Allosteric modulation of binding properties between units of chemokine receptor homo- and hetero-oligomers

Allosteric interactions within the AT₁ angiotensin receptor homodimer: role of the conserved DRY motif

G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) dimerization has a remarkable impact on the diversity of receptor signaling. Allosteric communication between the protomers of the dimer can alter ligand binding, receptor conformation and interactions with different effector proteins. In this study we investigated the allosteric interactions between wild type and mutant protomers of type 1 angiotensin receptor (AT₁R) dimers transiently expressed in CHO cells. In our experimental setup, one protomer of the dimer was selectively stimulated and the β-arrestin2 binding and conformation alteration of the other protomer was followed. The interaction between β-arrestin2 and the non-stimulated protomer was monitored through a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) based method. To measure the conformational alterations in the non-stimulated protomer directly, we also used a BRET based intramolecular receptor biosensor, which was created by inserting yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) into the 3rd intracellular loop of AT₁R and fusing Renilla luciferase (RLuc) to its C terminal region. We have detected β-arrestin2 binding, and altered conformation of the non-stimulated protomer. The cooperative ligand binding of the receptor homodimer was also observed by radioligand dissociation experiments. Mutation of the conserved DRY sequence in the activated protomer, which is also required for G protein activation, abolished all the observed allosteric effects. These data suggest that allosteric interactions in the homodimers of AT₁R significantly affect the function of the non-stimulated protomer, and the conserved DRY motif has a crucial role in these interactions.

CXCL12 signaling in the development of the nervous system

Chemokines are small, secreted proteins that have been shown to be important regulators of leukocyte trafficking and inflammation. All the known effects of chemokines are transduced by action at a family of G protein coupled receptors. Two of these receptors, CCR5 and CXCR4, are also known to be the major cellular receptors for HIV-1. Consideration of the evolution of the chemokine family has demonstrated that the chemokine Stromal cell Derived Factor-1 or SDF1 (CXCL12) and its receptor CXCR4 are the most ancient members of the family and existed in animals prior to the development of a sophisticated immune system. Thus, it appears that the original function of chemokine signaling was in the regulation of stem cell trafficking and development. CXCR4 signaling is important in the development of many tissues including the nervous system. Here we discuss the manner in which CXCR4 signaling can regulate the development of different structures in the central and peripheral nervous systems and the different strategies employed to achieve these effects.

History and biological significance of GPCR heteromerization in the neuroendocrine system

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute a large family of seven transmembrane proteins that regulate major cellular functions. The important role of GPCRs in the neuroendocrine system is outlined by the great interest of pharmaceutical companies in developing new drugs targeting these receptors. GPCRs exist as monomers, but can also be organized in oligomeric structures composed of either homo- or heteromers. GPCR heteromerization may play an important role in modulating and fine-tuning GPCR function and signaling. The literature reports many examples of GPCR heteromers in vitro raising the question of the physiological relevance of these complexes in tissues. Considerable efforts are currently being directed towards conclusive evidence for the existence of GPCRs heteromers in vivo, a crucial step for the validation of the concept of GPCR heteromerization and future drug development. The present review will give a brief history of GPCR oligomerization and emphasize the importance and physiological relevance of GPCR heteromerization by discussing key examples of GPCR couples.

BRET and Time-resolved FRET strategy to study GPCR oligomerization: from cell lines toward native tissues

The concept of oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) opens new perspectives regarding physiological function regulation. The capacity of one GPCR to modify its binding and coupling properties by interacting with a second one can be at the origin of regulations unsuspected two decades ago. Although the concept is interesting, its validation at a physiological level is challenging and probably explains why receptor oligomerization is still controversial. Demonstrating direct interactions between two proteins is not trivial since few techniques present a spatial resolution allowing this precision. Resonance energy transfer (RET) strategies are actually the most convenient ones. During the last two decades, bioluminescent resonance energy transfer and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) have been widely used since they exhibit high signal-to-noise ratio. Most of the experiments based on GPCR labeling have been performed in cell lines and it has been shown that all GPCRs have the propensity to form homo- or hetero-oligomers. However, whether these data can be extrapolated to GPCRs expressed in native tissues and explain receptor functioning in real life, remains an open question. Native tissues impose different constraints since GPCR sequences cannot be modified. Recently, a fluorescent ligand-based GPCR labeling strategy combined to a TR-FRET approach has been successfully used to prove the existence of GPCR oligomerization in native tissues. Although the RET-based strategies are generally quite simple to implement, precautions have to be taken before concluding to the absence or the existence of specific interactions between receptors. For example, one should exclude the possibility of collision of receptors diffusing throughout the membrane leading to a specific FRET signal. The advantages and the limits of different approaches will be reviewed and the consequent perspectives discussed.

Receptor oligomerization in family B1 of G-protein-coupled receptors: focus on BRET investigations and the link between GPCR oligomerization and binding cooperativity

The superfamily of the seven transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors (7TM/GPCRs) is the largest family of membrane-associated receptors. GPCRs are involved in the pathophysiology of numerous human diseases, and they constitute an estimated 30-40% of all drug targets. During the last two decades, GPCR oligomerization has been extensively studied using methods like bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) and today, receptor-receptor interactions within the GPCR superfamily is a well-established phenomenon. Evidence of the impact of GPCR oligomerization on, e.g., ligand binding, receptor expression, and signal transduction indicates the physiological and pharmacological importance of these receptor interactions. In contrast to the larger and more thoroughly studied GPCR subfamilies A and C, the B1 subfamily is small and comprises only 15 members, including, e.g., the secretin receptor, the glucagon receptor, and the receptors for parathyroid hormone (PTHR1 and PTHR2). The dysregulation of several family B1 receptors is involved in diseases, such as diabetes, chronic inflammation, and osteoporosis which underlines the pathophysiological importance of this GPCR subfamily. In spite of this, investigation of family B1 receptor oligomerization and especially its pharmacological importance is still at an early stage. Even though GPCR oligomerization is a well-established phenomenon, there is a need for more investigations providing a direct link between these interactions and receptor functionality in family B1 GPCRs. One example of the functional effects of GPCR oligomerization is the facilitation of allosterism including cooperativity in ligand binding to GPCRs. Here, we review the currently available data on family B1 GPCR homo- and heteromerization, mainly based on BRET investigations. Furthermore, we cover the functional influence of oligomerization on ligand binding as well as the link between oligomerization and binding cooperativity.

A new approach for studying GPCR dimers: drug-induced inactivation and reactivation to reveal GPCR dimer function in vitro, in primary culture, and in vivo

GPCRs are a major family of homologous proteins and are key mediators of the effects of numerous endogenous neurotransmitters, hormones, cytokines, therapeutic drugs, and drugs-of-abuse. Despite the enormous amount of research on the pharmacological and biochemical properties of GPCRs, the question as to whether they exist as monomers, dimers, or higher order structures in the body is unanswered. The GPCR dimer field has been dominated by techniques involving recombinant cell lines expressing mutant receptors, often involving the solubilization of the receptors. These techniques cannot be applied in vivo or even to primary cell cultures. This review will focus on a novel approach to exploring the functional properties of homodimers. Studies of the 5-HT(7) and 5-HT(2A) serotonin receptors have revealed that binding of a pseudo-irreversible antagonist ("inactivator") to one of the orthosteric sites of a homodimer abolishes all receptor activity, and subsequent binding of a competitive antagonist to the orthosteric site of the second protomer releases the inactivator, allowing the receptor to return to an active state. This approach demonstrates allosteric crosstalk between protomers of native GPCR homodimers, indicating that GPCRs do exist and function as homodimers in both recombinant cells and rat primary astrocytes. This technique can be applied universally using intact recombinant or primary cells in culture, membrane homogenate preparations and, potentially, in vivo. The data obtained using the 5-HT(7) and 5-HT(2A) receptors are strongly supportive of a GPCR homodimer structure, with little evidence of monomer involvement in the function of these receptors.

G protein-coupled receptors: walking hand-in-hand, talking hand-in-hand?

Most cells express a panel of different G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) allowing them to respond to at least a corresponding variety of extracellular ligands. In order to come to an integrative well-balanced functional response these ligand-receptor pairs can often cross-regulate each other. Although most GPCRs are fully capable to induce intracellular signalling upon agonist binding on their own, many GPCRs, if not all, appear to exist and function in homomeric and/or heteromeric assemblies for at least some time. Such heteromeric organization offers unique allosteric control of receptor pharmacology and function between the protomers and might even unmask 'new' features. However, it is important to realize that some functional consequences that are proposed to originate from heteromeric receptor interactions may also be observed due to intracellular crosstalk between signalling pathways of non-associated GPCRs.

Allosteric model of maraviroc binding to CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5)

Maraviroc is a nonpeptidic small molecule human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) entry inhibitor that has just entered the therapeutic arsenal for the treatment of patients. We recently demonstrated that maraviroc binding to the HIV-1 coreceptor, CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), prevents it from binding the chemokine CCL3 and the viral envelope glycoprotein gp120 by an allosteric mechanism. However, incomplete knowledge of ligand-binding sites and the lack of CCR5 crystal structures have hampered an in-depth molecular understanding of how the inhibitor works. Here, we addressed these issues by combining site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) with homology modeling and docking. Six crystal structures of G-protein-coupled receptors were compared for their suitability for CCR5 modeling. All CCR5 models had equally good geometry, but that built from the recently reported dimeric structure of the other HIV-1 coreceptor CXCR4 bound to the peptide CVX15 (Protein Data Bank code 3OE0) best agreed with the SDM data and discriminated CCR5 from non-CCR5 binders in a virtual screening approach. SDM and automated docking predicted that maraviroc inserts deeply in CCR5 transmembrane cavity where it can occupy three different binding sites, whereas CCL3 and gp120 lie on distinct yet overlapped regions of the CCR5 extracellular loop 2. Data suggesting that the transmembrane cavity remains accessible for maraviroc in CCL3-bound and gp120-bound CCR5 help explain our previous observation that the inhibitor enhances dissociation of preformed ligand-CCR5 complexes. Finally, we identified residues in the predicted CCR5 dimer interface that are mandatory for gp120 binding, suggesting that receptor dimerization might represent a target for new CCR5 entry inhibitors.

CXCR7/CXCR4 heterodimer constitutively recruits beta-arrestin to enhance cell migration

G protein-coupled receptor hetero-oligomerization is emerging as an important regulator of ligand-dependent transmembrane signaling, but precisely how receptor heteromers affect receptor pharmacology remains largely unknown. In this study, we have attempted to identify the functional significance of the heteromeric complex between CXCR4 and CXCR7 chemokine receptors. We demonstrate that co-expression of CXCR7 with CXCR4 results in constitutive recruitment of β-arrestin to the CXCR4·CXCR7 complex and simultaneous impairment of G(i)-mediated signaling. CXCR7/CXCR4 co-expression also results in potentiation of CXCL12 (SDF-1)-mediated downstream β-arrestin-dependent cell signaling pathways, including ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and SAPK as judged from the results of experiments using siRNA knockdown to deplete β-arrestin. Interestingly, CXCR7/CXCR4 co-expression enhances cell migration in response to CXCL12 stimulation. Again, inhibition of β-arrestin using either siRNA knockdown or a dominant negative mutant abrogates the enhanced CXCL12-dependent migration of CXCR4/CXCR7-expressing cells. These results show how CXCR7, which cannot signal directly through G protein-linked pathways, can nevertheless affect cellular signaling networks by forming a heteromeric complex with CXCR4. The CXCR4·CXCR7 heterodimer complex recruits β-arrestin, resulting in preferential activation of β-arrestin-linked signaling pathways over canonical G protein pathways. CXCL12-dependent signaling of CXCR4 and its role in cellular physiology, including cancer metastasis, should be evaluated in the context of potential functional hetero-oligomerization with CXCR7.

Functional crosstalk and heteromerization of serotonin 5-HT2A and dopamine D2 receptors

The serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor (5-HT(2A)R) and dopamine D(2) receptor (D(2)R) are high-affinity G protein-coupled receptor targets for two different classes of antipsychotic drugs used to treat schizophrenia. Interestingly, the antipsychotic effects are not based on the regulation of same signaling mediators since activation of the 5-HT(2A)R and of the D(2)R regulate G(q/11) protein and G(i/o) protein, respectively. Here we use radioligand binding and second messenger production assays to provide evidence for a functional crosstalk between 5-HT(2A)R and D(2)R in brain and in HEK293 cells. D(2)R activation increases the hallucinogenic agonist affinity for 5-HT(2A)R and decreases the 5-HT(2A)R induced inositol phosphate production. In vivo, 5-HT(2A)R expression is necessary for the full effects of D(2)R antagonist on MK-801-induced locomotor activity. Co-immunoprecipitation studies show that the two receptors can physically interact in HEK293 cells and raise the possibility that a receptor heterocomplex mediates the crosstalk observed. The existence of this 5-HT(2A)R-D(2)R heteromer and crosstalk may have implications for diseases involving alterations of serotonin and dopamine systems and for the development of new classes of therapeutic drugs.

Glioblastoma: synergy of growth promotion between CCL5 and NK-1R can be thwarted by blocking CCL5 with miraviroc, an FDA approved anti-HIV drug and blocking NK-1R with aprepitant, an FDA approved anti-nausea drug

WHAT IS KNOWN AND BACKGROUND

Two receptor signaling pathways that are commonly active in facilitating glioblastoma growth and invasion- that of CCR5 and neurokinin (NK)-1R- have small molecule inhibitors that are FDA approved and marketed to treat other conditions. The anti-HIV drug, maraviroc, inhibits human CCR5's ligand from binding, and hence blocks CCR5 stimulation. The anti-nausea drug aprepitant blocks substance P signaling at NK-1R.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

We propose on the basis of molecular insights that a combination of the two drugs is likely to be useful in the treatment of glioblastoma.

COMMENT

After stimulation by their respective ligands both CCR5 and NK-1R, through intermediaries, phosphorylate and thereby activate ERK1/2, triggering in turn migratory and mitotic events. Neurokinin-1R second messenger signaling also happens to serine phosphorylate CCR5. Phosphorylated CCR5 exhibits amplified activity after agonist ligation. Therefore, aprepitant and maraviroc combined treatment is expected to exert synergestic inhibition of growth enhancing signaling in glioblastoma. Inhibiting an amplifier is equivalent to amplifying an inhibitor. Since the two suggested drugs are non-cytotoxic they are envisioned as adjunctive treatments to current standard temozolomide, radiation, and bevacizumab, all to be used after debulking primary resection.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Our analysis makes the case for a well-designed trial of the proposed combination in the treatment of glioblastoma.

Receptor oligomerization: a pivotal mechanism for regulating chemokine function

Since the first reports on chemokine function, much information has been generated on the implications of these molecules in numerous physiological and pathological processes, as well as on the signaling events activated through their binding to receptors. Despite these extensive studies, no chemokine-related drugs have yet been approved for use in patients with inflammatory or autoimmune diseases. This discrepancy between efforts and results has forced a re-evaluation of the chemokine field. We have explored chemokine receptor conformations at the cell surface and found that, as is the case for other G protein-coupled receptors, chemokine receptors are not isolated entities that are activated following ligand binding; rather, they are found as dimers and/or higher order oligomers at the cell surface, even in the absence of ligands. These complexes form organized arrays that can be modified by receptor expression and ligand levels, indicating that they are dynamic structures. The way in which these receptor complexes are stabilized modulates ligand binding, as well as their pharmacological properties and the signaling events activated. These conformations thus represent a mechanism that increases the broad variety of chemokine functions. Understanding these receptor interactions and their dynamics at the cell surface is thus critical for influencing chemokine function and could open up new possibilities for drug design.

Effect of clozapine on the dimerization of serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor and its genetic variant 5-HT(2A)H425Y with dopamine D(2) receptor

Oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors has become a very important issue in a present molecular pharmacology. In the present study the level of the serotonin 5-HT(2A) and the dopamine D(2) receptor interactions have been studied since it may have a key significance in understanding the mechanism of action of drugs used to treat schizophrenia. With the use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer we demonstrated that the serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptors form homo- and hetero-dimers with the dopamine D(2) receptors and polymorphism H452Y within the 5-HT(2A) receptor, implicated as a cause of altered response to antipsychotic treatment, disturbs both processes. Clozapine affected the hetero-dimers (5-HT(2A)H452Y/D(2)) complexes and increased the otherwise weakened dimerization to the value observed for combination of both wild type receptors, and had no effect on the serotonin receptor homo-dimers (5-HT(2A)H452Y/5-HT(2A)), while haloperidol has restored the weakened interaction within homo-complexes and did not effect the hetero-complexes. The obtained data suggest that H452Y polymorphism has an influence not only on the level of constitutive oligomerization of investigated receptors but also it changes their pharmacological properties within both homo- and hetero-complexes.

Allostery at G protein-coupled receptor homo- and heteromers: uncharted pharmacological landscapes

For many years seven transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were thought to exist and function exclusively as monomeric units. However, evidence both from native cells and heterologous expression systems has demonstrated that GPCRs can both traffic and signal within higher-order complexes. As for other protein-protein interactions, conformational changes in one polypeptide, including those resulting from binding of pharmacological ligands, have the capacity to alter the conformation and therefore the response of the interacting protein(s), a process known as allosterism. For GPCRs, allosterism across homo- or heteromers, whether dimers or higher-order oligomers, represents an additional topographical landscape that must now be considered pharmacologically. Such effects may offer the opportunity for novel therapeutic approaches. Allosterism at GPCR heteromers is particularly exciting in that it offers additional scope to provide receptor subtype selectivity and tissue specificity as well as fine-tuning of receptor signal strength. Herein, we introduce the concept of allosterism at both GPCR homomers and heteromers and discuss the various questions that must be addressed before significant advances can be made in drug discovery at these GPCR complexes.

Heteromerization of G protein-coupled receptors: relevance to neurological disorders and neurotherapeutics

Because G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are numerous, widely expressed and involved in major physiological responses, they represent a relevant therapeutic target for drug discovery, particularly regarding pharmacological treatments of neurological disorders. Among the biological phenomena regulating receptor function, GPCR heteromerization is an important emerging area of interest and investigation. There is increasing evidence showing that heteromerization contributes to the pharmacological heterogeneity of GPCRs by modulating receptor ontogeny, activation and recycling. Although in many cases the physiological relevance of receptor heteromerization has not been fully established, the unique pharmacological and functional properties of heteromers are likely to lead to new strategies in clinical medicine. This review describes the main GPCR heteromers and their implications for major neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia and addiction. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying drug interactions related to the targeting of receptor heteromers could provide more specific and efficient therapeutic agents for the treatment of brain diseases.

Expanding the Concept of G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Dimer Asymmetry towards GPCR-Interacting Proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), major targets of drug discovery, are organized in dimeric and/or oligomeric clusters. The minimal oligomeric unit, the dimer, is composed of two protomers, which can behave differently within the dimer. Several examples of GPCR asymmetry within dimers at the level of ligand binding, ligand-promoted conformational changes, conformational changes within transmembrane domains, G protein coupling, and most recently GPCR-interacting proteins (GIPs), have been reported in the literature. Asymmetric organization of GPCR dimers has important implications on GPCR function and drug design. Indeed, the extension of the “asymmetry concept” to GIPs adds a new level of specific therapeutic intervention.

G protein activation by serotonin type 4 receptor dimers: evidence that turning on two protomers is more efficient

The discovery that class C G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) function as obligatory dimeric entities has generated major interest in GPCR oligomerization. Oligomerization now appears to be a common feature among all GPCR classes. However, the functional significance of this process remains unclear because, in vitro, some monomeric GPCRs, such as rhodopsin and β(2)-adrenergic receptors, activate G proteins. By using wild type and mutant serotonin type 4 receptors (5-HT(4)Rs) (including a 5-HT(4)-RASSL) expressed in COS-7 cells as models of class A GPCRs, we show that activation of one protomer in a dimer was sufficient to stimulate G proteins. However, coupling efficiency was 2 times higher when both protomers were activated. Expression of combinations of 5-HT(4), in which both protomers were able to bind to agonists but only one could couple to G proteins, suggested that upon agonist occupancy, protomers did not independently couple to G proteins but rather that only one G protein was activated. Coupling of a single heterotrimeric G(s) protein to a receptor dimer was further confirmed in vitro, using the purified recombinant WT RASSL 5-HT(4)R obligatory heterodimer. These results, together with previous findings, demonstrate that, differently from class C GPCR dimers, class A GPCR dimers have pleiotropic activation mechanisms.

Application of G protein-coupled receptor-heteromer identification technology to monitor β-arrestin recruitment to G protein-coupled receptor heteromers

Understanding the role of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR; also known as a 7 transmembrane receptor) heteromerization in the physiology and pathophysiology of cellular function has now become a major research focus. However, there is currently a lack of cell-based assays capable of profiling the specific functional consequences of heteromerization in a ligand-dependent manner. Understanding the pharmacology specifically associated with heteromer function in contrast to monomer or homomer function enables the so-called biochemical fingerprints of the receptor heteromer to be ascertained. This is the first step in establishing the physiological relevance of heteromerization, the goal of everyone in the field, as these fingerprints can then be utilized in future endeavors to elucidate heteromer function in native tissues. The simple, robust, ligand-dependent methodology described in this study utilizes a novel configuration of components of a proximity-based reporter system. This is exemplified by the use of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer due to the advantages of real-time live cell monitoring of proximity specifically between the heteromer complex and a protein that is recruited in a ligand-dependent manner, in this case, β-arrestin 2. Further, the demonstration of Z'-factor values in excess of 0.6 shows the potential of the method for screening compounds for heteromer-selective or biased activity. Three previously characterized GPCR heteromers, the chemokine receptor heteromers CCR2-CCR5 and CCR2-CXCR4, as well as the angiotensin II receptor type 1-bradykinin receptor type 2 heteromer, have been used to illustrate the profiling capability and specificity of the GPCR heteromer identification technology.

New insights into the mechanisms whereby low molecular weight CCR5 ligands inhibit HIV-1 infection

CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is a G-protein-coupled receptor for the chemokines CCL3, -4, and -5 and a coreceptor for entry of R5-tropic strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) into CD4(+) T-cells. We investigated the mechanisms whereby nonpeptidic, low molecular weight CCR5 ligands block HIV-1 entry and infection. Displacement binding assays and dissociation kinetics demonstrated that two of these molecules, i.e. TAK779 and maraviroc (MVC), inhibit CCL3 and the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 binding to CCR5 by a noncompetitive and allosteric mechanism, supporting the view that they bind to regions of CCR5 distinct from the gp120- and CCL3-binding sites. We observed that TAK779 and MVC are full and weak inverse agonists for CCR5, respectively, indicating that they stabilize distinct CCR5 conformations with impaired abilities to activate G-proteins. Dissociation of [(125)I]CCL3 from CCR5 was accelerated by TAK779, to a lesser extent by MVC, and by GTP analogs, suggesting that inverse agonism contributes to allosteric inhibition of the chemokine binding to CCR5. TAK779 and MVC also promote dissociation of [(35)S]gp120 from CCR5 with an efficiency that correlates with their ability to act as inverse agonists. Displacement experiments revealed that affinities of MVC and TAK779 for the [(35)S]gp120-binding receptors are in the same range (IC(50) ∼6.4 versus 22 nm), although we found that MVC is 100-fold more potent than TAK779 for inhibiting HIV infection. This suggests that allosteric CCR5 inhibitors not only act by blocking gp120 binding but also alter distinct steps of CCR5 usage in the course of HIV infection.

Different effects of the different natural CC chemokine receptor 2b ligands on beta-arrestin recruitment, Gαi signaling, and receptor internalization

The chemokine receptor CCR2, which has been implicated in a variety of inflammatory, autoimmune, and cardiovascular conditions, binds several natural chemokine ligands. Here, we assessed the recruitment of β-arrestin to CCR2 in response to these ligands using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer technology. Compared with CCL2, which was considered as a full agonist, other CCR2 ligands were partial agonists with reduced efficacy and potency. Agonist potencies were not a function of their affinity for CCR2. Efficacy of arrestin recruitment matched that of agonist-induced CCR2 internalization. Although the potency and efficacy rank orders of the ligands in arrestin recruitment were similar to those observed for Gα(i1) activation, arrestin recruitment was at least in part resistant to Gα(i/o)-inactivating pertussis toxin, suggesting partial independence from Gα(i/o). The degree of pertussis toxin resistance of arrestin recruitment was different between the chemokines. Moreover, qualitative differences between the arrestin responses to the different ligands were identified in the stability of the response: although CCL7-induced arrestin recruitment had a half-life of less than 15 min, CCL8 and CCL13 induced stable CCR2-arrestin interactions. Finally, the ligands stabilized different conformations of the CCR2 homodimer. Our results support the validity of models for receptor-ligand interactions in which different ligands stabilize different receptor conformations also for endogenous receptor ligands, with corresponding implications for drug development targeting CCR2.

Class A GPCR heterodimers: evidence from binding studies

There is a large body of experimental evidence that is compatible with the presence of heterodimers of the major A subclass of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and suggests that these heterodimers might have different functional properties from those of the monomers (or homodimers) of the individual receptors that engage in heterodimer formation. The question is whether there are allosteric interactions across the receptor-receptor interface of a heterodimer that modulate the binding properties of the heterodimer components and thereby change their pharmacology. In this review, I examine published experimental evidence from radioligand binding studies in the context of different models of allosterism and discuss a number of apparently discrepant results. The analysis suggests that more experimental data are required if equal, two-way, crossreceptor interactions within a GPCR heterodimer, at the level of binding, are to be unequivocally demonstrated.

Time-resolved FRET between GPCR ligands reveals oligomers in native tissues

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) oligomers have been proposed to play critical roles in cell signaling, but confirmation of their existence in a native context remains elusive, as no direct interactions between receptors have been reported. To demonstrate their presence in native tissues, we developed a time-resolved FRET strategy that is based on receptor labeling with selective fluorescent ligands. Specific FRET signals were observed with four different receptors expressed in cell lines, consistent with their dimeric or oligomeric nature in these transfected cells. More notably, the comparison between FRET signals measured with sets of fluorescent agonists and antagonists was consistent with an asymmetric relationship of the two protomers in an activated GPCR dimer. Finally, we applied the strategy to native tissues and succeeded in demonstrating the presence of oxytocin receptor dimers and/or oligomers in mammary gland.

The Epstein-Barr virus-encoded G protein-coupled receptor BILF1 hetero-oligomerizes with human CXCR4, scavenges Gαi proteins, and constitutively impairs CXCR4 functioning

Cells express distinct G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) subtypes on their surface, allowing them to react to a corresponding variety of extracellular stimuli. Cross-regulation between different ligand-GPCR pairs is essential to generate appropriate physiological responses. GPCRs can physically affect each other's functioning by forming heteromeric complexes, whereas cross-regulation between activated GPCRs also occurs through integration of shared intracellular signaling networks. Human herpesviruses utilize virally encoded GPCRs to hijack cellular signaling networks for their own benefit. Previously, we demonstrated that the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded GPCR BILF1 forms heterodimeric complexes with human chemokine receptors. Using a combination of bimolecular complementation and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer approaches, we now show the formation of hetero-oligomeric complexes between this viral GPCR and human CXCR4. BILF1 impaired CXCL12 binding to CXCR4 and, consequently, also CXCL12-induced signaling. In contrast, the G protein uncoupled mutant BILF1-K(3.50)A affected CXCL12-induced CXCR4 signaling to a much lesser extent, indicating that BILF1-mediated CXCR4 inhibition is a consequence of its constitutive activity. Co-expression of Gα(i1) with BILF1 and CXCR4 restored CXCL12-induced signaling. Likewise, BILF1 formed heteromers with the human histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R). BILF1 inhibited histamine-induced Gα(i)-mediated signaling by H(4)R, however, without affecting histamine binding to this receptor. These data indicate that functional cross-regulation of Gα(i)-coupled GPCRs by BILF1 is at the level of G proteins, even though these GPCRs are assembled in hetero-oligomeric complexes.

The effect of allosteric modulators on the kinetics of agonist-G protein-coupled receptor interactions in single living cells

Allosteric binding sites on adenosine -A(1) and -A(3) receptors represent attractive therapeutic targets for amplifying, in a spatially and temporally selective manner, the tissue protective actions of endogenous adenosine. This study has directly quantified the kinetics of agonist/G protein-coupled receptor interactions at the single-cell level, reflecting the physiological situation in which intracellular signaling proteins can exert major allosteric effects on agonist-receptor interactions. The association and dissociation rate constants at both A(1) and A(3) receptors, and therefore the affinity of the fluorescent adenosine derivative ABA-X-BY630 (structure appears in J Med Chem 50:782-793, 2007), were concentration-independent. The equilibrium dissociation constants of ABA-X-BY630 at A(1) and A(3) receptors were approximately 50 and 10 nM, respectively, suggesting that, even in live cells, low agonist concentrations predominantly detect high-affinity receptor states. At A(1) receptors, the dissociation of ABA-X-BY630 (30 nM) was significantly faster in the absence (k(off) = 1.95 +/- 0.09 min(-1)) compared with the presence of the allosteric enhancer (2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl)(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-methanone (PD81,723; 10 microM; k(off) = 0.80 +/- 0.03 min(-1)) and allosteric inhibitor 4-methoxy-N-(7-methyl-3-(2-pyridinyl)-1-isoquinolinyl)benzamide (VUF5455; 1 microM; k(off) = 1.48 +/- 0.16 min(-1)). In contrast, ABA-X-BY630 dissociation from A(3) receptors was significantly slower in the absence (k(off) = 0.78 +/- 0.18 min(-1)) than in the presence of the allosteric inhibitors VUF5455 (1 microM; k(off) = 3.15 +/- 0.12 min(-1)) and PD81,723 (10 microM; k(off) = 2.46 +/- 0.18 min(-1)). An allosteric mechanism of action has previously not been identified for PD81,723 at the A(3) receptor or VUF5455 at the A(1) receptor. Furthermore, the marked enhancement in fluorescent agonist dissociation by VUF5455 in living cells contrasts previous observations from broken cell preparations and emphasizes the need to study the allosteric regulation of agonist binding in living cells.

Co-operativity in agonist binding at the D2 dopamine receptor: evidence from agonist dissociation kinetics

There is much evidence to suggest that G protein coupled receptors exist as oligomers but the relevance to their function is unclear. We have, therefore, examined the binding of the radiolabelled agonist [(3)H]NPA to membranes of CHO cells expressing the D(2) dopamine receptor in dissociation rate experiments. When [(3)H]NPA dissociation was started by dilution, the dissociation rate in the absence of sodium ions was unaffected by addition of the antagonist/inverse agonist (+)-butaclamol, but was accelerated by addition of agonists e.g. dopamine, suggesting that the receptor was not behaving as a monomer with a single binding site. The very low efficacy partial agonist, aripiprazole provided an intermediate level of acceleration of dissociation. [(3)H]NPA dissociation experiments started by addition of ligands without dilution gave a similar pattern. [(3)H]NPA dissociation could also be accelerated by GTP. Dissociation of [(3)H]NPA in the presence of GTP and dopamine provided a greater acceleration than for either modulator alone, suggesting synergistic effects related to receptor/G protein interaction. When [(3)H]NPA dissociation experiments were performed in the presence of sodium ions, dissociation was faster than in their absence but the rate still depended on the ligand present in the assay. Overall the data cannot be explained by a ternary complex model and are consistent with an oligomeric receptor in which binding of [(3)H]NPA, as an example of an agonist ligand, can be modulated co-operatively by ligands binding elsewhere in the oligomer. Interactions with G proteins also occurs providing further modulation of [(3)H]NPA binding. Both agonists and G proteins are proposed to modulate the oligomer by switching high affinity agonist binding sites to low affinity sites.

Dynamic regulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 homo- and heterodimers

Although homo- and heterodimerization are reported for some chemokine receptors, it remains unclear whether these functional states are in dynamic equilibrium and how receptor/ligand levels influence oligomerization. In human neutrophils and in cell lines that coexpress the chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2, we used fluorescence resonance energy transfer techniques to show that these two receptors form homo- and heterodimers. Receptor expression and ligand activation were found to regulate the balance between these complexes, adapting the response to changes in the milieu. CXCL8, a ligand for both receptors, alters heterodimeric complexes, whereas it stabilizes homodimers and promotes receptor internalization. Oligomerization of receptors, together with the regulation of their expression and desensitization, could thus contribute to the fine control of chemokine functions.

Hetero-oligomerization of CCR2, CCR5, and CXCR4 and the protean effects of "selective" antagonists

Chemokine receptors constitute an attractive family of drug targets in the frame of inflammatory diseases. However, targeting specific chemokine receptors may be complicated by their ability to form dimers or higher order oligomers. Using a combination of luminescence complementation and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays, we demonstrate for the first time the existence of hetero-oligomeric complexes composed of at least three chemokine receptors (CCR2, CCR5, and CXCR4). We show in T cells and monocytes that negative binding cooperativity takes place between the binding pockets of these receptors, demonstrating their functional interaction in leukocytes. We also show that specific antagonists of one receptor (TAK-779 or AMD3100) lead to functional cross-inhibition of the others. Finally, using the air pouch model in mice, we show that the CCR2 and CCR5 antagonist TAK-779 inhibits cell recruitment promoted by the CXCR4 agonist SDF-1 alpha, demonstrating that cross-inhibition by antagonists also occurs in vivo. Thus, antagonists of the therapeutically important chemokine receptors regulate the functional properties of other receptors to which they do not bind directly with important implications for the use of these agents in vivo.

GPCR homomers and heteromers: a better choice as targets for drug development than GPCR monomers?

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are targeted by many therapeutic drugs marketed to fight against a variety of diseases. Selection of novel lead compounds are based on pharmacological parameters obtained assuming that GPCR are monomers. However, many GPCR are expressed as dimers/oligomers. Therefore, drug development may consider GPCR as homo- and hetero-oligomers. A two-state dimer receptor model is now available to understand GPCR operation and to interpret data obtained from drugs interacting with dimers, and even from mixtures of monomers and dimers. Heteromers are distinct entities and therefore a given drug is expected to have different affinities and different efficacies depending on the heteromer. All these concepts would lead to broaden the therapeutic potential of drugs targeting GPCRs, including receptor heteromer-selective drugs with a lower incidence of side effects, or to identify novel pharmacological profiles using cell models expressing receptor heteromers.

Allosteric communication between protomers of dopamine class A GPCR dimers modulates activation

A major obstacle to understanding the functional importance of dimerization between Class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been the methodological limitation in achieving control of the identity of the components comprising the signaling unit. We have developed a functional complementation assay that enables such control and illustrate it for the human dopamine D2 receptor. The minimal signaling unit, two receptors and a single G protein, is maximally activated by agonist binding to a single protomer, which suggests an asymmetrical activated dimer. Inverse agonist binding to the second protomer enhances signaling, whereas agonist binding to the second protomer blunts signaling. Ligand-independent constitutive activation of the second protomer also inhibits signaling. Thus, GPCR dimer function can be modulated by the activity state of the second protomer, which for a heterodimer may be altered in pathological states. Our novel methodology also makes possible the characterization of signaling from a defined heterodimer unit.

G-protein-coupled receptor heteromers or how neurons can display differently flavoured patterns in response to the same neurotransmitter

It is becoming accepted that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) arrange in the neuronal membrane into homo- and hetero-oligomers and, therefore, these complexes mediate neurotransmission. New models are then needed to understand GPCR operation and predict the consequences of GPCR homo- or hetero-oligomerization. Although there is not any unifying theory addressing how hetero-oligomerization occurs, recent models have been devised to understand the thermodynamics of binding of neurotransmitters to GPCRs and the allosteric protomer-protomer interactions involved in neurotransmitter-mediated activation of GPCRs. Although a model to predict how signalling is produced via homo- or hetero-oligomerization is lacking, functional data show that receptor oligomers exist to produce a variety of effects in neurons in response to a single neurotransmitter.

Brain receptor mosaics and their intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions: molecular integration in transmission and novel targets for drug development

The concept of intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions and evidence for their existence was introduced by Agnati and Fuxe in 1980/81 suggesting the existence of heteromerization of receptors. In 1982, they proposed the existence of aggregates of multiple receptors in the plasma membrane and coined the term receptor mosaics (RM). In this way, cell signaling becomes a branched process beginning at the level of receptor recognition at the plasma membrane where receptors can directly modify the ligand recognition and signaling capacity of the receptors within a RM. Receptor-receptor interactions in RM are classified as operating either with classical cooperativity, when consisting of homomers or heteromers of similar receptor subtypes having the same transmitter, or non-classical cooperativity, when consisting of heteromers. It has been shown that information processing within a RM depends not only on its receptor composition, but also on the topology and the order of receptor activation determined by the concentrations of the ligands and the receptor properties. The general function of RM has also been demonstrated to depend on allosteric regulators (e.g., homocysteine) of the receptor subtypes present. RM as integrative nodes for receptor-receptor interactions in conjunction with membrane associated proteins may form horizontal molecular networks in the plasma membrane coordinating the activity of multiple effector systems modulating the excitability and gene expression of the cells. The key role of electrostatic epitope-epitope interactions will be discussed for the formation of the RM. These interactions probably represent a general molecular mechanism for receptor-receptor interactions and, without a doubt, indicate a role for phosphorylation-dephosphorylation events in these interactions. The novel therapeutic aspects given by the RMs will be discussed in the frame of molecular neurology and psychiatry and combined drug therapy appears as the future way to go.

Differential coupling of the vasopressin V1b receptor through compartmentalization within the plasma membrane

We show here that the rat vasopressin V(1b) receptor simultaneously activates both the G(q/11)-inositol phosphate (IP) and G(s)-cAMP pathways when transiently expressed in Chinese hamster ovary, human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293, and COS-7 cells and stimulated with arginine-vasopressin. Higher concentrations of the hormone, however, were needed to trigger the cAMP pathway. The nonmammalian analog arginine-vasotocin and the selective V(1b) agonist d[Cha(4)]vasopressin also activated the cAMP and IP pathways, although d[Cha(4)]-vasopressin elicited the two responses with equivalent potencies. We determined that the V(1b) receptor is present as a homodimer at the plasma membrane. Treatment of V(1b)-transfected HEK-293 cells with methyl-beta-cyclodextrin, a drug known to dissociate cholesterol-rich domains of the plasma membrane, shifted the EC(50) of the vasopressin-induced cAMP accumulation to lower concentrations and, remarkably, increased the hormone efficacy related to the activation of this second messenger system. In parallel, the vasopressin-mediated activation of the IP pathway was slightly reduced without modification of its EC(50). These results suggest that, as with many other G protein-coupled receptors, when transfected in heterologous cell systems, the V(1b) receptor forms dimers that signal differentially through the G(q/11) and G(s) proteins depending on the nature of the ligand as well as on its localization within specialized compartments of the plasma membrane. The present study thus illustrates how signal transduction associated with the activation of a G protein-coupled receptor can be versatile and highly dependent on both the cell context and the chemical nature of the extracellular signaling messenger.

Viral hijacking of human receptors through heterodimerization

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human herpesvirus that primarily infects B lymphocytes and is associated with tumor development. Like other herpesviruses, EBV has pirated and modified host genes encoding important regulatory cellular proteins to take over cellular control after infection. One of these genes (BILF1) encodes a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). It is currently accepted that GPCRs exist and function as dimers. B lymphocyte migration and functioning is regulated by chemokines acting on their cognate receptors. In this study, we show that BILF1 heterodimerizes with various chemokine receptors using BRET, trFRET and co-immunoprecipitation. Importantly, heterodimerization of BILF1 with chemokine receptors may alter the responsiveness of B lymphocytes to chemokines thereby altering homing and homeostasis of infected B lymphocytes and might be essential for EBV dissemination and/or involved in EBV-induced pathogenesis.

CXCR2 chemokine receptor antagonism enhances DOP opioid receptor function via allosteric regulation of the CXCR2-DOP receptor heterodimer

Opioid agonists have a broad range of effects on cells of the immune system, including modulation of the inflammatory response, and opioid and chemokine receptors are co-expressed by many white cells. Hetero-oligomerization of the human DOP opioid and chemokine CXCR2 receptors could be detected following their co-expression by each of co-immunoprecipitation, three different resonance energy transfer techniques and the construction of pairs of individually inactive but potentially complementary receptor G-protein α subunit fusion proteins. Although DOP receptor agonists and a CXCR2 antagonist had no inherent affinity for the alternative receptor when either receptor was expressed individually, use of cells that expressed a DOP opioid receptor construct constitutively, and in which expression of a CXCR2 receptor construct could be regulated, demonstrated that the CXCR2 antagonist enhanced the function of DOP receptor agonists only in the presence of CXCR2. This effect was observed for both enkephalin- and alkaloid-based opioid agonists, and the effective concentrations of the CXCR2 antagonist reflected CXCR2 receptor occupancy. Entirely equivalent results were obtained in cells in which the native DOP opioid receptor was expressed constitutively and in which expression of the isolated CXCR2 receptor could be induced. These results indicate that a CXCR2 receptor antagonist can enhance the function of agonists at a receptor for which it has no inherent direct affinity by acting as an allosteric regulator of a receptor that is a heterodimer partner for the CXCR2 receptor. These results have novel and important implications for the development and use of small-molecule therapeutics.

G protein activation by the leukotriene B4 receptor dimer. Evidence for an absence of trans-activation

There is compelling evidence that G protein-coupled receptors exist as homo- and heterodimers, but the way these assemblies function at the molecular level remains unclear. We used here the purified leukotriene B(4) receptor BLT1 stabilized in its dimeric state to analyze how a receptor dimer activates G proteins. For this, we produced heterodimers between the wild-type BLT1 and a BLT1/ALXR chimera. The latter is no longer activated by leukotriene B(4) but is still activated by ALXR agonists. In this heterodimer, agonist binding to either one of the two protomers induced asymmetric conformational changes within the receptor dimer. Of importance, no G protein activation was observed when using a dimer where the ligand-loaded protomer was not able to trigger GDP/GTP exchange due to specific mutations in its third intracellular loop, establishing that the conformation of the agonist-free protomer is not competent for G protein activation. Taken together, these data indicate that although ligand binding to one protomer in the heterodimer is associated with cross-conformational changes, a trans-activation mechanism where the ligand-free subunit would trigger GDP/GTP exchange cannot be considered in this case for G protein activation. This observation sheds light into the way GPCR dimers, in particular heterodimers, could activate their cognate G proteins.

Synergy between coproduced CC and CXC chemokines in monocyte chemotaxis through receptor-mediated events

CC and CXC chemokines coinduced in fibroblasts and leukocytes by cytokines and microbial agents determine the number of phagocytes infiltrating into inflamed tissues. Interleukin-8/CXCL8 and stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCL12 significantly and dose-dependently increased the migration of monocytes, expressing the corresponding CXC chemokine receptors CXCR2 and CXCR4, toward suboptimal concentrations of the monocyte chemotactic proteins CCL2 or CCL7. These findings were confirmed using different chemotaxis assays and monocytic THP-1 cells. In contrast, the combination of two CC chemokines (CCL2 plus CCL7) or two CXC chemokines (CXCL8 plus CXCL12) did not provide synergy in monocyte chemotaxis. These data show that chemokines competing for related receptors and using similar signaling pathways do not synergize. Receptor heterodimerization is probably not essential for chemokine synergy as shown in CXCR4/CCR2 cotransfectants. It is noteworthy that CCL2 mediated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation and calcium mobilization was significantly enhanced by CXCL8 in monocytes, indicating cooperative downstream signaling pathways during enhanced chemotaxis. Moreover, in contrast to intact CXCL12, truncated CXCL12(3-68), which has impaired receptor signaling capacity but can still desensitize CXCR4, was unable to synergize with CCL2 in monocytic cell migration. Furthermore, AMD3100 and RS102895, specific CXCR4 and CCR2 inhibitors, respectively, reduced the synergistic effect between CCL2 and CXCL12 significantly. These data indicate that for synergistic interaction between chemokines binding and signaling of the two chemokines via their proper receptors is necessary.

CXCR4 dimerization and beta-arrestin-mediated signaling account for the enhanced chemotaxis to CXCL12 in WHIM syndrome

WHIM (warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis) syndrome is an immune deficiency linked in many cases to heterozygous mutations causing truncations in the cytoplasmic tail of CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4). Leukocytes expressing truncated CXCR4 display enhanced responses to the receptor ligand CXCL12, including chemotaxis, which likely impair their trafficking and contribute to the immunohematologic clinical manifestations of the syndrome. CXCR4 desensitization and endocytosis are dependent on beta-arrestin (betaarr) recruitment to the cytoplasmic tail, so that the truncated CXCR4 are refractory to these processes and so have enhanced G protein-dependent signaling. Here, we show that the augmented responsiveness of WHIM leukocytes is also accounted for by enhanced betaarr2-dependent signaling downstream of the truncated CXCR4 receptor. Indeed, the WHIM-associated receptor CXCR4(1013) maintains association with betaarr2 and triggers augmented and prolonged betaarr2-dependent signaling, as revealed by ERK1/2 phosphorylation kinetics. Evidence is also provided that CXCR4(1013)-mediated chemotaxis critically requires betaarr2, and disrupting the SHSK motif in the third intracellular loop of CXCR4(1013) abrogates betaarr2-mediated signaling, but not coupling to G proteins, and normalizes chemotaxis. We also demonstrate that CXCR4(1013) spontaneously forms heterodimers with wild-type CXCR4. Accordingly, we propose a model where enhanced functional interactions between betaarr2 and receptor dimers account for the altered responsiveness of WHIM leukocytes to CXCL12.

G protein-coupled receptor dimers: functional consequences, disease states and drug targets

With an ever-expanding need for reliable therapeutic agents that are highly effective and exhibit minimal deleterious side effects, a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) regulation is fundamental. GPCRs comprise more than 30% of all therapeutic drug targets and it is likely that this will only increase as more orphan GPCRs are identified. The past decade has seen a dramatic shift in the prevailing concept of how GPCRs function, in particular the growing acceptance that GPCRs are capable of interacting with one another at a molecular level to form complexes, with significantly different pharmacological properties to their monomeric selves. While the ability of like-receptors to associate and form homodimers raises some interesting mechanistic issues, the possibility that unlike-receptors could heterodimerise in certain tissue types, producing a functionally unique signalling complex that binds specific ligands, provides an invaluable opportunity to refine and redefine pharmacological interventions with greater specificity and efficacy.

Cooperative binding of insulin-like Peptide 3 to a dimeric relaxin family peptide receptor 2

Insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) binds to a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) called relaxin family peptide receptor 2 (RXFP2). RXFP2 belongs to the leucine-rich repeat-containing subgroup (LGR) of class A GPCRs. Negative cooperativity has recently been demonstrated in other members of the LGR subgroup. In this work, the kinetics of INSL3 binding to HEK293 cells stably transfected with RXFP2 (HEK293-RXFP2) have been investigated in detail to study whether negative cooperativity occurs and whether this receptor functions as a dimer. Our results show that negative cooperativity is present and that INSL3-RXFP2 binding shows both similarities and differences with insulin binding to the insulin receptor. A dose-response curve for the negative cooperativity of INSL3 binding had a reverse bell shape reminiscent of that seen for the negative cooperativity of insulin binding to its receptor. This suggests that binding of INSL3 may happen in a trans rather than in a cis way in a receptor dimer. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET(2)) experiments confirmed that RXFP2 forms constitutive homodimers. Heterodimerization between RXFP2 and RXFP1 was also observed.

Effect of CCR5 receptor antagonists on endocytosis of the human CCR5 receptor in CHO-K1 cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The CCR5 chemokine receptor is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family that is expressed by macrophages, memory T-lymphocytes and dendritic cells and is activated by chemotactic proteins (e.g. MIP-1alpha [CCL3], MIP-1beta [CCL4] and RANTES [CCL5]). CCR5 is also the principal co-receptor for macrophage-tropic strains of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) and some chemokines can inhibit HIV-1 infection by stimulating CCR5 receptor endocytosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CCR5 antagonists on CCR5 endocytosis.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The effects of CCR5 agonists and antagonists on receptor internalization in CHO cells, expressing a C-terminal green fluorescent protein-tagged human CCR5 receptor (CCR5-GFP), were quantified using a confocal imaging plate reader.

KEY RESULTS

MIP-1alpha [CCL3], MIP-1beta [CCL4] and RANTES [CCL5] were all able to stimulate potently the internalization of CCR5-GFP. This effect was inhibited by the non-peptide antagonist TAK 779. The CCR5 peptide antagonist met-RANTES antagonized MIP-1alpha-mediated increases in intracellular free calcium but was also able to stimulate a substantial internalization of the human CCR5-GFP receptor. However, CHO cells exhibited an aminopeptidase activity that was able to metabolize sufficient met-RANTES into an agonist metabolite capable of stimulating calcium mobilization via CCR5 receptors in naïve cells.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These data suggest that there is an endogenous aminopeptidase activity on the surface of CHO cells, that produces a slow internalization of the receptor following a time-dependent conversion of receptor-bound met-RANTES from a CCR5 receptor antagonist into a CCR5 agonist molecule.

[Multiple talents of the chemokine receptor-CXCR4]

CXCR4 is a clinically relevant chemokine receptor that has first gained attention as one of the cofactors for HIV entry into target cells. Moreover, the receptor is involved in cancer cell migration to distant metastatic sites and immune effector recruitment in inflammatory diseases such as asthma and rheumatoid arthritis. Unfortunately, pharmacologic intervention is complicated by the vital function of CXCR4 in the organism. The most prominent of these functions is its role in stem cell homing. The CXCR4 chemokine ligand, produced by bone marrow stromal cells, leads both to migration of hematopoietic stem cells towards this niche and their retention in this compartment. As models of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) activation evolve, it becomes clear that multiple factors modulate the functional outcome of ligand binding to a receptor. Modulation of GPCR activity, for example by allosteric ligands, may permit more subtle therapeutic approaches adapted to long term treatment. In addition, GPCR signalling can be altered by hetero-oligomerization of GPCRs. In this perspective, it might be possible to achieve modulation of GPCR signalling by also targeting the oligomerization partner of a given receptor. This approach is described using the example of strategies that aim at the optimization of stem cell homing in the context of cord blood-derived hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Chemokines and cancer: migration, intracellular signalling and intercellular communication in the microenvironment

Inappropriate chemokine/receptor expression or regulation is linked to many diseases, especially those characterized by an excessive cellular infiltrate, such as rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory disorders. There is now overwhelming evidence that chemokines are also involved in the progression of cancer, where they function in several capacities. First, specific chemokine–receptor pairs are involved in tumour metastasis. This is not surprising, in view of their role as chemoattractants in cell migration. Secondly, chemokines help to shape the tumour microenvironment, often in favour of tumour growth and metastasis, by recruitment of leucocytes and activation of pro-inflammatory mediators. Emerging evidence suggests that chemokine receptor signalling also contributes to survival and proliferation, which may be particularly important for metastasized cells to adapt to foreign environments. However, there is considerable diversity and complexity in the chemokine network, both at the chemokine/receptor level and in the downstream signalling pathways they couple into, which may be key to a better understanding of how and why particular chemokines contribute to cancer growth and metastasis. Further investigation into these areas may identify targets that, if inhibited, could render cancer cells more susceptible to chemotherapy.

Allosteric modulation of heterodimeric G-protein-coupled receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are, and will probably remain, the most tractable class of targets for the development of small-molecule therapeutic medicines. Currently, all approved GPCR-directed medicines are agonists or antagonists at orthosteric binding sites - except for the calcimimetic cinacalcet, which is a positive allosteric modulator of Ca(2+)-sensing receptors, and maraviroc, an allosteric inhibitor of CC-chemokine receptor (CCR) 5. It is now widely accepted that GPCRs exist and might function as dimers, and there is growing evidence for the physiological presence and relevance of GPCR heterodimers. Molecules that can regulate a GPCR within a heterodimer, through allosteric effects between the two protomers of the dimer or between a protomer or protomers and the associated G protein, offer the potential to function in a highly selective and tissue-specific way. Despite the conceptual attraction of such allosteric regulators of GPCR heterodimers as drugs, they cannot be identified by screening approaches that routinely use a 'one GPCR target at a time' strategy. In our opinion, this will require the development of new approaches for screening and a return to the use of physiologically relevant cell systems at an early stage in compound identification.

Allosteric transinhibition by specific antagonists in CCR2/CXCR4 heterodimers

Chemokine receptors are presently used as targets for candidate drugs in the frame of inflammatory diseases and human immunodeficiency virus infection. They were shown to dimerize, but the functional relevance of dimerization in terms of drug action remains poorly understood. We reported previously the existence of negative binding cooperativity between the subunits of CCR2/CCR5 heterodimers. In the present study, we extend these observations to heterodimers formed by CCR2 and CXCR4, which are more distantly related. We also show that specific antagonists of one receptor inhibit the binding of chemokines to the other receptor as a consequence of their heterodimerization, both in recombinant cell lines and primary leukocytes. This resulted in a significant functional cross-inhibition in terms of calcium mobilization and chemotaxis. These data demonstrate that chemokine receptor antagonists regulate allosterically the functional properties of receptors on which they do not bind directly, with important implications on the effects of these potential therapeutic agents.

Role of chemokines for the localization of leukocyte subsets in the kidney

Chemokines comprise a family of structurally related chemotactic proteins. They bind to about 20 corresponding receptors. Chemokines provide a general communication system for cells, and regulate lymphocyte migration under normal (homeostatic) and inflammatory conditions. Chemokines organize microenvironments in lymphoid tissue, lymphoid organogenesis, and participate in vascular and lymphatic angiogenesis. Expressed at the site of injury in the kidney, chemokines are involved in the recruitment of specific leukocyte subsets to particular renal compartments. Here we summarize recent data on chemokine biology with a focus on the role of chemokines in the recruitment of neutrophils (polymorphonuclear leukocytes), monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, T cells, including regulatory T cells, and B cells in renal inflammation.

Allosteric properties of G protein-coupled receptor oligomers

Allosteric regulation of ligand binding is a well-established mechanism regulating the function of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Allosteric modulators have been considered so far as molecules binding to an allosteric site, distinct from that of the reference ligand (orthosteric site), and able to modulate the binding affinity at the orthosteric site and/or the signaling properties resulting from orthosteric site occupancy. Given that most GPCR are known to form dimers or higher order oligomers, we explored whether allosteric interactions could also occur between protomers within oligomeric arrays, thereby influencing binding and signaling receptor properties. Two main conclusions emerged from such studies. First, allosteric modulators can affect one receptor by binding to another receptor within a dimeric or oligomeric complex. Second, allosteric modulators might act on a given receptor by targeting the "orthosteric site" in another receptor of the complex. Allosteric regulation within di(oligo)mers thus implies that the pharmacological properties of a given receptor subtype can be influenced by the array of dimerization partners coexpressed in each particular cell type. Ligands could thus act as agonists or antagonists on 1 receptor, while modulating allosterically the function of a variety of other receptors to which they do not bind directly. Allosteric regulation across GPCR oligomeric interfaces is expected to greatly influence the practice of pharmacology. It will likely affect the design of drug discovery programs, which rely mostly on the overexpression of the receptor of interest in a cell line, thereby focusing on homo-oligomers and ignoring the potential effects of other partners.