Tacrolimus rescue therapy for renal allograft rejection--five-year experience

Overview of transplantation immunology and the pharmacotherapy of adult solid organ transplant recipients: focus on immunosuppression

A review of transplantation immunology is discussed with emphasis on alloantigen presentation, T-lymphocyte activation and proliferation, and the immune effector mechanisms responsible for allograft rejection. Immunosuppressive pharmacology is introduced beginning with conventional medications (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and corticosteroids) followed by a discussion of drugs recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and the interleukin-2 receptor antagonists). In addition, drugs that are used in the treatment of transplant rejection or as rescue therapy are discussed (muromonab-CD3, antithymocyte globulin, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids). Throughout, implications for nurses involved in the pharmacotherapy of transplant recipients are discussed.

Long-term results of pancreas transplantation under tacrolius immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

The long-term safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in pancreas transplantation has not yet been demonstrated. The observation of prolonged pancreatic graft function under tacrolimus would indicate that any potential islet toxicity is short-lived and clinically insignificant. We report herein the results of pancreas transplantation in patients receiving primary tacrolimus immunosuppression for a minimum of 2 years.

METHODS

From July 4, 1994 until April 18, 1996, 60 patients received either simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (n=55), pancreas transplant only (n=4), or pancreas after kidney transplantation (n=1). Baseline immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus and steroids without antilymphocyte induction. Azathioprine was used as a third agent in 51 patients and mycophenolate mofetil in 9. Rejection episodes within the first 6 months occurred in 48 (80%) patients and were treated with high-dose corticosteroids. Antilymphocyte antibody was required in eight (13%) patients with steroid-resistant rejection.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 35.1+/-5.9 months (range: 24.3-45.7 months), 6-month and 1-, 2-, and 33-year graft survival is 88%, 82%, 80%, and 80% (pancreas) and 98%, 96%, 93%, and 91% (kidney), respectively. Six-month and 1-, 2-, and 3-year patient survival is 100%, 98%, 98%, and 96.5%. Mean fasting glucose is 91.6+/-13.8 mg/dl, and mean glycosylated hemoglobin is 5.1+/-0.7% (normal range: 4.3-6.1%). Mean tacrolimus dose is 6.5+/-2.6 mg/day and mean prednisone dose 2.0+/-2.9 mg/day at follow-up. Complete steroid withdrawal was possible in 31 (65%) of the 48 patients with functioning pancreases.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show for the first time that tacrolimus is a safe and effective long-term primary agent in pancreas transplantation and provides excellent long-term islet function without evidence of toxicity while permitting steroid withdrawal in the majority of patients.

Plasma exchange and tacrolimus-mycophenolate rescue for acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute renal allograft rejection associated with the development of donor-specific alloantibody (acute humoral rejection, AHR) typically carries a poor prognosis. The best treatment of this condition remains undefined.

METHODS

During a 14-month period, 73 renal transplants were performed. During the first postoperative month, five recipients (6.8%) with AHR were identified. The diagnosis was based on: (1) evidence of severe rejection, resistant to steroid and antilymphocyte therapy; (2) typical pathologic features; and (3) demonstration of donor-specific alloantibody (DSA) in recipient's serum at the time of rejection. Pretransplant donor-specific T- and B-cell cross-matches were negative.

RESULTS

Plasma exchange (PE, four to seven treatments per patient) significantly decreased circulating DSA to almost pretransplant levels in four of five patients, and improvement in renal function occurred in all patients. One patient had recurrent renal dysfunction in the setting of an increase in circulating DSA. A second series of five PE treatments decreased DSA and reversed the rejection episode. Rescue therapy with tacrolimus (initial mean dose: 0.14+/-0.32 mg/kg/day) and mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/day) was used in five of five and four of five patients, respectively. With a mean follow-up of 19.6+/-5.6 months, patient and allograft survival are 100%. Renal function remains excellent with a mean current serum creatinine of 1.2+/-0.3 mg/dl. (range: 0.9-1.8 mg/dl).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a therapeutic approach combining PE and tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil rescue has the potential to improve the outcome of AHR.

New immunosuppressive strategies

Discovery of novel biological and pharmaceutical agents directed against discrete molecular targets in the lympnocyte activation sequence has enabled the effective control of graft rejection by the use of combinatorial immunosuppressive therapy. Chimeric and humanized monoclonal antibodies against T-cell receptor CD3 complex chains or the IL-2 receptor block T-cell function without inducing activation, and do not cause the cytokine release syndrome of first generation products. Biological blockade of co-stimulatory molecules including CD40L and CD28 produces immunological allograft unresponsiveness in primates, though this effect is not yet proven in humans. Heterogeneity in clinical response to pharmaceutical agents is often explained by pharmacokinetic factors of absorption, metabolism and elimination. The use of microemulsion technology has increased the absorption and efficacy of cyclosporine in all organ transplants, so that there is little difference in efficacy between this agent and tacrolimus. Mycophenolate mofetil is not maximally effective alone, but significantly reduces the relative risk of acute rejection in combination with an immunophilin binding agent. It is also effective when introduced at the time of rejection. Whether it can replace other agents for maintenance immunosuppression is now under investigation. Sirolimus, the latest pharmaceutical agent to complete phase III trials, acts to inhibit IL-2 driven lymphocyte proliferation and reduces the risk of acute rejection to below 20%. Multiple pharmacokinetic interactions occur within and between these agents, so that pharmacokinetic monitoring is increasingly important. At present there are few tools to detect pharmacodynamic interactions, although reporter gene constructs and intracellular cytokine labeling offer exciting possibilities for biological monitoring. Despite these advances, none of these interventions confers demonstrable long-term benefit in graft survival or function. Acute rejection can not therefore be assumed to be a simple surrogate for chronic injury, and research must be re-focused to determine the relevant targets for long-term immunosuppression.

Therapeutic concentrations of cyclosporine A, but not FK506, increase P-glycoprotein expression in endothelial and renal tubule cells

BACKGROUND

The immunosuppressive drugs cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (FK506) are extruded from cells by the multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein (P-gp), an efflux pump for drugs and xenobiotics, which may limit their therapeutic effectiveness and/or incidence of toxic side effects. In the present study, we investigated the effect of therapeutic concentrations of CsA and FK506 on the expression of P-gp in cultured endothelial and proximal tubule cells.

METHODS

P-gp expression in human arterial endothelial (HAEC) and rat proximal tubule cells (RPTC) was determined by immunoblotting and immunocytochemistry, and correlated with P-gp-mediated transport by measuring the intracellular accumulation of the fluorescent probe calcein.

RESULTS

Following incubation of HAEC with therapeutic concentrations of 0.1 to 1.6 microM CsA up to seven days, P-gp expression increased in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, maximally to 291 +/- 42% of controls with 0.8 microM CsA for seven days. Similar effects of CsA were observed in RPTC. In contrast, therapeutic concentrations of FK506 (0.01 to 0.2 microM up to 7 days) did not change P-gp expression in either cell type, though at higher, supratherapeutic concentrations of FK506 (0.6 to 1.2 microM) P-gp expression was also increased. Immunocytochemistry revealed increased P-gp expression in the plasma membrane of HAEC and RPTC treated with 0.8 microM CsA, which was reflected by a decrease of P-gp-mediated accumulation of calcein in both cell types.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that the induction of P-gp expression in HAEC and RPTC at concentrations of CsA or FK506 above 0.5 microM is part of the protective answer of cells to toxic concentrations of the drugs and could therefore interfere with the therapeutic effectiveness of CsA in vivo.

The neuropathology of organ transplantation: comparison and contrast in 500 patients

The main objective of this report is to compare and contrast the type and frequency of neuropathological findings following liver, heart, lung, heart-lung, kidney and bone marrow transplantation and to provide an overview of the major systemic complications in patients that received allografts. This is a retrospective analysis of the complete autopsy records and clinical histories of 500 adults who underwent organ transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center during the interval of March, 1981 through July, 1997. This study is based on the neuropathological and systemic findings among 225 liver, 101 heart, 40 lung, 28 heart-lung, 74 kidney and 32 bone marrow transplants. Clinico-pathological correlations were made. All patients received base-line immunosuppressive therapy with one or more of the following drugs: cyclosporine, corticosteroids and azathioprine. Since August, 1989, the primary immunosuppressive agent is FK-506 (Tacrolimus). Some patients received antilymphocyte globulin (OKT3), when acute rejection was imminent. Light microscopic examination of tissue sections, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and in some cases with special stains were made. Ultrastructural evaluation were also performed in selected cases. All of the studies were carried out at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Neuropathology Division. Cerebrovascular complications were the most frequent and were seen in 51% of the liver, 59% of the heart, 58% of the lung, 50% of the heart-lung, 49% of the kidney and 44% of the bone marrow allografts. Aspergillus sp. infection was the most common of all CNS infections followed by viral, bacterial and protozoal. Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) was seen in 2% of the liver, and 2% of the heart recipients. Post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) involving the brain was seen in 2% of the liver allografts, 3% of the heart, and 7% of the heart-lung recipients. PTLD systemically was seen in 6% of the liver, 7% of the heart, 5% of the lung, 11% of the heart-lung and 4% of the kidney allografts. Graft-versus-host disease was seen only in 41% of the bone marrow recipients. There was no statistically significant difference between the incidence of the total CNS complications among the different organ transplant groups (p value > 0.10), but there was a statistically significant difference in the systemic complications among the organ transplant groups (p value < 0.001). In conclusion that immunocompromised patients with impaired cellular and humoral immunity are at risk for the development of opportunistic infections and hematologic abnormalities. PTLD appears to be different in its pathogenesis from that of PCNSL which occurs anew in the brain of these patients. The neurological complications may be reduced by earlier recognition and better understanding of their etiopathogenesis.

Cyclosporin nephrotoxicity: pathophysiology and comparison with FK-506

At the end of an era of almost exclusive use of cyclosporin A, there have been significant advances in the understanding of its immunosuppressive effects, whereas there is still uncertainty about the mechanisms underlying its nephrotoxicity. The recently introduced FK-506, in spite of its undeniable clinical advantages, has subsequently been proved to have rather similar nephrotoxicity. This paper reviews recent data on cyclosporin A and FK-506 nephrotoxicity, with emphasis on: first, the haemodynamic, functional and structural features; second, the potential mediators; and third, the relationship with some immunosuppressive mechanisms involved to give insights into the pathophysiology.

Tacrolimus. An update of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of organ transplantation

Tacrolimus (FK 506) has been evaluated as immunosuppressive therapy in patients with a variety of solid organ and other transplants. Extensive data have now confirmed its efficacy as primary or rescue therapy in renal and hepatic transplantation. In prospective and historically controlled studies of primary therapy, tacrolimus generally demonstrated greater efficacy than the conventional formulation of cyclosporin for preventing episodes of acute rejection and allowed reduction of corticosteroid use. Chronic rejection rates were also significantly lower with tacrolimus in a large randomised liver transplantation trial. However, patient and graft survival rates were similar in both treatment groups (although numerically larger in adults with liver transplants). In children, rejection rates and corticosteroid requirements were usually lower with tacrolimus and patient and graft survival were generally similar with the 2 immunosuppressants. The finding of reduced corticosteroid requirements with tacrolimus may be of particular benefit in prepubertal children, who are still growing. A small amount of evidence has also accumulated regarding the use of tacrolimus as primary therapy in patients who have undergone bone marrow or heart and/or lung transplantation. Data are not conclusive, particularly in children, but tacrolimus appears to be useful for treating patients who have undergone these organ transplantations and may be associated with a lower incidence of obliterative bronchiolitis than cyclosporin in the latter group. Potential efficacy has also been shown in a limited number of patients with pancreas or pancreas-kidney, pancreatic islet and intestinal or multivisceral transplants, and in children who have undergone heart or heart-lung transplantation. Tacrolimus also has a use as rescue therapy in bone marrow, heart, lung and pancreatic transplantation, but data are currently insufficient for conclusions to be made. However, these results support the need for further study in these populations. Adverse effects occurring during tacrolimus therapy are generally of the type common to all immunosuppressive regimens. However, diabetes mellitus, neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity are more common in tacrolimus than cyclosporin recipients. Hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, hirsutism and gingival hyperplasia are more common with cyclosporin. In 2 large multicentre clinical trials (US liver and European renal), tacrolimus was discontinued more frequently during the first year because of adverse events. However, the tolerability of tacrolimus appears related to dosage, improving as the dose is reduced. Tacrolimus should be considered an effective primary immunosuppressant in renal and hepatic transplantation. The drug is also a useful agent for rescue therapy in patients experiencing rejection or poor tolerability to cyclosporin. Thus, tacrolimus provides the clinician with an effective option for patients requiring immunosuppression and, with a different tolerability and efficacy profile to cyclosporin, it will better allow the tailoring of therapy to meet the needs of individual patients.

Prevention of transplant rejection: current treatment guidelines and future developments

In the past 2 decades, progressive improvements in the results of organ transplantation as a therapeutic strategy for patients with end-stage organ disease have been achieved due to greater insight into the immunobiology of graft rejection and better measures for surgical and medical management. It is now known that T cells play a central role in the specific immune response of acute allograft rejection. Strategies to prevent T cell activation or effector function are thus all potentially useful for immunosuppression. Standard immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation consists of baseline therapy to prevent rejection and short courses of high-dose corticosteroids or monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies as treatment of ongoing rejection episodes. Triple-drug therapy with the combination of cyclosporin, corticosteroids and azathioprine is now the most frequently used immunosuppressive drug regimen in cadaveric kidney recipients. The continuing search for more selective and specific agents has become, in the past decade, one of the priorities for transplant medicine. Some of these compounds are now entering routine clinical practice: among them are tacrolimus (which has a mechanism of action similar to that of cyclosporin), mycophenolate mofetil and mizoribine (which selectively inhibit the enzyme inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting enzyme for de novo purine synthesis during cell division), and sirolimus (rapamycin) [which acts on and inhibits kinase homologues required for cell-cycle progression in response to growth factors, like interleukin-2 (IL-2)]. Other new pharmacological strategies and innovative approaches to organ transplantation are also under development. Application of this technology will offer enormous potential not only for the investigation of mechanisms and mediators of graft rejection but also for therapeutic intervention.