51
|
van Kemenade BM, Muggleton N, Walsh V, Saygin AP. Effects of TMS over Premotor and Superior Temporal Cortices on Biological Motion Perception. J Cogn Neurosci 2012; 24:896-904. [DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Using MRI-guided off-line TMS, we targeted two areas implicated in biological motion processing: ventral premotor cortex (PMC) and posterior STS (pSTS), plus a control site (vertex). Participants performed a detection task on noise-masked point-light displays of human animations and scrambled versions of the same stimuli. Perceptual thresholds were determined individually. Performance was measured before and after 20 sec of continuous theta burst stimulation of PMC, pSTS, and control (each tested on different days). A matched nonbiological object motion task (detecting point-light displays of translating polygons) served as a further control. Data were analyzed within the signal detection framework. Sensitivity (d′) significantly decreased after TMS of PMC. There was a marginally significant decline in d′ after TMS of pSTS but not of control site. Criterion (response bias) was also significantly affected by TMS over PMC. Specifically, subjects made significantly more false alarms post-TMS of PMC. These effects were specific to biological motion and not found for the nonbiological control task. To summarize, we report that TMS over PMC reduces sensitivity to biological motion perception. Furthermore, pSTS and PMC may have distinct roles in biological motion processing as behavioral performance differs following TMS in each area. Only TMS over PMC led to a significant increase in false alarms, which was not found for other brain areas or for the control task. TMS of PMC may have interfered with refining judgments about biological motion perception, possibly because access to the perceiver's own motor representations was compromised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Neil Muggleton
- 1University College London
- 3National Central University, Taiwan
- 4National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
Rahnev DA, Maniscalco B, Luber B, Lau H, Lisanby SH. Direct injection of noise to the visual cortex decreases accuracy but increases decision confidence. J Neurophysiol 2012; 107:1556-63. [DOI: 10.1152/jn.00985.2011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The relationship between accuracy and confidence in psychophysical tasks traditionally has been assumed to be mainly positive, i.e., the two typically increase or decrease together. However, recent studies have reported examples of exceptions, where confidence and accuracy dissociate from each other. Explanations for such dissociations often involve dual-channel models, in which a cortical channel contributes to both accuracy and confidence, whereas a subcortical channel only contributes to accuracy. Here, we show that a single-channel model derived from signal detection theory (SDT) can also account for such dissociations. We applied transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the occipital cortex to disrupt the internal representation of a visual stimulus. The results showed that consistent with previous research, occipital TMS decreased accuracy. However, counterintuitively, it also led to an increase in confidence ratings. The data were predicted well by a single-channel SDT model, which posits that occipital TMS increased the variance of the internal stimulus distributions. A formal model comparison analysis that used information theoretic methods confirmed that this model was preferred over single-channel models, in which occipital TMS changed the signal strength or dual-channel models, which assume two different processing routes. Thus our results show that dissociations between accuracy and confidence can, at least in some cases, be accounted for by a single-channel model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian Maniscalco
- Columbia University, Department of Psychology, New York, New York
| | - Bruce Luber
- Duke University, Department of Psychiatry, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | - Hakwan Lau
- Columbia University, Department of Psychology, New York, New York
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sarah H. Lisanby
- Duke University, Department of Psychiatry, Durham, North Carolina; and
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Touching motion: rTMS on the human middle temporal complex interferes with tactile speed perception. Brain Topogr 2012; 25:389-98. [PMID: 22367586 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-012-0223-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2011] [Accepted: 02/13/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Brain functional and psychophysical studies have clearly demonstrated that visual motion perception relies on the activity of the middle temporal complex (hMT+). However, recent studies have shown that hMT+ seems to be also activated during tactile motion perception, suggesting that this visual extrastriate area is involved in the processing and integration of motion, irrespective of the sensorial modality. In the present study, we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to assess whether hMT+ plays a causal role in tactile motion processing. Blindfolded participants detected changes in the speed of a grid of tactile moving points with their finger (i.e. tactile modality). The experiment included three different conditions: a control condition with no TMS and two TMS conditions, i.e. hMT+-rTMS and posterior parietal cortex (PPC)-rTMS. Accuracies were significantly impaired during hMT+-rTMS but not in the other two conditions (No-rTMS or PPC-rTMS), moreover, thresholds for detecting speed changes were significantly higher in the hMT+-rTMS with respect to the control TMS conditions. These findings provide stronger evidence that the activity of the hMT+ area is involved in tactile speed processing, which may be consistent with the hypothesis of a supramodal role for that cortical region in motion processing.
Collapse
|
54
|
Abstract
Perceptual learning is considered a manifestation of neural plasticity in the human brain. We investigated brain plasticity mechanisms in a learning task using noninvasive transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). We hypothesized that different types of tES would have varying actions on the nervous system, which would result in different efficacies of neural plasticity modulation. Thus, the principal goal of the present study was to verify the possibility of inducing differential plasticity effects using two tES approaches [i.e., direct current stimulation (tDCS) and random noise stimulation (tRNS)] during the execution of a visual perceptual learning task.
Collapse
|
55
|
Rose JE, McClernon FJ, Froeliger B, Behm FM, Preud'homme X, Krystal AD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the superior frontal gyrus modulates craving for cigarettes. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 70:794-799. [PMID: 21762878 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2010] [Revised: 05/22/2011] [Accepted: 05/25/2011] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have shown strong correlations between cue-elicited craving for cigarettes and activation of the superior frontal gyrus (SFG). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) offers a noninvasive means to reversibly affect brain cortical activity, which can be applied to testing hypotheses about the causal role of SFG in modulating craving. METHODS Fifteen volunteer smokers were recruited to investigate the effects of rTMS on subjective responses to smoking versus neutral cues and to controlled presentations of cigarette smoke. On different days, participants were exposed to three conditions: 1) high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS directed at the SFG; 2) low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS directed at the SFG; and 3) low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS directed at the motor cortex (control condition). RESULTS Craving ratings in response to smoking versus neutral cues were differentially affected by the 10-Hz versus 1-Hz SFG condition. Craving after smoking cue presentations was elevated in the 10-Hz SFG condition, whereas craving after neutral cue presentations was reduced. Upon smoking in the 10-Hz SFG condition, ratings of immediate craving reduction as well as the intensity of interoceptive airway sensations were also attenuated. CONCLUSIONS These results support the view that the SFG plays a role in modulating craving reactivity; moreover, the results suggest that the SFG plays a role in both excitatory and inhibitory influences on craving, consistent with prior research demonstrating the role of the prefrontal cortex in the elicitation as well as inhibition of drug-seeking behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jed E Rose
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - F Joseph McClernon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Veterans Integrated Service Network Number 6 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brett Froeliger
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Frédérique M Behm
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Xavier Preud'homme
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew D Krystal
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Miniussi C, Vallar G. Brain stimulation and behavioural cognitive rehabilitation: A new tool for neurorehabilitation? Neuropsychol Rehabil 2011; 21:553-9. [DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2011.622435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
57
|
Vallar G, Bolognini N. Behavioural facilitation following brain stimulation: Implications for neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2011; 21:618-49. [DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2011.574050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
58
|
Ruzzoli M, Gori S, Pavan A, Pirulli C, Marzi CA, Miniussi C. The neural basis of the Enigma illusion: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 2011; 49:3648-55. [PMID: 21952193 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2011] [Revised: 09/09/2011] [Accepted: 09/10/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to test the role of the visual primary (V1) and the middle temporal area (V5/MT) in the illusory motion perception evoked by the Enigma figure. The Enigma figure induces a visual illusion that is characterized by apparent rotatory motion in the presence of a static figure. By means of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) we show that V5/MT is causally linked to the illusory perception of motion. When rTMS was applied bilaterally over V5/MT just prior to presentation of the Enigma figure, the perception of illusory motion was disrupted for approximately 400 ms resulting in a delayed illusion onset. In contrast, rTMS applied over V1 did not have any effect on the illusory perception of motion. These results show that V5/MT, a visual cortical area associated with real motion perception, is also important for the perception of illusory motion, while V1 appears not to be functionally involved in illusory motion perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Ruzzoli
- Department of Neurological, Neuropsychological, Morphological and Motor Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
59
|
Jacobs C, Goebel R, Sack AT. Visual awareness suppression by pre-stimulus brain stimulation; a neural effect. Neuroimage 2011; 59:616-24. [PMID: 21840406 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2011] [Revised: 07/27/2011] [Accepted: 07/29/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has established the functional relevance of early visual cortex (EVC) for visual awareness with great temporal specificity non-invasively in conscious human volunteers. Many studies have found a suppressive effect when TMS was applied over EVC 80-100 ms after the onset of the visual stimulus (post-stimulus TMS time window). Yet, few studies found task performance to also suffer when TMS was applied even before visual stimulus presentation (pre-stimulus TMS time window). This pre-stimulus TMS effect, however, remains controversially debated and its origin had mainly been ascribed to TMS-induced eye-blinking artifacts. Here, we applied chronometric TMS over EVC during the execution of a visual discrimination task, covering an exhaustive range of visual stimulus-locked TMS time windows ranging from -80 pre-stimulus to 300 ms post-stimulus onset. Electrooculographical (EoG) recordings, sham TMS stimulation, and vertex TMS stimulation controlled for different types of non-neural TMS effects. Our findings clearly reveal TMS-induced masking effects for both pre- and post-stimulus time windows, and for both objective visual discrimination performance and subjective visibility. Importantly, all effects proved to be still present after post hoc removal of eye blink trials, suggesting a neural origin for the pre-stimulus TMS suppression effect on visual awareness. We speculate based on our data that TMS exerts its pre-stimulus effect via generation of a neural state which interacts with subsequent visual input.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christianne Jacobs
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Ostendorf F, Kilias J, Ploner CJ. Theta-Burst Stimulation over Human Frontal Cortex Distorts Perceptual Stability across Eye Movements. Cereb Cortex 2011; 22:800-10. [DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
61
|
Miniussi C, Rossini PM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2011; 21:579-601. [PMID: 21462081 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2011.562689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can generate an increase or a decrease of neuronal excitability, which can modulate cognition and behaviour. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced cortical changes have been shown to result in neural plasticity. Thus, TMS provides an important opportunity to gain more insight into the mechanisms responsible for the remarkable flexibility of the central nervous system. The aim of this review was to cover the topics that could be useful when using TMS in the cognitive rehabilitation field after brain damage. The basic TMS principles are introduced, together with the clinical application for diagnosis and prognosis, the biological aspects, and the use in cognitive neuroscience studies. Finally, several hypotheses are discussed to explain the likely mechanisms induced by TMS that favour the recovery of a function after brain damage and cause the adult brain to undergo plasticity. The possibility of non-invasively interacting with the functioning of the brain and its plasticity mechanisms - a possibility that may eventually lead to cognitive and behavioural modifications - opens new and exciting scenarios in the cognitive neurorehabilitation field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Miniussi
- Dept of Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnologies, National Institute of Neuroscience, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
62
|
Stochastic resonance effects reveal the neural mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci 2011; 31:3143-7. [PMID: 21368025 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4863-10.2011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a popular method for studying causal relationships between neural activity and behavior. However, its mode of action remains controversial, and so far there is no framework to explain its wide range of facilitatory and inhibitory behavioral effects. While some theoretical accounts suggest that TMS suppresses neuronal processing, other competing accounts propose that the effects of TMS result from the addition of noise to neuronal processing. Here we exploited the stochastic resonance phenomenon to distinguish these theoretical accounts and determine how TMS affects neuronal processing. Specifically, we showed that online TMS can induce stochastic resonance in the human brain. At low intensity, TMS facilitated the detection of weak motion signals, but with higher TMS intensities and stronger motion signals, we found only impairment in detection. These findings suggest that TMS acts by adding noise to neuronal processing, at least in an online TMS protocol. Importantly, such stochastic resonance effects may also explain why TMS parameters that under normal circumstances impair behavior can induce behavioral facilitations when the stimulated area is in an adapted or suppressed state.
Collapse
|
63
|
Ruzzoli M, Abrahamyan A, Clifford CWG, Marzi CA, Miniussi C, Harris JA. The effect of TMS on visual motion sensitivity: an increase in neural noise or a decrease in signal strength? J Neurophysiol 2011; 106:138-43. [PMID: 21543749 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00746.2010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The underlying mechanisms of action of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are still a matter of debate. TMS may impair a subject's performance by increasing neural noise, suppressing the neural signal, or both. Here, we delivered a single pulse of TMS (spTMS) to V5/MT during a motion direction discrimination task while concurrently manipulating the level of noise in the motion stimulus. Our results indicate that spTMS essentially acts by suppressing the strength of the relevant visual signal. We suggest that TMS may induce a pattern of neural activity that complements the ongoing activation elicited by the sensory signal in a manner that partially impoverishes that signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Ruzzoli
- Department of Neurological, Neuropsychological, Morphological and Motor Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
64
|
Bolognini N, Maravita A. Uncovering Multisensory Processing through Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation. Front Psychol 2011; 2:46. [PMID: 21716922 PMCID: PMC3110874 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2010] [Accepted: 03/04/2011] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Most of current knowledge about the mechanisms of multisensory integration of environmental stimuli by the human brain derives from neuroimaging experiments. However, neuroimaging studies do not always provide conclusive evidence about the causal role of a given area for multisensory interactions, since these techniques can mainly derive correlations between brain activations and behavior. Conversely, techniques of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) represent a unique and powerful approach to inform models of causal relations between specific brain regions and individual cognitive and perceptual functions. Although NIBS has been widely used in cognitive neuroscience, its use in the study of multisensory processing in the human brain appears a quite novel field of research. In this paper, we review and discuss recent studies that have used two techniques of NIBS, namely transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, for investigating the causal involvement of unisensory and heteromodal cortical areas in multisensory processing, the effects of multisensory cues on cortical excitability in unisensory areas, and the putative functional connections among different cortical areas subserving multisensory interactions. The emerging view is that NIBS is an essential tool available to neuroscientists seeking for causal relationships between a given area or network and multisensory processes. With its already large and fast increasing usage, future work using NIBS in isolation, as well as in conjunction with different neuroimaging techniques, could substantially improve our understanding of multisensory processing in the human brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Bolognini
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
65
|
Seifert F, Fuchs O, Nickel FT, Garcia M, Dörfler A, Schaller G, Kornhuber J, Sperling W, Maihöfner C. A functional magnetic resonance imaging navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study of the posterior parietal cortex in normal pain and hyperalgesia. Neuroscience 2010; 170:670-7. [PMID: 20643193 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2010] [Revised: 06/20/2010] [Accepted: 07/13/2010] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Noxious stimuli activate a complex cerebral network. During central sensitization to pain, activity in most of these areas is changed. One of these areas is the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). The role of the PPC during processing of acute pain as well as hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia remains elusive. Therefore, we performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) based, neuro-navigated, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) study in 10 healthy volunteers. Firstly, pin-prick hyperalgesia was provoked on the right volar forearm, using the model of electrically-induced secondary mechanical hyperalgesia. fMRI was performed during pin-prick stimulation inside and outside the hyperalgesic areas. Secondly, on four different experimental sessions, the left and right individual intraparietal BOLD peak-activations were used as targets for a sham-controlled 1 Hz rTMS paradigm of 10 min duration. We measured psychophysically the (i) electrical pain stimulus intensity on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NRS, 0-10), the (ii) area of hyperalgesia, and the (iii) area of dynamic mechanical allodynia. Sham stimulation or rTMS was performed 16 min after induction of pin-prick hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia. Compared to sham stimulation, no significant effect of rTMS was observed on pain stimulus intensity and the area of allodynia. However, a reduction of the hyperalgesic area was observed for rTMS of the left PPC (P<0.05). We discuss the role of the PPC in central sensitization to pain, in spatial discrimination of pain stimuli and in spatial-attention to pain stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Seifert
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
66
|
The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: a new synthesis of methodological issues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010; 35:516-36. [PMID: 20599555 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 221] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2010] [Revised: 06/15/2010] [Accepted: 06/17/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become a mainstay of cognitive neuroscience, thus facing new challenges due to its widespread application on behaviorally silent areas. In this review we will summarize the main technical and methodological considerations that are necessary when using TMS in cognitive neuroscience, based on a corpus of studies and technical improvements that has become available in most recent years. Although TMS has been applied only relatively recently on a large scale to the study of higher functions, a range of protocols that elucidate how this technique can be used to investigate a variety of issues is already available, such as single pulse, paired pulse, dual-site, repetitive and theta burst TMS. Finally, we will touch on recent promising approaches that provide powerful new insights about causal interactions among brain regions (i.e., TMS with other neuroimaging techniques) and will enable researchers to enhance the functional resolution of TMS (i.e., state-dependent TMS). We will end by briefly summarizing and discussing the implications of the newest safety guidelines.
Collapse
|