Frequency and load of hepatitis B virus DNA in first-time blood donors with antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen

Lack of occult hepatitis B virus infection among blood donors with isolated hepatitis B core antibody living in an HBV low prevalence region of Iran

BACKGROUND

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in blood donors is considered a potential threat for the safety of the blood supply, however conclusive studies on this issue are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the occult HBV infection in blood donors with isolated hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) living in the city of Arak, in the Central Province of Iran, as a low prevalence region for HBV.

METHODS

A total of 531 voluntary blood donors in Arak, Iran were included in this study. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), anti-HBc, and hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) were tested in all subjects. The presence of HBV-DNA was determined quantitatively in plasma samples of cases with isolated anti-HBc (HBsAg-negative, anti-HBs-negative, and anti-HBc-positive) by real-time PCR using the artus HBV RG PCR kit on the Rotor-Gene 3000 real-time thermal cycler.

RESULTS

Of 531 subjects enrolled in this study, 11 (2.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.8-3.2%) had isolated anti-HBc. HBV-DNA was not detected in any of the cases with isolated anti-HBc.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that all the blood donors with isolated anti-HBc were negative for HBV-DNA, and occult HBV infection did not occur in the blood donors of this low prevalence region for HBV infection.

A new method of concentrating hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and HBV surface antigen: an application of the method to the detection of occult HBV infection

BACKGROUND

The risk of post-transfusion hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been reduced after the implementation of HBV nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT). However, the problem of HBV DNA-positive and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative occult HBV infections remains to be solved. This is in part due to the HBV DNA load being too low to detect these occult HBV infections using mini-pool NAT. In Japan, the assay for the antibody against the HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) has not completely excluded occult HBV infection. To solve this problem, we have developed a new method of concentrating HBV DNA and HBsAg simultaneously to increase the sensitivity of detection tests.

METHODS

Virus concentration is achieved by the enhancement of the agglutination of viruses using poly-L-lysine in the presence of a bivalent metal. Poly-L-lysine-coated magnetic beads are used to shorten the time of each step of the concentration procedure. Seventy-seven anti-HBc-positive and HBsAg-negative donations were examined. HBsAg and anti-HBc were tested by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (AxSYM; Abbott) and haemagglutination inhibition test (Japanese Red Cross), respectively.

RESULTS

HBV surface antigen and HBV DNA levels were concentrated up to four- to sevenfold. Using this method, 35 of the 77 anti-HBc-positive and HBsAg-negative donors were HBV DNA-positive by individual NAT and a further five donors became HBV DNA-positive by HBV concentration. Twenty-seven of 40 occult HBV infections became HBsAg-positive by HBsAg concentration.

CONCLUSION

Our new method of concentrating HBV and HBsAg increased the sensitivities of EIA and HBV NAT, and enabled us to detect 27 of 40 occult HBV infections by HBsAg EIA.

[Meta-analysis for the pooled sensitivity and specificity of hepatitis B surface antigen rapid tests]

BACKGROUND

Although hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) rapid test based on immunochromatographic assay (ICA) is now widely used, the test has not been evaluated sufficiently enough to validate its performance. Thus, it is important to summarize the clinical performance of the test kits. In this study, we performed meta-analysis for the performance of the HBsAg rapid tests.

METHODS

PubMed database was searched using keywords about the accuracy of diagnostic tests for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Two investigators assessed methodological quality utilizing standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) checklist. After performing a heterogeneity test, we obtained pooled sensitivity and specificity. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were simulated according to HBV prevalence.

RESULTS

A total of 38 studies was selected from 10 papers. The quality scores ranged from 3 to 13 (median, 8). Kappa value was good (0.85). The performance of the 38 studies was heterogeneous. When 33 studies with better quality from 7 papers were re-selected, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 98.07% (95% confidence interval, CI: 97.67-98.47%) and 99.56% (95% CI: 99.21-99.91%), respectively. With an HBV prevalence of 5%, PPV and NPV were predicted to be 92.14% and 99.90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of high HBV prevalence in Korea, it is thought that the HBsAg rapid test can be used for HBV screening in small-sized laboratories or for epidemiologic studies. This study should be helpful in establishing a guideline for the proper performance evaluation of the HBsAg rapid tests.

Anti-HBc screening in Egyptian blood donors reduces the risk of hepatitis B virus transmission

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) in blood donors is considered as a potential risk for transmission of HBV infection. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of anti-hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBC) positivity in Egyptian blood donations as well as to estimate the frequency of HBV-DNA in anti-HBc-positive donations. The study included 760 Egyptian healthy blood donors, representing 26 different Egyptian governorates screened according to routine practice for the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies (Abs), HIV-1/2 Abs and Treponema Abs. The accepted blood units for donation were tested for the presence of total anti-HBc Abs by two tests. Positive units for anti-HBc were further tested for HBV-DNA by polymerase chain reaction. According to routine screening, a total of 48/760 units (6.3%) were rejected [38 (5%) HCV-Ab-positive units, 9 (1.18%) HbsAg-positive units and 1 (0.13%) Treponema-Ab-positive unit]. Among the accepted blood units for donation, prevalence of anti-HBc was 78/712 units (10.96%). HBV-DNA was detected in 9/78 (11.54%) of the anti-HBc-positive units, and thus, occult HBV infection was detected in 9/712 (1.26%) of the accepted blood donations. Implementing anti-HBc test to the routine assay for the forthcoming two decades would certainly eliminate possible HBV-infected units. Rejection of these units will be beneficial to decrease the risk of HBV transmission with its potential consequences particularly in immunocompromised recipients.

Determination of hepatitis B virus DNA incidence, viral load, and mutations in blood donors with HBsAg and anti-HBs-negative serology and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to determine hepatitis B virus DNA incidence, viral load, and mutations in blood donors with HBsAG and anti-HBs negative serology and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 1000 blood donors with HBsAg-negative test results. Anti-HBc total screening was performed using the ELISA method. HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc total-positive samples were tested for anti-HBs, anti-HBc IgM, HBeAg, and anti-HBe. Samples with isolated anti-HBc were determined for viral load of HBV DNA using real-time PCR.

RESULTS

Anti-HBc total was established as positive in 200 (20%) of the 1000 blood donors. While anti-HBs was negative in 59 (29.5%) of the 200 anti-HBc-positive samples, it was found to be positive in 141 (70.5%) of them. All of the other hepatitis B markers were negative in all of the anti-HBs-negative samples. HBV DNA was not detected in the sera of the isolated anti-HBc-positive blood donors with real-time PCR.

CONCLUSION

Although we could not detect HBV DNA in the sera of the isolated anti-HBc-positive blood donors, findings in the literature suggest that anti-HBc testing should be used in combination with HBsAg for the screening of blood donors to reduce risk. After that, the most appropriate algorithm to follow can be HBV DNA screening of donors.

Detection and characterization of hepatitis B virus of anti-hepatitis B core antigen-reactive blood donors in Quebec with an in-house nucleic acid testing assay

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can be detected in blood donations by many serologic markers. Since the introduction of routine anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) donor screening at Héma-Québec in April 2003, a large number of donors have been deferred on the basis of reactive anti-HBc test results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the anti-HBc-reactive donations and the detection of HBV DNA with an in-house nucleic acid testing (NAT) assay.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The in-house HBV NAT assay is a conventional polymerase chain reaction amplifying part of the viral S gene. From October 2004 to November 2005, a total of 1169 anti-HBc-reactive donations were tested with this in-house assay. The results were correlated with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBs markers. HBV DNA-positive samples were further investigated by DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

All HBsAg-positive samples were detected by the NAT assay. Overall, 38 (3.25%) of anti-HBc-positive samples were found to be positive for the presence of HBV DNA. Of these 38, a total of 12 donations with a low level of HBV DNA were HBsAg-negative. The sequencing results clearly showed various genotypes and subtypes within a same genotype.

CONCLUSION

The 3.25 percent HBV DNA positivity rate among the anti-HBc-reactive donations and more particularly the low level of HBV DNA observed in occult donations underline the importance of the use of a sensitive assay to detect HBV DNA in conjunction with other markers. The HBV genetic diversity found in our donor population reflects the province demographics, particularly in the Montreal area where most of the positive donors were from.

Molecular testing in the diagnosis and management of chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is an enveloped virus with a small (3.2-kb) partially double-stranded DNA genome that causes acute and chronic infections. The impact of these infections on public health worldwide is enormous, with an estimated prevalence of 2 billion acute infections and 360 million chronic infections globally. This review focuses on chronic hepatitis B and the molecular assays used in its diagnosis and management. Background information, including that about features of the hepatitis B virion, viral replication, and epidemiology of infection, that is important for understanding chronic hepatitis B and molecular diagnostic tests for HBV is provided. To facilitate an understanding of the utility of molecular testing for chronic hepatitis B, the four stages of chronic hepatitis B infection that are currently recognized, as well as an additional entity, occult hepatitis B, that can be diagnosed only by sensitive nucleic acid amplification methods, are reviewed in detail, including available therapeutic agents. The molecular diagnostic content focuses on tests for HBV DNA quantification, genotyping, and mutation detection (including precore/core promoter and antiviral resistance mutations). The discussion of these tests encompasses their current utility and performance characteristics, drawing from current clinical guidelines and other studies from the literature. In recognition of the continual evolution of this field, the final section describes emerging molecular markers with future diagnostic potential.

Significant increase in HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis infections among blood donors in West Bengal, Eastern India 2004-2005: Exploratory screening reveals high frequency of occult HBV infection

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among blood donors in Kolkata, Eastern India for two consecutive years and to conduct a pilot study to explore the presence of HBV DNA among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative but anti-HBc positive blood donors.

METHODS: Seroprevalence of HBsAg, anti-HCV and anti-HIV was studied among 113 051 and 106 695 voluntary blood donors screened in 2004 and 2005, respectively. Moreover, a pilot study on 1027 HBsAg negative donors was carried out for evaluating the presence of HBV DNA by PCR on HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive donors.

RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in the prevalence of HBV (1448 vs 1768, P < 0.001), HIV (262 vs 374, P < 0.001), HCV (314 vs 372, P = 0.003) and syphilis (772 vs 853, P = 0.001) infections was noted among blood donors of Kolkata West Bengal in 2005 as compared to 2004. Moreover, the exploratory study on 1027 HBsAg negative donors revealed that 188 (18.3%) of them were anti-HBc positive out of which 21% were positive for HBV DNA.

CONCLUSION: The findings of this study underscore the significantly increasing endemicity of hepatitis viruses, syphilis and HIV among the voluntary blood donors of our community. The pilot study indicates a high rate of prevalence of HBV DNA among HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive donors and thus emphasizes the need for a more sensitive and stringent screening algorithm for blood donations.

International collaborative study proposal for the characterization of occult hepatitis B virus infection identified by nucleic acid or anti-HBc screening

The International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI) working party is proposing to undertake an international collaborative study aimed at understanding occult hepatitis B infection by molecular and immunological characterization, determining infectivity by transfusion and clinical relevance of this newly identified condition. This article provides information to the transfusion community and aims to recruit potential collaborators for the study. Further information can be obtained from the author or the ISBT TTI working group website (http://www.isbt-web.org).

Sensitivity of hepatitis B virus DNA transcription-mediated amplification testing in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive blood donations

BACKGROUND

The objective was to evaluate the performance of nucleic acid testing (NAT) in the detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive blood donations.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 253 HBsAg- and anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)-positive samples (50 hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive and 203 anti-HBe-positive) from blood donations collected in France were studied. The samples were investigated with a blood screening assay (Procleix Ultrio, Chiron/Gen-Probe) in minipool (MP; x8) and in individual-donation (ID) testing. All nonreactive samples were retested once, and nonreactive MP samples were assayed for viral load (VL).

RESULTS

All 50 HBeAg-positive samples were reactive in MP-NAT and ID-NAT. Of the 203 anti-HBe-positive donations, 80.3 percent were MP- and ID-reactive, 17.2 percent were MP-nonreactive and ID-reactive, and 2.5 percent were nonreactive in ID-NAT. Overall the sensitivity of ID-NAT was 98 percent versus 84 percent for MP-NAT. After retesting, 16 of the 35 MP-nonreactive and/or ID-reactive donations became MP-reactive and 2 of the ID-nonreactive donations became NAT-reactive. The capacity of Procleix Ultrio to detect HBV DNA was not related to HBsAg subtype, but correlated with the VL: the mean VL in the group of MP-nonreactive samples was 1,420 copies per mL vs. 17,000 copies per mL in the group of 40 MP-reactive samples.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that HBV-NAT in ID format is far more effective in detecting viremia in chronic HBsAg carriers than in MP-NAT. The sensitivity of the NAT assay needs to be improved to be considered for replacing the current HBsAg assays, especially when anti-HBc testing is not performed.

Characterization of HBV DNA+/HBsAg- blood donors in Poland identified by triplex NAT

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been performed in Poland since 2005 on samples seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), and anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV). Tools included 24-donation pool testing (PT) using Cobas Amplicor or in individual donations (ID) by Procleix Ultrio. Seven of 761,666 (1:108,800) and 21/250,191 (1:11,900) HBV DNA-positive donations were identified and confirmed by alternative methods. HBV DNA load ranged between 11.6 and 4.6 x 10(4) IU/mL in 11 samples and could not be quantified in 17 samples. HBV genotypes A (56%) and D (4%) were found. The analysis of combined results from index, follow-up, and look-back samples identified four groups: (1) Two cases tested HBsAg positive with alternative, more sensitive, assays; (2) Four cases were in the pre-seroconversion window period; (3) Eight cases had a fluctuating pattern of HBV DNA and anti-HBs detection (recovered infection); and (4) twelve cases carried anti-HBc without anti-HBs, which might correspond to either chronic or recovered "occult" HBV infection. One donor with no HBV markers in the follow-up was excluded, and another was in the window period preceding anti-HBs. HBV NAT identified more confirmed positive donors than HCV or HIV NAT, and 1:250,000 could not be detected by anti-HBc screening. Serological and molecular studies on follow-up and look-back samples are important to classify donors. In conclusion, further studies are needed to determine whether the considerably higher yield of HBV DNA detection obtained with individual donation screening improves blood safety compared with anti-HBc screening.

High levels of hepatitis B virus DNA in body fluids from chronic carriers

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major global health problem. Transmission is mainly blood-borne, although the route of infection during horizontal transmission in childhood is unclear. Nosocomial outbreaks of HBV have been widely reported, but have mainly focused on blood-borne transmission. There is limited knowledge of the viral load levels in other body fluids. In the present study, chronic HBV carriers were tested for the presence of HBV DNA in serum, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluid, urine and tears by means of qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. Twenty-five patients who were positive for HBV DNA with both PCRs were included. Low titres in real-time PCR corresponded with weak bands in the qualitative assay. HBV DNA was found in two urine samples, 10 saliva samples, five nasopharyngeal swabs and in tear fluid from four patients. One highly viraemic HBeAg-positive carrier with serum HBV DNA levels of 7 x 10(9) genome copies had high copy numbers detected in both saliva and nasopharyngeal fluid. These results demonstrate that highly viraemic HBV carriers may have high titres of HBV DNA in other body fluids. This has particular importance for infection control programmes and regulations, underlining the importance of aiming towards regular HBV DNA testing and thus infectivity assessment of chronic carriers in order to prevent transmission.

Real-time PCR quantitation of hepatitis B virus total DNA and covalently closed circular DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from hepatitis B virus-infected patients

It remains unclear whether hepatitis B virus (HBV) replicates in extrahepatic tissues, and particularly in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), which may serve as a reservoir for the maintenance of infection. A real-time PCR assay for the quantitation of total and covalently closed circular (ccc) HBV DNA in serum and in PBMCs was developed. This assay was highly sensitive (detection limit: 27 IU/mL), linear over a wide range (9 log10), and was displayed high inter- and intra-assay reproducibility for the quantitation of total DNA. Genotypes A to E were detected and the results were consistent with those obtained with the COBAS Amplicor HBV Monitor Test. The specificity of the methodology was increased by prior treatment with an enzyme that digests relaxed circular DNA, and the elimination of background signals from virus adsorbed to the surface of PBMCs. HBV DNA was detected in the serum and PBMCs of 12 HBsAg-positive patients, with less than 1% in the cccDNA form. In conclusion, the quantitation of total and ccc HBV DNA in PBMCs is potentially useful as a non-invasive marker, and may help to increase our knowledge of the natural history of hepatitis B.

Can Donors With Prior Hepatitis Be Safely Used for Heart Transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation represents a significant life-saving and increased quality-of-life intervention for patients with refractory cardiac failure. Successful transplantation requires continuous immunosuppression to avoid immune rejection. Unfortunately, persistent viral infections in donors may be transmitted to recipients in the process of heart transplantation. With the severe shortage of available organs and significant waiting list mortality there is a rationale for considering use of organs from donors with evidence of prior hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C infection.

METHODS

Published literature articles were searched using Medline, PaperChase and further review of references in relevant articles on issues related to hepatitis B and hepatitis C and heart transplantation.

RESULTS

Donor and recipient testing for hepatitis B and hepatitis C is important for relative risk assessment. Nucleic acid testing for hepatitis B DNA and hepatitis C RNA represent emerging technologies, which may add valuable information to traditional serologic testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Heart transplant recipient risk may be modified by vaccination against hepatitis B before transplantation. There is currently no available vaccine for hepatitis C. Recently described effective treatments for hepatitis B and hepatitis C provide further rationale for reconsideration of using hearts from donors with evidence of hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C infection.

Epidemiology of HBV infection in Asian blood donors: Emphasis on occult HBV infection and the role of NAT

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is endemic in many Asian countries. Among many transmission routes, transfusion is the one that should be prevented. The first major success in enhancing transfusion safety came with the implementation of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in the early 1970s. However, the studies quoted in this review demonstrate that transmission by blood components negative for HBsAg can still occur in the acute phase of infection during the seronegative window period, or during chronic stages of infection (i.c. "occult" HBV infection, OHB). OHB is defined as the presence of HBV DNA in blood or liver tissues in patients negative for HBsAg, with or without any HBV antibodies. Because of limitations in current blood screening practices, OHB is an overlooked source of HBV transmission. For policy development on screening for HBV infection in blood donors, it would be useful to assess the relative contribution of the above two sources of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection from HBsAg-negative donations. New screening policy should be evaluated on the basis of available data or newly designed studies. While anti-HBc screening can climinate residual risk of occult HBV transmission by transfusion in low-endemic areas, it would not be practical in most parts of the world where the prevalence of anti-HBc is >10% as too many otherwise healthy donors will be ineligible. On the contrary, studies mentioned in this paper indicate that nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) or new HBsAg tests of enhanced sensitivity would be effective in the screening of blood donors for OHB in highly endemic countries. However, the cost-effectiveness of blood screening tests is a major concern in Asia. We therefore have systemically reviewed the literature on prevalence and infectivity of OHB in Asian countries and the possible role of NAT for identifying blood donors in the pre-HBsAg window phase or in later stages of OHB.

Hepatitis B virus screening in contacts of blood donors with antibodies against core protein (anti-HBc), but without surface antigen (HBsAg)

To increase blood safety Brazil introduced screening for anti-HBc among blood donors in 1993. There was a decrease in the hepatitis B virus (HB V) transmission, but this measure identified a great number ofHBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive donors. Surveillance policy determines that contacts of HBV carriers should be screened to HBV markers, but there is no recommendation about how to guide contacts of HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive donors. Aiming to evaluate whether the contacts of this group are at greater risk for HB V infection, a cross-sectional study was performed to compare prevalence of HBV infection between contacts of HBsAg-positive blood donors (group I) and contacts of HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive donors (group II). Contacts were submitted to a questionnaire and blood tests for HBV markers. In group I (n = 143), 53 (37.1%) were anti-HBc-positive and 11 (7.7%) were HBsAg-positive. In group II (n = 111), there were 9 and 0.9%, respectively. HB V exposure was associated with group I, sexual activity, blood transfusion, being one of the donor's parents, and living for more than ten years with the donor. Regarding the families as sample units, it was more common to find at least one member with HBV markers (p < 0.05) among the families of group I compared to group II. Contacts of HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive individuals presented a much lower risk of having already been exposed to HBV and there is no need to screen them for HBV in low to moderate prevalence populations.

Serological pattern “anti-HBc alone”: Characterization of 552 individuals and clinical significance

AIM: To investigate the prevalence and clinical significance of “anti-HBc alone” in an unselected population of patients and employees of a university hospital in southern Germany.

METHODS: All individuals with the pattern “anti-HBc alone” were registered over a time span of 82 mo. HBV-DNA was measured in serum and liver samples, and clinical charts were reviewed.

RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty two individuals were “anti-HBc alone” (of 3004 anti-HBc positive individuals; 18.4%), and this pattern affected males (20.5%) more often than females (15.3%; P < 0.001). HBV-DNA was detected in serum of 44 of 545 “anti-HBc alone” individuals (8.1%), and in paraffin embedded liver tissue in 16 of 39 patients tested (41.0%). There was no association between the detection of HBV genomes and the presence of biochemical, ultrasonic or histological signs of liver damage. Thirty-eight “anti-HBc alone” patients with cirrhosis or primary liver carcinoma had at least one additional risk factor. HCV-coinfection was present in 20.4% of all individuals with “anti-HBc alone” and was the only factor associated with a worse clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION: In an HBV low prevalence area, no evidence is found that HBV alone causes severe liver damage in individuals with “anti-HBc alone”. Recommendations for the management of these individuals are given.

Novel mutation in Hepatitis B virus preventing HBeAg production and resembling primate strains

Chronic carriers of hepatitis B infection often harbour virus strains with mutations in the precore region. These mutations are temporally associated with the development of HBeAg loss and seroconversion to anti-HBe. The most common precore mutation is a stop codon at position 1896, but other mutations leading to abolished HBeAg secretion have been described. Here, a novel precore mutation introducing a lysine in the precore position 28, a sequence shared by non-human primates but not by other human isolates, is described. However, the insertion causes a frame-shift preventing the expression of HBeAg by introducing a stop codon 5 aa downstream of the mutation. Analysis of the predicted RNA secondary structure indicates that the insertion could occur without fatally affecting the stability of the stem–loop encapsidation signal.

Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing

Real-time PCR has revolutionized the way clinical microbiology laboratories diagnose many human microbial infections. This testing method combines PCR chemistry with fluorescent probe detection of amplified product in the same reaction vessel. In general, both PCR and amplified product detection are completed in an hour or less, which is considerably faster than conventional PCR detection methods. Real-time PCR assays provide sensitivity and specificity equivalent to that of conventional PCR combined with Southern blot analysis, and since amplification and detection steps are performed in the same closed vessel, the risk of releasing amplified nucleic acids into the environment is negligible. The combination of excellent sensitivity and specificity, low contamination risk, and speed has made real-time PCR technology an appealing alternative to culture- or immunoassay-based testing methods for diagnosing many infectious diseases. This review focuses on the application of real-time PCR in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Evidence of occult hepatitis B virus infection among Omani blood donors: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBc) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA among a selected group of Omani blood donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred HBsAg-negative donors were screened for anti-HBc. Those found to be positive were investigated for HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction. HBsAg was retested on these sera following an immune complex dissociation technique.

RESULTS

HBsAg was present in 2.8% of the donors. Forty-one out of 200 (20.5%) HBsAg-negative donors were positive for anti-HBc. Eleven were positive for HBsAg after dissociation, whereas 8 gave readings just over the cutoff. HBV DNA was not detected in this group.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that testing donors for HBsAg alone is not sufficient to eliminate HBV from the blood supply in Oman.

Hepatitis B virus DNA in blood donors with anti-HBc as a possible indicator of active hepatitis B virus infection in Yucatan, Mexico

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) may be present in serum even when negative for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg). If routine screening of sera for anti-HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) is not done, low-level HBV viraemia may not be identified. A study was done on the presence of HBV DNA in serum samples from Mexican blood donors negative for HBsAg. Sera from 158 volunteer blood donors, negative for HBsAg and anti-HBs, but positive for anti-HBc, were analysed using nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). HBV DNA was detected in sera from 13 (8.23%) of the 158. Specificity of the PCR-amplified products was corroborated using Southern blot. Single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis showed identical SSCP-banding patterns for all 13 PCR products, suggesting similar cDNA sequences. Occult HBV infection was observed in approximately 8% of anti-HBc only donors. The absence of HBsAg in the blood of apparently healthy individuals may not be sufficient to ensure lack of circulating HBV, and blood containing anti-HBc only may be infectious until proven otherwise.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA screening of blood donations in minipools with the COBAS AmpliScreen HBV test

BACKGROUND

The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission by blood transfusion (estimated at 1 in 63,000-1 in 205,000 units in the United States) exceeds that of hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Reduction of window-period HBV transmissions through detection of HBV DNA-positive units by minipool nucleic acid testing (MP NAT) would be expected to decrease this risk.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A large multicenter study of the COBAS AmpliScreen HBV test (Roche Molecular Systems) was conducted on minipools of 24 blood donation specimens. The yield of HBV DNA-positive, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative window-period donations was determined relative to current and newly licensed HBsAg assays. Donors with selected HBV DNA, HBsAg, and anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) results were further evaluated.

RESULTS

The detection rate of window-period units was 1 in 352,451 (95% confidence interval, 1 in 2,941,176-1 in 97,561). Assay specificity was high (99.9964%). HBV DNA was detected in 84 percent of HBsAg-positive, anti-HBc-positive donations by MP NAT and in 94 percent when individual-donation (ID) NAT was added. HBV DNA was detected in 0.03 percent of HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive donations by MP NAT and in 0.41 percent when ID NAT was added.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of HBV MP NAT will provide an increment in safety relative to HBV serologic screening, similar to that for HCV and in excess of that for HIV. Our data indicate that the implementation of HBV MP NAT would likely interdict 39 HBV window-period units and prevent 56 cases of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection annually. The current data indicate that HBV MP NAT should not lead to discontinuation of anti-HBc testing but that discontinuation of HBsAg testing with retention of anti-HBc testing may be possible.

Evaluation of the COBAS amplicor HBV monitor assay and comparison with the ultrasensitive HBV hybrid capture 2 assay for quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA

Performance characteristics of the COBAS Amplicor HBV Monitor test (Roche Diagnostics), which measures hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitatively, were evaluated and compared with the Ultrasensitive HBV Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2; Digene Corporation) assay. Linearity and within-run precision were assessed for both methods by using eight HBV DNA-positive samples serially diluted to obtain a range of <100 to 500,000 HBV DNA copies/ml and run in triplicate. Agreement between the methods was studied with 100 clinical samples. HC2 assay performance near the limit of detection was investigated through repeat testing of 149 samples with HC2 and testing of 37 samples with HC2 results of <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml by Amplicor assay and a qualitative PCR assay. The linearity experiment for Amplicor had regression of observed values compared to expected values (y = 1.073x - 0.247; R(2) = 0.993, n = 32; for HC2, y = 0.855x + 0.759, R(2) = 0.729, n = 18). Within-run standard deviation of log HBV DNA copies/ml ranged from 0.003 to 0.348 (Amplicor) and 0.027 to 0.253 (HC2). Agreement assessed by Deming regression was poor [Amplicor = 1.197(HC2) - 0.961; R(2) = 0.799, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 0.710, n = 94]. Near the lower limit of detection, 32 of 149 repeat HC2 results were <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml. Of the 37 samples with HC2 results of <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml, HBV DNA was not detected in 15 samples, while HBV DNA was detected by at least one PCR method in 12 samples. Amplicor is linear from 200 to 200,000 HBV DNA copies/ml with undiluted samples, and this range can be expanded through dilution. Inconsistent HC2 results near the limit of detection justify use of a grey zone.

Predonation screening of blood donors with rapid tests: implementation and efficacy of a novel approach to blood safety in resource-poor settings

BACKGROUND

In sub-Saharan Africa, the percentage of screened blood is limited to approximately 75 percent for human immunodeficiency virus antibodies (anti-HIV), 50 percent for hepatitis B surface antigen, and 19 percent for hepatitis C virus antibodies (anti-HCV), mainly because of costs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In 2002 to 2003, candidate blood donors were screened before donation for HIV, HCV, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) serologic markers with rapid tests. The efficacy of this screening was assessed by nucleic acid testing (NAT) applied to pools of 10 plasma samples from donated units with a virus specific triplex assay. NAT-reactive pools were resolved by viral genome identification in individual plasma sample. Deferred candidate donors were referred to a donor-care program.

RESULTS

A total of 9372 people were screened and 1534 (16.4%) were deferred. No HIV or HCV RNA-containing samples remained undetected by rapid tests unless a human testing error was involved. In contrast, 1.3 and 3.0 percent of HBV DNA-containing blood units were negative with rapid tests but were detected in individual donations with enzyme immunoassay and genomic amplification, respectively. Only half of these units were detectable in pools of 10 samples. One-third of deferred candidate donors attended the donor-care program and were informed and counseled.

CONCLUSIONS

Predonation viral screening of blood donors is effective in high endemic areas, and the savings it generates may improve the safety and limit the cost of blood. Communication with deferred donors may contribute to public health. A new screening strategy associating serologic rapid test before donation and NAT on pools of 10 plasma samples after donation is proposed.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection: implications in transfusion

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) presents a higher residual risk of transmission by transfusion than hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). While most infectious blood units are removed by screening for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), there is clear evidence that transmission by HBsAg-negative components occurs, in part, during the serologically negative window period, but more so during the late stages of infection. Donations negative for HBsAg, but positive for HBV DNA, with or without the presence of HBV antibodies, correspond to 'occult' HBV infection (OBI). The frequency of OBI depends on the relative sensitivity of both HBsAg and HBV DNA assays. It also depends on the prevalence of HBV infection in the population. OBI may follow recovery from infection, displaying antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) and persistent low-level viraemia, escape mutants undetected by the HBsAg assays, or healthy carriage with antibodies to hepatitis B e antigen (anti-HBe) and to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). Over time, in the latter situation, anti-HBe and, later, anti-HBc may become undetectable. The critical question is whether or not OBI is infectious by transfusion. All forms have been shown to be infectious in immunocompromised individuals, such as organ- or bone marrow-transplant recipients. In immunocompetent recipients, there is no evidence that anti-HBs-containing components (even at low titre) are infectious. Anti-HBc only, with HBV DNA, can be associated with infectivity, as can rare cases of HBV DNA without any serological HBV marker. If HBV nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) is considered, the OBI viral load would usually be < 500 IU/ml, making testing of plasma pools unsuitable unless the sensitivity of NAT significantly increases by genome enrichment or test improvement.

Low rate of occult hepatitis B virus infection among anti-HBc positive blood donors living in a low prevalence region in Brazil

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the rate of occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among blood donors living in a geographic region of low (5.6%) anti-HBc prevalence.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sera from 150 candidate blood donors whose blood was rejected due to total anti-HBc reactivity (despite absence of HBsAg) were tested for anti-HBs and IgM anti-HBc antibodies, as well as for HBeAg/anti-HBe. Serum HBV DNA was sought by using a PCR assay able to amplify part of the surface gene. Viral load was measured in the PCR positive samples.

RESULTS

The pattern 'anti-HBc alone' (without HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies) was found in 64 (42.7%) subjects. IgM anti-HBc and anti-HBe antibodies were detected in 2 (1.3%) and 80 (53.3%) samples, respectively. No sample was HBeAg-reactive. HBV DNA was repeatedly found in five (3.3%) samples, three of which were anti-HBs positive and two anti-HBs negative. All five HBV DNA positive samples showed a low viral load (<1000copies/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicated a low rate of occult infection among anti-HBc positive, HBsAg negative blood donors living in a region of low prevalence of infection. Viral load was very low in all HBV infected subjects.

Lack of correlation between HBsAg and HBV DNA levels in blood donors who test positive for HBsAg and anti-HBc: implications for future HBV screening policy

BACKGROUND

Studies showing a significant correlation between hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) levels have focused on the HBV seroconversion window period.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

HBsAg levels relative to HBV DNA results in 200 HBsAg-positive, anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)-reactive blood donations were analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (detection limit 400 copies/mL), two research PCR assays with increasing sensitivities (65 copies/mL and 1.3 copies/mL, respectively), and a quantitative HBsAg assay; HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were correlated with HBV serologic profiles; and the potential for replacing HBsAg screening with nucleic acid testing (NAT) was analyzed.

RESULTS

Serologic profiles for over 90 percent of the donor samples were consistent with chronic HBV infection. Correlation between HBsAg and HBV DNA concentrations was weak (correlation coefficient = 0.33). Thirty-six percent (72/200) of donor samples had DNA levels under 400 copies per mL. Retesting of the 72 samples by more sensitive PCR assays showed that 60 out of 200 (30%) were positive by PCR with sensitivity of 65 copies per mL, whereas 6 out of 200 (3%) required PCR sensitivity of 1.3 copies per mL for positivity. Three percent (6/200) were negative by all three NAT assays.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV DNA levels in HBsAg-positive, anti-HBc-reactive blood donations can be extremely low. About 6 percent of donations would be negative by current minipool HBV NAT methods. About 3 percent of donations would remain undetected by sensitive single-donor NAT. These results indicate caution in any consideration of dropping HBsAg screening.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection

The detection of HBV DNA without HBsAg with or without the presence of HBV antibodies outside the acute phase window period defines occult HBV infection. This condition has been described in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), chronic hepatitis B, healthy HBV carriage and recovered infection, chronic hepatitis C and individuals without serological markers of HBV. The frequency of the diagnosis depends on the relative sensitivity of both HBsAg and HBV DNA assays. It also depends on the prevalence of HBV infection in the population. Occult HBV in blood donors has a wide range of potential origins within the natural history of the infection. It may originate from recovered infections with anti-HBs and persistent, low-level, viral replication, escape mutants undetected by the HBsAg assays or healthy chronic carriage. The last situation is mostly found with anti-HBc only. Over time, antibody markers may become undetectable leaving HBV DNA as the only marker of the infection. In all cases, the viral load is low, mostly below 10(4) IU/ml, often below 100 IU/ml. At these levels, nucleic acid testing (NAT) in pools is likely to be largely ineffective. Is occult HBV transmissible by transfusion? Carriers of anti-HBs or anti-HBc only were shown infectious in immunosuppressed organ or bone marrow transplant recipients. In immunocompetent recipients, there is no evidence that anti-HBs-containing components are infectious, even in low titre. Donations carrying anti-HBc only and HBV DNA can be infectious and this is a threat where anti-HBc is not screened. Anti-HBc screening identifies most occult HBV infection but not all. HBV NAT needs either extreme sensitivity or to be performed on individual donations to eliminate HBV DNA-containing units.

Frequency of HBV DNA detection in US blood donors testing positive for the presence of anti-HBc: implications for transfusion transmission and donor screening

BACKGROUND

An estimate of the rate of HBV DNA-positive, anti-HBc-positive units is important for evaluating the need for anti-HBc donor screening, especially in the context of HBV NAT.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

HBsAg EIA-nonreactive, anti-HBc-reactive (Corzyme, Abbott Laboratories) specimens were retrieved from a repository and were retested for anti-HBc (with PRISM HBcore, Abbott Laboratories, currently under FDA review) and anti-HBs (with PRISM Ausab, Abbott Laboratories, research assay). HBV DNA testing using a PCR assay with a greater than 95 percent detection rate of less than 50 copies per mL was performed on a subset of specimens that were PRISM HBcore-reactive and were anti-HBs- negative or reactive at less than 100 IU per L.

RESULTS

A total of 395 of 1231 specimens eligible by our serologic criteria were tested by PCR. Four anti-HBs-negative specimens were PCR-positive with estimated HBV DNA copy numbers of 10 per 30 copies per mL in two specimens and 50 to 100 copies per mL in two others. The HBV DNA detection rate in anti-HBs-negative specimens was 3.7 percent, and the projected rate among all Corzyme-reactive specimens was 0.24 percent, leading to an estimated yield of 1 HBV DNA-positive, anti-HBc-positive unit in 49,000 units that were otherwise eligible for transfusion (95% CI, 1 in 16,600-1 in 152,600).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-HBc screening detects HBsAg EIA-negative, HBV-infected donors at a rate comparable to the estimated residual risk for HBV window-period infections. The low viral load in the HBV DNA-positive samples suggests that minipool NAT will not detect most potentially infectious units from anti-HBc-positive donors.

Detection of Marek's disease virus DNA in chicken but not in human plasma

Marek's disease virus (MDV) causes a common lymphomatous and neuropathic disease in domestic chickens and, less commonly, turkeys and quail. It is a member of the alpha-herpesviruses and until now was considered to be strongly cell associated. In 1991, MDV was suggested to be the causative infectious agent of multiple sclerosis (MS) in humans. In a previous study, we investigated the leukocytes of 107 well-defined MS patients for the presence of MDV DNA but were unable to confirm a role for MDV in the pathogenesis of MS. A recent report (S. Laurent, E. Esnault, G. Dambrine, A. Goudeau, D. Choudat, and D. Rasschaert, J. Gen. Virol. 82:233-240, 2001) described the detection of MDV DNA in 20% of 202 human serum samples, regardless of whether the individuals were exposed to poultry. The detection of MDV DNA in chicken serum samples was reported as well. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether we can confirm the presence of MDV DNA in chickens and humans if we use plasma as the source for nucleic acid isolation. Leukocytes and plasma specimens from 16 chickens experimentally infected with MDV serotype 1 and plasma specimens from 300 volunteer blood donors were tested for MDV DNA by two different TaqMan PCR assays. MDV DNA was repeatedly found in the leukocytes as well as in the plasma specimens of all 16 animals. All human samples analyzed, however, tested negative by both assays. Accordingly, Marek's disease in chickens can be diagnosed by detection of MDV DNA in plasma as well as in leukocytes. Once again, we found no evidence for the spread of MDV to humans.