Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2019 version)

Effectiveness of oral vitamin D supplementation in lessening disease severity among patients with psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Many treatment modalities have been used to manage psoriasis; however, there is, to our knowledge, no pooled estimate for the effectiveness of oral vitamin D supplements in patients with psoriasis. Hence, the aim of the present study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy of oral vitamin D supplementation in lessening disease severity of patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed on the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central and the gray literature for retrieving randomized controlled trials comparing oral vitamin D supplementation with placebo. The primary outcome was the change of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. We used the random effects model for synthesizing the evidence.

RESULTS

Of the total 5018 search results, 4 studies were included in the qualitative and 3 studies in quantitative analysis. Vitamin D supplementation was effective in ameliorating the PASI score after 6 mo of intervention (mean difference [MD] = -0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.72 to -0.11). However, after the Hartung-Knapp adjustment, the results became non-significant (MD = -0.92, 95% CI = -2.21 to 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

A favorable effect of oral vitamin D supplementation in patients with psoriasis could not be verified. More randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to produce robust results.

Tapering and discontinuation of systemic medications in psoriasis patients with low disease activity

Psoriasis is a chronic disease and often requires long-term treatment, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. It remains controversial whether the doses of systemic medications could be tapered or if these medications could be discontinued among patients in clinical remission. In this review, we summarize whether it is possible to taper or discontinue methotrexate, cyclosporine, and biologics while controlling the relapse rates of psoriasis. Based on the current evidence, methotrexate and biologics should not be discontinued for psoriasis patients with low disease activity. However, the doses of these medications could be tapered by reducing the maintenance dose or increasing the between-dose intervals. If the disease recurs, methotrexate and biologics should be restarted at their standard doses, and for cyclosporine, the dose can be maintained or discontinued progressively. If patients relapse, cyclosporine can be given again. The decisions to taper or discontinue anti-psoriasis drugs need to account for both benefits and risks and should be individualized according to patients' disease severity, quality of life, and presence of comorbidities.

An economic evaluation of risankizumab versus other biologic treatments of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Japan

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of risankizumab versus other biologic treatments (adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, brodalumab, ixekizumab, and guselkumab) of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Japan.Methods: A Markov cohort-level model was constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs for each treatment over a lifetime horizon. The model simulated patients' transition through one line of active biologic therapy followed by best supportive care and death. Transition probabilities were informed by network meta-analyses of Psoriasis Activity and Severity Index responses and adverse event-related discontinuation in clinical trials, as well as published real-world evidence and national mortality rates. Costs were evaluated from the health system, societal, and patient out-of-pocket perspectives.Results: Risankizumab was expected to provide 0.30-0.89 additional QALYs versus comparator biologics. Under the health system perspective, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of risankizumab ranged from ¥2,545,812/QALY versus ustekinumab to ¥6,077,134/QALY versus adalimumab. Societal ICERs were lower, ranging from ¥921,770/QALY to ¥4,350,879/QALY. From the patient perspective, risankizumab was estimated to be cost-saving versus four comparators and was associated with ICERs of <¥500,000/QALY versus the remaining comparators.Conclusion: Risankizumab was associated with higher QALYs and, based on typical willingness-to-pay benchmarks (¥5-6.7 million/QALY), considered cost-effective versus other biologics for the treatment of psoriasis in Japan.