Meta-analysis: the efficacy of azathioprine and mercaptopurine in ulcerative colitis

Effective long-term solution to therapeutic remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Role of Azathioprine

Azathioprine (AZA) is a well-known immunosuppressant used for many years for its ability to ensure long term disease remission in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) at an affordable cost to the public. However, the side effect profile has raised many concerns with numerous investigations into the risk, cause and prevention of these effects. Much of the side effect profile of AZA can be linked to a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) gene which ensures the breakdown and efficacy of AZA. Mutated TPMT alleles result in low or deficient TPMT levels which directly correlate to cytotoxity. This is a review of the role of AZA in the treatment of IBD. Knowing a patient's TPMT status allows the prescribing doctor to make an informed decision about dosage and be more alert to the signs of cytotoxicity. It is essential to include "early warning" SNP testing into common practice to ensure therapeutic efficacy.

Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on the use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease

Thiopurines (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) are widely used in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. In this paper, we review the main indications for their use, as well as practical aspects on efficacy, safety and method of administration. They are mainly used to maintain remission in steroid-dependent disease or with ciclosporin to control a severe ulcerative colitis flare-up, as well as to prevent postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence, and also in combination therapy with biologics. About 30-40% of patients will not respond to treatment and 10-20% will not tolerate it due to adverse effects. Before they are prescribed, immunisation status against certain infections should be checked. Determination of thiopurine methyltransferase activity (TPMT) is not mandatory but it increases initial safety. The appropriate dose is 2.5mg/kg/day for azathioprine and 1.5mg/kg/day for mercaptopurine. Some adverse effects are idiosyncratic (digestive intolerance, pancreatitis, fever, arthromyalgia, rash and some forms of hepatotoxicity). Others are dose-dependent (myelotoxicity and other types of hepatotoxicity), and their surveillance should never be interrupted during treatment. If therapy fails or adverse effects develop, management can include switching from one thiopurine to the other, reducing the dose, combining low doses of azathioprine with allopurinol and assessing metabolites, before their use is ruled out. Non-melanoma skin cancer, lymphomas and urinary tract tumours have been linked to thiopurine therapy. Thiopurine use is safe during conception, pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Thiopurine Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis: A Critical Review of the Evidence for Current Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Due to toxicity problems and controversial evidence, thiopurine use in ulcerative colitis (UC) has faced a lot of criticism. We present a critical review of the literature on efficacy of thiopurines in UC.

METHODS

Studies evaluating therapeutic efficacy of thiopurine remission induction and/or maintenance treatment in UC were identified using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Out of 5 randomized trials on thiopurine induction treatment, 3 demonstrated a significant effect of thiopurine treatment vs mesalamine or placebo in steroid-dependent UC patients: (1) lower endoscopic activity scores, (2) higher clinical remission rates, and (3) more patients who discontinued steroids. Two found no significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission of azathioprine compared with sulfasalazine or placebo in patients with active UC. Out of 7 randomized trials on thiopurine maintenance treatment, 4 demonstrated significant higher clinical and endoscopic remission rates in thiopurine-treated patients compared with placebo or mesalamine. Three found no significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission of thiopurine maintenance treatment compared with sulfasalazine or placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

All studies that investigated thiopurine treatment in UC had shortcomings, such as lack of sufficient power, no use of blinding, allowed concomitant treatment with steroids, and no endoscopy to confirm active disease at study entry or to evaluate therapeutic efficacy. Hence, current clinical practice of thiopurine treatment in UC is based on minimal and controversial evidence. This underscores the need for clinical studies with sufficient power and objective end points in order to determine efficacy of thiopurines in UC.

Long-term quality of life associated with early surgical complications in patients with ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is recommended for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in terms of surgical treatment. Measuring surgical complications of IPAA and long-term quality of life (QOL) are important to achieve an acceptable risk/benefit ratio for patients with UC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with UC who underwent total proctocolectomy (TPC) with IPAA from February 2008 to July 2016 at our institute were included. Early surgical complications were defined as mechanical/infectious events within one month after IPAA. Assessment of QOL was performed using the Cleveland Global Quality of Life instrument (CGQL), with 50% improvement as a cut-off value. Demographic and clinical variables were compared with univariable analysis and step-wise logistic regression models were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 58 eligible patients had a median follow-up time of 78.5 months [interquartile range (IQR), 34.4-92.8] from February2008 to March 2017, including 25 cases (43.1%) developed early surgical complications. Age at pouch surgery and excessive blood loss were risk factors associated with early surgical complications (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, older age at surgery [odds ratio (OR), 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.1] and significant blood loss (≧400 ml) (OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.21-16.87) were contributing factors for developing early surgical complications. The CGQL score was significantly increased after IPAA (0.728 ± 0.151 vs. 0.429 ± 0.173, p < 0.001). Early surgical complications (OR, 5.55; 95%CI, 1.44-21.37), older age at surgery (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12) and use of immunomodulatory (OR, 17.50; 95% CI, 1.52-201.39) were associated with poor long-term QOL.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that early surgical complications might contribute to develop a poor CGQL score, suggesting intentional control of risk factors associated with early surgical complications should be taken into consideration for patients with UC for pouch surgery.

The risk factor of clinical relapse in ulcerative colitis patients with low dose 5-aminosalicylic acid as maintenance therapy: A report from the IBD registry

Background

5-Aminosalicylic acids (5-ASA) are effective for ulcerative colitis (UC) as a maintenance therapy. It is not clear when and how to reduce a dose of 5-ASA after inducing remission. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and evaluate the risk factors of relapse for UC patients receiving 5-ASA.

Methods

The medical records of prospectively registered UC patients who received oral 5-ASA as maintenance therapy between January and December 31, 2014, were investigated. The patients’ clinical characteristics in a 2-year follow-up were compared between a relapse group and a remission group.

Results

Of 527 UC patients receiving only oral 5-ASA, 390 (74.0%) maintained remission and 137 (26.0%) relapsed during the follow-up period. Multivariable analysis indicated that a shorter duration of disease remission (p < 0.001, OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12–1.38) was statistically significant for each comparison between the remission and relapse groups among all the patients. Risk factors for clinical relapse were a shorter duration of disease remission (p <0.001, OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04–1.33) in the high-dose 5-ASA group and a shorter duration of disease remission (p = 0.003, OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.13–1.89) and a history of steroid use (p = 0.048, OR: 4.73, 95% CI: 1.01–22.2) in the low-dose group.

Conclusions

A dose reduction of 5-ASA might be cautiously selected in UC patients with a history of steroid use and a shorter duration of disease remission.

Changes in medical management and colectomy rates: a population-based cohort study on the epidemiology and natural history of ulcerative colitis in Örebro, Sweden, 1963-2010

BACKGROUND

Whether the epidemiology of ulcerative colitis (UC) has changed during recent decades is partly unknown.

AIM

To depict temporal trends in the epidemiology and medical treatment of UC as well as the long-term risk of progression in disease extent and colectomy, during 1963-2010.

METHODS

Patients were identified by evaluation of all medical records in the archive of the Colitis Clinic, Örebro University Hospital. Comparisons were made between three time periods, 1963-1975, 1976-1990 and 1991-2005.

RESULTS

The annual age-standardised incidence increased from 3.5 to 18.5 per 100 000 during the study period (P < .01). Correspondingly, the prevalence increased from 44 to 474 per 100 000 between 1965 and 2010. A higher proportion of males than females had extensive colitis at diagnosis (odds ratio: 1.55; 95% CI 1.17-2.05; P < .01). The risk for progression in disease extent was 34.5% and 18.5% at 10 years, for patients with proctitis and left-sided colitis, respectively (P < .01). The use of 5-aminosalicylates, within 10 years, rise from 79% to 92% between 1963-1975 and 1976-1990 (P < .01). Thiopurine use increased from 7% in 1976-1990 to 34% during 1991-2005 (P < .01). The colectomy rate at 10 years was 13.5% (95% CI 11.1%-15.8%), and the risk was lower among patients diagnosed in 1991-2005 compared to 1963-1975 (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.94; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

The incidence and prevalence of UC increased over time, and the observed prevalence in 2010 is among the highest reported. In parallel, a decrease in colectomy rates was observed during the most recent decades, potentially reflecting improved medical treatment.

Use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs in inflammatory bowel disease: Clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The two main forms of intestinal bowel disease, namely ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are not curable but can be controlled by various medical therapies. The Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) has prepared clinical practice guidelines to help physicians prescribe corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs for these patients. The guidelines consider therapies that induce remission in patients with active disease as well as treatment regimens that maintain remission. These guidelines complement already existing guidelines from IG-IBD on the use of biological drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Second Korean guidelines for the management of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. The direct and indirect costs of the treatment of UC are high, and the quality of life of patients is reduced, especially during exacerbation of the disease. The incidence and prevalence of UC in Korea are still lower than those of Western countries, but have been rapidly increasing during the past decades. Various medical and surgical therapies, including biologics, are currently used for the management of UC. However, many challenging issues exist, which sometimes lead to differences in practice between clinicians. Therefore, the IBD study group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases established the first Korean guidelines for the management of UC in 2012. This is an update of the first guidelines. It was generally made by the adaptation of several foreign guidelines as was the first edition, and encompasses treatment of active colitis, maintenance of remission, and indication of surgery for UC. The specific recommendations are presented with the quality of evidence and classification of recommendations.

Predictors of tissue healing in ulcerative colitis patients treated with anti-TNF

AIM

To identify factors predicting mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis patients treated with anti-TNFα agents with or without azathioprine.

METHODS

In a prospective, multicenter, one-year study biologic naïve patients aged 25-65 years, with corticosteroid-dependent or refractory colitis received combination treatment with anti-TNFα and azathioprine for 6 months followed by anti-TNFα monotherapy. Patients who denied combination therapy or were outside this age range received anti-TNFα monotherapy (controls). Before and at weeks 12 and 54 of treatment the total Mayo score was calculated. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore of 0. Mucosal expression of T helper (Th) cell-lineage specific transcription factors (Tbet, Gata3, Rorc, FoxP3) before treatment was also associated with mucosal healing.

RESULTS

Of 67 patients, 58 (86.6%) received combination and 9 (13.4%) anti-TNFα monotherapy. Overall 29 (43.3%) patients achieved mucosal healing; rates were higher in patients receiving combination therapy vs. monotherapy (p=0.03) and in azathioprine naïve vs. exposed patients in the combination group (p=0.01). Mucosal healing was associated with lower pre-treatment mucosal expression of transcription factor Th1-Tbet (p<0.05) and higher expression of Th17-Rorc (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Mucosal healing was associated with combination therapy, especially in biologic and azathioprine-naïve patients and pre-treatment mucosal expression of specific Th specific transcripting factors (Tbet and Rorc).

Thiopurines and inflammatory bowel disease: Current evidence and a historical perspective

The use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been examined in numerous prospective, controlled trials, with a majority demonstrating a clinical benefit. We conducted this review to describe the historical and current evidence in the use of thiopurines in IBD. A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE between 1965 and 2016 to identify studies on thiopurines in IBD. The most robust evidence for thiopurines in IBD includes induction of remission in combination with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, and maintenance of remission and post-operative maintenance in Crohn’s disease. Less evidence exists for thiopurine monotherapy in induction of remission, maintenance of ulcerative colitis, chemoprevention of colorectal cancer, and in preventing immunogenicity to anti-TNF. Evidence was often limited by trial design. Overall, thiopurines have demonstrated efficacy in a broad range of presentations of IBD. With more efficacious novel therapeutic agents, the positioning of thiopurines in the management of IBD will change and future studies will analyze the benefit of thiopurines alone and in conjunction with these new medications.

Treatment efficacy and safety of low-dose azathioprine in chronic active ulcerative colitis patients: A meta-analysis and systemic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose azathioprine (AZA) in treating patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

A literature search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang Database, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP Chinese Science and the Technology Journals Database was conducted to identify eligible studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose azathioprine (AZA) in treating patients with chronic active UC published up to 15 July 2015. Data were extracted from the studies, including clinical efficacy (response rate, adverse drug reaction [ADR] rate, steroid withdrawal rate and relapse rate) and endoscopic improvement (endoscopic remission rate and mucosal healing rate).

RESULTS

Six studies with 211 patients were eligible for the analysis. The overall response rates after 6 and 12 months of treatment were 78.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.0-85.0%) and 88.0% (95% CI 80.0-96.0%), respectively. The overall ADR rate was 25.0% (95% CI 18.0-31.0%). Endoscopic response rate was around 85.0%, while the endoscopic remission rates and mucosal healing rates after 6 and 12 months of treatment were above 60.0% and 70.0%, respectively. The steroid withdrawal rate and relapse rate were in moderate to high heterogeneity. Egger's test indicated that there was no publication bias for studies regarding the 6-month response rate and ADR rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose AZA is effective and safe in the treatment of chronic active UC patients. However, randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Monitoring thiopurine metabolites in inflammatory bowel disease

Thiopurines (azathioprine and mercaptopurine) are one of the immunosuppressive mainstays for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. In spite of its widespread use, thiopurine metabolism is still not fully understood, and a significant proportion of patients suffer toxicity or lack of efficacy. Different enzymatic pathways with individual variations constitute a pharmacogenetic model that seems to be suitable for monitoring and therapeutic intervention. This review is focused on current concepts and recent research that may help clinicians to rationally optimise thiopurine treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Review article: recent advances in pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics for safe and effective thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine and mercaptopurine have a pivotal role in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, because of their complex metabolism and potential toxicities, optimal use of biomarkers to predict adverse effects and therapeutic response is paramount.

AIM

To provide a comprehensive review focused on pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics for safe and effective thiopurine therapy in IBD.

METHODS

A literature search up to July 2015 was performed in PubMed using a combination of relevant MeSH terms.

RESULTS

Pre-treatment thiopurine S-methyltransferase typing plus measurement of 6-tioguanine nucleotides and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels during treatment have emerged with key roles in facilitating safe and effective thiopurine therapy. Optimal use of these tools has been shown to reduce the risk of adverse effects by 3-7%, and to improve efficacy by 15-30%. For the introduction of aldehyde oxidase (AOX) into clinical practice, the association between AOX activity and AZA dose requirements should be positively confirmed. Inosine triphosphatase assessment associated with adverse effects also shows promise. Nucleoside diphosphate-linked moiety X-type motif 15 variants have been shown to predict myelotoxicity on thiopurines in East Asian patients. However, the impact of assessments of xanthine oxidase, glutathione S-transferase, hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase appears too low to favour incorporation into clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of thiopurine-related enzymes and metabolites reduces the risk of adverse effects and improves efficacy, and should be considered part of standard management. However, this approach will not predict or avoid all adverse effects, and careful clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients receiving thiopurines remains essential.

Physician Perspectives on Unresolved Issues in the Management of Ulcerative Colitis: The UC Horizons Project

BACKGROUND

There is still uncertainty about what constitutes the best therapeutic practice in ulcerative colitis (UC).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the "UC Horizons Project" was to raise a series of questions regarding the management of UC to provide responses based on the best scientific evidence available.

METHODS

The 11 members of the scientific committee prepared draft answers to the 10 questions from available evidence after a literature search. A total of 48 Spanish gastroenterology specialists nationwide participated in the project. The national meeting discussed the 10 issues in working groups and reached consensus regarding the recommendations by anonymous, interactive vote following the Delphi methodology. Final answers were developed, based on evidence and clinical experience of the participants.

RESULTS

All the recommendations achieved a high level of agreement in the plenary vote, although the quality of the evidence was markedly heterogeneous. The lowest percentage of agreement corresponded to the questions with the weakest level of evidence, highlighting the necessity of conducting further studies in these areas. The recommendations focused on (1) aminosalicylates therapy (regarding dose and appropriateness of coadministration with thiopurines), (2) corticosteroid therapy (regarding dose and route of administration), (3) thiopurine treatment (regarding indications and possibility of withdrawal), (4) anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy (regarding appropriateness of combination with thiopurines, intensification, or discontinuation of treatment), and (5) colorectal cancer (regarding risk and time trends).

CONCLUSIONS

The UC Horizons Project raised a series of eminently practical questions about the management of UC and provided responses based on the best scientific evidence available.

The Toronto Consensus Statements for the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Pregnancy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) poses a particular challenge during pregnancy because the health of both the mother and the fetus must be considered.

METHODS

A systematic literature search identified studies on the management of IBD during pregnancy. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 29 of the 30 recommendations considered. Preconception counseling and access to specialist care are paramount in optimizing disease management. In general, women on 5-ASA, thiopurine, or anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monotherapy for maintenance should continue therapy throughout pregnancy. Discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy or switching from combination therapy to monotherapy may be considered in very select low-risk patients. Women who have a mild to moderate disease flare while on optimized 5-ASA or thiopurine therapy should be managed with systemic corticosteroid or anti-TNF therapy, and those with a corticosteroid-resistant flare should start anti-TNF therapy. Endoscopy or urgent surgery should not be delayed during pregnancy if indicated. Decisions regarding cesarean delivery should be based on obstetric considerations and not the diagnosis of IBD alone, with the exception of women with active perianal Crohn's disease. With the exception of methotrexate, the use of medications for IBD should not influence the decision to breast-feed and vice versa. Live vaccinations are not recommended within the first 6 months of life in the offspring of women who were on anti-TNF therapy during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal management of IBD before and during pregnancy is essential to achieving favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Pharmacological- and non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches in inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are a group of chronic inflammatory conditions mainly of the colon and small intestine. Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are the most frequent types of IBD. IBD is a complex disease which arises as a result of the interaction of environmental, genetic and immunological factors. It is increasingly thought that alterations of immunological reactions of the patients to their own enterable bacteria (microfilm) may contribute to inflammation. It is characterized by mucosal and sub mucosal inflammation, perpetuated by infiltration of activated leukocytes. CD may affect the whole gastrointestinal tract while UC only attacks the large intestine. The therapeutic goal is to achieve a steroid-free long lasting remission in both entities. UC has the possibility to be cured by a total colectomy, while CD never can be cured by any operation. A lifelong intake of drugs is mostly necessary and essential. Medical treatment of IBD has to be individualized to each patient and usually starts with anti-inflammatory drugs. The choice what kind of drugs and what route administered (oral, rectal, intravenous) depends on factors including the type, the localization, and severity of the patient's disease. IBD may require immune-suppression to control symptoms such as prednisolone, thiopurines, calcineurin or sometimes folic acid inhibitors or biologics like TNF-α inhibitors or anti-integrin antibodies. For both types of disease (CD, UC) the same drugs are available but they differ in their preference in efficacy between CD and UC as 5-aminosalicylic acid for UC or budesonide for ileocecal CD. As therapeutic alternative the main mediators of the disease, namely the activated pro-inflammatory cytokine producing leukocytes can be selectively removed via two apheresis systems (Adacolumn and Cellsorba) in steroid-refractory or dependent cases. Extracorporeal photopheresis results in an increase of regulatory B cells, regulatory CD8(+) T cells and T-regs Type 1. Both types of apheresis were able to induce clinical remission and mucosal healing accompanied by tapering of steroids.

JAK inhibition using tofacitinib for inflammatory bowel disease treatment: a hub for multiple inflammatory cytokines

The inflammatory diseases ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease constitute the two main forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). They are characterized by chronic, relapsing inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, significantly impacting on patient quality of life and often requiring prolonged treatment. Existing therapies for IBD are not effective for all patients, and an unmet need exists for additional therapies to induce and maintain remission. Here we describe the mechanism of action of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, tofacitinib, for the treatment of IBD and the effect of JAK inhibition on the chronic cycle of inflammation that is characteristic of the disease. The pathogenesis of IBD involves a dysfunctional response from the innate and adaptive immune system, resulting in overexpression of multiple inflammatory cytokines, many of which signal through JAKs. Thus JAK inhibition allows multiple cytokine signaling pathways to be targeted and is expected to modulate the innate and adaptive immune response in IBD, thereby interrupting the cycle of inflammation. Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor that is being investigated as a targeted immunomodulator for IBD. Clinical development of tofacitinib and other JAK inhibitors is ongoing, with the aspiration of providing new treatment options for IBD that have the potential to deliver prolonged efficacy and clinically meaningful patient benefits.

A Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Therapeutic Outcomes of Infliximab- versus Tacrolimus-Based Strategies for Steroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

Background/Aims. Antitumor necrosis factor antibodies and calcineurin inhibitors have shown good therapeutic efficacy for steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Although some studies have compared the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) and cyclosporin A, there are no published studies comparing IFX and tacrolimus (Tac). This study aimed to compare therapeutic efficacies between IFX- and Tac-based strategies for steroid-refractory UC. Methods. Between July 2009 and August 2013, 95 patients with steroid-refractory UC received either IFX (n = 48) or Tac (n = 47) in our hospital. In the IFX group, the patients continued to receive maintenance treatment with IFX. In the Tac group, patients discontinued Tac treatment up to 3 months and subsequently received thiopurine. We retrospectively compared the therapeutic outcomes between the groups. Results. There was no significant difference in the colectomy-free rate, clinical remission rate, and clinical response rate at 2 months between the groups. However, relapse-free survival was significantly higher in the IFX group than in the Tac group (p < 0.001; log-rank test). The proportions of serious adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion. The findings of our study showed that IFX and Tac have similar short-term therapeutic efficacy for steroid-refractory UC. Maintenance treatment with IFX, however, yields better long-term outcomes than Tac-thiopurine bridging treatment.

Predictors of Thiopurine Treatment Failure in Biologic-Naïve Ulcerative Colitis Patients

INTRODUCTION

Thiopurines (azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine) have been used in the management of UC patients for over three decades. Nearly half of patients with UC treated with thiopurines fail to achieve remission or lose remission during treatment. Factors associated with thiopurine failure are poorly understood. The primary aim of our study was to investigate patient-related factors which are associated with thiopurine failure.

METHODS

TNF-alpha antagonist-naïve patients with histological diagnosis of UC, receiving thiopurine therapy, with follow-up data from 1 to 3 years were included in the study. Data regarding demographics, laboratory results, and disease characteristics were collected. The primary endpoint was failure of thiopurine therapy, defined as treatment with steroids, therapeutic escalation to TNF-alpha antagonist therapy, or need for surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 563 patients identified using ICD-9 codes, 78 TNF-alpha antagonist-naïve patients with a histological diagnosis of UC, receiving thiopurine treatment, were identified. Over the three-year follow-up period, 38 patients failed thiopurine treatment. On adjusted Cox regression, BMI < 25 kg/m(2) (HR 3, 95 % CI 1.55-5.83; p value = 0.001) was significantly associated with thiopurine failure. Furthermore, although not statistically significant, there was a strong trend toward thiopurine failure among patients with serum albumin level < 4 g/dL (HR 1.98, 95 % CI 0.97-4; p value = 0.06), non-smoking status (HR 2.2, 95 % CI 0.96-5.06; p value = 0.06), and higher degree of colon inflammation (HR 1.49, 95 % CI 0.96-2.32; p value = 0.08).

DISCUSSION

Our results show that low body mass index is associated with increased risk of failure of thiopurine treatment. Furthermore, there was a strong trend toward thiopurine failure among patients with low serum albumin level (<4gm/dL). These factors should be considered as markers of non-response to thiopurine monotherapy for patients with moderately severe ulcerative colitis.

Different Profile of Efficacy of Thiopurines in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines are effective drugs in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) even if studies that specifically investigate these drugs' profile of efficacy in UC compared with CD are scarce. Our aim was to compare the profile of efficacy of thiopurines in patients with UC and CD.

METHODS

We perfomed a longitudinal observational study evaluating steroid-free clinical remission (CR) and mucosal healing (MH) in all patients with UC and CD who would complete 2 years of maintenance treatment with thiopurines. In patients with UC, CR and MH were assessed before starting treatment and 2 years later using the Mayo score (CR = Mayo score <2; MH = Mayo subscore ≤1). In patients with CD, CR and MH were assessed at the same time points using the Crohn's disease activity index (CR = Crohn's disease activity index < 150) and the Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (MH = Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease < 2). The efficacy of thiopurines was assessed through intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

RESULTS

The study included 205 steroid-dependent patients (104 UC; 101 CD), 140 of whom (70 UC; 70 CD) completed the 2-year observation period. Steroid-free CR was recorded in 43 patients with UC and 37 with CD (intention-to-treat: 41% versus 36%; P = 0.6; per-protocol: 61% versus 53%; P = 0.4); MH was obtained in 38 patients with UC and 17 with CD (intention-to-treat: 36% versus 16%; P < 0.01; odds ratio, 2.9; per-protocol: 54% versus 25%; P < 0.01; odds ratio, 3.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurines are effective in maintaining steroid-free CR in both UC and CD although they show a better profile of efficacy in terms of MH in cases of UC.

Pharmacologic therapy for inflammatory bowel disease refractory to steroids

Although corticosteroids are an effective treatment for induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), many patients are dependent on or refractory to corticosteroids. This review is based on scrutinizing current literature with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and Cochrane reviews on the management of IBD refractory to corticosteroids. Based on this evidence, we propose algorithms and optimization strategies for use of immunomodulator and biologic therapy in IBD refractory to corticosteroids.

Body Mass Index and Smoking Affect Thioguanine Nucleotide Levels in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

INTRODUCTION

Optimal levels of the thiopurine metabolite, 6-thioguanine nucleotides [6-TGN] correlate with remission of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Apart from variations in the thiopurine methyl transferase [TPMT] gene, little is known about other predictors of 6-TGN levels. Obesity adversely affects response to infliximab and adalimumab and clinical course in IBD, but little is known about the interaction of thiopurines and obesity. We investigated the relationship between body mass index [BMI] and 6-TGN levels and sought to examine other predictors of 6-TGN levels.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with concurrent measurements of 6-TGN and BMI. The association between 6-TGN and clinical variables including BMI was estimated using a multivariable linear regression model.

RESULTS

Of 132 observations, 77 [58%] had Crohn's disease and 55 [42%] ulcerative colitis. BMI, smoking, and TPMT levels were associated with 6-TGN levels in multivariable analysis. Every 5kg/m(2) increase in BMI was associated with an 8% decrease in 6-TGN (0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.98; p = 0.009). Smokers had higher 6-TGN levels in comparison with non-/ex-smokers [1.43; 95% CI 1.02-2.02; p = 0.041]. Patients with intermediate TPMT had higher 6-TGN compared to those with normal levels [2.13; 95% CI 1.62-2.80; p < 0.001]. Obese patients were more likely to have sub-therapeutic 6-TGN levels and a higher methyl mercaptopurine nucleotide [MMPN/TGN] ratio despite a similar dose of thiopurines.

CONCLUSIONS

Active smoking and intermediate TPMT values were associated with higher 6-TGN levels but increasing BMI resulted in lower 6-TGN and higher MMPN levels. This may explain the worse outcome that has been reported previously in obese IBD subjects.

Prognosis of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Sustained Remission After Thiopurines Withdrawal

BACKGROUND

The ideal length of treatment with thiopurines in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in sustained remission remains unknown. It is widely accepted that the drug withdrawal is associated with a worse outcome. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome after this withdrawal and to identify predictors of relapse.

METHODS

A multicenter and retrospective study was designed. A total of 102 patients with UC who discontinued thiopurines in a situation of sustained remission were included. All the patients were followed up until last revision or until relapse (understood as the occurrence of signs and symptoms of UC that required a rescue treatment).

RESULTS

After thiopurines withdrawal, overall relapse was recorded in 32.35% of the patients: 18.88% in the first year, 36.48% in the third, and 43.04% in the fifth year after withdrawal. On multivariate analysis, predictors of relapse were the time from diagnosis of UC until the starting of thiopurines (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.02; P = 0.039), the number of relapses before the withdrawal (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.01-1.66; P = 0.029), pancolitis (HR, 5.01; 95% CI, 1.95-26.43; P = 0.028), the duration of treatment with thiopurines (HR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.66; P = 0.013) and the situation of biological remission at withdrawal (HR, 0.004; 95% CI, 0.0001-0.14; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The withdrawal of thiopurines in patients with UC, although in sustained remission, is related to a high relapse rate. Clinical variables such as the extent of the disease, the duration of treatment or time from diagnosis to the start of thiopurines should be considered before stopping these drugs.

Use of Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Consensus Statement by the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID)

BACKGROUND/AIMS

For decades, thiopurines have been the mainstay of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment and will play an important role in the future. However, complex metabolism and various side effects limit the use of these potent drugs in clinical practice. The Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases developed a set of consensus statements with the aim of guiding clinicians on the appropriate use of thiopurines in the management of IBD.

METHODS

Sixteen statements were initially drafted by five committee members. The quality of evidence and classification of recommendation were assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. The statements were then circulated to IBD experts in Korea for review, feedback, and then finalized and accepted by voting at the consensus meeting.

RESULTS

The consensus statements comprised four parts: (1) pre-treatment evaluation and management strategy, including value of thiopurine S-methyltransferase screening, dosing schedule, and novel biomarkers for predicting thiopurine-induced leukopenia; (2) treatment with thiopurines with regards to optimal duration of thiopurine treatment and long-term outcomes of combination therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factors; (3) safety of thiopurines, especially during pregnancy and lactation; and (4) monitoring side effects or efficacy of therapy using biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurines are an effective treatment option for patients with IBD. Management decisions should be individualized according to the risk of relapse and adverse events.

Inflammatory bowel disease meta-evidence and its challenges: is it time to restructure surgical research?

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the methodological quality and input paper characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses reported in the medical and surgical literature by performing a systematic 'overview of reviews'. Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) were used as the framework for this comparison as they are relatively common serious conditions, with both medical and surgical options for therapy.

METHOD

Medline, Embase, CINHAL and the Cochrane Database were searched to November 2013. Eligible papers were systematic reviews or meta-analyses that considered a question of therapy in CD or UC. Two independent reviewers selected the papers, extracted the data and scored their methodology using the AMSTAR scoring system. The papers were categorized into medical therapy (M), surgical therapy (S) or medical and surgical therapy (MS) groups. Following retrieval of the sample of meta-evidence papers, the original input studies used in their creation were identified and a search of Medline, Embase, CINHAL and the Cochrane Database was performed. A team of researchers then examined the collection of papers for bibliographic and financial information.

RESULTS

Five hundred papers were identified in the meta-evidence search, of which 118 were deemed eligible. There was a difference in the AMSTAR-rated average quality of the papers between the S and M group (S 7.36 vs M 8.75, P = 0.01). On average S papers were published in journals with a lower impact factor (S 3.26, M 5.04, MS 5.30, P < 0.001). S papers also showed more heterogeneity (I(2) ; S 37%, M 24%, MS 10%, P < 0.001). Some 25% of S meta-analyses used data-sets with significant heterogeneity (I(2) > 75%), compared with 8% of M meta-analyses and 3% of the MS meta-analyses. Some 5% of S papers were done on data sets that had I(2) values > 90%. There was no difference in the average number of papers assessed in each group, the average number of patients per meta-paper, the average time covered by the reviews, the average number of papers considered within each meta-analysis, or the average number of patients considered within each meta-analysis. Considering the conclusions of each meta-analysis, S meta-evidence was 50% more likely than M meta-evidence to be unable to make recommendations for practice. A total of 1499 original input papers were identified, of which 283 were used in more than one review. Within the non-repeated papers (n = 1023) the average impact factor within the S group was lower than that of the M and the MS groups (3.720 vs 11.230 vs 7.563, respectively; ANOVAP < 0.001). M papers had higher rates of pharmaceutical sponsorship than S papers (M 56% vs S 1%) and twice the level of government support (M 16% vs S 8%). Of note, 21% of M papers had corporate sponsorship but did not list any conflict of interest.

CONCLUSION

Compared with M meta-analyses, S meta-analyses in the UC and CD domain are more likely to be of poorer methodological quality, are of a greater degree of heterogeneity and less often offer a positive conclusion. The papers used to generate meta-evidence in M papers have a greater degree of corporate and government sponsorship, and are more likely to come from journals with higher impact factors.

Optimal Endpoint of Therapy in IBD: An Update on Factors Determining a Successful Drug Withdrawal

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are chronic inflammatory disorders, which require long term treatment to achieve remission and to prevent relapses and cancer. While current therapies are effective in most cases, they can have rare but serious side effects and are often associated with high costs. On the other hand, early discontinuation of an effective treatment may lead to a quick relapse and to complications at the restart of therapy. Therefore it is essential to determine the optimal duration of maintenance therapy, but clear guidelines are missing. The most important questions when deciding whether to continue or withdraw therapy in quiescent UC and CD patients are the efficacy of the continuous treatment to maintain remission in the long term, the frequency and severity of side effects, and the chance of relapse after discontinuation of therapy. This review summarizes the current knowledge on these topics with respect to 5-aminosalicylates, thiopurines, methotrexate, and biological therapies and collects information regarding when and in which specific patient groups, in the absence of risk factors, can withdrawal of therapy be considered without a high risk of relapse. Additionally, the particular aspect of colorectal cancer prevention by current therapies will also be discussed.

Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Thiopurine Maintenance Treatment in Japanese Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

Background/Aims

The long-term clinical outcomes of patients with bio-naive ulcerative colitis (UC) who maintain remission with thiopurine are unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with thiopurine in UC patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational cohort analysis conducted at a single center. Between December 1998 and August 2013, 59 of 87 patients with bio-naive UC who achieved remission after induction with treatments other than biologics were enrolled. Remission maintenance with thiopurine was defined as no concomitant treatment needed other than 5-aminosalicylate without relapse. We assessed the remission-maintenance rate, mucosal healing rate, colectomy-free rate, and treatment safety in UC patients who received thiopurine as maintenance treatment.

Results

The 84-month cumulative remission-maintenance and colectomy-free survival rates in the UC patients who were receiving maintenance treatment with thiopurine and 5-aminosalicylate were 43.9% and 88.0%, respectively. Of the 38 patients who underwent colonoscopy during thiopurine maintenance treatment, 23 (60.5%) achieved mucosal healing. Of the 59 patients who achieved clinical remission with thiopurine, 6 patients (10.2%) discontinued the thiopurine therapy because of adverse events.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates the long-term efficacy and safety of thiopurine treatment in patients with bio-naive UC.

Clinical practice guidelines for the medical management of nonhospitalized ulcerative colitis: the Toronto consensus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) has improved through the development of new therapies and novel approaches that optimize existing drugs. Previous Canadian consensus guidelines addressed the management of severe UC in the hospitalized patient. We now present consensus guidelines for the treatment of ambulatory patients with mild to severe active UC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search identified studies on the management of UC. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Statements were developed through an iterative online platform and then finalized and voted on by a working group of specialists.

RESULTS

The participants concluded that the goal of therapy is complete remission, defined as both symptomatic and endoscopic remission without corticosteroid therapy. The consensus includes 34 statements focused on 5 main drug classes: 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA), corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies, and other therapies. Oral and rectal 5-ASA are recommended first-line therapy for mild to moderate UC, with corticosteroid therapy for those who fail to achieve remission. Patients with moderate to severe UC should undergo a course of oral corticosteroid therapy, with transition to 5-ASA, thiopurine, anti-TNF (with or without thiopurine or methotrexate), or vedolizumab maintenance therapy in those who successfully achieve symptomatic remission. For patients with corticosteroid-resistant/dependent UC, anti-TNF or vedolizumab therapy is recommended. Timely assessments of response and remission are critical to ensuring optimal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal management of UC requires careful patient assessment, evidence-based use of existing therapies, and thorough assessment to define treatment success.

Factors associated with mucosal healing in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission

BACKGROUND

Mucosal healing (MH) has been associated with improved outcomes in ulcerative colitis but factors associated with MH are not well defined.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission (Mayo symptomatic subscore = 0) who had at least 1 colonoscopy since diagnosis from 6 centers were included. For patients who had at least 2 colonoscopies during follow-up, each colonoscopy was reviewed to define whether they had early MH (Mayo endoscopic subscore reduced to 0 within 3 yr of clinical remission). Factors associated with MH and early MH were determined using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-seven patients with ulcerative colitis (mean age 50.39 ± 14.10 yr; 56.5% male) were included. Independent factors for MH were clinical remission >3 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-13.1), mild/moderate mucosal inflammation (OR 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3-8.5), and immunosuppressant use (OR 4.6; 95% CI, 1.5-14.6). Among patients who had ≥2 of above factors, 74% achieved MH, whereas only 39% with <2 factors achieved MH (P < 0.001). Of patients in clinical remission <1 year, 1 to 3 years and >3 years, 30%, 45.9%, and 62.9% achieved MH, respectively. Immunosuppressant therapy was associated with early MH (P = 0.025). In multivariate analysis, patients with previous mild inflammation were more likely to achieve early MH than those with moderate/severe inflammation (OR 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.2).

CONCLUSIONS

A longer disease remission, previous less severe mucosal inflammation, and immunosuppressant use are associated with MH. Severity of mucosal inflammation and use of immunosuppressant are also associated with early MH.

Ulcerative Colitis: What is the Optimal Treatment Goal and How Do We Achieve It?

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment paradigms and therapeutic options for ulcerative colitis (UC) have rapidly evolved during the past decade. Traditionally, the treatment target has focused on achieving successful induction and maintenance of steroid-free clinical remission. This has been shown to provide a better quality of life and a reduction in complications, hospitalizations, and surgery. Recent studies, however, suggest that achieving "mucosal healing" or endoscopic remission may be the optimal treatment endpoint. In this review, we will examine the treatment goals for UC and the efficacy of each therapy to reach these targets. We will also review the therapeutic options available for UC: mesalamines, steroids, immunomodulators, and biologics, including the first anti-integrin inhibitor, approved in May 2014, for the treatment of UC. Therapeutic drug monitoring, which measures serum drug level and anti-drug antibody concentrations, is emerging as an important clinical decision tool in patients on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-antagonists. These evolving treatment strategies allow gastroenterologists to optimize control of the disease and offer patients a better quality of life.

Long-term efficacy and safety of azathioprine in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Azathioprine (AZA) is an established treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC).However, controversy exists regarding its efficacy in inducing and maintaining clinical remission, and long-term data are lacking. We studied the effectiveness of AZA in a large cohort of UC patients treated in a single center.

METHODS

All UC patients treated with AZA were identified from a prospective electronic database. We assessed response to therapy at 4 months and sustained clinical benefit at the last point of follow-up. We also examined predictors of response and sustained clinical benefit, as well as outcomes in those treated with AZA for >5 years.

RESULTS

The study included 255 patients. At 4 months, 207 (81.2%) of 255 patients were still on AZA and 163 (63.9%) had responded to therapy. At the last point of follow-up 164 (64.3%) patients were still receiving AZA, of whom 154 (60.4%) achieved sustained clinical benefit. This effect was durable among 71 patients who received AZA for >5 years, with 61 (85.9%) considered to have achieved sustained clinical benefit. Twenty-six patients required admission to hospital for an exacerbation during AZA treatment, 20 patients ultimately required biologic therapy, and 21 underwent colectomy. Only two (2.8%) of 71 patients receiving AZA for >5 years needed to escalate to a biologic therapy, and only one (1.4%) required a colectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

AZA is a safe and effective therapy in UC patients who fail 5-aminosalisylates in both the short and long term. Escalation to a biologic therapy or colectomy was unlikely among patients who were able to continue AZA therapy beyond 5 years.

Conventional drug therapy for inflammatory bowel disease

Most patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are offered conventional medical therapy, because emerging therapies for IBD are regulated by health-care jurisdiction and often limited to academic centres. This review distils current evidence to provide a pragmatic approach to conventional IBD therapy, including aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, methotrexate, calcineurin inhibitors, infliximab and adalimumab. It addresses drug efficacy, safety and salient practice points for optimal and appropriate practice.

[Management of diagnosis and treatment in ulcerative colitis]

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease limited to the mucosa and affecting the rectum and the colon continuously. Salicylates are the first line treatment for moderate forms. Corticosteroids are used to induce remission, but are not given as maintenance therapy. Thiopurines are indicated as maintenance therapy in case of failure of salicylates or cortico-dependence. Anti TNF alpha are indicated in cortico-resistant severe flares or if cortico- dependence. Vedolizumab (anti-integrin) is the first non anti-TNF alpha biotherapy available for the treatment of UC. Severe acute colitis is a medical emergency; diagnosis is based on Lichtiger score. An emergency colectomy for severe acute colitis is indicated in cases of surgical complication or resistance to medical therapy. UC patients with extension beyond splenic flexure are at risk of colorectal cancer, increasing with the duration of the disease, severity of mucosal inflammation, family history of colorectal cancer, and the existence of sclerosing cholangitis. Annual surveillance colonoscopy is required in patients with sclerosing cholangitis regardless of the extension of their UC.

Ulcerative colitis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by continuous mucosal inflammation that starts in the rectum and extends proximally. Typical presenting symptoms include bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, urgency, and tenesmus. In some cases, extraintestinal manifestations may be present as well. In the right clinical setting, the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis is based primarily on endoscopy, which typically reveals evidence of continuous colonic inflammation, with confirmatory biopsy specimens having signs of chronic colitis. The goals of therapy are to induce and maintain remission, decrease the risk of complications, and improve quality of life. Treatment is determined on the basis of the severity of symptoms and is classically a step-up approach. 5-Aminosalycilates are the mainstay of treatment for mild to moderate disease. Patients with failed 5-aminosalycilate therapy or who present with more moderate to severe disease are typically treated with corticosteroids followed by transition to a steroid-sparing agent with a thiopurine, anti-tumor necrosis factor agent, or adhesion molecule inhibitor. Despite medical therapies, approximately 15% of patients still require proctocolectomy. In addition, given the potential risks of complications from the disease itself and the medications used to treat the disease, primary care physicians play a key role in optimizing the preventive care to reduce the risk of complications.

Risk of colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis under thiopurine treatment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Little is known about the risk factors of colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) under thiopurine treatment. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and the predictive risk factors of colectomy in an extensive cohort of patients with UC treated with thiopurines in Spain.

METHODS

Among 5753 UC patients, we identified those diagnosed between 1980 and 2009 and treated with azathioprine or mercaptopurine (AZA/MP). We analyzed the age at diagnosis, familial history of IBD, extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs), disease extent, smoking status and treatment requirements (AZA/MP, cyclosporine (CsA) or anti-TNFα). Colectomies for dysplasia or cancer were excluded. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression were performed. Results were reported as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI.

RESULTS

Among the 1334 cases included, 119 patients (8.9%) required colectomy after a median time of 26 months (IQR 12-42) after AZA/MP initiation. Independent predictors of colectomy were: Extensive UC (HR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.6), EIMs (HR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0-2.4), need for antiTNFα (HR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.5-3.4) and need for CsA (HR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.6-3.7). Patients requiring early introduction of AZA/MP had an increased risk of colectomy with a HR of 4.9 (95% CI: 3.2-7.8) when AZA/MP started in the first 33 months after UC diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one-tenth of patients with UC under thiopurines require colectomy. Extensive UC, EIMs, need for CsA or anti-TNFα ever and an early need for AZA/MP treatment were associated with a higher risk of colectomy. These risk factors of colectomy could help to stratify risk in further controlled studies in UC.

The incidence rate of colectomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis has declined in parallel with increasing anti-TNF use: a time-trend study

BACKGROUND

Medical therapy is standard treatment for ulcerative colitis with colectomy reserved for medically refractory disease or malignancy. The introductions of ciclosporin in 1994 and anti-TNF therapy in 2005 have extended medical management options.

AIM

To determine whether the colectomy incidence rate for medically refractory ulcerative colitis has changed since the introduction of anti-TNF therapy.

METHODS

Adult patients with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and who subsequently underwent an urgent or elective colectomy for medically refractory disease in Edmonton, Canada between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2011 were identified. Log-linear regression was used to estimate the annual percent change in the total colectomy incidence rate (urgent and elective combined) and the urgent and elective incidence rates individually, before and after 2005, the year infliximab was approved for use in ulcerative colitis. Temporal trends of drug utilisation in this study population were also described.

RESULTS

During 1998-2011, 481 patients with ulcerative colitis underwent a colectomy for medically refractory disease. There was negligible change in the total colectomy incidence rate from 1998 to 2005, with an annual percent change of 4.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.12% to 10.16%). From 2005-2011, following the approval and increasing use of anti-TNF therapy, the total colectomy incidence rate decreased by 16.1% (95% CI: -21.32% to -10.54%) every year to 0.9 per 100 ulcerative colitis patients in 2011.

CONCLUSION

The total incidence rate of colectomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis has declined substantially since 2005, paralleling the increased use of anti-TNF therapy in this patient population.

Current approaches to the management of new-onset ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, inflammatory gastrointestinal disease of the colon. As a chronic condition, UC follows a relapsing and remitting course with medical maintenance during periods of quiescent disease and appropriate escalation of therapy during times of flare. Initial treatment strategies must not only take into account current clinical presentation (with specific regard for extent and severity of disease activity) but must also take into consideration treatment options for the long-term. The following review offers an approach to new-onset UC with a focus on early treatment strategies. An introduction to the disease entity is provided along with an approach to initial diagnosis. Stratification of patients based on clinical parameters, disease extent, and severity of illness is paramount to determining course of therapy. Frequent assessments are required to determine clinical response, and treatment intensification may be warranted if expected improvement goals are not appropriately reached. Mild-to- moderate UC can be managed with aminosalicylates, mesalamine, and topical corticosteroids with oral corticosteroids reserved for unresponsive cases. Moderate-to-severe UC generally requires oral or intravenous corticosteroids in the short-term with consideration of long-term management options such as biologic agents (as initial therapy or in transition from steroids) or thiopurines (as bridging therapy). Patients with severe or fulminant UC who are recalcitrant to medical therapy or who develop disease complications (such as toxic megacolon) should be considered for colectomy. Early surgical referral in severe or refractory UC is crucial, and colectomy may be a life-saving procedure. The authors provide a comprehensive evidence-based approach to current treatment options for new-onset UC with discussion of long-term therapeutic efficacy and safety, patient-centered perspectives including quality of life and medication compliance, and future directions in related inflammatory bowel disease care.

Current and emerging maintenance therapies for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic idiopathic intestinal disease that requires life-long maintenance therapy to maintain clinical remission. This article reviews the current literature on maintenance treatments in UC. It examines the natural history of the condition and the proposed benefits of treatment. These include improving quality of life parameters, decreasing corticosteroid intake, the prevention of relapse, the prevention of colorectal cancer and the avoidance of colectomy. The immunosuppressive era appears to be reducing the need for elective colectomy in UC. The article explores the classes of drug currently used for maintenance of UC, reviews the literature around adherence issues, and summarizes emerging agents in this space.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the declining risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the magnitude of this effect is open to debate.

AIM

To assess the risk of CRC in UC patients by systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed up to November 2013. We selected studies describing the incidence and prevalence of CRC in patients with UC. Articles were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Cumulative incidence and incidence rates of CRC were combined and analysed using the generic inverse variance method. Sub-analyses were performed to identify factors associated with an increased risk of developing CRC.

RESULTS

A total of 81 studies (181 923 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The incidence rate of CRC in patients with UC was 1.58 per 1000 patient-years (py) [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39–1.76]. Results were heterogeneous (I2 = 81–89%). The incidence rate was 4.02/1000 py (95%CI = 2.74–5.31) in studies that only included patients with extensive colitis, and 1.24/1000 py (95%CI = 1.01–1.47) in population-based studies. The incidence rate was 0.91/1000 py (95%CI = 0.61–1.2) in the first decade of disease, 4.07/1000 py (95%CI = 2.58–5.56) in the second, and 4.55/1000 py (95%CI = 2.64–6.46) in the third. The incidence rate decreased from 4.29/1000 py in the studies published in the 1950s to 1.21/1000 py in studies published in the last decade.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of patients with ulcerative colitis developing colorectal cancer has decreased steadily over the last six decades, but the extent and duration of the disease increase this risk.

Association between 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels and clinical remission in inflammatory disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A previous meta-analysis suggested that 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels are associated with clinical remission in inflammatory bowel disease. It was criticized because of the relatively small number of patients included in this meta-analysis and heterogeneity between studies. Recent studies provided conflicting results, and the source of those discrepancies has yet to be explored.

METHODS

A comprehensive, computerized literature search was conducted in Medline, ISI Web of Science, and EMBASE until December 31, 2012. A combined odd ratio with its 95% confidence interval was calculated using a fixed effects model based on the Mantel-Haenszel method. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q statistic.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies enrolling 2049 patients with inflammatory bowel disease were analyzed. A significant heterogeneity was found in the overall analysis (P = 0.005). As heterogeneity among studies could be explained by differences in metabolite assay methods, an analysis including only studies using the reference method by Lennard et al (N = 10) was performed, and the pooled odds ratio for clinical remission among patients with 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels over a cut-off value between 230 and 260 pmol/8.10^8 RBC was 3.15 (95% confidence interval, 2.41-4.11).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis clearly establishes an association between 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels and clinical remission rates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and explains the heterogeneity of results among selected studies. The lack of standardization in 6-thioguanine nucleotides assays is responsible for recent contradictory results. Whether therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurines should be systematically used in clinical practice in inflammatory bowel disease to improve disease outcomes will require further investigation.