Thromboprophylaxis rates in US medical centers: success or failure?

Rate of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism during the care continuum in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the United States

BACKGROUND

Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are frequent and life-threatening complications of ischemic stroke. We evaluated rates of symptomatic DVT/PE, and of in-hospital and post-discharge thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

In a retrospective US database analysis, data were extracted from the Premier Perspective™-i3 Pharma Informatics linked database for patients aged ≥18 years who were hospitalized for ischemic stroke from January 2005 to November 2007, and who had ≥6 months' continuous plan enrollment prior to index hospitalization. Patients discharged to an acute-care facility or with atrial fibrillation were excluded. Prophylaxis was evaluated during index hospitalization and for 14 days' post-discharge. DVT/PE rates were calculated during index hospitalization and up to 30 days post-discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 1524 patients were included; 46.1% received pharmacological and/or mechanical prophylaxis in-hospital (28.3%, 11.4% and 12.3% received unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin and mechanical prophylaxis, respectively). 6.4% of patients received outpatient pharmacological prophylaxis; warfarin was most frequently prescribed (5.9%). Total mean ± standard deviation length of index hospitalization was 3.0 ± 2.5 days. Mean prophylaxis duration in all patients was 0.9 ± 1.5 days in-hospital and 1.7 ± 6.9 days post-discharge. Symptomatic DVT/PE occurred in 25 patients overall (1.64%), with an inpatient rate of 0.98% and an outpatient rate of 0.66%.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1% of patients with AIS experienced symptomatic in-hospital and/or post-discharge DVT/PE. Although 46% received prophylaxis in-hospital, only 6% received prophylaxis in the outpatient setting. This highlights the need for sustained thromboprophylaxis prescribing across the continuum of care.

Strategies to enhance venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients (SENTRY): a pilot cluster randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common preventable cause of mortality in hospitalized medical patients. Despite rigorous randomized trials generating strong recommendations for anticoagulant use to prevent VTE, nearly 40% of medical patients receive inappropriate thromboprophylaxis. Knowledge-translation strategies are needed to bridge this gap.

METHODS

We conducted a 16-week pilot cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the proportion of medical patients that were appropriately managed for thromboprophylaxis (according to the American College of Chest Physician guidelines) within 24 hours of admission, through the use of a multicomponent knowledge-translation intervention. Our primary goal was to determine the feasibility of conducting this study on a larger scale. The intervention comprised clinician education, a paper-based VTE risk assessment algorithm, printed physicians' orders, and audit and feedback sessions. Medical wards at six hospitals (representing clusters) in Ontario, Canada were included; three were randomized to the multicomponent intervention and three to usual care (i.e., no active strategies for thromboprophylaxis in place). Blinding was not used.

RESULTS

A total of 2,611 patients (1,154 in the intervention and 1,457 in the control group) were eligible and included in the analysis. This multicomponent intervention did not lead to a significant difference in appropriate VTE prophylaxis rates between intervention and control hospitals (appropriate management rate odds ratio = 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.50, 1.28; p = 0.36; intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.022), and thus was not considered feasible. Major barriers to effective knowledge translation were poor attendance by clinical staff at education and feedback sessions, difficulty locating preprinted orders, and lack of involvement by clinical and administrative leaders. We identified several factors that may increase uptake of a VTE prophylaxis strategy, including local champions, support from clinical and administrative leaders, mandatory use, and a simple, clinically relevant risk assessment tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals allocated to our multicomponent intervention did not have a higher rate of medical inpatients appropriately managed for thromboprophylaxis than did hospitals that were not allocated to this strategy.

Factors Associated With Inappropriate Chemical Prophylaxis of Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients

Introduction:

Despite various guidelines for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention, malpractice in prescribing thromboprophylaxis is common. In this study, factors associated with prescribing or not prescribing appropriate chemical thromboprophylaxis were assessed.

Materials and methods:

We enrolled high-risk patients for VTE (based on Caprini score) in the general surgery ward. They were divided into 2 groups based on receiving appropriate prophylaxis or not. Factors associated with prescribing thromboprophylaxis were analyzed.

Results:

A total of 613 patients were enrolled in this study. Head and neck operations ( P < .0001), minor surgeries ( P = .001), mastectomy ( P = .012), and medical treatment ( P = 0.034) were the factors associated with not prescribing thromboprophylaxis. In contrast, age ( P < .0001), laparoscopic surgeries ( P = .011), surgery duration (< .0001), oral contraceptive pill consumption ( P = .005), and complete bed rest ( P = .002) were protective factors.

Conclusion:

Minor surgeries, head and neck operations, mastectomy, and medical treatment are associated with overlooking anticoagulant administration. It is recommended to consider aforementioned pitfalls in routine practice and education.

Real-world economic burden of venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic prophylaxis in medical inpatients

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in medical patients, and the economic burden of this disease is plausibly relevant as well. However, few data from real-world observations are available on this topic. Aim of our study was to assess the costs of VTE management and antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine (IM) departments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The in-hospital paths of 160 patients with VTE (VTE group) and 160 patients receiving prophylaxis and without VTE (NO-VTE group) were retrospectively evaluated within 26IM units in Italy. The economic analysis was undertaken by applying a process analysis, the initial phase of the more comprehensive Activity Based Costing technique. Accordingly to this approach, only information closely linked to VTE or its prevention was registered.

RESULTS

The total median costs for VTE management were around four-times higher than those for prophylaxis (€ 1,348.68 vs € 373.03). Human resources were the most important cost-driver (55.5% and 65.7% in the VTE and NO-VTE groups), followed by instrumental (24.6% in VTE and 15.5% in NO-VTE) and haematologic tests (12.6% in VTE patients and 13.3% in controls). In the NO-VTE group the direct costs for prophylaxis accounted for 4.5% of total.

CONCLUSIONS

The real-world data of this study confirm the economic burden of in-hospital treatment of VTE, and the relatively low costs of thromboprophylaxis. A greater adherence to evidence-based protocols for VTE prevention could probably reduce the current financial burden of VTE on healthcare systems.

Mechanical and suboptimal pharmacologic prophylaxis and delayed mobilization but not morbid obesity are associated with venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

The FDA-approved dose of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may not provide adequate thromboprophylaxis in morbidly obese patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Suboptimal dosing, delayed initiation, and overreliance on mechanical methods may also limit the effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

We explored the associations between the type of thromboprophylaxis, obesity, time of mobilization, and undergoing bilateral TKA on development of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) after TKA.

DESIGN/SETTING/PATIENTS

This was a case-control study of patients undergoing TKA in 15 teaching hospitals between October 2008 and March 2010. Cases were screened using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Patient Safety Indicator 12 and had objectively documented acute VTE within 9 days of surgery; controls were randomly selected from the same hospital. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for postoperative VTE, adjusted for age and gender.

RESULTS

Among 130 cases with and 463 controls without acute VTE, body mass index (BMI) ranged from 17 to 61 (median = 34). Thromboprophylaxis was LMWH in 284 (48%), warfarin in 189 (32%), both in 55 (10%), and mechanical prophylaxis alone in 120 (20%). Overall, 77% ambulated on day 1 or 2 after surgery. Factors significantly associated with VTE were bilateral simultaneous TKA (odds ratio [OR] = 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-9.1), receipt of FDA-approved pharmacological prophylaxis (OR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.8), and ambulation by postoperative day 2 (OR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). Obesity was neither a significant confounder nor a modifier of these effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe obesity was not a significant independent predictor for VTE and did not modify the beneficial effect of FDA-approved pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Bilateral TKA and failure to ambulate by the second day after surgery were significant risk factors.

Rural relevant quality measures for critical access hospitals

PURPOSE

To identify current and future relevant quality measures for Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs).

METHODS

Three criteria (patient volume, internal usefulness for quality improvement, and external usefulness for public reporting and payment reform) were used to analyze quality measures for their relevance for CAHs. A 6-member panel with expertise in rural hospital quality measurement and improvement provided input regarding the final measure selection.

FINDINGS

The relevant quality measures for CAHs include measures that are ready for reporting now and measures that need specifications to be finalized and/or a data reporting mechanism to be established. They include inpatient measures for specific medical conditions, global measures that address appropriate care across multiple medical conditions, and Emergency Department measures.

CONCLUSIONS

All CAHs should publicly report on relevant quality measures. Acceptance of a single consolidated set of quality measures with common specifications for CAHs by all entities involved in regulation, accreditation, and payment; a phased process to implement the relevant measures; and the provision of technical assistance would help CAHs meet the challenge of reporting.

Venous thromboembolism in patients with diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE

The majority of epidemiological studies demonstrate an increased risk of venous thromboembolism among diabetic patients. Our aim was to compare clinical characteristics, prophylaxis, treatment, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in patients with and without previously diagnosed diabetes.

METHODS

We studied diabetic patients in the population-based Worcester Venous Thromboembolism Study of 2488 consecutive patients with validated venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Of 2488 venous thromboembolism patients, 476 (19.1%) had a clinical history of diabetes. Thromboprophylaxis was omitted in more than one third of diabetic patients who had been hospitalized for non-venous-thromboembolism-related illness or had undergone major surgery within 3 months before diagnosis. Patients with diabetes were more likely than nondiabetic patients to have a complicated course after venous thromboembolism. Patients with diabetes were more likely than patients without diabetes to suffer recurrent deep vein thrombosis (14.9% vs 10.7%) and long-term major bleeding complications (16.4% vs 11.7%) (all P=.01). Diabetes was associated with a significant increase in the risk of recurrent deep vein thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-2.51). Aspirin therapy at discharge (AOR 1.59; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3) and chronic kidney disease (AOR 2.19; 95% CI, 1.44-3.35) were independent predictors of long-term major bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Patients with diabetes who developed venous thromboembolism were more likely to suffer a complicated clinical course. Diabetes was an independent predictor of recurrent deep vein thrombosis. We observed a low rate of thromboprophylaxis in diabetic patients. Further studies should focus on venous thromboembolism prevention in this vulnerable population.

Venous thromboembolism: annualised United States models for total, hospital-acquired and preventable costs utilising long-term attack rates

Healthcare reform is upon the United States (US) healthcare system. Prioritisation of preventative efforts will guide necessary transitions within the US healthcare system. While annual deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) costs have recently been defined at the US national level, annual pulmonary embolism (PE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) costs have not yet been defined. A decision tree and cost model were developed to estimate US health care costs for total PE, total hospital-acquired PE, and total hospital-acquired "preventable" PE. The previously published DVT cost model was modified, updated and combined with the PE cost model to elucidate the same three categories of costs for VTE. Direct and indirect costs were also delineated. For VTE in the base model, annual cost ranges in 2011 US dollars for total, hospital- acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" costs and were $13.5-$27.2, $9.0-$18.2, and $4.5-$14.2 billion, respectively. The first sensitivity analysis, with higher incidence rates and costs, demonstrated annual US total, hospital-acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" VTE costs ranging from $32.1-$69.3, $23.7-$51.5, and $11.9-$39.3 billion, respectively. The second sensitivity analysis with long-term attack rates (LTAR) for recurrent events and post-thrombotic syndrome and chronic pulmonary thromboembolic hypertension demonstrated annual US total, hospital-acquired, and hospital-acquired "preventable" VTE costs ranging from $15.4-$34.4, $10.3-$25.4, and $5.1-$19.1 billion, respectively. PE costs comprised a majority of the VTE costs. Prioritisation of effective VTE preventative strategies will reduce significant costs, morbidity and mortality within the US healthcare system. The cost models may be utilised to estimate other countries' costs or VTE-specific disease states.

Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis

Pulmonary embolism is the third most common cause of death from cardiovascular disease after heart attack and stroke. Sequelae occurring after venous thromboembolism include chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and post-thrombotic syndrome. Venous thromboembolism and atherothrombosis share common risk factors and the common pathophysiological characteristics of inflammation, hypercoagulability, and endothelial injury. Clinical probability assessment helps to identify patients with low clinical probability for whom the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism can be excluded solely with a negative result from a plasma D-dimer test. The diagnosis is usually confirmed with compression ultrasound showing deep vein thrombosis or with chest CT showing pulmonary embolism. Most patients with venous thromboembolism will respond to anticoagulation, which is the foundation of treatment. Patients with pulmonary embolism should undergo risk stratification to establish whether they will benefit from the addition of advanced treatment, such as thrombolysis or embolectomy. Several novel oral anticoagulant drugs are in development. These drugs, which could replace vitamin K antagonists and heparins in many patients, are prescribed in fixed doses and do not need any coagulation monitoring in the laboratory. Although rigorous clinical trials have reported the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological prevention with low, fixed doses of anticoagulant drugs, prophylaxis remains underused in patients admitted to hospital at moderate risk and high risk for venous thromboembolism. In this Seminar, we discuss pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis of the legs.

AssessMent of ProphylAxis for VenouS ThromboembolIsm in Hospitalized Patients

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) accounts for several cases of in-hospital mortality (over 100 000 deaths annually in the West). Despite the existence of effective prophylaxis guidelines for at-risk patients, the guidelines adherence is missing. Methods: We evaluated the thromboprophylaxis reception and appropriateness based on the eighth edition of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines on VTE prophylaxis, among hospitalized patients of a World Health Organization (WHO)-collaborating teaching hospital in a 3-month period. Results: From the 904 evaluated cases, 481 entered the study. Appropriate decision on whether to prophylaxe or not, was made in 305 (63.40%), however, complete appropriateness (considering correct regimen type, dosing, and duration) was seen only in 229 patients (47.60%). The ACCP risk for VTE was the strongest predictor of thromboprophylaxis prescription (odds ratio [OR]: 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35-5.05). Conclusions: Our thromboprophylaxis results were comparable to that of Western countries. Improved thromboprophylaxis appropriateness, which requires improving the physicians' thromboprophylaxis awareness and knowledge, could reduce the rate of in-hospital VTE and translate into better patient care.

Economic impact of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a hospital perspective of the PREVAIL trial

BACKGROUND

The PREVAIL (Prevention of VTE [venous thromboembolism] after acute ischemic stroke with LMWH [low-molecular-weight heparin] and UFH [unfractionated heparin]) study demonstrated a 43% VTE risk reduction with enoxaparin versus UFH in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). A 1% rate of symptomatic intracranial and major extracranial hemorrhage was observed in both groups.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the economic impact, from a hospital perspective, of enoxaparin versus UFH for VTE prophylaxis after AIS.

DESIGN

A decision-analytic model was constructed and hospital-based costs analyzed using clinical information from PREVAIL. Total hospital costs were calculated based on mean costs in the Premier™ database and from wholesalers acquisition data. Costs were also compared in patients with severe stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≥14) and less severe stroke (NIHSS score <14).

RESULTS

The average cost per patient due to VTE or bleeding events was lower with enoxaparin versus UFH ($422 vs $662, respectively; net savings $240). The average anticoagulant cost, including drug-administration cost per patient, was lower with UFH versus enoxaparin ($259 vs $360, respectively; net savings $101). However, when both clinical events and drug-acquisition costs were considered, the total hospital cost was lower with enoxaparin versus UFH ($782 vs $922, respectively; savings $140). Hospital cost-savings were greatest ($287) in patients with NIHSS scores ≥14.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher drug cost of enoxaparin was offset by the reduction in clinical events as compared to the use of UFH for VTE prophylaxis after an AIS, particularly in patients with severe stroke.

Patient education program for venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalized patients

PURPOSE

Up to 15% of clinician-ordered doses of injectable pharmacological prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism are not administered. Patient refusal accounts for nearly 50% of these omitted doses. We conducted a prospective cohort study to determine whether a patient education program would improve medication adherence to clinician-ordered injectable prophylactic anticoagulation.

METHODS

We identified 528 hospitalized patients ordered to receive injectable pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. We evaluated the impact of pharmacist-led patient education sessions on medication adherence (defined as the ratio of doses administered to doses scheduled) compared with our historical cohort.

RESULTS

Individualized patient education sessions were conducted within 24 hours of the initial order for prophylactic anticoagulation in 99% of patients. Adherence to clinician-ordered pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was higher after the patient education program than in our historical cohort (94.4% vs 89.9%, P <.0001). The proportion of patients receiving 100% of scheduled doses of injectable pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was higher after our novel patient education program than in our historical cohort (73.7% vs 62.4%, P=.001). Patient refusal as a reason for omitted doses was less frequent after the patient education program (29.3% vs 43.7%, P=.001).

CONCLUSION

Pharmacist-led individualized patient education sessions were associated with higher medication adherence to clinician-ordered injectable pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and a reduction in patient refusal as a reason for omitted doses. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a patient education program on medication adherence to pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is warranted.

A simple reminder system improves venous thromboembolism prophylaxis rates and reduces thrombotic events for hospitalized patients1

BACKGROUND

Compliance with venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is poor.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether a simple electronic reminder applicable to all hospitalized patients would increase prophylaxis rates and reduce VTE rates.

METHODS

An electronic reminder was added to the electronic medical record admission note used by all services in our hospital. Prophylaxis, VTE and bleeding rates before and after implementation were compared. Data were analyzed with sas version 9.1.

RESULTS

Among all adult medical and surgical patients admitted to our hospital during the time periods studied, 42.8% (1236/2888) before and 60.0% (1410/2350) after the reminder was added received appropriate prophylaxis as per American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines (P < 0.001). The difference reached significance for both medical (51.0% vs. 68.9%; P < 0.001) and surgical (48.0% vs. 61.0%; P < 0.001) services. Fewer patients were diagnosed with VTE after our reminder was added (1.1% vs. 0.3%; P = 0.001), and there was a trend towards fewer bleeds (1.1% vs. 0.6%; P = 0.09). The presence of the reminder was an independent predictor for prophylaxis being given (odds ratio [OR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70-2.18; P < 0.001), and was independently associated with a decreased risk for VTE (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.64; P = 0.003) after adjustment for other VTE risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Adding an electronic reminder to the admission note improved prophylaxis rates and reduced VTE rates across services. The system is easily reproducible and applicable to other facilities. The improvement obtained was modest, so additional measures will probably be needed to optimize prophylaxis rates.

Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second leading cause of death and a major cause of morbidity in patients with cancer. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is recommended in all hospitalized cancer patients without contraindications to anticoagulants. The role of thromboprophylaxis in outpatients undergoing chemotherapy is less certain because of the diversity of the tumor types and their associated risks of VTE and bleeding. Thromboprophylaxis should only be considered in patients at high risk for VTE. Cancer patients with a newly diagnosed VTE should be preferably treated with low-molecular-weight heparin for a minimum of 3-6 months. Treatment duration should be individualized based on the clinical status and stage of the cancer, the risk of recurrent VTE, the risk of bleeding, and personal preference of the patient. Further research is required to assess the role of the new oral anticoagulants (direct Xa and thrombin inhibitors) for this high-risk population.

Thromboprophylaxis use in medical and surgical inpatients and the impact of an electronic risk assessment tool as part of a multi-factorial intervention. A report on behalf of the elVis study investigators

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major source of morbidity and mortality for both surgical and medical hospitalised patients. Despite the availability of guidelines, thromboprophylaxis continues to be underutilised. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of an electronic VTE risk assessment tool (elVis) on VTE prophylaxis in hospitalised patients. A national, multicentre, prospective clinical audit collected information on VTE prophylaxis and risk factors for VTE in 2,400 hospitalised patients (comprising of equal numbers of medical, surgical and orthopaedic patients). After auditing the standard care use of VTE prophylaxis in 1,200 consecutive patients (audit 1, A1), the elVis system was installed and a second audit (A2) of VTE prophylaxis was performed in a further 1,200 patients. The use of the electronic VTE risk assessment tool was low with 20.5% of patients assessed with elVis. The intervention, elVis plus accompanying education, improved the use VTE prophylaxis to guidelines by 5.0% amongst all patients and by 10.7% amongst high risk patients (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.27 and 1.65 respectively). The use of elVis in A2 varied between hospitals and specialties and this resulted in marked heterogeneity. Despite this heterogeneity, patients assessed with elVis had 1.44 times higher AOR of being treated to guidelines compared to those who were not (P < 0.05). The use of elVis accompanied by staff education improved VTE prophylaxis, especially amongst high risk patients. To optimise the effectiveness and support enduring practice change electronic systems, such as elVis, need to be completely integrated within the treatment pathway.

Barriers and potential solutions toward optimal prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis for hospitalized medical patients: a survey of healthcare professionals

OBJECTIVE

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis remains underused in hospitalized medical patients despite strong recommendations that at-risk patients should receive prophylaxis. To understand this gap between knowledge and practice, we surveyed clinicians' perceptions about the importance of DVT prophylaxis, barriers to guideline implementation, and interventions to optimize prophylaxis.

METHODS

Paper- and electronic mail-based surveys were sent to 1553 internists, nurses, pharmacists, and physiotherapists in Ontario, Canada. Responses were scored on 7-point Likert scales. An important barrier to optimal DVT prophylaxis was 1 with a mean score ≥5, and interventions with high potential success or feasibility were those with mean scores ≥5.

RESULTS

DVT prophylaxis was perceived as important by all clinician groups but this did not appear to translate into knowledge about underutilization of current DVT prophylaxis strategies. Physicians and pharmacists recognized the underuse of DVT prophylaxis in medical patients, while nurses and physiotherapists tended to perceive prophylaxis strategies as appropriate. Lack of clear indications and contraindications for prophylaxis and concerns about bleeding risks were perceived as important barriers. Preprinted orders were considered the most potentially successful and feasible way to optimize prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable barrier to optimal DVT prophylaxis utilization may be that those healthcare providers best able to conduct a daily assessment of patients' need for prophylaxis underrecognize the problem that prophylaxis is underutilized in this population. Interventions to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice should consider preprinted orders outlining DVT risk factors, and educating front-line care providers prior to implementation of a top-down approach.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for medical service-mostly cancer-patients at hospital discharge

OBJECTIVE

Many hospitalized Medical Service patients remain at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hospital discharge. Our aim was to compare the effect of the use or omission of extended pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis after hospital discharge among Medical Service patients on the incidence of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) over the ensuing 3 months.

METHODS

In this case-control study, we identified a case population of 461 patients for whom parenteral pharmacological VTE prophylaxis was prescribed to continue after discharge and matched them according to age, sex, and VTE risk score to a control group of 922 patients for whom VTE prophylaxis was not continued after discharge.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint of symptomatic DVT or PE at 90 days occurred in 5.0% of patients receiving extended prophylaxis compared with 4.3% of patients who received no prophylaxis after discharge (P=.58). Fewer patients were alive at 90 days in patients receiving extended pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis, compared with those who received no prophylaxis after discharge (56.8% vs 68.4%, P <.001). Major bleeding, defined as those events requiring blood transfusion, medical, or surgical intervention, occurred more frequently in patients receiving extended VTE prophylaxis after discharge than in those patients who received no prophylaxis after discharge (3.9% vs 1.9%, P=.03).

CONCLUSION

Extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in high-risk Medical Service patients did not reduce symptomatic DVT and PE in the ensuing 90 days after hospital discharge. There was a higher incidence of all-cause death and major bleeding episodes in patients receiving extended prophylaxis. Our observations do not support the routine use of extended VTE prophylaxis in Medical Service patients. Further research is needed to identify patients who may benefit from extended pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis and those who may have too great a bleeding risk.

Therapeutic Interchange of Parenteral Anticoagulants: Challenges for Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees

This is a review of key factors for pharmacy and therapeutics committees to consider when developing a therapeutic interchange (TI) program for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. Recent patient safety initiatives aimed at reducing the incidence of hospital-acquired VTE may increase the prescribing of thromboprophylactic agents recommended in VTE management guidelines. As a result, more pharmacy and therapeutics committees may consider TI programs for parenteral anticoagulants. However, the TI of anticoagulants appears challenging at this time. Firstly, the therapeutic equivalence of the commonly prescribed parenteral anticoagulants, enoxaparin, dalteparin and fondaparinux, has not been established. Secondly, because of the wide range of clinical indications for these anticoagulants, a blanket agent-specific TI program could lead to off-label use. Use of an indication-specific TI program could be difficult to manage administratively, and may cause prescribing confusion and errors. Thirdly, careful dosing and contraindications of certain parenteral anticoagulants in special patient populations, such as those with renal impairment, further impact the suitability of these agents for inclusion in TI programs. Finally, although TI may appear to offer lower drug-acquisition costs, it is important to determine its effect on all cost parameters and ultimately ensure that the care of patients requiring VTE prophylaxis is not compromised.

Low molecular weight heparin bridging for atrial fibrillation: is VTE thromboprophylaxis the major benefit?

Paucity of data has led to a lack of consensus regarding indications for, and risk-benefit ratio of, low molecular weight heparin 'bridging' for cardioembolic prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) until their INR levels are in therapeutic range. Using a hospital database, we compared AF patients ≥65 years who were bridged (n = 265) with patients who were not bridged (n = 4532) after hospital discharge. Patients who failed to achieve a therapeutic INR within 30 days were excluded. CHADS₂ scores (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75, diabetes, stroke), bleeding risk and co-morbidity scores were assessed. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for outcome events (death, stroke, hemorrhage and venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 30 days of discharge were compared. Bridged patients, as compared to those not bridged, were younger (74.7 ± 6.6 vs. 78.5 ± 7.7 years), less likely to be white (36 vs. 51%), and less likely to have CHADS₂ scores ≥2 (67 vs. 84%), all P < 0.001. There was no significant difference in bleeding risk (bridged vs. not bridged: 1.5 ± 7 vs. 1.7 ± 6). In logistic models adjusting for age, white race, bleeding risk, CHADS₂ and Comorbidity scores, bridging was significantly associated with lower mortality and a decreased odds ratio for VTE (both P < 0.01) but not for stroke or hemorrhage (both P > 0.80). Although we found insufficient evidence of either lower stroke or greater bleeding risk with bridging, our data suggest the possibility that LMWH bridging in patients with AF is associated with lower risks of VTE and death within 30 days of discharge.

Variation in physician deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis attitudes and practices at an academic tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains a major cause of in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Effective DVT prophylaxis is available but underutilized. We sought to describe physician understanding of DVT epidemiology and prophylaxis practices.

METHODS

All medical and surgical residents, and hospitalist attendings were invited to participate in an on-line survey. Physicians were queried about DVT epidemiology, risk factors, prophylaxis practices, and complications. Means and standard deviations were calculated for ordinal responses. χ² was used for dichotomous variables.

RESULTS

Of 281 doctors emailed, 69/160 (43%) medical residents, 26/72 (36%) surgical residents, and 21/49 (43%) hospitalist attendings participated. All three overestimated DVT incidence and morbidity. Surgical residents listed paralysis as high risk and minor surgery as a low/no risk factor. Medical residents thought heart failure and varicose veins were low/no risk for developing DVT. Regarding prophylaxis, surgical residents did not identify ambulation as a prophylactic measure, and were more likely to use SCDs, compression stockings, and enoxaparin, while medical residents and hospitalist attendings prescribed unfractionated heparin most frequently. Medical residents reported that they would hold anticoagulants for comorbidities most frequently, but all 3 groups agreed that anticoagulant prophylaxis would not significantly increase bleeding risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Perceptions of DVT risk factors and prophylaxis practices vary by both physician specialty and attending/resident status. Prophylaxis practice differences may result from these perceptions.

Venous thromboembolism pharmacy intervention management program with an active, multifaceted approach reduces preventable venous thromboembolism and increases appropriate prophylaxis

Two concepts relating to venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention have recently emerged-"appropriate" prophylaxis and "preventable" VTE. We evaluated whether a human alert, as part of a pharmacy intervention program, can increase appropriate prophylaxis and decrease preventable symptomatic VTE in hospitalized patients. This prospective study with retrospective data collection was conducted utilizing data from 1879 patients in 2006 as a control cohort. The intervention cohort data were from 1646 patients during 2007, after program implementation. The rate of appropriate prophylaxis increased from 23.8% in 2006 to 37.9% in 2007 (odds ratio 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6-2.1; P < .0001). Preventable VTE incidence was reduced by 74% (95% CI = 44%-88%) from 18.6 to 4.9 per 1000 patient discharges in 2006 and 2007, respectively (P = .0006). In conclusion, a pharmacy-led multifaceted intervention can significantly increase the rates of appropriate prophylaxis and significantly reduce the incidence of preventable VTE in hospitalized patients.

Effect of early clopidogrel discontinuation on rehospitalization in acute coronary syndrome: results from two distinct patient populations

PURPOSE

Results of a study of the association between early discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy and rehospitalization rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are reported.

SUMMARY

In a retrospective observational study, analyses of two nationally representative cohorts of adults hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or coronary stent insertion were conducted to assess risk factors for ACS-related adverse outcomes (rehospitalization for AMI or coronary revascularization) during the 12 months after completion of an initial 28-day course of clopidogrel therapy. Case data were sourced from a commercial insurance claims database, a pharmacy administrative claims database, and a combined dataset that linked hospital discharge and outpatient service data; a time-varying method was used to differentiate adverse events occurring "on" and "off" clopidogrel therapy. One cohort analysis (n = 42,757) indicated that patients who discontinued clopidogrel early (i.e., within 12 months of index discharge) were at significantly increased risk for ACS-related rehospitalization during the 12-month study period (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.20; p < 0.05). In the other cohort analysis (n = 3,171), early clopidogrel discontinuation was associated with an increased risk of rehospitalization or inpatient death (HR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.59-1.91; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Observational evidence from analyses of data on two large cohorts of patients with primarily employer-sponsored health insurance suggests that early discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy after hospitalization for AMI or coronary stent insertion is associated with a significant increase in the risk of ACS-related rehospitalization within the 12-month postdischarge period.

Perioperative pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

To determine the effectiveness of pharmacologic prophylaxis in preventing clinically relevant venous thromboembolic (VTE) events and deaths after surgery. The Surgical Care Improvement Project recommends that VTE pharmacologic prophylaxis be given within 24 hours of the operation. The bulk of evidence supporting this recommendation uses radiographic end points.

STUDY DESIGN

The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program is a Washington State quality improvement initiative with data linked to hospital admission/discharge and vital status records. We compared the rates of death, clinically relevant VTE, and a composite adverse event (CAE) in the 90 days after elective, colon/rectal resections, based on receipt of pharmacologic prophylaxis (within 24 hours of surgery) at 36 Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program hospitals (2005-2009).

RESULTS

Of 4,195 (mean age 61.1 ± 15.6 years; 54.1% women) patients, 56.5% received pharmacologic prophylaxis. Ninety-day death (2.5% vs 1.6%; p = 0.03), VTE (1.8% vs 1.1%; p = 0.04), and CAE (4.2% vs 2.5%; p = .002) were lower in those who received pharmacologic prophylaxis. After adjustment for patient and procedure characteristics, the odds were 36% lower for CAE (odds ratio = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93) with pharmacologic prophylaxis. In any given quarter, hospitals where patients more often received pharmacologic prophylaxis (highest tertile of use) had the lowest rates of CAE (2.3% vs 3.6%; p = 0.05) compared with hospitals in the lowest tertile.

CONCLUSIONS

Using clinical end points, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of VTE pharmacologic prophylaxis in patients having elective colorectal surgery. Hospitals that used pharmacologic prophylaxis more often had the lowest rates of adverse events.

Cancer-associated thrombosis: prevention and treatment

Patients with cancer are at high risk to develop venous thromboembolism, and they are also more likely to develop complications from anticoagulant treatment. Because little research has focused on the oncology population to date, the optimal methods of prophylaxis and treatment remain uncertain in some clinical situations. Currently, low molecular weight heparin and warfarin are the most frequently used pharmacologic agents; however, they have their limitations. Other therapeutic options, such as inferior caval filters, are poorly studied and remain controversial. A summary of the most recent evidence on the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients is presented here.

Adherence to guideline-directed venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among medical and surgical inpatients at 33 academic medical centers in the United States

This study's purpose was to describe compliance with established venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines in medical and surgical inpatients at US academic medical centers (AMCs). Data were collected for a 2007 University HealthSystem Consortium Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism (DVT/PE) Benchmarking Project that explored VTE in AMCs. Prophylaxis was considered appropriate based on 2004 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. A total of 33 AMCs from 30 states participated. In all, 48% of patients received guideline-directed prophylaxis-59% were medical and 41% were surgical patients. VTE history was more common among medical patients with guideline-directed prophylaxis. Surgical patients admitted from the emergency department and with higher illness severity were more likely to receive appropriate prophylaxis. Despite guidelines, VTE prophylaxis remains underutilized in these US AMCs, particularly among surgical patients. Because AMCs provide the majority of physician training and should reflect and set care standards, this appears to be an opportunity for practice and quality improvement and for education.

Venous thromboembolism in heart failure: preventable deaths during and after hospitalization

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare the clinical characteristics, prophylaxis, treatment, and outcomes of patients with venous thromboembolism with and without heart failure.

METHODS

We studied patients with heart failure in the population-based Worcester Venous Thromboembolism Study of 1822 consecutive patients with validated venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Of the 1822 patients with venous thromboembolism, 319 (17.5%) had a history of clinical heart failure and 1503 (82.5%) did not. Patients with heart failure were older (mean age 75 vs 62 years, P<.0001) and more likely to have been immobilized (65.2% vs 46.1%, P<.0001). Thromboprophylaxis was omitted in approximately one third of patients with heart failure who had been hospitalized for non-venous thromboembolism-related illness or had undergone major surgery within the 3 months before diagnosis. Patients with heart failure had a higher frequency of in-hospital death (9.7% vs 3.3%, P<.0001) and death within 30 days of venous thromboembolism diagnosis (15.6% vs 6.4%, P<.0001). Heart failure (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-3.62) and immobility (adjusted OR 4.37; 95% CI, 2.42-7.9) were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death. Heart failure (adjusted OR 1.57; 95% CI, 1.01-2.43) and immobility (adjusted OR 3.05; 95% CI, 2.01-4.62) also were independent predictors of death within 30 days of venous thromboembolism diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

High mortality was observed among patients with heart failure and venous thromboembolism both during and after hospitalization. Heart failure and immobility are potent risk factors for in-hospital death and death within 30 days in patients with venous thromboembolism.

Community hospital participation in a pilot project for venous thromboembolism quality measures: learning, collaboration, and early improvement

BACKGROUND

Participation in national demonstration projects by hospitals provides opportunities for learning, collaboration, and early improvement. A community teaching hospital, Overlook Hospital, part of the two-hospital Atlantic Health system, participated in a pilot project in the United States with The Joint Commission to develop quality measures for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention and management. THE PILOT PROJECT: The VTE project formally began in January 2005, and by January 2007, on the basis of alpha testing to assess face validity and data-collection issues, eight measures were selected for pilot testing. The hospitals tested the quality measures from January through June 2007; data collected included discharges from October 2006 through March 2007. During the pilot, Overlook achieved significant improvements in VTE prevention and management. As a result, in Summer 2007, Atlantic Health developed an organizationwide initiative to improve VTE prevention and treatment.

DISCUSSION

In 2008, the Joint Commission recommended that the VTE measures become a core measure set and be aligned with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services quality measures. Following successful implementation of multiple quality improvement innovations that arose from the pilot project participation, Atlantic Health sustained and expanded its efforts in 2009 to improve'performance on eight VTE quality measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation of a broad range of hospitals, including academic medical centers and community hospitals, in a national pilot project to develop quality measures is critical to ensure that differences in environment, resources, staffing, and patient acuity are accounted for, particularly when the measures are used for public reporting.

Economic impact of enoxaparin after acute ischemic stroke based on PREVAIL

The efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been demonstrated for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after acute ischemic stroke. Few data exist regarding the economic impact of LMWHs versus UFH in this population. A decision-analytic model was constructed using clinical information from the Prevention of VTE after Acute Ischemic stroke with LMWH Enoxaparin (PREVAIL) study, and drug costs and mean Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services event costs. When considering the total cost of events and drugs, enoxaparin was associated with cost-savings of $895 per patient compared with UFH ($2018 vs $2913). Findings were retained within the univariate and multivariate analyses. From a payer perspective, enoxaparin was cost-effective compared with UFH in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The difference was driven by the lower clinical event rates with enoxaparin. Use of enoxaparin may help to reduce the clinical and economic burden of VTE.

Risk assessment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim is to provide a concise review of risk assessment models that stratify hospitalized acutely ill medical patients at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

RECENT FINDINGS

Risk-assessment models (RAMs) for hospitalized medical patients at risk for VTE prior to 2005 attempted to identify at-risk patients using a point system or binary yes/no approach as to the existence of exposing (acute medical illness) or predisposing (genetic or clinical characteristic) risk factors for VTE. These RAMs were derived from data predominately from patient subgroups within randomized controlled trials and were cumbersome, not subject to rigorous validation, and were based on limited evidence of how these risk factors interacted in a quantitative manner. Recently, simplified RAMs have been proposed that have included this patient group. The RAMs are composed of various point systems and a threshold, which then would identify at-risk patient groups that would benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Although some of the point systems have been derived intuitively, they have been validated in large patient cohorts either prospectively or retrospectively and have shown good sensitivity. The presence of malignancy, prior VTE, hypercoagulability, advanced age and immobility all conferred increased risk of VTE during hospitalization or in the posthospital discharge period in the various models.

SUMMARY

Simple RAMs based on point systems to predict risk of VTE for the hospitalized medical patient have been validated that include either exposing or predisposing risk factors for VTE. It is hoped that these RAMs may identify acutely ill medical patients with additional characteristics that do not easily fit into group-specific thromboembolic risk assessment categories as currently proposed by international clinical guidelines.

Improving Practices in US Hospitals to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism: lessons from ENDORSE

BACKGROUND

venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is suboptimal in the US despite long-standing evidence-based recommendations. The aim of this subset analysis of the Epidemiologic International Day for the Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting (ENDORSE) study was to identify characteristics of hospitals with high guideline-recommended prophylaxis use.

METHODS

between September and November 2006, charts from eligible patients aged ≥ 40 years with an acute medical illness or age ≥ 18 years and undergoing a surgical procedure were reviewed from randomly selected US acute-care hospitals. Hospitals were ranked based on the proportion of at-risk patients who received American College of Chest Physicians-recommended types of prophylaxis. Hospital characteristics were compared to determine factors related to more frequent prophylaxis use. Hospitals were followed up 1 year after the chart audit.

RESULTS

overall, 9257 patients were evaluated from 81 hospitals. Appropriate types of prophylaxis were prescribed to more at-risk patients in hospitals in the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile of prophylaxis use (74% vs 36%). All quartiles had a similar percentage of at-risk patients (61%-65%). Significantly more hospitals in the highest quartile had residency training programs (43% vs 5%), a larger median number of beds (277 vs 140), and had adopted hospital-wide prophylaxis protocols (76% vs 40%). In the follow-up survey, more hospitals overall had adopted hospital-wide written guidelines for venous thromboembolism prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

these findings support the value of hospital-wide protocols and local audits for VTE prevention, as recommended by several national quality-of-care groups.

Prevalence of stroke/transient ischemic attack among patients with acute coronary syndromes in a real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Atherothrombosis is a systemic disease that may manifest as acute ischemic events in multiple vascular beds. Patients who have experienced an atherothrombosis-related ischemic event in 1 vascular bed are at risk for developing ischemic events in other vascular beds. Antiplatelet therapy demands an understanding of the balance between arterial thrombosis benefit and adverse event risk. Clinical trials indicate that dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and the newer thienopyridines increases the risk of bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with prior cerebrovascular events. Informed clinical decision making requires a better understanding of the real-world prevalence of cerebrovascular events.

OBJECTIVE AND PURPOSE

To estimate the prevalence of stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA) among patients with ACS within US health plan populations.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted of patients with ACS in 5 health care claims databases. The index event was defined as the first documented inpatient health care claim for myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Patients with ≥12 months of pre-index medical care encounter information were included. Stroke/TIA was identified by the first health care claim for these conditions any time prior to or within 90 days following the index ACS event.

RESULTS

Across all databases, between 3.8% and 15.7% of patients with ACS had prior stroke/TIA and between 3.4% and 11.7% of patients with ACS with no history of cerebrovascular events had documented stroke/TIA following the index ACS hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Despite important differences between the various database populations, there is a high prevalence of documented stroke/TIA in patients with ACS both prior to and following the ACS event. These real-world findings, set within the context of the increased bleeding risk observed with the newer thienopyridines, are important considerations when selecting antiplatelet therapy for patients with ACS.

Appropriate VTE prophylaxis is associated with lower direct medical costs

PURPOSE

To calculate and compare the direct medical costs of guideline-recommended prophylaxis with prophylaxis that does not fully adhere with guideline recommendations in a large, real-world population.

METHODS

Discharge records were retrieved from the US Premier Perspective™ database (January 2003-December 2003) for patients aged≥40 years with a primary diagnosis of cancer, chronic heart failure, lung disease, or severe infectious disease who received some form of thromboprophylaxis. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression modeling were performed to compare direct medical costs between discharges who received appropriate prophylaxis (correct type, dose, and duration based on sixth edition American College of Chest Physicians [ACCP] recommendations) and partial prophylaxis (not in full accordance with ACCP recommendations). Market segmentation analysis was used to compare costs stratified by hospital and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 683 005 discharges included, 148,171 (21.7%) received appropriate prophylaxis and 534,834 (78.3%) received partial prophylaxis. The total direct unadjusted costs were $15,439 in the appropriate prophylaxis group and $17,763 in the partial prophylaxis group. After adjustment, mean adjusted total costs per discharge were lower for those receiving appropriate prophylaxis ($11,713; 95% confidence interval [CI], $11,675-$11,753) compared with partial prophylaxis ($13,369; 95% CI, $13,332-$13 406; P<0.01). Appropriate prophylaxis appeared to be associated with numerically lower unadjusted costs than partial prophylaxis, regardless of hospital size, rural/urban location, teaching status, and patient age and gender.

CONCLUSION

This large, real-world analysis suggests that appropriate prophylaxis, in adherence with ACCP guidelines, is potentially cost-saving compared with partial prophylaxis in at-risk medical patients.

Are hospitals delivering appropriate VTE prevention? The venous thromboembolism study to assess the rate of thromboprophylaxis (VTE start)

The 7th conference of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP7) provides recommendations on the type, dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the extent to which hospitals follow these criteria has not been well studied. Discharge and billing records for patients admitted to any of 16 acute-care hospitals from January 2005 to December 2006 were obtained. Patients 18 years or older who had an inpatient stay ≥2 days and no apparent contraindications for thromboprophylaxis were grouped into the categories of critical care, surgery and medically ill before being assessed for additional VTE risk factors based on the diagnostic criteria outlined in ACCP7. For patients at risk, the recommended type (mechanical or pharmacologic), dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis was identified based on the guidelines and compared to the regimen actually received, if any. Among the 258,556 hospitalized patients, 68,278 (26.4%) were determined to be at risk of VTE without apparent contraindications for thromboprophylaxis. The proportions of patients who received the appropriate type, dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis were 10.5, 9.8, and 17.9% for critical care, medical, and surgical patients, respectively. Of those at risk, 36.8% received no thromboprophylaxis and an additional 50.2% received thromboprophylaxis deemed inappropriate for one or more reasons. The implementation of ACCP7 guidelines for type, dosage, and duration of thromboprophylaxis is low in patients at risk of VTE. There is a need for physicians and health systems to improve awareness and implementation of recommended thromboprophylaxis.

The importance of appropriate prophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in at-risk medical patients

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which encompasses both deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a significant healthcare problem, leading to considerable morbidity, mortality and resource utilisation.

AIMS

This review discusses the adherence to VTE guideline recommendations and the available clinical evidence on the appropriate type, dose and duration of VTE prophylaxis.

METHODS

A literature survey was conducted using Pub Med and EMBASE to identify publications related to appropriate thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients at risk of VTE.

RESULTS

Despite evidence from clinical trials and national guidelines, VTE prophylaxis in medically ill patients remains underutilised. The use of unfractionated heparin three-times-daily, low-molecular-weight heparin once-daily and fondaparinux once-daily has demonstrated effectiveness in clinical trials of medically ill patients. However, controversy exists about the use of unfractionated heparin twice-daily, and fondaparinux has not yet received US Food and Drug Administration approval for VTE prophylaxis in medically ill patients.

CONCLUSION

It is important for clinicians to have an understanding of the evidence-based literature when selecting an appropriate drug, at the appropriate dose, for the appropriate duration for VTE prophylaxis in medically ill patients. VTE prophylaxis in medically ill patients is cost-effective, and drugs that are expensive may still be cost-effective when considering improved efficacy and/or safety. Recently, the underutilisation of VTE prophylaxis has led to the involvement of government and other regulatory agencies in an attempt to increase appropriate VTE prophylaxis in US hospitals and improve the clinical and economic outcomes in medical patients at risk of VTE.

An Assessment of Surgical Thromboprophylaxis in a Tertiary Care Center

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent surgical complication. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends implementation of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis according to surgery type and VTE risk factors. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of surgical admissions to determine the rate and predictors of use and appropriate use of thromboprophylaxis as defined by the 2004 ACCP guidelines and to determine the risk of postoperative VTE. Methods: Using data from an administrative health care database of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke in the province of Quebec, we assembled a cohort of all consecutive surgical admissions in 2006 that met ACCP criteria for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis and assessed rates of thromboprophylaxis presence and appropriateness. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine characteristics associated with thromboprophylaxis prescription. The incidence of postoperative VTE was assessed at 3 months. Results: Of 2286 surgical admissions that met criteria for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, 81% received thromboprophylaxis and, of these, 31% received appropriate thromboprophylaxis as per ACCP guidelines. Male sex, age below 40 years, and short-duration hospitalization were significantly associated with absent and inappropriate thromboprophylaxis. Cancer diagnosis and heart failure within 3 months preceding surgery were protective against inappropriate thromboprophylaxis (OR 0.43, 95% CI [0.33-0.57] and 0.43 [0.26-0.70], respectively). At 3 months following surgery, 27 patients (1.2%) developed VTE. Patients who developed VTE were more likely to have had a previous VTE than patients who did not develop a VTE ( P < .0001). Conclusions: Targeted recommendations, in particular concerning male patients with short duration hospitalization, may improve thromboprophylaxis compliance and appropriateness rates.

Hospital-based costs associated with venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens

Clinically and economically, venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease represents a significant burden to the US healthcare system. This analysis compares the total direct medical costs associated with VTE prophylaxis with enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin (UFH). Hospital discharge and billing records were extracted from the Premier Perspective database (January 2002-December 2006). The primary outcome was the total direct medical costs for discharges that were at risk of VTE and received enoxaparin or UFH. A total of 894,364 discharge records met the study inclusion criteria, of which 39.4% received enoxaparin and 60.6% received UFH. After adjustment for pre-defined covariates, mean total direct medical costs per discharge for the UFH group were $6,443, $1,080 more than those for the enoxaparin group ($5,363; P < .0001). In conclusion, enoxaparin prophylaxis is a cost-saving therapy, when compared with UFH, for the prevention of VTE in patients with a diverse range of medical conditions conferring VTE risk.