Meropenem-Vaborbactam Resistance Selection, Resistance Prevention, and Molecular Mechanisms in Mutants of KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e01694-17. [PMID: 29038260 PMCID: PMC5700310 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01694-17]

Place in Therapy of the Newly Available Armamentarium for Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: Proposal of a Prescription Algorithm

The worldwide propagation of antimicrobial resistance represents one of the biggest threats to global health and development. Multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs), including carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negatives and Enterobacterales, present a heterogeneous and mutating spread. Infections by MDRO are often associated with an unfavorable outcome, especially among critically ill populations. The polymyxins represented the backbone of antibiotic regimens for Gram-negative MDROs in recent decades, but their use presents multiple pitfalls. Luckily, new agents with potent activity against MDROs have become available in recent times and more are yet to come. Now, we have the duty to make the best use of these new therapeutic tools in order not to prematurely compromise their effectiveness and at the same time improve patients’ outcomes. We reviewed the current literature on ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and cefiderocol, focusing on antimicrobial spectrum, on the prevalence and mechanisms of resistance development and on the main in vitro and clinical experiences available so far. Subsequently, we performed a step-by-step construction of a speculative algorithm for a reasoned prescription of these new antibiotics, contemplating both empirical and targeted use. Attention was specifically posed on patients with life-risk conditions and in settings with elevated prevalence of MDRO.

The role of new carbapenem combinations in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections

Multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria represent a growing threat, with an increasing prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections, for which treatment options are limited. New treatment combinations composed of a β-lactam antibiotic plus a potent β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) with anti-carbapenemase activity have been developed, including two carbapenem/BLI combinations that are commercially available-meropenem/vaborbactam (Vabomere® in the US, Vaborem® in Europe; Melinta Therapeutics) and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio®; Merck Sharp & Dohme), plus one other (meropenem/nacubactam) in early clinical development. This review provides a summary of the preclinical evidence supporting the use of carbapenem/BLI combinations and presents the clinical evidence across a range of MDR Gram-negative infections, with a focus on the use of meropenem/vaborbactam. All three BLIs have shown in vivo activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase and other class A carbapenemases. In 2019, meropenem/vaborbactam was listed in the WHO's list of essential medicines, because of its activity against priority 1 antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Meropenem/vaborbactam has considerable in vitro and in vivo activity against CRE, and in vitro evidence showing a low potential for resistance at clinically relevant doses. In randomized trials, meropenem/vaborbactam was non-inferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with complicated urinary tract infection and more effective than the best-available treatment in patients with serious CRE infections. Meropenem/vaborbactam is well tolerated and, based on clinical experience, demonstrated lower toxicity compared with the combination regimens that have previously been the standard of care. In conclusion, carbapenem/BLI combinations represent an important therapeutic strategy in patients with MDR Gram-negative infections.

Review of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Meropenem-Vaborbactam, and Imipenem/Cilastatin-Relebactam to Target Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales

Objective: To provide a review of 3 novel antimicrobial agents-ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam-regarding treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (KPC). Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed and OVID (MEDLINE) was performed up to March 2020 using the following search terms: Vabomere, meropenem-vaborbactam, vaborbactam, RPX7009, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase, KPC, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, CRE, relebactam, imipenem-relebactam, MK-7655, ceftazidime-avibactam. Abstracts from conferences, article bibliographies, and product information were also reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Articles were first screened by English language, then title, then abstract, and finally by review of the full article. Fifty-five clinical and preclinical studies were included. Data Synthesis: These 3 novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have shown considerable improvement in safety and efficacy as compared with traditional polymyxin-based combination therapy for the treatment of KPC infections. While meropenem-vaborbactam has not shown improved activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it has shown decreased rates of resistance to KPC versus ceftazidime-avibactam. Conclusions: With increasing incidence of KPC infections on a global scale, pharmacists should be aware of the notable similarities and differences between these 3 agents, and the current data supporting their use. Pharmacists may want to consider meropenem-vaborbactam over ceftazidime-avibactam for KPC infections due to decreased likelihood of resistance.

Emergence of Ceftazidime- and Avibactam-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (KPC-PA) has been reported sporadically. However, epidemiological and antimicrobial susceptibility data specific for KPC-PA are lacking. We collected 374 carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) isolates from seven hospitals in China from June 2016 to February 2019 and identified the bla_KPC-2 gene in 40.4% (n = 151/374) of the isolates. Approximately one-half of all KPC-PA isolates (n = 76/151; 50.3%) were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI). Combining Kraken2 taxonomy identification and Nanopore sequencing, we identified eight plasmid types, five of which carried bla_KPC-2, and 13 combination patterns of these plasmid types. In addition, we identified IS26-ΔTn6296 and Tn1403-like–ΔTn6296 as the two mobile genetic elements that mediated bla_KPC-2 transmission. bla_KPC-2 plasmid curing in 28 strains restored CAZ-AVI susceptibility, suggesting that bla_KPC-2 was the mediator of CAZ-AVI resistance. Furthermore, the bla_KPC-2 copy number was found to correlate with KPC expression and, therefore, CAZ-AVI resistance. Taken together, our results suggest that KPC-PA is becoming a clinical threat and that using CAZ-AVI to treat this specific pathogen should be done with caution.

IMPORTANCE Previous research has reported several cases of KPC-PA strains and three KPC-encoding P. aeruginosa plasmid types in China. However, the prevalence and clinical significance of KPC-PA are not available. In addition, the susceptibility of the strains to CAZ-AVI remains unknown. Samples in this study were collected from seven tertiary hospitals prior to CAZ-AVI clinical approval in China. Therefore, our results represent a retrospective study establishing the baseline efficacy of the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combination agent for treating KPC-PA infections. The observed correlation between the bla_KPC copy number and CAZ-AVI resistance suggests that close monitoring of the susceptibility of the strain during treatment is required. It would also be beneficial to screen for the bla_KPC gene in CRPA strains for antimicrobial surveillance purposes.

Genomic Features Associated with the Degree of Phenotypic Resistance to Carbapenems in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains cause severe infections that are difficult to treat. The production of carbapenemases such as the K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) is a common mechanism by which these strains resist killing by the carbapenems. However, the degree of phenotypic carbapenem resistance (MIC) may differ markedly between isolates with similar carbapenemase genes, suggesting that our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of carbapenem resistance remains incomplete. To address this problem, we determined the whole-genome sequences of 166 K. pneumoniae clinical isolates resistant to meropenem, imipenem, or ertapenem. Multiple linear regression analysis of this collection of largely bla_KPC-3-containing sequence type 258 (ST258) isolates indicated that bla_KPC copy number and some outer membrane porin gene mutations were associated with higher MICs to carbapenems. A trend toward higher MICs was also observed with those bla_KPC genes carried by the d isoform of Tn4401. In contrast, ompK37 mutations were associated with lower carbapenem MICs, and extended spectrum β-lactamase genes were not associated with higher or lower MICs in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. A machine learning approach based on the whole-genome sequences of these isolates did not result in a substantial improvement in prediction of isolates with high or low MICs. These results build upon previous findings suggesting that multiple factors influence the overall carbapenem resistance levels in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates.

IMPORTANCEKlebsiella pneumoniae can cause severe infections in the blood, urinary tract, and lungs. Resistance to carbapenems in K. pneumoniae is an urgent public health threat, since it can make these isolates difficult to treat. While individual contributors to carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae have been studied, few reports explore their combined effects in clinical isolates. We sequenced 166 clinical carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates to evaluate the contribution of known genes to carbapenem MICs and to try to identify novel genes associated with higher carbapenem MICs. The bla_KPC copy number and some outer membrane porin gene mutations were associated with higher carbapenem MICs. In contrast, mutations in one specific porin, ompK37, were associated with lower carbapenem MICs. Machine learning did not result in a substantial improvement in the prediction of carbapenem resistance nor did it identify novel genes associated with carbapenem resistance. These findings enhance our understanding of the many contributors to carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae.

Imipenem-Relebactam Susceptibility and Genotypic Characteristics of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) Identified during Population-Based Surveillance

Laboratories submit all carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella species to the Alameda County Public Health Department (ACPHD). ACPHD evaluated 75 isolates submitted during nine months for susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam (I-R) and identified β-lactamase genes using whole genome sequencing. Of 60 (80%) isolates susceptible to I-R, 8 (13%) had detectable carbapenemase genes, including four KPC, two NDM, and two OXA-48-like; we described the relationship between the presence of β-lactamase resistance genes and susceptibility to I-R.

Role of new antibiotics for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Klebsiella pneumoniae has accumulated a wide range of resistance determinants and has evolved into a difficult-to-treat pathogen that poses an increasing healthcare threat. KPC is an important marker for extensively drug-resistant (XDR) organisms with limited treatment options. In response to the medical need for new treatment options, several new antibiotics have been developed and registered recently. The β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam, the cephalosporin-siderophore conjugate cefiderocol, the aminoglycoside derivative plazomicin and the tetracycline derivative eravacycline, focus on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. These modified agents from old antibiotic classes illustrate the challenges of this requirement to address class-specific resistance mechanisms while critical gaps and some cross-resistance within a class, or to unrelated antibiotic classes, remain. The diverse molecular mechanisms and increasing diversification of carbapenem resistance among Klebsiella isolates requires improved rapid molecular diagnostic capabilities and stringent stewardship programmes to preserve the efficacy of new antibiotics for as long as possible.

Treatment for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: recent advances and future directions

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a growing threat to human health worldwide. CRE often carry multiple resistance genes that limit treatment options and require longer durations of therapy, are more costly to treat, and necessitate therapies with increased toxicities when compared with carbapenem-susceptible strains. Here, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of resistance in CRE, the epidemiology of CRE infections worldwide, and available treatment options for CRE. We review recentlyapproved agents for the treatment of CRE, including ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and novel aminoglycosides and tetracyclines. We also discuss recent advances in phage therapy and antibiotics that are currently in development targeted to CRE. The potential for the development of resistance to these therapies remains high, and enhanced antimicrobial stewardship is imperative both to reduce the spread of CRE worldwide and to ensure continued access to efficacious treatment options.

Landscape of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Egypt: Survey and Literature Review

Purpose

This article is the first to review published reports on the prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative infections in Egypt and gain insights into antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance and susceptibility testing capabilities of Egyptian medical centers.

Materials and Methods

A literature review and online survey were conducted.

Results

The online survey and literature review reported high prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (19–85.24% of E. coli, and 10–87% of K. pneumoniae), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (35–100% of K. pneumoniae and 13.8–100% of E. coli), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (10–100%), and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15–70%) in Egypt. Risk factors for MDR Gram-negative infections were ventilated patients (67.4%), prolonged hospitalization (53.5%) and chronic disease (34.9%). Although antimicrobial surveillance capabilities were deemed at least moderate in most centers, lack of access to rapid AMR diagnostics, lack of use of local epidemiological data in treatment decision-making, lack of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs, and lack of risk prediction tools were commonly reported by respondents.

Conclusion

This survey has highlighted the presence of knowledge gaps as well as limitations in the surveillance and monitoring capabilities of AMR in Egypt, with most laboratories lacking rapid diagnostics and molecular testing. Future efforts in Egypt should focus on tackling these issues via nationwide initiatives, including understanding the AMR trends in the country, capacity building of laboratories and their staff to correctly and timely identify AMR, and introducing newer antimicrobials for targeting emerging resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative species.

Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: mechanisms of resistance including updated data for novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations

Introduction: Multi-drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is currently one of the most pressing emerging issues in bacterial resistance. Treatment of K.pneumoniae infections is often problematic due to the lack of available therapeutic options, with a relevant impact in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare-associated costs. Soon after the launch of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, one of the approved new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, reports of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains developing resistance during treatment were published. Being a hospital-associated pathogen, K.pneumoniae is continuously exposed to multiple antibiotics resulting in constant selective pressure, which in turn leads to additional mutations that are positively selected.Areas covered: Herein the authors present the K.pneumoniae mechanisms of resistance to different antimicrobials, including updated data for ceftazidime-avibactam.Expert opinion: K.pneumoniae is a nosocomial pathogen commonly implicated in hospital outbreaks with a propensity for antimicrobial resistance toward mainstay β-lactam antibiotics and multiple other antibiotic classes. Following the development of drug resistance and understanding the mechanisms involved, we can improve the efficacy of current antimicrobials, by applying careful stewardship and rational use to preserve their potential utility. The knowledge on antibiotic resistance mechanisms should be used to inform the design of novel therapeutic agents that might not be subject to, or can circumvent, mechanisms of resistance.

Epidemiology of Meropenem/Vaborbactam Resistance in KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Causing Bloodstream Infections in Northern Italy, 2018

Meropenem/Vaborbactam (MEM-VAB) is a novel carbapenem- β-lactamase inhibitor active against KPC-producing Enterobacteria. Herein, we evaluate the incidence of meropenem/vaborbactam-resistance among KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) bloodstream infection in a large Italian hospital. Meropenem/vaborbactam-resistance was found in 8% (n = 5) KPC-Kp, while 5% (n = 3) strains exhibited cross-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI). Genomic analysis revealed that meropenem/vaborbactam-resistance was associated with truncated OmpK35 and insertion of glycine and aspartic acid within OmpK36 at position 134–135 (GD134–135). Notably, no specific mutation was associated to cross-resistance. No specific antimicrobial treatment was related to favorable clinical outcomes, while cross-resistance was not associated to higher clinical and/or microbiological failures. Our study indicated that resistance to meropenem/vaborbactam was due to porins mutations and is associated with reduced susceptibility to both ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenems.

Early Experience With Meropenem-Vaborbactam for Treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections

Twenty patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections were treated with meropenem-vaborbactam. Thirty-day clinical success and survival rates were 65% (13/20) and 90% (18/20), respectively. Thirty-five percent of patients had microbiologic failures within 90 days. One patient developed a recurrent infection due to meropenem-vaborbactam-nonsusceptible, ompK36 porin mutant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Nosocomial Pneumonia in the Era of Multidrug-Resistance: Updates in Diagnosis and Management

Nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-intubated patients and ventilator-associated pneumonia, is one of the most frequent hospital-acquired infections, especially in the intensive care unit. NP has a significant impact on morbidity, mortality and health care costs, especially when the implicated pathogens are multidrug-resistant ones. This narrative review aims to critically review what is new in the field of NP, specifically, diagnosis and antibiotic treatment. Regarding novel imaging modalities, the current role of lung ultrasound and low radiation computed tomography are discussed, while regarding etiological diagnosis, recent developments in rapid microbiological confirmation, such as syndromic rapid multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction panels are presented and compared with conventional cultures. Additionally, the volatile compounds/electronic nose, a promising diagnostic tool for the future is briefly presented. With respect to NP management, antibiotics approved for the indication of NP during the last decade are discussed, namely, ceftobiprole medocaril, telavancin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam.

Bacteriophage Treatment Rescues Mice Infected with Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258

Severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 258 (ST258) highlight the need for new therapeutics with activity against this pathogen. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is an alternative treatment approach for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections that has shown efficacy in experimental animal models and promise in clinical case reports. In this study, we assessed microbiologic, histopathologic, and survival outcomes following systemic administration of phage in ST258-infected mice. We found that prompt treatment with two phages, either individually or in combination, rescued mice with K. pneumoniae ST258 bacteremia. Among the three treatment groups, mice that received combination phage therapy demonstrated the greatest increase in survival and the lowest frequency of phage resistance among bacteria recovered from mouse blood and tissue. Our findings support the utility of phage therapy as an approach for refractory ST258 infections and underscore the potential of this treatment modality to be enhanced through strategic phage selection.

IS26 Veers Genomic Plasticity and Genetic Rearrangement toward Carbapenem Hyperresistance under Sublethal Antibiotics

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative carriers of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) often subvert antibiotic therapy due to inadequate sensitivity in laboratory detection. Although unstable gene amplification has been recognized to crucially contribute to underestimation or misestimation of antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates, the precise mechanisms underlying carbapenem resistance driven by amplification of bla_KPC-2 remain obscure. Here, we reported that IS26-mediated amplification of bla_KPC-2 rapidly and robustly gave rise to carbapenem hyperresistant phenotypes in an Escherichia coli clinical strain following sublethal meropenem or tobramycin preexposure. Intriguingly, IS26 also underpinned amplification of a 47 kb multiple drug resistance (MDR) region encompassing nine antibiotic resistance genes and six IS26 insertion sequences. Tandem-repeat analysis and experimental validation demonstrated that bla_KPC-2 amplification was indeed mediated by IS26, which was further experimentally shown to involve intricate genetic rearrangement. Such gene amplification arose dynamically under antibiotic stress and subsided upon antibiotic withdrawal. Instead of reducing the amplification of the IS26-flanked MDR region, drug combinations in vitro exacerbated it. Our study, thus, provides valuable insights into how dynamic gene amplification processes can precipitously transform resistance status and complicate diagnosis. IMPORTANCE Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) are powerful β-lactamases that enable Gram-negative pathogens to destroy clinically important carbapenems in antibiotic therapies. In particular, KPC-2 is difficult to detect due to a lack of instrument sensitivity in regular laboratory screens, which leads to misdiagnosis and poor treatment outcomes. It remains unclear how bla_KPC-2 rapidly induces exceedingly high-level resistance against carbapenems following the challenges of sublethal antibiotics. Here, we demonstrated that, under sublethal doses of antibiotics, insertion sequence IS26 mediated rapid amplification of multiple resistance determinants, including bla_KPC-2 and a multiple drug resistance (MDR) region, which was accompanied by intricate genetic rearrangement.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Etiology and antibiotic treatment

Carbapenem antibiotics were first introduced in the 1980s and have long been considered the most active agents for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Over the last decade, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have emerged as organisms causing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Infections caused by CRE have shown a higher mortality rate than those caused by bacteria sensitive to carbapenem antibiotics. Current antibiotic guidelines for the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are insufficient, and rapid de-escalation of empiric antibiotic treatment is not widely recognized. This review summarizes the molecular characteristics, epidemiology and possible treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis caused by CRE.

Spotlight on New Antibiotics for the Treatment of Pneumonia

In the last years, the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative (like Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii) and Gram-positive bacteria (mostly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) was worldwide reported, limiting the options for an effective antibiotic therapy. For these reasons, inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and delayed prescription can lead to an unfavorable outcome, especially in patients with pneumonia. New antibiotics approved belong to classes of antimicrobials, like beta-lactams with or without beta-lactamase inhibitors, aminoglycosides, oxazolidinones, quinolones, and tetracyclines, or based on new mechanisms of action. These new compounds show many advantages, including a broad spectrum of activity against MDR pathogens, good lung penetration, safety and tolerability, and finally the possibility of intravenous and/or oral formulations. However, the new antibiotics under development represent an important possible armamentarium against difficult-to-treat strains. The safety and clinical efficacy of these future drugs should be tested in clinical practice. In this review, there are reported characteristics of newly approved antibiotics that represent potential future options for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Finally, the characteristics of the drugs under development are briefly reported.

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

New Carbapenemase Inhibitors: Clearing the Way for the β-Lactams

Carbapenem resistance is a major global health problem that seriously compromises the treatment of infections caused by nosocomial pathogens. Resistance to carbapenems mainly occurs via the production of carbapenemases, such as VIM, IMP, NDM, KPC and OXA, among others. Preclinical and clinical trials are currently underway to test a new generation of promising inhibitors, together with the recently approved avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam. This review summarizes the main, most promising carbapenemase inhibitors synthesized to date, as well as their spectrum of activity and current stage of development. We particularly focus on β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations that could potentially be used to treat infections caused by carbapenemase-producer pathogens of critical priority. The emergence of these new combinations represents a step forward in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, especially in regard to metallo-β-lactamases and carbapenem-hydrolysing class D β-lactamases, not currently inhibited by any clinically approved inhibitor.

An Appraisal of the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Meropenem-Vaborbactam

Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens remain an urgent public health threat, and safe, effective treatment options are limited. Although several agents are now available to combat these infections, meropenem-vaborbactam was the first to combine a novel, cyclic, boronic acid-based, β-lactamase inhibitor with a carbapenem backbone. Vaborbactam emanated from a discovery program specifically designed to identify candidate β-lactamase inhibitors with biochemical, microbiologic, and pharmacologic properties optimized for use in conjunction with a carbapenem. Meropenem was selected as the ideal carbapenem given its broad-spectrum in vitro activity, well established safety profile, and proven efficacy in the treatment of serious gram-negative infections. The combination has demonstrated potent in vitro activity against resistant gram-negative pathogens, particularly KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC₅₀ values typically ≤ 0.06 mg/l). Importantly, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of the two agents are well matched, and the approved optimized dosing regimen of 4 g every 8 h (Q8h) as a 3-h infusion provides reliable probability of target attainment against the majority of commonly encountered carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Robust in vitro and in vivo PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) data support the ability of this dosing regimen to achieve specified PK/PD targets for both bactericidal activity and prevention of resistance among pathogens with MICs up to 8 mg/l. This concerted effort into optimizing the PK and PD parameters of both the β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor alone and in combination contributed to the clinical success of meropenem-vaborbactam demonstrated in phase 3 trials in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), including acute pyelonephritis (AP), and serious CRE infections. As the use of meropenem-vaborbactam increases concomitantly with the prevalence of KPC-producing CRE, continued pharmacovigilance and antimicrobial stewardship efforts will be of upmost importance to ensure that these PK/PD efforts translate into improved patient outcomes.

Resistance to Novel β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: The "Price of Progress"

Significant advances were made in antibiotic development during the past 5 years. Novel agents were added to the arsenal that target critical priority pathogens, including multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Of these, 4 novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) reached clinical approval in the United States. With these additions comes a significant responsibility to reduce the possibility of emergence of resistance. Reports in the rise of resistance toward ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam are alarming. Clinicians and scientists must make every attempt to reverse or halt these setbacks.

The Strategies of Pathogen-Oriented Therapy on Circumventing Antimicrobial Resistance

The emerging antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses serious threats to the global public health. Conventional antibiotics have been eclipsed in combating with drug-resistant bacteria. Moreover, the developing and deploying of novel antimicrobial drugs have trudged, as few new antibiotics are being developed over time and even fewer of them can hit the market. Alternative therapeutic strategies to resolve the AMR crisis are urgently required. Pathogen-oriented therapy (POT) springs up as a promising approach in circumventing antibiotic resistance. The tactic underling POT is applying antibacterial compounds or materials directly to infected regions to treat specific bacteria species or strains with goals of improving the drug efficacy and reducing nontargeting and the development of drug resistance. This review exemplifies recent trends in the development of POTs for circumventing AMR, including the adoption of antibiotic-antibiotic conjugates, antimicrobial peptides, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, nanotechnologies, CRISPR-Cas systems, and microbiota modulations. Employing these alternative approaches alone or in combination shows promising advantages for addressing the growing clinical embarrassment of antibiotics in fighting drug-resistant bacteria.

Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam plus Meropenem/Vaborbactam When Both Are Used Together Is Achieved in Four Steps in Metallo-β-Lactamase-Negative Klebsiella pneumoniae

Serine β-lactamases are dominant causes of β-lactam resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Recently, this has driven clinical deployment of the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor pairs ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. We show that four steps, i.e., ompK36 and ramR mutation plus carriage of OXA-232 and KPC-3-D178Y variant β-lactamases, confer ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam resistance when both pairs are used together. These findings have implications for decision making about sequential and combinatorial use of these β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor pairs to treat K. pneumoniae infections.

α-Triazolylboronic Acids: A Promising Scaffold for Effective Inhibitors of KPCs

Boronic acids are known reversible covalent inhibitors of serine β-lactamases. The selectivity and high potency of specific boronates bearing an amide side chain that mimics the β-lactam's amide side chain have been advanced in several studies. Herein, we describe a new class of boronic acids in which the amide group is replaced by a bioisostere triazole. The boronic acids were obtained in a two-step synthesis that relies on the solid and versatile copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) followed by boronate deprotection. All of the compounds show very good inhibition of the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase KPC-2, with Ki values ranging from 1 nM to 1 μM, and most of them are able to restore cefepime activity against K. pneumoniae harboring blaKPC-2 . In particular, compound 1 e, bearing a sulfonamide substituted by a thiophene ring, proved to be an excellent KPC-2 inhibitor (Ki =30 nM); it restored cefepime susceptibility in KPC-Kpn cells (MIC=0.5 μg/mL) with values similar to that of vaborbactam (Ki =20 nM, MIC in KPC-Kpn 0.5 μg/mL). Our findings suggest that α-triazolylboronates might represent an effective scaffold for the treatment of KPC-mediated infections.

Antibiotic resistance breakers: current approaches and future directions

Infections of antibiotic-resistant pathogens pose an ever-increasing threat to mankind. The investigation of novel approaches for tackling the antimicrobial resistance crisis must be part of any global response to this problem if an untimely reversion to the pre-penicillin era of medicine is to be avoided. One such promising avenue of research involves so-called antibiotic resistance breakers (ARBs), capable of re-sensitising resistant bacteria to antibiotics. Although some ARBs have previously been employed in the clinical setting, such as the β-lactam inhibitors, we posit that the broader field of ARB research can yet yield a greater diversity of more effective therapeutic agents than have been previously achieved. This review introduces the area of ARB research, summarises the current state of ARB development with emphasis on the various major classes of ARBs currently being investigated and their modes of action, and offers a perspective on the future direction of the field.

How to manage KPC infections

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae represent an increasing global threat worldwide and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP) has become one of the most important contemporary pathogens, especially in endemic areas. Risk stratification and rapid diagnostics laboratory workflows are of paramount importance and indication for therapy of KPC-KP infection must be individualized according to the baseline characteristics of the patient and severity of infection. The optimal treatment of infection because of KPC-KP organisms is uncertain and antibiotic options are limited. The knowledge of the patient's pathophysiology, infection site, and application of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles on the basis of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has progressively gained major relevance. Combination therapies including high-dose meropenem, colistin, fosfomycin, tigecycline, and aminoglycosides are widely used, with suboptimal results. In the past few years, new antimicrobials targeting KPC-KP have been developed and are now at various stages of clinical research. However, their optimal use should be guaranteed in the long term for delaying, as much as possible, the emergence of resistance. Strict infection control measures remain necessary. The aim of this review is to discuss the challenges in the management and treatment of patients with infections because KPC-KP and provide an expert opinion.

Precision medicine for the diagnosis and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: time to think from a different perspective

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) represent a global public health problem. Precision medicine (PM) is a multicomponent medical approach that should be used to individualize the management of patients infected with CRE.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we differentiate carbapenem-producing CRE (CP-CRE) from non-CP-CRE and the importance of this distinction in clinical practice. The current phenotypic CRE-case definition and its implications are also discussed. Additionally, we summarize data regarding phenotypic and molecular diagnostic tools and available antibiotics. In order to review the most relevant data, a comprehensive literature search of peer-reviewed articles in PubMed and abstracts presented at high-impact conferences was performed.

EXPERT OPINION

PM in CRE infections entails a multi-step process that includes applying the current phenotypic definition, utilization of the right phenotypic or molecular testing methods, and thorough evaluation of risk factors, source of infection, and comorbidities. A powerful armamentarium is available to treat CRE infections, including recently approved agents. Randomized controlled trials targeting specific pathogens instead of site of infections may be appropriate to fill in the current gaps. In light of the diverse enzymology behind CP-CRE, PM should be employed to provide the best therapy based on the underlying resistance mechanism.

Zinc Chelators as Carbapenem Adjuvants for Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Bacteria: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation

Infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing bacteria are emerging and carry a significant impact on patients' outcome. MBL producers are spread worldwide, both in community and hospital setting, with increasingly reported epidemic clusters and the search for MBL inhibitors is an important topic for public health. MBLs are zinc-dependent enzymes whose functioning can be hampered by zinc chelators. We evaluated the potential of six zinc chelators (disulfiram, nitroxoline, 5-amino-8-hydroxyquinoline, 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid [DOTA], cyclam, and N,N,N',N'-tetrakis (2-pyridymethyl) ethylenediamine [TPEN]) in restoring carbapenem activity against MBL producers. Zinc chelators alone or in combination with meropenem against MBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, Chryseobacterium indologenes, Elizabethkingia meningoseptica, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates were tested in vitro and in vivo (Galleria mellonella). In vitro experiments showed a synergistic activity between TPEN and meropenem toward all the strains. Nitroxoline alone retained activity against S. maltophilia, C. indologenes, and E. meningoseptica. In vivo experiments showed that TPEN or nitroxoline in combination with meropenem increased survival in larvae infected with E. meningoseptica, S. maltophilia, and K. pneumoniae. Based on our data, zinc chelators are potential carbapenem adjuvants molecules (restoring carbapenem activity) against MBL-sustained infections and could represent an interesting option for infections induced by these microorganisms.

Meropenem/vaborbactam: a next generation β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination

INTRODUCTION

infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) constitute a worldwide threat and are associated with significant mortality, especially in fragile patients, and costs. Meropenem-vaborbactam (M/V) is a combination of a group 2 carbapenem with a novel cyclic boronic acid-based β-lactamase inhibitor which has shown good efficacy against KPC carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, which are amongst the most prevalent types of CRE.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the microbiological and pharmacological profile and current clinical experience and safety of M/V in the treatment of infections caused by CRE.

EXPERT OPINION

M/V is a promising drug for the treatment of infections due to KPC-producing CRE (KPC-CRE). It exhibited an almost complete coverage of KPC-CRE isolates from large surveillance studies and a low propensity for resistance selection, retaining activity also against strains producing KPC mutants resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Both meropenem and vaborbactam have a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, with similar kinetic properties, a good intrapulmonary penetration, and are efficiently cleared during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). According to available data, M/V monotherapy is associated with higher clinical cure rates and lower rates of adverse events, especially in terms of nephrotoxicity, if compared to 'older' combination therapies.

Meropenem-Vaborbactam versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections

The comparative efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam for treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections remains unknown. This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults with CRE infections who received ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-vaborbactam for ≥72 hours from February 2015 to October 2018. Patients with a localized urinary tract infection and repeat study drug exposures after the first episode were excluded. The primary endpoint was clinical success compared between treatment groups. Secondary endpoints included 30- and 90-day mortality, adverse events (AE), 90-day CRE infection recurrence, and development of resistance in patients with recurrent infection. A post hoc subgroup analysis was completed comparing patients who received ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy, ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy, and meropenem-vaborbactam monotherapy. A total of 131 patients were included (ceftazidime-avibactam, n = 105; meropenem-vaborbactam, n = 26), 40% of whom had bacteremia. No significant difference in clinical success was observed between groups (62% versus 69%; P = 0.49). Patients in the ceftazidime-avibactam arm received combination therapy more often than patients in the meropenem-vaborbactam arm (61% versus 15%; P < 0.01). No difference in 30- and 90-day mortality resulted, and rates of AE were similar between groups. In patients with recurrent infection, development of resistance occurred in three patients that received ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy and in no patients in the meropenem-vaborbactam arm. Clinical success was similar between patients receiving ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam for treatment of CRE infections, despite ceftazidime-avibactam being used more often as a combination therapy. Development of resistance was more common with ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Associated with Increased bla KPC-3 Gene Copy Number Mediated by pKpQIL Plasmid Derivatives in Sequence Type 258 Klebsiella pneumoniae

This study reports on the characterization of two ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA)-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains (KP-14159 and KP-8788) sequentially isolated from infections occurred in a patient never treated with CZA. Whole-genome sequencing characterization using a combined short- and long-read sequencing approach showed that both isolates belonged to the same ST258 strain, had altered outer membrane porins (a truncated OmpK35 and an Asp137Thr138 duplication in the L3 loop of OmpK36), and carried novel pKpQIL plasmid derivatives (pIT-14159 and pIT-8788, respectively) harboring two copies of the Tn4401a KPC-3-encoding transposon. Plasmid pIT-8788 was a cointegrate of pIT-14159 with a ColE replicon (that was also present in KP-14159) apparently evolved in vivo during infection. pIT-8788 was maintained at a higher copy number than pIT-14159 and, upon transfer to Escherichia coli DH10B, was able to increase the CZA MIC by 32-fold. The present findings provide novel insights about the mechanisms of acquired resistance to CZA, underscoring the role that the evolution of broadly disseminated pKpQIL plasmid derivatives may have in increasing the bla _KPC gene copy number and KPC-3 expression in bacterial hosts. Although not self-transferable, similar elements, with multiple copies of Tn4401 and maintained at a high copy number, could mediate transferable CZA resistance upon mobilization.

Potency of Vaborbactam Is Less Affected than That of Avibactam in Strains Producing KPC-2 Mutations That Confer Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam due to mutations in KPC genes has been reported both in vitro and in clinical settings. The most frequently reported mutation leads to the amino acid substitution D179Y in the Ω loop of the enzyme. Bacterial cells that carry mutant KPC acquire a higher level of ceftazidime resistance, become more sensitive to other cephalosporins, and almost completely lose resistance to carbapenems. In this study, we demonstrated that two substitutions in KPC-2, D179Y and L169P, reduce the ability of avibactam to enhance the activity of ceftazidime, cefepime, or piperacillin against isogenic efflux-deficient strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 8- to 32-fold and 4- to 16-fold for the D179Y and L169P variants, respectively, depending on the antibiotic.

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam due to mutations in KPC genes has been reported both in vitro and in clinical settings. The most frequently reported mutation leads to the amino acid substitution D179Y in the Ω loop of the enzyme. Bacterial cells that carry mutant KPC acquire a higher level of ceftazidime resistance, become more sensitive to other cephalosporins, and almost completely lose resistance to carbapenems. In this study, we demonstrated that two substitutions in KPC-2, D179Y and L169P, reduce the ability of avibactam to enhance the activity of ceftazidime, cefepime, or piperacillin against isogenic efflux-deficient strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 8- to 32-fold and 4- to 16-fold for the D179Y and L169P variants, respectively, depending on the antibiotic. In contrast, the potency of vaborbactam, the structurally unrelated β-lactamase inhibitor that was recently approved by the FDA in combination with meropenem, is reduced no more than 2-fold. Experiments with purified enzymes demonstrate that the D179Y substitution causes an ∼20-fold increase in the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) for inhibition of ceftazidime hydrolysis by avibactam, versus 2-fold for vaborbactam, and that the L169P substitution has an ∼4.5-fold-stronger effect on the affinity for avibactam than for vaborbactam. In addition, the D179Y and L169P variants hydrolyze ceftazidime with 10-fold and 4-fold-higher efficiencies, respectively, than that of wild-type KPC-2. Thus, microbiological and biochemical experiments implicate both decreased ability of avibactam to interact with KPC-2 variants and an increase in the efficiency of ceftazidime hydrolysis in resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam. These substitutions have a considerably lesser effect on interactions with vaborbactam, making the meropenem-vaborbactam combination a valuable agent in managing infections due to KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam, or Both? Clinical and Formulary Considerations

Ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are changing the management of invasive infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), leading to higher rates of clinical cure, decreased mortality, and decreased rates of acute kidney injury compared with colistin-based regimens. However, these 2 agents are not interchangeable with regard to management of CRE infections, and clinicians need to be aware of their differences. This review focuses on differences in the in vitro activity of these agents as a function of mechanism of carbapenem resistance, the clinical data supporting their superiority over colistin-based therapy, and the differences between agents with regard to propensity for selection of resistance. Furthermore, considerations and recommendations for hospital formularies and antibiotic stewardship programs regarding positioning of these agents are discussed.

Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Children

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are increasingly prevalent in children and are associated with poor clinical outcomes. Optimal treatment strategies for CRE infections continue to evolve. A lack of pediatric-specific comparative effectiveness data, uncertain pediatric dosing regimens for several agents, and a relative lack of new antibiotics with pediatric indications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) collectively present unique challenges for children. In this review, we provide a framework for antibiotic treatment of CRE infections in children, highlighting relevant microbiologic considerations and summarizing available data related to the evaluation of FDA-approved antibiotics (as of September 2019) with CRE activity, including carbapenems, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam, polymyxins, tigecycline, eravacycline, and plazomicin.

Activity of Meropenem-Vaborbactam against Bacterial Isolates Causing Pneumonia in Patients in U.S. Hospitals during 2014 to 2018

Meropenem-vaborbactam is approved to treat hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in Europe. Meropenem-vaborbactam activity was evaluated against 3,193 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 4,790 Enterobacterales isolates causing pneumonia, including VAP, in hospitalized patients in the United States. Susceptibility testing was performed by using the broth microdilution method, and all carbapenem-resistant isolates were submitted for whole-genome sequencing.

Meropenem-vaborbactam is approved to treat hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in Europe. Meropenem-vaborbactam activity was evaluated against 3,193 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 4,790 Enterobacterales isolates causing pneumonia, including VAP, in hospitalized patients in the United States. Susceptibility testing was performed by using the broth microdilution method, and all carbapenem-resistant isolates were submitted for whole-genome sequencing. Meropenem-vaborbactam exhibited almost complete activity against Enterobacterales (>99.9% susceptible), including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and was also very active against P. aeruginosa isolates (89.5% susceptible).

Avibactam Sensitizes Carbapenem-Resistant NDM-1-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae to Innate Immune Clearance

Infections caused by New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)–producing strains of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae are a global public health threat lacking reliable therapies. NDM is impervious to all existing β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) drugs, including the non–β-lactam BLI avibactam (AVI). Though lacking direct activity against NDMs, AVI can interact with penicillin-binding protein 2 in a manner that may influence cell wall dynamics. We found that exposure of NDM-1–producing K. pneumoniae to AVI led to striking bactericidal interactions with human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide LL-37, a frontline component of host innate immunity. Moreover, AVI markedly sensitized NDM-1–producing K. pneumoniae to killing by freshly isolated human neutrophils, platelets, and serum when complement was active. Finally, AVI monotherapy reduced lung counts of NDM-1–producing K. pneumoniae in a murine pulmonary challenge model. AVI sensitizes NDM-1–producing K. pneumoniae to innate immune clearance in ways that are not appreciated by standard antibiotic testing and that merit further study.

Biochemical Activity of Vaborbactam

The most common mechanism of resistance to β-lactams antibiotics in Gram-negative bacteria is production of β-lactamase enzymes capable of cleaving the β-lactam ring. Inhibition of β-lactamase activity with small-molecule drugs is a proven strategy to restore the potency of many β-lactam antibiotics. Vaborbactam (formerly RPX7009) is a cyclic boronic acid β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) with a broad spectrum of activity against various serine β-lactamases, including KPC carbapenemases. The combination of vaborbactam and meropenem is approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of various nosocomial infections. We attempted to gain more insight into the mechanism of action of vaborbactam by conducting detailed kinetic characterization of its interaction with various recombinant His-tagged β-lactamases. Vaborbactam demonstrated potent inhibition of class A and class C enzymes with K_i values ranging from 0.022 to 0.18 μM, while inhibition of class D enzymes was rather poor, and no activity against class B β-lactamases was detected. Importantly, vaborbactam inhibited KPC-2, KPC-3, BKC-1, and SME-2 carbapenemases at 1:1 stoichiometry, while these numbers were higher for other class A and C enzymes. Vaborbactam was also shown to be a potent progressive inactivator of several enzymes, including KPCs with inactivation constants k ₂/K in the range of 3.4 × 10³ to 2.4 × 10⁴ M^-1 s^-1 Finally, experiments on the recovery of enzyme activity demonstrated the high stability of the vaborbactam-KPC complex, with 0.000040 s^-1 k _off values and a corresponding residence time of 7 h, whereas the release of vaborbactam bound to other serine β-lactamases was substantially faster. The biochemical characteristics of vaborbactam described in this study may facilitate further chemical optimization efforts to develop boronic BLIs with improved affinity and broader spectrum of inhibition.

The Battle Is on: New Beta-Lactams for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Resistant gram-negative infections are becoming increasingly difficult to treat, prompting increased focus on drug development. This review will focus primarily on the new beta-lactam agents developed in the past 5 years that target multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative organisms, including those producing carbapenemases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Four new agents including ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem-vaborbactam (MER-VAB), imipenem-relebactam (IMI-REL), and cefiderocol have recently been approved for the treatment of resistant gram-negative infections. CAZ-AVI remains an option for blaOXA-48-producing isolates and potentially MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but the concern for resistance arises when using the agent for KPC-producing Enterobacteriales. MER-VAB appears to be more stable than CAZ-AVI in the treatment of KPC-producing Enterobacteriales but less is known about its propensity for the development of resistance and the drug does not reliably expand the coverage of meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. IMI-REL expands the spectrum of imipenem-cilastatin to include KPC-producing Enterobacteriales as well as MDR P. aeruginosa but much less is known about its real-world clinical utility. Cefiderocol is the only of the four new agents with efficacy against metallo-beta-lactamases and resistant Acinetobacter species, but comparator studies using best available therapy for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections show higher mortality rates with the new drug, making its role in clinical therapy still to be determined. The new beta-lactams differ in their mechanisms of combatting resistance and thus have unique roles in therapy. Additional evidence is needed regarding the potential for development of resistance in the newer combination agents, as well as for the role of cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections.

Preventing sepsis development in complicated urinary tract infections

Introduction: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most prevalent infections in the community and the most common reason for antimicrobial prescribing in ambulatory care. A UTI is defined as complicated when urinary tract anatomical abnormalities or urinary devices are present, when it is recurrent and when associated with immunodeficiency. Complicated UTIs (cUTIs) have a higher risk of treatment failure and often require longer antimicrobial treatment courses. cUTIs, especially those which are healthcare-associated, are often due to multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs).Areas covered: This article will review the available evidence in relation to prevention of sepsis in cUTI, evaluating the risk factors associated with sepsis development. Published articles from January 2005 to September 2019 on UTIs and sepsis prevention in complicated UTIs were identified by using MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine Bethesda MD) and by reviewing the references of retrieved articles.Expert opinion: Prevention of sepsis relies on prompt and timely diagnosis of cUTI, early identification of the causative organism, removal of obstructions and source control, proper and adequate empirical/targeted antimicrobial treatment. In particular, source control, i.e. removal of urinary obstructions, infected stents, urinary catheters, nephrostomies, and drainage of hydronephrosis/abscess, is essential for preventing the development and progression of sepsis.

The latest advances in β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative pathogens is a significant threat to global health. β-Lactams (BL) are one of the safest and most-prescribed classes of antibiotics on the market today. The acquisition of β-lactamases, especially those which hydrolyze carbapenems, is eroding the efficacy of BLs for the treatment of serious infections. During the past decade, significant advances were made in the development of novel BL-β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations to target β-lactamase-mediated resistant Gram-negatives.Areas covered: The latest progress in 20 different approved, developing, and preclinical BL-BLI combinations to target serine β-lactamases produced by Gram-negatives are reviewed based on primary literature, conference abstracts (when available), and US clinical trial searches within the last 5 years. The majority of the compounds that are discussed are being evaluated as part of a BL-BLI combination.Expert opinion: The current trajectory in BLI development is promising; however, a significant challenge resides in the selection of an appropriate BL partner as well as the development of resistance linked to the BL partner. In addition, dosing regimens for these BL-BLI combinations need to be critically evaluated. A revolution in bacterial diagnostics is essential to aid clinicians in the appropriate selection of novel BL-BLI combinations for the treatment of serious infections.

Treatment of urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance and new antimicrobial agents

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are a growing concern due to limited treatment options. Knowledge of the common uropathogens in addition to local susceptibility patterns is essential in determining appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy of UTIs. The recommended first-line empiric antibiotic therapy for acute uncomplicated bacterial cystitis in otherwise healthy adult nonpregnant females is a 5-day course of nitrofurantoin, a 3-g single dose of fosfomycin tromethamine, or a 5-day course of pivmecillinam. High rates of resistance for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin preclude their use as empiric treatment of UTIs in several communities, particularly if patients who were recently exposed to them or in patients who are at risk of infections with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Enterobacteriales. Second-line options include oral cephalosporins such as cephalexin or cefixime, fluoroquinolones and β-lactams, such as amoxicillin-clavulanate. Current treatment options for UTIs due to AmpC- β -lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales include nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, pivmecillinam, fluoroquinolones, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam and carbapenems. Treatment oral options for UTIs due to ESBLs-E coli include nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, pivmecillinam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, finafloxacin, and sitafloxacin while pivmecillinam, fosfomycin, finafloxacin, and sitafloxacin are treatment oral options for ESBLs- Klebsiella pneumoniae. Parenteral treatment options for UTIs due to ESBLs-producing Enterobacteriales include piperacillin-tazobactam (for ESBL-E coli only), carbapenems including meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam, and sulopenem, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, cefiderocol, fosfomycin, sitafloxacin, and finafloxacin. Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam, colistin, fosfomycin, aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam and amoxicillin-clavulanate, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, cefiderocol, tigecycline are treatment options for UTIs caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE). Treatment options for UTIs caused by multidrug resistant (MDR)-Pseudomonas spp. include fluoroquinolones, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems including imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam, meropenem, and fosfomycin, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam, cefiderocol, and colistin. It is important to use the new antimicrobials wisely for treatment of UTIs caused by MDR-organisms to avoid resistance development.

Use of meropenem in treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections

Introduction: The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is increasingly worldwide. Production of carbapenemases is the most common and efficient mechanism of carbapenem resistance, and could theoretically be overcome by optimizing the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) behavior of meropenem. Areas covered: This article overviews the available literature concerning the potential role that meropenem may still have in the treatment carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Clinical studies published in English language until June 2019 were searched on PubMed database. Expert commentary: High-dose continuous infusion meropenem-based combination regimens could still represent a valuable option for treating CRE infections in specific circumstances. Knowledge of the local prevalent mechanisms of carbapenem resistance, of patient clinical severity, of the site of infection, of an accurate minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value, coupled with the possibility of carrying-out a real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based PK/PD optimization of drug exposure must all be considered as fundamental for properly pursuing this goal.

In vitro activity of meropenem combined with vaborbactam against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae in China

Background

Vaborbactam is a novel inhibitor of serine β-lactamases, including KPCs, which predominate in China. It is being developed in combination with meropenem.

Methods

Using the broth microdilution method, the in vitro activity of meropenem/vaborbactam against 128 KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae from China was investigated.

Results

Meropenem alone showed no activity (MIC50 and MIC90 >64 mg/L), but the addition of vaborbactam potentiated meropenem in a dose-dependent manner with MIC90 decreasing from >64 to 0.5 mg/L in the presence of increasing concentrations of vaborbactam. MIC50 and MIC90 of meropenem with 8 mg/L vaborbactam (MV8) were reduced to 0.5 and 8 mg/L, respectively. MV8 (4 mg/L meropenem) inhibited 76.6% of Klebsiella pneumoniae and 100% of Escherichia coli isolates. Seventy-three (77.7%) of the K. pneumoniae isolates belonged to ST11; the remaining 22.3% of isolates were represented by 12 different STs. Of the ST11 and non-ST11 isolates, 71.2% and 95.2%, respectively, were inhibited by MV8 (4 mg/L meropenem). In 14 strains characterized for intrinsic resistance mechanisms, MV8 MIC was increased in isolates with defects in both OmpK35 and OmpK36. The highest MV8 MIC was observed in the strain that had both non-functional porins and increased expression of blaKPC and acrB.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that meropenem/vaborbactam has good activity against KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae from China. However, a higher percentage of K. pneumoniae isolates for which MV8 MIC was elevated compared with other geographical areas is noteworthy. This might be due to clonal dissemination of ST11 KPC-producing isolates that are defective in both major porins, OmpK35 and OmpK36.

Recognizing and Overcoming Resistance to New Beta-Lactam/Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the mechanisms and clinical relevance of emergent resistance to three recently introduced beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) active against resistant Gram-negative organisms: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite their recent introduction into practice, clinical reports of resistance to BLICs among typically susceptible organisms have already emerged, in some cases associated with therapeutic failure. The resistance mechanisms vary by agent, including mutations in beta-lactamase active sites, upregulation of efflux pumps, and alterations in the structure or expression of porin channels. These changes may confer cross-resistance or, rarely, increased susceptibility to related agents. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential for initial or emergent resistance to BLICs and ensure appropriate antimicrobial susceptibility testing is performed. Dose optimization and novel combinations of agents may play a role in preventing and managing resistance. Recently approved BLICs have provided important new therapeutic options against resistant Gram-negative organisms, but are already coming up against emergent resistance. Awareness of the potential for resistance, early detection, and dose optimization may be important in preserving the utility of these agents.

Current status of countermeasures for infectious diseases and resistant microbes in the field of urology

A worldwide increase in antimicrobial-resistant microbes due to the improper use of antimicrobial agents, along with a lack of progress in developing new antimicrobials, is becoming a societal problem. Although carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, which are resistant to carbapenem antimicrobials, first appeared in 1993, treatment options remain limited. Mechanisms behind antimicrobial resistance involve changes to microbial outer membranes, drug efflux pump abnormalities, β-lactamase production and the creation of biofilms around cell bodies. Genetic information related to these forms of antimicrobial resistance exists on chromosomes and plasmids, and when located on the latter can easily be transmitted to other strains, no matter the species, which creates a risk of antimicrobial resistance spreading exceptionally rapidly. To prevent the spread of antimicrobial resistance, the World Health Organization in 2015 published an action plan on antimicrobial resistance, based on which World Health Organization member countries have laid out specific policies and targets. Urinary tract infections are a type of healthcare-associated infection, and the sexually transmitted disease pathogen, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, has been included in a list of microbes that pose a risk to human health published by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Urologists face numerous problems when attempting to use antimicrobials properly, which is one method of dealing with antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, this article describes the current state of resistant microbes associated with urinary tract infections and countermeasures for antimicrobial resistance, including new antimicrobials.

Defining the Role of Novel β-Lactam Agents That Target Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms

With the current carbapenem-resistant organism crisis, conventional approaches to optimizing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters are frequently inadequate, and traditional salvage agents (eg, colistin, tigecycline, etc) confer high toxicity and/or have low efficacy. However, several β-lactam agents with activity against carbapenem-resistant organisms were approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration, and more are anticipated to be approved in the near future. The primary goal of this review is to assist infectious disease practitioners with preferentially selecting 1 agent over another when treating patients infected with a carbapenem-resistant organism. However, resistance to some of these antibiotics has already developed. Antibiotic stewardship programs can ensure that they are reserved for situations in which other options are lacking and are paramount for the survival of these agents.