Gene expression profiling of the PPAR-alpha agonist ciprofibrate in the cynomolgus monkey liver

Cross-species comparative toxicogenomics as an aid to safety assessment

Cross-species comparative toxicogenomics has the potential for improving the understanding of the different responses of animal models to toxicants at a molecular level. This understanding could then lead to a more accurate extrapolation of the risk posed by these toxicants to humans. Cross-species comparative studies have been carried out at the genomic sequence level and using microarrays to examine changes in global mRNA profiles. However, these studies face considerable bioinformatic challenges in terms of identifying which genes are truly orthologous across species. The resources to analyse such studies, in the context of such orthologues, beg improvement. Finally, the experimental design of such studies needs to be carefully considered to make their results fully interpretable. These issues are discussed, along with the current state-of-the-art cross-species comparative toxicogenomics in this review.

Workgroup report: Review of genomics data based on experience with mock submissions--view of the CDER Pharmacology Toxicology Nonclinical Pharmacogenomics Subcommittee

Over the past few years, both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the pharmaceutical industry have recognized the potential importance of pharmacogenomics and toxicogenomics to drug development. To resolve the uncertainties surrounding the use of microarray technology and the presentation of genomics data for regulatory purposes, several pharmaceutical companies and genomics technology providers have provided the FDA with reports of genomics studies that included supporting toxicology data (e.g., serum chemistry, histopathology). These studies were not associated with any active drug application and were exploratory or hypothesis generating in nature. For training purposes, these reports were reviewed by the Nonclinical Pharmacogenomics Subcommittee consisting of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research pharmacology and toxicology researchers and reviewers. In this article, we describe some of these submissions and report on our assessment of data content, format, and quality control metrics that were useful for evaluating these nonclinical genomics submissions, specifically in relation to the proposed MIAME/MINTox (minimum information about a microarray experiment/minimum information needed for a toxicology experiment) recommendations. These genomics submissions allowed both researchers and regulators to gain experience in the process of reviewing and analyzing toxicogenomics data. The experience will allow development of recommendations for the submission and review of these data as the state of the science evolves.