51
|
GLA:D® Back Australia: a mixed methods feasibility study for implementation. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:17. [PMID: 35392935 PMCID: PMC8989099 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00427-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Practice-based guidelines recommend patient education and exercise as first-line care for low back pain (LBP); however, these recommendations are not routinely delivered in practice. GLA:D® Back, developed in Denmark to assist clinicians to implement guideline recommendations, offers a structured education and supervised exercise program for people with LBP in addition to a clinical registry to evaluate patient outcomes. In this study we evaluated the feasibility of implementing the GLA:D® Back program in Australia. We considered clinician and patient recruitment and retention, program fidelity, exploring clinicians’ and patients’ experiences with the program, and participant outcome data collection. Methods Clinicians (chiropractors and physiotherapists) were recruited and participated in a 2-day GLA:D® Back training course. Patients were eligible to participate if they had persistent or recurrent LBP. Feasibility domains included the ability to: (1) recruit clinicians to undergo training; (2) recruit and retain patients in the program; (3) observe program fidelity; and (4) perceive barriers and facilitators for GLA:D® Back implementation. We also collected data related to: (5) clinician confidence, attitudes, and behaviour; and (6) patient self-reported outcomes related to pain, disability, and performance tests. Results Twenty clinicians (8 chiropractors, 12 physiotherapists) participated in the training, with 55% (11/20) offering GLA:D® Back to their patients. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the program, with 67% (38/57) attending the final follow-up assessment. Loss to follow up was mainly due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. We observed program fidelity, with clinicians generally delivering the program as intended. Interviews revealed two clinician themes related to: (i) intervention acceptability; and (ii) barriers and facilitators to implementation. Patient interviews revealed themes related to: (i) intervention acceptability; and (ii) program efficacy. At 3 months follow-up, clinicians demonstrated high treatment confidence and biomedical orientation. Patient outcomes trended towards improvement. Conclusion GLA:D® Back implementation in Australia appears feasible based on clinician recruitment, program acceptability and potential benefits for patient outcomes from the small sample of participating clinicians and patients. However, COVID-19 impacted patient recruitment, retention, and data collection. To scale-up GLA:D® Back in private and public settings, further work is warranted to address associated barriers, and to leverage facilitators. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-022-00427-3.
Collapse
|
52
|
Feldman R, Haleva-Amir S, Pincus T, Ben Ami N. Physiotherapists' perceptions of implementing evidence-based practice for patients with low back pain through the Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract 2022:1-12. [PMID: 35384785 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2062690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physiotherapists have been urged to implement evidence-based practice for the management of low back pain (LBP). However, recent evidence suggests that many fail to do so, specifically in accordance with eliciting and addressing psychosocial factors that impact pain. The Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI) for the Treatment of patients with LBP was developed in Israel according to the clinical guidelines and demonstrated clinically and cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVES This study's purpose is to explore physiotherapists' perceptions of implementing evidence-based practice through the ETMI approach. DESIGN Qualitative study. METHODS Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 physiotherapists. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically to identify prevalent themes. RESULTS Three main themes were identified from the transcripts, consisting of barriers and facilitators of implementing the intervention, and a meta-theme referring to shifts in the perceptions of professional role and identity. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that physiotherapists believed that implementing ETMI and adopting a psychosocial approach to LBP can be achieved by overcoming issues around communication skills, patient reassurance, and inter-professional collaboration. Therapists also highlighted the need for physiotherapy training to gain skills in combined physical and psychological approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Feldman
- Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.,Department of Physiotherapy, "Maccabi" Healthcare Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Tamar Pincus
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Noa Ben Ami
- Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Jenkins HJ, Kongsted A, French SD, Jensen TS, Doktor K, Hartvigsen J, Hancock M. Patients with low back pain presenting for chiropractic care who want diagnostic imaging are more likely to receive referral for imaging: a cross-sectional study. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:16. [PMID: 35379281 PMCID: PMC8978373 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00425-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear if the use of imaging for low back pain (LBP) is impacted by patient beliefs. This study aimed to: (1) describe beliefs about the importance of imaging and whether patients wanted imaging when presenting for chiropractic care for LBP; (2) describe associations between baseline patient characteristics and imaging beliefs and whether patients wanted imaging; and (3) determine whether patients who believed imaging to be important in the management of LBP, or who wanted to receive imaging, were more likely to receive an imaging referral. METHODS Cross-sectional observational data was collected between November 2016 to December 2019 from 10 primary care chiropractic clinics in Denmark. Consecutive patients aged 18 or older and presenting with a new episode of LBP were included (N = 2818). Beliefs about the importance of imaging (two questions) and whether imaging was wanted (one question) were collected at the initial visit, together with baseline participant characteristics and whether an imaging referral was provided. Associations between imaging beliefs/desire to receive imaging and participant characteristics were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The relationships between imaging beliefs and desire to receive imaging with subsequent imaging referral were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for pre-selected confounder variables. RESULTS Approximately one third of participants believed imaging to be important for the management of LBP (29.5% (95%CI 27.8, 31.3) or 41.5% (95%CI 39.6, 43.3) depending on the two imaging beliefs questions). Approximately one quarter (26.1%, 95%CI 24.5, 27.7) of participants wanted to receive an imaging referral. Participants were more likely to believe in the importance of imaging or want an imaging referral if they had a longer duration of LBP, history of previous imaging for LBP, or a lower completed education level. Participants who wanted imaging at the initial consult were more likely to receive an imaging referral (Odds ratio; 95%CI 1.6; 1.2, 2.1). CONCLUSIONS Approximately one third of patients presenting for chiropractic care in Denmark believed imaging to be important in the management of LBP. One quarter wanted imaging at the initial consult. Patients' desire for imaging appeared to impact the use of diagnostic imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazel J Jenkins
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Simon D French
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tue Secher Jensen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark.,Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Klaus Doktor
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mark Hancock
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Horppu R, Väänänen A, Kausto J. Evaluation of a guidelines implementation intervention to reduce work disability and sick leaves related to chronic musculoskeletal pain: a theory-informed qualitative study in occupational health care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:272. [PMID: 35317760 PMCID: PMC8938719 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05234-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines for pain management and sick leave prescription were formulated and implemented in an occupational health services (OHS) in Finland to reduce work disability and sick leaves related to musculoskeletal pain. We investigated how the guidelines implementation intervention may have produced its effects, how the number of prescribed sick leave days varied before and after the launch of the guidelines, and which factors beyond physician behaviour were seen to influence sick leaves. Methods Seventeen physicians, two occupational physiotherapists and one occupational health care nurse were interviewed. Qualitative content analysis using both inductive and deductive approaches was performed, informed by Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework. Employees’ sick leave days related to musculoskeletal disorders in 2015–2019 were drawn from the employer’s register. Results Physicians’ guidelines adherence was facilitated by psychological capability (e.g., having relevant knowledge, remembering to engage in recommended behaviours), reflective motivation (e.g., guidelines-related behaviours regarded as central part of one’s professional role; beliefs in the positive consequences of recommended behaviours to employees and employers), and physical and social opportunities (e.g., adequate physical resources, culture of social support). Some physicians also described barriers to recommended behaviours (e.g., lack of knowledge or non-pharmacological pain treatment tools). The guidelines had served as sources of new knowledge, reminders of recommended practices and means of self-assessment. Considerable declining trend of prescribed sick leave days was detected, especially during the first years after the intervention, levelling off somewhat thereafter. OHS policies and structures were seen to enable professionals’ focusing on preventing pain-related disability and prolonged sick leaves. The decline of sickness absences was also attributed to the municipal client organization’s commitment and the employees’ positive attitudes towards the alternatives to full-time sick leave. Conclusions The guidelines implementation intervention was found successful. The study showed the importance of social and organizational environment supporting physicians’ engagement in recommended practices. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05234-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritva Horppu
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O Box 40, 00032, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Ari Väänänen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O Box 40, 00032, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Kausto
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O Box 40, 00032, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Murphy DR, Justice B, Bise CG, Timko M, Stevans JM, Schneider MJ. The primary spine practitioner as a new role in healthcare systems in North America. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:6. [PMID: 35139859 PMCID: PMC8826679 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00414-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In an article published in 2011, we discussed the need for a new role in health care systems, referred to as the Primary Spine Practitioner (PSP). The PSP model was proposed to help bring order to the chaotic nature of spine care. Over the past decade, several efforts have applied the concepts presented in that article. The purpose of the present article is to discuss the ongoing need for the PSP role in health care systems, present persistent barriers, report several examples of the model in action, and propose future strategies. Main body The management of spine related disorders, defined here as various disorders related to the spine that produce axial pain, radiculopathy and other related symptoms, has received significant international attention due to the high costs and relatively poor outcomes in spine care. The PSP model seeks to bring increased efficiency, effectiveness and value. The barriers to the implementation of this model have been significant, and responses to these barriers are discussed. Several examples of PSP integration are presented, including clinic systems in primary care and hospital environments, underserved areas around the world and a program designed to reduce surgical waiting lists. Future strategies are proposed for overcoming the continuing barriers to PSP implementation in health care systems more broadly. Conclusion Significant progress has been made toward integrating the PSP role into health care systems over the past 10 years. However, much work remains. This requires substantial effort on the part of those involved in the development and implementation of the PSP model, in addition to support from various stakeholders who will benefit from the proposed improvements in spine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald R Murphy
- Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 133 Dellwood Road, Cranston, RI, 02920, USA
| | - Brian Justice
- Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, 165 Court Street, Rochester, NY, 14647, USA
| | - Christopher G Bise
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point 1, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 210, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219-3130, USA
| | - Michael Timko
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point Suite 228, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 210, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219-3130, USA
| | - Joel M Stevans
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point 1, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 500, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219-3130, USA
| | - Michael J Schneider
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point 1, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 500, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219-3130, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Pereira VC, Silva SN, Carvalho VKS, Zanghelini F, Barreto JOM. Strategies for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in public health: an overview of systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:13. [PMID: 35073897 PMCID: PMC8785489 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00815-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
As a source of readily available evidence, rigorously synthesized and interpreted by expert clinicians and methodologists, clinical guidelines are part of an evidence-based practice toolkit, which, transformed into practice recommendations, have the potential to improve both the process of care and patient outcomes. In Brazil, the process of development and updating of the clinical guidelines for the Brazilian Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS) is already well systematized by the Ministry of Health. However, the implementation process of those guidelines has not yet been discussed and well structured. Therefore, the first step of this project and the primary objective of this study was to summarize the evidence on the effectiveness of strategies used to promote clinical practice guideline implementation and dissemination.
Methods
This overview used systematic review methodology to locate and evaluate published systematic reviews regarding strategies for clinical practice guideline implementation and adhered to the PRISMA guidelines for systematic review (PRISMA).
Results
This overview identified 36 systematic reviews regarding 30 strategies targeting healthcare organizations, healthcare providers and patients to promote guideline implementation. The most reported interventions were educational materials, educational meetings, reminders, academic detailing and audit and feedback. Care pathways—single intervention, educational meeting—single intervention, organizational culture, and audit and feedback—both strategies implemented in combination with others—were strategies categorized as generally effective from the systematic reviews. In the meta-analyses, when used alone, organizational culture, educational intervention and reminders proved to be effective in promoting physicians' adherence to the guidelines. When used in conjunction with other strategies, organizational culture also proved to be effective. For patient-related outcomes, education intervention showed effective results for disease target results at a short and long term.
Conclusion
This overview provides a broad summary of the best evidence on guideline implementation. Even if the included literature highlights the various limitations related to the lack of standardization, the methodological quality of the studies, and especially the lack of conclusion about the superiority of one strategy over another, the summary of the results provided by this study provides information on strategies that have been most widely studied in the last few years and their effectiveness in the context in which they were applied. Therefore, this panorama can support strategy decision-making adequate for SUS and other health systems, seeking to positively impact on the appropriate use of guidelines, healthcare outcomes and the sustainability of the SUS.
Collapse
|
57
|
García-Martínez E, Soler-González J, Blanco-Blanco J, Rubí-Carnacea F, Masbernat-Almenara M, Valenzuela-Pascual F. Misbeliefs about non-specific low back pain and attitudes towards treatment by primary care providers in Spain: a qualitative study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:9. [PMID: 35172719 PMCID: PMC8759168 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01617-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
AIM To identify misbeliefs about the origin and meaning of non-specific chronic low back pain and to examine attitudes towards treatment by primary health care providers. DESIGN Generic qualitative study. METHODS Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted between October and November 2016 with physicians and nurses from primary health care centres in Lleida. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using inductive thematic analysis via Atlas.ti-8 software. RESULTS Five themes were identified: i. beliefs about the origin and meaning of chronic low back pain, ii. psychosocial aspects of pain modulators, iii. Therapeutic exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain, iv. biomedical attitudes of primary health care providers, and v. difficulties in the clinical approach to chronic low back pain. CONCLUSION Primary health care providers have a unifactorial view of chronic low back pain and base their approach on the biomedical model. Professionals attribute chronic low back pain to structural alterations in the lumbar spine while psychosocial factors are only recognized as pain modulators. For professionals, therapeutic exercise represents a possible solution to chronic low back pain; however, they still do not prescribe it and continue to educate on postural hygiene and recommend limiting physical and/or occupational activities, as opposed to clinical practice guidelines. These findings suggest that to improve the adherence of primary health care providers to the biopsychosocial model, it may be necessary first to modify their misbeliefs about non-specific chronic low back pain by increasing their knowledge on pain neurophysiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02962817 . Date of registration: 11/11/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester García-Martínez
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, The University of Lleida, Montserrat Roig, 2, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group, GRECS, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Jorge Soler-González
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Institut Català de la Salut and Department of Medicine - University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Joan Blanco-Blanco
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, The University of Lleida, Montserrat Roig, 2, 25198, Lleida, Spain.
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
- Health Care Research Group, GRECS, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.
| | - Francesc Rubí-Carnacea
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, The University of Lleida, Montserrat Roig, 2, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group, GRECS, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - María Masbernat-Almenara
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, The University of Lleida, Montserrat Roig, 2, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group, GRECS, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Fran Valenzuela-Pascual
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, The University of Lleida, Montserrat Roig, 2, 25198, Lleida, Spain
- Group for the Study of Society Health Education and Culture, GESEC, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group, GRECS, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
O'Hagan ET, Skinner IW, Jones MD, Karran EL, Traeger AC, Cashin AG, Wand BM, Schabrun SM, O'Neill S, Harris IA, McAuley JH. Development and measurement properties of the AxEL (attitude toward education and advice for low-back-pain) questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:4. [PMID: 35012565 PMCID: PMC8744221 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01908-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinician time and resources may be underutilised if the treatment they offer does not match patient expectations and attitudes. We developed a questionnaire (AxEL-Q) to guide clinicians toward elements of first-line care that are pertinent to their patients with low back pain. METHODS We used guidance from the COSMIN consortium to develop the questionnaire and evaluated it in a sample of people with low back pain of any duration. Participants were recruited from the community, were over 18 years and fluent in English. Statements that represented first-line care were identified. Semantic scales were used to measure attitude towards these statements. These items were combined to develop the questionnaire draft. Construct validity was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis and hypotheses testing, comparing to the Back Beliefs Questionnaire and modified Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Reliability was evaluated and floor and ceiling effects calculated. RESULTS We recruited 345 participants, and had complete data for analysis for 313 participants. The questionnaire draft was reduced to a 3-Factor questionnaire through exploratory factor analysis. Factor 1 comprised 9 items and evaluated Attitude toward staying active, Factor 2 comprised 4 items and evaluated Attitude toward low back pain being rarely caused by a serious health problem, Factor 3 comprised 4 items and evaluated Attitude toward not needing to know the cause of back pain to manage it effectively. There was a strong inverse association between each factor and the Back Beliefs Questionnaire and a moderate positive association with the modified Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Each independent factor demonstrated acceptable internal consistency; Cronbach α Factor 1 = 0.92, Factor 2 = 0.91, Factor 3 = 0.90 and adequate interclass correlation coefficients; Factor 1 = 0.71, Factor 2 = 0.73, Factor 3 = 0.79. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates acceptable construct validity and reliability of the AxEL-Q, providing clinicians with an insight into the likelihood of patients following first-line care at the outset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edel T O'Hagan
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Ian W Skinner
- School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew D Jones
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emma L Karran
- IIMPACT in Health, UniSA: Allied Health and Human Performance, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Aidan G Cashin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Benedict M Wand
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | - Siobhan M Schabrun
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Sean O'Neill
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool Hospital, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian A Harris
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool Hospital, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James H McAuley
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Ballengee LA, Zullig LL, George SZ. Implementation of Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy for Low Back Pain: Where Do We Stand, Where Do We Go? J Pain Res 2021; 14:3747-3757. [PMID: 34908873 PMCID: PMC8665872 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s311973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Low back pain continues to be a leading cause of disability and cost throughout the world. Evidence-based guidelines recommend use of non-pharmacological interventions to address decreases in physical function due to low back pain. Psychologically informed physical therapy (PIPT) is one way to effectively and efficiently address the need for non-pharmacological approaches. However, adoption of psychologically informed practice (PiP) by physical therapists has shown mixed results due to implementation challenges. In this perspective, we discuss the current state of PIPT training and implementation. We also propose a conceptual roadmap for future implementation needs related to increasing delivery of PIPT-informed approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay A Ballengee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of Physical Therapy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Steven Z George
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Shah S, Prakash V. Limited evidence exists on determinants of physiotherapists' adherence to high value interventions in nonspecific low back pain management: A scoping review. Musculoskeletal Care 2021; 20:442-453. [PMID: 34875125 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Examining the emerging body of evidence investigating what drives physiotherapist's clinical decisions in the management of low back pain can guide future research into identifying barriers and facilitators of their adherence to evidence recommended interventions. OBJECTIVE To establish the body of evidence regarding factors that improve or hinder physiotherapists' adherence to high-value interventions on the management of non-specific low back pain. DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS We conducted a Scoping review by searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases on 13 February 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved literature and selected articles for inclusion. We included quantitative research that investigated an association between physiotherapists' personal characteristics or setting related characteristics with their clinical management of patients with non-specific low back pain. RESULTS Twelve studies reported in 13 publications were included. The majority of the studies were conducted in high-income countries including, the United States, Canada and UK. Twenty-six factors were investigated as potentially influencing physiotherapists' adherence to high value interventions in low back pain management. The most commonly examined physiotherapists' attributes were educational qualification that is postgraduate or certification course (58%, N = 7 studies), years of experience (41%, N = 5 studies), and beliefs and attitude about low back pain (41%, N = 5 studies). Work setting (N = 4) and workload (N = 3) were frequently investigated setting related factors. CONCLUSION Currently, there is limited evidence available to understand determinants controlling practice behaviours of physiotherapists' management of nonspecific low back pain. Future researches conceptualized within contemporary theories of clinician behaviour change and models of knowledge translation are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sweni Shah
- Ashok and Rita Patel Institute of Physiotherapy, Charotar University of Science and Technology (CHARUSAT), Changa, Anand, Gujarat, India
| | - V Prakash
- Ashok and Rita Patel Institute of Physiotherapy, Charotar University of Science and Technology (CHARUSAT), Changa, Anand, Gujarat, India
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Jenkins HJ, Kongsted A, French SD, Jensen TS, Doktor K, Hartvigsen J, Hancock M. What are the effects of diagnostic imaging on clinical outcomes in patients with low back pain presenting for chiropractic care: a matched observational study. Chiropr Man Therap 2021; 29:46. [PMID: 34814923 PMCID: PMC8611826 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-021-00403-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence suggests that diagnostic imaging for low back pain does not improve care in the absence of suspicion of serious pathology. However, the effect of imaging use on clinical outcomes has not been investigated in patients presenting to chiropractors. The aim of this study was to determine if diagnostic imaging affects clinical outcomes in patients with low back pain presenting for chiropractic care. Methods A matched observational study using prospective longitudinal observational data with one year follow up was performed in primary care chiropractic clinics in Denmark. Data was collected from November 2016 to December 2019. Participants included low back pain patients presenting for chiropractic care, who were either referred or not referred for diagnostic imaging during their initial visit. Patients were excluded if they were less than 18 years old, had a diagnosis of underlying pathology, or had previous imaging relevant to their current clinical presentation. Coarsened exact matching was used to match participants referred for diagnostic imaging with participants not referred for diagnostic imaging on baseline variables including participant demographics, pain characteristics, and clinical history. Mixed linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of imaging on back pain intensity and disability at two-weeks, three-months, and one-year, and on global perceived effect and satisfaction with care at two-weeks. Results 2162 patients were included, with 24.1% referred for imaging. Near perfect balance between matched groups was achieved for baseline variables except age and leg pain. Participants referred for imaging had slightly higher back pain intensity at two-weeks (0.4, 95%CI: 0.1, 0.8) and one-year (0.4, 95%CI: 0.0, 0.7), and disability at two-weeks (5.7, 95%CI: 1.4, 10.0), but the changes are unlikely to be clinically meaningful. No difference between groups was found for the other outcome measures. Similar results were found when sensitivity analysis, adjusted for age and leg pain intensity, was performed. Conclusions Diagnostic imaging did not result in better clinical outcomes in patients with low back pain presenting for chiropractic care. These results support that current guideline recommendations against routine imaging apply equally to chiropractic practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazel J Jenkins
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Rm 347, 17 Wally's Walk, Sydney, 2109, Australia.
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Simon D French
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Rm 347, 17 Wally's Walk, Sydney, 2109, Australia
| | - Tue Secher Jensen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark.,Diagnostic Centre - Imaging Section, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Klaus Doktor
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mark Hancock
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Rm 347, 17 Wally's Walk, Sydney, 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Siddle HJ, Chapman LS, Mankia K, Zăbălan C, Kouloumas M, Raza K, Falahee M, Kerry J, Kerschbaumer A, Aletaha D, Emery P, Richards SH. Perceptions and experiences of individuals at-risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) knowing about their risk of developing RA and being offered preventive treatment: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 81:159-168. [PMID: 34750103 PMCID: PMC8762008 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Objectives There is increasing interest in identifying individuals at-risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and initiating early treatment to prevent or delay the onset of arthritis. We aimed to describe the perceptions and experiences of at-risk individuals and to inform the conduct of clinical trials and studies, and clinical practice. Methods A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies was conducted. Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion, appraised their methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist and assessed confidence in the findings using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation–Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approach. Results Seven studies involving 115 individuals at-risk of developing RA were included. Three major themes (seven subthemes) were identified: understanding the risk of developing RA (knowledge of RA and identification of potential risk factors); preventive interventions to reduce the risk of developing RA (understanding the value and role of preventive interventions, and engagement with preventive interventions); and perceptions of predictive testing for RA (benefits of predictive testing, decision to undertake predictive testing and concerns about predictive testing). Moderate confidence in most review findings was evident. Conclusion While there are clear benefits in informing individuals at-risk of RA about their risk following predictive testing and offering preventive treatment, there are potential barriers to engagement, intensified by the burden of uncertainty. Identification of the optimum approaches for presenting risk information, including the risks and benefits of engaging with preventive interventions, is urgently needed to support individuals at-risk of RA in their decision making. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021236034.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi J Siddle
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lara S Chapman
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Kulveer Mankia
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Karim Raza
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marie Falahee
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joel Kerry
- Library and Information Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
63
|
Collard VEJ, Moore C, Nichols V, Ellard DR, Patel S, Sandhu H, Parsons H, Sharma U, Underwood M, Madan J, Tang NKY. Challenges and visions for managing pain-related insomnia in primary care using the hybrid CBT approach: a small-scale qualitative interview study with GPs, nurses, and practice managers. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:210. [PMID: 34666682 PMCID: PMC8527665 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01552-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
Background Chronic pain and insomnia have a complex, bidirectional relationship – addressing sleep complaints alongside pain may be key to alleviating patient-reported distress and disability. Healthcare professionals have consistently reported wanting to offer psychologically informed chronic pain management at the primary care level. Research in secondary care has demonstrated good treatment efficacy of hybrid CBT for chronic pain and insomnia. However, primary care is typically the main point of treatment entry, hence may be better situated to offer treatments using a multidisciplinary approach. In this study, primary care service providers’ perception of feasibility for tackling pain-related insomnia in primary care was explored. Methods The data corpus originates from a feasibility trial exploring hybrid CBT for chronic pain and insomnia delivered in primary care. This formed three in-depth group interviews with primary care staff (n = 9) from different primary care centres from the same NHS locale. All interviews were conducted on-site using a semi-structured approach. Verbal data was recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the thematic analysis process. Results Eight themes were identified – 1) Discrepant conceptualisations of the chronic pain-insomnia relationship and clinical application, 2) Mismatch between patients’ needs and available treatment offerings, 3) Awareness of psychological complexities, 4) Identified treatment gap for pain-related insomnia, 5) Lack of funding and existing infrastructure for new service development, 6) General shortage of psychological services for complex health conditions, 7) Multidisciplinary team provision with pain specialist input, and 8) Accessibility through primary care. These mapped onto four domains - Current understanding and practice, Perceived facilitators, Perceived barriers, Ideal scenarios for a new treatment service – which reflected the focus of our investigation. Taken together these provide key context for understanding challenges faced by health care professionals in considering and developing a new clinical service. Conclusions Primary care service providers from one locale advocate better, multidisciplinary treatment provision for chronic pain and insomnia. Findings suggest that situating this in primary care could be a feasible option, but this requires systemic support and specialist input as well as definitive trials for success. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01552-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V E J Collard
- Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
| | - C Moore
- Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - V Nichols
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - D R Ellard
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.,University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - S Patel
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - H Sandhu
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - H Parsons
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.,University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - U Sharma
- University/User Teaching and Research Action Partnership, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - M Underwood
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.,University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - J Madan
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - N K Y Tang
- Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Reddington M, Baxter S, Walters SJ. A qualitative exploration of patient experiences of medication for sciatica. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2021; 55:102419. [PMID: 34186473 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sciatica is often a painful and disabling condition, with medication routinely the first line of management. It is important to describe patients experiences of taking medication for sciatica, the reasons for commencing and reasons for cessation, the effects of the medication in symptom management and any other potential positive or deleterious effects. OBJECTIVES To describe patient experiences of medication for the relief of symptoms of sciatica. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative analysis of data from a mixed-methods randomised controlled pilot study. METHODS A total of 46 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 consenting participants (19 female) recruited from 14 GP practices. A purposive sampling strategy ensured a range of age, severity of pain and disability. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim prior to thematic analysis, which aimed to identify the important, interesting or divergent views within the data. FINDINGS Participant experiences of pain were often severe with significant disability and fear. The use of a combination of medications was common, including the use of opioids and other medication inconsistent with national (NICE) guidance. Most participants found medication ineffective and reported significant side-effects, often necessitating cessation of the drugs or the use of alternatives. Despite the regularity of participants stopping all medication for sciatica, their pain levels still significantly eased over the 6-month period of the study. CONCLUSIONS The study highlighted a lack of perceived effectiveness for prescribed medication, often with concomitant side-effects. Clinicians should be cognisant of the fears that patients hold in terms of the cause and severity of sciatica, as well as fears of prescribed medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Reddington
- Therapy Services Outpatient Department Northern General Hospital Herries Road Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK.
| | - Susan Baxter
- Section of Public Health ScHARR, University of Sheffield 30 Regents Court Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Stephen J Walters
- Designs, Trials and Statistics, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, 30 Regents Court, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Bellosta-López P, Domenech-Garcia V, Palsson TS, Christensen SW, Silva PDB, Langella F, Berjano P, Jensen PS, Riis A, Baroncini A, Blasco-Abadía J, Jiménez-Sánchez C, Calvo S, Jaén-Carrillo D, Herrero P, Hoegh M. European knowledge alliance for innovative measures in prevention of work-related musculoskeletal pain disorders (Prevent4Work Project): protocol for an international mixed-methods longitudinal study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e052602. [PMID: 34521678 PMCID: PMC8442076 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Work-related musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a highly prevalent condition and one of the main contributors to disability and loss of work capacity. Current approaches to the management and prevention of work-related MSK pain do not consistently integrate current evidence-based knowledge and seem to be outdated. The Prevent4Work (P4W) Project aims to collect and spread evidence-based information to improve the management and prevention of work-related MSK pain. P4W will longitudinally investigate (1) risk factors associated with the prevalence of work-related MSK pain, (2) predictive factors for new events of work-related MSK pain in the short term and (3) the modification of pain beliefs after participating in evidence-based e-learning courses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This project employs a mixed-methods design with international cohorts of workers from Spain, Italy and Denmark. All participants will be assessed using self-reported variables at baseline (ie, cross-sectional design) with follow-up after 3 and 6 months (ie, prospective-predictive design). Throughout the first phase (0-3 months), all participants will be offered to self-enrol in e-learning courses on work-related MSK pain. Changes in pain beliefs (if any) will be assessed. The dataset will include sociodemographic characteristics, physical and psychological job demands, lifestyle-related factors, MSK pain history and pain beliefs. At baseline, all participants will additionally complete the P4W questionnaire developed to detect populations at high risk of suffering work-related MSK pain.Descriptive statistics, binary logistic regression, and analysis of variance will be used to identify the significant factors that influence the history of work-related MSK pain, evaluate the short-term prediction capacity of the P4W questionnaire, and investigate whether workers' participation in e-learning courses will modify their pain beliefs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study received ethical approval from the Ethical Committee of San Jorge University (USJ011-19/20). The results will be made available via peer-reviewed publications, international conferences and P4W official channels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Steffan Wittrup Christensen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Francesco Langella
- Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pedro Berjano
- Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Palle Schlott Jensen
- Department of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Allan Riis
- Department of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Alice Baroncini
- Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Julia Blasco-Abadía
- Department of Physiotherapy, San Jorge University, Villanueva de Gallego, Spain
| | | | - Sandra Calvo
- Department of Physiotherapy, San Jorge University, Villanueva de Gallego, Spain
| | - Diego Jaén-Carrillo
- Department of Physiotherapy, San Jorge University, Villanueva de Gallego, Spain
| | - Pablo Herrero
- Physiatry and Nursing, Zaragoza University, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Morten Hoegh
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Simula AS, Jenkins HJ, Hancock MJ, Malmivaara A, Booth N, Karppinen J. Patient education booklet to support evidence-based low back pain care in primary care - a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:178. [PMID: 34493219 PMCID: PMC8422671 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01529-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate imaging and low-value care for low back pain (LBP) are common. A new patient-education booklet was created to overcome identified barriers to the delivery of recommended care, including the use of inappropriate imaging. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of this booklet as part of primary care for LBP patients in comparison to usual care. METHODS A cluster-randomized trial was performed. The intervention involved providing practitioners with the new patient-education booklet and a 30-min training session on its use. The booklet was provided during the clinical consult to all consenting LBP patients in the intervention group. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients presenting with LBP who underwent imaging examinations during the first three months of follow-up and PROMIS PF-20 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, 20-item physical functioning short form) change between baseline and three-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes, including sick leave and imaging examinations at 12 months, were investigated. Logistic regression using GEE-estimation was used for dichotomous outcomes, Poisson regression using GEE-estimation for count outcomes, and linear mixed models for continuous outcomes. RESULTS Using the patient education booklet appeared to substantially reduce the proportion of LBP patients who underwent an imaging examination at three months, but the result was not statistically significant (OR 0.57, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.27 to 1.22). At 12 months, the effect was slightly larger and statistically significant (OR 0.50, 95%Cl 0.30 to 0.83, p = 0.008). No difference was observed in the PROMIS PF-20 T-score change between baseline and 3 months or 12 months (p = 0.365 and p = 0.923, respectively). The number of sick leave days in the intervention group was less than that in the control group at 3 months (RR 0.47, 95%Cl 0.26 to 0.83, p = 0.010) and at 12 months (RR 0.36, 95%Cl 0.18 to 0.72, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS The booklet appeared to be effective in reducing the proportion of LBP patients who underwent imaging examinations over 12 months. The intervention had no discernible effect on the PROMIS PF20 T-score change. The number of sick leave days was substantially lower in the intervention group. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN14389368 , Registered 4 April 2019-Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna S Simula
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, 90014, Oulu, Finland. .,Department of General Medicine, the South Savo Social and Health Care Authority, Porrassalmenkatu 35-37, 50100, Mikkeli, Finland.
| | - Hazel J Jenkins
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Balaclava Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.,Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Balaclava Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Balaclava Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Antti Malmivaara
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Neill Booth
- Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33014, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jaro Karppinen
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, 90014, Oulu, Finland.,Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Aapistie 1, 90220, Oulu, Finland.,Rehabilitation Services of South Karelia Social and Health Care District, Lappeenranta, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Bussières A, Cancelliere C, Ammendolia C, Comer CM, Zoubi FA, Châtillon CE, Chernish G, Cox JM, Gliedt JA, Haskett D, Jensen RK, Marchand AA, Tomkins-Lane C, O'Shaughnessy J, Passmore S, Schneider MJ, Shipka P, Stewart G, Stuber K, Yee A, Ornelas J. Non-Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Leading To Neurogenic Claudication: A Clinical Practice Guideline. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2021; 22:1015-1039. [PMID: 33857615 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) causing neurogenic claudication (NC) is increasingly common with an aging population and can be associated with significant symptoms and functional limitations. We developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on nonsurgical management of patients with LSS causing NC. Using the GRADE approach, a multidisciplinary guidelines panel based recommendations on evidence from a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews published through June 2019, or expert consensus. The literature monitored up to October 2020. Clinical outcomes evaluated included pain, disability, quality of life, and walking capacity. The target audience for this guideline includes all clinicians, and the target patient population includes adults with LSS (congenital and/or acquired, lateral recess or central canal, with or without low back pain, with or without spondylolisthesis) causing NC. The guidelines panel developed 6 recommendations based on randomized controlled trials and 5 others based on professional consensus, summarized in 3 overarching recommendations: (Grade: statements are all conditional/weak recommendations) Recommendation 1. For patients with LSS causing NC, clinicians and patients may initially select multimodal care nonpharmacological therapies with education, advice and lifestyle changes, behavioral change techniques in conjunction with home exercise, manual therapy, and/or rehabilitation (moderate-quality evidence), traditional acupuncture on a trial basis (very low-quality evidence), and postoperative rehabilitation (supervised program of exercises and/or educational materials encouraging activity) with cognitive-behavioral therapy 12 weeks postsurgery (low-quality evidence). Recommendation 2. In patients LSS causing NC, clinicians and patients may consider a trial of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or tricyclic antidepressants. (very low-quality evidence). Recommendation 3. For patients LSS causing NC, we recommend against the use of the following pharmacological therapies: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, methylcobalamin, calcitonin, paracetamol, opioids, muscle relaxants, pregabalin (consensus-based), gabapentin (very low-quality), and epidural steroidal injections (high-quality evidence). PERSPECTIVE: This guideline, on the basis of a systematic review of the evidence on the nonsurgical management of lumbar spine stenosis, provides recommendations developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Safe and effective non-surgical management of lumbar spine stenosis should be on the basis of a plan of care tailored to the individual and the type of treatment involved, and multimodal care is recommended in most situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Bussières
- School of Physical Medicine & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Carolina Cancelliere
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Canada
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto and Mount Sinai Hospital, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine M Comer
- Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom/ Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Fadi Al Zoubi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| | | | - Greg Chernish
- Family Medicine at the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Jordan A Gliedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Rikke Krüger Jensen
- NIKKB and Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Andrée-Anne Marchand
- Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christy Tomkins-Lane
- Department of Health and Physical Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada
| | - Julie O'Shaughnessy
- Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
| | - Steven Passmore
- Faculty of Kinesiology & Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Michael J Schneider
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Kent Stuber
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Albert Yee
- Health Systems Management, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joseph Ornelas
- American Hip Institute, Des Plaines, Illinois; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Impacts of a Re-designed Care Path for Back Pain Directing Patients to Physiotherapists: A Pre-Post Intervention Study. J Occup Environ Med 2021; 63:e276-e282. [PMID: 33605653 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate impact of directing patients with back pain for first visit to a physiotherapist on sick leaves, healthcare utilization, and patient satisfaction. METHODS Pre-post intervention study of 70,138 patients treated in Poland for back pain: 27,034 before the care pathway redesign and 43,104 after. RESULTS After the redesign, all per-patient measures (mean ± SD) significantly decreased over the 12-month follow-up: sick leaves number from 0.32 ± 0.87 to 0.29 ± 0.86, sick leaves days from 2.78 ± 11.56 to 2.56 ± 11.25, doctors' visits from 2.02 ± 1.70 to 1.51 ± 1.63, diagnostic imaging services from 0.63 ± 0.79 to 0.43 ± 0.71 and rehabilitation services from 7.55 ± 14.90 to 4.70 ± 12.61.The Net Promoter Score was higher for physiotherapist (83), than for orthopedists (59), primary care (74), or neurologists (67). CONCLUSIONS Involving physiotherapists early in the back pain care may result in benefits for patients and healthcare organizations.
Collapse
|
69
|
Singh G, McNamee G, Sharpe L, Lucas M, Lewis P, Newton C, O’Sullivan P, Lin I, O’Sullivan K. Psychological, social and lifestyle screening of people with low back pain treated by physiotherapists in a National Health Service musculoskeletal service: an audit. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/21679169.2021.1950208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gurpreet Singh
- Physiotherapy Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - George McNamee
- Physiotherapy Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Laura Sharpe
- Physiotherapy Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Michael Lucas
- Physiotherapy Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Paul Lewis
- Physiotherapy Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Christopher Newton
- Physiotherapy Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter O’Sullivan
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Ivan Lin
- WA Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia, Geraldton, Australia
| | - Kieran O’Sullivan
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Ng W, Slater H, Starcevich C, Wright A, Mitchell T, Beales D. Barriers and enablers influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Pain 2021; 162:2154-2185. [PMID: 33534357 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT A substantial evidence-practice gap exists between healthcare professionals learning about the biopsychosocial model of pain and adopting this model in clinical practice. This review aimed to explore the barriers and enablers that influence the application of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain in practice, from the clinicians' perspective. Qualitative evidence synthesis was used. Four electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO) were searched. Primary qualitative studies were included if they investigated the experiences of primary healthcare professionals using a biopsychosocial model of musculoskeletal pain care in outpatient settings or their perceptions towards biopsychosocial-oriented clinical practice guidelines. After screening 6571 abstracts, 77 full-text articles were retrieved. Twenty-five studies met the eligibility criteria, reporting the experiences of 413 healthcare professionals (including general practitioners, physiotherapists, and others) spanning 11 countries. Three metathemes were identified that impact the adoption of the biopsychosocial model across the whole of health: (1) at the microlevel, healthcare professionals' personal factors, knowledge and skills, and their misconceptions of clinical practice guidelines, perception of patients' factors, and time; (2) at the mesolevel, clinical practice guideline formulation, community factors, funding models, health service provision, resourcing issues, and workforce training issues; and (3) at the macrolevel, health policy, organizational, and social factors. Synthesized data revealed multilevel (whole-of-health) barriers and enablers to health professionals adopting a biopsychosocial model of pain into practice. Awareness of these multilevel factors may help inform preimplementation preparedness and support more effective implementation of the biopsychosocial model of musculoskeletal pain into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Ng
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Slater
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Cobie Starcevich
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anthony Wright
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Tim Mitchell
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Pain Options, South Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Darren Beales
- School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Pain Options, South Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
George SZ, Lentz TA, Goertz CM. Back and neck pain: in support of routine delivery of non-pharmacologic treatments as a way to improve individual and population health. Transl Res 2021; 234:129-140. [PMID: 33901699 PMCID: PMC8340679 DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Chronic back and neck pain are highly prevalent conditions that are among the largest drivers of physical disability and cost in the world. Recent clinical practice guidelines recommend use of non-pharmacologic treatments to decrease pain and improve physical function for individuals with back and neck pain. However, delivery of these treatments remains a challenge because common care delivery models for back and neck pain incentivize treatments that are not in the best interests of patients, the overall health system, or society. This narrative review focuses on the need to increase use of non-pharmacologic treatment as part of routine care for back and neck pain. First, we present the evidence base and summarize recommendations from clinical practice guidelines regarding non-pharmacologic treatments. Second, we characterize current use patterns for non-pharmacologic treatments and identify potential barriers to their delivery. Addressing these barriers will require coordinated efforts from multiple stakeholders to prioritize evidence-based non-pharmacologic treatment approaches over low value care for back and neck pain. These stakeholders include patients, health care providers, health care organizations, administrators, payers, policymakers and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Z George
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Trevor A Lentz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christine M Goertz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Piraux A, Faure S, Naber KG, Alidjanov JF, Ramond-Roquin A. Changes in the management of urinary tract infections in women: impact of the new recommendations on antibiotic prescribing behavior in France, between 2014 and 2019. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:612. [PMID: 34182991 PMCID: PMC8240268 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06653-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infections that require antibiotic therapy. In December 2015, new guidelines for UTI management were published in France with the aim of reducing antibiotic misuse and the risk of antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVES To analyze changes in antibiotic prescribing behavior for acute uncomplicated UTI in women in France from 2014 to 2019. METHODS Retrospective study using data extracted from the medico-administrative database 'OpenMedic' that is linked to the French National Health Data System and collects data on the reimbursement of prescribed drugs. The analyses focused on the number of boxes of antibiotics delivered by community pharmacies, the molecule class, and the prescriber's specialty. RESULTS Overall, antibiotic dispensing by community pharmacies increased by 2% between 2014 and 2019, but with differences in function of the antibiotic class. The use of antibiotics recommended as first-line and second-line treatment increased (+ 41% for fosfomycin and + 7430% for pivmecillinam). Conversely, the dispensing of lomefloxacin and norfloxacin decreased by 80%, and that of ciprofloxacin by 26%. Some antibiotics were mostly prescribed by general practitioners (lomefloxacin, pivmecillinam) and others by secondary care physicians (ofloxacin). Dispensing increased for antibiotics prescribed by secondary care physicians (+ 13% between 2014 and 2019) and decreased for antibiotics prescribed by GPs (- 2% for the same period). CONCLUSION These data suggest that the new recommendations are followed, as indicated by the increased prescription of fosfomycin and pivmecillinam and decreased prescription of fluoroquinolones. However, the efficient transmission and implementation of new recommendations by practitioners requires time, means and dedicated tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Piraux
- Univ Angers, Inserm, CNRS, MINT, SFR ICAT, 16 boulevard Daviers, F-49000, Angers, France.
| | - Sébastien Faure
- Univ Angers, Inserm, CNRS, MINT, SFR ICAT, 16 boulevard Daviers, F-49000, Angers, France
| | - Kurt G Naber
- Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jakhongir F Alidjanov
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Aline Ramond-Roquin
- Faculté de Santé, Département de Médecine Générale, Univ Angers, F-49000, Angers, France
- Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, EHESP1, Inserm, IRSET-ESTER, SFR ICAT, F-49000, Angers, France
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Ris I, Schröder K, Kongsted A, Abbott A, Nilsen P, Hartvigsen J, Öberg B. Adapting the determinants of implementation behavior questionnaire to evaluate implementation of a structured low back pain programme using mixed-methods. Health Sci Rep 2021; 4:e266. [PMID: 33842696 PMCID: PMC8020443 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Best-practice low back pain (LBP) primary care programmes have been developed based on evidence-based clinical guidelines and implemented in Sweden and Denmark. The theoretical domains framework (TDF) was utilized in the design of the implementation strategy. Based on the TDF domains, the Determinants of Implementation Behavior Questionnaire (DIBQ) has been developed to evaluate implementation determinants, but its feasibility and validity need to be tested and adapted to study specific contexts. This study aimed to tailor the DIBQ for evaluation of implementation for LBP primary care programmes. The objectives were to (a) translate the DIBQ into Swedish and Danish, (b) adapt the DIBQ into DIBQ-tailored (DIBQ-t) to study content validity, (c) test the DIBQ-t for feasibility, and (d) perform validity testing of DIBQ-t. METHODS We used a mixed-methods design. First, forward translation of the DIBQ, then adaptation into DIBQ-t using qualitative face validity and quantitative content validity was done. Finally, to determine feasibility and construct validity using confirmatory factor analyses, we used data from DIBQ-t collected after the programmes' 2-day course. RESULTS The final DIBQ-t included 28 items describing 10 of the original 18 DIBQ domains and was considered feasible. A total of 598 clinicians out of 609 responded to the DIBQ-t, with only 2‰ of the items missing. The confirmatory factor analyses showed a good fit after removing two items with the lowest domain loading. The DIBQ-t maintained linkage to all domains within the Behavioral Change Wheel. The clinicians' expectations, according to the DIBQ-t, indicate facilitating determinants outweighing barriers at the initiation of implementation processes. CONCLUSIONS The study resulted in a feasible and valid version of a questionnaire for evaluating clinicians' expectations regarding implementation determinants of best-practice LBP primary care programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Ris
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical BiomechanicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of PhysiotherapyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Karin Schröder
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of PhysiotherapyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical BiomechanicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge HubOdense MDenmark
| | - Allan Abbott
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of PhysiotherapyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Per Nilsen
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of PhysiotherapyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical BiomechanicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
- Chiropractic Knowledge HubOdense MDenmark
| | - Birgitta Öberg
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of PhysiotherapyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Longtin C, Décary S, Cook CE, Tousignant-Laflamme Y. What does it take to facilitate the integration of clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain into practice? Part 1: A synthesis of recommendation. Pain Pract 2021; 21:943-954. [PMID: 33998769 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the emergence of multiple clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the rehabilitation of low back pain (LBP) over the last decade, self-reported levels of disability in this population have not improved. This may be explained by the numerous implementation barriers, such as the complexity of information and sheer volumes of CPGs. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to summarize the evidence and recommendations from the most recent and high-quality CPGs on the rehabilitation management of LBP by developing an infographic summarizing the recommendations to facilitate dissemination into clinical practice. METHODS We performed a systematic review of high-quality CPGs with an emphasis on rehabilitation approaches. We searched major health-related research databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, and PEDro). We performed quality assessment via the AGREE-II instrument. Contents of the CPGs were synthesized by extracting recommendations, which were then compared to one another to identify consistencies based on an iterative evaluation process. RESULTS We identified and assessed 5 recent high-quality CPGs. We synthesized 13 recommendations on the rehabilitation management of LBP (2 for screening procedures, 3 for assessment procedures, and 8 involving treatment approaches) and 2 underlying principles were highlighted. These results were then synthetized and illustrated in a concise infographic that serves as a conceptual roadmap that identifies the specific behavior changes (i.e., adoption of CPGs' recommendations) rehabilitation professionals should adopt in order to integrate an evidenced-based approach for the management of LBP. CONCLUSIONS We systematically reviewed the literature for CPGs' recommendations for the physical rehabilitation management of LBP and synthesized the information through an infographic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Longtin
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Shebrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Shebrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Chad E Cook
- Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Shebrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Longtin C, Décary S, Cook CE, Tousignant-Laflamme Y. What does it take to facilitate the integration of clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain into practice? Part 2: A strategic plan to activate dissemination. Pain Pract 2021; 22:107-112. [PMID: 33998767 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide among all musculoskeletal disorders despite an intense focus in research efforts. Researchers and decision makers have produced multiple clinical practice guidelines for the rehabilitation of LBP, which contain specific recommendations for clinicians. Adherence to these recommendations may have several benefits, such as improving the quality of care for patients living with LBP, by ensuring that the best evidence-based care is being delivered. However, clinicians' adherence to recommendations from these guidelines is low and numerous implementation barriers and challenges, such as complexity of information and sheer volume of guidelines have been documented. In a previous paper, we performed a systematic review of the literature to identify high-quality clinical practice guidelines on the management of LBP, and developed a concise yet comprehensive infographic that summarizes the recommendations from these guidelines. Considering the wealth of scientific evidence, passive dissemination alone of this research knowledge is likely to have limitations to help clinicians implement these recommendations into routine practice. Thus, an active and engaging dissemination strategy, aimed at improving the implementation and integration of specific recommendations into practice is warranted. In this paper, we argue that a conceptual framework, such as the theoretical domains framework, could facilitate the implementation of these recommendations into clinical practice. Specifically, we present a systematic approach that could serve to guide the development of a theory-informed knowledge translation intervention as a means to overcome implementation challenges in rehabilitation of LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Longtin
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Shebrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Shebrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Chad E Cook
- Department of Orthopedics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Shebrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
|
77
|
Factors influencing implementation of the GLA: D Back, an educational/exercise intervention for low back pain: a mixed-methods study. JBI Evid Implement 2021; 19:394-408. [PMID: 33965996 PMCID: PMC8635265 DOI: 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction and aims: Guidelines for low back pain (LBP) management recommend patient education and exercises. GLA:D Back, a structured group-based patient-education exercise program for LBP, facilitates evidence-based care implementation. This study aimed to inform on the implementation processes, assessing clinician-related factors. Objectives were to describe profiles of implementers and nonimplementers by demographics, and responses to the tailored version of the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (DIBQ-t) qualitatively explore clinician perspectives on implementation, and compare the results of the DIBQ-t with the interview data to evaluate their fit of integration for facilitators, barriers, and new insights. Methods: A mixed-methods parallel design study was conducted. Physiotherapists and chiropractors, educated in the GLA:D Back program, were asked to complete the DIBQ-t (measuring theoretical determinants of implementation) 6 months after their training. Implementers and nonimplementers of the program were selected for interviews. Qualitative data were used to understand clinicians’ viewpoints on implementation, providing a broader perspective on the quantitative data and exploring new aspects. Results: More physiotherapists than chiropractors implemented the program. Implementers responded more positively on most domains of the DIBQ-t. The interviews revealed three themes important for implementation: personal gain, practicalities, and buying-in on the program. Clinicians’ attitudes to the program appeared additionally as relevant to implementation. Conclusion: The profession of the clinician was associated with implementation behavior. Implementers and nonimplementers identified the same themes but perceived them as either positive or negative. Both groups reported high levels of knowledge and skills, indicating that training alone is insufficient for implementation.
Collapse
|
78
|
Mishriky J, Stupans I, Chan V. Low back pain management - What Australian community pharmacists recommend and how this compares to current clinical guidelines. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE 2021; 29:336-343. [PMID: 33950187 DOI: 10.1093/ijpp/riab022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a serious and debilitating condition that necessitates proper assessment and management. Community pharmacists are ideally positioned to interact with these patients and provide therapeutic recommendations in line with LBP clinical guidelines, which have changed in recent years. Understanding what therapeutic strategies pharmacists recommend and why, can provide insights into whether these recommendations are in line with current clinical resources. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to examine community pharmacists' views, knowledge and practices in LBP management compared to current clinical guidelines; and investigate their views regarding the accessibility and use of clinical LBP resources. METHODS A cross-sectional study of Australian community pharmacists was conducted using a structured, self-administered, anonymous online survey. Primary outcomes assessed were pharmacists' views, practices and recommendations in low back pain of different severities, as well as views on the use and accessibility of clinical guidelines. KEY FINDINGS A total of 176 pharmacists completed the survey. Most recommended non-pharmacological strategies to manage mild symptoms for both adult and teenage groups, escalating to pharmacological with increasing symptom severity. Approximately 75% reported they would recommend ibuprofen over paracetamol for low back pain. Approximately 40% agreed there is difficulty in finding and accessing clinical resources and more than 40% reported being unaware that there are specific guidelines available for the management of LBP symptoms. CONCLUSION Results from this study highlight an important need to further improve the knowledge and awareness of pharmacists in low back pain management, including locating and accessing clinical resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Mishriky
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ieva Stupans
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vincent Chan
- Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Goertz CM, Long CR, English C, Meeker WC, Marchiori DM. Patient-Reported Physician Treatment Recommendations and Compliance Among U.S. Adults with Low Back Pain. J Altern Complement Med 2021; 27:S99-S105. [PMID: 33788609 PMCID: PMC8035914 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2020.0392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Numerous recently published clinical care guidelines, including the 2017 American College of Physicians (ACP) Guideline for Low Back Pain (LBP), call for nonpharmacological approaches to pain management. However, little data exist regarding the extent to which these guidelines have been adopted by patients and medical doctors. The study objective was to determine patient-reported treatment recommendations by medical doctors for LBP and patient compliance with those recommendations. Design: This study used a cross-sectional web and mail survey. Settings/Location: The study was conducted among Gallup Panel members across the United States. Subjects: Survey participants included 5377 U.S. adults randomly selected among Gallup Panel members. Of those, 545 reported a visit to a medical doctor within the past year for low back pain and were asked a series of follow-up questions regarding treatment recommendations. Interventions: Participants were asked about medical doctor recommendations for both drug (acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], opioids, benzodiazepines, Gabapentin, Neurontin, and cortisone injections) and nondrug (self-care treatments, massage, acupuncture, spinal manipulation, and physical therapy) treatments. Outcome Measures: Participants were asked to indicate if their medical doctor recommended each drug and nondrug therapy for their LBP and if they had followed each of those treatment recommendations. Results: Ninety-six percent of patients who visited a medical doctor for LBP received a recommendation for one or more pain treatments, with 81% reporting that their medical doctor recommended both drug and nondrug therapies. Seventy-six percent of respondents were recommended acetaminophen or NSAIDs, 79% were recommended self-care treatments, 37% were recommended massage, acupuncture, or spinal manipulation, and 60% were recommended physical therapy. Nearly two-thirds of our sample reported that their doctor had recommended prescription medications, including opioids, benzodiazepines, Gabapentin, Neurontin, or cortisone injections. Reported adherence to treatment recommendations ranged from 68% for acupuncture to 94% for NSAIDs. Conclusions: One year after publication of the ACP's Guideline on LBP, patients report that medical doctors recommended both pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment approaches to patients with LBP. In the majority of cases, a combination of prescription medications and self-care were recommended, illustrating the need for additional research on the effectiveness of multi-modal treatment strategies. Patients reported that they were largely compliant with medical doctor recommendations, underscoring the influence that medical doctors have in directing patient care for LBP. These findings indicate that further work is also needed to explore the impact of personal experience, training, clinical evidence, sociocultural factors, and health plans on medical doctors therapeutic recommendations in the context of back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M Goertz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cynthia R Long
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic and IA, USA
| | | | - William C Meeker
- President's Office, Palmer College of Chiropractic West, San Jose, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
80
|
Maxwell C, Robinson K, McCreesh K. Managing shoulder pain: a meta-ethnography exploring healthcare providers' experiences. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:3772-3784. [PMID: 33847548 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1897886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review and synthesize qualitative research studies exploring the experiences of Healthcare Providers (HCPs) of managing shoulder pain. METHODS A meta-ethnographic approach was adopted to review and synthesize eligible studies. The findings from each included study were translated into one another using Noblit and Hares' seven-stage process. A systematic search of eleven electronic databases was conducted in February 2021. Methodological quality was assessed using the CASP Appraisal Tool. RESULTS Ten studies were included in the meta-synthesis, all deemed of high methodological quality. Three themes were identified; (1) Lack of consensus: "we all have different approaches." (2) Challenges to Changing Practice: It's "really hard to change and switch to a different approach," (3) Getting "Buy in" to Treatment: "…so you have to really sell it early". CONCLUSION Healthcare providers working with people with shoulder pain struggle to reconcile, often conflicting, research recommendations with their own clinical experience, beliefs and patient expectations. These findings help explain the continued lack of consensus on how best to manage shoulder pain in clinical practice.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONHealthcare providers (HCPs) working with people with shoulder pain struggle to resolve conflicts between evidence-based recommendations, clinical experience, their own shoulder pain beliefs and patient expectations and preferences.Stronger collaboration across professional disciplines is needed to address the current lack of consensus on the management of shoulder pain.Many HCP's find it difficult to engage patients with shoulder pain in exercise and they work hard to "sell" this approach to patients using strategies such as education, shared decision making and therapeutic alliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Maxwell
- Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.,Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Katie Robinson
- Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.,Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Karen McCreesh
- Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.,Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Sharma S, Traeger AC, Tcharkhedian E, Harrison J, Hersch JK, Pickles K, Harris IA, Maher CG. "I would not go to him": Focus groups exploring community responses to a public health campaign aimed at reducing unnecessary diagnostic imaging of low back pain. Health Expect 2021; 24:648-658. [PMID: 33599389 PMCID: PMC8077077 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community awareness of the harms of overdiagnosis remains low. OBJECTIVE To evaluate community responses to a public health campaign designed for health service waiting rooms that focuses on the harms of unnecessary diagnostic imaging for low back pain. METHODS We conducted two focus groups of 19 community members with or without low back pain in Sydney, Australia. This study formed the fourth and final stage of the development process of a public health campaign: (a) initial design, (b) expert review and revision, (c) online experiment and (d) community views & revision. We evaluated reactions to components of the campaign that included digital posters and an information leaflet using strong imagery and messaging about the risk of overdiagnosis. We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis to identify main themes. RESULTS Community members reacted with surprise, initial mistrust, and occasionally anger towards imagery and messaging that suggested diagnostic imaging tests could be unnecessary and harmful. With further reflection and discussion, and after reading longer format information about overdiagnosis, the participants found some of the messages informative and useful. Participants appeared to gain a better understanding of the concept of overdiagnosis and the importance of not rushing to imaging. CONCLUSIONS Public health campaigns including posters and leaflets displayed in waiting rooms could raise awareness about overuse of diagnostic imaging and the harms of overdiagnosis more broadly. However, negative reactions are possible and must be managed carefully. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION We involved a community participation manager who provided advice on the focus group discussion guide, participant recruitment and manuscript presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sweekriti Sharma
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthInstitute for Musculoskeletal HealthSydney School of Public HealthThe University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health DistrictSydneyNSWAustralia
- Wiser HealthcareSydney School of Public HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Adrian C. Traeger
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthInstitute for Musculoskeletal HealthSydney School of Public HealthThe University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health DistrictSydneyNSWAustralia
- Wiser HealthcareSydney School of Public HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | | | - Janet Harrison
- Clinical Governance DepartmentLiverpool HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Jolyn K. Hersch
- Wiser HealthcareSydney School of Public HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthSydney School of Public HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Wiser HealthcareSydney School of Public HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthSydney School of Public HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Ian A. Harris
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthInstitute for Musculoskeletal HealthSydney School of Public HealthThe University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health DistrictSydneyNSWAustralia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical ResearchSouth Western Sydney Clinical SchoolUNSW SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Chris G. Maher
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthInstitute for Musculoskeletal HealthSydney School of Public HealthThe University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health DistrictSydneyNSWAustralia
- Wiser HealthcareSydney School of Public HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Sharma S, Traeger AC, O'Keeffe M, Copp T, Freeman A, Hoffmann T, Maher CG. Effect of information format on intentions and beliefs regarding diagnostic imaging for non-specific low back pain: A randomised controlled trial in members of the public. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:595-602. [PMID: 32854984 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of information format on intentions to request diagnostic imaging for non-specific low back pain in members of the public. METHODS We performed a three arm, 1:1:1, superiority randomised trial on members of the public. Participants were randomised to one of the three groups: a Standard Care Leaflet group (standard information on low back pain), a Neutral Leaflet group (balanced information on the benefits and harms of imaging) and a Nudge Leaflet group (with behavioural cues to emphasise the harms of unnecessary imaging). Our primary outcome was intention to request imaging for low back pain. RESULTS 418 participants were randomised. After reading the leaflet, intention to request imaging (measured on an 11-point scale (0 = definitely would not request to 10 = definitely would request) was lower in the Nudge Leaflet group (mean = 4.6, SD = 3.4) compared with the Standard Care Leaflet group (mean = 5.3, SD = 3.3) and the Neutral Leaflet group (mean = 5.3, SD = 3.0) (adjusted mean difference between Nudge and Neutral, -1.0 points, 95%CI -1.6 to -0.4). CONCLUSION Framing information to emphasise potential harms from overdiagnosis reduced intention to request diagnostic imaging for low back pain. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Nudge leaflets could help clinicians manage patient pressure for unnecessary tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sweekriti Sharma
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mary O'Keeffe
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Freeman
- Winton Centre for Risk and Communication, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tammy Hoffmann
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Chris G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Lemieux J, Kawchuk G, Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, Abdollah V, Jones A. The feasibility of implementing an English language version of GLA:D Back. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:38. [PMID: 33522956 PMCID: PMC7849100 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00758-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidenced-based clinical guidelines for the treatment of low back pain (LBP) consistently suggest educating patients about their back pain, its natural course, and providing advice to keep active and continue working. Despite this evidence, clinicians routinely do not follow these recommendations resulting in ineffective and fragmented care. GLA:D® Back, a standardized care package, was originally developed in Denmark to assist clinicians in implementing evidence-based care. This study will evaluate the feasibility of implementing the English version of the Danish GLA:D® Back program in Alberta, Canada. METHODS Thirty-five clinicians from nineteen clinics in Alberta, Canada, participated. Feasibility of program implementation, our primary objective, was evaluated within 3 months. Feasibility success was defined as 50% clinician/clinic adoption in addition to 66-88 enrolled participants registered in the database. Our secondary objectives included collecting data pertaining to clinician confidence, attitudes and behaviour of treating patients, perceived barriers and facilitators of program in addition to collecting patient-data regarding pain, function, general health and self-efficacy. RESULTS The majority of the clinics (15/19, 79%) offered GLA:D® Back to their patients within the study period. Of the participating clinicians, GLA:D® Back was delivered by (25/35, 71%) of clinicians. In total, 78 patients were enrolled in the program and (69/78, 88%) participants attended the final assessment. Secondarily, clinicians demonstrated a biomedical and behavioural orientation along with high confidence when treating LBP patients while patient outcomes trended toward improvement. CONCLUSION The English translation of the Danish GLA:D Back program was feasible for Albertan clinicians to implement into practice in both urban and rural settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Lemieux
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - G Kawchuk
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - A Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - J Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - V Abdollah
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - A Jones
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Kiel S, Raus C, Sierocinski E, Knauthe P, Chenot JF. Concordance of patient beliefs and expectations regarding the management of low back pain with guideline recommendations - a cross-sectional study in Germany. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:275. [PMID: 33342429 PMCID: PMC7751122 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01352-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Low back pain is a common reason for patients to seek medical care. Physician non-adherence to clinical guidelines has been observed. We investigated the extent to which patient expectations correspond to recommendations of the German national guideline for management of low back pain (G-LBP) and whether patient characteristics, history of LBP and previous treatment experience are associated with expectations. Methods A cross-sectional study including patients from 13 general practices was conducted. Data were collected using a questionnaire. Inverse probability weights were used to address non-response bias. Descriptive analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were performed. Results A total of 977 patients were included in analyses (median age 57 years, 39% male). 75% of patients reported experiencing LBP currently or within the last year. More than 65% indicated they would agree to forgo further examinations if their LBP was judged by their physician to be of no serious concern. This was associated with the highest level of education and no prior imaging, and negatively associated with good-to-poor health status and moderate-to-severe pain intensity. 40% of participants expected imaging. The highest educational level, female gender and no prior imaging were associated with a decreased expectation of imaging. 70% expected prescriptions for massages. Females, participants with good-to-poor health status, current LBP or LBP in the last 12 months had an increased expectation for massages. Expectations for injection therapy (45%) were mainly associated with previous injections. Expectations for physiotherapy (64%) were associated with female gender, lower educational level, good-to-poor health status, current LBP or in the last 12 months. The perspective that daily activities should be continued (66%) was associated with female gender and higher educational level. Participants who agreed to the statement ‘There is no effective treatment for LBP’ (11%) had a poor health status, current LBP and a severe pain intensity. Conclusion Patient views regarding LBP management are partially concordant with guideline recommendations and are strongly influenced by previous treatment experiences and education level. Exploration of patient expectations and experiences in LBP treatment may help minimize dissatisfaction of patients expecting treatments not endorsed by guidelines and simultaneously increase physician guideline adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Kiel
- Department of General Practice, Institute of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Fleischmannstraße 6, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Christina Raus
- Department of General Practice, Institute of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Fleischmannstraße 6, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Elizabeth Sierocinski
- Department of General Practice, Institute of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Fleischmannstraße 6, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Jean-François Chenot
- Department of General Practice, Institute of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Fleischmannstraße 6, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Wang Y, Hussain SM, Wluka AE, Lim YZ, Urquhart DM, Mishra GD, Teede H, Doust J, Brown WJ, Cicuttini FM. Rates, costs and determinants of lumbar spine imaging in population-based women born in 1973-1978: Data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0243282. [PMID: 33270739 PMCID: PMC7714143 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective There are concerns that lumbar spine imaging represents low value care. Our aim was to examine the use of lumbar spine imaging [radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] over 20 years, and costs and person-level characteristics of imaging in a large cohort of Australian women. Methods The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH) is a longitudinal population-based survey of women randomly selected from national health insurance scheme (Medicare) database. This study examined 13458 women born in 1973–1978 who consented to link their ALSWH and Medical Benefits Scheme records. Self-reported data on demographics, body mass index, depression, physical and mental health, and back pain were collected in each survey performed in 1996, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2015. Data on lumbar spine imaging from 1996 to 2015 were obtained from the Medical Benefits Scheme database. Results 38.9% of women underwent some form of lumbar spine imaging over 20 years. While radiography increased from 1996 to 2011 and decreased thereafter, CT and MRI continued to increase from 1996 to 2015. In women with self-reported back pain, depression and poorer physical health were associated with imaging, with no significant differences in types of imaging. Based on imaging rates in ALSWH, the estimated costs for Australian women aged 30–39 years were AU$51,735,649 over 2011–2015. Conclusions Lumbar spine imaging was common in population-based Australian women, with rates increasing over 20 years. Depression and poor physical health were associated with lumbar spine imaging. Raising awareness of this in clinicians is likely to result in significant cost savings if clinical guidelines are followed, with the potential of freeing resources for high value care and health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanyuan Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sultana Monira Hussain
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anita E. Wluka
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yuan Z. Lim
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Donna M. Urquhart
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gita D. Mishra
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
- Diabetes and Vascular Medicine Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Wendy J. Brown
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Flavia M. Cicuttini
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Abstract
Overcoming overuse in musculoskeletal health care requires an understanding of its drivers. In this, the third article in a series on "Overcoming Overuse" of musculoskeletal health care, we consider the drivers of overuse under 4 domains: (1) the culture of health care consumption, (2) patient factors and experiences, (3) clinician factors and experiences, and (4) practice environment. These domains are interrelated, interact, and influence the clinician-patient interaction. We map drivers to potential solutions to overcome overuse. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(12):657-660. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.0111.
Collapse
|
87
|
Traeger AC, Checketts J, Tcharkhedian E, O'Connor DA, Klinner C, Sharma S, Vyas P, Albarqouni L, McCaffery K. Patient and general practitioner views of tools to delay diagnostic imaging for low back pain: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039936. [PMID: 33162393 PMCID: PMC7651716 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Delayed prescribing is a promising strategy to manage patient requests for unnecessary tests and treatments. The purpose of this study was to explore general practitioner (GP) and patient views of three communication tools (Overdiagnosis Leaflet, Dialogue Sheet and 'Wait-and-see' Note) to support delayed prescribing of diagnostic imaging. DESIGN Qualitative study. SETTING Primary and emergency care in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS 16 GPs and 14 patients with recent episode of low back pain. OUTCOME Views on the tools to delay diagnostic imaging for low back pain. Data were collected using a combination of focus groups and individual interviews. ANALYSIS Two researchers independently performed a thematic analysis, and the author team reviewed and refined the analysis. RESULTS GP participants responded positively to the Overdiagnosis Leaflet. The Dialogue Sheet and 'Wait-and-see' Note raised several concerns about patient pushback, adding to time pressure and being overwhelmed with hard-to-find paper resources. GPs preferred to communicate verbally the reasons to delay an imaging test. For patients, the reactions to the tools were more positive. Patients valued written information and a signed agreement to delay the test. However, patients expressed that a strong desire for diagnostic imaging would likely over-ride any effect of written advice to delay the test. The term 'false alarm' to describe overdiagnosis was poorly understood by patients. CONCLUSIONS GPs and patients agreed that a leaflet about overdiagnosis could support a delayed prescribing approach to imaging for low back pain. The Dialogue Sheet and 'Wait-and-see' Note were acceptable to patients but not to GPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juliet Checketts
- Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Elise Tcharkhedian
- Department of Physiotherapy, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Denise A O'Connor
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christiane Klinner
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sweekriti Sharma
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Parima Vyas
- Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Loai Albarqouni
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Risk-stratified and stepped models of care for back pain and osteoarthritis: are we heading towards a common model? Pain Rep 2020; 5:e843. [PMID: 33235943 PMCID: PMC7678800 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Substantial overlap between interventions and models of care for osteoarthritis and low back pain suggests potential for one common model, which may facilitate implementation. The overall quality of care for musculoskeletal pain conditions is suboptimal, partly due to a considerable evidence-practice gap. In osteoarthritis and low back pain, structured models of care exist to help overcome that challenge. In osteoarthritis, focus is on stepped care models, where treatment decisions are guided by response to treatment, and increasingly comprehensive interventions are only offered to people with inadequate response to more simple care. In low back pain, the most widely known approach is based on risk stratification, where patients with higher predicted risk of poor outcome are offered more comprehensive care. For both conditions, the recommended interventions and models of care share many commonalities and there is no evidence that one model of care is more effective than the other. Limitations of existing models of care include a lack of integrated information on social factors, comorbid conditions, and previous treatment experience, and they do not support an interplay between health care, self-management, and community-based activities. Moving forwards, a common model across musculoskeletal conditions seems realistic, which points to an opportunity for reducing the complexity of implementation. We foresee this development will use big data sources and machine-learning methods to combine stepped and risk-stratified care and to integrate self-management support and patient-centred care to a greater extent in future models of care.
Collapse
|
89
|
Sharma S, Traeger AC, Reed B, Hamilton M, O'Connor DA, Hoffmann TC, Bonner C, Buchbinder R, Maher CG. Clinician and patient beliefs about diagnostic imaging for low back pain: a systematic qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037820. [PMID: 32830105 PMCID: PMC7451538 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Overuse of diagnostic imaging for patients with low back pain remains common. The underlying beliefs about diagnostic imaging that could drive overuse remain unclear. We synthesised qualitative research that has explored clinician, patient or general public beliefs about diagnostic imaging for low back pain. DESIGN A qualitative evidence synthesis using a thematic analysis. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and PsycINFO from inception to 17 June 2019. Qualitative studies that interviewed clinicians, patients and/or general public exploring beliefs about diagnostic imaging for low back pain were included. Four review authors independently extracted data and organised these according to themes and subthemes. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool to critically appraise included studies. To assess confidence in review findings, we used the GRADE-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research method. RESULTS We included 69 qualitative studies with 1747 participants. Key findings included: Patients and clinicians believe diagnostic imaging is an important test to locate the source of low back pain (33 studies, high confidence); patients with chronic low back pain believe pathological findings on diagnostic imaging provide evidence that pain is real (12 studies, moderate confidence); and clinicians ordered diagnostic imaging to reduce the risk of a missed diagnosis that could lead to litigation, and to manage patients' expectations (12 studies, moderate confidence). CONCLUSION Clinicians and patients can believe that diagnostic imaging is an important tool for locating the source of non-specific low back pain. Patients may underestimate the harms of unnecessary imaging tests. These beliefs could be important targets for intervention. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017076047.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sweekriti Sharma
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ben Reed
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melanie Hamilton
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Denise A O'Connor
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tammy C Hoffmann
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chris G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Alva Staufert MF, Ferreira GE, Sharma S, Gutiérrez Camacho C, Maher CG. A look into the challenges and complexities of managing low back pain in Mexico. Glob Public Health 2020; 16:936-946. [PMID: 32816643 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1808038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Low back pain is a global health problem. In Mexico it is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions as well as the leading cause of disability. This review provides an overview of the challenges and complexities of managing low back pain in Mexico. It begins with an explanation of the Mexican healthcare system and an overview of the burden of low back pain. Usual care for low back pain in Mexico is then contrasted with recommended best practice care to highlight common evidence-practice gaps and drivers of poor care. Finally, solutions are proposed based on positive experiences from other countries. Delving into the Mexican health framework and the burden of low back pain will provide a better understanding of why it is important to pay attention to this musculoskeletal disorder. Potential steps required to reduce the burden are also outlined to benefit not only the people suffering from low back pain but also the Mexican economy and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giovanni E Ferreira
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sweekriti Sharma
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Chris G Maher
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Mishriky J, Stupans I, Chan V. The role of the pharmacist in low back pain management: a narrative review of practice guidelines on paracetamol vs non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2020; 18:2075. [PMID: 32802218 PMCID: PMC7416311 DOI: 10.18549/pharmpract.2020.3.2075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly condition and a leading cause of
disabilities across the globe. In Australia and other countries, there has been
changes in LBP management guidelines and evidence in recent years, including the
use of pharmacotherapy. Inadequately treated LBP is a burden with significant
health and economic impacts. Although there is some variability, non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have largely replaced paracetamol as the
first-choice analgesic for non-specific LBP in many international clinical
guidelines, including the current Australian Therapeutic Guidelines. More recent
clinical evidence also supports that targeting LBP with the use of NSAIDs can
provide superior and more effective relief of LBP symptoms compared with
paracetamol. Community pharmacists are one of the most accessible and frequently
visited health professionals that offer vital primary healthcare services aimed
to provide enhanced clinical outcomes for patients. The position of a community
pharmacist is pivotal in LBP assessment and management, from both a
pharmacological and non-pharmacological standpoint, including the use of
clinical guidelines, yet their roles are often not fully utilized in LBP
therapy. Studies investigating the community pharmacist’s views,
practices, knowledge, and roles, specifically in LBP management in Australia are
variable and limited. This narrative review will briefly cover the impacts of
LBP, and to provide a summary on recent evidence, updates and a comparison of
the Australian and international low back pain management guidelines on
paracetamol vs NSAIDs in LBP, as well as pharmacists’ roles and
interventions in a primary healthcare setting in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Mishriky
- BPharm(Hons). Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University. Bundoora, VIC (Australia).
| | - Ieva Stupans
- BPharm, PhD. Professor and Discipline Head. Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University. Bundoora, VIC (Australia).
| | - Vincent Chan
- BPharm, MPH, PhD. Senior Lecturer. Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University. Bundoora, VIC (Australia).
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Rozbroj T, Haas R, O'Connor DA, Thomas R, McCaffery K, Carter S, Buchbinder R. How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037283. [PMID: 32636285 PMCID: PMC7342480 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Examining patient and public understanding of overtesting and overdiagnosis (OverTD) is vital for reducing the burden of OverTD. Studies from disparate contexts, disciplines and focusing on disparate healthcare issues have examined patient and public understanding of OverTD. A synthesis is needed to bring this literature together, examine common themes, strengthen conclusions and identify gaps. This will help steer further research, policy and practice to improve patient and public understanding of OverTD. The objective of this study is to synthesise qualitative research data about patient and public understanding of OverTD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A thematic meta-synthesis will be used to synthesise primary qualitative research and qualitative components of primary mixed-methods research about patient and public understanding of OverTD. Studies published in English will be included. These will be identified using systematic searches from inception to March 2020 in the Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and MEDLINE databases. Studies that satisfy eligibility criteria will be assessed for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Thematic meta-synthesis will comprise three stages: (1) line-by-line coding; (2) generation of descriptive themes and (3) generation of analytic themes. Confidence in the synthesis findings will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in Evidence (GRADE CERQual) approach. A summary of GRADE CERQual results will be presented alongside the key themes. Study eligibility screening, data extraction, analysis and the CASP and GRADE CERQual assessments will be undertaken independently by two review authors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not required for this secondary analysis of published data. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and may be presented in conference papers and elsewhere. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020156838.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Rozbroj
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| | - Romi Haas
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| | - Denise A O'Connor
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rae Thomas
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stacy Carter
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Ahern M, Dean CM, Dear BF, Willcock SM, Hush JM. Management of acute low back pain: the practices and perspectives of primary care clinicians in Australia. Aust J Prim Health 2020; 26:256-264. [PMID: 32527369 DOI: 10.1071/py19152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is the highest cause of years lived with a disability in Australia and the most frequent musculoskeletal condition for which patients seek primary care. The aims of this study were to: (1) evaluate the current practices and perspectives of Australian GPs and physiotherapists managing acute back pain; and (2) explore alignment of care with clinical guidelines. This was a prospective cross-sectional Internet survey conducted from March 2018 to May 2018 of experienced Australian GPs and physiotherapists. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse all quantitative outcomes. Two hundred primary care practitioners (72% physiotherapists and 28% GPs) from all States and Territories of Australia completed the survey. Most primary care practitioners were familiar with clinical guidelines for acute back pain management and reported delivery of many of the core components of guideline-based care, including education, advice about favourable prognosis, encouraging activity and self-management and discouraging prolonged bed rest. Deviations from guideline-based care were common, including provision of analgesic medication, passive therapies and using radiological imaging. Australian primary care clinicians in this sample were aware of back pain guidelines and typically implement care that is consistent with guideline-based recommendations. Divergences from these guidelines may indicate that primary care practitioners are delivering evidence-based and person-centred care that integrates clinicians' judgement with patients' preferences and guideline-based evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malene Ahern
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 3, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| | - Catherine M Dean
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 3, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Blake F Dear
- eCentreClinic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; and Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Simon M Willcock
- Macquarie University Health Sciences Centre, Macquarie University, Suite 305, Level 3, 2 Technology Place, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Julia M Hush
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 3, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Sattar R, Johnson J, Lawton R. The views and experiences of patients and health-care professionals on the disclosure of adverse events: A systematic review and qualitative meta-ethnographic synthesis. Health Expect 2020; 23:571-583. [PMID: 32074396 PMCID: PMC7321730 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize the literature on the views and experiences of patients/family members and health-care professionals (HCPs) on the disclosure of adverse events. METHODS Systematic review of qualitative studies. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO. Study quality was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Qualitative data were analysed using a meta-ethnographic approach, comprising reciprocal syntheses of 'patient' and 'health-care professional' studies, combined to form a lines-of-argument synthesis embodying both perspectives. RESULTS Fifteen studies were included in the final syntheses. The results highlighted that there is a difference in attitudes and expectations between patients and HCPs regarding the disclosure conversation. Patients/family members expressed a need for information, the importance of sincere regret and a promise of improvement. However, HCPs faced several barriers, which hindered appropriate disclosure practices. These included difficulty of disclosure in a blame culture, avoidance of litigation, lack of skills on how to conduct disclosure and inconsistent guidance. A lines-of-argument synthesis is presented that identified both the key elements of an ideal disclosure desired by patients and the facilitators for HCPs, which can increase the likelihood of this taking place. CONCLUSIONS Although patients/family members and HCPs both advocate disclosure, several barriers prevent HCPs from conducting disclosure effectively. Both groups have different needs for disclosure. To meet patients' requirements, training on disclosure for HCPs and the development of an open, transparent culture within organizations are potential areas for intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raabia Sattar
- University of Leeds and Bradford Institute for Health ResearchLeedsUK
| | - Judith Johnson
- University of Leeds and Bradford Institute for Health ResearchLeedsUK
| | - Rebecca Lawton
- University of Leeds and Bradford Institute for Health ResearchLeedsUK
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Cohen SP, Bhaskar A, Bhatia A, Buvanendran A, Deer T, Garg S, Hooten WM, Hurley RW, Kennedy DJ, McLean BC, Moon JY, Narouze S, Pangarkar S, Provenzano DA, Rauck R, Sitzman BT, Smuck M, van Zundert J, Vorenkamp K, Wallace MS, Zhao Z. Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45:424-467. [PMID: 32245841 PMCID: PMC7362874 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The past two decades have witnessed a surge in the use of lumbar facet blocks and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat low back pain (LBP), yet nearly all aspects of the procedures remain controversial. METHODS After approval by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, letters were sent to a dozen pain societies, as well as representatives from the US Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense. A steering committee was convened to select preliminary questions, which were revised by the full committee. Questions were assigned to 4-5 person modules, who worked with the Subcommittee Lead and Committee Chair on preliminary versions, which were sent to the full committee. We used a modified Delphi method, whereby the questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chair, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was reached. RESULTS 17 questions were selected for guideline development, with 100% consensus achieved by committee members on all topics. All societies except for one approved every recommendation, with one society dissenting on two questions (number of blocks and cut-off for a positive block before RFA), but approving the document. Specific questions that were addressed included the value of history and physical examination in selecting patients for blocks, the value of imaging in patient selection, whether conservative treatment should be used before injections, whether imaging is necessary for block performance, the diagnostic and prognostic value of medial branch blocks (MBB) and intra-articular (IA) injections, the effects of sedation and injectate volume on validity, whether facet blocks have therapeutic value, what the ideal cut-off value is for a prognostic block, how many blocks should be performed before RFA, how electrodes should be oriented, the evidence for larger lesions, whether stimulation should be used before RFA, ways to mitigate complications, if different standards should be applied to clinical practice and clinical trials and the evidence for repeating RFA (see table 12 for summary). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar medial branch RFA may provide benefit to well-selected individuals, with MBB being more predictive than IA injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of more false-negatives. Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven P Cohen
- Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine Division, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Arun Bhaskar
- Anesthesiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Haemodialysis Clinic Hayes Satellite Unit, Hayes, UK
| | - Anuj Bhatia
- Anesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto and University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tim Deer
- Spine & Nerve Centers, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| | - Shuchita Garg
- Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Robert W Hurley
- Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David J Kennedy
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian C McLean
- Anesthesiology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii, USA
| | - Jee Youn Moon
- Dept of Anesthesiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, The Republic of Korea
| | - Samer Narouze
- Center for Pain Medicine, Summa Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| | - Sanjog Pangarkar
- Dept of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Richard Rauck
- Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Matthew Smuck
- Dept.of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jan van Zundert
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Lanaken, Belgium
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark S Wallace
- Anesthesiology, UCSD Medical Center-Thornton Hospital, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Zirong Zhao
- Neurology, VA Healthcare Center District of Columbia, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Niño de Guzmán E, Song Y, Alonso-Coello P, Canelo-Aybar C, Neamtiu L, Parmelli E, Pérez-Bracchiglione J, Rabassa M, Rigau D, Parkinson ZS, Solà I, Vásquez-Mejía A, Ricci-Cabello I. Healthcare providers' adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe: a systematic literature review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 181:499-518. [PMID: 32378052 PMCID: PMC7220981 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05657-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Clinical guidelines’ (CGs) adherence supports high-quality care. However, healthcare providers do not always comply with CGs recommendations. This systematic literature review aims to assess the extent of healthcare providers’ adherence to breast cancer CGs in Europe and to identify the factors that impact on healthcare providers’ adherence. Methods We searched for systematic reviews and quantitative or qualitative primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase up to May 2019. The eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and cross-checked by a second author. We conducted a narrative synthesis attending to the modality of the healthcare process, methods to measure adherence, the scope of the CGs, and population characteristics. Results Out of 8137 references, we included 41 primary studies conducted in eight European countries. Most followed a retrospective cohort design (19/41; 46%) and were at low or moderate risk of bias. Adherence for overall breast cancer care process (from diagnosis to follow-up) ranged from 54 to 69%; for overall treatment process [including surgery, chemotherapy (CT), endocrine therapy (ET), and radiotherapy (RT)] the median adherence was 57.5% (interquartile range (IQR) 38.8–67.3%), while for systemic therapy (CT and ET) it was 76% (IQR 68–77%). The median adherence for the processes assessed individually was higher, ranging from 74% (IQR 10–80%), for the follow-up, to 90% (IQR 87–92.5%) for ET. Internal factors that potentially impact on healthcare providers’ adherence were their perceptions, preferences, lack of knowledge, or intentional decisions. Conclusions A substantial proportion of breast cancer patients are not receiving CGs-recommended care. Healthcare providers’ adherence to breast cancer CGs in Europe has room for improvement in almost all care processes. CGs development and implementation processes should address the main factors that influence healthcare providers' adherence, especially patient-related ones. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018092884). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05657-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Yang Song
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Luciana Neamtiu
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy.
| | - Elena Parmelli
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy
| | | | - Montserrat Rabassa
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Zuleika Saz Parkinson
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - Iván Solà
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adrián Vásquez-Mejía
- Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
| | - Ignacio Ricci-Cabello
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.,Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Palma, Spain.,Primary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Balearic Islands Health Service, Palma, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Inoue K, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Tsugawa Y. Association between industry payments for opioid products and physicians' prescription of opioids: observational study with propensity-score matching. J Epidemiol Community Health 2020; 74:647-654. [PMID: 32350126 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2020-214021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Industry marketing to physicians for opioids has received substantial attention as it can potentially influence physicians' prescription of opioids. However, robust evidence demonstrating a causal link between industry payments for opioids and physicians' prescription practice for opioids is lacking. METHODS Using the national databases of physicians treating Medicare beneficiaries, we examined the association between physicians' receipt of opioid-related industry payments in 2016 and (1) the number of opioids prescribed and (2) the annual expenditures for the opioid products by those physicians in 2017, using propensity-score matching in a 1:1 ratio adjusting for the physician characteristics (sex, years in practice, medical school attended, specialty), the number of opioid prescriptions in 2016, and physicians' financial relationships with industry in 2015. We compared matched pairs of physicians using the estimated effect and paired t-test. RESULTS Among 43 778 physicians included after propensity-score matching, physicians who received opioid-related industry payments in 2016 prescribed more opioids (153.8 vs 129.7; adjusted difference (95% CI), 24.1 (19.1 to 29.1)) and accounted for more spending due to opioids ($10 476 vs $6983; adjusted difference (95% CI), $3493 (2854 to 4134)) in 2017, compared with physicians who did not receive payments. The association was larger among primary care physicians than surgeons or specialists. The dose-response analysis revealed that even a small amount of industry payments was sufficient to effectively affect physicians' prescription practice of opioids. CONCLUSIONS Opioid-related industry payments to physicians in the prior year were associated with a higher number of opioid prescriptions and expenditures for opioid products in the subsequent year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Inoue
- Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jose F Figueroa
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - E John Orav
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yusuke Tsugawa
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA .,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.,UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Simula AS, Malmivaara A, Booth N, Karppinen J. A classification-based approach to low back pain in primary care - protocol for a benchmarking controlled trial. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:61. [PMID: 32252643 PMCID: PMC7137427 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01135-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Guidelines recommend a biopsychosocial framework for low back pain (LBP) management and the avoidance of inappropriate imaging. In clinical practice, care strategies are often inconsistent with evidence and guidelines, even though LBP is the most common disabling health condition worldwide. Unhelpful beliefs, attitudes and inappropriate imaging are common. LBP is understood to be a complex biopsychosocial phenomenon with many known multidimensional risk factors (symptom- and lifestyle-related, psychological and social) for persistent or prolonged disability, which should be identified and addressed by treatment. The STarT Back Tool (SBT) was developed for early identification of individual risk factors of LBP to enable targeted care. Stratified care according SBT has been shown to improve the effectiveness of care in a primary care setting. A biopsychosocially-oriented patient education booklet, which includes imaging guidelines and information, is one possible way to increase patients’ understanding of LBP and to reduce inappropriate imaging. Premeditated pathways, education of professionals, written material, and electronic patient registry support in health care organizations could help implement evidence-based care. Methods We will use a Benchmarking Controlled Trial (BCT) design in our study. We will prospectively collect data from three health care regions before and after the implementation of a classification-based approach to LBP in primary care. The primary outcome will be change in PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) (short form 20a) over 12-month follow-up. Discussion The implementation of a classification-based biopsychosocial approach can potentially improve the care of LBP patients, reduce inappropriate imaging without increasing health-care costs, and decrease indirect costs by reducing work disability. Using the BCT we will be able to evaluate the effectiveness of the improvement strategy for the entire care pathway. Trial registration ISRCTN,ISRCTN13273552, retrospectively registered 13/05/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Simula
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. .,Department of General Medicine, The South Savo Social and Health Care Authority, Mikkeli, Finland.
| | - A Malmivaara
- Centre for Health and Social Economics, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - N Booth
- Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - J Karppinen
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.,Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Nevedal AL, Lewis ET, Wu J, Jacobs J, Jarvik JG, Chou R, Barnett PG. Factors Influencing Primary Care Providers' Unneeded Lumbar Spine MRI Orders for Acute, Uncomplicated Low-Back Pain: a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:1044-1051. [PMID: 31832927 PMCID: PMC7174262 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05410-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines suggest that magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine (LS-MRI) is unneeded during the first 6 weeks of acute, uncomplicated low-back pain. Unneeded LS-MRIs do not improve patient outcomes, lead to unnecessary surgeries and procedures, and cost the US healthcare system about $300 million dollars per year. However, why primary care providers (PCPs) order unneeded LS-MRI for acute, uncomplicated low-back pain is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To characterize and explain the factors contributing to PCPs ordering unneeded LS-MRI for acute, uncomplicated low-back pain. DESIGN Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS Veterans Affairs PCPs identified from administrative data as having high or low rates of guideline-concordant LS-MRI ordering in 2016. APPROACH Providers were interviewed about their use of LS-MRI for acute, uncomplicated low-back pain and factors contributing to their decision-making. Directed content analysis of transcripts was conducted to identify and compare environmental-, patient-, and provider-level factors contributing to unneeded LS-MRI. KEY RESULTS Fifty-five PCPs participated (8.6% response rate). Both low (n = 33) and high (n = 22) guideline-concordant providers reported that LS-MRIs were required for specialty care referrals, but they differed in how other environmental factors (stringency of radiology utilization review, management of patient travel burden, and time constraints) contributed to LS-MRI ordering patterns. Low- and high-guideline-concordant providers reported similar patient factors (beliefs in value of imaging and pressure on providers). However, provider groups differed in how provider-level factors (guideline familiarity and agreement, the extent to which they acquiesced to patients, and belief in the value of LS-MRI) contributed to LS-MRI ordering patterns. CONCLUSIONS Results describe how diverse environmental, patient, and provider factors contribute to unneeded LS-MRI for acute, uncomplicated low-back pain. Prior research using a single intervention to reduce unneeded LS-MRI has been ineffective. Results suggest that multifaceted de-implementation strategies may be required to reduce unneeded LS-MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea L Nevedal
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
| | - Eleanor T Lewis
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.,Program Evaluation and Resource Center, VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Justina Wu
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA
| | - Josephine Jacobs
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.,Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey G Jarvik
- Departments of Radiology, Neurological Surgery, and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Roger Chou
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Informatics and Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Paul G Barnett
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.,Health Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Weller CD, Richards C, Turnour L, Team V. Understanding factors influencing venous leg ulcer guideline implementation in Australian primary care. Int Wound J 2020; 17:804-818. [PMID: 32150790 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the venous leg ulcer (VLU) management in primary health care settings located in Melbourne metropolitan and rural Victoria, Australia. We explored health professionals' perspective on the use of the Australian and New Zealand Venous Leg Ulcer Clinical Practice Guideline (VLU CPG) to identify the main challenges of VLU CPG uptake in clinical practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 general practitioners (GPs) and 20 practice nurses (PNs), including two Aboriginal health nurses. The Theoretical Domains Framework guided data collection and analysis. Data were analysed using a theory-driven analysis. We found a lack of awareness of the VLU CPGs, which resulted in suboptimal knowledge and limited adherence to evidence-based recommendations. Environmental factors, such as busy nature of clinical environment and absence of handheld Doppler ultrasound, as well as social and professional identity factors, such as reliance on previous experience and colleague's advice, influenced the uptake of the VLU CPGs in primary care. Findings of this study will inform development of interventions to increase the uptake of the VLU CPG in primary care settings and to reduce the evidence-practice gap in VLU management by health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina D Weller
- Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catelyn Richards
- Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Turnour
- Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria Team
- Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|