A Lifetime Versus a Graft Life Approach Redefines the Importance of HLA Matching in Kidney Transplant Patients

Impact of donor kidney function and donor age on poor outcome of living-unrelated kidney transplantation (KT) in comparison with living-related KT

Living-unrelated donors (LURD) have been widely used for kidney transplantation (KT). We retrospectively reviewed 779 patients who underwent living-donor KT from 2000 to 2012, to compare outcomes of 264 KT from LURD and 515 from living-related donors (LRD), and to identify risk factors for living KT. Median follow-up was 67 months. Mean donor age, total human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, and HLA-DR mismatches were higher, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in LURD. Acute rejection (AR)-free survival (p = 0.018) and graft survival (p = 0.025) were lower for LURD than LRD, whereas patient survival rate was comparable. Cox regression analysis showed HLA-DR mismatches (OR 1.75 for one mismatch; OR 2.19 for two mismatches), recipient age ≤ 42 yr, and donor age > 50 yr were significant risk factors for acute rejection. For graft survival, AR and donor eGFR (OR 1.90, p = 0.035) were significant. We also identified significant impact of recipient age > 50 yr and diabetes for patient survival. However, KT from LURD was not a significant risk factor for AR (p = 0.368), graft survival (p = 0.205), and patient survival (p = 0.836). Our data suggest that donor eGFR and donor age are independent risk factors for clinical outcomes of living KT, which can be related with poor outcome of KT from LURD.

Modeling the benefits and costs of integrating an acceptable HLA mismatch allocation model for highly sensitized patients

BACKGROUND

The Eurotransplant acceptable mismatch program has improved transplantation access for highly sensitized recipients. However, the benefits and costs of implementing such a program remain unknown.

METHODS

Using decision analytical modeling, we compared the average waiting time for transplantation, overall survival gains (in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years gained), and costs of integrating an acceptable mismatch allocation model compared with the current deceased-donor kidney allocation model in Australia.

RESULTS

Acceptable mismatches were identified in 12 of 28 (43%) highly sensitized recipients using HLAMatchmaker. Inclusion of acceptable mismatches in the current allocation model improved the transplantation access for four (14%) highly sensitized recipients, with an average reduction in waiting time of 34 months (from 86 to 52 months). Compared with the current allocation model, incorporating an acceptable mismatch allocation model achieved an overall lifetime gain of 0.034 quality-adjusted life-years and savings of over $4,000 per highly sensitized patient, with a small consequential loss of 0.005 quality-adjusted life-years and extra costs of $800 for every reallocated patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite modest overall health gains, application of an acceptable mismatch allocation model is an equitable approach to improve transplantation access for highly sensitized transplant candidates without compromising the overall health benefits among the other patients on the deceased-donor waitlist in Australia.

Impact of donor mismatches at individual HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, and -DQ loci on the development of HLA-specific antibodies in patients listed for repeat renal transplantation

We have analyzed the relationship between donor mismatches at each HLA locus and development of HLA locus-specific antibodies in patients listed for repeat transplantation. HLA antibody screening was undertaken using single-antigen beads in 131 kidney transplant recipients returning to the transplant waiting list following first graft failure. The number of HLA mismatches and the calculated reaction frequency of antibody reactivity against 10,000 consecutive deceased organ donors were determined for each HLA locus. Two-thirds of patients awaiting repeat transplantation were sensitized (calculated reaction frequency over 15%) and half were highly sensitized (calculated reaction frequency of 85% and greater). Antibody levels peaked after re-listing for repeat transplantation, were independent of graft nephrectomy and were associated with length of time on the waiting list (odds ratio 8.4) and with maintenance on dual immunosuppression (odds ratio 0.2). Sensitization was independently associated with increasing number of donor HLA mismatches (odds ratio 1.4). All mismatched HLA loci contributed to the development of HLA locus-specific antibodies (HLA-A: odds ratio 3.2, HLA-B: odds ratio 3.4, HLA-C: odds ratio 2.5, HLA-DRB1: odds ratio 3.5, HLA-DRB3/4/5: odds ratio 3.9, and HLA-DQ: odds ratio 3.0 (all significant)). Thus, the risk of allosensitization following failure of a first renal transplant increases incrementally with the number of mismatches at all HLA loci assessed. Maintenance of re-listed patients on dual immunosuppression was associated with a reduced risk of sensitization.

Transplantation results of completely HLA-mismatched living and completely HLA-matched deceased-donor kidneys are comparable

BACKGROUND

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches are known to influence graft survival in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. We studied the effect of HLA mismatches in a population of recipients of deceased-donor or living-donor kidney transplantations.

METHODS

All 1998 transplantations performed in our center between 1990 and 2011 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Four different multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed with HLA mismatches as continuous variable, as categorical variable (total number of HLA mismatches), as binary variable (zero vs. nonzero HLA mismatches), and HLA-A, -B, and -DR mismatches included separately.

RESULTS

Nine hundred ninety-one patients received a deceased-donor kidney and 1007 received a living-donor kidney. In multivariable Cox analysis, HLA mismatches, recipient age, current panel-reactive antibodies, transplant year, donor age, calcineurin inhibitor treatment, and donor type were found to have a significant and independent influence on the risk of graft failure, censored for death. Variables representing the total number of HLA-A, -B, and -DR mismatches had a significant and comparable influence in all analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The influence of HLA mismatches on death-censored graft survival holds true for both deceased- and living-donor kidney transplantation. However, the relative risk of death-censored graft failure of a 2-2-2 mismatched living-donor kidney is comparable with that of a 0-0-0 mismatched deceased-donor kidney.

Impact of HLA mismatch at first kidney transplant on lifetime with graft function in young recipients

As HLA matching has been progressively de-emphasized in the American deceased donor (DD) kidney allocation algorithm, concerns have been raised that poor matching at first transplant may lead to greater sensitization and more difficulty finding an acceptable donor for a second transplant should the first transplant fail. We compared proportion of total observed lifetime with graft function after first transplant, and waiting times for a second transplant between individuals with different levels of HLA mismatch (MM) at first transplant. We studied patients recorded in the United States Renal Data System (1988-2009) who received a first DD transplant at age ≤21 years (n = 8433), and the subgroup who were listed for a second DD transplant following first graft failure (n = 2498). Compared with recipients of 2-3 MM first grafts, 4-6 MM graft recipients spent 12% less of their time and 0-1 MM recipients 15% more time with a functioning graft after the first transplant (both p < 0.0001); 4-6 MM recipients were significantly less likely (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87 [95% confidence interval 0.76, 0.98]; p = 0.03), and 0-1 MM recipients more likely (HR 1.26 [0.99, 1.60]; p = 0.06) to receive a second transplant after listing. The benefits of better HLA matching at first transplant on lifetime with graft function are significant, but relatively small.

Order of donor type in pediatric kidney transplant recipients requiring retransplantation

BACKGROUND

Living-donor kidney transplantation (KT) is encouraged for children with end-stage renal disease due to superior long-term graft survival compared with deceased-donor KT. Despite this, there has been a steady decrease in the use of living-donor KT for pediatric recipients. Due to their young age at transplantation, most pediatric recipients eventually require retransplantation, and the optimal order of donor type is not clear.

METHODS

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we analyzed first and second graft survival among 14,799 pediatric (<18 years old) recipients undergoing KT between 1987 and 2010.

RESULTS

Living-donor grafts had longer survival compared with deceased-donor grafts, similarly among both first (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.84; P<0.001) and second (aHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.84; P<0.001) transplants. Living-donor second grafts had longer survival compared with deceased-donor second grafts, similarly after living-donor (aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.83; P<0.001) and deceased-donor (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95; P=0.02) first transplants. Cumulative graft life of two transplants was similar regardless of the order of deceased-donor and living-donor transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Deceased-donor KT in pediatric recipients followed by living-donor retransplantation does not negatively impact the living-donor graft survival advantage and provides similar cumulative graft life compared with living-donor KT followed by deceased-donor retransplantation. Clinical decision-making for pediatric patients with healthy, willing living donors should consider these findings in addition to the risk of sensitization, aging of the living donor, and deceased-donor waiting times.

Ceppellini Lecture 2012: collateral damage from HLA mismatching in kidney transplantation

Inclusion of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching in donor kidney allocation schemes has been based solely on its association with graft survival. Other long-term effects associated with HLA incompatibility are largely unexplored. Data from deceased donor kidney transplants reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study have been analyzed to assess the relation between HLA mismatching and clinical events to 3 years post-transplant, and an overview of these analyses is presented. A significant correlation was observed between the number of mismatches and the need for anti-rejection therapy during the first year post-transplant, which was maintained for HLA-DR and HLA-A + B mismatching separately and at years 2 and 3 post-transplant. The number of HLA-DR mismatches and the number of HLA-A + B mismatches as well as rejection treatment showed significant associations with the dose of maintenance steroids. The cumulative incidences of death with a functioning graft from infection or cardiovascular causes, but not from cancer, were also significantly associated with HLA mismatching. The number of HLA-DR mismatches showed a significant association with the incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and hip fractures. These findings show that the adverse consequences of HLA mismatching on kidney transplants extend beyond an effect on graft survival, and include an increased risk of death with a functioning graft, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and hip fracture.

Current role of human leukocyte antigen matching in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With graft survival rates steadily improving during the recent years, there is debate whether donor kidneys should still be allocated according to compatibility for human leukocyte antigens (HLA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies argue for continued kidney exchange efforts for achieving better HLA compatibility. In this modern era of immunosuppression, better HLA matching is associated not only with better graft survival, but also with the administration of lower dosages of immunosuppressive agents, a lower incidence of side-effects of immunosuppression such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, hip fractures, and death from infection, and a lower grade of sensitization if a patient has lost a kidney graft and is relisted for a retransplant.

SUMMARY

Despite the overall improved graft survival rates in the recent years, the data continue to support organ sharing based on HLA matching in kidney transplantation.

Living unrelated renal transplantation: a good match for the pediatric candidate?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Living donor kidney transplantation is encouraged for children with end-stage renal disease given the superior survival of living donor grafts, but pediatric candidates are also given preference for kidneys from younger deceased donors.

METHODS

Death-censored graft survival of pediatric kidney-only transplants performed in the U.S. between 1987-2012 was compared across living related (LRRT) (n=7741), living unrelated (LURT) (n=618), and deceased donor renal transplants (DDRT) (n=8945) using Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and matched controls analysis.

RESULTS

As expected, HLA mismatch was greater among LURT compared to LRRT (p<0.001). Unadjusted graft survival was lower, particularly long-term, for LURT compared to LRRT (p=0.009). However, LURT graft survival was still superior to DDRT graft survival, even when compared only to deceased donors under age 35 (p=0.002). The difference in graft survival between LURT and LRRT was not seen when adjusting for HLA mismatch, year of transplantation, and donor and recipient characteristics using a Cox model (aHR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.87-1.24, p=0.7) or matched controls (HR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.82-1.27, p=0.9).

CONCLUSION

Survival of LURT grafts is superior to grafts from younger deceased donors and equivalent to LRRT grafts when adjusting for other factors, most notably differences in HLA mismatch.

A glow of HLA typing in organ transplantation

The transplant of organs and tissues is one of the greatest curative achievements of this century. In organ transplantation, the adaptive immunity is considered the main response exerted to the transplanted tissue, since the main goal of the immune response is the MHC (major histocompatibility complex) molecules expressed on the surface of donor cells. Cell surface molecules that induce an antigenic stimulus cause the rejection immune response to grafted tissue or organ. A wide variety of transplantation antigens have been described, including the major histocompatibility molecules, minor histocompatibility antigens, ABO blood group antigens and endothelial cell antigens. The sensitization to MHC antigens may be caused by transfusions, pregnancy, or failed previous grafts leading to development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies that are important factor responsible for graft rejection in solid organ transplantation and play a role in post-transfusion complication Anti-HLA Abs may be present in healthy individuals. Methods for HLA typing are described, including serological methods, molecular techniques of sequence-specific priming (SSP), sequence-specific oligonucleotide probing (SSOP), Sequence based typing (SBT) and reference strand-based conformation analysis (RSCA) method. Problems with organ transplantation are reservoir of organs and immune suppressive treatments that used to decrease rate of rejection with less side effect and complications.

Prevention of antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection

There is increasing evidence that antibody-mediated rejection is the major cause of late kidney graft failure. Prevention of antibody-mediated allograft damage has therefore become an important issue in kidney transplantation. Such prevention starts already before transplantation with the avoidance of sensitizing events. When a patient is already sensitized, precise characterization of alloantibodies and exact HLA typing of the donor at the time of transplantation are mandatory. To ensure timely and successful transplantation of highly sensitized patients, desensitization, and inclusion in special programs such as the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch Program should be considered. After transplantation, close monitoring of kidney function, testing for the de novo development or changing characteristics of alloantibodies, and attention to non-adherence to immunosuppression is obligatory. In the current overview, we discuss the currently available measures for the prevention of antibody-mediated kidney graft rejection.

Immune factors influencing ethnic disparities in kidney transplantation outcomes

An influence of ethnicity on the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients has been recognized for several decades. Both immune and nonimmune factors have been explored as potential explanations. Most studies have focused on the inferior outcomes of African-Americans. As a group, African-Americans differ from Caucasians with respect to a number of measurable components of the alloimmune response, including the T-cell repertoire and the expression and function of costimulatory molecules and various cytokines and chemokines. In general, these differences suggest that African-Americans may be high immune responders. However, no single difference in any of these components of alloimmunity satisfactorily explains the disparities in outcomes. It seems probable that some combination of immune factors interacts with nonimmune factors, such as socioeconomic resources, to influence transplant outcomes in a complex manner.

Managing patients with a failed kidney transplant: how can we do better?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with a failed kidney transplant represent a unique chronic kidney disease (CKD) population that is increasing in number, and that is at high risk of morbidity and mortality because of a prolonged history of CKD that may be sub-optimally managed, and exposure to immunosuppressant medications that are often continued after transplant failure.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is no consensus on the optimal use of immunosuppressant medications after transplant failure. Recent observational studies have demonstrated that surgical removal of the failed allograft and discontinuation of immunosuppressant medications may be associated with a decreased long-term risk of mortality. However, the indications for elective transplant nephrectomy remain poorly defined. Removal of the failed allograft may limit opportunities for repeat transplantation by increasing cytotoxic antibody levels, and may be associated with an increased risk of repeat transplant failure.

SUMMARY

In the absence of controlled studies, judicious use of immunosuppressant medications based on the patient's suitability for repeat transplantation, anticipated time to repeat transplantation, risk of sensitization, and drug tolerance, together with a cohesive plan for CKD management and appropriate preparation for dialysis, may improve outcomes in this unique patient population.

On the future of HLA

As the immunobiological function of the HLA (human leucocyte antigen) class I and II molecules was revealed, we have seen an explosive development of the HLA field. Today, the HLA complex occupies a central position in basic and clinical immunology. In this Opinion article, I will briefly discuss some challenges which in my opinion are more important than others in the near future of HLA, with a focus on products of the classical HLA class I and II genes. Matching for HLA antigens will continue to be of importance in organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. In the latter field, induction of graft-versus-leukemia effects will receive greater attention, where HLA will play a central role. It is anticipated that we will see an extensive development in our knowledge of the etiology and pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, where some HLA class I and II genes by far are the strongest predisposing genes. To predict and prevent autoimmune diseases will be a major challenge for the HLA field in the future. HLA will also be of increasing importance in pharmacogenomics, vaccinations and anthropology. Together, this will leave the HLA field with many new challenges and opportunities, which in the future will require more focus on functional aspects of the immunogenetics of HLA.

Impact of HLA matching and HLA antibodies in organ transplantation: a collaborative transplant study view

The Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) was initiated in 1982 in Heidelberg, Germany, and originated from the need to gain further insight into the complex problems and risks involved in human organ transplantation. Currently, more than 400 transplant centers in 45 countries are contributing to this voluntary international effort, and from the beginning of the study, the impact on graft outcome of immunological factors, such as matching for HLA antigens and allosensitization to HLA and non-HLA antigens, have been areas of interest. Herein, we summarize the recent findings from the CTS on these two topics.

Blood transfusions in organ transplant patients: mechanisms of sensitization and implications for prevention

Sensitization by previous pregnancies or transplants is considered unavoidable, but it is transfusions given to these patients that leads most often to broad sensitization. Both leukocytes and red cells carry a significant HLA antigen load, and residual leukocytes and/or red cell HLA may explain why leukocyte-reduced units are unable to prevent sensitization to any significant degree. Prevention of sensitization will require a more active effort to avoid blood transfusions, whenever possible. When transfusions are required, there is evidence that the use of HLA-matched blood or immunosuppression in selected situations may reduce sensitization, even in patients previously exposed to alloantigens. These additional measures are not logistically straightforward or devoid of risks and need to be confirmed by rigorous studies. However, remaining as passive observers when patients become broadly sensitized should no longer be considered an acceptable alternative for potential transplant recipients.

Effect of immunosuppression for first kidney or kidney/pancreas transplant on sensitization at the time of second transplant

BACKGROUND

Previously transplanted patients are more likely to be sensitized, leading to prolonged waitlist times and decreased graft survival. This analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing kidney/pancreas transplant database investigates factors at the time of first transplant associated with increased sensitization in patients undergoing second transplantation.

METHODS

Records of nonsensitized patients (panel reactive antibodies [PRA] <20%) receiving a primary transplant in 1999 or later were analyzed to determine whether immunosuppressive agents at the time of first transplant were associated with a change in PRA from first to second transplant. Variables included gender, race, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG), interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, tacrolimus (FK), cyclosporine A (CSA), and mycophenolate mofetil/sodium (MMF).

RESULTS

For the primary endpoint of increase in PRA greater than or equal to 20%, African Americans (AA) versus non-AA (OR 2.63, P<0.0001) and HLA nonzero mismatch versus zero mismatch (OR 2.90, P<0.0001) were associated with increased sensitization. The effect of immunosuppressive regimen depended on race and HLA status. In non-AAs/HLA mismatch (1-6), interleukin-2 receptor antagonists versus RATG (OR 1.40, P=0.001), CSA versus FK (OR 1.69, P<0.001) and no MMF versus MMF (OR 1.39, P<0.001) were also associated with increased sensitization. In AAs/HLA mismatch (1-6), no induction versus RATG (OR 1.59, P=0.031) and CSA versus FK (OR 1.68, P=0.006) were associated with increased sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest a reduced risk of sensitization at the time of second transplant when using more potent immunosuppression with RATG, FK, and MMF for nonsensitized primary kidney or kidney/pancreas transplant patients. These effects seem to be related to race and HLA mismatch.

Kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death: a 25-year experience

BACKGROUND

The shortage of organ donors presents a major obstacle for adequate treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease. Donation after cardiac death (DCD) has been shown to increase the number of kidneys available for transplantation. The present article reports on the first 25 years of our experience with DCD kidney transplantation.

METHODS

This observational cohort study included all DCD kidney transplantations recovered in our procurement area from January 1, 1981 until December 31, 2005 (n=297). Patients were followed up until the earliest of death or December 31, 2006. Clinical outcomes were compared with matched kidney transplantations from brain dead donors (DBD, n=594), using multivariable regression models to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

DCD activity resulted in a 44% increase in the number of deceased donor kidneys from our organ procurement area. After adjustment for potential confounders, the odds of primary nonfunction and delayed graft function were 7.5 (95% CI, 4.0-14.1; P<0.001) and 10.3 (95% CI, 6.7-15.9; P<0.001) times greater, respectively, for DCD kidneys compared with DBD kidneys. The high incidence of primary nonfunction of DCD kidneys resulted in an increased rate of graft loss (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.37-2.42; P<0.001). However, DCD kidneys that did not experience primary nonfunction functioned as long as DBD kidneys (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.73-1.51; P=0.79). Patient survival of DCD and DBD kidney recipients was equivalent (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.87-1.54; P=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of DCD kidney transplantation outweigh the increased risk of early graft loss. Expansion of the supply of DCD kidneys is likely to improve the treatment of wait-listed dialysis patients.

Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients: are there options to overcome a positive crossmatch?

Presensitization against a broad array of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) is associated with prolonged waiting times and inferior graft survival in kidney transplantation. Since the late 1960s, a positive lymphocytotoxic crossmatch has been considered a contraindication for kidney transplantation and solutions, such as enrollment of eligible patients in the Acceptable Mismatch Program of Eurotransplant and kidney paired donation in the case of living donor kidney transplantation, have been proposed to avoid this barrier. Alternatively, a positive crossmatch might not be considered as a contraindication for kidney transplantation and one can try to overcome this hurdle by desensitization. In principle, there are three different ways to overcome the crossmatch barrier by desensitization. The highly sensitized patient awaiting a cadaveric kidney transplant may be desensitized either immediately pretransplant when an organ is offered or in advance, during the time on the waiting list, to increase his chance of having a negative crossmatch at the time of transplantation. In the case of living donor kidney transplantation, the patient can be desensitized for days to weeks until the positive crossmatch with his intended living kidney donor becomes negative. "Heidelberg algorithm" is a combination of different measures, such as pretransplant risk estimation, good HLA match, inclusion of patients in the Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program, and desensitization, which leads to timely transplantation and excellent survival rates in highly sensitized patients at a low rate of toxicity. We believe that all available options should be utilized in an integrated manner for the transplantation of kidney transplant recipients who are at a high risk of antibody-mediated rejection.

Predicting HLA class II alloantigen immunogenicity from the number and physiochemical properties of amino acid polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

We have shown previously that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I immunogenicity can be predicted by the number, position, and physiochemical differences of polymorphic amino acids (AAs). We have now modeled the structural and physiochemical polymorphisms of HLA class II alloantigens and correlated these with humoral alloimmunity in sensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Sera obtained from 30 patients with high levels of IgG HLA-specific antibodies were screened using single-antigen HLA antibody detection beads. A computer program was developed to determine the number of AA mismatches (after interlocus and intralocus subtraction) and their hydrophobicity and electrostatic mismatch score for each mismatched HLA-DR and -DQ specificity. Regression methods were used to compare these variables with the occurrence and magnitude of alloantibody responses.

RESULTS

HLA-specific antibody was detected against 879 (55%) of 1604 mismatched HLA specificities evaluated. There was a strong correlation between increasing number of AA mismatches and the occurrence (P<0.001, odds ratio 3.85 per AA) and magnitude of alloantibody responses (P<0.001); only 6% of alloantigens with 0 to 2 mismatched AA-induced alloantibody (median fluorescence intensity 37) compared with 82% of alloantigens with more than or equal to 20 mismatched AAs (median fluorescence intensity 9969). Hydrophobicity and electrostatic mismatch scores also correlated closely with alloantibody response (P<0.001), but neither variable had independent predictive value over the number of AA mismatches alone.

CONCLUSION

Differences in the number of polymorphic AA mismatches and their physiochemical properties for a given recipient HLA type are strong predictors of class II alloantigen immunogenicity and alloantibody response before kidney transplantation.

Enhancing the expanded criteria donor policy as an intervention to improve kidney allocation: is it actually a 'net-zero' model?

In the United States, relatively little progress has been made in recent years to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of deceased donor kidney allocation. Despite enactment of the Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) Policy in 2002, known inequities and suboptimal utility of donated kidneys persist. In contrast with dialysis patients with shorter predicted life expectancies, those with longer predicted lifetimes can often improve their survival by waiting longer for a Standard Criteria Donor (SCD) kidney. Yet, a substantial fraction of these candidates accept ECD kidneys, often poorly HLA matched. Meanwhile, waitlist mortality continues to rise, particularly among older transplant candidates. Despite required consent processes for candidates to list for ECD kidneys, centers appear to interpret and implement ECD policy differently—some list candidates selectively while others list nearly their entire candidate pool. To ensure more efficient and effective implementation of ECD policy across centers, we advocate for (1) more oversight and guidance in directing patients to the ECD list who stand to benefit the most from receipt of an ECD kidney; and (2) enhanced transparency of center-level ECD consent and listing practices. More uniform implementation of ECD policy could improve efficiency and effectiveness of deceased donor kidney allocation without deleteriously impacting equity.