Assessment of the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline Recommendations for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Applicability of the AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation in Japanese Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess, among Japanese patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recommendations from the 2017 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society (AHA/ACC/HRS) guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD).

BACKGROUND

Although ICDs are used to prevent SCD from ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in patients with CS, the generalizability of the AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines for Japanese patients with CS remains unclear.

METHODS

This study examined 188 consecutive patients with CS in 2 tertiary hospitals between 1979 and 2020. Patients were followed for a primary outcome of VT/VF or SCD.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 5.68 years, the primary outcome occurred in 44 patients (23%). Patients with a class I recommendation for ICD implantation showed the highest incidence of the primary outcome among patients in whom the guideline recommendations for ICD implantation were used (log-rank test; p = 0.03). However, compared with patients with left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) ≤35%, there was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary outcome among patients with LVEFs >35% and those who required a permanent pacemaker (p = 0.31); similar results were observed in those with LVEFs >35% and late gadolinium enhancement during cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (p = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

The American guideline recommendations for ICD implantation might be applicable to Japanese patients with CS. Implantation of an ICD may need to be considered in these patients if they require a permanent pacemaker or have late gadolinium enhancement, regardless of LVEF.

ERS clinical practice guidelines on treatment of sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

The major reasons to treat sarcoidosis are to lower the morbidity and mortality risk or to improve quality of life (QoL). The indication for treatment varies depending on which manifestation is the cause of symptoms: lungs, heart, brain, skin, or other manifestations. While glucocorticoids (GC) remain the first choice for initial treatment of symptomatic disease, prolonged use is associated with significant toxicity. GC-sparing alternatives are available. The presented treatment guideline aims to provide guidance to physicians treating the very heterogenous sarcoidosis manifestations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A European Respiratory Society Task Force (TF) committee composed of clinicians, methodologists, and patients with experience in sarcoidosis developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology. The committee developed eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions and these were used to make specific evidence-based recommendations.

RESULTS

The TF committee delivered twelve recommendations for seven PICOs. These included treatment of pulmonary, cutaneous, cardiac, and neurologic disease as well as fatigue. One PICO question regarding small fiber neuropathy had insufficient evidence to support a recommendation. In addition to the recommendations, the committee provided information on how they use alternative treatments, when there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many treatments available to treat sarcoidosis. Given the diverse nature of the disease, treatment decisions require an assessment of organ involvement, risk for significant morbidity, and impact on QoL of the disease and treatment.

MESSAGE

An evidence based guideline for treatment of sarcoidosis is presented. The panel used the GRADE approach and specific recommendations are made. A major factor in treating patients is the risk of loss of organ function or impairment of quality of life.

Identification of a novel presumed cardiac sarcoidosis category for patients at high risk of disease

BACKGROUND

Histologic evidence is required for a definitive diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) by published guidelines; however, the sporadic nature of the disease may produce false negative biopsy results, causing CS to be underdiagnosed. We sought to establish a clinical category of CS absent histologic findings.

METHODS

Patients evaluated for CS were stratified into 3 groups: probable CS and definite CS based on Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) criteria and presumed CS, ie, patients without any histologic evidence of sarcoidosis, but with unexplained high-grade atrioventricular block or ventricular arrhythmia and findings suggestive of CS on either cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography. The primary end point was hospitalization-free and overall survival at 10 years.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients were included in the study: 59, definite CS; 223, probable CS; and 101, presumed CS (62, isolated CS and 39, systemic CS). Compared with patients meeting HRS criteria for CS, patients with presumed CS had lower odds of New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 0.44 [95% CI, 0.23-0.83]; P = .01) but greater odds of previous ventricular tachycardia (OR, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.4-4.0]; P = .001) or history of resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest (OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.0-8.6]; P = .05). Hospitalization-free and overall survival were similar among groups (P = .51 and P = .71, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical categorization of patients with presumed CS identified a high-risk cohort comparable to patients with histologic evidence of disease, although caution should be exercised in reaching this diagnosis without paying due diligence to the differential diagnosis.

Ten Questions Cardiologists Should Be Able to Answer About Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Case-Based Approach and Contemporary Review

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory multisystemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the formation of noncaseating epithelioid cell granulomas. Cardiac sarcoidosis might be life-threatening and its diagnosis and treatment remain a challenge nowadays. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview of cardiac sarcoidosis and, through 10 practical clinical questions and real-life challenging case scenarios, summarize the main clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, imaging findings, and contemporary treatment.

Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis Bench to Bedside: A Case-Based Review

Cardiac sarcoidosis is a component of an often multiorgan granulomatous disease of still uncertain cause. It is being recognized with increasing frequency, mainly as the result of heightened awareness and new diagnostic tests, specifically cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans. The purpose of this case-based review is to highlight the potentially life-saving importance of making the early diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis using these new tools and to provide a framework for the optimal care of patients with this disease. We will review disease mechanisms as currently understood, associated arrhythmias including conduction abnormalities, and atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, guideline-directed diagnostic criteria, screening of patients with extracardiac sarcoidosis, and the use of pacemakers and defibrillators in this setting. Treatment options, including those related to heart failure, and those which may help clarify disease mechanisms are included.

Sarcoid Heart Disease: an Update on Diagnosis and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an update on cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and to discuss the current recommendations and progress in diagnosis and management of this disease. Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. Cardiac involvement is seen in at least 25% and is associated with poor prognosis. Manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) can vary from presence of silent myocardial granulomas, which may lead to sudden death, to symptomatic conduction abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure.

RECENT FINDINGS

We discuss newer imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in conjunction with clinical criteria increasingly used for diagnosing and prognosticating patients with CS. Immunosuppression (primarily corticosteroids) is recommended for treatment of CS; however, its efficacy has never been proven in prospective randomized studies. The role of imaging to guide the use of immunotherapy is unknown. Cardiac sarcoidosis continues to challenge clinicians due to its protean presentations, lack of diagnostic standards, and data for risk stratification and treatment. There is a need for prospective, randomized controlled trials to understand how best to diagnose and treat cardiac sarcoidosis.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Global Longitudinal Strain and Prognosis After Heart Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

This study determined the long-term prognostic significance of GLS assessed using CMR-FT in a large cohort of heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND

In heart transplant recipients, global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessed using echocardiography has shown promise in the prediction of clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT) GLS is independently associated with long-term outcomes in heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

In a cohort of consecutive heart transplant recipients who underwent routine CMR for clinical surveillance, CMR-FT GLS was calculated from 3 long-axis cine CMR images. Associations between GLS and a composite endpoint of death or major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including retransplantation, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and heart failure hospitalization, were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 152 heart transplant recipients (age 54 ± 15 years; 29% women; 5.0 ± 5.4 years after heart transplantation) were included. The median GLS was -11.6% (interquartile range: -13.6% to -9.2%). Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, 59 recipients reached the composite endpoint. On Kaplan-Meier analyses, recipients with GLS worse than the median had a higher estimated cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint compared with recipients with GLS better than the median (log rank p = 0.004). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression, GLS was independently associated with the composite endpoint after adjustment for cardiac allograft vasculopathy, history of rejection, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), right ventricular EF, and presence of myocardial fibrosis, with a hazard ratio of 1.15 for every 1% worsening in GLS (95% confidence interval: 1.06 to 1.24; p < 0.001). Similar results were seen in subgroups of recipients with LVEF >50% and with no myocardial fibrosis. GLS provided incremental prognostic value over other variables in the multivariate model as determined by the log-likelihood chi-squared test.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of heart transplant recipients, CMR-FT GLS was independently associated with the long-term risk of death or MACE.

Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation: Role of Purkinje System and Microstructural Myocardial Abnormalities

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation is diagnosed in patients who survived a ventricular fibrillation episode without any identifiable structural or electrical cause after extensive investigations. It is a common cause of sudden death in young adults. The study reviews the diagnostic value of systematic investigations and the new insights provided by detailed electrophysiological mapping. Recent studies have shown the high incidence of microstructural cardiomyopathic areas, which act as the substrate of ventricular fibrillation re-entries. These subclinical alterations require high-density endo- and epicardial mapping to be identified using electrogram criteria. Small areas are involved and located individually in various sites (mostly epicardial). Their characteristics suggest a variety of genetic or acquired pathological processes affecting cellular connectivity or tissue structure, such as cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, or fatty infiltration. Purkinje abnormalities manifesting as triggering ectopy or providing a substrate for re-entry represent a second important cause. The documentation of ephemeral Purkinje ectopy requires continuous electrocardiography monitoring for diagnosis. A variety of diseases affecting Purkinje cell function or conduction are potentially at play in their pathogenesis. Comprehensive investigations can therefore allow the great majority of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation to ultimately receive diagnoses of a cardiac disease, likely underlain by a mosaic of pathologies. Precise phenotypic characterization has significant implications for interpretation of genetic variants, the risk assessment, and individual therapy. Future improvements in imaging or electrophysiological methods may hopefully allow the identification of the subjects at risk and the development of primary prevention strategies.

Clinical characteristics and organ system involvement in sarcoidosis: comparison of the University of Minnesota Cohort with other cohorts

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. Clinical cohort studies of different populations are important to understand the high variability in clinical presentation and disease course of sarcoidosis. The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical characteristics, including organ involvement, pulmonary function tests, and laboratory parameters, in a sarcoidosis cohort at the University of Minnesota. We compare the organ system involvement of this cohort with other available cohorts.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective data collection and analysis of 187 subjects with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis seen at a tertiary center. Organ system involvement was determined using the WASOG sarcoidosis organ assessment instrument. Clinical phenotype groups were classified using the Genomic Research in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency and Sarcoidosis criteria.

RESULTS

Mean subject age at diagnosis was 45.8 ± 12.4, with a higher proportion of males (55.1%), and a higher proportion of blacks (17.1%) compared to the racial distribution of Minnesota residents (5.95%). The majority (71.1%) of subjects required anti-inflammatory therapy for at least 1 month. Compared to the A Case Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis cohort, there was a higher frequency of extra-thoracic lymph node (34.2% vs. 15.2%), eye (20.9% vs. 11.8%), liver (17.6% vs. 11.5%), spleen (20.9% vs. 6.7%), musculoskeletal (9.6% vs. 0.5%), and cardiac (10.7% vs. 2.3%) involvement in our cohort. A multisystem disease with at least five different organs involved was identified in 13.4% of subjects. A restrictive physiological pattern was observed in 21.6% of subjects, followed by an obstructive pattern in 17.3% and mixed obstructive and restrictive pattern in 2.2%. Almost half (49.2%) were Scadding stages II/III. Commonly employed disease activity markers, including soluble interleukin-2 receptor and angiotensin-converting enzyme, did not differ between treated and untreated groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort features a relatively high frequency of high-risk sarcoidosis phenotypes including cardiac and multiorgan disease. Commonly-utilized serum biomarkers do not identify subpopulations that require or do better with treatment. Findings from this study further highlight the high-variability nature of sarcoidosis and the need for a more reliable biomarker to predict and measure disease severity and outcomes for better clinical management of sarcoidosis patients.

Right Ventricular Abnormalities on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Sarcoidosis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the prevalence on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) of right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction and RV late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), their determinants, and their influences on long-term adverse outcomes in patients with sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND

In patients with sarcoidosis, RV abnormalities have been described on many imaging modalities. On CMR, RV abnormalities include RV systolic dysfunction quantified as an abnormal right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), and RV LGE.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis who underwent CMR for suspected cardiac involvement were studied. They were followed for 2 endpoints: all-cause death, and a composite arrhythmic endpoint of sudden cardiac death or significant ventricular arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Among 290 patients, RV systolic dysfunction (RVEF <40% in men and <45% in women) and RV LGE were present in 35 (12.1%) and 16 (5.5%), respectively. The median follow-up time was 3.2 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.6 to 5.7 years) for all-cause death and 3.0 years (IQR: 1.4 to 5.5 years) for the arrhythmic endpoint. On Cox proportional hazards regression multivariable analyses, only RVEF was independently associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05 for every 1% decrease; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.09; p = 0.022) after adjustment for left ventricular EF, left ventricular LGE extent, and the presence of RV LGE. RVEF was not associated with the arrhythmic endpoint (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.06; p = 0.67). Conversely, RV LGE was not associated with all-cause death (HR: 2.78; 95% CI: 0.36 to 21.66; p = 0.33), while it was independently associated with the arrhythmic endpoint (HR: 5.43; 95% CI: 1.25 to 23.47; p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients with sarcoidosis, RV systolic dysfunction and RV LGE had distinct prognostic associations; RV systolic dysfunction but not RV LGE was independently associated with all-cause death, whereas RV LGE but not RV systolic dysfunction was independently associated with sudden cardiac death or significant ventricular arrhythmia. These findings may indicate distinct implications for the management of RV abnormalities in sarcoidosis.

Long-Term Embolic Outcomes After Detection of Left Ventricular Thrombus by Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is more sensitive than echocardiography for the detection of intracardiac thrombus because of its unique ability to identify thrombus based on tissue characteristics related to avascularity. The long-term prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) thrombus detected by LGE CMR is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a matched cohort study of consecutive adult patients with LV thrombus detected by LGE CMR who were matched on the date of CMR, age, and LV ejection fraction to up to 3 patients without LV thrombus. We investigated the long-term incidence of a composite of embolic events: stroke, transient ischemic attack, or extracranial systemic arterial embolism. We also compared outcomes among patients with LV thrombus detected by LGE CMR stratified by whether the LV thrombus was also detected by echocardiography or not.

RESULTS

Of 157 LV thrombus patients, 155 were matched to 400 non-LV thrombus patients. During a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the cumulative incidence of embolism was significantly higher in LV thrombus patients compared with the matched non-LV thrombus patients (P<0.001), with annualized rates of 3.7% and 0.8% for LV thrombus and matched non-LV thrombus patients, respectively. LV thrombus was the only independent predictor of the composite embolic end point (hazard ratio, 3.99 [95% CI, 1.54-10.35]; P=0.004). The cumulative incidence of embolism was not different in patients with LV thrombus that was also detected by echocardiography versus patients with LV thrombus not detected by echocardiography (P=0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite contemporary antithrombotic treatment, LV thrombus detected by LGE CMR is associated with a 4-fold higher long-term incidence of embolism compared with matched non-LV thrombus patients. LV thrombus detected by LGE CMR but not by echocardiography is associated with a similar risk of embolism as that detected by both LGE CMR and echocardiography.