An In Vitro Evaluation of Fit of Zirconium-Oxide-Based Ceramic Four-Unit Fixed Partial Dentures, Generated with Three Different CAD/CAM Systems, before and after Porcelain Firing Cycles and after Glaze Cycles

An in vivo evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide based ceramic single crowns, generated with two CAD/CAM systems, in comparison to metal ceramic single crowns

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess in vivo the marginal fit of single crowns produced using two CAD/CAM all-ceramic systems, in comparison to more traditional metal ceramic crowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty vital, caries-free, and previously untreated teeth were chosen in five patients who needed extraction for implant placement and therefore were included in this study. In the control group (C), 10 regular metal ceramic crowns with porcelain occlusal surfaces were fabricated. In the other two groups (Z and E), CAD/CAM technology was used for the fabrication of 20 zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single crowns with two systems. All zirconia crowns were cemented with glass-ionomer cement, always following the manufacturer's instructions. The same dentist carried out all clinical phases. The teeth were extracted 1 month later. Marginal gaps along vertical planes were measured for each crown, using a total of four landmarks for each tooth by means of a microscope at a magnification of 50×. On completion of microscopic evaluation, representative specimens from each group were prepared for ESEM evaluation. Mean and standard deviations of the four landmarks (mesial, distal, buccal, palatal) at each single crown were calculated for each group. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed to determine whether the four landmarks, taken into consideration together, differed between groups. Two-way ANOVA was performed to study in detail, for each landmark, how the three systems used to produce the FPDs affected the gap measurements. Differences were considered to be significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

MANOVA revealed no quantitative differences of the four landmarks, when taken into consideration together, between the three groups (p < 0.0001). Two-way ANOVA, performed at each landmark, revealed no quantitative differences between the three groups (p < 0.0001 for each landmark).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the two zirconium-oxide-based ceramic CAD/CAM systems demonstrated a similar and acceptable marginal fit when compared to more traditional metal ceramic crowns.

Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Evidence is limited on the efficacy of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systemic review was to assess zirconia-based FDPs in terms of survival and complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Searches performed in PubMed databases were enriched by hand searches to identify suitable publications. The keywords used were: "zirconia" and "fixed dental prosthesis," "zirconia" and "crown," "zirconia" and "fixed partial denture" and "humans," "zirconia" and "crown" and "humans," "crown" and "all-ceramics," and "fixed partial denture" and "all-ceramics". Titles and abstracts were read to identify literature that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Only peer reviewed clinical studies published in the English language from January 1999 through June 2011 were included.

RESULTS

Twelve clinical studies based on zirconia, framework design, and porcelain veneering technique met the inclusion criteria. Of the studies identified, 1 was a randomized clinical study with 3-year follow-up results; the others were cohort prospective studies. Clinical complications included chipping of veneering porcelain, abutment failure, and framework fracture. One study investigated pressed ceramics as the veneering material and found no chipping of veneering porcelain after 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Short term clinical data suggest that zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses may serve as an alternative to metal ceramic fixed dental prostheses in the anterior and posterior dentition.

Clinical performance and failures of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a review literature

PURPOSE

Zirconia has been used in clinical dentistry for approximately a decade, and there have been several reports regarding the clinical performance and survival rates of zirconia-based restorations. The aim of this article was to review the literatures published from 2000 to 2010 regarding the clinical performance and the causes of failure of zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search of English peer-reviewed dental literatures was performed through PubMed to obtain all the clinical studies focused on the performance of the zirconia FPDs. The electronic search was supplemented by manual searching through the references of the selected articles for possible inclusion of some articles. Randomized controlled clinical trials, longitudinal prospective and retrospective cohort studies were the focuses of this review. Articles that did not focus on the restoration of teeth using zirconia-based restorations were excluded from this review.

RESULTS

There have been three studies for the study of zirconia single crowns. The clinical outcome was satisfactory (acceptable) according to the CDA evaluation. There have been 14 studies for the study of zirconia FPDs. The survival rates of zirconia anterior and posterior FPDs ranged between 73.9% - 100% after 2 - 5 years. The causes of failure were veneer fracture, ceramic core fracture, abutment tooth fracture, secondary caries, and restoration dislodgment.

CONCLUSION

The overall performance of zirconia FPDs was satisfactory according to either USPHS criteria or CDA evaluations. Fracture resistance of core and veneering ceramics, bonding between core and veneering materials, and marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based restorations were discussed as the causes of failure. Because of its repeated occurrence in many studies, future researches are essentially required to clarify this problem and to reduce the fracture incident.

Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to determine the success rate of single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with zirconia copings generated with two CAD/CAM systems, compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) single-unit posterior FDPs after 5 years of function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2005 to 2006, 60 patients who needed a single-unit FDP on a first molar in the mandibular jaw (left or right) in a private office setting were included in this study. The 60 first mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20): in the control group (group C), 20 PFM FDPs were included. In the other two groups CAD/CAM technology was used for the fabrication of the zirconium-oxide copings: 20 single-unit posterior FDPs with zirconia copings were generated with the Procera system (group P, Nobel Biocare); 20 single-unit posterior FDPs with zirconia copings were generated with the Lava system (group L, 3M ESPE). For the ANOVA follow-up data, the clinical life table method was applied. The statistical analysis was performed using two nonparametric tests, the log-rank test for k-groups and the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of zirconia-ceramic FDPs of both groups (P and L) evaluated together and metal-ceramic posterior single FDPs was found at 5 years of function; however, clinical data showed that technical problems, such as extended fracture of the veneering ceramic, tended to occur more frequently in the zirconia-ceramic FDP groups. The difference in the frequency of failure was statistically significant only in the comparison of groups C and P.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if no statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of zirconia-ceramic FDPs of both groups (P and L) considered together and metal-ceramic posterior single FDPs was found at 5 years of function, clinical data showed that the two zirconia-ceramic FDP groups tended to have more frequent clinical problems: for this reason all the clinical and technical variables related to the use of zirconia-ceramic FDPs generated with CAD/CAM systems should be carefully considered prior to all treatment procedures.

Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses

Distortions in the marginal region during manufacture are detrimental to the long-term success of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate changes in marginal fit because of the veneering process of four-unit FDPs made from different zirconia materials. Two groups of FDPs with 10 specimens each were machined from white body zirconia blanks (VITA In-Ceram YZ Cubes, KaVo Everest ZS-Blanks) by means of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems and subsequently sintered to their final density. The marginal and internal gaps of the frameworks were determined using a replica technique. Afterwards, frameworks were veneered with the recommended ceramics (VITA VM9, GC Initial Zr), and fitting accuracy was evaluated again. Statistical analyses were performed by Student's t-test with the level of significance chosen at 0.05. With one framework/veneering system (Everest ZS-Blanks/Initial Zr), both marginal gap (P = 0.019) and internal gap (P = 0.001) at the premolar retainer were significantly affected by the veneering process. The resulting distortions were directed towards the lumina of the retainers and the mean values of the measured gaps decreased by about 23.8 mum (marginal gap) and 27.3 mum (internal gap). For the other system (In-Ceram YZ Cubes/VM9), no distortions because of the veneering were found. The veneering of zirconia restorations may lead to significant changes in the marginal fit, while the combination of core and veneering material used influences the resulting distortions.