51
|
Dai CH, Wang Y, Chen P, Jiang Q, Lan T, Li MY, Su JY, Wu Y, Li J. Suppression of the FA pathway combined with CHK1 inhibitor hypersensitize lung cancer cells to gemcitabine. Sci Rep 2017; 7:15031. [PMID: 29118324 PMCID: PMC5678185 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15172-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The combination of platinum and gemcitabine is one of the standard regimens in the treatment of advanced lung squamous carcinoma (LSC). Resistance to gemcitabine is main barrier to the successful treatment of LSC. In this study, we showed that suppression of the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway increased the sensitivity of two LSC cell lines SK-MES-1 and KLN205 to gemcitabine. Moreover, we found that the CHK1 pathway and the FA pathway are functionally compensatory in the repair of DNA damage in the LSC cell lines. Inactivation of one of the two pathways led to DNA damage, triggering compensatory activation of other pathway. Furthermore, we demonstrated that FANCD2 depletion combined with CHK1 inhibitor MK-8776 significantly potentiated the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine to the two LSC cell lines, compared to individual FANCD2 depletion or MK-8776 treatment. The enhanced effect of gemcitabine-chemosensitization was accompanied by loss of DNA repair function and accumulation of DNA single strand breaks and double strand breaks, in parallel with obvious increase of caspase-3 dependent apoptosis. Our results indicate that the enhancement effect of FANCD2 depletion combined with CHK1 inhibitor in sensitizing the LCS cells to gemcitabine supports the FA pathway and CHK1 as two therapeutic targets for improvement of anti-tumor regimens in treatment of LSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Hua Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Center of Experimental Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Affitialed Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Qian Jiang
- Center of Experimental Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Ting Lan
- Institute of Medical Science, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Mei-Yu Li
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Affitialed Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Jin-Yu Su
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Affitialed Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Yan Wu
- Institute of Medical Science, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Affitialed Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Qiu Z, Oleinick NL, Zhang J. ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy. Radiother Oncol 2017; 126:450-464. [PMID: 29054375 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 196] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Revised: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 09/30/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The cell cycle checkpoint proteins ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated-and-Rad3-related kinase (ATR) and its major downstream effector checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) prevent the entry of cells with damaged or incompletely replicated DNA into mitosis when the cells are challenged by DNA damaging agents, such as radiation therapy (RT) or chemotherapeutic drugs, that are the major modalities to treat cancer. This regulation is particularly evident in cells with a defective G1 checkpoint, a common feature of cancer cells, due to p53 mutations. In addition, ATR and/or CHK1 suppress replication stress (RS) by inhibiting excess origin firing, particularly in cells with activated oncogenes. Those functions of ATR/CHK1 make them ideal therapeutic targets. ATR/CHK1 inhibitors have been developed and are currently used either as single agents or paired with radiotherapy or a variety of genotoxic chemotherapies in preclinical and clinical studies. Here, we review the status of the development of ATR and CHK1 inhibitors. We also discuss the potential mechanisms by which ATR and CHK1 inhibition induces cell killing in the presence or absence of exogenous DNA damaging agents, such as RT and chemotherapeutic agents. Lastly, we discuss synthetic lethality interactions between the inhibition of ATR/CHK1 and defects in other DNA damage response (DDR) pathways/genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaojun Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - Nancy L Oleinick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - Junran Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Narayan S, Jaiswal AS, Sharma R, Nawab A, Duckworth LV, Law BK, Zajac-Kaye M, George TJ, Sharma J, Sharma AK, Hromas RA. NSC30049 inhibits Chk1 pathway in 5-FU-resistant CRC bulk and stem cell populations. Oncotarget 2017; 8:57246-57264. [PMID: 28915668 PMCID: PMC5593639 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment induces DNA damage and stalling of DNA replication forks. These stalled replication forks then collapse to form one sided double-strand breaks, leading to apoptosis. However, colorectal cancer (CRC) stem cells rapidly repair the stalled/collapsed replication forks and overcome treatment effects. Recent evidence suggests a critical role of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) in preventing the replicative stress. Therefore, Chk1 kinase has been a target for developing mono or combination therapeutic agents. In the present study, we have identified a novel orphan molecule NSC30049 (NSC49L) that is effective alone, and in combination potentiates 5-FU-mediated growth inhibition of CRC heterogeneous bulk and FOLFOX-resistant cell lines in culture with minimal effect on normal colonic epithelial cells. It also inhibits the sphere forming activity of CRC stem cells, and decreases the expression levels of mRNAs of CRC stem cell marker genes. Results showed that NSC49L induces 5-FU-mediated S-phase cell cycle arrest due to increased load of DNA damage and increased γ-H2AX staining as a mechanism of cytotoxicity. The pharmacokinetic analysis showed a higher bioavailability of this compound, however, with a short plasma half-life. The drug is highly tolerated by animals with no pathological aberrations. Furthermore, NSC49L showed very potent activity in a HDTX model of CRC stem cell tumors either alone or in combination with 5-FU. Thus, NSC49L as a single agent or combined with 5-FU can be developed as a therapeutic agent by targeting the Chk1 pathway in 5-FU-resistant CRC heterogeneous bulk and CRC stem cell populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satya Narayan
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Aruna S. Jaiswal
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Ritika Sharma
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Akbar Nawab
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Lizette Vila Duckworth
- Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Brian K. Law
- Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Maria Zajac-Kaye
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Thomas J. George
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Jay Sharma
- Celprogen, Inc., Torrance, CA 90503, USA
| | - Arun K. Sharma
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Robert A. Hromas
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Seshacharyulu P, Baine MJ, Souchek JJ, Menning M, Kaur S, Yan Y, Ouellette MM, Jain M, Lin C, Batra SK. Biological determinants of radioresistance and their remediation in pancreatic cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2017; 1868:69-92. [PMID: 28249796 PMCID: PMC5548591 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Despite recent advances in radiotherapy, a majority of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PC) do not achieve objective responses due to the existence of intrinsic and acquired radioresistance. Identification of molecular mechanisms that compromise the efficacy of radiation therapy and targeting these pathways is paramount for improving radiation response in PC patients. In this review, we have summarized molecular mechanisms associated with the radio-resistant phenotype of PC. Briefly, we discuss the reversible and irreversible biological consequences of radiotherapy, such as DNA damage and DNA repair, mechanisms of cancer cell survival and radiation-induced apoptosis following radiotherapy. We further describe various small molecule inhibitors and molecular targeting agents currently being tested in preclinical and clinical studies as potential radiosensitizers for PC. Notably, we draw attention towards the confounding effects of cancer stem cells, immune system, and the tumor microenvironment in the context of PC radioresistance and radiosensitization. Finally, we discuss the need for examining selective radioprotectors in light of the emerging evidence on radiation toxicity to non-target tissue associated with PC radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parthasarathy Seshacharyulu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Michael J Baine
- Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Joshua J Souchek
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Melanie Menning
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Sukhwinder Kaur
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Ying Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Michel M. Ouellette
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Maneesh Jain
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Chi Lin
- Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| | - Surinder K. Batra
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
- Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
- Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Suzuki M, Yamamori T, Bo T, Sakai Y, Inanami O. MK-8776, a novel Chk1 inhibitor, exhibits an improved radiosensitizing effect compared to UCN-01 by exacerbating radiation-induced aberrant mitosis. Transl Oncol 2017; 10:491-500. [PMID: 28550769 PMCID: PMC5447387 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine kinase that plays an important role in G2/M checkpoint signaling. Here, we evaluate the radiosensitizing effects of a novel selective Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776, comparing its efficacy with a first-generation Chk1 inhibitor UCN-01, and attempt to elucidate the mechanism of radiosensitization. In a clonogenic survival assay, MK-8776 demonstrated a more pronounced radiosensitizing effect than UCN-01, with lower cytotoxicity. Importantly, radiosensitization by MK-8776 can be achieved at doses as low as 2.5 Gy, which is a clinically applicable irradiation dose. MK-8776, but not UCN-01, exacerbated mitotic catastrophe (MC) and centrosome abnormalities, without affecting repair kinetics of DNA double strand breaks. Furthermore, live-cell imaging revealed that MK-8776 significantly abrogated the radiation-induced G2/M checkpoint, prolonged the mitotic phase, and enhanced aberrant mitosis. This suggests that Chk1 inhibition by MK-8776 activates a spindle assembly checkpoint and increases mitotic defects in irradiated EMT6 cells. In conclusion, we have shown that, at minimally toxic concentrations, MK-8776 enhances radiation-induced cell death through the enhancement of aberrant mitosis and MC, without affecting DNA damage repair.
Collapse
|
56
|
Nickoloff JA, Boss MK, Allen CP, LaRue SM. Translational research in radiation-induced DNA damage signaling and repair. Transl Cancer Res 2017; 6:S875-S891. [PMID: 30574452 PMCID: PMC6298755 DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2017.06.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an effective tool in the fight against cancer. It is non-invasive and painless, and with advanced tumor imaging and beam control systems, radiation can be delivered to patients safely, generally with minor or no adverse side effects, accounting for its increasing use against a broad range of tumors. Tumors and normal cells respond to radiation-induced DNA damage by activating a complex network of DNA damage signaling and repair pathways that determine cell fate including survival, death, and genome stability. DNA damage response (DDR) proteins represent excellent targets to augment radiotherapy, and many agents that inhibit key response proteins are being combined with radiation and genotoxic chemotherapy in clinical trials. This review focuses on how insights into molecular mechanisms of DDR pathways are translated to small animal preclinical studies, to clinical studies of naturally occurring tumors in companion animals, and finally to human clinical trials. Companion animal studies, under the umbrella of comparative oncology, have played key roles in the development of clinical radiotherapy throughout its >100-year history. There is growing appreciation that rapid translation of basic knowledge of DNA damage and repair systems to improved radiotherapy practice requires a comprehensive approach that embraces the full spectrum of cancer research, with companion animal clinical trials representing a critical bridge between small animal preclinical studies, and human clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jac A Nickoloff
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Flint Animal Cancer Center, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Mary-Keara Boss
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Flint Animal Cancer Center, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Christopher P Allen
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Flint Animal Cancer Center, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Susan M LaRue
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Flint Animal Cancer Center, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Ayars M, Eshleman J, Goggins M. Susceptibility of ATM-deficient pancreatic cancer cells to radiation. Cell Cycle 2017; 16:991-998. [PMID: 28453388 PMCID: PMC5462076 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1312236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is inactivated in a significant minority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and may be predictor of treatment response. We determined if ATM deficiency renders pancreatic cancer cells more sensitive to fractionated radiation or commonly used chemotherapeutics. ATM expression was knocked down in three pancreatic cancer cell lines using ATM-targeting shRNA. Isogenic cell lines were tested for sensitivity to several chemotherapeutic agents and radiation. DNA repair kinetics were analyzed in irradiated cells using the comet assay. We find that while rendering pancreatic cancer cells ATM-deficient did not significantly change their sensitivity to several chemotherapeutics, it did render them exquisitely sensitized to radiation. Pancreatic cancer ATM status may help predict response to radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ayars
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James Eshleman
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Medicine, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Centre; The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Targeting the ATR-CHK1 Axis in Cancer Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2017; 9:cancers9050041. [PMID: 28448462 PMCID: PMC5447951 DOI: 10.3390/cancers9050041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Revised: 04/23/2017] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) is a new therapeutic approach in cancer that shows great promise for tumour selectivity. Key components of the DDR are the ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3 related (ATR) and checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) kinases. This review article describes the role of ATR and its major downstream target, CHK1, in the DDR and why cancer cells are particularly reliant on the ATR-CHK1 pathway, providing the rationale for targeting these kinases, and validation of this hypothesis by genetic manipulation. The recent development of specific inhibitors and preclinical data using these inhibitors not only as chemosensitisers and radiosensitisers but also as single agents to exploit specific pathologies of tumour cells is described. These potent and specific inhibitors have now entered clinical trial and early results are presented.
Collapse
|
59
|
Ghelli Luserna di Rora’ A, Iacobucci I, Martinelli G. The cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of leukemias. J Hematol Oncol 2017; 10:77. [PMID: 28356161 PMCID: PMC5371185 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-017-0443-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The inhibition of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway in the treatment of cancers has recently reached an exciting stage with several cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors that are now being tested in several clinical trials in cancer patients. Although the great amount of pre-clinical and clinical data are from the solid tumor experience, only few studies have been done on leukemias using specific cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors. This review aims to summarize the most recent data found on the biological mechanisms of the response to DNA damages highlighting the role of the different elements of the DDR pathway in normal and cancer cells and focusing on the main genetic alteration or aberrant gene expression that has been found on acute and chronic leukemias. This review, for the first time, outlines the most important pre-clinical and clinical data available on the efficacy of cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors in single agent and in combination with different agents normally used for the treatment of acute and chronic leukemias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - I. Iacobucci
- Department of Hematology and Medical Sciences “L. and A. Seràgnoli”, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Present: Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - G. Martinelli
- Department of Hematology and Medical Sciences “L. and A. Seràgnoli”, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Patel R, Barker HE, Kyula J, McLaughlin M, Dillon MT, Schick U, Hafsi H, Thompson A, Khoo V, Harrington K, Zaidi S. An orally bioavailable Chk1 inhibitor, CCT244747, sensitizes bladder and head and neck cancer cell lines to radiation. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122:470-475. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
61
|
Wahl DR, Lawrence TS. Integrating chemoradiation and molecularly targeted therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017; 109:74-83. [PMID: 26596559 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Revised: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 11/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
While the advent of combined chemoradiation has improved outcomes for innumerable patients with locally advanced cancers, further improvements are urgently needed. Escalation of either chemotherapy or radiotherapy is associated with unacceptable toxicity. An alternative strategy is the integration of chemoradiation and molecularly targeted therapies, which exploits biological differences between cancer and normal tissue and should therefore increase efficacy while maintaining tolerable toxicity. Combining chemoradiation with agents that modulate tumor-specific pathways such as cell cycle checkpoints, PARP signaling, EGFR signaling, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis and androgen signaling has shown immense promise in preclinical and clinical studies, as have combinations with environmentally-targeted agents against the immune system and angiogenesis. The optimal application of these strategies will likely require consideration of molecular heterogeneity between patients and within individual tumors.
Collapse
|
62
|
Parsels LA, Tanska DM, Parsels JD, Zabludoff SD, Cuneo KC, Lawrence TS, Maybaum J, Morgan MA. Dissociation of gemcitabine chemosensitization by CHK1 inhibition from cell cycle checkpoint abrogation and aberrant mitotic entry. Cell Cycle 2016; 15:730-9. [PMID: 26890478 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1148841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In order to determine the relative contribution of checkpoint abrogation and subsequent aberrant mitotic entry to gemcitabine chemosensitization by CHK1 inhibition, we established a model utilizing the CDK inhibitors roscovitine or purvalanol A to re-establish cell cycle arrest and prevent aberrant mitotic entry in pancreatic cancer cells treated with gemcitabine and the CHK inhibitor AZD7762. In this study, we report that the extent of aberrant mitotic entry, as determined by flow cytometry for the mitotic marker phospho-Histone H3 (Ser10), did not reflect the relative sensitivities of pancreatic cancer cell lines to gemcitabine chemosensitization by AZD7762. In addition, re-establishing gemcitabine-induced cell cycle arrest either pharmacologically, with roscovitine or purvalanol A, or genetically, with cyclin B1 siRNA, did not inhibit chemosensitization uniformly across the cell lines. Furthermore, we found that AZD7762 augmented high-intensity γH2AX signaling in gemcitabine-treated cells, suggesting the presence of replication stress when CHK1 is inhibited. Finally, the ability of roscovitine to prevent chemosensitization correlated with its ability to inhibit AZD7762-induced high-intensity γH2AX, but not aberrant pHH3, suggesting that the effects of AZD7762 on DNA replication or repair rather than aberrant mitotic entry determine gemcitabine chemosensitization in pancreatic cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie A Parsels
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.,b Department of Pharmacology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| | - Daria M Tanska
- b Department of Pharmacology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| | - Joshua D Parsels
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.,b Department of Pharmacology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| | - Sonya D Zabludoff
- c AstraZeneca R&D Boston , Waltham , MA , USA.,d Zabludoff Consulting San Diego , CA , USA
| | - Kyle C Cuneo
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| | - Theodore S Lawrence
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| | - Jonathan Maybaum
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.,b Department of Pharmacology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| | - Meredith A Morgan
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Ronco C, Martin AR, Demange L, Benhida R. ATM, ATR, CHK1, CHK2 and WEE1 inhibitors in cancer and cancer stem cells. MEDCHEMCOMM 2016; 8:295-319. [PMID: 30108746 DOI: 10.1039/c6md00439c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Accepted: 11/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
DNA inevitably undergoes a high number of damages throughout the cell cycle. To preserve the integrity of the genome, cells have developed a complex enzymatic machinery aimed at sensing and repairing DNA lesions, pausing the cell cycle to provide more time to repair, or induce apoptosis if damages are too severe. This so-called DNA-damage response (DDR) is yet considered as a major source of resistance to DNA-damaging treatments in oncology. Recently, it has been hypothesized that cancer stem cells (CSC), a sub-population of cancer cells particularly resistant and with tumour-initiating ability, allow tumour re-growth and cancer relapse. Therefore, DDR appears as a relevant target to sensitize cancer cells and cancer stem cells to classical radio- and chemotherapies as well as to overcome resistances. Moreover, the concept of synthetic lethality could be particularly efficiently exploited in DDR. Five kinases play pivotal roles in the DDR: ATM, ATR, CHK1, CHK2 and WEE1. Herein, we review the drugs targeting these proteins and the inhibitors used in the specific case of CSC. We also suggest molecules that may be of interest for preclinical and clinical researchers studying checkpoint inhibition to sensitize cancer and cancer stem cells to DNA-damaging treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyril Ronco
- Université Côte d'Azur , CNRS , Institut de Chimie de Nice , UMR7272 - Parc Valrose , 06108 Nice Cedex 2 , France . ; ; Tel: +33 4 92076143
| | - Anthony R Martin
- Université Côte d'Azur , CNRS , Institut de Chimie de Nice , UMR7272 - Parc Valrose , 06108 Nice Cedex 2 , France . ; ; Tel: +33 4 92076143
| | - Luc Demange
- Université Côte d'Azur , CNRS , Institut de Chimie de Nice , UMR7272 - Parc Valrose , 06108 Nice Cedex 2 , France . ; ; Tel: +33 4 92076143.,Université Paris Descartes , Sorbonne Paris Cité , UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques , 4 avenue de l'Observatoire , Paris Fr-75006 , France.,Université Paris Descartes , Sorbonne Paris Cité , UFR Biomédicale des Saints Pères , 45 rue des Saints Pères , France
| | - Rachid Benhida
- Université Côte d'Azur , CNRS , Institut de Chimie de Nice , UMR7272 - Parc Valrose , 06108 Nice Cedex 2 , France . ; ; Tel: +33 4 92076143
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Im MM, Flanagan SA, Ackroyd JJ, Knapp B, Kramer A, Shewach DS. Late DNA Damage Mediated by Homologous Recombination Repair Results in Radiosensitization with Gemcitabine. Radiat Res 2016; 186:466-477. [PMID: 27740890 DOI: 10.1667/rr14443.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Gemcitabine (dFdCyd) shows broad antitumor activity in solid tumors in chemotherapeutic regimens or when combined with ionizing radiation (radiosensitization). While it is known that mismatches in DNA are necessary for dFdCyd radiosensitization, the critical event resulting in radiosensitization has not been identified. Here we hypothesized that late DNA damage (≥24 h after drug washout/irradiation) is a causal event in radiosensitization by dFdCyd, and that homologous recombination repair (HRR) is required for this late DNA damage. Using γ-H2AX as a measurement of DNA damage in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, we demonstrate that 10 or 80 nM dFdCyd alone produced significantly more late DNA damage compared to that observed within 4 h after treatment. The combination of dFdCyd treatment followed by irradiation did not produce a consistent increase in DNA damage in the first 4 h after treatment, however, there was a synergistic increase 24-48 h later relative to treatment with dFdCyd or radiation alone. RNAi suppression of the essential HRR protein, XRCC3, significantly decreased both radiosensitization and late DNA damage. Furthermore, inhibition of HRR with the Rad51 inhibitor B02 prevented radiosensitization when added after, but not during, treatment with dFdCyd and radiation. To our knowledge, this is the first published study to show that radiosensitization with dFdCyd results from a synergistic increase in DNA damage at 24-48 h after drug and radiation treatment, and that this damage and radiosensitization require HRR. These results suggest that tumors that overexpress HRR will be more vulnerable to chemoradiotherapy, and treatments that increase HRR and/or mismatches in DNA will enhance dFdCyd radiosensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Im
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Sheryl A Flanagan
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Jeffrey J Ackroyd
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Brendan Knapp
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Aaron Kramer
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Donna S Shewach
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Yang SH, Kuo TC, Wu H, Guo JC, Hsu C, Hsu CH, Tien YW, Yeh KH, Cheng AL, Kuo SH. Perspectives on the combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy with DNA repair inhibitors in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:7275-7288. [PMID: 27621574 PMCID: PMC4997635 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i32.7275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Revised: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/21/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is highly lethal. Current research that combines radiation with targeted therapy may dramatically improve prognosis. Cancerous cells are characterized by unstable genomes and activation of DNA repair pathways, which are indicated by increased phosphorylation of numerous factors, including H2AX, ATM, ATR, Chk1, Chk2, DNA-PKcs, Rad51, and Ku70/Ku80 heterodimers. Radiotherapy causes DNA damage. Cancer cells can be made more sensitive to the effects of radiation (radiosensitization) through inhibition of DNA repair pathways. The synergistic effects, of two or more combined non-lethal treatments, led to co-administration of chemotherapy and radiosensitization in BRCA-defective cells and patients, with promising results. ATM/Chk2 and ATR/Chk1 pathways are principal regulators of cell cycle arrest, following DNA double-strand or single-strand breaks. DNA double-stranded breaks activate DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs). It forms a holoenzyme with Ku70/Ku80 heterodimers, called DNA-PK, which catalyzes the joining of nonhomologous ends. This is the primary repair pathway utilized in human cells after exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiosensitization, induced by inhibitors of ATM, ATR, Chk1, Chk2, Wee1, PP2A, or DNA-PK, has been demonstrated in preclinical pancreatic cancer studies. Clinical trials are underway. Development of agents that inhibit DNA repair pathways to be clinically used in combination with radiotherapy is warranted for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
66
|
Kausar T, Schreiber JS, Karnak D, Parsels LA, Parsels JD, Davis MA, Zhao L, Maybaum J, Lawrence TS, Morgan MA. Sensitization of Pancreatic Cancers to Gemcitabine Chemoradiation by WEE1 Kinase Inhibition Depends on Homologous Recombination Repair. Neoplasia 2016; 17:757-66. [PMID: 26585231 PMCID: PMC4656803 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2015] [Revised: 09/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
To improve the efficacy of chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and begin to establish patient selection criteria, we investigated the combination of the WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 with gemcitabine-radiation in homologous recombination (HR) repair proficient and deficient pancreatic cancers. Sensitization to gemcitabine-radiation by AZD1775 was assessed in pancreatic cancer cells by clonogenic survival and in patient-derived xenografts by tumor growth. The contributions of HR repair inhibition and G2 checkpoint abrogation to sensitization were assessed by γH2AX, BRCA2 manipulation, and RAD51 focus formation and pHistone H3 flow cytometry, respectively. We found that AZD1775 sensitized to gemcitabine-radiation in BRCA2 wild-type but not BRCA2 mutant pancreatic cancer cells. In all cells, AZD1775 caused inhibition of CDK1 phosphorylation and G2 checkpoint abrogation. However, sensitization by AZD1775 was associated with persistent γH2AX and inhibition of RAD51 focus formation. In HR-proficient (BRCA2 wild-type) or -deficient (BRAC2 null) isogenic cells, AZD1775 sensitized to gemcitabine-radiation in BRCA2 wild-type, but not in BRCA2 null cells, despite significant G2 checkpoint abrogation. In patient-derived pancreatic tumor xenografts, AZD1775 significantly inhibited tumor growth and impaired RAD51 focus formation in response to gemcitabine-radiation. In conclusion, WEE1 inhibition by AZD1775 is an effective strategy for sensitizing pancreatic cancers to gemcitabine chemoradiation. Although this sensitization is accompanied by inhibition of CDK1 phosphorylation and G2 checkpoint abrogation, this mechanism is not sufficient for sensitization. Our findings demonstrate that sensitization to chemoradiation by WEE1 inhibition results from inhibition of HR repair and suggest that patient tumors without underlying HR defects would benefit most from this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasneem Kausar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Jason S Schreiber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - David Karnak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Leslie A Parsels
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Joshua D Parsels
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Mary A Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Lili Zhao
- Biostatistics Unit, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Jonathan Maybaum
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Theodore S Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Meredith A Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Reichert ZR, Wahl DR, Morgan MA. Translation of Targeted Radiation Sensitizers into Clinical Trials. Semin Radiat Oncol 2016; 26:261-70. [PMID: 27619248 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2016.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Over the past century, technologic advances have promoted the evolution of radiation therapy into a precise treatment modality allowing for the maximal administration of dose to tumors while sparing normal tissues. Coinciding with this technological maturation, systemic therapies have been combined with radiation in an effort to improve tumor control. Conventional cytotoxic agents have improved survival in several tumor types but cause increased toxicity due to effects on normal tissues. An increased understanding of tumor biology and the radiation response has led to the nomination of several pathways whose targeted inhibition has the potential to radiosensitize tumor cells with lesser effects on normal tissues. These pathways include those regulating the cell cycle, DNA damage repair, and mitogenic signaling. Few drugs targeting these pathways are in clinical practice, although many are in clinical trials. This review will describe the rationale for combining agents targeting these pathways with radiation, provide an overview of the current landscape in the clinical pipeline and attempt to outline the future steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachery R Reichert
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Daniel R Wahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Meredith A Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Wu Y, Gan Y, Yuan H, Wang Q, Fan Y, Li G, Zhang J, Yao M, Gu J, Tu H. Enriched environment housing enhances the sensitivity of mouse pancreatic cancer to chemotherapeutic agents. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2016; 473:593-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
69
|
Samadder P, Aithal R, Belan O, Krejci L. Cancer TARGETases: DSB repair as a pharmacological target. Pharmacol Ther 2016; 161:111-131. [PMID: 26899499 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is a disease attributed to the accumulation of DNA damages due to incapacitation of DNA repair pathways resulting in genomic instability and a mutator phenotype. Among the DNA lesions, double stranded breaks (DSBs) are the most toxic forms of DNA damage which may arise as a result of extrinsic DNA damaging agents or intrinsic replication stress in fast proliferating cancer cells. Accurate repair of DSBs is therefore paramount to the cell survival, and several classes of proteins such as kinases, nucleases, helicases or core recombinational proteins have pre-defined jobs in precise execution of DSB repair pathways. On one hand, the proper functioning of these proteins ensures maintenance of genomic stability in normal cells, and on the other hand results in resistance to various drugs employed in cancer therapy and therefore presents a suitable opportunity for therapeutic targeting. Higher relapse and resistance in cancer patients due to non-specific, cytotoxic therapies is an alarming situation and it is becoming more evident to employ personalized treatment based on the genetic landscape of the cancer cells. For the success of personalized treatment, it is of immense importance to identify more suitable targetable proteins in DSB repair pathways and also to explore new synthetic lethal interactions with these pathways. Here we review the various alternative approaches to target the various protein classes termed as cancer TARGETases in DSB repair pathway to obtain more beneficial and selective therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pounami Samadder
- National Centre for Biomolecular Research, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; International Clinical Research Center, Center for Biomolecular and Cellular Engineering, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Rakesh Aithal
- National Centre for Biomolecular Research, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Belan
- Department of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lumir Krejci
- National Centre for Biomolecular Research, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; International Clinical Research Center, Center for Biomolecular and Cellular Engineering, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Biology, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Gavande NS, VanderVere-Carozza PS, Hinshaw HD, Jalal SI, Sears CR, Pawelczak KS, Turchi JJ. DNA repair targeted therapy: The past or future of cancer treatment? Pharmacol Ther 2016; 160:65-83. [PMID: 26896565 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 258] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The repair of DNA damage is a complex process that relies on particular pathways to remedy specific types of damage to DNA. The range of insults to DNA includes small, modest changes in structure including mismatched bases and simple methylation events to oxidized bases, intra- and interstrand DNA crosslinks, DNA double strand breaks and protein-DNA adducts. Pathways required for the repair of these lesions include mismatch repair, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, and the homology directed repair/Fanconi anemia pathway. Each of these pathways contributes to genetic stability, and mutations in genes encoding proteins involved in these pathways have been demonstrated to promote genetic instability and cancer. In fact, it has been suggested that all cancers display defects in DNA repair. It has also been demonstrated that the ability of cancer cells to repair therapeutically induced DNA damage impacts therapeutic efficacy. This has led to targeting DNA repair pathways and proteins to develop anti-cancer agents that will increase sensitivity to traditional chemotherapeutics. While initial studies languished and were plagued by a lack of specificity and a defined mechanism of action, more recent approaches to exploit synthetic lethal interaction and develop high affinity chemical inhibitors have proven considerably more effective. In this review we will highlight recent advances and discuss previous failures in targeting DNA repair to pave the way for future DNA repair targeted agents and their use in cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navnath S Gavande
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| | | | - Hilary D Hinshaw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| | - Shadia I Jalal
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| | - Catherine R Sears
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| | | | - John J Turchi
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States; NERx Biosciences, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
DNA Damage Signalling and Repair Inhibitors: The Long-Sought-After Achilles' Heel of Cancer. Biomolecules 2015; 5:3204-59. [PMID: 26610585 PMCID: PMC4693276 DOI: 10.3390/biom5043204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
For decades, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were the two only approaches exploiting DNA repair processes to fight against cancer. Nowadays, cancer therapeutics can be a major challenge when it comes to seeking personalized targeted medicine that is both effective and selective to the malignancy. Over the last decade, the discovery of new targeted therapies against DNA damage signalling and repair has offered the possibility of therapeutic improvements in oncology. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of DNA damage signalling and repair inhibitors, their molecular and cellular effects, and future therapeutic use.
Collapse
|
72
|
Le QT, Shirato H, Giaccia AJ, Koong AC. Emerging Treatment Paradigms in Radiation Oncology. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21:3393-401. [PMID: 25991820 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Rapid advancements in radiotherapy and molecularly targeted therapies have resulted in the development of potential paradigm-shifting use of radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer. In this review, we discuss some of the most promising therapeutic approaches in the field of radiation oncology. These strategies include the use of highly targeted stereotactic radiotherapy and particle therapy as well as combining radiotherapy with agents that modulate the DNA damage response, augment the immune response, or protect normal tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
| | - Hiroki Shirato
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Amato J Giaccia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Albert C Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Hong CS, Ho W, Zhang C, Yang C, Elder JB, Zhuang Z. LB100, a small molecule inhibitor of PP2A with potent chemo- and radio-sensitizing potential. Cancer Biol Ther 2015; 16:821-33. [PMID: 25897893 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1040961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is a serine/threonine phosphatase that plays a significant role in mitotic progression and cellular responses to DNA damage. While traditionally viewed as a tumor suppressor, inhibition of PP2A has recently come to attention as a novel therapeutic means of driving senescent cancer cells into mitosis and promoting cell death via mitotic catastrophe. These findings have been corroborated in numerous studies utilizing naturally produced compounds that selectively inhibit PP2A. To overcome the known human toxicities associated with these compounds, a water-soluble small molecule inhibitor, LB100, was recently developed to competitively inhibit the PP2A protein. This review summarizes the pre-clinical studies to date that have demonstrated the anti-cancer activity of LB100 via its chemo- and radio-sensitizing properties. These studies demonstrate the tremendous therapeutic potential of LB100 in a variety of cancer types. The results of an ongoing phase 1 trial are eagerly anticipated.
Collapse
Key Words
- ABC, ATP-binding cassette.
- APC, adenomatous polyposis coli
- ARPP19, cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein 19
- ATM, ataxia-telangiectasia mutated
- CIP2A, cancerous inhibitor of PP2A
- CNTF, ciliary neurotrophic factor
- DISC, death-inducing signaling complex
- DVL, dishevelled
- ENSA, α-endosulphine
- GBM, glioblastoma
- GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HDACs, histone deacetylase complexes
- HIF-1a, hypoxia-inducible factor-1a
- HRR, homologous recombination repair
- MDM2, mouse double minute 2 homolog
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- PP2A, protein phosphatase 2A
- Plk1, polo-like kinase 1
- TCTP, translationally-controlled tumor protein
- TMZ, temozolomide
- TRAIL, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand
- VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor
- cell cycle
- chemosensitization
- mitotic catastrophe
- protein phosphatase 2A
- radiosensitizationreview
- small molecule inhibitor
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher S Hong
- a The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center ; Department of Neurological Surgery ; Columbus , OH USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
74
|
Wei D, Zhang Q, Schreiber JS, Parsels LA, Abulwerdi FA, Kausar T, Lawrence TS, Sun Y, Nikolovska-Coleska Z, Morgan MA. Targeting mcl-1 for radiosensitization of pancreatic cancers. Transl Oncol 2015; 8:47-54. [PMID: 25749177 PMCID: PMC4350640 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2014.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In order to identify targets whose inhibition may enhance the efficacy of chemoradiation in pancreatic cancer, we previously conducted an RNAi library screen of 8,800 genes. We identified Mcl-1 (myeloid cell leukemia-1), an anti-apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family, as a target for sensitizing pancreatic cancer cells to chemoradiation. In the present study we investigated Mcl-1 inhibition by either genetic or pharmacological approaches as a radiosensitizing strategy in pancreatic cancer cells. Mcl-1 depletion by siRNA produced significant radiosensitization in BxPC-3 and Panc-1 cells in association with Caspase-3 activation and PARP cleavage, but only minimal radiosensitization in MiaPaCa-2 cells. We next tested the ability of the recently identified, selective, small molecule inhibitor of Mcl-1, UMI77, to radiosensitize in pancreatic cancer cells. UMI77 caused dissociation of Mcl-1 from the pro-apoptotic protein Bak and produced significant radiosensitization in BxPC-3 and Panc-1 cells, but minimal radiosensitization in MiaPaCa-2 cells. Radiosensitization by UMI77 was associated with Caspase-3 activation and PARP cleavage. Importantly, UMI77 did not radiosensitize normal small intestinal cells. In contrast, ABT-737, an established inhibitor of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and Bcl-w, failed to radiosensitize pancreatic cancer cells suggesting the unique importance of Mcl-1 relative to other Bcl-2 family members to radiation survival in pancreatic cancer cells. Taken together, these results validate Mcl-1 as a target for radiosensitization of pancreatic cancer cells and demonstrate the ability of small molecules which bind the canonical BH3 groove of Mcl-1, causing displacement of Mcl-1 from Bak, to selectively radiosensitize pancreatic cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongping Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School
| | - Qiang Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School
| | - Jason S Schreiber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School
| | - Leslie A Parsels
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School
| | | | - Tasneem Kausar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School
| | | | - Yi Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School
| | | | - Meredith A Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School.
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Lunardi A, Varmeh S, Chen M, Taulli R, Guarnerio J, Ala U, Seitzer N, Ishikawa T, Carver BS, Hobbs RM, Quarantotti V, Ng C, Berger AH, Nardella C, Poliseno L, Montironi R, Castillo-Martin M, Cordon-Cardo C, Signoretti S, Pandolfi PP. Suppression of CHK1 by ETS Family Members Promotes DNA Damage Response Bypass and Tumorigenesis. Cancer Discov 2015; 5:550-63. [PMID: 25653093 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-1050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2013] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The ETS family of transcription factors has been repeatedly implicated in tumorigenesis. In prostate cancer, ETS family members, such as ERG, ETV1, ETV4, and ETV5, are frequently overexpressed due to chromosomal translocations, but the molecular mechanisms by which they promote prostate tumorigenesis remain largely undefined. Here, we show that ETS family members, such as ERG and ETV1, directly repress the expression of the checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1), a key DNA damage response cell-cycle regulator essential for the maintenance of genome integrity. Critically, we find that ERG expression correlates with CHK1 downregulation in human patients and demonstrate that Chk1 heterozygosity promotes the progression of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia into prostatic invasive carcinoma in Pten(+) (/-) mice. Importantly, CHK1 downregulation sensitizes prostate tumor cells to etoposide but not to docetaxel treatment. Thus, we identify CHK1 as a key functional target of the ETS proto-oncogenic family with important therapeutic implications. SIGNIFICANCE Genetic translocation and aberrant expression of ETS family members is a common event in different types of human tumors. Here, we show that through the transcriptional repression of CHK1, ETS factors may favor DNA damage accumulation and consequent genetic instability in proliferating cells. Importantly, our findings provide a rationale for testing DNA replication inhibitor agents in ETS-positive TP53-proficient tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Lunardi
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shohreh Varmeh
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ming Chen
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Riccardo Taulli
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jlenia Guarnerio
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ugo Ala
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nina Seitzer
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tomoki Ishikawa
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brett S Carver
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robin M Hobbs
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Valentina Quarantotti
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher Ng
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alice H Berger
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Caterina Nardella
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura Poliseno
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region (Ancona), United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy
| | | | | | - Sabina Signoretti
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pier Paolo Pandolfi
- Cancer Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Goldstein M, Kastan MB. The DNA Damage Response: Implications for Tumor Responses to Radiation and Chemotherapy. Annu Rev Med 2015; 66:129-43. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-081313-121208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 303] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Goldstein
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710; ,
| | - Michael B. Kastan
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710; ,
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Fokas E, O'Neill E, Gordon-Weeks A, Mukherjee S, McKenna WG, Muschel RJ. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: From genetics to biology to radiobiology to oncoimmunology and all the way back to the clinic. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA 2015; 1855:61-82. [PMID: 25489989 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2014] [Revised: 12/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/03/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death. Despite improvements in the clinical management, the prognosis of PDAC remains dismal. In the present comprehensive review, we will examine the knowledge of PDAC genetics and the new insights into human genome sequencing and clonal evolution. Additionally, the biology and the role of the stroma in tumour progression and response to treatment will be presented. Furthermore, we will describe the evidence on tumour chemoresistance and radioresistance and will provide an overview on the recent advances in PDAC metabolism and circulating tumour cells. Next, we will explore the characteristics and merits of the different mouse models of PDAC. The inflammatory milieu and the immunosuppressive microenvironment mediate tumour initiation and treatment failure. Hence, we will also review the inflammatory and immune escaping mechanisms and the new immunotherapies tested in PDAC. A better understanding of the different mechanisms of tumour formation and progression will help us to identify the best targets for testing in future clinical studies of PDAC.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/immunology
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/therapy
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology
- Disease Models, Animal
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/immunology
- Humans
- Immunotherapy/methods
- Inflammation/pathology
- Mice
- Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/immunology
- Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/immunology
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy
- Radiation Tolerance/genetics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
| | - Eric O'Neill
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Alex Gordon-Weeks
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Somnath Mukherjee
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - W Gillies McKenna
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruth J Muschel
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Liu Y, Kwiatkowski DJ. Combined CDKN1A/TP53 mutation in bladder cancer is a therapeutic target. Mol Cancer Ther 2014; 14:174-82. [PMID: 25349305 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-14-0622-t] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Invasive bladder cancer has high morbidity and nearly uniform mortality when metastatic, with no therapeutic improvement in many years. Although chemotherapy combined with Chk1 inhibition has been investigated in several cancer types in which TP53 mutation is seen, this combination treatment approach has not been studied in bladder cancer. Recently, cancer genome sequencing efforts have identified CDKN1A (p21) mutations at 14% frequency in invasive bladder cancer, co-occurring half the time with TP53 mutations. We hypothesized that combined CDKN1A-TP53 loss would make bladder cancer sensitive to combined treatment with gemcitabine and Chk1 inhibitor. Here, we show that TP53-CDKN1A double-mutant bladder cancer cell lines, 647V and RT-112, have a remarkable increase in p-Chk1 levels and G2-M arrest in response to gemcitabine treatment, with a heightened sensitivity to combination treatment with gemcitabine and either Chk1 inhibitor PF477736 or AZD7762, in comparison with other bladder cancer cell lines (either TP53 or p21 deficient). In addition, CDKN1A restoration in p21-deficient bladder cancer cells significantly reduced their sensitivity to combined treatment by protecting them from DNA damage and apoptosis. Furthermore, xenograft studies using RT-112 showed a significant synergistic effect of combined gemcitabine-PF477736 treatment on tumor growth. Our findings suggest that TP53/CDKN1A double-mutant bladder cancer cells have a unique dependence on Chk1 activity for the G2-M cell-cycle checkpoint in response to chemotherapy-induced DNA damage. This combination or others involving genotoxic agents and Chk kinase inhibitors is a promising therapeutic approach for bladder cancer with these mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Translational Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David J Kwiatkowski
- Translational Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Karnak D, Engelke CG, Parsels LA, Kausar T, Wei D, Robertson JR, Marsh KB, Davis MA, Zhao L, Maybaum J, Lawrence TS, Morgan MA. Combined inhibition of Wee1 and PARP1/2 for radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20:5085-96. [PMID: 25117293 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE While the addition of radiation to chemotherapy improves survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, more effective therapies are urgently needed. Thus, we investigated the radiosensitizing efficacy of the novel drug combination of Wee1 and PARP1/2 inhibitors (AZD1775 and olaparib, respectively) in pancreatic cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Radiosensitization of AsPC-1 or MiaPaCa-2 human pancreatic cancer cells was assessed by clonogenic survival and tumor growth assays. Mechanistically, the effects of AZD1775, olaparib, and radiation on cell cycle, DNA damage (γH2AX), and homologous recombination repair (HRR) were determined. RESULTS Treatment of AsPC-1 and MiaPaCa-2 cells with either AZD1775 or olaparib caused modest radiosensitization, whereas treatment with the combination significantly increased radiosensitization. Radiosensitization by the combination of AZD1775 and olaparib was associated with G2 checkpoint abrogation and persistent DNA damage. In addition, AZD1775 inhibited HRR activity and prevented radiation-induced Rad51 focus formation. Finally, in vivo, in MiaPaCa-2-derived xenografts, olaparib did not radiosensitize, whereas AZD1775 produced moderate, yet significant, radiosensitization (P < 0.05). Importantly, the combination of AZD1775 and olaparib produced highly significant radiosensitization (P < 0.0001) evidenced by a 13-day delay in tumor volume doubling (vs. radiation alone) and complete eradication of 20% of tumors. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, these results demonstrate the efficacy of combined inhibition of Wee1 and PARP inhibitors for radiosensitizing pancreatic cancers and support the model that Wee1 inhibition sensitizes cells to PARP inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization through inhibition of HRR and abrogation of the G2 checkpoint, ultimately resulting in unrepaired, lethal DNA damage and radiosensitization. Clin Cancer Res; 20(19); 5085-96. ©2014 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Karnak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Carl G Engelke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Leslie A Parsels
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Tasneem Kausar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Dongping Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jordan R Robertson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Katherine B Marsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Mary A Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lili Zhao
- Biostatistics Unit, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jonathan Maybaum
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Theodore S Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Meredith A Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Unbiased analysis of pancreatic cancer radiation resistance reveals cholesterol biosynthesis as a novel target for radiosensitisation. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:1139-49. [PMID: 25025965 PMCID: PMC4453840 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 05/31/2014] [Accepted: 06/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its promise as a highly useful therapy for pancreatic cancer (PC), the addition of external beam radiation therapy to PC treatment has shown varying success in clinical trials. Understanding PC radioresistance and discovery of methods to sensitise PC to radiation will increase patient survival and improve quality of life. In this study, we identified PC radioresistance-associated pathways using global, unbiased techniques. METHODS Radioresistant cells were generated by sequential irradiation and recovery, and global genome cDNA microarray analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed genes in radiosensitive and radioresistant cells. Ingenuity pathway analysis was performed to discover cellular pathways and functions associated with differential radioresponse and identify potential small-molecule inhibitors for radiosensitisation. The expression of FDPS, one of the most differentially expressed genes, was determined in human PC tissues by IHC and the impact of its pharmacological inhibition with zoledronic acid (ZOL, Zometa) on radiosensitivity was determined by colony-forming assays. The radiosensitising effect of Zol in vivo was determined using allograft transplantation mouse model. RESULTS Microarray analysis indicated that 11 genes (FDPS, ACAT2, AG2, CLDN7, DHCR7, ELFN2, FASN, SC4MOL, SIX6, SLC12A2, and SQLE) were consistently associated with radioresistance in the cell lines, a majority of which are involved in cholesterol biosynthesis. We demonstrated that knockdown of farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FDPS), a branchpoint enzyme of the cholesterol synthesis pathway, radiosensitised PC cells. FDPS was significantly overexpressed in human PC tumour tissues compared with healthy pancreas samples. Also, pharmacologic inhibition of FDPS by ZOL radiosensitised PC cell lines, with a radiation enhancement ratio between 1.26 and 1.5. Further, ZOL treatment resulted in radiosensitisation of PC tumours in an allograft mouse model. CONCLUSIONS Unbiased pathway analysis of radioresistance allowed for the discovery of novel pathways associated with resistance to ionising radiation in PC. Specifically, our analysis indicates the importance of the cholesterol synthesis pathway in PC radioresistance. Further, a novel radiosensitiser, ZOL, showed promising results and warrants further study into the universality of these findings in PC, as well as the true potential of this drug as a clinical radiosensitiser.
Collapse
|
81
|
Fang Y, Yu H, Liang X, Xu J, Cai X. Chk1-induced CCNB1 overexpression promotes cell proliferation and tumor growth in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2014; 15:1268-79. [PMID: 24971465 DOI: 10.4161/cbt.29691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The high morbidity and mortality of colorectal cancer pose a significant public health problem worldwide. Here we assessed the pro-cancer efficacy and mechanism of action of CCNB1 in different colorectal cancer cells. We provided evidence that CCNB1 mRNA and protein level were upregulated in a subset of human colorectal tumors, and positively correlated with Chk1 expression. Repression of Chk1 caused a significant decrease in cell proliferation and CCNB1 protein expression in colorectal cancer cells. Furthermore, downregulation of CCNB1 impaired colorectal cancer proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Specifically, suppression of CCNB1 caused a strong G 2/M phase arrest in both HCT116 and SW480 cells, interfering with the expression of cdc25c and CDK1. Additionally, CCNB1 inhibition induced apoptotic death in certain colorectal cancer cells. Together, these results suggest that CCNB1 is activated by Chk1, exerts its oncogenic role in colorectal cancer cells, and may play a key role in the development of a novel therapeutic approach against colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifeng Fang
- The Second Department of General Surgery; Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital; School of Medicine; Zhejiang University; Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China
| | - Hong Yu
- The Second Department of General Surgery; Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital; School of Medicine; Zhejiang University; Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China
| | - Xiao Liang
- The Second Department of General Surgery; Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital; School of Medicine; Zhejiang University; Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China
| | - Junfen Xu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology; Women's Hospital; School of Medicine; Zhejiang University; Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- The Second Department of General Surgery; Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital; School of Medicine; Zhejiang University; Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Al-Ejeh F, Pajic M, Shi W, Kalimutho M, Miranda M, Nagrial AM, Chou A, Biankin AV, Grimmond SM, Brown MP, Khanna KK. Gemcitabine and CHK1 inhibition potentiate EGFR-directed radioimmunotherapy against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20:3187-97. [PMID: 24838526 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop effective combination therapy against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with a combination of chemotherapy, CHK1 inhibition, and EGFR-targeted radioimmunotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Maximum tolerated doses were determined for the combination of gemcitabine, the CHK1 inhibitor PF-477736, and Lutetium-177 ((177)Lu)-labeled anti-EGFR antibody. This triple combination therapy was investigated using PDAC models from well-established cell lines, recently established patient-derived cell lines, and fresh patient-derived xenografts. Tumors were investigated for the accumulation of (177)Lu-anti-EGFR antibody, survival of tumor-initiating cells, induction of DNA damage, cell death, and tumor tissue degeneration. RESULTS The combination of gemcitabine and CHK1 inhibitor PF-477736 with (177)Lu-anti-EGFR antibody was tolerated in mice. This triplet was effective in established tumors and prevented the recurrence of PDAC in four cell line-derived and one patient-derived xenograft model. This exquisite response was associated with the loss of tumor-initiating cells as measured by flow cytometric analysis and secondary implantation of tumors from treated mice into treatment-naïve mice. Extensive DNA damage, apoptosis, and tumor degeneration were detected in the patient-derived xenograft. Mechanistically, we observed CDC25A stabilization as a result of CHK1 inhibition with consequent inhibition of gemcitabine-induced S-phase arrest as well as a decrease in canonical (ERK1/2 phosphorylation) and noncanonical EGFR signaling (RAD51 degradation) as a result of EGFR inhibition. CONCLUSIONS Our study developed an effective combination therapy against PDAC that has potential in the treatment of PDAC.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology
- Apoptosis/drug effects
- Benzodiazepinones/pharmacology
- Blotting, Western
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/therapy
- Cell Proliferation/drug effects
- Checkpoint Kinase 1
- Combined Modality Therapy
- DNA Damage/drug effects
- Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives
- Deoxycytidine/pharmacology
- Drug Synergism
- ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors
- Female
- Humans
- Immunoenzyme Techniques
- Mice
- Mice, Inbred BALB C
- Mice, Inbred NOD
- Mice, SCID
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy
- Phosphorylation/drug effects
- Protein Kinases/chemistry
- Pyrazoles/pharmacology
- Radioimmunotherapy
- Signal Transduction/drug effects
- Tumor Cells, Cultured
- Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
- Gemcitabine
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fares Al-Ejeh
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Marina Pajic
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United KingdomAuthors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Wei Shi
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Murugan Kalimutho
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Mariska Miranda
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United KingdomAuthors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Adnan M Nagrial
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Chou
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United KingdomAuthors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew V Biankin
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United KingdomAuthors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Sean M Grimmond
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United KingdomAuthors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United KingdomAuthors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medic
| | - Michael P Brown
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United KingdomAuthors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Kum Kum Khanna
- Authors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United KingdomAuthors' Affiliations: Signal Transduction Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston; Queensland Centre for Medical Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland; The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW; Department of Anatomical Pathology, SYDPATH, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, for the full list of contributors see http://www.pancreaticcancer.net.au/apgi/collaborators; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre, and Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; and Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Dillon MT, Good JS, Harrington KJ. Selective targeting of the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint to improve the therapeutic index of radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 26:257-65. [PMID: 24581946 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2013] [Revised: 01/22/2014] [Accepted: 01/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Despite tremendous advances in radiotherapy techniques, allowing dose escalation to tumour tissues and sparing of organs at risk, cure rates from radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy remain suboptimal for most cancers. In tandem with our growing understanding of tumour biology, we are beginning to appreciate that targeting the molecular response to radiation-induced DNA damage holds great promise for selective tumour radiosensitisation. In particular, approaches that inhibit cell cycle checkpoint controls offer a means of exploiting molecular differences between tumour and normal cells, thereby inducing so-called cancer-specific synthetic lethality. In this overview, we discuss cellular responses to radiation-induced damage and discuss the potential of using G2/M cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors as a means of enhancing tumour control rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M T Dillon
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Targeted Therapy Team, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - J S Good
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - K J Harrington
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Targeted Therapy Team, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Maginn EN, de Sousa CH, Wasan HS, Stronach EA. Opportunities for translation: targeting DNA repair pathways in pancreatic cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2014; 1846:45-54. [PMID: 24727386 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2014] [Revised: 03/21/2014] [Accepted: 04/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the poorest prognosis neoplasms. It is typified by high levels of genomic aberrations and copy-number variation, intra-tumoural heterogeneity and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Improved therapeutic options, ideally targeted against cancer-specific biological mechanisms, are urgently needed. Although induction of DNA damage and/or modulation of DNA damage response pathways are associated with the activity of a number of conventional PDAC chemotherapies, the effectiveness of this approach in the treatment of PDAC has not been comprehensively reviewed. Here, we review chemotherapeutic agents that have shown anti-cancer activity in PDAC and whose mechanisms of action involve modulation of DNA repair pathways. In addition, we highlight novel potential targets within these pathways based on the emerging understanding of PDAC biology and their exploitation as targets in other cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaina N Maginn
- Molecular Therapy Laboratory, Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
| | - Camila H de Sousa
- Molecular Therapy Laboratory, Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom
| | - Harpreet S Wasan
- Molecular Therapy Laboratory, Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom
| | - Euan A Stronach
- Molecular Therapy Laboratory, Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Abstract
Chemoradiation is the standard therapy for the majority of inoperable, locally advanced cancers. Although there is a need to improve chemoradiation efficacy, normal-tissue toxicity limits our ability to give additional chemotherapy or higher doses of radiation. Thus, there is excitement about the addition of molecularly targeted agents, which tend to be less toxic than chemotherapy, to chemoradiation regimens. Unfortunately, initial empiric attempts have not been successful. This review will focus on the evidence that supports rational combinations of targeted agents with chemoradiation, with an emphasis on agents that target the DNA damage response and radiation-induced membrane signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith A. Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Leslie A. Parsels
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jonathan Maybaum
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Theodore S. Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|