Factors associated with pregnancy outcome in anti-TNF treated women with inflammatory bowel disease

Continuous Anti-TNFα Use Throughout Pregnancy: Possible Complications For the Mother But Not for the Fetus. A Retrospective Cohort on the French National Health Insurance Database (EVASION)

OBJECTIVES

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) need long-term treatment, which can influence pregnancies in young women. Uncontrolled IBD is associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Despite the labeling of Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies (anti-TNFα) which indicates that their use is not recommended during pregnancy, anti-TNFα are increasingly being used during pregnancy and may expose women and their fetuses to treatment-related complications. Existing recommendations on the timing of treatment during pregnancy are inconsistent. We aimed to assess the safety of anti-TNFα treatment in pregnant women with IBD, and up to the first year of life for their children.

METHODS

An exposed/non exposed retrospective cohort was conducted on the French national health system database SNIIRAM (Système National d'Information Inter-Régimes de l'Assurance Maladie). All IBD women who became pregnant between 2011 and 2014 were included. Women with concomitant diseases potentially treated with anti-TNFα were excluded. Anti-TNFα exposure (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab or certolizumab pegol) during pregnancy was retrieved from the exhaustive prescription database in SNIIRAM. The main judgment criterion was a composite outcome of disease-, treatment- and pregnancy-related complications during pregnancy for the mother, and infections during the first year of life for children.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 11,275 pregnancies (8726 women with IBD), among which 1457 (12.9%) pregnancies were exposed to anti-TNFα, mainly infliximab or adalimumab, with 1313/7722 (17.0%) suffering from Crohn's disease and 144/3553 (4.1%) from ulcerative colitis. After adjusting for disease severity, steroid use, age, IBD type, and duration and concomitant 6-mercaptopurine use, anti-TNFα treatment was associated with a higher risk of overall maternal complications (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-1.67) and infections (aOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.16-1.47). Maintaining anti-TNFα after 24 weeks did not increase the risk of maternal complication, but interrupting the anti-TNFα increased relapse risk. No increased risk for infection was found in children (aOR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.76-1.05) born to mother exposed to anti-TNFα during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TNFα treatment during pregnancy increased the risk of maternal complications compared to unexposed; however, discontinuation before week 24 increased the risk of disease flare. There was no increased risk for children exposed to anti-TNFα up to 1 year of life.

Fecal Calprotectin During Pregnancy in Women With Moderate-Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a biomarker used for assessing disease activity among IBD patients. Sparse knowledge exists as to whether FC correlates with clinical disease activity during pregnancy. Our aim was to assess FC and selected biomarkers in women with moderate-severe IBD and correlate them with clinical disease activity scores in pregnant women.

METHODS

We identified a nationwide cohort of 219 singleton pregnancies in women with moderate-severe disease (all treated with anti-tumor recrosis factor-α [anti-TNF-α] therapy during pregnancy), and we reviewed the medical records to extract clinical details and information on biomarkers. FC, C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin, and albumin were collected according to each trimester.

RESULTS

A total of 346 FC measurements were obtained throughout the gestational periods. FC values were between 80-120, 259-349, and 778-1277 mg/kg in women with clinically inactive, mild, and moderate-severe disease activity, respectively, and were significantly higher among the women with clinical disease activity. ROC curves for disease activity were computed according to the preconception period: 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.93), first trimester: 0.73 (95% CI, 0.60-0.86), second trimester: 0.74 (95% CI, 0.62-0.86), and third trimester: 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.88), respectively. We found a sensitivity of 69.7%-80.0%, a specificity of 66.7%-73.3%, and a positive predictive value of 66.7%-74.4% over the 4 gestational periods when a cutoff of 200 mg/kg was used. We found no clinically significant differences in CRP, albumin, or hemoglobin.

CONCLUSIONS

FC in pregnant women with moderate-severe IBD treated with anti-TNF-α therapy was significantly higher in women with clinical disease activity compared with the women without. FC correlated with the level of clinical disease activity in all gestational periods.

Risk of preterm delivery and small-for-gestational-age births in women with autoimmune disease using biologics before or during pregnancy: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk of preterm delivery and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births in women with autoimmune diseases using biologics before or during pregnancy.

METHODS

Using population-based administrative data in British Columbia, Canada, women with one or more autoimmune diseases who had pregnancies between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2012 were included. Exposure to biologics was defined as having at least one biologic prescription 3 months before or during pregnancy. Each exposed pregnancy was matched with five unexposed pregnancies using high-dimensional propensity scores (HDPS). Logistic regression modelling was used to evaluate the association between biologics use and preterm delivery and SGA.

RESULTS

There were 6218 women with 8607 pregnancies who had an autoimmune disease diagnosis; of which 109 women with 120 pregnancies were exposed to biologics 3 months before or during pregnancy. In unadjusted analyses, the ORs for the association of biologics exposure with preterm deliveries were 1.64 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.63) and 1.34 (95% CI 0.72 to 2.51) for SGA. After HDPS matching with 600 unexposed pregnancies, the ORs for the association of biologics exposure and preterm deliveries were 1.13 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.90) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.78) for SGA. Sensitivity analyses using HDPS deciles, continuous HDPS covariate or longer exposure window did not result in marked changes in point estimates and CIs.

CONCLUSIONS

These population-based data suggest that the use of biologics before and during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery or SGA births.

Anti-TNF-α Use During the Third Trimester of Pregnancy in Women with Moderate-severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease and the Risk of Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight

BACKGROUND

Little knowledge exists about the association between anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapy for inflammatory bowel disease during late pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. We aimed to examine whether treatment with anti-TNF-α during the third trimester affected preterm birth and low birth weight (LBW), compared with women who discontinued anti-TNF-α therapy before the third trimester.

METHODS

We identified a nationwide cohort of 219 women treated with anti-TNF-α during the pregnancy period and reviewed the medical records to extract clinical details. The exposed cohort (n = 113, 51.6%) constituted pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF-α during the third trimester, and the unexposed cohort (n = 106, 48.4%) constituted pregnancies with no anti-TNF-α during the third trimester. The association between anti-TNF-α therapy in the third trimester and adverse birth outcomes was studied (1) in those women who had clinical disease activity during pregnancy and (2) in women who had no clinical disease activity during pregnancy.

RESULTS

In women with disease activity, treated with anti-TNF-α during the third trimester, we found an adjusted odds ratio of 2.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-6.20) for preterm birth and 1.16 (95% CI, 0.26-5.23) for LBW. Among women without disease activity, treated with anti-TNF-α therapy during the third trimester, we found an adjusted odds ratio of 3.36 (95% CI, 0.31-36.46) for preterm birth and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.05-14.95) for LBW.

CONCLUSIONS

For anti-TNF-α therapy in the third trimester, we found no statistically significant increased risk of either LBW or preterm birth.

Sexuality, Fertility, and Pregnancy in Crohn's Disease

Many factors influence the sexual health of people with Crohn's disease, but active disease and depression play key roles. The fertility rate in nonoperated patients with inflammatory bowel disease with quiescent disease is similar to that in the general population. Crohn's disease can increase the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, but being in remission on a stable, steroid-free medication regimen for at least 3 months before conception and adhering to the treatment throughout pregnancy can improve outcomes. Infants with intrauterine exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor medications should avoid live vaccines for the first 9 months or until drug concentrations are undetectable.

The Effect of Disease Activity on Birth Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort of Women with Moderate to Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during conception and pregnancy may increase the risk of adverse birth outcomes. Former studies have examined heterogeneous groups of women with varying degrees of IBD severity. We aimed to examine the effect of active IBD on birth outcomes in a more homogeneous group of women with a moderate to severe disease course. Since in Denmark, moderate to severe IBD is an indication for use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy, we examined all women who used anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy during pregnancy.

METHODS

We identified a nationwide cohort of 219 singleton pregnancies in women treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy during pregnancy (2005-2014). Pregnancies with clinical disease activity (65.8%) constituted the exposed cohort and pregnancies without disease activity constituted the unexposed (34.2%). Disease activity scores were supported by levels of fecal calprotectin. Outcomes included low birth weight, preterm birth, and congenital anomalies.

RESULTS

In women with IBD, disease activity was associated with adjusted odds ratio of low birth weight and preterm birth; 2.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.37-11.35) and 2.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-8.17), respectively. In those with clinical moderate to severe disease activity, the odds ratio for preterm birth was 3.60 (95% confidence interval, 1.14-11.36). In women with ulcerative colitis and disease activity, 19.5% had a child with low birth weight and 29.3% gave birth preterm.

CONCLUSION

In women with moderate to severe IBD, 66% experienced disease activity during pregnancy. In those with the highest degree of disease activity, the risk of preterm birth was increased 3 to 4 folds. The proportion of adverse birth outcomes was high, particularly among women with ulcerative colitis and disease activity.

The effects of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Transplacental transfer of infliximab and adalimumab results in detectable drug levels in the cord blood and infant.

AIM

To determine if pregnancy influenced the pharmacokinetics of anti-TNF agents in women with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

Twenty-five women from the University of Calgary inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) pregnancy clinic on maintenance infliximab or adalimumab were recruited prospectively with serum bio-banking performed each trimester. Infliximab trough and adalimumab steady-state levels were the outcomes of interest and were analysed using the ANSER infliximab and adalimumab assays. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models were constructed to assess infliximab and adalimumab drug levels during pregnancy adjusting for the clinical covariates of albumin, BMI and CRP.

RESULTS

Fifteen women (eight Crohn's disease, seven ulcerative colitis) received infliximab and 10 women with 11 pregnancies were treated with adalimumab. Median age was 29.6 years (IQR: 27.6-31.2 years). Median disease duration was 9.2 years (IQR: 3.16-15.0 years). Median trough infliximab concentrations were 8.50 μg/mL (IQR: 7.23-10.07 μg/mL), 10.31 μg/mL (IQR: 7.66-15.63 μg/mL) and 21.02 μg/mL (IQR: 16.01-26.70 μg/mL) at trimesters 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Significant changes in albumin and BMI (P < 0.05) but not CRP (P > 0.05) were documented throughout pregnancy. After adjusting for albumin, BMI and CRP, infliximab trough levels increased during pregnancy, by 4.2 μg/mL per trimester (P = 0.02), while adalimumab drug levels remained stable (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab levels rise during pregnancy, whereas adalimumab levels remain stable after accounting for changes in albumin, BMI and CRP. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the second trimester may be useful in guiding dosing in the third trimester.

Drug Safety and Risk of Adverse Outcomes for Pregnant Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The management of the pregnant patient with inflammatory bowel disease is complicated by multiple providers, misinformation, and a disease entity that, particularly when active, can adversely affect pregnancy outcomes. This article seeks to frame the debate on medication safety in pregnancy and lactation using the US Food and Drug Administration's new Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule and the most up-to-date safety information to discuss the risks and benefits of using each class of inflammatory bowel disease medication.

Outcome of pregnancy and neonatal complications with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α use in females with immune mediated diseases; a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune mediated diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly affect young and adolescent females. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents are increasingly used to treat these conditions, but their safety during pregnancy remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk of pregnancy related outcomes in patients with various immune mediated diseases treated with anti-TNF-α agents.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing the outcome of pregnancy in female patients with various immune mediated diseases who were treated with anti-TNF-α agents. Direct and network meta-analyses were performed between anti-TNF-α users, non-users, and the general population.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (including RA, IBD and various immune mediated diseases) were identified. Among the studies that compared the outcome between anti-TNF-α users and the general population, anti-TNF-α users had a non-significant trend towards reduced rate of live birth (odds ratio (OR) = 0.38 (P = 0.081), 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.13-1.13) and were at significantly increased risk of preterm birth (OR = 2.62 (P < 0.0001), 95% CI = 2.12-3.23), spontaneous abortion (OR = 4.08 (P = 0.033), 95% CI = 1.12-14.89) and low birth weight (OR = 5.95 (P = 0.032), 95% CI = 1.17-30.38) compared to the general population. Risk of anomalies was not elevated (OR = 1.46 (P = 0.18), 95% CI = 0.84-2.56). Among the studies that compared the outcome between anti-TNF-α users and non-users, there were no significant differences in the rates of live birth and pregnancy related complications. Among the studies that compared the outcome between non-anti-TNF-α users and the general population, risk of spontaneous abortion was elevated (OR = 2.60 (P = 0.033), 95% CI = 1.08-6.27), but there were no significant differences in the rates of live birth and other pregnancy related complications. Network meta-analysis confirmed the rank order of all outcomes as general population, non-users and users of anti-TNF-α agents (ascending order based on safety).

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients with immune mediated diseases treated with anti-TNF-α agents were at significantly increased risks of preterm birth, spontaneous abortion and low birth weight compared to the general population, but had comparable outcomes with non-users. These results provide useful information for female patients in their reproductive age and raise awareness of the conditions that they are facing among clinicians managing their care.

Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor α Therapies and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pregnancy Outcomes: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly affects women during their reproductive years, leading to concerns regarding pregnancy outcomes and therapeutic safety. The aim of this study was to assess the risks associated with anti-tumour necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) therapy for pregnancy outcomes, including rates of congenital abnormality, based on published studies.

METHODS

Published studies were screened from on-line databases and international meeting abstracts. A meta-analysis was performed for adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), congenital abnormalities (CAs), preterm birth (PTB) and low birth weight (LBW). The prevalence of CAs was compared with whole-population pooled registry data.

RESULTS

In women exposed to anti-TNFα the pooled odds ratio for APOs was 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.78; p = 0.55) compared with disease-matched controls. The pooled odds ratios for CAs, PTB and LBW were 0.89 (0.37-2.13; p = 0.79), 1.21 (0.74-2.00; p = 0.45) and 1.36 (0.77-2.38; p = 0.29) respectively. The rate of CAs in TNFα-exposed women was not statistically different from that in population-wide registries (difference 0.4%, 95% CI -2.0 to +2.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TNFα therapy does not increase the risk of APOs, CAs, PTB or LBW compared with disease-matched controls. Furthermore, the risk of CAs is not increased when published prevalence data are compared with data for the general population. These findings may offer some reassurance for women and physicians regarding the safety profile of anti-TNFα during pregnancy in IBD.

Overcoming challenges of treating inflammatory bowel disease in pregnancy

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is frequently diagnosed before or during the peak reproductive years. Overall management of inflammatory bowel disease is becoming more complex given the nuances involved with multiple mechanisms of action of the current treatment and need for therapeutic monitoring for safety and efficacy; another layer of complexity is added in the setting of a pregnancy. In this review, we have identified several key challenges that health care providers face when caring for patients with IBD during pregnancy. The goal of this review is to provide the most up-to-date evidence and provide our expert recommendations so that providers can more comfortably address patients' questions about pregnancy in IBD and the associated risks as well as optimize their care to ensure the best outcomes possible.

The Toronto Consensus Statements for the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Pregnancy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) poses a particular challenge during pregnancy because the health of both the mother and the fetus must be considered.

METHODS

A systematic literature search identified studies on the management of IBD during pregnancy. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 29 of the 30 recommendations considered. Preconception counseling and access to specialist care are paramount in optimizing disease management. In general, women on 5-ASA, thiopurine, or anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monotherapy for maintenance should continue therapy throughout pregnancy. Discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy or switching from combination therapy to monotherapy may be considered in very select low-risk patients. Women who have a mild to moderate disease flare while on optimized 5-ASA or thiopurine therapy should be managed with systemic corticosteroid or anti-TNF therapy, and those with a corticosteroid-resistant flare should start anti-TNF therapy. Endoscopy or urgent surgery should not be delayed during pregnancy if indicated. Decisions regarding cesarean delivery should be based on obstetric considerations and not the diagnosis of IBD alone, with the exception of women with active perianal Crohn's disease. With the exception of methotrexate, the use of medications for IBD should not influence the decision to breast-feed and vice versa. Live vaccinations are not recommended within the first 6 months of life in the offspring of women who were on anti-TNF therapy during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal management of IBD before and during pregnancy is essential to achieving favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Treatment of the Pregnant Patient with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Research regarding fertility, medication safety, and pregnancy outcomes is increasing, but there are still many knowledge gaps in these areas. Women with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease may have decreased fertility because of voluntary childlessness and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) surgery, and women with Crohn's disease may also have decreased ovarian reserve. Initial studies show that in vitro fertilization is a viable option, and laparoscopic ileoanal pouch anastomosis surgery improves fertility rates. Additional research is needed on the effect of disease activity on fertility and on the rates of pregnancy loss and ectopic pregnancies. We do not know how to reliably measure disease activity during pregnancy or the effect of pregnancy on the microbiome. Although immunomodulators and anti-tumor necrosis factor medications are relatively safe during pregnancy, the long-term effects of these medications on the child are unknown. The recommended mode of delivery is still debated, especially for women after ileoanal pouch anastomosis. There are multiple studies on the relative safety of immunomodulators and anti-tumor necrosis factor medications during pregnancy, and we know how to safely treat a pregnant patient with a disease flare. The best way to manage women with IBD who are pregnant or contemplating pregnancy is a multidisciplinary approach. Team members often include a gastroenterologist, a high-risk obstetrician, an infertility specialist, a colorectal surgeon, and a pediatrician with experience in caring for children of mothers with IBD. By integrating expertise from these disciplines, women with even very complex IBD should be able to have a healthy pregnancy and delivery.

A safety assessment of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy for treatment of Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) therapy has revolutionized the medical treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). Nevertheless, anti-TNF-α therapy has been associated with serious adverse events (SAE) raising safety concerns. This review focuses on the safety profile of anti-TNF-α agents in CD.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a literature search until August 2015 to collect safety data on infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol monotherapy or combined with immunomodulators (IMM). We have mainly focused on infections and malignancies. Safety in pregnancy, the elderly and children are also presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Available data in CD suggest that anti-TNF-α monotherapy or in combination with IMM is relatively safe, although it may be associated with an elevated risk of serious infections, skin cancer and lymphoma. However, as this data derive mainly from cohort studies, post-marketing registries, and meta-analyses of RCTs, often characterized by inherited methodological weaknesses that may hinder their validity, data from large, statistically powered, prospective studies of sufficient follow up are required to define the actual risk of SAE during anti-TNF-α therapy in IBD. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in predicting and preventing SAE awaits confirmation.

The EULAR points to consider for use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation

A European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) task force was established to define points to consider on use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation. Based on a systematic literature review and pregnancy exposure data from several registries, statements on the compatibility of antirheumatic drugs during pregnancy and lactation were developed. The level of agreement among experts in regard to statements and propositions of use in clinical practice was established by Delphi voting. The task force defined 4 overarching principles and 11 points to consider for use of antirheumatic drugs during pregnancy and lactation. Compatibility with pregnancy and lactation was found for antimalarials, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, colchicine, intravenous immunoglobulin and glucocorticoids. Methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide require discontinuation before conception due to proven teratogenicity. Insufficient documentation in regard to fetal safety implies the discontinuation of leflunomide, tofacitinib as well as abatacept, rituximab, belimumab, tocilizumab, ustekinumab and anakinra before a planned pregnancy. Among biologics tumour necrosis factor inhibitors are best studied and appear reasonably safe with first and second trimester use. Restrictions in use apply for the few proven teratogenic drugs and the large proportion of medications for which insufficient safety data for the fetus/child are available. Effective drug treatment of active inflammatory rheumatic disease is possible with reasonable safety for the fetus/child during pregnancy and lactation. The dissemination of the data to health professionals and patients as well as their implementation into clinical practice may help to improve the management of pregnant and lactating patients with rheumatic disease.

Use of Immunomodulators and Biologics Before, During, and After Pregnancy

Immunomodulators and biologic medications, alone or in combination, form the core therapeutic strategy for managing moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD incidence peaks during the prime reproductive years, raising concerns about the impact of disease and its treatment on fertility, maternal and fetal health during pregnancy, breastfeeding safety, and childhood development. Although IBD increases risk of pregnancy complications independent of disease activity, adverse pregnancy outcomes are more common when disease is active. To mitigate fetal risk, women should conceive while disease is quiescent. Aside from methotrexate, immunomodulators and biologics may be used during pregnancy to achieve and maintain disease control. Based on available safety data, there is no increased risk of congenital anomalies among infants exposed to these medications. Active thiopurine metabolites and most monoclonal antibodies cross the placenta and are detectable in neonates. They are detectable in breast milk in minute levels as well. The impact of this exposure on neonatal outcomes is discussed. Adjusted dosing schedules during gestation may reduce fetal drug exposure, though the maternal risks of such manipulation require careful consideration. Ongoing prospective studies will further inform risk assessment, including for newer medications such as the anti-integrin agents.