Gamma-hydroxybutyrate and ethanol effects and interactions in humans

Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) measurement by GC-MS in blood, urine and gastric contents, following an acute intoxication in Belgium

Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB, sodium oxybate) is a compound related to neuromodulator gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), emerging as a recreational drug of abuse and as a rape drug. GHB-related emergencies have dramatically increased in the 1990s, but a decrease is observed since 2000. We describe the case of an acute GHB intoxication in a 28-year-old male who fell unconscious after ingestion of a mouthful of an unknown beverage, and required medical support for 2 days. A cocaine abuse was also detected by preliminary toxicological screening, but the clinical presentation was not typical of cocaine intoxication. A simple liquid-liquid extraction was used for quantitation of GHB, followed by disilyl-derivatization and analysis in selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), using GHB-d6 as internal standard. High concentrations of GHB were detected in urine (3020 mg/L) and gastric contents (71487 mg/L) at admission. After a 6-hours delay, GHB was still present in urine at 2324 mg/L and in blood at 43 mg/L. The clinical symptoms of cocaine intoxication were diminished by GHB consumption, and the cerebral scan was modified. Attention must thus be paid to acute intoxications with surprising clinical symptoms, and GHB has probably to be added to the preliminary toxicological screening. Data available regarding GHB are briefly reviewed, and our results are compared with previously published reports of non-fatal GHB intoxication.

Drug interactions involving ethanol and alcoholic beverages

Ethanol is likely among the most widely and extensively used drugs in the world. It has also been demonstrated to alter the expression or activity of some drug-metabolizing enzymes. Thus, marked ethanol-provoked drug interactions could be of notable clinical importance. To date, relatively few clinically important interactions have been reported, involving cocaine, disulfiram and tacrolimus. Limited or modest interactions with ethanol have also been reported for drugs such as abacavir, cisapride, 'ecstasy' (3,4-methylenedioxymetamfetamine), gamma-hydroxybutyrate, methylyphenidate, metronidazole and verapamil. Most of these interactions do not seem to involve CYP2E1, the enzyme initially characterized and cloned based on its ability to metabolize and be induced by ethanol. Important work has elucidated the relationship between CYP2E1-mediated formation of the hepatotoxic metabolite of acetaminophen and alcohol consumption. Lastly, drug interactions involving other components of alcoholic beverages such as flavonoid and other polyphenolic components of red wine have been reported.

Relative abuse liability of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, flunitrazepam, and ethanol in club drug users

OBJECTIVES

Despite the increasing concern about gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) toxicity, there are few studies examining the clinical pharmacology of GHB and its abuse potential. To evaluate GHB-induced subjective and physiological effects, its relative abuse liability and its impact on psychomotor performance in club drug users.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve healthy male recreational users of GHB participated in 5 experimental sessions in the framework of a clinical trial. The study was randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, and crossover. Drug conditions were a single oral dose of GHB (40 or 60 mg/kg), ethanol (0.7 g/kg), flunitrazepam (1.25 mg), and placebo. Study variables included vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, oral temperature, pupil diameter), psychomotor performance (digit symbol substitution test, balance, Maddox-Wing), subjective effects (a set of 13 visual analogue scales, Addiction Research Center Inventory-49 items, and Evaluation of the Subjective Effects of Substances with Potential of Abuse questionnaires), and pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

All active conditions induced positive effects related to their abuse potential. The administration of GHB produced euphoria and pleasurable effects with slightly higher ratings than those observed for flunitrazepam and ethanol. Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid induced a biphasic time profile with an initial stimulant-like effect related to the simultaneous rise of plasma concentrations and a latter sedative effect not related to GHB kinetics. Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid increased blood pressure and pupil diameter. Ethanol induced its prototypical effects, and flunitrazepam produced marked sedation. Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid and flunitrazepam impaired psychomotor performance, digit symbol substitution test, and balance task, whereas ethanol, at the dose tested, induced only mild effects exclusively affecting the balance task.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a high abuse liability of GHB and flunitrazepam in club drug users.

Experiences of gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) ingestion: a focus group study

GHB (gamma hydroxybutyrate) is a significant new drug of abuse added to the United States Controlled Substance Act in 2000. The majority of the published literature on GHB consists of clinical case reports, mainly from emergency departments, and a collection of laboratory-based studies, focused mainly on anesthesia. While comments about the various experiences and behaviors of human users are often included in such studies or reports, these aspects of GHB are only just beginning to be systematically investigated or detailed. Reported here are data from a qualitative study using focus group methods on the consumption habits, experiences, and beliefs of GHB users. A total of 51 people, 30 men and 21 women, mean age of 31.1+/-7.6 years (range 18 to 52 years), who report having used GHB for an average of 4.3+/-2.5 years (range one to 11 years), were interviewed in 10 separate groups held in 2004. This article discusses broadly the general experience of the GHB high, major perceived benefits including sexual responses to the drug, perceived risks and dangers of ingestion, co-ingestion, and various contexts of use. It concludes with a discussion of the implications drawn from this information for clinicians treating patients who use GHB.

High-risk behaviors and hospitalizations among gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) users

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about behaviors linked to gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) morbidity.

METHODS

We surveyed 131 GHB users, using logistic regression to test the associations between the high risk behaviors and hospital treatment for GHB (26 [20%] of subjects).

RESULTS

Increased risk of GHB hospital treatment was associated with: co-ingestion of ethanol (OR 5.2; 95% CI 1.7-16), driving under the influence of GHB (OR 3.2; 95%, CI 1.3-7.8),use of GHB to treat withdrawal symptoms (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.9), and co-ingestion of ketamine (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.7).

CONCLUSION

Targeted prevention activities could focus on selected high-risk behaviors.

Clinical Pharmacology of 1,4-Butanediol and Gamma-hydroxybutyrate After Oral 1,4-Butanediol Administration to Healthy Volunteers

1,4-Butanediol (BD) is converted to gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) after ingestion, and is associated with cases of dependence, coma, and death. The pharmacology of BD after oral ingestion has not been described in humans. Eight healthy volunteers (five men) were administered 25 mg/kg BD in a single oral dose after an overnight fast in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Vital signs were monitored, and serial blood samples collected over 24 h for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of BD and GHB levels. Subjective mood and symptoms responses were assessed by visual analog scale. All subjects completed the study without significant adverse effects. BD was quickly absorbed and cleared, with time to maximal plasma concentration of 24+/-12 min, and elimination half-life (T(1/2)) of 39.3+/-11 min. BD was extensively converted to GHB, with a mean maximum GHB concentration of 45.6+/-19.7 mg/l reached 39.4+/-11.2 min after BD ingestion. GHB T(1/2) averaged 32.3+/-6.6 min. Some subjects exhibited slow oral clearance of BD, which tended to correlate with a variant haplotype of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene ADH-IB G143A. Mean CL/F was 151.5+/-176.5 ml/min kg for four subjects with variant haplotype versus 598.8+/-446.6 ml/min kg for four wild-type subjects (P=0.061). Subjects reported feeling less awake and alert, less able to concentrate, and more lightheaded in the first 90 min after BD ingestion. Pulse oximetry readings were lower 45 min after BD dosing with a mean oxygen saturation of 98.5% with BD versus 99.6% with placebo (P=0.031). Transient increases in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed, but other vital signs remained unchanged. BD was extensively converted to GHB after oral administration, but significant inter-individual variability in the rate of metabolism, possibly related to variants in ADH-IB, was observed. At the modest dose studied, significant clinical effects were not seen.

GHB urine concentrations after single-dose administration in humans

Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) is used as an illicit drug and is implicated in drug-facilitated sexual assault, but it also has some therapeutic uses. Detection of GHB in urine is important for forensic testing and could be of clinical benefit in overdose management. Urine GHB concentration-time profiles have not been well-characterized or correlated with doses used therapeutically. GHB levels were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in urine collected over 24 h from 16 adults administered single doses of 50 mg/kg GHB (Xyrem) alone and combined with 0.6 g/kg ethanol. Peak GHB urine concentrations averaged 150-200 mg/L and occurred in the 0-3 h urine collection. Significant variability in GHB urine levels between individuals was observed. Caucasians had lower urine concentrations than other races/ethnicities (p = 0.03). Men had lower GHB levels than women in the first 3 h after dosing (p = 0.038). Coingestion of ethanol did not significantly affect renal clearance of GHB, but urine GHB concentrations were lower in the first 3 h when ethanol and GHB were coingested (p = 0.039). At a proposed cut-off of 10 mg/L to distinguish endogenous versus exogenous GHB levels, 12.5% of the samples collected from 3 to 6 h, 81.3% of samples collected from 6 to 12 h, and 100% of urine specimens collected from 12 to 24 h were below this level. We conclude that the detection time for GHB in urine may be shorter than the previously reported 12-h window in some people taking therapeutic doses of GHB.