51
|
Yamamoto RT, Nogi Y, Dodd JA, Nomura M. RRN3 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes an essential RNA polymerase I transcription factor which interacts with the polymerase independently of DNA template. EMBO J 1996; 15:3964-73. [PMID: 8670901 PMCID: PMC452116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
RRN3 is one of the RRN genes specifically required for the transcription of rDNA by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have cloned the gene, determined the nucleotide sequence, and found that it is an essential gene which encodes a protein of calculated molecular weight of 72 369. Extracts prepared from rrn3 mutants were defective in in vitro transcription of rDNA templates. We used extracts from a strain containing an epitope-tagged Rrn3 protein to purify a factor that could complement the mutant extracts. Using immunoaffinity purification combined with Mono Q chromatography, we obtained an essentially pure preparation of Rrn3p which complements the mutant extracts. By carrying out template commitment experiments, we found that Rrn3p is not part of the pre-initiation complex that is stable through multiple rounds of transcription. We also found that pre-incubation of Rrn3p with purified Pol I leads to stimulation of transcription upon subsequent mixing with DNA template and other transcription reaction components. Single-round transcription experiments using the detergent Sarkosyl showed that this stimulation is due to increased efficiency of formation of a Sarkosyl-resistant pre-initiation complex. Thus, Rrn3p appears to interact directly with Pol I, apparently stimulating Pol I recruitment to the promoter, and is distinct from two other Pol I-specific transcription factors, the Rrn6/7 complex and the Rrn5/9/10 complex (UAF), characterized previously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R T Yamamoto
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
May M, Mengus G, Lavigne AC, Chambon P, Davidson I. Human TAF(II28) promotes transcriptional stimulation by activation function 2 of the retinoid X receptors. EMBO J 1996; 15:3093-104. [PMID: 8670810 PMCID: PMC450252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcriptional activation in vitro involves direct interactions of transactivators with the TATA binding protein (TBP) and the TBP-associated factors (TAF(II)s) which constitute the TFIID complex. However, the role of TAF(II)s in transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells has not been addressed. We show that activation function 2 of the retinoid X receptors (RXR AF-2) does not activate transcription from a minimal promoter in Cos cells. However, coexpression of human (h) TAF(II)28 promotes a strong ligand-dependent activity of the RXR AF-2 on a minimal promoter and potentiates the ability of the RXRalpha AF-2 to activate transcription from a complex promoter. The expression of hTAF(II)28 also potentiated transactivation by several nuclear receptors, notably the oestrogen and vitamin D3 receptors (ER and VDR), whereas other classes of activator were not affected. The effect of hTAFII(28) on RXR AF-2 activities did not appear to require direct RXR-TAFII(28) interactions, but correlated with the ability of hTAFII(28) to interact with TBP. In contrast to Cos cells, the RXR AF-2s had differential abilities to activate transcription from a minimal promoter in HeLa cells, and a lesser increase in their activity was observed upon hTAFII28 coexpression. Moreover, coexpression of hTAFII(28) did not increase but rather repressed activation by the ER and VDR AF-2s in HeLa cells. In agreement with these data, showing that TAF(II)28 is limiting in the AF-2 activation pathway in Cos cells, TAF(II)28 is selectively depleted in Cos cell TFIID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M May
- Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/ULP, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
53
|
Labhart P. Phosphorylation of the N-terminal domain of Xenopus TATA-box binding protein by DNA-dependent protein kinase depends on the C-terminal core domain. FEBS Lett 1996; 386:110-4. [PMID: 8647263 DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00420-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) has been shown to phosphorylate several transcription factors in vitro, suggesting that this nuclear enzyme - in addition to its role in DNA repair and recombination - may be involved in transcriptional regulation. In the typical mechanism the DNA-bound kinase phosphorylates a substrate that is bound to the same DNA molecule. Here I report that the Xenopus TATA-box binding protein (xTBP) is hyperphosphorylated by DNA-PK in vitro. The phosphorylation is in the N-terminal domain of the protein but depends fully on the presence of the C-terminal core domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Labhart
- Scripps Research Institute, Department for Molecular and Experimental Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92037,
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Jordan P, Mannervik M, Tora L, Carmo-Fonseca M. In vivo evidence that TATA-binding protein/SL1 colocalizes with UBF and RNA polymerase I when rRNA synthesis is either active or inactive. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1996; 133:225-34. [PMID: 8609157 PMCID: PMC2120796 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.133.2.225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Here we show that the TATA-binding protein (TBP) is localized in the nucleoplasm and in the nucleolus of mammalian cells, consistent with its known involvement in transcription by RNA polymerase I, II, and III. In the nucleolus of actively growing cells, TBP colocalizes with upstream binding factor (UBF) and RNA polymerase I at the sites of rRNA transcription. During mitosis, when rRNA synthesis is down-regulated, TBP colocalizes with TBP-associated factors for RNA polymerase I (TAF(I)s), UBF, and RNA polymerase I on the chromosomal regions containing the rRNA genes. Treatment of cells with a low concentration of actinomycin D inhibits rRNA synthesis and causes a redistribution of the rRNA genes that become concentrated in clusters at the periphery of the nucleolus. A similar redistribution was observed for the major components of the rRNA transcription machinery (i.e., TBP, TAF(I)s, UBF, and RNA polymerase I), which still colocalized with each other. Furthermore, anti-TBP antibodies are shown to coimmunoprecipitate TBP and TAF(I)63 in extracts prepared from untreated and actinomycin D-treated cells. Collectively, the data indicate that in vivo TBP/promoter selectivity factor, UBF, and RNA polymerase I remain associated with both active and inactive rRNA genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Jordan
- Institute of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Roussel P, André C, Comai L, Hernandez-Verdun D. The rDNA transcription machinery is assembled during mitosis in active NORs and absent in inactive NORs. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1996; 133:235-46. [PMID: 8609158 PMCID: PMC2120807 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.133.2.235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
In cycling cells, the rDNAs are expressed from telophase to the end of G2 phase. The early resumption of rDNA transcription at telophase raises the question of the fate of the rDNA transcription machinery during mitosis. At the beginning of mitosis, rDNA transcription is arrested, and the rDNAs are clustered in specific chromosomal sites, the nucleolar organizer regions (NOR). In human cells, we demonstrate that the rDNA transcription machinery, as defined in vitro, is colocalized in some NORs and absent from others whatever the mitotic phase: RNA polymerase I and the RNA polymerase I transcription factors, upstream binding factor and promoter selectivity factor (as verified for TATA-binding protein and TATA-binding protein-associated factor for RNA polymerase I [110]), were colocalized in the same NORs. The RNA polymerase I complex was localized using two different antibodies recognizing the two largest subunits or only the third largest subunit, respectively. These two antibodies immunoprecipitated the RNA polymerase I complex in interphase cells as well as in mitotic cells. These results clearly indicated that the RNA polymerase I complex remained assembled during mitosis. In addition, RNA polymerase I and the transcription factors varied in the same proportions in the positive NORs, suggesting stoichiometric association of these components. The fact that the rDNA transcription machinery is not equally distributed among NORs most likely reflects the implication of the different NORs during the subsequent interphase. Indeed, we demonstrate that only positive NORs exhibit transcription activity at telophase and that the level of transcription activity is related to the amount of rDNA transcription machinery present in the NOR. We propose that assembly of rDNA transcription machinery preceding mitosis determines expression of the rDNAs at the beginning of the next cell cycle. Consequently, the association of rDNAs with the rDNA transcription machinery defines the "active" NORs and the level of activity at the transition telophase/interphase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Roussel
- Institut Jacques Monod, Paris, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
56
|
Keys DA, Lee BS, Dodd JA, Nguyen TT, Vu L, Fantino E, Burson LM, Nogi Y, Nomura M. Multiprotein transcription factor UAF interacts with the upstream element of the yeast RNA polymerase I promoter and forms a stable preinitiation complex. Genes Dev 1996; 10:887-903. [PMID: 8846924 DOI: 10.1101/gad.10.7.887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Like most eukaryotic rDNA promoters, the promoter for rDNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae consists of two elements: a core element, which is essential, and an upstream element, which is not essential but is required for a high level of transcription. We have demonstrated that stimulation of transcription by the upstream element is mediated by a multiprotein transcription factor, UAF (upstream activation factor) which contains three proteins encoded by RRN5, RRN9, and RRN10 genes, respectively, and probably two additional uncharacterized proteins. The three genes were originally defined by mutants that show specific reduction in the transcription of rDNA. These genes were cloned and characterized. Epitope tagging of RRN5 (or RRN9), combined with immunoaffinity purification was used to purify UAF, which complemented all three (rrn5, rrn9, and rrn10) mutant extracts. Using rrn10 mutant extracts, a large stimulation by UAF was demonstrated for template containing both the core element and the upstream element but not for a template lacking the upstream element. In the absence of UAF, the mutant extracts showed the same weak transcriptional activity regardless of the presence or absence of the upstream element. We have also demonstrated that UAF alone makes a stable complex with the rDNA template, committing that template to transcription. Conversely, no such template commitment was observed with rrn10 extracts without UAF. By using a series of deletion templates, we have found that the region necessary for the stable binding of UAF corresponds roughly to the upstream element defined previously based on its ability to stimulate rDNA transcription. Differences between the yeast UAF and the previously studied metazoan UBF are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Keys
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California-Irvine 92717, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
57
|
McKnight SL. Transcription revisited: a commentary on the 1995 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory meeting, "Mechanisms of Eukaryotic Transcription". Genes Dev 1996; 10:367-81. [PMID: 8600022 DOI: 10.1101/gad.10.4.367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- S L McKnight
- Tularik Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080, USA
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Ruppert SM, McCulloch V, Meyer M, Bautista C, Falkowski M, Stunnenberg HG, Hernandez N. Monoclonal antibodies directed against the amino-terminal domain of human TBP cross-react with TBP from other species. Hybridoma (Larchmt) 1996; 15:55-68. [PMID: 9064287 DOI: 10.1089/hyb.1996.15.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The TATA box-binding protein (TBP) is a key transcription factor required for transcription by all three eukaryotic RNA polymerases. It consists of a conserved carboxy-terminal DNA binding domain and a highly divergent amino terminal domain. TBP and different sets of TBP-associated factors (TAFs) constitute at least four multisubunit complexes referred to as SL1, TFIID, TFIIIB, and SNAPC. SL1, TFIID, and TFIIIB are required for transcription by RNA polymerases I, II, and III, respectively, while the SNAP complex is involved in transcription of the small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes by RNA polymerases II and III. TBP also associates with a number of basal transcription factors such as TFIIA and TFIIB, and with several regulatory factors such as VP16, E1A, and p53. Here we describe the characterization of a panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against the amino-terminal domain of human TBP. These MAbs recognize different TBP epitopes, some of which have been precisely defined. Different MAbs recognize different TBP-containing complexes and several of them crossreact with TBP from other species. These antibodies can be used to purify TBP-containing complexes in a functional form and should be useful to identify new protein-protein interactions involving TBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Ruppert
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294-2170, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
59
|
Eberhard D, Grummt I. Species specificity of ribosomal gene transcription: a factor associated with human RNA polymerase I prevents transcription of mouse rDNA. DNA Cell Biol 1996; 15:167-73. [PMID: 8634144 DOI: 10.1089/dna.1996.15.167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
An intrinsic property of class I gene transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is the species specificity of the initiation reaction. Previous studies have demonstrated that species-specific rDNA promoter recognition is brought about by a TBP-TAF complex, termed TIF-IB in mouse and SL1 in man. We have compared the ability of affinity-purified TIF-IB and SL1 to direct transcription from the homologous rDNA template both in a reconstituted transcription system and in nuclear extracts prepared from mouse and human cells. We show that Pol I from both species and the individual transcription factors, with the exception of TIF-IB/SL1, are functionally interchangeable in the reconstituted transcription system containing purified proteins. In nuclear extracts, however, species-specific differences are obvious. Whereas SL1 reprograms a heterologous mouse extract to recognize the human promoter, TIF-IB fails to reprogram a human extract unless it is complemented with mouse Pol I. Crude human, but not mouse, Pol I exhibits species-specific differences that disappear after purification. We propose that in extracts and less purified fractions human Pol I exists as 'holoenzyme' containing associated protein(s) that prevent assembly of TIF-IB-directed initiation complexes at the murine rDNA promoter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Eberhard
- Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Schnapp A, Grummt I. Purification, assay, and properties of RNA polymerase I and class I-specific transcription factors in mouse. Methods Enzymol 1996; 273:233-48. [PMID: 8791616 DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)73023-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Schnapp
- Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II/0120, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
61
|
Cairns C, McStay B. HMG box 4 is the principal determinant of species specificity in the RNA polymerase I transcription factor UBF. Nucleic Acids Res 1995; 23:4583-90. [PMID: 8524646 PMCID: PMC307429 DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.22.4583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcription of ribosomal genes requires, in addition to RNA polymerase I, the trans-acting factors UBF and Rib1 in Xenopus or SL1 in humans. RNA polymerase I transcription is remarkably species specific. Between closely related species SL1 is the sole determinant of this specificity. Between more distantly related species, however, UBF is also a component of this species specificity. Xenopus UBF cannot function in human RNA polymerase I transcription and human UBF cannot function in Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription. Xenopus and human UBFs are remarkably similar at the amino acid sequence level, both containing multiple HMG box DNA binding motifs. The only major difference between xUBF and hUBF is the lack of a HMG box 4 equivalent in xUBF. Utilizing a series of hybrid UBF molecules we have identified HMG box 4 as the principal determinant of species specificity. Addition of human HMG box 4 to xUBF converts it to a form that functions in human RNA polymerase I transcription. Deletion of HMG box 4 from hUBF converts it to a form that functions in Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription. Furthermore, mutations within Xenopus UBF demonstrate that UBF requires a precise arrangement and number of HMG boxes to function in RNA polymerase I transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Cairns
- Biomedical Research Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
62
|
Yang Q, Radebaugh CA, Kubaska W, Geiss GK, Paule MR. Acanthamoeba castellanii contains a ribosomal RNA enhancer binding protein which stimulates TIF-IB binding and transcription under stringent conditions. Nucleic Acids Res 1995; 23:4345-52. [PMID: 7501455 PMCID: PMC307389 DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The intergenic spacer (IGS) of Acanthamoeba castellanii rRNA genes contains repeated elements which are weak enhancers for transcription by RNA polymerase I. A protein, EBF, was identified and partially purified which binds to the enhancers and to several other sequences within the IGS, but not to other DNA fragments, including the rRNA core promoter. No consensus binding sequence could be discerned in these fragments and bound factor is in rapid equilibrium with unbound. EBF has functional characteristics similar to vertebrate upstream binding factors (UBF). Not only does it bind to the enhancer and other IGS elements, but it also stimulates binding of TIF-IB, the fundamental transcription initiation factor, to the core promoter and stimulates transcription from the promoter. Attempts to identify polypeptides with epitopes similar to rat or Xenopus laevis UBF suggest that structurally the protein from A.castellanii is not closely related to vertebrate UBF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q Yang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
63
|
Thuriaux P, Mariotte S, Buhler JM, Sentenac A, Vu L, Lee BS, Nomura M. Gene RPA43 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes an essential subunit of RNA polymerase I. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:24252-7. [PMID: 7592632 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.41.24252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Yeast RNA polymerase I contains 14 distinct polypeptides, including A43, a component of about 43 kDa. The corresponding gene, RPA43, encodes a 326-amino acid polypeptide matching the peptidic sequence of two tryptic fragments isolated from A43. Gene inactivation leads to a lethal phenotype that is rescued by a plasmid containing the 35S ribosomal RNA gene fused to the GAL7 promoter, which allows the synthesis of 35S rRNA by RNA polymerase II in the presence of galactose. A screening for mutants rescued by the presence of GAL7-35SrDNA identified a nonsense rpa43 allele truncating the protein at amino acid position 217. [3H]Uridine pulse labeling showed that this mutation abolishes 35S rRNA synthesis without significant effects on the synthesis of 5 S RNA and tRNAs. These properties establish that A43 is an essential component of RNA polymerase I. This highly hydrophilic phosphoprotein has a strongly acidic carboxyl-terminal domain, and shows no homology to entries in current sequence data banks, including all the genetically identified components of the other two yeast RNA polymerases. RPA43 mapped next to RPA190, encoding the largest subunit of polymerase I. These genes are divergently transcribed and may thus share upstream regulatory elements ensuring their co-regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Thuriaux
- Service de Biochimie et Génétique Moleculaire, CEA Saclay, Sur Yvette, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
64
|
Abstract
An unusual property of ribosomal gene transcription is its marked species specificity. This results from distinct promoter-recognition properties of the RNA polymerase I transcription apparatus. The purification and functional characterization of TIF-IB/SL1, a promoter-recognition factor containing the TATA-binding protein, as well as the recent cloning of cDNAs encoding the three subunits (TAF(I)s) of the respective human and mouse factor, will facilitate the molecular analysis of the mechanisms underlying species-specific rDNA transcription and reveal how the basal transcriptional machinery has evolved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Heix
- Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
65
|
Gong X, Radebaugh CA, Geiss GK, Simon MN, Paule MR. Site-directed photo-cross-linking of rRNA transcription initiation complexes. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:4956-63. [PMID: 7651413 PMCID: PMC230742 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.15.9.4956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Site-specific photo-cross-linking of the rRNA committed transcription complex was carried out by using 5-[N-(p-azidobenzoyl)-3-aminoallyl]-dUMP-derivatized promoter DNA. Putative TAFIs of 145, 99, 96, and 91 kDa, as well as TATA-binding protein (TBP), were found to specifically photo-cross-link to different positions along the promoter. These had been identified as potential subunits of the fundamental transcription initiation factor TIF-IB (also known as SL1, factor D, and TFID) from Acanthamoeba castellanii by purification to apparent homogeneity. No other polypeptides attributable to the rRNA architectural transcription factor UBF were identified, suggesting that this protein is not part of the committed complex. Scanning transmission electron microscopy of the complexes was used to estimate the mass of the complex and the contour length of the DNA in the complex. This showed that a single molecule of TIF-IB is in each committed complex and that the DNA is not looped around the protein, as would be expected if UBF were in the complex. A circular permutation analysis of DNA bending resulting from TIF-IB binding revealed a 45 +/- 3.1 degrees (n = 14) bend centered 23 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site. This degree of bending and the position of the bend relative to the site of TBP photo-cross-linking are consistent with earlier data showing that the TBP TATA box-binding domain is not utilized in the assembly of the rRNA committed complex (C. A. Radebaugh, J. L. Mathews, G. K. Geiss, F. Liu, J. Wong, E. Bateman, S. Camier, A. Sentenac, and M. R. Paule, Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:597-605, 1994).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Gong
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1870, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
66
|
Voit R, Kuhn A, Sander EE, Grummt I. Activation of mammalian ribosomal gene transcription requires phosphorylation of the nucleolar transcription factor UBF. Nucleic Acids Res 1995; 23:2593-9. [PMID: 7651819 PMCID: PMC307079 DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.14.2593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The nucleolar factor UBF is phosphorylated by casein kinase II (CKII) at serine residues within the C-terminal acidic domain which is required for transcription activation. To investigate the biological significance of UBF modification, we have compared the trans-activating properties of cellular UBF and recombinant UBF expressed in Escherichia coli. Using a variety of assays we demonstrate that unphosphorylated UBF is transcriptionally inactive and has to be phosphorylated at multiple sites to stimulate transcription. Examination of cDNA mutants in which the serine residues within the C-terminal domain were altered by site-directed mutagenesis demonstrates that CKII-mediated phosphorylations of UBF contribute to, but are not sufficient for, transcriptional activation. Besides CKII, other cellular protein kinases phosphorylate UBF at distinct sites in a growth-dependent manner. The marked differences in the tryptic peptide maps of UBF from growing and serum-starved cells suggest that alterations in the degree of UBF phosphorylation may modulate rRNA synthetic activity in response to extracellular signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Voit
- Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
67
|
Geiduschek EP, Kassavetis GA. Comparing transcriptional initiation by RNA polymerases I and III. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1995; 7:344-51. [PMID: 7662364 DOI: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80089-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
We comment on the current understanding of transcriptional initiation by RNA polymerases I and III, and look for common modes of operation of these enzymes, emphasizing selected recent developments. These include definitive experiments on the constitution of the human RNA polymerase I transcription factor SL1/TIF-IB, the development of a genetic system for analyzing the function of RNA polymerase I in yeast, the elucidation of the structure of the human snRNA gene transcription factor SNAPc, and initial stages of mapping the protein-protein interactions involved in the assembly of transcriptional initiation complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E P Geiduschek
- Department of Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0634, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
68
|
Labhart P. DNA-dependent protein kinase specifically represses promoter-directed transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995; 92:2934-8. [PMID: 7708751 PMCID: PMC42333 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is a nuclear enzyme that phosphorylates several transcription factors, but its cellular function has not been elucidated. Here I show that DNA-PK strongly inhibits promoter-directed transcription initiation by Xenopus RNA polymerase I in vitro. The repression is due to protein phosphorylation, since it is relieved by 6-dimethylaminopurine, an inhibitor of protein kinases. DNA-PK inhibits transcription from both linear and circular templates, but the repression is more efficient on linear templates. DNA-PK has no effect on promoter-directed transcription by RNA polymerases II and III. Partial fractionation of the in vitro transcription system shows that a protein fraction containing transcription factor Rib1, the Xenopus equivalent of human SL1, mediates the repression of transcription by DNA-PK. The present data suggest a role for DNA-PK in down-regulating ribosomal gene transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Labhart
- Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Riggs DL, Peterson CL, Wickham JQ, Miller LM, Clarke EM, Crowell JA, Sergere JC. Characterization of the components of reconstituted Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase I transcription complexes. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:6205-10. [PMID: 7890756 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.11.6205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
We have reconstituted specific RNA polymerase I transcription from three partially purified chromatographic fractions (termed A, B, and C). Here, we present the chromatographic scheme and the initial biochemical characterization of these fractions. The A fraction contained the RNA polymerase I transcription factor(s), which was necessary and sufficient to form stable preinitiation complexes at the promoter. Of the three fractions, only fraction A contained a significant amount of the TATA binding factor. The B fraction contributed RNA polymerase I, and it contained an essential RNA polymerase I transcription factor that was specifically inactivated in response to a significant decrease in growth rate. The function of the C fraction remains unclear. This reconstituted transcription system provides a starting point for the biochemical dissection of the yeast RNA polymerase I transcription complex, thus allowing in vitro experiments designed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms controlling rRNA synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Riggs
- Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, Norman 73019
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
70
|
Kuhn A, Gottlieb TM, Jackson SP, Grummt I. DNA-dependent protein kinase: a potent inhibitor of transcription by RNA polymerase I. Genes Dev 1995; 9:193-203. [PMID: 7851793 DOI: 10.1101/gad.9.2.193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) comprises a catalytic subunit of approximately 350 kD (p350) and a DNA-binding component termed Ku. Although DNA-PK can phosphorylate many transcription factors, no function for this enzyme in transcription has been reported thus far. Here, we show that DNA-PK strongly represses transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I). Transcriptional repression by DNA-PK requires ATP hydrolysis, and DNA-PK must be colocalized on the same DNA molecule as the Pol I transcription machinery. Consistent with DNA-PK requiring DNA ends for activity, transcriptional inhibition only occurs effectively on linearized templates. Mechanistic studies including single-round transcriptions, abortive initiation assays, and factor-independent transcription on a tailed template demonstrate that DNA-PK inhibits initiation (i.e., the formation of the first phosphodiester bonds) but does not affect transcription elongation. Repression of transcription involves phosphorylation of the transcription initiation complex, and rescue experiments reveal that the inactivated factor remains bound to the promoter and thus prevents initiation complex formation. We discuss the possible relevance of these findings in regard to the control of rRNA synthesis in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kuhn
- German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
71
|
UBF, an Architectural Element for RNA Polymerase I Promoters. NUCLEIC ACIDS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 1995. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-79488-9_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
72
|
Moss T, Stefanovsky VY. Promotion and regulation of ribosomal transcription in eukaryotes by RNA polymerase I. PROGRESS IN NUCLEIC ACID RESEARCH AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 1995; 50:25-66. [PMID: 7754036 DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60810-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- T Moss
- Cancer Research Centre, Laval University, Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
73
|
Niu H, Zhang J, Jacob ST. E1BF/Ku interacts physically and functionally with the core promoter binding factor CPBF and promotes the basal transcription of rat and human ribosomal RNA genes. Gene Expr 1995; 4:111-24. [PMID: 7734947 PMCID: PMC6134380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/1994] [Accepted: 08/16/1994] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
We have previously characterized an RNA polymerase (pol) I transcription factor, E1BF, from rat cells. This protein is immunologically related to Ku autoantigen and is required in pol-I directed transcription of rodent ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA). Glycerol density gradient fractionation and in situ UV cross-linking analysis of the purified factor showed directly that it consists of a heterodimer of 85 and 72 kDa polypeptides. E1BF also interacted with the human core promoter and augmented transcription of human rDNA as much as fivefold in HeLa nuclear extract, whereas transcription from adenovirus major late promoter, CMV or SV40 early promoters by pol II and of U6 and 5S RNA genes by pol III were either unaffected or minimally inhibited by the antibodies. Purified rat E1BF partially restored the suppression of human rDNA transcription by anti-Ku antibodies. Immunoprecipitation of rat cell extract with the anti-Ku antibodies followed by SDS-PAGE of the precipitated proteins and Southwestern analysis showed that E1BF interacts with CPBF, a core promoter binding factor. When the majority of CPBF and E1BF was removed from the reaction mixture by preincubation with a core promoter oligo nucleotide fragment, rDNA transcription was severely impaired. Addition of exogenous CPBF or E1BF to such a reaction resulted in significant restoration of the transcription, whereas inclusion of both factors caused further enhancement of rDNA transcription. These data demonstrate that E1BF is a basal pol I transcription factor that interacts with a core promoter binding factor both physically and functionally, and that is not a general pol II or pol III transcription factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Niu
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, Chicago Medical School, IL 60064, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
74
|
Comai L, Zomerdijk JC, Beckmann H, Zhou S, Admon A, Tjian R. Reconstitution of transcription factor SL1: exclusive binding of TBP by SL1 or TFIID subunits. Science 1994; 266:1966-72. [PMID: 7801123 DOI: 10.1126/science.7801123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
RNA polymerase I and II transcription factors SL1 and TFIID, respectively, are composed of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and a set of TBP-associated factors (TAFs) responsible for promoter recognition. How the universal transcription factor TBP becomes committed to a TFIID or SL1 complex has not been known. Complementary DNAs encoding each of the three TAFIs that are integral components of SL1 have not been isolated. Analysis of subunit interactions indicated that the three TAFIs can bind individually and specifically to TBP. In addition, these TAFIs interact with each other to form a stable TBP-TAF complex. When TBP was bound first by either TAFI110, 63, or 48, subunits of TFIID such as TAFII250 and 150 did not bind TBP. Conversely, if TBP first formed a complex with TAFII250 or 150, the subunits of SL1 did not bind TBP. These results suggest that a mutually exclusive binding specificity for TBP intrinsic to SL1 and TFIID subunits directs the formation of promoter- and RNA polymerase-selective TBP-TAF complexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Comai
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley 94720-3204
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
75
|
Khoo B, Brophy B, Jackson SP. Conserved functional domains of the RNA polymerase III general transcription factor BRF. Genes Dev 1994; 8:2879-90. [PMID: 7995525 DOI: 10.1101/gad.8.23.2879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, two components of the RNA polymerase III (Pol III) general transcription factor TFIIIB are the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the B-related factor (BRF), so called because its amino-terminal half is homologous to the Pol II transcription factor IIB (TFIIB). We have cloned BRF genes from the yeasts Kluyveromyces lactis and Candida albicans. Despite the large evolutionary distance between these species and S. cerevisiae, the BRF proteins are conserved highly. Although the homology is most pronounced in the amino-terminal half, conserved regions also exist in the carboxy-terminal half that is unique to BRF. By assaying for interactions between BRF and other Pol III transcription factors, we show that it is able to bind to the 135-kD subunit of TFIIIC and also to TBP. Surprisingly, in addition to binding the TFIIB-homologous amino-terminal portion of BRF, TBP also interacts strongly with the carboxy-terminal half. Deleting two conserved regions in the BRF carboxy-terminal region abrogates this interaction. Furthermore, TBP mutations that selectively inhibit Pol III transcription in vivo impair interactions between TBP and the BRF carboxy-terminal domain. Finally, we demonstrate that BRF but not TFIIB binds the Pol III subunit C34 and we define a region of C34 necessary for this interaction. These observations provide insights into the roles performed by BRF in Pol III transcription complex assembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Khoo
- Wellcome/CRC Institute, Cambridge University, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
76
|
White RJ, Khoo BC, Inostroza JA, Reinberg D, Jackson SP. Differential regulation of RNA polymerases I, II, and III by the TBP-binding repressor Dr1. Science 1994; 266:448-50. [PMID: 7939686 DOI: 10.1126/science.7939686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
RNA polymerases I, II, and III each use the TATA-binding protein (TBP). Regulators that target this shared factor may therefore provide a means to coordinate the activities of the three nuclear RNA polymerases. The repressor Dr1 binds to TBP and blocks the interaction of TBP with polymerase II- and polymerase III-specific factors. This enables Dr1 to coordinately regulate transcription by RNA polymerases II and III. Under the same conditions, Dr1 does not inhibit polymerase I transcription. By selectively repressing polymerases II and III, Dr1 may shift the physiological balance of transcriptional output in favor of polymerase I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J White
- Wellcome/CRC Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
77
|
Keys DA, Vu L, Steffan JS, Dodd JA, Yamamoto RT, Nogi Y, Nomura M. RRN6 and RRN7 encode subunits of a multiprotein complex essential for the initiation of rDNA transcription by RNA polymerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 1994; 8:2349-62. [PMID: 7958901 DOI: 10.1101/gad.8.19.2349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Previously, we have isolated mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae primarily defective in the transcription of 35S rRNA genes by RNA polymerase I and have identified a number of genes (RRN genes) involved in this process. We have now cloned the RRN6 and RRN7 genes, determined their nucleotide sequences, and found that they encode proteins of calculated molecular weights of 102,000 and 60,300, respectively. Extracts prepared from rrn6 and rrn7 mutants were defective in in vitro transcription of rDNA templates. We used extracts from strains containing epitope-tagged wild-type Rrn6 or Rrn7 proteins to purify protein components that could complement these mutant extracts. By use of immunoaffinity purification combined with biochemical fractionation, we obtained a highly purified preparation (Rrn6/7 complex), which consisted of Rrn6p, Rrn7p, and another protein with an apparent molecular weight of 66,000, but which did not contain the TATA-binding protein (TBP). This complex complemented both rrn6 and rrn7 mutant extracts. Template commitment experiments carried out with this purified Rrn6/7 complex and with rrn6 mutant extracts have demonstrated that the Rrn6/7 complex does not bind stably to the rDNA template by itself, but its binding is dependent on the initial binding of some other factor(s) and that the Rrn6/7 complex is required for the formation of a transcription-competent preinitiation complex. These observations are discussed in comparison to in vitro rDNA transcription systems from higher eukaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Keys
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine 92717-1700
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
78
|
Rudloff U, Eberhard D, Grummt I. The conserved core domain of the human TATA binding protein is sufficient to assemble the multisubunit RNA polymerase I-specific transcription factor SL1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91:8229-33. [PMID: 8058785 PMCID: PMC44579 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.8229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The human ribosomal RNA polymerase (Pol) I promoter selectivity factor SL1 is a complex consisting of the TATA binding protein (TBP) and three TBP-associated factors (TAFs). We have investigated which elements of TBP are involved in the assembly of Pol I-specific TBP-TAF complexes by comparing SL1 isolated from two human cell lines, one expressing epitope-tagged full-length TBP and another expressing a deletion of nearly the entire N-terminal domain (e delta NTBP). We have immunopurified epitope-tagged full-length TBP- and e delta NTBP-TAF complexes and show that e delta NTBP reconstitutes SL1 activity almost as well as full-length TBP. Moreover, e delta NTBP is shown to be associated with all three Pol I-specific TAFs. Thus, the core of TBP alone is sufficient for the correct assembly of the Pol I-specific TBP-TAF complex, and the variable N-terminal region of human TBP is not required for transcriptional activity. We also demonstrate by an in vitro protein-protein interaction assay that TBP directly interacts with the smallest TAF, TAFI48.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Rudloff
- German Cancer Research Center, Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II, Heidelberg
| | | | | |
Collapse
|