Everolimus plus early tacrolimus minimization: a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicentre trial in renal transplantation

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Everolimus: A Consensus Report

In 2014, the Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology called a meeting of international experts to provide recommendations to guide therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus (EVR) and its optimal use in clinical practice. EVR is a potent inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, approved for the prevention of organ transplant rejection and for the treatment of various types of cancer and tuberous sclerosis complex. EVR fulfills the prerequisites for TDM, having a narrow therapeutic range, high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, and established drug exposure-response relationships. EVR trough concentrations (C0) demonstrate a good relationship with overall exposure, providing a simple and reliable index for TDM. Whole-blood samples should be used for measurement of EVR C0, and sampling times should be standardized to occur within 1 hour before the next dose, which should be taken at the same time everyday and preferably without food. In transplantation settings, EVR should be generally targeted to a C0 of 3-8 ng/mL when used in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs (calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids); in calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens, the EVR target C0 range should be 6-10 ng/mL. Further studies are required to determine the clinical utility of TDM in nontransplantation settings. The choice of analytical method and differences between methods should be carefully considered when determining EVR concentrations, and when comparing and interpreting clinical trial outcomes. At present, a fully validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay is the preferred method for determination of EVR C0, with a lower limit of quantification close to 1 ng/mL. Use of certified commercially available whole-blood calibrators to avoid calibration bias and participation in external proficiency-testing programs to allow continuous cross-validation and proof of analytical quality are highly recommended. Development of alternative assays to facilitate on-site measurement of EVR C0 is encouraged.

Systematic Review on Role of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors as an Alternative to Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplant: Challenges and Window to Excel

OBJECTIVES

This review focuses on the current limited evidence of graft function and graft survival in various immunosuppressive regimens involving mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors with or without calcineurin inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the current literature for describing the role of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Crossref, and Scopus databases using medical subject heading terms.

RESULTS

Our detailed analyses of all relevant literature showed use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based de novo regimens, early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal with subsequent introduction of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based regimens, and late conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based regimens. Notably, early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal with subsequent introduction of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based regimen seemed to be a more practical and realistic approach toward immunosuppressive treatment of renal transplant recipients. However, in view of the high rejection rate observed in these studies, it is advisable not to offer these regimens to patients with moderate to high immunologic risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The present evidences suggest that treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors allows early and substantial calcineurin inhibitor minimization. The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors everolimus and sirolimus are preferred due to their complementary mechanisms of action and favorable nephrotoxicity profile, which have opened the way for calcineurin inhibitor reduction/withdrawal in the early posttransplant period.

Everolimus and Malignancy after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Clinical Update

Malignancy after solid organ transplantation remains a major cause of posttransplant mortality. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor class of immunosuppressants exerts various antioncogenic effects, and the mTOR inhibitor everolimus is licensed for the treatment of several solid cancers. In kidney transplantation, evidence from registry studies indicates a lower rate of de novo malignancy under mTOR inhibition, with some potentially supportive data from randomized trials of everolimus. Case reports and small single-center series have suggested that switch to everolimus may be beneficial following diagnosis of posttransplant malignancy, particularly for Kaposi's sarcoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer, but prospective studies are lacking. A systematic review has shown mTOR inhibition to be associated with a significantly lower rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence versus standard calcineurin inhibitor therapy. One meta-analysis has concluded that patients with nontransplant HCC experience a low but significant survival benefit under everolimus monotherapy, so far unconfirmed in a transplant population. Data are limited in heart transplantation, although observational data and case reports have indicated that introduction of everolimus is helpful in reducing the recurrence of skin cancers. Overall, it can be concluded that, in certain settings, everolimus appears a promising option to lessen the toll of posttransplant malignancy.

Immunosuppression for kidney transplantation: Where are we now and where are we going?

Advances in immunosuppression have propelled kidney transplantation from a scientific curiosity to the optimal treatment for patients with end stage kidney disease. Declining rates of acute rejection have led to improvements in short term kidney transplant survival, culminating in incrementally better long term patient and allograft outcomes. Contextualized around established immune-suppressing drug targets, this review summarizes the history of the clinical science and highlights the pivotal trials that have led to present-day treatment standards at the level of both individual agents and multidrug regimens for kidney recipients. Finally, recently approved and emerging therapies are discussed, with an emphasis on challenges faced by clinicians managing this increasingly complex patient population.

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization, Conversion, Withdrawal, and Avoidance Strategies in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite their clinical efficacy, concerns about calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity make alternative regimens that reduce CNI exposure attractive for renal transplant recipients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed four CNI immunosuppression strategies (minimization, conversion, withdrawal, and avoidance) designed to reduce CNI exposure and assessed the impact of each on patient and allograft survival, acute rejection and renal function. We evaluated 92 comparisons from 88 randomized controlled trials and found moderate- to high-strength evidence suggesting that minimization strategies result in better clinical outcomes compared with standard-dose regimens; moderate-strength evidence indicating that conversion to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or belatacept was associated with improved renal function but increased rejection risk; and moderate- to high-strength evidence suggesting planned CNI withdrawal could result in improved renal function despite an association with increased rejection risk. The evidence base for avoidance studies was insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions. The applicability of the review is limited by the large number of studies examining cyclosporine-based strategies and low-risk populations. Additional research is needed with tacrolimus-based regimens and higher risk populations. Moreover, research is necessary to clarify the effect of induction and adjunctive agents in alternative immunosuppression strategies and should include more comprehensive and consistent reporting of patient-centered outcomes.

Induction Immunosuppressive Therapy With Everolimus and Low-Dose Tacrolimus Extended-Release Preserves Good Renal Function at 1 Year After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Utilization of everolimus (EVR) has been increasing in recent years for patients undergoing renal transplantation to reduce calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) levels. However, an optimum regimen has yet to be established.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 12 renal transplant recipients who underwent an induction immunosuppressive protocol; the protocol comprises 5 agents, including EVR plus low-dose tacrolimus extended-release (TAC-ER) treatment. We compared those findings from those of 14 patients who underwent a conventional protocol without EVR. Clinical outcome and pathologic changes were assessed by using protocol graft biopsy findings obtained at 3 months and 1 year after transplantation.

RESULTS

The estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly higher for the EVR group at both 3 months and 1 year compared with the conventional group (P < .01 and P = .03, respectively). TAC-ER trough levels were also significantly lower at 3 months and 1 year (both, P < .01). Histologic findings of the 3-month protocol biopsy samples in the EVR group revealed 4 cases of borderline change and 2 of acute cellular-mediated rejection. The findings from the 1-year biopsy samples revealed 10 cases with normal findings with no evidence of CNI toxicity. Patients in the EVR group developed subclinical borderline change and acute cellular-mediated rejection after 3 months at a significantly higher rate than the conventional group (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the present therapeutic strategy successfully maintained the trough of each drug at a lower level, and it also kept renal function stable up to 1 year after transplantation.

The Influence of Immunosuppressive Agents on the Risk of De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibody Production in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Production of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) is a major risk factor for acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss after all solid organ transplantation. In this article, we review the data available on the risk of individual immunosuppressive agents and their ability to prevent dnDSA production. Induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin may achieve a short-term decrease in dnDSA production in moderately sensitized patients. Rituximab induction may be beneficial in sensitized patients, and in abrogating rebound antibody response in patients undergoing desensitization or treatment for antibody-mediated rejection. Use of bortezomib for induction therapy in at-risk patients is of interest, but the benefits are unproven. In maintenance regimens, nonadherent and previously sensitized patients are not suitable for aggressive weaning protocols, particularly early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal without lymphocyte-depleting induction. Early conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor monotherapy has been reported to increase the risk of dnDSA formation, but a combination of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor does not appear to alter the risk. Early steroid therapy withdrawal in standard-risk patients after induction has no known dnDSA penalty. The available data do not demonstrate a consistent effect of mycophenolic acid on dnDSA production. Risk minimization for dnDSA requires monitoring of adherence, appropriate risk stratification, risk-based immunosuppression intensity, and prospective DSA surveillance.

Efficacy and Safety of Elective Conversion From Sotrastaurin (STN) to Tacrolimus (TAC) or Mycophenolate (MPS) in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety outcomes of conversion strategies in stable kidney transplant recipients after premature termination of the sotrastaurin (STN) development program.

METHODS

This is an exploratory and prospective study, including 38 stable renal transplant recipients. Tacrolimus (TAC) group [STN → mycophenolate sodium (MPS)] consisted of 9 patients receiving TAC, STN, and prednisone that were converted from STN to MPS. Everolimus (EVR) group (STN → TAC) consisted of 29 patients receiving EVR, STN, and prednisone that were converted from STN to TAC.

RESULTS

In TAC (STN → MPS) group, dose-adjusted TAC concentrations decreased from baseline to first week (2.3 ± 1.1 versus 1.5 ± 1.0 ng·mL·mg, P < 0.05). Two patients experienced a first acute rejection episode. Conversion to MPS was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events. In EVR (STN → TAC) group, dose-adjusted EVR concentrations decreased from baseline to first week (3.6 ± 2.3 ng·mL·mg versus 1.9 ± 0.8 ng·mL·mg, P < 0.01). The proportion of patients with donor-specific antibodies was lower in TAC (STN → MPS) (11%) compared to EVR (STN → TAC) (31%) before conversion. Conversion from STN to TAC was associated with a reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (69.6 ± 16.9 versus 61.0 ± 18.8 mL·min·1.73 m, P < 0.01) and a decreased proportion of patients with donor-specific antibodies (31% versus 14%) at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from TAC/STN to TAC/MPS or from EVR/STN to TAC/EVR was associated with significant pharmacokinetic changes in both TAC and EVR whole-blood trough concentrations due to known drug-to-drug interaction, which were associated with changes in efficacy and safety.

Design and rationale of the ATHENA study--A 12-month, multicentre, prospective study evaluating the outcomes of a de novo everolimus-based regimen in combination with reduced cyclosporine or tacrolimus versus a standard regimen in kidney transplant patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors remains the mainstay of treatment after kidney transplantation; however, long-term use of these drugs may be associated with nephrotoxicity. In this regard, the current approach is to optimise available immunosuppressive regimens to reduce the calcineurin inhibitor dose while protecting renal function without affecting the efficacy. The ATHENA study is designed to evaluate renal function in two regimens: an everolimus and reduced calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen versus a standard treatment protocol with mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients.

Method/Design

ATHENA is a 12-month, multicentre, open-label, prospective, randomised, parallel-group study in de novo kidney transplant recipients (aged 18 years or older) receiving renal allografts from deceased or living donors. Eligible patients are randomised (1:1:1) prior to transplantation to one of the following three treatment arms: everolimus (starting dose 1.5 mg/day; C0 3–8 ng/mL) with cyclosporine or everolimus (starting dose 3 mg/day; C0 3–8 ng/mL) with tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid (enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium at 1.44 g/day or mycophenolate mofetil at 2 g/day) with tacrolimus; in combination with corticosteroids. All patients receive induction therapy with basiliximab. The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of renal function (eGFR by the Nankivell formula) in one of the everolimus arms compared with the standard group at month 12 post transplantation. The key secondary objective is to assess the incidence of treatment failure, defined as biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death, among the treatment groups. Other objectives include assessment of the individual components of treatment failure, incidence and severity of viral infections, incidence and duration of delayed graft function, incidence of indication biopsies, slow graft function and wound healing complications, and overall safety and tolerability. Exploratory objectives include evaluation of left ventricular hypertrophy assessed by the left ventricular mass index, evolution of human leukocyte antigen and non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, and a cytomegalovirus substudy.

Discussion

As one of the largest European multicentre kidney transplant studies, ATHENA will determine whether a de novo everolimus-based regimen can preserve renal function versus the standard of care. This study further assesses a number of clinical issues which impact long-term outcomes post transplantation; hence, its results will have a major clinical impact.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01843348, date of registration – 18 April 2013; EUDRACT number: 2011-005238-21, date of registration – 20 March 2012

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1220-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Safety of mTOR inhibitors in adult solid organ transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) are a class of immunosuppressive drugs approved for solid organ transplantation (SOT). By inhibiting the ubiquitous mTOR pathway, they present a peculiar safety profile. The increased incidence of serious adverse events in early studies halted the enthusiasm as a kidney sparing alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI).

AREAS COVERED

Herein we review mTOR inhibitors safety profile for adult organ transplantation, ranging from acute side effects, such as lymphoceles, delayed wound healing, or cytopenias, to long-term ones which increase morbidity and mortality, such as cancer risk and metabolic profile. Infection, proteinuria, and cutaneous safety profiles are also addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

In the authors' opinion, mTOR inhibitors are a safe alternative to standard immunosuppression therapy with CNI and mycophenolate/azathioprine. Mild adverse events can be easily managed with an increased awareness and close monitoring of trough levels. Most serious side effects are dose- and organ-dependent. In kidney and heart transplantation mTOR inhibitors may be safely used as either low-dose de novo or through early-conversion. In the liver, conversion 4 weeks post-transplantation may reduce long-term chronic kidney disease secondary to calcineurin nephrotoxicity, without increasing hepatic artery/portal vein thrombosis.

Improved Tacrolimus Target Concentration Achievement Using Computerized Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients--A Prospective, Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Early after renal transplantation, it is often challenging to achieve and maintain tacrolimus concentrations within the target range. Computerized dose individualization using population pharmacokinetic models may be helpful. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the target concentration achievement of tacrolimus using computerized dosing compared with conventional dosing performed by experienced transplant physicians.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective study was conducted. Renal transplant recipients were randomized to receive either computerized or conventional tacrolimus dosing during the first 8 weeks after transplantation. The median proportion of tacrolimus trough concentrations within the target range was compared between the groups. Standard risk (target, 3-7 μg/L) and high-risk (8-12 μg/L) recipients were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Eighty renal transplant recipients were randomized, and 78 were included in the analysis (computerized dosing (n = 39): 32 standard risk/7 high-risk, conventional dosing (n = 39): 35 standard risk/4 high-risk). A total of 1711 tacrolimus whole blood concentrations were evaluated. The proportion of concentrations per patient within the target range was significantly higher with computerized dosing than with conventional dosing, both in standard risk patients (medians, 90% [95% confidence interval {95% CI}, 84-95%] vs 78% [95% CI, 76-82%], respectively, P < 0.001) and in high-risk patients (medians, 77% [95% CI, 71-80%] vs 59% [95% CI, 40-74%], respectively, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Computerized dose individualization improves target concentration achievement of tacrolimus after renal transplantation. The computer software is applicable as a clinical dosing tool to optimize tacrolimus exposure and may potentially improve long-term outcome.

Practical considerations for the use of mTOR inhibitors

Immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation is based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). In most cases CNI therapy is combined with mycophenolate and steroids. In spite of good short-term results this therapy is associated with long-term toxicities, graft loss and patient death. Therefore, alternative immunosuppressive strategies are needed that combine excellent efficacy with low incidences of long-term adverse outcomes.

This review focuses on the strategies based on mTOR- inhibitors in combination with minimized exposure to CNI.

Pilot conversion trial from mycophenolic acid to everolimus in ABO-incompatible kidney-transplant recipients with BK viruria and/or viremia

Immunosuppression using everolimus (EVR) plus low-dose tacrolimus (Tac) is commonly used in organ transplantation. EVR has potential antiviral effects. Herein, the long-term outcomes and impacts of Tac-EVR on the BK virus are reported in ABO-incompatible kidney-transplant recipients. The initial immunosuppressive regimen combined steroids, Tac, and mycophenolic acid (MPA). At a median of 141 (34-529) days post-transplantation, seven stable ABO-incompatible kidney-transplant recipients were converted from MPA to EVR because of active BK replication, and compared with a reference group of fourteen ABO-incompatible patients receiving classical Tac plus MPA. At 1 month before conversion, at 1, 3 months after, and at last follow-up, clinical and biological parameters were monitored. The median time from conversion to the last follow-up was 784 (398-866) days. Conversion to EVR caused no change to rejection episodes or immunological status (isoagglutinin titers, anti-HLA antibodies). At last follow-up, median eGFR was similar in the Tac-MPA versus Tac-EVR group (40 [range: 14-56] vs. 54.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) [range: 0-128], P = 0.07). The major adverse event was dyslipidemia. Interestingly, conversion from MPA to EVR decreased BK viral load in five patients. ABO-incompatible kidney-transplant recipients with an active BK virus infection may benefit from conversion to EVR.

Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses

This study compared the incidence of CMV infection/disease in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus or mycophenolate and no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis. We randomized 288 patients to receive a single 3 mg/kg dose of antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (r-ATG/EVR, n = 85); basiliximab, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (BAS/EVR, n = 102); or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone (BAS/MPS, n = 101). The primary end-point was the incidence of first CMV infection/disease in the intention-to-treat population at 12 months. Patients treated with r-ATG/EVR showed a 90% proportional reduction (4.7% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.037-0.29; p < 0.001), while those treated with BAS/EVR showed a 75% proportional reduction (10.8% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.48; p < 0.001) in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to BAS/MPS. There were no differences in the incidence of acute rejection (9.4 vs. 18.6 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.403), wound-healing complications, delayed graft function, and proteinuria. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in BAS/EVR (65.7 ± 21.8 vs. 60.6 ± 20.9 vs. 69.5 ± 21.5 ml/min, p = 0.021). In de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving no pharmacological CMV prophylaxis, reduced-dose tacrolimus and everolimus was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to standard tacrolimus dose and mycophenolate (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01354301).

What immunosuppression should be used for old-to-old recipients?

Elderly patients receiving a kidney from old donors (old-to-old) are a growing population of transplant recipients. This population cumulates risks of complications due to the co-morbidities and the immunodeficiency state and the frailty of the recipients together with the kidney senescence of the donors. In this context, the choice of immunosuppression is complicated and must take into account some contradictory principles explaining why no consensus exists today.

Pharmacokinetics and Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Everolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients Converted From Cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

Conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to everolimus (EVR) in kidney transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate sodium (MPS) and corticosteroids has been used to reduce CsA associated toxicities. Nevertheless, exposures produced by the initial EVR dose, the steady state pharmacokinetic and long-term safety and tolerability have not been explored in detail.

METHODS

Twenty-four stable kidney transplant recipients receiving CSA, MPS, and corticosteroids were converted from CSA to EVR. The initial EVR dose was 3 mg BID. Weekly monitoring of EVR blood concentrations was followed by a full 12 hour pharmacokinetic profile 28 days after conversion. Therapeutic drug monitoring, safety, and tolerability were analyzed during 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The study population was relatively young (mean of 42 years) with a predominance of males (62%) and White (67%) recipients of kidneys from living (54%) or deceased (46%) donors. Mean time of the conversion was 61 months after transplantation. In the first 7 patients, the initial EVR dose of 3 mg BID resulted in mean EVR trough blood concentration of 14.7 ± 3.7 ng/mL at day 7. The initial EVR dose was then reduced to 2 mg BID for the following 17 patients. Four weeks after conversion, mean EVR dose was 1.7 ± 0.5 mg BID (7 patients were receiving 1 mg BID and 17 were receiving 2 mg BID) resulting in mean EVR trough blood concentration of 4.0 ± 1.4 ng/mL. Whereas mean maximum concentration (13.4 ± 2.8 versus 22.9 ± 7.4 ng/mL, P = 0.003) and mean apparent clearance (232 ± 79 versus 366 ± 173 mL/min, P = 0.016) were higher, mean area under the curve (78.2 ± 22.1 versus 102.5 ± 38.5 ng.h/mL, P = 0.067) and mean C0 (3.7 ± 1.3 versus 4.1 ± 1.5 ng/mL, P = 0.852) were no different comparing patients receiving 1 mg and 2 mg EVR BID. Mean inter-subject variability of area under the curve, trough concentration, and maximum concentration was 38%, 36%, and 38%. EVR treatment was discontinued in 29% of patients due to proteinuria (N = 2), pneumonia (N = 2), dyslipidemia (N = 2), and anemia (N = 1) and MPS dose was reduced in 58% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial 3 mg BID dose produced high EVR trough blood concentrations. The 2 mg BID dose appears to be the appropriate initial dose to provide therapeutic concentrations but still requires initial intensive therapeutic monitoring to achieve and maintain blood concentrations within the therapeutic target concentration. The combination of EVR and full dose MPS has limited long-term tolerability and safety.

Renal function improvement in liver transplant recipients after early everolimus conversion: A clinical practice cohort study in Spain

A national, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to assess the results obtained for liver transplant recipients with conversion to everolimus in daily practice. The study included 477 recipients (481 transplantations). Indications for conversion to everolimus were renal dysfunction (32.6% of cases), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 30.2%; prophylactic treatment for 68.9%), and de novo malignancy (29.7%). The median time from transplantation to conversion to everolimus was 68.7 months for de novo malignancy, 23.8 months for renal dysfunction, and 7.1 months for HCC and other indications. During the first year of treatment, mean everolimus trough levels were 5.4 (standard deviation [SD], 2.7) ng/mL and doses remained stable (1.5 mg/day) from the first month after conversion. An everolimus monotherapy regimen was followed by 28.5% of patients at 12 months. Patients with renal dysfunction showed a glomerular filtration rate (4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) increase of 10.9 mL (baseline mean, 45.8 [SD, 25.3] versus 57.6 [SD, 27.6] mL/minute/1.73 m(2) ) at 3 months after everolimus initiation (P < 0.001), and 6.8 mL at 12 months. Improvement in renal function was higher in patients with early conversion (<1 year). Adverse events were the primary reason for discontinuation in 11.2% of cases. The probability of survival at 3 years after conversion to everolimus was 83.0%, 71.1%, and 59.5% for the renal dysfunction, de novo malignancy, and HCC groups, respectively. Everolimus is a viable option for the treatment of renal dysfunction, and earlier conversion is associated with better recovery of renal function. Prospective studies are needed to confirm advantages in patients with malignancy.

Everolimus treatment for patients with autoimmune hepatitis and poor response to standard therapy and drug alternatives in use

OBJECTIVE

Not all patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) respond to standard medical therapy with corticosteroids and azathioprine. Such patients may develop end-stage liver disease with poor prognosis unless transplantation is considered. Alternatively, the introduction of new therapeutic strategies could potentially ameliorate deterioration of liver function. Patients in our tertiary center were selected for everolimus therapy when exhibiting nonresponse or intolerance to combinations of the standard and empirical drugs in use (e.g., mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors [CNIs]). We here report the efficacy of everolimus treatment of patients with AIH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven patients (six female, mean age 47 years, range 22-62 years) in whom disease control could not be achieved with standard therapy or the alternative drugs in use were included.

RESULTS

Treatment with everolimus induced a clear reduction of transaminases within 2 weeks. After 3-5 months three patients had normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (10-45 IU) and four patients had ALT levels below 55 IU compared to a three- to fivefold elevated level prior to everolimus treatment. Sustained remission after 1 year of treatment was observed in three patients; in another two patients ALT was 45-68 U/L. Four patients in remission after 3 years were rebiopsied. Two showed no histological progression, and in two the fibrosis had decreased. Side effects noted were myalgias and minor bacterial infections not leading to discontinuation of the drug.

CONCLUSION

Our experience indicates that everolimus may be of value in selected patients with therapy-resistant AIH and comorbidity/side effects that excludes the use of CNIs.

New Recipes With Known Ingredients: Combined Therapy of Everolimus and Low-dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Allograft Recipients

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstones of immunosuppressive management in renal allograft recipients even though their nephrotoxicity may contribute to a reduced long-term graft survival. This has created a great interest in improving immunosuppressive strategies in the early post-transplantation period. Proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs), such as everolimus, are promising alternatives, although their side effects may have a drawback in de novo renal transplant recipients, for instance, delaying renal function in the presence of renal ischemia/acute tubular necrosis and predisposing to lymphocele development.

STUDY AND METHODS

A retrospective study was developed to compare the combined therapy of low-dose tacrolimus and everolimus (study group) with mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid and standard-dose tacrolimus (control group) in the first 3 months post-transplantation. The study's end-points concerned renal graft function, proteinuria, incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, surgical complication rates, and incidence of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation.

RESULTS

There was no more delayed graft function in the study group and graft function distribution was similar between groups. Median serum creatinine and eGFR were comparable as well as proteinuria levels. Generally, adverse events were rare in both groups and there were no significant statistical differences between them in terms of biopsy-proven acute rejection, surgical complication, and new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation rates.

CONCLUSION

Despite the slightly lower tendency for serum creatinine in the study group, renal allograft function wasn't statistically different between groups. Moreover, there weren't more metabolic or surgical complications in the study group. Everolimus may be a choice in tacrolimus-sparing strategies, but a larger study and a longer follow-up are still required.

A 12-month single arm pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients at high immunologic risk

The optimal immunosuppressive strategy for renal transplant recipients at high immunologic risk remains a topic of investigation. This prospective single arm pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combined tacrolimus and sirolimus regimen in recipients at immunological high risk and to compare outcomes with a contemporaneous control group received tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients that received a renal allograft between 2010 and 2011 at high risk (defined as panel reactive antibodies > 50%, 4 or more human leukocyte antigen mismatches, or retransplantation) were enrolled. All patients received basiliximab induction and corticosteroids. A total of 28 recipients treated with tacrolimus and sirolimus were enrolled in this study and 69 recipients were retrospectively reviewed as a control group. The sirolimus group showed a higher, but not statistically significant, incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection and a lower glomerular filtration rate than the control group. Furthermore, sirolimus group was associated with significant increases in BKV infection (P = 0.031), dyslipidemia (P = 0.004), and lymphocele (P = 0.020). The study was terminated prematurely due to a high incidence of adverse events. A de novo tacrolimus/sirolimus combination regimen may not be an ideal choice for recipients at high immunological risk.

Five-year outcomes in kidney transplant patients converted from cyclosporine to everolimus: the randomized ZEUS study

ZEUS study was an open-label, 12-month, multicenter study in which 300 de novo kidney transplant recipients were randomized to continue receiving cyclosporine (CsA) or convert to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant. Five-year follow-up data were available for 245/269 patients (91.1%) who completed the core 12-month study (123 everolimus, 109 CsA). At 5 years, adjusted estimated GFR was 66.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) with everolimus versus 60.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) with CsA; the mean difference was 5.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in favor of everolimus (95% CI 2.4, 8.3; p < 0.001 [intent-to-treat population]). In a post hoc analysis of patients remaining on study drug at 5 years (everolimus 77, CsA 86), mean difference was 8.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (95% CI 4.3, 12.1; p < 0.001) in favor of everolimus. The cumulative incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection postrandomization was 13.6% with everolimus versus 7.5% with CsA (p = 0.095), largely accounted for by grade I rejection (16/21 patients and 7/11 patients, respectively). Postrandomization, graft loss, mortality, serious adverse events and neoplasms were similar in both arms. In conclusion, conversion of kidney transplant patients to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant is associated with a significant improvement in renal function that is maintained to at least 5 years. The increase in early mild acute rejection did not affect long-term graft function.

The role of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in the management of post-transplant malignancy

Post-transplant malignancies, which occur either de novo or as cancer recurrences, are due to chronic exposure to immunosuppressive agents and are often more aggressive than those that develop in the non-transplant setting. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have antitumor and immunosuppressive effects. The dual effects of this class of agents may provide adequate immunosuppression to prevent organ rejection while simultaneously reducing the risk of post-transplant malignancy. mTOR inhibitors have become established approved agents for treating renal cell carcinoma and other cancers and, as reviewed herein, accumulating experience among organ transplant recipients collectively points toward a potential to prevent the development of de novo malignancies of various types in the post-transplant period. To date, most research efforts surrounding mTOR inhibitors and cancer control in the transplant population have been in the area of skin cancer prevention, but there have also been interesting observations regarding regression of post-transplant Kaposi's sarcoma and post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder that warrant further study.

Strategies for the management of adverse events associated with mTOR inhibitors

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are used as potent immunosuppressive agents in solid-organ transplant recipients (everolimus and sirolimus) and as antineoplastic therapies for various cancers (eg, advanced renal cell carcinoma; everolimus, temsirolimus, ridaforolimus). Relevant literature, obtained from specific PubMed searches, was reviewed to evaluate the incidence and mechanistic features of specific adverse events (AEs) associated with mTOR inhibitor treatment, and to present strategies to effectively manage these events. The AEs examined in this review include stomatitis and other cutaneous AEs, wound-healing complications (eg, lymphocele, incisional hernia), diabetes/hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, proteinuria, nephrotoxicity, delayed graft function, pneumonitis, anemia, hypertension, gonadal dysfunction, and ovarian toxicity. Strategies for selecting appropriate patients for mTOR inhibitor therapy and minimizing the risks of AEs are discussed, along with best practices for identifying and managing side effects. mTOR inhibitors are promising therapeutic options in immunosuppression and oncology; most AEs can be effectively detected and managed or reversed with careful monitoring and appropriate interventions.

A randomized, controlled trial of everolimus-based dual immunosuppression versus standard of care in de novo kidney transplant recipients

Kidney transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression incur increased long-term risks of cancer and kidney fibrosis. Switch to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors may reduce these risks. Steroid or Cyclosporin Removal After Transplant using Everolimus (SOCRATES), a 36-month, prospective, multinational, open-label, randomized controlled trial for de novo kidney transplant recipients, assessed whether everolimus switch could enable elimination of mycophenolate plus either steroids or CNI without compromising efficacy. Patients received cyclosporin, mycophenolate and steroids for the first 14 days then everolimus with mycophenolate and CNIwithdrawal (CNI-WD); everolimus with mycophenolate and steroid withdrawal (steroid-WD); or cyclosporin, mycophenolate and steroids (control). 126 patients were randomized. The steroid WD arm was terminated prematurely because of excess discontinuations. Mean eGFR at month 12 for CNI-WD versus control was 65.1 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. 67.1 ml/min/1.73 m² by ITT, which met predefined noninferiority criteria (P = 0.026). The CNI-WD group experienced a higher rate of BPAR(31% vs. control 13%, P = 0.048) and showed a trend towards higher composite treatment failure (BPAR, graft loss, death, loss to follow-up). The 12 month results from SOCRATES show noninferiority in eGFR, but a significant excess of acute rejection when everolimus was commenced at week 2 to enable a progressive withdrawal of mycophenolate and cyclosporin in kidney transplant recipients.

Conversion of stable ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients from mycophenolate mofetil with standard exposure calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to everolimus with very low exposure CNIs-a short-term pilot study

BACKGROUND

A recent report has demonstrated that as with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), everolimus is capable of inhibiting human B-lymphocyte function and activation including B-lymphocyte proliferation, apoptosis, and immunoglobulin production in vitro. Everolimus may therefore be used as an immunosuppressant in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

METHODS

A three-month pilot study was performed to examine the efficacy and safety of conversion of stable ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients from MMF with standard exposure calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to everolimus with very low exposure CNIs. Sixteen recipients were enrolled in the study. The patients without acute rejection by graft biopsy were switched from MMF to everolimus with CNI minimization. At three months after conversion, graft biopsies were performed to check for acute rejection and C4d deposition.

RESULTS

Conversion to everolimus with CNI minimization for three months did not induce acute rejection and C4d deposition in all of the ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients. A slight elevation of anti-A/B antibody titer occurred in our present study. Everolimus was associated with hyperlipidemia and edema.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrated that short-term conversion from MMF to everolimus after one yr post-transplant may be a safe and effective alternate for ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients requiring temporary discontinuation of MMF.

The effects of preoperative immunosuppressive therapy on ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury in healthy rats

PURPOSE

Warm-ischemia-induced injuries might be encountered during renal transplants from cadavers and healthy donors. Toll-like receptors (TLR) in ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury are one of the indicators of intracellular injury pathways. The intensity of ischemic injury is directly proportionate to high TLR levels. To minimize the I/R injury, we investigated TLR2 and TLR4 levels on rats, which were pretreated with tacrolimus (FK506) before I/R.

METHODS

Eight Wistar albino rats in the study group were administered .01 mg/kg intramuscular tacrolimus. Administration to the study group was performed 24 and 1 h before warm ischemia. Eight rats in the control group were injected with 0.1 c.c. of distilled water. Blood samples were collected from the tail veins of all the rats on the first, second and third days. Expression levels of TLR2 and TLR4 genes were analyzed using the polymerase chain reaction method, to determine any significant difference between the control and study groups on the days when blood was taken.

RESULTS

TLR2 (p = 0.045) and TLR4 (p = 0.022) levels in the study group were found to be statistically, and significantly, lower than those in the control group, on the second day following warm-ischemia- and reperfusion-induced injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of immunosuppressive drugs to healthy donor rats led to a statistically significant reduction in the expression levels of TLR2 and TLR4 in the early period. In light of the data obtained by this study, we hypothesize that a preoperative therapy on donors might have a role in preventing I/R injury.

Is it time to give up with calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation?

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) represent today a cornerstone for the maintenance immunosuppressive treatment in solid organ transplantation. Nevertheless, several attempts have been made either to minimize their dosage or to avoid CNIs at all because these drugs have the severe side effect of chronic nephrotoxicity. This issue represents a frontier for renal transplantation. The principal problem is to understanding whether the poor outcome over the long-term may be ascribed to CNIs nephrotoxicity or to the inability of these drugs to control the acute and chronic rejection B cells mediated. The authors analyze extensively all the international trials attempting to withdraw, minimize or avoid the use of CNIs. Few trials undertaken in low risk patients with an early conversion from CNIs to proliferation signal inhibitors were successful, but the vast majority of trials failed to improve CNIs side effects. To date the use of a new drug, a co-stimulation blocker, seems promising in avoiding CNIs with similar efficacy, better glomerular filtration rate and an improved metabolic profile. Moreover the use of this drug is not associated with the development of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. This point has a particular relevance, because the failure of CNIs to realize good outcomes in renal transplantation has recently ascribed to their inability to control the acute and chronic rejections B-cell mediated. This paper analyzes all the recent studies that have been done on this issue that represents the real frontier that should be overcome to realize better results over the long-term after transplantation.

Mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors in solid organ transplantation: from benchside to clinical use

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Here, we review recent advances and new insights in mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) biology (signalling pathway, kidney biology and immune system), and recent clinical data on mTOR inhibitors related to solid organ transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The mTOR pathway is a major integrator of signals governing protein and lipid biosynthesis and growth factor-driven cell cycle progression. Recent findings have emphasized a critical role of mTOR in cellular homeostasis with a crucial role in podocyte function. Beyond CD8(+) and regulatory T-cell control, mTOR protein is involved in critical biological functions of T helper cells or dendritic cells. New specific inhibitors of mTORC1/C2 are available and shed new light on mTOR functions. Finally, clinical trials have better defined the use of mTOR inhibitors and emphasized their role in cancer prevention.

SUMMARY

The mTOR pathway is considered as a key integrator of multiple inputs that drives numerous biological processes in cell biology. mTOR inhibitors are potent immunosuppressive drugs for solid organ transplantation. Newly designed specific inhibitors of mTOR complex 1 and 2 offer promising therapeutic effects and a better understanding of the pathway. Many conditions may benefit from mTOR inhibition for a short period, but tolerance of treatment in a chronic setting remains a major concern.