Dual atrioventricular nodal pathways: a reappraisal

Determinants of tachycardia induction using ventricular stimulation in dual pathway atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Factors determining tachycardia induction using ventricular stimulation in atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia utilizing the slow pathway for anterograde and the fast pathway for retrograde conduction were analyzed in 53 patients. Sixteen patients had tachycardia induced by ventricular stimulation. In 15, tachycardia was inducible with incremental ventricular pacing. In 4 of these 15 patients, the tachycardia was also induced with V1V2 testing, while in 11 patients, the tachycardia was not induced with V1V2 testing. In 9 of the latter 11 patients, tachycardia could be induced with V1V2V3 testing, suggesting that the retrograde effective refractory period (ERP) of the right bundle (RB) or the relative refractory period of the His-Purkinje system (HPS) was the limiting factor for tachycardia induction during V1V2 testing. In the remaining one patient, tachycardia was induced with V1V2V3 testing, which provoked a premature ventricular beat, leading to tachycardia induction. Tachycardia was not induced by ventricular stimulation in 37 patients. Factors deterring tachycardia induction in these patients may be related to the retrograde ERP or functional refractory period (FRP) of the HPS, the retrograde ERP of the fast pathway, and an insufficient conduction delay of the circuit (retrograde fast and anterograde slow pathway) to allow anterograde conduction of the slow pathway. In conclusion, AV nodal reentrant tachycardia can be induced by ventricular stimulation in approximately 30% of patients with incremental ventricular pacing and/or ventricular extrastimulus testing. Induction of tachycardia with ventricular stimulation, nevertheless, is frequently limited by the retrograde FRP or ERP of the HPS, the retrograde ERP of the fast pathway, and possibly by an insufficient conduction delay of the circuit.

Sustained "slow-fast" and "fast-slow" AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia in a patient with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia

A case is presented of a 21-year-old woman with recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Electrophysiologic study demonstrated the presence of both antegrade and retrograde dual AV nodal conduction pathways and both conventional slow-fast and atypical fast-slow forms of the AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia could be induced. Both tachycardias were successfully suppressed with a combination of digoxin and verapamil.

Effects of oral diltiazem in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

Electrophysiologic studies were performed before and 2 hours after the oral administration of 270 mg of diltiazem in 3 divided doses at 8-hour intervals in 36 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Before diltiazem, all 36 patients had induction of sustained SVT: 24 with atrioventricular (AV) reentrance incorporating an accessory pathway (Group 1) and 12 with AV nodal reentrance (Group 2). After diltiazem, 20 patients in Group 1 lost the ability to induce or sustain SVT because of increased anterograde normal pathway refractoriness in 19 patients and increased retrograde accessory pathway refractoriness in 1. Eight patients in Group 2 could no longer induce or sustain SVT because of increased anterograde slow pathway refractoriness in 2 patients and increased retrograde fast pathway refractoriness in 6. Diltiazem concentration in the blood, measured in 29 patients, was 156 +/- 75 ng/ml (mean +/- standard deviation). Fifteen patients, 2 with and 13 without induction of sustained SVT after diltiazem, were discharged on the same dosage of diltiazem and followed up 5 +/- 3 months. The former 2 patients had attacks of sustained SVT, whereas the latter 13 have been free of sustained SVT. In conclusion, oral diltiazem prevents induction and sustenance of paroxysmal SVT in most patients and may be used as an alternative agent for the prophylaxis of SVT.

Spontaneous manifestation of dual AV nodal pathways resulting in complex patterns of AV conduction

Dual intranodal pathways are not uncommonly demonstrated at electophysiological study especially in patients with intranodal re-entrant tachycardias. This type of tachycardia is the most common spontaneous manifestation (albeit indirect) of dual AV nodal pathways. Other forms of spontaneous expression of dual atrio-His conduction are rare. In this report we describe a patient who exhibited complex atrioventricular conduction patterns over two intranodal pathways.