Imaging-guided injection techniques with fluoroscopy and CT for spinal pain management

The short- and medium-term effectiveness of CT-guided selective cervical nerve root injection for pain and disability

INTRODUCTION

CT-guided cervical nerve root injection with corticosteroid and/or local anesthetic is a recognized technique in the evaluation and treatment of cervical radiculopathy. There are few prospective studies on the efficacy of the various techniques employed in cervical nerve root injection. We present our results from a 1-year prospective series using a CT-guided anterolateral transforaminal approach for cervical nerve root injection of bupivacaine and dexamethasone.

METHODS

Pain using a numeric rating scale was assessed at pre-injection, 15 min post-injection, 1 month, and 3 months. Disability was assessed using the Oswestry Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire at pre-injection, 1 month post-injection, and 3 months.

RESULTS

In total, 50 patients were followed for 3 months. The mean reductions in pain were: 15 min (77 %), 1 month (39 %), and 3 months (33 %). The mean reductions in NDI were: 1 month (26 %) and 3 months (also 26 %). Results were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-guided selective cervical nerve root injection in the treatment of cervical radicular pain and related disability produces statistically significant reductions in pain and disability to at least 3 months post-procedure.

Musculoskeletal aspiration procedures

With advances in imaging technology, there has been a significant increase in the number and range of interventional musculoskeletal image-guided procedures. One of the most commonly performed image-guided musculoskeletal interventions is the diagnostic and therapeutic percutaneous aspiration and drainage of multiple types of intra-articular, juxta-articular, and intramuscular pathologic fluid collections. These procedures may be performed under fluoroscopic, ultrasound, computed tomography, or even magnetic resonance guidance depending on the location to be accessed, type of pathology, patient characteristics, and operator preference. Musculoskeletal image-guided aspiration and drainage procedures are minimally invasive and generally very safe while offering valuable diagnostic information as well as therapeutic benefit. This article focuses on the appropriate indications, contraindications, and general technique for accessing the major joints via imaging guidance. For each joint, we discuss pertinent anatomy, appropriate imaging modalities, and preferred approaches to gaining intra-articular access. Additionally, the article discusses some of the more frequently encountered juxta-articular and intramuscular fluid collections that can be accessed and aspirated via percutaneous intervention, with mention of the importance of recognizing extremity sarcomas that can mimic these benign collections.

Effect of facet joint injection versus systemic steroids in low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of facet joint injection versus systemic steroid in patients with a diagnosis of facet joint syndrome.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The term facet joint syndrome has been used to define back pain originating from the facet joints. Treatment is mainly conservative, although interventions, including intra-articular injections and medial branch nerve blocks are used to manage facet-mediated pain. Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness of these interventions. Results of facet joint injection, however, are conflicting.

METHODS

Sixty subjects with a diagnosis of facet joint syndrome were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into experimental and control groups. The experimental group was administered with intra-articular injection of 6 lumbar facet joints with triamcinolone hexacetonide; the control group was administered with triamcinolone acetonide intramuscular injection of 6 lumbar paravertebral points. Visits were taken at baseline and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after interventions. Outcome measures were used: pain visual analogue scale, pain visual analogue scale during extension of the spine, Likert scale, improvement percentage scale, Roland-Morris, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and accountability of medications taken.Homogeneity was tested using the Student t, Pearson χ, and Mann-Whitney tests. Analysis of variance was used to analyze differences in the groups over time and the Student t test to analyze differences between groups at each time evaluation.

RESULTS

The groups were similar at baseline. Comparisons between the groups showed, in analysis of variance analysis, an improvement in the experimental group regarding diclofenac intake and quality of life, in the "role physical" profile, assessed by 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.In the analysis at each time point, an improvement in the experimental group was also found in the Roland-Morris questionnaire, in the improvement percentage scale and in the response to treatment, assessed by the Likert scale.

CONCLUSION

Both treatments were effective, with a slight superiority of the intra-articular injection of steroids over intramuscular injection.

Optimal contrast concentration for CT-guided epidural steroid injections

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Contrast is used in CT-guided epidural steroid injections to ensure proper needle placement. Once injected, undiluted contrast often obscures the needle, hindering subsequent repositioning. The purpose of this investigation was to establish the optimal contrast dilution for CT-guided epidural steroid injections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This investigation consisted of an initial phantom study, followed by a prospective, randomized, single-center trial assessing a range of contrast dilutions. In the phantom study, a phantom housing a chamber containing a 22-gauge needle and various dilutions of contrast was scanned, and images were evaluated for needle visibility. On the basis of these results, concentrations of 66, 100, 133, and 150 mg/mL iodine were selected for evaluation in a clinical study. Patients presenting for CT-guided epidural steroid injections were randomly assigned to a contrast dilution, and images from the procedure were evaluated by 2 readers blinded to the contrast assignment. Needle visibility was scored by use of a 5-point scale.

RESULTS

In the phantom study, the needle was not visible at contrast concentrations of ≥133 mg/mL. In the clinical study, needle visibility was strongly associated with contrast concentration (P < .0001). Significant improvements in visibility were found in 66 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL compared with higher iodine concentrations; no difference was found comparing 66 mg/mL with 100 mg/mL iodine. Neither injection location (cervical versus lumbar) nor technique (interlaminar versus transforaminal) influenced visibility scores.

CONCLUSIONS

For CT-guided epidural steroid injections, the optimal contrast concentration is 66-100 mg/mL iodine. Because these concentrations are not commercially available, proceduralists must dilute their contrast for such procedures.

[Imaging-guided injection techniques of the lumbar spine]

Spinal injections are an important treatment option in the conservative management of many spinal disorders. A large number of imaging techniques are available to achieve a precise and safe needle placement in interventional procedures. Fluoroscopy-guided injections are safe, cost effective and available in most institutions. The following article presents an overview of common fluoroscopy-guided spinal injection therapy of the lumbar spine.

[Injection techniques in the cervical spine]

Spinal injections are a treatment option in the conservative management of degenerative spinal disorders. The indications must be critically reviewed for every patient. Treatment with injections for painful spinal disorders should be a part of interdisciplinary treatment regimes. The diagnostic value varies between injection procedures. A large number of imaging techniques are used to achieve a precise and safe needle placement in interventional procedures. The following article presents an overview of common fluoroscopy-guided spinal injection techniques for the cervical spine.

ICRP Publication 117. Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department

An increasing number of medical specialists are using fluoroscopy outside imaging departments, but there has been general neglect of radiological protection coverage of fluoroscopy machines used outside imaging departments. Lack of radiological protection training of those working with fluoroscopy outside imaging departments can increase the radiation risk to workers and patients. Procedures such as endovascular aneurysm repair, renal angioplasty, iliac angioplasty, ureteric stent placement, therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography,and bile duct stenting and drainage have the potential to impart skin doses exceeding Gy. Although tissue reactions among patients and workers from fluoroscopy procedures have, to date, only been reported in interventional radiology and cardiology,the level of fluoroscopy use outside imaging departments creates potential for such injuries.A brief account of the health effects of ionising radiation and protection principles is presented in Section 2. Section 3 deals with general aspects of the protection of workers and patients that are common to all, whereas specific aspects are covered in Section 4 for vascular surgery, urology, orthopaedic surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology,gastroenterology and hepatobiliary system, and anaesthetics and pain management.Although sentinel lymph node biopsy involves the use of radio-isotopic methods rather than fluoroscopy, performance of this procedure in operating theatres is covered in this report as it is unlikely that this topic will be addressed in another ICRP publication in coming years. Information on radiation dose levels to patients and workers, and dose management is presented for each speciality.

Effective Dose of CT-Guided Epidural and Periradicular Injections of the Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Study

Spinal injection procedures can be performed blindly or, more accurately, with fluoroscopic or computed tomography (CT) guidance. Radiographic guidance for selective nerve root blocks and epidural injections allows an accurate needle placement, reduces the procedure time and is more secure for the patient, especially in patients with marked degenerative changes and scoliosis, resulting in a narrowing of the interlaminar space. Limiting factors remain the availability of scanners and the radiation dose. Interventional CT scan protocols in axial CT-acquisition mode for epidural and periradicular injections help to limit the radiation dose without a significant decrease of image quality. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the effective radiation dosage patients are exposed during CT-guided epidural lumbar and periradicular injections. A total amount of n=1870 datasets from 18 months were analyzed after multiplying the dose length product with conversion factor k for each lumbar segment. For lumbar epidural injections (n=1286), a mean effective dose of 1.34 mSv (CI 95%, 1.30-1.38), for periradicular injections (n=584) a mean effective dose of 1.38 mSv (CI 95%, 1.32-1.44) were calculated.

The influence of patient position on withdrawal force of thoracic epidural catheters

We investigated the forces required to remove thoracic epidural catheters to determine the effect of patient position on removal. Eighty-four patients undergoing open thoracotomy and thoracic patient-controlled epidural analgesia were enrolled. Catheterisation was performed under fluoroscopic guidance before surgery, and the patients were allocated to one of three position groups for removal: prone; sitting; and lateral. On the third postoperative day, the peak tension during withdrawal in the assigned position was measured. No differences in mean (SD) forces were found between groups: prone 1.61 (0.39) N, supine 1.62 (0.61) N and lateral 1.36 (0.56) N (p = 0.140). The withdrawal forces required to remove thoracic epidural catheters were not affected by the position. Thus, the position for removal can be determined by patient's choice and clinical judgement.

A miniature patient-mount navigation system for assisting needle placement in CT-guided intervention

BACKGROUND

CT-guided intervention is routinely performed in an iterative fashion that often leads to lengthy operation and high X-ray exposure to patients. To streamline the workflow, we develop a patient-mount navigation system for assisting needle placement in CT-guided interventions.

METHODS

The system comprises three components, a miniature patient-mount tracking unit, an auto-registered reference-frame unit and an intuitive image-processing unit. The system is operated like a virtual biplane fluoroscopy with augmented CT reconstructed images to streamline the conventional CT-guided intervention workflow. Surgery efficiency and safety can be increased, while radiation for patients and surgeons can be reduced. Two preclinical validations were conducted to evaluate the technical applicability and accuracy of the system.

RESULTS

The results of the rigid physical phantom test showed a machine position error of 1.6 mm and a tilting error of 1.5°. The results of the deformable porcine phantom test showed the operation position error to be 3.6 mm and tilting error to be 2.9°.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that the accuracy of our system is within the comparable range of the existing navigation systems.

Image-guided lumbar facet joint infiltration in nonradicular low back pain

Objective:

To assess the efficacy of facet joint infiltrations for pain relief in 44 selected patients with chronic nonradicular low back pain (LBP).

Materials and Methods:

Forty-four patients with chronic LBP of more than 3 months' duration were selected for facet joint infiltration. The majority (n = 24) had facetal pain with no evidence of significant facetal arthropathy on imaging. Fifteen patients had radiological evidence of facetal arthropathy, one had a facet joint synovial cyst, three were post–lumbar surgery patients, and two patients had spondylolysis. Facet joint injections were carried out under fluoroscopic guidance in 39 patients and under CT guidance in 5 cases. Pain relief was assessed using the visual analog scale at 1 h post-procedure and, thereafter, at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks.

Results:

A total of 141 facet joints were infiltrated in 44 patients over a 2-year period. There was significant pain relief in 81.8% patients 1 h after the procedure, in 86.3% after 1 week, in 93.3% after 4 weeks, in 85.7% after 12 weeks, and in 62.5% after 24 weeks. No major complications were encountered.

Conclusions:

Facet nerve block was found to be a simple, minimally invasive, and safe procedure. With meticulous patient selection, we achieved long-term success rates of over 60%. We conclude that this method represents an important alternative treatment for nonradicular back pain.

Comparison of clinical effectiveness of cervical transforaminal steroid injection according to different radiological guidances (C-arm fluoroscopy vs. computed tomography fluoroscopy)

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Transforaminal steroid injection using C-arm fluoroscopy has been regarded as a useful method of treatment for cervical herniated disc. But C-arm fluoroscopy cannot identify soft tissue; so there is controversy about its safety and efficacy. Computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy permits precise anatomical resolution and has the potential to offer a safer technique compared with C-arm fluoroscopy.

PURPOSE

This study was to identify the clinical effectiveness of CT fluoroscopy guidance in cervical transforaminal steroid injection compared with C-arm fluoroscopy guidance.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Prospective randomized controlled study/spine hospital. PATIENTS SAMPLE: Patients with neck pain and radiating upper limb pain resulting from cervical disc herniation participated in the study. They were allocated into either the CT (CT group, N=51) or C-arm (C group, N=65) fluoroscopy guidance group.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score and Neck Disability Index (NDI) values were measured at pretreatment and 8 weeks after treatment. Successful pain relief and functional improvement were defined as a 50% or more reduction in NRS and at least 40% reduction in NDI compared with pretreatment one. Numeric Rating Scale and NDI efficiency were also calculated by the difference between pre and 8 weeks after treatment to validate the degree of change in pain reduction and functional improvement.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks, both groups showed pain reduction and functional improvement. The CT group showed significantly the better outcomes in reduction of NRS for arm pain score and improvement of NDI. Whereas the CT group had no cases of side effects, the C group had 10 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The CT group, without any side effects, showed the better effectiveness than the C-arm group in the improvement of radiating pain and functional status in patients with cervical disc herniation. Therefore, CT fluoroscopy can be a substitute for C-arm fluoroscopy in transforaminal steroid injection when treating patients with cervical disc herniation.

A new simplified sonographic approach for pararadicular injections in the lumbar spine: a CT-controlled cadaver study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Injection therapies play a major role in the treatment of lower back pain and are to date performed mainly under CT or fluoroscopic guidance. The benefits of US-guided instillation procedures have been shown in many studies. We conducted this study to simplify an US-guided approach to the lumbar spinal nerves and to assess the feasibility and preliminary accuracy by means of CT and anatomic dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten US-guided injections at 5 different levels (L1-L5) were performed on 1 embalmed cadaver. Images in 3 sagittal/parasagittal scanning planes were obtained at each lumbar level: 1) the plane of the spinous processes, 2) the plane of the lumbar arches/zygapophyseal-joints, and 3) the plane of the transverse processes. The PAP was then defined by positioning the transducer perpendicularly over the medial part of the respective transverse processes, depicting the hyperechoic intertransverse ligament. In the "in-plane technique," spinal needles were advanced through the respective segmental intertransverse ligament. A solution consisting of a contrast agent and a pigmented dispersion was subsequently injected into the pararadicular compartment. An anatomic dissection of the specimen and CT scans were performed to verify the exact placement of the needle tips and to evaluate fluid dispersion in the punctured compartment.

RESULTS

CT examination confirmed that each needle tip was correctly placed within the intended compartment with sufficient contrast accumulation around the respective proximal segment of the spinal nerve. On each anatomic section, dye was identified in the correct compartment and directly around each targeted spinal nerve with needles shown in the correct position.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified US approach for therapeutic root injections in the lumbar spine by using the intertransverse ligament as a new anatomic landmark allows an easy and correct needle placement within the pararadicular compartment.

Image-guided facet joint injection

Chronic spine pain poses a peculiar diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to multiple pain sources, overlapping clinical features and nonspecific radiological findings. Facet joint injection is an interventional pain management tool for facet-related spinal pain that can be effectively administered by a radiologist. This technique is the gold standard for identifying facet joints as the source of spinal pain. The major indications for facet injections include strong clinical suspicion of the facet syndrome, focal tenderness over the facet joints, low back pain with normal radiological findings, post-laminectomy syndrome with no evidence of arachnoiditis or recurrent disc disease, and persistent low back pain after spinal fusion. The contraindications are more ancillary, with none being absolute. Like any synovial joint degeneration, inflammation and injury can lead to pain on motion, initiating a vicious cycle of physical deconditioning, irritation of facet innervations and muscle spasm. Image-guided injection of local anesthetic and steroid into or around the facet joint aims to break this vicious cycle and thereby provide pain relief. This outpatient procedure has high diagnostic accuracy, safety and reproducibility but the therapeutic outcome is variable.

Cervical nerve injection: computed tomography guidance with intravenous contrast and extraforaminal needle placement. Series of seven consecutive case reports

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Image-guided cervical nerve injections are being performed with increasing frequency. Severe complications are being reported.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to introduce a technique for cervical nerve injection that may decrease the possibility for severe complications.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a series of case reports describing the technique and clinical follow-up.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The sample comprises seven consecutive cases of unilateral neck and arm pain referred for cervical nerve injection.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Retrospective evaluation of pain relief before and after the injection and at follow-up is reported as case studies.

METHODS

The technique for computed tomography guided cervical nerve injection is described with case reports of seven consecutive patients.

RESULTS

The results are case reports of each of the seven patients after unilateral cervical nerve injection.

CONCLUSION

A technique for cervical nerve injection is described with the results of the injection. This technique may allow some standardization in the procedure, decrease the learning curve for training physicians, and minimize the potential complications.

Morphologic evaluation of cervical and lumbar facet joints: intra-articular facet block considerations

STUDY DESIGN

Needle orientations for lumbar and cervical facet injection were measured in cadavers and compared with facet angles measured on magnetic resonance images (MRIs).

OBJECTIVES

To establish facet orientation relative to clinical procedures of a facet joint block in the cervical and lumbar spine.

METHODS

Needle orientation angles were measured from 20 unembalmed human cadaveric specimens (13 cervical and 7 lumbar). Spinal needles were inserted into the midpoints of the facet joint spaces from C3 to C7 and L1 to L5. Needle trajectories were measured with an optical tracking system. For comparison, facet angles from 100 clinical MRIs of lumbar spines were also measured. Facet orientations on MRIs were measured at their intersection with the transverse plane, and angles were quantified using image analysis software.

RESULTS

Typical angles for insertion of the needle into the cervical facets were oriented closer to the coronal plane, whereas insertion angles for lumbar needles were oriented closer to the sagittal plane. Relative to the sagittal plane, the mean cervical angle was 72 degrees and the mean lumbar angle was 33 degrees. The insertion points of the cervical facets were a mean of 29 mm from the midsagittal plane compared with a mean of 22 mm for the lumbar facets. MRI-based facet joint angles correlated poorly with actual injection angles, which were overestimated 5 to 23 degrees, depending on the lumbar level.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of the quantitative anatomy of the facets may help improve clinical diagnosis and treatment. These data also may aid in constructing more realistic computer simulations.

Computed Tomography Fluoroscopic-guided Percutaneous Spinal Interventions in the Management of Spinal Pain

Local back pain and radiculopathy can be debilitating for sufferers of these conditions. There are a multitude of treatment modalities, ranging from conservative approaches such as bed rest, physical therapy and chiropractic manipulation, to more invasive options such as percutane- ous spinal intervention (PSI) and surgery. We present here the techniques employed in the use of minimally invasive, image-guided percutaneous techniques under computed tomography fluoroscopy in our institutions. The inherent high spatial and tissue contrast resolution not only allows ease of trajectory planning in avoiding critical structures, but also allows precision needle placement. Cervical, lumbosacral, and sacroiliac pain can therefore be evaluated and treated both safely and effectively. Key words: Back pain, Fluoroscopy, Spinal injections

Spinal injection procedures: a review of concepts, controversies, and complications

The field of spinal injection procedures is growing at a tremendous rate. Many disciplines are involved, including radiology, anesthesiology, orthopedics, physiatry and rehabilitation medicine, as well as other specialties. However, there remains tremendous variability in the assessment of patients receiving these therapies, methods for evaluation of outcome, and in the understanding of where these procedures belong in the triaging of those who require surgery. In this article, we attempt to highlight the biologic concepts on which these therapies are based, controversies that have arisen with their increasing use, and a description of complications that have been reported.

Management of chronic low back pain: rationales, principles, and targets of imaging-guided spinal injections

If low back pain does not improve with conservative management, the cause of the pain must be determined before further therapy is initiated. Information obtained from the patient's medical history, physical examination, and imaging may suffice to rule out many common causes of chronic pain (eg, fracture, malignancy, visceral or metabolic abnormality, deformity, inflammation, and infection). However, in most cases, the initial clinical and imaging findings have a low predictive value for the identification of specific pain-producing spinal structures. Diagnostic spinal injections performed in conjunction with imaging may be necessary to test the hypothesis that a particular structure is the source of pain. To ensure a valid test result, diagnostic injection procedures should be monitored with fluoroscopy, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. The use of controlled and comparative injections helps maximize the reliability of the test results. After a symptomatic structure has been identified, therapeutic spinal injections may be administered as an adjunct to conservative management, especially in patients with inoperable conditions. Therapeutic injections also may help hasten the recovery of patients with persistent or recurrent pain after spinal surgery.

A cervical nerve block approach to improve safety

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this report is to describe a previously unreported technique of selective cervical nerve block, performed from January 1, 2004, to May 19, 2006, in 560 injections, that was designed to allow continual monitoring of injectate passage and verification of needle tip position. We also illustrate faulty needle placement in a cadaveric neck.

CONCLUSION

Using a short connecting tube, contrast material mixed with the final injectate, and fluoroscopy when performing a selective cervical nerve block allows continual monitoring of injectate including where washout of the original testing contrast material actually flows. A true lateral view shows a more dangerous anterior needle tip placement. In addition, performing a test with anesthetic and contrast material, waiting 1.5 minutes before administering the final injectate, and using a water-soluble steroid may provide further safety with selective cervical nerve block.

Infiltrations, blocs et neurolyses en pathologie ostéo-articulaire

Computed Tomography fluoroscopy for blocks and neurolysis provides a minimally-invasive, accurate and rapid alternative to surgery. Spinal and peri-spinal ultrasound-guided procedures, excluding peripheral procedures, will be discussed as well. The imaging-guided procedures discussed are performed using small needles. These percutaneous procedures must be performed with maximum patient comfort and cause as little complications as possible. These procedures should be performed by an experienced radiologist after discussion with the treating clinician.

Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection for neck pain and cervical radiculopathy: effect and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE

To verify the usefulness of a fluoroscopy guided cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection (CIESI) in patients with neck pain and cervical radiculopathy and to evaluate outcome predictors.

DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed 91 patients from July 2004 to June 2005 in whom CIESI was initially performed for neck pain and cervical radiculopathy. Therapeutic effects were evaluated 2 weeks after the administration of CIESI, and CIESI effectiveness was graded using a five-point scale, namely, whether the pain had disappeared, was much improved, slightly improved, the same, or aggravated. We also used a visual analog scale (VAS) for the clinical evaluation. According to documentation and follow-up charts, we categorized treatments as effective or ineffective. Possible outcome predictors, namely, diagnosis (spinal stenosis vs herniated disc), primary symptoms (neck pain vs radiculopathy vs both), age, gender, and duration of pain (more or less than 6 months) were also analyzed. Fisher's exact test, the chi-square test, and multiple logistic regression analysis were used for the statistical analysis.

PATIENTS

After their medical records had been reviewed, 76 patients were included in this study. Inclusion criteria were: the availability of a cross-sectional image, such as a CT scan or an MR image, and a follow-up record after injection.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The medical records of 76 patients (male:female = 41 : 35) of mean age 53.1 years (range 32 years to 82 years) were reviewed. Two weeks after injection, 55 patients (72.4%) had experienced effective pain relief. Patients with herniated discs had significantly better results than patients with spinal stenosis (86.1% vs 60.0%) (P < 0.05). Other non-significant predictors of an improved outcome included: a symptom duration of <6 months, a young age, and the presence of cervical radiculopathy. Multiple regression analysis showed that the only factor that was significantly associated with outcome was the cause of the pain, i.e., herniated disc or spinal stenosis. Fluoroscopy guided CIESI is a safe and effective means of treating patients with neck pain and cervical radiculopathy. The most important outcome predictor was cause of pain, and patients with herniated disc experienced better pain relief than those with spinal stenosis.

Transverse morphology of the sacroiliac joint: effect of angulation and implications for fluoroscopically guided sacroiliac joint injection

OBJECTIVE

Effects of angulation of computed tomography (CT) reconstruction plane on sacroiliac (SI) joint morphology were studied, and factors influencing the approach to fluoroscopically guided SI joint injection were assessed.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

CT scans of pelvises were reformatted on 41 subjects, aged 51.7 (+/-15.1) years. Transverse images were reconstructed at the caudal 3 cm of the SI joint tilting plane of reconstruction from -30 degrees to +30 degrees at 15 degrees increments. Anteroposterior diameter of joint (depth), angle from sagittal plane (orientation angle), and distance from skin were measured. Joint contour was classified, and presence of bone blocking access to the joint was recorded. Comparison between angles were analysed by t-test. Relationships between variables were assessed by a Pearson correlation test.

RESULTS

Depth was shorter with angulation in the inferior direction (P<0.01). Orientation angle increased with superior angulation (P<0.01). Distance from skin increased (P<0.01) with angulation in either direction. Joint contour was significantly different from baseline at each angle (P<0.001) but highly variable. Inferior angulation resulted in interposition of ilium between skin and SI joint, and superior angulation caused bone block due to the lower sacrum. None of these features was identified without tilting of the reconstruction plane, and effects were more pronounced with steeper angulation.

CONCLUSION

Angulation of the reconstruction plane considerably affects the appearance of the sacroiliac joints. By shortening joint depth, an inferiorly directed approach to SI joint injection may make fluoroscopic guidance easier, although associated bony interposition can prevent access to the synovial compartment. A superiorly directed approach is more likely to have adverse effects.

Short, medium and long term efficacy of epidurally injected anaesthetic-corticosteroid mixture in lumbocruralgia and lumbosciatalgia

We assessed the efficacy of an epidural sited anaesthetic-corticosteroid mixture with transforaminal or interlaminar/interspinous access, in subjects with chronic lumbocruralgia or lumbosciatalgia caused by discal pathology or degenerative foraminal stenosis. From September 2003 to June 2005, 84 patients were treated in the transforaminal region and 32 in epidural space through back access (interlaminar or interspinous) with 2 ml cortisone (megacort) and 2ml anaesthetic (naropine 7.5mg/ml). All 116 patients underwent a minimum of two and a maximum of three treatment sessions. The results were evaluated for a follow-up period of ten months by comparing the answers given by the patients with the Visual Analogic Score. This was done prior to and after every single injection and during the follow-up period. Out of 142 spaces treated, improvement of symptoms for a period varying from one to three months was recorded in 74 cases (52%), for a period of more than three months in 53 (37%) cases, while in the remaining 15 (11%) cases no sufficient regression of pain was reported. In many cases of chronic lumbago/lumbosciatalgia, the percutaneous injection of an anaesthetic-cortisone mixture can be useful in relieving or even killing pain for a period of more than three months. No major complication was reported.

Lumbar Radiculopathy: Treatment with Selective Lumbar Nerve Blocks—Comparison of Effectiveness of Triamcinolone and Betamethasone Injectable Suspensions

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine if there is a difference in the effectiveness of triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension versus betamethasone sodium phosphate and betamethasone acetate injectable suspension in the treatment of radiculopathy and low back pain with selective lumbar nerve blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant; informed consent was not required. Charts and self-reported pain score evaluations were retrospectively reviewed in 114 patients (56 men, 58 women; age range, 36-84 years; mean age, 60 years) treated for radiculopathy from 1997 to 2003 with 130 selective lumbar nerve blocks with triamcinolone or betamethasone. Perineural location was confirmed with fluoroscopic guidance. Forty-nine patients received a mixture of 1 mL of the triamcinolone, 40 mg/mL, and 1 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride. Eighty-one patients received a mixture of 1 mL of the betamethasone, 6 mg/mL, and 1 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride. Patients completed standardized pain evaluation sheets and compared their pain with baseline levels during 14 days after injection. Fisher exact test was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

From day 0 to 1 after the procedure, there was no statistically significant difference in improvement in low back pain and lower extremity pain between groups. On day 3, 42% of triamcinolone recipients and 58% of betamethasone recipients demonstrated improvement in low back pain (P = .04, Fisher exact test), whereas 55% of triamcinolone recipients and 57% of betamethasone recipients had lower extremity pain improvement (P = .33). On day 7, 45% of triamcinolone recipients and 58% of betamethasone recipients had improvement in low back pain (P = .38), whereas 52% of triamcinolone recipients and 57% of betamethasone recipients had improvement in lower extremity pain (P = .69). On day 14, 42% of triamcinolone recipients and 53% of betamethasone recipients had improvement in low back pain (P = .26), whereas 49% of triamcinolone recipients and 55% of betamethasone recipients had improvement in lower extremity pain (P = .69).

CONCLUSION

Selective nerve root blocks with betamethasone and triamcinolone reduced low back pain and lower extremity pain, although there was no significant difference in effectiveness between the two.

Spinal CT-guided interventional procedures for management of chronic back pain

PURPOSE

Image-guided interventional procedures have arisen as an alternative for management of back pain, with controversial indications and efficacy. This study describes the technique, clinical impact, and complications of computed tomography (CT)-guided infiltrations for the management of chronic back pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred eleven patients with chronic back pain treated with CT-guided infiltrations were studied prospectively. Procedures performed included nerve root, facet joint, epidural, and sacroiliac joint blocks. Pain intensity was evaluated with use of a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-two infiltrations were performed in 111 consecutive patients. After 18 months of follow-up, pain improvement lasted for a mean duration of 9 months and the complication rate was less than 1%. Moderate to good pain response was seen in 95% of followed patients and 4% of patients required surgery.

CONCLUSION

Spinal CT-guided infiltration constitutes an effective therapy for chronic back pain. This series confirms a low complication rate, good response, and high therapeutic value.

Interventional spine procedures

Minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of some spinal diseases are percutaneous treatments, proposed before classic surgery. By using imaging guidance, one can significantly increase accuracy and decrease complication rates. This review report physiopathology and discusses indications, methods, complications and results of performing these techniques on the spine, including different level (cervical, thoracic, lumbar and sacroiliac) and different kind of treatments (nerve block, disc treatment and bone treatment). Finally the present article also reviews current literature on the controversial issues involved.

Interventional radiology and the musculoskeletal system

Imaging-guided interventional procedures are becoming increasingly important in clinical rheumatology, since arthrocentesis of peripheral joints and the spine, as well as soft tissue injections, have a high rate of para-articular localisation when performed as blind techniques. Ultrasound-guided needle placement is the method of choice for interventional procedures on peripheral joints and for soft tissue injections. Fluoroscopy and computed tomography (CT) are not recommended for these indications due to the application of ionising radiation and the high procedural effort. By contrast, CT and magnetic resonance imaging are preferred for a variety of percutaneous procedures on the spine and sacroiliac joints. The increasing use of these methods for interventional purposes should improve both technical and procedural quality, thus ensuring cost-effectiveness and patient safety.

Fluoroscopic imaging for technically difficult spinal anesthesia

We report a case of technically difficult spinal anesthesia in a morbidly obese woman, which was successfully implemented under fluoroscopy. Although radiological imaging is well known to guide various regional anesthetic procedures, until now, the utility of fluoroscopic imaging to facilitate spinal anesthesia had not been reported.

Cervical Nerve Root Blocks: Indications and Role of MR Imaging

PURPOSE

To examine whether magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings of the cervical spine can predict pain relief after selective computed tomography (CT)-guided nerve root block and thus assist in the appropriate selection of patients who are suitable for this procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients with cervical radicular pain were examined with MR imaging and then treated with CT-guided cervical nerve root blocks (CNRBs). Various MR imaging findings were assessed and compared in terms of associated pain relief after CNRB. Pain relief was graded (0%-100%) by using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The relationship between MR imaging findings and level of pain relief was tested by using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of pain reduction at VAS grading was 46%. There was a significant relationship between pain relief level and both location of disk herniation (mean pain reductions of 41% at median or mediolateral locations and 64% at foraminal locations, P =.034) and location of nerve root compromise (mean pain reductions of 19% at intraspinal, 45% at foraminal entrance, and 58% at foraminal locations; P =.019). There was an inverse relationship between pain relief level and absence or presence of spinal canal stenosis (mean pain reductions of 29% when stenosis present and 53% when stenosis absent, P =.013). Other parameters were not significantly related to pain relief.

CONCLUSION

MR imaging of the cervical spine assists in the appropriate selection of patients suitable for CNRB. Patients with foraminal disk herniation, foraminal nerve root compromise, and no spinal canal stenosis appear to have the greatest pain relief after this procedure.

Epidural steroid injections

Epidural steroid injections have a significant role in the treatment of patients with low back, neck, and radicular pain. Although these procedures may not address the causative lesions, they often shorten the clinical course of the disease process, keep patients out of the hospital, and provide symptomatic relief that improves quality of life. These procedures are most accurately performed with fluoroscopic guidance and major complications are rare. Although support for cervical epidural steroid injection is less uniform than that for lumbar and caudal injections, a growing body of experience is beginning to support its efficacy and safety.