Mechanisms of early peripheral CD4 T-cell tolerance induction by anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: evidence for anergy and deletion but not regulatory cells

Mechanisms of transplantation tolerance in animals and humans

Donor-specific immune tolerance would avoid the toxicities of chronic immunosuppressive therapies while preventing graft rejection. Hematopoietic cell transplantation has shown preliminary success for intentional tolerance induction in pilot clinical trials. The mechanisms of tolerance in these trials and the animal studies leading up to them are discussed.

Immunomodulatory effects of mixed hematopoietic chimerism: immune tolerance in canine model of lung transplantation

Long-term survival after lung transplantation is limited by acute and chronic graft rejection. Induction of immune tolerance by first establishing mixed hematopoietic chimerism (MC) is a promising strategy to improve outcomes. In a preclinical canine model, stable MC was established in recipients after reduced-intensity conditioning and hematopoietic cell transplantation from a DLA-identical donor. Delayed lung transplantation was performed from the stem cell donor without pharmacological immunosuppression. Lung graft survival without loss of function was prolonged in chimeric (n = 5) vs. nonchimeric (n = 7) recipients (p < or = 0.05, Fisher's test). There were histological changes consistent with low-grade rejection in 3/5 of the lung grafts in chimeric recipients at > or =1 year. Chimeric recipients after lung transplantation had a normal immune response to a T-dependent antigen. Compared to normal dogs, there were significant increases of CD4+INFgamma+, CD4+IL-4+ and CD8+ INFgamma+ T-cell subsets in the blood (p < 0.0001 for each of the three T-cell subsets). Markers for regulatory T-cell subsets including foxP3, IL10 and TGFbeta were also increased in CD3+ T cells from the blood and peripheral tissues of chimeric recipients after lung transplantation. Establishing MC is immunomodulatory and observed changes were consistent with activation of both the effector and regulatory immune response.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation for tolerance induction: animal models to clinical trials

The induction of donor-specific immune tolerance is the "holy grail" of transplantation, as it would avoid the toxicities of chronic immunosuppressive therapies while preventing acute and chronic graft rejection. A large number of approaches to tolerance induction have been described in the experimental literature, but only hematopoietic cell transplantation has shown preliminary success for intentional tolerance induction in pilot clinical trials. This review summarizes the conditions that allow progress to be made in moving strategies for tolerance induction from the bench to the bedside and discuss the mechanisms by which tolerance may be achieved through hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Microarrays: monitoring for transplant tolerance and mechanistic insights

With recent advances in immunology and a growing understanding of transplantation biology, the development of reliable assays that may be used for identification and prediction of the current state of an immune response (rejection and tolerance) are urgently needed to allow us to predict the development of immunologic graft injury, individualize immunosuppression, rationally minimize immunosuppressive drug toxicity, promote a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying stable graft acceptance, and aid in the design of tolerance-inducing clinical transplantation trials. Microarrays can provide nonbiased, simultaneous global expression patterns for more than 40,000 human genes across different experiments. High throughput microarray technology offers a means to study disease-specific transcriptional changes in tissue biopsy, peripheral blood, and biofluids.

CTLA-4 on alloreactive CD4 T cells interacts with recipient CD80/86 to promote tolerance

Although the inhibitory receptor CTLA-4 (CD152) has been implicated in peripheral CD4 T-cell tolerance, its mechanism of action remains poorly defined. We analyzed mechanisms of CD4 cell tolerance in a model of tolerance induction involving establishment of mixed hematopoietic chimerism in recipients of fully MHC-mismatched allogeneic bone marrow cells with anti-CD154 mAb. Animals lacking CD80 and CD86 failed to achieve chimerism. We detected no T cell-intrinsic requirement for CD28 for chimerism induction. However, a CD4 T cell-intrinsic signal through CTLA-4 was shown to be essential within the first 48 hours of exposure to alloantigen for the establishment of tolerance and mixed chimerism. This signal must be provided by a recipient CD80/86(+) non-T-cell population. Donor CD80/86 expression was insufficient to achieve tolerance. Together, our findings demonstrate a surprising role for interactions of CTLA-4 expressed by alloreactive peripheral CD4 T cells with CD80/86 on recipient antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in the induction of early tolerance, suggesting a 3-cell tolerance model involving directly alloreactive CD4 cells, donor antigen-expressing bone marrow cells, and recipient antigen-presenting cells. This tolerance is independent of regulatory T cells and culminates in the deletion of directly alloreactive CD4 T cells.

Rapid deletional peripheral CD8 T cell tolerance induced by allogeneic bone marrow: role of donor class II MHC and B cells

Mixed chimerism and donor-specific tolerance are achieved in mice receiving 3 Gy of total body irradiation and anti-CD154 mAb followed by allogeneic bone marrow (BM) transplantation. In this model, recipient CD4 cells are critically important for CD8 tolerance. To evaluate the role of CD4 cells recognizing donor MHC class II directly, we used class II-deficient donor marrow and were not able to achieve chimerism unless recipient CD8 cells were depleted, indicating that directly alloreactive CD4 cells were necessary for CD8 tolerance. To identify the MHC class II(+) donor cells promoting this tolerance, we used donor BM lacking certain cell populations or used positively selected cell populations. Neither donor CD11c(+) dendritic cells, B cells, T cells, nor donor-derived IL-10 were critical for chimerism induction. Purified donor B cells induced early chimerism and donor-specific cell-mediated lympholysis tolerance in both strain combinations tested. In contrast, positively selected CD11b(+) monocytes/myeloid cells did not induce early chimerism in either strain combination. Donor cell preparations containing B cells were able to induce early deletion of donor-reactive TCR-transgenic 2C CD8 T cells, whereas those devoid of B cells had reduced activity. Thus, induction of stable mixed chimerism depends on the expression of MHC class II on the donor marrow, but no requisite donor cell lineage was identified. Donor BM-derived B cells induced early chimerism, donor-specific cell-mediated lympholysis tolerance, and deletion of donor-reactive CD8 T cells, whereas CD11b(+) cells did not. Thus, BM-derived B cells are potent tolerogenic APCs for alloreactive CD8 cells.

Spontaneous renal allograft acceptance associated with "regulatory" dendritic cells and IDO

MHC-mismatched DBA/2 renal allografts are spontaneously accepted by C57BL/6 mice by poorly understood mechanisms, but both immune regulation and graft acceptance develop without exogenous immune modulation. Previous studies have shown that this model of spontaneous renal allograft acceptance is associated with TGF-beta-dependent immune regulation, suggesting a role for T regulatory cells. The current study shows that TGF-beta immune regulation develops 30 days posttransplant, but is lost by 150 days posttransplant. Despite loss of detectable TGF-beta immune regulation, renal allografts continue to function normally for >200 days posttransplantation. Because of its recently described immunoregulatory capabilities, we studied IDO expression in this model, and found that intragraft IDO gene expression progressively increases over time, and that IDO in "regulatory" dendritic cells (RDC) may contribute to regulation associated with long-term maintenance of renal allografts. Immunohistochemistry evaluation confirms the presence of both Foxp3+ T cells and IDO+ DCs in accepted renal allografts, and localization of both cell types within accepted allografts suggests the possibility of synergistic involvement in allograft acceptance. Interestingly, at the time when RDCs become detectable in spleens of allograft acceptors, approximately 30% of these mice challenged with donor-matched skin allografts accept these skin grafts, demonstrating progression to "true" tolerance. Together, these data suggest that spontaneous renal allograft acceptance evolves through a series of transient mechanisms, beginning with TGF-beta and T regulatory cells, which together may stimulate development of more robust regulation associated with RDC and IDO.

Differential impact of CD154 costimulation blockade on alloreactive effector and regulatory T cells in murine renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Although CD154 costimulation blockade prolongs allograft survival in multiple transplantation models, the underlying immunological mechanisms remain to be elucidated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used a murine orthotopic kidney allograft (KTx) model to analyze the impact of CD154 blockade on trafficking and function of alloreactive T effector versus T regulatory cells. A single dose of MR1 Ab treatment at the time of KTx significantly improved the survival of Balb/c KTx in naïve C57BL/6 recipients (mean survival time >100 days vs. 52 days in controls; P<0.005), and improved graft histology, as evidenced by decreased lymphocyte infiltration and preservation of tissue architecture (days 6-8). In the early posttransplant phase, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealed preferential depression of T effector (CD8+CD25+) and relative enrichment of T-regulatory (CD4+ CD25+ CD152+) cells selectively in KTx. This pattern was further supported by intragraft gene expression analysis, which showed increased FoxP3/Tbet ratio and simultaneously decreased granzyme B/IFN-gamma levels in Ab-treated recipients. Additionally, MR1 Ab selectively up-regulated intragraft CCL17, but suppressed CXCL9/CCL5, in parallel with increased CCR4/CCR8 but unaltered CXCR3 expression.

CONCLUSION

These results provide evidence, at both cellular and molecular levels, that CD154 blockade in murine KTx recipients differentially targeted T-effector and T-regulatory cell subsets by regulating intragraft induction of chemokines targeting distinct T-cell subsets.

Alloreactive CD8 T cell tolerance requires recipient B cells, dendritic cells, and MHC class II

Allogeneic bone marrow chimerism induces robust systemic tolerance to donor alloantigens. Achievement of chimerism requires avoidance of marrow rejection by pre-existing CD4 and CD8 T cells, either of which can reject fully MHC-mismatched marrow. Both barriers are overcome with a minimal regimen involving anti-CD154 and low dose (3 Gy) total body irradiation, allowing achievement of mixed chimerism and tolerance in mice. CD4 cells are required to prevent marrow rejection by CD8 cells via a novel pathway, wherein recipient CD4 cells interacting with recipient class II MHC tolerize directly alloreactive CD8 cells. We demonstrate a critical role for recipient MHC class II, B cells, and dendritic cells in a pathway culminating in deletional tolerance of peripheral alloreactive CD8 cells.

Peripheral deletional tolerance of alloreactive CD8 but not CD4 T cells is dependent on the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway

Although interaction between programmed death-1 (PD-1) and the ligand PD-L1 has been shown to mediate CD8 cell exhaustion in the setting of chronic infection or the absence of CD4 help, a role for this pathway in attenuating early alloreactive CD8 cell responses has not been identified. We demonstrate that the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is needed to rapidly tolerize alloreactive CD8 cells in a model that requires CD4 cells and culminates in CD8 cell deletion. This protocol involves allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) following conditioning with low-dose total body irradiation and anti-CD154 antibody. Tolerized donor-reactive T-cell receptor transgenic CD8 cells are shown to be in an abortive activation state prior to their deletion, showing early and prolonged expression of activation markers (compared with rejecting CD8 cells) while being functionally silenced by day 4 after transplantation. Although both tolerized and rejecting alloreactive CD8 cells up-regulate PD-1, CD8 cell tolerance is dependent on the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. In contrast, CD4 cells are tolerized independently of this pathway following BMT with anti-CD154. These studies demonstrate a dichotomy between the requirements for CD4 and CD8 tolerance and identify a role for PD-1 in the rapid tolerization of an alloreactive T-cell population via a deletional mechanism.

Manipulating the immune system for anti-tumor responses and transplant tolerance via mixed hematopoietic chimerism

SUMMARY

Stem cells (SCs) with varying potentiality have the capacity to repair injured tissues. While promising animal data have been obtained, allogeneic SCs and their progeny are subject to immune-mediated rejection. Here, we review the potential of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to promote immune tolerance to allogeneic and xenogeneic organs and tissues, to reverse autoimmunity, and to be used optimally to cure hematologic malignancies. We also review the mechanisms by which hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can promote anti-tumor responses and establish donor-specific transplantation tolerance. We discuss the barriers to clinical translation of animal studies and describe some recent studies indicating how they can be overcome. The recent achievements of durable mixed chimerism across human leukocyte antigen barriers without graft-versus-host disease and of organ allograft tolerance through combined kidney and bone marrow transplantation suggest that the potential of this approach for use in the treatment of many human diseases may ultimately be realized.

Chimerism and tolerance in a recipient of a deceased-donor liver transplant

Complete hematopoietic chimerism and tolerance of a liver allograft from a deceased male donor developed in a 9-year-old girl, with no evidence of graft-versus-host disease 17 months after transplantation. The tolerance was preceded by a period of severe hemolysis, reflecting partial chimerism that was refractory to standard therapies. The hemolysis resolved after the gradual withdrawal of all immunosuppressive therapy.

Immune tolerance: mechanisms and application in clinical transplantation

The achievement of immune tolerance, a state of specific unresponsiveness to the donor graft, has the potential to overcome the current major limitations to progress in organ transplantation, namely late graft loss, organ shortage and the toxicities of chronic nonspecific immumnosuppressive therapy. Advances in our understanding of immunological processes, mechanisms of rejection and tolerance have led to encouraging developments in animal models, which are just beginning to be translated into clinical pilot studies. These advances are reviewed here and the appropriate timing for clinical trials is discussed.

Different mechanisms control peripheral and central tolerance in hematopoietic chimeric mice

Regulatory T cells (Treg) are important in peripheral tolerance, but their role in establishing and maintaining hematopoietic mixed chimerism and generating central tolerance is unclear. We now show that costimulation blockade using a donor-specific transfusion and anti-CD154 antibody applied to mice given bone marrow and simultaneously transplanted with skin allografts leads to hematopoietic chimerism and permanent skin allograft survival. Chimeric mice bearing intact skin allografts fail to generate effector/memory T cells against allogeneic targets as shown by the absence of IFNgamma-producing CD44(high)CD8+ T cells and in vivo cytotoxicity. Depletion of Tregs by injection of anti-CD4 or anti-CD25 antibody prior to costimulation blockade prevents chimerism, shortens skin allograft survival and leads to generation of effector/memory cytotoxic T cells. Depletion of Tregs by injection of anti-CD4 or anti-CD25 antibody two months after transplantation leads to loss of skin allografts even though mice remain chimeric and exhibit little in vivo cytotoxicity. In contrast, chimerism is lost, but skin allografts survive following naïve T-cell injection. We conclude that hematopoietic chimerism and peripheral tolerance may be maintained by different mechanisms in mixed hematopoietic chimeras.

Recent Progress in Tolerance Induction through Mixed Chimerism

Organ transplant recipients require life-long treatment with immunosuppressive drugs. Currently available immunosuppression is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, and is ineffective in inhibiting chronic rejection and graft loss. Therefore, a permanent state of donor-specific tolerance remains a primary goal for transplantation research. The induction of mixed hematopoietic chimerism is an attractive concept in this regard. Hematopoietic chimerism modulates the immunologic repertoire by extending the mechanisms of self-tolerance to donor-specific allotolerance. Despite recent progress in developing nontoxic bone marrow transplantation protocols for rodents, translation to large animals has remained difficult. Here, we outline the concept of tolerance via mixed chimerism, and review recent progress and remaining challenges in bringing this approach to the clinical setting.

CTLA4Ig promotes the induction of hematopoietic chimerism and tolerance independently of Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) under costimulation blockade induces mixed chimerism and tolerance in rodent models. Recent data, predominantly from in vitro studies, suggest that in addition to blocking the CD28 costimulation pathway CTLA4Ig also acts through upregulating the tryptophan-catabolizing enzyme indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). Here we demonstrate that even though CTLA4Ig is critically required for the induction of chimerism and tolerance in a murine model of nonmyeloablative BMT, IDO activity is not. No significant differences were detectable in the kynurenine to tryptophan ratios (indicative of IDO activity) in sera of BMT recipients treated with CTLA4Ig (tolerant group) versus BMT recipients treated without CTLA4Ig (nontolerant group) versus naïve controls. In vivo inhibition of IDO immediately after BMT with CTLA4Ig or several months thereafter did not block achievement of chimerism and tolerance. Thus, IDO does not play a critical role in the induction or maintenance of chimerism and tolerance in a CTLA4Ig-based BMT model.

Apoptotic donor leukocytes limit mixed-chimerism induced by CD40-CD154 blockade in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

"Mini" allogeneic bone marrow transplants using non-myeloablative conditioning have reduced early treatment-related mortalities, but graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft rejection remain clinical problems. Our preliminary studies indicated that low-dose busulfan conditioning and costimulatory blockade using anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in combination with a pretransplantation "tolerating" dose of bone marrow (BM) cells were sufficient to establish stable mixed-chimerism without GVHD when transplanting moderate doses of T cell depleted (TCD)-BM from major histocompatibility complex (MHC) fully-mismatched donors (Adams AB, Durham MM, Kean L, et al. J Immunol. 2001;167:1103-1111). In this study, donor splenocytes were administered before transplantation as a tolerating cell infusion with a conditioning regimen consisting of low-dose busulfan and anti-CD154 mAb. We compared the ability of viable and apoptotic donor cells of different ex vivo treatments and purified different donor cell populations (CD3(+), CD3(-), CD11b(+), and CD11b(-) splenocytes) to induce tolerance and enhance donor chimerism in a MHC mismatched model of murine bone marrow transplantation. We found that mixed chimerism without GVHD was enhanced by pretransplantation administration of viable allogeneic splenocytes and diminished in mice with prior exposure to apoptotic/necrotic donor splenocytes. CD11b(+)-enriched splenocytes more potently enhanced donor chimerism compared to unfractionated splenocytes or other splenocyte subsets. Mixed lymphocyte cultures demonstrated that apoptotic stimulators overcame the immune-tolerating activity of anti-CD154 mAb and led to increased interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha synthesis, increased proliferation of responder T cells, and decreased production of interleukin-10. In conclusion, viable donor splenocytes administered before transplantation in combination with costimulatory blockade induced tolerance and enhanced donor chimerism, whereas pretransplantation administration of apoptotic/necrotic donor cells led to host T cell activation and decreased overall donor engraftment.

Hematopoietic stem cell recipients do not develop post-transplantation immune tolerance to antigens present on minimal residual disease

The immune environment present after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) contributes to the control of leukemia. Our laboratory has demonstrated in a murine model that vaccination of recipients after transplantation with recipient tumor vaccines does not exacerbate graft-versus-host disease but does induce meaningful graft-versus-tumor effects. We previously demonstrated that part of the reason for the lack of graft-versus-host disease from post-transplantation vaccination is due to gradual acquisition of tolerance or unresponsiveness to recipient immunodominant minor histocompatibility antigens that are ubiquitously expressed in the recipient. However, our prior studies have not critically addressed the question of whether a similar process of acquisition of unresponsiveness to or tolerance of antigens present on minimal residual disease also occurs. The present study tested the hypothesis that unresponsiveness to antigens present on minimal residual disease present at the time of HSCT would also occur. The answer to this question would have a significant effect on the potential efficacy of post-transplantation tumor vaccines. In a murine model of major histocompatibility complex matched, minor histocompatibility antigen mismatched HSCT (C3.SW female donors and C57BL/6 female recipients), we tested whether transplant recipients would acquire unresponsiveness to antigens present on small numbers of residual leukemia/lymphoma cells. We employed a male C57BL/6 lymphoid malignancy with an immunoglobulin/c-myc oncogene in these studies using as a model of tumor-restricted antigen the well-characterized male (HY) antigen system present only on the tumor but not present as ubiquitous minor antigens in the recipient. After HSCT, recipients did not mount immune responses to the ubiquitously distributed immunodominant recipient strain H7 minor histocompatibility antigen, but did retain the capacity to mount significant T cell responses to HY antigens present on small numbers of HY+ tumor cells present at transplantation. Additional studies using small numbers of nonmalignant recipient male B cells or dendritic cells as models of minimal residual disease also demonstrated that the transplant recipients retained their capacity to mount anti-HY T cell responses. After HSCT, recipients may retain the capacity to mount effective T cell responses to antigens present on minimal residual disease and still acquire relative tolerance to ubiquitously distributed immunodominant minor antigens that are related to graft-versus-host disease.

Inducing mixed chimerism and transplantation tolerance through allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with costimulation blockade

Induction of mixed chimerism (i.e., coexistence of donor and recipient hematopoietic cells) through transplantation of allogeneic donor bone marrow under appropriate host conditioning, is one of the most reliable strategies to induce transplantation tolerance. Robust tolerance is evident in mixed chimeras as they permanently accept donor skin grafts while promptly rejecting third party grafts. Although historically, myeloablative and T-cell depleting regimens have been described, milder protocols involving costimulation blockade have recently been developed. The prototypical murine protocol described in this chapter, involves the use of CTLA4Ig and a monoclonal antibody-specific for CD154 (CD40L) for costimulation blockade, 3 Gy of nonmyeloablative total body irradiation and a conventional number of 20 x 10(6) fully allogeneic bone marrow cells. Flow cytometry is used to determine levels of multilineage hematopoietic chimerism and deletion of donor-reactive CD4+ T cells. Tolerance is assessed in vivo by grafting of donor and third party skin.

Induction of dominant tolerance using monoclonal antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies (MAb) have been shown to be effective in inducing immune tolerance in transplantation and autoimmunity. Several different MAb have tolerogenic properties and their effect has been studied in a range of experimental animal models and, in some cases, in clinical trials. The tolerant state seems to be maintained by CD4+ regulatory T cells (Treg), induced in the periphery, capable of suppressing other T cells specific for the same antigens or antigens presented by the same antigen presenting cells. Furthermore, following the initial induction of Treg cells under MAb treatment, Treg cells themselves can maintain the tolerant state in a dominant way in the absence of the therapeutic MAb or other immunosuppressive agents, and are able to recruit other T cells into the regulatory pool--a process named infectious tolerance.

The last 5 years of basic science investigation in transplant immunology

Many new insights have been gained over the past 5 years into the mechanisms that regulate immune reactivity to cell and organ transplants. This new knowledge is being applied to the development of innovative experimental strategies that may soon be evaluated in the clinic.

Molecular signature of mice T lymphocytes following tolerance induction by allogeneic BMT and CD40-CD40L costimulation blockade

Tolerance induction by mixed chimerism and costimulation blockade is a promising approach to avoid immunosuppression, but the molecular basis of tolerant T lymphocytes remains elusive. We investigated the genome-wide gene expression profile of murine T lymphocytes after tolerance induction by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and costimulatory blockade using the anti-CD40L antibody MR1. Molecular functions, biological processes, cellular locations, and coregulation of identified genes were determined. A total of 113 unique genes exhibited a significant differential expression between the lymphocytes of MR1-treated Tolerance (TOL) and untreated recipients Control (CTRL). The majority of genes upregulated in the TOL group are involved in several signal transduction cascades such as members of the MAPKKK cascade (IL6, Tob2, Stk39, and Dusp24). Other genes involved in lymphocyte differentiation and highly expressed in the TOL group are lymphotactin, the estrogen receptors (ERs) and the suppressor of cytokine signaling 7. Common transcription factors such as ER 1 alpha, GATA-binding protein 1, insulin promoter factor 1, and paired-related homeobox 2 could be identified in the promoter regions of upregulated genes in the TOL group. These data suggest that T lymphoctes of tolerant mice exhibit a distinct molecular expression profile, which needs to be evaluated in other experimental tolerance models to determine whether it is a universal signature of tolerance.

Transplant tolerance: models, concepts and facts

Despite extensive research, our understanding of immunological tolerance to self-antigens is incomplete, and the goal of achieving tolerance to allogeneic transplanted tissue remains elusive. Currently, it is generally believed that the blockade of T cell co-stimulation offers considerable potential for achieving tolerance in the clinical setting. However, the recent finding that CD154-specific antibody may act through the depletion of activated T cells rather than co-stimulation blockade alone highlights the need for a re-evaluation of published data and the role of co-stimulation blockade in transplant tolerance. Activated T cells are programmed to die unless they receive sufficient survival signals in the form of inflammatory and lymphotropic cytokines produced by activated antigen-presenting cells or the T cells themselves. In conditions where the threshold for surviving activation is not reached, for example when a small number of responder T cells are activated in the absence of substantial injury or inflammation, the ensuing death of all activated T cells can result in deletional tolerance. Therefore, we propose that tolerance represents a failure of T cells to survive activation and develop into memory cells. This concept is likely to apply in the transplant setting, where the strength of the alloresponse depends on both the number/phenotype of the recipients' alloreactive T cells and immunogenicity of the transplanted tissue. Hence, in some rodent donor-recipient strain combinations that instigate a weak alloresponse, many treatments that only modestly decrease the alloresponse can achieve tolerance. In contrast, clinical transplantation is characterised by a strong alloresponse and highly immunogenic allografts, and thus, most treatments fail to control allograft rejection, and tolerance is difficult to achieve.

Transplant Tolerance: Converging on a Moving Target

Enthusiasm for tolerance induction has been tempered by the realization that it is more difficult to achieve clinically than was predicted by experimental models. Unlike the view that the immune response to an allograft is ordered and thus predictable, we view alloimmunity as highly plastic and molded by previous and ongoing experiences with allogeneic and environmental antigens. This implies that an individual's response to an allograft changes over time and that responses of seemingly similar individuals may vary greatly. This variability highlights the need to develop assays for monitoring the recipient immune response as well as individualized methods for therapeutic immune modulation.

Early regulation of CD8 T cell alloreactivity by CD4+CD25- T cells in recipients of anti-CD154 antibody and allogeneic BMT is followed by rapid peripheral deletion of donor-reactive CD8+ T cells, precluding a role for sustained regulation

While acquisition of regulatory function by CD4+CD25- T cells has been reported following antigenic stimulation, "naturally occurring" regulatory CD4+ T cells (Treg) are believed to express CD25. We examined the mechanisms involved in peripheral CD8 T cell tolerance by induction of mixed chimerism using non-myeloablative conditioning with low-dose (3 Gy) total body irradiation and anti-CD154 antibody. Recipient CD4+ T cells were initially required for the induction of CD8 cell tolerance, but were not needed beyond 2 weeks. Depletion of CD25+ Treg prior to bone marrow transplantation and blockade of IL-2 with neutralizing antibody did not impede tolerance induction. Tolerance was dependent on CTLA4, but not on IFN-gamma. In C57BL/6 mice containing a fraction of 2C TCR transgenic CD8+ T cells, which recognize the MHC class I alloantigen Ld, induction of chimerism with L(d+), but not Ld-, bone marrow cells led to deletion of peripheral 2C+ CD8+ cells within 1 week in peripheral blood and spleen. Complete deletion required the presence of recipient CD4+ T cells. Thus, a novel, rapid form of regulation by CD4+CD25- T cells permits initial CD8 T cell tolerance in this model. Rapid peripheral deletion of donor-specific CD8 T cells precludes an ongoing requirement for CD4 T cell-mediated regulation.

Disruption of CD40/CD40-ligand interactions in a retinal autoimmunity model results in protection without tolerance

We examined the role of CD40/CD40L interactions on the development of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU), a cell-mediated, Th1-driven autoimmune disease that serves as a model for autoimmune uveitis in humans. EAU-susceptible B10.RIII mice immunized with the retinal autoantigen interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein in CFA and treated with anti-CD40L Ab (MR1) had reduced incidence and severity of disease. Real-time PCR analysis revealed that the innate and adaptive responses of protected mice were reduced, without an obvious shift toward a Th2 cytokine profile. In contrast to some other reports, no evidence was found for regulatory cells in adoptive transfer experiments. To determine whether CD40L blockade resulted in long-term tolerance, mice protected by treatment with MR1 Ab were rechallenged for uveitis after circulating MR1 Ab levels dropped below the detection limit of ELISA. MR1-treated mice developed severe EAU and strong cellular responses to interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein, comparable to those of control mice. These responses were higher than in mice that had not received the primary immunization concurrently with anti-CD40L treatment. We conclude that 1) CD40/CD40L interaction is required for EAU and its disruption prevents disease development; 2) CD40L blockade inhibits the innate response to immunization and reduces priming, but does not result in immune deviation; and 3) protection is dependent on persistence of anti-CD40L Abs, and long-term tolerance is not induced. Furthermore, immunological memory develops under cover of CD40L blockade causing enhanced responses upon rechallenge. Taken together, our data suggest that ongoing CD40/CD40L blockade might be required to maintain a therapeutic effect against uveitis.

Roles of Deletion and Regulation in Creating Mixed Chimerism and Allograft Tolerance Using a Nonlymphoablative Irradiation-Free Protocol

The induction of mixed chimerism (MC) is a powerful and effective means to achieve transplantation tolerance in rodent models. Host conditioning with irradiation or cytotoxic drugs has been used in many protocols for chimeric induction across allogeneic barriers. The deletion of alloreactive T cell clones has been described as the main mechanism responsible for the induction of a stable MC. In this study, we demonstrate that a stable MC and skin allograft tolerance can be established across MHC barriers by a noncytotoxic, irradiation-free approach using costimulation blockade plus rapamycin treatment. By using an adoptive transfer model of skin allograft and using specific Vbeta TCR probes, we demonstrated that deletion of donor-reactive cytopathic T cell clones is indeed profound in tolerant hosts. Nonetheless, the challenge of tolerant mixed chimeras with 5 million mononuclear leukocytes (MNL) from naive syngeneic mice was neither able to abolish the stable MC nor to trigger skin allograft rejection, a hallmark of peripheral, not central tolerance. Furthermore, in an adoptive transfer model, MNLs harvested from tolerant hosts significantly inhibited the capacity of naive MNLs to reject same donor, but not third-party, skin allografts. Moreover, when we transplanted skin allografts from stable tolerant chimeras onto syngeneic immune-incompetent mice, graft-infiltrating T cells migrated from the graft site, expanded in the new host, and protected allografts from acute rejection by naive syngeneic MNLs. In this model, both deletional and immunoregulatory mechanisms are active during the induction and/or maintenance of allograft tolerance through creation of MC using a potentially clinically applicable regimen.

Organ transplantation—how much of the promise has been realized?

Since the introduction of organ transplantation into medical practice, progress and optimism have been abundant. Improvements in immunosuppressive drugs and ancillary care have led to outstanding short-term (1--3-year) patient and graft survival rates. This success is mitigated by several problems, including poor long-term (>5-year) graft survival rates, the need for continual immunosuppressive medication and the discrepancy between the demand for organs and the supply. Developing methods to induce transplant tolerance, as a means to improve graft outcomes and eliminate the requirement for immunosuppression, and expanding the pool of organs for transplantation are the major challenges of the field.

The role of non-deletional tolerance mechanisms in a murine model of mixed chimerism with costimulation blockade

Peripheral and central clonal deletion are important tolerance mechanisms in models using bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with costimulation blockade (CB). However, since tolerance can be found before peripheral deletion is complete and since elimination of recipient CD4(+) cells at the time of BMT prevents tolerance induction, we investigated the potential roles of regulation and anergy in such a murine model. We found that transient elimination of CD25(+) cells or neutralization of IL2 immediately after BMT and CB prevented the induction of skin graft tolerance. Cotransfer into SCID mice of CD4(+) cells taken from chimeras early after BMT, together with naive recipient-type CD4(+) cells significantly prolonged donor skin graft survival. In contrast, cotransfer of CD4(+) cells harvested from chimeras late after BMT did not prolong donor skin graft survival. Besides, depletion of CD25(+) cells in established chimeras several months post-BMT did not break tolerance. In vivo administration of recombinant IL2 inhibited chimerism and tolerance neither early nor late post-BMT, arguing against a decisive role for classical anergy. Thus, CD4 cell-mediated regulation contributes significantly to tolerance induction early after BMT, but appears to have no critical role in the maintenance of tolerance.

Control of systemic B cell-mediated autoimmune disease by nonmyeloablative conditioning and major histocompatibility complex-mismatched allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Systemic autoimmune disease (AID) can be controlled with conventional therapies in most patients. However, relapses are common, leading to progressive disability and premature death. Nonmyeloablative conditioning and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) could be an effective treatment for severe AID, because of mild toxicity of the conditioning and the potential benefits of donor chimerism. We examined the effects of this treatment in experimental autoimmune arthritis. Our results demonstrate the induction of complete donor chimerism and significant suppression of disease activity. No clinical graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was observed. The beneficial effects were most likely caused by the elimination of plasma cells producing pathogenic autoantibodies, because these antibodies disappeared rapidly after BMT. Although this type of treatment was effective in organ-specific T-cell-mediated AID, the present study provides convincing evidence that nonmyeloablative conditioning and allogeneic BMT can effectively treat severe B-cell-mediated AID with a systemic inflammatory component.

Tolerance in mixed chimerism - a role for regulatory cells?

The establishment of mixed hematopoietic chimerism induces life-long donor-specific organ graft tolerance while obviating the need for chronic immunosuppression. Recent advances have dramatically reduced the conditioning toxicity required to achieve mixed chimerism. We argue that the achievement of high levels of donor chimerism ensures life-long deletion of donor-reactive T cells, precluding and obviating the need for regulatory mechanisms in the maintenance of tolerance. However, in situations where high levels of donor chimerism cannot be established or sustained, control of immune responsiveness can be achieved through additional mechanisms, including regulatory T cells.

Depletion of alloantigen-primed lymphocytes overcomes resistance to allogeneic bone marrow in mildly conditioned recipients

OBJECTIVE

Successful implantation of allogeneic bone marrow (BM) cells after nonmyeloablative conditioning would allow to compensate for the inadequate supply of compatible grafts and to reduce mortality of graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD). Recently, we proposed to facilitate engraftment of mismatched BM by conditioning for alloantigen-primed lymphocyte depletion (APLD) with cyclophosphamide (CY). Here we summarize the experimental results obtained by this approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Naive or mildly irradiated BALB/c mice were primed with C57BL/6 BM cells (day 0), treated with CY (day 1) to deplete alloantigen-primed lymphocytes, and given a second C57BL/6 BM transplant (day 2) for engraftment. Recipients were repeatedly tested for chimerism in the blood and followed for GVHD and survival. The protocol was also tested for inducing tolerance to donor tissue and organ allografts, and for treatment of leukemia, breast cancer, and autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice.

RESULTS

APLD by 200 mg/kg CY provided engraftment of allogeneic BM from the same donor in 100% mildly irradiated recipients. Eighty percent chimeras remained GVHD-free more 200 days. All chimeras accepted permanently donor skin grafts and donor hematopoietic stromal progenitors. Allogeneic BM transplantation (BMT) after APLD had a strong therapeutic potential in BALB/c mice harboring malignant cells and in autoimmune NOD recipients. Tolerance-inducing CY dose could be reduced to 100 mg/kg. Conditioning for APLD resulted in engraftment of allogeneic BM after a significantly lower radiation dose than treatment with radiation and CY alone.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that conditioning for APLD has a definite advantage over general immunosuppression with CY and radiation therapy.

Chimerism as a tool to induce clinical transplantation tolerance

The principle that the induction of (mixed) hematopoietic chimerism can lead to transplantation tolerance to another organ from the same donor has been verified in rodents, in large animals including non-human primates and recently in a selected group of renal transplant recipients. The wide application of this tool depends on the development of more gentle, non-toxic induction protocols and reliable assays with which to detect the establishment of stable donor-specific tolerance.

Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells for induction of unresponsiveness to organ allografts

Although it has been recognized since the early days of Owen and Medawar that engraftment of donor stem cells, induced in utero spontaneously or intentionally neonatally, results in life-long unresponsiveness to donor alloantigens. However, successful induction of transplantation tolerance in adult life still represents an unsolved problem. Engraftment of donor stem cells using conventional modalities involves intensive myeloablative or lymphoablative immunosuppression, which is associated with toxicity and mortality and such methods are not suitable for organ allograft recipients. In this chapter, we present an innovative approach for induction of donor-specific unresponsiveness to bone marrow and organ allografts without myeloablative conditioning. Our methods is based on cyclophosphamide-induced, alloantigen-primed lymphocyte depletion. Cyclophosphamide is administered 1 day following infusion of donor hematopoietic cells, thus eliminating predominantly host T lymphocytes reacting against donor cell challenge, and resulting in relative unresponsiveness to donor alloantigens. Subsequently, life-long tolerance to fully mismatched donor skin allografts can be accomplished by a second infusion of stem cells from the same donor, with donor T cells displacing residual alloreactive host cells that may have escaped deletion. Taken together, we believe that induction of true permanent and specific tolerance to organ allografts using donor hematopoietic cells could become a clinical reality in the foreseeable future.

Tolerance induction in clinical transplantation

Introduction of modern immunosuppressive agents has led to great success of allotransplantation in humans, and survival rates for all solid organs have been dramatically improved. However, a constant proportion of organs is lost every year due to chronic allograft rejection and immunosuppressive drug toxicity. This has led to a situation where, despite the of donor organ shortage, about one third of the patients on the kidney transplant waiting list are listed for a retransplant. The induction of donor-specific tolerance has the potential of at least partially resolving this problem, since it might prevent chronic rejection and drug toxicity at the same time. For a variety of protocols, successful tolerance induction has been demonstrated in rodent models. However, translation of such protocols to large animal models and on clinical trials has turned out to be very difficult. This review briefly describes mechanisms and barriers to transplantation tolerance, and then focuses on pre-clinical and clinical studies in non-human primates and humans. We have divided the strategies into two groups, based on the principle mechanisms of tolerance induction: the first group are protocols not using hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) as part of there regimen. They rely mainly on intensive T cell depletion (either by total body irradiation, total lymphoid irradiation or treatment with T cell-depleting agents such as anti-thymocyte globulin, anti-CD52 antibody or CD3 immunotoxin), which have been combined with costimulatory blockade, signaling blockade or donor antigen infusion. The second group are HCT-based protocols combining HCT with T cell-depleting agents and cytoreductive treatment. So far, only two protocols (one with total lymphoid irradiation and anti-thymocyte globulin, but no HCT; one with HCT, cyclophosphamide, anti-thymocyte globulin and thymic irradiation) have been translated into successful human studies. We summarize and discuss the results of these trials and suggest goals for further studies for the development tolerance protocols applicable for a broad population of allograft recipients.