Complications of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: follow-up of 241 patients

Crinkling of epicardial defibrillator patches. A common and serious problem

The durability and reliability of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator epicardial patch systems have not been reported. In 128 consecutive patients such systems manufactured by Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. (St. Paul, Minn.) or Medtronic, Inc. (Minneapolis, Minn.) were implanted with 100% follow-up to investigate the rate of patch crinkling and its consequences. A total of 122 patients survived the operation (operative mortality, 6 patients: 4.7%). Ninety-four patients received Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. AICD patches and 28 received Medtronic PCD patches. Patients had chest x-ray studies every 3 to 6 months and function of the defibrillator was checked every 3 months. Late mortality occurred in 17 patients (13%) leaving a total of 105 long-term survivors (82%) to the present. Among 122 survivors, severe crinkling of the patches occurred in 48 patients--33 in the Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. AICD group (36%) and 15 in the PCD group (54%)--within 2 years of the implant. Crinkling of patches caused not only malfunction of the system, but also cardiac pain in three patients. Crinkling occurred as early as 2 months after implant and progressed throughout the period of observation. Fourteen patients later required implant of an additional transvenous defibrillator because of failure of the epicardial system. The percentage of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems needed was higher for the Medtronic group (28%) than for the Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. AICD group (6.3%). Both systems have shown an unacceptably high rate of patch crinkling that occurs in a relatively short time. There is no difference whether a thoracotomy or midline sternotomy is used or whether the patches are implanted intrapericardially or extrapericardially. The quest should continue for a better patch system design.

Transvenous versus transthoracic cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. A comparative analysis of morbidity, mortality, and survival

The hypothesis that transvenous implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator is associated with less morbidity than use of a transthoracic approach was investigated in a retrospective series of 146 patients. None of these patients had concomitant heart procedures, and the preoperative characteristics of the two groups were similar. When analyzed by actual technique used (transvenous, 57 patients; transthoracic, 89 patients) and by the intention-to-treat method (transvenous, 65 patients, 8 of whom actually underwent thoracotomy; thoracotomy, 81 patients), transvenous implantation was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative respiratory complications and atrial fibrillation. Total cardiac mortality and freedom from sudden cardiac death in the transvenous and transthoracic groups were comparable at 2 years.

Diagnosis of ICD lead failure using continuous event marker recording

Stored electrograms enhance the ability to evaluate therapy episodes in the third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator. These electrograms are recorded from either the shocking or rate sensing leads, but not both. As a result, differentiation of certain types of sensing abnormalities may be difficult prior to surgical exploration. We present a case of rate sensing lead failure due to an insulation break. Several minutes of recording of the event marker in the laboratory failed to document any abnormal sensing; the diagnosis was made by recording the event marker on a 24-hour continuous (Holter) monitor. The Holter monitor/event marker combination was of substantial diagnostic value and allowed for a more focused surgical evaluation and treatment.

Subclavian crush syndrome complicating transvenous cardioverter defibrillator systems

Subclavian crush syndrome, described with pacemaker leads implanted via subclavian puncture, may occur when conductor fractures and insulation breaches develop by compression of a lead between the first rib and clavicle. We reviewed our experience in 164 patients who underwent intended implantation of transvenous defibrillator systems to determine the clinical relevance of subclavian crush syndrome in defibrillator patients. Venous access was obtained via subclavian puncture in 114 patients (70%) and via cephalic cut-down in 50 patients (30%). Nonthoracotomy lead systems, with or without subcutaneous patch, were successfully implanted in 131 of 164 patients (79.9%). Thoracotomy was required in 32 patients (19.5%) and subxiphoid patch in 1 patient (0.6%). Over a mean of 12.9 months (range 1-62 months), 3 patients (1.8%) required revision of the rate sensing lead/coil or superior vena cava coil after development of lead compression fractures in the region of the clavicle and first rib. In all 3 patients the leads had been implanted via subclavian puncture (2.6% of patients in whom the subclavian technique was utilized). Two patients presented with spurious shocks. One patient was asymptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

When venous access is obtained via subclavian puncture, subclavian crush syndrome may develop in patients with transvenous defibrillator systems. Patients may be asymptomatic and lead fractures may go unrecognized. When implanting transvenous defibrillator systems, strong consideration should be given to obtaining venous access primarily via the cephalic cut-down technique.

Limitations and late complications of third-generation automatic cardioverter-defibrillators

BACKGROUND

This study examines the limitations and complex management problems associated with the use of tiered-therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study group comprises the first 154 patients undergoing implantation of tiered-therapy ICDs at our institution. Pulse generators from three different manufacturers were used. In 39 patients, a complete nonthoracotomy lead system was used. The perioperative mortality was 1.3%. Of these 154 patients, 37% experienced late postoperative problems. Twenty-one patients required system revision within 36.5 months (mean, 8.57 +/- 11.3) of surgery. Reasons for revision were spurious shocks due to electrode fractures (3) or electrode adapter malfunction (2), inadequate signal from endocardial rate-sensing electrodes (3), superior vena cava or right ventricular coil migration (5), failure to correct tachyarrhythmias due to a postimplant rise in defibrillation threshold (5), or pulse generator failure (3). One of these patients required system removal for infection after revision of an endocardial lead. A further 32 patients received inappropriate shocks for atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response or sinus tachycardia. Two of these patients also received shocks for ventricular tachycardia initiated by antitachycardia pacing triggered by atrial fibrillation. Ventricular pacing for bradycardia was associated with inappropriate shocks due to excessive autogain in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the major diagnostic and therapeutic advantages of tiered-therapy ICDs, a significant proportion of patients continue to experience hardware-related complications or receive inappropriate shocks.

Italian multicenter clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation: acute and long-term results in 307 patients. The Italian Endotak Investigator Group

This study presents the acute and long-term results of 307 patients (267 men, mean age 57.5 years, 205 suffering from coronary artery disease, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 33.3%) with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias who underwent attempted transvenous ICD implantation with the CPI Endotak lead system in 37 Italian centers. Transvenous ICD implantation was ultimately accomplished in 306 (99.7%) patients. These included 19 subjects with high (< 10 J below output energy of implanted device) defibrillation threshold (DFT) at implant. One hundred sixty-four patients (53%) were implanted with the endocardial lead alone, while 142 also received an SQ patch or SQ array. The mean DFT (not always step-down DFT) at implant was 16.9 +/- 5.7 joules; 15.3 +/- 5.2 joules with biphasic shock and 19.6 +/- 5.4 joules with monophasic shock; P < 0.0001. A significantly higher percentage of patients tested with a biphasic shock could be implanted with adequate safety margin and without an additional SQ patch or SQ array (98% and 81%, respectively). No perioperative deaths occurred. During the mean follow-up of 14.5 +/- 10.2 months, 140 patients (52%) received at least one appropriate shock. An inappropriate shock was observed in 26% of episodes. The 1- and 3-year actuarial incidence of sudden death was 2% and 4%, respectively, and that of total death was 10% and 20%, respectively. A pocket infection requiring ICD explantation occurred in 4 patients (1.4%) and an endocardial lead dislodgment in 11 patients (3.6%). Two patients (0.3%) showed a sensing pin disconnection and six patients (2.3%) had a lead insulation break. The results of this Italian multicenter trial indicate that the CPI Endotak lead system is a simple, safe, and reliable system for endocardial defibrillation. When compared to epicardial leads, it clearly reduces the perioperative mortality and morbidity, while maintaining a similar efficacy in preventing sudden death and terminating ventricular arrhythmias.

Right atrial compression related to defibrillator patches

Acceptable function of an internal defibrillator can be achieved with different patch orientations. For patients requiring defibrillator patches concomitant with a cardiac procedure requiring extracorporeal circulation, application of one of the patches within the pericardium adjacent to the right atrium has provided excellent defibrillation thresholds. We describe 4 such patients in whom a compressing thrombus subsequently developed between the patch and the atrium. The thrombus was small and asymptomatic in 1 patient, but caused localized tamponade requiring reexploration in 2 patients and a fatal superior vena caval obstruction in 1. The precise etiology of this serious complication remains unclear, but its occurrence argues against the application of intrapericardial defibrillator patches in this orientation.

Benefits of treatment with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with stable ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

The availability of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) that are capable of antitachycardia pacing may lead to an increased use of ICDs in patients with haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without a history of cardiac arrest. The frequency of potentially life-threatening fast ventricular tachycardias (cycle length < 250 ms) was investigated in patients who had a third generation ICD with endocardial leads implanted because they had haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without a history of cardiac arrest.

METHODS

Between January 1990 and October 1993, 50 patients (age (mean (SD)) 60 (11); ejection fraction 39 (16)%; 82% with coronary artery disease and 8% with dilated cardiomyopathy) with haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia (cycle length (mean (SD)) 348 (60) ms; range 250-500 ms) and without a history of cardiac arrest were treated with third generation ICDs that were capable of antitachycardia pacing. Fast ventricular tachycardia had been induced in 14 (28%) during baseline electrophysiological study. The benefit of ICD treatment was estimated as the difference between total mortality and the occurrence of fast ventricular tachycardia that would have been fatal if it had not been terminated.

RESULTS

During follow up of 17 (12) months, 33 patients (66%) had a total of 3861 episodes of ventricular tachycardia. 91% of these episodes were terminated by antitachycardia pacing. 11 patients (22%) had episodes of potentially life-threatening fast ventricular tachycardia and 3 of these also had inducible fast ventricular tachycardia. One patient died suddenly 27 months after implantation. The difference between survival without fast ventricular tachycardia and total mortality was 9%, 12%, 27%, and 27% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

About a fifth of patients who had been given an ICD to treat haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia and who had no history of cardiac arrest experienced fast ventricular tachycardia during follow up requiring immediate cardioversion. Prospective studies are needed to investigate whether the prognosis of patients with a history of haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest is improved by ICD therapy.

Electrocardiographic pseudo-infarct patterns after implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators

Postoperative electrocardiographic (ECG) changes are frequently present after insertion of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and may mimic perioperative myocardial infarction (MI). The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and clinical significance of postoperative ECG changes in relation to clinical, laboratory, and implantation data. In 25 (16%) of 156 patients undergoing ICD implantation, significant ECG changes (> or = 50% reduction in R-wave amplitude in > or = 3 leads or new Q waves in > or = 2 leads) were present 1 to 3 days after the operation and persisted at hospital discharge in 12 (8%). Presence of thoracotomy, the total number of induced ventricular fibrillation episodes, and the number of defibrillation shocks required during defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing correlated with postoperative ECG changes. Other factors associated with a significant R-wave loss in the lateral precordial leads included left-sided pleural effusion, lung infiltrates or atelectasis, and large defibrillator patch electrodes over the left ventricle or the lateral chest wall. Myocardial necrosis documented by elevated cardiac enzymes occurred in 6 (5%) of 151 patients without significant ECG changes and in 3 (12%) with (p value not significant). However, postoperative ECG changes associated with elevated enzymes were indistinguishable from changes unrelated to necrosis. Therefore the sensitivity and specificity of the surface ECG for detection of MI after ICD placement is poor. Multiple factors such as thoracotomy, myocardial injury from DFT testing, electric insulation, or shielding of the heart may contribute to the development of electrocardiographic pseudo-infarct patterns.

Infections after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: observations in 335 patients over 10 years

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of infection after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator and the management of this complication.

SUBJECTS

335 consecutive patients who had a cardioverter-defibrillator implanted between January 1984 and December 1993.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of infection within the first month after implantation (early infection) and after the first month (late infection).

RESULTS

Infections associated with cardioverter-defibrillator devices occurred in 13 patients (3.9%) during a mean follow up of 22 (11) months. All patients had general signs of inflammation, fever (> 37.5 degrees C), and leucocytosis (> 10,000/ml) with or without purulent drainage. Five patients (38%) had infections during the first implantation, whereas eight patients (62%) had infections after replacement of the pulse generator. Early infection was observed in four patients (31%) and late infection in nine (69%). Incidence of infection was higher in patients who underwent epicardial cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (12/207 patients, 5.8%) than in those who received nonthoracotomy lead systems (1/125 patients, 0.8%) (P < 0.05). Infections were caused by staphyloccocus in 10 patients, pseudomonas in two patients, and streptococcus in one patient. The whole device had to be removed in all patients. During a mean follow up of 39 (29) months seven patients died: six of congestive heart failure and one of myocardial reinfarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection, one of the most serious complications after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. When infection occurs the system must be removed to avoid a fatal outcome.

Implantable defibrillation and thromboembolic events

In ICD patients thromboembolic events (TEEs) are described as possible complications at implant or during the follow-up. We report four cases of TEEs (two peripheral and two cerebral; 6.5% of patients) that occurred in our series during a mean follow-up of 19.4 months. The patients had chronic postinfarction LV aneurysm (3) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (1). None had previous embolisms nor evidence of left atrial or LV clots at standard preoperative transthoracic echocardiography. No paroxysms of atrial fibrillation were documented prior or after ICD implant. We discuss the possible causes of embolization and the suitability of anticoagulant therapy in ICD patients.

Nonthoracotomy- versus thoracotomy-implantable defibrillators. Intention-to-treat comparison of clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Nonthoracotomy-implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) systems may represent a significant advance in the treatment of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, but their merits relative to those of the well-established thoracotomy systems remain largely unknown. The objective of this study was to compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes after attempted ICD implantation via a nonthoracotomy versus thoracotomy approach in similar groups of patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between September 1990 and December 1992, 212 consecutive patients underwent attempted ICD system implantation without concomitant cardiac surgery at a single institution. Approach selection was not randomized but rather was based primarily on hardware availability. Primary comparisons of short- and long-term outcome were performed according to the "intention-to-treat" principle. Implantation was attempted via a nonthoracotomy approach in 120 patients (57%) and via a thoracotomy approach in 92 patients (43%). Prior cardiac surgery was more prevalent in the nonthoracotomy patients; otherwise, groups did not differ significantly in terms of prognostically relevant clinical characteristics. Nonthoracotomy implantation was successful in 101 patients (84%). After crossover to thoracotomy implantation (14 patients), the eventual success rate for ICD system implantation was 96% in the nonthoracotomy group. Thoracotomy implantation was successful in 89 patients (97%). Operative mortality was 3.3% in the nonthoracotomy and 4.3% in the thoracotomy groups (P = .73). Nonthoracotomy group patients were less likely to experience postoperative congestive heart failure (6% versus 16%; P = .02) or supraventricular arrhythmia (6% versus 18%; P = .004) and had significantly shorter postoperative intensive care and total hospitalization. Total hospital costs were significantly lower in the nonthoracotomy group ($32,205 versus $37,265; P = .001). After a follow-up of 16 +/- 9 months, there were 17 deaths in the nonthoracotomy group (none sudden) and 12 deaths in the thoracotomy group (1 sudden). One- and 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities were .87 (95% CI, .78 to .91) and .80 (95% CI, .68 to .88) in the nonthoracotomy group and .90 (95% CI, .82 to .95) and .87 (95% CI, .77 to .93) in the thoracotomy group (P = .56; log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonthoracotomy ICD implantation is associated with reduced surgical morbidity, postoperative hospital care requirement, and hospital costs and has similar efficacy in preventing sudden death relative to the thoracotomy approach. From these nonrandomized data, it appears that a nonthoracotomy approach should be considered preferable in most patients requiring ICD therapy.

One-incision approach for insertion of implantable cardioverter defibrillators

The placement of a transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) system through a single infraclavicular skin incision has been a surgical goal for years. The development of a new investigational model of ICD with substantially reduced dimensions (volume, 83 cm3; mass, 132 g) has made the one-incision approach a clinical reality. Between March and September 1993, 4 female and 19 male patients (mean age, 60 +/- 9.6 years; range, 46 to 73 years) underwent implantation of this device for the treatment of ventricular fibrillation (n = 14) or ventricular tachycardia (n = 9). One transvenous lead was placed in the right ventricular apex and another in the left subclavian vein. A subpectoral pocket was formed in the infraclavicular area from the same incision to house the ICD generator and, if necessary, the subcutaneous patch. The mean operation time (81.5 +/- 32.7 minutes; range, 54 to 195 minutes) was significantly shorter than that noted for a previous series made up of patients undergoing traditional transvenous ICD implantations. In 20 patients (87%), endovenous defibrillation without a subcutaneous patch successfully caused externally induced ventricular fibrillation to revert with a mean minimum energy output of 21.9 +/- 3.5 J (range, 12 to 24 J). Endovenous defibrillation was more successful when biphasic (n = 16/17 [94%]) shocks rather than monophasic shocks (n = 4/6 [67%]) were used. No mortality, morbidity, or surgical complications were observed. These results indicate that the one-incision approach and the small size of the ICD generator can substantially facilitate ICD implantation and result in a reduction in the surgical trauma, the operation time, and the amount of material implanted.

The usefulness of a stretch-polyester pouch to encase implanted pacemakers and defibrillators

This study was undertaken to assess the effects of enclosing permanent pacemaker and ICD pulse generators in a stretch-polyester pouch prior to implantation. Follow-up of 223 patients with oversized pacemakers and with ICDs and 344 with standard-sized pacemaker pulse generators showed that the pouch was effective in decreasing the frequency of pulse generator migration and extrusion.

Experience with two different nonthoracotomy systems for implantable defibrillator in 170 patients

Implantation of a nonthoracotomy system (Medtronic PCD or CPI Endotak) was attempted in 170 patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) not requiring concomitant cardiac surgery. A nonthoracotomy system could be successfully implanted in 95 of the 115 patients with the PCD system and 49 of 55 patients receiving the Endotak lead system. In 26 patients with failed nonthoracotomy system because of defibrillation threshold (DFT) > 25 joules (J), an epicardial system was implanted at the same setting. Patients receiving the two lead systems were comparable with regard to age, sex, and ejection fraction. However, since the PCD system offers tiered therapy multiprogrammable options, all attempts were made to implant this lead system in patients with VT that could be pace terminated. Mean DFT (15 +/- 4.7 vs 17 +/- 4.6 J; P = 0.03) and implant time (2.5 +/- 0.6 vs 3.3 +/- 0.7 hours; P = 0.02) were less with the Endotak lead system. There was no perioperative mortality. During a mean follow-up of 20 +/- 4 months, there were eight instances of lead dislodgment in patients receiving the PCD system. There were four nonsudden cardiac deaths and one sudden death in the Endotak group and three nonsudden deaths in the PCD group. Sudden cardiac death and total survival using the intention-to-treat analysis during this follow-up period were 99% and 95%, respectively. In conclusion, successful implantation, perioperative mortality, and survival rate are comparable with both lead systems; however, incorporating two defibrillating electrodes in one lead minimizes lead dislodgment and reduces implant time.

Relation between shock-related myocardial injury and defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic shocks in a canine model

BACKGROUND

Certain biphasic waveforms with specific time ratios of positive and negative components require less energy for successful defibrillation of the fibrillating ventricles than monophasic waveforms. However, if more efficient waveforms were also to be associated with more injurious effects on myocardial function, they might not provide a true biological advantage. This study investigates the relation between defibrillation efficacy and potential toxicity of monophasic and asymmetric, single capacitor, biphasic waveforms with equal durations of positive and negative components.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The myocardial lactate extraction rate (LER) was used to measure the injurious effects on myocardial oxidative metabolism of two synchronized 35-J shocks in sinus rhythm. LER, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and, in a subset of experiments, cardiac output (CO) and coronary blood flow (CBF) were measured at baseline, 30 seconds, 60 seconds, 90 seconds, 150 seconds, 300 seconds, and 600 seconds after the shocks. In 12 dogs, three different waveforms (M 10: monophasic 10 milliseconds; BI 10: biphasic 10 milliseconds; BI 20: biphasic 20 milliseconds) were tested as series of two consecutive shocks (60 seconds apart) resulting in a total of 36 sets of data. At baseline, LER was 25 +/- 11%. After monophasic shocks, LER decreased significantly more than after biphasic shocks (LER at 150 seconds: M 10: -6 +/- 31% versus BI 10: 21 +/- 15% versus BI 20: 21 +/- 16%; M 10 versus BI 10 and M 10 versus BI 20, P < .05) and showed also a slower recovery (LER at 300 seconds: M 10: 1 +/- 24% versus BI 10: 20 +/- 11% versus BI 20: 20 +/- 15%; M 10 versus BI 10 and M 10 versus BI 20, P < .05). The maximal decrease in LER was 41 +/- 27% for M 10 compared with 18 +/- 15% for BI 10 and 15 +/- 11% for BI 20 (both, M 10 versus BI 10 and M 10 versus BI 20, P < .05). There was a similar decrease in CO and MAP, with the lowest MAP after monophasic shocks. The maximal decrease in MAP was significantly greater after M 10 compared with BI 20 (-29 +/- 15 mm Hg versus -13 +/- 11 mm Hg, P < .05). The defibrillation threshold was 18.6 +/- 8 J for M 10 compared with 11.5 +/- 4.0 J for BI 10 (P < .05) and 15.0 +/- 6.1 J for BI 20, respectively (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that these specific biphasic waveforms are associated with less injurious effects on myocardial oxidative metabolism and hemodynamic performance. Given their higher defibrillation efficacy as well, biphasic waveforms may provide important long-term benefits in patients receiving frequent shocks from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Sudden death in recipients of first-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators: analysis of terminal events. Participating investigators

Clinical factors and terminal events associated with sudden death in 51 patients were analyzed from among a multicenter experience of 864 recipients of first generation automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) devices (single zone, committed, monophasic pulse with > or = 1 epicardial patch electrode) during the period May 1982-February 1988. For these 51 patients, mean age was 58 years and atherosclerotic heart disease was present in 84%, with a history of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 61%, and inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 84%; mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.26. Nearly 80% experienced one or more appropriate AICD shocks during the median 9 month (range 0-46 months) period prior to death. Of 30 monitored deaths, the first documented terminal rhythm was VF in 12 (40%), VT in 8 (27%), and asystole or electromechanical dissociation in the remaining 10 (33%). Shocks were documented during terminal events in 21 (66%) of 32 witnessed cases of sudden death with activated devices. The proportion of monitored or witnessed sudden deaths that were known or presumed to be tachyarrhythmic (based on terminal VT, VF, or shocks) ranged from 69% (11/16 cases with activated/nondepleted devices and a defibrillation threshold [DFT] < or = 20 J) to 81% (29/36 cases on intention-to-treat basis). Of 27 patients with known or presumed sudden tachyarrhythmic death, the AICD had been deactivated prior to death in 4 (15%); activated, but depleted in 4 (15%); activated/nondepleted, but with DFT of 25 J in 4 (15%); and activated/nondepleted, but without DFT testing in 4 (15%). The remaining 11 (41%) known or presumed sudden tachyarrhythmic deaths occurred in patients with activated/nondepleted devices and DFT < or = 20 J; however, definite or suspected contributory factors (e.g., hematoma under epicardial patch, generator component failure, or drug-induced DFT rise) could be identified in 6 (55%) of 11 cases. Thus, in this first-generation AICD experience: 1) most sudden deaths occurred on the basis of a known or presumed tachyarrhythmia; and 2) an understanding of apparent "failure" of ICD therapy could often be gained through an integrated analysis of associated clinical factors and management practices, as well as device "hardware" function. These observations are likely to remain relevant, even with respect to newer generation ICDs.

Pseudo-oversensing of the T wave by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a nonclinical problem

Two patients are described who had pseudo-oversensing of T waves during follow-up testing of the Medtronic PCD. Each patient exhibited appropriate T wave sensing following closely coupled spontaneous QRS complexes to subthreshold stimuli without having T wave sensing following sensed or paced complexes. One patient also revealed T wave sensing following fusion beats. The occurrence of T wave sensing in these unique clinical situations was due to the auto-adjusting sensitivity threshold function used by the PCD. Recognition of this normal sensing function will prevent inappropriate reprogramming of the sensitivity or postpace refractory period, interventions that could potentially lead to ventricular tachyarrhythmia undersensing.

Defibrillator twiddler's syndrome

Long-term complications of internal cardioverter defibrillators have generally involved inappropriate shocks or hardware malfunctions. The present case documents a new problem of internal cardioverter defibrillator lead disruption resulting from patient-induced rotation of the generator in its pocket, similar to the previously reported pacemaker twiddler's syndrome. However, unlike the usual early symptoms of pacemaker nonfunction, the first symptomatic manifestation of the defibrillator twiddler's syndrome may be an inappropriate internal cardioverter defibrillator discharge or more importantly, unrescued sudden death. Careful attention to patient complaints about the internal cardioverter defibrillator generator and being alert to subtle lead changes on chest radiographs may allow the clinician to recognize this syndrome before a major, possibly fatal event.

The development of implantable cardioversion defibrillation systems: the clinical chronicle of defibrillation leads

Clinical experience suggests that there is a significant advantage from both the standpoint of survival and thoracotomy morbidity in the use of cardioverter defibrillator implantation strategies with transvenous and subcutaneous leads. Bioengineering achievements making the latter possible remains somewhat preliminary in comparison with the highly advanced analytic technology from which the leads for bradycardia pacing have issued. Accordingly, a good deal remains to be accomplished in the technology evolution of leads for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). While second- and third-generation leads have proved to be clinically useful, their development remains far from complete. To date most lead studies have focused on endocardial shock pathways, waveforms, and the linkage thereof affecting defibrillation thresholds. Experience suggests that asymmetric biphasic waveforms that use dual pathways (versus monophasic unidirectional shocks) yield a greater margin of safety for effective control of arrhythmias with existing ICD systems. The critical mass and region of myocardium encompassed by energy pathways, the simultaneous versus sequential pulsing of ICD antiarrhythmic discharges, as well as electrode combinations, locations, and polarity, remain under study. Although final adjudication of the superiority of endocardial systems that exclude the need for thoracotomy over those that use epicardial electrodes remains to be determined by further observational and randomized trials, it is reasonable to conclude at this juncture that ICDs with endocardial leads are feasible and facile, providing a highly promising alternative to other antiarrhythmic strategies.