penicillins [4-12 g iv per day] or vancomycin [1 g iv every 12 h]) in 2 randomized, international trials involving 1092 patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections. Among 902 clinically evaluable patients, clinical success rates were 83.4% and 84.2% for the daptomycin- and comparator-treated groups, respectively (95% confidence interval, -4.0 to 5.6). Among patients successfully treated with iv daptomycin, 63% required only 4-7 days of therapy, compared with 33% of comparator-treated patients (P<.0001). The frequency and distribution of adverse events were similar among both treatment groups. Overall, the safety and efficacy of daptomycin were comparable with conventional therapy.

Skin infections in the elderly

The diagnosis and management of viral diseases of the skin are significant issues in the elderly population. With advances in these areas, there are new tools to combat these diseases and limit morbidity. It is important for clinicians to monitor and treat these diseases aggressively in the elderly because of the potential for immunosuppression in this population. Further advances in antiviral therapy and the potential for the development of antiviral vaccines will aid in the therapy of these diseases. Onychomycosis is found more frequently in the elderly. In this population, the most common clinical presentations are distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis (which usually affects the great or first toe) and white superficial onychomycosis (which generally involves the third or fourth toes). Over the past several years, new treatments for this disorder have emerged that offer shorter courses of therapy and greater efficacy than previous therapies. The treatment of bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the elderly is an important issue. There has been an alarming increase in the incidence of gram-positive infections, including resistant bacteria, such as MRSA and drug-resistant pneumococci. Although vancomycin has been considered the drug of last defense against gram-positive multidrug-resistant bacteria, the late 1980s saw a rise in vancomycin-resistant bacteria, including VRE. With treatment options limited, it has become critical to identify antibiotics with novel mechanisms of activity. Several new drugs have emerged as possible therapeutic alternatives, including linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin.

Efficacy of ertapenem against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in complicated skin/skin structure infections: results of a double-blind clinical trial versus piperacillin-tazobactam

Staphylococcus aureus is the predominant pathogen in complicated skin/skin structure infections. In this analysis of a subgroup of data from a randomised, double-blind trial, the efficacy of ertapenem 1 g daily was compared with piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g Q6H for treatment of complicated skin/skin structure infections caused by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Of the 529 treated patients in this trial, 185 (35.0%) had MSSA as a baseline pathogen. At the test of cure assessment 10-21 days post-therapy, 54 of 67 (80.6%) protocol evaluable patients in the ertapenem group and 55 of 68 (80.9%) in the piperacillin-tazobactam group were cured (odds ratio: 1.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-2.4), P = 0.99). In both treatment groups, cure rates were higher in patients with monomicrobial than polymicrobial infections, but the difference was not significant. In this subgroup analysis of patients with MSSA complicated skin/skin structure infections, therapy with ertapenem 1 g daily was as effective as piperacillin-tazobactam 13.5 g divided in four daily doses.

Cutaneous infections in the elderly: diagnosis and management

Over the past several years there have been many advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous infectious diseases. This review focuses on the three major topics of interest in the geriatric population: herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), onychomycosis, and recent advances in antibacterial therapy. Herpes zoster in adults is caused by reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) that causes chickenpox in children. For many years acyclovir was the gold standard of antiviral therapy for the treatment of patients with herpes zoster. Famciclovir and valacyclovir, newer antivirals for herpes zoster, offer less frequent dosing. PHN refers to pain lasting > or = 2 months after an acute attack of herpes zoster. The pain may be constant or intermittent and may occur spontaneously or be caused by seemingly innocuous stimuli such as a light touch. Treatment of established PHN through pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapy will be discussed. In addition, therapeutic strategies to prevent PHN will be reviewed. These include the use of oral corticosteroids, nerve blocks, and treatment with standard antiviral therapy. Onychomycosis, or tinea unguium, is caused by dermatophytes in the majority of cases, but can also be caused by Candida and nondermatophyte molds. Onychomycosis is found more frequently in the elderly and in more males than females. There are four types of onychomycosis: distal subungual onychomycosis, proximal subungual onychomycosis, white superficial onychomycosis, and candidal onychomycosis. Over the past several years, new treatments for this disorder have emerged which offer shorter courses of therapy and greater efficacy than previous therapies. The treatment of bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the elderly is an important issue. There has been an alarming increase in the incidence of gram-positive infections, including resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and drug-resistant pneumococci. While vancomycin has been considered the drug of last defense against gram-positive multidrug-resistant bacteria, the late 1980s saw an increase in vancomycin-resistant bacteria, including vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). More recently, strains of vancomycin-intermediate resistant S. aureus (VISA) have been isolated. Gram-positive bacteria, such as S. aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes are often the cause of skin and skin structure infections, ranging from mild pyodermas to complicated infections including postsurgical wound infections, severe carbunculosis, and erysipelas. With limited treatment options, it has become critical to identify antibiotics with novel mechanisms of activity. Several new drugs have emerged as possible therapeutic alternatives, including linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin.

Newer Treatment Options for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

In recent years, serious skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) caused by multidrug resistant pathogens have become more common. While the majority of SSTIs are caused by Staphylococcus aureus or beta-haemolytic streptococci that are methicillin/oxacillin susceptible, the emergence of methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-resistant community-acquired and nosocomial Gram-positive pathogens has created a need for different therapeutic agents, such as linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, daptomycin, and newer generation carbapenems and fluoroquinolones. This review focuses on agents presently in clinical development for the treatment of SSTIs caused by Gram-positive pathogens such as staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Newer-generation carbapenems, such as meropenem and ertapenem, are characterised by a broad-spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and -negative aerobes and anaerobes, and are resistant to hydrolysis by many beta-lactamases. Current-generation fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, have demonstrated better eradication rates for S. aureus than conventional penicillin and cephalosporins. These antimicrobial agents can be used to treat methicillin-susceptible staphylococcal and streptococcal strains. Oxazolidinones, streptogramin combinations and cyclic lipopeptides have novel mechanisms of action and have been studied in several multinational phase III clinical trials in the treatment of complicated and uncomplicated SSTIs. They possess a broad spectrum of activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens, including MRSA and VRE. Linezolid has been shown to be active against a wide variety of community-acquired and nosocomial antimicrobial-resistant pathogens with comparability to vancomycin, as well as resulting in reduced lengths of hospital stay. Cyclic lipopeptides such as daptomycin have a unique mechanism of action by disruption of bacterial membrane electric potentials with less likelihood for development of cross-resistance. Daptomycin has recently been US FDA approved for the treatment of complicated SSTI. However, rapid development of resistance to some of these newer agents has already been reported and this trend magnifies the importance of further need for effective antimicrobial agents. Several investigational agents, such as dalbavancin, oritavancin and tigecycline, are in advanced stages of development and are likely to proceed to licensing in the next few years. With their long half-lives, these agents have an advantage of less frequent dose administration with more rapid bactericidal activity and less likelihood for development of resistance. However, because of their proven activity against highly resistant organisms, these antibacterial agents should be reserved only for life-threatening situations and/or when resistant pathogens are suspected. Rational antimicrobial use coupled with awareness of infection control measures is paramount to avert the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: impact on dermatology practice

Methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) emerged in the 1960s and is now commonly seen in hospitals, clinics and, since the mid-1990s, the community. Risk factors for the acquisition of MRSA include chronic dermatoses, underlying medical illnesses, attending healthcare facilities, use of prescription antibacterials, surgery, intravenous lines, hospitalization in an intensive care unit, and proximity to patients colonized with MRSA. Recent community-associated strains often occur in patients without these risk factors. Staphylococci are readily spread from person to person and readily contaminate the environment. Infection control measures thus involve identifying the infected patients, separating them from other non-infected patients, cleaning of the environment and, most important of all, scrupulous attention to hand hygiene. Alcoholic antiseptic hand rubs offer an alternative to antiseptic hand washes and increase compliance. Treatment of MRSA skin infections is challenging. Topical agents such as mupirocin or fusidic acid can be used, but the organisms often become resistant. Systemic therapy involves non-beta-lactams. Parenteral treatment is generally with glycopeptides such as vancomycin; oral therapy is more complex. Monotherapy with quinolones, rifampin (rifampicin), and fusidic acid often results in the development of resistance and so, if any of these agents are chosen it should be in combination. There are no data on combination therapy, although rifampin-containing combinations are often chosen. Fourth-generation quinolones and linezolid are expensive but promising alternatives.

Once-Weekly Dalbavancin versus Standard-of-Care Antimicrobial Regimens for Treatment of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections

Dalbavancin, a novel glycopeptide with a long elimination half-life ( approximately 9-12 days), was compared to standard antimicrobial therapy for skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs). In a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase 2 proof-of-concept trial, adults received 1100 mg of dalbavancin (as a single intravenous infusion), 1000 mg of dalbavancin intravenously and then 500 mg intravenously 1 week later, or a prospectively defined standard-of-care regimen. A gram-positive pathogen was isolated from samples obtained from 41 (66%) of 62 patients at baseline; Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent species (83% of pathogens). Clinical success rates at a follow-up visit (test of cure) were 94.1% among patients treated with 2 doses of dalbavancin, 61.5% among patients treated with 1 dose of dalbavancin, and 76.2% among patients treated with a standard-of-care regimen. All treatment regimens were well tolerated; drug-related adverse reaction rates were similar across the 3 groups. These findings suggest that a regimen of 2 doses of dalbavancin administered 1 week apart is effective in the treatment of complicated, gram-positive bacterial SSTIs and warrants further study.

A practical guide to the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections

Complicated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) remain a common reason for hospitalisation. Optimal management of complicated SSTIs begins with a physical examination, and obtaining the complete social and medical history of the patient. Empirical intravenous antibacterial therapy is guided by expected pathogens, patient factors and diagnostic procedure reports, such as the Gram-stained smear of discharge or exudates. The majority of community-acquired SSTIs are caused by Staphylococcus aureus and beta-haemolytic streptococci. On the basis of recent surveillance data, 80-90% of these pathogens remain susceptible to cefazolin or oxacillin. Consequently, a first generation cephalosporin or an antistaphylococcal penicillin remains the first line empirical therapy for community-acquired skin and soft tissue infections. Vancomycin may be an appropriate alternative when vancomycin-resistant S. aureus is highly suspected on the basis of patient history and co-morbid conditions. With the global emergence and spread of macrolide-resistant S. aureus and beta-haemolytic streptococci, clindamycin rather than a macrolide is the recommended agent for empirical antibacterial therapy of community-acquired SSTIs in penicillin-allergic patients. Nosocomial complicated SSTIs are predominantly caused by S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli and other Enterobacteriaceae. Piperacillin/tazobactam with or without vancomycin is the preferred agent for empirical treatment depending on local resistance statistics. The newer fluoroquinolones may have a role in the treatment of complicated SSTIs, especially in penicillin-allergic patients. More clinical studies are needed before a formal recommendation can be made. Many of the newer antimicrobial agents such as the carbapenems, oxazolidinones and streptogramins have been shown to be effective for the treatment of complicated SSTIs. However, because of their proven activity against highly resistant organisms including methicillin-resistant S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (oxazolidinones and streptogramins), and Gram-negative bacilli producing extended spectrum beta-lactamases (carbapenems), these antibacterials should be reserved for life-threatening situations and/or when resistant pathogens are suspected. Complicated skin and soft tissue infections are often associated with exudates, ulcerations, fluid collections or abscesses. Adequate debridement of devitalized tissues and drainage of abscesses and fluid collections in addition to systemic antibacterial therapy is an integral part of appropriate management.

Role of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of Gram-positive nosocomial infections in haematological or oncological patients

Gram-positive pathogens, primarily Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, viridans group streptococci, and enterococci, are now the predominant causes of infection in neutropenic haematology/oncology patients, but are often resistant to multiple antibiotics. Glycopeptides have been the only alternative antibiotic treatments for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections to date. However, glycopeptides are not always effective or well tolerated, and can produce nephrotoxic or ototoxic effects. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a recently introduced streptogramin antibiotic that is active in vitro against most of the major Gram-positive pathogens causing infection in neutropenic patients. Recent studies of the in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of Gram-positive pathogens to quinupristin/dalfopristin are summarized. Pre-clinical and clinical studies of the efficacy and safety of quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections are reviewed. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is active in vitro against the vast majority of recent isolates of relevant Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant staphylococci, viridans group streptococci, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, but excluding Enterococcus faecalis. Pre-clinical and clinical data indicate the efficacy of quinupristin/dalfopristin in infections caused by these organisms, including bacteraemia and catheter-related infections. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is not associated with nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a potential alternative to glycopeptides in haematology or oncology patients with multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections, especially those who are unresponsive to, or intolerant of, glycopeptides.

Treatment of bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Bacterial skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) are among the most frequently seen infectious entities in the community setting and occasionally in the institutional setting. A wide variety of SSSIs exist, with cellulitis, impetigo and folliculitis being the most common. Most SSSIs are caused by aerobic staphylococci and streptococci, with aerobic Gram-negative bacilli and anaerobes being involved in more complicated infections. Systemic therapy with a variety of beta-lactams, macrolides and lincosamides (clindamycin) have been the cornerstone of SSSI therapy for many years. With the exception of mupirocin, topical therapy occupies a small therapeutic niche. Despite the emergence of antimicrobial resistance among the pathogens most commonly associated with SSSIs (for example, Streptococcus pyogenes and macrolides; Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin, vancomycin, penicillin and mupirocin), few treatment failures have been reported. The newest antimicrobials reviewed herein (linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin and moxifloxacin) are not a significant improvement upon older agents in the treatment of SSSIs. Perhaps this assessment will change if the penetrance of the antimicrobial resistance patterns described above reach a critical threshold and clinical failures become more widespread.

Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid: evidence and opinion

Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid demonstrate in vitro activity against a wide range of gram-positive bacteria, including many isolates resistant to earlier antimicrobials. Quinupristin-dalfopristin is inactive against Enterococcus faecalis but has been effective for treatment of infections due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium associated with bacteremia. In comparative trials, linezolid proved to be equivalent to comparator agents, resulting in its approval for several clinical indications. The almost-complete bioavailability of linezolid permits oral administration. Each agent can cause adverse effects that may limit use in individual patients. Resistance to these drugs has been encountered infrequently among vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. Resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin is rare among staphylococci in the United States, and resistance to linezolid is very rare. Whether there is any benefit to use of these agents in combination regimens, and whether there are circumstances in which they might be alternatives to cell-wall active antibiotics for treatment of bone or endovascular infections, are questions that deserve further study.

Risk factors for arthralgias or myalgias associated with quinupristin-dalfopristin therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate risk factors for the development of arthralgias or myalgias associated with quinupristin-dalfopristin.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review and case-control analysis.

SETTING

An 850-bed tertiary care medical center.

PATIENTS

All adult and pediatric patients who had received quinupristin-dalfopristin through either a compassionate-use protocol (February 1996-October 1999) or in the year after quinupristin-dalfopristin was added to the hospital formulary (November 1999-October 2000) were included in this study. Case patients were those who developed arthralgias or myalgias while receiving quinupristin-dalfopristin therapy; control patients were those who received quinupristin-dalfopristin but did not develop arthralgias or myalgias.

INTERVENTION

Medical records, pharmacy dispensing information, and microbiology data were reviewed by a physician and a pharmacist, both of whom specialized in infectious diseases. Presence or absence of arthralgias or myalgias was the primary outcome assessed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Quinupristin-dalfopristin was administered to 68 patients during the period defined by the study. Arthralgias and myalgias could not be assessed in 18 of the 68 patients because they were sedated and paralyzed, or they were young children who could not communicate the presence of pain. Univariate analysis demonstrated that significant risk factors for arthralgias or myalgias associated with quinupristin-dalfopristin were female sex, chronic liver disease, receipt of liver transplant, elevated bilirubin level at baseline, major surgery, and receipt of either mycophenolate or cyclosporine. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a strong association with chronic liver disease, receipt of liver transplant, elevated bilirubin level at baseline, and receipt of either cyclosporine or mycophenolate. Of 50 evaluable patients receiving quinupristin-dalfopristin, 25 had pain that may have been associated with this antimicrobial agent.

CONCLUSION

The mechanism for development of arthralgias or myalgias associated with quinupristin-dalfopristin remains unknown, but these adverse events are more likely to occur in patients with chronic liver disease and those who have received a liver transplant or are receiving cyclosporine or mycophenolate.

Safety and efficacy of quinupristin/dalfopristin for treatment of invasive Gram-positive infections in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive pathogens are an increasingly common cause of serious pediatric infections. Although quinupristin/dalfopristin demonstrates favorable activity against resistant Gram-positive pathogens (including many vancomycin-resistant and methicillin-resistant staphylococci), published experience in the pediatric patient population is limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from the global quinupristin/dalfopristin Emergency-Use Program, which enrolled patients with serious Gram-positive infections who had no further therapy options because of resistance to, failure on or intolerance to standard antibiotic treatments. Our subset included safety and efficacy data from pediatric patients (age <18 years). There were no restrictions on underlying diseases, severity of illness or prior/concomitant antimicrobial use.

RESULTS

Between May 1995 and October 1999, 127 pediatric patients with 131 infections were enrolled. Microbiologic confirmation of etiology was available in 124 patients. All patients had 1 or more concomitant conditions, including malignancy and solid organ or bone marrow transplantation. The most frequent causative pathogens were vancomycin-resistant (80%), spp. (7%), methicillin-resistant (6%) and (4%). All but 21 patients received intravenous quinupristin/dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg every 8 h. The favorable clinical response rate of quinupristin/dalfopristin was 86 of 124 (69%); the favorable microbiologic response rate was 97 of 124 (78%). Eleven patients (8%) had nonvenous adverse events classified as possibly or probably related to quinupristin/dalfopristin.

CONCLUSIONS

Quinupristin/dalfopristin demonstrated favorable response rates and was reasonably well-tolerated in pediatric patients with serious Gram-positive infections unable to receive alternative therapy. In our opinion quinupristin/dalfopristin is a therapeutic option for the management of such infections.

Quinupristin/dalfopristin

Gram-positive pathogens are associated with both community- and hospital-acquired infections. These infections may be life-threatening in hospitalised patients, especially in those with significant underlying acute or chronic diseases. Prompt and appropriate antimicrobial therapy is essential for avoiding morbidity and mortality. The concept of appropriate therapy is being redefined by increasing antimicrobial resistance, especially amongst Gram-positive pathogens. This has been most dramatic with penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the community, including cross-resistance to other classes of antimicrobial agents. In the US, the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with community isolates is significant. For hospital-acquired Gram-positive pathogens, MRSA, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species and vancomycin-intermediate resistant and -resistant S. aureus are a great concern, particularly as the frequency of recovery of these pathogens from infected patients increases. The net result of these various resistance issues is a reduction in the number of appropriate antimicrobial agents for treating infected patients. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a parental streptogramin with a spectrum of activity that includes Gram-positive pathogens, including those resistant to other classes of antimicrobial compounds. In this review, data summarising the frequency of recovered Gram-positive pathogens from various infectious diseases, the escalating prevalence of resistance amongst Gram-positive pathogens and the factors making quinupristin/dalfopristin a suitable agent for treating patients infected with Gram-positive organisms will be discussed.

General microbiology and in vitro susceptibility of anaerobes isolated from complicated skin and skin-structure infections in patients enrolled in a comparative trial of ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam

In a recently completed study of once-a-day ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam every 6 h in the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections, 540 patients were randomized in a 1rcolon;1 ratio and assigned to 1 of 2 strata: those with a complicating underlying disease or all others. The most common infections in the study were deep soft-tissue abscess (18.9%), followed by diabetic lower extremity infection (18.1%); 7.0% of these were perineal cellulitis/abscess. With the exception of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, almost all of the predominant aerobic pathogens were susceptible to both study drugs. Eighty-seven patients (16%) had >/=1 anaerobe identified in their baseline wound cultures, with a total of 232 anaerobic isolates. Of the 141 anaerobes tested for susceptibility, 97.2% were susceptible to ertapenem and 97.9% to piperacillin-tazobactam. Ertapenem had excellent in vitro activity against the most common aerobic pathogens and almost all anaerobes recovered from patients with infections of the skin and skin structures.

Once-daily, high-dose levofloxacin versus ticarcillin-clavulanate alone or followed by amoxicillin-clavulanate for complicated skin and skin-structure infections: a randomized, open-label trial

This study tested whether levofloxacin, at a new high dose of 750 mg, was effective for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections (SSSIs). Patients with complicated SSSIs (n=399) were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to 2 treatment arms: levofloxacin (750 mg given once per day intravenously [iv], orally, or iv/orally) or ticarcillin-clavulanate (TC; 3.1 g given iv every 4-6 hours) followed, at the investigator's discretion, by amoxicillin-clavulanate (AC; 875 mg given orally every 12 hours). In the clinically evaluable population, therapeutic equivalence was demonstrated between the levofloxacin and TC/AC regimens (success rates of 84.1% and 80.3%, respectively). In the microbiologically evaluable population, the overall rate of eradication was 83.7% in the levofloxacin treatment group and 71.4% in the TC/AC treatment group (95% confidence interval, -24.3 to -0.2). Both levofloxacin and TC/AC were well tolerated. These data demonstrate that levofloxacin (750 mg once per day) is safe and at least as effective as TC/AC for complicated SSSIs.

Ertapenem once daily versus piperacillin-tazobactam 4 times per day for treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections in adults: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing ertapenem (1 g once daily) with piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 g every 6 h) as parenteral treatment for 540 adults with complicated skin and skin-structure infections. The most common diagnoses were skin or soft-tissue abscesses and lower-extremity infections associated with diabetes. The mean duration (+/- standard deviation) of therapy was 9.1+/-3.1 days for ertapenem and 9.8+/-3.3 days for piperacillin-tazobactam. At the assessment of primary efficacy end point, 10-21 days after treatment, 82.4% of those who received ertapenem and 84.4% of those who received piperacillin-tazobactam were cured. The difference in response rates, adjusting for the patients' assigned strata, was -2.0% (95% confidence interval, -10.2% to 6.2%), indicating that the response rates in the 2 treatment groups were equivalent. Cure rates for the 2 treatment groups were similar when compared by stratum, diagnosis, and severity of infection. The frequency and severity of drug-related adverse events were similar in the treatment groups.

Cost-effectiveness of active surveillance cultures and contact/droplet precautions for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Some have reported that adopting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines requiring contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) had no impact on rates of nosocomial spread or infection, and may therefore waste money. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of active surveillance cultures and barrier precautions for controlling MRSA. Estimated costs of surveillance cultures and isolation measures used during an MRSA outbreak at this hospital were compared with the estimated attributable excess costs of methicillin resistance (i.e., the difference between MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus costs) for bacteraemias occurring during an MRSA outbreak not promptly controlled at another hospital. The study was set in the neonatal intensive care units of two tertiary care hospitals. Estimated costs of controlling the 10.5-month outbreak in this neonatal intensive care unit that resulted in 18 colonized and four infected infants ranged from $48 617 to $68 637. The estimated attributable excess cost of 75 MRSA bacteraemias in a second neonatal intensive care unit outbreak that resulted in 14 deaths and lasted 51 months was $1 306 600. Weekly active surveillance cultures and isolation of patients with MRSA halted an outbreak at this hospital, and cost 19- to 27-fold less than the attributable costs of MRSA bacteraemias in another outbreak that was not promptly controlled. The costs of infections at other body sites and the human cost of deaths from infection were not estimated but would further help to justify the cost of identifying colonized patients and implementing effective preventive measures.

Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections

Serious infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) usually occurs in patients with significantly compromised host defences and serious co-morbidities, and this magnifies the importance of effective antimicrobial treatment. Assessments of antibacterial efficacy against VRE have been hampered by the lack of a comparator treatment arm(s), complex treatment requirements including surgery, and advanced illness-severity associated with a high crude mortality. Treatment options include available agents which don't have a specific VRE approval (chloramphenicol, doxycycline, high-dose ampicillin or ampicillin/sulbactam), and nitrofurantoin (for lower urinary tract infection). The role of antimicrobial combinations that have shown in vitro or animal-model in vivo efficacy has yet to be established. Two novel antimicrobial agents (quinupristin/ dalfopristin and linezolid) have emerged as approved therapeutic options for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium on the basis of in vitro susceptibility and clinical efficacy from multicentre, pharmaceutical company-sponsored clinical trials. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is a streptogramin, which impairs bacterial protein synthesis at both early peptide chain elongation and late peptide chain extrusion steps. It has bacteriostatic activity against vancomycin-resistant E. faecium [minimum concentration to inhibit growth of 90% of isolates (MIC(90)) = 2 microg/ml] but is not active against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC(90 )= 16 microg/ml). In a noncomparative, nonblind, emergency-use programme in patients who were infected with Gram-positive isolates resistant or refractory to conventional therapy or who were intolerant of conventional therapy, quinupristin/dalfopristin was administered at 7.5 mg/kg every 8 hours. The clinical response rate in the bacteriologically evaluable subset was 70.5%, and a 65.8% overall response (favourable clinical and bacteriological outcome) was observed. Resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin on therapy was observed in 6/338 (1.8%) of VRE strains. Myalgia/arthralgia was the most frequent treatment-limiting adverse effect. In vitro studies which combine quinupristin/dalfopristin with ampicillin or doxycyline have shown enhanced killing effects against VRE; however, the clinical use of combined therapy remains unestablished. Linezolid, an oxazolidinone compound that acts by inhibiting the bacterial pre-translational initiation complex formation, has bacteriostatic activity against both vancomycin resistant E. faecium (MIC(90) = 2 to 4 microg/ml) and E. faecalis (MIC(90) = 2 to 4 microg/ml). This agent was studied in a similar emergency use protocol for multi-resistant Gram-positive infections. 55 of 133 evaluable patients were infected with VRE. Cure rates for the most common sites were complicated skin and soft tissue 87.5% (7/8), primary bacteraemia 90.9% (10/11), peritonitis 91.7% (11/12), other abdominal/pelvic infections 91.7% (11/12), and catheter-related bacteraemia 100% (9/9). There was an all-site response rate of 92.6% (50/54). In a separate blinded, randomised, multicentre trial for VRE infection at a variety of sites, intravenous low dose linezolid (200mg every 12 hours) was compared to high dose therapy (600 mg every 12 hours) with optional conversion to oral administration. A positive dose response (although statistically nonsignificant) was seen with a 67% (39/58) and 52% (24/46) cure rate in the high- and low-dose groups, respectively. Adverse effects of linezolid therapy have been predominantly gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea), headache and taste alteration. Reports of thrombocytopenia appear to be limited to patients receiving somewhat longer courses of treatment (>14 to 21 days). Linezolid resistance (MIC > or = 8 microg/ml) has been reported in a small number of E. faecium strains which appears to be secondary to a base-pair mutation in the genome encoding for the bacterial 23S ribosome binding site. At present a comparative study between the two approved agents for VRE (quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid) has not been performed. Several investigational agents are currently in phase II or III trials for VRE infection. This category includes daptomycin (an acidic lipopeptide), oritavancin (LY-333328; a glycopeptide), and tigilcycline (GAR-936; a novel analogue of minocycline). Finally, strategies to suppress or eradicate the VRE intestinal reservoir have been reported for the combination of oral doxycyline plus bacitracin and oral ramoplanin (a novel glycolipodepsipeptide). If successful, a likely application of such an approach is the reduction of VRE infection during high risk periods in high risk patient groups such as the post-chemotherapy neutropenic nadir or early post-solid abdominal organ transplantation.

Therapeutic options for Gram-positive infections

Gram-positive infections impose a major burden on patients and the healthcare systems globally. The need to treat these infections correctly in an empirical fashion is of paramount importance. Further complicating this changing aetiology is the emergence of resistant strains which are no longer predictably susceptible to standard first-line antimicrobials such as oxacillin or vancomycin. Thus new agents such as linezolid have been developed to assist with initial empirical prescribing in infections where Gram-positive pathogens may be present. The characteristics of linezolid, including spectrum of activity, pharmacodynamic profile, tolerablility and overall efficacy should strengthen confidence when considering initial antimicrobial therapy in patients in risk areas. Future agents also being developed to fight multi-resistant Gram-positive infections include oritavancin, daptomycin and the glycylcyclines; however, these are still in the development phase.

Clinical presentations of soft-tissue infections and surgical site infections

Skin and soft-tissue infections that usually follow minor traumatic events or surgical procedures are caused by a wide spectrum of bacteria. Less frequently, the infections occur spontaneously, which often is clinically confusing and leads to delays in diagnosis. Most of the infections are self-limited and easily treated with local measures and/or antibiotics. Others are life-threatening, requiring prompt diagnosis and aggressive surgical debridement in addition to the wise choice of antibiotic agents to limit tissue loss and preserve life. Many survivors experience critical tissue losses that may require changes in lifestyle as well as major reconstructive cosmetic surgery. Involvement of antibiotic-resistant gram-positive microorganisms in these infections only increases the difficulty of their treatment and may have a significant influence on the ultimate outcome.