Racial and ethnic disparities in maternal morbidity and obstetric care

Racial Disparities in the Military Health System: A Framework Synthesis

INTRODUCTION

Racial disparities in health care are a well-documented phenomenon in the USA. Universal insurance has been suggested as a solution to mitigate these disparities. We examined race-based disparities in the Military Health System (MHS) by constructing and analyzing a framework of existing studies that measured disparities between direct care (care provided by military treatment facilities) and private sector care (care provided by civilian health care facilities).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a framework synthesis on 77 manuscripts published in partnership with the Comparative Effectiveness and Provider-Induced Demand Collaboration Project that use MHS electronic health record data to present an overview of racial disparities assessed for multiple treatment interventions in a nationally representative, universally insured population.

RESULTS

We identified 32 studies assessing racial disparities in areas of surgery, trauma, opioid prescription and usage, women's health, and others. Racial disparities were mitigated in postoperative complications, trauma care, and cancer screenings but persisted in diabetes readmissions, opioid usage, and minimally invasive women's health procedures.

CONCLUSION

Universal coverage mitigates many, but not all, racial disparities in health care. An examination of a broader range of interventions, a closer look at variation in care provided by civilian facilities, and a look at the quality of care by race provide further opportunities for research.

Health Equity Morbidity and Mortality Conferences in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Maternal mortality and morbidity continue to occur at unacceptably high levels in the United States, with communities of color experiencing significantly higher rates than their White counterparts, even after adjustment for confounding factors such as socioeconomic status. Many obstetrics and gynecology departments across the country have begun to incorporate routine discussion and analysis of health equity into peer review and educational processes, including grand rounds and morbidity and mortality conferences. Despite the desire and drive, there is little published guidance on best practices for incorporation of an equity component into these conferences. This document outlines the current processes at four academic institutions to highlight the variety of ways in which health equity and social justice can be incorporated when analyzing patient experiences and health outcomes. This commentary also provides a list of specific recommendations based on the combined experiences at these institutions so that others across the country can incorporate principles of health equity into their peer-review processes.

Association between weighted adverse outcome score and race/ethnicity in women and neonates

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the Weighted Adverse Outcome Score (WAOS) and race/ethnicity among a large and diverse population-based cohort of women and neonates in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered in the United States between 2011 and 2013. We identified mother-infant pairs with adverse maternal and/or neonatal outcomes. These outcomes were assigned weighted scores to account for relative severity. The association between race/ethnicity and WAOS was examined using chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Compared to White women and their neonates, Black women and their neonates were at higher odds of an adverse outcome.

CONCLUSION(S)

The vast majority of women and neonates had no adverse outcome. However, Black women and their neonates were found to have a higher WAOS. This tool could be used to designate hospitals or regions with higher-than-expected adverse outcomes and target them for intervention.

Population based cohort study of fetal deaths, and neonatal and perinatal mortality at term within a Somali diaspora

Background

Somali women deliver at greater gestational age with limited information on the associated perinatal mortality. Our objective is to compare perinatal mortality among Somali women with the population rates.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study from all births that occurred in Minnesota between 2011 and 2017. Information was obtained from certificates of birth, and neonatal and fetal death. Data was abstracted from 470,550 non-anomalous births ≥37 and ≤ 42 weeks of gestation. The study population included U.S. born White, U.S. born Black, women born in Somalia or self-identified as Somali, and women who identified as Hispanic regardless of place of birth (377,426). We excluded births < 37 weeks and > 42 weeks, > 1 fetus, age < 18 or > 45 years, or women of other ethnicities. The exposure was documented ethnicity or place of birth, and the outcomes were live birth, fetal death, neonatal death prior to 28 days, and perinatal mortality rates. These were calculated using binomial proportions with 95% confidence intervals and compared using odds ratios adjusted (aOR) for diabetes, hypertension and maternal body mass index.

Results

The aOR [95%CI] for stillbirth rate in the Somali cohort was greater than for U.S. born White (2.05 [1.49–2.83]) and Hispanic women (1.90 [1.30–2.79]), but similar to U.S. born Black women (0.88 [0.57–1.34]). Neonatal death rates were greater than for U.S. born White (1.84 [1.36–2.48], U.S. born Black women (1.47 [1.04–2.06]) and Hispanic women (1.47 [1.05–2.06]). This did not change after analysis was restricted to those with spontaneous onset of labor. When analyzed by week, at 42 weeks Somali aOR for neonatal death was the same as for U.S. born White women, but compared against U.S. born Black and Hispanic women, was significantly lower.

Conclusions

The later mean gestational age at delivery among women of Somali ethnicity is associated with greater overall risk for stillbirth and neonatal death rates at term, except compared against U.S. born Black women with whom stillbirth rates were not different. At 42 weeks, Somali neonatal mortality decreased and was comparable to that of the U.S. born White population and was lower than that of the other minorities.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-04163-z.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury by maternal origin and length of residence: a nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association between maternal origin and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), and assess if associations differed by length of residence.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

The Medical Birth Registry of Norway.

POPULATION

Primiparous women with vaginal livebirth of a singleton cephalic fetus between 2008 and 2017 (n = 188 658).

METHODS

Multivariable logistic regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for OASI with 95% CI by maternal region of origin and birthplace. We stratified models on length of residence and paternal birthplace.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

OASI.

RESULTS

Overall, 6373 cases of OASI were identified (3.4% of total cohort). Women from South Asia were most likely to experience OASI (6.2%; aOR 2.24, 95% CI 1.87-2.69), followed by those from Southeast Asia, East Asia & the Pacific (5.7%; 1.59, 1.37-1.83) and Sub-Saharan Africa (5.2%; 1.85, 1.55-2.20), compared with women originating from Norway. Among women born in the same region, those with short length of residence in Norway (0-4 years), showed the highest odds of OASI. Migrant women across most regions of origin had the lowest risk of OASI if they had a Norwegian partner.

CONCLUSIONS

Primiparous women from Asian regions and Sub-Saharan Africa had up to two-fold risk of OASI, compared with women originating from Norway. Migrants with short residence and those with a foreign-born partner had higher risk of OASI, implying that some of the risk differential is due to sociocultural factors. Some migrants, especially new arrivals, may benefit from special attention during labour to reduce morbidity and achieve equitable outcomes.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Anal sphincter injury during birth is more common among Asian and Sub-Saharan migrants and particularly among recent arrivals.

Hospital Geographic Location and Unexpected Complications in term Newborns in Florida

INTRODUCTION

Birth trauma rates in term of neonates is a quality measure used by the Joint Commission. In the United States birth trauma rates occurs at a rate of 37 per 1000 live births and are on the decline. However, this decline has been significantly lower among term neonates born in rural facilities. There is a critical lack of evidence toward the influence geographical risk factors has on birth trauma rates for neonatal patients. We sought to measure rural community and hospital characteristics associated with birth trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal study design was used to examine inpatient medical discharge data across 103 hospitals of neonates at birth from 2013 to 2018. Discharge data was linked to the American Hospital Association annual survey. We used a multi-level mixed effect model to investigate the relationship between individual and hospital-level attributes associated with increased risk of birth trauma among neonatal patients.

RESULTS

We found that rural hospitals were 3.99 times (p < 0.001) more likely to experience higher birth trauma than urban hospitals. Medium sized hospitals were 2.11 times (p < 0.001) more likely to experience higher birth trauma. Hospitals who indicate having a safety culture were more likely (p < 0.05) to have high rates of birth trauma.

DISCUSSION

Neonates born at rural hospitals, were more likely to experience a birth-related injury. Policy strategies focusing on improving health care quality in rural areas are critical to mitigating this increased risk of birth trauma. Further research is required to assess how physician characteristics may impact birth trauma rates.

Self-Reported Health Status Improved For Racial And Ethnic Minority Groups After Michigan Medicaid Expansion

Addressing health inequities for racial and ethnic minority populations is challenging. After passage of the Affordable Care Act, Michigan launched its Healthy Michigan Plan, which expanded Medicaid eligibility in the state. Our evaluation of the expansion provided the opportunity to study its impact on racial and ethnic minority groups, including Arab American and Chaldean American enrollees, an understudied population. Using data from telephone surveys collected in 2016, 2017, and 2018, we conducted an analysis to study the plan's impact on access to a regular source of care and health status among racial and ethnic minority groups. More than 90 percent of respondents of all racial and ethnic groups reported having a regular source of care after plan enrollment compared with 74.4 percent before enrollment. Respondents who identified as non-Hispanic White, African American, and Hispanic reported improvements in health status after plan enrollment. Our study demonstrates the potential of health insurance access to narrow health inequities between racial and ethnic groups.

Costs of Severe Maternal Morbidity in U.S. Commercially Insured and Medicaid Populations: An Updated Analysis

Background: The most common reason for hospitalization in the United States is childbirth. The costs of childbirth are substantial. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of hospital deliveries identified in the MarketScan^® Commercial and Medicaid health insurance claim databases. Women with an inpatient birth in the calendar year 2016 were included. Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) was identified using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention algorithm of 21 International Classification of Diseases-10 codes. Mean costs and cost ratios for women with and without SMM were reported. Generalized linear models were used to analyze demographic and clinical variables influencing delivery costs. Results: We identified 1,486 women in the Commercial population, who had a birth in 2016 and met the criteria for SMM. The total mean per-patient costs of care for women with and without SMM were $50,212 and $23,795, respectively. In the Medicaid population there were 29,763 births, of which 342 met the criteria for SMM. The total mean per-patient costs of care for women with and without SMM were $26,513 and $9,652, respectively. A multifetal gestation, a cesarean delivery, maternal age, and pregnancy-related complications were independently predictive of increased delivery costs in both Commercial and Medicaid populations. Conclusions: The occurrence of SMM was associated with an increase in maternity-related costs of 111% in the Commercial and 175% in the Medicaid population. Some of the factors associated with increased delivery hospitalization costs could be treated or avoided.

A Systematic Review of Patient-, Provider-, and Health System-Level Predictors of Postpartum Health Care Use by People of Color and Low-Income and/or Uninsured Populations in the United States

Introduction: People of color and low-income and uninsured populations in the United States have elevated risks of adverse maternal health outcomes alongside low levels of postpartum visit attendance. The postpartum period is a critical window for delivering health care services to reduce health inequities and their transgenerational effects. Evidence is needed to identify predictors of postpartum visit attendance in marginalized populations. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature to identify studies that quantified patient-, provider-, and health system-level predictors of postpartum health care use by people of color and low-income and uninsured populations. We extracted study design, sample, measures, and outcome data from studies meeting our eligibility criteria, and used a modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to evaluate risk of bias. Results: Out of 2,757 studies, 36 met our criteria for inclusion in this review. Patient-level factors consistently associated with postpartum care included higher socioeconomic status, rural residence, fewer children, older age, medical complications, and previous health care use. Perceived discrimination during intrapartum care and trouble understanding the health care provider were associated with lower postpartum visit use, while satisfaction with the provider and having a provider familiar with one's health history were associated with higher use. Health system predictors included public facilities, group prenatal care, and services such as patient navigators and appointment reminders. Discussion: Postpartum health service research in marginalized populations has predominantly focused on patient-level factors; however, the multilevel predictors identified in this review reflect underlying inequities and should be used to inform the design of structural changes.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Peripartum Hysterectomy Risk and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether race and ethnicity contribute to risks associated with peripartum hysterectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cross-sectional study utilized the 2000-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample to analyze risk of peripartum hysterectomy and associated severe maternal morbidity, mortality, surgical injury, reoperation, surgical-site complications, and mortality by maternal race and ethnicity. Race and ethnicity were categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other, and unknown. Multivariable log-linear regression models including patient, clinical, and hospital risk factors were performed with adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of 59,854,731 delivery hospitalizations, there were 45,369 peripartum hysterectomies (7.6 per thousand). Of these, 37.8% occurred among non-Hispanic white, 13.9% among non-Hispanic black, and 22.8% among Hispanic women. In adjusted analyses, non-Hispanic black (aRR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.17-1.29) and Hispanic women (aRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.22-1.29) were at increased risk of hysterectomy compared with non-Hispanic white women. Risk for severe morbidity was increased for non-Hispanic black (aRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.19-1.33), but not for Hispanic (aRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97-1.07) women. Between these three groups, risk for intraoperative complications was highest among non-Hispanic white women, risk for reoperation was highest among Hispanic women, and risk for surgical-site complications was highest among non-Hispanic black women. Evaluating maternal mortality, non-Hispanic black women (RR: 3.83, 95% CI: 2.65-5.53) and Hispanic women (RR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.74-3.59) were at higher risk than non-Hispanic white women.

CONCLUSION

Peripartum hysterectomy and related complications other than death differed modestly by race. In comparison, mortality differentials were large supporting that differential risk for death in the setting of this high-risk scenario may be an important cause of disparities.

KEY POINTS

· Peripartum hysterectomy and related complications differed modestly by race.. · Mortality differentials in the setting of peripartum hysterectomy were large.. · Failure to rescue may be an important cause of peripartum hysterectomy disparities..

Contribution of Prepregnancy Obesity to Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Severe Maternal Morbidity

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of prepregnancy obesity as a mediator in the association between race-ethnicity and severe maternal morbidity.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis on a population-based retrospective cohort study using 2010-2014 birth records linked with hospital discharge data in New York City. A multivariable logistic regression mediation model on a subgroup of the sample consisting of normal-weight and obese women (n=409,021) calculated the mediation effect of obesity in the association between maternal race-ethnicity and severe maternal morbidity, and the residual effect not mediated by obesity. A sensitivity analysis was conducted excluding the severe maternal morbidity cases due to blood transfusion.

RESULTS

Among 591,455 live births, we identified 15,158 cases of severe maternal morbidity (256.3/10,000 deliveries). The severe maternal morbidity rate among obese women was higher than that of normal-weight women (342 vs 216/10,000 deliveries). Black women had a severe maternal morbidity rate nearly three times higher than White women (420 vs 146/10,000 deliveries) and the severe maternal morbidity rate among Latinas was nearly twice that of White women (285/10,000 deliveries). Among women with normal or obese body mass index (BMI) only (n=409,021), Black race was strongly associated with severe maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.02, 95% CI 2.88-3.17) but the obesity-mediated effect represented only 3.2% of the total association (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05). Latina ethnicity was also associated with severe maternal morbidity (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.90-2.12) and the obesity-mediated effect was similarly small: 3.4% of the total association (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03). In a sensitivity analysis excluding blood transfusion, severe maternal morbidity cases found a higher mediation effect of obesity in the association with Black race and Latina ethnicity (15.3% and 15.2% of the total association, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that prepregnancy obesity, a modifiable factor, is a limited driver of racial-ethnic disparities in overall severe maternal morbidity.

The influence of medical insurance on obstetrical care

Maternal and obstetrical outcomes vary widely within the United States. The impact of insurance type on health care disparities and its influence on obstetrical care and maternal outcome is not clear. We report the impact of health care insurance on obstetrical and maternal outcomes in a tertiary care health care system. Our maternal quality care database (n = 4199) was queried comparing commercial insurance to government sponsored insurance from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2018. Parturients with commercial insurance were older, weighed more, presented with less gravidity and parity, had more advanced gestation, and had a higher neonatal 5-minute Apgar score than government insured parturients. Additionally, government insured parturients were less likely to be admitted for induction with oxytocin, receive labor epidural analgesia, and have a primary caesarean delivery. Similarly, government insured parturients were more likely to be of African American descent, be a current known smoker, have a positive urine drug screen, and receive a general anesthetic. We conclude obstetrical and maternal health care disparities exist based on medical insurance type.

Does Universal Coverage Mitigate Racial Disparities in Potentially Avoidable Maternal Complications?

OBJECTIVE

Potentially avoidable maternity complications (PAMCs) have been validated as an indicator of access to quality prenatal care. African-American mothers have exhibited a higher incidence of PAMCs, which has been attributed to unequal health coverage. The objective of this study was to assess if racial disparities in the incidence of PAMCs exist in a universally insured population.

STUDY DESIGN

PAMCs in each racial group were compared relative to White mothers using multivariate logistic regression. Stratified subanalyses assessed for adjusted differences in the odds of PAMCs for each racial group within direct versus purchased care.

RESULTS

A total of 675,553 deliveries were included. Among them, 428,320 (63%) mothers were White, 112,170 (17%) African-American, 37,151 (6%) Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 97,912 (15%) others. African-American women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08) were more likely to have PAMCs compared with White women, and Asian women (aOR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.95) were significantly less likely to have PAMCs compared with White women. On stratified analysis according to the system of care, equal odds of PAMCs among African-American women compared with White women were realized within direct care (aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.07), whereas slightly higher odds among African-American persisted in purchased (aOR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10).

CONCLUSION

Higher occurrence of PAMCs among minority women sponsored by a universal health coverage was mitigated compared with White women. Protocol-based care as in the direct care system may help overcome health disparities.

Shaping birth: variation in the birth canal and the importance of inclusive obstetric care

Regional variation in pelvic morphology and childbirth has long occurred alongside traditional labour support and an understanding of possible normal courses of childbirth for each population. The process of migration and globalization has broken down these links, while a European model of 'normal' labour has become widespread. The description of 'normal' childbirth provided within obstetrics and midwifery textbooks, in fact, is modelled on a specific pelvic morphology that is common in European women. There is mounting evidence, however, that this model is not representative of women's diversity, especially for women of non-white ethnicities. The human birth canal is very variable in shape, both within and among human populations, and differences in pelvic shapes have been associated with differences in the mechanism of labour. Normalizing a white-centred model of female anatomy and of childbirth can disadvantage women of non-European ancestry. Because they are less likely to fit within this model, pelvic shape and labour pattern in non-white women are more likely to be considered 'abnormal', potentially leading to increased rates of labour intervention. To ensure that maternal care is inclusive and as safe as possible for all women, obstetric and midwifery training need to incorporate women's diversity. This article is part of the theme issue 'Multidisciplinary perspectives on social support and maternal-child health'.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Intensive Care Admissions in a Pregnant and Postpartum Population, Hawai'i, 2012-2017

OBJECTIVE

Maternal morbidity and mortality is a global concern despite advances in medical care and technology and improved economic resources of nations worldwide. The primary objective of our study was to describe racial/ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity by using admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) as a marker. The secondary objective was to evaluate associations between patient characteristics, including obstetric outcomes, and severe maternal morbidity.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used a large inpatient database to identify pregnancy and postpartum hospitalizations in Hawai'i from January 2012 through September 2017. We evaluated associations between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and race/ethnicity by using χ² tests. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess associations between race/ethnicity and ICU admission. We used a post hoc analysis to assess associations between ICU admission and obstetric outcomes by race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

After adjustment, we found a significantly higher ICU admission rate among Asian (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.04-1.62; P = .02), Filipino (aOR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.17-1.79; P < .001), and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander (aOR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.15-1.68; P < .001) women compared with non-Hispanic White women. Multiple clinical characteristics and outcomes were associated with ICU admission, such as preexisting chronic conditions and pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders.

CONCLUSION

We found that severe maternal morbidity represented by ICU admission is higher among Asian, Filipino, and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander women than among non-Hispanic White women in Hawai'i. Our findings reemphasize the need for health care providers to be vigilant in caring for members of racial/ethnic minority groups and managing their comorbidities.

Services and payer mix of Black-serving hospitals and related severe maternal morbidity

BACKGROUND

Black-serving hospitals are associated with increased maternal risk. However, prior administrative data research on maternal disparities has generally included limited hospital factors. More detailed evaluation of hospital factors related to obstetric outcomes may be important in understanding disparities.

OBJECTIVE

To examine detailed characteristics of Black-serving hospitals and how these characteristics are associated with risk for severe maternal morbidity (SMM).

METHODS

This serial cross-sectional study linked the 2010-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample and the 2013 American Hospital Association Annual Survey Databases. Delivery hospitalizations occurring to women 15-54 years of age were identified. The proportions of non-Hispanic Black patients within a hospital was categorized into quartiles, and hospital factors such as specialized medical, surgical and safety-net services as well as payer mix were compared across these quartiles. A series of models was performed evaluating risk for SMM with Black-serving hospital quartile as the primary exposure. Log linear regression models with a Poisson distribution (and robust variance) were performed with unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as measures of effect.

RESULTS

Overall 965,202 deliveries from 430 hospitals met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. By quartile, non-Hispanic Black patients accounted for 1.3%, 5.4%, 13.4%, and 33.8% of patients. Many services were significantly less common in the lowest compared to the highest Black-serving hospital quartile including cardiac intensive care (48.9% versus 74.5%), neonatal intensive care (28.9% versus 64.9%), pediatric intensive care (20.0% versus 45.7%), pediatric cardiology (29.6% versus 44.7%), and HIV/AIDS services (36.3% versus 71.3%) (p≤0.01 for all). Indigent care clinics, crisis prevention, and enabling services (p≤0.01 for all) were more common at Black-serving hospitals as was Medicaid payer. Following adjustments for detailed hospital factors, the lowest Black serving hospital quartile carried the lowest risk for SMM. However, SMM risks were similar across the 2^nd (aRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08, 1.59), 3^rd (aRR 1.27, 95% 1.05, 1.55), and 4^th (aRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.07, 1.55) quartiles.

CONCLUSION

Black-serving hospitals were more likely to provide a range of specialized medical, surgical, and safety-net services and to have a higher Medicaid burden. Payer mix and unmeasured confounding may account for some of the maternal risk associated with Black-serving hospitals.

Rethinking Bias to Achieve Maternal Health Equity: Changing Organizations, Not Just Individuals

To reduce and eliminate Black–White maternal health disparities, we must enact solutions that address systemic biases.

In this article, we address the limitations of existing implicit bias interventions as a strategy for achieving maternal health equity. We then focus on how institutionally sanctioned racial stereotyping harms Black maternal health and marginalizes a key group in the fight for health equity—Black physicians. Finally, we provide strategies to address racial bias in perinatal health care and structural barriers impeding Black physicians' success.

Language Preference and Risk of Primary Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

While some medical indications for cesarean delivery are clear, subjective provider and patient factors contribute to the rising cesarean delivery rates and marked disparities between racial/ethnic groups. We aimed to determine the association between language preference and risk of primary cesarean delivery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) deliveries of patients over 18 years old from 2011-2016 at an academic medical center, supplemented with data from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. We used modified Poisson regression with robust error variance to calculate risk ratios for cesarean delivery between patients with English language preference and other language preference, with secondary outcomes of Apgar score, maternal readmission, blood transfusion, and NICU admission.

RESULTS

Of the 11,298 patients included, 10.3% reported a preferred language other than English, including Mandarin and Cantonese (61.7%), Portuguese (9.7%), and Spanish (7.5%). The adjusted risk ratio for cesarean delivery among patients with a language preference other than English was 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-0.997; p = 0.046) compared to patients with English language preference. No significant differences in risk of secondary outcomes between English and other language preference were found.

DISCUSSION

After adjusting for confounders, this analysis demonstrates a decreased risk of cesarean delivery among women who do not have an English language preference at one institution. This disparity in cesarean delivery rates in an NTSV population warrants future research, raising the question of what clinical and social factors may be contributing to these lower cesarean delivery rates.

Severe maternal morbidity associated with cerclage use in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the frequency of serious maternal complications associated with cerclage use during pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study of all live births in Ohio from 2006 to 2015. Maternal sociodemographic, medical, and obstetric characteristics were compared for births in which cerclage was utilized during the pregnancy versus those without cerclage. The primary outcome for the study was a composite of adverse outcome including maternal intensive care unit (ICU) admission, blood product transfusion, uterine rupture and unplanned hysterectomy in all births. Secondary outcomes included each of the individual adverse outcomes as well as maternal hospital transfer to a tertiary facility, unplanned operation after delivery and chorioamnionitis. Each outcome was also analyzed separately in singleton and twin births. Generalized linear modeling was used to estimate the relative risk of adverse maternal outcomes associated with cerclage placement after adjustment for coexisting risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1,428,655 singleton and twin live births in Ohio from 2006 to 2015, 4595 [0.3%] were recorded on the birth certificate as having cerclage during pregnancy. Of those, 11.7% experienced a serious adverse maternal outcome, compared to 3.7% without cerclage, adjRR 2.7 [95% CI 2.5, 3.0]. The rate of the composite maternal adverse outcome was significantly increased for pregnancies with cerclage versus those without overall, and in singleton and twin pregnancies when measured individually [all p ≤ .001]. Even after adjustment for coexisting risk factors, cerclage remained significantly associated with composite adverse outcome in each of these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 1 in 10 women with cerclage experience an adverse maternal outcome. Even after adjusting for gestational age at delivery and other risk factors, maternal risk for serious adverse event remains over twofold increased for pregnancies with cerclage. This information may be helpful in counseling women regarding potential maternal risk when considering neonatal benefit of cerclage in pregnancies at high risk of preterm birth.

Racial Disparities in Maternal Critical Care: Are There Racial Differences in Level of Care?

BACKGROUND

Obstetric care in the US is complicated by marked racial and ethnic disparities in maternal obstetric outcomes, including severe morbidity and mortality, which are not explained by underlying differences in patient characteristics. Understanding differences in care delivery related to clinical acuity across different racial groups may help elucidate the source of these disparities.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the association of maternal race with utilization of critical care interventions.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted as a secondary analysis of a large, multicenter observational study of women undergoing cesarean delivery. All women with a known delivery date were included. The primary outcome measure, a composite of critical care interventions (CCI) at delivery or postpartum that included mechanical ventilation, central and arterial line placement, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were compared by racial/ethnic group-non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American. We evaluated differences in utilization of critical care with a multivariable regression model accounting for selected characteristics present at admission for delivery, including maternal age, BMI, co-morbidities, parity, and plurality. Maternal mortality was also evaluated as a secondary outcome and the frequency of CCI by significant maternal co-morbidity, specifically heart disease, renal disease, and chronic hypertension was assessed to ascertain the level of care provided to women of different race/ethnicity with specific baseline co-morbidities.

RESULTS

73,096 of 73,257 women in the parent trial met inclusion criteria, of whom 505 (0.7%) received a CCI and 3337 (4.6%) had a significant medical co-morbidity (1.2% heart disease, 0.8% renal disease, 2.5% chronic hypertension). The mortality rate was significantly higher among non-Hispanic black women, compared to non-Hispanic white and Hispanic women. In the adjusted model, there was no significant association between CCI and race/ethnicity.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that differences in maternal morbidity by race may be accounted for by differential escalation to higher intensity care. Further investigation into processes for care intensification may continue to clarify sources of racial and ethnic disparities in maternal morbidity and potential for improvement.

Geographic access to critical care obstetrics for women of reproductive age by race and ethnicity

BACKGROUND

The goal of risk-appropriate maternal care is for high-risk pregnant women to receive specialized obstetrical services in facilities equipped with capabilities and staffing to provide care or transfer to facilities with resources available to provide care. In the United States, geographic access to critical care obstetrics varies. It is unknown whether this variation in proximity to critical care obstetrics differs by race, ethnicity, and region.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the geographic access, defined as residence within 50 miles of a facility capable of providing risk-appropriate critical care obstetrics services for women of reproductive age, by distribution of race and ethnicity.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive spatial analysis was used to assess geographic distance to critical care obstetrics for women of reproductive age by race and ethnicity. Data were analyzed geographically: nationally, by the Department of Health and Human Services regions, and by all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Dot density analysis was used to visualize geographic distributions of women by residence and critical care obstetrics facilities across the United States. Proximity analysis defined the proportion of women living within an approximate 50-mile radius of facilities. Source data included the 2015 American Community Survey from the United States Census Bureau and the 2015 American Hospital Association Annual Survey.

RESULTS

Geographic access to critical care obstetrics was the greatest for Asian and Pacific Islander women of reproductive age (95.8%), followed by black (93.5%), Hispanic (91.4%), and white women of reproductive age (89.1%). American Indian and Alaska Native women had more limited geographic access (66%) in all regions. Visualization of proximity to critical care obstetrics indicated that facilities were predominantly located in urban areas, which may limit access to women in frontier or rural areas of states including nationally recognized reservations where larger proportions of white women and American Indian and Alaska Native women reside, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Disparities in proximity to critical care obstetrics exist in rural and frontier areas of the United States, which affect white women and American Indian and Alaska Native women, primarily. Examining insurance coverage, interstate hospital referral networks, and transportation barriers may provide further insight into critical care obstetrics accessibility. Further exploring the role of other equity-based measures of access on disparities beyond geography is warranted.

Scoping Review on the Use of Early Warning Trigger Tools for Women in Labor

OBJECTIVE

To identify existing obstetric trigger tools, evaluate their sensitivity and specificity to correctly identify women in need of care escalation, and describe clinicians' experiences of using these tools while caring for women in labor.

DATA SOURCES

Iterative searches of three databases, CINAHL, PubMed, and SCOPUS, in October 2019 and June 2020 using the keywords maternal surveillance system, obstetric∗, early warning scores, early warning systems, and trigger tools.

STUDY SELECTION

Primary quantitative and qualitative studies on the utility or implementation of trigger tools for women in labor that were written in English. Through the initial search, I identified 208 articles and included 11 full-text articles in this review.

DATA EXTRACTION

I extracted data related to aims, population, methodology, outcomes, and key findings for each study and entered them into a matrix based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Review Guidelines.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Quantitative researchers found that the sensitivity and specificity to correctly identify women in need of care escalation of tools varied and recommended that institutions should consider the burdens of false positives versus the risks of false negatives when choosing a tool for their contexts. Qualitative researchers described clinicians' experiences with the use of trigger tools and systems-level barriers to implementation, including lack of training, poor management of implementation, increased workload due to redundant charting, and belief that tools were not appropriate for women with low-risk pregnancies. Greater rates of false positives led clinicians to use trigger tools only for women with high-risk pregnancies rather than as a screening tool for all women.

CONCLUSION

Trigger tools may help with early identification of worsening clinical condition, but further research is needed to refine and improve tools, as well as understand best practices for tool implementation. Systems-level factors should be considered in tool selection.

Trends and Risk Markers for Severe Maternal Morbidity and Other Obstetric Complications

Background: Studies of obstetric quality of care have almost exclusively focused on severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and have rarely examined more common complications. Methods: This 2016-2018 retrospective, population-based cohort study analyzed maternal delivery outcomes at 127 Illinois hospitals. International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 Revision codes were used to describe the incidence of SMM and route-specific complications. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the association of maternal sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics with the likelihood of coded complications. Results: Among 421,426 deliveries, the SMM rate was 1.4% overall, 0.4% for vaginal, and 2.8% for cesarean delivery. Other complications were documented for 6.9% of women with vaginal and 10.0% of women with cesarean deliveries. While SMM rates were stable, vaginal delivery complications increased 5.9% from 2016 to 2018 and cesarean delivery complications increased 13.8%. Patient age, minority race and ethnicity, high poverty level, and preexisting and pregnancy-related clinical conditions were significantly associated with each complication outcome. Higher hospital delivery volume was associated with higher route-specific complications. Conclusion: SMM significantly underestimates the incidence of maternal complications. Complicated deliveries have much higher charges and length of stay, although ICD-10 coding intensity may influence incidence. New outcome measures based on more detailed clinical data and linked antepartum and postpartum care will be necessary to improve obstetric quality of care measurement.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Prenatal and Postnatal Counseling About Maternal and Infant Health-Promoting Practices Among Teen Mothers

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Disparities in perinatal counseling among all pregnant women exist, yet teen data are lacking. We evaluated racial/ethnic differences in (1) prenatal and (2) postnatal counseling of teen mothers.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data from 2012-2016 and included mothers 19 years of age and younger.

INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Counseling measures included tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs, weight gain, HIV testing, influenza vaccination, breastfeeding, infant safe sleep, postpartum depression, and contraception. Bivariate associations of maternal/infant characteristics and counseling were estimated using χ² tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the independent relationship between race/ethnicity and counseling.

RESULTS

A weighted sample of 544,930 teen mothers was analyzed. Compared with non-Hispanic white (NHW) teens, non-Hispanic black teens were more likely to receive counseling on tobacco (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.77), alcohol (aOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.28-2.46), illicit drugs (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.33-2.41), and HIV testing (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.26-2.09). Compared with NHW teens, Hispanic teens were less likely to receive tobacco counseling (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97) and more likely to receive influenza vaccine counseling (aOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.18-1.76). No difference was found in receipt of postnatal counseling.

CONCLUSION

Racial/ethnic differences in receipt of perinatal counseling exist, with non-Hispanic black teens being more likely to receive counseling on substance use and HIV testing and Hispanic teens being more likely to receive influenza vaccine recommendations compared with NHW teens. Ongoing investigation is needed to understand drivers of these differences.

Mexican-Born Women's Experiences of Perinatal Care in the United States

Mexican-born women represent a significant proportion of the obstetric patient population in California and have higher incidence of adverse obstetric outcomes than white women, including maternal postpartum hemorrhage and perinatal depression. Little is known, however, about Mexican-born women's experiences of maternity care in the United States. Qualitative methods were used to conduct a secondary analysis of interview transcripts, field notes, original photographs, and analytic memos from a study of 7 Mexican-born women's birth experiences. Participants reported social isolation influenced their expectations of maternity care. Disconnection, characterized by unmet physical and relational needs, yielded negative experiences of maternity care, while positive experiences were the result of attentive care wherein they felt providers cared about them as individuals.

A Systematic Review of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Health Outcomes among Asians/Pacific Islanders

Efforts to improve women's health and to reduce maternal mortality worldwide have led to a notable reduction in the global maternal mortality ratio (MMR) over the past two decades. However, it is clear that maternal health outcomes are not equitable, especially when analyzing the scope of maternal health disparities across "developed" and "underdeveloped" nations. This study evaluates recent MMR scholarship with a particular focus on the racial and ethnic divisions that impact on maternal health outcomes. The study contributes to MMR research by analyzing the racial and ethnic disparities that exist in the US, especially among Asian and Pacific Islander (API) subgroups. The study applies exclusionary criteria to 710 articles and subsequently identified various maternal health issues that disproportionately affect API women living in the US. In applying PRISMA review guidelines, the study produced 22 peer-reviewed articles that met inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for this review. The data analysis identified several maternal health foci: obstetric outcomes, environmental exposure, obstetric care and quality measures, and pregnancy-related measures. Only eight of the 22 reviewed studies disaggregated API populations by focusing on specific subgroups of APIs, which signals a need to reconceptualize marginalized API communities' inclusion in health care systems, to promote their equitable access to care, and to dissolve health disparities among racial and ethnic divides. Several short- and long-term initiatives are recommended to develop and implement targeted health interventions for API groups, and thus provide the groundwork for future empirically driven research among specific API subgroups in the US.

Elective Labor Induction at 39 Weeks of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management: Factors Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate characteristics associated with adverse outcomes in low-risk nulliparous women randomized to elective labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation or expectant management.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of women randomized during the 38th week to induction at 39 weeks of gestation or expectant management. Deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation and those not adherent to study protocol or with fetal anomalies were excluded. A composite of adverse outcomes (perinatal death or severe neonatal complications), third- or fourth-degree lacerations, and postpartum hemorrhage were evaluated. Log binomial regression models estimated relative risks and 95% CIs for associations of outcomes with patient characteristics including randomly assigned treatment group. Interactions between patient characteristics and treatment group were tested.

RESULTS

Of 6,096 women with outcome data, 5,007 (82.1%) met criteria for inclusion in this analysis. Frequency of the perinatal composite was 252 (5.0%), 166 (3.3%) for third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration, and 237 (4.7%) for postpartum hemorrhage. In multivariable analysis, intended labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation was associated with a reduced perinatal composite outcome (4.1% vs 6.0%; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.71; 95% CI 0.55-0.90), whereas increasing body mass index (BMI) was associated with an increased perinatal composite outcome (aRR 1.04/unit increase; 95% CI 1.02-1.05). Decreased risk of third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration was observed with increasing BMI (aRR 0.96/unit increase; 95% CI 0.93-0.98) and in Black women compared with White women (1.2% vs 3.9%; aRR 0.34; 95% CI 0.19-0.60). Increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage was observed in Hispanic women compared with White women (6.3% vs 4.0%; aRR 1.64; 95% CI 1.18-2.29). Patient characteristics associated with adverse outcomes were similar between treatment groups (P for interaction >.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with expectant management, intended induction at 39 weeks of gestation was associated with reduced risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Patient characteristics associated with adverse outcomes were few and similar between groups.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01990612.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Maternal and Neonatal Adverse Outcomes in College-Educated Women

OBJECTIVE

To compare composite maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes among women with at least a bachelor's degree by racial and ethnic groups.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the U.S. vital statistics data sets. We included women with at least a bachelor's degree who delivered a nonanomalous live singleton neonate at 24-40 weeks. The primary outcome, composite maternal adverse outcome, included admission to intensive care unit, maternal transfusion, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, or unplanned operating room procedure after delivery. The secondary outcome, composite neonatal adverse outcome, included 5-minute Apgar score less than 5, assisted ventilation for more than 6 hours, neonatal seizure, birth injury, or neonatal death. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the association between maternal race and adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 11.8 million live births, 2.2 million (19%) met the inclusion criteria; 81.5% were to non-Hispanic white women, 8.5% to non-Hispanic black women, and 10% Hispanic women. The overall rate of composite maternal adverse outcome was 5.3 per 1,000 live births. Compared with non-Hispanic white women, the risk of the composite maternal adverse outcome was significantly higher among non-Hispanic black women (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.20; 95% CI 1.13-1.27), but lower among Hispanic women (aRR 0.69; 95% CI 0.64-0.74), a pattern which varied among different gestational age groups. The overall rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome was 11.6 per 1,000 live births. The risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome was significantly higher among neonates with non-Hispanic black mothers (aRR 1.25; 95% CI 1.20-1.30), but lower among neonates with Hispanic mothers (aRR 0.71; 95% CI 0.68-0.75), compared with neonates delivered by non-Hispanic white mothers and varied across gestational age.

CONCLUSION

Among women with at least a bachelor's degree, small but measurable racial and ethnic disparities in composite maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.

Differential effects of different delivery methods on progression to severe postpartum hemorrhage between Chinese nulliparous and multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Delivery methods are associated with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) both in nulliparous and multiparous women. However, few studies have examined the difference in this association between nulliparous and multiparous women. This study aimed to explore the difference of maternal and neonatal characteristics and delivery methods between Chinese nulliparous and multiparous women, and then examine the differential effects of different delivery methods on PPH between these two-type women.

METHODS

Totally 151,333 medical records of women who gave birth between April 2013 to May 2016 were obtained from the electronic health records (EHR) in a northern province, China. The severity of PPH was estimated and classified into blood loss at the level of < 900 ml, 900-1500 ml, 1500-2100 ml, and > 2100 ml. Neonatal and maternal characteristics related to PPH were derived from the same database. Multiple ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate associations.

RESULTS

Medical comorbidities, placenta previa and accreta were higher in the nulliparous group and the episiotomy rate was higher in the multiparous group. Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), the adjusted odds (aOR) for progression to severe PPH due to the forceps-assisted delivery was much higher in multiparous women (aOR: 9.32; 95% CI: 3.66-23.71) than in nulliparous women (aOR: 1.70; 95% CI: 0.91-3.18). The (aOR) for progression to severe PPH due to cesarean section (CS) compared to SVD was twice as high in the multiparous women (aOR: 4.32; 95% CI: 3.03-6.14) as in the nulliparous women (aOR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.40-2.97). However, the (aOR) for progression to severe PPH due to episiotomy compared to SVD between multiparous (aOR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.96-1.62) and nulliparous women (aOR: 1.55; 95% CI: 0.92-2.60) was not significantly different. The (aOR) for progression to severe PPH due to vacuum-assisted delivery compared to SVD in multiparous women (aOR: 2.41; 95% CI: 0.36-16.29) was not significantly different from the nulliparous women (aOR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.40-2.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Forceps-assisted delivery and CS methods were found to increase the risk of severity of the PPH. The adverse effects were even greater for multiparous women. Episiotomy and the vacuum-assisted delivery, and SVD were similar to the risk of progression to severe PPH in either nulliparous or multiparous women. Our findings have implications for the obstetric decision on the choice of delivery methods, maternal and neonatal health care, and obstetric quality control.

Inpatient patient safety events in vulnerable populations: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Widespread attention to structural racism has heightened interest in disparities in the quality of care delivered to racial/ethnic minorities and other vulnerable populations. These groups may also be at increased risk of patient safety events.

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in inpatient patient safety events for vulnerable populations defined by race/ethnicity, insurance status and limited English proficiency (LEP).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary care academic medical centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Inpatient admissions of those aged ≥18 years from 1 October 2014 to 31 December 2018.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary exposures of interest were self-identified race/ethnicity, Medicaid insurance/uninsured and LEP. The primary outcome of interest was the total number of patient safety events, defined as any event identified by a modified version of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement global trigger tool that automatically identifies patient safety events ('automated') from the electronic record or by the hospital-wide voluntary provider reporting system ('voluntary'). Negative binomial models were used to adjust for demographic and clinical factors. We also stratified results by automated and voluntary.

RESULTS

We studied 141 877 hospitalisations, of which 13.6% had any patient safety event. In adjusted analyses, Asian race/ethnicity was associated with a lower event rate (incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96); LEP patients had a lower risk of any patient safety event and voluntary events (IRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.96; IRR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.94). Asian and Latino race/ethnicity were also associated with a lower rate of voluntary events but no difference in risk of automated events. Black race was associated with an increased risk of automated events (IRR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.20).

LIMITATIONS

This is a single centre study.

CONCLUSIONS

A commonly used method for monitoring patient safety problems, namely voluntary incident reporting, may underdetect safety events in vulnerable populations.

A double blind randomized controlled trial using copper impregnated maternity sanitary towels to reduce perineal wound infection

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of copper impregnated sanitary towels on the infection rate following vaginal delivery (VD).

DESIGN

Single center double blind randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Women aged 18 or over who had a sutured second-degree tear or episiotomy following VD.

INTERVENTIONS

All women were randomized to receive either a copper-oxide impregnated sanitary towel (study group) or a non-copper sanitary towel (control group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary study outcome was the incidence of wound infection within a 30-day period from VD, assessed via telephone questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and risk factors of infection.

RESULTS

450 women were enrolled in the study of whom 225 were randomized to the copper impregnated sanitary towel (study group) and 225 to the non-copper sanitary towel (control group) group. Follow-up rate was 98.2%. A total of 102 women (23.1%) developed an infection within 30 days following VD, 19 in the study group (8.6%) and 83 (37.4%) in the control group (P = <0.001, absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 28.8%). The incidence of superficial/deep and organ/space infections was significantly lower in the study group (7.7% vs. 30.2%, P = <0.001 and 4.6% vs. 31.5%, P = <0.001 respectively) with an ARR of 22.5% and 27.0% respectively. Multivariable analysis reported Asian ethnicity and prolonged rupture of membranes as significant risk factors; for the development of infection (OR 1.91, P = 0.03 and OR = 1.97, P = 0.04 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate a significant reduction in infection rate following VD with the use of copper impregnated sanitary towels.

Maternity Care Deserts and Pregnancy-Associated Mortality in Louisiana

BACKGROUND

Maternal mortality is an issue of growing concern in the United States, where the incidence of death during pregnancy and postpartum seems to be increasing. The purpose of this analysis was to explore whether residing in a maternity care desert (defined as a county with no hospital offering obstetric care and no OB/GYN or certified nurse midwife providers) was associated with risk of death during pregnancy and up to 1 year postpartum among women in Louisiana from 2016 to 2017.

METHODS

Data provided by the March of Dimes were used to classify Louisiana parishes by level of access to maternity care. Using data on all pregnancy-associated deaths verified by the Louisiana Department of Health (n = 112 from 2016 to 2017) and geocoded live births occurring in Louisiana during the same time period (n = 101,484), we fit adjusted modified Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations and exploratory spatial analysis to identify significant associations between place of residence and risk of death.

RESULTS

We found that the risk of death during pregnancy and up to 1 year postpartum owing to any cause (pregnancy-associated mortality) and in particular death owing to obstetric causes (pregnancy-related mortality) was significantly elevated among women residing in maternity care deserts compared with women in areas with greater access (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] for pregnancy-associated mortality, 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-3.18; aRR for pregnancy-related mortality, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.71-6.65). A large racial inequity in risk persisted above and beyond differences in geographic access to maternity care (non-Hispanic Black vs. non-Hispanic White aRR for pregnancy-associated mortality, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.39-3.56; aRR for pregnancy-related mortality, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.16-6.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Ensuring access to maternity care may be an important step toward maternal mortality prevention, but may alone be insufficient for achieving maternal health equity.

Identifying Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Interhospital Transfer: an Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Interhospital transfer (IHT) is often performed to provide patients with specialized care. Racial/ethnic disparities in IHT have been suggested but are not well-characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and IHT.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of 2016 National Inpatient Sample data.

PATIENTS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years old with common medical diagnoses at transfer, including acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, stroke, sepsis, pneumonia, and gastrointestinal bleed.

MAIN MEASURES

We performed a series of logistic regression models to estimate adjusted odds of transfer by race/ethnicity controlling for patient demographics, clinical variables, and hospital characteristics and to identify potential mediators. In secondary analyses, we estimated adjusted odds of transfer among patients at community hospitals (those more likely to transfer patients) and performed subgroup analyses by region and primary medical diagnosis.

KEY RESULTS

Of 5,774,175 weighted hospital admissions, 199,015 (4.5%) underwent IHT, including 4.7% of White patients, compared with 3.9% of Black patients and 3.8% of Hispanic patients. Black (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.89) and Hispanic (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.87) patients had lower crude odds of transfer compared with White patients, but this became non-significant after adjusting for hospital-level characteristics. In secondary analyses among patients hospitalized at community hospitals, Hispanic patients had lower adjusted odds of transfer (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-0.98). Disparities in IHT by race/ethnicity varied by region and medical diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Black and Hispanic patients had lower odds of IHT, largely explained by a higher likelihood of being hospitalized at urban teaching hospitals. Racial/ethnic disparities in transfer were demonstrated at community hospitals, in certain geographic regions and among patients with specific diseases.

Disparities in Adverse Maternal Outcomes Among Asian Women in the US Delivering at Term

This population-based retrospective cohort study used US Vital Statistics data from 2014-2017 to assess the risk of adverse maternal outcomes at term for Asian women in the US.

Cesarean birth and maternal morbidity among Black women and White women after implementation of a blended payment policy

OBJECTIVE

To test whether Minnesota's blended payment policy had differential effects on cesarean use and maternal morbidity among black women and white women in Minnesota, as compared to six control states.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING

Claims data from births to Medicaid fee-for-service beneficiaries, 2006-2012, in Minnesota (policy state) and six control states (Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana).

STUDY DESIGN

The key study intervention was Minnesota's blended payment policy, which established one single payment rate for uncomplicated vaginal and cesarean births in 2009. The primary outcome was cesarean birth, and secondary outcomes were maternal morbidity (composite), postpartum hemorrhage, and chorioamnionitis. Policy effects were assessed using race-stratified comparative interrupted time series analysis.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Following policy implementation, cesarean use decreased among both black and white women in Minnesota compared to control states; this decline was larger among black women (-2.88 percent 3-year cumulative decline, from a prepolicy cesarean rate of 22.2 percent) than among white women (-1.32 percent, P = .0013). Postpartum hemorrhage increased, with larger increases among black women (1.20 percent 3-year cumulative increase), compared with white women (0.48 percent, P < .001) in Minnesota compared with control states.

CONCLUSIONS

Policy-related declines in cesarean use after Minnesota's blended payment policy were larger in black women. Increases in postpartum hemorrhage signal potential unintended consequences of policy-related cesarean reduction.

Effect of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Surgical-Site Infection in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Obesity increases the risk of both cesarean delivery and surgical-site infection. Despite widespread use, it is unclear whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery in obese women.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, initiated immediately after cesarean delivery, lowers the risk of surgical-site infections compared with standard wound dressing in obese women.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter randomized trial conducted from February 8, 2017, through November 13, 2019, at 4 academic and 2 community hospitals across the United States. Obese women undergoing planned or unplanned cesarean delivery were eligible. The study was terminated after 1624 of 2850 participants were recruited when a planned interim analysis showed increased adverse events in the negative pressure group and futility for the primary outcome. Final follow-up was December 18, 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to either undergo prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, with application of the negative pressure device immediately after repair of the surgical incision (n = 816), or receive standard wound dressing (n = 808).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was superficial or deep surgical-site infection according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Secondary outcomes included other wound complications, composite of surgical-site infections and other wound complications, and adverse skin reactions.

RESULTS

Of the 1624 women randomized (mean age, 30.4 years, mean body mass index, 39.5), 1608 (99%) completed the study: 806 in the negative pressure group (median duration of negative pressure, 4 days) and 802 in the standard dressing group. Superficial or deep surgical-site infection was diagnosed in 29 participants (3.6%) in the negative pressure group and 27 (3.4%) in the standard dressing group (difference, 0.36%; 95% CI, -1.46% to 2.19%, P = .70). Of 30 prespecified secondary end points, 25 showed no significant differences, including other wound complications (2.6% vs 3.1%; difference, -0.53%; 95% CI, -1.93% to 0.88%; P = .46) and composite of surgical-site infections and other wound complications (6.5% vs 6.7%; difference, -0.27%; 95% CI, -2.71% to 2.25%; P = .83). Adverse skin reactions were significantly more frequent in the negative pressure group (7.0% vs 0.6%; difference, 6.95%; 95% CI, 1.86% to 12.03%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, compared with standard wound dressing, did not significantly reduce the risk of surgical-site infection. These findings do not support routine use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in obese women after cesarean delivery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03009110.

Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity among infertile women: analysis of US claims data

BACKGROUND

Severe maternal morbidity continues to be an issue of national and global concern and is increasing in incidence. The incidence of infertility is also on the rise, and infertile women experience a higher risk of incident chronic medical disease and cancer, suggesting that fertility may serve as a window to a woman's overall health.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis using Optum's de-identifed Clinformatics Data Mart Database between 2003 and 2015. Infertile women stratified by infertility diagnosis, testing, or treatment were compared to fertile women seeking routine gynecologic care. In both groups, only women who underwent pregnancy and delivery of a singleton during the follow-up period were included. Main outcomes were severe maternal morbidity indicators, defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and identified by International Classification of Diseases 10^th Revision and Common Procedural Technology codes within 6 weeks of each delivery. Results were adjusted for maternal age, race, education, nulliparity, smoking, obesity, delivery mode, preterm birth, number of prenatal visits, and year of delivery.

RESULTS

A total of 19,658 women comprised the infertile group and 525,695 women comprised the fertile group. The overall incidence of any severe maternal morbidity indicator was 7.0% among women receiving fertility treatment, 6.4% among women receiving a fertility diagnosis, 5.5% among women receiving fertility testing, and 4.3% among fertile women. Overall, infertile women had a significantly higher risk of developing any severe maternal morbidity indicator (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22; confidence interval, 1.14-1.31, P < .01) as well as a significantly higher risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; confidence interval, 1.26-1.73, P < .01), eclampsia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37; confidence interval, 1.05-1.79, P < .01), heart failure during procedure or surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.54; confidence interval, 1.21-1.97, P < .01), internal injuries of the thorax, abdomen, or pelvis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.59; confidence interval, 1.12-2.26, P < .01), intracranial injuries (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; confidence interval, 1.20-2.61, P < .01), pulmonary edema (adjusted odds ratio, 2.18; confidence interval, 1.54-3.10, P < .01), thrombotic embolism (adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; confidence interval, 1.14-2.17, P < .01), and blood transfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; confidence interval, 1.30-1.72, P < .01) compared to fertile women. Fertile women did not face a significantly higher risk of any maternal morbidity indicator compared to infertile women. In subgroup analysis by maternal race/ethnicity, the likelihood of severe morbidity was significantly higher among fertile black women compared to fertile white women. There was no difference between infertile black women and infertile white women after multivariable adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Using an insurance claims database, we report that women diagnosed with infertility and women receiving fertility treatment experience a significantly higher risk of multiple indicators of severe maternal morbidity compared to fertile women. The increased risk of severe maternal morbidity noted among fertile black women compared to fertile white women is attenuated among infertile black women, who face risks similar to those of infertile white women.

Using Electronic Health Record and Administrative Data to Analyze Maternal and Neonatal Delivery Complications

BACKGROUND

Obstetric quality of care measures have largely focused on severe maternal morbidity (SMM), with little consensus about measures of less severe but more prevalent delivery and neonatal complications. This study analyzes risk-adjusted maternal and neonatal outcomes using both ICD-10 coding and electronic health record (EHR) data.

METHODS

Complication rates at seven health system hospitals from January 2016 to August 2019 were analyzed. EHR data and ICD-10 codes were used to identify the incidence of SMM as well as other route-specific maternal and neonatal complications. Researchers tested the association of maternal sociodemographic and clinical risk markers with the likelihood of maternal and neonatal complications using multiple logistic and Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Among 42,681 deliveries, the SMM rate was 1.3%, and other complication rates were 12.9% for vaginal and 19.7% for cesarean deliveries. The neonatal complication rate was 20.2%. Risk factors for all complications included multiple gestation and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Risk factors for SMM included nulliparity, cesarean delivery, and preexisting conditions; risks for neonatal complications included academic medical center admission, cesarean delivery, higher maternal body mass index, and preterm birth. There were significant racial disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study is among the first to combine EHR and administrative discharge data to describe a wide range of maternal and neonatal birth outcomes, including associations with established risk factors. Although SMM was rare, route-specific and neonatal complications were much more common and may offer a better focus for obstetric quality improvement efforts.

Factors Associated with Unplanned Primary Cesarean Birth: Secondary Analysis of the Listening to Mothers in California Survey

BACKGROUND

In many countries, cesarean section has become the most common major surgical procedure. Most nations have high cesarean birth rates, suggesting overuse. Due to the excess harm and expense associated with unneeded cesareans, many health systems are seeking approaches to safe reduction of cesarean rates. Surveys of childbearing women are a distinctive and underutilized source of data for examining factors that may contribute to cesarean reduction.

METHODS

To identify factors associated with unplanned primary cesarean birth, we carried out a secondary analysis of the Listening to Mothers in California Survey, limited to the subgroup who had not had a previous cesarean birth and did not have a planned primary cesarean (n = 1,964). Participants were identified through birth certificate sampling and contacted initially by mail and then by telephone, text message and email, as available. Sampled women could participate in English or Spanish, on any device or with a telephone interviewer. Following bivariate demographic, knowledge and attitude, and labor management analyses, we carried out multivariable analyses to adjust with covariates and identify factors associated with unplanned primary cesarean birth.

RESULTS

Whereas knowledge, attitudes, preferences and behaviors of the survey participants were not associated with having an unplanned primary cesarean birth, their experience of pressure from a health professional to have a cesarean and a series of labor management practices were strongly associated with how they gave birth. These practices included attempted induction of labor, early hospital admission, and labor augmentation. Women's reports of pressure from a health professional to have a primary cesarean were strongly related to the likelihood of cesarean birth.

CONCLUSIONS

While women largely wish to avoid unneeded childbirth interventions, their knowledge, preferences and care arrangement practices did not appear to impact their likelihood of an unplanned primary cesarean birth. By contrast, a series of labor management practices and perceived health professional pressure to have a cesarean were associated with unplanned primary cesarean birth. Improving ways to engage childbearing women and implementing changes in labor management and communication practices may be needed to reduce unwarranted cesarean birth.

An assessment of baseline risk factors for peripartum maternal critical care interventions

BACKGROUND

Maternal morbidity presents a growing challenge to the American healthcare system and increasing numbers of patients are requiring higher levels of care in pregnancy. Identifying patients at high risk for critical care interventions, including intensive care unit admission, during delivery hospitalizations may facilitate appropriate multidisciplinary planning and lead to improved maternal safety. Baseline risk factors for critical care in pregnancy have not been well-described previously.

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses baseline factors associated with critical care interventions that were present at admission for delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational registry of pregnancy after prior uterine surgery and primary cesarean delivery. All women with known gestational age were included. The primary outcome measure was a composite of critical care interventions that included postpartum intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, central intravenous access, and arterial line placement. Risk for this critical care outcome measure was compared by selected baseline and obstetric characteristics known at the time of hospital admission, including maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, race, maternal co-morbidities, parity, and plurality. We evaluated these potential predictors and fit a multivariable logistic regression model to ascertain the most significant risk factors for critical care during a delivery hospitalization.

RESULTS

73,096 of 73,257 women in the parent trial met inclusion criteria, of whom 505 underwent a critical care intervention (0.7%). In the adjusted model, heart disease [aOR = 10.05, CI = 6.97 - 14.49], renal disease [aOR = 2.78, CI = 1.49 - 5.18], and connective tissue disease [aOR = 3.27, CI = 1.52 - 6.99], as well as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy [aOR = 2.04, CI = 1.31 - 3.17] were associated with the greatest odds of critical care intervention [p < .01] (Table 2). Other predictors associated with increased risk included maternal age, African American race, smoking, diabetes, asthma, anemia, nulliparity, and twin pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, women with cardiac disease, renal disease, connective tissue disease and preeclampsia spectrum disorders were at increased risk for critical care interventions. Obstetric providers should assess patient risk routinely, ensure appropriate maternal level of care, and create multidisciplinary plans to improve maternal safety and reduce risk.

The association between race/ethnicity and peripartum hysterectomy and the risk of perioperative complications

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative outcomes by patient race/ethnicity.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study identified 7 331 638 childbirth hospitalizations for women aged 12-55 years in the USA between 2004-2014. Peripartum hysterectomy, in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, length of stay, and cost of hysterectomy data were analyzed using SAS.

RESULTS

Among childbirth hospitalizations (52.9% white, 13.5% black, 23.0% Hispanic, 5.2% Asian, and 5.4% other), peripartum hysterectomy occurred in 6619. The incidence of peripartum hysterectomy was 90.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.7-93.0) per 100 000 hospitalizations, and higher for black (111.0, 95% CI 104.5-117.4), Hispanic (104.9, 95% CI 99.1-110.8), and Asian women (119.6, 95% CI 109.1-130.2) compared to whites (75.7, 95% CI 72.8-78.5). After adjustment, Hispanic women had an 18% higher odds of undergoing peripartum hysterectomy (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.29; P=0.004) than white women. Non-white women had a 2-3-fold higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR_black 2.76, 95% CI 1.44-5.30; OR_Hispanic 1.99, 95% CI 1.04-3.82; OR_Asian+other 2.44, 95% CI 1.11-5.40. Black and Asian/other women were more likely to undergo blood transfusions.

CONCLUSION

Women of color have higher rates of peripartum hysterectomy and experience higher rates of poor perioperative outcomes and mortality.

Future Directions: Analyzing Health Disparities Related to Maternal Hypertensive Disorders

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy complicate up to 10% of pregnancies worldwide, constituting one of the most significant causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. Hypertensive disorders, specifically gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension, and preeclampsia, throughout pregnancy are contributors to the top causes of maternal mortality in the United States. Diagnosis of hypertensive disorders throughout pregnancy is challenging, with many disorders often remaining unrecognized or poorly managed during and after pregnancy. Moreover, the research has identified a strong link between the prevalence of maternal hypertensive disorders and racial and ethnic disparities. Factors that influence the prevalence of maternal hypertensive disorders among racially and ethnically diverse women include maternal age, level of education, United States-born status, nonmetropolitan residence, prepregnancy obesity, excess weight gain during pregnancy, and gestational diabetes. Examination of the factors that increase the risk for maternal hypertensive disorders along with the current interventions utilized to manage hypertensive disorders will assist in the identification of gaps in prevention and treatment strategies and implications for future practice. Specific focus will be placed on disparities among racially and ethnically diverse women that increase the risk for maternal hypertensive disorders. This review will serve to promote the development of interventions and strategies that better address and prevent hypertensive disorders throughout a pregnant woman's continuum of care.

Maternal Mortality in the United States: Updates on Trends, Causes, and Solutions

The rising trend in pregnancy-related deaths during the past 2 decades in the United States stands out among other high-income countries where pregnancy-related deaths are declining. Cardiomyopathy and other cardiovascular conditions, hemorrhage, and other chronic medical conditions are all important causes of death. Unintentional death from violence, overdose, and self-harm are emerging causes that require medical and public health attention. Significant racial/ethnic inequities exist in pregnancy care with non-Hispanic black women incurring 3 to 4 times higher rates of pregnancy-related death than non-Hispanic white women. Varied terminology and lack of standardized methods for identifying maternal deaths in the United States have resulted in nuanced data collection and interpretation challenges. State maternal mortality review committees are important mechanisms for capturing and interpreting data on cause, timing, and preventability of maternal deaths. Importantly, a thorough standardized review of each maternal death leads to recommendations to prevent future pregnancy-associated deaths. Key interventions to improve maternal health outcomes include 1) integrating multidisciplinary care for women with high-risk comorbidities during preconception care, pregnancy, postpartum, and beyond; 2) addressing structural racism and the social determinants of health; 3) implementing hospital-wide safety bundles with team training and simulation; 4) providing patient education on early warning signs for medical complications of pregnancy; and 5) regionalizing maternal levels of care so that women with risk factors are supported when delivering at facilities with specialized care teams.

Reduction in racial disparities in severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage in a large-scale quality improvement collaborative

BACKGROUND

Eliminating persistent racial/ethnic disparities in maternal mortality and morbidity is a public health priority. National strategies to improve maternal outcomes are increasingly focused on quality improvement collaboratives. However, the effectiveness of quality collaboratives for reducing racial disparities in maternity care is understudied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a hemorrhage quality-improvement collaborative on racial disparities in severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional study from 2011 to 2016 among 99 hospitals that participated in a hemorrhage quality improvement collaborative in California. The focus of the quality collaborative was to implement the national maternal hemorrhage safety bundle consisting of 17 evidence-based recommendations for practice and care processes known to improve outcomes. This analysis included 54,311 women from the baseline period (January 2011 through December 2014) and 19,165 women from the postintervention period (October 2015 through December 2016) with a diagnosis of obstetric hemorrhage during delivery hospitalization. We examined whether racial/ethnic-specific severe maternal morbidity rates in these women with obstetric hemorrhage were reduced from the baseline to the postintervention period. In addition, we conducted Poisson Generalized Estimating Equation models to estimate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for severe maternal morbidity comparing each racial/ethnic group with white.

RESULTS

During the baseline period, the rate of severe maternal morbidity among women with hemorrhage was 22.1% (12,002/54,311) with the greatest rate observed among black women (28.6%, 973/3404), and the lowest among white women (19.8%, 3124/15,775). The overall rate fell to 18.5% (3553/19,165) in the postintervention period. Both black and white mothers benefited from the intervention, but the benefit among black women exceeded that of white women (9.0% vs 2.1% absolute rate reduction). The baseline risk of severe maternal morbidity was 1.34 times greater among black mothers compared with white mothers (relative risk, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.42), and it was reduced to 1.22 (1.05-1.40) in the postintervention period. Sociodemographic and clinical factors explained a part of the black-white differences. After controlling for these factors, the black-white relative risk was 1.22 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.30) at baseline and narrowed to 1.07 (1.92-1.24) in the postintervention period. Results were similar when excluding severe maternal morbidity cases with transfusion alone. After accounting for maternal risk factors, the black-white relative risk for severe maternal morbidity excluding transfusion alone was reduced from a baseline of 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.52) to 0.99 (0.76-1.29) in the postintervention period. The most important clinical risk factor for disparate black rates for both severe maternal morbidity and severe maternal morbidity excluding transfusion alone was cesarean delivery, potentially providing another opportunity for quality improvement.

CONCLUSION

A large-scale quality improvement collaborative reduced rates of severe maternal morbidity due to hemorrhage in all races and reduced the performance gap between black and white women. Improving access to highly effective treatments has the potential to decrease disparities for care-sensitive acute hospital-focused morbidities.

Obstetric Outcomes in Military Servicewomen: Emerging Knowledge, Considerations, and Gaps

The number of women in the U.S. military is dramatically increasing. Similarly, the roles of active-duty women are greatly expanding, thus exposing them to new occupational risks. Determining the impact of pregnancy outcomes for women while in the military is difficult due to changing exposures over time, difficulty in utilizing appropriate comparison groups, and the lack of prospective investigations. Despite these limitations, it was concerning that the available data suggest that servicewomen delivering within 6 months of their first deployment have an increased preterm birth risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.1), and those with three prior deployments have an even greater risk (aOR: 3.8). Servicewomen also have an increased risk of hypertensive disorders with a rate of 13% compared with 5% in the general obstetric population. Furthermore, depression is higher for women who deploy after childbirth and are exposed to combat when compared with those who have not deployed since the birth of their child (aOR: 2.01). Due to the importance of this issue, prospective research designs are necessary to better understand and address the unique health care needs of this population.

Racial disparities in peripartum cardiomyopathy: eighteen years of observations

Background: Black women have greater than a three-fold risk of pregnancy-associated death compared to White women; cardiomyopathy is a leading cause of maternal mortality.Objectives: This study examined racial disparities in health outcomes among women with peripartum cardiomyopathy.Study design: Retrospective cohort of women with peripartum cardiomyopathy per the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute definition from January 2000 to November 2017 from a single referral center. Selected health outcomes among Black and White women were compared; primary outcome was ejection fraction at diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular outcomes, markers of maternal morbidity, resource utilization, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.Results: Ninety-five women met inclusion criteria: 48% Black, 52% White. Nearly all peripartum cardiomyopathy diagnoses were postpartum (95.4% Black, 93% White, p=.11). Ejection fraction at diagnosis was not different between Black and White women (26.8 ± 12.5 vs. 28.7 ± 9.9, p=.41). Though non-significant, fewer Black women had myocardial recovery to EF ≥55% (35 vs. 53%, p=.07); however, 11 (24%) of Black women vs. 1 (2%) White woman had an ejection fraction ≤35% at 6-12 months postpartum (p<.01). More Black women underwent implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement: n = 15 (33%) vs. n = 7 (14%), p=.03. Eight women (8.4%) died in the study period, not different by race (p=.48). Black women had higher rates of healthcare utilization. In the subsequent pregnancy, Black women had a lower initial ejection fraction (40 vs. 55%, p=.007) and were less likely to recover postpartum (37.5 vs. 55%, p=.02).Conclusions: Black and White women have similar mean ejection fraction at diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy, but Black women have more severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction leading to worse outcomes, increased resource use, and lower ejection fraction entering the subsequent pregnancy.

Routine Healthcare Utilization Among Reproductive-Age Women Residing in a Rural Maternity Care Desert

It is important that women of reproductive age have access to and use routine health services to improve birth outcomes. While it is estimated that more than 5 million women in over 1000 counties across the United States live in maternity care deserts, to date there have been no published studies characterizing access and barriers to routine healthcare utilization in these areas. Therefore, a cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural county in northwest Ohio with 315 women ages 18-45 years. Health insurance coverage, usual source of care, length of time since routine check-up, and barriers to receipt of health services were assessed via a self-reported, anonymous survey. Over one-tenth (11.3%) of participants reported having no health insurance coverage. A total of 14.4% reported having no usual source of care and 22.8% reported not having a routine check-up in the past year. Just over one-half (53.0%) of participants reported having at least one barrier to accessing health care. In a logistic regression analysis, having a routine check-up in the past year was inversely associated with number of barriers (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.95; p = 0.019); women who reported more barriers were less likely to report receipt of preventive care in the past year. The results of this study reveal that many reproductive-age women living in a maternity care desert face challenges in accessing health services. Policies and programs need to be developed and implemented to close these gaps and maximize opportunities for optimal health.