Underdiagnosed and undertreated psoriasis: Nuances of treating psoriasis affecting the scalp, face, intertriginous areas, genitals, hands, feet, and nails

Quality-of-Life Outcomes, Effectiveness and Tolerability of Apremilast in Patients with Plaque Psoriasis and Routine German Dermatology Care: Results from LAPIS-PSO

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease characterised by pruritic skin lesions that impair quality of life (QOL). Long-Term Documentation of the Utilization of Apremilast in Patients with Plaque Psoriasis under Routine Conditions (LAPIS-PSO; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02626793) was a 52-week, prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study conducted in real-world dermatology clinical settings in Germany. We evaluated physician- and patient-reported outcomes for QOL, effectiveness and tolerability in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris in LAPIS-PSO.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score ≤ 5 or ≥ 5-point improvement from baseline in DLQI score at visit 2 (~ 4 months after baseline). Secondary endpoints included assessments of symptoms and disease severity. Tolerability was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs). A pre-defined subgroup analysis based on baseline Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score (2 or 3 versus 4) was performed. Data were examined descriptively through visit 5 (~ 13 months) using the last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) approach and data as observed.

RESULTS

In total, 257 patients were included for efficacy assessment. On LOCF analysis, most patients achieved the primary endpoint at visit 2 (66.5%); DLQI response was maintained at visit 5 (72.4%). Earlier treatment response was observed in patients with a PGA score of 2 or 3 versus 4 (visit 1 PASI ≤ 3: 20.5% versus 10.8%). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of apremilast.

CONCLUSIONS

In routine clinical care in Germany, patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis benefited from apremilast treatment up to ~ 13 months, consistent with findings from clinical trials, with a good safety profile.

Characterizing Outcomes and Unmet Needs Among Patients in the United States with Mild-to-Moderate Plaque Psoriasis Using Prescription Topicals

INTRODUCTION

Topical therapies are considered first-line treatment in the management of plaque psoriasis (PSO). However, data on patient-reported outcomes for topicals are scarce. We designed a survey to record the treatment experience of patients with mild-to-moderate PSO using prescription topicals.

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among adult patients on prescription topicals for mild-to-moderate PSO (body surface area [BSA] ≤ 10%) in the US. Data on treatment goals, changes in PSO after current treatment, satisfaction with current treatment (assessed with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [TSQM]), and treatment adherence (how often current treatment was taken as instructed) were collected. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 175 patients with mild-to-moderate PSO who completed the survey, 67.4% were female, with a median age of 55.0 years and 10.8 years since PSO diagnosis. Patients reported (medians) the use of three topicals since diagnosis, with 5 years on the current prescription topical. The top three treatment goals for current topical treatment were improvements in visible skin, 97.1%; non-skin related symptoms, 62.9%; and social/emotional well-being, 60.0%. Overall, 43.4% of patients reported 0% BSA change and 5.7% reported ≥ 75% BSA reduction. Approximately 75.0% each reported improvement in itch and pain symptoms. Embarrassment/self-consciousness because of skin symptoms persisted in 72.6% of patients. Median TSQM scores for global satisfaction, convenience, and effectiveness ranged between 58 and 72, indicating partial treatment satisfaction, except for side effects, which was high (median: 100). Approximately half of patients (49.7%) reported not being highly adherent to treatment.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to their treatment goals, patients with mild-to-moderate PSO using prescription topicals reported partial effectiveness, incomplete symptom resolution, impacted emotional and social well-being, and suboptimal global satisfaction, effectiveness, adherence, and convenience. Our findings highlight several unmet needs among topical-experienced, systemic-naïve patients with mild-to-moderate PSO using prescription topicals.

Freedom from disease in psoriasis: a Delphi consensus definition by patients, nurses and physicians

Background

Physician‐reported clinical outcome and quality of life (QoL) measures are currently used to assess outcomes and direct treatment of plaque psoriasis. However, people with psoriasis may have different criteria for judging treatment success.

Objectives

To build a unified consensus on the definition of ‘freedom from disease’ from a European stakeholder group, including people with psoriasis, dermatologists and nurses.

Methods

The modified Delphi consensus methodology was used to define ‘freedom from disease’, with a consensus group consisting of people with psoriasis, nurses and dermatologists. This methodology involved people with psoriasis during the entire process and consisted of a 15‐member Facilitating Consensus Panel to drive the programme content and a larger Voting Consensus Panel to vote on defining ‘freedom from disease’. The Facilitating Panel agreed on disease domains, and aspects of each domain were put forward to the Voting Consensus Panel to establish relative importance. Following two voting rounds, a meeting was held to agree on a final consensus statement.

Results

The Facilitating Panel consisted of six patient advocacy group representatives, three specialist nurses and six dermatologists. Voting rounds 1 and 2 were completed by 166 and 130 respondents from the Voting Consensus Panel, respectively. The outputs from both rounds of voting were similar, focusing on normality of living, symptom control, and a relationship of mutual respect and trust between the individual with psoriasis and their healthcare professional. The consensus statement emphasizes that ‘freedom from disease’ is multifaceted and includes the following domains ‘management of clinical symptoms’, ‘psychosocial elements’, ‘QoL and well‐being’, ‘treatment’ and ‘healthcare team support’. ‘Freedom from disease’ means all aspects are addressed.

Conclusions

Freedom from disease in psoriasis is a multicomponent concept including five main domains. This diverse and multifaceted patient perspective will help us to improve understanding of the outcomes of treatment interventions in people with psoriasis.

Evolution of Patient Perceptions of Psoriatic Disease: Results from the Understanding Psoriatic Disease Leveraging Insights for Treatment (UPLIFT) Survey

INTRODUCTION

Since the 2012 Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (MAPP) survey, several systemic treatments for psoriasis (PsO) and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been approved. The population-based UPLIFT survey was conducted to understand how perceptions of treatment-related outcomes have evolved, particularly for patients with mild to moderate PsO and/or PsA and their dermatologists.

METHODS

This population- and web-based survey was conducted from 2 March to 3 June 2020, in North America, Europe, and Japan. Adults with self-reported healthcare practitioner (HCP)-diagnosed PsO and/or PsA and dermatologists who spent > 50% of time treating patients and treated ≥ 20 patients with PsO, including plaque PsO, per month were included. Patient participants were recruited at random from online panels; dermatologists were recruited randomly from representative physician panels.

RESULTS

Of 264,054 patient responses, 3806 who self-reported an HCP diagnosis of PsO and/or PsA were included in the final sample; 67% had PsO alone, 28% had PsO and PsA, and 5% had PsA alone. The estimated population prevalence of psoriatic disease was 7% (PsO only: 4%; PsO and PsA: 2%; PsA only: 1%). Most patients (78%) reported PsO-involved body surface area (BSA) ≤ 3 palms, and ~ 90% or more reported itching, redness, flaking, and scales. Many PsO patients without diagnosed PsA reported musculoskeletal symptoms suggestive of PsA (63%). Across BSA categories, approximately one in four patients was not currently receiving treatment and > 50% had Dermatology Life Quality Index score > 5. Patients and dermatologists had different perceptions of PsO severity, office visit discussions, treatment goals, and treatment satisfaction. The survey was conducted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which could have affected assessments of patient-reported outcomes and ability to have in-person HCP visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PsO and PsA in UPLIFT reported high disease burden, including patients with limited skin involvement. An opportunity exists to align patient and dermatologist perceptions to optimize management of PsO and PsA.

The hair follicle-psoriasis axis: Shared regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic targets

It has long been known that there is a special affinity of psoriasis for the scalp: Here, it occurs most frequently, lesions terminate sharply in frontal skin beyond the hair line and are difficult to treat. Yet, surprisingly, scalp psoriasis only rarely causes alopecia, even though the pilosebaceous unit clearly is affected. Here, we systematically explore the peculiar, insufficiently investigated connection between psoriasis and growing (anagen) terminal scalp hair follicles (HFs), with emphasis on shared regulatory mechanism and therapeutic targets. Interestingly, several drugs and stressors that can trigger/aggravate psoriasis can inhibit hair growth (e.g. beta-blockers, chloroquine, carbamazepine, interferon-alpha, perceived stress). Instead, several anti-psoriatic agents can stimulate hair growth (e.g. cyclosporine, glucocorticoids, dithranol, UV irradiation), while skin/HF trauma (Köbner phenomenon/depilation) favours the development of psoriatic lesions and induces anagen in "quiescent" (telogen) HFs. On this basis, we propose two interconnected working models: (a) the existence of a bidirectional "hair follicle-psoriasis axis," along which keratinocytes of anagen scalp HFs secrete signals that favour the development and maintenance of psoriatic scalp lesions and respond to signals from these lesions, and (b) that anagen induction and psoriatic lesions share molecular "switch-on" mechanisms, which invite pharmacological targeting, once identified. Therefore, we advocate a novel, cross-fertilizing and integrative approach to psoriasis and hair research that systematically characterizes the "HF-psoriasis axis," focused on identification and therapeutic targeting of selected, shared signalling pathways in the future management of both, psoriasis and hair growth disorders.

Lipid-based nanoparticles for psoriasis treatment: a review on conventional treatments, recent works, and future prospects

Psoriasis is a lingering inflammatory skin disease that attacks the immune system. The abnormal interactions between T cells, immune cells, and inflammatory cytokines causing the epidermal thickening. International guidelines have recommended topical treatments for mild to moderate psoriasis whilst systemic and phototherapy treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis. However, current therapeutic approaches have a wider extent to treat moderate to severe type of psoriasis especially since the emergence of diverse biologic agents. In the meantime, topical delivery of conventional treatments has prompted many unsatisfactory effects to penetrate through the skin (stratum corneum). By understanding the physiology of stratum corneum barrier functions, scientists have developed different types of lipid-based nanoparticles like solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, nanovesicles, and nanoemulsions. These novel drug delivery systems help the poorly solubilised active pharmaceutical ingredient reaches the targeted site seamlessly because of the bioavailability feature of the nanosized molecules. Lipid-based nanoparticles for psoriasis treatments create a paradigm for topical drug delivery due to their lipids' amphiphilic feature to efficiently encapsulate both lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs. This review highlights different types of lipid-based nanoparticles and their recent works of nano formulated psoriasis treatments. The encapsulation of psoriasis drugs through lipid nanocarriers unfold numerous research opportunities in pharmaceutical applications but also draw challenges for the future development of nano drugs.

Clinical and trichoscopic aspects of scalp psoriasis: commentary to 'Clinical and trichoscopic features in various forms of scalp psoriasis' by F. Bruni et al

Linked article: F. Bruni et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 35: 1830–1837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17354

Mimics of Dermatitis

Dermatitis is a common condition frequently encountered by dermatologists. The diagnosis of dermatitis can be challenging because this condition is often multifactorial, and many skin diseases that can mimic dermatitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis. It is important to recognize and be familiar with these conditions because some of them can represent signs of systemic disease or malignancies and misdiagnosis can lead to mismanagement and adverse outcomes for the patient.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast and Methotrexate in Patients with Palmoplantar Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Placebo-controlled studies have reported the efficacy of apremilast in the management of palmoplantar psoriasis but studies comparing efficacy with a conventional agent are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article was to  compare the efficacy and safety of apremilast and methotrexate in patients with palmoplantar psoriasis.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, active-controlled, observer-blinded clinical trial, conducted at a psoriasis clinic of a tertiary care institute in India from 1 July, 2019 to 1 June, 2020, 84 patients with palmoplantar psoriasis were randomized (1:1) to receive either methotrexate (0.4 mg/kg/week orally) or apremilast (30 mg twice daily). The treatment protocol was continued for 16 weeks or until achieving a ≥ 75% improvement in the Modified Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (m-PPPASI 75), whichever was earlier. Changes in m-PPPASI and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores from baseline, the proportion of patients achieving m-PPPASI 75, and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were included (76 palmoplantar psoriasis and 8 palmoplantar pustulosis). The mean age (standard deviation) was 44.5 (12.9) years and 53 (63%) were women. The m-PPPASI score [median (interquartile range)] after 16 weeks of treatment showed a significant improvement from baseline in both apremilast [- 6.3 (10.9), p < 0.001] and methotrexate groups [- 8.5 (9.9), p < 0.001]. The estimated median difference between the groups was - 1.2 (p = 0.39, 95% confidence interval - 4.2 to 2.1). At 16 weeks, m-PPPASI 75 was achieved by 14/42 (33%) and 17/42 (41%) patients in the apremilast and methotrexate groups, respectively (p = 0.49). A significant reduction in the Dermatology Life Quality Index score [median (interquartile range)] was observed in both groups [apremilast: - 3.0 (6.0), p < 0.001; methotrexate: - 3.0 (6.3), p < 0.001] with an estimated median difference of 0.0 (p = 0.99, 95% confidence interval - 1.0 to 2.0). The proportion of patients experiencing adverse events was comparable (p = 0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast showed a comparable efficacy and safety profile to methotrexate in the management of palmoplantar psoriasis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

CTRI/2019/06/019830, date of registration: 24 June, 2019; trial registered prospectively.

Pain Management in Painful Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthropathy: Challenging and Intricately Intertwined Issues Involving Several Systems

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthropathy are inflammatory autoimmune conditions that can lead to profound emotional distress, social stigmatization, isolation, disfigurement, pain, disability, unemployment, and decreased quality of life. Thus, this disease has immense psychological, social, and economic implications as the pain experienced is closely associated with the primary disease burden. This review focuses on discussing the primary disease burden of psoriasis and psoriatic arthropathy, as well as management of different types of pain in these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pain affects over 40% of patients with psoriasis, ranging from neuropathic to nociceptive. Treatment of pain largely focuses on treating the underlying disease with mild topical steroids and non-steroidal medications including vitamin D analogs followed by systemic immunomodulatory agents for more severe disease. Interventional options such as corticosteroid injections are available for select cases (conditional recommendation). Psoriasis and psoriatic arthropathy have been associated with underreporting and resultant undertreatment of pain. Pain control in these conditions is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. More research and guidelines are needed in the areas of reporting of psoriatic disease, associated pain, psoriatic nociception, and optimal clinical management.

A description of treatment patterns of psoriasis by medical providers and disease severity in US women

Background

Studies on treatment patterns of psoriasis are valuable to evaluate how efficiently individuals with psoriasis are treated and may facilitate improved outcomes for these patients.

Objective

To describe treatment patterns of psoriasis among US women.

Methods

In the Nurses' Health Study II (NHS II), a prospective study of female nurses, 2107 women reported to have a diagnosis of psoriasis made by a clinician. We sent them the Psoriasis Screening Tool-2, a validated diagnostic tool for psoriasis, which queries age at diagnosis, treatments, type of psoriasis lesions, body surface area involved, and the provider who made the diagnosis.

Results

A total of 1382 women completed and returned the survey, with 1243 of them validated for having psoriasis. 30% of the patients were diagnosed by non-dermatologists. 79% of the patients reported mild, 17% moderate and 4% severe disease. Psoriasis phenotypes were as follows: plaque 41%, scalp 49%, inverse 27%, nail 22% and palmoplantar 15%. Treatment patterns for mild psoriasis were as follows: only topical treatment 58%, systemic therapy and/or phototherapy 16% and no treatment 26%. Treatment patterns for moderate-to-severe disease were as follows: only topical treatment 42%, systemic therapy and/or phototherapy 47% and no treatment 11%.

Conclusion

The majority of women in NHS II with psoriasis have mild disease. A large proportion of psoriasis patients were diagnosed by non-dermatologists. More than half of people with moderate-to-severe disease received no treatment or only topical medications. A considerable percentage of people with psoriasis reported phenotypes other than chronic plaque psoriasis.

Therapeutic update of biologics and small molecules for scalp psoriasis: a systematic review

Scalp psoriasis represents the most common difficult-to-treat area in psoriasis patients. Its presence is linked to severe discomfort and impairment of quality of life given the associated symptoms (most of all, scaling and pruritus) and the location in a highly visible area, thus a prompt treatment is required. Its management may be challenging as the scalp is quite sensitive to long-term treatment with topical corticosteroids and usually resistant to topical and systemic agents. Likely, the currently available therapeutic armamentarium has been enriched with biologicals and small molecules that revolutionized psoriasis treatment and that of scalp psoriasis. Nevertheless, the lack of international dedicated guidelines pushed us to perform a comprehensive review on the efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules on scalp psoriasis with the aim to put the basis for a therapeutic algorithm. After reviewing all the available evidence on the short-term and long-term efficacy of biologics and small molecules on scalp psoriasis the use of the newest biologics (anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23) seems to be linked to the highest clinical performances in controlling scalp psoriasis. However, head-to-head comparisons between different biologics or biologics and small molecules are lacking. Hence, treatment selection should always be individualized.

A head-to-head comparison of ixekizumab vs. guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 24-week efficacy and safety results from a randomized, double-blinded trial

Background

Significantly more patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis treated with the interleukin (IL)‐17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL‐23p19 inhibitor guselkumab in the IXORA‐R head‐to‐head trial achieved 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100) at week 12.

Objectives

To compare skin and nail clearance and patient‐reported outcomes for ixekizumab vs. guselkumab, up to week 24.

Methods

IXORA‐R enrolled adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis, defined as static Physician’s Global Assessment ≥ 3, PASI ≥ 12 and involved body surface area ≥ 10%. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test stratified by pooled site. Time‐to‐first‐event comparisons were performed using Kaplan–Meier analysis, and P‐values were generated using adjusted log‐rank tests stratified by treatment group. Cumulative days at clinical and patient‐reported responses were compared by ancova. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03573323).

Results

Of the 1027 patients randomly assigned, 90% completed the trial (465 of 520 ixekizumab and 459 of 507 guselkumab). As early as week 2 and through week 16, more patients on ixekizumab achieved PASI 100 (P < 0·01). At week 24, ixekizumab was noninferior to guselkumab (50% vs. 52%, difference −2·3%), with no statistically significant difference in PASI 100 (P = 0·41). More patients receiving ixekizumab showed completely clear nails at week 24 (52% vs. 31%, P = 0·007). The median time to first PASI 50/75/90 and PASI 100 were 2 and 7·5 weeks shorter, respectively, for patients on ixekizumab vs. guselkumab (P < 0·001). Patients on ixekizumab also had a greater cumulative benefit, with more days at PASI 90 and 100, with Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1, and itch free (P < 0·05). The frequency of serious adverse events was 3% for each group, with no new safety signals.

Conclusions

Ixekizumab was noninferior to guselkumab in complete skin clearance and superior in clearing nails at week 24. Ixekizumab cleared skin more rapidly in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis, with a greater cumulative benefit, than guselkumab. Overall, the safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile for ixekizumab.

What is already known about this topic?

Patients with plaque psoriasis desire both high levels of clearance and rapid onset of treatment effects.

Ixekizumab is a high‐affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)‐17A.

In the 12‐week report of the IXORA‐R study, ixekizumab demonstrated significantly higher efficacy at early timepoints than the IL‐23p19 inhibitor guselkumab, with more patients achieving 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100) and improved quality of life as early as week 4.

What does this study add?

Patients on ixekizumab vs. guselkumab achieved similar levels of skin clearance and superior efficacy in the resolution of nail psoriasis at week 24.

Patients on ixekizumab vs. guselkumab had a greater cumulative benefit, with more days at PASI 90 and 100, more days when psoriasis did not impact their quality of life, and more itch‐free days.

The safety profiles of both drugs were consistent with those in previous studies.

Linked Comment: Puig. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184:992–993.

Effects of disease severity on quality of life in patients with psoriasis

Psoriasis is one of the leading dermatological diseases that can result in degradation in quality of life (QOL). We aimed to evaluate the effects of disease severity on QOL in psoriasis patients living in our region. Fifty-nine female and 41 male patients diagnosed with psoriasis were included in the study. The Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) was used to determine disease severity. The Psoriasis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PQLQ) was used to evaluate QOL. The mean PASI score was 14.3 ± 10.1. The PQLQ and subscale scores were not affected by age, marital status, educational status, or age at onset of the disease etc. parameters (P > .05). Additional drug use, joint involvement, and lesion site exposure were found to increase psychosocial negativity scores significantly (P < .05). The mean scores for difficulties in daily life and treatment problems were significantly higher in men than in women (P < .05). There was a positive correlation between PASI scores and PQLQ, PQLQ subgroup scores. We found that QOL decreased with increasing severity of the disease. QOL as well as clinical severity should be considered in the planning and follow-up of psoriasis treatment. To evaluate the QOL, we believe that the PQLQ can be used as demonstrated in our study.

Psoriasis: pathological mechanisms, current pharmacological therapies, and emerging drug delivery systems

Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune skin disorder triggered by either genetic factors, environmental factors, life style, or a combination thereof. Clinical investigations have identified pathogenesis, such as T cell and cytokine-mediated, genetic disposition, antimicrobial peptides, lipocalin-2, galectin-3, vaspin, fractalkine, and human neutrophil peptides in the progression of psoriasis. In addition to traditional therapies, newer therapeutics, including phosphodiesterase type 4 (PDE4) inhibitors, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), gene therapy, anti-T cell therapy, and phytoconstituents have been explored. In this review, we highlight nanotechnology-related developments for psoriasis treatment, including patented delivery systems and therapeutics currently in clinical trials.

Psoriasis severity: commonly used clinical thresholds may not adequately convey patient impact

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis severity is usually evaluated using quantitative and qualitative measures, including per cent body surface area (BSA) involvement, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), a patient-reported questionnaire. However, standardized definitions for psoriasis severity categories have not been well established. A PASI of 10 or 12 has remained the minimal severity threshold defining eligibility for psoriasis treatments. In the present study, the validity of this cut-off was re-evaluated in the context of quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the thresholds commonly used to define moderate psoriasis (PASI of 10-12 and BSA of 10) are supported by patient-reported DLQI data.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials that enrolled mild or moderate patients published between January 2000 and June 2017 was used to assess correlations between provider and patient-generated severity at baseline.

RESULTS

For subject groups with high impact on quality of life (DLQI > 10), the mean weighted BSA was 7.6 (Range: 7.1-8.4) and the mean weighted DLQI was 11 (Range: 10.2-12.2). Similarly, the mean weighted PASI for patients with DLQI > 10 was 8.7 (Range: 7.1-10.1) and the mean weighted DLQI was 10.9 (Range: 10.1-12.2).

CONCLUSION

Patients with PASI or BSA scores less than 10 can have major quality of life impairment. In general, the objective measures of BSA and PASI alone, when excluding DLQI, may not fully capture the impact of disease severity.

Brodalumab in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

A number of highly selective biologic therapies that target specific immunological pathways of psoriasis have emerged, including molecules that target interleukin (IL)-17. IL-17 has been identified as a key effector pathogenic cytokine in psoriasis, and validated as a highly effective therapeutic target for the treatment of plaque psoriasis.

AREA COVERED

This review examines the therapeutic efficacy and safety of IL-17 inhibitors in plaque psoriasis and provides an overview of the efficacy and safety data of brodalumab compared with other IL-17 inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

In the real world, the treatment of psoriasis has been revolutionized by the new class of drugs belonging to IL-17 inhibitors, with secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab currently licensed and approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. With its distinct mechanism of action, brodalumab may offer a unique advantage over other IL-17 inhibitors due to its rapid onset of action, achievement of complete skin clearance in a high proportion of patients, and its overall favorable safety profile. Importantly, treatment with systemic biologic drugs should be established early on in the course of the disease in order to prevent comorbidities and to allow patients to achieve a stable and persistent remission.

Psoriasis 2.0: Facebook als Quelle krankheitsbezogener Informationen für Patienten mit Psoriasis

HINTERGRUND UND ZIELE

Das Internet ist eine gängige Informationsquelle bezüglich gesundheitlicher Themen. Soziale Medien ermöglichen es Patienten mit Psoriasis, Informationen über ihre Erkrankung zu suchen und auszutauschen. Ihre Nutzung geht jedoch auch mit Risiken wie Fehlinformation und Neid einher. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Relevanz und Eignung von Facebook als Quelle krankheitsbezogener Informationen für Patienten mit Psoriasis zu untersuchen.

MATERIAL UND METHODIK

Querschnittsstudie in Form einer Online-Befragung (11/2017-01/2018). Der Link wurde auf einer deutschen Psoriasis-Informationswebsite veröffentlicht. Daten über die allgemeine und krankheitsbezogene Facebook-Nutzung der Teilnehmer sowie deren Einschätzung der Chancen und Risiken von Facebook in Bezug auf Psoriasis wurden erhoben.

ERGEBNISSE

101 Teilnehmer mit Psoriasis haben den Fragebogen vollständig ausgefüllt. 75 % von ihnen berichteten, Facebook mindestens einmal pro Monat zu nutzen, und 72 % der Facebook-Nutzer gaben an, auf Facebook nach krankheitsbezogenen Informationen zu suchen. Aktive Mitglieder von Facebook-Gruppen mit Bezug zu Psoriasis bewerteten Facebook als nützlicher im Umgang mit der Erkrankung als andere Nutzer. 60 % der Facebook-Nutzer berichteten auf Facebook fragwürdigen Informationen über Psoriasis und 57 % Werbung mit Bezügen zu Psoriasis ausgesetzt zu sein.

SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN

Laut den Ergebnissen dieser Studie ist Facebook eine relevante Informationsquelle für Patienten mit Psoriasis. Die Qualität der Informationen erscheint jedoch unzureichend und sollte deshalb verbessert werden.

Psoriasis 2.0: Facebook as a source of disease-related information for patients with psoriasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Internet is a commonly used source of health-related information. Social media allow psoriasis patients to seek and share information about their disease. However, they also involve risks such as misinformation and envy. The aim of this study was to explore the relevance and suitability of Facebook as a source of disease-related information for patients with psoriasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional study consisting of an online survey (11/2017-01/2018). The link was published on a German information website focused on psoriasis. We also collected data about the respondents' general and disease-related Facebook habits as well as their assessment of opportunities and risks of Facebook in the context of psoriasis.

RESULTS

101 participants with psoriasis completed the questionnaire. Of these, 75 % reported using Facebook at least once a month, and 72 % of Facebook users stated that they had searched for disease-related information on Facebook. Active members of psoriasis-related Facebook groups deemed Facebook more helpful for coping with psoriasis. 60 % of Facebook users reported unreliable information and 57 % reported sales promotions regarding psoriasis when using Facebook.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that Facebook is a relevant source of information for psoriasis patients. However, the quality of information offered seems insufficient and needs to be improved.

[Intertriginous psoriasis]

Intertriginous psoriasis is a variant of psoriasis that is associated with inflammatory lesions in skin folds. Patients often feel ashamed, are subjected to stigmatization, social isolation, or experience mental health issues. There is no general consensus on the definition of intertriginous psoriasis. Depending on the definition used, the prevalence varies substantially. Due to the particular location of skin lesions, therapeutic management is very challenging. Mild symptoms can be treated with topical corticosteroids or topical immunomodulators. There are encouraging data demonstrating the efficacy of ixekizumab, possibly charting the way for it to become a systemic treatment option.

High Prevalence of Erythrasma in Patients with Inverse Psoriasis: A Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Inverse psoriasis is characterized by erythematous nonscaly plaques in intertriginous regions. Similarly, erythrasma, a superficial infection caused by Corynebacterium minutissimum (C. minutissimum), is also found in skin folds with red-brown lesions, making the distinction between psoriasis and erythrasma difficult. No studies have previously determined whether these two clinically similar cutaneous disorders can occur concurrently. METHODS: Thirty patients with inverse psoriatic plaques were examined using a standard Wood's lamp to visualize porphyrins associated with C. minutissimum. RESULTS: Just over half (56.6%) of patients with inverse psoriatic plaques showed evidence of this bacterium. Specifically, 45.5 percent of inverse psoriatic lesions were found to be positive for C. minutissimum, with the highest prevalence of erythrasma located in the gluteal cleft. CONCLUSION: Clinical suspicion for C. minutissimum should be high in patients with inverse psoriasis due to the organism's potential to trigger or exacerbate psoriatic lesions. Further studies are indicated to determine the response to treatment in patients with this combination.

Characterization of Patients with Psoriasis in Challenging-to-Treat Body Areas in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry

BACKGROUND

Real-world studies evaluating patients with challenging-to-treat localizations of psoriasis (scalp, nail, and palmoplantar) are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patients with versus without psoriasis in challenging-to-treat areas seen in routine US clinical practice.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included all adult patients with psoriasis enrolled in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry between April 2015 and May 2018 who initiated a biologic therapy at registry enrollment. Patients were stratified by the presence of scalp, nail, or palmoplantar psoriasis (nonmutually exclusive groups). Patient demographics, clinical char-acteristics, disease activity, and patient-reported outcome measures (pain, fatigue, itch, EuroQol visual analog scale [EQ VAS], Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI], and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire [WPAI]) were assessed at registry enrollment and compared between patients with versus without each challenging-to-treat area using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. Generalized linear regression models were used to estimate differences in disease activity and patient-reported outcomes between patients with versus without each challenging-to-treat area.

RESULTS

Among 2,042 patients with psoriasis (mean age [±SD], 49.6 ± 14.7 years; 51.5% male), 38.4% had psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 38.1% had scalp psoriasis, 16.0% had nail psoriasis, 10.9% had palmoplantar psoriasis, and 26.2% had a combination of ≥2 challenging-to-treat areas and PsA; only 34.2% had body plaque psoriasis without PsA or challenging-to-treat areas. Patients in all challenging-to-treat groups reported higher (mean [95% CI]) itch (scalp, 58.01 [57.62-58.40] vs. 54.35 [53.99-54.72]; nail, 56.42 [56.02-56.81] vs. 55.59 [55.20-55.97]; palmoplantar, 60.22 [59.86-60.59] vs. 55.15 [54.79-55.54]) and lower EQ VAS (scalp, 68.12 [67.78-68.48] vs. 69.46 [69.12-69.81]; nail, 66.21 [65.89-66.55] vs. 69.48 [69.14-69.83]; palmoplantar, 66.21 [66.07-66.75] vs. 69.29 [68.94-69.94]) scores than those without the respective challenging-to-treat localization. Patients with nail or palmoplantar psoriasis reported higher pain, fatigue, and DLQI scores than those without. Higher proportions of patients with scalp or palmoplantar psoriasis reported work impairment compared with those without.

CONCLUSION

Two-thirds of patients with psoriasis who initiated biologic therapy had PsA and/or ≥1 challenging-to-treat area. Patients with challenging-to-treat areas had worse patient-reported outcome scores than those without, indicating a significant burden of challenging-to-treat areas on patients' quality of life.

Inverse Psoriasis: From Diagnosis to Current Treatment Options

Inverse psoriasis represents a clinical variant of psoriasis that is sometimes difficult to diagnose due to its clinical similarity with other skin disorders involving the folds, mainly including mechanical intertrigo, fungal and bacterial infections, contact dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, and lichen planus. Dermoscopy represents a useful tool for an enhanced non-invasive diagnosis. The treatment of inverse psoriasis may be challenging and include topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs, traditional oral systemic therapies such as cyclosporine and methotrexate, and biologic therapies.

Calcipotriol Plus Betamethasone Dipropionate Aerosol Foam For Scalp Psoriasis

This article presents real-world experience of the effectiveness of calcipotriol (50 µg/g)/betamethasone dipropionate (0.5 mg/g) (Cal/BD) aerosol foam formulation in three cases of scalp psoriasis, and briefly reviews the literature relating to Cal/BD topical therapy in adults with scalp psoriasis. Patients had long histories of scalp psoriasis and reported negative impacts on their lives (e.g. clothing choices, psychological well-being, employment status). Previous treatments had provided inadequate or only temporary relief. Cal/BD aerosol foam relieved itching in the first few days and was associated with visible improvement of flaky patches on the scalp at the end of the recommended 4-week treatment period. Controlled clinical trials in patients with scalp psoriasis are rare. There have been several trials in adults with scalp psoriasis involving Cal/BD gel or suspension scalp formulations, which have proven more effective and well tolerated compared with the individual components or vehicle alone. The Cal/BD aerosol formulation has enhanced skin penetration and higher bioavailability compared with the older formulations; studies show improved efficacy with Cal/BD aerosol foam, compared with older formulations, in patients with plaque psoriasis. The present cases confirm the benefits of Cal/BD aerosol foam in adults with scalp psoriasis, treated in real-world settings.

Psoriasis in special localizations

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis affecting 1–3% of the general population. Patients with psoriasis represent a heterogeneous population with individual disease expression – different degrees and severity of skin involvement. Psoriatic lesions in particular localizations such as the face, scalp, intertriginous or palmoplantar areas significantly reduce quality of life. Patients often feel ashamed, embarrassed, or self-conscious about their symptoms. Furthermore, genital psoriasis significantly affects sexual health. Among patients with psoriasis, the prevalence of special localizations is estimated to be 23–27% on the nails, 49% on the face, 12–16% on the palms and soles, and up to 36% in intertriginous regions. Due to peculiar features of skin in these areas, adequate and specific management is required, which is discussed in this review.

Underdiagnosed and undertreated psoriasis: Nuances of treating psoriasis affecting the scalp, face, intertriginous areas, genitals, hands, feet, and nails

Psoriasis of the scalp, face, intertriginous areas, genitals, hands, feet, and nails is often underdiagnosed, and disease management can be challenging. Despite the small surface area commonly affected by psoriasis in these locations, patients have disproportionate levels of physical impairment and emotional distress. Limitations in current disease severity indices do not fully capture the impact of disease on a patient's quality of life, and, combined with limitations in current therapies, many patients do not receive proper or adequate care. In this review, we discuss the clinical manifestations of psoriasis in these less commonly diagnosed areas and its impact on patient quality of life. We also examine clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of therapies on psoriasis in these regions. This article highlights the need to individualize treatment strategies for psoriasis based on the area of the body that is affected and the emerging role of biologic therapy in this regard.