Objective measures of health-related quality of life over 24 months post-liver transplantation

Quality of life after liver transplantation. A systematic review

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although many studies have reported significant improvements in quality of life (QOL) after liver transplantation (LT), consistent data on areas of improvement are lacking. To perform a systematic review on medical literature of QOL after LT paying particular attention to studies that utilized the most commonly adopted study instrument, Short Form-36 (SF-36).

METHODS

To collect studies focused on QOL in adult LT recipients, from 1963 to 2007, cited in Pub Med, Embase or Cochrane databases. From an initial identification of 613 articles, we selected 44 longitudinal studies with pre- and post-LT data that we assessed using a sign test, and 19 used SF-36, which we analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Longitudinal data showed remarkable improvement of common domains of QOL comparing pre- and post-transplant items. However, analysis of 16 SF-36 cross-sectional studies comparing post-LT patient domains with control population showed significantly higher ratings for controls in six while no differences were found in two.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that whereas general QOL improves after LT, when compared with healthy controls, LT recipients have significant deficits in QOL. Consequently, the previously reported QOL benefits after LT may have been overstated.

Liver transplantation and quality of life: relevance of a specific liver disease questionnaire

AIM

A positive effect of liver transplantation on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has been well documented in previous studies using generic instruments. Our aim was to re-evaluate different aspects of HRQOL before and after liver transplantation with a relatively new questionnaire the 'liver disease quality of life' (LDQOL).

METHODS

The LDQOL and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires were applied to ambulatory patients, either in the transplant list (n=65) or after 6 months to 5 years of liver transplant (n=61). The aetiology of cirrhosis, comorbidities, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) Child-Pugh scores and recurrence of liver disease after liver transplantation were analysed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskall-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

In patients awaiting liver transplantation, MELD scores > or =15 and Child-Pugh class C showed statistically significant worse HRQOL, using both the SF-36 and the LDQOL questionnaires. HRQOL in pretransplant patients was found to be significantly worse in those with cirrhosis owing to hepatitis C (n=30) when compared with other aetiologies (n=35) in 2/7 domains of the SF-36 and in 7/12 domains of the LDQOL. Significant deterioration of HRQOL after recurrence of hepatitis C post-transplant was detected with the LDQOL questionnaire although not demonstrated with the SF-36. The statistically significant differences were in the LDQOL domains: symptoms of liver disease, concentration, memory and health distress.

CONCLUSIONS

The LDQOL, a specific instrument for measuring HRQOL, has shown a greater accuracy in relation to liver symptoms and could demonstrate, with better reliability, impairments before and after liver transplantation.

Rates and Risk Factors for Nonadherence to the Medical Regimen After Adult Solid Organ Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite the impact of medical regimen nonadherence on health outcomes after organ transplantation, there is mixed and conflicting evidence regarding the prevalence and predictors of posttransplant nonadherence. Clinicians require precise information on nonadherence rates in order to evaluate patients' risks for this problem.

METHODS

A total of 147 studies of kidney, heart, liver, pancreas/kidney-pancreas, or lung/heart-lung recipients published between 1981 and 2005 were included in a meta-analysis. Average nonadherence rates were calculated for 10 areas of the medical regimen. Correlations between nonadherence and patient psychosocial risk factors were examined.

RESULTS

Across all types of transplantation, average nonadherence rates ranged from 1 to 4 cases per 100 patients per year (PPY) for substance use (tobacco, alcohol, illicit drugs), to 19 to 25 cases per 100 PPY for nonadherence to immunosuppressants, diet, exercise, and other healthcare requirements. Rates varied significantly by transplant type in two areas: immunosuppressant nonadherence was highest in kidney recipients (36 cases per 100 PPY vs. 7 to 15 cases in other recipients). Failure to exercise was highest in heart recipients (34 cases per 100 PPY vs. 9 to 22 cases in other recipients). Demographics, social support, and perceived health showed little correlation with nonadherence. Pretransplant substance use predicted posttransplant use.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimated nonadherence rates, overall and by transplant type, allow clinicians to gauge patient risk and target resources accordingly. Nonadherence rates in some areas--including immunosuppressant use--appear unacceptably high. Weak correlations of most patient psychosocial factors with nonadherence suggest that attention should focus on other classes of variables (e.g., provider-related and systems-level factors), which may be more influential.

Quality of life in hepatitis C

A number of different studies have shown a clear reduction in the quality of life of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver-disease patients. Quality of life can be assessed by means of both generic and specific instruments, depending on the aim of the study and the population being studied. The application of a specific instrument to patients with liver diseases provides a broader assessment of different parameters related to hepatic disorders. In hepatitis C, alterations such as the stigma of liver disease, concerns about the disease and symptoms of the disease could be demonstrated with this type of instrument. The impact of the diagnosis of hepatitis C, a potentially serious disease, and the presence of comorbidities such as alcohol and drugs may lead to lower quality of life. Longitudinal studies have proved that, following diagnosis, the stigma of liver disease becomes more apparent over time. Women report worse quality of life than men, supporting that gender differences in hepatitis are also important when assessing quality of life. Alterations in the quality of life of patients submitted to treatment are mainly related to the somatic side effects of Interferon and Ribavirin and are most noticeable in the first weeks of therapy. Early improvement in the quality of life of patients who become HCV-RNA negative suggests that the virus itself plays a biological role. There is no doubt that liver transplantation leads to an improvement in quality of life. Nevertheless, a major concern is the relapse of HCV, with the associated lower quality of life.

A randomized trial of exercise and dietary counseling after liver transplantation

We report results of a randomized clinical trial of a combined intervention of exercise and dietary counseling (ExD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Of the 151 patients randomized into ExD or usual care (UC), 119 completed testing 2, 6 and 12 months post-OLT. Testing included assessment of exercise capacity (VO(2peak)), quadricep muscle strength, body composition (DXA), nutritional intake (Block 95) and health-related quality of life (SF-36). The intervention consisted of individualized counseling and follow-up to home-based exercise and dietary modification. Repeated measure ANOVA was performed to determine differences over time between ExD and UC with a secondary analysis to determine differences over time between adherers (Adh), nonadherers (Nadh) to the intervention and UC. The ExD group showed greater increases in VO(2peak) (p = 0.036), and self-reported general health (p = 0.038) compared to UC. Both groups demonstrated increases in muscle strength, body weight, body fat and other SF-36 scale scores. Adherence to the intervention was 37% with positive trends in VO(2peak) and body composition observed in Adh compared to Nadh and UC. These data suggest improvements in exercise capacity and body composition are achieved with nutrition and exercise behavior modifications initiated early after OLT and with regular follow-up.