Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure Achieves Early Fascial Closure of Open Abdomens after Severe Trauma

Nonocclusive mesenteric hypoperfusion syndromes: recognition and treatment

The main focus when discussing acute or chronic mesenteric ischemia is on occlusive disease, arterial or venous. This article reviews present knowledge on mesenteric nonocclusive hypoperfusion syndromes. The following three clinical entities are reviewed: (1) Intraabdominal hypertension (IAH), or abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), is important after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. IAH >20 mm Hg occurs in approximately 50% of patients after open repair and in 20% after endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, but these patients are different and no randomized data exists yet. A consensus issued by the World Society of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome provides guidance. Early conservative treatment of IAH and, alternatively, abdominal closure devices for leaving the abdomen partially open temporarily are discussed and a treatment algorithm is suggested. (2) Colonic ischemia after abdominal aortic surgery, its risk factors, clinical presentation, and treatment are discussed. A significant number of such patients develop IAH and reducing the abdominal perfusion pressure affects the left colon, the sentinel organ in these patients. (3) Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI); most often such patients suffer from severe cardiac failure requiring massive inotropic support. The condition is difficult to define. Early diagnosis with multidetector row computed tomography is a worthwhile alternative when angiography presents difficulties. A stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery is frequently enough that it should be ruled out because endovascular treatment can be lifesaving. New knowledge on these three different mesenteric hypoperfusion syndromes is reviewed. Success in treating these difficult patients is benefited from a multidisciplinary approach.

Vacuum-assisted closure in severe abdominal sepsis with or without retention sutured sequential fascial closure: a clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Multiple techniques have been introduced to obtain fascial closure for the open abdomen to minimize morbidity and cost of care. We hypothesized that a modification of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) technique that provides constant fascial tension and prevents abdominis rectis retraction would facilitate primary fascial closure and reduce morbidity.

METHODS

In all, 53 patients with severe abdominal sepsis were allocated randomly into 2 groups, and 30 patients were analyzed. In the VAC group, we included patients managed only with the VAC device, whereas the retentions sutured sequential fascial closure (RSSFC) group included patients to whom RSSFC was performed.

RESULTS

The abdomen was left open for 12 days (P = .0001) with 4.4 ± 1.35 changes per patient for the VAC group (P = .001) and 8 days with 2.87 ± 0.74 dressing changes per patient for the RSSFC group, respectively. Abdominal closure was possible in only 6 patients in the VAC group, whereas for the RSSFC group, abdominal closure was achieved in 14 patients (P = .005). Planned hernia was exclusively decided in patients in the VAC group (P = .001). The hospital stay was 17.53 ± 4.59 days for the VAC group and 11.93 ± 2.05 days for the RSSFC group (P = .0001). The median initial intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was 12 mm Hg for the VAC group and 16 mm Hg for the RSSFC group (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the superiority of RSSFC compared with the single use of the VAC device. In our opinion, sequential fascial closure can immediately begin when abdominal sepsis is controlled.

Damage control surgery and open abdominal management: recent advances and our approach

The concept of damage control and improved understanding of the pathophysiology of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) have been proven to be great advances in the management of both traumatic and nontraumatic surgical conditions. The practice of damage control surgery includes 3 components: 1) abbreviated resuscitative surgery for rapid control of hemorrhage and abdominal contamination by gastrointestinal contents, followed by temporary abdominal wall closure for planned reoperation and prevention of ACS; 2) restoration of physiologic function, including rewarming and correction of coagulopathy and hemodynamic stabilization in the intensive care unit; and 3) re-exploration for the definitive management of injuries and abdominal wall closure. Although this new approach can decrease the mortality rate of patients with severe physiological derangement, the establishment of clearly defined indications is necessary. For patients who require damage control surgery, interventional radiology should be integrated into the strategy for achieving hemostasis. Angiographic evaluation and embolization should be considered immediately after initial operation, especially for patients with combined intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal hemorrhage, severe hepatic injury, or ongoing hemorrhage after damage control surgery. In many patients who require conventional open abdominal management following damage control surgery or decompressive laparotomy for ACS, the granulating abdominal contents are covered with only a skin graft, which is associated with a risk of enterocutaneous fistula. These patients will ultimately require complex abdominal wall reconstruction at a later stage. We have performed early fascial closure using an anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap method. This technique may reduce the need for skin grafting and subsequent reconstruction and can be considered as an alternative method for the early management of patients with open abdomen.

Recurrent Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: An Inciting Factor of the Second Hit Phenomenon

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) after damage control laparotomy (DCL) is not unusual and because of this, patients are treated with open-abdomen techniques to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). The occurrence of recurrent ACS (R-ACS) after abdominal wall closure under tension in patients managed with DCL can be a trigger factor for second hit syndrome. Outcomes in this subset have not been previously described. In this 1-year retrospective study of severely injured patients in a Level I trauma center managed with DCL and sequential abdominal wall closure, 26 patients were identified. After attempted abdominal wall closure, 13 (50%) patients had R-ACS and 13 (50%) non-R-ACS. R-ACS patients had a statistically significant higher incidence of multisystem organ failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and sepsis as well as requiring longer ventilator support and longer hospital length of stay. We concluded that failure to recognize and treat IAH with development of R-ACS after tension abdominal wall closure in patients with DCL will trigger the second hit syndrome with increased risk of morbidity. Institution of a management algorithm with intra-abdominal pressure/abdominal perfusion pressure surveillance at the time of abdominal wall closure can potentially ameliorate complications.

Classification--important step to improve management of patients with an open abdomen

This short report is a distillation of the proceedings from a consensus group meeting in January 2009. It outlines a proposed classification system for patients with an open abdomen (OA). The classification allows (1) a description of the patient's clinical course; (2) standardized clinical guidelines for improving OA management; and (3) improved reporting of OA status, which will facilitate comparisons between studies and heterogeneous patient populations. The following grading is suggested: grade 1A, clean OA without adherence between bowel and abdominal wall or fixity of the abdominal wall (lateralization); grade 1B, contaminated OA without adherence/fixity; grade 2A, clean OA developing adherence/fixity; grade 2B, contaminated OA developing adherence/fixity; grade 3, OA complicated by fistula formation; grade 4, frozen OA with adherent/fixed bowel, unable to close surgically, with or without fistula. We propose that this classification system will facilitate communication, clarify OA management, and potentially improve patient care.

Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis: low primary closure rate

BACKGROUND

Abdominal Vacuum-Assisted Closure (V.A.C.) systems for treatment of open abdomens have been predominantly used for trauma patients with a high primary fascial closure rate. Use of the V.A.C. technique in abdominal sepsis is less well established.

METHODS

All patients with abdominal sepsis and treatment with the abdominal V.A.C. system between 2004 and 2007 were prospectively assessed. End points were fascial closure, V.A.C.-related morbidity, and quality of life score (SF-36) at follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with abdominal sepsis were included in the study. Primary fascial closure was feasible in 10, partial closure in 4, and no closure in 16 patients. Median number of V.A.C. changes was 3 (range, 1-10). Nine patients died. V.A.C.-related morbidity was as follows: two fistulas, three fascial edge necroses, one skin blister, and four prolapses of small bowel between the fascia and foam. Univariate analysis showed no variables influencing primary closure rate or V.A.C.-related morbidity. Mortality was significantly influenced by age (P < 0.001), respiratory failure (P = 0.01), and pneumonia (P = 0.03). At follow-up, V.A.C. patients scored lower in the physical health scores and similar in the mental health scores compared with the normal population.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of the open abdomen in patients with abdominal sepsis with the abdominal V.A.C. system is safe with good long-term quality of life. Primary closure rate in these patients is substantially lower than in trauma patients. Stepwise closure of the fascia during V.A.C. changes should be attempted to avoid additional lateral retraction of fascial edges. V.A.C.-related complications may be avoided with careful surgical technique.

Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen

Background

This study was designed to systematically review the literature to assess which temporary abdominal closure (TAC) technique is associated with the highest delayed primary fascial closure (FC) rate. In some cases of abdominal trauma or infection, edema or packing precludes fascial closure after laparotomy. This “open abdomen” must then be temporarily closed. However, the FC rate varies between techniques.

Methods

The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched until December 2007. References were checked for additional studies. Search criteria included (synonyms of) “open abdomen,” “fascial closure,” “vacuum,” “reapproximation,” and “ventral hernia.” Open abdomen was defined as “the inability to close the abdominal fascia after laparotomy.” Two reviewers independently extracted data from original articles by using a predefined checklist.

Results

The search identified 154 abstracts of which 96 were considered relevant. No comparative studies were identified. After reading them, 51 articles, including 57 case series were included. The techniques described were vacuum-assisted closure (VAC; 8 series), vacuum pack (15 series), artificial burr (4 series), Mesh/sheet (16 series), zipper (7 series), silo (3 series), skin closure (2 series), dynamic retention sutures (DRS), and loose packing (1 series each). The highest FC rates were seen in the artificial burr (90%), DRS (85%), and VAC (60%). The lowest mortality rates were seen in the artificial burr (17%), VAC (18%), and DRS (23%).

Conclusions

These results suggest that the artificial burr and the VAC are associated with the highest FC rates and the lowest mortality rates.

Is TNP in the open abdomen safe and effective?

Much of the evidence for the use of TNP in the open abdomen comes from data on trauma patients. In view of the potentially severe complications, much greater evidence is needed for its application on patients with abdominal sepsis.

Preventing loss of domain: a management strategy for closure of the "open abdomen" during the initial hospitalization

BACKGROUND

In the management of the abdominal compartment syndrome resulting in an open abdomen, the so-called "planned ventral hernia" is considered an acceptable outcome. We describe a technique of surgical management of the abdominal wound that allows fascial closure in most cases during the initial admission.

METHODS

Consecutive trauma patients with abdominal compartment syndrome managed with an open abdomen over a 3-year period were identified. Medical records and the trauma data registry were reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, operative treatment, timing and type of wound management, closure of the abdomen, and outcome.

RESULTS

From January 2004 to January 2007, 23 patients underwent management with an open abdomen. The mechanism of injury was blunt in 83% of patients and penetrating in 17%. All 18 survivors underwent primary fascial closure of the abdomen using a vacuum- and tie-assisted technique of wound closure. The mean time to closure was 11 +/- 4.4 days (range, 4-18 days). In all, 9 complications occurred in 7 patients, which included 1 reoperation for abscess after fascial closure. There was no dehiscence and no fistula. The Apache II score was 19.3 +/- 6.9 (range, 7-30), and the injury severity score was 32.3 + 10.6 (range, 9-50).

CONCLUSIONS

A technique of managing the open abdomen that prevents fascial retraction results in a high primary closure rate with an acceptable rate of short-term complications.

A prospective look at the current state of open abdomens

The present study examines the current management, closure rate, and complications of open abdomens in trauma patients admitted to an Academic Level I trauma center between May 2004 and April 2007. Variables examined include mechanism, injuries, use of antibiotics and paralytics, type of abdominal closure, days to closure, complications, ICU and hospital length of stay, and mortality. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of failed abdominal closure. Of 900 laparotomies, 93 (10%) were left open. Eighty-five (91%) patients survived for closure opportunity. Definitive fascial closure was achieved in 72 (85%) at 3.9 +/- 3.7 days (range 1-21 days). Of the remaining 13 patients, seven were closed with biologic material, five by skin grafting, and one had skin-only closure. Entero-atmospheric fistulas occurred in 14 (15%) patients. Two independent risk factors associated with failed abdominal closure were the presence of deep surgical site infection [odds ratio (OR) 17.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-115.8, P = 0.003] and intra-abdominal abscess (OR 7.4; 95% CI 1.1-51.0, P = 0.04). In conclusion, open abdomens are commonly necessary after trauma laparotomies. Definitive fascial closure can be achieved in 85 per cent of cases. In conjunction with biologics, closure can be achieved in 93 per cent of cases. Failure to primarily close the abdomen is associated with a significantly higher risk for entero-atmospheric fistula occurrence.

Vacuum-Assisted Closure for Successful Treatment of a Major Contaminated Gunshot Chest-Wound: A Case Report

Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) is a well-established treatment for complicated wound infections and chronic wounds, including poststernotomy mediastinitis. The use of VAC in treating high-energy trauma has been more limited. We present a case where VAC was successfully used to treat a contaminated self-inflicted gunshot-wound of the chest and abdomen.

Topical negative pressure wound therapy: a review of its role and guidelines for its use in the management of acute wounds

Over the past two decades, topical negative pressure (TNP) wound therapy has gained wide acceptance as a genuine strategy in the treatment algorithm for a wide variety of acute and chronic wounds. Although extensive experimental and clinical evidence exists to support its use and despite the recent emergence of randomised control trials, its role and indications have yet to be fully determined. This article provides a qualitative overview of the published literature appertaining to the use of TNP therapy in the management of acute wounds by an international panel of experts using standard methods of appraisal. Particular focus is applied to the use of TNP for the open abdomen, sternal wounds, lower limb trauma, burns and tissue coverage with grafts and dermal substitutes. We provide evidence-based recommendations for indications and techniques in TNP wound therapy and, where studies are insufficient, consensus on best practice.

Closing the open abdomen: improved success with Wittmann Patch staged abdominal closure

BACKGROUND

Although the "open abdomen" has likely contributed to improved outcomes in trauma patients, the challenge of subsequent fascial closure has emerged. Since mid 2004, we have incorporated Wittmann Patch staged abdominal closure into our management of the open abdomen. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of this device on our incidence of fascial closure versus planned ventral hernia.

METHODS

Patients managed by open abdomen from 2001 through 2006 were identified from the trauma registry. Fascial closure immediately after definitive repair of injuries was defined as "early fascial closure." Continuation of the open abdomen beyond the definitive repair of injuries with subsequent fascial closure was defined as "delayed fascial closure." Since April 2004, the Wittmann Patch was uniformly employed in open abdomen management. Patients managed before the use of this device ("pre-Patch") were compared with those managed in the "Patch" era.

RESULTS

Fifty-six open abdomens were managed in the pre-Patch era and 103 were managed in the Patch era. In the pre-Patch era, 33 (59%) underwent early fascial closure, compared with 67 (65%) in the Patch era (p NS). For the remaining patients, the incidence of delayed fascial closure was significantly higher in those managed with the Wittmann Patch compared with those managed in the pre-Patch era (78% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). Planned ventral hernia was performed in 8 (8%) patients in the Patch era versus 16 (29%) patients in the pre-Patch era (p < 0.001). Abdominal complications were similar between groups (11% vs. 9%, p NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating the Wittmann Patch into a clinical pathway for management of the open abdomen has contributed to an increased incidence of delayed fascial closure. Abdominal complications were similar in both groups, suggesting that the device is not only efficacious, but also relatively safe.

The Clinical Importance of Monitoring Intra Abdominal Pressure after Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Aim:

The aim of this paper was to review the literature on the clinical importance of monitoring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair.

Method:

The literature was searched for abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) or intra-abdominal pressure and aortic aneurysm. Original articles were studied. Personal experiences were reported.

Results:

The consensus documents of the World society on the abdominal compartment syndrome ( wsacs.org ), with their definitions and guidelines, constitute an important step forward for the possibilities to study this clinical entity. Few papers were published describing the problem specifically in the patient population operated on for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). The incidence was approximately 5% when the patients were not monitored with IAP, and above 10% when IAP was monitored. The incidence seems to be similar irrespective if open or endovascular repair is performed, though comparative prospective studies were not published. Patients with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) or ACS have higher mortality and more complications. If IAH is recognized early conservative treatment may be effective to prevent development of ACS. After ACS has developed, surgical decompression is usually required. A proposed algorithm on how to act on different levels of IAH is presented.

Conclusions:

IAH/ACS is an important complication after operation on patients with rAAA. Monitoring IAP may be associated with improved outcomes.

[Current treatment of hepatic trauma]

The therapeutic and diagnostic approach of liver trauma injuries (by extension, of abdominal trauma) has evolved remarkably in the last decades. The current non-surgical treatment in the vast majority of liver injuries is supported by the accumulated experience and optimal results in the current series. It is considered that the non-surgical treatment of liver injuries has a current rate of success of 83-100%, with an associated morbidity of 5-42%. The haemodynamic stability of the patient will determine the applicability of the non-surgical treatment. Arteriography with angioembolisation constitutes a key technical tool in the context of liver trauma. Patients with haemodynamic instability will need an urgent operation and can benefit from abdominal packing techniques, damage control and post-operative arteriography. The present review attempts to contribute to the current, global and practical management in the care of liver trauma.

A cautionary note: the use of vacuum-assisted closure systems in the treatment of gastrointestinal cutaneous fistula may be associated with higher mortality from subsequent fistula development

During the past several years, vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) systems have been increasingly used in the treatment of gastrointestinal cutaneous fistulas, particularly those associated with open abdomen. Recently, I experienced 2 cases in which the original fistula closed after treatment by the VAC system. However, these patients, who had exposed bowel, developed an additional fistula that required surgery. In a recent article from an intestinal-failure unit in the United Kingdom, Rao et al(1) reported on a series of 29 patients treated with VAC, 6 of whom developed new gastrointestinal cutaneous fistulas. Four of these 6 patients died. My own experiences, plus the report of Rao et al,(1) suggest the possibility that the use of the VAC system in patients with exposed bowel and an open abdomen may be associated with subsequent fistula development. Although the numbers are small, it also raises the question that development of a fistula in a patient treated with VAC may result in higher mortality.

Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction--a novel technique for late closure of the open abdomen

BACKGROUND

Open abdomen (OA) treatment often results in difficulties in closing the abdomen. Highest closure rates are seen with the vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAWC) technique. However, we have experienced occasional failures with this technique in cases with severe visceral swelling needing longer treatment periods with open abdomen. Feasibility and short-term outcome of a novel combination of techniques for managing the open abdomen are presented.

METHODS

The VAWC technique was combined with medial traction of the fasciae through a temporary mesh in seven consecutive patients. The VAWC-system was changed and the mesh tightened every 2-3 days.

RESULTS

Median (range) age in the 7 men was 65 (17-78) years. The diagnoses were ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (3), operation for juxtarenal AAA (1), iatrogenic aortic lesion (1), trauma (1) and abdominal abscesses (1). Four patients were decompressed due to abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) or intra-abdominal hypertension, and 3 could not be closed after laparotomy. Intra-abdominal pressure prior to OA treatment was 24 (17-36) mmHg. Maximal separation of the fasciae was 16 (7 -30) cm. Delayed primary closure was achieved in all patients after 32 (12-52) days with OA. No recurrent ACS was seen. No technique-specific complication was observed. Two small incisional hernias, one intra-abdominal abscess and one wound infection occurred in three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed primary closure in cases with severe visceral swelling and long periods of OA seems feasible with this technique.

Transverse laparostomy is feasible and effective in the treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Only recently has the important role of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) been recognized as a contributing factor to the multiple organ failure commonly seen in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Decompressive laparostomy for ACS is a life-saving procedure usually performed through a midline incision followed by a negative pressure wound dressing. High risk of intestinal fistulas and frequent inability to close the fascia with ensuing planned ventral hernia has prompted the search for alternative techniques. Subcutaneous fasciotomy may be effective in early and less severe cases of ACS but it is always accompanied with a ventral hernia.

CASE REPORT

A patient with SAP developed manifest ACS and was treated with bilateral subcostal laparostomy. Immediately after decompression, the intra-abdominal pressure dropped from 23 mmHg to 10 mmHg, and the respiratory, cardiovascular and renal functions improved markedly leading to full recovery. The abdominal incision including the fascia and the skin was closed gradually over 4 relaparotomies, and during the 6 months' follow up there are no signs of ventral hernia or other wound complications.

DISCUSSION

Transverse subcostal laparostomy is a promising alternative decompression technique for ACS in SAP. It is feasible, effective and might provide a chance of early fascial closure. Comparative studies are needed to define its role as a decompressive technique for ACS.

In Vitro Comparison of Intra-Abdominal Hypertension Development After Different Temporary Abdominal Closure Techniques

BACKGROUND

To compare volume reserve capacity (VRC) and development of intra-abdominal hypertension after different in vitro temporary abdominal closure (TAC) techniques.

METHODS

A model of the abdomen was designed. The abdominal wall was simulated with polychloroprene, a synthetic rubber compound. A lentil-shaped defect of 150 cm(2) was cut into the anterior aspect of the abdominal wall. TAC of this defect was performed by a zipper system (ZS), a bag silo closure (BSC), or a vacuum assisted closure (VAC) with subatmospheric pressures ranging from 0- to 200 mmHg. The model with intact abdominal wall served as reference. The model was filled with water to baseline level. The intra-abdominal pressure was increased in 2 mmHg steps from baseline level (6 mmHg) to 40 mmHg by adding volume to the system according to a standardized protocol. VRC with corresponding intra-abdominal pressure were analyzed and compared for the different TAC techniques.

RESULTS

VRC was the highest after BSC at all pressure levels studied (P < 0.05). VAC and ZS resulted in significantly lower VRC compared with BSC and reference (P < 0.05). The magnitude of negative pressure on the VAC did not significantly influence the VRC.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present in vitro model, BSC demonstrated the highest VRC of all evaluated TAC techniques. Different levels of subatmospheric pressures applied to the VAC did not affect VRC. The results for ZS and VAC indicate that these TAC techniques may increase the risk for recurrent intra-abdominal hypertension and should therefore not be used in high-risk patients during the initial phase after abdominal decompression.

Cobertura temporária da cavidade abdominal com curativo a vácuo

OBJETIVO: Descrever técnica de curativo para cobertura temporária da cavidade abdominal que utiliza sistema de vácuo. MÉTODO: A técnica foi aplicada em 12 pacientes. Inicialmente coloca-se sobre a laparostomia a bolsa plástica fenestrada, em seguida a primeira camada de compressas. Sobre esta, coloca-se o tubo de látex. Este é recoberto por outra camada de compressas as quais são fixadas sobre o curativo com o campo cirúrgico auto-aderente. O tubo de látex é conectado ao sistema de vácuo com pressão de -10 a -50 mmHg. Trocam-se os curativos a cada 12 horas. Material utilizado bolsa plástica de solução salina, compressas cirúrgicas, tubo de látex, campo cirúrgico auto-aderente de 50cm x 30cm e vácuo do sistema de gases hospitalares. RESULTADOS:A peritonite grave foi a indicação mais freqüente para laparostomia, seguida da síndrome de compartimento abdominal. Fechamento definitivo da cavidade abdominal foi possível em oito pacientes (67%) em média após 11 dias (9 a 21 dias) da laparostomia. Não houve complicações associadas ao método. O custo diário aproximado do curativo foi de R$ 50,00. CONCLUSÃO: O curativo a vácuo proporcionou boa contenção das vísceras abdominais, controlou o extravasamento de secreções e o edema. Permitiu o fechamento definitivo da cavidade abdominal na maioria dos casos e foi de baixo custo.

Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome: a potential threat for all trauma clinicians

Post-injury abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is an increasingly recognised phenomenon in critical care. During the last decade, ACS had also been characterised in patients without abdominal injuries, referred to as secondary ACS. Recent investigation has described this elusive syndrome better, with up to 70% mortality. Regardless of the cause of the syndrome and the nature of any extra-abdominal injuries, secondary ACS is invariably associated with massive fluid resuscitation. With a reliable, predictive model and new monitoring techniques, trauma clinicians should be able to identify the high-risk patient and attenuate the impact of this syndrome.

The use of vacuum-assisted closure of abdominal wounds: a word of caution

OBJECTIVE

Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) has been used in our centre to aid the closure of abdominal wounds. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical outcome of patients in whom VAC therapy had been used in conjunction with laparostomy.

METHOD

All patients in whom VAC was used in the management of open abdominal wounds from November 2003 to March 2005 were included in this study.

RESULTS

There were 29 patients in the study. Nineteen (65.5%) needed ICU care. Six (20%) patients developed leakage of small bowel contents into the abdominal wound cavity because of intestinal fistulation during the VAC therapy. Four of the six (66%) died, all from multi-organ failure.

CONCLUSION

Our study has demonstrated a high incidence of intestinal leakage following VAC therapy. The reasons for this are multifactorial. We would recommend caution in using it on patients with bowel anastomoses or enterotomy repairs.

Usefulness of the bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap method for early fascial closure in patients requiring open abdominal management

BACKGROUND

Many patients requiring conventional open abdominal management need a postoperative intermediate period with a large ventral hernia. This situation, in which the granulated abdominal contents are covered only with a skin graft, carry with it a high risk of enterocutaneous fistula, and the patients ultimately require late-stage abdominal wall reconstruction. Early abdominal wall reconstruction in noncandidates for standard fascial closure has received little attention. In this study we used bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flaps for early fascial closure which, to date, has not been evaluated as a technique for early fascial closure.

METHODS

Eleven trauma and 18 nontrauma cases requiring open abdominal management over a 7-year period were reviewed. Bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flaps were created by longitudinal incisions along the lateral edge of the anterior rectus sheath, which were mobilized medially and approximated. The skin was closed primarily.

RESULTS

Twelve nontrauma and eight trauma patients survived. No enteric fistula or abdominal abscess occurred. Anterior rectus sheath turnover flaps were used in nine of the 18 nontrauma and two of the 11 trauma patients, all of whom were unsuitable for standard fascial closure of prolonged visceral edema; the respective mean intervals from initial laparotomy to fascial closure were 9.4 and 18 days. Of the 11 patients with flaps, ten survived without fascial dehiscence or herniation (maximum follow-up: 65 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Early fascial closure using the anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap may reduce the need for skin grafting and subsequent abdominal wall reconstruction. This approach can be considered as an alternative technique in the early management of patients with open abdomen.

[Abdominal vacuum device with open abdomen]

BACKGROUND

For the treatment of peritonitis or abdominal compartment syndrome, an open abdomen can be required. Because of the high complication rate associated with this method, different technical modifications were developed that are now being applied. Abdominal vacuum-assisted closure is increasingly favoured. We analyse our experience with this device in a distinct group of patients from gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From June 2003 to December 2005, 36 patients were treated with 151 double-layer abdominal vacuum devices. Indications for applying this device were peritonitis (n = 22), abdominal compartment syndrome (n = 11), and necrotising fasciitis (n = 3). Thirty-four patients gave anamneses of malignoma.

RESULTS

Overall, the vacuum therapy treatment lasted a median of 13 days (range 3-48). With it, four enteric fistulas (11%) and four abdominal wall bleedings (11%) occurred. In our patient group, no new intra-abdominal abscesses were observed. Four patients died during treatment with the vacuum-assisted device and four afterward because of multiple organ failure in acute sepsis (in-hospital mortality 22%). Twenty-six patients (72%) underwent direct fascial closure after a median treatment duration of 10 days. Six patients (17%) required synthetic mesh for fascial closure. After a median follow-up of 100 days, two patients developed ventral hernias and two others showed ossification of the scar.

CONCLUSION

Compared with other methods of temporary abdominal closure, our experience with the vacuum-assisted device demonstrates its advantages concerning clinical feasibility and the relatively low complication rate. The high rate of direct fascial closure with an acceptable rate of ventral hernias following vacuum-assisted abdominal closure are further benefits of this technique.

Delayed Primary Closure in Damage Control Laparotomy: The Value of the Wittmann Patch

Damage control laparotomy has become an accepted practice in trauma surgery. A number of methods leading to delayed primary closure of the abdomen have been advocated; complications are recognized with all these methods. The approach to staged repair using the Wittmann patch (Star Surgical Inc., Burlington, WI) combines the advantages of planned relaparotomy and open management, while minimizing the rate of complications. The authors hypothesized that use of the Wittmann patch would lead to a high rate of delayed primary closure of the abdomen. The patch consists of two sheets sutured to the abdominal fascia, providing for temporary closure. Advancement of the patch and abdominal exploration can be done at bedside. When the fascial edges can be reapproximated without tension, abdominal closure is performed. Twenty-six patients underwent staged abdominal closure during the study period. All were initially managed with intravenous bag closure. Eighty-three per cent (20 of 24) went on to delayed primary closure of the abdomen, with a mean time of 13.1 days from patch placement to delayed primary closure. The rate of closure using the Wittmann patch is equivalent to other commonly used methods and should be considered when managing patients with abdominal compartment syndrome or severe abdominal trauma.

Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient

Severe secondary peritonitis carries significant mortality, despite advancements in critical care support and other therapies. Surgical management requires a multidisciplinary approach to guide the timing and the number of interventions necessary to eradicate the septic foci and create optimal healing with the fewest complications. Research is needed regarding the best surgical strategy for very severe cases. The use of deferred primary anastomosis seems safe in patients presenting with hemodynamic instability and hypoperfusion. These patients have a high risk of anastomotic failure and fistula formation. Allowing for aggressive resuscitation and judicious assessment of the progression of local inflammation are safe strategies to achieve the highest success and minimize serious and protracted complications in patients who survive the initial septic insult.

One hundred percent fascial approximation with sequential abdominal closure of the open abdomen

BACKGROUND

Damage-control surgery and the recognition of the abdominal compartment syndrome have improved patient outcomes but at the cost of an open abdomen. Multiple techniques have been introduced to obtain fascial closure for the open abdomen to minimize morbidity and cost of care. We performed a modification of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) technique that provided constant fascial tension, hypothesizing this would result in a higher rate of primary fascial closure.

METHODS

After initial temporary closure of the abdomen after post-injury damage control or decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome, we began the sequential closure technique. The technique begins by covering the bowel with the multiple white sponges overlapped like patchwork, and the fascia is placed under moderate tension over the white sponges with #1-PDS sutures. Large black VAC sponges are placed on top of the white sponges and affixed with an occlusive dressing and standard suction tubing is placed. Patients are returned to the operating room for sequential fascial closure and replacement of the sponge sandwich every 2 days, with a resulting decrease in the fascial defect.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients underwent sequential abdominal closure during the study period: 9 owing to damage control surgery and 5 owing to secondary abdominal compartment syndrome. Average time to closure was 7.5 +/- 1.0 days (range 4-16) and average number of laparotomies to closure was 4.6 +/- 0.5 (range 3-8). All patients attained primary fascial closure.

CONCLUSION

We propose a modification of the previously described vacuum-assisted closure technique that achieves 100% fascial approximation in our limited experience. Further application and refinement of this technique may eliminate the need for delayed complex and costly reconstructive abdominal wall procedures for the open abdomen.

Subatmospheric pressure wound therapy and the vacuum-assisted closure device: basic science and current clinical successes

This article reviews the development, current theories behind the mechanism of action and clinical use of subatmospheric pressure wound therapy with the vacuum-assisted closure device. An evolving list of indications for subatmospheric pressure therapy is discussed including its use in chronic wounds, traumatic wounds and orthopedic salvage, infected sternal wounds, management of the open abdomen, enterocutaneous fistulae, burn wounds, skin grafts and dermal substitutes, as well as systemic disease processes, such as myoglobinuria. The vacuum-assisted closure device Instill system is also reviewed, in which subatmospheric pressure therapy has been combined with the instillation of therapeutic solutions for the treatment of difficult infected wounds.

Behandlung enteraler Fisteln beim offenen Abdomen

Formation of enteric fistulas frequently complicates the open abdomen in patients who have sustained traumatic injury. The post-traumatic subset of patients with enterocutaneous fistula enjoy better than average recovery. To optimize this recovery, a systematic management approach is required. Patients must first be stabilized with nutritional support, control of sepsis, and special wound management systems to prevent further deterioration of the abdominal wall. Investigation of the origin, course, and characteristics of the fistula provides information about its likelihood to close without operation. Definitive operative therapy may be necessary to resolve the fistula and close the abdominal wall. Finally, healing support includes nutritional support and physical and occupational therapies to restore patients to pre-injury states.

Early definitive abdominal closure using serial closure technique on injured soldiers returning from Afghanistan and Iraq

BACKGROUND

Twenty-nine of 1,284 battle-injured soldiers arriving at Walter Reed Army Medical Center from Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom have abdominal wounds requiring delayed definitive closure with Gore-Tex (WL Gore & Assoc) mesh.

METHODS

Serial abdominal closure (SAC) leading to early definitive abdominal closure (EDAC) was achieved using Gore-Tex mesh. Inpatient records of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom soldiers with open or reopened abdomens were reviewed from March 2003 to August 2005.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine soldiers, average age 27 years (range 20 to 42 years) injured by secondary blast effects (n = 19); penetrating (n = 8); motor vehicle crashes (n = 1); and crushing injury (n = 1) were included in the study. Patients arrived at Walter Reed Army Medical Center 8 days (range 3 to 56 days) after injury with Gore-Tex mesh placed 6 days (range 0 to 26 days) from arrival and 14 days (range 4 to 79 days) from injury. SAC was achieved with towel clamp tightening or excision of midline mesh and drawing fascia closer to the midline for an average of 46 days (range 15 to 160 days) before EDAC. One patient is undergoing SAC and another was transferred to another facility. EDAC was achieved in 24 of the remaining of 27 patients (89%). Four patients required early removal of the Gore-Tex mesh, resulting in three patients with planned ventral hernia. One patient underwent EDAC with primary closure and fascial release. EDAC was completed with polypropylene mesh in 17 patients and 6 patients had original Gore-Tex in place. Patients were discharged from the hospital an average of 18 days after closure (range 1 to 89 days) with total hospital days of 62 (range 17 to 197 days). Average followup of patients from placement of Gore-Tex mesh is 264 days (range 31 to 855 days).

CONCLUSIONS

SAC with Gore-Tex mesh led to EDAC in 89% of patients and proved to be a safe and effective alternative to planned ventral hernia. SAC allowed protection of abdominal contents, effective fluid management, reclamation of abdominal domain, and early rehabilitation with minimal complications and only one hernia reoccurrence.

Delayed closure of ventral abdominal hernias after severe trauma

BACKGROUND

Primary closure after trauma celiotomies is not always accomplished. We reviewed our experience with delayed closure in trauma patients.

METHODS

Prospective data were collected on patients who had damage-control celiotomy and were discharged with open abdomens. The time to closure, repair methods, and complication data also were compiled.

RESULTS

In the 6-year period, 84 patients underwent damage-control celiotomy. Thirty-one patients died and 33 patients had early closure. Twenty patients had closure during a subsequent hospitalization (mean time to delayed closure, 193 days): 8 patients (40%) had component separation, 3 (15%) had component separation with mesh, 4 (20%) had mesh alone, and primary closure occurred in 5 (25%). Nine patients (45%) had complications such as wound and mesh infections, hernias, and fistulas. Repair before or after 6 months showed no statistically significant difference for the presence of complications or enterotomies (P = .64 and .5743, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Open-abdomen reconstruction presents significant challenges. Closure within 6 months is possible; the presence of complications is not affected by early repair.

The Revised ???Reconstructive Ladder??? and Its Applications for High-Energy Injuries to the Extremities

In this report, we tried to evaluate the merits of the classic "reconstructive ladder" and other reconstructive tools, such as acute shortening followed by distraction osteogenesis and a vacuum-assisted closure device, for the treatment of high-energy injuries. Thirty-seven patients suffering from high-velocity injuries to the extremities caused by war weapons and blast terror attacks were treated at our institution. The fractures were initially stabilized by the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) unilateral tubular external fixator, which was changed 2-3 days later to a circular Ilizarov frame for 19 patients. Temporary acute shortening was performed for 5 patients. Skin grafts were performed for 21 patients, local or regional flaps for 14 patients, and free flaps for 6. Vacuum-assisted closure was selected for 8 patients. The wounds were successfully closed in all the patients. Two patients with upper-limb injuries had nonunion. Motor nerve injuries recovered in 7/10 patients. Due to hypergranulating tissue, 2 patients treated with vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) had to stop treatment early. Their wounds were closed with skin graft or local flap. The classic reconstructive ladder, starting from direct closure and ending with a free flap, should be extended for limb traumas and include acute shortening with or without angulation, followed by distraction osteogenesis and the VAC system on the same step as the free flap.

Vacuum-Assisted Closure of the Sternotomy Wound: Respiratory Mechanics and Ventilation

BACKGROUND

Numerous authors have reported promising results with the use of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in poststernotomy mediastinitis. The negative pressure applied to the anterior mediastinum substantially exceeds the normal negative pressure in the pleural cavities, and interaction with respiratory physiology cannot be excluded. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the application of six clinically relevant negative pressures between -50 mmHg and -175 mmHg to the sternotomy wound affects respiratory parameters in a porcine model.

METHODS

A midline sternotomy was performed in six mechanically ventilated pigs weighing 70 +/- 3 kg. Vacuum-assisted closure therapy was applied with continuous negative pressure in a randomized order to the sternotomy wound. The following respiratory parameters were monitored by a carbon dioxide-based noninvasive monitoring system connected to the ventilator: carbon dioxide elimination, peak inspiratory pressure, peak expiratory flow, alveolar minute volume, alveolar tidal volume, expired tidal volume, static compliance, and airway resistance.

RESULTS

All pigs survived the treatment, and there was no significant change in the respiratory parameters investigated at any of the six negative pressures applied. A tendency toward increased airway resistance was noted when -175 mmHg was applied, although this change was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of negative pressure therapy in the treatment of deep poststernotomy infections is a novel modality gaining increased attention. In this study, no impairment in respiratory mechanics, ventilation, or oxygenation was detected when comparing applied pressures ranging from -50 mmHg to -175 mmHg in the sternotomy wound.

Gauze packing of open surgical wounds: empirical or evidence-based practice?

INTRODUCTION

Most surgical wounds are closed primarily, but some are allowed to heal by secondary intention. This usually involves repeated packing and dressing of the raw wound surfaces. Although the long-term care of such wounds has devolved to the care of nurses in the community or out-patient setting, the initial wound dressing or cavity packing is done by the surgeon in the operating theatre. Many surgeons are unaware of the growth of the discipline of wound care, and still use traditional soaked gauze for dressing and packing open surgical wounds and cavities.

RESULTS

This review summarises the some of the modern alternatives available and the evidence--or the lack of it--for their use in both the acute and chronic setting.

Management of abdominal wound dehiscence using vacuum assisted closure in patients with compromised healing

BACKGROUND

Restoration of the abdominal wall's integrity after postoperative wound dehiscence is frequently performed in a delayed fashion, necessitating a temporary dressing of the dehisced wound.

METHODS

The Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) system (Kinetic Concepts, Inc., San Antonio, TX) was used in 21 patients with postoperative abdominal wound dehiscences that could not be closed immediately and who were at high risk for healing complications. The VAC device was used in conjunction with sharp debridement and it was maintained on a continuous mode with a negative pressure of -75 to -125 mm Hg. The dressing was changed every 2 days. VAC therapy was continued until the integrity of the abdominal wall was reestablished by surgical procedures or secondary healing.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients had fascial dehiscence, and 9 of them had frank bowel exposure. Definitive fascial closure was performed in 9 of 13 patients with fascial dehiscence. Stable cutaneous coverage was subsequently achieved in all patients by local abdominal skin flap advancement (6), skin grafting (9), or secondary intention healing (6). Seven patients had part of their VAC therapy as outpatients. The complications included a low-output small bowel enterocutaneous fistula in 2 patients and partial skin graft loss in 1 patient. The fistulae resolved after operative treatment (1) or conservative treatment (1).

CONCLUSION

Integration of the VAC system in the management of post-laparotomy wound dehiscence in patients with compromised wound healing appears to be successful and should be considered in such patients to provide a stable, healed wound.

[New observations on gut trauma]

Abdominal trauma from blunt objects remains a challenge in clinical practice. The primary aims are quick recognition and reversal of life-threatening situations, rational use of the available diagnostic methods, and avoidance of unnecessary laparotomy. The majority of these injuries can now be treated conservatively, whereby interventional methods such as drainage inserts and embolisation are becoming increasingly favoured. Observation of the treatment course by an experienced surgeon is a must. In patients with complicated injuries, special attention must be paid to so-called missed injuries: traumata that may be overlooked such as small intestine and diaphragm ruptures. Aside from retaining organs and their function, the most important concern is damage control (for complex injuries) and laparotomy in the abdominal compartment, with the application of temporary laparotomy as needed. These methods are aimed at reducing mortality pre- and post-admittance. However, we still lack valid prognostic parameters to allow realistic estimation of survival following severe, blunt abdominal trauma.

Early Aggressive Closure of the Open Abdomen

BACKGROUND

The aim of this series is to describe a new and aggressive approach to definitive closure of the open abdomen.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 37 patients who underwent definitive abdominal closure using a combination of vacuum pack, vacuum-assisted wound management and human acellular dermal matrix (HADM).

RESULTS

All patients' open abdomens were maintained with vacuum assisted wound management in attempts for primary closure. Once it was determined that the abdomen would not close primarily; it was closed with HADM and skin advancement. The mean duration of the open abdomen was 21.7 days (range 6-45), with an average of 127.78 cm of HADM, the largest number being 800 cm, with decreasing use of product later in the series. No major complications were seen with the repair. Superficial wound infection occurred with two patients that were easily treated with wet to dry dressing changes. No intraabdominal complications such as fistula or graft loss were seen. All patients left the hospital with an intact abdominal wall and skin. All 37 patients survived to discharge and were seen in follow-up within one month. No early hernia formation was seen at the one month follow up with the longest at three years. No abdominal wall complications were seen in subsequent follow up patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Early aggressive closure of the open abdomen is possible with a combination of vacuum pack, vacuum-assisted wound management and HADM. Short term results are promising and warrant further study.

Vacuum-assisted wound closure after resection of musculoskeletal tumors

Resection of musculoskeletal tumors may result in large soft tissue defects that cannot be closed primarily and require prolonged dressing changes and complex surgical interventions for wound coverage. We retrospectively reviewed 23 patients with such defects treated with a vacuum-assisted wound closure system and compared the outcome of these patients with a control group. The study group included 15 women and eight men who had their wounds located at the back (two), pelvic girdle (11), thigh (eight), and leg (two). Treatment included sealed wound coverage with polyurethane foam and overlying tape connected to a vacuum pump. This system was disconnected and changed every 48 hours for 7 to 19 days, after which all defects were reduced in size by an average of 25% and covered with a viable granulation tissue. This allowed primary closure in seven patients, primary closure with skin grafting in 14 patients, and healing by secondary intention in two patients. Compared with the control group, patients in the study group had shorter hospital stays and number of surgical interventions and greater rates of primary wound closure. The use of vacuum-assisted wound closure facilitates wound healing and primary wound closure in patients who have a large soft tissue defect after resection of a musculoskeletal tumor.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level III (retrospective comparative study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.