An intact Raf zinc finger is required for optimal binding to processed Ras and for ras-dependent Raf activation in situ

Microtubule integrity regulates Pak leading to Ras-independent activation of Raf-1. insights into mechanisms of Raf-1 activation

Growth factors activate Raf-1 by engaging a complex program, which requires Ras binding, membrane recruitment, and phosphorylation of Raf-1. The present study employs the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole as an alternative approach to explore the mechanisms of Raf activation. Incubation of cells with nocodazole leads to activation of Pak1/2, kinases downstream of small GTPases Rac/Cdc42, which have been previously indicated to phosphorylate Raf-1 Ser(338). Nocodazole-induced stimulation of Raf-1 is augmented by co-expression of small GTPases Rac/Cdc42 and Pak1/2. Dominant negative mutants of these proteins block activation of Raf-1 by nocodazole, but not by epidermal growth factor (EGF). Thus, our studies define Rac/Cdc42/Pak as a module upstream of Raf-1 during its activation by microtubule disruption. Although it is Ras-independent, nocodazole-induced activation of Raf-1 appears to involve the amino-terminal regulatory region in which the integrity of the Ras binding domain is required. Surprisingly, the Raf zinc finger mutation (C165S/C168S) causes a robust activation of Raf-1 by nocodazole, whereas it diminishes Ras-dependent activation of Raf-1. We also show that mutation of residues Ser(338) to Ala or Tyr(340)-Tyr(341) to Phe-Phe immediately amino-terminal to the catalytic domain abrogates activation of both the wild type and zinc finger mutant Raf by both EGF/4beta-12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate and nocodazole. Finally, an in vitro kinase assay demonstrates that the zinc finger mutant serves as a better substrate of Pak1 than the wild type Raf-1. Collectively, our results indicate that 1) the zinc finger exerts an inhibitory effect on Raf-1 activation, probably by preventing phosphorylation of (338)SSYY(341); 2) such inhibition is first overcome by an unknown factor binding in place of Ras-GTP to the amino-terminal regulatory region in response to nocodazole; and 3) EGF and nocodazole utilize different kinases to phosphorylate Ser(338), an event crucial for Raf activation.

Protein phosphatases 1 and 2A promote Raf-1 activation by regulating 14-3-3 interactions

Raf-1 activation is a complex process which involves plasma membrane recruitment, phosphorylation, protein-protein and lipid-protein interactions. We now show that PP1 and PP2A serine-threonine phosphatases also have a positive role in Ras dependent Raf-1 activation. General serine-threonine phosphatase inhibitors such sodium fluoride, or ss-glycerophosphate and sodium pyrophosphate, or specific PP1 and PP2A inhibitors including microcystin-LR, protein phosphatase 2A inhibitor I(1) or protein phosphatase inhibitor 2 all abrogate H-Ras and K-Ras dependent Raf-1 activation in vitro. A critical Raf-1 target residue for PP1 and PP2A is S259. Serine phosphatase inhibitors block the dephosphorylation of S259, which accompanies Raf-1 activation, and Ras dependent activation of mutant Raf259A is relatively resistant to serine phosphatase inhibitors. Sucrose gradient analysis demonstrates that serine phosphatase inhibition increases the total amount of 14-3-3 and Raf-1 associated with the plasma membrane and significantly alters the distribution of 14-3-3 and Raf-1 across different plasma membrane microdomains. These observations suggest that dephosphorylation of S259 is a critical early step in Ras dependent Raf-1 activation which facilitates 14-3-3 displacement. Inhibition of PP1 and PP2A therefore causes plasma membrane accumulation of Raf-1/14-3-3 complexes which cannot be activated.

Meaningful relationships: the regulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by protein interactions

The Ras/Raf/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase)/ERK (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase) pathway is at the heart of signalling networks that govern proliferation, differentiation and cell survival. Although the basic regulatory steps have been elucidated, many features of this pathway are only beginning to emerge. This review focuses on the role of protein-protein interactions in the regulation of this pathway, and how they contribute to co-ordinate activation steps, subcellular redistribution, substrate phosphorylation and cross-talk with other signalling pathways.

Meaningful relationships: the regulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by protein interactions

The Ras/Raf/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase)/ERK (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase) pathway is at the heart of signalling networks that govern proliferation, differentiation and cell survival. Although the basic regulatory steps have been elucidated, many features of this pathway are only beginning to emerge. This review focuses on the role of protein-protein interactions in the regulation of this pathway, and how they contribute to co-ordinate activation steps, subcellular redistribution, substrate phosphorylation and cross-talk with other signalling pathways.

Meaningful relationships: the regulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by protein interactions

The Ras/Raf/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase)/ERK (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase) pathway is at the heart of signalling networks that govern proliferation, differentiation and cell survival. Although the basic regulatory steps have been elucidated, many features of this pathway are only beginning to emerge. This review focuses on the role of protein-protein interactions in the regulation of this pathway, and how they contribute to co-ordinate activation steps, subcellular redistribution, substrate phosphorylation and cross-talk with other signalling pathways.

Meaningful relationships: the regulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by protein interactions

The Ras/Raf/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase)/ERK (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase) pathway is at the heart of signalling networks that govern proliferation, differentiation and cell survival. Although the basic regulatory steps have been elucidated, many features of this pathway are only beginning to emerge. This review focuses on the role of protein-protein interactions in the regulation of this pathway, and how they contribute to co-ordinate activation steps, subcellular redistribution, substrate phosphorylation and cross-talk with other signalling pathways.

A novel assay for the measurement of Raf-1 kinase activity

Raf-1 is a serine-threonine protein kinase that functions as a central component of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway. Raf-1 activity is currently assayed in vitro by either measuring 32P incorporation into MEK, Raf-1's only characterized substrate, or by using the phosphorylated MEK to initiate a coupled assay culminating in the phosphorylation of myelin basic protein by MAP kinase. These assays are plagued by a potential lack of specificity in the case of the former, and the time consuming and error-prone nature of the later indirect assay. In this report, we demonstrate a novel single step assay for Raf-1 kinase activity based on phosphorylation of recombinant MEK-1, detected using an activation-specific MEK antibody that recognizes MEK only when specifically phosphorylated by Raf-1 on Ser 217 and Ser 221. The assay readily detected stem cell factor-mediated Raf-1 activation. MEK phosphorylation by immunoprecipitated Raf-1 plateaued at 10 min following initiation of the kinase reaction and was completely dependent on the inclusion of Raf-1. There was a linear correlation between the degree of MEK phosphorylation and the amount of Raf-1 protein immunoprecipitated. In addition to detecting growth factor-mediated activation, the assay was also able to detect paclitaxel-mediated Raf-1 activation. This assay is rapid, sensitive, and specific and therefore is a marked improvement over currently utilized techniques.

Mutation of Ha-Ras C terminus changes effector pathway utilization

In PC12 cells, Ha-Ras modulates multiple effector proteins that induce neuronal differentiation. To regulate these pathways Ha-Ras must be located at the plasma membrane, a process normally requiring attachment of farnesyl and palmitate lipids to the C terminus. Ext61L, a constitutively activated and palmitoylated Ha-Ras that lacks a farnesyl group, induced neurites with more actin cytoskeletal changes and lamellipodia than were induced by farnesylated Ha-Ras61L. Ext61L-triggered neurite outgrowth was prevented easily by co-expressing inhibitory Rho, Cdc42, or p21-activated kinase but required increased amounts of inhibitory Rac. Compared with Ha-Ras61L, Ext61L caused 2-fold greater Rac GTP binding and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity in membranes, a hyperactivation that explained the numerous lamellipodia and ineffectiveness of Rac(N17). In contrast, Ext61L activated B-Raf kinase and ERK phosphorylation more poorly than Ha-Ras61L. Thus, accentuated differentiation by Ext61L apparently results from heightened activation of one Ras effector (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase) and suboptimal activation of another (B-Raf). This surprising unbalanced effector activation, without changes in the designated Ras effector domain, indicates the Ext61L C-terminal alternations are a new way to influence Ha-Ras-effector utilization and suggest a broader role of the lipidated C terminus in Ha-Ras biological functions.

Elucidation of binding determinants and functional consequences of Ras/Raf-cysteine-rich domain interactions

Raf-1 is a critical downstream target of Ras and contains two distinct domains that bind Ras. The first Ras-binding site (RBS1) in Raf-1 has been shown to be essential for Ras-mediated translocation of Raf-1 to the plasma membrane, whereas the second site, in the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain (Raf-CRD), has been implicated in regulating Raf kinase activity. While recognition elements that promote Ras.RBS1 complex formation have been characterized, relatively little is known about Ras/Raf-CRD interactions. In this study, we have characterized interactions important for Ras binding to the Raf-CRD. Reconciling conflicting reports, we found that these interactions are essentially independent of the guanine nucleotide bound state, but instead, are enhanced by post-translational modification of Ras. Specifically, our findings indicate that Ras farnesylation is sufficient for stable association of Ras with the Raf-CRD. Furthermore, we have also identified a Raf-CRD variant that is impaired specifically in its interactions with Ras. NMR data also suggests that residues proximal to this mutation site on the Raf-CRD form contacts with Ras. This Raf-CRD mutant impairs the ability of Ras to activate Raf kinase, thereby providing additional support that Ras interactions with the Raf-CRD are important for Ras-mediated activation of Raf-1.

Activation of H-ras61L-specific signaling pathways does not require posttranslational processing of H-ras

We have previously demonstrated that H-ras61L retained transforming activity when lacking C-terminal lipid modifications, provided that plasma membrane localization was restored by an N-terminal transmembrane domain. Since several ras-activated pathways contribute to the transformed phenotype, we utilized a novel set of transmembrane domain-anchored H-ras derivatives to examine if lipids are required for activation of any specific signaling pathways. We demonstrate here that H-ras61L-induced activation of the Raf/MEK/MAPK pathway, including recruitment of Raf to the plasma membrane and activation of Raf and MAPK, does not require C-terminal processing of H-ras61L. Biochemical fractionation experiments confirm the localization of TM-ras derivatives to the plasma membrane, as well as the ras-mediated recruitment of c-Raf-1. Changes in the actin cytoskeleton, controlled by H-ras61L-mediated activation of the Rac/ Rho pathway, as well as PI 3-kinase activation, can also occur in the absence of C-terminal lipid modifications. Finally, downstream events, such as the induction of the immediate-early gene c-fos or neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells, are stimulated by the expression of plasma membrane-anchored, nonlipidated H-ras6lL. These results demonstrate that H-ras can be functionally targeted to the plasma membrane using a transmembrane domain sequence and that several signal transduction pathways downstream of H-ras can be activated without the presence of normal lipid modifications.

Regulation of the protein kinase Raf-1 by oncogenic Ras through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, Cdc42/Rac and Pak

Activation of the protein kinase Raf-1 is a complex process involving association with the GTP-bound form of Ras (Ras-GTP), membrane translocation and both serine/threonine and tyrosine phosphorylation (reviewed in [1]). We have reported previously that p21-activated kinase 3 (Pak3) upregulates Raf-1 through direct phosphorylation on Ser338 [2]. Here, we investigated the origin of the signal for Pak-mediated Raf-1 activation by examining the role of the small GTPase Cdc42, Rac and Ras, and of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase. Pak3 acted synergistically with either Cdc42V12 or Rac1V12 to stimulate the activities of Raf-1, Raf-CX, a membrane-localized Raf-1 mutant, and Raf-1 mutants defective in Ras binding. Raf-1 mutants defective in Ras binding were also readily activated by RasV12. This indirect activation of Raf-1 by Ras was blocked by a dominant-negative mutant of Pak, implicating an alternative Ras effector pathway in Pak-mediated Raf-1 activation. Subsequently, we show that Pak-mediated Raf-1 activation is upregulated by both RasV12C40, a selective activator of PI 3-kinase, and p110-CX, a constitutively active PI 3-kinase. In addition, p85Delta, a mutant of the PI 3-kinase regulatory subunit, inhibited the stimulated activity of Raf-1. Pharmacological inhibitors of PI 3-kinase also blocked both activation and Ser338 phosphorylation of Raf-1 induced by epidermal growth factor (EGF). Thus, Raf-1 activation by Ras is achieved through a combination of both physical interaction and indirect mechanisms involving the activation of a second Ras effector, PI 3-kinase, which directs Pak-mediated regulatory phosphorylation of Raf-1.

P(2Y) purinoceptor subtypes recruit different mek activators in astrocytes

Extracellular ATP can function as a glial trophic factor as well as a neuronal transmitter. In astrocytes, mitogenic signalling by ATP is mediated by metabotropic P(2Y) receptors that are linked to the extracellular signal regulated protein kinase (Erk) cascade, but the types of P(2Y) receptors expressed in astrocytes have not been defined and it is not known whether all P(2Y) receptor subtypes are coupled to Erk by identical or distinct signalling pathways. We found that the P(2Y) receptor agonists ATP, ADP, UTP and 2-methylthioATP (2MeSATP) activated Erk and its upstream activator MAP/Erk kinase (Mek). cRaf-1, the first kinase in the Erk cascade, was activated by 2MeSATP, ADP and UTP but, surprisingly, cRaf-1 was not stimulated by ATP. Furthermore, ATP did not activate B-Raf, the major isoform of Raf in the brain, nor other Mek activators such as Mek kinase 1 (MekK1) and MekK2/3. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT - PCR) studies using primer pairs for cloned rat P(2Y) receptors revealed that rat cortical astrocytes express P(2Y(1)), a receptor subtype stimulated by ATP and ADP and their 2MeS analogues, as well as P(2Y(2)) and P(2Y(4)), subtypes in rats for which ATP and UTP are equipotent. Transcripts for P(2Y(6)), a pyrimidine-preferring receptor, were not detected. ATP did not increase cyclic AMP levels, suggesting that P(2Y(11)), an ATP-preferring receptor, is not expressed or is not linked to adenylyl cyclase in rat cortical astrocytes. These signal transduction and RT - PCR experiments reveal differences in the activation of cRaf-1 by P(2Y) receptor agonists that are inconsistent with properties of the P(2Y(1)), P(2Y(2)) and P(2Y(4)) receptors shown to be expressed in astrocytes, i.e. ATP=UTP; ATP=2MeSATP, ADP. This suggests that the properties of the native P(2Y) receptors coupled to the Erk cascade differ from the recombinant P(2Y) receptors or that astrocytes express novel purine-preferring and pyrimidine-preferring receptors coupled to the ERK cascade.

Oxidative stress and gene regulation

Reactive oxygen species are produced by all aerobic cells and are widely believed to play a pivotal role in aging as well as a number of degenerative diseases. The consequences of the generation of oxidants in cells does not appear to be limited to promotion of deleterious effects. Alterations in oxidative metabolism have long been known to occur during differentiation and development. Experimental perturbations in cellular redox state have been shown to exert a strong impact on these processes. The discovery of specific genes and pathways affected by oxidants led to the hypothesis that reactive oxygen species serve as subcellular messengers in gene regulatory and signal transduction pathways. Additionally, antioxidants can activate numerous genes and pathways. The burgeoning growth in the number of pathways shown to be dependent on oxidation or antioxidation has accelerated during the last decade. In the discussion presented here, we provide a tabular summary of many of the redox effects on gene expression and signaling pathways that are currently known to exist.

Association of yeast adenylyl cyclase with cyclase-associated protein CAP forms a second Ras-binding site which mediates its Ras-dependent activation

Posttranslational modification, in particular farnesylation, of Ras is crucial for activation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae adenylyl cyclase (CYR1). Based on the previous observation that association of CYR1 with cyclase-associated protein (CAP) is essential for its activation by posttranslationally modified Ras, we postulated that the associated CAP might contribute to the formation of a Ras-binding site of CYR1, which mediates CYR1 activation, other than the primary Ras-binding site, the leucine-rich repeat domain. Here, we observed a posttranslational modification-dependent association of Ras with a complex between CAP and CYR1 C-terminal region. When CAP mutants defective in Ras signaling but retaining the CYR1-binding activity were isolated by screening of a pool of randomly mutagenized CAP, CYR1 complexed with two of the obtained three mutants failed to be activated efficiently by modified Ras and exhibited a severely impaired ability to bind Ras, providing a genetic evidence for the importance of the physical association with Ras at the second Ras-binding site. On the other hand, CYR1, complexed with the other CAP mutant, failed to be activated by Ras but exhibited a greatly enhanced binding to Ras. Conversely, a Ras mutant E31K, which exhibits a greatly enhanced binding to the CYR1-CAP complex, failed to activate CYR1 efficiently. Thus, the strength of interaction at the second Ras-binding site appears to be a critical determinant of CYR1 regulation by Ras: too-weak and too-strong interactions are both detrimental to CYR1 activation. These results, taken together with those obtained with mammalian Raf, suggest the importance of the second Ras-binding site in effector regulation.

Farnesylation of Ras is important for the interaction with phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma

The correct functioning of Ras proteins requires post-translational modification of the GTP hydrolases (GTPases). These modifications provide hydrophobic moieties that lead to the attachment of Ras to the inner side of the plasma membrane. In this study we investigated the role of Ras processing in the interaction with various putative Ras-effector proteins. We describe a specific, GTP-independent interaction between post-translationally modified Ha- and Ki-Ras4B and the G-protein responsive phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110gamma. Our data demonstrate that post-translational processing increases markedly the binding of Ras to p110gamma in vitro and in Sf9 cells, whereas the interaction with p110alpha is unaffected under the same conditions. Using in vitro farnesylated Ras, we show that farnesylation of Ras is sufficient to produce this effect. The complex of p110gamma and farnesylated RasGTP exhibits a reduced dissociation rate leading to the efficient shielding of the GTPase from GTPase activating protein (GAP) action. Moreover, Ras processing affects the dissociation rate of the RasGTP complex with the Ras binding domain (RBD) of Raf-1, indicating that processing induces alterations in the conformation of RasGTP. The results suggest a direct interaction between a moiety present only on fully processed or farnesylated Ras and the putative target protein p110gamma.

The strength of interaction at the Raf cysteine-rich domain is a critical determinant of response of Raf to Ras family small GTPases

To be fully activated at the plasma membrane, Raf-1 must establish two distinct modes of interactions with Ras, one through its Ras-binding domain and the other through its cysteine-rich domain (CRD). The Ras homologue Rap1A is incapable of activating Raf-1 and even antagonizes Ras-dependent activation of Raf-1. We proposed previously that this property of Rap1A may be attributable to its greatly enhanced interaction with Raf-1 CRD compared to Ras. On the other hand, B-Raf, another Raf family member, is activatable by both Ras and Rap1A. When interactions with Ras and Rap1A were measured, B-Raf CRD did not exhibit the enhanced interaction with Rap1A, suggesting that the strength of interaction at CRDs may account for the differential action of Rap1A on Raf-1 and B-Raf. The importance of the interaction at the CRD is further supported by a domain-shuffling experiment between Raf-1 and B-Raf, which clearly indicated that the nature of CRD determines the specificity of response to Rap1A: Raf-1, whose CRD is replaced by B-Raf CRD, became activatable by Rap1A, whereas B-Raf, whose CRD is replaced by Raf-1 CRD, lost its response to Rap1A. Finally, a B-Raf CRD mutant whose interaction with Rap1A is selectively enhanced was isolated and found to possess the double mutation K252E/M278T. B-Raf carrying this mutation was not activated by Rap1A but retained its response to Ras. These results indicate that the strength of interaction with Ras and Rap1A at its CRD may be a critical determinant of regulation of the Raf kinase activity by the Ras family small GTPases.

Bradykinin B(2) receptor-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in COS-7 cells requires dual signaling via both protein kinase C pathway and epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation

The signaling routes linking G-protein-coupled receptors to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) may involve tyrosine kinases, phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma (PI3Kgamma), and protein kinase C (PKC). To characterize the mitogenic pathway of bradykinin (BK), COS-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with the human bradykinin B(2) receptor and hemagglutinin-tagged MAPK. We demonstrate that BK-induced activation of MAPK is mediated via the alpha subunits of a G(q/11) protein. Both activation of Raf-1 and activation of MAPK in response to BK were blocked by inhibitors of PKC as well as of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor. Furthermore, in PKC-depleted COS-7 cells, the effect of BK on MAPK was clearly reduced. Inhibition of PI3-Kgamma or Src kinase failed to diminish MAPK activation by BK. BK-induced translocation and overexpression of PKC isoforms as well as coexpression of inactive or constitutively active mutants of different PKC isozymes provided evidence for a role of the diacylglycerol-sensitive PKCs alpha and epsilon in BK signaling toward MAPK. In addition to PKC activation, BK also induced tyrosine phosphorylation of EGF receptor (transactivation) in COS-7 cells. Inhibition of PKC did not alter BK-induced transactivation, and blockade of EGF receptor did not affect BK-stimulated phosphatidylinositol turnover or BK-induced PKC translocation, suggesting that PKC acts neither upstream nor downstream of the EGF receptor. Comparison of the kinetics of PKC activation and EGF receptor transactivation in response to BK also suggests simultaneous rather than consecutive signaling. We conclude that in COS-7 cells, BK activates MAPK via a permanent dual signaling pathway involving the independent activation of the PKC isoforms alpha and epsilon and transactivation of the EGF receptor. The two branches of this pathway may converge at the level of the Ras-Raf complex.

Regulation of Ras.GTP loading and Ras-Raf association in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes by G protein-coupled receptor agonists and phorbol ester. Activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade by phorbol ester is mediated by Ras

The small G protein Ras has been implicated in hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes. We therefore examined the activation (GTP loading) of Ras by the following hypertrophic agonists: phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), endothelin-1 (ET-1), and phenylephrine (PE). All three increased Ras.GTP loading by 10-15-fold (maximal in 1-2 min), as did bradykinin. Other G protein-coupled receptor agonists (e.g. angiotensin II, carbachol, isoproterenol) were less effective. Activation of Ras by PMA, ET-1, or PE was reduced by inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC), and that induced by ET-1 or PE was partly sensitive to pertussis toxin. 8-(4-Chlorophenylthio)-cAMP (CPT-cAMP) did not inhibit Ras.GTP loading by PMA, ET-1, or PE. The association of Ras with c-Raf protein was increased by PMA, ET-1, or PE, and this was inhibited by CPT-cAMP. However, only PMA and ET-1 increased Ras-associated mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1-activating activity, and this was decreased by PKC inhibition, pertussis toxin, and CPT-cAMP. PMA caused the rapid appearance of phosphorylated (activated) extracellular signal-regulated kinase in the nucleus, which was inhibited by a microinjected neutralizing anti-Ras antibody. We conclude that PKC- and Gi-dependent mechanisms mediate the activation of Ras in myocytes and that Ras activation is required for stimulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase by PMA.

Interactions of c-Raf-1 with phosphatidylserine and 14-3-3

Activation of Raf-1 occurs at the plasma membrane. We recently showed that 14-3-3 must be complexed with Raf-1 for efficient recruitment to the plasma membrane and activation by Ras, but that 14-3-3 is completely displaced from Raf-1 following plasma membrane binding. We show here that the Raf-1 zinc finger is not absolutely required for 14-3-3 binding but is required to stabilize the interaction between Raf-1 and 14-3-3. Incubation of Raf-1 with phosphatidylserine, an inner plasma membrane phospholipid, results in removal of 14-3-3 and an increase in Raf-1 kinase activity, whereas removal of 14-3-3 from Raf-1 using specific phosphopeptides substantially reduces Raf-1 basal kinase activity. Displacement of 14-3-3 from activated Raf-1 by phosphopeptides has no effect on kinase activity if Raf-1 is first removed from solution, but completely eradicates kinase activity of soluble activated Raf-1. These results suggest a mechanism for the removal of 14-3-3 from Raf-1 at the plasma membrane and show that removal of 14-3-3 from Raf-1 has markedly different effects depending on experimental conditions.

A method for computational combinatorial peptide design of inhibitors of Ras protein

A computational combinatorial approach is proposed for the design of a peptide inhibitor of Ras protein. The procedure involves three steps. First, a 'Multiple Copy Simultaneous Search' identifies the location of specific functional groups on the Ras surface. This search method allowed us to identify an important binding surface consisting of two beta strands (residues 5-8 and 52-56), in addition to the well known Ras effector loop and switch II region. The two beta strands had not previously been reported to be involved in Ras-Raf interaction. Second, after constructing the peptide inhibitor chain based on the location of N-methylacetamide (NMA) minima, functional groups are selected and connected to the main chain Calpha atom. This step generates a number of possible peptides with different sequences on the Ras surface. Third, potential inhibitors are designed based on a sequence alignment of the peptides generated in the second step. This computational approach reproduces the conserved pattern of hydrophobic, hydrophilic and charged amino acids identified from the Ras effectors. The advantages and limitations of this approach are discussed.

[ZAP genes: characterizing the protein structure of a new family of proliferation associated genes in the exocrine pancreas]

While interested in proliferation-dependent gene regulation in a pancreatic carcinoma cell line, we cloned a set of proteins (ZAP) characterized by a conserved region consisting of consecutive zinc finger, ankyrin repeat and PH domains. Functional aspects of these domains were obtained by comparison with proteins involved in several signal transduction pathways and cell cycle regulation. The members of the ZAP protein family are individually characterized by different types of supplementary protein domains, their chromosomal localization and their tissue specific gene transcription. All results indicate a wide spectrum of protein-protein interactions. Up to now specific binding partners have not been identified. In summary, the multiplicity of conserved regions and transcriptional data indicate a scaffold function for ZAP proteins in the complex network of proliferation associated intracellular signal transduction pathways.

Serine and tyrosine phosphorylations cooperate in Raf-1, but not B-Raf activation

The Raf family of serine/threonine protein kinases couple growth factor receptor stimulation to mitogen activated protein kinase activation, but their own regulation is poorly understood. Using phospho-specific antisera, we show that activated Raf-1 is phosphorylated on S338 and Y341. Expression of Raf-1 with oncogenic Ras gives predominantly S338 phosphorylation, whereas activated Src gives predominantly Y341 phosphorylation. Phosphorylation at both sites is maximal only when both oncogenic Ras and activated Src are present. Raf-1 that cannot interact with Ras-GTP is not phosphorylated, showing that phosphorylation is Ras dependent, presumably occurring at the plasma membrane. Mutations which prevent phosphorylation at either site block Raf-1 activation and maximal activity is seen only when both are phosphorylated. Mutations at S339 or Y340 do not block Raf-1 activation. While B-Raf lacks a tyrosine phosphorylation site equivalent to Y341 of Raf-1, S445 of B-Raf is equivalent to S338 of Raf-1. Phosphorylation of S445 is constitutive and is not stimulated by oncogenic Ras. However, S445 phosphorylation still contributes to B-Raf activation by elevating basal and consequently Ras-stimulated activity. Thus, there are considerable differences between the activation of the Raf proteins; Ras-GTP mediates two phosphorylation events required for Raf-1 activation but does not regulate such events for B-Raf.

Identification and characterization of potential effector molecules of the Ras-related GTPase Rap2

In search for effectors of the Ras-related GTPase Rap2, we used the yeast two-hybrid method and identified the C-terminal Ras/Rap interaction domain of the Ral exchange factors (RalGEFs) Ral GDP dissociation stimulator (RalGDS), RalGDS-like (RGL), and RalGDS-like factor (Rlf). These proteins, which also interact with activated Ras and Rap1, are effectors of Ras and mediate the activation of Ral in response to the activation of Ras. Here we show that the full-length RalGEFs interact with the GTP-bound form of Rap2 in the two-hybrid system as well as in vitro. When co-transfected in HeLa cells, an activated Rap2 mutant (Rap2Val-12) but not an inactive protein (Rap2Ala-35) co-immunoprecipitates with RalGDS and Rlf; moreover, Rap2-RalGEF complexes can be isolated from the particulate fraction of transfected cells and were localized by confocal microscopy to the resident compartment of Rap2, i.e. the endoplasmic reticulum. However, the overexpression of activated Rap2 neither leads to the activation of the Ral GTPase via RalGEFs nor inhibits Ras-dependent Ral activation in vivo. Several hypotheses that could explain these results, including compartmentalization of proteins involved in signal transduction, are discussed. Our results suggest that in cells, the interaction of Rap2 with RalGEFs might trigger other cellular responses than activation of the Ral GTPase.

Characterization of Raf-1 activation in mitosis

We have used site-directed mutagenesis to explore the mechanisms underlying Raf-1 activation in mitosis, and we have excluded most previously characterized activating interactions. Our results indicate that the primary locus of activation lies in the carboxyl-half of the molecule, although the extent of activation can be influenced by the amino-proximal region, particularly by the Raf-1 zinc finger. We also found that Raf-1 is hyperphosphorylated in mitosis at multiple sites within residues 283-302 and that these hyperphosphorylations are not required for activation. In addition, neither Mek1 nor Mek2 are stably activated in coordination with Raf-1 in nocodazole-arrested cells. Overall, the data suggest that the mechanism(s) responsible for activating Raf-1 during mitosis, and the subsequent downstream effects, are distinct from those involved in growth factor stimulation.

A non-farnesylated Ha-Ras protein can be palmitoylated and trigger potent differentiation and transformation

Ha-Ras undergoes post-translational modifications (including attachment of farnesyl and palmitate) that culminate in localization of the protein to the plasma membrane. Because palmitate is not attached without prior farnesyl addition, the distinct contributions of the two lipid modifications to membrane attachment or biological activity have been difficult to examine. To test if palmitate is able to support these crucial functions on its own, novel C-terminal mutants of Ha-Ras were constructed, retaining the natural sites for palmitoylation, but replacing the C-terminal residue of the CAAX signal for prenylation with six lysines. Both the Ext61L and ExtWT proteins were modified in a dynamic fashion by palmitate, without being farnesylated; bound to membranes modestly (40% as well as native Ha-Ras); and retained appropriate GTP binding properties. Ext61L caused potent transformation of NIH 3T3 cells and, unexpectedly, an exaggerated differentiation of PC12 cells. Ext61L with the six lysines but lacking palmitates was inactive. Thus, farnesyl is not needed as a signal for palmitate attachment or removal, and a combination of transient palmitate modification and basic residues can support Ha-Ras membrane binding and two quite different biological functions. The roles of palmitate can therefore be independent of and distinct from those of farnesyl. Reciprocally, if membrane association can be sustained largely through palmitates, farnesyl is freed to interact with other proteins.

Phospholipase D and its product, phosphatidic acid, mediate agonist-dependent raf-1 translocation to the plasma membrane and the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway

The primary known function of phospholipase D (PLD) is to generate phosphatidic acid (PA) via the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine. However, the functional role of PA is not well understood. We report here evidence that links the activation of PLD by insulin and the subsequent generation of PA to the activation of the Raf-1-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade. Brefeldin A (BFA), an inhibitor of the activation of ADP-ribosylation factor proteins, inhibited insulin-dependent production of PA and MAPK phosphorylation. The addition of PA reversed the inhibition of MAPK activation by BFA. Overexpression of a catalytically inactive variant of PLD2, but not PLD1, blocked insulin-dependent activation of PLD and phosphorylation of MAPK. Real time imaging analysis showed that insulin induced Raf-1 translocation to cell membranes by a process that was inhibited by BFA. PA addition reversed the effects of BFA on Raf-1 translocation. However, PA did not activate Raf-1 in vitro or in vivo, suggesting that the primary function of PA is to enhance the recruitment of Raf-1 to the plasma membrane where other factors may activate it. Finally, we found that the recruitment of Raf-1 to the plasma membrane was transient, but Raf-1 remained bound to endocytic vesicles.

Effect of phosphorylation on activities of Rap1A to interact with Raf-1 and to suppress Ras-dependent Raf-1 activation

Rap1A is phosphorylated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), and this phosphorylation has been shown to modulate its interaction with other proteins. However, it is not known whether Rap1A phosphorylation is involved in regulation of its cellular functions, including suppression of Ras-dependent Raf-1 activation. We have previously shown that this suppressive activity of Rap1A is attributable to its greatly enhanced ability to bind to the cysteine-rich region (CRR, residues 152-184) of Raf-1 compared with that of Ras. Here, we show that phosphorylation of Rap1A by PKA abolished its binding activity to CRR. Furthermore, a mutant Rap1A(S180E), whose sole PKA phosphorylation residue, Ser-180, was substituted by an acidic residue, Glu, to mimic its phosphorylated form, failed to suppress Ras-dependent Raf-1 activation in COS-7 cells. These results indicate that the CRR binding activity and the Ras-suppressive function of Rap1A can be modulated through phosphorylation and suggest that Rap1A may function as a PKA-dependent regulator of Raf-1 activation, not merely as a suppressor.

Protein kinase C isoenzyme patterns characteristically modulated in early prostate cancer

Expression of protein kinase C (PKC) isoenzymes -alpha, -beta, -delta, -epsilon, -gamma, -iota, -lambda, -mu, -theta, and -zeta, and of their common receptor for activated C-kinase (RACK)-1, was determined immunohistochemically using specific antibodies in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens of early prostatic adenocarcinomas (n = 23) obtained at radical prostatectomy. Expression of each isoenzyme by malignant tissues was compared with nonneoplastic prostate tissues removed at radical cystectomy (n = 10). The most significant findings were decreased PKC-beta expression in early neoplasia when compared to benign epithelium (P < 0.0001), together with a reciprocal increase in expression of PKC-epsilon (P < 0.0001). Detectable levels of PKC-alpha and PKC-zeta were also significantly increased in the cancers (P = 0.045 and P = 0.015 respectively) but did not correlate with either PKC-beta or PKC-epsilon for individual cases. Alterations in the levels of the four PKC isoenzymes occurred specifically and consistently during the genesis and progression of human prostate cancer. PKC-delta, -gamma, and -theta were not expressed in the epithelium of either the benign prostates or the cancers. Levels of expression for PKC-A, -iota, -mu, and RACK-1 were not significantly different between the benign and malignant groups. Although changes in PKC isoenzyme expression may assist in explaining an altered balance between proliferation and apoptosis, it is likely that changes in activity or concentrations of these isoenzymes exert important modulating influences on particular pathways regulating cellular homeostasis. The findings of this study raise an exciting possibility of novel therapeutic intervention to regulate homeostatic mechanisms controlling proliferation and/or apoptosis, including expression of the p170 drug-resistance glycoprotein, intracellular Ca2+ concentrations, and enhanced cellular mobility resulting in the metastatic dissemination of human prostate cancer cells. Attenuation of PKC-beta expression is currently being assessed as a reliable objective adjunct to morphological appearance for the diagnosis of early progressive neoplasia in human prostatic tissues.

The RafC1 cysteine-rich domain contains multiple distinct regulatory epitopes which control Ras-dependent Raf activation

Activation of c-Raf-1 (referred to as Raf) by Ras is a pivotal step in mitogenic signaling. Raf activation is initiated by binding of Ras to the regulatory N terminus of Raf. While Ras binding to residues 51 to 131 is well understood, the role of the RafC1 cysteine-rich domain comprising residues 139 to 184 has remained elusive. To resolve the function of the RafC1 domain, we have performed an exhaustive surface scanning mutagenesis. In our study, we defined a high-resolution map of multiple distinct functional epitopes within RafC1 that are required for both negative control of the kinase and the positive function of the protein. Activating mutations in three different epitopes enhanced Ras-dependent Raf activation, while only some of these mutations markedly increased Raf basal activity. One contiguous inhibitory epitope consisting of S177, T182, and M183 clearly contributed to Ras-Raf binding energy and represents the putative Ras binding site of the RafC1 domain. The effects of all RafC1 mutations on Ras binding and Raf activation were independent of Ras lipid modification. The inhibitory mutation L160A is localized to a position analogous to the phorbol ester binding site in the protein kinase C C1 domain, suggesting a function in cofactor binding. Complete inhibition of Ras-dependent Raf activation was achieved by combining mutations K144A and L160A, which clearly demonstrates an absolute requirement for correct RafC1 function in Ras-dependent Raf activation.

Identification of residues in the cysteine-rich domain of Raf-1 that control Ras binding and Raf-1 activity

We have identified mutations in Raf-1 that increase binding to Ras. The mutations were identified making use of three mutant forms of Ras that have reduced Raf-1 binding (Winkler, D. G., Johnson, J. C., Cooper, J. A., and Vojtek, A. B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24402-24409). One mutation in Raf-1, N64L, suppresses the Ras mutant R41Q but not other Ras mutants, suggesting that this mutation structurally complements the Ras R41Q mutation. Missense substitutions of residues 143 and 144 in the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain were isolated multiple times. These Raf-1 mutants, R143Q, R143W, and K144E, were general suppressors of three different Ras mutants and had increased interaction with non-mutant Ras. Each was slightly activated relative to wild-type Raf-1 in a transformation assay. In addition, two mutants, R143W and K144E, were active when tested for induction of germinal vesicle breakdown in Xenopus oocytes. Interestingly, all three cysteine-rich domain mutations reduced the ability of the Raf-1 N-terminal regulatory region to inhibit Xenopus oocyte germinal vesicle breakdown induced by the C-terminal catalytic region of Raf-1. We propose that a direct or indirect regulatory interaction between the N- and C-terminal regions of Raf-1 is reduced by the R143W, R143Q, and K144E mutations, thereby increasing access to the Ras-binding regions of Raf-1 and increasing Raf-1 activity.

Ras--a versatile cellular switch

With the number of known roles played by Ras proteins increasing rapidly, finding answers to how the diverse cellular responses are triggered is becoming increasingly pertinent. Although our understanding of the control of specificity of signal transduction is still small, the combination of biochemical, structural and genetic analyses is starting to reveal how the cell-specific responses to Ras activation are controlled.

14-3-3 facilitates Ras-dependent Raf-1 activation in vitro and in vivo

14-3-3 proteins complex with many signaling molecules, including the Raf-1 kinase. However, the role of 14-3-3 in regulating Raf-1 activity is unclear. We show here that 14-3-3 is bound to Raf-1 in the cytosol but is totally displaced when Raf-1 is recruited to the plasma membrane by oncogenic mutant Ras, in vitro and in vivo. 14-3-3 is also displaced when Raf-1 is targeted to the plasma membrane. When serum-starved cells are stimulated with epidermal growth factor, some recruitment of 14-3-3 to the plasma membrane is evident, but 14-3-3 recruitment correlates with Raf-1 dissociation and inactivation, not with Raf-1 recruitment. In vivo, overexpression of 14-3-3 potentiates the specific activity of membrane-recruited Raf-1 without stably associating with the plasma membrane. In vitro, Raf-1 must be complexed with 14-3-3 for efficient recruitment and activation by oncogenic Ras. Recombinant 14-3-3 facilitates Raf-1 activation by membranes containing oncogenic Ras but reduces the amount of Raf-1 that associates with the membranes. These data demonstrate that the interaction of 14-3-3 with Raf-1 is permissive for recruitment and activation by Ras, that 14-3-3 is displaced upon membrane recruitment, and that 14-3-3 may recycle Raf-1 to the cytosol. A model that rationalizes many of the apparently discrepant observations on the role of 14-3-3 in Raf-1 activation is proposed.

The extended protein kinase C superfamily

Members of the mammalian protein kinase C (PKC) superfamily play key regulatory roles in a multitude of cellular processes, ranging from control of fundamental cell autonomous activities, such as proliferation, to more organismal functions, such as memory. However, understanding of mammalian PKC signalling systems is complicated by the large number of family members. Significant progress has been made through studies based on comparative analysis, which have defined a number of regulatory elements in PKCs which confer specific location and activation signals to each isotype. Further studies on simple organisms have shown that PKC signalling paradigms are conserved through evolution from yeast to humans, underscoring the importance of this family in cellular signalling and giving novel insights into PKC function in complex mammalian systems.

The RAF family: an expanding network of post-translational controls and protein-protein interactions

Protein kinase RAF is strategically located in the "Ras-MAP-kinase signal transduction pathway", a principle system which transmits signals from growth factor receptors to the nucleus, resulting in cell proliferation. Growth factor responses are mediated in part by activation of Ras, which in turn activates RAF to phosphorylate MEK, its downstream substrate. MEK activates MAP-kinase to influence nuclear events. It is clear, however, that a network of signals other than those carried by Ras plays a role in RAF regulation. These orthogonal influences are mediated by: serine/threonine kinases, tyrosine kinases, and protein-protein interactions. As a further complication to the RAF network, three isoforms of RAF have been established which have divergent N-terminal regulatory domains. Whereas these divergent regulatory domains implicate isoform-specific functions, no clear evidence or hypothesis for distinct functions for individual isoforms has been presented. Recently, "isoform-specific protein interactions" have been identified among numerous proteins interacting with RAF. These studies may serve to delineate independent functions for RAF isoforms.

Insulin signal transduction through protein kinase cascades

This review summarizes the evolution of ideas concerning insulin signal transduction, the current information on protein ser/thr kinase cascades as signalling intermediates, and their status as participants in insulin regulation of energy metabolism. Best characterized is the Ras-MAPK pathway, whose input is crucial to cell fate decisions, but relatively dispensable in metabolic regulation. By contrast the effectors downstream of PI-3 kinase, although less well elucidated, include elements indispensable for the insulin regulation of glucose transport, glycogen and cAMP metabolism. Considerable information has accrued on PKB/cAkt, a protein kinase that interacts directly with Ptd Ins 3'OH phosphorylated lipids, as well as some of the elements further downstream, such as glycogen synthase kinase-3 and the p70 S6 kinase. Finally, some information implicates other erk pathways (e.g. such as the SAPK/JNK pathway) and Nck/cdc42-regulated PAKs (homologs of the yeast Ste 20) as participants in the cellular response to insulin. Thus insulin recruits a broad array of protein (ser/thr) kinases in its target cells to effectuate its characteristic anabolic and anticatabolic programs.

Requirement of Ras-GTP-Raf complexes for activation of Raf-1 by protein kinase C

Receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated activation of the Raf-1 protein kinase is coupled to the small guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding protein Ras. By contrast, protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated activation of Raf-1 is thought to be Ras independent. Nevertheless, stimulation of PKC in COS cells led to activation of Ras and formation of Ras-Raf-1 complexes containing active Raf-1. Raf-1 mutations that prevent its association with Ras blocked activation of Raf-1 by PKC. However, the activation of Raf-1 by PKC was not blocked by dominant negative Ras, indicating that PKC activates Ras by a mechanism distinct from that initiated by activation of receptor tyrosine kinases.

Angiotensin II induces diverse signal transduction pathways via both Gq and Gi proteins in liver epithelial cells

Angiotensin II stimulates a biphasic activation of Raf-1, MEK, and ERK in WB liver epithelial cells. The first peak of activity is rapid and transient and is followed by a sustained phase. Angiotensin II also causes a rapid activation of p21ras in these cells. Moreover, two Src family kinases (Fyn and Yes) were activated by angiotensin II in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Microinjection of antibodies against Fyn and Yes blocked angiotensin II-induced DNA synthesis and c-Fos expression in WB cells, indicating an obligatory involvement of these tyrosine kinases in the activation of the ERK cascade by angiotensin II. Finally, substantial reduction of the angiotensin II-stimulated activation of Fyn, Raf-1, ERK, and expression of c-Fos by pertussis toxin pretreatment argues that G proteins of the Gi family as well as the Gq family are involved in angiotensin II-mediated mitogenic pathways in WB cells.

KSR stimulates Raf-1 activity in a kinase-independent manner

Kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR) is an evolutionarily conserved component of Ras-dependent signaling pathways. Here, we find that murine KSR (mKSR1) translocates from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane in the presence of activated Ras. At the membrane, mKSR1 modulates Ras signaling by enhancing Raf-1 activity in a kinase-independent manner. The activation of Raf-1 is mediated by the mKSR1 cysteine-rich CA3 domain and involves a detergent labile cofactor that is not ceramide. These findings reveal another point of regulation for Ras-mediated signal transduction and further define a noncatalytic role for mKSR1 in the multistep process of Raf-1 activation.

Discrimination of amino acids mediating Ras binding from noninteracting residues affecting raf activation by double mutant analysis

The contribution of residues outside the Ras binding domain of Raf (RafRBD) to Ras-Raf interaction and Ras-dependent Raf activation has remained unresolved. Here, we utilize a double mutant approach to identify complementary interacting amino acids that are involved in Ras-Raf interaction and activation. Biochemical analysis demonstrates that Raf-Arg59 and Raf-Arg67 from RafRBD are interacting residues complementary to Ras-Glu37 located in the Ras effector region. Raf-Arg59 and Raf-Arg67 also mediate interaction with Ras-Glu37 in Ras-dependent Raf activation. The characteristics observed here can be used as criteria for a role of residues from other regions of Raf in Ras-Raf interaction and activation. We developed a quantitative two-hybrid system as a tool to investigate the effect of point mutations on protein-protein interactions that elude biochemical analysis of bacterially expressed proteins. This assay shows that Raf-Ser257 in the RafCR2 domain does not contribute to Ras-Raf interaction and that the Raf-S257L mutation does not restore Raf binding to Ras-E37G. Yet, Raf-S257L displays high constitutive kinase activity and further activation by Ras-G12V/E37G is still impaired as compared with activation by Ras-G12V. This strongly suggests that the RafCR2 domain is an independent domain involved in the control of Raf activity and a common mechanism for constitutively activating mutants may be the interference with the inactive ground state of the kinase.

Identification and characterization of mutations in Ha-Ras that selectively decrease binding to cRaf-1

The oncoprotein Ras transforms cells by binding to one or more effector proteins. Effector proteins have been identified by their ability to bind to Ras in the GTP but not GDP form, and by their requirement for the Ras effector domain for binding. The best understood Ras effectors are serine/threonine kinases of the Raf family, but other candidate Ras effectors, including a Ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3 kinase) have also been identified. To investigate the mechanism of binding of cRaf-1 to Ras, and to investigate the roles of other candidate Ras effectors in transformation, we have isolated and characterized mutants of activated Ras with decreased binding to cRaf-1 relative to other candidate effectors. Examination of these mutants indicates that surface-exposed residues of Ras outside the minimal effector domain interact differentially with cRaf-1 and other Ras-binding proteins, and that fibroblast transformation correlates with cRaf-1 binding and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation. Furthermore, activation of PI3 kinase can occur in the absence of significant MAP kinase activation, suggesting that PI3 kinase activation is a primary effect of Ras.

Activity of plasma membrane-recruited Raf-1 is regulated by Ras via the Raf zinc finger

Ras recruits Raf to the plasma membrane for activation by a combination of tyrosine phosphorylation and other as yet undefined mechanism(s). We show here that the Raf zinc finger is not required for plasma membrane recruitment of Raf by Ras but is essential for full activation of Raf at the plasma membrane. Membrane targeting cannot compensate for the absence of the zinc finger. One facet of the zinc finger activation defect is revealed using a constitutively activated Raf mutant. Targeting Raf Y340D,Y341D to the plasma membrane increments activity, but full activation requires coexpression with activated Ras. This sensitivity to regulation by Ras at the plasma membrane is abrogated by mutations in the Raf zinc finger but is unaffected by mutation of the minimal Ras binding domain. These data show for the first time that Ras has two separate roles in Raf activation: recruitment of Raf to the plasma membrane through an interaction with the minimal Ras binding domain and activation of membrane-localized Raf via a mechanism that requires the Raf zinc finger.

Activation of c-Raf-1 by Ras and Src through different mechanisms: activation in vivo and in vitro

The c-Raf-1 protein kinase plays a critical role in intracellular signaling downstream from many tyrosine kinase and G-protein-linked receptors. c-Raf-1 binds to the proto-oncogene Ras in a GTP-dependent manner, but the exact mechanism of activation of c-Raf-1 by Ras is still unclear. We have established a system to study the activation of c-Raf-1 in vitro. This involves mixing membranes from cells expressing oncogenic H-RasG12V, with cytosol from cells expressing epitope-tagged full-length wild-type c-Raf-1. This results in a fraction of the c-Raf-1 binding to the membranes and a concomitant 10- to 20-fold increase in specific activity. Ras was the only component in these membranes required for activation, as purified recombinant farnesylated K-Ras.GTP, but not non-farnesylated K-Ras.GTP or farnesylated K-Ras.GDP, was able to activate c-Raf-1 to the same degree as intact H-RasG12V membranes. The most potent activation occurred under conditions in which phosphorylation was prohibited. Under phosphorylation-permissive conditions, activation of c-Raf-1 by Ras was substantially inhibited. Consistent with the results from other groups, we find that the activation of c-Raf-1 by Src in vivo occurs concomitant with tyrosine phosphorylation on c-Raf-1, and in vitro, activation of c-Raf-1 by Src requires the presence of ATP. Therefore we propose that activation of c-Raf-1 by Ras or by Src occurs through different mechanisms.

Physical association with ras enhances activation of membrane-bound raf (RafCAAX)

The transforming activity of artificially membrane-targeted Raf1 suggests that Ras-mediated recruitment of Raf1 to the plasma membrane is an important step in Raf1 activation. Cellular Ras is concentrated in the caveolae, a microdomain of the plasma membrane that is highly enriched in caveolin, glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins, and signal transduction molecules. Growth factor stimulation recruits Raf1 to this membrane domain. Whether Ras simply promotes Raf1 association with caveolae membranes or also modulates subsequent activation events is presently unclear. We have identified a ras variant, ras12V,37G, that does not interact with Raf1 but does interact with a mutant raf1, raf1(257L). To examine the role of Ras in the activation of membrane-bound Raf1, raf1CAAX, and raf1(257L)CAAX, membrane-targeted variants of Raf1 and raf1(257L), respectively, were expressed in fibroblasts with or without coexpression of ras12V, 37G. Cell fractionation localized both raf1CAAX and raf1(257L)CAAX to caveolae membranes independent of ras12V,37G expression; however, coexpression of ras12V,37G enhanced the activation of raf(257L)CAAX, but not raf1CAAX, as monitored by induction of cellular transformation, increased Raf kinase activity, and induction of activated MAP kinase. These results suggest that the Ras/Raf1 interaction plays a role in Raf1 activation that is distinct from membrane recruitment.