Relationship between co-morbidities at diagnosis, survival and ultimate cause of death in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL): a prospective cohort study

Reconstitution of humoral immunity and decreased risk of infections in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Immune dysregulation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) contributes to a high rate of infections and morbidity. The Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors ibrutinib and acalabrutinib mark major breakthroughs in the treatment of CLL, however many patients require long-term therapy with these agents. Despite receiving effective therapy for CLL, patients on BTK inhibitors remain immunocompromised and at risk of infectious complications. We previously reported that treatment of CLL with ibrutinib leads to partial reconstitution of humoral immunity and fewer infections during the first two years of therapy. It is currently unclear whether the positive effects of ibrutinib on the immune system are sustained during long-term therapy. Acalabrutinib is a newer, more selective BTK inhibitor than ibrutinib; however a detailed evaluation of the immunologic impact of acalabrutinib therapy is lacking. Herein, utilizing two independent trials, we assessed the immunological effects and infectious risk of ibrutinib and acalabrutinib treatment in patients with CLL.

Targeting BTK in CLL: Beyond Ibrutinib

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) ibrutinib has revolutionized the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), current limitations include off-target toxicities and the development of resistance. In this review, we summarize the emerging data for alternative BTKi.

RECENT FINDINGS

Second-generation BTKi include acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and tirabrutinib which offer greater BTK selectivity. While these agents may limit off-target toxicity, they do not overcome common mechanisms of ibrutinib resistance. Reversible BTKi including vecabrutinib and LOXO-305 inhibit BTK in the presence of C481S mutation, and non-selective reversible BTKi, including ARQ-531, may retain activity despite mutations within PLCG2. Early-phase studies are underway to establish the clinical efficacy and toxicity of these agents. A randomized trial of ibrutinib versus acalabrutinib is ongoing, and acalabrutinib may be an option for ibrutinib-intolerant patients. Results from ongoing trials of alternate BTKi will help to define their role in CLL therapy as single agents or in combination therapy.

Transplant eligibility in elderly multiple myeloma patients: Prospective external validation of the international myeloma working group frailty score and comparison with clinical judgment and other comorbidity scores in unselected patients aged 65-75 years

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is feasible and effective in selected older patients with Multiple Myeloma, but specific criteria for evaluating ASCT eligibility in elderly patients are lacking. We evaluated 131 patients aged 65-75 considered for ASCT at our center: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and IMWG frailty score were obtained at diagnosis, but the intensity of treatment was left to physician's choice. The scores and age's impact on outcome was analyzed: 85 patients were judged transplant eligible, whereas 46 patients received a less intensive treatment (median follow up 27 months). No patients classified as frail had been considered eligible to ASCT with a worse outcome compared to fit and unfit patients (median PFS (progression free survival): 7.9 vs 32.9 and 29.6 months; P < .001). PFS was superior in the ASCT group (35.6 vs 19.9 months, P .013). In the ASCT group, PFS was better in patients aged 65-69 years than in patients ≥70 (51.5 vs 27.7 months, P.004). Indeed, in unfit patients aged ≥70 the PFS of the ASCT group was comparable to NO ASCT group (18 vs 27 months, P = .33) whereas in unfit patients aged 65-69 PFS was superior in the ASCT group: 43.3 vs 18.4 months, P .01. ISS III and impaired functional status independently affected PFS in a multivariate analysis (P .011 and P .006). While CCI and HCT-CI did not predict different outcome in ASCT patients, the IMWG frailty score would be of help in identifying unfit patients aged 70-75, whose outcome with ASCT selected by clinical judgment was no better than with less intensive treatments.

Ofatumumab is safe and effective as front-line treatment in older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and severe co-morbidities, including other malignancies

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are older and have multiple comorbidities, including other cancer diagnoses. These patients are routinely excluded from participation in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

In this phase II study, we determined the activity and toxicity of ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in older patients with CLL, poor performance status and comorbidities.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients with CLL aged ≥65 years with an ECOG performance status of 2-3 or Charlson comorbidity index ≥2 were eligible. Ofatumumab was administered intravenously weekly for the first month, then monthly for a total of 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Median age was 73 years, and 29% had another cancer diagnosis. Among 32 patients evaluable for response, the overall response rate was 72%. We observed complete responses in 19% of patients and partial responses in 53%. The median progression-free survival duration was 21 months, and the estimated proportion of patients alive at 36 months was 87%. All 34 patients were evaluable for toxicity. Treatment was well tolerated, with infusion-related reactions being the most common treatment-related adverse event. Only one patient had a grade 3 infection. Additional grade 3 adverse events that may have been related to ofatumumab were diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, hyperglycemia, pulmonary embolism, and hypersensitivity reaction, each in one patient. No grade 4 adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent ofatumumab is a well-tolerated and effective therapeutic approach for treatment-naïve older patients with CLL; it can be safely administered to patients with significant comorbidities and other cancer diagnoses.

Survival improvement of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in routine care 1995-2017

Seven hundred and twenty-four CLL-outpatients with a median age of 67 (35-92) were analyzed. Four hundred and twenty-seven (59%) were male, 297 (41%) female. At diagnosis 556 (77%) were in Binet stage A, 91 (13%) stage B and 36 (5%) stage C. Forty-six percent received treatment during the evaluation period. Treatment consisted of purine analogs in 38%, alkylating agents in 96%, chemoimmunotherapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in 63%, ibrutinib in 9%, venetoclax in 1% and idelalisib in 3%. 3% received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Overall survival (OS) according to Binet stage was: A 13.9 years (0.1-37.4), B 9.2 years (1.4-29.3) and C 7.9 years (0.5-19.4) respectively. Median OS from the start of therapy improved over time; 1995-2001: 5.8 years, 2002-2008: 6.1 years and 2009-2017: median not reached. Survival of patients with CLL has improved in routine care and was strongly related to active disease, disease stage, performance status and whether therapy included an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody.

Impact of oral oncolytic initiation on medication adherence for pre-existing comorbid chronic conditions

PURPOSE

Oral oncolytics have improved survival in hematological cancers like chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, and multiple myeloma; however, it is unclear of the extent to which initiating these treatments might impact adherence to oral therapies for pre-existing comorbid chronic conditions.

METHODS

Adults diagnosed with and prescribed oral oncolytics for chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, or multiple myeloma between 2013 and 2016 and with continuous eligibility six months before and after oral oncolytic initiation were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan databases. Among those identified, patients with pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia with ≥1 fill for oral comorbid therapies were selected. Adherence to oral oncolytics and comorbid therapies was measured using the proportion of days covered metric. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests assessed changes in adherence for comorbid therapies after initiation of an oral oncolytic. Unadjusted difference-in-difference models assessed the impact of adherence to oral oncolytics on changes in adherence to comorbid therapies.

RESULTS

Significant reductions in adherence after oncolytic initiation were observed across the comorbid therapies and were highest for patients taking lipid-lower agents (10.7-15.6%). Unadjusted difference-in-difference models revealed consistent and significantly lower reductions in adherence for those taking antihypertensives (chronic myeloid leukemia: p = 0.03; chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: p = 0.007; multiple myeloma: p = 0.09) and adherent to oral oncolytics.

CONCLUSION

Initiation of oral oncolytics may negatively impact adherence to oral therapies for chronic comorbid conditions, necessitating the need for medication management strategies to help patients adhere to their entire medication regimen.

Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in CLL: Ready for Use in Clinical Routine?

The introduction of chemoimmunotherapy and more recently the implementation of novel agents into first-line and relapse treatment have substantially improved treatment outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). With longer progression-free survival and more frequently observed deep remissions there is an emerging need for sensitive methods quantitating residual disease after therapy. Over the last decade, assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) has increasingly been implemented in CLL trials. The predictive value of MRD status on survival outcomes has repeatedly been proven in the context of chemoimmunotherapy and cellular therapies. Recent data suggests a similar correlation for Bcl-2 inhibitor-based therapy. While the relevance of MRD assessment as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials is largely undisputed, its role in routine clinical practice has not yet been well defined. This review outlines current methods of MRD detection in CLL and summarizes MRD data from relevant trials. The significance of MRD testing in clinical studies and in routine patient care is assessed and new MRD-guided treatment strategies are discussed.

Tailored Treatment Strategies for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in a Rapidly Changing Era

The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is rapidly evolving, with multiple agents recently approved. They include a glycoengineered monoclonal antibody (obinutuzumab), B-cell receptor signaling inhibitors (ibrutinib, idelalisib, and duvelisib), and the BCL-2 inhibitor (venetoclax). These compounds are dramatically changing the natural course of the disease. Nonetheless, despite improved survival rates, particularly in higher-risk disease (older adults, patients with unmutated IGHV, del(11q), and del(17p)/TP53 mutated), there is still room for progress. Given the panoply of highly effective therapies commercially available, it is important to define a tailored treatment strategy for this heterogeneous condition that considers balance of treatment efficacy versus toxicity or tolerance. This article summarizes the most promising clinical advances by reviewing the data from recent clinical trials and discussing meaningful clinical endpoints, including the role of minimal residual disease assessment. The recent development of therapies targeting dysregulated pathways is revolutionary and may ultimately lead us to not only achieve prolonged remission durations but also envision the possibility of a functional cure for a larger population of patients.

Treating Older Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Personalized Approach

Median age at diagnosis for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is 72 years, and the number of older individuals affected by this condition is predicted to increase in the future as populations age. Contrary to common assumptions, CLL significantly affects the life expectancy of older individuals, frequently presenting at a more advanced stage and with more unfavorable features than in the younger population. Therefore, identifying the optimal treatment for these patients is a priority. Older patients with CLL are usually classified as fit, non-fit, or frail based on performance status and comorbidities, and several assessment tools can be used to make these evaluations. While supportive care is appropriate for frail patients, the remaining patients should be treated when indication criteria are met. Treatment options include chemoimmunotherapy, monoclonal antibody-based approaches (such as the use of rituximab, ofatumumab, or obinutuzumab) and, more recently, small molecules (such as ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax). The choice of treatment is guided by the patient's performance status and co-morbidities and by the disease characteristics, such as chromosomal and molecular abnormalities, and in patients with recurrent disease also by the type of prior regimen, their tolerability, and duration of response.

Major hemorrhage in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients in the US Veterans Health Administration system in the pre-ibrutinib era: Incidence and risk factors

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients are at increased risk for major hemorrhage (MH). We examined incidence of and risk factors for MH in CLL patients before introduction of newer CLL therapies such as ibrutinib, which includes bleeding risk. This study included 24 198 CLL patients treated in the VA system before FDA approval of ibrutinib as CLL therapy. Data came from VA databases from 1999 to 2013. MH incidence was 1.9/100 person-years (95% CI: 1.8-1.9), with cumulative incidences of 2.3%, 5.2%, and 7.3% by year 1, 3, and 5, respectively. Median time from CLL diagnosis to MH was 2.8 years (range: 0-15.7 years). In multivariate analyses, concurrent anticoagulant and antiplatelet use (HR: 4.2; 95% CI: 3.2-5.6), anticoagulant use only (HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 2.3-3.1), and antiplatelet use only (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3-1.7) increased MH risk vs not receiving those medications; being nonwhite, male, having MH history, renal impairment, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and alcohol abuse were associated with increased MH risk. These pre-ibrutinib data are important for providing context for interpreting MH risk in ibrutinib-treated patients. As ibrutinib clinical use is increasing, updated analyses of MH risk among ibrutinib-treated VA patients with CLL may provide additional useful insight.

First-line therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a Swedish nation-wide real-world study on 1053 consecutive patients treated between 2007 and 2013

The aim of this study was to investigate long-term outcome following first-line therapy in consecutive chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients in a well-defined geographic area: Sweden. All patients diagnosed with CLL (2007-2013) (n=3672) were identified from national registries, screening of patient files identified all (100%) treated first line (n=1053) and for those, an in-depth analysis was performed. End points were overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Median age was 71 years; 53% had Rai stage III-IV and 97% had performance status grade 0-2. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed in 57% of patients: 15% had del(17p). Chlorambucil + prednisone was used in 39% (5% also received rituximab). Fludarabine+cyclophosphamide+rituximab or fludarabine+cyclophosphamide was used in 43% and bendamustine + rituximab in 6%. Overall response rate was 64%; chlorambucil 43%, fludarabine+cyclophosphamide+rituximab 84%, fludarabine+cyclophosphamide 75% and bendamustine + rituximab 75%. Median PFS and OS was 24 and 58 months, respectively, both were significantly associated (multivariate analysis) with type of treatment, del(17p), performance status, gender, age and geographical region (OS only). Chlorambucil-treated patients had a median PFS and OS of only 9 and 33 months, respectively. Chlorambucil usage declined gradually throughout the study period, but one-third of patients still received chlorambucil + rituximab in 2013. Infections ≥grade III were significantly associated with treatment; chlorambucil 19% versus fludarabine+cyclophosphamide+rituximab 30%. Richter transformation occurred in 5.5% of the patients, equally distributed across therapies. This is the largest retrospective, real-world cohort of consecutive first-line treated CLL patients with a complete follow up. In elderly patients, an unmet need for more effective, well-tolerated therapies was identified.

Management of unfit elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease characterized by an increasing incidence with age reaching 35/100,000 in patients over 85 years. Elderly CLL patients carry several challenges, which have to be considered particularly in advanced stages including a higher risk of infections and individual differences in comorbidities and geriatric syndromes. Although no specific tool for geriatric evaluation in CLL has been developed so far, several of them (e.g. CIRS or Charlson-Score) have been tested in CLL patients. Several treatment options exist for frontline and relapse therapy in unfit CLL patients. Less intensive chemoimmunotherapy with engineered CD20 antibodies (e.g. obinutuzumab) is one of the treatment options, if TP53 mutation or deletion has been ruled out by genetic testing. Single agent treatment with the Btk-inhibitor ibrutinib is not only approved in relapsed CLL; but also for frontline therapy. The kinase inhibitor idelalisib (plus rituximab) and the bcl2 inhibitor venetoclax are other novel compounds, which showed great efficacy in relapsed CLL even in unfit patients. Treatment decisions in unfit patients have to take patient-related as well as disease-related risk factors into consideration.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Diagnosis and Treatment

The complexity of the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia has increased substantially over the past several years as a consequence of the advent of novel biological agents such as ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax, as well as increasingly potent anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. In addition, the identification of molecular predictive markers and the introduction of more sensitive and sophisticated techniques to assess minimal residual disease have allowed optimization of the use of chemoimmunotherapy and targeted therapies and may become standard of care in the future. This review summarizes the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with emphasis on new prognostic and predictive factors and novel treatment strategies.

What is the optimal management of older CLL patients?

CLL is the most common leukemia in older adults with a median age at diagnosis of 71. Therefore, management of patients with this disease must take into account the older age of most patients and consequences of this in terms of functional status and organ function. This review will discuss the management of CLL with regards to observation prior to the initiation of therapy, functional status, and initial treatment. We will discuss criteria for the initiation of therapy, and how initial therapy is different between older and younger patients. Finally, we will discuss specific therapies including chemoimmunotherapy and newer targeted therapies that are being used widely in the older patient population.