Emollients improve treatment results with topical corticosteroids in childhood atopic dermatitis: a randomized comparative study

Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: Section 4. Prevention of disease flares and use of adjunctive therapies and approaches

Atopic dermatitis is a common, chronic inflammatory dermatosis that can affect all age groups. This evidence-based guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in its management. In this final section, treatments for flare prevention and adjunctive and complementary therapies and approaches are reviewed. Suggestions on use are given based on available evidence.

Impact of Atopic Dermatitis on Health-Related Quality of Life among Infants and Children in Singapore: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction:

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing skin disease that affects about 20.8% of children between seven to 16 years old in Singapore. Impairment in quality of life for one with AD is greater than childhood chronic disease like epilepsy or asthma. This study aims to describe the areas of health-related quality of life affected by AD in a cross-sectional survey of infants and children in Singapore.

Methods:

Thirty-four children aged 0 to 16 years old with atopic eczema were recruited. Quality of life was measured using Infant's Dermatitis Quality of Life Index in children aged four years and below and Children's Dermatitis Life Quality Index was used in children between five to 16 years old.

Results:

Children with severe disease experience significant impact on quality of life compared to those with mild/moderate disease. Itching and sleep disturbance are the two items in the top three domains for both the younger and older children. Impairment in participation in family activities was significant in boys compared with girls. Social impact on girls is greater compared to boys with a trend towards significance.

Conclusion:

This study shows that quality of life in patients with AD is affected. There appears to be gender and racial differences in some of the domains affected. Future studies should investigate the differences seen and the need for better holistic management of AD, taking into consideration the various needs of the different patient groups.

Effect of emollients containing vegetable-derived lactobacillus in the treatment of atopic dermatitis symptoms: split-body clinical trial

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) patients suffer from xerosis. Proper skin care, including the use of emollients, may help improve xerosis and minimize disease exacerbation. Lactobacillus sakei probio 65, isolated from the Korean vegetable-based product kimchi, can decrease interleukin 4 and immunoglobulin E levels and inhibit Staphylococcus aureus. Moreover, it has reportedly shown positive dermatological effects in both animal and clinical studies.

Objective

To compare the effects of an emollient that contains Lactobacillus (treated) with a normal emollient (control) on AD.

Methods

This double-blind, randomized, split-body clinical trial involved 28 patients with AD. The patients applied the Lactobacillus-containing emollient on one side of their body and the control emollient on the other side twice daily for 4 weeks. Trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin capacitance were evaluated and investigator global assessment and the visual analogue scale (VAS) were administered on weeks 0, 1, 2, and 4.

Results

The treated sides had significantly lower TEWL and VAS values and significantly higher skin capacitance values over time than the control sides.

Conclusion

Topical application of Lactobacillus-containing emollients may improve the skin permeability of patients with AD.

Children with dry skin and atopic predisposition: daily use of emollients in a participant-blinded, randomized, prospective trial

BACKGROUND

Dry skin reflects a skin barrier defect which can lead to atopic dermatitis. Little is known about the distinct effects of emollient use in children with dry skin and atopic predisposition.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effects of daily application of pressed ice plant juice (PIPJ)-based emollients and petrolatum-based emollients.

METHODS

Children aged 2-6 years with dry skin and atopic predisposition were randomized into 2 groups: group 1 received emollients containing PIPJ and natural lipids, while group 2 received petrolatum-based emollients. Skin condition and biophysical properties of the skin barrier were assessed at inclusion and weeks 4, 12 and 16.

RESULTS

Skin condition improved significantly in all children. Comparing the groups, children treated with emollients containing PIPJ showed significantly higher stratum corneum hydration values and significantly lower transepidermal water loss values at week 16 on the forearm and forehead. A significant decrease in skin pH was noted in group 2 on the forearm and forehead; group 1 showed a stable course.

CONCLUSION

Early intervention with emollients in children with dry skin condition and atopic predisposition may improve their skin condition during daily emollient application. PIPJ-based formulations may be helpful to maintain skin barrier integrity.

Management of difficult-to-treat atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a complex disorder caused by the interplay between multiple genetic and environmental factors. Particularly in patients with severe disease, the effect is not just an itchy rash but also the secondary effects on the psychological well-being of the patient and their carers, particularly disturbed sleep. The aim of this review is to provide health care professionals with a holistic approach to the management of difficult-to-treat atopic dermatitis, defined as atopic dermatitis seemingly unresponsive to simple moisturizers and mild potency (classes VI and VII) topical corticosteroids. The critical importance of education and advice is emphasized, as is the seminal role of secondary bacterial infection and polyclonal T-cell activation in causing acute flares in patients with severe, generalized disease. In atypical cases or those that do not respond to treatment, alternative diagnoses should be considered.

Guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) part I

The existing evidence for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis, AE) is evaluated using the national standard Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation. The consensus process consisted of a nominal group process and a DELPHI procedure. Management of AE must consider the individual symptomatic variability of the disease. Basic therapy is focused on hydrating topical treatment, and avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. Anti-inflammatory treatment based on topical glucocorticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) is used for exacerbation management and more recently for proactive therapy in selected cases. Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy, but the TCI tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are preferred in certain locations. Systemic immune-suppressive treatment is an option for severe refractory cases. Microbial colonization and superinfection may induce disease exacerbation and can justify additional antimicrobial treatment. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation preferably with UVA1 wavelength or UVB 311 nm. Dietary recommendations should be specific and given only in diagnosed individual food allergy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy to aeroallergens may be useful in selected cases. Stress-induced exacerbations may make psychosomatic counselling recommendable. 'Eczema school' educational programs have been proven to be helpful. Pruritus is targeted with the majority of the recommended therapies, but some patients need additional antipruritic therapies.

Effect of moisturizers on epidermal barrier function

A daily moisturizing routine is a vital part of the management of patients with atopic dermatitis and other dry skin conditions. The composition of the moisturizer determines whether the treatment strengthens or deteriorates the skin barrier function, which may have consequences for the outcome of the dermatitis. One might expect that a patient's impaired skin barrier function should improve in association with a reduction in the clinical signs of dryness. Despite visible relief of the dryness symptoms, however, the abnormal transepidermal water loss has been reported to remain high, or even to increase under certain regimens, whereas other moisturizers improve skin barrier function. Differing outcomes have also been reported in healthy skin: some moisturizers produce deterioration in skin barrier function and others improve the skin. Possible targets for barrier-influencing moisturizing creams include the intercellular lipid bilayers, where the fraction of lipids forming a fluid phase might be changed due to compositional or organizational changes. Other targets are the projected size of the corneocytes or the thickness of the stratum corneum. Moisturizers with barrier-improving properties may delay relapse of dermatitis in patients with atopic dermatitis. In a worst-case scenario, treatment with moisturizing creams could increase the risks of dermatitis and asthma.

Barrier-restoring therapies in atopic dermatitis: current approaches and future perspectives

Atopic dermatitis is a multifactorial, chronic relapsing, inflammatory disease, characterized by xerosis, eczematous lesions, and pruritus. The latter usually leads to an “itch-scratch” cycle that may compromise the epidermal barrier. Skin barrier abnormalities in atopic dermatitis may result from mutations in the gene encoding for filaggrin, which plays an important role in the formation of cornified cytosol. Barrier abnormalities render the skin more permeable to irritants, allergens, and microorganisms. Treatment of atopic dermatitis must be directed to control the itching, suppress the inflammation, and restore the skin barrier. Emollients, both creams and ointments, improve the barrier function of stratum corneum by providing it with water and lipids. Studies on atopic dermatitis and barrier repair treatment show that adequate lipid replacement therapy reduces the inflammation and restores epidermal function. Efforts directed to develop immunomodulators that interfere with cytokine-induced skin barrier dysfunction, provide a promising strategy for treatment of atopic dermatitis. Moreover, an impressive proliferation of more than 80 clinical studies focusing on topical treatments in atopic dermatitis led to growing expectations for better therapies.

Management of itch in atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a common, pruritic, inflammatory skin disorder. Chronic, localized, or even generalized pruritus is the diagnostic hallmark of atopic dermatitis, and its management remains a challenge for physicians. The threshold for itch and alloknesis is markedly reduced in these patients, and infections can promote exacerbation and thereby increase the itch. Modern management consists of anti-inflammatory, occasionally antiseptic, as well as antipruritic therapies to address the epidermal barrier as well as immunomodulation or infection. Mild forms of atopic dermatitis may be controlled with topical therapies, but moderate-to-severe forms often require a combination of systemic treatments consisting of antipruritic and immunosuppressive drugs, phototherapy, and topical compounds. In addition, patient education and a therapeutic regimen to help the patient cope with the itch and eczema are important adjuvant strategies for optimized long-term management. This review highlights various topical, systemic, and complementary and alternative therapies, as well as provide a therapeutic ladder for optimized long-term control of itch in atopic dermatitis.

Topical fluticasone propionate: intervention and maintenance treatment options of atopic dermatitis based on a high therapeutic index

Fluticasone propionate (FP), a medium potent glucocorticoid (class III) of carbothioate nature with a favourable benefit/risk ratio, has emerged as a standard medication for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin disorders, in particular atopic dermatitis (AD). FP is available as a 0.05% cream and a 0.005% ointment formulation. The glucocorticoid is characterized by high lipophilicity, high affinity binding to the glucocorticoid receptor and a rapid hepatic biotransformation. Though skin blanching following topical application of FP surpasses that given with glucocorticoids of medium strength, clinical trials show a low potential of FP for local and systemic adverse effects. Even in paediatric patients with AD as well as in difficult-to-treat areas like face, eyelids and intertriginous areas, FP proved to be both effective and safe. Thus, the therapeutic effects of FP clearly outweigh the unwanted effects. Correspondingly, a therapeutic index of 2.0 can be attributed to this glucocorticoid. In this respect, topical FP does not differ from other topical glucocorticoids with increased benefit-to-risk ratio, e.g. prednicarbate, methylprednisolone aceponate and mometasone furoate. However, randomized controlled trials do not only support conventional intervention but also innovative maintenance treatment.

Optimizing the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children: a review of the benefit/risk ratio of methylprednisolone aceponate

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, recurring, pruritic, inflammatory skin condition which has its onset in early childhood in most cases. A stepped approach to therapy, starting with emollients and adding first mild and then more potent topical medications is recommended. For more than 50 years, topical corticosteroids (TCs) have been the gold standard in AD therapy. Increasingly potent TCs have tended to come with increasing risk of adverse events, however. Calculating the benefit/risk ratio [or therapeutic index (TIX)] for TCs when treating children and infants is more challenging in this population. Not only does their increased surface area to volume ratio as a result of their small size mean that they are likely to absorb a greater proportion of any active agent applied to their skin, but drug metabolism is slower than in adults and the systemic effects of corticosteroids are more pronounced (in particular reduction of serum cortisol levels through suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis). Unlike traditional TCs, topical calcineurin inhibitors are not associated with the systemic effects and have shown good efficacy in treating AD in children. Parental/Carer concerns about their long-term use can limit their acceptance for treatment in the paediatric population, however. Modifications to the structure of fourth generation corticosteroids mean that increased potency is not accompanied by increased risk of adverse events and hence they have an improved TIX. Methylprednisolone aceponate is a potent fourth generation corticosteroid which has demonstrated efficacy and safety in acute and maintenance programmes in infants and children. It is licenced for once-daily use, and is available in four formulations - ointment, fatty ointment, cream and milk, which combine with its improved TIX to meet the needs of young patients and their carers.

A pilot study of emollient therapy for the primary prevention of atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Prevention strategies in atopic dermatitis (AD) using allergen avoidance have not been consistently effective. New research reveals the importance of the skin barrier in the development of AD and possibly food allergy and asthma. Correcting skin barrier defects from birth may prevent AD onset or moderate disease severity.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the feasibility of skin barrier protection as a novel AD prevention strategy.

METHODS

We enrolled 22 neonates at high risk for developing AD in a feasibility pilot study using emollient therapy from birth.

RESULTS

No intervention-related adverse events occurred in our cohort followed up for a mean time of 547 days. Of the 20 subjects who remained in the study, 3 (15.0%) developed AD, suggesting a protective effect when compared with historical controls. Skin barrier measurements remained within ranges seen in normal-appearing skin.

LIMITATIONS

No conclusions regarding efficacy can be made without a control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin barrier repair from birth represents a novel and feasible approach to AD prevention. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy of this approach.

Update on the management of chronic eczema: new approaches and emerging treatment options

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common disease with worldwide prevalence, affecting up to 20% of children and 3% of adults. Recent evidence regarding pathogenesis has implicated epidermal barrier defects deriving from filagrin mutations with resulting secondary inflammation. In this report, the authors comprehensively review the literature on atopic dermatitis therapy, including topical and systemic options. Most cases of AD will benefit from emollients to enhance the barrier function of skin. Topical corticosteroids are first-line therapy for most cases of AD. Topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus ointment, pimecrolimus cream) are considered second line therapy. Several novel barrier-enhancing prescription creams are also available. Moderate to severe cases inadequately controlled with topical therapy may require phototherapy or systemic therapy. The most commonly employed phototherapy modalites are narrow-band UVB, broadband UVB, and UVA1. Traditional systemic therapies include short-term corticosteroids, cyclosporine (considered to be the gold standard), methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and most recently leflunamide. Biologic therapies include recombinant monoclonal antibodies acting on the immunoglobulin E / interleukin-5 pathway (omalizumab, mepolizumab), acting as tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab), and acting as T-cell (alefacept) and B-cell (rituxumab) inhibitors, as well as interferon γ and intravenous immunoglobulin. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability are reviewed for each medication.

Atopic dermatitis: a review of topical treatment options

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, pruritic, inflammatory skin disease with a wide range of severity, and is usually the first manifestation of atopic disease. It is one of the most common skin disorders in developed countries, affecting approximately 20% of children and 1-3% of adults. Symptoms such as eczematous papules, plaques, and itch, and their associated consequences, such as sleep disturbance, can significantly impact the quality of life of the patient and family.

SCOPE

This is a broad-based review focusing on clinical practice for primary care physicians treating patients with AD. The PubMed database was searched (to 1 November 2008) for English-language articles containing the keywords atopic dermatitis, atopic eczema, topical calcineurin inhibitor, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, or corticosteroid. Articles focusing on clinical practice for patients with AD were chosen for further review. A limitation is that this is not a systematic review of the literature.

FINDINGS

Emollients have long been used to maintain the skin barrier function in patients with AD. Topical corticosteroids have been the pillar of medicated therapy for AD since their introduction nearly 50 years ago. The introduction of topical calcineurin inhibitors more than 8 years ago represented the first new class of medication approved for the treatment of AD since topical corticosteroids. Topical calcineurin inhibitors provide targeted anti-inflammatory activity without the local or systemic side-effects seen with topical corticosteroids. More recently, three new, nonsteroidal, barrier creams (Atopiclair * , Mimyx dagger , and Epiceram double dagger ) have entered the marketplace for AD treatment. A multi-therapeutic approach that incorporates short-term management of flares and longer-term strategies to prolong the time between flares is needed for the treatment of AD.

CONCLUSION

Multiple topical therapies have been successfully used to treat patients with AD. An understanding of the available treatment options will help primary care providers striving to achieve best practice in the management of AD.

Are the new moisturizers more effective?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The authors discuss the role of moisturizers in the daily skin care regimen of healthy skin and in atopic dermatitis, as well as the efficacy of newer products.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent findings have shown that the affected skin of atopic individuals is deficient in ceramides, an integral lipid component of the stratum corneum. Several manufacturers have developed topical products with ceramides in an attempt to replace the missing molecules. These products, though more expensive, have shown moderate efficacy improvements over traditional moisturizers.

SUMMARY

Moisturizers are recommended to nearly every atopic patient, and should be part of the daily skin care of these patients, as they have the potential to reduce the quantity of topical steroids necessary to keep disease quiescent. The vast array of choices available to consumers is overwhelming, and most patients would like their physicians to recommend specific products. We attempt to provide a review of the newer products available, with special emphasis on those products that contain ceramides.

Treatment with a barrier-strengthening moisturizing cream delays relapse of atopic dermatitis: a prospective and randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) is based on topical glucocorticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors to treat flares combined with moisturizer treatment to alleviate dry skin symptoms. Patients with AD have an abnormal skin barrier function, and strategies for reducing the risks for eczema would be to repair the barrier or prevent barrier dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to explore the time to relapse of eczema during a 26-week maintenance treatment with a urea containing moisturizer compared to no treatment (neither medical nor non-medicated preparations) after successful clearing of atopic lesions. The moisturizer has previously been shown to improve skin barrier function.

METHODS

Patients applied betamethasone valerate (0.1%) on eczematous lesions during a 3-week period. Those with cleared eczema entered a 26-week maintenance phase, applying the moisturizer or left the previously affected area untreated. Upon eczema relapse, patients were instructed to contact the clinic and to have the relapse confirmed by the investigator.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients entered the study and 44 patients were included in the maintenance phase (22 using moisturizer twice daily and 22 using no treatment). Median time to relapse for patients treated with moisturizer was > 180 days (duration of the study) compared with 30 days for the no-treatment group. Sixty-eight per cent of the patients treated with the moisturizer and 32% of the untreated patients remained free from eczema during the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance treatment with a barrier-improving urea moisturizer on previous eczematous areas reduced the risk of relapse to approximately one third of that of no treatment.