51
|
Dietrich CF, Nolsøe CP, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Burns PN, Cantisani V, Chammas MC, Chaubal N, Choi BI, Clevert DA, Cui X, Dong Y, D'Onofrio M, Fowlkes JB, Gilja OH, Huang P, Ignee A, Jenssen C, Kono Y, Kudo M, Lassau N, Lee WJ, Lee JY, Liang P, Lim A, Lyshchik A, Meloni MF, Correas JM, Minami Y, Moriyasu F, Nicolau C, Piscaglia F, Saftoiu A, Sidhu PS, Sporea I, Torzilli G, Xie X, Zheng R. Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2020; 46:2579-2604. [PMID: 32713788 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications. The 2012 guideline requires updating as, previously, the differences in the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective. These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCAs in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph F Dietrich
- Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland; Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitätsklinik, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Christian Pállson Nolsøe
- Center for Surgical Ultrasound, Dep of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge. Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES). University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard G Barr
- Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA; Southwoods Imaging, Youngstown, Ohio, USA
| | - Annalisa Berzigotti
- Hepatology, University Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, DBMR, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter N Burns
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Imaging Research, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vito Cantisani
- Uos Ecografia Internistico-chirurgica, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche, Anatomo-Patologiche, Policlinico Umberto I, Univ. Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Chammas
- Institute of Radiology, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nitin Chaubal
- Thane Ultrasound Centre, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Byung Ihn Choi
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, Department of Radiology, University of Munich-Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| | - Xinwu Cui
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yi Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mirko D'Onofrio
- Department of Radiology, G. B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - J Brian Fowlkes
- Basic Radiological Sciences Division, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Odd Helge Gilja
- National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Pintong Huang
- Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Andre Ignee
- Department of Internal Medicine 2, Caritas Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Department of Internal Medicine, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany
| | - Yuko Kono
- Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nathalie Lassau
- Imaging Department, Gustave Roussy and BIOMAPS, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Won Jae Lee
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Departments of Health and Science and Technology and Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Young Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Adrian Lim
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College London and Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Jean Michel Correas
- Service de Radiologie Adultes, Hôpital Necker, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Yasunori Minami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Fuminori Moriyasu
- Center for Cancer Ablation Therapy, Sanno Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Carlos Nicolau
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clinic. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania
| | - Paul S Sidhu
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ioan Sporea
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes", Timisoara, Romania
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary & General Surgery, Humanitas University & Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Xiaoyan Xie
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rongqin Zheng
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: can hypointensity on the late portal venous phase be used as an alternative to washout? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:2705-2716. [PMID: 32382820 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02553-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the added value of considering hypointensity on late portal venous phase (LPVP) images as washout for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). METHODS This retrospective study comprised 97 patients at high risk for HCC who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI including unenhanced, multi-arterial phase, conventional portal venous phase (CPVP, 60 s), and LPVP (mean, 99.9 ± 9.1 s; range, 90-119 s) images. A total of 115 hepatic lesions were identified by histopathological or clinical diagnosis. Three independent radiologists assessed the MRI images by consensus. Diagnosis of HCC was made using criteria of arterial hyperenhancement and hypointensity relative to the surrounding liver parenchyma (1) on CPVP or (2) on CPVP and/or LPVP images. The generalized estimating equation was used to compare diagnostic performance for HCC between Criterion 1 and 2. RESULTS In 82 HCCs, the frequency of hypointensity differed significantly between the CPVP and LPVP images (64.6% [53/82] vs. 84.1% [69/82], P < 0.001). Among 33 non-HCCs, two cHCC-CCs showed additional hypointensity on LPVP than CPVP images (33.3% [11/33] vs. 39.4% [13/33], P = 0.500). Criterion 2 provided significantly greater sensitivity for diagnosing HCC than Criterion 1 (54.9% [45/82] vs. 74.4% [61/82], P < 0.001), with relatively little reduction in specificity (90.9% [30/33] vs. 84.8% [28/33], P = 0.145). CONCLUSION Additional use of LPVP hypointensity as washout could significantly improve sensitivity for HCC diagnosis when utilizing Gd-EOB-MRI in patients with CLD, without a significant decrease in specificity.
Collapse
|
53
|
Ponnoprat D, Inkeaw P, Chaijaruwanich J, Traisathit P, Sripan P, Inmutto N, Na Chiangmai W, Pongnikorn D, Chitapanarux I. Classification of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on multi-phase CT scans. Med Biol Eng Comput 2020; 58:2497-2515. [PMID: 32794015 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-020-02229-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Liver and bile duct cancers are leading causes of worldwide cancer death. The most common ones are hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Influencing factors and prognosis of HCC and ICC are different. Precise classification of these two liver cancers is essential for treatment and prevention plans. The aim of this study is to develop a machine-based method that differentiates between the two types of liver cancers from multi-phase abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scans. The proposed method consists of two major steps. In the first step, the liver is segmented from the original images using a convolutional neural network model, together with task-specific pre-processing and post-processing techniques. In the second step, by looking at the intensity histograms of the segmented images, we extract features from regions that are discriminating between HCC and ICC, and use them as an input for classification using support vector machine model. By testing on a dataset of labeled multi-phase CT scans provided by Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand, we have obtained 88% in classification accuracy. Our proposed method has a great potential in helping radiologists diagnosing liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donlapark Ponnoprat
- Data Science Research Center, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| | - Papangkorn Inkeaw
- Advanced Research Center for Computational Simulation, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
| | - Jeerayut Chaijaruwanich
- Data Science Research Center, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| | - Patrinee Traisathit
- Data Science Research Center, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| | - Patumrat Sripan
- Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| | - Nakarin Inmutto
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| | - Wittanee Na Chiangmai
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| | - Donsuk Pongnikorn
- Cancer Registry Unit, Lampang Cancer Hospital, Lampang, 52000, Thailand
| | - Imjai Chitapanarux
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Min JH, Kim JM, Kim YK, Cha DI, Kang TW, Kim H, Choi GS, Choi SY, Ahn S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Extracellular Contrast Detects Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Greater Accuracy Than With Gadoxetic Acid or Computed Tomography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:2091-2100.e7. [PMID: 31843599 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI), and MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI) in the detection of HCC using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS). METHODS We studied 125 participants (102 men; mean age, 55.3 years) with chronic liver disease who underwent CT, ECA-MRI, or HBA-MRI (with gadoxetic acid) before surgery for a nodule initially detected by ultrasound at a tertiary center in Korea, from November 2016 through February 2019. We collected data on major features and assigned LI-RADS categories (v2018) from CT and MRI examinations. We then compared the diagnostic performance for LR-5 for each modality alone, and in combination. RESULTS In total, 163 observations (124 HCCs, 13 non-HCC malignancies, and 26 benign lesions; mean size, 20.7 mm) were identified. ECA-MRI detected HCC with 83.1% sensitivity and 86.6% accuracy, compared to 64.4% sensitivity and 71.8% accuracy for CT (P < .001) and 71.2% sensitivity (P = .005) and 76.5% accuracy for HBA-MRI (P = .005); all technologies detected HCC with 97.4% specificity. Adding CT to either ECA-MRI (89.2% sensitivity, 91.4% accuracy; both P < .05) or HBA-MRI (82.8% sensitivity, 86.5% accuracy; both P < .05) significantly increased its diagnostic performance in detection of HCC compared with the MRI technologies alone. ECA-MRI identified arterial phase hyperenhancement in a significantly higher proportion of patients (97.6%) than CT (81.5%; P < .001) or HBA-MRI (89.5%; P = .002). ECA-MRI identified non-peripheral washout in 79.8% of patients, vs 74.2% of patients for CT and 73.4% of patients for HBA-MRI (differences not significant). ECA-MRI identified enhancing capsules in 85.5% of patients, vs 33.9% for CT (P < .001) and 41.4% for HBA-MRI (P < .001). CONCLUSION In a prospective study of patients with chronic liver disease and a nodule detected by ultrasound, ECA-MRI detected HCC with higher levels of sensitivity and accuracy than CT or HBA-MRI, based on LI-RADS. Diagnostic performance was best when CT was used in combination with MRI compared with MRI alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hye Min
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Kon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Dong Ik Cha
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Wook Kang
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Honsoul Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyu Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seo-Youn Choi
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Soohyun Ahn
- Department of Mathematics, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Au KP, Chiang CL, Chan ACY, Cheung TT, Lo CM, Chok KSH. Initial experience with stereotactic body radiotherapy for intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:2758-2768. [PMID: 32742986 PMCID: PMC7360706 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i13.2758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graft hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplant is more frequently encountered. Graft hepatectomy is technically challenging and is associated with high morbidity. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of primary HCC. However, its role in HCC recurrence in a liver graft remains unclear.
AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT for the treatment of graft HCC recurrence after liver transplantation.
METHODS A retrospective study was conducted. From 2012 to 2018, 6 patients with intrahepatic HCC recurrence after liver transplant were treated with SBRT at Queen Mary Hospital, the University of Hong Kong. The primary outcome was time to overall disease progression and secondary outcomes were time to local progression and best local response, as assessed with the Modified response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours criteria. Patients were monitored for treatment related toxicities and graft dysfunction.
RESULTS A total of 9 treatment courses were given for 13 tumours. The median tumour size was 2.3 cm (range 0.7-3.6 cm). Two (22%) patients had inferior vena cava tumour thrombus. The best local treatment response was: 5 (55%) complete response, 1 (11%) partial response and 3 (33%) stable disease. After a median follow up duration of 15.5 mo, no local progression or mortality was yet observed. The median time to overall disease progression was 6.5 mo. There were 6 regional progression in the liver graft (67%) and 2 distant progression in the lung (22%). There was no grade 3 or above toxicity and there was no graft dysfunction after SBRT.
CONCLUSION SBRT appears to be safe in this context. Regional progression is the mode of failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kin Pan Au
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Chi Leung Chiang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Albert Chi Yan Chan
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Chung Mau Lo
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Kenneth Siu Ho Chok
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Kim TH, Yoon JH, Lee JM. Emerging Role of Hepatobiliary Magnetic Resonance Contrast Media and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Emphasis on Recent Updates in Major Guidelines. Korean J Radiol 2020; 20:863-879. [PMID: 31132813 PMCID: PMC6536788 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be noninvasively diagnosed on the basis of its characteristic imaging findings of arterial phase enhancement and portal/delayed “washout” on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cirrhotic patients. However, different specific diagnostic criteria have been proposed by several countries and major academic societies. In 2018, major guideline updates were proposed by the Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), Korean Liver Cancer Association and National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) of Korea. In addition to dynamic CT and MRI using extracellular contrast media, these new guidelines now include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using hepatobiliary contrast media as the first-line diagnostic test, while the KLCA-NCC and EASL guidelines also include contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as the second-line diagnostic test. Therefore, hepatobiliary MR contrast media and CEUS will be increasingly used for the noninvasive diagnosis and staging of HCC. In this review, we discuss the emerging role of hepatobiliary phase MRI and CEUS for the diagnosis of HCC and also review the changes in the HCC diagnostic criteria in major guidelines, including the KLCA-NCC practice guidelines version 2018. In addition, we aimed to pay particular attention to some remaining issues in the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Hee Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Chen Y, Zhao C, Yang Y, Xin YJ, Wang YN, Li X, Zhou X, Feng DP. Using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score for Evaluating Patients with Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Radiofrequency Ablation: A Two-Center Retrospective Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 43:1294-1304. [PMID: 32435833 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02519-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) in patients with BCLC stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2013 to December 2016, 325 patients with BCLC stage A HCC who underwent RFA at the National Cancer Center and First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into low (≤ 4) and high (≥ 5) CONUT scores for assessment of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Several covariates, including age, sex, the diameter and number of lesions, lesion differentiation, Child-Pugh class, hepatitis B virus infection, along with blood levels of AFP, AST, ALT, γ-GT, and TBIL, were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS The mortality rate was 17.49% (46/263) and 35.48% (22/62) in the low and high CONUT groups, respectively, with the difference being statistically significant (P = 0.033). In addition, disease recurrence was significantly higher in the high CONUT group at 70.97%, as compared to the low CONUT group at 43.35% (P = 0.041). The predictive factors were used to build the nomogram to estimate 1-, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS rates. CONCLUSIONS CONUT scores were found to be associated with the prognosis of patients with early-stage HCC who underwent RFA. Higher CONUT scores were associated with poor survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Chen
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.,Department of Interventional Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Chao Zhao
- Department of Interventional Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yu-Jing Xin
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ya-Nan Wang
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiao Li
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiang Zhou
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Dui-Ping Feng
- Department of Interventional Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Iavarone M, Viganò M, Piazza N, Occhipinti V, Sangiovanni A, Maggioni M, D'Ambrosio G, Forzenigo LV, Motta F, Lampertico P, Rumi MG, Colombo M. Contrast imaging techniques to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotics outside regular surveillance. Ann Hepatol 2020; 18:318-324. [PMID: 31036496 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIM The American Association for the Study of the Liver (AASLD) recommends contrast computerized tomography (CT-scan) and magnetic resonance (MRI) to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arising in cirrhotic patients under semiannual surveillance with abdominal ultrasound (US). A US guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) serves the same purpose in radiologically undiagnosed tumors and incidentally detected nodules in cirrhotics outside surveillance. In this population, we evaluated the performance of radiological diagnosis of HCC according to 2010 AASLD recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS All cirrhotic patients with a liver nodule incidentally detected by US were prospectively investigated with a sequential application of CT-scan/MRI examination and a FNB. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2015, 94 patients (mean age 67 years) had a liver nodule (total 120) detected by US in the context of histologically confirmed cirrhosis. Mean nodules diameter was 40 (10-160) mm, 87 (73%) <5cm. At histology, 84 (70%) nodules were HCC, 8 (7%) intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 6 (5%) metastases, 2 (2%) neuroendocrine tumors and 20 (16%) benign lesions. Hyperenhancement in arterial phase followed by wash-out in venous phases on at least one radiological technique was demonstrated in 62 nodules (61 HCC, 1 high grade dysplastic nodule), with a specificity of 97% (IC95%: 85-100%), sensitivity 73% (IC95%: 62-81%) and diagnostic accuracy 80%, being 64% for ≥5cm HCC. Sensitivity of AFP >200ng/mL was 12% (IC95%: 6-23%). CONCLUSION A single contrast imaging technique showing a typical contrast pattern confidently identifies HCC also in cirrhotic patients with an incidental liver nodule, thereby reducing the need for FNB examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Iavarone
- C.R.C. "A.M. & A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease" and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Milan and Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mauro Viganò
- Hepatology Unit, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicole Piazza
- C.R.C. "A.M. & A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease" and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Milan and Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Angelo Sangiovanni
- C.R.C. "A.M. & A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease" and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Milan and Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Maggioni
- Department of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Fabio Motta
- Radiology Unit, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Lampertico
- C.R.C. "A.M. & A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease" and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Milan and Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria-Grazia Rumi
- Hepatology Unit, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Colombo
- Center for Translational Hepatology Research, Clinical and Research Center Humanitas Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Cheng JT, Tan NE, Volk ML. Utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan in detecting residual hepatocellular carcinoma post treatment: Series of case reports. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12:358-364. [PMID: 32206185 PMCID: PMC7081113 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i3.358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2019] [Revised: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multi-phase computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been the standard of care for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis for years.
CASE SUMMARY We report a case series of four patients in whom positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan complemented the conventional CT/MRI scans in evaluating treatment response. In these four cases the conventional multi-phase CT and MRI failed to identify residual HCC disease post-treatment, while PET-CT complemented and aided in treatment response evaluation. In each case, the addition of PET-CT identified and located residual HCC disease, allowed retreatment, and altered medical management.
CONCLUSION This case series suggests that PET-CT should perhaps play a role in the HCC management algorithm, in addition to the conventional contrast-enhanced multi-phase scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason T Cheng
- Transplantation Institute, Loma Linda University Medical Center, San Bernardino, CA 92408, United States
| | - Nelly E Tan
- Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, United States
| | - Michael L Volk
- Transplantation Institute, Loma Linda University Medical Center, San Bernardino, CA 92408, United States
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Omran MM, Farid K, Omar MA, Emran TM, El-Taweel FM, Tabll AA. A combination of α-fetoprotein, midkine, thioredoxin and a metabolite for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Hepatol 2020; 19:179-185. [PMID: 31648804 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The heterogenous nature of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) motivated this attempt at developing and validating a model based on combined biomarkers for improving early HCC detection. PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS This study examined 196 patients for an estimation study (104 patients with HCC, 52 with liver cirrhosis and 40 with liver fibrosis) and 122 patients for the validation study (80 patients with HCC, 42 with liver cirrhosis). All patients were positive for hepatitis C virus. Four markers were measured: Midkine and thioredoxin using ELISA, 1-methyladenosine and 1-methylguanosine using a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results were compared with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). The performance of the model was estimated in BCLC, CLIP and Okuda staging systems of HCC. RESULTS The model yielded high performance with an area under ROC (AUC) of 0.94 for predicting HCC in patients with liver cirrhosis, compared with AUC of 0.69 for AFP. This model had AUCs of 0.93, 0.94 and 0.94 in patients who had only one single nodule, absent macrovascular invasion and tumor size <2cm, respectively, compared with AUCs of 0.71, 0.6 and 0.59 for AFP. The model produced AUCs of 0.91 for BCLC (0-A), 0.92 for CLIP (0-1) and 0.94 for Okuda (stage I) compared with AUCs of 0.56, 0.58 and 0.64 for AFP. No significant difference was found between AUC in the estimation and the validation groups. CONCLUSION This model may enhance early-stage HCC detection and help to overcome insufficient sensitivity of AFP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed M Omran
- Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Khaled Farid
- Tropical Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mona A Omar
- Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, New Damietta, Egypt
| | - Tarek M Emran
- Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, New Damietta, Egypt
| | - Fathy M El-Taweel
- Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, New Damietta, Egypt
| | - Ashraf A Tabll
- Microbial Biotechnology Department, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Singal AG, Lampertico P, Nahon P. Epidemiology and surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: New trends. J Hepatol 2020; 72:250-261. [PMID: 31954490 PMCID: PMC6986771 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 632] [Impact Index Per Article: 158.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highest in East Asia and Africa, although its incidence and mortality are rapidly rising in the United States and Europe. With the implementation of hepatitis B vaccination and hepatitis C treatment programmes worldwide, the epidemiology of HCC is shifting away from a disease predominated by viral hepatitis - an increasing proportion of cases are now attributable to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Surveillance using ultrasound, with or without alpha-fetoprotein, every 6 months has been associated with improved early detection and improved overall survival; however, limitations in implementation lead to a high proportion of HCC being detected at late stages in clinical practice. Herein, we review the current state of HCC surveillance and highlight areas for future research, including improved risk stratification of at-risk patients, surveillance tools with higher sensitivity and specificity for early HCC, and interventions to increase surveillance utilisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Pietro Lampertico
- CRC "A. M. and A. Migliavacca" Center for the Study of Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Nahon
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Universités, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot, Université Paris, Paris, France; Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors, USPC, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot, Université Paris, Paris, France; Service d'hépatologie, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France; Unité de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris 13, Communauté d'Universités et Etablissements Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Lang S, Martin A, Kasper P, Schramm C, Kütting F, Goeser T, Steffen HM, Demir M. Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance with liver imaging is not associated with improved survival. Scand J Gastroenterol 2020; 55:222-227. [PMID: 31990240 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1718747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Objective: International guidelines recommend hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance with ultrasound in high-risk patients with chronic liver diseases. However, there is low-strength evidence about the effects on mortality. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of surveillance on the clinical course and survival of HCC patients seen at a tertiary referral center in Germany.Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 401 HCC patients, who presented to our clinic between 1997 and 2015. Two groups were compared regarding patient and disease outcomes: one group included patients who received at least two ultrasound examinations for surveillance purposes prior to first diagnosis (n = 111). The other group consisted of patients with HCC at first presentation without foregoing HCC surveillance (n = 290).Results: Median follow-up in the surveillance group was 76 months (range 4-310 months). Patients in the surveillance group had smaller median tumor sizes (3.5 cm vs. 4.5 cm; p < .001), fulfilled more often Milan criteria (64% vs. 42%; p < .001) and received more often liver transplantation (27% vs. 9%, p < .001) when compared with the non-surveillance group. However, HCC surveillance was not associated with an improved survival (14 months in the surveillance group vs. 12 months in the non-surveillance group, p = .375), hazard ratio regarding overall mortality for the surveillance group: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.62-1.04, p = .09).Conclusions: HCC surveillance with ultrasound led to the detection of earlier disease stages but was not significantly associated with improved survival. Further prospective and long-term studies are needed to clarify benefits and harms of HCC surveillance programs on mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Lang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Anna Martin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Kasper
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Schramm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Fabian Kütting
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tobias Goeser
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans-Michael Steffen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Münevver Demir
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Clinic, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
A proposal for a useful algorithm to diagnose small hepatocellular carcinoma on MRI. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 32:74-79. [PMID: 31211723 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess MRI features for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and especially for nodules not showing both of the typical hallmarks. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred and sixty-four cirrhotic patients underwent liver MRI for 10-30 mm nodules suggestive of HCC. The diagnostic performances of MRI features [T1, T2; diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging signal, enhancement, capsule, fat content] were tested, both individually and in association with both typical hallmarks and as substitutions for one hallmark. The diagnostic reference was obtained using a multifactorial algorithm ensuring high specificity (Sp). RESULTS Four hundred and ninety-three nodules were analyzed. No alternative features, associations or substitutions outperformed the typical hallmarks for the diagnosis of HCC. For 10-20 mm nodules not displaying one of the typical hallmarks, hyperintensity on DW images was the most accurate substitutive sign, providing a sensitivity of 71.4% and Sp of 75% for nodules without arterial enhancement and sensitivity = 65.2% and Sp = 66% for nodules without washout on the portal or delayed phases. A new diagnostic algorithm, including typical hallmarks as a first step then the best-performing substitutive signs (capsule presence or DW hyperintensity) in combination with the nonmissing typical hallmark as a second step, enabled the correct classification of 77.7% of all nodules, regardless of size. CONCLUSION Using MRI, the typical hallmarks remain the best criteria for the diagnosis of small HCCs. However, by incorporating other MRI features, it is possible to build a simple algorithm enabling the noninvasive diagnosis of HCCs displaying both or only one of the typical hallmarks.
Collapse
|
64
|
Fraquelli M, Nadarevic T, Giljaca V, Colli A, Miletic D, Štimac D, Casazza G. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in advanced chronic liver disease. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mirella Fraquelli
- Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit; Via F. Sforza, 35 Milan Italy 20122
| | - Tin Nadarevic
- Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka; Department of Radiology; Kresimirova 42 Rijeka Croatia 51000
| | - Vanja Giljaca
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital; Directorate of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology; Bordesley Green East Birmingham UK B9 5SS
| | - Agostino Colli
- A Manzoni Hospital ASST Lecco; Department of Internal Medicine; Via dell'Eremo, 9/11 Lecco Italy 23900
| | - Damir Miletic
- Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka; Department of Radiology; Kresimirova 42 Rijeka Croatia 51000
| | - Davor Štimac
- Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka; Department of Gastroenterology; Kresimirova 42 Rijeka Croatia 51000
| | - Giovanni Casazza
- Università degli Studi di Milano; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche "L. Sacco"; via GB Grassi 74 Milan Italy 20157
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Esfeh JM, Hajifathalian K, Ansari-Gilani K. Sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in obese patients compared to explant pathology as the gold standard. Clin Mol Hepatol 2019; 26:54-59. [PMID: 31726817 PMCID: PMC6940490 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2019.0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends ultrasound (US) screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among cirrhotic patients, regardless of body mass index (BMI), every 6 months. We examined US sensitivity for diagnosis of HCC in obese patients.
Methods Liver transplant patients data with HCC in explant was used (January 2012-December 2017). All patients underwent liver US within 3 months of diagnosis of HCC. Number/size of HCC lesions were extracted from radiologic and pathologic reports. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2.
Results One hundred sixteen patients were included. 80% were male, with mean BMI of 31 kg/m2. The most common underlying liver disease was hepatitis C virus (62%). At the time of diagnosis, median number of HCC lesions was 2 (interquartile range [IQR], 1–3), and median size of the largest lesion was 2.5 cm (IQR, 1.75–3.9). Overall sensitivity of US study for detection of HCC was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29–48%). Sensitivity was 77% (95% CI, 62–93%) in patients with BMI<30 and 21% (95% CI, 11–30%) in patients with BMI≥30 (P<0.001). Size of the largest HCC lesion (P=0.290) and number of lesions (P=0.505) were not different between groups. Computed tomography (CT) scan detected HCC in 98% of the obese patients with negative US. Conclusions Sensitivity of US for detection of HCC is significantly lower among obese patients compared to overweight and normal weight patients. These patients may benefit from alternating between US and a different imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamak Modaresi Esfeh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Transplant Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kaveh Hajifathalian
- Department of Gastroenterology and Transplant Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kianoush Ansari-Gilani
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Profiling of plasma metabolomics in patients with hepatitis C-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Exp Hepatol 2019; 5:317-326. [PMID: 31893244 PMCID: PMC6935851 DOI: 10.5114/ceh.2019.89478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim of the study The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually late, due to the lack of early detection of biomarkers for HCC. Metabolomics analysis has emerged as a useful tool for studying human diseases. The objective of the study was to investigate the differences in plasma metabolites between hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced cirrhosis and HCC. Material and methods 22 subjects with HCV-related liver cirrhosis and 22 subjects with HCC were enrolled. Clinical, routine laboratory and imaging studies were done. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) was used for metabolomics analysis of patients' plasma samples. Results 34 known metabolites were detected, of which five metabolites were identified to have the strongest discriminatory power for separation between HCC and cirrhosis groups: octanoic acid (caprylic acid), decanoic (capric acid), oleic acid, oxalic acid and glycine. These are 3 fatty acids (FA), a dicarboxylic acid and a glucogenic amino acid, respectively. No significant correlation was found between the relative intensities of the five metabolites and any of the patient or tumor characteristics (Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, number of focal lesions and size of largest focal lesion). ROC curve analysis was performed and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated, revealing that oleic acid, octanoic (caprylic) acid and glycine had higher positive predictive value than α-fetoprotein. Conclusions The study of metabolomics (particularly involving FA) may help define distinct metabolic patterns to distinguish HCV-induced liver cirrhosis from HCC patients. Future research in this field is still needed, particularly concerning HCC treatment strategies which target fatty acid-related metabolic pathways.
Collapse
|
67
|
Sparchez Z, Mocan T, Hagiu C, Kacso G, Zaharie T, Rusu I, Al Hajjar N, Leucuta DC, Sparchez M. Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced-Guided Biopsy Compared with Conventional Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Hepatic Tumors on a Background of Advanced Chronic Liver Disease: A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2019; 45:2915-2924. [PMID: 31447237 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.07.678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to compare contrast-enhanced-guided liver biopsy (CEUSLB) and ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (USLB) in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs) developed on a background of advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). Between 2011 and 2019, patients diagnosed with liver tumors on a background of ACLD were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the CEUSLB or USLB group. In total, 144 patients were randomly assigned to either CEUSLB (n = 79) or USLB (n = 65). Overall, in the CEUSLB group, the sensitivity was significantly better (94.74% vs. 74.6%, respectively; p = 0.001). Both the fragment length of the biopsy specimen and the single puncture success rate were statistically higher in the CEUSLB group (p = 0.022 and p = 0.0006, respectively). There was no difference in terms of major or minor complications (p = 0.682). CEUSLB is a feasible technique that increases the diagnostic sensitivity for liver tumors developed in ACLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeno Sparchez
- 3rd Medical Department, Institute for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Tudor Mocan
- 3rd Medical Department, Institute for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Claudia Hagiu
- 3rd Medical Department, Institute for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Gabriel Kacso
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Toader Zaharie
- 3rd Pathology Department, Institute for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Ioana Rusu
- 3rd Pathology Department, Institute for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Nadim Al Hajjar
- 3rd Surgical Department, Institute for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Daniel Corneliu Leucuta
- Medical Informatics and Biostatistics Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Mihaela Sparchez
- Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2nd Paediatric Clinic, Children's Hospital at Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Di Tommaso L, Spadaccini M, Donadon M, Personeni N, Elamin A, Aghemo A, Lleo A. Role of liver biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:6041-6052. [PMID: 31686761 PMCID: PMC6824282 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of liver biopsy in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been challenged over time by the ability of imaging techniques to characterize liver lesions in patients with known cirrhosis. In fact, in the diagnostic algorithm for this tumor, histology is currently relegated to controversial cases. Furthermore, the risk of complications, such as tumor seeding and bleeding, as well as inadequate sampling have further limited the use of liver biopsy for HCC management. However, there is growing evidence of prognostic and therapeutic information available from microscopic and molecular analysis of HCC and, as the information content of the tissue sample increases, the advantages of liver biopsy might modify the current risk/benefit ratio. We herein review the role and potentiality of liver biopsy in the diagnosis and management of HCC. As the potentiality of precision medicine comes to the management of HCC, it will be crucial to have rapid pathways to define prognosis, and even treatment, by identifying the patients who could most benefit from target-driven therapies. All of the above reasons suggest that the current role of liver biopsy in the management of HCC needs substantial reconsideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Di Tommaso
- Pathology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Italy
| | - Nicola Personeni
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Italy
| | - Abubaker Elamin
- Pathology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Italy
| | - Alessio Aghemo
- Division of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Italy
| | - Ana Lleo
- Division of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Ho CL, Chen S, Cheung SK, Leung TWT. Significant Value of 11C-Acetate and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography on 90Y Microsphere Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PET Clin 2019; 14:459-467. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2019.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
70
|
Kim DH, Choi SH, Park SH, Kim KW, Byun JH, Kim SY, Lee SS, Shin YM, Won HJ, Kim PN. Meta-analysis of the accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 2019; 68:1719-1721. [PMID: 31300516 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Ho Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Won Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Ho Byun
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - So Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Soo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Moon Shin
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Jin Won
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Pyo-Nyun Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Pascual S, Miralles C, Bernabé JM, Irurzun J, Planells M. Surveillance and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:2269-2286. [PMID: 31531321 PMCID: PMC6718786 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) appears in most of cases in patients with advanced liver disease and is currently the primary cause of death in this population. Surveillance of HCC has been proposed and recommended in clinical guidelines to obtain earlier diagnosis, but it is still controversial and is not accepted worldwide.
AIM To review the actual evidence to support the surveillance programs in patients with cirrhosis as well as the diagnosis procedure.
METHODS Systematic review of recent literature of surveillance (tools, interval, cost-benefit, target population) and the role of imaging diagnosis (radiological non-invasive diagnosis, optimal modality and agents) of HCC.
RESULTS The benefits of surveillance of HCC, mainly with ultrasonography, have been assessed in several prospective and retrospective analysis, although the percentage of patients diagnosed in surveillance programs is still low. Surveillance of HCC permits diagnosis in early stages allows better access to curative treatment and increases life expectancy in patients with cirrhosis. HCC is a tumor with special radiological characteristics in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, which allows highly accurate diagnosis without routine biopsy confirmation. The actual recommendation is to perform biopsy only in indeterminate nodules.
CONCLUSION The evidence supports the recommendation of performing surveillance of HCC in patients with cirrhosis susceptible of treatment, using ultrasonography every 6 mo. The diagnosis evaluation of HCC can be established based on noninvasive imaging criteria in patients with cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Pascual
- Liver Unit, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante 03010, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, CIBEREHD, Alicante 03010, Spain
| | - Cayetano Miralles
- Liver Unit, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante 03010, Spain
| | - Juan M Bernabé
- Radiology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante 03010, Spain
| | - Javier Irurzun
- Radiology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante 03010, Spain
| | - Mariana Planells
- Radiology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante 03010, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Performance of gadoxetic acid MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging for the diagnosis of early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2019; 30:186-194. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06351-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
73
|
2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2019; 20:1042-1113. [PMID: 31270974 PMCID: PMC6609431 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer globally and the fourth most common cancer in men in Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle-aged and elderly patients. These practice guidelines will provide useful and constructive advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 44 experts in hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology in the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2014 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions.
Collapse
|
74
|
Ayuso C, Forner A, Darnell A, Rimola J, García-Criado Á, Bianchi L, Vilana R, Oliveira R, Llarch N, Bruix J. Prospective evaluation of gadoxetic acid magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in newly detected nodules ≤2 cm in cirrhosis. Liver Int 2019; 39:1281-1291. [PMID: 31077539 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Most of the published studies about the diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (EOB-MR) for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have had a retrospective design. Thus, we aimed to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EOB-MR for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in nodules ≤2 cm detected by screening ultrasound (US) in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS Between July 2012 and October 2015, 62 consecutive asymptomatic Child-Pugh A-B cirrhotic patients with newly US-detected solitary nodules between 1 and 2 cm were prospectively included in the study. Hepatic extracellular contrast-enhanced MR (ECCE-MR) followed by EOB-MR were obtained in less than 1-month interval. Two independent radiologists blindly reviewed the EOB-MR studies, and the diagnosis of HCC was assigned when the lesion showed arterial enhancement followed by portal venous phase washout and/or hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The final HCC diagnosis was made by ECCE-MR according to the accepted non-invasive criteria, or by biopsy in lesions with atypical vascular profile. RESULTS Final diagnoses were as follows: HCC (n = 41), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2), colorectal metastases (n = 1) and benign conditions (n = 18). The sensitivity and specificity of EOB-MR for HCC diagnosis were 56.1% (95% CI: 39.7-71.5) and 90.5% (95% CI: 69.6-98.8), respectively, while sensitivity of ECCE-MR was 63.4% (95% CI: 46.9-77.9). The low rate of hypointense HCCs in the HBP and suboptimal liver uptake of contrast agent justify the low sensitivity of EOB-MR for HCC diagnosis. CONCLUSION EOB-MR does not surpass the diagnostic accuracy of ECCE-MR for non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in nodules ≤2 cm in cirrhotic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Ayuso
- Radiology Department, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Forner
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain.,Liver Unit, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Darnell
- Radiology Department, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Rimola
- Radiology Department, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ángeles García-Criado
- Radiology Department, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis Bianchi
- Radiology Department, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ramón Vilana
- Radiology Department, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafael Oliveira
- Radiology Department, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Neus Llarch
- Liver Unit, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Bruix
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain.,Liver Unit, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Nadarevic T, Giljaca V, Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, Miletic D, Štimac D. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic advanced liver disease. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tin Nadarevic
- Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka; Department of Radiology; Kresimirova 42 Rijeka Croatia 51000
| | - Vanja Giljaca
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital; Directorate of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology; Bordesley Green East Birmingham UK B9 5SS
| | - Agostino Colli
- A Manzoni Hospital ASST Lecco; Department of Internal Medicine; Via dell'Eremo, 9/11 Lecco Italy 23900
| | - Mirella Fraquelli
- Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit; Via F. Sforza, 35 Milan Italy 20122
| | - Giovanni Casazza
- Università degli Studi di Milano; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche "L. Sacco"; via GB Grassi 74 Milan Italy 20157
| | - Damir Miletic
- Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka; Department of Radiology; Kresimirova 42 Rijeka Croatia 51000
| | - Davor Štimac
- Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka; Department of Gastroenterology; Kresimirova 42 Rijeka Croatia 51000
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gut Liver 2019; 13:227-299. [PMID: 31060120 PMCID: PMC6529163 DOI: 10.5009/gnl19024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 233] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer globally and the fourth most common cancer in men in Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle-aged and elderly patients. These practice guidelines will provide useful and constructive advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 44 experts in hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology and radiation oncology in the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2014 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions.
Collapse
|
77
|
Kim YJ, Lee MH, Choi SY, Yi BH, Lee HK. Magnetic resonance imaging features predictive of an incomplete response to transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A STROBE-compliant study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e15592. [PMID: 31083245 PMCID: PMC6531079 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
To identify pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features associated with an incomplete response (IR) to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).The medical records of 89 patients with HCC who had undergone a first TACE were reviewed retrospectively. The size, visual attenuation in the arterial phase, signal intensity (SI) on T1-, T2-, and diffusion-weighted images, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of each lesion were evaluated on pretreatment images. The response to TACE was routinely assessed at 4 weeks post-treatment by 4-phase computed tomography. The HCC patients were classified as complete or incomplete responders based on the arterial-phase enhancement of the target lesion.In multivariate analysis, larger lesion diameter (P = .004, OR = 1.06 per millimeter, 95% CI = 1.02-1.11), faint enhancement on arterial phase (P = .021, OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.22-9.14), and non-low SI on T1-weighted images (P = .016, OR = 3.36, 95% CI = 1.29-9.32) were significantly associated with increased odds of an IR to TACE in HCC patients.An iso-to-high T1-weighted SI by pretreatment MRI was an independent predictor of an incomplete response to TACE in patients with HCC, in addition to faint arterial enhancement and lesion size.
Collapse
|
78
|
Forner A, Da Fonseca LG, Díaz-González Á, Sanduzzi-Zamparelli M, Reig M, Bruix J. Controversies in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. JHEP Rep 2019; 1:17-29. [PMID: 32039350 PMCID: PMC7001551 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved considerably over the last decade. Surveillance of cirrhotic patients and refinements to imaging techniques have enabled a relevant proportion of patients to be diagnosed at an early stage, when effective therapies are feasible. Resection, transplantation and ablation are all options in patients with early stage HCC. Thus, there is some controversy regarding which is the best treatment approach in challenging scenarios. There have also been major developments in locoregional therapies, particularly in intra-arterial approaches. Finally, the systemic treatment for HCC has changed dramatically following the demonstration of a survival benefit with sorafenib; there are currently several first-line (sorafenib and lenvatinib) and second-line (regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab) treatments that have shown a survival benefit. Expectations for immune checkpoint inhibitors are high, with the results of the ongoing phase III trials eagerly awaited. In this review we discuss some of the controversies in the management of HCC, focussing in particular on systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Forner
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomédica (FCRB), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Spain
| | - Leonardo G Da Fonseca
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomédica (FCRB), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Álvaro Díaz-González
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomédica (FCRB), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Sanduzzi-Zamparelli
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomédica (FCRB), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Reig
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomédica (FCRB), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Spain
| | - Jordi Bruix
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomédica (FCRB), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Navin PJ, Venkatesh SK. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: State of the Art Imaging and Recent Advances. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2019; 7:72-85. [PMID: 30944823 PMCID: PMC6441649 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2018.00032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Revised: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing, with this trend expected to continue to the year 2030. Hepatocarcinogenesis follows a predictable course, which makes adequate identification and surveillance of at-risk individuals central to a successful outcome. Moreover, imaging is central to this surveillance, and ultimately to diagnosis and management. Many liver study groups throughout Asia, North America and Europe advocate a surveillance program for at-risk individuals to allow early identification of HCC. Ultrasound is the most commonly utilized imaging modality. Many societies offer guidelines on how to diagnose HCC. The Liver Image Reporting and Data System (LIRADS) was introduced to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, reporting and data collection of HCC cases. The LIRADS advocates diagnosis using multiphase computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging. The 2017 version also introduces contrast-enhanced ultrasound as a novel approach to diagnosis. Indeed, imaging techniques have evolved to improve diagnostic accuracy and characterization of HCC lesions. Newer techniques, such as T1 mapping, intravoxel incoherent motion analysis and textural analysis, assess specific characteristics that may help grade the tumor and guide management, allowing for a more personalized approach to patient care. This review aims to analyze the utility of imaging in the surveillance and diagnosis of HCC and to assess novel techniques which may increase the accuracy of imaging and determine optimal treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sudhakar K. Venkatesh
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- *Correspondence to: Sudhakar K. Venkatesh, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 200 1 Street, Rochester MN 55905, USA. Tel: +1-507-284-1728, Fax: +1-507-284-2405, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Alhasan A, Cerny M, Olivié D, Billiard JS, Bergeron C, Brown K, Bodson-Clermont P, Castel H, Turcotte S, Perreault P, Tang A. LI-RADS for CT diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: performance of major and ancillary features. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:517-528. [PMID: 30167771 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1762-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 major features, the impact of ancillary features, and categories on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 59 patients (104 observations including 72 HCCs) with clinical suspicion of HCC undergoing CECT between 2013 and 2016. Two radiologists independently assessed major and ancillary imaging features for each liver observation and assigned a LI-RADS category based on major features only and in combination with ancillary features. The composite reference standard included pathology or imaging. Per-lesion estimates of diagnostic performance of major features, ancillary features, and LI-RADS categories were assessed by generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS Major features (arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout, capsule, and threshold growth) respectively had a sensitivity of 86.1%, 81.6%, 20.7%, and 26.1% and specificity of 39.3%, 67.9%, 89.9%, and 85.0% for HCC. Ancillary features (ultrasound visibility as discrete nodule, subthreshold growth, and fat in mass more than adjacent liver) respectively had a sensitivity of 42.6%, 50.8%, and 15.1% and a specificity of 79.2%, 66.9%, and 96.4% for HCC. Ancillary features modified the final category in 4 of 104 observations. For HCC diagnosis, categories LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, and LR-TIV (tumor in vein) had a sensitivity of 5.3%, 29.0%, 53.7%, and 10.7%; and a specificity of 49.1%, 84.4%, 97.3%, and 96.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION On CT, LR-5 category has near-perfect specificity for the diagnosis of HCC and ancillary features modifies the final category in few observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman Alhasan
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, H2X 0C2, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia
| | - Milena Cerny
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), 900, rue Saint-Denis (Tour Viger), Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Damien Olivié
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, H2X 0C2, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Billiard
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, H2X 0C2, Canada
| | - Catherine Bergeron
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, H2X 0C2, Canada
| | - Kip Brown
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), 900, rue Saint-Denis (Tour Viger), Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Paule Bodson-Clermont
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), 900, rue Saint-Denis (Tour Viger), Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Hélène Castel
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Simon Turcotte
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), 900, rue Saint-Denis (Tour Viger), Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Service, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pierre Perreault
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, H2X 0C2, Canada
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, H2X 0C2, Canada.
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), 900, rue Saint-Denis (Tour Viger), Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.
- Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Purcell Y, Copin P, Paradis V, Vilgrain V, Ronot M. Lessons learnt from pathologic imaging correlation in the liver: an historical perspective. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180701. [PMID: 30604641 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging and pathology can be considered as two sides of the same diagnostic coin. Yet, pathology remains the gold-standard technique for the diagnosis of most diseases. Nevertheless, significant and constant progress in imaging has been made thanks to fruitful rad-path correlations. The aim of this article is to show how much imaging has benefited from pathology and to illustrate the different ways in which imaging has evolved according to different types of pathological references. Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma shows how image-based knowledge and expertise can be exploited to yield a non-invasive diagnosis approaching that of a fixed, robust pathological reference. Hepatocellular adenomas provide an example of the constant radiological evolutions triggered by changing pathological definitions. Finally, hepatic steatosis illustrates the possibility for imaging to surpass its historical reference, and become a new gold-standard. For these three examples, we have taken a historical approach to demonstrate how rad-path interminglement creates knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Purcell
- 1 Department of Radiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine , Clichy , France
| | - Pauline Copin
- 1 Department of Radiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine , Clichy , France
| | - Valérie Paradis
- 2 Department of Pathology, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine , Clichy , France.,3 University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité , Paris , France
| | - Valérie Vilgrain
- 1 Department of Radiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine , Clichy , France.,3 University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité , Paris , France.,4 Centre de recherche biomédicale Bichat-Beaujon , Paris , France
| | - Maxime Ronot
- 1 Department of Radiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine , Clichy , France.,3 University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité , Paris , France.,4 Centre de recherche biomédicale Bichat-Beaujon , Paris , France
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Krishan S, Dhiman RK, Kalra N, Sharma R, Baijal SS, Arora A, Gulati A, Eapan A, Verma A, Keshava S, Mukund A, Deva S, Chaudhary R, Ganesan K, Taneja S, Gorsi U, Gamanagatti S, Madhusudan KS, Puri P, Shalimar, Govil S, Wadhavan M, Saigal S, Kumar A, Thapar S, Duseja A, Saraf N, Khandelwal A, Mukhopadyay S, Gulati A, Shetty N, Verma N. Joint Consensus Statement of the Indian National Association for Study of the Liver and Indian Radiological and Imaging Association for the Diagnosis and Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incorporating Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2019; 9:625-651. [PMID: 31695253 PMCID: PMC6823668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 6th most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. There are currently no universally accepted practice guidelines for the diagnosis of HCC on imaging owing to the regional differences in epidemiology, target population, diagnostic imaging modalities, and staging and transplant eligibility. Currently available regional and national guidelines include those from the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD), the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the Japan Society of Hepatology, the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group, Hong Kong, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network in the United States. India with its large population and a diverse health infrastructure faces challenges unique to its population in diagnosing HCC. Recently, American Association have introduced a Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LIRADS, version 2017, 2018) as an attempt to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of liver lesions on imaging and hence improve the coherence between radiologists and clinicians and provide guidance for the management of HCC. The aim of the present consensus was to find a common ground in reporting and interpreting liver lesions pertaining to HCC on imaging keeping LIRADSv2018 in mind.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonal Krishan
- Department of Radiology, Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | - Radha K. Dhiman
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India,Address for correspondence: Radha Krishan Dhiman, MD, DM, FACG, FRCP, FAASLD, Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
| | - Navin Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Postgraduate Institute Of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Raju Sharma
- Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay S. Baijal
- Department of Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology, Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | - Anil Arora
- Institute Of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Gulati
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Anu Eapan
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Ashish Verma
- Department of Radiology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
| | - Shyam Keshava
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Amar Mukund
- Department of Intervention Radiology, Institute of liver and biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - S. Deva
- Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ravi Chaudhary
- Department of Radiology, Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | | | - Sunil Taneja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ujjwal Gorsi
- Department of Radiology, Postgraduate Institute Of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Kumble S. Madhusudan
- Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Pankaj Puri
- Institute Of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Shalimar
- Department of GastroEnterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Manav Wadhavan
- Institute of Digestive and Liver Diseases, BLK Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Sanjiv Saigal
- Department of Hepatology, Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Institute Of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Shallini Thapar
- Department of Radiology, Institute of liver and biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Duseja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Neeraj Saraf
- Department of Hepatology, Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | | | | | - Ajay Gulati
- Department of Radiology, Postgraduate Institute Of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Nitin Shetty
- Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Kolkata, India
| | - Nipun Verma
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Wu L, Swan P, McCall J, Gane E, Holden A, Merrilees S, Munn S, Johnston P, Bartlett A. Intention-to-treat analysis of liver transplantation, resection and thermal ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in a single centre. HPB (Oxford) 2018; 20:966-976. [PMID: 29843986 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Revised: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND potentially curative treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include liver transplantation (LT), liver resection (LR) and thermal ablation (TA). Long term intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis from a single-centre using all three modalities contemporaneously has not been published. METHODS An ITT analysis was undertaken of all patients with HCC listed for LT, or have undergone LR or TA. RESULTS 444 patients were identified; 145 were listed for LT (121 underwent LT), 190 underwent LR and 109 underwent TA. One and 3-year overall survival (OS) was similar among LT, LR and TA (88/77%, 88/64% and 95/72%) whereas 5-year OS was higher following LT than LR or TA (73% vs. 54% vs. 49%). Disease-free survival at 1- and 5-years was higher for LT (97% and 84%) than LR (66% and 35%) or TA (73%, and 19%). CONCLUSION LT offered the lowest rate of cancer recurrence and highest chance of long-term survival. Differences in outcome likely reflect a combination of cancer-related factors (AFP, micro- and macrovascular invasion), patient-related factors (performance status, co-morbidities and psychosocial issues) and treatment type. Two thirds of patients treated by LR and three quarters treated by TA had HCC recurrence by 5 years, reinforcing the need for close long-term surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily Wu
- New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit, Level 15, Support Building, Auckland City Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand; Hepatopancreaticobiliary Unit, Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Peter Swan
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - John McCall
- New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit, Level 15, Support Building, Auckland City Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand; Hepatopancreaticobiliary Unit, Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Edward Gane
- New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit, Level 15, Support Building, Auckland City Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andrew Holden
- Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Stephen Merrilees
- Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Stephen Munn
- New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit, Level 15, Support Building, Auckland City Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Peter Johnston
- New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit, Level 15, Support Building, Auckland City Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand; Hepatopancreaticobiliary Unit, Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Adam Bartlett
- New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit, Level 15, Support Building, Auckland City Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand; Hepatopancreaticobiliary Unit, Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Galanakis N, Kehagias E, Matthaiou N, Samonakis D, Tsetis D. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency or microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. Hepat Oncol 2018; 5:HEP07. [PMID: 31293775 PMCID: PMC6613040 DOI: 10.2217/hep-2018-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common type of malignancy. Several therapies are available for HCC and are determined by stage of presentation, patient clinical status and liver function. Local–regional treatment options, including transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation, are safe and effective for HCC but are accompanied by limitations. The synergistic effects of combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation/microwave ablation may overcome these limitations and improve the therapeutic outcome. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature on these combined therapies and examine their efficacy, safety and influence on the overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Galanakis
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.C. 71110, Greece.,Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.C. 71110, Greece
| | - Elias Kehagias
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.C. 71110, Greece.,Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.C. 71110, Greece
| | - Nikolas Matthaiou
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.C. 71110, Greece.,Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.C. 71110, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Samonakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.C. 71110, Greece.,Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.C. 71110, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Tsetis
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.C. 71110, Greece.,Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, P.C. 71110, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Kamaya A, Kielar AZ, Elsayes KM, Bashir MR, Kono Y, Do RK, Mitchell DG, Singal AG, Tang A, Sirlin CB. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients. Radiology 2018; 289:816-830. [PMID: 30251931 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 626] [Impact Index Per Article: 104.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is composed of four individual algorithms intended to standardize the lexicon, as well as reporting and care, in patients with or at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in the context of surveillance with US; diagnosis with CT, MRI, or contrast material-enhanced US; and assessment of treatment response with CT or MRI. This report provides a broad overview of LI-RADS, including its historic development, relationship to other imaging guidelines, composition, aims, and future directions. In addition, readers will understand the motivation for and key components of the 2018 update.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Chernyak
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Aya Kamaya
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Ania Z Kielar
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Yuko Kono
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Richard K Do
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Donald G Mitchell
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Amit G Singal
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - An Tang
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 (V.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Medicine and Radiology (Y.K.), and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology (C.B.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas Tex (A.G.S.); and Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Sangiovanni A, Triolo M, Iavarone M, Forzenigo LV, Nicolini A, Rossi G, La Mura V, Colombo M, Lampertico P. Multimodality treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: How field practice complies with international recommendations. Liver Int 2018; 38:1624-1634. [PMID: 29791968 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 05/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is framed within standardized protocols released by Scientific Societies, whose applicability and efficacy in field practice need refining. AIM We evaluated the applicability and effectiveness of guidelines for the treatment of HCC of the American Association for the Study of the Liver (AASLD). METHODS 370 consecutive cirrhotic patients with de novo HCC in different stages, 253 BCLC A, 66 BCLC B, 51 BCLC C received treatment through a multidisciplinary team (MDT) decision and were followed until death or end of follow-up. RESULTS Treatment was adherent to AASLD recommendations in 205 (81%) BCLC A patients, 36 (54%) BCLC B, and 27 (53%) BCLC C. Radiological complete response was achieved in 165 (45%) patients after the first-line treatment, in 22 (19%) after a second-line and in 9 (23%) after a third-line treatment. Adherence to AASLD recommendation allowed a lower yearly mean mortality rate in BCLC A patients compared with other treatment (5.0% vs 10.4% P = .004), whereas upward treatment stage migration compared with the standard of care was associated with reduced yearly mortality in BCLC B (8.6% vs 20.7%, P = .029) and BCLC C (42.6% vs 59.0%, P = .04) patients. CONCLUSIONS HCC multimodality treatment including other than first-line therapy is common in clinical practice and impact on the achievement of complete response. Personalized treatment was able to provide survival benefits to patients whose profile is not accounted for by international recommendations, which need to be amended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Sangiovanni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CRC "A.M. and A. Migliavacca" Center for the study of Liver Disease, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Triolo
- Division of Internal Medicine, Policlinico S. Donato, University of Milan, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Massimo Iavarone
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CRC "A.M. and A. Migliavacca" Center for the study of Liver Disease, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura V Forzenigo
- Division of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Nicolini
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Rossi
- Division of Surgery and Liver Transplant, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo La Mura
- Internal Medicine Hemostasis and Thrombosis Division, Biomedical Sciences for Health Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Colombo
- Department of Medicine and Hepatology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Pietro Lampertico
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CRC "A.M. and A. Migliavacca" Center for the study of Liver Disease, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Maurer MH. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with MRI. Gut 2018; 67:1563-1565. [PMID: 29549097 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-315999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
88
|
Gupta M, Gabriel H, Miller FH. Role of Imaging in Surveillance and Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2018; 47:585-602. [PMID: 30115439 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
The prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is dependent on tumor stage at diagnosis, with curative treatment options more available to early-detected HCCs. Professional organizations have produced HCC screening guidelines in at-risk groups, with ultrasound the most commonly used screening tool and increased interest in MRI in specific populations. HCC may be diagnosed by imaging features alone and have been universally incorporated into management guidelines. The radiology community has standardized imaging criteria for HCC with the development of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System, which has expanded to incorporate computed tomography, MR, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnostic purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North Saint Clair Street, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Helena Gabriel
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North Saint Clair Street, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Frank H Miller
- Body Imaging Section and Fellowship Program, MRI, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 North Saint Clair Street, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Thompson SM, Garg I, Ehman EC, Sheedy SP, Bookwalter CA, Carter RE, Roberts LR, Venkatesh SK. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-associated hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of hepatic steatosis on major hepatocellular carcinoma features at MRI. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20180345. [PMID: 30074820 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of hepatic steatosis on LI-RADS® major features at MRI in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: HCC and liver parenchyma features at MRI from 48 consecutive patients with NAFLD and histology proven HCC (mean ± SD; 4.5 ± 3.4 cm) were independently reviewed by three radiologists. Inter-rater agreement was determined by prevalence/bias-adjusted kappa. Hepatic fat signal fraction (FS%) was independently calculated. HCC features were compared by FS% at MRI using logistic regression analysis and histologic steatosis grade using Cochran-Armitage test for trend, stratified by cirrhotic liver morphology or histologic fibrosis stage. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the sensitivity and specificity for major HCC features by FS%. RESULTS: Major HCC features included arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) in 45 (93%), portal venous phase washout (PVWO) in 30 (63%), delayed phase washout (DPWO) in 38 (79%) and enhancing "capsule" in 34 (71%). Cirrhotic morphology was present in 22 (46%). Inter-rater agreement was 0.75 for APHE, 0.42-0.58 for PVWO, 0.58-0.71 for DPWO and 0.38-0.67 for enhancing "capsule". There was an 18%, 14% and 22% increase in the odds of absent PVWO, DPWO and capsule appearance for every 1% increase in hepatic FS% in patients with non-cirrhotic liver morphology (p = 0.011, 0.040 and 0.029, respectively). Hepatic FS% ≥ 14.8% had a sensitivity and specificity of 64 and 100% for absent PVWO and 71 and 90% for absent DPWO in patients with non-cirrhotic liver morphology. CONCLUSION: Absent washout and capsule appearance are associated with increasing hepatic steatosis in patients with non-cirrhotic, NAFLD-associated HCC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In patients with non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), absent HCC washout and capsule appearance are associated with increasing hepatic steatosis, thereby potentially impacting the noninvasive imaging diagnosis of HCC in these patients. Lack of washout or capsule appearance in steatotic livers at MRI may require alternative criteria for the diagnosis of HCC in patients with non-cirrhotic NAFLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott M Thompson
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , USA
| | - Ishan Garg
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , USA
| | - Eric C Ehman
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , USA
| | - Shannon P Sheedy
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , USA
| | - Candice A Bookwalter
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , USA
| | - Rickey E Carter
- 2 Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Jacksonville, FL , USA
| | - Lewis R Roberts
- 3 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , USA
| | - Sudhakar K Venkatesh
- 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , USA
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Yoon JH, Lee JM, Lee YJ, Lee KB, Han JK. Added Value of sequentially performed gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI for the diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) or atypical hepatic observations at contrast-enhanced CT: A prospective comparison. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 49:574-587. [PMID: 30102433 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) often show atypical features at cross-sectional imaging, yet there is no preferred recommendation for the diagnosis or characterization of small observations (10-19 mm) at present. PURPOSE To determine the added value of sequentially performed gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI for contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT)-detected small (10-19 mm) or atypical hepatic observations ≥20 mm in the diagnosis of HCC. STUDY TYPE Prospective, cross-sectional, intraindividual comparison. POPULATION In all, 110 patients at high risk of developing HCC. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 1.5T and 3T/T1 -weighted imaging. ASSESSMENT Hepatic observations were classified into HCCs or benign non-HCCs based on imaging features of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and portal or delayed washout at CT or APHE and portal washout at MRI. Final diagnoses were established using a composite algorithm and diagnostic performances of MRI and CT were compared in all observations. In addition, in a subgroup of histologically confirmed observations and stable benign observations during follow-up (n = 94), sensitivity and specificity of MRI were compared between the aforementioned criteria and LR-5 of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2014. STATISTICAL TEST χ2 test. RESULTS MRI provided higher sensitivity than CT (62.2% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.0001) while maintaining specificity (97.2%, each) at the per-patient level. Among 124 observations, 10-19 mm in size, MRI showed significantly higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCCs (62.5%, 50/80) than CT (25%, 20/80, P < 0.0001) with comparable specificity (97.7% [43/44], each). However, seven atypical observations (≥20 mm) at CT remained atypical at MRI. In the subgroup analysis, the diagnostic criteria of APHE and portal washout showed a significantly higher sensitivity (44.2%, 19/43) than LR-5 (23.2%, 10/43, P = 0.004), without compromising specificity (97.7% vs. 95.5%). DATA CONCLUSION Sequentially performed gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI provided added value to CECT for the diagnosis of HCCs in small observations by improving sensitivity while maintaining specificity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:574-587.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Hee Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Jin Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Bun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Koreas
| | - Joon Koo Han
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
D'Ambrosio R, Aghemo A, Rumi MG, Degasperi E, Sangiovanni A, Maggioni M, Fraquelli M, Perbellini R, Rosenberg W, Bedossa P, Colombo M, Lampertico P. Persistence of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in hepatitis C patients with a response to IFN and cirrhosis regression. Liver Int 2018; 38:1459-1467. [PMID: 29377616 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM In patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, a sustained virological response may lead to cirrhosis regression. Whether histological changes translate into prevention of long-term complications, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma is still unknown. This was investigated in a cohort of histological cirrhotics who had been prospectively followed-up for 10 years after the achievement of a sustained virological response to IFN. METHODS In all, 38 sustained virological response cirrhotics who underwent a liver biopsy 5 years post-SVR were prospectively followed to assess the impact of cirrhosis regression on clinical endpoints. RESULTS During a follow-up of 86 (30-96) months from liver biopsy, no patients developed clinical decompensation, whilst 5 (13%) developed hepatocellular carcinoma after 79 (7-88) months. The 8-year cumulative probability of hepatocellular carcinoma was 17%, without differences between patients with or without cirrhosis regression (19% [95% CI 6%-50%] vs 14% [95% CI 4%-44%], P = .88). Patients who developed or did not an hepatocellular carcinoma had similar rates of residual cirrhosis (P = 1.0), collagen content (P = .48), METAVIR activity (P = .34), portal inflammation (P = .06) and steatosis (P = .17). At baseline, patients who developed an hepatocellular carcinoma had higher γGT (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06; P = .014) and glucose (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.02; P = .012) values; moreover, they had increased Forns Score (HR 12.8, 95% CI 1.14-143.9; P = .039), Lok Index (HR 6.24, 95% CI 1.03-37.6; P = .046) and PLF (HR 19.3, 95% CI 1.72-217.6; P = .016) values. One regressor died of lung cancer. The 8-year cumulative survival probability was 97%, independently on cirrhosis regression (96% vs 100%, P = 1.0) or hepatocellular carcinoma (100% vs 97%, P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS Post-SVR cirrhosis regression does not prevent hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta D'Ambrosio
- A. M. and A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessio Aghemo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano-Milan, Italy.,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Rumi
- Division of Hepatology, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Degasperi
- A. M. and A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Sangiovanni
- A. M. and A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Maggioni
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mirella Fraquelli
- Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Perbellini
- A. M. and A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - William Rosenberg
- Center for Hepatology, Division of Medicine, University College of London, London, UK
| | - Pierre Bedossa
- Department of Pathology and INSERM U773, Hopital Beaujon, Universitée Paris-Diderot, Clichy, France
| | - Massimo Colombo
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Lampertico
- A. M. and A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Llovet JM, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul JL, Schirmacher P, Vilgrain V. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018; 69:182-236. [PMID: 29628281 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5295] [Impact Index Per Article: 882.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
93
|
Cartier V, Crouan A, Esvan M, Oberti F, Michalak S, Gallix B, Seror O, Paisant A, Vilgrain V, Aubé C, Anty R, Archambeaud I, Baudin G, Brun V, Chevallier P, Cuilleron M, Dumortie J, Duvoux C, Estivalet L, Frampas E, Gandon Y, Guillygomarc’h A, Guiu B, Lebigot J, Le Pennec V, Luciani A, Minello A, Ollivier-Hourmand I, Pilleul F, Patouillard B, Sylvain C, Tasu J. Suspicious liver nodule in chronic liver disease: Usefulness of a second biopsy. Diagn Interv Imaging 2018; 99:493-499. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 12/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
94
|
Li H, Yang Y, Zhang M, Yin L, Tu J, Guo X, Zhang D. Acoustic Characterization and Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Long-Circulating Lipid-Coated Microbubbles. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2018; 37:1243-1256. [PMID: 29127707 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A long-circulating lipid-coated ultrasound (US) contrast agent was fabricated to achieve a longer wash-out time and gain more resistance against higher-mechanical index sonication. Systemic physical, acoustic, and in vivo imaging experiments were performed to better understand the underlying mechanism enabling the improvement of contrast agent performance by adjusting the physical and acoustic properties of contrast agent microbubbles. METHODS By simply altering the gas core, a kind of US contrast agent microbubble was synthesized with a similar lipid-coating shell as SonoVue microbubbles (Bracco SpA, Milan, Italy) to achieve a longer wash-out time and higher inertial cavitation threshold. To bridge the structure-performance relationship of the synthesized microbubbles, the imaging performance of the microbubbles was assessed in vivo with SonoVue as a control group. The size distribution and inertial cavitation threshold of the synthesized microbubbles were characterized, and the shell parameters of the microbubbles were determined by acoustic attenuation measurements. All of the measurements were compared with SonoVue microbubbles. RESULTS The synthesized microbubbles had a spherical shape, a smooth, consistent membrane, and a uniform distribution, with an average diameter of 1.484 μm. According to the measured attenuation curve, the synthesized microbubbles resonated at around 2.8 MHz. Although the bubble's shell elasticity (0.2 ± 0.09 N/m) was comparable with SonoVue, it had relatively greater viscosity and inertial cavitation because of the different gas core. Imaging studies showed that the synthesized microbubbles had a longer circulation time and a better chance of fighting against rapid collapse than SonoVue. CONCLUSIONS Nano/micrometer long-circulating lipid-coated microbubbles could be fabricated by simply altering the core composition of SonoVue microbubbles with a higher-molecular weight gas. The smaller diameter and higher inertial cavitation threshold of the synthesized microbubbles might make it easier to access deep-seated organs and give prolonged imaging enhancement in the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongbo Li
- Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics, Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yanye Yang
- Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics, Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Meimei Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics, Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Ultrasonography, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Liping Yin
- Department of Ultrasonography, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Juan Tu
- Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics, Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiasheng Guo
- Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics, Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Dong Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics, Department of Physics, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructure, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
- State Key Laboratory of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Cerny M, Bergeron C, Billiard JS, Murphy-Lavallée J, Olivié D, Bérubé J, Fan B, Castel H, Turcotte S, Perreault P, Chagnon M, Tang A. LI-RADS for MR Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Performance of Major and Ancillary Features. Radiology 2018; 288:118-128. [PMID: 29634435 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018171678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the performance of major features, ancillary features, and categories of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2014 at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included patients with liver MR imaging and at least one pathologically proved lesion. Between 2004 and 2016, 102 patients (275 observations including 113 HCCs) met inclusion criteria. Two radiologists independently assessed major and ancillary imaging features for each liver observation and assigned a LI-RADS category. Per-lesion estimates of diagnostic performance of major features, ancillary features, and LI-RADS categories were assessed by using generalized estimating equation models. Results Major features (arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout, capsule, and threshold growth) had a sensitivity of 88.5%, 60.6%, 32.9%, and 41.6%, and a specificity of 18.6%, 84.8%, 98.8%, and 83.2% for HCC, respectively. Ancillary features (mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, restricted diffusion, mosaic architecture, intralesional fat, lesional fat sparing, blood products, and subthreshold growth) had a sensitivity of 62.2%, 54.8%, 9.9%, 30.9%, 23.1%, 2.8%, and 48.3%, and a specificity of 79.4%, 90.6%, 99.4%, 94.2%, 83.1%, 99.3%, and 91.4% for HCC, respectively. The LR-5 or LR-5 V categories had a per-lesion sensitivity of 50.8% and a specificity of 95.8% for HCC, respectively. The LR-4, LR-5, or LR-5 V categories (determined by using major features only vs combination of major and ancillary features) had a per-lesion sensitivity of 75.9% and 87.9% and a per-lesion specificity of 87.5% and 86.2%, respectively. Conclusion The use of ancillary features in combination with major features increases the sensitivity while preserving a high specificity for the diagnosis of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Cerny
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - Catherine Bergeron
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - Jean-Sébastien Billiard
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - Jessica Murphy-Lavallée
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - Damien Olivié
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - Joshua Bérubé
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - Boyan Fan
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - Hélène Castel
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - Simon Turcotte
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - Pierre Perreault
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - Miguel Chagnon
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| | - An Tang
- From the Department of Radiology (M. Cerny, C.B., J.S.B., J.M.L., D.O., J.B., B.F., P.P., A.T.), Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (H.C.), and Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Division (S.T.), Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada (S.T., A.T.); and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (M. Chagnon)
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Kielar AZ, Chernyak V, Bashir MR, Do RK, Fowler KJ, Mitchell DG, Cerny M, Elsayes KM, Santillan C, Kamaya A, Kono Y, Sirlin CB, Tang A. LI-RADS 2017: An update. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 47:1459-1474. [PMID: 29626376 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The computed tomography / magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting & Data System (LI-RADS) is a standardized system for diagnostic imaging terminology, technique, interpretation, and reporting in patients with or at risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Using diagnostic algorithms and tables, the system assigns to liver observations category codes reflecting the relative probability of HCC or other malignancies. This review article provides an overview of the 2017 version of CT/MRI LI-RADS with a focus on MRI. The main LI-RADS categories and their application will be described. Changes and updates introduced in this version of LI-RADS will be highlighted, including modifications to the diagnostic algorithm and to the optional application of ancillary features. Comparisons to other major diagnostic systems for HCC will be made, emphasizing key similarities, differences, strengths, and limitations. In addition, this review presents the new Treatment Response algorithm, while introducing the concepts of MRI nonviability and viability. Finally, planned future directions for LI-RADS will be outlined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1459-1474.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ania Z Kielar
- Royal Victoria Regional Health Center, Barrie, Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard K Do
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Donald G Mitchell
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Milena Cerny
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- Department of Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Huston, Texas, USA
| | - Cynthia Santillan
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Aya Kamaya
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Yuko Kono
- Department of gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Ranganath PG, Robbin ML, Back SJ, Grant EG, Fetzer DT. Practical advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abdominopelvic radiology. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:998-1012. [PMID: 29332247 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1442-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are two of the workhorse modalities of abdominopelvic radiology. However, these modalities are not without patient- and technique-specific limitations that may prevent a timely and accurate diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an effective, rapid, and cost-effective imaging modality with expanding clinical utility in the United States. In this pictorial essay, we provide a case-based discussion demonstrating the practical advantages of CEUS in evaluating a variety of pathologies in which CT or MRI was precluded or insufficient. Through these advantages, CEUS can serve a complementary role with CT and MRI in comprehensive abdominopelvic radiology.
Collapse
|
98
|
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma appears frequently in patients with cirrhosis. Surveillance by biannual ultrasound is recommended for such patients because it allows diagnosis at an early stage, when effective therapies are feasible. The best candidates for resection are patients with a solitary tumour and preserved liver function. Liver transplantation benefits patients who are not good candidates for surgical resection, and the best candidates are those within Milan criteria (solitary tumour ≤5 cm or up to three nodules ≤3 cm). Image-guided ablation is the most frequently used therapeutic strategy, but its efficacy is limited by the size of the tumour and its localisation. Chemoembolisation has survival benefit in asymptomatic patients with multifocal disease without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. Finally, sorafenib, lenvatinib, which is non-inferior to sorafenib, and regorafenib increase survival and are the standard treatments in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This Seminar summarises the scientific evidence that supports the current recommendations for clinical practice, and discusses the areas in which more research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Forner
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer group, Liver Unit, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain.
| | - María Reig
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer group, Liver Unit, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jordi Bruix
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer group, Liver Unit, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Terzi E, Iavarone M, Pompili M, Veronese L, Cabibbo G, Fraquelli M, Riccardi L, De Bonis L, Sangiovanni A, Leoni S, Zocco MA, Rossi S, Alessi N, Wilson SR, Piscaglia F. Contrast ultrasound LI-RADS LR-5 identifies hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in a multicenter restropective study of 1,006 nodules. J Hepatol 2018; 68:485-492. [PMID: 29133247 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 10/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis was questioned because of the risk of a false positive diagnosis in cases of cholangiocarcinoma. The American College of Radiology has recently released a scheme (CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System [LI-RADS®]) to classify lesions at risk of HCC investigated by CEUS. The aim of the present study was to validate this LI-RADS scheme for the diagnosis of HCC. METHODS A total of 1,006 nodules from 848 patients with chronic liver disease at risk of HCC were collected in five Italian centers and retrospectively analyzed. Nodules were classified as LR-5, (HCC) if ≥1 cm with arterial phase hyperenhancement, and late washout (onset ≥60 s after contrast injection) of mild degree. Rim enhancement and/or early and/or marked washout qualified lesions as LR-M (malignant, but not specific for HCC). Other combinations qualified lesions at intermediate risk for HCC (LR-3) or probable HCC (LR-4). Diagnostic reference standard was CT/MRI diagnosis of HCC (n = 506) or histology (n = 500). RESULTS The median nodule size was 2 cm. Of 1,006 nodules, 820 (81%) were HCC, 40 (4%) were cholangiocarcinoma, 116 (11%) regenerative nodules (±dysplastic). The LR-5 category (52% of all nodules) was 98.5% predictive of HCC, with no risk of misdiagnosis for pure cholangiocarcinoma. Sensitivity for HCC was 62%. All LR-M nodules were malignant and the majority of non-hepatocellular origin. Over 75% of cholangiocarcinomas were LR-M. The LR-3 category included 203 lesions (HCC 96 [47%]) and the LR-4 202 (HCC 173 [87%]). CONCLUSIONS The CEUS LI-RADS class LR-5 is highly specific for HCC, enabling its use for a confident non-invasive diagnosis. LAY SUMMARY This is a retrospective study of approximately 1,000 focal lesions at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Herein, we demonstrate that the refined definition of the typical contrast enhanced ultrasound pattern of HCC introduced by the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS®) practically abolishes the risk of misdiagnosis of other malignant entities (e.g. cholangiocarcinoma) for HCC with negligible reduction in sensitivity. These data support the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound to diagnose HCC in cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Terzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Division of Internal Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Massimo Iavarone
- A.M. & A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gemelli Hospital, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Letizia Veronese
- Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cabibbo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine (Di.Bi.M.I.S.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mirella Fraquelli
- Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Riccardi
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gemelli Hospital, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico De Bonis
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Division of Internal Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelo Sangiovanni
- A.M. & A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Leoni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Division of Internal Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Assunta Zocco
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gemelli Hospital, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sandro Rossi
- Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Nicola Alessi
- Section of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialized Medicine (Di.Bi.M.I.S.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Stephanie R Wilson
- Radiology and Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Division of Internal Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
100
|
Takayasu K, Arii S, Sakamoto M, Matsuyama Y, Kudo M, Kaneko S, Nakashima O, Kadoya M, Izumi N, Takayama T, Ku Y, Kumada T, Kubo S, Kokudo T, Hagiwara Y, Kokudo N. Impact of resection and ablation for single hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma ≤2 cm analysed with propensity score weighting. Liver Int 2018; 38:484-493. [PMID: 29266722 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Small hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤2 cm is biologically less aggressive than hypervascular one, however, the optimal treatment is still undetermined. The efficacy of surgical resection (SR), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) was evaluated. METHODS The 853 (SR, 176; RFA, 491; PEI, 186) patients were enrolled who met Child-Pugh A/B, single hypovascular HCC ≤2 cm pathologically proven, available tumour differentiation and absence of macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis. Overall and recurrence-free survivals were compared in original and a propensity score weighted pseudo-population with 732 patients. RESULTS The median follow-up time and tumour size were 2.8 years and 1.47 cm respectively. In original population, multivariate Cox regression showed no significant difference for overall survival among three groups. In pseudo-population, Cox regression also revealed no significant difference for overall survival among them, although SR (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.86) and RFA (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-1.00) groups had significantly lower recurrence than PEI group. The overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years for the SR, RFA and PEI groups were 94%/70%, 90%/75% and 94%/73% respectively. Corresponding recurrence-free survival rates were 64%/54%, 59%/41% 48%/33% respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant survival benefit of SR compared with non-SR. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS For patients with single hypovascular HCC ≤2 cm, no significant difference for overall survival was first identified among 3 treatment groups. The SR or RFA could be recommended, and PEI would be alternative to RFA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichi Takayasu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeki Arii
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Japan Labor Health and Welfare Organization, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Michiie Sakamoto
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Matsuyama
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Sayama, Japan
| | - Shuichi Kaneko
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Osamu Nakashima
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | - Masumi Kadoya
- Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Namiki Izumi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Japan
| | - Tadatoshi Takayama
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yonson Ku
- Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takashi Kumada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan
| | - Shoji Kubo
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Kokudo
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hagiwara
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|