Molecular mechanisms of sulbactam antibacterial activity and resistance determinants in Acinetobacter baumannii

Evaluation of Piperacillin/Sulbactam, Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Cefoperazone/Sulbactam Dosages in Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections by Monte Carlo Simulation

The optimal regimens of piperacillin/sulbactam (PIS 2:1), piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ 8:1), and cefoperazone/sulbactam (CSL 2:1) are not well defined in patients based on renal function. This study was conducted to identify optimal regimens of BLBLIs in these patients. The antimicrobial sensitivity test was performed by a two-fold agar dilution method. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was used to simulate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for various dosing regimens in patients with different renal functions. For strains with an MIC ≤ 8/4 mg/L, PIS 4.5 g q6h achieved 99.03%PTA in the subset of patients with creatinine clearance (CrCL) > 90 mL/min. For patients with CrCL 60-90 mL/min, PIS 4.5 g q6h achieved 81.2% CFR; for those with CrCL 40-59 mL/min, PIS 4.5 g q8h achieved 80.25% CFR. However, for patients infected by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, PIS 4.5 g q6h achieved a CFR lower than 80%. For patients infected by A. baumannii with a CrCL of 31-60 mL/min, PIS 6.0 g q8h and 4.5 g q6h achieved 81.24% and 82.42% CFR, respectively. For those infected by P. aeruginosa, PIS 4.5 g q6h reached 90% CFR. PIS and PTZ achieved a similar CFR when piperacillin was at the same dose. The CFRs of CSL were much lower than those of the other two agents in Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa infections. The antibacterial spectrum of PIS is superior to that of PTZ and CSL. Higher dosages and dosing adjustment according to renal function should be considered to treat Gram-negative bacterial BSIs.

Inhibitor Assessment against the LpxC Enzyme of Antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Using Virtual Screening, Dynamics Simulation, and in vitro Assays

BACKGROUND

Bacterial resistance is currently a significant global public health problem. Acinetobacter baumannii has been ranked in the list of the World Health Organization as the most critical and priority pathogen for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. In this context, computational methods play a central role in the modern drug discovery process. The purpose of the current study was to identify new potential therapeutic molecules to neutralize MDR A. baumannii bacteria.

METHODS

A total of 3686 proteins retrieved from the A. baumannii proteome were subjected to subtractive proteomic analysis to narrow down the spectrum of drug targets. The SWISS-MODEL server was used to perform a 3D homology model of the selected target protein. The SAVES server was used to evaluate the overall quality of the model. A dataset of 74500 analogues retrieved from the PubChem database was docked with LpxC using the AutoDock software.

RESULTS

In this study, we predicted a putative new inhibitor for the Lpxc enzyme of A. baumannii. The LpxC enzyme was selected as the most appropriate drug target for A. baumannii. According to the virtual screening results, N-[(2S)-3-amino-1-(hydroxyamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl]-4-(4-bromophenyl) benzamide (CS250) could be a promising drug candidate targeting the LpxC enzyme. This molecule shows polar interactions with six amino acids and non-polar interactions with eight other residues. In vitro experimental validation was performed through the inhibition assay.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that suggests CS250 as a promising inhibitory molecule that can be exploited to target this gram-negative pathogen.

The Role of the Respiratory Microbiome in the Pathogenesis of Aspiration Pneumonia: Implications for Diagnosis and Potential Therapeutic Choices

Although the lungs were considered to be sterile until recently, the advent of molecular biology techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction, 16 S rRNA sequencing and metagenomics has led to our expanding knowledge of the lung microbiome. These methods may be particularly useful for the identification of the causative agent(s) in cases of aspiration pneumonia, in which there is usually prior administration of antibiotics. The most common empirical treatment of aspiration pneumonia is the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics; however, this may result in negative cultures from specimens taken from the respiratory tract. Therefore, in such cases, polymerase chain reaction or metagenomic next-generation sequencing may be life-saving. Moreover, these modern molecular methods may assist with antimicrobial stewardship. Based upon factors such as age, altered mental consciousness and recent hospitalization, there is a shift towards the predominance of aerobes, especially Gram-negative bacteria, over anaerobes in aspiration pneumonia. Thus, the therapeutic choices should be expanded to cover multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria in selected cases of aspiration pneumonia.

Assessment of Effective Antimicrobial Regimens and Mortality-Related Risk Factors for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Objective

This study aimed to determine the clinical features, risk factors, and effective antimicrobial therapy for Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infection (BSI).

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of data from patients with CRAB bacteremia in a Chinese tertiary hospital between January 2012 and October 2021. Risk factors, predictors of 30-day mortality, and effective antimicrobial therapy for CRAB BSI were identified using logistic and cox regression analyses.

Results

Data from 276 patients with Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) BSI were included, of whom 157 (56.9%) had CRAB BSI. The risk factors that were significantly associated with CRAB BSI included previous intensive care unit (ICU) stay (P < 0.001), immunocompromised status (P < 0.001), cephalosporin use (P = 0.014), and fluoroquinolone use (P = 0.007). The 30-day mortality of the CRAB BSI group was 49.7% (78/157). ICU stay after BSI (P = 0.047), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥10 (P < 0.001), and multiple organ failure (MOF) (P = 0.037) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Among antibiotic strategies for the treatment of patients with CRAB BSI, we found that definitive regimens containing cefoperazone/sulbactam were superior to those without cefoperazone/sulbactam in reducing the 30-day mortality rate (25.4% vs 53.4%, P = 0.005). After propensity score matching, we observed a significant increase in the 30-day mortality (77.8%vs 33.3%, P = 0.036) in patients receiving tigecycline monotherapy compared to those receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy. The mortality rate of patients receiving tigecycline with cefoperazone/sulbactam was also higher than that of patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam monotherapy; however, the difference was not significant (28.6%vs 19.0%, P = 0.375).

Conclusion

The severity of patient conditions was significantly associated with mortality in patients with CRAB BSI. Those Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam had better clinical prognoses, and tigecycline should be used with caution.

Fighting antibiotic resistance-strategies and (pre)clinical developments to find new antibacterials

Antibacterial resistance is one of the greatest threats to human health. The development of new therapeutics against bacterial pathogens has slowed drastically since the approvals of the first antibiotics in the early and mid-20^th century. Most of the currently investigated drug leads are modifications of approved antibacterials, many of which are derived from natural products. In this review, we highlight the challenges, advancements and current standing of the clinical and preclinical antibacterial research pipeline. Additionally, we present novel strategies for rejuvenating the discovery process and advocate for renewed and enthusiastic investment in the antibacterial discovery pipeline.

Acinetobacter baumannii Resistance to Sulbactam/Durlobactam: A Systematic Review

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) have limited therapeutic options. Sulbactam-durlobactam is a combination of two βlactamase inhibitors with activity against CRAB under phase 3 clinical investigation. We performed a systematic review on in vitro studies reporting A. baumannii resistances against sulbactam/durlobactam. We considered "resistant" species to be those with MIC ≥ 8 mg/L. Ten studies were included in the review (9754 tested isolates). Overall, 2.3% of A. baumannii were resistant to sulbactam/durlobactam, and this percentage rose to 3.4% among CRAB subgroups and to 3.7% among colistin-resistant strains. Resistance was 100% among metallo β-lactamase-producing strains. Overall, in 12.5% of cases, sulbactam/durlobactam resistance was associated with the production of NDM-1, in 31.7% of cases with the substitutions in the PBP3 determinants, and in the remaining cases the resistance mechanism was unknown. In conclusion, A. baumannii resistance towards sulbactam/durlobactam is limited, except for MBL-producing strains.

Growth kinetics of multiple Acinetobacter baumannii resistotype after meropenem-based antibiotic combination exposure

Background: Carbapenems are the treatment of choice for multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR)  Acinetobacter baumannii infections, but the emergence of carbapenem-resistant  A. baumannii (CRAB) has rendered it ineffective in the vast majority of cases. Combination therapy has grown in popularity over the last decade; this study aims to analyze  A.baumannii growth kinetics after exposure to meropenem and ampicillin-sulbactam compared with meropenem and amikacin antibiotic combinations in clinically relevant concentrations.  Methods: This experimental laboratory study was conducted on the  A. baumannii ATCC 19606 isolate and three clinical isolates that were intermediate or resistant to tested antibiotics. Meropenem and ampicillin-sulbactam, as well as meropenem and amikacin, were tested at four different concentrations against isolates. Turbidity measurements were taken at predetermined time points of 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours following exposure; bacterial concentration was enumerated using the agar plate method, with the results plotted in a time-kill curve.   Results: A bactericidal effect was achieved in isolates that were intermediate to ampicillin-sulbactam and resistant to meropenem after the administration of meropenem and ampicillin-sulbactam combination with a concentration of 4 µg/ml and 16/8 µg/ml, respectively. The combination of meropenem and ampicillin-sulbactam demonstrated bacteriostatic activity against isolates that were resistant to both antibiotics. Isolates treated with resistant antibiotics showed an increased growth rate compared to the growth control.  Conclusion: The combination of meropenem and ampicillin-sulbactam could be a promising combination therapy in treating CRAB infections. The mechanism and degree of antibiotic resistance in the isolates affect the efficacy of antibiotic combinations; further research is needed to corroborate the findings of this study.

Update on the Management of Surgical Site Infections

Surgical site infections are an increasingly important issue in nosocomial infections. The progressive increase in antibiotic resistance, the ever-increasing number of interventions and the ever-increasing complexity of patients due to their comorbidities amplify this problem. In this perspective, it is necessary to consider all the risk factors and all the current preventive and prophylactic measures which are available. At the same time, given multiresistant microorganisms, it is essential to consider all the possible current therapeutic interventions. Therefore, our review aims to evaluate all the current aspects regarding the management of surgical site infections.

Effects of amikacin, polymyxin-B, and sulbactam combination on the pharmacodynamic indices of mutant selection against multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Amikacin and polymyxins as monotherapies are ineffective against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii at the clinical dose. When polymyxins, aminoglycosides, and sulbactam are co-administered, the combinations exhibit in vitro synergistic activities. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) were determined in 11 and 5 clinical resistant isolates of A. baumannii harboring OXA-23, respectively, in order to derive the fraction of time over the 24-h wherein the free drug concentration was within the mutant selection window (fT_MSW) and the fraction of time that the free drug concentration was above the MPC (fT_>MPC) from simulated pharmacokinetic profiles. The combination of these three antibiotics can confer susceptibility in multi-drug resistant A. baumannii and reduce the opportunity for bacteria to develop further resistance. Clinical intravenous dosing regimens of amikacin, polymyxin-B, and sulbactam were predicted to optimize fT_MSW and fT_>MPC from drug exposures in the blood. Mean fT_>MPC were ≥ 60% and ≥ 80% for amikacin and polymyxin-B, whereas mean fT_MSW was reduced to <30% and <15%, respectively, in the triple antibiotic combination. Due to the low free drug concentration of amikacin and polymyxin-B simulated in the epithelial lining fluid, the two predicted pharmacodynamic parameters in the lung after intravenous administration were not optimal even in the combination therapy setting.

Metabolomic profiling of polymyxin-B in combination with meropenem and sulbactam against multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Empirical therapies using polymyxins combined with other antibiotics are recommended in the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections. In the present study, the synergistic activities of polymyxin-B, meropenem, and sulbactam as combination therapy were investigated using metabolomic analysis. The metabolome of A. baumannii was investigated after treatment with polymyxin-B alone (2 mg/l), meropenem (2 mg/l) alone, combination of polymyxin-B/meropenem at their clinical breakpoints, and triple-antibiotic combination of polymyxin-B/meropenem and 4 mg/l sulbactam. The triple-antibiotic combination significantly changed the metabolite levels involved in cell outer membrane and cell wall biosynthesis, including fatty acid, glycerophospholipid, lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan, and nucleotide within 15 min of administration. In contrast, significant changes in metabolome were observed after 1 h in sample treated with either meropenem or polymyxin-B alone. After 1 h of administration, the double and triple combination therapies significantly disrupted nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis pathways as well as the central carbon metabolism, including pentose phosphate and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways, and tricarboxylic acid cycle. The addition of sulbactam to polymyxin-B and meropenem combination appeared to be an early disruptor of A. baumannii metabolome, which paves the way for further antibiotic penetration into bacteria cells. Combination antibiotics consisting of sulbactam/meropenem/polymyxin-B can effectively confer susceptibility to A. baumannii harboring OXA-23 and other drug resistant genes. Metabolomic profiling reveals underlying mechanisms of synergistic effects of polymyxin-B combined with meropenem and sulbactam against multi-drug resistant A. baumannii.

Intrinsic Antibacterial Activity of Xeruborbactam In Vitro : Assessing Spectrum and Mode of Action

Xeruborbactam (formerly QPX7728) is a cyclic boronate inhibitor of numerous serine and metallo-beta-lactamases. At concentrations generally higher than those required for beta-lactamase inhibition, xeruborbactam has direct antibacterial activity against some Gram-negative bacteria, with MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀ values of 16/32 μg/mL and 16/64 μg/mL against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, respectively (the MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀ values against Pseudomonas aeruginosa are >64 μg/mL). In Klebsiella pneumoniae, inactivation of OmpK36 alone or in combination with OmpK35 resulted in 2- to 4-fold increases in the xeruborbactam MIC. In A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, AdeIJK and MexAB-OprM, respectively, affected xeruborbactam’s antibacterial potency (the MICs were 4- to 16-fold higher in efflux-proficient strains). In Escherichia coli and K. pneumoniae, the 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀s) of xeruborbactam’s binding to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) PBP1a/PBP1b, PBP2, and PBP3 were in the 40 to 70 μM range; in A. baumannii, xeruborbactam bound to PBP1a, PBP2, and PBP3 with IC₅₀s of 1.4 μM, 23 μM, and 140 μM, respectively. Treating K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa with xeruborbactam at 1× and 2× MIC resulted in changes of cellular morphology similar to those observed with meropenem; the morphological changes observed after treatment of A. baumannii were consistent with inhibition of multiple PBPs but were unique to xeruborbactam compared to the results for control beta-lactams. No single-step xeruborbactam resistance mutants were obtained after selection at 4× MIC of xeruborbactam using wild-type strains of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii; mutations selected at 2× MIC in K. pneumoniae did not affect antibiotic potentiation by xeruborbactam through beta-lactamase inhibition. Consistent with inhibition of PBPs, xeruborbactam enhanced the potencies of beta-lactam antibiotics even against strains that lacked beta-lactamase. In a large panel of KPC-producing clinical isolates, the MIC₉₀ values of meropenem tested with xeruborbactam (8 μg/mL) were at least 4-fold lower than those in combination with vaborbactam at 64 μg/mL, the concentration of vaborbactam that is associated with complete inhibition of KPC. The additional enhancement of the potency of beta-lactam antibiotics beyond beta-lactamase inhibition may contribute to the potentiation of beta-lactam antibiotics by xeruborbactam.

In Vitro Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Global Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Collected from 2016 to 2021

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination designed to treat serious Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) infections, including carbapenem-non-susceptible and multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. The current study characterized the in vitro activity of sulbactam-durlobactam against a collection of 5,032 ABC clinical isolates collected in 33 countries across the Asia/South Pacific region, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and North America from 2016 to 2021. The sulbactam-durlobactam MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ were 1 and 2 μg/mL, respectively, for all ABC isolates tested. The addition of durlobactam (at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/mL) to sulbactam decreased its MIC₅₀ by 8-fold (from 8 to 1 μg/mL) and its MIC₉₀ by 32-fold (from 64 to 2 μg/mL) for all ABC isolates. The in vitro activity of sulbactam-durlobactam was maintained across individual ABC species, years, global regions of collection, specimen sources, and resistance phenotypes, including MDR and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) isolates. At 4 μg/mL (preliminary sulbactam-durlobactam susceptible MIC breakpoint), sulbactam-durlobactam inhibited 98.3% of all ABC isolates and >96% of sulbactam-, imipenem-, ciprofloxacin-, amikacin-, and minocycline-non-susceptible isolates; as well as colistin-resistant, MDR, and XDR isolates. Most imipenem-non-susceptible ABC isolates (96.8%, 2,488/2,570) were carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB); 96.9% (2,410/2,488) of CRAB isolates were sulbactam-durlobactam-susceptible. More than 80% of ABC isolates had sulbactam-durlobactam MIC values that were ≥2 doubling-dilutions (4-fold) lower than sulbactam alone. Only 1.7% (84/5,032) of ABC isolates from 2016 to 2021 had sulbactam-durlobactam MIC values of >4 μg/mL. Of the 84 isolates, 94.0% were A. baumannii, 4.8% were A. pittii, and 1.2% were A. nosocomialis. In summary, sulbactam-durlobactam demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against a 2016 to 2021 collection of geographically diverse clinical isolates of ABC isolates, including carbapenem-non-susceptible and MDR isolates.

In Vitro Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates: A Multicentre Report from Italy

In the present study, the in vitro activity of the sulbactam-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) combination was evaluated against 141 carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) clinical strains collected from six Italian laboratories. Over half (54.6%) of these isolates were resistant to colistin. The SUL-DUR combination was active against these CRAb isolates with MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values of 0.5 mg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively. Only eleven isolates were resistant to SUL-DUR with MIC values ranging from 8 to 128 mg/L. The SUL-DUR resistant A. baumannii exhibited several antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) such as bla_OXA-20, bla_OXA-58, bla_OXA-66, bla_ADC-25, aac(6')-Ib3 and aac(6')-Ib-cr and mutations in gyrA (S81L) and parC (V104I, D105E). However, in these isolates, mutations Q488K and Y528H were found in PBP3. Different determinants were also identified in these CRAb isolates, including adeABC, adeFGH, adeIJK, abeS, abaQ and abaR, which encode multidrug efflux pumps associated with resistance to multiple antibacterial agents. This is the first report on the antimicrobial activity of SUL-DUR against carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates selected from multiple regions in Italy.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Colistin Combined with Sulbactam: 9 g per Day versus 12 g per Day in the Treatment of Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia: An Interim Analysis

Extensively drug-resistant A. baumannii (XDRAB) pneumonia has a high mortality rate in hospitalized patients. One of the recommended treatments is colistin combined with sulbactam; however, the optimal dosage of sulbactam is unclear. In an open-label, superiority, randomized controlled trial, patients diagnosed with XDRAB pneumonia were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive colistin in combination with sulbactam at either 9 g/day or 12 g/day. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate in the intention-to-treat population. A total of 88 patients received colistin in combination with sulbactam at a dosage of either 12 g/day (n = 45) or 9 g/day (n = 43). Trends toward a lower mortality rate were observed in the 12 g/day group at 7 days (11.1% vs. 23.3%), 14 days (33.3% vs. 41.9%), and 28 days (46.7% vs. 58.1%). The microbiological cure rate at day 7 was significantly higher in the 12 g/day group (90.5% vs. 58.1%; p = 0.02). Factors associated with mortality at 28 days were asthma, cirrhosis, APACHEII score ≥ 28, and a dosage of sulbactam of 9 g/day for mortality at any timepoint. Treatment with colistin combined with sulbactam at 12 g/day was not superior to the combination treatment with sulbactam at 9 g/day. However, due to being an interim analysis, this trial was underpowered to detect mortality differences.

Overcoming addition of phosphoethanolamine to lipid A mediated colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates with colistin–sulbactam combination therapy

Overcoming colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CoR-AB) has become a major concern due to the lack of effective antibiotics. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of CoR-AB clinical isolates in Thailand, their mechanisms of resistance, and test the efficacy of colistin plus sulbactam against CoR-AB isolates. The colistin resistance rate among carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii was 15.14%. The mcr gene or its variants were not detected in CoR-AB isolates by PCR screening. The lipid A mass spectra of CoR-AB isolates showed the additional [M–H]⁻ ion peak at m/z = 2034 that correlated to the phosphoethanolamine (pEtN) addition to lipid A (N = 27/30). The important amino acid substitutions were found at position S14P, A138T, A227V in PmrB that are associated with overexpression of the pEtN transferase (PmrC) and contributed the pEtN addition. The lipopolysacccharide production genes (lpxACD) were not related to lipid A mass spectra. A colistin plus sulbactam combination exhibited the synergy rate at 86.7% against CoR-AB isolates compare to sulbactam (85.89% resistance) or colistin (15.14% resistance) alone. The excellent synergistic activity of colistin plus sulbactam combination has the potential for the treatment of CoR-AB infections.

Phenotypic, genomic, and transcriptomic changes in an Acinetobacter baumannii strain after spaceflight in China's Tiangong-2 space laboratory

Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic pathogen often found in patients with low immunity. It causes nosocomial infections, which are difficult to treat. This bacterium can rapidly mutate, developing resistance to antimicrobials and adapting to environmental stress, thereby increasing its survival. Understanding such adaptive mechanisms will be beneficial for controlling the spread of A. baumannii. Astrobiology studies have demonstrated that microbiomes from astronauts and manned spaceflight environments show resistance to stress and antibiotics. Astronauts also encounter low immunity during spaceflight missions. The extreme conditions of spaceflight provide a unique research platform for studying how opportunistic pathogens such as A. baumannii adapt to conditions such as microgravity and mutate during spaceflight. In this study, we compared phenotypic variations and analyzed genomic and transcriptomic variations in A. baumannii strains exposed to three different conditions: ST1 (64 days on Tiangong-2 space laboratory), GT1 (ground control), and Aba (original strain). Biofilm formation ability of the ST1 strain increased after 64 days of spaceflight. In addition, high-throughput sequencing revealed that some differentially expressed genes were upregulated in the ST1 strain compared to the GT1 strain. These results provide insights into the environmental adaptation of this widespread pathogen.

In-vitro activity of sulbactam-durlobactam against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and mechanisms of resistance

OBJECTIVES

Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, particularly strains producing OXA-type carbapenemases, have rapidly emerged in health care settings as a frequent cause of serious infections with limited treatment options. This study evaluated the in-vitro activity of sulbactam (SUL) combined with durlobactam (DUR), against a collection of carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii, and investigated the mechanisms of resistance.

METHODS

Susceptibility testing was performed on 100 isolates by either broth microdilution or by E-test. Isolates were screened for the insertion sequence ISAba1 upstream of the intrinsic chromosomal bla_ADC by PCR. Whole genome sequencing was performed on 25 SUL-DUR resistant isolates, and analyses were performed using the Center for Genomic Epidemiology platform. Target gene sequences were compared to A. baumannii ATCC 17978.

RESULTS

SUL-DUR exhibited excellent activity against A. baumannii isolates with susceptibility levels as follows: amikacin, 18%; colistin, 91%; cefepime, 5%; imipenem, 0%; minocycline, 46%; SUL, 3%; sulbactam-cefoperazone, 8%; SUL-DUR, 71% (based on a breakpoint at 4 mg/L). Twenty-five non-NDM-producing isolates had SUL-DUR MIC values >4 mg/L, among which 14 isolates showed substitutions in penicillin binding protein PBP3, previously shown to be associated with SUL-DUR resistance. Substitutions that have not previously been described were detected in SUL-DUR targets, namely PBP1a, PBP1b, PBP2, and PBP3. By contrast, there was no evidence of the involvement of permeability or efflux.

CONCLUSIONS

SUL-DUR exhibited excellent in-vitro antibacterial activity against these carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii isolates. Amongst the 25 resistant isolates we identified a number of mechanisms which may be contributing factors, in particular PBP substitutions and the production of some specific beta-lactamases.

Antibiofilm Activity of β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination against Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella Typhimurium

This study was designed to assess the effect of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations on the inhibition of biofilm formation of Salmonella Typhimurium. The anti-planktonic and anti-biofilm activities of ampicillin (AMP), ceftriaxone (CEF), and combination treatments of antibiotics and sulbactam (AMP + SUL and CEF + SUL) were evaluated against antibiotic-sensitive S. Typhimurium ATCC 19585 (ST^AS) and clinically isolated multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. Typhimurium CCARM 8009 (ST^MDR). Compared to the control, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of AMP against ST^AS and CEF against ST^MDR were decreased from 32 to 16 μg/mL and 0.25 to 0.125 μg/mL, respectively, in the presence of SUL. The numbers of ST^MDR treated with AMP + SUL and CEF + SUL were effectively reduced by more than 2 logs after 4 h of incubation at 37 °C. The β-lactamase activities of ST^AS and ST^MDR treated with AMP and CEF were reduced from 3.3 to 2.6 μmol/min/mL and from 8.3 to 3.4 μmol/min/mL, respectively, in the presence of SUL. The biofilm cell numbers of ST^AS and ST^MDR were reduced at all treatments after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C. The biofilm cell numbers of ST^AS and ST^MDR were reduced by more than 2 logs in the presence of SUL compared to the AMP and CEF alone. The lowest relative fitness level was 0.6 in ST^AS treated with AMP + SUL, while no significant differences in the relative fitness were observed in ST^MDR. This study suggests that β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) could be used for controlling biofilm formation of β-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant S. Typhimurium.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) causes colonization and infection predominantly in hospitalized patients. Distinction between the two is a challenge. When CRAB is isolated from a non-sterile site (soft tissue, respiratory samples, etc.), it probably represents colonization unless clear signs of infection (fever, elevated white blood count, elevated inflammatory markers and abnormal imaging) are present. Treatment is warranted only for true infections. In normally sterile sites (blood, cerebrospinal fluid) the presence of indwelling medical devices (catheters, stents) should be considered when evaluating positive cultures. In the absence of such devices, the isolate represents an infection and should be treated. If an indwelling device is present and there are no signs of active infection, the device should be replaced if possible, and no treatment is required. If there are signs of an active infection the device should be removed or replaced, and treatment should be administered. Current treatments options and clinical data are limited. No agent or combination regimen has been shown to be superior to any other in randomized clinical trials. Ampicillin-sulbactam appears to have the best evidence for initial use. This is probably due to its ability to saturate penicillin-binding proteins 1 and 3 when given in high dose. Tigecycline when used should be given in high dose as well. Polymyxins are a treatment option but are difficult to dose correctly and have significant side effects. Newer treatment options such as eravacycline and cefiderocol have potential; however, currently there are not enough data to support their use as single agents. Combination therapy appears to be the best treatment option and should always include high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam combined with another active agent such as high-dose tigecycline, polymyxins, etc. These infections require a high complexity of skill, and an infectious disease specialist should be involved in the management of these patients.

Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam and Comparators Against a National Collection of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates From Greece

Background

Acinetobacter baumannii is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections worldwide, due to both its persistence in the hospital setting and ability to acquire high levels of antibiotic resistance. Carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates (CRAB) limit the activity of current antimicrobial regimens and new alternatives or adjuncts to traditional antibiotics are urgently needed. Durlobactam is a novel broad-spectrum inhibitor of serine-type β-lactamases that restores sulbactam (SUL) activity against A. baumannii. The sulbactam-durlobactam (SD) combination has recently completed Phase 3 testing in the global ATTACK trial.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate the in vitro activity of SD versus comparators against a representative nationwide collection of CRAB isolates.

Methods

One hundred ninety CRAB isolates were collected from clinical samples of patients hospitalized in 11 hospitals throughout Greece during 2015. In vitro activities of SD and comparators (SUL alone, amikacin, minocycline, imipenem, meropenem, colistin, SD and imipenem combined with SD) were determined by broth microdilution.

Results

Durlobactam restored sulbactam activity against the majority of the strains tested, with SD exhibiting the lowest MIC₉₀ (8 μg/ml) relative to the other single comparators tested; 87.9% of the isolates had SD MICs ≤4/4 µg/ml. The most active comparator was colistin (MIC₉₀ = 16 μg/ml). The addition of imipenem further lowered the MIC₉₀ of SD by one two-fold dilution.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the potential utility of SD for the treatment of infections caused by A. baumannii. If its clinical efficacy is confirmed, SD may be an important therapeutic option for CRAB infections.

Effects of Inactivation of d,d-Transpeptidases of Acinetobacter baumannii on Bacterial Growth and Susceptibility to β-Lactam Antibiotics

Resistance to β-lactams, the most used antibiotics worldwide, constitutes the major problem for the treatment of bacterial infections. In the nosocomial pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii, β-lactamase-mediated resistance to the carbapenem family of β-lactam antibiotics has resulted in the selection and dissemination of multidrug-resistant isolates, which often cause infections characterized by high mortality rates. There is thus an urgent demand for new β-lactamase-resistant antibiotics that also inhibit their targets, penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). As some PBPs are indispensable for the biosynthesis of the bacterial cell wall and survival, we evaluated their importance for the growth of A. baumannii by performing gene inactivation studies of d,d-transpeptidase domains of high-molecular-mass (HMM) PBPs individually and in combination with one another. We show that PBP3 is essential for A. baumannii survival, as deletion mutants of this d,d-transpeptidase were not viable. The inactivation of PBP1a resulted in partial cell lysis and retardation of bacterial growth, and these effects were further enhanced by the additional inactivation of PBP2 but not PBP1b. Susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics increased 4- to 8-fold for the A. baumannii PBP1a/PBP1b/PBP2 triple mutant and 2- to 4-fold for all remaining mutants. Analysis of the peptidoglycan structure revealed a significant change in the muropeptide composition of the triple mutant and demonstrated that the lack of d,d-transpeptidase activity of PBP1a, PBP1b, and PBP2 is compensated for by an increase in the l,d-transpeptidase-mediated cross-linking activity of LdtJ. Overall, our data showed that in addition to essential PBP3, the simultaneous inhibition of PBP1a and PBP2 or PBPs in combination with LdtJ could represent potential strategies for the design of novel drugs against A. baumannii.

Synergism of imipenem with fosfomycin associated with the active cell wall recycling and heteroresistance in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex

The carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii (ACB) complex has become an urgent threat worldwide. Here, we determined antibiotic combinations and the feasible synergistic mechanisms against three couples of ACB (A. baumannii (AB250 and A10), A. pittii (AP1 and AP23), and A. nosocomialis (AN4 and AN12)). Imipenem with fosfomycin, the most effective in the time-killing assay, exhibited synergism to all strains except AB250. MurA, a fosfomycin target encoding the first enzyme in the de novo cell wall synthesis, was observed with the wild-type form in all isolates. Fosfomycin did not upregulate murA, indicating the MurA-independent pathway (cell wall recycling) presenting in all strains. Fosfomycin more upregulated the recycling route in synergistic strain (A10) than non-synergistic strain (AB250). Imipenem in the combination dramatically downregulated the recycling route in A10 but not in AB250, demonstrating the additional effect of imipenem on the recycling route, possibly resulting in synergism by the agitation of cell wall metabolism. Moreover, heteroresistance to imipenem was observed in only AB250. Our results indicate that unexpected activity of imipenem on the active cell wall recycling concurrently with the presence of heteroresistance subpopulation to imipenem may lead to the synergism of imipenem and fosfomycin against the ACB isolates.

Clinical efficacy of novel combinations of older beta-lactam and beta-lactamase inhibitors: Where are the evidences?

India is well known for the rampant growth of ESBLs that jeopardized the clinical utility of standalone beta-lactam. Pharmaceutical organizations fancied to rescue these beta-lactams by combining them with generic beta-lactamase inhibitors despite such combinations were never investigated in non-clinical or clinical studies. Lack of stringency in regulatory review practices allowed the market entry of these combinations. CSE 1034 (ceftriaxone, sulbactam and EDTA) and cefoperazone sulbactam are the most irrational antibiotics in clinical use. The effectiveness of such combinations relies on multiple factors such as relative beta-lactamase stability of the standalone beta-lactam, the inhibitory potency of the beta-lactamase inhibitor and more importantly the adequacy of the dose incorporated in the formulation. Unfortunately, none of the unconventional BL-BLI inhibitor combinations marketed in India has been subjected to such evaluations. Therefore, their therapeutic utility is uncertain. Besides questionable therapeutic utility, sub-optimal exposures would lead to the selection of resistant clones.

Acinetobacter baumannii Can Survive with an Outer Membrane Lacking Lipooligosaccharide Due to Structural Support from Elongasome Peptidoglycan Synthesis

Gram-negative bacteria resist external stresses due to cell envelope rigidity, which is provided by two membranes and a peptidoglycan layer. The outer membrane (OM) surface contains lipopolysaccharide (LPS; contains O-antigen) or lipooligosaccharide (LOS). LPS/LOS are essential in most Gram-negative bacteria and may contribute to cellular rigidity. Acinetobacter baumannii is a useful tool for testing these hypotheses as it can survive without LOS. Previously, our group found that strains with naturally high levels of penicillin binding protein 1A (PBP1A) could not become LOS deficient unless the gene encoding it was deleted, highlighting the relevance of peptidoglycan biosynthesis and suggesting that high PBP1A levels were toxic during LOS deficiency. Transposon sequencing and follow-up analysis found that axial peptidoglycan synthesis by the elongasome and a peptidoglycan recycling enzyme, ElsL, were vital in LOS-deficient cells. The toxicity of high PBP1A levels during LOS deficiency was clarified to be due to a negative impact on elongasome function. Our data suggest that during LOS deficiency, the strength of the peptidoglycan specifically imparted by elongasome synthesis becomes essential, supporting that the OM and peptidoglycan contribute to cell rigidity.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. A previous guidance document focused on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Here, guidance is provided for treating AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

METHODS

A panel of six infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated questions about the treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections. Answers are presented as suggestions and corresponding rationales. In contrast to guidance in the previous document, published data on optimal treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections are limited. As such, guidance in this document is provided as "suggested approaches" based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and a review of the available literature. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment suggestions are provided, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Suggestions apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of September 17, 2021 and will be updated annually. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance-2.0/.

Contemporary Perspective on the Treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii Infections: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists

The purpose of this narrative review is to bring together the most recent epidemiologic, preclinical, and clinical findings to offer our perspective on best practices for managing patients with A. baumannii infections with an emphasis on carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB). To date, the preferred treatment for CRAB infections has not been defined. Traditional agents with retained in vitro activity (aminoglycosides, polymyxins, and tetracyclines) are limited by suboptimal pharmacokinetic characteristics, emergence of resistance, and/or toxicity. Recently developed and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor agents do not provide enhanced activity against CRAB. On balance, cefiderocol and eravacycline demonstrate potent in vitro activity and are well tolerated, but clinical data for patients with CRAB infections do not yet support widespread use. Given that CRAB has the capacity to infect vulnerable patients and preferred regimens have not been identified, we advocate for combination therapy. Our preferred regimen for critically ill patients infected, or considered to be at high risk for CRAB, includes meropenem, polymyxin B, and ampicillin/sulbactam. Importantly, site of infection, severity of illness, and local epidemiology are essential factors to be considered in selecting combination therapies. Molecular mechanisms of resistance may unveil preferred combinations at individual centers; however, such data are often unavailable to treating clinicians and have not been linked to improved clinical outcomes. Combination strategies may also pose an increased risk for antibiotic toxicity and Clostridioides difficile infection, and should therefore be balanced by understanding patient goals of care and underlying health conditions. Promising therapies that are in clinical development and/or under investigation include durlobactam-sulbactam, cefiderocol combination regimens, and bacteriophage therapy, which may over time eliminate the need for the continued use of polymyxins. Future goals for CRAB management include pathogen-focused treatment paradigms that are based on molecular mechanisms of resistance, local susceptibility rates, and the availability of well-tolerated, effective treatment options.

Case Commentary: Uncertainty in Evaluating Treatment Outcomes in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections are challenging to treat and associated with poor clinical outcomes. In this issue, sulbactam-durlobactam, a novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor, was used with cefiderocol to successfully treat CRAB pneumonia. While this report and in vitro data are encouraging, determining the impact of treatment regimens on clinical outcomes after CRAB infections is not straightforward. Therefore, careful evaluation in pathogen-directed randomized controlled trials is needed to determine the optimal treatment of CRAB infections.

Sulbactam Enhances in vitro Activity of β-Lactam Antibiotics Against Acinetobacter baumannii

Purpose

To evaluate in vitro activities of β-lactam antibiotics alone and in combination with sulbactam at different ratios against Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strains from China.

Methods

A total of 300 clinical isolates of A. baumannii were collected from 29 hospitals across China in 2018. Susceptibility to common antibiotics was assessed, and β-lactamase genes were detected. In vitro activity of ampicillin, cefoperazone and imipenem was tested alone and in combination with sulbactam at the ratios of 2:1, 1:1, 1:1.5, 1:2, 1:2.5 and 1:3.

Results

High resistant rates for common antibiotics were observed except tigecycline and polymyxin B. Among carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, 97.3% isolates harbored bla_OXA-23. MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values for sulbactam were 32 mg/L and 64 mg/L, respectively. High resistant rates for ampicillin, cefoperazone and imipenem were observed (92.3%, 93% and 85.3%, respectively). A stepwise increase in the ratio of sulbactam to partner β-lactam antibiotics led to a stepwise decrease in the MICs and a stepwise increase in the susceptible rates. The susceptible rates for imipenem-sulbactam 1:3, ampicillin-sulbactam 1:3 and cefoperazone-sulbactam 1:3 reached 16.3%, 58.3% and 91%, respectively.

Conclusion

The increasing proportion of sulbactam could enhance antimicrobial activities of imipenem-sulbactam, ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam combinations against A. baumannii clinical strains in China, with cefoperazone-sulbactam as the most potent compound.

Rational design of a new antibiotic class for drug-resistant infections

The development of new antibiotics to treat infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens is of paramount importance as antibiotic resistance continues to increase worldwide¹. Here we describe a strategy for the rational design of diazabicyclooctane inhibitors of penicillin-binding proteins from Gram-negative bacteria to overcome multiple mechanisms of resistance, including β-lactamase enzymes, stringent response and outer membrane permeation. Diazabicyclooctane inhibitors retain activity in the presence of β-lactamases, the primary resistance mechanism associated with β-lactam therapy in Gram-negative bacteria^2,3. Although the target spectrum of an initial lead was successfully re-engineered to gain in vivo efficacy, its ability to permeate across bacterial outer membranes was insufficient for further development. Notably, the features that enhanced target potency were found to preclude compound uptake. An improved optimization strategy leveraged porin permeation properties concomitant with biochemical potency in the lead-optimization stage. This resulted in ETX0462, which has potent in vitro and in vivo activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa plus all other Gram-negative ESKAPE pathogens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and biothreat pathogens. These attributes, along with a favourable preclinical safety profile, hold promise for the successful clinical development of the first novel Gram-negative chemotype to treat life-threatening antibiotic-resistant infections in more than 25 years.

Syzygium aromaticum Extracts as a Potential Antibacterial Inhibitors against Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii: An In-Silico-Supported In-Vitro Study

Imipenem is the most efficient antibiotic against Acinetobacter baumannii infection, but new research has shown that the organism has also developed resistance to this agent. A. baumannii isolates from a total of 110 clinical samples were identified by multiplex PCR. The antibacterial activity of Syzygium aromaticum multiple extracts was assessed following the GC-Mass spectra analysis. The molecular docking study was performed to investigate the binding mode of interactions of guanosine (Ethanolic extract compound) against Penicillin- binding proteins 1 and 3 of A. baumannii. Ten isolates of A. baumannii were confirmed to carry recA and iutA genes. Isolates were multidrug-resistant containing bla_TEM and Bla_SHV. The concentrations (0.04 to 0.125 mg mL^-1) of S. aromaticum ethanolic extract were very promising against A. baumannii isolates. Even though imipenem (0.02 mg mL^-1) individually showed a great bactericidal efficacy against all isolates, the in-silico study of guanosine, apioline, eugenol, and elemicin showed acceptable fitting to the binding site of the A. baumannii PBP1 and/or PBP3 with highest binding energy for guanosine between -7.1 and -8.1 kcal/mol respectively. Moreover, it formed π-stacked interactions with the residue ARG76 at 4.14 and 5.6, Å respectively. These findings might support the in vitro study and show a substantial increase in binding affinity and enhanced physicochemical characteristics compared to imipenem.

Durlobactam, a New Diazabicyclooctane β-Lactamase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acinetobacter Infections in Combination With Sulbactam

Durlobactam is a new member of the diazabicyclooctane class of β-lactamase inhibitors with broad spectrum activity against Ambler class A, C, and D serine β-lactamases. Sulbactam is a first generation β-lactamase inhibitor with activity limited to a subset of class A enzymes that also has direct-acting antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter spp. The latter feature is due to sulbactam’s ability to inhibit certain penicillin-binding proteins, essential enzymes involved in bacterial cell wall synthesis in this pathogen. Because sulbactam is also susceptible to cleavage by numerous β-lactamases, its clinical utility for the treatment of contemporary Acinetobacter infections is quite limited. However, when combined with durlobactam, the activity of sulbactam is effectively restored against these notoriously multidrug-resistant strains. This sulbactam-durlobactam combination is currently in late-stage development for the treatment of Acinectobacter infections, including those caused by carbapenem-resistant isolates, for which there is a high unmet medical need. The following mini-review summarizes the molecular drivers of efficacy of this combination against this troublesome pathogen, with an emphasis on the biochemical features of each partner.

Treatment of patients with serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: How viable are the current options?

This review critically appraises the published microbiologic and clinical data on the treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Despite being recognized as an urgent threat pathogen by the CDC and WHO, optimal treatment of patients with serious CRAB infections remains ill-defined. Few commercially available agents exhibit reliable in vitro activity against CRAB. Historically, polymyxins have been the most active agents in vitro, though interpretations of susceptibility data are difficult given issues surrounding MIC testing methodologies and lack of correlation between MICs and clinical outcomes. Most available preclinical and clinical data involve use of polymyxins, tetracyclines, and sulbactam, alone and in combination. As the number of viable treatment options is limited, combination therapy with a polymyxin is often used for patients with CRAB infections, despite the significant risk of nephrotoxicity. However, no treatment regimen has been found to reduce mortality, which exceeds 40% across most studies, or substantially improve clinical response. While some newer agents, such as eravacycline and cefiderocol, have demonstrated in vitro activity, clinical efficacy has not been fully established. New agents with clinically relevant activity against CRAB isolates and favorable toxicity profiles are sorely needed.

Characterisation of ESKAPE Pathogens with Special Reference to Multidrug Resistance and Biofilm Production in a Nepalese Hospital

Background

“ESKAPE” is an acronym for a group of life-threatening nosocomial pathogens, viz, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp. Global efforts on controlling multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms have been hampered by their ability to escape antibacterial drugs. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of ESKAPE pathogens with prime focus on biofilm production and antibiotic resistance.

Methods

A total of 8756 clinical samples were processed for the isolation and identification of ESKAPE pathogens following standard microbiological procedures. These isolates were subjected to antimicrobial sensitivity test as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Test for MDR, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) was done by the disk diffusion and E-test methods. In the case of VRE molecular detection was done for vanA and vanB genes. All the isolates were processed for biofilm detection by the tube adherence method.

Results

The percentage distribution of Enterococcus faecium was 5.5%, S. aureus 33.4%, K. pneumoniae 33.0%, A. baumannii 8.6%, P. aeruginosa 18.6%, and Enterobacter aerogenes 0.9%. MRSA was 57.6%, and vancomycin resistance among Enterococcus faecium was 20%. ESBL- and MBL-producing K. pneumoniae were 16.1%, and 8.1%, A. baumannii 10.3% each and P. aeruginosa 10.7% and 8.3%, respectively. A total of 42.3% of isolates were biofilm producers. Linezolid was the drug of choice for VRE. Ampicillin-sulbactam was most useful against A. baumannii apart from polymyxins, whereas piperacillin-tazobactam was effective against other Gram-negative bacteria. VanA gene was detected in all the VRE isolates.

Conclusion

This study estimates the burden of the ESKAPE organisms and their antimicrobial resistance pattern in a hospital setting. A high percentage of drug resistance and biofilm production was noted; hence antimicrobial resistance surveillance targeting ESKAPE pathogens should be incorporated in the infection control policy in Nepal.

Acinetobacter baumannii Infections in Hospitalized Patients, Treatment Outcomes

Background Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), an opportunistic pathogen, could develop into serious infections with high mortality and financial burden. The debate surrounding the selection of effective antibiotic treatment necessitates studies to define the optimal approach. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of commonly used treatment regimens in hospitalized patients with AB infections to guide stewardship efforts. Material and methods: Ethical approval was obtained, 320 adult patients with confirmed AB infections admitted to our tertiary care facility within two years were enrolled. The treatment outcomes were statistically analyzed to study the relation between antibiotic regimens and 14, 28, and 90-day mortality as the primary outcomes using binary logistic regression—using R software—in addition to the length of hospitalization, adverse events due to antibiotic treatment, and 90-day recurrence as secondary outcomes. Results: Among 320 patients, 142 (44%) had respiratory tract, 105 (33%) soft tissue, 42 (13%) urinary tract, 22 (7%) bacte iemia, and other infections 9 (3%). Nosocomial infections were 190 (59%) versus community-acquired. Monotherapy was significantly associated with lower 28-day (p < 0.05, OR:0.6] and 90-day (p < 0.05, OR:0.4) mortality rates, shorter length of stay LOS (p < 0.05, Median: −12 days] and limited development of adverse events (p < 0.05, OR:0.4). Subgroup analysis revealed similar results ranging from lower odds of mortality, adverse events, and shorter LOS to statistically significant correlation to monotherapy. Meropenem (MEM) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) monotherapies showed non-significant high odd ratios of mortalities, adverse events, and disparate LOS. There was a statistical correlation between most combined therapies and adverse events, and longer LOS. Colistin based and colistin/meropenem (CST/MEM) combinations were superior in terms of 14-day mortality (p = 0.05, OR:0.4) and (p < 0.05, OR:0.4) respectively. Pip/Taz and MEM-based combined therapies were associated with statistically non-significant high odd ratios of mortalities. Tigecycline (TGC)-based combinations showed a significant correlation to mortalities (p < 0.05, OR:2.5). Conclusion: Monotherapy was associated with lower mortality rates, shorter LOS, and limited development of adverse events compared to combined therapies. Colistin monotherapy, colistin/meropenem, and other colistin combinations showed almost equivalent mortality outcomes. Patients on combined therapy were more susceptible to adverse events and comparable LOS. The possible adverse outcomes of PIP/TAZ and MEM-based therapies in the treatment of MDRAB infections and the association of TGC with a higher mortality rate raise doubts about their treatment role.

A New Twist: The Combination of Sulbactam/Avibactam Enhances Sulbactam Activity against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) Isolates

An increasing number of untreatable infections are recorded every year. Many studies have focused their efforts on developing new β-lactamase inhibitors to treat multi-drug resistant (MDR) isolates. In the present study, sulbactam/avibactam and sulbactam/relebactam combination were tested against 187 multi-drug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter clinical isolates; both sulbactam/avibactam and sulbactam/relebactam restored sulbactam activity. A decrease ≥2 dilutions in sulbactam MICs was observed in 89% of the isolates when tested in combination with avibactam. Sulbactam/relebactam was able to restore sulbactam susceptibility in 40% of the isolates. In addition, the susceptibility testing using twenty-three A. baumannii AB5075 knockout strains revealed potential sulbactam and/or sulbactam/avibactam target genes. We observed that diazabicyclooctanes (DBOs) β-lactamase inhibitors combined with sulbactam restore sulbactam susceptibility against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter clinical isolates. However, relebactam was not as effective as avibactam when combined with sulbactam. Exploring novel combinations may offer new options to treat Acinetobacter spp. infections, especially for widespread oxacillinases and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) producers.

Semi-mechanistic PK/PD modelling of meropenem and sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii

Due to limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) infections, antibiotic combinations are commonly used. In this study, we explored the potential efficacy of meropenem-sulbactam combination (MEM/SUL) against CR-AB. The checkerboard method was used to screen for synergistic activity of MEM/SUL against 50 clinical CR-AB isolates. Subsequently, time-kill studies against two CR-AB isolates were performed. Time-kill data were described using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Subsequently, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of 2-log kill, 1-log kill or stasis at 24-h following combination therapy. The MEM/SUL demonstrated synergy against 28/50 isolates. No antagonism was observed. The MIC50 and MIC₉₀ of MEM/SUL were decreased fourfold, compared to the monotherapy MIC. In the time-kill studies, the combination displayed synergistic killing against both isolates at the highest clinically achievable concentrations. At concentrations equal to the fractional inhibitory concentration, synergism was observed against one isolate. The PK/PD model adequately delineated the data and the interaction between meropenem and sulbactam. The effect of the combination was driven by sulbactam, with meropenem acting as a potentiator. The simulations of various dosing regimens revealed no activity for the monotherapies. At best, the MEM/SUL regimen of 2 g/4 g every 8 h demonstrated a probability of target attainment of 2-log₁₀ kill at 24 h of 34%. The reduction in the MIC values and the achievement of a moderate PTA of a 2-log₁₀ reduction in bacterial burden demonstrated that MEM/SUL may potentially be effective against some CR-AB infections.

Semi-mechanistic PK/PD modelling of fosfomycin and sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Due to limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) infections, antibiotic combinations are now considered potential treatments for CR-AB. This study aimed to explore the utility of fosfomycin-sulbactam combination (FOS/SUL) therapy against CR-AB isolates.Synergism of FOS/SUL against 50 clinical CR-AB isolates were screened using the checkerboard method. Thereafter, time-kill studies against two CR-AB isolates were performed. The time-kill data were described using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Monte Carlo simulations were then performed to estimate the probability of stasis, 1-log kill and 2-log kill after 24-hours with combination therapy.The FOS/SUL combination demonstrated a synergistic effect against 74% of isolates. No antagonism was observed. The MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ of FOS/SUL were decreased four- to eight-fold, compared to the monotherapy MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ In the time-kill studies, the combination displayed bactericidal activity against both isolates and synergistic activity against one isolate, at the highest clinically achievable concentrations. Our PK/PD model was able to describe the interaction between fosfomycin and sulbactam in vitro Bacterial kill was mainly driven by sulbactam, with fosfomycin augmentation. FOS/SUL regimens that included sulbactam 4 g every 8 hours, demonstrated a probability of target attainment of 1-log₁₀ kill at 24 h of ∼69-76%, as compared to ∼15-30% with monotherapy regimens at the highest doses.The reduction in the MIC values and the achievement of a moderate PTA of a 2-log₁₀ reduction in bacterial burden demonstrated that FOS/SUL may potentially be effective against some CR-AB infections.

Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in Important Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Pathogens and Novel Antibiotic Solutions

Multidrug-resistant bacteria have on overwhelming impact on human health, as they cause over 670,000 infections and 33,000 deaths annually in the European Union alone. Of these, the vast majority of infections and deaths are caused by only a handful of species-multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus spp., Acinetobacter spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae. These pathogens employ a multitude of antibiotic resistance mechanisms, such as the production of antibiotic deactivating enzymes, changes in antibiotic targets, or a reduction of intracellular antibiotic concentration, which render them insusceptible to multiple antibiotics. The purpose of this review is to summarize in a clinical manner the resistance mechanisms of each of these 6 pathogens, as well as the mechanisms of recently developed antibiotics designed to overcome them. Through a basic understanding of the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, the clinician can better comprehend and predict resistance patterns even to antibiotics not reported on the antibiogram and can subsequently select the most appropriate antibiotic for the pathogen in question.

A γ-lactam siderophore antibiotic effective against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter spp

Serious infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii) present a critical need for innovative drug development. Herein, we describe the preclinical evaluation of YU253911, 2, a novel γ-lactam siderophore antibiotic with potent antimicrobial activity against MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Penicillin-binding protein (PBP) 3 was shown to be a target of 2 using a binding assay with purified P. aeruginosa PBP3. The specific binding interactions with P. aeruginosa were further characterized with a high-resolution (2.0 Å) X-ray structure of the compound's acylation product in P. aeruginosa PBP3. Compound 2 was shown to have a concentration >1 μg/ml at the 6 h time point when administered intravenously or subcutaneously in mice. Employing a meropenem resistant strain of P. aeruginosa, 2 was shown to have dose-dependent efficacy at 50 and 100 mg/kg q6h dosing in a mouse thigh infection model. Lastly, we showed that a novel γ-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combination can effectively lower minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter spp. that demonstrated decreased susceptibility to 2 alone.

Combating Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria by Integrating a Novel Target Site Penetration and Receptor Binding Assay Platform Into Translational Modeling

Multidrug-resistant bacteria are causing a serious global health crisis. A dramatic decline in antibiotic discovery and development investment by pharmaceutical industry over the last decades has slowed the adoption of new technologies. It is imperative that we create new mechanistic insights based on latest technologies, and use translational strategies to optimize patient therapy. Although drug development has relied on minimal inhibitory concentration testing and established in vitro and mouse infection models, the limited understanding of outer membrane permeability in Gram-negative bacteria presents major challenges. Our team has developed a platform using the latest technologies to characterize target site penetration and receptor binding in intact bacteria that inform translational modeling and guide new discovery. Enhanced assays can quantify the outer membrane permeability of β-lactam antibiotics and β-lactamase inhibitors using multiplex liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. While β-lactam antibiotics are known to bind to multiple different penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), their binding profiles are almost always studied in lysed bacteria. Novel assays for PBP binding in the periplasm of intact bacteria were developed and proteins identified via proteomics. To characterize bacterial morphology changes in response to PBP binding, high-throughput flow cytometry and time-lapse confocal microscopy with fluorescent probes provide unprecedented mechanistic insights. Moreover, novel assays to quantify cytosolic receptor binding and intracellular drug concentrations inform target site occupancy. These mechanistic data are integrated by quantitative and systems pharmacology modeling to maximize bacterial killing and minimize resistance in in vitro and mouse infection models. This translational approach holds promise to identify antibiotic combination dosing strategies for patients with serious infections.

Minocycline Alone and in Combination with Polymyxin B, Meropenem, and Sulbactam against Carbapenem-Susceptible and -Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model

Acinetobacter baumannii is recognized as an urgent public health threat by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Current treatment options are scarce, particularly against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). We simulated the impact of minocycline standard (200 mg load + 100 mg Q12h) and high (700 mg load + 350 mg Q12h) doses, polymyxin B (2.5 mg/kg Q12h), sulbactam (1 g Q6h and 9 g/24 h as continuous infusion), and meropenem (intermittent 1 or 2 g Q8h and 6 g/24 h as continuous infusion) alone or in combination against CRAB and non-CRAB isolates by simulating human therapeutic dosing regimens in a 72-h, in vitro pharmacodynamic (IVPD) model. There were no monotherapy regimens that demonstrated bactericidal activity against the tested non-CRAB and CRAB strains. Resistance development was common in monotherapy regimens. Against the CRAB isolate, the triple combination of high-dose minocycline (fAUC/MIC 21.2), polymyxin B (fAUC/MIC 15.6), and continuous-infusion sulbactam (67% T _>MIC) was the most consistently active regimen. Against non-CRAB, the triple therapy regimen of high-dose minocycline (fAUC/MIC 84.8) with continuous-infusion meropenem (100% T _>MIC) and continuous-infusion sulbactam (83% T _>MIC), as well as the double therapy of high-dose minocycline (fAUC/MIC 84.8) with continuous-infusion meropenem (100% T _>MIC), resulted in persistently bactericidal activity. In conclusion, triple therapy with high-dose minocycline, continuous-infusion sulbactam, and polymyxin B produced the most significant kill against the carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, with no regrowth and minimal resistance development.

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Pathogenic Burkholderia Species

The Gram-negative bacterial genus Burkholderia includes several hard-to-treat human pathogens: two biothreat species, Burkholderia mallei (causing glanders) and B. pseudomallei (causing melioidosis), and the B. cepacia complex (BCC) and B. gladioli, which cause chronic lung infections in persons with cystic fibrosis. All Burkholderia spp. possess an Ambler class A Pen β-lactamase, which confers resistance to β-lactams. The β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination sulbactam-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is in clinical development for the treatment of Acinetobacter infections. In this study, we evaluated SUL-DUR for in vitro and in vivo activity against Burkholderia clinical isolates. We measured MICs of SUL-DUR against BCC and B. gladioli (n = 150), B. mallei (n = 30), and B. pseudomallei (n = 28), studied the kinetics of inhibition of the PenA1 β-lactamase from B. multivorans and the PenI β-lactamase from B. pseudomallei by durlobactam, tested for bla _PenA1 induction by SUL-DUR, and evaluated in vivo efficacy in a mouse model of melioidosis. SUL-DUR inhibited growth of 87.3% of the BCC and B. gladioli strains and 100% of the B. mallei and B. pseudomallei strains at 4/4 μg/ml. Durlobactam potently inhibited PenA1 and PenI with second-order rate constant for inactivation (k ₂ /K) values of 3.9 × 10⁶ M^-1 s^-1 and 2.6 × 10³ M^-1 s^-1 and apparent K_i (K_{i app}) of 15 nM and 241 nM, respectively, by forming highly stable covalent complexes. Neither sulbactam, durlobactam, nor SUL-DUR increased production of PenA1. SUL-DUR demonstrated activity in vivo in a murine melioidosis model. Taken together, these data suggest that SUL-DUR may be useful as a treatment for Burkholderia infections.

Cefoperazone/sulbactam: New composites against multiresistant gram negative bacteria?

Sulbactam, a class A β-lactamase inhibitor, added to cefoperazone either at a fixed 8 mg/L level of sulbactam or at a level of fixed cefoperazone: sulbactam ratio (2:1) would constitute a combination form of cefoperazone/sulbactam, which has better activities against Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii than cefoperazone alone. Cefoperazone/sulbactam (1:1 or 1:2) has greater in-vitro activity against most multidrug-resistant organisms (ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii except for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa) than a 2:1 ratio. However, increased sulbactam concentration may induce AmpC production. Besides, sulbactam concentration might not be readily achievable in serum if the susceptibility rates were defined by the breakpoints of higher sulbactam composites, such as ≤16/16 (1:1) or 16/32 (1:2) mg/L. Carbapenemases (KPC-, OXA-type enzymes and metallo-β-lactamases) can't be inhibited by sulbactam. Some in-vitro studies showed that increasing sulbactam composites of cefoperazone/sulbactam had no effect on carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, suggesting the presence of carbapenemases or AmpC overproduction that could not be overcome by increasing sulbactam levels to recover cefoperazone activity. Sulbactam alone has good intrinsic activity against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter strains sometimes even in the presence of carbapenemase genes, suggesting unsteady levels of carbapenemases. In conclusion, appropriate composites of cefoperazone and β-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam may expand the clinical use if the pharmacokinetic optimization could be achieved in the human serum.

Enhanced bacterial killing with colistin/sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

AIMS

Polymyxin-based combination therapy is often used to treat carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) infections. Although sulbactam is intrinsically active against A. baumannii, few studies have investigated colistin/sulbactam combinations against carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.

METHODS

Whole genome sequencing was undertaken on eight carbapenem-resistant (colistin-susceptible) isolates of A. baumannii from Chinese patients. Bacterial killing of colistin and sulbactam, alone and in combination, was examined with checkerboard (all isolates) and static and dynamic time-kill studies (three isolates). In the dynamic studies, antibiotics were administered in various clinically-relevant dosing regimens that mimicked patient pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

The eight isolates consisted of ST195, ST191 and ST208 belonging to clonal complex 208, which is the most epidemic clonal type of A. baumannii globally. All isolates possessed Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinase (ADC-61 or ADC-78) and seven of eight isolates contained the carbapenem-resistance gene bla_OXA-23. The colistin/sulbactam combination was synergistic against two of eight isolates in checkerboard studies. In time-kill studies, rapid bacterial killing of ca. 3-6 log₁₀ CFU/mL was observed with colistin monotherapy, followed by steady regrowth. Sulbactam monotherapy was generally ineffective. Substantially enhanced bacterial killing was observed with colistin/sulbactam combinations in both static and dynamic models, especially with the higher sulbactam concentration (2 g) and/or longer sulbactam infusion time (2 hours) in the dynamic model.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was the first to use a pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics model to investigate synergistic activity of colistin/sulbactam combinations against A. baumannii. It showed that clinically-relevant dosing regimens of colistin combined with sulbactam may substantially improve bacterial killing of multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.

First Penicillin-Binding Protein Occupancy Patterns for 15 β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors in Mycobacterium abscessus

Mycobacterium abscessus causes serious infections that often require over 18 months of antibiotic combination therapy. There is no standard regimen for the treatment of M. abscessus infections, and the multitude of combinations that have been used clinically have had low success rates and high rates of toxicities. With β-lactam antibiotics being safe, double β-lactam and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations are of interest for improving the treatment of M. abscessus infections and minimizing toxicity. However, a mechanistic approach for building these combinations is lacking since little is known about which penicillin-binding protein (PBP) target receptors are inactivated by different β-lactams in M. abscessus We determined the preferred PBP targets of 13 β-lactams and 2 β-lactamase inhibitors in two M. abscessus strains and identified PBP sequences by proteomics. The Bocillin FL binding assay was used to determine the β-lactam concentrations that half-maximally inhibited Bocillin binding (50% inhibitory concentrations [IC₅₀s]). Principal component analysis identified four clusters of PBP occupancy patterns. Carbapenems inactivated all PBPs at low concentrations (0.016 to 0.5 mg/liter) (cluster 1). Cephalosporins (cluster 2) inactivated PonA2, PonA1, and PbpA at low (0.031 to 1 mg/liter) (ceftriaxone and cefotaxime) or intermediate (0.35 to 16 mg/liter) (ceftazidime and cefoxitin) concentrations. Sulbactam, aztreonam, carumonam, mecillinam, and avibactam (cluster 3) inactivated the same PBPs as cephalosporins but required higher concentrations. Other penicillins (cluster 4) specifically targeted PbpA at 2 to 16 mg/liter. Carbapenems, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime were the most promising β-lactams since they inactivated most or all PBPs at clinically relevant concentrations. These first PBP occupancy patterns in M. abscessus provide a mechanistic foundation for selecting and optimizing safe and effective combination therapies with β-lactams.