A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of aprotinin for reducing blood loss and the requirement for donor-blood transfusion in patients undergoing repeat coronary artery bypass grafting

Blood tranfusion in critically ill patients: state of the art

Anemia is one of the most common abnormal findings in critically ill patients, and many of these patients will receive a blood transfusion during their intensive care unit stay. However, the determinants of exactly which patients do receive transfusions remains to be defined and have been the subject of considerable debate in recent years. Concerns and doubts have emerged regarding the benefits and safety of blood transfusion, in part due to the lack of evidence of better outcomes resulting from randomized studies and in part related to the observations that transfusion may increase the risk of infection. As a result of these concerns and of several studies suggesting better or similar outcomes with a lower transfusion trigger, there has been a general tendency to decrease the transfusion threshold from the classic 10 g/dL to lower values. In this review, we focus on some of the key studies providing insight into current transfusion practices and fueling the current debate on the ideal transfusion trigger.

Neuroprotection during cardiac surgery

Cerebral injury following cardiac surgery continues to be a significant source of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. A spectrum of injuries ranging from subtle neurocognitive dysfunction to fatal strokes are caused by a complex series of multifactorial mechanisms. Protecting the brain from these injuries has focused on intervening on each of the various etiologic factors. Although numerous studies have focused on a pharmacologic solution, more success has been found with nonpharmacologic strategies, including optimal temperature management and reducing emboli generation.

Aprotinin Use in Cardiac Surgery Patients at Low Risk for Requiring Blood Transfusion

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine if aprotinin is safe and effective in patients at low risk for requiring blood transfusion after cardiac surgery by evaluating whether there is any significant difference in blood product use or other significant clinical outcomes between patients who received aprotinin versus those who did not.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Inpatient community nonteaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Three hundred thirty-five patients who underwent primary cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass between November 1, 2003, and December 31, 2005, and were considered at low risk for requiring postoperative blood transfusion; 162 patients received aprotinin and 173 patients received aminocaproic acid (control).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Comparison of patients in the aprotinin group versus those in the aminocaproic acid group revealed no difference in total donor exposures to blood products (1.86 vs 1.16 units/patient, p=0.07), total packed red blood cells (PRBCs) received (1.25 vs 0.86 units/patient, p=0.09), postoperative donor exposures to blood products (0.91 vs 0.48 unit/patient, p=0.13), or postoperative PRBCs received (0.61 vs 0.40 unit/patient, p=0.23). No difference was noted in any other clinical outcome in the aprotinin group versus the aminocaproic acid group, including postoperative azotemia (13.0% vs 10.4%, p=0.46), new onset of atrial fibrillation (14.8% vs 15.0%, p=0.95), myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. Mean +/- SD total hospital length of stay was similar in the aprotinin group versus the aminocaproic acid group (8.1 +/- 3.8 vs 7.4 +/- 2.8 days, p=0.08), but length of stay from surgery to discharge was longer in the aprotinin group than in the aminocaproic acid group (5.9 +/- 0.17 vs 5.4 +/- 0.12 days, p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Although aprotinin appeared to be safe in this low-risk patient population, it was not more effective than aminocaproic acid in reducing blood product use after cardiac surgery. More robust evidence is needed from a controlled randomized trial to demonstrate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacoeconomic benefit of aprotinin.

[Neurological complications in cardiac surgery post-operative period]

The incidence of neurological complications after cardiac surgery continues to be elevated, although this is variable in the different studies published, fundamentally because of the different populations studied and the different definitions of neurological dysfunction. The etiology of these alterations is attributed to a multifactorial origin, aortic artherosclerosis, cerebral hypoperfusion and inflammatory phenomenon secondary to the technique. This review arises from the recognition of the personal, economic, and socio-health care repercussion entailed by these complications, with high rates of mortality and morbidity recorded, and it tries to give an objective view of the current literature on the subject. Having knowledge of the risk markers and understanding the pathogenesis is important to try to plan strategies that may minimize the appearance and development of these complications and contribute to the decrease of their serious consequences. The data and the experience obtained by our group are shown at the end of the review.

Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients having cardiac procedures (15% to 20%) consume more than 80% of the blood products transfused at operation. Blood must be viewed as a scarce resource that carries risks and benefits. A careful review of available evidence can provide guidelines to allocate this valuable resource and improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed all available published evidence related to blood conservation during cardiac operations, including randomized controlled trials, published observational information, and case reports. Conventional methods identified the level of evidence available for each of the blood conservation interventions. After considering the level of evidence, recommendations were made regarding each intervention using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology classification scheme.

RESULTS

Review of published reports identified a high-risk profile associated with increased postoperative blood transfusion. Six variables stand out as important indicators of risk: (1) advanced age, (2) low preoperative red blood cell volume (preoperative anemia or small body size), (3) preoperative antiplatelet or antithrombotic drugs, (4) reoperative or complex procedures, (5) emergency operations, and (6) noncardiac patient comorbidities. Careful review revealed preoperative and perioperative interventions that are likely to reduce bleeding and postoperative blood transfusion. Preoperative interventions that are likely to reduce blood transfusion include identification of high-risk patients who should receive all available preoperative and perioperative blood conservation interventions and limitation of antithrombotic drugs. Perioperative blood conservation interventions include use of antifibrinolytic drugs, selective use of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, routine use of a cell-saving device, and implementation of appropriate transfusion indications. An important intervention is application of a multimodality blood conservation program that is institution based, accepted by all health care providers, and that involves well thought out transfusion algorithms to guide transfusion decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available evidence, institution-specific protocols should screen for high-risk patients, as blood conservation interventions are likely to be most productive for this high-risk subset. Available evidence-based blood conservation techniques include (1) drugs that increase preoperative blood volume (eg, erythropoietin) or decrease postoperative bleeding (eg, antifibrinolytics), (2) devices that conserve blood (eg, intraoperative blood salvage and blood sparing interventions), (3) interventions that protect the patient's own blood from the stress of operation (eg, autologous predonation and normovolemic hemodilution), (4) consensus, institution-specific blood transfusion algorithms supplemented with point-of-care testing, and most importantly, (5) a multimodality approach to blood conservation combining all of the above.

Transfusion risks and transfusion-related pro-inflammatory responses

Despite improvements in blood screening and administration techniques, serious adverse events related to transfusion continue to occur, albeit at a much lower incidence. In addition to the development and implementation of new screening and blood purification/modification techniques and implementation of an optimal blood management program, the incidence and consequences of transfusion reactions can be reduced by a basic understanding of transfusion-related complications. Although acute hemolytic transfusion reactions, transfusion-associated anaphylaxis and sepsis, and transfusion-associated acute lung injury occur infrequently, diligence in administration of blood and monitoring for development of respective signs/symptoms can minimize the severity of these potentially life-threatening complications. In addition, emerging blood-banking techniques such as psoralen-UV inactivation of pathogens and use of patient identification systems may attenuate the incidence of adverse events related to transfusion. With respect to optimizing blood management by means of an effective blood management program involving pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies, the ability to reduce use of blood products and to decrease operative time or re-exploration rates has important implications for disease prevention, blood inventory and costs, and overall health care costs.

Protease activated receptors: clinical relevance to hemostasis and inflammation

The protease-activated receptors (PARs) are a unique family of vascular receptors that confer on cells an ability to sense, and respond to, local changes in the proteolytic environment. They are activated by serine proteases of the blood coagulation cascade, notably thrombin, and are linked to thrombotic and inflammatory effector pathways. In surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), thrombin is generated in large quantities in the extracorporeal circuit and can exert systemic effects by way of platelet and endothelial PAR1. Aprotinin (Trasylol), a serine protease inhibitor used in cardiac surgery, preserves platelet function, and attenuates the inflammatory response by protecting the PAR 1 receptor on platelets and endothelium.

The Role of Endogenous Kallikrein Inhibition in Perioperative Transfusion and Adverse Outcome in Cardiac Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to explore the relationship among endogenous plasma kallikrein inhibition (KI), perioperative bleeding, and adverse outcomes in cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational study.

SETTING

University teaching hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Cardiac surgical patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Endogenous plasma KI levels (%) and kallikrein-like activity (KKA) were measured preoperatively, 30 minutes into cardiopulmonary bypass, and at the end of surgery. Patients were divided into quartiles of preoperative KI. Data including risk factors, blood loss, transfusion requirements, and postoperative outcomes were collected.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Preoperative endogenous KI ranged from 40% to 175%, where 100% represents the activity of pooled healthy volunteer plasma. The quartiles of KI levels were as follows: quartile 1, KI = 40% to 83.8% (n = 40); quartile 2, KI = 84% to 101.5% (n = 40); quartile 3, KI = 102% to 120% (n = 42); and quartile 4, KI = 121% to 175% (n = 38). The hematocrits on admission to the intensive care unit were as follows: quartile 1, 28% +/- 4%; quartile 2, 26% +/- 4%; quartile 3, 26% +/- 4%; and quartile 4, 24% +/- 4% (p = 0.009). Blood product use was similar among quartiles in the operating room. Quartiles 3 and 4 received more blood (p = 0.003) and platelet (p = 0.04) transfusions than quartiles 1 and 2 in the first 24 hours after surgery. More patients in quartile 4 were ventilated for more than 24 hours after surgery (p < 0.05). Hospital length of stay was longest in quartile 4 (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to expectation, higher endogenous KI levels were associated with more blood product transfusion, longer postoperative mechanical ventilation, and hospital length of stay. These findings raise questions as to the role of KI in postoperative outcomes.

Anti-inflammatory Strategies and Hemostatic Agents: Old Drugs, New Ideas

Hemostatic abnormalities occur following injury associated with both cardiac and noncardiac surgery. These changes are part of inflammatory pathways with signaling mechanisms that link these diverse pathways. The inflammatory response to surgery is exacerbated by allogeneic blood transfusion by enhancing intrinsic inflammatory activity and directly increasing plasma levels of inflammatory mediators. Surgical patients can be preventively treated with pharmacologic agents to modulate inflammatory responses. Multiple studies have reported preventive pharmacologic therapies to reduce bleeding and the need for allogeneic transfusions in surgery. Strategies for cardiac surgical patients during cardiopulmonary bypass include administration of either lysine analogs, such as epsilon aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid, or the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin.

Transfusion Algorithms and How They Apply to Blood Conservation: The High-risk Cardiac Surgical Patient

Considerable blood product support is administered to the cardiac surgery population. Due to the multifactorial etiology of bleeding in the cardiac bypass patient, blood products frequently and empirically are infused to correct bleeding, with varying success. Several studies have demonstrated the benefit of algorithm-guided transfusion in reducing blood loss, transfusion exposure, or rate of surgical re-exploration for bleeding. Some transfusion algorithms also incorporate laboratory-based decision points in their guidelines. Despite published success with standardized transfusion practices, generalized change in blood use has not been realized, and it is evident that current laboratory-guided hemostasis measures are inadequate to define and address the bleeding etiology in these patients.

Is There Still a Role for Aprotinin in Cardiac Surgery?

Cardiac surgery is associated with a systemic inflammatory response and systemic coagulopathy, which can result in significant organ dysfunction and bleeding. Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor, can limit systemic inflammation, and has been associated with myocardial, pulmonary and cerebral protection in addition to its proven haemostatic efficacy. Data are currently conflicting regarding the haemostatic efficacy of aprotinin relative to alternative agents including tranexamic acid. Recent studies have demonstrated aprotinin usage is associated with increased rates of thrombotic and renal complications, but these findings are at odds with the majority of studies relating to aprotinin safety to date. The lack of adequately powered, randomised studies evaluating aprotinin and alternative agents limits drawing conclusions about the complete use or disuse of aprotinin presently and requires individualised patient selection based on bleeding risk and co-morbidities for its usage.

Aprotinin; friend or foe? A review of recent medical literature

Recent articles published in peer review journals have questioned the safety of using aprotinin in patients having heart surgery. Also, evidence has been published to suggest an increase in renal events in patients given aprotinin when compared to those where tranexamic acid was used. The present review will focus principally on the first of these articles in relation to previously published data and experience.

Full-dose aprotinin use in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: an analysis of perioperative pharmacotherapy and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate activation of hemostasis and inflammation may contribute to postoperative morbidity and mortality. The serine protease inhibitor, aprotinin, has been shown to prevent tissue and organ injury in laboratory and animal studies. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the relationship of aprotinin therapy with organ dysfunction in humans undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

METHODS

Data from prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of full-dose aprotinin (2 million KIU load, 2 million KIU pump prime, and 0.5 million KIU/h continuous infusion) to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing CABG (placebo, n = 861; aprotinin, n = 862) were examined retrospectively. Primary end-points were death, adverse cerebrovascular outcome, myocardial infarction (MI), and pharmacological interventions (inotropic drugs, vasopressors, and antiarrhythmics).

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that relative to placebo, full-dose aprotinin therapy was associated with significant effects on the incidence of adverse cerebrovascular outcome (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.93; P = 0.03) and use of inotropic drugs (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97; P = 0.02), vasopressors (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.90; P < 0.01), and antiarrhythmics (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96; P = 0.02), but not death (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.54-1.85; P = 1.0) or MI (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.64-1.31; P = 0.6). Multivariate analysis confirmed results of univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis of data collected from prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled studies in CABG shows that full-dose aprotinin use was associated with a lower risk of adverse cerebrovascular outcomes and a reduced need for use of vasoactive drugs; the risk of death and perioperative MI was not affected by aprotinin therapy.

Aprotinin and the protease-activated receptor 1 thrombin receptor: antithrombosis, inflammation, and stroke reduction

Cardiopulmonary bypass, although remaining an indispensable asset in cardiac surgery, especially in more complex and repeat operations, is associated with significant thrombin generation in the bypass circuit, leading to the activation of platelets, the coagulation system, an inflammatory response, and perioperative stroke. Recent clinical studies and meta-analyses of clinical trials in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery have confirmed that aprotinin not only reduces transfusion requirements in cardiac surgery but also confers significant protection against platelet dysfunction, activation of the systemic inflammatory response, and perioperative stroke when administered at the full (or "Hammersmith") dose. This article reviews research from several independent groups to propose a novel mechanism through which the antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective mechanism might be mediated, via protection of the high-affinity thrombin receptor protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1).

High-Dose Aprotinin in Cardiac Surgery: Is High-Dose High Enough?

In this retrospective analysis we tested the hypothesis that aprotinin doses of more than 6 x 10(6) kallikrein inhibiting units (KIU) per patient may be more effective in reducing bleeding compared with the high-dose regimen of 5-6 x 10(6) KIU aprotinin. The aprotinin doses administered for 8281 adult cardiac surgical patients were correlated to body weight and time of operation and calculated in KIU per kg body weight and minute of operation. Linear and logistic regression models were designed to detect potential associations between dose and postoperative bleeding, transfusion, and other covariates. The 6-h chest tube drainage in the lowest quartile dosing group was 447 +/- 319 mL (mean +/- sd) compared with 360 +/- 290 mL in the highest quartile dosing group (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusion was reduced from 55% to 47% comparing the lowest with the highest dosing group (P < 0.01). Aprotinin dose was also an independent predictor for rethoracotomy for surgical hemostasis (1.9% in the highest quartile to 2.4% in the lowest dosing quartile; P < 0.01). The risk of renal failure requiring dialysis (2.3% in the highest dosing group vs 3.3% in the lowest dosing group; P < 0.01) or impairment of renal function (creatinine increase of >or=2 mg/dL postoperatively, 6.4% in the highest dosing group vs 10.0% in the lowest dosing group; P < 0.01) was lower with higher doses of aprotinin. Thus, there was no association between aprotinin dose and renal function. Our results support the hypothesis that a more individualized aprotinin regimen with potentially higher doses may optimize the effectiveness of aprotinin therapy in cardiac surgery.

Predicting and preventing adverse neurologic outcomes with cardiac surgery

Adverse neurologic outcomes after cardiac surgery can have devastating consequences, among them increased mortality risk and, among survivors, loss of independence and a diminished quality of life. They also represent a burden on the health-care system, requiring prolonged hospitalizations and additional aftercare and, therefore, greater costs. Adverse outcomes are classified by their severity. Frank stroke is the most serious. This complication is associated with patient age; however, the presence of significant ascending aortic disease represents the greatest hazard. Multivariable analysis also indicates that prior neurologic events, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, preoperative status, and diffuse vascular disease are predictive. The second type of adverse cerebral outcome includes neurocognitive abnormalities such as memory loss and diminished emotional health. The strongest predictors of these abnormalities are hypertension and a history of alcohol use, as well as age. These predictive factors have been incorporated into the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia stroke-risk index, which clinicians can use to better assess the risk of adverse neurologic events. Clinical research examining the relationship between the predictive variables for neurologic adverse events and cerebral blood flow has suggested some surgical strategies for minimizing risk, such as limiting manipulation of the ascending aorta. The benefits of strategies such as using low or high mean arterial pressures and manipulating pump flow remain unclear. Off-pump coronary bypass surgery has been proposed as a means of reducing neurologic risk, but its effectiveness is unproved in this area. One pharmacologic strategy, the administration of aprotinin, has been shown to reduce the incidence of stroke in high-risk patients.

Effect of aprotinin and recombinant variants on platelet protease-activated receptor 1 activation

BACKGROUND

Thrombin generated during cardiopulmonary bypass activates the high-affinity thrombin receptor, protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), causing platelet dysfunction and excessive bleeding. The serine protease inhibitor aprotinin protects platelets against thrombin-mediated PAR1 activation in vitro and in vivo. Here we have investigated three novel recombinant aprotinin variants with specific modifications to the active site lysine at amino acid position 15 (arginine-15, arginine-15-alanine-17, and valine-15-leucine-17) for their effect on PAR1-mediated platelet aggregation in vitro.

METHODS

Aggregation studies were carried out using washed human platelets (n = 9) or platelet rich plasma (n = 7) from healthy volunteers activated with 1 or 5 nM thrombin. Recombinant aprotinin variants were used at the molar equivalent to 50 KIU/mL of the parent compound. The PAR1-specific antagonist peptide, FLLRN, was used at 500 microM.

RESULTS

Platelet aggregation at low concentrations of thrombin (1 nM) was mediated exclusively through PAR1, as shown by inhibition of aggregation in the presence of FLLRN. At 1 nM thrombin, the mean percentage +/- SD aggregation of washed platelets was 68.6% +/- 12.3%. This was suppressed by each aprotinin variant at the 50 KIU/mL equivalent dose: arginine-15 (23.0% +/- 17.5%, p < 0.001); arginine-15-alanine-17 (33.3% +/- 22.9%, p < 0.01); aprotinin (37.5% +/- 19.4%, p < 0.05); valine-15-leucine-17 (50.0% +/- 16.1%, not significant)). At 5 nM thrombin, which activates both high (PAR1) and low-affinity (PAR4) thrombin receptors on platelets, FLLRN and aprotinin failed to block aggregation: this finding indicates that aprotinin selectively targeted PAR1. In platelet-rich plasma, aggregation at 1 nM thrombin was 77.1% +/- 10.0%, and this was inhibited in the following order: arginine-15 (30.1% +/- 9.6%, p < 0.001); arginine-15-alanine-17 (52.3% +/- 9.7%, p > 0.001); aprotinin (55.9% +/- 6.2%, p > 0.001); valine-15-leucine-17 (73.7% +/- 7.1%, not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin variants differentially inhibit PAR1-mediated platelet aggregation. With more understanding of the mechanisms of action of aprotinin and its derivatives, safer and more efficacious aprotinin variants may become available for clinical use.

Cardiopulmonary bypass management and neurologic outcomes: an evidence-based appraisal of current practices

Neurologic complications after cardiac surgery are of growing importance for an aging surgical population. In this review, we provide a critical appraisal of the impact of current cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management strategies on neurologic complications. Other than the use of 20-40 microm arterial line filters and membrane oxygenators, newer modifications of the basic CPB apparatus or the use of specialized equipment or procedures (including hypothermia and "tight" glucose control) have unproven benefit on neurologic outcomes. Epiaortic ultrasound can be considered for ascending aorta manipulations to avoid atheroma, although available clinical trials assessing this maneuver are limited. Current approaches for managing flow, arterial blood pressure, and pH during CPB are supported by data from clinical investigations, but these studies included few elderly or high-risk patients and predated many other contemporary practices. Although there are promising data on the benefits of some drugs blocking excitatory amino acid signaling pathways and inflammation, there are currently no drugs that can be recommended for neuroprotection during CPB. Together, the reviewed data highlight the deficiencies of the current knowledge base that physicians are dependent on to guide patient care during CPB. Multicenter clinical trials assessing measures to reduce the frequency of neurologic complications are needed to develop evidence-based strategies to avoid increasing patient morbidity and mortality.

Antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

To review the perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery, including the management of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and off-pump surgery.

METHODS

A review of the relevant English literature over the period 1975-2005 was undertaken, in addition to a review of international practices in antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Cardiopulmonary bypass is required in most procedures and makes anticoagulation mandatory. Anticoagulation is, usually, achieved with unfractionnated heparin (UFH). Unfractionated heparin is monitored by point-of-care (POC) testing, such as the activated clotting time or the determination of heparin concentration. The target values of both tests remain empirical, with no clearly validated thresholds. The target value needs to be adjusted according to the POC test, given significant variations between devices and activators. After CABG, the need for antiplatelet therapy is well demonstrated, in order to limit the risk of postoperative death or ischemic events, and improve venous graft patency. Immediately after valvular surgery, antithrombotic therapy should take into account the specific risk carried by each patient and by each prosthetic device. The risk of venous thromboembolism, though poorly defined, is also present in the postoperative period and may require additional attention. Given the frequent exposure to UFH, occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is not infrequent in these patients and requires careful individual management.

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombotic therapy is an essential component of cardiac surgery. Yet, with the exception of antiplatelet agents in CABG patients, antithrombotic therapy is often based on the clinical experience of medical teams more than on an evidence-based assessment of the literature.

Aprotinin does not diminish blood loss in elective operations for infrarenal abdominal aneurysms: a randomized double-blind controlled trial

Surgery for abdominal aneurysm is associated with substantial blood loss. In cardiac surgery, aprotinin, a fibrinolysis inhibitor, has shown to reduce blood loss significantly. Our aim was to assess the effect of aprotinin, when administered during elective surgery of infrarenal abdominal aneurysm, on coagulation, blood loss, and morbidity. A double-blind randomized trial was performed on 35 consecutive patients. They were randomized to either an aprotinin or a placebo group. The aprotinin group received 2,000,000 kallikrein inhibiting units (KIU) of aprotinin (500,000 KIU in 50 mL NaCl 0.9%) as a starting dose, followed by 500,000 KIU per hour during the operation. The placebo group received equal amounts of only NaCl 0.9%. During the operation and 24 hr thereafter, blood samples were taken to assess coagulation factors. Blood loss was measured in suction devices and swabs. All patients were followed until their discharge from the hospital. Statistical analysis was performed by independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test and chi-squared test. There was no significant difference in the amount of blood loss or the amount of blood products administered between the two groups. Morbidity and mortality were also comparable. In both groups, consumption of clotting factors could be detected, indicating activation of the coagulation cascade. However, in the aprotinin group, the alpha2-antiplasmin level was raised during surgery, indicating inhibition of fibrinolysis. Administration of aprotinin during elective operations for infrarenal aortic aneurysm induces inhibition of fibrinolysis. However, it does not significantly reduce blood loss or the need for blood products.

Cost, quality, and risk: measuring and stopping the hidden costs of coronary artery bypass graft surgery

PURPOSE

Blood conservation programs have been successfully implemented in hospitals in which an overarching commitment to the reduction of the number of blood transfusions existed. This review will describe the rationale and some of the considerations involved in starting such a program.

SUMMARY

Management of a hospital's blood supply is a high pressure area dominated by a resource shortage, increasing costs, a medical community that has been trained to use transfusion, public awareness and concern, and to a lesser extent an increasing body of evidence suggesting that transfusions are often deleterious. The implementation of new techniques and protocols to conserve blood during surgery can be facilitated if a physician champion addresses the medical staff and the hospital administrators clear political and budgetary issues. With a team approach and an understanding of the clinical and economic evidence supporting less blood use, many of the hurdles can be overcome.

CONCLUSION

Blood conservation programs offer a solution to the multiple problems that surround blood use. When successfully implemented, such initiatives reduce safety concerns, hospital spending, and the dependency of hospitals on the national blood supply and improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Review and application of serine protease inhibition in coronary artery bypass graft surgery

PURPOSE

Current pharmacologic agents, aprotinin, epsilon aminocaproic acid, and tranexamic acid, used to decrease blood loss and transfusion requirements during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery are discussed. Aprotinin is the only agent that also modulates the systemic inflammatory responses that are generated by contact activation during CABG surgery. These responses are largely mediated by serine proteases such as kallikrein, thrombin, and plasmin.

SUMMARY

Aprotinin is a naturally occurring polypeptide that has a concentration-dependent effect to inhibit serine proteases. Two aprotinin dosing regimens are indicated in the United States (U.S.) for prophylactic use to reduce perioperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusion in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during the course of CABG surgery. Serum concentrations achieved with the full-dose regimen inhibit both kallikrein and plasmin activity resulting in attenuation of the systemic inflammatory response to bypass, whereas serum concentrations achieved with the half-dose regimen only inhibit plasmin activity. The efficacy and safety of aprotinin have been studied in randomized controlled trials in over 5,000 patients. Aprotinin is well tolerated compared to placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events are similar to those associated with CPB surgery. However, because aprotinin is a bovine protein, there is a small, but manageable risk of hypersensitivity reactions. Epsilon aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid are lysine analogs that reduce bleeding by inhibiting the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, a serine protease responsible for breaking down fibrinogen to fibrin. Although they are commonly used to decrease bleeding associated with CABG surgery with CPB, they are not currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for CABG surgery.

CONCLUSION

Aprotinin is the only agent that has an FDA indication to prevent blood loss and transfusion during CABG surgery, and the additional benefit of attenuating the systemic inflammatory response associated with CABG with CPB.

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid for Reducing Blood Loss in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

BACKGROUND

Epsilon-aminocaproic acid is a plasmin inhibitor that potentially reduces perioperative bleeding when administered prophylactically to cardiac surgery patients. To evaluate the efficacy of epsilon-aminocaproic acid, a prospective placebo-controlled trial was conducted in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred patients were randomly assigned to receive either epsilon-aminocaproic acid (100 mg/kg before skin incision followed by 1 g/hour continuous infusion until chest closure, 10 g in cardiopulmonary bypass circuit) or placebo, and the efficacy of epsilon-aminocaproic acid was evaluated by the reduction in postoperative thoracic-drainage volume and in donor-blood transfusion up to postoperative day 12.

RESULTS

Postoperative thoracic-drainage volume was significantly lower in the epsilon-aminocaproic acid group compared with the placebo group (epsilon-aminocaproic acid, 649 +/- 261 mL; versus placebo, 940 +/- 626 mL; p=0.003). There were no significant differences between the epsilon-aminocaproic acid and placebo groups in the percentage of patients requiring donor red blood cell transfusions (epsilon-aminocaproic acid, 24%; versus placebo, 18%; p=0.62) or in the number of units of donor red blood cells transfused (epsilon-aminocaproic acid, 2.2 +/- 0.8 U; versus placebo, 1.9 +/- 0.8 U; p=0.29). Epsilon-aminocaproic acid did not reduce the risk of donor red blood cell transfusions compared with placebo (odds ratio: 1.2, 95% confidence interval; 0.4 to 3.2, p=0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic administration of epsilon-aminocaproic acid reduces postoperative thoracic-drainage volume by 30%, but it may not be potent enough to reduce the requirement and the risk for donor blood transfusion in cardiac surgery patients. This information is useful for deciding on a therapy for hemostasis in cardiac surgery.

The risk associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients undergoing surgical treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction receive antifibrinolytic therapy to limit blood loss. This approach appears counterintuitive to the accepted medical treatment of the same condition--namely, fibrinolysis to limit thrombosis. Despite this concern, no independent, large-scale safety assessment has been undertaken.

METHODS

In this observational study involving 4374 patients undergoing revascularization, we prospectively assessed three agents (aprotinin [1295 patients], aminocaproic acid [883], and tranexamic acid [822]) as compared with no agent (1374 patients) with regard to serious outcomes by propensity and multivariable methods. (Although aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor, here we use the term antifibrinolytic therapy to include all three agents.)

RESULTS

In propensity-adjusted, multivariable logistic regression (C-index, 0.72), use of aprotinin was associated with a doubling in the risk of renal failure requiring dialysis among patients undergoing complex coronary-artery surgery (odds ratio, 2.59; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.36 to 4.95) or primary surgery (odds ratio, 2.34; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.27 to 4.31). Similarly, use of aprotinin in the latter group was associated with a 55 percent increase in the risk of myocardial infarction or heart failure (P<0.001) and a 181 percent increase in the risk of stroke or encephalopathy (P=0.001). Neither aminocaproic acid nor tranexamic acid was associated with an increased risk of renal, cardiac, or cerebral events. Adjustment according to propensity score for the use of any one of the three agents as compared with no agent yielded nearly identical findings. All the agents reduced blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between aprotinin and serious end-organ damage indicates that continued use is not prudent. In contrast, the less expensive generic medications aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid are safe alternatives.

Massive Transfusion Coagulopathy

Coagulopathy following massive transfusion is a consequence of post-traumatic and surgical hemorrhage. Bleeding following massive transfusion can occur due to hypothermia, dilutional coagulopathy, platelet dysfunction, fibrinolysis, or hypofibrinogenemia. Transfusion of 15 to 20 units of blood products causes dilutional thrombocytopenia, and both antiplatelet agents (eg, clopidogrel [Plavix, Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ]) and hemostatic inhibitors (eg, low-molecular-weight heparins, pentasaccharides, and direct thrombin inhibitors) are contributing factors to bleeding. Tests for platelet dysfunction are not readily available. Excessive fibrinolysis and low fibrinogen are also causes of bleeding in these patients. Currently, however, there are several agents that have been reported to be effective for the prophylaxis of hemorrhage in surgical patients, including aprotinin for cardiac surgery, orthopedic surgery, and hepatic transplantation, and the off-label use of recombinant activated factor VII (NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) as rescue therapy for life-threatening hemorrhage.

Overview of clinical efficacy and safety of pharmacologic strategies for blood conservation

PURPOSE

The pharmacologic management of hemostasis in patients undergoing surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is discussed.

SUMMARY

Nearly 45 studies involving 7,000 patients have reported efficacy of aprotinin in blood conservation. Both in primary coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries and in repeat surgeries, aprotinin treatment significantly reduces the incidence of blood transfusions and the number of units of blood transfused. These effects have been observed for red blood cell, platelet, and other blood products. The safety of aprotinin treatment has been extensively evaluated in randomized clinical trials, in postmarketing databases, and in systematic reviews of the literature. Overall, data do not indicate that aprotinin treatment increases mortality, myocardial infarction, or renal failure. These findings are supported by the results of a recent meta-analysis of 35 studies in patients undergoing CABG surgery. In addition, the meta-analysis suggests that aprotinin treatment was associated with a reduced incidence of stroke and a trend toward a reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation. Although lysine analogs, desmopressin, and recombinant factor VIIa are sometimes used to reduce bleeding, only aprotinin is indicated for use during CABG surgery.

CONCLUSION

The future of cardiac surgery will be marked by an increasingly complex, high-risk group of patients and a greater need for multiple pharmacologic options for reducing bleeding. Pharmacologic approaches that attenuate the activation of the hemostatic system and inflammation need to be employed to decrease coagulopathies and the need for allogeneic blood administration.

Forty Years of Clinical Aprotinin Use: A Review of 124 Hypersensitivity Reactions

Since its clinical introduction, the anaphylactic potential of aprotinin has been a major concern. World wide, its use is expanding so there is an increased chance that patients have reexposure from various sources. The risk of anaphylaxis is approximately 2.8% in reexposed patients. From 1963 to 2003, 124 cases of aprotinin-induced anaphylaxis were reported in 61 publications. Eleven patients died. The reexposure interval was less than 3 months in 72% (38 of 53 patients). This review looks at the profile of patients at risk so preventive measures may be taken. Past and future exposures have to be taken into account before any aprotinin administration.

Which may be effective to reduce blood loss after cardiac operations in cyanotic children: tranexamic acid, aprotinin or a combination?

BACKGROUND

Children with cyanotic heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery in which cardiopulmonary bypass is used are at increased risk of postoperative bleeding. In this study, the authors investigated the possibility of reducing postoperative blood loss by using aprotinin and tranexamic acid alone or a combination of these two agents.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, blind study, 100 children undergoing cardiac surgery were investigated. In group 1 (n = 25) patients acted as the control and did not receive either study drugs. In group 2 (n = 25) patients received aprotinin (30.000 KIU.kg(-1) after induction of anesthesia, 30.000 KIU.kg(-1) in the pump prime and 30.000 KIU.kg(-1) after weaning from bypass). In group 3 (n = 25) patients received tranexamic acid (100 mg.kg(-1) after induction of anesthesia, 100 mg.kg(-1) in the pump prime and 100 mg.kg(-1) after weaning from bypass). In group 4 (n = 25) patients received a combination of the two agents in the same manner. Total blood loss and transfusion requirements during the period from protamine administration until 24 h after admission to the intensive care unit were recorded. In addition, hemoglobin, platelet counts and coagulation studies were recorded.

RESULTS

Postoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the control group (group 1) compared with children in other groups who were treated with aprotinin, tranexamic acid or a combination of the two agents (groups 2, 3 and 4) during the first 24 h after admission to cardiac intensive care unit (40 +/- 18 ml.kg(-1).24 h(-1), aprotinin; 35 +/- 16 ml.kg(-1).24 h(-1), tranexamic acid; 34 +/- 19 ml.kg(-1).24 h(-1), combination; 35 +/- 15 ml.kg(-1).24 h(-1)). The total transfusion requirements were also significantly less in the all treatment groups. Time taken for sternal closure was longer in the control group (68 +/- 11 min) compared with treatment groups 2, 3 and 4, respectively (40 +/- 18, 42 +/- 11, 42 +/- 13 min, P < 0.05). The coagulation parameters were not found to be significantly different between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that both agents were effective to reduce postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease. However, the combination of aprotinin and tranexamic acid did not seem more effective than either of the two drugs alone.

Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents

Skilful surgery combined with blood-saving methods and careful management of blood coagulation will all help reduce unnecessary blood loss and transfusion requirements. Excessive surgical bleeding causes hypovolaemia, haemodynamic instability, anaemia and reduced oxygen delivery to tissues, with a subsequent increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. The role of anaesthetists in managing surgical blood loss has increased greatly in the last decade. Position of the patient during surgery and the provision of a hypotensive anaesthetic regimen were once considered the most important contributions of the anaesthetist to decreasing blood loss. Now, several pharmacological haemostatic agents are being used by anaesthetists as blood-saving agents. After a brief discussion of the physiology of haemostasis, this article will review the evidence for the role of such agents in reducing perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.

What is the evidence for using hemostatic agents in surgery?

The pharmacological methods used to achieve systemic hemostasis have generated much discussion due to concerns of serious adverse effects (e.g., thromboembolic complications) and costs of therapy in addition to efficacy considerations. There are a limited number of well-controlled trials involving pharmacological hemostasis for spine surgery. In the largest double-blinded randomized controlled trial to date involving spine surgery, there was a trend toward reduced homologous transfusion in patients receiving aprotinin, but the only statistically significant result ( p<0.001) was a reduction in autologous red cell donations. The findings of this trial are important, since the investigators used a number of restrictive transfusion strategies (e.g., autologous donation, low hematocrit trigger for transfusion, blood-salvaging procedures with the exception of no cell saver) that were not always employed in earlier trials involving hemostatic agents. Smaller studies involving antifibrinolytic agents other than aprotinin have demonstrated reductions in blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing spine surgery, although the results were not always statistically significant. A very large randomized trial would be required to address comparative medication- and transfusion-related adverse events; such a trial involving patients undergoing cardiac surgery is currently being performed. Additionally, cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to help define the role of these agents based on the data that is available.

Effect of aprotinin on clinical outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Despite proven blood transfusion benefits, aprotinin may be underused in coronary artery bypass grafting. Reluctance to use aprotinin may stem from safety concerns. The current objective was to evaluate clinical outcomes (mortality, myocardial infarction, renal failure, stroke, atrial fibrillation) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting who receive aprotinin by performing a quantitative overview of published, randomized, controlled trials.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PHARMLINE (1988-2001) and reference lists of relevant articles were searched for coronary artery bypass grafting studies. Criteria for data inclusion were as follows: (1) random allocation of study treatments, (2) placebo control, (3) enrollment only of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, (4) no combination with another experimental medication or device, and (5) prophylactic and continuous intraoperative use.

RESULTS

Data from 35 coronary artery bypass grafting trials (n = 3879) confirm that aprotinin reduces transfusion requirements (relative risk 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.66) relative to placebo, with a 39% risk reduction. Aprotinin therapy was not associated with increased or decreased mortality (relative risk 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.65-1.40), myocardial infarction (relative risk 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.63-1.14), or renal failure (relative risk 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.55-1.83) risk, but it was associated with a reduced risk of stroke (relative risk 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.90) and a trend toward reduced atrial fibrillation (relative risk 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin reduces transfusion requirements. Concerns that aprotinin therapy is associated with increased mortality, myocardial infarction, or renal failure risk is not supported by data from published, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Evidence for a reduced risk of stroke and a tendency toward reduction of atrial fibrillation occurrence was observed in patients who received aprotinin.

Efficacy and safety of aprotinin in cardiac surgery

Cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass produces bleeding and the need for allogenic blood product transfusions in many patients. Blood conservation is important in the perioperative management of patients. Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor isolated from bovine lung, is a complex protease inhibitor that is an antifibrinolytic, inhibits contact activation, and decreases the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Aprotinin reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Full-dose aprotinin significantly reduces postoperative blood loss and has been demonstrated in multiple prospective blinded studies to be safe and effective. One of the major adverse effects is anaphylaxis that occurs on re-exposure to aprotinin.

Cost analysis of aprotinin for coronary artery bypass patients: analysis of the randomized trials

BACKGROUND

The full kallikrein-inhibiting dose of aprotinin has been shown to reduce blood loss, transfusion requirements, and the systemic inflammatory response associated with cardiopulmonary bypass graft surgery (CABG). A half-dose regimen, although having a reduced delivery cost, inhibits plasmin and fibrinolysis without substantially effecting kallikrein-mediated inflammation associated with bypass surgery. The differing pharmacologic effects of the two regimens impact the decision-making process. The current study assessed the medical cost offset of full-dose and half-dose aprotinin from short- and long-term perspectives to provide a rational decision-making framework for clinicians.

METHODS

To estimate CABG admission costs, resource utilization and clinical data from aprotinin clinical trials were combined with unit costs estimated from a Duke University-based cost model. Lifetime medical costs of stroke and acute myocardial infarction were based on previous research.

RESULTS

Relative to placebo, the differences in total perioperative cost for primary CABG patients receiving full-dose or half-dose aprotinin were not significant. When lifetime medical costs of complications were considered, total costs in full-dose and half-dose aprotinin-treated patients were not different relative to that of placebo. Total perioperative cost was significantly lower for repeat CABG patients treated with aprotinin, with savings of $2,058 for full-dose and $2,122 for half-dose patients when compared with placebo. Taking lifetime costs of stroke and acute myocardial infarction into consideration, the cost savings estimates were $6,044 for full-dose patients and $4,483 for half-dose patients, due to substantially higher lifetime stroke costs incurred by the placebo patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Using this cost model, use of full-dose and half-dose aprotinin in primary CABG patients was cost neutral during hospital admission, whereas both dosing regimens were significantly cost saving in reoperative CABG patients. Additional lifetime cost savings were realized relative to placebo due to reduced complication costs, particularly with the full-dose regimen. As the full kallikrein-inhibiting dose of aprotinin has been shown to be safe and effective, the current results support its use in both primary and repeat CABG surgery. No demonstrable economic advantage was observed with the half-dose aprotinin regimen.

Successful Surgical Treatment of Mitral Valve Stenosis in a Dog

OBJECTIVE

To report the successful surgical management (open mitral commissurotomy, OMC) of mitral stenosis (MS), incorporating heart-beating cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), in a 1-year-old dog.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical case.

ANIMALS

One-year-old Cairn Terrier with MS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Diagnosis of MS was confirmed by means of 2-dimensional, continuous-wave and color-flow Doppler echocardiography. Surgery was performed through a left intercostal thoracotomy. CPB was initiated and the heart was kept beating. The fused commissures of the mitral valve were incised to free the cusps of the valve.

RESULTS

Left intercostal thoracotomy allowed easy observation of the mitral orifice during heart-beating OMC. Persistent bleeding from the atriotomy site required a second surgical procedure after which the dog had an uneventful recovery. Echocardiography at 2 weeks and 1 year postoperatively indicated substantial improvement in left ventricular filling (pressure half-time=187 ms before surgery, 105 ms [2 weeks] and 110 ms [1 year] after surgery). Enlargement of the left atrium resolved; however, moderate mitral valve regurgitation was still present.

CONCLUSIONS

MS can be successfully treated by OMC, facilitated by use of CPB. Substantial improvement in cardiac function was evident by ultrasound and Doppler examination postoperatively.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

OMC under heart-beating CPB should be considered for the treatment of MS in the dog.

Vasopressin for treatment of shock following aprotinin administration

PURPOSE

To describe the utility of vasopressin in the treatment of acute distributive shock clinically compatible with the diagnosis of aprotinin anaphylaxis.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 57-yr-old female patient underwent repeat cardiac surgery to treat prosthetic valve endocarditis. She had received aprotinin during her first surgery 60 days ago. Despite a negative test dose of i.v. aprotinin 20,000 KIU, when aprotinin loading was initiated during the repeat surgery, the patient developed bronchospasm and hypotension secondary to acute distributive shock. Bronchospasm responded to inhaled salbutamol and ipatropium. The hypotension was refractory to high doses of phenylephrine. Two doses of i.v. vasopressin 5 U reversed the vasodilation and reestablished normal blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Vasopressin, in association with alpha-agonists, can reverse acute refractory distributive shock following aprotinin administration.

Impact of tranexamic acid vs. aprotinin on blood loss and transfusion requirements after cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial

INTRODUCTION

Aprotinin (AP) reduces blood loss and transfusions after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), but may sensitise patients and is expensive. Tranexamic acid (TA) has less side-effects, but data regarding its efficacy are controversial. The aim of our prospective, randomised, double-blind study was to compare the impact of AP vs. TA on drainage blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing first time CABG on CPB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty adult patients were randomised to receive either high-dose AP according to Hammersmith or a total of 2 g TA. Perioperative blood products were transfused in a standardised fashion. Blood loss was measured up to 24 h. Demographic and clinical patient data were collected until hospital discharge.

RESULTS

The data from 118 patients (TA: n = 58, AP: n = 60) who completed the study according to protocol were analysed. Blood loss at 24 h postoperation in TA patients was significantly higher (896 +/- 354 ml) as compared to AP patients (756 +/- 347 ml; p = 0.03). TA patients received 1.5 +/- 1.5 units of red blood cells (AP: 1.5 +/- 1.7, p = 1.0), 1.3 +/- 2.0 units of fresh frozen plasma (AP: 1.0 +/- 2.0, p = 0.38) and 0.5 +/- 1.4 units of platelets (AP: 0.2 +/- 0.7, p = 0.15). Clinical data, including perioperative myocardial infarction rate, acute renal failure, mechanical ventilation, hospital stay and mortality, were not significantly different between either group.

CONCLUSION

Our data show a difference in blood loss between TA and high-dose AP. Although statistically significant, it has little clinical relevance, because perioperative transfusion requirements were similar for both groups. Thus, TA appears to be a cost-effective alternative to AP in primary CABG patients.

Evaluation of a novel kallikrein inhibitor on hemostatic activation in vitro

BACKGROUND

DX-88 is a potent kallikrein inhibitor that is being studied for the treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) and represents a potential alternative to aprotinin in cardiac surgical patients. The current study was designed to evaluate in vitro effects of DX-88 on coagulation in comparison with aprotinin.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from consented 12 healthy volunteers. DX-88 or aprotinin was added to blood at 200 and 800 kallikrein inhibitory units (KIU) per milliliter for aprotinin, and at 1.1, 2.2, or 8.8 microg/ml for DX-88. Thromboelastography (TEG) was performed using celite, kaolin, or tissue factor (TF) activation. Kaolin-based activated clotting times (ACTs) were measured at different heparin levels. The whole blood prothrombin time (PT)/PTT values were also measured. The endogenous thrombin generation was assessed with a fluorogenic assay using platelet-poor plasma (PPP).

RESULTS

With celite and kaolin activation of TEG, the reaction time was prolonged with DX-88 and aprotinin. With tissue factor activation, TEG parameters were not affected. DX-88 caused dose-dependent kaolin-ACT prolongation that was augmented by increasing doses of heparin. DX-88 or aprotinin had no significant effects on the PT values, but PTT values were dose-dependently prolonged. Both agents delayed the onset of thrombin generation when PTT reagent was used as a trigger, whereas no change was observed when tissue factor was used.

CONCLUSION

We found that DX-88 delayed contact activator induced coagulation without affecting tissue factor mediated coagulation. For evaluation of coagulation during DX-88 therapy, the use of PT or tissue factor-activated TEG may be preferable.

A randomized trial of aprotinin (Trasylol) on blood loss, blood product requirement, and myocardial injury in total arterial grafting

BACKGROUND

Total arterial grafting is increasingly preferred in coronary artery bypass grafting, but it increases blood loss. Aprotinin (Trasylol; Bayer Corp, Leverkusen, Germany) reduces blood loss in cardiac surgery but has not been subjected to a randomized trial in total arterial grafting.

METHODS

A single-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of aprotinin administration in total arterial grafting was performed. The primary outcome variable was postoperative blood loss, and the secondary outcome variable was the number of units of donor blood or coagulant products transfused. The incidence of myocardial injury was determined from serial measurements of cardiac troponin T and creatine kinase-MB and renal injury from serum creatinine.

RESULTS

The placebo group (n = 34) and aprotinin group (n = 36) were similar with respect to all preoperative and intraoperative comparisons. One patient in each group underwent reexploration for bleeding. Open-label aprotinin was administered to 9 patients in the placebo group (26%) and to 2 patients in the aprotinin group (6%). There was a highly significant reduction in the median (interquartile range) blood loss in the aprotinin group compared with the placebo group (785 mL [590-1025 mL] vs 1525 mL [1175-1920 mL], respectively). Similarly, the aprotinin group demonstrated a marked reduction in the need for blood transfusion (77% vs 39%; P =.0001), the mean number of transfused blood units (2.6 vs 0.8, P <.001), and the number of patients requiring coagulant products (24% vs 3%; P <.001). There was no difference in myocardial injury in the 2 groups. Four patients in the aprotinin group had persistently elevated creatinine levels in the postoperative period (3 of whom had elevated preoperative creatinine levels and perioperative complications).

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin significantly reduces blood loss and the need for blood component transfusion in patients undergoing total arterial grafting without increasing the risk of myocardial injury. Aprotinin should be considered routinely in patients undergoing total arterial grafting but cautiously in patients with an elevated preoperative creatinine level.