Recipient Age and Risk for Mortality After Kidney Transplantation in England

Perspectives of Older Kidney Transplant Recipients on Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Older kidney transplant recipients are susceptible to cognitive impairment, frailty, comorbidities, immunosuppression-related complications, and chronic graft failure, however, there has been limited focus on their concerns and expectations related to transplantation. This study aims to describe the perspectives of older kidney transplant recipients about their experience of kidney transplantation, self-management, and treatment goals to inform strategies and interventions that address their specific needs.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted with 30 kidney transplant recipients aged 65-80 years from five renal units in Australia. Transcripts were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Six themes were identified: restoring vitality of youth (with subthemes of revived mindset for resilience, embracing enjoyment in life, drive for self-actualization); persisting through prolonged recovery (yielding to aging, accepting functional limitations, pushing the limit, enduring treatment responsibilities); imposing sicknesses (combatting devastating comorbidities, painful restrictions, emerging disillusionment, anxieties about accumulating side effects, consuming treatment burden); prioritizing graft survival (privileged with a miracle, negotiating risks for longevity, enacting a moral duty, preserving the last opportunity); confronting health deterioration (vulnerability and helplessness, narrowing focus to immediate concerns, uncertainty of survival); and value of existence (purpose through autonomy, refusing the burden of futile treatment, staying alive by all means).

CONCLUSIONS

Older kidney transplant recipients felt able to enjoy life and strived to live at their newly re-established potential and capability, which motivated them to protect their graft. However, some felt constrained by slow recuperation and overwhelmed by unexpected comorbidities, medication-related side effects, and health decline. Our findings suggest the need to prepare and support older recipients for self-management responsibilities, clarify their expectations of post-transplant risks and outcomes, and provide assistance through prolonged recovery after kidney transplantation.

Infectious complications as the leading cause of death after kidney transplantation: analysis of more than 10,000 transplants from a single center

AIM

To identify specific causes of graft failure in a large sample of kidney transplant patients from a middle-income, developing country.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study analyzing all consecutive single kidney transplants (KTs) performed at a single center in Brazil between January 1st 1998 and December 31st 2013. The database closing date was December 31st 2014.

RESULTS

Out of 10,400 KTs, there were 1191 (11.45%) deaths with a functioning graft, 40 cases (0.38%) of primary non-function (PNF) and 1417 cases (13.62%) of graft loss excluding death and PNF as the cause. Infectious complications (404 cases, 34% of all deaths) were the major cause of death. Most deaths due to infection occurred within the first year after transplantation (157 deaths, 38.86%). Immunologic mechanisms, comprising acute rejection and immune-mediated interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), were responsible for 52% of all cases of graft failure not involving recipient death. Half of the losses by acute rejection occurred late after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to what is observed in developed countries, infectious complications are the main challenge with kidney transplantation in Brazil. Non-adherence to treatment also appears to contribute significantly to long-term kidney graft loss. Strategies for improvement should focus on better compliance and a greater safety profile of immunosuppressive treatment.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate mofetil in younger and elderly renal transplant recipients

AIMS

Elderly transplant recipients have a lower incidence of acute rejection, and a higher risk to die from infectious complications. A potential cause may be differences in the pharmacokinetics (PK) or pharmacodynamics (PD) of the immunosuppressive drugs they are taking. This study was designed to comprehensively evaluate the influence of age on the PK and PD of mycophenolic acid (MPA).

METHODS

In this study the PK and PD of MPA was studied in 26 elderly and 54 younger renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. Patients were sampled repetitively, both before and during the first 6 months after kidney transplantation. Age-related variability in MPA PK, baseline IMPDH activity, as well as MPA-induced IMPDH inhibition were studied.

RESULTS

The IMPDH activity pre-transplantation did not differ between elderly and younger patients. Neither IMPDH activity pre-transplantation nor maximum IMPDH inhibition was significantly correlated with the patients' age. The area under the MPA plasma concentration-time curve (AUC_0-12h ) and the area under the effect (IMPDH activity)-time curve (AEC_0-12h ) from 0 to 12 h were also not significantly different between the two groups. We found no significant differences in EC₅₀ and E_max between elderly and younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Age did not significantly affect the PK or PD of MPA. It is unlikely that the lower incidence of acute rejection in elderly patients, or the higher risk to die from a severe infection in elderly patients is due to different handling of MPA in the elderly.

Survival of Elderly Adults Undergoing Incident Home Hemodialysis and Kidney Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

To compare the mortality of elderly adults with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treated with home hemodialysis (HD) with that of those receiving a kidney transplant (KTx).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Pertinent data for the two groups were obtained from electronic medical records from a large dialysis provider and the U.S. Renal Data System.

PARTICIPANTS

Using data from elderly adults (aged ≥65) who started home HD and underwent KTx in the US between 2007 and 2011, a 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched cohort of 960 elderly adults was created, and the association between treatment modality and all-cause mortality was examined using Cox proportional hazards and competing risk regression survival models using modality failure as a competing event.

MEASUREMENTS

Modality of renal replacement therapy.

RESULTS

The baseline mean age ± standard deviation of the PS-matched individuals undergoing home HD was 71 ± 6, and that of KTx recipients was 71 ± 5, 69% of both groups were male, 81% of those undergoing home HD and 79% of KTx recipients were white, and 11% and 12%, respectively, were African American. Median follow-up time was 205 days (interquartile range (IQR) 78-364 days) for those undergoing home HD and 795 days (IQR 366-1,221 days) for KTx recipients. There were 97 deaths (20%, 253/1,000 patient-years, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 207-309/1,000 patient-years) in the home HD group and 48 deaths (10%, 45/1,000 patient-years, 95% CI = 34-60/1,000 patient-years) in the KTx group. Elderly adults undergoing home HD had a risk of mortality that was almost five times as high as that of KTx recipients (hazard ratio = 4.74, 95% CI = 3.25-6.91). Similar results were seen in competing risk regression analyses (subhazard ratio = 4.71, 95% CI = 3.27-6.79). Results were consistent across different types of kidney donors and subgroups divided according to various recipient characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Elderly adults with ESRD who receive a KTx have greater survival than those who undergo home HD. Further studies are needed to assess whether KTx receipt is associated with other benefits such as better quality of life and lower hospitalization rates.

Impact of comorbidity on outcome in kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective study in Italy

The aim of this study was to relate in-hospital mortality (IHM), cardiovascular events (CVEs) and non-immunologic comorbidity evaluated on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codification, in Italian kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We evaluated IHM and admissions due to CVEs between 2000 and 2013 recorded in the database of the region Emilia Romagna. The Elixhauser score was calculated for evaluation of non-immunologic comorbidity. Three main outcomes (i.e. IHM, admission due to major CVEs and combined outcome) were the dependent variables of the multivariate models, while age, gender and Elixhauser score were the independent ones. During the examined period, a total of 9063 admissions in 3648 KTRs were recorded; 1945 patients were males (53.3 %) and 1703 females (46.7 %) and the mean age was 52.9 ± 13.1 years. The non-immunological impaired status of the KTRs, examined by the Elixhauser score, was 3.88 ± 4.29. During the 14-year follow-up period, IHM for any cause was 3.2 % (n = 117), and admissions due to CVEs were 527 (5.8 %). Age and comorbidity were independently associated with CVEs, IHM and the combined outcome. Male gender was independently associated with IHM and combined outcome, but not with CVEs. Evaluation of non-immunological comorbidity is important in KTRs and identification of high-risk patients for major clinical events could improve outcome. Moreover, comorbidity could be even more important in chronic kidney disease patients who are waiting for a kidney transplant.

Ongoing higher infection rate in ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipient: is it a serious problem? A single-center experience

Purpose

Additional clinical experience and knowledge regarding the barrier to transplantation of ABO blood type incompatibility could reduce the higher rate of infectious complications in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

Methods

A total of 79 ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOiKT) patients were compared with 260 ABO-compatible kidney transplantation (ABOcKT) patients for basic clinical characteristics, infectious complications, rejection episodes, and graft survival.

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, rejection rates, or graft survival between the ABOiKT and ABOcKT patients. No significant difference in the infection rate was shown for cytomegalovirus (26.6% vs. 30.0%; P = 0.672), BK virus (19.0% vs. 21.5%; P = 0.752), herpes disease (10.1% vs. 5.0%; P = 0.082), pneumonia (5.3% vs. 3.8%; P = 0.746), or urinary tract infection (8.9% vs. 10.0%; P > 0.999). Female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 2.20; P = 0.003), advanced age (≥60 years) (HR, 2.5; P = 0.019), history of rejection episodes (HR, 2.28; P = 0.016), and history of surgical complications (HR, 4.64; P = 0.018) were significant risk factors for infection. ABO incompatibility demonstrated a tendency toward higher infection risk without statistical significance (HR, 1.74; P = 0.056).

Conclusion

In spite of immunosuppressant protocol modification, the rate of infectious complications following ABOiKT is still higher than with ABOcKT when a modified desensitization protocol is used. However, this was not sufficient to avoid ABOiKT.

A High Comorbidity Score Should Not be a Contraindication for Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Currently, potential kidney transplant patients more often suffer from comorbidities. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was developed in 1987 and is the most used comorbidity score. We questioned to what extent number and severity of comorbidities interfere with graft and patient survival. Besides, we wondered whether the CCI was best to study the influence of comorbidity in kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

In our center, 1728 transplants were performed between 2000 and 2013. There were 0.8% cases with missing values. Nine pretransplant comorbidity covariates were defined: cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, lung disease, malignancy, other organ transplantation, and human immunodeficiency virus positivity. The CCI used was unadjusted for recipient age. The Rotterdam Comorbidity in Kidney Transplantation score was developed, and its influence was compared to the CCI. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, corrected for variables with a known significant influence, were performed.

RESULTS

We noted 325 graft failures and 215 deaths. The only comorbidity covariate that significantly influenced graft failure censored for death was peripheral vascular disease. Patient death was significantly influenced by cardiovascular disease, other organ transplantation, and the total comorbidity scores. Model fit was best with the Rotterdam Comorbidity in Kidney Transplantation score compared to separate comorbidity covariates and the CCI. In the population with the highest comorbidity score, 50% survived more than 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the negative influence of comorbidity, patient survival after transplantation is remarkably good. This means that even patients with extensive comorbidity should be considered for transplantation.

'I feel stronger and younger all the time'-perspectives of elderly kidney transplant recipients: thematic synthesis of qualitative research

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation offers improved survival and quality of life to an increasing number of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, elderly kidney transplant recipients may face unique challenges due to a higher burden of comorbidity, greater cumulative risk of immunosuppression-related complications and increasing frailty. We aimed to describe the perspectives of elderly kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched to April 2015. Qualitative studies were eligible if they reported views from elderly kidney transplant recipients (≥60 years). Thematic synthesis was used to analyse the findings.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies involving >116 recipients were included. We identified seven themes. 'Regaining strength and vitality' meant valuing the physical and psychosocial improvements in daily functioning and life participation. 'Extending life' was the willingness to accept any organ, including extended criteria kidneys, to prolong survival. 'Debt of gratitude' entailed conscious appreciation toward their donor while knowing they were unable to repay their sacrifice. 'Moral responsibility to maintain health' motivated adherence to medication and lifestyle recommendations out of an ethical duty to protect their gift for graft survival. 'Unabating and worsening forgetfulness' hindered self-management. 'Disillusionment with side effects and complications' reflected disappointment and exasperation with the unintended consequences of medications. 'Finality of treatment option' was an acute awareness that the current transplant may be their last.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplantation was perceived to slow and even reverse the experience of aging among elderly recipients, especially compared with dialysis. However, some were frustrated over persistent limitations after transplant, struggled with the burden of medication side effects and worried about a possible return to dialysis if the transplant failed. Clarifying patient expectations of transplantation, providing support to alleviate the debilitating impacts of immunosuppression and addressing fears about deteriorating health and graft failure may improve satisfaction and outcomes in elderly kidney transplant recipients.

A Rationale for Age-Adapted Immunosuppression in Organ Transplantation

Demographic changes are associated with a steady increase of older patients with end-stage organ failure in need for transplantation. As a result, the majority of transplant recipients are currently older than 50 years, and organs from elderly donors are more frequently used. Nevertheless, the benefit of transplantation in older patients is well recognized, whereas the most frequent causes of death among older recipients are potentially linked to side effects of their immunosuppressants.Immunosenescence is a physiological part of aging linked to higher rates of diabetes, bacterial infections, and malignancies representing the major causes of death in older patients. These age-related changes impact older transplant candidates and may have significant implications for an age-adapted immunosuppression. For instance, immunosenescence is linked to lower rates of acute rejections in older recipients, whereas the engraftment of older organs has been associated with higher rejection rates. Moreover, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation is more frequent in the elderly, potentially related to corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors.This review presents current knowledge for an age-adapted immunosuppression based on both, experimental and clinical studies in and beyond transplantation. Recommendations of maintenance and induction therapy may help to improve graft function and to design future clinical trials in the elderly.

Kidney Transplantation Among the Elderly: Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Outcomes

Elderly patients (>65 years old) represent the fastest growing population among the ESRD patients and those awaiting kidney transplantation. There is ample evidence to suggest that kidney transplant in the elderly population offers the best chance of survival and improves health-related quality of life compared to remaining on dialysis. Although all these emerging facts are encouraging, this population brings with them complex medical problems including frailty, cognitive impairment, and multiple comorbidities. These issues can be barriers to transplantation and threaten the well-being of the patients after transplantation. Furthermore, aging results in changes to the immune system and affects the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants. All these changes can increase risk of complications such as infections and malignancy. Because death with a functioning graft is a common cause of graft loss, the new kidney allocation system has been implemented in an attempt to maximize allograft utilization and minimize unrealized graft years. This may result in longer wait-times for the elderly. In this review, we will highlight the barriers to kidney transplant, characterize transplant-related issues in the elderly, and propose alternative strategies under the new allocation system.

Allocation strategies for elderly kidney transplant recipients

In all modern societies, the percentage of elderly people is increasing. However, this does not necessary reflect the percentage of patients waiting for a new kidney and the availability of organs for this entity differs markedly between countries. Thus, allocation strategies for elderly kidney recipients should be based on the characteristics of the specific countries and take into account: access to the waiting list and availability of living as well as marginal and conventional post-mortem donors.

Renal Transplantation in Recipients Older Than 65 Years: Retrospective Analysis of the Results of a 4-year (2008-2012) Experience

BACKGROUND

We analyze the results of renal transplantation among recipients older than 65 years old over a 4-year period (2008-2012) from a single renal transplantation unit and compare results with younger recipients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 2018 renal transplantations performed between November 2008 and December 2012. The χ(2) test was used for the comparison of categorical data, and the Student t test was used for the analysis of continuous variables. Patient and graft cumulative actuarial survivals were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and we tested for differences with the Mantel-Cox log-rank test.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (3.7%) recipients were aged ≥ 65 years with a median age of 68 (range, 65 to 82) years. Actuarial graft survivals at 1, 2, and 3 years were 93.8%, 92.5%, and 90.3%, respectively, for the <65 group and 89.7%, 88.1%, and 83.1%, respectively, for the ≥ 65 group (P < .03). Actuarial patient survivals at 1, 2, and 3 years were 96.3%, 95.5%, and 94.7%, respectively, for the younger and 91.8%, 90.2%, and 88%, respectively, for the older samples (P < .03). When graft survival was censored for patient death with a functioning kidney at 1, 2, and 3 years, the results were similar between groups with 95.5%, 94%, and 92.8%, respectively, for recipients aged <65 years and 94.7%, 89.2%, and 89.2%, respectively, for recipients aged ≥ 65 years (P = .213).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that renal transplantation in selected patients older than 65 years was associated with good outcomes; this indicates that it seems safe and effective to treat end-stage renal disease in the elderly knowing there are acceptable rates of graft and patient survival.

Challenges in early clinical drug development for ischemia-reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

In an effort to expand the donor pool, kidneys from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are increasingly utilised in renal transplantation. These kidneys suffer greater ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and have a higher incidence of delayed graft function. In the last 25 years, relatively few pharmacological therapies to reduce IRI have been tested in randomised controlled trials in renal transplantation and currently no pharmacological agents are routinely utilised for this purpose.

AREAS COVERED

The authors look at why promising treatments in pre-clinical studies have not translated to significant clinical benefit in human trials. This may reflect a translational disconnect between the pre-clinical models used and clinical problems that are encountered in the transplant population. They also discuss the issues in conducting clinical trials and its implication on drug development.

EXPERT OPINION

Translating pharmacological strategies for reducing IRI is highly challenging at every stage of development from pre-clinical studies to clinical trials. Scientific knowledge of the complexity of IRI is rapidly evolving and new treatments are expected to emerge. There are ethical barriers that prevent donor treatments, particularly in the DCD setting. However, new clinical techniques such as normothermic regional and ex-vivo perfusion represent exciting opportunities to utilise pharmacological agents earlier in the process of transplantation.

A simple clinical tool to inform the decision-making process to refer elderly incident dialysis patients for kidney transplant evaluation

Patients over the age of 70 constitute the fastest growing segment of the ESKD population worldwide, but most of them are not considered candidates for kidney transplantation (KT). We have developed a simple clinical screening score to identify incident elderly dialysis patients over 70 years with an acceptable long-term prognosis to identify those patients most suitable for KT evaluation. From the French national prospective registry, a logistic regression was used to develop a risk score of mortality within 3 years in a derivation cohort (years 2002-06) and validated in a separate cohort (years 2007-08). Of the 9305 patients in the derivation cohort, the points assigned for the score were: male (1pt); age (75-80); 2pts), (80-85; 5pts), 85 and over (9pts); diabetes (2pts); intermittent hemodialysis (2pt); peripheral vascular disease stage III-IV (5pts); congestive heart failure stages I-II (2pts), III-IV (4pts); dysrhythmia (2pts); chronic respiratory disease (2pts); active malignancy (5pts); severe behavioral disorder (6pts); cardiovascular disease (1pt); mobility (needs assistance for transfers (4pt), totally dependent (9pts)); BMI (21-25; 1pt), BMI (<21; 3pts); and temporary central vascular catheter (3pts). In the 7947 patient validation cohort, the probability of patients being alive within 3 years was around 70% for the lowest risk score quintile (0-6 pts) representing about 20% of incident patients. Thus, our tool identified a subgroup of patients to help nephrologists select individuals who, despite their age, could be suitable candidates for KT evaluation.