Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in testicular tumors: report from the International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference

Adult metastatic yolk sac tumor descending from an intra-abdominal testis: A case report and review of the literature

Pure yolk sac tumors are extremely rare in adults; to the best of our knowledge, <20 cases have been reported. Multiple metastases originating from a pure yolk sac testicular tumor, descending from an intra-abdominal testis, are additionally extremely rare. In the present case, a man exhibiting a 30-year history of cryptorchidism and indirect inguinal hernia, was admitted to the Department of Urology (The Second Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China) due to a mass that had descended from the abdominal cavity 7 months previously. Elevated levels of specific serum marker (α-fetoprotein, lactate dehydrogenase and human chorionic gonadotropin) did not indicate potential testicular germ cell types prior to surgery and pathological examination. Pathological results and immunohistochemistry revealed a testicular pure yolk sac tumor subsequent to surgery. The present case report and literature review describes the typical characteristics of an adult testicular yolk sac tumor, as well as the diagnosis and management of the disease.

Practical Applications in Immunohistochemistry: Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site

CONTEXT

-Identification of the site of origin of carcinoma of unknown primary using immunohistochemistry is a frequent requirement of anatomic pathologists. Diagnostic accuracy is crucial, particularly in the current era of targeted therapies and smaller sample sizes.

OBJECTIVES

-To provide practical guidance and suggestions for classifying carcinoma of unknown primary using both proven and new antibodies, as well as targeting panels based on integration of morphologic and clinical features.

DATA SOURCES

-Literature review, the authors' practice experience, and authors' research.

CONCLUSIONS

-With well-performed and interpreted immunohistochemistry panels, anatomic pathologists can successfully identify the site of origin of carcinoma of unknown primary. It is crucial to understand not only the diagnostic uses of the many available antibodies but also the potential limits and pitfalls.

A need for cautious interpretation of elevated serum germ cell tumor markers in children. Review and own experiences

Protocols for pediatric germ cell tumors (GCT) allow for chemotherapy (CHT) initiation without histological diagnosis, based on typical clinical and radiological picture and increased alphafetoprotein (AFP) or beta-human chorionic gonadotropin serum levels. Such strategy may result in misdiagnoses in rare cases. We present two patients with abdominal tumors and high serum AFP levels, diagnosed as GCT. In both, no tumor shrinkage and increasing AFP was observed after first cycles of multidrug CHT for pediatric GCT. Histological examination of biopsied tumor tissues revealed metastatic cholangiocarcinoma in patient 1 and pancreatoblastoma in patient 2, which implicated immediate change of therapy. Presented cases support the necessity to consider the tumor biopsy when patients diagnosed with GCT based on typical clinical presentation and elevated AFP do not respond to CHT with AFP decrease and tumor size reduction.

Disparities in Interpretation of Primary Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Pathology

OBJECTIVES

Accurate pathologic interpretation of testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) can be problematic due to low incidence and variation in histologic patterns. By analyzing changes in the diagnosis of testicular specimens after secondary review, we hoped to determine how these can affect prognosis and treatment.

METHODS

From 1999 to 2013, a total of 235 patients underwent radical orchiectomy at a referring facility and had pathology specimens reanalyzed by our center's pathologists with expertise in genitourinary malignancies. We identified discrepancies in pathologic reporting.

RESULTS

Fifty (21.3%) patients had variations in interpretation of their orchiectomy specimens. A clinically significant alteration was identified in 16 (6.8%) patients, most commonly due to recognition (or misrecognition) of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) associated with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs). Changes in LVI status resulted in upstaging or downstaging from clinical stage 1A to stage 1B or vice versa in six patients with NSGCTs, with a subsequent change in therapeutic strategy. In addition, one patient with stage 1 pure seminoma had been misclassified with nonseminoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Inaccurate interpretation of orchiectomy specimens is not uncommon and may lead to incorrect tumor staging, imprecise assignment of progression risk, and inappropriate management recommendations. Secondary opinions of primary GCT orchiectomy specimens potentially facilitate appropriate counseling and therapeutic strategies.

Handling and reporting of orchidectomy specimens with testicular cancer: areas of consensus and variation among 25 experts and 225 European pathologists

AIMS

The handling and reporting of testicular tumours is difficult due to their rarity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A survey developed by the European Network of Uro-Pathology (ENUP) and sent to its members and experts to assess the evaluation of testicular germ cell tumours. Twenty-five experts and 225 ENUP members replied. Areas of disagreement included immaturity in teratomas, reported by 32% of experts but 68% of ENUP. Although the presence of rete testis invasion was reported widely, the distinction between pagetoid and stromal invasion was made by 96% of experts but only 63% of ENUP. Immunohistochemistry was used in more than 50% of cases by 68% of ENUP and 12% of experts. Staging revealed the greatest areas of disagreement. Invasion of the tunica vaginalis without vascular invasion was interpreted as T1 by 52% of experts and 67% of ENUP, but T2 by the remainder. Tumour invading the hilar adipose tissue adjacent to the epididymis without vascular invasion was interpreted as T1: 40% of experts, 43% of ENUP; T2: 36% of experts, 30% of ENUP; and T3: 24% of experts, 27% of ENUP.

CONCLUSIONS

There is remarkable consensus in many areas of testicular pathology. Significant areas of disagreement included staging and reporting of histological types, both of which have the potential to impact on therapy.