Prognostic impact of KRAS mutation subtypes in 677 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinomas

Prognostic Impact of KRAS G12C Mutation in Patients With NSCLC: Results From the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape Project

INTRODUCTION

KRAS mutations, the most frequent gain-of-function alterations in NSCLC, are currently emerging as potential predictive therapeutic targets. The role of KRAS-G12C (Kr_G12C) is of special interest after the recent discovery and preclinical analyses of two different Kr_G12C covalent inhibitors (AMG-510, MRTX849).

METHODS

KRAS mutations were evaluated in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections by a microfluidic-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction platform as a component of the previously published European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape 003 Multiplex Mutation study, of clinically annotated, resected, stage I to III NSCLC. In this study, -Kr_G12C mutation prevalence and its association with clinicopathologic characteristics, molecular profiles, and postoperative patient outcome (overall survival, relapse-free survival, time-to-relapse) were explored.

RESULTS

KRAS gene was tested in 2055 Lungscape cases (adenocarcinomas: 1014 [49%]) with I or II or III stage respective distribution of 53% or 24% or 22% and median follow-up of 57 months. KRAS mutation prevalence in the adenocarcinoma cohort was 38.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.0% to 41.0%), with Kr_G12C mutation representing 17.0% (95% CI: 14.7% to 19.4%). In the "histologic-subtype" cohort, Kr_G12C prevalence was 10.5% (95% CI: 9.2% to 11.9%). When adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics, a significant negative prognostic effect of Kr_G12C presence versus other KRAS mutations or nonexistence of KRAS mutation was identified in the adenocarcinoma cohort alone and in the "histologic-subtype" cohort. For overall survival in adenocarcinomas, hazard ratio (HR)_{G12C versus other KRAS} is equal to 1.39 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.89, p = 0.031) and HR_{G12C versus no KRAS} is equal to 1.32 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.69, p = 0.028) (both also significant in the "histologic-subtype" cohort). For time-to-relapse, HR_{G12C versus other KRAS} is equal to 1.41 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.92, p = 0.030). In addition, among all patients, for relapse-free survival, HR_{G12C versus no KRAS} is equal to 1.27 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.54, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, clinically annotated stage I to III NSCLC cohort, the specific Kr_G12C mutation is significantly associated with poorer prognosis (adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics) among adenocarcinomas and in unselected NSCLCs.

KRAS G12C-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Biology, Developmental Therapeutics, and Molecular Testing

Mutation in the gene that encodes Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is the most common oncogenic driver in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, occurring in approximately 30% of lung adenocarcinomas. Over 80% of oncogenic KRAS mutations occur at codon 12, where the glycine residue is substituted by different amino acids, leading to genomic heterogeneity of KRas-mutant tumors. The KRAS glycine-to-cysteine mutation (G12C) composes approximately 44% of KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer, with mutant KRas^G12C present in approximately 13% of all patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Mutant KRas has been an oncogenic target for decades, but no viable therapeutic agents were developed until recently. However, advances in KRas molecular modeling have led to the development and clinical testing of agents that directly inhibit mutant KRas^G12C. These agents include sotorasib (AMG-510), adagrasib (MRTX-849), and JNJ-74699157. In addition to testing for known actionable oncogenic driver alterations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET exon 14 skipping, RET, and NTRK and for the expression of programmed cell-death protein ligand 1, pathologists, medical oncologists, and community practitioners will need to incorporate routine testing for emerging biomarkers such as MET amplification, ERBB2 (alias HER2), and KRAS mutations, particularly KRAS G12C, considering the promising development of direct inhibitors of KRas^G12C protein.

KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world cohort from the German prospective, observational, nation-wide CRISP Registry (AIO-TRK-0315)

OBJECTIVES

After decades of unsuccessful efforts in inhibiting KRAS, promising clinical data targeting the mutation subtype G12C emerge. Since little is known about outcome with standard treatment of patients with G12C mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we analyzed a large, representative, real-world cohort from Germany.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1039 patients with advanced KRAS-mutant or -wildtype NSCLC without druggable alterations have been recruited in the prospective, observational registry CRISP from 12/2015 to 06/2019 by 98 centers in Germany. Details on treatment, best response, and outcome were analyzed for patients with KRAS wildtype, G12C, and non-G12C mutations.

RESULTS

Within the study population, 160 (15.4 %) patients presented with KRAS G12C, 251 (24.2 %) with non-G12C mutations, 628 (60.4 %) with KRAS wildtype. High PD-L1 expression (Tumor Proportion Score, TPS > 50 %) was documented for 28.0 %, 43.5 %, and 28.9 % (wildtype, G12C, non-G12C) of the tested patients; 68.8 %, 89.3 %, and 87.7 % of the patients received first-line treatment combined with an immune checkpoint-inhibitor in 2019. TPS > 50 % vs. TPS < 1 % was associated with a significantly decreased risk of mortality in a multivariate Cox model (HR 0.39, 95 % CI 0.26-0.60, p=<0.001). There were no differences in clinical outcome between KRAS wildtype, G12C or non-G12C mutations and KRAS mutational status was not prognostic in the model.

CONCLUSION

Here we describe the so far largest prospectively recruited cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC and KRAS mutations, with special focus on the G12C mutation. These data constitute an extremely valuable historical control for upcoming clinical studies that employ KRAS inhibitors.

Treatment Outcomes and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with KRAS-G12C-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

KRAS mutations are identified in approximately 30% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Novel direct inhibitors of KRAS G12C have shown activity in early-phase clinical trials. We hypothesized that patients with KRAS G12C mutations may have distinct clinical characteristics and responses to therapies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Through routine next-generation sequencing, we identified patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) from 2014 to 2018 and reviewed tumor characteristics, overall survival, and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 1,194 patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC, including 770 with recurrent or metastatic disease. KRAS G12C mutations were present in 46% and KRAS non-G12C mutations in 54%. Patients with KRAS G12C had a higher tumor mutation burden (median, 8.8 vs. 7 mut/Mb; P = 0.006) and higher median PD-L1 expression (5% vs. 1%). The comutation patterns of STK11 (28% vs. 29%) and KEAP1 (23% vs. 24%) were similar. The median overall survivals from diagnosis were similar for KRAS G12C (13.4 months) and KRAS non-G12C mutations (13.1 months; P = 0.96). In patients with PD-L1 ≥50%, there was not a significant difference in response rate with single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor for patients with KRAS G12C mutations (40% vs. 58%; P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide outcome data for a large series of patients with KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC with available therapies, demonstrating that responses and duration of benefit with available therapies are similar to those seen in patients with KRAS non-G12C mutations. Strategies to incorporate new targeted therapies into the current treatment paradigm will need to consider outcomes specific to patients harboring KRAS G12C mutations.

The improbable targeted therapy: KRAS as an emerging target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

KRAS is a frequent oncogenic driver in solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It was previously thought to be an "undruggable" target due to the lack of deep binding pockets for specific small-molecule inhibitors. A better understanding of the mechanisms that drive KRAS transformation, improved KRAS-targeted drugs, and immunological approaches that aim at yielding immune responses against KRAS neoantigens have sparked a race for approved therapies. Few treatments are available for KRAS mutant NSCLC patients, and several approaches are being tested in clinicals trials to fill this void. Here, we review promising therapeutics tested for KRAS mutant NSCLC.

Sensitive Detection of KRAS Mutations by Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) is the isoform most frequently mutated in human tumors. Testing for activating KRAS mutations has important implications for diagnosis and the personalized medicine of cancers. The current techniques for detecting KRAS mutations have moderate sensitivity. The emerging clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system shows great promise in the detection of nucleic acids and is revolutionizing medical diagnostics. This study aimed to develop CRISPR–Cas12a as a sensitive test to detect KRAS mutations. Serially diluted DNA samples containing KRAS mutations are subjected to CRISPR–Cas12a and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). CRISPR–Cas12a and PCR can specifically detect 0.01% and 0.1% mutant KRAS DNA in the presence of wild-type KRAS DNA, respectively. Twenty pairs of lung tumor and noncancerous lung tissues are tested by CRISPR–Cas12a, PCR, and direct sequencing. CRISPR–Cas12a could identify the G12C mutation in five of 20 tumor tissues, while both PCR and direct sequencing discovered the KRAS mutation in three of the five tumor tissues. Furthermore, the results of CRISPR–Cas12a for testing the mutation could be directly and immediately visualized by a UV light illuminator. Altogether, CRISPR–Cas12a has a higher sensitivity for the detection of KRAS mutations compared with PCR and sequencing analysis, and thus has diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Nevertheless, the technique needs to be validated for its clinical significance in a large and prospective study.

Prognostic values, ceRNA network, and immune regulation function of SDPR in KRAS-mutant lung cancer

Background

Serum Deprivation Protein Response (SDPR) plays an important role in formation of pulmonary alveoli. However, the functions and values of SDPR in lung cancer remain unknown. We explored prognostic value, expression pattern, and biological function of SDPR in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and KRAS-mutant lung cancers.

Methods

SDPR expression was evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and Western blot on human NSCLC cells, lung adenocarcinoma tissue array, KRAS-mutant transgenic mice, TCGA and GEO datasets. Prognostic values of SDPR were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis. Bioinformatics implications of SDPR including SDPR-combined transcription factors (TFs) and microRNAs were predicted. In addition, correlations between SDPR, immune checkpoint molecules, and tumor infiltration models were illustrated.

Results

SDPR expression was downregulated in tumor cells and tissues. Low SDPR expression was an independent factor that correlated with shorter overall survival of patients both in lung cancer and KRAS-mutant subgroups. Meanwhile, ceRNA network was constructed to clarify the regulatory and biological functions of SDPR. Negative correlations were found between SDPR and immune checkpoint molecules (PD-L1, TNFRSF18, TNFRSF9, and TDO2). Moreover, diversity immune infiltration models were observed in NSCLC with different SDPR expression and copy number variation (CNV) patterns.

Conclusions

This study elucidated regulation network of SDPR in KRAS-mutant NSCLC, and it illustrated correlations between low SDPR expression and suppressed immune system, unfolding a prognostic factor and potential target for the treatment of lung cancer, especially for KRAS-mutant NSCLC.

Role of next generation sequencing-based liquid biopsy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: impact of STK11, KRAS and TP53 mutations and co-mutations on outcome

BACKGROUND

Characterization of tumor-related genetic alterations is promising for the screening of new predictive markers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Aim of the study was to evaluate prognostic and predictive role of most frequent tumor-associated genetic alterations detected in plasma before starting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

Between January 2017 and October 2019, advanced NSCLC patients were prospectively screened with plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) while included in two trials: VISION (NCT02864992), using Guardant360^® test, and MAGIC (Monitoring Advanced NSCLC through plasma Genotyping during Immunotherapy: Clinical feasibility and application), using Myriapod NGS-IL 56G Assay. A control group of patients not receiving ICIs was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients receiving ICIs were analyzed: median overall survival (OS) was 20.8 (95% CI: 16.7-24.9) months and median immune-related progression free disease (irPFS) 4.2 (95% CI: 2.3-6.1) months. TP53 mutations in plasma negatively affected OS both in patients treated with ICIs and in control group (P=0.001 and P=0.009), indicating a prognostic role. STK11 mutated patients (n=9) showed a trend for worse OS only if treated with ICIs. The presence of KRAS/STK11 co-mutation and KRAS/STK11/TP53 co-mutation affected OS only in patients treated with ICIs (HR =10.936, 95% CI: 2.337-51.164, P=0.002; HR =17.609, 95% CI: 3.777-82.089, P<0.001, respectively), indicating a predictive role.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma genotyping demonstrated prognostic value of TP53 mutations and predictive value of KRAS/STK11 and KRAS/STK11/TP53 co-mutations.

Advances in Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Targeted Therapy

The treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is constantly evolving. Although the advent of immunotherapy has played an important role in the treatment of patients with NSCLC, the identification of driver mutations and the subsequent specific treatment of these targets often lead to durable responses while maintaining quality of life. This review delves into targeted therapies available for epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ROS1, neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase, and BRAF- mutated NSCLC patients, as well as other mutations with promising novel drugs under clinical investigation.

KRAS oncogene may be another target conquered in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is one of the most common mutant oncogenes in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The survival of patients with KRAS mutations may be much lower than patients without KRAS mutations. However, due to the complex structure and diverse biological properties, it is difficult to achieve specific inhibitors for the direct elimination of KRAS activity, making KRAS a challenging therapeutic target. At present, with the tireless efforts of medical research, including KRAS G12C inhibitors, immunotherapy and other combination strategies, this dilemma is expected to an end. In addition, inhibition of the downstream signaling pathways of KRAS may be a promising combination strategy. Given the rapid development of treatments, understanding the details will be important to determine the individualized treatment options, including combination therapy and potential resistance mechanisms.

The survival of patients with KRAS mutations may be much lower than patients without KRAS mutations. At present, with the tireless efforts of medical research, including KRAS G12C inhibitors, immunotherapy and other combination strategy, this dilemma of KRAS mutated NSCLC is expected to an end.

KRAS mutation as a prognostic factor and predictive factor in advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

KRAS (Kirsten Rat Sarcoma) is the most common oncogenic mutation detected in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of KRAS as either a prognostic factor or predictive factor (modifier of treatment effects) in NSCLC is not well established at this time. This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis synthesized the available evidence regarding the role of KRAS mutation as a predictive factor and/or prognostic factor of survival and response outcomes in patients with advanced/metastatic (stage IIIB-IV) NSCLC. Relevant clinical trials and observational studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Meta-analyses were performed using data extracted from multivariable and univariable analyses from clinical studies to assess the empirical evidence of KRAS mutation status as a prognostic or/and predicitive factor. 43 selected studies were identified by the SLR and included in this meta-analysis. Pairwise meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not demonstrate a significant prognostic effect of mutant KRAS on overall survival (OS) (HR=1.10; 95% CI [0.88, 1.38]) or progression free survival (PFS) (HR=1.03; 95% CI [0.80, 1.33]). However, when conducting meta-analyses on HRs reported in observational studies, a statistically significant negative prognostic effect of mutant KRAS was observed (OS HR=1.71; 95% CI [1.07, 2.84]; PFS HR=1.18; 95% CI [1.02, 1.36]). Meta-analyses of objective response rate (ORR) in RCTs demonstrated a negative prognostic effect of mutant KRAS (RR=0.38; 95% CI [0.16, 0.63]). Limited data were available to evaluate the role of KRAS mutation as a predictive factor. In conclusion, this research offers evidence that KRAS mutation may be a negative prognostic factor for survival and response outcomes in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, but further research is needed to address conflicting results on the importance of KRAS mutations as a predictive factor.

Prognostic Value of KRAS Mutation Subtypes and PD-L1 Expression in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of different KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene) mutation subtypes and their association with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) remain unclear. We examined the association of KRAS mutation subtypes with clinical outcomes and PD-L1 expression status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with KRAS-mutated LADC were evaluated for PD-L1 expression, cancer staging, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

A cohort of 254 KRAS-mutated LADC patients (median follow-up, 17 months) was studied. The 3 major subtypes of KRAS mutations were G12C (46.1%), G12V (21.7%), and G12D (15.7%). We found that all these subtypes had no impact on cancer stages, brain metastasis at diagnosis, OS, and relapse-free survival. Among this cohort, 33% of 94 patients who had PD-L1 staining data available had PD-L1-positive disease (≥ 1% of tumor cells). PD-L1 expression status was not significantly different among the 3 major mutation subtypes. Of interest, among patients with G12C mutation, positive PD-L1 expression was associated with significantly shorter OS (median survival, 5.7 vs. 12.8 months, P = .007). In multivariable analysis, PD-L1 positivity remained as an adverse factor for OS, with hazard ratio of 4.44 (P = .0007). PD-L1 status did not affect OS in other subtypes of mutations.

CONCLUSION

KRAS mutation subtype is not associated with patient clinical outcomes or PD-L1 expression status. However, PD-L1 positivity appears to negatively affect OS in LADC patients with G12C mutation. Further study is needed to confirm our observation and to determine if programmed cell death 1/PD-L1 antagonist may affect the clinical outcome of patients with different KRAS mutation subtypes.

Real world outcomes in KRAS G12C mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

KRAS mutations are found in 20-30 % of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and were traditionally considered undruggable. KRAS^G12C mutation confers sensitivity to KRAS^G12C covalent inhibitors, however its prognostic impact remains unclear. This study assesses the frequency, clinical features, prevalence of brain metastases and outcomes in KRAS^G12C NSCLC in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the prospective Thoracic Malignancies Cohort (TMC) between July 2012 to October 2019 with recurrent/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC, available KRAS results, and without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 gene aberrations, were selected. Data was extracted from TMC and patient records. Clinicopathologic features, treatment and overall survival (OS) was compared for KRAS wildtype (KRAS^WT) and KRAS mutated (KRAS^mut); and KRAS^G12C and other (KRAS^other) mutations.

RESULTS

Of 1386 NSCLC patients, 1040 were excluded: non-metastatic/recurrent (526); unknown KRAS status (356); ALK/EGFR/ROS1 positive (154); duplicate (4). Of 346 patients analysed, 144 (42 %) were KRAS^mut, of whom 65 (45 %) were KRAS^G12C. All patients with KRAS^G12C were active or ex-smokers, compared to 92 % of KRAS^other and 83 % of KRAS^WT. The prevalence of brain metastases during follow-up was similar between KRAS^mut and KRAS^WT (33 % vs 40 %, p = 0.17), and KRAS^G12C and KRAS^other (40 % vs 41 %, p = 0.74). The proportion of patients receiving one or multiple lines of systemic therapy was comparable. OS was similar between KRAS^mut and KRAS^WT (p = 0.54), and KRAS^G12C and KRAS^other (p = 0.39).

CONCLUSION

Patients with KRAS^mut and KRAS^WT, and KRAS^G12C and KRAS^other NSCLC have comparable clinical features, treatment and survival. While not prognostic, KRAS^G12C may be an important predictive biomarker as promising KRAS^G12C covalent inhibitors continue to be developed.

Targeting KRAS Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Past, Present and Future

Lung cancer is the most frequent cancer with an aggressive clinical course and high mortality rates. Most cases are diagnosed at advanced stages when treatment options are limited and the efficacy of chemotherapy is poor. The disease has a complex and heterogeneous background with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85% of patients and lung adenocarcinoma being the most common histological subtype. Almost 30% of adenocarcinomas of the lung are driven by an activating Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation. The ability to inhibit the oncogenic KRAS has been the holy grail of cancer research and the search for inhibitors is immensely ongoing as KRAS-mutated tumors are among the most aggressive and refractory to treatment. Therapeutic strategies tailored for KRAS+ NSCLC rely on the blockage of KRAS functional output, cellular dependencies, metabolic features, KRAS membrane associations, direct targeting of KRAS and immunotherapy. In this review, we provide an update on the most recent advances in anti-KRAS therapy for lung tumors with mechanistic insights into biological diversity and potential clinical implications.

Outcomes of Patients With Advanced NSCLC From the Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique Biomarkers France Study by KRAS Mutation Subtypes

Introduction

KRAS mutations are detected in 20% to 30% of NSCLC. However, KRAS mutation subtypes may differently influence the outcome of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

In the Biomarkers France study, 4894 KRAS mutations (26.2%) were detected in 4634 patients from the 17,664 enrolled patients with NSCLC. Survival and treatment data on noncurative stage III to IV NSCLC were available for 901 patients. First- and second-line treatment effects on progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed according to the KRAS mutations subtype.

Results

Over 95% of patients with KRAS mutation were smokers or former smokers who were white (99.5%), presenting with adenocarcinoma (82.5%). The most common KRAS mutation subtype was G12C (374 patients; 41.5%), followed by G12V (168; 18.6%), G12D (131; 14.5%), G12A (62; 6.9%), G13C (45; 5.0%), G13D (31; 3.4%), and others (10; 1%). Approximately 21% of patients had transition mutation and 68.2% had a transversion mutation. G12D and transition mutations were predominant in never-smokers. The median overall survival for patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.5-9.5), without any differences according to the different KRAS subtypes mutations. The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI: 4.2-5.1) for first-line treatment and 4.8 months (95% CI: 4.3-6.8) for second-line treatment, without any differences according to the different KRAS subtypes mutations.

Conclusions

KRAS mutation subtypes influenced neither treatment responses nor outcomes. The KRAS G12C mutation was detected in 41.5% of patients, who are now eligible for potent and specific G12C inhibitors.

The Inhibition of Wnt Restrain KRASG12V-Driven Metastasis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The KRAS mutations have been an obstacle to identify therapeutic targets in cancer treatment. In this work, we clarified the distinct metastasis pattern of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) induced by KRAS^G12V/KRAS^G12D mutations and inhibited the KRAS^G12V mediated metastasis by Wnt inhibitor. First, we found that KRAS^G12V induced more aggressive phenotype in vitro and in vivo experiments. The Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) results of H838 KRAS^G12V cells showed a significant negative correlation with RhoA-related signaling. Following this clue, we observed KRAS^G12D induced higher activation of RhoA and suppressed activation of Wnt/β-catenin in H838KRAS^G12D cells. The restored activation of Wnt/β-catenin in H838KRAS^G12D cells could be detected when expression with a dominant-negative mutant of RhoA or treatment with RhoA inhibitor. Furthermore, the Wnt inhibitor abolished the KRAS^G12V-induced migration. We elucidated the importance of the axis of RhoA/Wnt in regulatory NSCLC metastasis driven by KRAS mutations. Our data indicate that KRAS^G12V driven NSCLC metastasis is Wnt-dependent and the mechanisms of NSCLC metastasis induced by KRAS^G12V/KRAS^G12D is distinct.

RAS and BRAF in the foreground for non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer: Similarities and main differences for prognosis and therapies

Lung and colorectal cancer are included in the most tremendously threatening diseases in terms of incidence and death. Although they are located in completely different organs and differ in various characteristics they do share some common features, especially regarding their molecular mutational profile. Among several commonly mutated genes KRAS and BRAF are spotted to be highly associated with patient's poor disease outcome and resistance to targeted therapies mostly in liaison with other mutant activated genes. Many studies have shed light in these mechanisms for disease progression and numerous preclinical models, clinical trials and meta-analysis reports investigate the impact of specific treatments or combination of therapies. The present review is an effort to compare the mutational imprint of these genes between the two diseases and their impact in prognosis, current therapy, mechanisms of therapy resistance and future therapeutic plans and provide a spherical perspective regarding the systemic molecular profile of cancer.

New Horizons in KRAS-Mutant Lung Cancer: Dawn After Darkness

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most frequent oncogenic mutation in western countries is KRAS, for which, however, there remains no clinically approved targeted therapies. Recent progress on high biological heterogeneity including diverse KRAS point mutations, varying dependence on mutant KRAS, wide spectrum of other co-occurring genetic alterations, as well as distinct cellular status across the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), has not only deepened our understanding about the pathobiology of KRAS-mutant NSCLC but also brought about unprecedented new hopes for precision treatment of patients. In this review, we provide an update on the most recent advances in KRAS-mutant lung cancer, with a focus on mechanistic insights into tumor heterogeneity, the potential clinic implications and new therapies on horizons tailored for KRAS-mutant lung cancer.

Co-occurring genomic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer biology and therapy

The impressive clinical activity of small-molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for oncogene-addicted subgroups of non-small-cell lung cancer (for example, those driven by activating mutations in the gene encoding epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or rearrangements in the genes encoding the receptor tyrosine kinases anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) and rearranged during transfection (RET)) has established an oncogene-centric molecular classification paradigm in this disease. However, recent studies have revealed considerable phenotypic diversity downstream of tumour-initiating oncogenes. Co-occurring genomic alterations, particularly in tumour suppressor genes such as TP53 and LKB1 (also known as STK11), have emerged as core determinants of the molecular and clinical heterogeneity of oncogene-driven lung cancer subgroups through their effects on both tumour cell-intrinsic and non-cell-autonomous cancer hallmarks. In this Review, we discuss the impact of co-mutations on the pathogenesis, biology, microenvironmental interactions and therapeutic vulnerabilities of non-small-cell lung cancer and assess the challenges and opportunities that co-mutations present for personalized anticancer therapy, as well as the expanding field of precision immunotherapy.

REG4 is an indicator for KRAS mutant lung adenocarcinoma with TTF-1 low expression

OBJECTIVES

Recent research has classified lung adenocarcinoma patients with KRAS mutation into three subtypes by co-occurring genetic events in TP53 (KP subgroup), STK11/LKB1 (KL subgroup) and CDKN2A/B inactivation plus TTF-1 low expression (KC subgroup). The aim of this study was to identify valuable biomarkers by searching the candidate molecules that contribute to lung adenocarcinoma pathogenesis, especially KC subtype.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the publicly available database and identified the candidate REG4 using the E-GEOD-31210 dataset, and then confirmed by TCGA dataset. In addition, an independent cohort of 55 clinical samples was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Functional studies and RNA sequencing were performed after silencing the REG4 expression.

RESULTS

REG4, an important regulator of gastro-intestinal carcinogenesis, was highly expressed in KRAS mutant lung adenocarcinoma with low expression of TTF-1 (KC subtype). The results were validated both by gene expression analysis and immunohistochemistry study in an independent 55 clinical samples from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Further in vitro and in vivo functional assays revealed silencing REG4 expression significantly reduces cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Moreover, RNA sequencing and GSEA analysis displayed that REG4 knockdown might induce cell cycle arrest by regulating G2/M checkpoint and E2F targets.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that REG4 plays an important role in KRAS-driven lung cancer pathogenesis and is a novel biomarker of lung adenocarcinoma subtype. Future studies are required to clarify the underlying mechanisms of REG4 in the division and proliferation of KC tumors and its potential therapeutic value.

Impact of smoking on frequency and spectrum of K-RAS and EGFR mutations in treatment naive Indonesian lung cancer patients

Background: Indonesia has the highest cigarette consumption in the world. We explored the clinical impact of smoking on the prevalence of EGFR and K-RAS mutations and survival in this prospective study.

Methods: 143 treatment naive lung cancer patients were recruited from Persahabatan Hospital, a national tertiary hospital. DNA from cytological specimens had been extracted and genotyped for both EGFR and K-RAS mutations using a combination of PCR high resolution melting, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and direct DNA sequencing.

Results:EGFR mutation frequency in never smokers (NS) and ever smokers (ES) were 75% and 56% (p = 0.0401), respectively. In this cohort, the overall K-RAS mutation rate was 7%. Neither gender nor smoking history were associated with K-RAS mutation significantly. However, K-RAS transversion mutations were more common in male ES than transition mutations. Smoking history did not affect EGFR and K-RAS mutation frequencies in women. Concurrent EGFR/K-RAS mutation rate was 2.8% (4 of 143 patients). Four out of 91 EGFR mutation positive patients (4.4%) had simultaneous K-RAS mutation.

Conclusions: In region where cigarette consumption is prevalent, smoking history affected frequencies of EGFR and K-RAS mutations, mainly in males.

Impact of KRAS mutation subtype and concurrent pathogenic mutations on non-small cell lung cancer outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Concurrent genetic mutations are prevalent in KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and may differentially influence patient outcomes. We sought to characterize the effects of KRAS mutation subtypes and concurrent pathogenic mutations on overall survival (OS) and PD-L1 expression, a predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC at a single institution and abstracted clinical, molecular, and pathologic data from electronic health records. Cox regression and multinomial logistic regression were used to determine how KRAS mutation subtypes and concurrent pathogenic mutations are associated with OS and tumor PD-L1 expression, respectively.

RESULTS

A total 186 patients were included. Common KRAS mutation subtypes included G12C (35%) and G12D (17%). Concurrent pathogenic mutations were identified in TP53 (39%), STK11 (12%), KEAP1 (8%), and PIK3CA (4%). On multivariable analysis, KRAS G12D mutations were significantly associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-5.16; P = 0.021), as were STK11 co-mutations (HR 2.95, 95% CI 1.27-6.88; P = 0.012). Compared to no (<1%) PD-L1 expression, KRAS G12C mutations were significantly associated with positive yet low (1-49%) PD-L1 expression (odds ratio [OR] 4.94, 95% CI 1.07-22.85; P = 0.041), and TP53 co-mutations with high (≥50%) PD-L1 expression (OR 6.36, 95% CI 1.84-22.02; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

KRAS G12D and STK11 mutations confer poor prognoses for patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC. KRAS G12C and TP53 mutations correlate with a biomarker that predicts benefit from immunotherapy. Concurrent mutations may represent distinct subsets of KRAS-mutant NSCLC; further investigation is warranted to elucidate their role in guiding treatment.

Type of TP53 mutation influences oncogenic potential and spectrum of associated K-ras mutations in lung-specific transgenic mice

TP53 and K-ras mutations are two of the major genetic alterations in human nonsmall cell lung cancers. The association between these two genes during lung tumorigenesis is unknown. We evaluated the potential of two common Type I (273H, contact) and Type II (175H, conformational) TP53 mutations to induce lung tumors in transgenic mice, as well as K-ras status, and other driver mutations in these tumors. Among 516 (138 nontransgenic, 207 SPC-TP53-273H, 171 SPC-TP53-175H) mice analyzed, 91 tumors, all adenocarcinomas, were observed. Type II mutants developed tumors more frequently (as compared to nontransgenics, p = 0.0003; and Type I, p = 0.010), and had an earlier tumor onset compared to Type I (p = 0.012). K-ras mutations occurred in 21 of 50 (42%) of murine lung tumors sequenced. For both the nontransgenic and the SPC-TP53-273H transgenics, tumor K-ras codon 12-13 mutations occurred after 13 months with a peak incidence at 16-18 months. However, for the SPC-TP53-175H transgenics, K-ras codon 12-13 mutations were observed as early as 6 months, with a peak incidence between the ages of 10-12 months. Codons 12-13 transversion mutations were the predominant changes in the SPC-TP53-175H transgenics, whereas codon 61 transition mutations were more common in the SPC-TP53-273H transgenics. The observation of accelerated tumor onset, early appearance and high frequency of K-ras codon 12-13 mutations in the Type II TP53-175H mice suggests an enhanced oncogenic function of conformational TP53 mutations, and gains in early genetic instability for tumors containing these mutations compared to contact mutations.

Exceptional responders with invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas: a phase 2 trial of bortezomib in patients with KRAS G12D-mutant lung cancers

KRAS G12D-mutant/p53-deficient non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) models are dependent on the NF-κB pathway that can be down-regulated by the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Two exceptional responders were observed on prior clinical trials of bortezomib, both of whom had KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC, prompting the initiation of this single-center phase 2 trial. Patients with advanced KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLC were eligible. Bortezomib was administered at 1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneously (days 1, 4, 8, 11; 21-d cycle) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was best objective response (RECIST v1.1). Sixteen patients with KRAS G12D-mutant lung adenocarcinomas were treated. Patients had a median pack year smoking history of 4 (range 0-45). A partial response (PR) was observed in one patient (-66% from baseline) and stable disease in five patients on the first stage of this study (overall response rate of 6%, 95% CI: 0.2-30.2), and further patients were not accrued. The median progression-free survival was 1 mo (95% CI: 1-6). The median overall survival was 13 mo (95% CI: 6-NA). The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (38%) and diarrhea (26%). TP53 status did not predict response on exploratory testing. Of note, the patient with a PR had a unique subtype of lung adenocarcinoma-invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (IMA)-and had rapid clinical improvement and substantial disease regression, which was also previously observed in two other patients with advanced KRAS G12D-mutant lung cancer with IMAs who received bortezomib on separate clinical trials. Exceptional responses to bortezomib can be achieved in KRAS G12D-mutant NSCLCs. KRAS G12D mutation alone, however, is not a robust predictor of response. Further evaluation should only be performed after further elucidation of other factors such as co-occurring alterations and histologic subtype such as IMA that may predict sensitivity to therapy.

Harnessing Clinical Sequencing Data for Survival Stratification of Patients with Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinomas

Purpose

Broad panel sequencing of tumors facilitates routine care of people with cancer as well as clinical trial matching for novel genome-directed therapies. We sought to extend the use of broad panel sequencing results to survival stratification and clinical outcome prediction.

Patients and Methods

Using sequencing results from a cohort of 1,054 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas, we developed OncoCast, a machine learning tool for survival risk stratification and biomarker identification.

Results

With OncoCast, we stratified this patient cohort into four risk groups based on tumor genomic profile. Patients whose tumors harbored a high-risk profile had a median survival of 7.3 months (95% CI 5.5-10.9), compared to a low risk group with a median survival of 32.8 months (95% CI 26.3-38.5), with a hazard ratio of 4.6 (P<2e-16), far superior to any individual gene predictor or standard clinical characteristics. We found that co-mutations of both STK11 and KEAP1 are a strong determinant of unfavorable prognosis with currently available therapies. In patients with targetable oncogenes including EGFR/ALK/ROS1 and received targeted therapies, the tumor genetic background further differentiated survival with mutations in TP53 and ARID1A contributing to a higher risk score for shorter survival.

Conclusion

Mutational profile derived from broad-panel sequencing presents an effective genomic stratification for patient survival in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. OncoCast is available as a public resource that facilitates the incorporation of mutational data to predict individual patient prognosis and compare risk characteristics of patient populations.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic KRAS-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinomas: The Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium Experience

INTRODUCTION

Mutations in the KRAS gene are the most common driver oncogenes present in lung adenocarcinomas. We analyzed the largest multi-institutional database available containing patients with metastatic KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

The Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC) is a multi-institutional collaboration to study the genomic characteristics of lung adenocarcinomas, treat them with genomically directed therapeutic approaches, and assess their outcomes. Since its inception in 2009, the LCMC has enrolled more than 1900 patients and has performed pretreatment, multiplexed, molecular characterization along with collecting clinical data. We evaluated the characteristics of patients with KRAS mutation in the LCMC and the association with overall survival.

RESULTS

Data from 1655 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinomas were analyzed. Four hundred fifty (27%) patients had a KRAS mutation, 58% were female, 93% were smokers, and there was a median age of 65 years. Main KRAS subtypes were: G12C 39%; and G12D and G12V at 18% each. Among patients with KRAS mutation, G12D had a higher proportion of never-smokers (22%, p < 0.001). Patients with KRAS-mutant tumors had a trend toward shorter median survival compared to all others in the series (1.96 versus 2.22; P = 0.08) and lower 2-year survival rate (49% [95% confidence interval: 44%-54%] and 55% [95% confidence interval: 52%-58%], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the LCMC study, 27% of lung adenocarcinomas patients harbored a KRAS mutation and up to one-third of them had another oncogenic driver. Patients with both KRAS and STK11 mutations had a significantly inferior clinical outcome.

First-line Chemotherapy Responsiveness and Patterns of Metastatic Spread Identify Clinical Syndromes Present Within Advanced KRAS Mutant Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer With Different Prognostic Significance

BACKGROUND

Unsuccessful KRAS-specific treatment approaches in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might reflect underlying disease heterogeneity. We sought to define clinical "syndromes" within advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC to improve future clinical trials and create a clinical framework for future molecular development.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To test a series of a priori hypotheses regarding KRAS-mutant NSCLC clinical syndromes, we conducted a multi-institutional retrospective medical record review. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier model. Between-group differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analyses and Wilcoxon rank sum testing were used to assess progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) differences.

RESULTS

Among 218 patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC, OS and progression-free survival with first-line chemotherapy did not differ by intrathoracic versus extrathoracic spread, smoking intensity, or the specific KRAS mutation. Metastatic disease at diagnosis resulted in significantly worse OS than recurrent, unresectable disease (median OS, 14.6 vs. 40.9 months; P = .001). Among the patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, nonscalp, soft tissue metastases (syndrome X; 6% of cases; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5%-10.1%) signified a poor prognosis (median OS, 7.5 vs. 15.9 months for the controls; P = .021). The response to first-line chemotherapy (syndrome Y; 41% of cases; 95% CI, 32.3%-50.6%) signified a good prognosis (median OS, 26.7 vs. 11.9 months; P = .002). The overlap between these 2 syndromes was minimal (2 of 111). Multivariate analysis confirmed these observations. The hazard ratio for death for syndromes X and Y was 2.64 (95% CI, 1.13-6.14) and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.28-0.76), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy-responsive disease and nonscalp, soft tissue spread might represent distinct clinical syndromes within KRAS-mutant NSCLC. The molecular biology underlying this heterogeneity warrants future studies.

[Research Progress of KRAS Mutation in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

肺癌是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因。非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）占所有肺癌患者中的80%-85%，大多数肺癌患者在确诊时已处于晚期阶段。目前，基于驱动基因的靶向治疗的发展改变了晚期NSCLC患者的治疗模式。在NSCLC中，表皮生长因子受体突变（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）和棘皮动物微管相关蛋白和间变性淋巴瘤激酶（echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase, EML4-ALK）融合已被验证为强大的生物标志物。众所周知KRAS也是NSCLC中最常见的突变致癌基因之一，尽管20多年前在NSCLC中发现了KRAS突变，迄今为止用于治疗KRAS突变的NSCLC患者的药物有很多，但目前还没有针对直接消除KRAS活性的选择性和特异性抑制剂。此外具有KRAS突变的NSCLC患者对大多数系统性治疗的反应性差。然而使用靶向药物针对活化的信号通路个体化治疗对KRAS突变的NSCLC患者的预后有很好疗效。此外KRAS突变在NSCLC中的预后和预测作用尚不清楚。在这篇综述中，我们重点讨论了KRAS突变的NSCLC的研究进展，包括分子生物学、临床病理特征、KRAS突变的预后和预测等方面，进而有助于提高临床工作者对KRAS突变的NSCLC的认知。。

Outcome analysis of Phase I trial patients with metastatic KRAS and/or TP53 mutant non-small cell lung cancer

KRAS and TP53 mutations, which are the most common genetic drivers of tumorigenesis, are still considered undruggable targets. Therefore, we analyzed these genetic aberrations in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for the development of potential therapeutics. One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients with metastatic NSCLC in a phase 1 trial center were included. Their genomic aberrations, clinical characteristics, survivals, and phase 1 trial therapies were analyzed. About 10%, 18%, 36%, and 36% of the patients had metastatic KRAS+/TP53+, KRAS+/TP53-,KRAS-/TP53+, and KRAS-/TP53- NSCLC, respectively. The most common concurrent genetic aberrations beside KRAS and/or TP53 (>5%) were KIT, epidermal growth factor receptor, PIK3CA, c-MET, BRAF, STK11, ATM, CDKN2A, and APC. KRAS+/TP53+ NSCLC did not respond well to the phase 1 trial therapy and was associated with markedly worse progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survivals than the other three groups together. KRAS hotspot mutations at locations other than codon G12 were associated with considerably worse OS than those at this codon. Gene aberration-matched therapy produced prolonged PFS and so was anti-angiogenesis in patients with TP53 mutations. Introduction of the evolutionary action score system of TP53 missense mutations enabled us to identify a subgroup of NSCLC patients with low-risk mutant p53 proteins having a median OS duration of 64.5 months after initial diagnosis of metastasis. These data suggested that patients with metastatic dual KRAS+/TP53+ hotspot-mutant NSCLC had poor clinical outcomes. Further analysis identified remarkably prolonged survival in patients with low-risk mutant p53 proteins, which warrants confirmatory studies.

Targeting oncogenic drivers in lung cancer: Recent progress, current challenges and future opportunities

Targeted therapies have changed the landscape of treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Specific targeted therapies have been approved for NSCLC patients harboring genetic alterations in four oncogenes, and agents targeting additional oncogenic drivers are under investigation. Standard first-line chemotherapy has been supplanted by these targeted therapies due to superior efficacy and lower toxicity. Despite excellent response rates and durable responses in some cases, most patients experience relapse within a few years due to the development of acquired drug resistance. Next generation targeted therapies are being developed to overcome drug resistance and extend the duration of therapy. In this review, we summarize the current treatment strategies for the major targetable oncogenic mutations/alterations in NSCLC and discuss the mechanisms leading to acquired drug resistance.

KRAS-Mutant non-small cell lung cancer: From biology to therapy

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most frequent oncogene driver mutation in Western countries is Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), and KRAS-mutant NSCLC is associated with smoking. There are various sources of biological heterogeneity of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, including different genotypes that may be associated with specific clinical outcomes, the presence of other co-mutations that exhibit different biological features and drug sensitivity patterns, and mutant allelic content. The efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC is generally poor and numerous novel therapeutic strategies have been developed. These approaches include targeting KRAS membrane associations, targeting downstream signalling pathways, the use of KRAS synthetic lethality, direct targeting of KRAS, and immunotherapy. Of these, immunotherapy may be one of the most promising treatment approaches for patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC. Recent data also suggest the potential for distinct efficacy of immunotherapy according to the presence of other co-mutations. In view of the biological heterogeneity of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, treatment will likely need to be individualised and, in future, may require the use of rational combinations of treatment, many of which are currently under investigation.

STK11/LKB1 Mutations and PD-1 Inhibitor Resistance in KRAS-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma

KRAS is the most common oncogenic driver in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAC). We previously reported that STK11/LKB1 (KL) or TP53 (KP) comutations define distinct subgroups of KRAS-mutant LUAC. Here, we examine the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in these subgroups. Objective response rates to PD-1 blockade differed significantly among KL (7.4%), KP (35.7%), and K-only (28.6%) subgroups (P < 0.001) in the Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C) cohort (174 patients) with KRAS-mutant LUAC and in patients treated with nivolumab in the CheckMate-057 phase III trial (0% vs. 57.1% vs. 18.2%; P = 0.047). In the SU2C cohort, KL LUAC exhibited shorter progression-free (P < 0.001) and overall (P = 0.0015) survival compared with KRAS^MUT;STK11/LKB1^WT LUAC. Among 924 LUACs, STK11/LKB1 alterations were the only marker significantly associated with PD-L1 negativity in TMB^{Intermediate/High} LUAC. The impact of STK11/LKB1 alterations on clinical outcomes with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors extended to PD-L1-positive non-small cell lung cancer. In Kras-mutant murine LUAC models, Stk11/Lkb1 loss promoted PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor resistance, suggesting a causal role. Our results identify STK11/LKB1 alterations as a major driver of primary resistance to PD-1 blockade in KRAS-mutant LUAC.Significance: This work identifies STK11/LKB1 alterations as the most prevalent genomic driver of primary resistance to PD-1 axis inhibitors in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Genomic profiling may enhance the predictive utility of PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden and facilitate establishment of personalized combination immunotherapy approaches for genomically defined LUAC subsets. Cancer Discov; 8(7); 822-35. ©2018 AACR.See related commentary by Etxeberria et al., p. 794This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 781.

KRAS mutation is predictive of outcome in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma

AIMS

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a poorly differentiated non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with aggressive behaviour. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic clinicopathological and genetic characteristics of PSCs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-three cases of surgically treated PSCs were selected, 23 of which were subjected to mutation and copy number variation analysis using the 50-gene Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel. The majority of the patients were male (32 of 53, 60.3%) and smokers (51 of 53, 96.2%). Overall, 25 (47.1%) patients died within 2-105 months (mean = 22.7 months, median = 15 months) after diagnosis, and 28 were alive 3-141 months (mean = 38.7 months, median = 21.5 months) after diagnosis. Five-year overall survival was 12.5%. KRAS codon 12/13 mutation in adenocarcinomas (P = 0.01), age more than 70 years (P = 0.008) and tumour size ≥4.0 cm (P = 0.02) were associated strongly with worse outcome. TP53 (17 of 23, 74.0%) and KRAS codon 12 of 13 mutations (10 of 23, 43.4%) were the most common genetic alterations. Potentially actionable variants were identified including ATM (four of 23, 17.3%), MET, FBXW7 and EGFR (two of 23, 8.7%), AKT1, KIT, PDGFRA, HRAS, JAK3 and SMAD4 (one of 23, 4.3%). MET exon 14 skipping and missense mutations were identified in two (11.1%) cases with adenocarcinoma histology. Copy number analysis showed loss of RB1 (three of 23, 13%) and ATM (two of 23, 8.7%). Copy number gains were seen in EGFR (two of 23, 13.0%) and in one (4.3%) of each PIK3CA, KRAS, MET and STK11.

CONCLUSIONS

Potentially targetable mutations can be identified in a subset of PSC, although most tumours harbour currently untargetable prognostically adverse TP53 and KRAS mutations.

Multiplexed in vivo homology-directed repair and tumor barcoding enables parallel quantification of Kras variant oncogenicity

Large-scale genomic analyses of human cancers have cataloged somatic point mutations thought to initiate tumor development and sustain cancer growth. However, determining the functional significance of specific alterations remains a major bottleneck in our understanding of the genetic determinants of cancer. Here, we present a platform that integrates multiplexed AAV/Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) with DNA barcoding and high-throughput sequencing to simultaneously investigate multiple genomic alterations in de novo cancers in mice. Using this approach, we introduce a barcoded library of non-synonymous mutations into hotspot codons 12 and 13 of Kras in adult somatic cells to initiate tumors in the lung, pancreas, and muscle. High-throughput sequencing of barcoded Kras HDR alleles from bulk lung and pancreas reveals surprising diversity in Kras variant oncogenicity. Rapid, cost-effective, and quantitative approaches to simultaneously investigate the function of precise genomic alterations in vivo will help uncover novel biological and clinically actionable insights into carcinogenesis.

Effects of Co-occurring Genomic Alterations on Outcomes in Patients with KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose:KRAS mutations occur in approximately 25% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the uniform presence of KRAS mutations, patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC can have a heterogeneous clinical course. As the pattern of co-occurring mutations may describe different biological subsets of patients with KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, we explored the effects of co-occurring mutations on patient outcomes and response to therapy.Experimental Design: We identified patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC and evaluated the most common co-occurring genomic alterations. Multivariate analyses were performed incorporating the most frequent co-mutations and clinical characteristics to evaluate association with overall survival as well as response to platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Results: Among 330 patients with advanced KRAS-mutant lung cancers, the most frequent co-mutations were found in TP53 (42%), STK11 (29%), and KEAP1/NFE2L2 (27%). In a multivariate analysis, there was a significantly shorter survival in patients with co-mutations in KEAP1/NFE2L2 [HR, 1.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.33-2.92; P ≤ 0.001]. STK11 (HR, 1.3; P = 0.22) and TP53 (HR 1.11, P = 0.58) co-mutation statuses were not associated with survival. Co-mutation in KEAP1/NFE2L2 was also associated with shorter duration of initial chemotherapy (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.04-2.59; P = 0.03) and shorter overall survival from initiation of immune therapy (HR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.55-8.11; P = 0.003).Conclusions: Among people with KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC, TP53, STK11, and KEAP1/NFE2L2 are the most commonly co-occurring somatic genomic alterations. Co-mutation of KRAS and KEAP1/ NFE2L2 is an independent prognostic factor, predicting shorter survival, duration of response to initial platinum-based chemotherapy, and survival from the start of immune therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(2); 334-40. ©2017 AACR.

Peritoneum as the sole distant metastatic site of lung adenosquamous cell carcinoma: a case report

Background

Peritoneum metastasis of lung cancer is a rare event which, in addition to the peritoneum, usually involves multiple metastatic tissues. Here we report a case of a patient with lung adenosquamous cell carcinoma with the peritoneum as the sole distant metastatic site.

Case presentation

An 82-year-old Han Chinese man, in the teaching profession, was diagnosed with lung adenosquamous cell carcinoma in the upper lobe of his left lung with the involvement of ipsilateral hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, and was initially staged as IIIa (cT₂N₂M₀). Molecular testing identified a mutation at KRAS G12A. Due to his poor physical condition, our patient was given gamma knife radiotherapy with a total dose of 28.0 Gy. Two weeks later, our patient was diagnosed as peritoneal metastasis identified by using magnetic resonance imaging and confirmed with ascitic cytology and peritoneal histology. No other distant metastatic sites such as liver, brain, bone, paranephroi, and lungs were found. Subsequently, our patient received palliative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and died within 2 months.

Conclusions

Our patient represented a rare case of lung adenosquamous cell carcinoma harboring the KRAS G12A mutation, which metastasized distantly to the peritoneum only, and progressed rapidly.

Treating KRAS-mutant NSCLC: latest evidence and clinical consequences

KRAS mutations represent one of the most prevalent oncogenic driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For many years we have unsuccessfully addressed KRAS mutation as a unique disease. The recent widespread use of comprehensive genomic profiling has identified different subgroups with prognostic implications. Moreover, recent data recognizing the distinct biology and therapeutic vulnerabilities of different KRAS subgroups have allowed us to explore different treatment approaches. Small molecules that selectively inhibit KRAS G12C or use of immune checkpoint inhibitors based on co-mutation status are some examples which anticipate that personalized treatment for this challenging disease is finally on the horizon.

Prognostic considerations of the new World Health Organization classification of lung adenocarcinoma

The 2015 World Health Organization (WHO) lung adenocarcinoma classification divides tumours into categories of indolent pre-invasive, minimally invasive and predominantly lepidic and, by examining predominant patterns of invasion, allows for further stratification into intermediate and high-grade tumours. The impact of the 2015 classification on prognosis was reviewed by a PubMed search for search terms "adenocarcinoma", "lung pathology" and "prognosis" and relevant publications reviewed. These were sorted for data on stage and survival as impacted by histological classification, and survival studies were separated into all stage versus stage 1 studies. Predictive aspects of histological classification were also examined, but molecular correlates were not. The separation of adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma from invasive subtypes as distinct prognostic entities and the prognostic significance, for disease specific and overall survival for low- and high-grade categories, are discussed. The impact on stage at presentation including risk of node metastasis by histology is examined, as well as histology in relation to recurrence after surgery. Early data with regard to the value of predominant histology in the prediction of chemotherapy response will also be explored.

Targeting the KRAS Pathway in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, significant progress has been made individualizing therapy based on molecular aberrations (e.g., EGFR, ALK) and pathologic subtype. KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated genes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), found in approximately 30% of lung adenocarcinomas, and is thus an appealing target for new therapies. Although no targeted therapy has yet been approved for the treatment of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, there are multiple potential therapeutic approaches. These may include direct inhibition of KRAS protein, inhibition of KRAS regulators, alteration of KRAS membrane localization, and inhibition of effector molecules downstream of mutant KRAS. This article provides an overview of the KRAS pathway in lung cancer and related therapeutic strategies under investigation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The identification of oncogene-addicted cancers and specific inhibitors has revolutionized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment and outcomes. One of the most commonly mutated genes in adenocarcinoma is KRAS, found in approximately 30% of lung adenocarcinomas, and thus it is an appealing target for new therapies. This review provides an overview of the KRAS pathway and related targeted therapies under investigation in NSCLC. Some of these agents may play a key role in KRAS-mutant NSCLC treatment in the future.

KRAS mutations in the circulating free DNA (cfDNA) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) is obtained from serum or plasma by non-invasive methods such as a simple blood draw, a technique known as "liquid biopsy". Genetic analyses of driver alterations in cfDNA have proved very effective to predict survival and treatment response of cancer patients according to tumoral cfDNA burden in blood. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with higher concentration of tumoral cfDNA in blood have, on average, shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Regarding specific genetic alterations, KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase (KRAS) is one of the main genes involved in NSCLC and several studies have been performed to determine its value as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in liquid biopsy. Unfortunately, to date no strong conclusions can be drawn since they have yielded contradictory results. Therefore, further investigations are necessary to establish the value of KRAS testing in liquid biopsy as prognostic or predictive factor in NSCLC. Herein, we review the current knowledge on the importance of KRAS as prognostic and predictive biomarker using non-invasive approaches and the scientific data available regarding its application in clinical practice for treatment of NSCLC.

The prevalence and prognostic significance of KRAS mutation subtypes in lung adenocarcinomas from Chinese populations

BACKGROUND

We performed this retrospective study to identify the prevalence of KRAS mutation in Chinese populations and make a comprehensive investigation of the clinicopathological features of KRAS mutation in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from 2007 to 2013 diagnosed with primary lung adeno-carcinoma who received a radical resection were examined for KRAS, EGFR, HER2, BRAF mutations, and ALK, RET, and ROS1 fusions. Clinicopathological features, including sex, age, tumor-lymph node-metastasis stage, tumor differentiation, smoking status, histological subtypes, and survival information were analyzed.

RESULT

KRAS mutation was detected in 113 of 1,368 patients. Nine different subtypes of KRAS mutation were identified in codon 12, codon 13, and codon 61. KRAS mutation was more frequently found in male patients and former/current smoker patients. Tumors with KRAS mutation had poorer differentiation. Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma predominant and solid predominant subtypes were more frequent in KRAS mutant patients. No statistical significance was found in relapse-free survival or overall survival between patients with KRAS mutation and patients with other mutations.

CONCLUSION

In Chinese populations, we identified KRAS mutation in 8.3% (113/1,368) of the patients with lung adenocarcinoma. KRAS mutation defines a molecular subset of lung adenocarcinoma with unique clinicopathological features.

Identifying recurrent mutations in cancer reveals widespread lineage diversity and mutational specificity

Mutational hotspots indicate selective pressure across a population of tumor samples, but their prevalence within and across cancer types is incompletely characterized. An approach to detect significantly mutated residues, rather than methods that identify recurrently mutated genes, may uncover new biologically and therapeutically relevant driver mutations. Here we developed a statistical algorithm to identify recurrently mutated residues in tumour samples. We applied the algorithm to 11,119 human tumors, spanning 41 cancer types, and identified 470 hotspot somatic substitutions in 275 genes. We find that half of all human tumors possess one or more mutational hotspots with widespread lineage-, position-, and mutant allele-specific differences, many of which are likely functional. In total, 243 hotspots were novel and appeared to affect a broad spectrum of molecular function, including hotspots at paralogous residues of Ras-related small GTPases RAC1 and RRAS2. Redefining hotspots at mutant amino acid resolution will help elucidate the allele-specific differences in their function and could have important therapeutic implications.

Is there a specific phenotype associated with the different subtypes of KRAS mutations in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancers?

OBJECTIVES

KRAS mutations occur in 20 to 25% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and seem to predict a poor prognosis. There is heterogeneousness in the frequency and spectrum of KRAS mutations, which can be categorized in transitions and transversions. We wondered if subtypes of KRAS mutation were associated with specific clinical phenotypes and specific survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 2007 and May 2012, patients with advanced NSCLC and KRAS mutation diagnosed in two university hospitals were included. Clinical and histological characteristics, therapeutics and survival data were collected.

RESULTS

Among 635 patients screened for KRAS mutations, 90 were found to be mutated and were included. Median age was 59 years (range: 54-69). Most were males (60%), current or former smokers (63% and 33%, respectively) and had an adenocarcinoma (ADC) (80%). Eighty patients were stage IV and 10 were stage IIIB. Eighty percent of the KRAS mutations were transversions and 20% were transitions. In uni- and multivariate analyses, there was a trend for fewer smokers among patients with transitions than among those with transversions (Odds Ratio [OR]=0.28, 95% CI [0.079-0.999], p=0.05). No significant difference was noted between transitions and transversions for other clinical characteristics. Patients with transitions had more frequently squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) compared to those with transversions, who had more frequently adenocarcinomas (OR=16.7, 95% CI [2.76-100.8], p=0.002). Seventy-nine patients (86%) had received first-line chemotherapy. No significant difference was seen for disease-control rate, median progression-free survival or overall survival between transitions and transversions.

CONCLUSION

A higher proportion of non-smokers and SCC subtypes were observed in the transitions compared to transversions. This confirms the heterogeneity of KRAS mutations and could suggest to expand KRAS testing in SCC to assess impact of RAS in SCC, which remains poorly investigated.

Biomarkers and targeted systemic therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The last decade has witnessed significant growth in therapeutic options for patients diagnosed with lung cancer. This is due in major part to our improved technological ability to interrogate the genomics of cancer cells, which has enabled the development of biologically rational anticancer agents. The recognition that lung cancer is not a single disease entity dates back many decades to the histological subclassification of malignant neoplasms of the lung into subcategories of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While SCLC continues to be regarded as a single histologic and therapeutic category, the NSCLC subset has undergone additional subcategorizations with distinct management algorithms for specific histologic and molecular subtypes. The defining characteristics of these NSCLC subtypes have evolved into important tools for prognosis and for predicting the likelihood of benefit when patients are treated with anticancer agents.

Impact of KRAS codon subtypes from a randomised phase II trial of selumetinib plus docetaxel in KRAS mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886)+docetaxel increases median overall survival (OS) and significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) compared with docetaxel alone in patients with KRAS mutant, stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; NCT00890825).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of OS, PFS, ORR and change in tumour size at week 6 for different sub-populations of KRAS codon mutations.

RESULTS

In patients receiving selumetinib+docetaxel and harbouring KRAS G12C or G12V mutations there were trends towards greater improvement in OS, PFS and ORR compared with other KRAS mutations.

CONCLUSION

Different KRAS mutations in NSCLC may influence selumetinib/docetaxel sensitivity.

Immunohistochemical Loss of LKB1 Is a Biomarker for More Aggressive Biology in KRAS-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

LKB1 loss is common in lung cancer, but no assay exists to efficiently evaluate the presence or absence of LKB1. We validated an IHC assay for LKB1 loss and determined the impact of LKB1 loss in KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We optimized and validated an IHC assay for LKB1 (clone Ley37D/G6) using a panel of lung cancer cell lines and tumors with known LKB1 mutations, including 2 patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) who developed lung adenocarcinoma. We retrospectively analyzed tumors for LKB1 using IHC from 154 KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients, including 123 smokers and 31 never-smokers, and correlated the findings with patient and tumor characteristics and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

LKB1 expression was lost by IHC in 30% of KRAS-mutant NSCLC (smokers 35% vs. never-smokers 13%, P = 0.017). LKB1 loss did not correlate with a specific KRAS mutation but was more frequent in tumors with KRAS transversion mutations (P = 0.029). KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients with concurrent LKB1 loss had a higher number of metastatic sites at the time of diagnosis (median 2.5 vs. 2, P = 0.01), higher incidence of extrathoracic metastases (P = 0.01), and developed brain metastasis more frequently (48% vs. 25%, P = 0.02). There was a nonsignificant trend to worse survival in stage IV KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients with LKB1 loss.

CONCLUSIONS

LKB1 IHC is a reliable and efficient assay to evaluate for loss of LKB1 in clinical samples of NSCLC. LKB1 loss is more common in smokers, and is associated with a more aggressive clinical phenotype in KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients, accordingly to preclinical models.