Serum bactericidal activities and comparative pharmacokinetics of meropenem and imipenem-cilastatin

Comparative intracellular (THP-1 macrophage) and extracellular activities of beta-lactams, azithromycin, gentamicin, and fluoroquinolones against Listeria monocytogenes at clinically relevant concentrations

The activities of ampicillin, meropenem, azithromycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and moxifloxacin against intracellular hemolysin-positive Listeria monocytogenes were measured in human THP-1 macrophages and were compared with the extracellular activities observed in broth. All extracellular concentrations were adjusted to explore ranges that are clinically achievable in human serum upon conventional therapy. In broth, ampicillin, meropenem, and azithromycin were only bacteriostatic, whereas gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and moxifloxacin were strongly bactericidal in a concentration-dependent manner. In cells, ampicillin, meropenem, azithromycin, and ciprofloxacin were slightly bactericidal (0.3- to 0.8-log CFU reductions), moxifloxacin was strongly bactericidal (2.1-log CFU reduction), and gentamicin was virtually inactive. The difference in the efficacies of moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin in cells did not result from a difference in levels of accumulation in cells (6.96 +/- 1.05 versus 7.75 +/- 1.03) and was only partially explainable by the difference in the MICs (0.58 +/- 0.04 versus 1.40 +/- 0.17 mg/liter). Further analysis showed that intracellular moxifloxacin expressed only approximately 1/7 of the activity demonstrated against extracellular bacteria and ciprofloxacin expressed only 1/15 of the activity demonstrated against extracellular bacteria. Gentamicin did not increase the intracellular activities of the other antibiotics tested. The data suggest (i) that moxifloxacin could be of potential interest for eradication of the intracellular forms of L. monocytogenes, (ii) that the cellular accumulation of an antibiotic is not the only determinant of its intracellular activity (for fluoroquinolones, it is actually a self-defeating process as far as activity is concerned), and (iii) that pharmacodynamics (activity-to-concentration relationships) need to be considered for the establishment of efficacy against intracellular bacteria, just as they are for the establishment of efficacy against extracellular infections.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of the carbapenems: clinical implications

During the last few decades, several carbapenems have been developed. The major characteristic of the newer drugs, such as MK-826, is a prolonged half-life. Alternatively, some carbapenems have been developed that can be given orally, such as CS-834 and L-084. Although imipenem and panipenem have to be administered with a co-drug to prevent degradation by the enzyme dehydropeptidase-1 and reduce nephrotoxicity, the newer drugs such as meropenem, biapenem and lenapenem are relatively stable towards that enzyme. Structural modifications have, besides changes in pharmacology, also led to varying antimicrobial properties. For instance, meropenem is relatively more active against Gram-negative organisms than most other carbapenems, but is slightly less active against Gram-positive organisms. Except for half-life and bioavailability, the pharmacokinetic properties of the carbapenems are relatively similar. Distribution is mainly in extracellular body-water, as observed both from the volumes of distribution and from blister studies. Some carbapenems have a better penetration in cerebrospinal fluid than others. In patients with renal dysfunction, doses have to be adjusted, and special care must be taken with imipenem/cilastatin and panipenem/betamipron to prevent accumulation of the co-drugs, as the pharmacokinetic properties of the co-drugs differ from those of the drugs themselves. However, toxicity of the co-drugs has not been shown. The carbapenems differ in proconvulsive activity. Imipenem shows relatively the highest proconvulsive activity, especially at higher concentrations. Pharmacodynamic studies have shown that the major surrogate parameter for antimicrobial efficacy is the percentage of time of the dosage interval above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The minimum percentage percentage of time above the MIC (TaM) needed for optimal effect is known in animals (30 to 50%), but not in humans. It is probably less than 100%, but may be higher than 50%. Dosage regimens currently in use result in a TaM of about 50% at 4 mg/L, which is the current 'susceptible' breakpoint determined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for most micro-organisms. Dosage regimens in patients with reduced renal clearance should be based on the TaM. The increased half-life of the newer carbapenems will probably lead to less frequent administration, although continuous infusion may still be the optimal mode of administration for these drugs. The availability of oral carbapenems will have a profound effect on the use of carbapenems in the community.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with acute renal failure undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration

OBJECTIVE

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum antibiotic used for severe infections. In patients with chronic end-stage renal failure, meropenem clearance is reduced and doses must be adjusted according to the creatinine clearance. The aim of this study was to assess pharmacokinetic data of meropenem in patients with acute renal failure and to determine the amount of drug removed by continuous venovenous hemofiltration, an often-used renal replacement therapy in patients with acute renal failure.

METHODS

Nine critically ill anuric patients with acute renal failure undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration received 500 mg meropenem 2 or 3 times daily. Plasma and hemofiltrate concentrations were determined during 1 dosing interval at steady state. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for a 2-compartment open model and dose requirements were calculated.

RESULTS

The total meropenem clearance was 52.0 +/- 8.4 mL/min, with a hemofiltration clearance of 22.0 +/- 4.7 mL/min and a nonrenal-nonhemofiltration clearance of 29.9 +/- 5.4 mL/min; 235.9 +/- 88.6 mg, or 47.2% +/- 17.7%, of the dose were removed through continuous venovenous hemofiltration. The terminal elimination half-life was 8.7 +/- 3.5 hours and the volume of distribution at steady state was 12.4 +/- 1.8 L. Peak and trough concentrations for a dosing interval of 12 hours were 38.9 +/- 9.7 mg/L and 7.3 +/- 1.3 mg/L, respectively. The corresponding concentrations for a dosing interval of 8 hours were 44.7 +/- 10.4 mg/L and 11.9 +/- 0.7 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacokinetic data of anuric patients with acute renal failure were similar to those of patients with end-stage renal failure. Because hemofiltration contributes significantly to meropenem elimination, the recommended dose for critically ill anuric patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration should be increased by 100% to avoid potential underdosing.