Bacterial chromosome segregation by the ParABS system

Relief of ParB autoinhibition by parS DNA catalysis and recycling of ParB by CTP hydrolysis promote bacterial centromere assembly

Three-component ParABS systems are widely distributed factors for plasmid partitioning and chromosome segregation in bacteria. ParB acts as adaptor protein between the 16–base pair centromeric parS DNA sequences and the DNA segregation proteins ParA and Smc (structural maintenance of chromosomes). Upon cytidine triphosphate (CTP) and parS DNA binding, ParB dimers form DNA clamps that spread onto parS-flanking DNA by sliding, thus assembling the so-called partition complex. We show here that CTP hydrolysis is essential for efficient chromosome segregation by ParABS but largely dispensable for Smc recruitment. Our results suggest that CTP hydrolysis contributes to partition complex assembly via two mechanisms. It promotes ParB unloading from DNA to limit the extent of ParB spreading, and it recycles off-target ParB clamps to allow for parS retargeting, together superconcentrating ParB near parS. We also propose a model for clamp closure involving a steric clash when binding ParB protomers to opposing parS half sites.

The CTPase activity of ParB determines the size and dynamics of prokaryotic DNA partition complexes

ParB-like CTPases mediate the segregation of bacterial chromosomes and low-copy number plasmids. They act as DNA-sliding clamps that are loaded at parS motifs in the centromere of target DNA molecules and spread laterally to form large nucleoprotein complexes serving as docking points for the DNA segregation machinery. Here, we solve crystal structures of ParB in the pre- and post-hydrolysis state and illuminate the catalytic mechanism of nucleotide hydrolysis. Moreover, we identify conformational changes that underlie the CTP- and parS-dependent closure of ParB clamps. The study of CTPase-deficient ParB variants reveals that CTP hydrolysis serves to limit the sliding time of ParB clamps and thus drives the establishment of a well-defined ParB diffusion gradient across the centromere whose dynamics are critical for DNA segregation. These findings clarify the role of the ParB CTPase cycle in partition complex assembly and function and thus advance our understanding of this prototypic CTP-dependent molecular switch.

Dissection of the ATPase active site of McdA reveals the sequential steps essential for carboxysome distribution

Carboxysomes, the most prevalent and well-studied anabolic bacterial microcompartment, play a central role in efficient carbon fixation by cyanobacteria and proteobacteria. In previous studies, we identified the two-component system called McdAB that spatially distributes carboxysomes across the bacterial nucleoid. Maintenance of carboxysome distribution protein A (McdA), a partition protein A (ParA)-like ATPase, forms a dynamic oscillating gradient on the nucleoid in response to the carboxysome-localized Maintenance of carboxysome distribution protein B (McdB). As McdB stimulates McdA ATPase activity, McdA is removed from the nucleoid in the vicinity of carboxysomes, propelling these proteinaceous cargos toward regions of highest McdA concentration via a Brownian-ratchet mechanism. How the ATPase cycle of McdA governs its in vivo dynamics and carboxysome positioning remains unresolved. Here, by strategically introducing amino acid substitutions in the ATP-binding region of McdA, we sequentially trap McdA at specific steps in its ATP cycle. We map out critical events in the ATPase cycle of McdA that allows the protein to bind ATP, dimerize, change its conformation into a DNA-binding state, interact with McdB-bound carboxysomes, hydrolyze ATP, and release from the nucleoid. We also find that McdA is a member of a previously unstudied subset of ParA family ATPases, harboring unique interactions with ATP and the nucleoid for trafficking their cognate intracellular cargos.

Bacterial chromosome segregation: New insights into non-binary replication and division

Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus divides in a non-binary manner resulting in an even or odd number of progeny. A new study tracks the spatiotemporal dynamics of chromosome segregation in this species and shows that the process is dependent on the conserved ParA-ParB-parS system.

CTP regulates membrane-binding activity of the nucleoid occlusion protein Noc

ATP- and GTP-dependent molecular switches are extensively used to control functions of proteins in a wide range of biological processes. However, CTP switches are rarely reported. Here, we report that a nucleoid occlusion protein Noc is a CTPase enzyme whose membrane-binding activity is directly regulated by a CTP switch. In Bacillus subtilis, Noc nucleates on 16 bp NBS sites before associating with neighboring non-specific DNA to form large membrane-associated nucleoprotein complexes to physically occlude assembly of the cell division machinery. By in vitro reconstitution, we show that (1) CTP is required for Noc to form the NBS-dependent nucleoprotein complex, and (2) CTP binding, but not hydrolysis, switches Noc to a membrane-active state. Overall, we suggest that CTP couples membrane-binding activity of Noc to nucleoprotein complex formation to ensure productive recruitment of DNA to the bacterial cell membrane for nucleoid occlusion activity.

The structure of the bacterial DNA segregation ATPase filament reveals the conformational plasticity of ParA upon DNA binding

The efficient segregation of replicated genetic material is an essential step for cell division. Bacterial cells use several evolutionarily-distinct genome segregation systems, the most common of which is the type I Par system. It consists of an adapter protein, ParB, that binds to the DNA cargo via interaction with the parS DNA sequence; and an ATPase, ParA, that binds nonspecific DNA and mediates cargo transport. However, the molecular details of how this system functions are not well understood. Here, we report the cryo-EM structure of the Vibrio cholerae ParA2 filament bound to DNA, as well as the crystal structures of this protein in various nucleotide states. These structures show that ParA forms a left-handed filament on DNA, stabilized by nucleotide binding, and that ParA undergoes profound structural rearrangements upon DNA binding and filament assembly. Collectively, our data suggest the structural basis for ParA’s cooperative binding to DNA and the formation of high ParA density regions on the nucleoid.

ParA is an ATPase involved in the segregation of newly replicated DNA in bacteria. Here, structures of a ParA filament bound to DNA and of ParA in various nucleotide states offer insight into its conformational changes upon DNA binding and filament assembly, including the basis for ParA’s cooperative binding to DNA.

A CTP-dependent gating mechanism enables ParB spreading on DNA

Proper chromosome segregation is essential in all living organisms. The ParA-ParB-parS system is widely employed for chromosome segregation in bacteria. Previously, we showed that Caulobacter crescentus ParB requires cytidine triphosphate to escape the nucleation site parS and spread by sliding to the neighboring DNA (Jalal et al., 2020). Here, we provide the structural basis for this transition from nucleation to spreading by solving co-crystal structures of a C-terminal domain truncated C. crescentus ParB with parS and with a CTP analog. Nucleating ParB is an open clamp, in which parS is captured at the DNA-binding domain (the DNA-gate). Upon binding CTP, the N-terminal domain (NTD) self-dimerizes to close the NTD-gate of the clamp. The DNA-gate also closes, thus driving parS into a compartment between the DNA-gate and the C-terminal domain. CTP hydrolysis and/or the release of hydrolytic products are likely associated with reopening of the gates to release DNA and recycle ParB. Overall, we suggest a CTP-operated gating mechanism that regulates ParB nucleation, spreading, and recycling.

A CTP-dependent gating mechanism enables ParB spreading on DNA

Proper chromosome segregation is essential in all living organisms. The ParA-ParB-parS system is widely employed for chromosome segregation in bacteria. Previously, we showed that Caulobacter crescentus ParB requires cytidine triphosphate to escape the nucleation site parS and spread by sliding to the neighboring DNA (Jalal et al., 2020). Here, we provide the structural basis for this transition from nucleation to spreading by solving co-crystal structures of a C-terminal domain truncated C. crescentus ParB with parS and with a CTP analog. Nucleating ParB is an open clamp, in which parS is captured at the DNA-binding domain (the DNA-gate). Upon binding CTP, the N-terminal domain (NTD) self-dimerizes to close the NTD-gate of the clamp. The DNA-gate also closes, thus driving parS into a compartment between the DNA-gate and the C-terminal domain. CTP hydrolysis and/or the release of hydrolytic products are likely associated with reopening of the gates to release DNA and recycle ParB. Overall, we suggest a CTP-operated gating mechanism that regulates ParB nucleation, spreading, and recycling.

CTP regulates membrane-binding activity of the nucleoid occlusion protein Noc

ATP- and GTP-dependent molecular switches are extensively used to control functions of proteins in a wide range of biological processes. However, CTP switches are rarely reported. Here, we report that a nucleoid occlusion protein Noc is a CTPase enzyme whose membrane-binding activity is directly regulated by a CTP switch. In Bacillus subtilis, Noc nucleates on 16 bp NBS sites before associating with neighboring non-specific DNA to form large membrane-associated nucleoprotein complexes to physically occlude assembly of the cell division machinery. By in vitro reconstitution, we show that (1) CTP is required for Noc to form the NBS-dependent nucleoprotein complex, and (2) CTP binding, but not hydrolysis, switches Noc to a membrane-active state. Overall, we suggest that CTP couples membrane-binding activity of Noc to nucleoprotein complex formation to ensure productive recruitment of DNA to the bacterial cell membrane for nucleoid occlusion activity.

•

CTP is required for Noc to form a higher-order nucleoprotein complex on DNA

•

CTP binding switches DNA-entrapped Noc to a membrane-active state

•

CTP hydrolysis likely reverses the association between Noc-DNA and the membrane

•

The membrane-targeting helix adopts an autoinhibitory conformation in apo-Noc

Mechanisms for Chromosome Segregation in Bacteria

The process of DNA segregation, the redistribution of newly replicated genomic material to daughter cells, is a crucial step in the life cycle of all living systems. Here, we review DNA segregation in bacteria which evolved a variety of mechanisms for partitioning newly replicated DNA. Bacterial species such as Caulobacter crescentus and Bacillus subtilis contain pushing and pulling mechanisms that exert forces and directionality to mediate the moving of newly synthesized chromosomes to the bacterial poles. Other bacteria such as Escherichia coli lack such active segregation systems, yet exhibit a spontaneous de-mixing of chromosomes due to entropic forces as DNA is being replicated under the confinement of the cell wall. Furthermore, we present a synopsis of the main players that contribute to prokaryotic genome segregation. We finish with emphasizing the importance of bottom-up approaches for the investigation of the various factors that contribute to genome segregation.

The emergence of phase separation as an organizing principle in bacteria

Recent investigations in bacteria suggest that membraneless organelles play a crucial role in the subcellular organization of bacterial cells. However, the biochemical functions and assembly mechanisms of these compartments have not yet been completely characterized. This article assesses the current methodologies used in the study of membraneless organelles in bacteria, highlights the limitations in determining the phase of complexes in cells that are typically an order of magnitude smaller than a eukaryotic cell, and identifies gaps in our current knowledge about the functional role of membraneless organelles in bacteria. Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is one proposed mechanism for membraneless organelle assembly. Overall, we outline the framework to evaluate LLPS in vivo in bacteria, we describe the bacterial systems with proposed LLPS activity, and we comment on the general role LLPS plays in bacteria and how it may regulate cellular function. Lastly, we provide an outlook for super-resolution microscopy and single-molecule tracking as tools to assess condensates in bacteria.

Gradual opening of Smc arms in prokaryotic condensin

Multi-subunit SMC ATPases control chromosome superstructure apparently by catalyzing a DNA-loop-extrusion reaction. SMC proteins harbor an ABC-type ATPase "head" and a "hinge" dimerization domain connected by a coiled coil "arm." Two arms in a SMC dimer can co-align, thereby forming a rod-shaped particle. Upon ATP binding, SMC heads engage, and arms are thought to separate. Here, we study the shape of Bacillus subtilis Smc-ScpAB by electron-spin resonance spectroscopy. Arm separation is readily detected proximal to the heads in the absence of ligands, and separation near the hinge largely depends on ATP and DNA. Artificial blockage of arm opening eliminates DNA stimulation of ATP hydrolysis but does not prevent basal ATPase activity. We report an arm contact as being important for controlling the transformations. Point mutations at this arm interface eliminated Smc function. We propose that partially open, intermediary conformations provide directionality to SMC DNA translocation by (un)binding suitable DNA substrates.

Physical Modeling of a Sliding Clamp Mechanism for the Spreading of ParB at Short Genomic Distance from Bacterial Centromere Sites

Bacterial ParB partitioning proteins involved in chromosomes and low-copy-number plasmid segregation are cytosine triphosphate (CTP)-dependent molecular switches. CTP-binding converts ParB dimers to DNA clamps, allowing unidimensional diffusion along the DNA. This sliding property has been proposed to explain the ParB spreading over large distances from parS centromere sites where ParB is specifically loaded. We modeled such a "clamping and sliding" mechanism as a typical reaction-diffusion system, compared it to the F plasmid ParB DNA binding pattern, and found that it can account neither for the long range of ParB binding to DNA nor for the rapid assembly kinetics observed in vivo after parS duplication. Also, it predicts a strong effect on the F plasmid ParB binding pattern from the presence of a roadblock that is not observed in ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq). We conclude that although "clamping and sliding" can occur at short distances from parS, another mechanism must apply for ParB recruitment at larger genomic distances.