The retinoblastoma protein binds E2F residues required for activation in vivo and TBP binding in vitro

A cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes that inhibits activation by E2F

The adenovirus E1A protein both activates and represses gene expression to promote cellular proliferation and inhibit differentiation. Here we report the identification and characterization of a cellular protein that antagonizes transcriptional activation and cellular transformation by E1A. This protein, termed CREG for cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes, shares limited sequence similarity with E1A and binds both the general transcription factor TBP and the tumor suppressor pRb in vitro. In transfection assays, CREG represses transcription and antagonizes 12SE1A-mediated activation of both the adenovirus E2 and cellular hsp70 promoters. CREG also antagonizes E1A-mediated transformation, as expression of CREG reduces the efficiency with which E1A and the oncogene ras cooperate to transform primary cells. Binding sites for E2F, a key transcriptional regulator of cell cycle progression, were found to be required for repression of the adenovirus E2 promoter by CREG, and CREG was shown to inhibit activation by E2F. Since both the adenovirus E1A protein and transcriptional activation by E2F function to promote cellular proliferation, the results presented here suggest that CREG activity may contribute to the transcriptional control of cell growth and differentiation.

PU.1 induces myeloid lineage commitment in multipotent hematopoietic progenitors

Little is known about the transcription factors that mediate lineage commitment of multipotent hematopoietic precursors. One candidate is the Ets family transcription factor PU.1, which is expressed in myeloid and B cells and is required for the development of both these lineages. We show here that the factor specifically instructs transformed multipotent hematopoietic progenitors to differentiate along the myeloid lineage. This involves not only the up-regulation of myeloid-specific cell surface antigens and the acquisition of myeloid growth-factor dependence but also the down-regulation of progenitor/thrombocyte-specific cell-surface markers and GATA-1. Both effects require an intact PU.1 transactivation domain. Whereas sustained activation of an inducible form of the factor leads to myeloid lineage commitment, short-term activation leads to the formation of immature eosinophils, indicating the existence of a bilineage intermediate. Our results suggest that PU.1 induces myeloid lineage commitment by the suppression of a master regulator of nonmyeloid genes (such as GATA-1) and the concomitant activation of multiple myeloid genes.

Miranda mediates asymmetric protein and RNA localization in the developing nervous system

Neuroblasts undergo asymmetric stem cell divisions to generate a series of ganglion mother cells (GMCs). During these divisions, the cell fate determinant Prospero is asymmetrically partitioned to the GMC by Miranda protein, which tethers it to the basal cortex of the dividing neuroblast. Interestingly, prospero mRNA is similarly segregated by the dsRNA binding protein, Staufen. Here we show that Staufen interacts in vivo with a segment of the prospero 3' UTR. Staufen protein and prospero RNA colocalize to the apical side of the neuroblast at interphase, but move to the basal side during prophase. Both the apical and basal localization of Staufen are abolished by the removal of a conserved domain from the carboxyl terminus of the protein, which interacts in a yeast two-hybrid screen with Miranda protein. Furthermore, Miranda colocalizes with Staufen protein and prospero mRNA during neuroblast divisions, and neither Staufen nor prospero RNA are localized in miranda mutants. Thus Miranda, which localizes Prospero protein, also localizes prospero RNA through its interaction with Staufen protein.

Hypophosphorylation of the RB protein in S and G2 as well as G1 during growth arrest

The RB tumor suppressor protein is a cell cycle regulator, where hypophosphorylated RB is associated with G1/0 arrest and its cyclin-dependent phosphorylation in G1 allows progression from G1 to S. The present report shows that in human leukemia cells induced to undergo growth arrest with sodium butyrate or DMSO, hypophosphorylation of the RB protein is not G1 restricted and also occurs in S and G2/M cells as well as in G1 cells when growth is inhibited. While all of the RB protein in G1/0 cells is hypophosphorylated, residual cells in S and G2 have significant detectable amounts of hypophosphorylated RB as well as still hyperphosphorylated RB protein. Thus RB hypophosphorylation can be induced in S and G2 as well as the G1 phase. The results show that growth retardation in other than the G1 phase is associated with occurrence of hypophosphorylated RB. RB may thus have a broader capability to inhibit proliferation than just in G1.

The maize retinoblastoma protein homologue ZmRb-1 is regulated during leaf development and displays conserved interactions with G1/S regulators and plant cyclin D (CycD) proteins

Recent discoveries of plant retinoblastoma (Rb) protein homologues and D-type cyclins suggest that control of the onset of cell division in plants may have stronger parallels with mammalian G1/S controls than with yeasts. In mammals, the Rb protein interacts specifically with D-type cyclins and regulates cell proliferation by binding and inhibiting E2F transcription factors. However, the developmental role of Rb in plants and its potential interaction with cell cycle regulators is unknown. We show that the maize Rb homologue ZmRb-1 is temporally and spatially regulated during maize leaf development. ZmRb-1 is highly expressed in differentiating cells, but almost undetectable in proliferating cells. In vitro, both ZmRb-1 and human Rb bind all classes of plant D-type cyclins with the involvement of a conserved N-terminal Leu-x-Cys-x-Glu (LxCxE) Rb-interaction motif. This binding is strongly reduced by mutation of the conserved Cys-470 of ZmRb-1. ZmRb-1 binds human and Drosophila E2F, and inhibits transcriptional activation of human E2F. We also show that ZmRb-1 is a good in vitro substrate for all human G1/S protein kinases. The functional conservation of proteins that control the G1/S transition in mammals and plants points to the existence of plant E2F homologues. We conclude that evolution of Rb and cyclin D proteins occurred after separation of the fungi from the higher eukaryotic lineage, but preceded the divergence of plant and animal kingdoms.

Cell cycle-regulated transcription in mammalian cells

The periodic, phase-specific transcription of defined sets of genes is a hallmark of cell cycle progression in all organisms (1-3). In this article, we will summarise our current knowledge and views of the mechanisms governing the cross-coupling of cell cycle control and transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells, with particular emphasis on the transcription factor E2F and the retinoblastoma protein pRb (1-3). Excluded from this review will be the genomic response to mitogenic stimulation, which is part of the mitogen-triggered signal transduction cascades rather than a reflection of cell cycle regulation (4).

The Gcn4p activation domain interacts specifically in vitro with RNA polymerase II holoenzyme, TFIID, and the Adap-Gcn5p coactivator complex

The Gcn4p activation domain contains seven clusters of hydrophobic residues that make additive contributions to transcriptional activation in vivo. We observed efficient binding of a glutathione S-transferase (GST)-Gcn4p fusion protein to components of three different coactivator complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell extracts, including subunits of transcription factor IID (TFIID) (yeast TAFII20 [yTAFII20], yTAFII60, and yTAFII90), the holoenzyme mediator (Srb2p, Srb4p, and Srb7p), and the Adap-Gcn5p complex (Ada2p and Ada3p). The binding to these coactivator subunits was completely dependent on the hydrophobic clusters in the Gcn4p activation domain. Alanine substitutions in single clusters led to moderate reductions in binding, double-cluster substitutions generally led to greater reductions in binding than the corresponding single-cluster mutations, and mutations in four or more clusters reduced binding to all of the coactivator proteins to background levels. The additive effects of these mutations on binding of coactivator proteins correlated with their cumulative effects on transcriptional activation by Gcn4p in vivo, particularly with Ada3p, suggesting that recruitment of these coactivator complexes to the promoter is a cardinal function of the Gcn4p activation domain. As judged by immunoprecipitation analysis, components of the mediator were not associated with constituents of TFIID and Adap-Gcn5p in the extracts, implying that GST-Gcn4p interacted with the mediator independently of these other coactivators. Unexpectedly, a proportion of Ada2p coimmunoprecipitated with yTAFII90, and the yTAFII20, -60, and -90 proteins were coimmunoprecipitated with Ada3p, revealing a stable interaction between components of TFIID and the Adap-Gcn5p complex. Because GST-Gcn4p did not bind specifically to highly purified TFIID, Gcn4p may interact with TFIID via the Adap-Gcn5p complex or some other adapter proteins. The ability of Gcn4p to interact with several distinct coactivator complexes that are physically and genetically linked to TATA box-binding protein can provide an explanation for the observation that yTAFII proteins are dispensable for activation by Gcn4p in vivo.

Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription

The retinoblastoma protein (Rb) silences specific genes that are active in the S phase of the cell cycle and which are regulated by E2F transcription factors. Rb binds to the activation domain of E2F and then actively represses the promoter by a mechanism that is poorly understood. Here we show that Rb associates with a histone deacetylase, HDAC1, through the Rb 'pocket' domain. Association with the deacetylase is reduced by naturally occurring mutations in the pocket and by binding of the human papilloma virus oncoprotein E7. We find that Rb can recruit histone deacetylase to E2F and that Rb cooperates with HDAC1 to repress the E2F-regulated promoter of the gene encoding the cell-cycle protein cyclin E. Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity by trichostatin A (TSA) inhibits Rb-mediated repression of a chromosomally integrated E2F-regulated promoter. Our results indicate that histone deacetylases are important for regulating the cell cycle and that active transcriptional repression by Rb may involve the modification of chromatin structure.

DDB, a putative DNA repair protein, can function as a transcriptional partner of E2F1

The transcription factor E2F1 is believed to be involved in the regulated expression of the DNA replication genes. To gain insights into the transcriptional activation function of E2F1, we looked for proteins in HeLa nuclear extracts that bind to the activation domain of E2F1. Here we show that DDB, a putative DNA repair protein, associates with the activation domain of E2F1. DDB was identified as a heterodimeric protein (48 and 127 kDa) that binds to UV-damaged DNA. We show that the UV-damaged-DNA binding activity from HeLa nuclear extracts can associate with the activation domain of E2F1. Moreover, the 48-kDa subunit of DDB, synthesized in vitro, binds to a fusion protein of E2F1 depending on the C-terminal activation domain. The interaction between DDB and E2F1 can also be detected by coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Immunoprecipitation of an epitope-tagged DDB from cell extracts resulted in the coprecipitation of E2F1. In a reciprocal experiment, immunoprecipitates of E2F1 were found to contain DDB. Fractionation of HeLa nuclear extracts also revealed a significant overlap in the elution profiles of E2F1 and DDB. For instance, DDB, which does not bind to the E2F sites, was enriched in the high-salt fractions containing E2F1 during chromatography through an E2F-specific DNA affinity column. We also observed evidence for a functional interaction between DDB and E2F1 in living cells. For instance, expression of DDB specifically stimulated E2F1-activated transcription. In addition, the transcriptional activation function of a heterologous transcription factor containing the activation domain of E2F1 was stimulated by coexpression of DDB. Moreover, DDB expression could overcome the retinoblastoma protein (Rb)-mediated inhibition of E2F1-activated transcription. The results suggest that this damaged-DNA binding protein can function as a transcriptional partner of E2F1. We speculate that the damaged-DNA binding function of DDB, besides repair, might serve as a negative regulator of E2F1-activated transcription, as damaged DNA will sequester DDB and make it unavailable for E2F1. Furthermore, the binding of DDB to damaged DNA might be involved in downregulating the replication genes during growth arrest induced by damaged DNA.

E2F transcription factor action, regulation and possible role in human cancer

E2F transcription factors regulate expression of a panel of cellular genes that control cellular DNA synthesis and proliferation, either by activating or repressing their transcription, largely in a cell cycle-dependent manner. The ability of E2F proteins to regulate expression of these target genes is, in turn, regulated by other cellular proteins that are important for normal control of cell cycle progression. Together, E2F proteins, their target genes, and the proteins that regulate E2F activity comprise a genetic pathway that is probably the most, frequently altered pathway in human cancer. This review examines this genetic pathway and focuses on the role of E2F proteins in its function. Specifically, the target genes regulated by E2F, the likely mechanisms by which activation and repression of target gene transcription is achieved, and the regulation of E2F activity by other proteins in the cell, are discussed.

Interaction between cell cycle regulator, E2F-1, and NF-kappaB mediates repression of HIV-1 gene transcription

The NF-kappaB/Rel family of transcription factors is one of the main targets of cytokines and other agents that induce HIV-1 gene expression. Some of these extracellular stimuli arrest cells in the G1 phase of the mitotic division cycle and modulate the activity of the tumor suppressor protein Rb and its partner E2F-1. Earlier studies indicated that E2F-1, a transcription factor that stimulates expression of S-phase-specific genes, is able to repress transcription directed by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) type-1 promoter in a variety of cells, including those of glial and lymphocytic origin. Here, we demonstrate that E2F-1 may regulate the activity of the HIV-1 long terminal repeat through its ability to bind sequences in the NF-kappaB enhancer region and to interact with the NF-kappaB subunit, p50. Gel retardation and methylation interference assays show that E2F-1 is able to bind specifically to a site embedded within the two NF-kappaB elements. Gel retardation/immunoblot analysis using purified E2F-1 and p50 homodimers reveals the presence of complexes containing both proteins. Affinity chromatography and co-immunoprecipitation assays provide evidence for direct interaction of E2F-1 and p50 in the absence of their DNA target sequences. In vitro transcription assay demonstrates that E2F-1 represses NF-kappaB mediated transcription in a cell-free system. Functional studies in Jurkat T lymphocytic cells point to the importance of both the E2F and NF-kappaB binding sites in E2F-1 mediated repression of HIV-1 promoter, in vivo. The results of this study suggest that NF-kappaB activity may be regulated by its interaction with the cell cycle regulatory protein, E2F-1.

Deletion of RB exons 24 and 25 causes low-penetrance retinoblastoma

A deletion in the tumor-suppressor gene, RB, discovered by quantitative multiplex PCR, shows low penetrance (LP), since only 39% of eyes at risk in this family develop retinoblastoma. The 4-kb deletion spanning exons 24 and 25 (delta24-25) is the largest ever observed in an LP retinoblastoma family. Unlike the usual RB mutations, which cause retinoblastoma in 95% of at-risk eyes and yield no detectable protein, the delta24-25 allele transcribed a message splicing exon 23 to exon 26, resulting in a detectable protein (pRBdelta24-25) that lacks 58 amino acids from the C-terminal domain, proving that this domain is essential for suppression of retinoblastoma. Two functions were partially impaired by delta24-25-nuclear localization and repression of E2F-consistent with the idea that LP mutations generate "weak alleles" by reducing but not eliminating essential activities. However, delta24-25 ablated interaction of pRB with MDM2. Since a homozygous LP allele is considered nontumorigenic, the pRB/MDM2 interaction may be semi- or nonessential for suppressing retinoblastoma. Alternatively, some homozygous LP alleles may not cause tumorigenesis because an additional event is required (the "three-hit hypothesis"), or the resulting imbalance in pRB function may cause apoptosis (the "death allele hypothesis"). pRBdelta24-25 was also completely defective in suppressing growth of Saos-2 osteosarcoma cells. Targeting pRBdelta24-25 to the nucleus did not improve Saos-2 growth suppression, suggesting that C-terminal domain functions other than nuclear localization are essential for blocking proliferation in these cells. Since delta24-25 behaves like a null allele in these cells but like an LP allele in the retina, pRB may use different mechanisms to control growth in different cell types.

A novel link between REC2, a DNA recombinase, the retinoblastoma protein, and apoptosis

The REC2 recombinase is essential for recombinational repair following DNA damage as well as for successful meiosis and gene targeting in the corn smut Ustilago maydis. Here we report that overexpression of REC2 induced apoptotic cell death in human HuH-7, Hep G2, and Hep 3B hepatoma cells. Apoptosis was related to recombinase activity and was significantly increased by inhibition of retinoblastoma (Rb) expression with transforming growth factor-beta1. REC2-induced apoptosis was associated with a significantly reduced percentage of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and a significant reduction in G2/M only in the Rb(-/-) Hep 3B cells. Overexpression of REC2 resulted in increased abundance of the hyperphosphorylated form of Rb. However, by immunoprecipitation REC2 was associated primarily with hypophosphorylated Rb, suggesting that REC2 may be involved in modulating the phosphorylation state of Rb. The A and B pocket domains with the spacer amino acid sequence and the carboxyl-terminal region of Rb were required for maximal binding to REC2. Overexpression of Rb significantly inhibited REC2-induced apoptosis even in the presence of transforming growth factor-beta1. Taken together, these data suggest a novel interaction of Rb with the recombinase REC2 and a role for this complex in bridging DNA recombination and apoptosis.

Repression of p53-mediated transcription by MDM2: a dual mechanism

The oncoprotein MDM2 binds to the activation domain of the tumor suppressor p53 and inhibits its ability to stimulate transcription. This same region of p53 is able to bind several basal transcription factors that appear to be important for the transactivation function of p53. It has therefore been suggested that MDM2 acts to inhibit p53 by concealing its activation domain from the basal machinery. Here we present data suggesting that MDM2 possesses an additional inhibitory function. Our experiments reveal that in addition to a p53-binding domain, MDM2 also contains an inhibitory domain that can directly repress basal transcription in the absence of p53. By fusing portions of MDM2 to a heterologous DNA-binding domain to allow p53-independent promoter recruitment, we have localized this inhibitory domain to a region encompassing amino acids 50-222 of MDM2. Furthermore, the function of this inhibitory domain does not require the presence of either TFIIA or the TAFs. Of the remaining basal factors, both the small subunit of TFIIE and monomeric TBP are bound by the MDM2 inhibitory domain. It is possible that MDM2 inhibits the ability of the preinitiation complex to synthesize RNA through one of these interactions. Our results are consistent with a model in which MDM2 represses p53-dependent transcription by a dual mechanism: a masking of the activation domain of p53 through a protein-protein interaction that additionally serves to recruit MDM2 to the promoter where it directly interferes with the basal transcription machinery.

E2F1-induced apoptosis requires DNA binding but not transactivation and is inhibited by the retinoblastoma protein through direct interaction

E2F1 overexpression has been shown to induce apoptosis in cooperation with p53. Using Saos-2 cells, which are null for p53 and lack functional Rb, we have demonstrated that E2F1 overexpression can also induce apoptosis in the absence of p53 and retinoblastoma protein (Rb). E2F1-induced apoptosis can be specifically inhibited by Rb but not mdm2, which is known for its ability to inhibit p53-induced apoptosis. Through the study of the apoptotic function of a set of E2F1 mutants, it was clear that the transactivation and the apoptotic function of E2F1 are uncoupled. The transactivation-defective E2F1 mutants E2F1(1-374), E2F1(390-1)DF(delta mdm2), and E2F1(406-415)(delta Rb) can induce apoptosis as effectively as wild-type E2F1. In contrast to E2F1 transactivation, the DNA-binding activity of E2F1 was proven to be essential for its apoptotic function, as the DNA-binding-defective mutants E2F1(132) and E2F1(132)(1-374) failed to induce apoptosis. Therefore Rb may inhibit E2F1-induced apoptosis by mechanisms other than the suppression of the transactivation of E2F1. This hypothesis was supported by our observation that although Rb overexpression can specifically repress the apoptosis induced by wild-type E2F1 and a Rb-binding-competent E2F1 mutant E2F1(390-1)DF(delta mdm2), it failed to inhibit the apoptosis induced by mutants E2F1(1-374) and E2F1(delta 406-415)(delta Rb), which are defective or reduced in Rb binding and transactivation. All of these points argue for a novel function for E2F1 and Rb in controlling apoptosis. The results also indicate that transcriptional repression rather than the transactivation function of E2F1 may be involved in its apoptotic function. The results presented here may provide us some physiological implication of the repression function of the Rb-E2F1 complex.

The CBP co-activator stimulates E2F1/DP1 activity

The cell cycle-regulating transcription factors E2F1/DP1 activate genes whose products are required for S phase progression. During most of the G1 phase, E2F1/DP1 activity is repressed by the retinoblastoma gene product RB, which directly contacts the E2F1 activation domain and silences it. The E2F1 activation domain has sequence similarity to the N-terminal activation domain of E1A(12S), which contains binding sites for CBP as well as RB. Here, we present evidence that the CBP protein directly contacts E2F1/DP1 and stimulates its activation capacity. We show that CBP interacts with the activation domain of E2F1 both in vitro and in vivo. Deletion of four residues from the E2F1 activation domain reduces CBP binding as well as transcriptional activation, but still allows the binding of RB and MDM2. This deletion removes residues which are conserved in the N-terminal activation domain of E1A and which are required for the binding of CBP to E1A. When the E1A N-terminus is used as a competitor in squelshing experiments it abolishes CBP-induced activation of E2F1/DP1, whereas an E1A mutant lacking CBP binding ability fails to do so. These results indicate that CBP can act as a coactivator for E2F1 and suggest that CBP recognises a similar motif within the E1A and E2F1 activation domains. The convergence of the RB and CBP pathways on the regulation of E2F1 activity may explain the cooperativity displayed by these proteins in mediating the biological functions of E1A. We propose a model in which E1A activates E2F not only by removing the RB repression but also by providing the CBP co-activator.

Dual mechanisms of repression of E2F1 activity by the retinoblastoma gene product

The retinoblastoma gene product, pRb, negatively regulates cell proliferation by modulating the activity of the transcription factor E2F1 that controls expression of S-phase genes. To dissect transcriptional regulation of E2F1 by pRb, we developed a means to control the subcellular localization of pRb by exchanging its constitutive nuclear localization signal (NLS) with an inducible nuclear targeting domain from the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). In co-transfection experiments in hormone-free media, pRb delta NLS-GR sequestered E2F1 in the cytoplasm; addition of steroid hormones induced co-translocation of pRb delta NLS-GR and E2F1 to the nucleus. A pRb allele lacking a NLS, pRb delta NLS, also sequestered E2F1 in the cytoplasm. Both nuclear and cytoplasmic pRb delta NLS-GR repressed transcription from a simple, E2F1-activated, promoter equally well. pRb delta NLS-GR exerted differential effects on complex promoters containing an activator and E2F sites that acted as either positive or negative elements. We propose a dual mechanism of transcriptional repression by pRb which allows tight control of E2F1-responsive genes: a pRb-E2F1 repressor unit is assembled off DNA to pre-empt transcriptional activation by E2F1; recruitment of this repressor unit to cognate binding sites on promoters allows silencing of adjacent promoter elements.

Identification of seven hydrophobic clusters in GCN4 making redundant contributions to transcriptional activation

GCN4 is a transcriptional activator in the bZIP family that regulates amino acid biosynthetic genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The N-terminal 100 amino acids of GCN4 contains a potent activation function that confers high-level transcription in the absence of the centrally located acidic activation domain (CAAD) delineated in previous studies. To identify specific amino acids important for activation by the N-terminal domain, we mutagenized a GCN4 allele lacking the CAAD and screened alleles in vivo for reduced expression of the HIS3 gene. We found four pairs of closely spaced phenylalanines and a leucine residue distributed throughout the N-terminal 100 residues of GCN4 that are required for high-level activation in the absence of the CAAD. Trp, Leu, and Tyr were highly functional substitutions for the Phe residue at position 45. Combined with our previous findings, these results indicate that GCN4 contains seven clusters of aromatic or bulky hydrophobic residues which make important contributions to transcriptional activation at HIS3. None of the seven hydrophobic clusters is essential for activation by full-length GCN4, and the critical residues in two or three clusters must be mutated simultaneously to observe a substantial reduction in GCN4 function. Numerous combinations of four or five intact clusters conferred high-level transcription of HIS3. We propose that many of the hydrophobic clusters in GCN4 act independently of one another to provide redundant means of stimulating transcription and that the functional contributions of these different segments are cumulative at the HIS3 promoter. On the basis of the primacy of bulky hydrophobic residues throughout the activation domain, we suggest that GCN4 contains multiple sites that mediate hydrophobic contacts with one or more components of the transcription initiation machinery.

RB [corrected] as a modulator of transcription

pRB interacts with a number of transcription factors and can both directly and indirectly modulate transcriptional activity. Growth suppression by pRB is tightly linked to its ability to form complexes with E2F which are capable of repressing transcription of certain genes required for S phase. The ability of pRB to enhance the activity of several non-E2F transcription factors might suggest a mechanism by which pRB could coordinately regulate sets of genes at or near the restriction point. Specifically, complexes consisting of underphosphorylated pRB and E2F, by virtue of transcriptional repression of promoters containing E2F sites, would act to block entry into S phase. At the same time, distinct complexes of underphosphorylated pRB and transcription factors such as the glucocorticoid receptor, ATF-2, or MyoD, might lead to an increase in the transcription of genes required for differentiation or for additional growth inhibitory functions (e.g. TGF-beta 1). Changes in the activities of various cyclin-dependent kinase complexes would lead to phosphorylation of pRB and thus coordinate a release of S phase genes from repression with a loss of activation of differentiation genes. While this model is speculative, the role of pRB as a transcriptional modulator, as well as its interactions with cell-cycle regulatory kinases, places it in a position to integrate extracellular and intracellular growth signals and to transduce those signals into changes in gene transcription which ultimately influence cell growth and differentiation.

Repression of RNA polymerase III transcription by the retinoblastoma protein

Transcription by RNA polymerase (pol) III is under cell-cycle control, being higher in S and G2 than in G0 and early G1 phases. Many transformed cell types have elevated pol III activity, presumably to sustain sufficient protein synthesis for unrestrained growth. The retinoblastoma tumour-suppressor protein (Rb) restricts cellular proliferation, and is often found mutated in transformed cells. Here we demonstrate that Rb can repress the level of transcription from pol III templates both in vitro and vivo. Analysis of Rb-deficient SAOS2 cells and primary fibroblasts from Rb-/- mice demonstrates elevated levels of pol III activity in the absence of functional Rb protein. Rb-induced repression of pol III activity is alleviated by mutations in the Rb pocket domain that occur naturally in tumours, and by viral transforming proteins that bind and inactivate Rb. These results implicate repression of pol III transcription as a mechanism for Rb-induced growth arrest, and suggest that restraining protein biosynthesis may be important in the prevention of tumour development.

Characterization of the interaction between the acidic activation domain of VP16 and the RNA polymerase II initiation factor TFIIB

Contact between a transcriptional activator and one or more components of the RNA polymerase II transcription initiation machinery is generally believed important for activators to function. Several different molecular targets have been suggested for direct contact by herpes simplex virus virion protein VP16, including the general initiation factor TFIIB. In this report we have used several strategies to critically assess this interaction between VP16 and TFIIB. Affinity columns of VP16 bound TFIIB activity from HeLa cell extracts and the binding was reduced by mutations in the activation domain of VP16. In assays of direct binding, VP16 bound recombinant human TFIIB but not Drosophila or yeast TFIIB. Unlike binding from an extract, however, we found that the interaction between VP16 and recombinant human TFIIB was not affected by mutations in VP16 that reduce transactivation. Point mutations within human TFIIB that reduce transactivation by VP16 have been shown to reduce VP16 binding, but we show here that these same mutations critically affect both the important TBP-TFIIB interaction and the ability of TFIIB to support activator-independent basal transcription in vitro. Taken together our results suggest more evidence is needed to support the notion that TFIIB is a functionally important target for the activator VP16.

Wild-type and transactivation-defective mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein bind human TATA-binding protein in vitro

SUMMARY

Tat regulates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gene expression by increasing both the rate of transcription initiation and the efficiency of transcription elongation. The ability of Tat to facilitate HIV-1 transcription preinitiation complex formation suggests that components of the basal transcriptional machinery may be targeted by Tat. Previous studies have demonstrated that Tat interacts directly with the human TATA-binding protein (TBP) and specific TBP-associated factors (TAFS) that comprise the TFIID complex. Here, in vitro glutathione S-transferase protein binding assays containing fully functional or transactivation-defective mutant Tat proteins have been used to investigate the functional significance of the direct interaction between Tat and TBP relative to Tat transactivation. Results demonstrate that full-length Tat, as well as the activation domain of Tat alone, binds human TBP in vitro. Site-directed mutations within the activation domain of Tat (C22G and P18IS) that abrogate transactivation by Tat in vivo fail to inhibit Tat-TBP binding. Full-length Tat, the activation domain of Tat alone, and a transactivation-defective mutant of Tat that lacks N-terminal amino acid residues 2-36 bind with equal efficiencies to TBP provided that the H1 alpha helical domain that maps to amino acids 167-220 within the highly conserved carboxyl terminus of TBP is maintained. These data indicate that an activity mapped within the activation domain of Tat, which is distinct from Tat-TBP binding. is required for transactivation by Tat.

Three functional classes of transcriptional activation domain

We have studied the abilities of different transactivation domains to stimulate the initiation and elongation (postinitiation) steps of RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo. Nuclear run-on and RNase protection analyses revealed three classes of activation domains: Sp1 and CTF stimulated initiation (type I); human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat fused to a DNA binding domain stimulated predominantly elongation (type IIA); and VP16, p53, and E2F1 stimulated both initiation and elongation (type IIB). A quadruple point mutation of VP16 converted it from a type IIB to a type I activator. Type I and type IIA activators synergized with one another but not with type IIB activators. This observation implies that synergy can result from the concerted action of factors stimulating two different steps in transcription: initiation and elongation. The functional differences between activators may be explained by the different contacts they make with general transcription factors. In support of this idea, we found a correlation between the abilities of activators, including Tat, to stimulate elongation and their abilities to bind TFIIH.

A role for a bent DNA structure in E2F-mediated transcription activation

We examined the role of promoter architecture, as well as that of the DNA-bending capacity of the E2F transcription factor family, in the activation of transcription. DNA phasing analysis revealed that a consensus E2F site in the E2F1 promoter possesses an inherent bend with a net magnitude of 40 +/-2 degrees and with an orientation toward the major groove relative to the center of the E2F site. The inherent DNA bend is reversed upon binding of E2F, generating a net bend with a magnitude of 25 +/- 3 degrees oriented toward the minor groove relative to the center of the E2F site. We also found that three members of the E2F family, in conjunction with the DP1 protein, bend the DNA toward the minor groove, suggesting that DNA bending is a characteristic of the entire E2F family. The Rb-E2F complex, on the other hand, does not reverse the intrinsic DNA bend. Analysis of a series of E2F1 deletion mutants defined E2F1 sequences which are not required for DNA binding but are necessary for the DNA-bending capacity of E2F. An internal region of E2F1, previously termed the marked box, which is highly homologous among E2F family members, was particularly important in DNA bending. We also found that a bent DNA structure can be a contributory component in the activation of the E2F1 promoter but is not critical in the repression of that promoter in quiescent cells. This finding suggests that E2F exhibits characteristics typical of modular transcription factors, with independent DNA-binding and transcriptional activation functions, but also has features of architectural factors that alter DNA structure.

Interaction of Sp1 with the growth- and cell cycle-regulated transcription factor E2F

Within the region around 150 bp upstream of the initiation codon, which was previously shown to suffice for growth-regulated expression, the murine thymidine kinase gene carries a single binding site for transcription factor Sp1; about 10 bp downstream of this site, there is a binding motif for transcription factor E2F. The latter protein appears to be responsible for growth regulation of the promoter. Mutational inactivation of either the Sp1 or the E2F site almost completely abolishes promoter activity, suggesting that the two transcription factors interact directly in delivering an activation signal to the basic transcription machinery. This was verified by demonstrating with the use of glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins that E2F and Sp1 bind to each other in vitro. For this interaction, the C-terminal part of Sp1 and the N terminus of E2F1, a domain also present in E2F2 and E2F3 but absent in E2F4 and E2F5, were essential. Accordingly, E2F1 to E2F3 but not E2F4 and E2F5 were found to bind sp1 in vitro. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments showed that complexes exist in vivo, and it was estabilished that the distance between the binding sites for the two transcription factors was critical for optimal promoter activity. Finally, in vivo footprinting experiments indicated that both the sp1 and E2F binding sites are occupied throughout the cell cycle. Mutation of either binding motif abolished binding of both transcription factors in vivo, which may indicate cooperative binding of the two proteins to chromatin-organized DNA. Our data are in line with the hypothesis that E2F functions as a growth- and cell cycle regulated tethering factor between Sp1 and the basic transcription machinery.

E2F1 and E1A(12S) have a homologous activation domain regulated by RB and CBP

The E2F1 transcription factor has a well-characterized activation domain at its C terminus and the E1A protein has a recently defined activation domain at its N terminus. Here we show that these activation domains are highly related in sequence. The sequence homology reflects, at least partly, the conservation of common binding sites for the RB and CBP/p300 proteins, which are preserved in the same relative order along E2F1 and E1A. Furthermore, the interaction of RB and CBP with these two activation domains results in the same functional consequences: RB represses both activation domains, whereas CBP stimulates them. We conclude that the activation domains of E1A(12s) and E2F1 belong to a novel functional class, characterized by specific protein binding sites. The implication of this conservation with respect to E1A-induced stimulation of E2F activity is discussed.

Protein-DNA interactions at the major and minor promoters of the divergently transcribed dhfr and rep3 genes during the Chinese hamster ovary cell cycle

In mammals, two TATA-less bidirectional promoters regulate expression of the divergently transcribed dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and rep3 genes. In CHOC 400 cells, dhfr mRNA levels increase about fourfold during the G1-to-S phase transition of the cell cycle, whereas the levels of rep3 transcripts vary less than twofold during this time. To assess the role of DNA-binding proteins in transcriptional regulation of the dhfr and rep3 genes, the major and minor dhfr-rep3 promoter regions were analyzed by high-resolution genomic footprinting during the cell cycle. At the major dhfr promoter, prominent DNase I footprints over four upstream Sp1 binding sites did not vary throughout G1 and entry into the S phase. Genomic footprinting revealed that a protein is constitutively bound to the overlapping E2F sites throughout the G1-to-S phase transition, an interaction that is most evident on the transcribed template strand. On the nontranscribed strand, multiple changes in the DNase I cleavage pattern are observed during transit through G1 and entry into the S phase. By using gel mobility shift assays and a series of sequence-specific probes, two different species of E2F were shown to interact with the dhfr promoter during the cell cycle. The DNA binding activity of one E2F species, which preferentially recognizes the sequence TTTGGCGC, did not vary significantly during the cell cycle. The DNA binding activity of the second E2F species, which preferentially recognizes the sequence TTTCGCGC, increased during the G1-to-S phase transition. Together, these results indicate that Sp1 and the species of E2F that binds TTTGGCGC participate in the formation of a basal transcription complex, while the species of E2F that binds TTTCGCGC regulates dhfr gene expression during the G1-to-S phase transition. At the minor promoter, DNase I footprints at a consensus c-Myc binding site and three Sp1 binding sites showed little variation during the G1-to-S phase transition. In addition to protein binding at sequences known to be involved in the regulation of transcription, genomic footprinting of the entire promoter region also showed that a protein factor is constitutively bound to the first intron of the rep3 gene.

Transcriptional regulation of the dihydrofolate reductase gene

As cells approach S phase, many changes occur to create an environment conducive for DNA synthesis and commitment to cell division. The transcription rate of many genes encoding enzymes involved in DNA synthesis, including the dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) gene, increases at the G1/S boundary of the cell cycle. Although a number of transcription factors interact to finely tune the levels of dhfr RNA produced, two families of transcription factors, Sp1 and E2F, play central roles in modulating dhfr levels. A region containing several Sp1-binding sites is required for both regulated and basal transcription levels. In contrast, the E2F-binding sites near the transcription start site are required only for regulated transcription. A model is presented for the regulation of the dhfr gene which may also pertain to other cell cycle-associated genes.

Introduction to the E2F family: protein structure and gene regulation

E2F is a heterodimer composed of two partners, such as E2F1 and DP1. Although E2F1 can bind DNA as a homodimer and increase promoter activity, optimal DNA-binding and transcriptional activity occurs in the heterodimeric form. A model (Fig. 3) for the involvement of E2F activity in cell growth control that incorporates viral oncoproteins, positive regulators of cell growth (cyclins) and negative regulators of cell growth (tumor suppressor proteins) can now be advanced. Each aspect of this model is addressed in subsequent chapters of this book. It is likely that binding of growth-suppressing proteins, such as Rb, can inhibit the transactivation potential of E2F1, either by blocking the interaction of E2F1 with a separate component of the transcription complex or by bringing a repressor domain to the transcription complex (Flemington et al. 1993; Helin et al. 1993; Weintraub et al. 1992; Zamanian and La Thangue 1993; Zhu et al. 1993). Phosphorylation or sequestration of Rb by viral oncoproteins can free E2F. The influence of viral oncoproteins on E2F activity and the regulation of the different E2F complexes is the focus of the contributions by Cobrinik and by Cress and Nevens. The interaction of the free E2F induces a bend in the DNA that may also play a role in transactivation, perhaps by bringing proteins (such as an Sp1 or CCAAT family member) separated by distance on the promoter DNA into contact (Huber et al. 1994). Because E2F target genes encode proteins critical for cell growth, deregulation of E2F activity can have severe consequences, such as apoptosis or uncontrolled proliferation. The effect of altered expression of E2F activity on the cell cycle and on tumorigenicity is the focus of the contribution by Adams and Kaelin. Finally, a comparison of E2F to the genetically well-characterized factors that regulate G1/S phase transcription in yeast is the subject of the chapter by Breeden. This volume concludes with Farnham's summary of the rapid gains in knowledge concerning the E2F gene family that have been made in the past several years and provides a series of questions and lines of investigation that will be the focus of future studies.

Apoptosis and the cell cycle

Apoptosis is an evolutionarily conserved 'suicide' programme present in all metazoan cells. Despite its highly conserved nature, it is only recently that any of the molecular mechanisms underlying apoptosis have been identified. Several lines of reasoning indicate that apoptosis and cell proliferation coincide to some degree: many oncogenes that promote cell cycle progression also induce apoptosis; damage to the cell cycle or to DNA integrity is a potent trigger of apoptosis; and the key tumour suppressor proteins, p105rb and p53, exert direct effects both on cell viability and on cell cycle progression. There is less evidence, however, to indicate that apoptosis and the cell cycle share common molecular mechanisms. Moreover, the interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme (ICE) family of cysteine proteases is now known to play a key role in apoptosis but has no discernible role in the cell cycle, arguing that the two processes are discrete.

Interaction of the 72-kilodalton human cytomegalovirus IE1 gene product with E2F1 coincides with E2F-dependent activation of dihydrofolate reductase transcription

Three polypeptides are produced from the major immediate-early (IE) region of human cytomegalovirus by alternative splicing. The IE gene products regulate subsequent viral and cellular gene expression. We previously reported that cotransfection of a genomic clone of the major IE region stimulated transient expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase driven by the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) promoter and that an intact E2F site was required for the trans activation (M. Wade, T. F. Kowalik, M. Mudryj, E.-S. Huang, and J. C. Azizkhan, Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4364-4374, 1992). With the availability of cDNA clones for the individual major IE proteins, we sought to determine which of these proteins exerted this effect and whether the IE protein(s) interacted with E2F. In this study, we use cotransfection to demonstrate that the 55- and 86-kDa major IE proteins from the IE2 region can each moderately trans activate the DHFR promoter and that the 72-kDa IE1 protein stimulates DHFR transcription to a much higher level. Furthermore, trans activation through the 72-kDa IE1 protein is in part E2F dependent, while activation by the 55- and 86-kDa IE proteins is E2F independent. We also demonstrate by in vitro pull-down assays that the 72-kDa IE1 protein can specifically interact with the DNA binding domain of E2F1 (amino acids 88 to 191) in the presence of nuclear extract. Moreover, antibodies to either E2F1 or IE72 will immunoprecipitate both E2F and IE72 from cells that stably express IE72, and antibody to E2F1 will immunoprecipitate IE72 from normal human fibroblast cells infected with human cytomegalovirus.

A compilation of composite regulatory elements affecting gene transcription in vertebrates

Over the past years, evidence has been accumulating for a fundamental role of protein-protein interactions between transcription factors in gene-specific transcription regulation. Many of these interactions run within composite elements containing binding sites for several factors. We have selected 101 composite regulatory elements identified experimentally in the regulatory regions of 64 genes of vertebrates and of their viruses and briefly described them in a compilation. Of these, 82 composite elements are of the synergistic type and 19 of the antagonistic type. Within the synergistic type composite elements, transcription factors bind to the corresponding sites simultaneously, thus cooperatively activating transcription. The factors, binding to their target sites within antagonistic type composite elements, produce opposing effects on transcription. The nucleotide sequence and localization in the genes, the names and brief description of transcription factors, are provided for each composite element, including a representation of experimental data on its functioning. Most of the composite elements (3/4) fall between -250 bp and the transcription start site. The distance between the binding sites within the composite elements described varies from complete overlapping to 80 bp. The compilation of composite elements is presented in the database COMPEL which is electronically accessible by anonymous ftp via internet.

CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha amino acid motifs with dual TBP and TFIIB binding ability co-operate to activate transcription in both yeast and mammalian cells

We have analysed the molecular basis for the function of the C/EBP alpha transactivation domain. We have previously found that the three C/EBP alpha transactivation elements (TEs) synergistically activate transcription in mammalian cells. We now report that two of these elements, TE-I and -II, co-operatively mediate in vitro binding of C/EBP alpha to TBP and TFIIB, two essential components of the RNA polymerase II basal transcriptional apparatus. The TBP and TFIIB binding elements of C/EBP alpha coincide, and require amino acid motifs conserved between the activating members of the C/EBP family. These same motifs are necessary for the transcription activation function of TE-I and -II in both yeast and mammalian cells. Our data demonstrate a biochemical basis for the modular buildup of transactivation domains, and indicate that this modularity is conserved in eukaryote evolution. We also show that the same amino acid motifs in a cellular activator can co-operate to mediate contacts between the activator and two distinct basal transcription factors. These results suggest that domains of TBP and TFIIB that interact with activating surfaces are functionally similar and may be structurally related, and support the idea that the same amino acid motifs in an activator carry out multiple functions during the initiation process.

Mechanism of active transcriptional repression by the retinoblastoma protein

The retinoblastoma tumour-suppressor protein (Rb) belongs to a family that share a motif known as the pocket. The pocket was originally identified as the region of Rb required for binding to oncoproteins from DNA tumour viruses, which disrupt the binding of Rb to the E2F family of cell-cycle transcription factors (referred to collectively here as E2F). Rb switches E2F sites from positive to negative elements, suggesting that Rb-E2F is an active complex that blocks transcription. Here we report that Rb is selectively recruited to promoters through E2F, where it in turn inactivates surrounding transcription factors by blocking their interaction with the basal transcription complex. We suggest that this repressor activity is essential for inhibiting promoters that contain enhancers in addition to E2F sites.

Stimulation of E2F1/DP1 transcriptional activity by MDM2 oncoprotein

The MDM2 proto-oncogene is found amplified in a variety of tumours. The oncogenic capacity of the MDM2 protein is attributed to its ability to bind the p53 tumour-suppressor protein and mask its transcriptional activation potential. Here we show that MDM2 makes a functional contact with two cooperating transcription factors, E2F1 and DP1 (refs 4,5), which are involved in S-phase progression. MDM2 contacts the activation domain of E2F1 using residues conserved in the activation domain of p53. However, in contrast to its repression of p53 activity, MDM2 stimulates the activation capacity of E2F1/DP1. These results indicate that MDM2 not only releases a proliferative block by silencing the tumour suppressor p53, it also positively augments proliferation by stimulating the S-phase inducing transcription factors E2F1/DP1.

Promoter-dependent photocross-linking of the acidic transcriptional activator E2F-1 to the TATA-binding protein

Sequence-specific transcriptional activators, such as the human factor E2F-1, increase the rate of initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II, possibly by contacting one or more of the RNA polymerase II-associated general initiation factors. One candidate target of transactivators is the TATA-binding protein (TBP), which, when bound to a promoter, nucleates the formation of a preinitiation complex. Previous studies using affinity chromatography techniques have shown that the activation domains of certain activators, including the acidic activation domain of E2F-1, can interact with TBP in the absence of DNA. Using a site-directed photoaffinity cross-linking approach, we demonstrate here that the activation domain of the chimeric activator LexA-E2F-1 can be cross-linked to TBP when both factors are bound to a transcriptionally responsive RNA polymerase II promoter. Mutations within the activation domain of LexA-E2F-1 that impaired its ability to activate transcription in vitro were found to reduce cross-linking of LexA-E2F-1 to TBP. The association of initiation factor TFIIB with the TBP-promoter complex did not preclude this promoter-dependent cross-linking to LexA-E2F-1; however, this cross-linking was promoter-independent. In contrast, TFIIA strongly inhibited the promoter-dependent cross-linking of LexA-E2F-1 to TBP. These results directly demonstrate that acidic activators such as E2F-1 can interact with TBP during the earliest stages in the assembly of an RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex.

Direct transcriptional repression by pRB and its reversal by specific cyclins

It was recently shown that the E2F-pRB complex is a negative transcriptional regulator. However, it was not determined whether the whole complex or pRB alone is required for repression. Here we show that pRB and the related protein p107 are capable of direct transcriptional repression independent of E2F. When fused to the DNA binding domain of GAL4, pRB or p107 represses transcription of promoters with GAL4 binding sites. Thus, E2F acts as a tether for pRB or p107 but is not actively involved in repression of other enhancers. This function of pRB maps to the pocket and is abrogated by mutation of this domain. This result suggests an intriguing model in which the pocket has a dual function, first to bind E2F and second to repress transcription directly, possibly through interaction with other proteins. We also show that direct transcriptional repression by pRB is regulated by phosphorylation. Mutations which render pRB constitutively hypophosphorylated potentiate repression, while phosphorylation induced by cyclin A or E reduces repression ninefold.

Transcriptional regulation during the mammalian cell cycle

Progression of the cell cycle in mammalian cells, as in all other organisms, is associated with the phase-specific transcription of defined sets of genes. Such periodically expressed genes frequently encode proteins that either directly control cell-cycle progression or function in metabolic processes linked to the cell cycle, such as nucleotide and DNA biosynthesis. Here, I summarize our current knowledge and views of the mechanisms governing the coupling of cell-cycle control mechanisms to transcriptional regulation, with particular emphasis on the transcription factor E2F and its connections with cyclin-dependent kinases and the retinoblastoma gene family.

Interaction of the COOH-terminal transactivation domain of p65 NF-kappa B with TATA-binding protein, transcription factor IIB, and coactivators

We show that the transactivating COOH terminus of the p65 subunit of human transcription factor NF-kappa B directly binds the general transcription factors TFIIB and TATA-binding protein (TBP) in vitro. Interaction of p65 with TFIIB required the most COOH-terminal sequence repeat within TFIIB. A functional interaction of TFIIB with p65 was evident from assays in yeast cells. Cotransfection experiments in COS cells revealed that only overexpression of TBP was able to further stimulate p65-dependent transactivation of a reporter gene. The coexpression of neither TBP nor TFIIB was able to relieve squelching, indicating the involvement of additional factors in transactivation by p65. A cell-free assay using highly purified factors revealed a specific transcriptional stimulation through the COOH-terminal activation domain of NF-kappa B by at least one cofactor, PC1, isolated from HeLa cells. These data show that the potent acidic transactivation domains in the COOH terminus of p65 are able to functionally recruit various components of the basic transcription machinery as well as coactivators.

Hepatitis B virus transactivator protein X interacts with the TATA-binding protein

Several viral transcriptional activators have been shown to interact with the basal transcription factor TATA-binding protein (TBP). These associations have been implicated in facilitating the assembly of the transcriptional preinitiation complex. We report here that the hepatitis B virus protein X (pX) specifically binds to TBP in vitro. While truncations of the highly conserved carboxyl terminus of TBP abolished this binding, amino-terminal deletions had no effect. Deletion analysis suggests that a domain consisting of 71 aa in the highly conserved carboxyl-terminal region of TBP is necessary for its interaction with pX. The minimal region in pX sufficient for its interaction with TBP includes aa 110-143. Furthermore, TBP from phylogenetically distinct species including Arabidopsis thaliana, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, and Solanum tuberosum (potato) bound to pX. The pX-TBP interaction was inhibited in the presence of nonhydrolyzable analogs of ATP, suggesting a requirement for ATP. These results provide an explanation for the promiscuous behavior of pX in the transactivation of a large repertoire of cellular promoters. This study further implicates a fundamental role for pX in modulating transcriptional regulatory pathways by interacting with the basal transcription factor TBP.

Regulation of cyclin D1, DNA topoisomerase I, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen promoters during the cell cycle

Cyclin D1, DNA topoisomerase I, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) are three important cell cycle regulatory proteins. Recently, their promoters have been isolated, thus facilitating molecular analysis of transcriptional control mechanisms of these genes. Transcription of these three promoters in stable K562 transfectants during different cell cycle phases was analyzed after cell cycle synchronization. About 1 kb of 5' flanking region from either cyclin D1 or DNA topoisomerase I gene is sufficient to confer G1- or S-phase-specific transcription activity to chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter genes, respectively. In contrast, 2.8 kb of 5' flanking sequences from the PCNA gene led to constitutive transcription, but the inclusion of a segment of the PCNA gene first intron, which contains evolutionarily conserved sequences, could enhance transcription in G1/S-enriched nuclei. This PCNA intron region contains a binding site recognized by the transcription factor E2F. To test whether this site is functional, we cotransfected PCNA-CAT genes with E2F-1 and DP-1 expression plasmids. Expression of the E2F-1/DP-1 heterodimer activated the CAT gene with the PCNA intron. Therefore, this intron region, involved in transcriptional activation at the cell cycle G1/S boundary, is also E2F inducible.

Differential specificity for binding of retinoblastoma binding protein 2 to RB, p107, and TATA-binding protein

The growth suppressor activities of the RB and p107 products are believed to be mediated by the reversible binding of a heterogeneous family of cellular proteins to a conserved T/E1A pocket domain that is present within both proteins. To study the functional role of these interactions, we examined the properties of cellular retinoblastoma binding protein 2 (RBP2) binding to RB, p107, and the related TATA-binding protein (TBP) product. We observed that although RBP2 bound exclusively to the T/E1A pocket of p107, it could interact with RB through independent T/E1A and non-T/E1A domains and with TBP only through the non-T/E1A domain. Consistent with this observation, we found that a mutation within the Leu-X-Cys-X-Glu motif of RBP2 resulted in loss of ability to precipitate p107, while RB- and TBP-binding activities were retained. We located the non-T/E1A binding site of RBP2 on a 15-kDa fragment that is independent from the Leu-X-Cys-X-Glu motif and encodes binding activity for RB and TBP but does not interact with p107. Despite the presence of a non-T/E1A binding site, however, recombinant RBP2 retained the ability to preferentially precipitate active hypophosphorylated RB from whole-cell lysates. In addition, we found that cotransfection of RBP2 can reverse in vivo RB-mediated suppression of E2F activity. These findings confirm the differential binding specificities of the related RB, p107, and TBP proteins and support the presence of multifunctional domains on the nuclear RBP2 product which may allow complex interactions with the cellular transcription machinery.

Deregulated transcription factor E2F-1 expression leads to S-phase entry and p53-mediated apoptosis

E2F-1 is a transcription factor suspected of activating genes required for S phase and a known target for the action of RB, the retinoblastoma gene product. Its induction in quiescent fibroblasts led to S-phase entry followed by apoptosis. E2F-1-mediated apoptosis was suppressed by coexpression of wild-type RB or a transdominant negative mutant species of p53. In contrast, coexpression of a naturally occurring loss-of-function RB mutant or wild-type p53 did not suppress the induction of apoptosis under these conditions. Thus, deregulated E2F-1 activity gives rise to proliferative and apoptotic signals. p53 appears to participate in the execution of the latter.

Differential specificity for binding of retinoblastoma binding protein 2 to RB, p107, and TATA-binding protein

The growth suppressor activities of the RB and p107 products are believed to be mediated by the reversible binding of a heterogeneous family of cellular proteins to a conserved T/E1A pocket domain that is present within both proteins. To study the functional role of these interactions, we examined the properties of cellular retinoblastoma binding protein 2 (RBP2) binding to RB, p107, and the related TATA-binding protein (TBP) product. We observed that although RBP2 bound exclusively to the T/E1A pocket of p107, it could interact with RB through independent T/E1A and non-T/E1A domains and with TBP only through the non-T/E1A domain. Consistent with this observation, we found that a mutation within the Leu-X-Cys-X-Glu motif of RBP2 resulted in loss of ability to precipitate p107, while RB- and TBP-binding activities were retained. We located the non-T/E1A binding site of RBP2 on a 15-kDa fragment that is independent from the Leu-X-Cys-X-Glu motif and encodes binding activity for RB and TBP but does not interact with p107. Despite the presence of a non-T/E1A binding site, however, recombinant RBP2 retained the ability to preferentially precipitate active hypophosphorylated RB from whole-cell lysates. In addition, we found that cotransfection of RBP2 can reverse in vivo RB-mediated suppression of E2F activity. These findings confirm the differential binding specificities of the related RB, p107, and TBP proteins and support the presence of multifunctional domains on the nuclear RBP2 product which may allow complex interactions with the cellular transcription machinery.

Differential regulation of RNA polymerases I, II, and III by the TBP-binding repressor Dr1

RNA polymerases I, II, and III each use the TATA-binding protein (TBP). Regulators that target this shared factor may therefore provide a means to coordinate the activities of the three nuclear RNA polymerases. The repressor Dr1 binds to TBP and blocks the interaction of TBP with polymerase II- and polymerase III-specific factors. This enables Dr1 to coordinately regulate transcription by RNA polymerases II and III. Under the same conditions, Dr1 does not inhibit polymerase I transcription. By selectively repressing polymerases II and III, Dr1 may shift the physiological balance of transcriptional output in favor of polymerase I.