CheZ phosphatase localizes to chemoreceptor patches via CheA-short

Differential affinity and catalytic activity of CheZ in E. coli chemotaxis

Push–pull networks, in which two antagonistic enzymes control the activity of a messenger protein, are ubiquitous in signal transduction pathways. A classical example is the chemotaxis system of the bacterium Escherichia coli, in which the kinase CheA and the phosphatase CheZ regulate the phosphorylation level of the messenger protein CheY. Recent experiments suggest that both the kinase and the phosphatase are localized at the receptor cluster, and Vaknin and Berg recently demonstrated that the spatial distribution of the phosphatase can markedly affect the dose–response curves. We argue, using mathematical modeling, that the canonical model of the chemotaxis network cannot explain the experimental observations of Vaknin and Berg. We present a new model, in which a small fraction of the phosphatase is localized at the receptor cluster, while the remainder freely diffuses in the cytoplasm; moreover, the phosphatase at the cluster has a higher binding affinity for the messenger protein and a higher catalytic activity than the phosphatase in the cytoplasm. This model is consistent with a large body of experimental data and can explain many of the experimental observations of Vaknin and Berg. More generally, the combination of differential affinity and catalytic activity provides a generic mechanism for amplifying signals that could be exploited in other two-component signaling systems. If this model is correct, then a number of recent modeling studies, which aim to explain the chemotactic gain in terms of the activity of the receptor cluster, should be reconsidered.

In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, extra- and intracellular signals are often processed by biochemical networks in which two enzymes together control the activity of a messenger protein via opposite modification reactions. A well-known example is the chemotaxis network of Escherichia coli that controls the swimming behavior of the bacterium in response to chemical stimuli. Recent experiments suggest that the two counteracting enzymes in this network are colocalized at the receptor cluster, while experiments by Vaknin and Berg indicate that the spatial distribution of the enzymes by itself can markedly affect the response of the network. We argue using mathematical modeling that the most widely used model of the chemotaxis network is inconsistent with these experimental observations. We then present an alternative model in which part of one enzyme is colocalized with the other enzyme at the receptor cluster, while the remainder freely diffuses in the cytoplasm; moreover, the fraction at the cluster both binds more strongly to the messenger protein and modifies it faster. This model is consistent with a large number of experimental observations and provides a generic mechanism for amplifying signals.

The diverse CheC-type phosphatases: chemotaxis and beyond

A new class of protein phosphatases has emerged in the study of bacterial/archaeal chemotaxis, the CheC-type phosphatases. These proteins are distinct and unrelated to the well-known CheY-P phosphatase CheZ, though they have convergently evolved to dephosphorylate the same target. The family contains a common consensus sequence D/S-X(3)-E-X(2)-N-X(22)-P that defines the phosphatase active site, of which there are often two per protein. Three distinct subgroups make up the family: CheC, FliY and CheX. Further, the CheC subgroup can be divided into three classes. Bacillus subtilis CheC typifies the first class and might function as a regulator of CheD. Class II CheCs likely function as phosphatases in systems other than chemotaxis. Class III CheCs are found in the archaeal class Halobacteria and might function as class I CheCs. FliY is the main phosphatase in the B. subtilis chemotaxis system. CheX is quite divergent from the rest of the family, forms a dimer and some may function outside chemotaxis. A model for the evolution of the family is discussed.

Dynamic map of protein interactions in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway

Protein-protein interactions play key roles in virtually all cellular processes, often forming complex regulatory networks. A powerful tool to study interactions in vivo is fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), which is based on the distance-dependent energy transfer from an excited donor to an acceptor fluorophore. Here, we used FRET to systematically map all protein interactions in the chemotaxis signaling pathway in Escherichia coli, one of the most studied models of signal transduction, and to determine stimulation-induced changes in the pathway. Our FRET analysis identified 19 positive FRET pairs out of the 28 possible protein combinations, with 9 pairs being responsive to chemotactic stimulation. Six stimulation-dependent and five stimulation-independent interactions were direct, whereas other interactions were apparently mediated by scaffolding proteins. Characterization of stimulation-induced responses revealed an additional regulation through activity dependence of interactions involving the adaptation enzyme CheB, and showed complex rearrangement of chemosensory receptors. Our study illustrates how FRET can be efficiently employed to study dynamic protein networks in vivo.

Different signaling roles of two conserved residues in the cytoplasmic hairpin tip of Tsr, the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor

Bacterial chemoreceptors form ternary signaling complexes with the histidine kinase CheA through the coupling protein CheW. Receptor complexes in turn cluster into cellular arrays that produce highly sensitive responses to chemical stimuli. In Escherichia coli, receptors of different types form mixed trimer-of-dimers signaling teams through the tips of their highly conserved cytoplasmic domains. To explore the possibility that the hairpin loop at the tip of the trimer contact region might promote interactions with CheA or CheW, we constructed and characterized mutant receptors with amino acid replacements at the two nearly invariant hairpin charged residues of Tsr: R388, the most tip-proximal trimer contact residue, and E391, the apex residue of the hairpin turn. Mutant receptors were subjected to in vivo tests for the assembly and function of trimers, ternary complexes, and clusters. All R388 replacements impaired or destroyed Tsr function, apparently through changes in trimer stability or geometry. Large-residue replacements locked R388 mutant ternary complexes in the kinase-off (F, H) or kinase-on (W, Y) signaling state, suggesting that R388 contributes to signaling-related conformational changes in the trimer. In contrast, most E391 mutants retained function and all formed ternary signaling complexes efficiently. Hydrophobic replacements of any size (G, A, P, V, I, L, F, W) caused a novel phenotype in which the mutant receptors produced rapid switching between kinase-on and -off states, indicating that hairpin tip flexibility plays an important role in signal state transitions. These findings demonstrate that the receptor determinants for CheA and CheW binding probably lie outside the hairpin tip of the receptor signaling domain.

Comparative genomics of Geobacter chemotaxis genes reveals diverse signaling function

Background

Geobacter species are δ-Proteobacteria and are often the predominant species in a variety of sedimentary environments where Fe(III) reduction is important. Their ability to remediate contaminated environments and produce electricity makes them attractive for further study. Cell motility, biofilm formation, and type IV pili all appear important for the growth of Geobacter in changing environments and for electricity production. Recent studies in other bacteria have demonstrated that signaling pathways homologous to the paradigm established for Escherichia coli chemotaxis can regulate type IV pili-dependent motility, the synthesis of flagella and type IV pili, the production of extracellular matrix material, and biofilm formation. The classification of these pathways by comparative genomics improves the ability to understand how Geobacter thrives in natural environments and better their use in microbial fuel cells.

Results

The genomes of G. sulfurreducens, G. metallireducens, and G. uraniireducens contain multiple (~70) homologs of chemotaxis genes arranged in several major clusters (six, seven, and seven, respectively). Unlike the single gene cluster of E. coli, the Geobacter clusters are not all located near the flagellar genes. The probable functions of some Geobacter clusters are assignable by homology to known pathways; others appear to be unique to the Geobacter sp. and contain genes of unknown function. We identified large numbers of methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) homologs that have diverse sensing domain architectures and generate a potential for sensing a great variety of environmental signals. We discuss mechanisms for class-specific segregation of the MCPs in the cell membrane, which serve to maintain pathway specificity and diminish crosstalk. Finally, the regulation of gene expression in Geobacter differs from E. coli. The sequences of predicted promoter elements suggest that the alternative sigma factors σ²⁸ and σ⁵⁴ play a role in regulating the Geobacter chemotaxis gene expression.

Conclusion

The numerous chemoreceptors and chemotaxis-like gene clusters of Geobacter appear to be responsible for a diverse set of signaling functions in addition to chemotaxis, including gene regulation and biofilm formation, through functionally and spatially distinct signaling pathways.

The three adaptation systems of Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis

Adaptation has a crucial role in the gradient-sensing mechanism that underlies bacterial chemotaxis. The Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway uses a single adaptation system involving reversible receptor methylation. In Bacillus subtilis, the chemotaxis pathway seems to use three adaptation systems. One involves reversible receptor methylation, although quite differently than in E. coli. The other two involve CheC, CheD and CheV, which are chemotaxis proteins not found in E. coli. Remarkably, no one system is absolutely required for adaptation or is independently capable of generating adaptation. In this review, we discuss these three novel adaptation systems in B. subtilis and propose a model for their integration.

Stochastic assembly of chemoreceptor clusters in Escherichia coli

Chemoreceptors and cytoplasmic chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli form clusters that play a key role in signal processing. These clusters localize at cell poles and at specific positions along the cell body which correspond to future division sites, but the details of cluster formation and the mechanism of cluster distribution remain unclear. Here, we used fluorescence microscopy to investigate how the numbers and sizes of receptor clusters depend on the expression level of chemotaxis proteins and on the cell length. We show that the average cluster number saturates at high levels of protein expression at approximately 3.7 clusters per cell, well below the number of available positioning sites. Correspondingly, distances between clusters in filamentous cells saturate at an average of 1 mum but, even at saturating expression levels, individual cluster numbers and distances show a broad distribution around the mean. Our data imply a stochastic mode of cluster assembly, where a defined average interval between clusters along the cell body arises from competition between nucleation of new clusters and growth of existing clusters. Upon subsequent anchorage to defined lateral sites, clusters grow with rates that inversely depend on their size, and become polar upon several rounds of cell division.

Functional characterization and mutagenesis of the proposed behavioral sensor TlpD of Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori requires flagellar motility and chemotaxis to establish and maintain chronic infection of the human stomach. The pH gradient in the stomach mucus is essential for bacterial orientation and guides the bacterium toward a narrow layer of the mucus, suggesting that H. pylori is capable of energy sensing or taxis. In the present study, H. pylori wild-type behavior in a temporal swimming assay could be altered by electron transport inhibitors, indicating that a connection between metabolism and behavior exists. In order to elucidate mechanisms of behavioral responses of H. pylori related to energy sensing, we investigated the phenotypes of single and multiple mutants of the four proposed chemotaxis sensor proteins. All sensor mutants were motile, but they diverged in their behavior in media supporting different energy yields. One proposed intracellular sensor, TlpD, was crucial for behavioral responses of H. pylori in defined media which did not permit growth and led to reduced bacterial energy levels. Suboptimal energetic conditions and inhibition of electron transport induced an increased frequency of stops and direction changes in the wild type but not in tlpD mutants. Loss of metabolism-dependent behavior in tlpD mutants could be reversed by complementation but not by electron donors bypassing the activity of the electron transport chain, in contrast to the case for the wild type. TlpD, which apparently lacks transmembrane domains, was detected both in the bacterial cytoplasm and at the bacterial periphery. The proposed energy sensor TlpD was found to mediate a repellent tactic response away from conditions of reduced electron transport.

Interaction of CheY with the C-terminal peptide of CheZ

Chemotaxis, a means for motile bacteria to sense the environment and achieve directed swimming, is controlled by flagellar rotation. The primary output of the chemotaxis machinery is the phosphorylated form of the response regulator CheY (P-CheY). The steady-state level of P-CheY dictates the direction of rotation of the flagellar motor. The chemotaxis signal in the form of P-CheY is terminated by the phosphatase CheZ. Efficient dephosphorylation of CheY by CheZ requires two distinct protein-protein interfaces: one involving the strongly conserved C-terminal helix of CheZ (CheZ(C)) tethering the two proteins together and the other constituting an active site for catalytic dephosphorylation. In a previous work (J. Guhaniyogi, V. L. Robinson, and A. M. Stock, J. Mol. Biol. 359:624-645, 2006), we presented high-resolution crystal structures of CheY in complex with the CheZ(C) peptide that revealed alternate binding modes subject to the conformational state of CheY. In this study, we report biochemical and structural data that support the alternate-binding-mode hypothesis and identify key recognition elements in the CheY-CheZ(C) interaction. In addition, we present kinetic studies of the CheZ(C)-associated effect on CheY phosphorylation with its physiologically relevant phosphodonor, the histidine kinase CheA. Our results indicate mechanistic differences in phosphotransfer from the kinase CheA versus that from small-molecule phosphodonors, explaining a modest twofold increase of CheY phosphorylation with the former, observed in this study, relative to a 10-fold increase previously documented with the latter.

CheX in the three-phosphatase system of bacterial chemotaxis

Bacterial chemotaxis involves the regulation of motility by a modified two-component signal transduction system. In Escherichia coli, CheZ is the phosphatase of the response regulator CheY but many other bacteria, including Bacillus subtilis, use members of the CheC-FliY-CheX family for this purpose. While Bacillus subtilis has only CheC and FliY, many systems also have CheX. The effect of this three-phosphatase system on chemotaxis has not been studied previously. CheX was shown to be a stronger CheY-P phosphatase than either CheC or FliY. In Bacillus subtilis, a cheC mutant strain was nearly complemented by heterologous cheX expression. CheX was shown to overcome the DeltacheC adaptational defect but also generally lowered the counterclockwise flagellar rotational bias. The effect on rotational bias suggests that CheX reduced the overall levels of CheY-P in the cell and did not truly replicate the adaptational effects of CheC. Thus, CheX is not functionally redundant to CheC and, as outlined in the discussion, may be more analogous to CheZ.

Positioning of chemosensory clusters in E. coli and its relation to cell division

Chemotaxis receptors and associated signalling proteins in Escherichia coli form clusters that consist of thousands of molecules and are the largest native protein complexes described to date in bacteria. Clusters are located at the cell poles and laterally along the cell body, and play an important role in signal transduction. Much work has been done to study the structure and function of receptor clusters, but the significance of their positioning and the underlying mechanisms are not understood. Here, we used fluorescence imaging to study cluster distribution and follow cluster dynamics during cell growth. Our data show that lateral clusters localise to specific periodic positions along the cell body, which mark future division sites and are involved in the localisation of the replication machinery. The chemoreceptor cluster positioning is thus intricately related to the overall structure and division of an E. coli cell.

Comparative genomic and protein sequence analyses of a complex system controlling bacterial chemotaxis

Molecular machinery governing bacterial chemotaxis consists of the CheA-CheY two-component system, an array of specialized chemoreceptors, and several auxiliary proteins. It has been studied extensively in Escherichia coli and, to a significantly lesser extent, in several other microbial species. Emerging evidence suggests that homologous signal transduction pathways regulate not only chemotaxis, but several other cellular functions in various bacterial species. The availability of genome sequence data for hundreds of organisms enables productive study of this system using comparative genomics and protein sequence analysis. This chapter describes advances in genomics of the chemotaxis signal transduction system, provides information on relevant bioinformatics tools and resources, and outlines approaches toward developing a computational framework for predicting important biological functions from raw genomic data based on available experimental evidence.

Assays for CheC, FliY, and CheX as Representatives of Response Regulator Phosphatases

Much study of two-component systems deals with the excitation of the histidine kinase, activation of the response regulator, and the ultimate target of the signal. Removal of the message is of great importance to these signaling systems. Many methods have evolved in two-component systems to this end. These include autodephosphorylation of the response regulator, hydrolysis of the phosphoryl group by the kinase, or a dedicated phosphatase protein. It has long been known that CheZ is the phosphatase in the chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli and related bacteria. Most bacteria and archaea, however, do not have a cheZ gene, but instead rely on the CheC, CheX, and FliY family of CheY-P phosphatases. Here, we describe assays to test these chemotactic phosphatases, applicable to many other response regulator phosphatases.

In vivo measurement by FRET of pathway activity in bacterial chemotaxis

The two-component pathway in Escherichia coli chemotaxis has become a paradigm for bacterial signal processing. Genetics and biochemistry of the pathway as well as physiological responses have been studied in detail. Despite its relative simplicity, the chemotaxis pathway is renowned for its ability to amplify and integrate weak signals and for its robustness against various kinds of perturbations. All this information inspired multiple attempts at mathematical analysis and computer modeling, but a quantitative understanding of the pathway was hampered by our inability to follow the signal processing in vivo. To address this problem, we developed assays based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) that enabled us to monitor activity-dependent protein interactions in real time directly in living cells. Here, we describe quantitative applications of these assays in cell populations and on a single-cell level to study the interaction of the phosphorylated response regulator CheY with its phosphatase CheZ. Since this interaction defines the rate of CheY dephosphorylation, which at steady state equals the rate of CheY phosphorylation, it can be used to characterize intracellular kinase activity and thus to analyze properties of the chemotaxis signaling network.

Characterization of the Thermotoga maritima chemotaxis methylation system that lacks pentapeptide-dependent methyltransferase CheR:MCP tethering

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by covalent modifications of specific glutamate and glutamine residues within the cytoplasmic domains of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). In Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica, efficient methylation of MCPs depends on the localization of methyltransferase CheR to MCP clusters through an interaction between the CheR beta-subdomain and a pentapeptide sequence (NWETF or NWESF) at the C-terminus of the MCP. In vitro methylation analyses utilizing S. enterica and Thermotoga maritima CheR proteins and MCPs indicate that MCP methylation in T. maritima occurs independently of a pentapeptide-binding motif. Kinetic and binding measurements demonstrate that despite efficient methylation, the interaction between T. maritima CheR and T. maritima MCPs is of relatively low affinity. Comparative protein sequence analyses of CheR beta-subdomains from organisms having MCPs that contain and/or lack pentapeptide-binding motifs identified key similarities and differences in residue conservation, suggesting the existence of two distinct classes of CheR proteins: pentapeptide-dependent and pentapeptide-independent methyltransferases. Analysis of MCP C-terminal ends showed that only approximately 10% of MCPs contain a putative C-terminal binding motif, the majority of which are restricted to the different proteobacteria classes (alpha, beta, gamma, delta). These findings suggest that tethering of CheR to MCPs is a relatively recent event in evolution and that the pentapeptide-independent methylation system is more common than the well-characterized pentapeptide-dependent methylation system.

Determinants of chemoreceptor cluster formation in Escherichia coli

Chemotactic stimuli in bacteria are sensed by large sensory complexes, or receptor clusters, that consist of tens of thousands of proteins. Receptor clusters appear to play a key role in signal processing, but their structure remains poorly understood. Here we used fluorescent protein fusions to study in vivo formation of the cluster core, which consists of receptors, a kinase CheA and an assisting protein CheW. We show that receptors aggregate through their cytoplasmic domains even in the absence of other chemotaxis proteins. Clustering is further enhanced by the binding of CheW. Surprisingly, we observed that some fragments of CheA bind receptor clusters well in the absence of CheW, although the latter does assist the binding of full-length CheA. The resulting mode of receptor cluster formation is consistent with an experimentally observed flexible stoichiometry of chemosensory complexes and with assumptions of recently proposed computer models of signal processing in chemotaxis.

Two different Pseudomonas aeruginosa chemosensory signal transduction complexes localize to cell poles and form and remould in stationary phase

Pseudomonas aeruginosa has sets of sensory genes designated che and che2. The che genes are required for flagella-mediated chemotaxis. The che2 genes are expressed in the stationary phase of growth and are probably also involved in flagella-mediated behavioural responses. P. aeruginosa also has 26 chemoreceptor genes, six of which are preferentially expressed in stationary phase. Subcellular localization experiments indicated that Che proteins form signal transduction complexes at cell poles throughout growth. Cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-tagged McpA, a stationary phase-expressed chemoreceptor, appeared and colocalized with yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-tagged CheA when cells entered stationary phase. This indicates that P. aeruginosa chemotaxis protein complexes are subject to remoulding by chemoreceptor proteins that are expressed when cells stop growing. CheA-CFP and CheY2-YFP tagged proteins that were coexpressed in the same cell had separate subcellular locations, indicating that Che2 proteins do not enter into direct physical interactions with Che proteins. Che2 protein complex formation required McpB, another stationary phase induced chemoreceptor that is predicted to be soluble. This implies that Che2 complexes have a function that depends on just one chemoreceptor. Our results suggest that motile P. aeruginosa cells have signal transduction systems that are adapted to allow non-growing cells to sense and respond to their environment differently from actively growing cells.

Helical distribution of the bacterial chemoreceptor via colocalization with the Sec protein translocation machinery

In Escherichia coli, chemoreceptor clustering at a cell pole seems critical for signal amplification and adaptation. However, little is known about the mechanism of localization itself. Here we examined whether the aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar) is inserted directly into the polar membrane by using its fusion to green fluorescent protein (GFP). After induction of Tar–GFP, fluorescent spots first appeared in lateral membrane regions, and later cell poles became predominantly fluorescent. Unexpectedly, Tar–GFP showed a helical arrangement in lateral regions, which was more apparent when a Tar–GFP derivative with two cysteine residues in the periplasmic domain was cross-linked to form higher oligomers. Moreover, similar distribution was observed even when the cytoplasmic domain of the double cysteine Tar–GFP mutant was replaced by that of the kinase EnvZ, which does not localize to a pole. Observation of GFP–SecE and a translocation-defective MalE–GFP mutant, as well as indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on SecG, suggested that the general protein translocation machinery (Sec) itself is arranged into a helical array, with which Tar is transiently associated. The Sec coil appeared distinct from the MreB coil, an actin-like cytoskeleton. These findings will shed new light on the mechanisms underlying spatial organization of membrane proteins in E. coli.

Differential activation of Escherichia coli chemoreceptors by blue-light stimuli

Enteric bacteria tumble, swim slowly, and are then paralyzed upon exposure to 390- to 530-nm light. Here, we analyze this complex response in Escherichia coli using standard fluorescence microscope optics for excitation at 440 +/- 5 nm. The slow swimming and paralysis occurred only in dye-containing growth media or buffers. Excitation elicited complete paralysis within a second in 1 muM proflavine dye, implying specific motor damage, but prolonged tumbling in buffer alone. The tumbling half-response times were subsecond for onset but more than a minute for recovery. The response required the chemotaxis signal protein CheY and receptor-dependent activation of its kinase CheA. The study of deletion mutants revealed a specific requirement for either the aerotaxis receptor Aer or the chemoreceptor Tar but not the Tar homolog Tsr. The action spectrum of the wild-type response was consistent with a flavin, but the chromophores remain to be identified. The motile response processed via Aer was sustained, with recovery to either step-up or -down taking more than a minute. The response processed via Tar was transient, recovering on second time scales comparable to chemotactic responses. The response duration and amplitude were dependent on relative expression of Aer, Tar, and Tsr. The main response features were reproduced when each receptor was expressed singly from a plasmid in a receptorless host strain. However, time-resolved motion analysis revealed subtle kinetic differences that reflect the role of receptor cluster interactions in kinase activation-deactivation dynamics.

Conformational suppression of inter-receptor signaling defects

Motile bacteria follow gradients of attractant and repellent chemicals with high sensitivity. Their chemoreceptors are physically clustered, which may enable them to function as a cooperative array. Although native chemoreceptor molecules are typically transmembrane homodimers, they appear to associate through their cytoplasmic tips to form trimers of dimers, which may be an important architectural element in the assembly and operation of receptor clusters. The five receptors of Escherichia coli that mediate most of its chemotactic and aerotactic behaviors have identical trimer contact residues and have been shown by in vivo crosslinking methods to form mixed trimers of dimers. Mutations at the trimer contact sites of Tsr, the serine chemoreceptor, invariably abrogate Tsr function, but some of those lesions (designated Tsr*) are epistatic and block the function of heterologous chemoreceptors. We isolated and characterized mutations (designated Tar()) in the aspartate chemoreceptor that restored function to Tsr* receptors. The suppressors arose at or near the Tar trimer contact sites and acted in an allele-specific fashion on Tsr* partners. Alone, many Tar() receptors were unable to mediate chemotactic responses to aspartate, but all formed clusters with varying efficiencies. Most of those Tar() receptors were epistatic to WT Tsr, but some regained Tar function in combination with a suppressible Tsr* partner. Tar()-Tsr* suppression most likely occurs through compensatory changes in the conformation or dynamics of a mixed receptor signaling complex, presumably based on trimer-of-dimer interactions. These collaborative teams may be responsible for the high-gain signaling properties of bacterial chemoreceptors.

Changing cellular location of CheZ predicted by molecular simulations

In the chemotaxis pathway of the bacterium Escherichia coli, signals are carried from a cluster of receptors to the flagellar motors by the diffusion of the protein CheY-phosphate (CheYp) through the cytoplasm. A second protein, CheZ, which promotes dephosphorylation of CheYp, partially colocalizes with receptors in the plasma membrane. CheZ is normally dimeric in solution but has been suggested to associate into highly active oligomers in the presence of CheYp. A model is presented here and supported by Brownian dynamics simulations, which accounts for these and other experimental data: A minority component of the receptor cluster (dimers of CheA_short) nucleates CheZ oligomerization and CheZ molecules move from the cytoplasm to a bound state at the receptor cluster depending on the current level of cellular stimulation. The corresponding simulations suggest that dynamic CheZ localization will sharpen cellular responses to chemoeffectors, increase the range of detectable ligand concentrations, and make adaptation more precise and robust. The localization and activation of CheZ constitute a negative feedback loop that provides a second tier of adaptation to the system. Subtle adjustments of this kind are likely to be found in many other signaling pathways.

In order to function effectively, a living cell must not only synthesize the correct molecules but also put them in the correct place. Understanding how this positioning occurs, and what its consequences are, is a matter of great interest and concern to contemporary biologists. The author here proposes a novel mechanism that will enhance the ability of a bacterial cell to perform chemotaxis—the ability to swim toward sources of food or away from noxious substances. In this hypothesis, a key protein in the chemotaxis pathway moves dynamically between the membrane and the cytoplasm depending on the presence of attractants or repellents. This idea is explored and tested by means of detailed molecular simulations in which all of the relevant molecules are shown in their correct location in the cell. The simulations show that the proposed shift in location of the key molecule will improve the speed, range, and robustness of the cell's response. It seems likely that similar movements of proteins will occur in many other signaling pathways.

Crystal structures of beryllium fluoride-free and beryllium fluoride-bound CheY in complex with the conserved C-terminal peptide of CheZ reveal dual binding modes specific to CheY conformation

Chemotaxis, the environment-specific swimming behavior of a bacterial cell is controlled by flagellar rotation. The steady-state level of the phosphorylated or activated form of the response regulator CheY dictates the direction of flagellar rotation. CheY phosphorylation is regulated by a fine equilibrium of three phosphotransfer activities: phosphorylation by the kinase CheA, its auto-dephosphorylation and dephosphorylation by its phosphatase CheZ. Efficient dephosphorylation of CheY by CheZ requires two spatially distinct protein-protein contacts: tethering of the two proteins to each other and formation of an active site for dephosphorylation. The former involves interaction of phosphorylated CheY with the small highly conserved C-terminal helix of CheZ (CheZ(C)), an indispensable structural component of the functional CheZ protein. To understand how the CheZ(C) helix, representing less than 10% of the full-length protein, ascertains molecular specificity of binding to CheY, we have determined crystal structures of CheY in complex with a synthetic peptide corresponding to 15 C-terminal residues of CheZ (CheZ(200-214)) at resolutions ranging from 2.0 A to 2.3A. These structures provide a detailed view of the CheZ(C) peptide interaction both in the presence and absence of the phosphoryl analog, BeF3-. Our studies reveal that two different modes of binding the CheZ(200-214) peptide are dictated by the conformational state of CheY in the complex. Our structures suggest that the CheZ(C) helix binds to a "meta-active" conformation of inactive CheY and it does so in an orientation that is distinct from the one in which it binds activated CheY. Our dual binding mode hypothesis provides implications for reverse information flow in CheY and extends previous observations on inherent resilience in CheY-like signaling domains.

Systems biology of bacterial chemotaxis

Motile bacteria regulate chemotaxis through a highly conserved chemosensory signal-transduction system. System-wide analyses and mathematical modeling are facilitated by extensive experimental observations regarding bacterial chemotaxis proteins, including biochemical parameters, protein structures and protein-protein interaction maps. Thousands of signaling and regulatory chemotaxis proteins within a bacteria cell form a highly interconnected network through distinct protein-protein interactions. A bacterial cell is able to respond to multiple stimuli through a collection of chemoreceptors with different sensory modalities, which interact to affect the cooperativity and sensitivity of the chemotaxis response. The robustness or insensitivity of the chemotaxis system to perturbations in biochemical parameters is a product of the system's hierarchical network architecture.

Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: evidence for strongly coupled clusters

Receptor coupling is believed to explain the high sensitivity of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis network to small changes in levels of chemoattractant. We compare in detail the activity response of coupled two-state receptors for different models of receptor coupling: weakly-coupled extended one-dimensional and two-dimensional lattice models and the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model of isolated strongly-coupled clusters. We identify features in recent data that distinguish between the models. Specifically, researchers have measured the receptor activity response to steps of chemoattractant for a variety of engineered E. coli strains using in vivo fluorescence resonance energy transfer. We find that the fluorescence resonance energy transfer results for wild-type and for a low-activity mutant are inconsistent with the lattice models of receptor coupling, but consistent with the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model of receptor coupling, suggesting that receptors form isolated strongly-coupled clusters.

Stabilization of polar localization of a chemoreceptor via its covalent modifications and its communication with a different chemoreceptor

In the chemotaxis of Escherichia coli, polar clustering of the chemoreceptors, the histidine kinase CheA, and the adaptor protein CheW is thought to be involved in signal amplification and adaptation. However, the mechanism that leads to the polar localization of the receptor is still largely unknown. In this study, we examined the effect of receptor covalent modification on the polar localization of the aspartate chemoreceptor Tar fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP). Amidation (and presumably methylation) of Tar-GFP enhanced its own polar localization, although the effect was small. The slight but significant effect of amidation on receptor localization was reinforced by the fact that localization of a noncatalytic mutant version of GFP-CheR that targets to the C-terminal pentapeptide sequence of Tar was similarly facilitated by receptor amidation. Polar localization of the demethylated version of Tar-GFP was also enhanced by increasing levels of the serine chemoreceptor Tsr. The effect of covalent modification on receptor localization by itself may be too small to account for chemotactic adaptation, but receptor modification is suggested to contribute to the molecular assembly of the chemoreceptor/histidine kinase array at a cell pole, presumably by stabilizing the receptor dimer-to-dimer interaction.

Clustering requires modified methyl-accepting sites in low-abundance but not high-abundance chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli

Chemotaxis signalling complexes of Escherichia coli, composed of chemoreceptors, CheA and CheW, form clusters located predominantly at cell poles. As the only kind of receptor in a cell, high-abundance receptors are polar and clustered whereas low-abundance chemoreceptors are polar but largely unclustered. We found that clustering was a function of the cytoplasmic, carboxyl-terminal domain and that effective clustering was conferred on low-abundance receptors by addition of the approximately 20-residue sequence from the carboxyl terminus of either high-abundance receptor. These sequences are different but share a carboxyl-terminal pentapeptide that enhances adaptational covalent modification and allows a physiological balance between modified and unmodified methyl-accepting sites, implying that receptor modification might influence clustering. Thus we investigated directly effects of modification state on chemoreceptor clustering. As the sole receptor type in a cell, low-abundance receptors were clustered only if modified, but high-abundance receptors were clustered independent of extent of modification. This difference could mean that the two receptor types are fundamentally different or that they are poised at different positions in the same conformational equilibrium. Notably, no receptor perturbation we tested altered a predominant location at cell poles, emphasizing a distinction between determinants of clustering and polar localization.

High mobility of carboxyl-terminal region of bacterial chemotaxis phosphatase CheZ is diminished upon binding divalent cation or CheY-P substrate

In Escherichia coli chemotaxis, the CheZ phosphatase catalyzes the removal of the phosphoryl group from the signaling molecule, CheY. The cocrystal structure of CheZ with CheY x BeF3- x Mg2+ (a stable analogue of CheY-P) revealed that CheZ is a homodimer with a multidomain, nonglobular structure. To explore the effects of CheZ/CheY complex formation on CheZ structure, the rotational dynamics of the different structural domains of CheZ [the four-helix bundle, the N-terminal helix, the C-terminal helix, and the putative disordered linker between the C-terminal helix and the bundle] were evaluated. To monitor dynamics of the different regions, fluorescein probes were covalently attached at various locations on CheZ through reaction with engineered cysteine residues and the rotational behavior of the fluoresceinated derivatives were assessed using steady state fluorescence anisotropy. Anisotropy measurements at various solution viscosities (Perrin plot analysis) demonstrated large differences in global rotational motion for fluorophores located on different regions. Rotational correlation times for probes located on the four-helix bundle and the N-terminal helix agreed well with theoretical values predicted for a protein the size and shape of the four-helix bundle. However, the rotational correlation times of probes located on the linker and the C-terminal helix were 8-20x lower, indicating rapid motion independent of the bundle. The anisotropies of probes located on the linker and the C-terminal helix increased in the presence of divalent cation (Mg2+, Ca2+, or Mn2+) in a saturable fashion, consistent with a binding event (Kd approximately 1-4 mM) that results in decreased mobility. The anisotropies of probes located on the C-terminal helix and the C-terminal portion of the linker increased further as a result of binding CheY-P. In light of the recently available structural data and the high independent mobility of the C-terminus demonstrated here, we interpret the CheY-P-dependent increase in anisotropy to be a consequence of decreased mobility of the C-terminal region due to binding interactions with CheY-P, and not to the formation of higher order aggregates of the CheZ2(CheY-P)2 complex.

Phosphatase localization in bacterial chemotaxis: divergent mechanisms, convergent principles

Chemotaxis is the process by which cells sense changes in their chemical environment and move towards more favorable conditions. In divergent species of bacteria, the chemotaxis proteins localize to the poles of the cell and information is transferred to the flagellar motors through the phosphorylation of a soluble protein CheY. Using mathematical models and computer simulation, we demonstrate that phosphatase localization controls the spatial distribution of CheY-P in the cytosol at steady state. Remarkably, the location of the phosphatase is not conserved in different species of bacteria. The sole phosphatase in Escherichia coli is localized with the signaling complex and the primary phosphatase in Bacillus subtilis is localized at the flagellar motors. Despite these alternate pathway structures, both designs minimize differences in the concentration of phosphorylated CheY proximal to each motor unlike a design where the phosphatase is freely diffusing in the cytoplasm. These results suggest that motile bacteria have evolved alternate mechanisms to ensure that each motor receives roughly the same signal at steady state. The hypothesis is that complex networks have evolved to satisfy certain design principles in order to function robustly. While specific mechanisms are different, the underlying principles of phosphatase localization in E. coli and B. subtilis appear to be the same.

Tryptophan residues flanking the second transmembrane helix (TM2) set the signaling state of the Tar chemoreceptor

The chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli are homodimeric membrane proteins that cluster in patches near the cell poles. They convert environmental stimuli into intracellular signals that control flagellar rotation. The functional domains of a receptor are physically separated by the cell membrane. Chemoeffectors bind to the extracellular (periplasmic) domain, and the cytoplasmic domain mediates signaling and adaptation. These two domains communicate through the second transmembrane helix (TM2) that connects them. In the high-abundance receptors Tar and Tsr, TM2 is flanked by tryptophan residues, which should localize preferentially to the interfacial zone between the polar and hydrophobic layers of the phospholipid bilayer. To investigate the functional significance of the Trp residues that flank TM2 of Tar, we used site-directed mutagenesis to generate the W192A and W209A substitutions. The W192A protein retains full activity in vivo and in vitro, but it increases the K(i) for aspartate in the in vitro assay 3-fold. The W209A replacement eliminates receptor-mediated stimulation of CheA in vitro, and it leads to an increased level of adaptive methylation in vivo. This phenotype in some respects mimics the changes seen upon binding aspartate. Since the W209A substitution may cause the C-terminus of TM2 to protrude farther into the cytoplasm, these results reinforce the hypothesis that aspartate binding causes a similar displacement. Moving Trp to each position from residue 206 to residue 212 generated a wide variety of Tar signaling states that are generally consistent with the predictions of the piston model of transmembrane signaling. None of these receptors was completely locked in one signaling mode, although most showed pronounced signaling biases. Our findings suggest that the Trp residues flanking TM2, especially Trp-209, are important in setting the baseline activity and ligand sensitivity of the Tar receptor. We also conclude that the Tyr-210 residue plays at least an auxiliary role in this control.

Receptor clustering and signal processing in E. coli chemotaxis

Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli is one of the most thoroughly studied model systems for signal transduction. Receptor-kinase complexes, organized in clusters at the cell poles, sense chemoeffector stimuli and transmit signals to flagellar motors by phosphorylation of a diffusible response regulator protein. Despite the apparent simplicity of the signal transduction pathway, the high sensitivity, wide dynamic range and integration of multiple stimuli of this pathway remain unexplained. Recent advances in computer modeling and in quantitative experimental analysis suggest that cooperative protein interactions in receptor clusters play a crucial role in the signal processing during bacterial chemotaxis.

Simulated diffusion of phosphorylated CheY through the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli

We describe the use of a computational model to study the effects of cellular architecture and macromolecular crowding on signal transduction in Escherichia coli chemotaxis. A newly developed program, Smoldyn, allows the movement and interaction of a large number of individual molecules in a structured environment to be simulated (S. S. Andrews and D. Bray, Phys. Biol., in press). With Smoldyn, we constructed a three-dimensional model of an E. coli cell and examined the diffusion of CheYp from the cluster of receptors to the flagellar motors under control conditions and in response to attractant and repellent stimuli. Our simulations agree well with experimental observations of cell swimming responses and are consistent with the diffusive behavior expected in wild-type and mutant cells. The high resolution available to us in the new program allows us to calculate the loci of individual CheYp molecules in a cell and the distribution of their lifetimes under different cellular conditions. We find that the time delay between stimulus and response differs for flagellar motors located at different positions in the cell. We explore different possible locations for the phosphatase CheZ and show conditions under which a gradient of CheYp exists in the cell. The introduction of inert blocks into the cytoplasm, representing impenetrable structures such as the nucleoid and large protein complexes, produces a fall in the apparent diffusion coefficient of CheYp and enhances the differences between motors. These and other results are left as predictions for future experiments.

Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis

Motile bacteria respond to environmental cues to move to more favorable locations. The components of the chemotaxis signal transduction systems that mediate these responses are highly conserved among prokaryotes including both eubacterial and archael species. The best-studied system is that found in Escherichia coli. Attractant and repellant chemicals are sensed through their interactions with transmembrane chemoreceptor proteins that are localized in multimeric assemblies at one or both cell poles together with a histidine protein kinase, CheA, an SH3-like adaptor protein, CheW, and a phosphoprotein phosphatase, CheZ. These multimeric protein assemblies act to control the level of phosphorylation of a response regulator, CheY, which dictates flagellar motion. Bacterial chemotaxis is one of the most-understood signal transduction systems, and many biochemical and structural details of this system have been elucidated. This is an exciting field of study because the depth of knowledge now allows the detailed molecular mechanisms of transmembrane signaling and signal processing to be investigated.

Single-cell FRET imaging of phosphatase activity in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis system

Two-component signaling systems, in which a receptor-coupled kinase is used to control the phosphorylation level of a response regulator, are commonly used in bacteria to sense their environment. In the chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli, the receptors, and thus the kinase, are clustered on the inner cell membrane. The phosphatase of this system also is recruited to receptor clusters, but the reason for this association is not clear. By using FRET imaging of single cells, we show that in vivo the phosphatase activity is substantially larger at the cluster, indicating that the signaling source (the kinase) and the signaling sink (the phosphatase) tend to be located at the same place in the cell. When this association is disrupted, a gradient in the concentration of the phosphorylated response regulator appears, and the chemotactic response is degraded. Such colocalization is inevitable in systems in which the activity of the kinase and the phosphatase are produced by the same enzyme. Evidently, this design enables a more rapid and spatially uniform response.

Effect of chemoreceptor modification on assembly and activity of the receptor-kinase complex in Escherichia coli

Bacterial chemoreceptors are embedded in the inner cell membrane in tight clusters. We show that changes in receptor methylation that generate large changes in kinase activity have relatively little effect on cluster morphology. Thus, changes in receptor activity do not appear to be mediated by changes in receptor-kinase assembly.

The accessibility of cys-120 in CheA(S) is important for the binding of CheZ and enhancement of CheZ phosphatase activity

The cheA gene of Escherichia coli encodes two proteins from in-frame tandem translation start sites. The long form of CheA (CheA(L)) is the histidine kinase responsible for phosphorylating the response regulator, CheY. The short form of CheA (CheA(S)) is identical in domain structure to CheA(L) except that it is missing the first 97 amino acids. Reduced CheA(S) bound to and enhanced the activity of the phosphatase of phospho-CheY, CheZ. Oxidized CheA(S) was unable to interact with CheZ. Oxidized CheA(S) formed covalent dimers, whereas CheA(L) did not. This property was believed to be the result of an intermolecular disulfide bond. The CheA proteins contain three cysteine residues, one of which likely lies within the CheZ binding region of CheA(S) and is exposed to solvent. We identified the CheZ binding domain of CheA(S) by testing the various fragments of CheA(S) that contain cysteine residues for CheZ binding activity in an ELISA-based CheA(S)-CheZ binding assay. Fragments of CheA(S) lacking the truncated P1 domain of CheA(S) ('P1) were unable to bind CheZ. We also found that a fusion of the first 42 amino acids of CheA(S) ('P1 domain) to GST bound CheZ and enhanced its activity. The interaction between the GST-CheA[98-139] fusion protein and CheZ was dependent on the accessibility of a cysteine residue (Cys-120) located in the 'P1 domain.

Diversity in chemotaxis mechanisms among the bacteria and archaea

The study of chemotaxis describes the cellular processes that control the movement of organisms toward favorable environments. In bacteria and archaea, motility is controlled by a two-component system involving a histidine kinase that senses the environment and a response regulator, a very common type of signal transduction in prokaryotes. Most insights into the processes involved have come from studies of Escherichia coli over the last three decades. However, in the last 10 years, with the sequencing of many prokaryotic genomes, it has become clear that E. coli represents a streamlined example of bacterial chemotaxis. While general features of excitation remain conserved among bacteria and archaea, specific features, such as adaptational processes and hydrolysis of the intracellular signal CheY-P, are quite diverse. The Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis system is considerably more complex and appears to be similar to the one that existed when the bacteria and archaea separated during evolution, so that understanding this mechanism should provide insight into the variety of mechanisms used today by the broad sweep of chemotactic bacteria and archaea. However, processes even beyond those used in E. coli and B. subtilis have been discovered in other organisms. This review emphasizes those used by B. subtilis and these other organisms but also gives an account of the mechanism in E. coli.

Cellular stoichiometry of the components of the chemotaxis signaling complex

The chemotactic sensory system of Escherichia coli comprises membrane-embedded chemoreceptors and six soluble chemotaxis (Che) proteins. These components form signaling complexes that mediate sensory excitation and adaptation. Previous determinations of cellular content of individual components provided differing and apparently conflicting values. We used quantitative immunoblotting to perform comprehensive determinations of cellular amounts of all components in two E. coli strains considered wild type for chemotaxis, grown in rich and minimal media. Cellular amounts varied up to 10-fold, but ratios between proteins varied no more than 30%. Thus, cellular stoichiometries were almost constant as amounts varied substantially. Calculations using those cellular stoichiometries and values for in vivo proportions of core components in complexes yielded an in vivo stoichiometry for core complexes of 3.4 receptor dimers and 1.6 CheW monomers for each CheA dimer and 2.4 CheY, 0.5 CheZ dimers, 0.08 CheB, and 0.05 CheR per complex. The values suggest a core unit of a trimer of chemoreceptor dimers, a dimer (or two monomers) of kinase CheA, and two CheW. These components may interact in extended arrays and, thus, stoichiometries could be nonintegral. In any case, cellular stoichiometries indicate that CheY could be bound to all signaling complexes and this binding would recruit essentially the entire cellular complement of unphosphorylated CheY, and also that phosphatase CheZ, methylesterase CheB, and methyltransferase CheR would be present at 1 per 2, per 14, and per 20 core complexes, respectively. These characteristic ratios will be important in quantitative treatments of chemotaxis, both experimental and theoretical.

Distributed subunit interactions in CheA contribute to dimer stability: a sedimentation equilibrium study

The structural domains of the Escherichia coli CheA protein resemble 'beads on a string', since the N-terminal phosphate-accepting (P) domain is joined to the CheY/CheB-binding (B) domain through a flexible linker, and the B domain is in turn joined to the C-terminal dimerization/catalytic/regulatory domains by a second intervening linker. Dimerization occurs primarily via interactions between two dimerization domains, which is required for CheA trans-autophosphorylation. In this study, sedimentation equilibrium was used to demonstrate significant subunit interactions at secondary sites in the two naturally occurring (full-length and short) forms of CheA (CheA(1-654) or CheA(L), and CheA(98-654) or CheA(S)) by contrasting the dimerization of CheA(L) and CheA(S) to CheA(T), an engineered form that lacked the P domain entirely. The estimated dimer dissociation constant (K(1,2)) for CheA(T) (3.1 microM) was weaker than K(1,2) for CheA(L) (0.49 microM), which was attributed to the P domain-catalytic domain interactions that were present in CheA(L) but not CheA(T). In contrast, CheA(S) dimerization was unexpectedly stronger (K(1,2) approximately 20 nM), which arose through interactions between two P domain remnants in the CheA(S) dimer. This conclusion was supported by the results of sedimentation equilibrium experiments conducted with P domains and P domain remnants expressed in the absence of the dimerization/catalytic/regulatory domains. The P domain remnant had a measurable tendency to self-associate; the full-length P domain did not. Hydrophobic forces probably drive this interaction, since hydrophobic amino acids buried in the intact P domain are solvent-exposed in CheA(S). Also, the nascent N-terminus of CheA(S) bound to the phosphatase (CheZ) more effectively, a conclusion based on the demonstrably greater ability of the P domain remnant to co-sediment CheZ, compared to the intact P domain.

Proteomic screening and identification of differentially distributed membrane proteins in Escherichia coli

Bacteria show asymmetric subcellular distribution of many proteins involved in diverse cellular processes such as chemotaxis, motility, actin polymerization, chromosome partitioning and cell division. In many cases, the specific subcellular localization of these proteins is critical for proper regulation and function. Although cellular organization of the bacterial cell clearly plays an important role in cell physiology, systematic studies to uncover asymmetrically distributed proteins have not been reported previously. In this study, we undertook a proteomics approach to uncover polar membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. We identified membrane proteins enriched in E. coli minicells using a combination of two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Among a total of 173 membrane protein spots that were consistently detected, 36 spots were enriched in minicell membranes, whereas 15 spots were more abundant in rod cell membranes. The minicell-enriched proteins included the inner membrane proteins MCPs, AtpA, AtpB, YiaF and AcrA, the membrane-associated FtsZ protein and the outer membrane proteins YbhC, OmpW, Tsx, Pal, FadL, OmpT and BtuB. We immunolocalized two of the minicell-enriched proteins, OmpW and YiaF, and showed that OmpW is a bona fide polar protein whereas YiaF displays a patchy membrane distribution with a polar and septal bias.

Bacillus subtilis CheC and FliY are members of a novel class of CheY-P-hydrolyzing proteins in the chemotactic signal transduction cascade

Rapid restoration of prestimulus levels of the chemotactic response regulator, CheY-P, is important for preparing bacteria and archaea to respond sensitively to new stimuli. In an extension of previous work (Szurmant, H., Bunn, M. W., Cannistraro, V. J., and Ordal, G. W. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 48611-48616), we describe a new family of CheY-P phosphatases, the CYX family, that is widespread among the bacteria and archaea. These proteins provide another pathway, in addition to the ones involving CheZ of the gamma- and beta-proteobacteria (e.g. Escherichia coli) or the alternative CheY that serves as a "phosphate sink" among the alpha-proteobacteria (e.g. Sinorhizobium meliloti), for dephosphorylating CheY-P. In particular, we identify CheC, known previously to be involved in adaptation to stimuli in Bacillus subtilis, as a CheY-P phosphatase. Using an in vitro assay used previously to demonstrate that the switch protein FliY is a CheY-P phosphatase, we have shown that increasing amounts of CheC accelerate the hydrolysis of CheY-P. In vivo, a double mutant lacking cheC and the region of fliY that encodes the CheY-P binding domain is almost completely smooth swimming, implying that these cells contain very high levels of CheY-P. CheC appears to be primarily involved in restoring normal CheY-P levels following the addition of attractant, whereas FliY seems to act on CheY-P constitutively. The activity of CheC is relatively low compared to that of FliY, but we have shown that the chemotaxis protein CheD enhances the activity of CheC 5-fold. We suggest a model for how FliY, CheC, and CheD work together to regulate CheY-P levels in the bacterium.

FimX, a multidomain protein connecting environmental signals to twitching motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Twitching motility is a form of surface translocation mediated by the extension, tethering, and retraction of type IV pili. Three independent Tn5-B21 mutations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with reduced twitching motility were identified in a new locus which encodes a predicted protein of unknown function annotated PA4959 in the P. aeruginosa genome sequence. Complementation of these mutants with the wild-type PA4959 gene, which we designated fimX, restored normal twitching motility. fimX mutants were found to express normal levels of pilin and remained sensitive to pilus-specific bacteriophages, but they exhibited very low levels of surface pili, suggesting that normal pilus function was impaired. The fimX gene product has a molecular weight of 76,000 and contains four predicted domains that are commonly found in signal transduction proteins: a putative response regulator (CheY-like) domain, a PAS-PAC domain (commonly involved in environmental sensing), and DUF1 (or GGDEF) and DUF2 (or EAL) domains, which are thought to be involved in cyclic di-GMP metabolism. Red fluorescent protein fusion experiments showed that FimX is located at one pole of the cell via sequences adjacent to its CheY-like domain. Twitching motility in fimX mutants was found to respond relatively normally to a range of environmental factors but could not be stimulated by tryptone and mucin. These data suggest that fimX is involved in the regulation of twitching motility in response to environmental cues.

Template-Directed Assembly of Receptor Signaling Complexes

Transmembrane receptors in the signaling pathways of bacterial chemotaxis systems influence cell motility by forming noncovalent complexes with the cytoplasmic signaling proteins to regulate their activity. The requirements for receptor-mediated activation of CheA, the principal kinase of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis signaling pathway, were investigated using self-assembled clusters of a receptor fragment (CF) derived from the cytoplasmic domain of the aspartate receptor, Tar. Histidine-tagged Tar CF was assembled on the surface of sonicated unilamellar vesicles via a lipid containing the nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid moiety as a headgroup. In the presence of the adaptor protein CheW, CheA bound to and was activated approximately 180-fold by vesicle-bound CF. The extent of CheA activation was found to be independent of the level of covalent modification on the CF. Instead, the stability of the complex increased significantly as the level of covalent modification increased. Surface-assembled CF was also found to serve as a substrate for receptor methylation in a reaction catalyzed by the receptor methyltransferase, CheR. Since neither CheA activation nor CF methylation was observed in comparable samples in the absence of vesicles, it is concluded that surface templating generates the organization among CF subunits required for biochemical activity.

Targeting of two signal transduction pathways to different regions of the bacterial cell

Components of bacterial chemosensory pathways which sense via transmembrane receptors have been shown to localize to the cell poles. Many species, however, have operons encoding multiple putative chemosensory pathways, some including putative cytoplasmic receptors. In-genome fusions to single or multiple genes encoding components of two chemosensory pathways in Rhodobacter sphaeroides, cheOp2 and cheOp3, revealed that while sensory transducing proteins associated with transmembrane receptors and encoded on cheOp2 were targeted to the cell poles, the proteins associated with putative cytoplasmic receptors and encoded on cheOp3 were all targeted to a cytoplasmic cluster. No proteins were localized to both sites. These data show that bacteria target components of related pathways to different sites in the cell, presumably preventing direct cross-talk between the different pathways, but allowing a balanced response between extracellular and cytoplasmic signals. It also indicates that there is intracellular organization in bacterial cells, with specific proteins targeted and localized to cytoplasmic regions.

Electron microscopic analysis of membrane assemblies formed by the bacterial chemotaxis receptor Tsr

The serine receptor (Tsr) from Escherichia coli is representative of a large family of transmembrane receptor proteins that mediate bacterial chemotaxis by influencing cell motility through signal transduction pathways. Tsr and other chemotaxis receptors form patches in the inner membrane that are often localized at the poles of the bacteria. In an effort to understand the structural constraints that dictate the packing of receptors in the plane of the membrane, we have used electron microscopy to examine ordered assemblies of Tsr in membrane extracts isolated from cells engineered to overproduce the receptor. Three types of assemblies were observed: ring-like "micelles" with a radial arrangement of receptor subunits, two-dimensional crystalline arrays with approximate hexagonal symmetry, and "zippers," which are receptor bilayers that result from the antiparallel interdigitation of cytoplasmic domains. The registration among Tsr molecules in the micelle and zipper assemblies was sufficient for identification of the receptor domains and for determination of their contributions to the total receptor length. The overall result of this analysis is compatible with an atomic model of the receptor dimer that was constructed primarily from the X-ray crystal structures of the periplasmic and cytoplasmic domains. Significantly, the micelle and zipper structures were also observed in fixed, cryosectioned cells expressing the Tsr receptor at high abundance, suggesting that the modes of Tsr assembly found in vitro are relevant to the situation in the cell.

A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis

We have developed a microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis in which a gradient of chemoeffectors is established inside a microchannel via diffusion between parallel streams of liquid in laminar flow. The random motility and chemotactic responses to L-aspartate, L-serine, L-leucine, and Ni(2+) of WT and chemotactic-mutant strains of Escherichia coli were measured. Migration of the cells was quantified by counting the cells accumulating in each of 22 outlet ports. The sensitivity of the assay is attested to by the significant response of WT cells to 3.2 nM L-aspartate, a concentration three orders of magnitude lower than the detection limit in the standard capillary assay. The response to repellents was as robust and easily recorded as the attractant response. A surprising discovery was that L-leucine is sensed by Tar as an attractant at low concentrations and by Tsr as a repellent at higher concentrations. This assay offers superior performance and convenience relative to the existing assays to measure bacterial tactic responses, and it is flexible enough to be used in a wide range of different applications.