Two phase randomised controlled clinical trial of postoperative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients

Artificial nutrition: principles and practice of enteral feeding

Enteral feeding is a commonly used form of nutritional supplementation for patients with intestinal failure, both in hospitals and in the community. This article concentrates on the basic principles of enteral feeding, including the physiological effects of feeding into the intestinal tract. It covers the indications for enteral feeding, the different methods of supplying enteral feeds to the gastrointestinal tract, and the potential complications. There is also a discussion of the indications for and practice of home enteral nutrition.

Colorectal surgery patients prefer simple solid foods to clear fluids as the first postoperative meal

PURPOSE

Randomized controlled trials have established that there is no benefit to withholding oral food and fluids from colorectal surgery patients postoperatively. The aim of this survey was to determine food preferences for the first postoperative meal and compare these with a traditional clear-fluid diet.

METHODS

One hundred forty-five elective colorectal surgery patients were surveyed about their preferences for 35 common foods within 72 hours of surgery and their levels of nausea, hunger, and pain. Preferences were examined by postoperative day (one vs. two) and levels of nausea, hunger, and pain.

RESULTS

The survey showed that patients significantly preferred solid foods as early as the first postoperative day and their preferences had little congruency with the traditional clear-fluid diet. Foods highest in preference, such as eggs, regular broth soup (e.g., chicken noodle soup), toast, and potatoes, were significantly more preferred than common clear-fluid diet items such as gelatin, clear broth, and carbonated beverages (P < 0.01). Oral supplements were preferred by only 44%. Patients reported low levels of nausea, hunger, and pain.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative colorectal surgery patients prefer to receive simple solid foods rather than a clear-fluid diet as their first postoperative meal.

ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: surgery

In modern surgical practice it is advisable to manage patients within an enhanced recovery protocol and thereby have them eating normal food within 1-3 days. Consequently, there is little room for routine perioperative artificial nutrition. Only a minority of patients may benefit from such therapy. These are predominantly patients who are at risk of developing complications after surgery. The main goals of perioperative nutritional support are to minimize negative protein balance by avoiding starvation, with the purpose of maintaining muscle, immune, and cognitive function and to enhance postoperative recovery. Several studies have demonstrated that 7-10 days of preoperative parenteral nutrition improves postoperative outcome in patients with severe undernutrition who cannot be adequately orally or enterally fed. Conversely, its use in well-nourished or mildly undernourished patients is associated with either no benefit or with increased morbidity. Postoperative parenteral nutrition is recommended in patients who cannot meet their caloric requirements within 7-10 days orally or enterally. In patients who require postoperative artificial nutrition, enteral feeding or a combination of enteral and supplementary parenteral feeding is the first choice. The main consideration when administering fat and carbohydrates in parenteral nutrition is not to overfeed the patient. The commonly used formula of 25 kcal/kg ideal body weight furnishes an approximate estimate of daily energy expenditure and requirements. Under conditions of severe stress requirements may approach 30 kcal/kg ideal body weights. In those patients who are unable to be fed via the enteral route after surgery, and in whom total or near total parenteral nutrition is required, a full range of vitamins and trace elements should be supplemented on a daily basis.

Pennington Lecture Teams, strategies and networks: developments in nutritional support; a personal perspective

Chris Pennington was an archetypal team player, strategist and networker. Clinical nutritional support has progressed remarkably since the 1970s and it has been a privilege to work in this field over this period during which teamwork, strategy development and networking have been crucial. British experience has been characterised by groups of individuals of differing professions and specialties coming together to enable progress to be made. This approach was initially in the form of nutrition support teams orientated to patient-centred ward-based care, then as hospital strategic committees and the concept of the ‘patient journey’. Indeed, the formation of the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (now known as BAPEN) in 1992 required the statesmanlike burying of jealousies as societies came together into a multiprofessional association. With the understanding that disease-related malnutrition was highly prevalent it became apparent that it must be managed on a broad and organised clinical front. In the Organisation of Food and Nutritional Support in Hospitals a group of professionals developed for BAPEN concepts of hospital-wide organisation to tackle malnutrition that were based on previous reports, both national and international, and were made easily accessible from the BAPEN website, especially the ‘Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool’ and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence nutrition guidelines. The coming together of six national clinical societies to develop evidence-based consensus guidelines for intravenous saline therapy (also on the BAPEN website) has shown that BAPEN can catalyse opinion well beyond its own nutritional constituency. In England Chris Pennington's Scottish lead is being followed by developing a patient-centred strategic framework for a managed home parenteral nutrition and intestinal failure national network. In research, education or clinical practice the engines of progress have been teams, strategies and networks.

Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition

BACKGROUND

Evidence for the effectiveness of nutritional supplements containing protein and energy, often prescribed for older people, is limited. Malnutrition is more common in this age group and deterioration of nutritional status can occur during illness. It is important to establish whether supplementing the diet is an effective way of improving outcomes for older people at risk from malnutrition.

OBJECTIVES

This review examined trials for improvement in nutritional status and clinical outcomes when extra protein and energy were provided, usually as commercial 'sip-feeds'.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar, CINAHL, BIOSIS, CAB abstracts. We also hand searched nutrition journals and reference lists and contacted 'sip-feed' manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of oral protein and energy supplementation in older people, with the exception of groups recovering from cancer treatment or in critical care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trials prior to inclusion and independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Authors of trials were contacted for further information as necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-two trials with 10,187 randomised participants have been included in the review. Maximum duration of intervention was 18 months. Most included trials had poor study quality. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) for percentage weight change showed a benefit of supplementation of 2.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8 to 2.5) from 42 trials. There was no significant reduction in mortality in the supplemented compared with control groups (relative risk (RR) 0.92, CI 0.81 to 1.04) from 42 trials. Mortality results were statistically significant when limited to trials in which participants (N = 2461) were defined as undernourished (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97).The risk of complications was reduced in 24 trials (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99). Few trials were able to suggest any functional benefit from supplementation. The WMD for length of stay from 12 trials also showed no statistically significant effect (-0.8 days, 95% CI -2.8 to 1.3). Adverse effects included nausea or diarrhoea.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Supplementation produces a small but consistent weight gain in older people. Mortality may be reduced in older people who are undernourished. There may also be a beneficial effect on complications which needs to be confirmed. However, this updated review found no evidence of improvement in functional benefit or reduction in length of hospital stay with supplements. Additional data from large-scale multi-centre trials are still required.

Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature

BACKGROUND

Although previous studies recommend the use of enteral nutrition (EN), the benefit of EN after elective gastrointestinal surgery has not been comprehensively demonstrated as through a meta-analysis. Our aim is to determine whether enteral nutrition is more beneficial than parenteral nutrition.

METHODS

A search was conducted on Medline, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library electronic databases, and bibliographic reviews. The trials were based on randomization, gastrointestinal surgery, and the reporting of at least one of the following end points: any complication, any infectious complication, mortality, wound infection and dehiscence, anastomotic leak, intraabdominal abscess, pneumonia, respiratory failure, urinary tract infection, renal failure, any adverse effect, and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine trials, which included 2,552 patients, met the criteria. EN was beneficial in the reduction of any complication (relative risk (RR), 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.99; P = 0.04), any infectious complication (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86; P = 0.001), anastomotic leak (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.95; P = 0.03), intraabdominal abscess (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95; P = 0.03), and duration of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.25-0.38; P = 0.02). There were no clear benefits in any of the other complications.

CONCLUSION

The present findings would lead us to recommend the use of EN rather than PN when possible and indicated.

Dietary advice for illness-related malnutrition in adults

BACKGROUND

Illness-related malnutrition has been reported in 10% to 55% of ill people in hospital and the community in areas of food sufficiency. Dietary advice encouraging the use of energy- and nutrient-rich foods rather than oral nutritional supplements has been suggested for managing illness-related malnutrition.

OBJECTIVES

To examine evidence that dietary advice to improve nutritional intake in adults with illness-related malnutrition improves survival, weight and anthropometry; to estimate the size of any additional effect of nutritional supplements given in combination with dietary advice.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant publications were identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Additional studies were sought by contacting dietitians, clinicians and the manufacturers of nutritional supplements. Last search: September 2007

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of dietary advice in people with illness-related malnutrition compared with:(1) no advice;(2) oral nutritional supplements; and(3) dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-six studies (37 comparisons) met the inclusion criteria with 2714 randomised participants. Twelve trials (comparing dietary advice plus supplements if required with no advice) identified during searching are included as a separate comparison. Follow up ranged from 18 days to 24 months. No comparison showed a significant difference in mortality. There are several significant results for change in weight and other nutritional indices favouring nutritional intervention, but the precise contributions of the different strategies have yet to be determined. It is uncertain whether nutritional supplements and dietary advice produce the same effects. There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about clinical outcomes and cost. Few data were available for other outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the lack of evidence for the provision of dietary advice in managing illness-related malnutrition. Dietary advice plus nutritional supplements may be more effective than dietary advice alone or no advice in enhancing short-term weight gain, but whether this is sustainable, or whether survival and morbidity are improved remains uncertain. A large adequately-powered randomised controlled trial is needed comparing the efficacy of different therapies to increase dietary intake in people with illness-related malnutrition and examining the impact of this on clinical function and survival.

A planning tool for two-phase case-control studies

We present a software tool for planning two-phase case-control studies assuming categorical covariates. Two-phase designs, in which validation or complete information data are sampled stratified both on a dichotomous outcome and a covariate from a first-phase study with incomplete data, result in efficient estimates compared to standard designs. Efficiency and power depend on sample size, sampling fractions within each stratum x outcome cell, distributional assumptions and the regression model. Our software, called Two-Phase Planning Tool (or 2P Planning Tool), offers a graphical user interface (GUI) to organize and input the relevant anticipated entities and calculates a normed, expected two-phase case-control study. The 2P Planning Tool is especially helpful in selecting a stratification. The data are output into an Excel-sheet, which in turn can be read into a standard statistics package to perform "experimental" power calculations. Its use is illustrated by an example from epidemiology. Software for analyzing logistic two-phase studies is also provided.

Who benefits from nutritional support: what is the evidence?

Nutritional support, including oral nutritional supplements, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition, can be an important part of the management of any patient. Malnutrition is common and costly, clinically and financially, if left untreated. In patients with, or at risk of, malnutrition, the appropriate use of nutritional support can prevent complications arising, produce other clinical, functional and financial benefits, and can be life saving in some situations. This article discusses the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effectiveness of nutritional support.

Does enteral nutrition affect clinical outcome? A systematic review of the randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Both parenteral nutrition (PN) and enteral nutrition (EN) are widely advocated as adjunctive care in patients with various diseases. A systematic review of 82 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PN published in 2001 found little, if any, effect on mortality, morbidity, or duration of hospital stay; in some situations, PN increased infectious complication rates.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to assess the effect of EN or volitional nutrition support (VNS) in individual disease states from available RCTs.

DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review. RCTs comparing EN or VNS with untreated controls, or comparing EN with PN, were identified and separated according to the underlying disease state. Meta-analysis was performed when at least three RCTs provided data. The evidence from the RCTs was summarized into one of five grades. A or B, respectively, indicated the presence of strong or weak (low-quality RCTs) evidence supporting the use of the intervention. C indicated a lack of adequate evidence to make any decision about efficacy. D indicated that limited data could not support the intervention. E indicated either that strong data found no effect, or that either strong or weak data suggested that the intervention caused harm.

PATIENTS AND SETTINGS

RCTs could include either hospitalized or nonhospitalized patients. The EN or VNS had to be provided as part of a treatment plan for an underlying disease process.

INTERVENTIONS

The RCT had to compare recipients of either EN or VNS with controls not receiving any type of artificial nutrition or had to compare recipients of EN with recipients of PN.

OUTCOME MEASURES

These were mortality, morbidity (disease specific), duration of hospitalization, cost, or interventional complications. SUMMARY OF GRADING: A: No indication was identified. B: EN or VNS in the perioperative patient or in patients with chronic liver disease; EN in critically ill patients or low birth weight infants (trophic feeding); VNS in malnourished geriatric patients. (The low-quality trials found a significant difference in survival favoring the VNS recipients in the malnourished geriatric patient trials; two high-quality trials found nonsignificant differences that favored VNS as well.) C: EN or VNS in liver transplantation, cystic fibrosis, renal failure, pediatric conditions other than low birth weight infants, well-nourished geriatric patients, nonstroke neurologic conditions, AIDS; EN in acute pancreatitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nonmalnourished geriatric patients; VNS in inflammatory bowel disease, arthritis, cardiac disease, pregnancy, allergic patients, preoperative bowel preparation. D: EN or VNS in patients receiving nonsurgical cancer treatment or in patients with hip fractures; EN in patients with inflammatory bowel disease; VNS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. E: EN in the first week in dysphagic, or VNS at any time in nondysphagic, stroke patients who are not malnourished; dysphagia persisting for weeks will presumably ultimately require EN.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence for not using EN in the first week in dysphagic, and not using VNS at all in nondysphagic, stroke patients who are not malnourished. There is reasonable evidence for using VNS in malnourished geriatric patients. The recommendations to consider EN/VNS in perioperative/liver/critically ill/low birth weight patients are limited by the low quality of the RCTs. No evidence could be identified to justify the use of EN/VNS in other disease states.

Dietary advice for illness-related malnutrition in adults

BACKGROUND

Illness-related malnutrition has been reported in 10% to 55% of ill people in hospital and the community in areas of food sufficiency. Dietary advice encouraging the use of energy- and nutrient-rich foods rather than oral nutritional supplements has been suggested for managing illness-related malnutrition.

OBJECTIVES

To examine evidence that dietary advice to improve nutritional intake in adults with illness-related malnutrition improves survival, weight and anthropometry; to estimate the size of any additional effect of nutritional supplements given in combination with dietary advice.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant publications were identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Additional studies were sought by contacting dietitians, clinicians and the manufacturers of nutritional supplements. Last search: October 2006

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of dietary advice in people with illness-related malnutrition compared with:(1) no advice;(2) oral nutritional supplements; and(3) dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-five studies (37 comparisons) met the inclusion criteria with 2648 randomised participants. Twelve trials (comparing dietary advice plus supplements if required with no advice) identified during searching are included as a separate comparison. Follow up ranged from 18 days to 24 months. No comparison showed a significant difference in mortality. Significant improvements in weight at three months were found for groups receiving dietary advice plus nutritional supplements compared with dietary advice alone, WMD 1.68 kg (95% CI 0.14 to 3.21) or no additional advice, WMD 1.97 (95% CI 0.07 to 3.86). There were significant improvements in grip strength and mid-arm muscle circumference in the advice plus supplement groups compared with dietary advice alone. It is uncertain whether nutritional supplements and dietary advice produce the same effects. No significant differences were found between groups for clinical outcomes. Few data were available for other outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the lack of evidence for the provision of dietary advice in managing illness-related malnutrition. Dietary advice plus nutritional supplements may be more effective than dietary advice alone or no advice in enhancing short-term weight gain, but whether this is sustainable, or whether survival and morbidity are improved remains uncertain. A large adequately-powered randomised controlled trial is needed comparing the efficacy of different therapies to increase dietary intake in people with illness-related malnutrition and examining the impact of this on clinical function and survival.

Early enteral nutrition within 24h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications

BACKGROUND

The role of early postoperative enteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery is controversial. Traditional management consist of 'nil by mouth', where patients receive fluids followed by solids when tolerated. Although several trials have implicated lower incidence of septic complications and faster wound healing upon early enteral feeding, other trials have shown opposite results. The immediate advantage of caloric intake could be a faster recovery with fewer complications, to be evaluated systematically.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether early commencement of postoperative enteral nutrition compared to traditional management (no nutritional supply) is associated with fewer complications in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PUBMED, EMBASE, and LILACS from 1979 (first RCT published) to March 2006. We manually scanned the references from the relevant articles, and consulted primary authors for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We looked for randomised controlled trials (RCT's) comparing early commencement of feeding (within 24 hours) with no feeding in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Early enteral nutrition is defined as all oral intakes (i.e. registered oral intake, supplemented oral feeding) and any kind of tube feeding (gastric, duodenal or jejunal) containing caloric content. No feeding is traditional management, defined as none caloric oral intake or any kind of tube feeding before bowel function. The definition 'no nutrition' includes non caloric placebo and water.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The three authors independently assessed the identified trials, and extracted the relevant data using a specifically developed data extraction sheet. Primary end points of interest were: Wound infections and intraabdominal abscesses, postoperative complications such as acute myocardial infarction, postoperative thrombosis or pneumonia, anastomotic leakages, mortality, length of hospital stay, and significant adverse effects. We combined data to estimate the common relative risk of postoperative complications, and calculated the associated 95% confidence intervals. For analysis, we used fixed effects model (risk ratios to summarise the treatment effect) whenever feasible. The treatment effect on length of stay was estimated using effect size (presented as mean +/- SD). Some outcomes were not analysed but presented in a descriptive way. We used a random effects model to estimate overall risk ratio and effect size.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified thirteen randomised controlled trials, with a total of 1173 patients, all undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Individual clinical complications failed to reach statistical significance, but the direction of effect indicates that earlier feeding may reduce the risk of post surgical complications. Mortality was the only outcome showing a significant benefit, but not necessarily associated with early commencement of feeding, as the reported cause of death was anastomotic leakage, reoperation, and acute myocardial infarction.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although non-significant results, there is no obvious advantage in keeping patients 'nil by mouth' following gastrointestinal surgery, and this review support the notion on early commencement of enteral feeding.

Nutritional supplementation and resistance training in nutritionally at risk older adults following lower limb fracture: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To describe the independent and combined effects of oral nutrition supplementation and resistance training on health outcomes in nutritionally at risk older adults following lower limb fracture.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial with 12-week masked outcome assessment.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred nutritionally at risk older adults hospitalized following a fall-related lower limb fracture.

INTERVENTION

Commenced seven days after injury. Consisted of daily multinutrient energy-dense oral supplement (6.3 kJ/mL) individually prescribed for six weeks (n = 25), tri-weekly resistance training for 12 weeks (n = 25), combined treatment (n = 24) or attention control plus usual care and general nutrition and exercise advice (n = 26).

MEASUREMENTS

Weight change, quadriceps strength, gait speed, quality of life and health care utilization at completion of the 12-week intervention.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, all groups lost weight: nutrition -6.2% (-8.4, -4.0); resistance training -6.3% (-8.3, -4.3); nutrition and resistance training -4.7% (-7.4, -2.0); attention control -5.2% (-9.0, -1.5). Those receiving resistance training alone lost more weight than those receiving the combined treatment (P= 0.029). Significant weight loss was prevented if supplement was consumed for at least 35 days. Groups were no different at 12 weeks for any other outcome.

CONCLUSION

Frail, undernourished older adults with a fall-related lower limb fracture experience clinically significant weight loss that is unable to be reversed with oral nutritional supplements. Those receiving a programme of resistance training without concurrent nutrition support are at increased risk of weight loss compared with those who receive a combined nutrition and resistance training intervention. In this high-risk patient group it is possible to prevent further decline in nutritional status using oral nutritional supplements if strategies are implemented to ensure prescription is adequate to meet energy requirements and levels of adherence are high.

An investigation into the current peri-operative nutritional management of oesophageal carcinoma patients in major carcinoma centres in England

INTRODUCTION

Patients with oesophageal carcinoma are at high risk of malnutrition. The aim of this study was to assess current practice for the nutritional management of patients following surgery for oesophageal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A postal questionnaire was sent to 82 dietetic departments of those hospitals in England identified as major centres for upper gastrointestinal surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 66 (80%) responses received, 22 (33%) centres routinely perform pre-operative nutritional screening/assessment on oesophageal carcinoma patients. Centres with dietetic support dedicated to these patients are more likely to perform a pre-operative nutritional assessment (n = 17; 55%) than those without (n = 5; 14%; P < 0.001; chi(2) = 12.17). Pre-operative nutritional support is routinely provided in only 11 (17%) centres with the majority of centres (n = 50; 75%), providing it if patients are considered malnourished only. A total of 47 (70%) centres routinely provide postoperative nutritional support with jejunal feeding being the most commonly chosen route. Dedicated dietetic support is provided at 31 (47%) centres. Those centres with a dedicated dietitian are more likely to provide early postoperative nutritional support (n = 27; 87%) than those without (n = 20; 57%; P = 0.007; chi(2) = 7.195) and more likely to review patients routinely following discharge from hospital (n = 25 [81%] with a dietitian versus n = 17 [49%] without; P = 0.007; chi(2) = 7.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The nutritional management of patients following surgery for upper gastrointestinal carcinoma is not uniform with practice varying considerably between centres. Those centres with a dedicated dietitian are more likely to assess patients' nutritional status and provide nutritional support.

Evidence for early oral feeding of patients after elective open colorectal surgery: a literature review

AIM

To review research on early oral feeding following elective, open colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND

Fasting following gastrointestinal surgery is a traditional surgical practice, based on fears of causing postoperative complications if oral intake begins before bowel function returns, but fasting following elective surgery is questionable as a best practice.

METHODS

Searches in Journals@Ovid CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library for primary studies, published during 1995-2004, used the keywords: 'surgery', 'postoperative', 'elective, 'colorectal', 'bowel, 'colon', 'oral', 'enteral', 'feeding', 'early', 'traditional'. Studies of adults undergoing elective, open colorectal surgery who were allowed fluids and food before bowel function returned (early feeding) were included. Outcomes of interest were safety, tolerability, duration of gastrointestinal ileus and length of hospital stay. Critical appraisal of randomized and controlled studies was undertaken following inclusion.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies comprising 1352 patients were reviewed. All studies concluded early feeding was safe, based on complications rates. Total complications were 12.5% (range 0-25%) for 935 early feeding patients, with no increased risk of anastomotic leak, aspiration pneumonia, or bowel obstruction. For all studies an average of 86% patients (range 73-100%) tolerated early feeding. Studies demonstrating faster resolution of postoperative ileus or shorter hospitalization were associated with multimodal perioperative care, including early mobilization, epidural analgesia and comprehensive patient education. Appraisal of five randomized trials revealed no blinding and inadequate randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

This review supports early oral feeding after elective, open colorectal surgery and challenges the traditional practice of fasting patients until return of bowel function. Early feeding was safe, well-tolerated and easy to implement. Reduced length of ileus and shorter hospitalization may occur with multimodal protocols.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses can highlight this new evidence for other health professionals, advocate development of clinical protocols featuring early feeding and participate in multi-disciplinary, multi-method research regarding benefits of early feeding.

ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Surgery including organ transplantation

Enhanced recovery of patients after surgery ("ERAS") has become an important focus of perioperative management. From a metabolic and nutritional point of view, the key aspects of perioperative care include: Enteral nutrition (EN) by means of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and if necessary tube feeding (TF) offers the possibility of increasing or ensuring nutrient intake in cases where food intake is inadequate. These guidelines are intended to give evidence-based recommendations for the use of ONS and TF in surgical patients. They were developed by an interdisciplinary expert group in accordance with officially accepted standards and are based on all relevant publications since 1980. The guideline was discussed and accepted in a consensus conference. EN is indicated even in patients without obvious undernutrition, if it is anticipated that the patient will be unable to eat for more than 7 days perioperatively. It is also indicated in patients who cannot maintain oral intake above 60% of recommended intake for more than 10 days. In these situations nutritional support should be initiated without delay. Delay of surgery for preoperative EN is recommended for patients at severe nutritional risk, defined by the presence of at least one of the following criteria: weight loss >10-15% within 6 months, BMI<18.5 kg/m(2), Subjective Global Assessment Grade C, serum albumin <30 g/l (with no evidence of hepatic or renal dysfunction). Altogether, it is strongly recommended not to wait until severe undernutrition has developed, but to start EN therapy early, as soon as a nutritional risk becomes apparent.

[Economic assessment of the implementation of a parenteral nutrition protocol for patients undergoing intestinal resection by a multidisciplinary team]

OBJECTIVE

An economic assessment on the impact of total parenteral nutrition guidelines developed by the Hospital Nutrition Committee for patients undergoing intestinal resection and implemented by a nutritional support multidisciplinary team, was conducted.

METHOD

A comparative retrospective study of two consecutive annual periods before and after the implementation of total parenteral nutrition guidelines for patients undergoing intestinal resection developed by the Nutrition Committee was carried out. Cost-effectiveness analysis from the hospital perspective was performed with the pharmacoeconomic program Pharma-Decision Hospital. Effectiveness was assessed as nutritional gain and safety profile; as well as determination of the costs of acquisition, preparation, administration, monitoring and nutritional complications. Sensitivity analysis (+/-20%) of effectiveness and hospital stay.

RESULTS

Among 326 patients hospitalized for intestinal resection, 69 out of 172 (40%) received parenteral nutrition during the early period, versus 40 out of 154 (26%) after the surgery procedure (p < 0.01). In 79% of the patients with parenteral nutrition, the adequacy of the indication was assessed, being adequate in 51.7% and 56.7%, respectively (p = 0.66). Nutritional gain before and after surgery was similar (78.3 vs. 82.5%, p > 0.05), with patients having less episodes of hypophosphatemia postoperatively (60 vs. 38%). Mean total cost per patient before and after surgery was 9,180.81 and 7,871.96, respectively. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the above results.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of total parenteral nutrition guidelines by the Nutrition Committee for surgical patients undergoing intestinal resection and their implementation by a multidisciplinary team improved the use of parenteral nutrition and reduced associated costs, with the same nutritional evolution.

Évolution périopératoire du statut nutritionnel en chirurgie carcinologique des voies aérodigestives supérieures. Étude prospective et descriptive

AIM OF THE STUDY

To assess the perioperative evolution of the nutritional status of head and neck surgical patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, descriptive case series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients candidates for total or partial laryngectomy for malignancy of the neck tract without a past of neck surgery. The nutritional status of all patients hospitalized for total pharyngolaryngectomy, total or partial laryngectomy was assessed by 1) clinical parameters including weight (W), weight variation (WV, percentage of loss), Body Mass Index (BMI), triceps skin fold measurement (T), midarm circumference (M), and 2) biological parameters such as serum albumin (SA), transthyretin (TTR), lymphocytes (Ly). These parameters were noted at the time of diagnostic laryngoscopy (T1), the day before surgery (T2), and 10 days afterward (T3) when patients were authorized to eat normally. All patients had enteral nutrition (EN) support (35 kcal/kg/day) starting at D1 and for 10 days afterward. Only complete data per patient were analyzed.

RESULTS

24 patients were excluded. During the 21 days [7-53] preoperative period (T1-T2), WV was (6.6% [-8,1-+20.0] [T2] vs. 4.7% [-12,9-+20.0] [T1], p<0.05) without difference in T and M. In the postoperative period (T2-T3), all parameters worsened, except T, with: WV (8.2% [-8,1-+20.0] [T3], p<0.05 vs T2), M (27.4 cm [20.0-37.0] [T3] vs 28.3 cm [20.5-39.0] [T2], p<0.05) et TTR (0.21 mg/l [0.09-0.36] [T3] vs. 0.27 mg/l [0.08-0.45] [T2], p<0.05). BMI was 22.9 [15.2-36.7] (T1) vs 22.9 [15.2-35.3] (T2), NS and 22.1 [15.0-34.9] (T3), p<0.05 vs (T2).

CONCLUSION

The nutritional status in malignancy head and neck surgical patients seems to be best assessed by loss weight. It worsened mainly during the postoperative period even if a well-conducted EN was performed as defined by the French consensus conference.

Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Clinical care of patients undergoing colonic surgery differs between hospitals and countries. In addition, there is considerable variation in rates of recovery and length of hospital stay following major abdominal surgery. There is a need to develop a consensus on key elements of perioperative care for inclusion in enhanced recovery programmes so that these can be widely adopted and refined further in future clinical trials.

METHODS

Medline database was searched for all clinical studies/trials relating to enhanced recovery after colorectal resection. Relevant papers from the reference lists of these articles and from the authors' personal collections were also reviewed. A combination of evidence-based and consensus methodology was used to develop the resulting enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) clinical care protocol.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Within traditional perioperative practice there is considerable evidence supporting a range of manoeuvres which, in isolation, may improve individual aspects of recovery after colonic surgery. The present manuscript reviews these issues in detail. There is also growing evidence that an integrated multimodal approach to perioperative care can result in an overall enhancement of recovery. However, effects on major morbidity and mortality remain to be determined. A protocol is presented which is in current use by the ERAS Group and may provide a standard of care against which either current or future novel elements of an enhanced recovery approach can be tested for their effect on outcome.

Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition

BACKGROUND

Evidence for the effectiveness of nutritional supplements containing protein and energy, which are often prescribed for older people, is limited. Furthermore malnutrition is more common in this age group and deterioration of nutritional status can occur during illness. It is important to establish whether supplementing the diet is an effective way of improving outcomes for older people at risk from malnutrition.

OBJECTIVES

This review examined the evidence from trials for improvement in nutritional status and clinical outcomes when extra protein and energy were provided, usually in the form of commercial 'sip-feeds'.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Healthstar, CINAHL, BIOSIS, CAB abstracts. We also hand searched nutrition journals and reference lists and contacted 'sip-feed' manufacturers. Date of most recent search: March 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials of oral protein and energy supplementation in older people with the exception of groups recovering from cancer treatment or in critical care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trials prior to inclusion and independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Authors of trials were contacted for further information as necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-nine trials with 4790 randomised participants have been included in the review. Most included trials had poor study quality. The pooled weighted mean difference [WMD] for percentage weight change showed a benefit of supplementation of 2.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9 to 2.7) from 34 trials. There was a reduced mortality in the supplemented compared with control groups (relative risk (RR) 0.74, CI 0.59 to 0.92) from 32 trials. The risk of complications from 14 trials showed no significant difference (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.11). Few trials were able to suggest any functional benefit from supplementation. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) for length of stay from 10 trials also showed no statistically significant effect (WMD -1.98 days, 95% CI -5.20 to 1.24).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Supplementation produces a small but consistent weight gain in older people. There may also be a beneficial effect on mortality. However, there was no evidence of improvement in clinical outcome, functional benefit or reduction in length of hospital stay with supplements. Additional data from large-scale multi-centre trials are still required.

Perioperative and postoperative nutrition

Nutritional deficiency among hospitalized patients is common, and is often unrecognized and untreated. Perioperative starvation is detrimental to recovery. Nutritional support can reduce morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay. This article reviews the evidence for parenteral, enteral and oral nutritional support in the perioperative and postoperative period.

Dietary advice and nutritional supplements in the management of illness-related malnutrition: systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This review investigated whether dietary advice to improve nutritional intake in adults with illness-related malnutrition improved mortality, morbidity, weight and energy intake, and whether oral nutritional supplements gave additional benefit, when given in combination with dietary advice.

METHODS

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing dietary advice with either (i) no advice, (ii) nutritional supplements or (iii) dietary advice plus nutritional supplements, in people with illness-related malnutrition.

RESULTS

Twenty-four trials (25 comparisons) met the inclusion criteria, including 2135 randomised participants. Duration of follow-up ranged from 16 days to 24 months. There was no significant difference in mortality or morbidity for each comparison. Groups receiving supplements gained significantly more weight (or lost significantly less weight) than those who received dietary advice, weighted mean difference 1.09 kg (0.29-1.90) (4 studies). There were no significant differences in weight and energy intake between groups for the other comparisons. Few data were available for other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Nutritional supplements may have a greater role than dietary advice in the short-term improvement of body weight in illness-related malnutrition. There is a lack of evidence to support dietary advice in the management of illness-related malnutrition, but this is based on few, often poor quality, studies.

Nutrition intervention is beneficial in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the gastrointestinal or head and neck area

Malnutrition occurs frequently in patients with cancer of the gastrointestinal (GI) or head and neck area and can lead to negative outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of early and intensive nutrition intervention (NI) on body weight, body composition, nutritional status, global quality of life (QoL) and physical function compared to usual practice in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the GI or head and neck area. Outpatients commencing at least 20 fractions of radiotherapy to the GI or head and neck area were randomised to receive intensive, individualised nutrition counselling by a dietitian using a standard protocol and oral supplements if required, or the usual practice of the centre (general advice and nutrition booklet). Outcome parameters were measured at baseline and 4, 8 and 12 weeks after commencing radiotherapy using valid and reliable tools. A total of 60 patients (51M : 9F; mean age 61.9±14.0 years) were randomised to receive either NI (n=29) or usual care (UC) (n=31). The NI group had statistically smaller deteriorations in weight (P<0.001), nutritional status (P=0.020) and global QoL (P=0.009) compared with those receiving UC. Clinically, but not statistically significant differences in fat-free mass were observed between the groups (P=0.195). Early and intensive NI appears beneficial in terms of minimising weight loss, deterioration in nutritional status, global QoL and physical function in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the GI or head and neck area. Weight maintenance in this population leads to beneficial outcomes and suggests that this, rather than weight gain, may be a more appropriate aim of NI.

Randomized clinical trial of the effects of preoperative and postoperative oral nutritional supplements on clinical course and cost of care

BACKGROUND

Postoperative oral nutritional supplementation has been shown to be of clinical benefit. This study examined the clinical effects and cost of administration of oral supplements both before and after surgery.

METHODS

This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in three centres. Patients undergoing lower gastrointestinal tract surgery were randomized to one of four groups: group CC received no nutritional supplements, group SS took supplements both before and after surgery, group CS received postoperative supplements only, and group SC were given supplements only before surgery. Preoperative supplements were given from the time it was decided to operate to 1 day before surgery. Postoperative supplements were started when the patient was able to take free fluids and continued for 4 weeks after discharge from hospital. Data collected included weight change, complications, length of stay, nutritional intake, anthropometrics, quality of life and detailed costings covering all aspects of care.

RESULTS

Some 179 patients were randomized, of whom 27 were withdrawn and 152 analysed (CC 44, SS 32, CS 35, SC 41). Dietary intake was similar in all four groups throughout the study. Mean energy intake from preoperative supplements was 536 and 542 kcal/day in the SS and SC groups respectively; that 2 weeks after discharge from hospital was 274 and 361 kcal/day in the SS and CS groups respectively. There was significantly less postoperative weight loss in the SS group than in the CC and CS groups (P < 0.050), and significantly fewer minor complications in the SS and CS groups than the CC group (P < 0.050). There were no differences in the rate of major complications, anthropometrics and quality of life. Mean overall costs were greatest in the CC group, although differences between groups were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative oral nutritional supplementation started before hospital admission for lower gastrointestinal tract surgery significantly diminished the degree of weight loss and incidence of minor complications, and was cost-effective.

Assessment of malnutrition in mental health clients: nurses' judgement vs. a nutrition risk tool

BACKGROUND

The existence of malnutrition in general hospitals is well documented. Psychiatric patients are known to have increased risk of malnutrition, yet physical examinations and nutritional assessments rarely take place in psychiatric hospitals.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to adapt an established nutrition risk score for use with psychiatric patients, using criteria previously agreed by the care team, and to assess whether the clinical judgement of ward staff alone identified a similar group of patients to be at risk.

METHOD

The risk score assessment was compared with a subjective risk assessment made by nursing staff as patients were admitted to the unit. Data were collected for 112 patients.

RESULTS

The comparison revealed that nurses did not identify malnutrition in the same patients as the risk score, overlooking 27 (29%) at risk patients. Nurses associated malnutrition with psychotic illness, suggesting that depressed patients are more likely to be overlooked.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Although the risk score was based on a validated tool and its content and face validity were established, it has not itself been validated against criteria of nutritional status (malnutrition).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing routine nutritional screening on such units would assist in identifying at risk patients, enabling referral for dietetic intervention to be made. Providing nutrition education for staff might help to improve knowledge and awareness of malnutrition for this patient group.

New developments facilitating nutritional intake after gastrointestinal surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Conventional perioperative care includes a period of semistarvation before bowel function returns and adequate oral intake is allowed. It has been clearly shown that there is no need for restriction in oral intake after, at least lower, gastrointestinal surgery, and that early oral feeding does not increase the risk for dehiscense of the anastomosis. In contrast, early feeding reduces postoperative complications. Even if early oral intake is allowed, however, it is common that side effects such as nausea and vomiting prevent patients from reaching the target energy intakes. Thus, developing routines and treatments that promote sufficient early oral intake after surgery and maintain adequate energy intake in the postoperative period are probably of great importance for the outcome from surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are a number of factors which may facilitate early oral intake after gastrointestinal surgery including effective pain relief using epidural anaesthesia while avoiding opioids, minimizing sodium and fluid administration perioperatively and substantially reducing preoperative fasting. In addition, sufficient preoperative information, intensive mobilization, energy-dense hospital food and oral supplements may all contribute to improved energy intake after surgery.

SUMMARY

In general, there is a great need for randomized controlled trials examining factors important for the regulation of oral intake after surgery and also the effects of early oral intake after upper gastrointestinal surgery. Future areas of research may also include regulation of appetite and use of peripherally acting opioid antagonists.

A program to reduce fatigue in convalescing elderly adults

This study is an examination of the influence of a fatigue reduction program on the level of fatigue experienced by elderly individuals convalescing in subacute units after lower extremity injury, surgery, or weakness. Fifty participants with a mean age of 81 were divided into two groups of 25 participants. The experimental group received a fatigue reduction program consisting of planned rest periods after bathing and therapy; high-protein, high-carbohydrate liquid supplement; and a 3-minute back rub at bedtime. Each participant's level of fatigue was tested soon after admission and 1 week later, and data were analyzed using the paired t test. The difference between the change in pre-test and post-test scores of the two groups was significant in all three measures of fatigue. The experimental group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in fatigue. The outcomes reinforced the value of nursing interventions that have been an integral component of nursing care from its beginning: promoting nutrition, alternating periods of activity and rest, and including a back rub in evening care.

Benefits and limitations of enteral nutrition in the early postoperative period

BACKGROUND

Preexisting malnutrition has been shown to be a major clinical problem in surgical patients. Surgical stress itself increases the energy expenditure and protein loss making necessary the early nutritional support. Although there is strong evidence that "nil by mouth" is not justified, the data are still conflicting over the role of early enteral nutrition compared with the traditional methods of postoperative feeding including total parenteral nutrition support.

METHODS AND FOCUS

This paper deals with the various trials related to early enteral feeding. It also compares this with the possible advantages of total parenteral nutrition as a method of perioperative nutritional support in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

Early oral feeding after elective abdominal surgery--what are the issues?

This review analyzes the literature and the historical concerns (restrictions, traditions, nasogastric tube) and pathophysiologic factors (postoperative ileus, risk of anastomotic dehiscence, nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite) invoked for not instituting early oral feeding after major abdominal procedures. It appears that several factors may promote postoperative oral feeding such as thoracic epidural analgesia, multimodal anti-emetic treatment, opioid-sparing analgesia, selective peripheral opioid antagonists, and enforced oral nutrition. Recent data from multimodal fast-track rehabilitation surgical programs in abdominal surgery provide a rational basis for future studies to investigate and facilitate enforced oral feeding after major abdominal procedures.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for postoperative fatigue

BACKGROUND

Postoperative fatigue is common, even after uncomplicated operations. Various theories have been presented regarding its aetiology, each suggesting different possible interventions. The purpose of this review was to identify all studies that have assessed interventions for postoperative fatigue and to evaluate these interventions using meta-analytical techniques.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials of interventions, identified from a systematic search of relevant databases, were evaluated according to standardized criteria and categorized according to intervention modality. Data relating to the efficacy of each intervention at four different postoperative time-points were collated and data synthesis by meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Analgesia is effective in reducing fatigue immediately after operation. Perioperative administration of human growth hormone reduces fatigue between 8 and 30 days after abdominal surgery. Weaker evidence was found to suggest an influence of glucocorticoid administration and of surgical technique on fatigue in the first week after operation. No evidence was found to support the theory that psychosocial or nutritional interventions affect the symptom.

CONCLUSION

While the results demonstrate that improved analgesia can attenuate immediate postoperative fatigue in most patient groups, further research is needed to determine whether the efficacy of human growth hormone and glucocorticoids extends beyond abdominal surgery. The paucity of research into cognitive-behavioural, sleep and activity-based interventions also needs to be addressed.

Patients' experiences of their intake of food and fluid following gastrectomy due to tumor

Several studies have documented patients' intake of parenteral and enteral nutrition following gastrointestinal surgery. There is a lack of knowledge, however, regarding patients' experiences of intake of food and fluid following gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of this study was to describe patients' experiences of their appetite, hunger, changes in weight, and intake of food and fluid three months after gastrointestinal surgery due to tumor. Fifteen patients were invited to be interviewed regarding their experiences following gastrointestinal surgery due to tumor. The method used for data analysis was a qualitative content analyses approach. The categorization of data identified three themes: 1) the struggle to eat and drink; 2) bodily estrangement; and 3) nutritional treatment regimens. These three themes consisted of subthemes such as: lack of appetite and hunger; difficulties in eating and drinking; feelings of nausea; and fighting and adaptation. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of these patients' nutritional regimen and suggest the individual's personal situation and living circumstances should be considered when developing a nutritional plan following gastrointestinal surgery for tumor.

Nutritional status of elective gastrointestinal surgery patients pre- and post-operatively

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Studies have indicated that undernutrition is common on admission to hospital but there is limited data on change in nutritional parameters during the hospital stay. We assessed the nutritional status of elective gastrointestinal surgery patients on admission and documented change in nutritional indices during hospitalisation.

METHODS

Two hundred patients aged 18-80 years undergoing elective open gastrointestinal surgery were nutritionally assessed on admission and 150 were reassessed on commencement of oral diet post-surgery. Data were collected on height, weight, upper arm anthropometry and hand-grip dynamometry.

RESULTS

On admission BMI <20, 20-24.9 and >25, respectively, were found in 9%, 34% and 57% of patients. Post-surgery, 34% of patients experienced a clinically significant weight loss. Males lost significantly more weight (3.7% vs 1.6%, P<0.001) and tended to lose muscle mass while females preferentially lost subcutaneous fat.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of undernutrition on admission appears to be lower than previously reported. However, clinically significant weight loss was common and this study highlighted gender differences in the changes in nutritional parameters experienced by gastrointestinal surgery patients. This differential influence of gender warrants further investigation and may have implications for the nutritional management of such patients.

Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition

BACKGROUND

Postoperative organ dysfunction contributes to morbidity, hospital stay and convalescence. Multimodal rehabilitation with epidural analgesia, early oral feeding, mobilization and laxative use after colonic resection has reduced ileus and hospital stay.

METHODS

Fourteen patients receiving conventional care (group 1) and 14 patients who had multimodal rehabilitation (group 2) were studied before and 8 days after colonic resection. Outcome measures included postoperative mobilization, body composition by whole-body dual X-ray absorptiometry, cardiovascular response to treadmill exercise, pulmonary function and nocturnal oxygen saturation.

RESULTS

Defaecation occurred earlier (median day 1 versus day 4) and hospital stay was shorter (median 2 versus 12 days) in patients who had multimodal treatment. Lean body and fat mass decreased in group 1 but not in group 2. Exercise performance decreased by 44 per cent in group 1 but was unchanged in group 2. A postoperative increase in heart rate (HR) response to exercise was avoided in group 2. Pulmonary function decreased in group 1 but not in group 2. There was less nocturnal postoperative hypoxaemia in group 2. Cardiac demand-supply (HR/oxygen saturation ratio) increased in group 1 but not in group 2.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal rehabilitation prevents reduction in lean body mass, pulmonary function, oxygenation and cardiovascular response to exercise after colonic surgery.