1
|
White VanGompel EC, Perez SL, Datta A, Carlock FR, Cape V, Main EK. Culture That Facilitates Change: A Mixed Methods Study of Hospitals Engaged in Reducing Cesarean Deliveries. Ann Fam Med 2021; 19:249-257. [PMID: 34180845 PMCID: PMC8118480 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Large-scale efforts to reduce cesarean deliveries have shown varied levels of impact; yet understanding factors that contribute to hospitals' success are lacking. We aimed to characterize unit culture differences at hospitals that successfully reduced their cesarean rates compared with those that did not. METHODS A mixed methods study of California hospitals participating in a statewide initiative to reduce cesarean delivery. Participants included nurses, obstetricians, family physicians, midwives, and anesthesiologists practicing at participating hospitals. Hospitals' net change in nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex cesarean delivery rates classified them as successful if they achieved either a minimum 5 percentage point reduction or rate of fewer than 24%. The Labor Culture Survey was used to quantify differences in unit culture. Key informant interviews were used to explore quantitative findings and characterize additional cultural barriers and facilitators. RESULTS Out of 55 hospitals, 37 (n = 840 clinicians) meeting inclusion criteria participated in the Labor Culture Survey. Physicians' individual attitudes differed by hospital success on 5 scales: best practices (P = .003), fear (P = .001), cesarean safety (P = .014), physician oversight (P <.001), and microculture (P = .044) scales. Patient ability to make informed decisions showed poor agreement across all hospitals, but was higher at successful hospitals (38% vs 29%, P = .01). Important qualitative themes included: ease of access to shared resources on best practices, fear of bad outcomes, personal resistance to change, collaborative practice and effective communication, leadership engagement, and cultural flexibility. CONCLUSIONS Successful hospitals' culture and context was measurably different from nonresponders. Leveraging these contextual factors may facilitate success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C White VanGompel
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois .,NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Susan L Perez
- Department of Public Health, California State University, Sacramento, California
| | - Avisek Datta
- NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, Illinois
| | | | - Valerie Cape
- Stanford University, California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
| | - Elliott K Main
- Stanford University, California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosenstein MG, Chang SC, Sakowski C, Markow C, Teleki S, Lang L, Logan J, Cape V, Main EK. Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California. JAMA 2021; 325:1631-1639. [PMID: 33904868 PMCID: PMC8080226 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.3816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Safe reduction of the cesarean delivery rate is a national priority. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the rates of cesarean delivery for nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) births in California in the context of a statewide multifaceted intervention designed to reduce the rates of cesarean delivery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Observational study of cesarean delivery rates from 2014 to 2019 among 7 574 889 NTSV births in the US and at 238 nonmilitary hospitals providing maternity services in California. From 2016 to 2019, California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative partnered with Smart Care California to implement multiple approaches to decrease the rates of cesarean delivery. Hospitals with rates of cesarean delivery greater than 23.9% for NTSV births were invited to join 1 of 3 cohorts for an 18-month quality improvement collaborative between July 2016 and June 2019. EXPOSURES Within the collaborative, multidisciplinary teams implemented multiple strategies supported by mentorship, shared learning, and rapid-cycle data feedback. Partnerships among nonprofit organizations, state governmental agencies, purchasers, and health plans addressed the external environment through transparency, award programs, and incentives. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the change in cesarean delivery rates for NTSV births in California and a difference-in-differences analysis was performed to compare cesarean delivery rates for NTSV births in California vs the rates in the rest of the US. A mixed multivariable logistic regression model that adjusted for patient-level and hospital-level confounders also was used to assess the collaborative and the external statewide actions. The cesarean delivery rates for NTSV births at hospitals participating in the collaborative were compared with the rates from the nonparticipating hospitals and the rates in the participating hospitals prior to participation in the collaborative. RESULTS A total of 7 574 889 NTSV births occurred in the US from 2014 to 2019, of which 914 283 were at 238 hospitals in California. All California hospitals were exposed to the statewide actions to reduce the rates of cesarean delivery, including the 149 hospitals that had baseline rates of cesarean delivery greater than 23.9% for NTSV births, of which 91 (61%) participated in the quality improvement collaborative. The rate of cesarean delivery for NTSV births in California decreased from 26.0% (95% CI, 25.8%-26.2%) in 2014 to 22.8% (95% CI, 22.6%-23.1%) in 2019 (relative risk, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.87-0.89). The rate of cesarean delivery for NTSV births in the US (excluding California births) was 26.0% in both 2014 and 2019 (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.996-1.005). The difference-in-differences analysis revealed that the reduction in the rate of cesarean delivery for NTSV births in California was 3.2% (95% CI, 1.7%-3.5%) higher than in the US (excluding California). Compared with the hospitals and the periods not exposed to the collaborative activities, and after adjusting for patient characteristics and time using a modified stepped-wedge analysis, exposure to collaborative activities was associated with a lower odds of cesarean delivery for NTSV births (24.4% vs 24.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.85-0.89]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this observational study of NTSV births in California from 2014 to 2019, the rates of cesarean delivery decreased over time in the setting of the implementation of a coordinated hospital-level collaborative and statewide initiatives designed to support vaginal birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa G. Rosenstein
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University, Stanford
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Shen-Chih Chang
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University, Stanford
- Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Christa Sakowski
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University, Stanford
| | - Cathie Markow
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University, Stanford
| | | | | | - Julia Logan
- California Department of Health Care Services, Sacramento
- California Public Employees’ Retirement System, Sacramento
| | - Valerie Cape
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University, Stanford
| | - Elliott K. Main
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University, Stanford
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Main EK, Chang SC, Dhurjati R, Cape V, Profit J, Gould JB. Reduction in racial disparities in severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage in a large-scale quality improvement collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223:123.e1-123.e14. [PMID: 31978432 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eliminating persistent racial/ethnic disparities in maternal mortality and morbidity is a public health priority. National strategies to improve maternal outcomes are increasingly focused on quality improvement collaboratives. However, the effectiveness of quality collaboratives for reducing racial disparities in maternity care is understudied. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of a hemorrhage quality-improvement collaborative on racial disparities in severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a cross-sectional study from 2011 to 2016 among 99 hospitals that participated in a hemorrhage quality improvement collaborative in California. The focus of the quality collaborative was to implement the national maternal hemorrhage safety bundle consisting of 17 evidence-based recommendations for practice and care processes known to improve outcomes. This analysis included 54,311 women from the baseline period (January 2011 through December 2014) and 19,165 women from the postintervention period (October 2015 through December 2016) with a diagnosis of obstetric hemorrhage during delivery hospitalization. We examined whether racial/ethnic-specific severe maternal morbidity rates in these women with obstetric hemorrhage were reduced from the baseline to the postintervention period. In addition, we conducted Poisson Generalized Estimating Equation models to estimate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for severe maternal morbidity comparing each racial/ethnic group with white. RESULTS During the baseline period, the rate of severe maternal morbidity among women with hemorrhage was 22.1% (12,002/54,311) with the greatest rate observed among black women (28.6%, 973/3404), and the lowest among white women (19.8%, 3124/15,775). The overall rate fell to 18.5% (3553/19,165) in the postintervention period. Both black and white mothers benefited from the intervention, but the benefit among black women exceeded that of white women (9.0% vs 2.1% absolute rate reduction). The baseline risk of severe maternal morbidity was 1.34 times greater among black mothers compared with white mothers (relative risk, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.42), and it was reduced to 1.22 (1.05-1.40) in the postintervention period. Sociodemographic and clinical factors explained a part of the black-white differences. After controlling for these factors, the black-white relative risk was 1.22 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.30) at baseline and narrowed to 1.07 (1.92-1.24) in the postintervention period. Results were similar when excluding severe maternal morbidity cases with transfusion alone. After accounting for maternal risk factors, the black-white relative risk for severe maternal morbidity excluding transfusion alone was reduced from a baseline of 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.52) to 0.99 (0.76-1.29) in the postintervention period. The most important clinical risk factor for disparate black rates for both severe maternal morbidity and severe maternal morbidity excluding transfusion alone was cesarean delivery, potentially providing another opportunity for quality improvement. CONCLUSION A large-scale quality improvement collaborative reduced rates of severe maternal morbidity due to hemorrhage in all races and reduced the performance gap between black and white women. Improving access to highly effective treatments has the potential to decrease disparities for care-sensitive acute hospital-focused morbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliott K Main
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, CA.
| | - Shen-Chih Chang
- Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, CA
| | - Ravi Dhurjati
- Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, CA; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, CA
| | - Valerie Cape
- Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, CA
| | - Jochen Profit
- Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, CA
| | - Jeffrey B Gould
- Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, CA; California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
White VanGompel E, Perez S, Wang C, Datta A, Cape V, Main E. Measuring labor and delivery unit culture and clinicians' attitudes toward birth: Revision and validation of the Labor Culture Survey. Birth 2019; 46:300-310. [PMID: 30407646 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2018] [Revised: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cesarean delivery rates in the United States vary widely between hospitals, which cannot be fully explained by hospital or patient factors. Cultural factors are hypothesized to play a role in cesarean overuse, yet tools to measure labor culture are lacking. The aim of this study was to revise and validate a survey tool to measure hospital culture specific to cesarean overuse. METHODS A panel of clinicians and researchers compiled an item bank from validated surveys, added newly created items, and performed four rounds of iterative revision and consolidation. Obstetricians, family physicians, midwives, anesthesiologists, and labor nurses were recruited from 79 hospitals in California. Exploratory factor analysis was used to reduce the number of survey items and identify latent constructs to form the basis of subscales. Confirmatory factor analysis examined reliability in 31 additional hospitals. Poisson regression assessed associations between hospitals' mean score on each individual item and cesarean rates. RESULTS A total of 1718 individuals from 70 hospitals were included in the exploratory factor analysis. The final Labor Culture Survey (LCS) consisted of 29 items and six subscales: "Best Practices to Reduce Cesarean Overuse," "Fear of Vaginal Birth," "Unit Microculture," "Physician Oversight," "Maternal Agency," and "Cesarean Safety." CONCLUSIONS The revised LCS is a valid and reliable tool to measure constructs shown to be associated with cesarean rates. These findings support prior research that has shown that hospital culture is measurable, and that clinician attitudes are predictive of clinician behaviors. Unique to our survey is the construct of labor and delivery unit microculture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily White VanGompel
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.,NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Susan Perez
- California State University, Sacramento, Sacramento, California
| | - Chi Wang
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Avisek Datta
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Valerie Cape
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Elliott Main
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess hospital unit culture and clinician attitudes associated with varying rates of primary cesarean delivery. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING Intrapartum nurses, midwives, and physicians recruited from 79 hospitals in California participating in efforts to reduce cesarean overuse. STUDY DESIGN Labor unit culture and clinician attitudes measured using a survey were linked to the California Maternal Data Center for birth outcomes and hospital covariates. METHODS Association with primary cesarean delivery rates was assessed using multivariate Poisson regression adjusted for hospital covariates. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS 1718 respondents from 70 hospitals responded to the Labor Culture Survey. The "Unit Microculture" subscale was strongly associated with primary cesarean rate; the higher a unit scored on 8-items describing a culture supportive of vaginal birth (eg, nurses are encouraged to spend time in rooms with patients, and doulas are welcomed), the cesarean rate decreased by 41 percent (95% CI = -47 to -35 percent, P < 0.001). Discordant attitudes between nurses and physicians were associated with increased cesarean rates. CONCLUSIONS Hospital unit culture, clinician attitudes, and consistency between professions are strongly associated with primary cesarean rates. Improvement efforts to reduce cesarean overuse must address culture of care as a key part of the change process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily White VanGompel
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of MedicineEvanstonIllinois
- NorthShore University HealthSystemEvanstonIllinois
| | - Susan Perez
- Department of Kinesiology and Health ScienceCalifornia State University, SacramentoSacramentoCalifornia
| | - Avisek Datta
- NorthShore University HealthSystemEvanstonIllinois
| | - Chi Wang
- Biostatistics and ResearchNorthShore University HealthSystemEvanstonIllinois
| | - Valerie Cape
- California Maternal Quality Care CollaborativeStanford UniversityStanfordCalifornia
| | - Elliott Main
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCalifornia
- California Maternal Quality Care CollaborativeStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCalifornia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Main EK, Chang SC, Sakowski C, Cape V, Smith H, Julie V. 254: Can NTSV cesarean rates be significantly reduced without impacting maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
7
|
Main EK, Cape V, Abreo A, Vasher J, Woods A, Carpenter A, Gould JB. Reduction of severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage using a state perinatal quality collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216:298.e1-298.e11. [PMID: 28153661 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Revised: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obstetric hemorrhage is the leading cause of severe maternal morbidity and of preventable maternal mortality in the United States. The California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative developed a comprehensive quality improvement tool kit for hemorrhage based on the national patient safety bundle for obstetric hemorrhage and noted promising results in pilot implementation projects. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine whether these safety tools can be scaled up to reduce severe maternal morbidity in women with obstetric hemorrhage using a large maternal quality collaborative. STUDY DESIGN We report on 99 collaborative hospitals (256,541 annual births) using a before-and-after model with 48 noncollaborative comparison hospitals (81,089 annual births) used to detect any systemic trends. Both groups participated in the California Maternal Data Center providing baseline and rapid-cycle data. Baseline period was the 48 months from January 2011 through December 2014. The collaborative started in January 2015 and the postintervention period was the 6 months from October 2015 through March 2016. We modified the Institute for Healthcare Improvement collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement to include the mentor model whereby 20 pairs of nurse and physician mentors experienced in quality improvement gave additional support to small groups of 6-8 hospitals. The national hemorrhage safety bundle served as the template for quality improvement action. The main outcome measurement was the composite Centers for Disease Control and Prevention severe maternal morbidity measure, for both the target population of women with hemorrhage and the overall delivery population. The rate of adoption of bundle elements was used as an indicator of hospital engagement and intensity. RESULTS Compared to baseline period, women with hemorrhage in collaborative hospitals experienced a 20.8% reduction in severe maternal morbidity while women in comparison hospitals had a 1.2% reduction (P < .0001). Women in hospitals with prior hemorrhage collaborative experience experienced an even larger 28.6% reduction. Fewer mothers with transfusions accounted for two thirds of the reduction in collaborative hospitals and fewer procedures and medical complications, the remainder. The rate of severe maternal morbidity among all women in collaborative hospitals was 11.7% lower and women in hospitals with prior hemorrhage collaborative experience had a 17.5% reduction. Improved outcomes for women were noted in all hospital types (regional, medium, small, health maintenance organization, and nonhealth maintenance organization). Overall, 54% of hospitals completed 14 of 17 bundle elements, 76% reported regular unit-based drills, and 65% reported regular posthemorrhage debriefs. Higher rate of bundle adoption was associated with improvement of maternal morbidity only in hospitals with high initial rates of severe maternal morbidity. CONCLUSION We used an innovative collaborative quality improvement approach (mentor model) to scale up implementation of the national hemorrhage bundle. Participation in the collaborative was strongly associated with reductions in severe maternal morbidity among hemorrhage patients. Women in hospitals in their second collaborative had an even greater reduction in morbidity than those approaching the bundle for the first time, reinforcing the concept that quality improvement is a long-term and cumulative process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliott K Main
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
| | - Valerie Cape
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Anisha Abreo
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Julie Vasher
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Amanda Woods
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | | | - Jeffrey B Gould
- California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|