Presentation and outcome of patients with 2016 WHO diagnosis of prefibrotic and overt primary myelofibrosis

Molecular Pathology of Myeloid Neoplasms: Molecular Pattern Recognition

Despite the apparent complexity of the molecular genetic underpinnings of myeloid neoplasms, most myeloid mutational profiles can be understood within a simple framework. Somatic mutations accumulate in hematopoietic stem cells with aging and toxic insults, termed clonal hematopoiesis. These "old stem cells" mutations, predominantly in the epigenetic and RNA spliceosome pathways, act as "founding" driver mutations leading to a clonal myeloid neoplasm when sufficient in number and clone size. Subsequent mutations can create the genetic flavor of the myeloid neoplasm ("backseat" drivers) due to their enrichment in certain entities or act as progression events ("aggressive" drivers) during clonal evolution.

A case of a primary myelofibrosis with progression and related literature review of progression phase genetics

Philadelphia (BCR-ABL)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). MPN can transform into an accelerated or a blast phase, which is associated with poor response to standard therapy and low overall median survival. We present an interesting case of a patient with a history of PMF and progression and summarize the current studies on genetic features of myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase (MPN-BP) with an emphasis on PMF. Although MPN-BP show ≥20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow, it is not considered as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) according to the WHO classification. While MPNs-BP typically lack genetic mutations seen in de novo AML, they commonly harbor IDH1/2, SRSF2, ASXL1, and TP53 mutations, similar to the genetic profiles of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC).

Calreticulin mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Calreticulin (CALR) is a chaperone present in the endoplasmic reticulum, which is involved in the quality control of N-glycosylated proteins and storage of calcium ions. In 2013, the C-terminal mutation in CALR was identified in half of the patients with essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis who did not have a JAK2 or MPL mutation. The results of 8 years of intensive research are changing the clinical practice associated with treating myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The presence or absence of CALR mutations and their mutation types already provide important information for diagnosis and treatment decision making. In addition, the interaction with the thrombopoietin receptor MPL, which is the main mechanism of transformation by CALR mutation, and the expression of the mutant protein on the cell surface have a great potential as targets for molecular-targeted drugs and immunotherapy. This chapter presents recent findings on the clinical significance of the CALR mutation and the molecular basis by which this mutation drives MPNs.

Activated IL-6 signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of, and is a novel therapeutic target for, CALR-mutated MPNs

Calreticulin (CALR), an endoplasmic reticulum-associated chaperone, is frequently mutated in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Mutated CALR promotes downstream JAK2/STAT5 signaling through interaction with, and activation of, the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL). Here, we provide evidence of a novel mechanism contributing to CALR-mutated MPNs, represented by abnormal activation of the interleukin 6 (IL-6)-signaling pathway. We found that UT7 and UT7/mpl cells, engineered by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) to express the CALR type 1-like (DEL) mutation, acquired cytokine independence and were primed to the megakaryocyte (Mk) lineage. Levels of IL-6 messenger RNA (mRNA), extracellular-released IL-6, membrane-associated glycoprotein 130 (gp130), and IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), phosphorylated JAK1 and STAT3 (p-JAK1 and p-STAT3), and IL-6 promoter region occupancy by STAT3 all resulted in increased CALR DEL cells in the absence of MPL stimulation. Wild-type, but not mutated, CALR physically interacted with gp130 and IL-6R, downregulating their expression on the cell membrane. Agents targeting gp130 (SC-144), IL-6R (tocilizumab [TCZ]), and cell-released IL-6 reduced proliferation of CALR DEL as well as CALR knockout cells, supporting a mutated CALR loss-of-function model. CD34+ cells from CALR-mutated patients showed increased levels of IL-6 mRNA and p-STAT3, and colony-forming unit-Mk growth was inhibited by either SC144 or TCZ, as well as an IL-6 antibody, supporting cell-autonomous activation of the IL-6 pathway. Targeting IL-6 signaling also reduced colony formation by CD34+ cells of JAK2V617F-mutated patients. The combination of TCZ and ruxolitinib was synergistic at very low nanomolar concentrations. Overall, our results suggest that target inhibition of IL-6 signaling may have therapeutic potential in CALR, and possibly JAK2V617F, mutated MPNs.

Quantification of JAK2V617F mutation load by droplet digital PCR can aid in diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

This study developed a method for quantifying the JAK2V617F mutation load in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which provides a new laboratory method for diagnosing polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and pre-primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF).

METHODS

Patients with MPN who had JAK2V617F mutations from March 2013 to August 2019 were enrolled in this study. JAK2V617F mutation loads were quantified using ddPCR technology.

RESULTS

The study examined 225 patients, including 135 with ET, 58 with PV, and 32 with PMF. JAK2V617F mutation loads significantly differed (P < .001) between the ET and PV groups and between the ET and PMF groups. Bone marrow biopsies were reclassified in accordance with the 2016 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria, which revealed 132 patients with MPN: 62 with ET, 35 with PV, 17 with pre-PMF, and 18 with overt-PMF. JAK2V617F mutation loads significantly differed (P < .001) between the ET and PV groups and between the ET and pre-PMF groups. The cutoff value between the ET and pre-PMF groups was 49.9.

CONCLUSION

JAK2V617F mutation loads provide an additional basis for diagnosis of ET, PV, and PMF, particularly regarding differentiation between ET and pre-PMF.

Overview of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: History, Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Criteria, and Complications

Myeloproliferative disorders are a group of diseases morphologically linked by terminal myeloid cell expansion that frequently evolve from one clinical phenotype to another and eventually progress to acute myeloid leukemia. Diagnostic criteria for the Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have been established by the World Health Organization and they are recognized as blood cancers. MPNs have a complex and incompletely understood pathogenesis that includes systemic inflammation, clonal hematopoiesis, and constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. Complications, such as thrombosis and progression to overt forms of myelofibrosis and acute leukemia, contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality of patients with MPN.

Application of Single-Cell Approaches to Study Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Biology

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are an excellent tractable disease model of a number of aspects of human cancer biology, including genetic evolution, tissue-associated fibrosis, and cancer stem cells. In this review, we discuss recent insights into MPN biology gained from the application of a number of new single-cell technologies to study human disease, with a specific focus on single-cell genomics, single-cell transcriptomics, and digital pathology.

The role of new technologies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Application of next-generation sequencing in myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Driver mutations in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are well known. In the past, whole-genome sequencing identified nondriver mutations in other genes, potentially contributing to evolution of malignant clones.

METHODS

Next-generation sequencing was used to assess the presence of any mutations in 14 candidate genes at the point of diagnosis and the resultant impact on the clinical course of the disease.

RESULTS

The study analysed 63 patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Nondriver mutations were detected in 44% of them. The most frequently affected genes were ASXL1 (27%), TET2 (11%) and SF3B1 (6%). The frequency of such mutations was highest in primary MF (59%) and lowest in the prefibrotic phase of primary MF (21%). Patients with prognostically unfavourable sequence variants in genes had significantly worse overall survival (53 vs 71 months; HR = 2.77; 95% CI 1.17-6.56; P = .017).

CONCLUSION

In our study, multivariate analysis proved DIPSS to be the only significant factor to predict patient survival. DIPSS contains all of the important clinical and laboratory factors except genetic changes. Stratification of patients according to DIPSS is still beneficial although there are newer and improved scoring systems like GIPSS or MIPSS70. Assessing subclonal mutations in candidate genes during diagnosis may aid in the identification of high-risk MF patients and is therefore relevant for making a prediction for overall survival more accurate.

Gene expression profile correlates with molecular and clinical features in patients with myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) belongs to the family of classic Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). It can be primary myelofibrosis (PMF) or secondary myelofibrosis (SMF) evolving from polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET). Despite the differences, PMF and SMF patients are currently managed in the same way, and prediction of survival is based on the same clinical and genetic features. In the last few years, interest has grown concerning the ability of gene expression profiles (GEPs) to provide valuable prognostic information. Here, we studied the GEPs of granulocytes from 114 patients with MF, using a microarray platform to identify correlations with patient characteristics and outcomes. Cox regression analysis led to the identification of 201 survival-related transcripts characterizing patients who are at high risk for death. High-risk patients identified by this gene signature displayed an inferior overall survival and leukemia-free survival, together with clinical and molecular detrimental features included in contemporary prognostic models, such as the presence of high molecular risk mutations. The high-risk group was enriched in post-PV and post-ET MF and JAK2V617F homozygous patients, whereas pre-PMF was more frequent in the low-risk group. These results demonstrate that GEPs in MF patients correlate with their molecular and clinical features, particularly their survival, and represent the proof of concept that GEPs might provide complementary prognostic information to be applied in clinical decision making.

The Role of Megakaryocytes in Myelofibrosis

Megakaryocytes give rise to platelets, which have a wide variety of functions in coagulation, immune response, inflammation, and tissue repair. Dysregulation of megakaryocytes is a key feature of in the myeloproliferative neoplasms, especially myelofibrosis. Megakaryocytes are among the main drivers of myelofibrosis by promoting myeloproliferation and bone marrow fibrosis. In vivo targeting of megakaryocytes by genetic and pharmacologic approaches ameliorates the disease, underscoring the important role of megakaryocytes in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Here we review the current knowledge of the function of megakaryocytes in the JAK2, CALR, and MPL-mutant myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Prevention and Management of Thrombosis in BCR/ABL-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders of the hematopoietic stem cell. Classical BCR/ABL-negative MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Thrombotic events are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Pathogenesis of blood clotting activation involves various abnormalities of platelets, erythrocytes, and leukocytes, as well as dysfunctions of endothelial cells. Patients with MPN can be stratified in "high risk" or "low risk" of thrombosis according to established risk factors. ET and PV clinical management is highly dependent on the patient's thrombotic risk, and a risk-oriented management strategy to treat these diseases is strongly recommended. In this review, we give an overview of risk factors, pathogenesis, and thrombosis prevention and treatment in MPN.

CREB3L1 overexpression as a potential diagnostic marker of Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Discrimination of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-MPNs) from reactive hypercytosis and myelofibrosis requires a constellation of testing including driver mutation analysis and bone marrow biopsies. We searched for a biomarker that can more easily distinguish Ph-MPNs from reactive hypercytosis and myelofibrosis by using RNA-seq analysis utilizing platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-derived RNAs from patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and reactive thrombocytosis, and CREB3L1 was found to have an extremely high impact in discriminating the two disorders. To validate and further explore the result, expression levels of CREB3L1 in PRP were quantified by reverse-transcription quantitative PCR and compared among patients with ET, other Ph-MPNs, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and reactive hypercytosis and myelofibrosis. A CREB3L1 expression cutoff value determined based on PRP of 18 healthy volunteers accurately discriminated 150 driver mutation-positive Ph-MPNs from other entities (71 reactive hypercytosis and myelofibrosis, 6 CML, and 18 healthy volunteers) and showed both sensitivity and specificity of 1.0000. Importantly, CREB3L1 expression levels were significantly higher in ET compared with reactive thrombocytosis (P < .0001), and polycythemia vera compared with reactive erythrocytosis (P < .0001). Pathology-affirmed triple-negative ET (TN-ET) patients were divided into a high- and low-CREB3L1-expression group, and some patients in the low-expression group achieved a spontaneous remission during the clinical course. In conclusion, CREB3L1 analysis has the potential to single-handedly discriminate driver mutation-positive Ph-MPNs from reactive hypercytosis and myelofibrosis, and also may identify a subgroup within TN-ET showing distinct clinical features including spontaneous remission.

Prognostic value of ASXL1 mutations in patients with primary myelofibrosis and its relationship with clinical features: a meta-analysis

Additional sex combs like 1 (ASXL1) mutations are one of the most common molecular biological abnormalities in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), and the effect of these mutations on prognosis remains controversial. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic value and clinical characteristics of ASXL1 mutations in PMF patients. Eligible studies were systematically searched from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. We extracted the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS), the number of patients transformed to acute leukemia, and clinical characteristics to carry out a meta-analysis by fixed effect model or random effect model according to the heterogeneity between studies. A total of 4501 PMF patients from 16 cohorts of 14 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results revealed that ASXL1 mutations might predict a shorter OS (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.79-2.94, P < 0.00001) and a higher probability of transformation to acute leukemia (LFS: HR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.30-2.42, P = 0.0003; the rate of acute leukemia transformation: OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.50-2.83, P < 0.00001). Furthermore, ASXL1 mutations were correlated with patients older than 65 years old, male, a lower level of platelet counts, and a higher risk of the international prognostic score system. These findings indicate that ASXL1 mutations have a significant adverse impact on the prognosis of PMF patients and may contribute to risk stratification and prognostic assessment for PMF patients.

Important Pathologic Considerations for Establishing the Diagnosis of Myelofibrosis

Diagnostic criteria for primary myelofibrosis as defined by the 2017 revised World Health Organization (WHO) classification system incorporate clinical and laboratory findings, including driver mutational status (JAK2, MPL, CALR. and triple negative). The WHO emphasized the role of histopathology in making an accurate diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis and successfully incorporated a fibrosis scoring system and scoring schemas for collagen fibrosis and osteosclerosis. These steps represent a significant addition to the standardization of myelofibrosis evaluation and minimize the risk for misdiagnosis. This article reviews important pathologic considerations along with highlights of potentially relevant pitfalls relevant to histopathological diagnosis of myelofibrosis.

Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied by JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations. Additional disease features include bone marrow reticulin/collagen fibrosis, aberrant inflammatory cytokine expression, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH), constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival.

DIAGNOSIS

Bone marrow morphology is the primary basis for diagnosis. Presence of JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutation, expected in around 90% of the patients, is supportive but not essential for diagnosis; these mutations are also prevalent in the closely related MPNs, namely polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). The 2016 World Health Organization classification system distinguishes "prefibrotic" from "overtly fibrotic" PMF; the former might mimic ET in its presentation. Furthermore, approximately 15% of patients with ET or PV might progress into a PMF-like phenotype (post-ET/PV MF) during their clinical course.

ADVERSE MUTATIONS

SRSF2, ASXL1, and U2AF1-Q157 mutations predict inferior survival in PMF, independent of each other and other risk factors. RAS/CBL mutations predicted resistance to ruxolitinib therapy.

ADVERSE KARYOTYPE

Very high risk abnormalities include -7, inv (3), i(17q), +21, +19, 12p-, and 11q-.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Two new prognostic systems for PMF have recently been introduced: GIPSS (genetically-inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 (MIPSSv2; mutation- and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system). GIPSS is based exclusively on mutations and karyotype. MIPSSv2 includes, in addition, clinical risk factors. GIPSS features four and MIPSSv2 five risk categories.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Observation alone is advised for MIPSSv2 "low" and "very low" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 56%-92%); allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is the preferred treatment for "very high" and "high" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 0%-13%); treatment-requiring patients with intermediate-risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 30%) are best served by participating in clinical trials. In non-transplant candidates, conventional treatment for anemia includes androgens, prednisone, thalidomide, and danazol; for symptomatic splenomegaly, hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib; and for constitutional symptoms, ruxolitinib. Fedratinib, another JAK2 inhibitor, has now been FDA-approved for use in ruxolitinib failures. Splenectomy is considered for drug-refractory splenomegaly and involved field radiotherapy for non-hepatosplenic EMH and extremity bone pain.

NEW DIRECTIONS

A number of new agents, alone or in combination with ruxolitinib, are currently under investigation for MF treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov); preliminary results from some of these clinical trials were presented at the 2020 ASH annual meeting and highlighted in the current document.

The 2020 revision of the guidelines for the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms

In 2016, the World Health Organization revised the diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) based on the discovery of disease-driving genetic aberrations and extensive analysis of the clinical characteristics of patients with MPNs. Recent studies have suggested that additional somatic mutations have a clinical impact on the prognosis of patients harboring these genetic abnormalities. Treatment strategies have also advanced with the introduction of JAK inhibitors, one of which has been approved for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and those with hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant polycythemia vera. Recently developed drugs aim to elicit hematologic responses, as well as symptomatic and molecular responses, and the response criteria were refined accordingly. Based on these changes, we have revised the guidelines and present the diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification of MPNs encountered in Korea.

MOLECULAR GENETIC ABNORMALITIES IN THE GENOME OF PATIENTS WITH Ph-NEGATIVE MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASIA AFFECTED BY IONIZING RADIATION AS A RESULT OF THE CHORNOBYL NUCLEAR ACCIDENT

OBJECTIVE

to determine the frequency of major somatic mutations in the JAK2, MPL and CALR genes in the genomeof patients with Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms that occur in individuals who have been exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of the Chornobyl accident.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Molecular genetic analysis of genomic DNA samples isolated from blood was performed in90 patients with Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasia (MPN) with a history of radiation exposure and 191patients with spontaneous MPN utilizing allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

RESULTS

The presence of major mutations in the genes JAK2, CALR and MPL was revealed in patients with MPN witha history of radiation exposure with a frequency 58.9 % (53 of 90), 12.2 % (11 of 90), and 0 % respectively, and without exposure with frequency 75.4 % (144 of 191), 3.1 % (6 out of 191) and 1.6 % (3 out of 191) respectively.Mutations JAK2 V617F in patients with spontaneous MPN were observed in each clinical form: polycythemia vera (PV),essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). CALR mutations were detected exclusively inpatients with PMF and ET, significantly more often in groups with a radiation exposure history (18.9 % and 33.3 %,vs. 4.2 % and 6.5 %) than without one. At the same time, the occurence of MPL mutations was determined only inpatients with spontaneous MPN in 1.6 % of casees. Triple negative mutation status of genes JAK2, MPL and CALR prevailed in the group of patients with MPN with a history of radiation exposure and was 27.8 %, against 16.2 % inpatients without radiation exposure (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Genomic research of patients with Ph-negative MPN revealed features of molecular genetic damage inthose patients who were exposed to IR as a result of the Chornobyl accident and those with spontaneous MPN. Thedata obtained by determining of JAK2, MPL and CALR genes mutational status in the genome of patients with MPN isnecessary to expand the understanding of the mechanism of leukogenesis, especially caused by radiation.

The Genetic Basis of Primary Myelofibrosis and Its Clinical Relevance

Among classical BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most aggressive subtype from a clinical standpoint, posing a great challenge to clinicians. Whilst the biological consequences of the three MPN driver gene mutations (JAK2, CALR, and MPL) have been well described, recent data has shed light on the complex and dynamic structure of PMF, that involves competing disease subclones, sequentially acquired genomic events, mostly in genes that are recurrently mutated in several myeloid neoplasms and in clonal hematopoiesis, and biological interactions between clonal hematopoietic stem cells and abnormal bone marrow niches. These observations may contribute to explain the wide heterogeneity in patients' clinical presentation and prognosis, and support the recent effort to include molecular information in prognostic scoring systems used for therapeutic decision-making, leading to promising clinical translation. In this review, we aim to address the topic of PMF molecular genetics, focusing on four questions: (1) what is the role of mutations on disease pathogenesis? (2) what is their impact on patients' clinical phenotype? (3) how do we integrate gene mutations in the risk stratification process? (4) how do we take advantage of molecular genetics when it comes to treatment decisions?

[Myelofibrosis: A review]

Myelofibrosis is a BCR-ABL1-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm that includes primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. It is characterized by stem cell-derived clonal proliferation that is often, but not always, accompanied by somatic mutations, which are classified into driver mutations (JAK2, CALR, or MPL), subclonal mutations and fibrosis on bone marrow biopsy. Myelofibrosis commonly demonstrates splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, anemia, thrombocytosis, or thrombocytopenia. Patients may also be asymptomatic. Complications as thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events can reveal the disease. Primary myelofibrosis is the least common myeloproliferative neoplasm but is associated with poor survival and acute leukemic transformation. In contrast to the significant progress made in understanding the disease's pathogenesis, treatment for myelofibrosis remains largely palliative. The JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib is not sufficient in eliminating the underlying myeloid progenitor clone, as disease inevitably returns with therapy discontinuation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only therapeutic option that offers potential cure. The development of novel treatment strategies aimed at slowing or even reversing disease progression, prolonging patient survival and preventing evolution to blast-phase are still lacking.

A multistate model of survival prediction and event monitoring in prefibrotic myelofibrosis

Among 382 patients with WHO-defined prefibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) followed for a median of 6.9 years, fibrotic or leukemic transformation or death accounts for 15, 7, and 27% of cases, respectively. A multistate model was applied to analyze survival data taking into account intermediate states that are part of the clinical course of pre-PMF, including overt PMF and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Within this multistate framework, multivariable models disclosed older age (>65 years) and leukocytosis (>15 × 10⁹/L) as predictors of death and leukemic transformation. The risk factors for fibrotic progression included anemia and grade 1 bone marrow fibrosis. The outcome was further affected by high molecular risk (HMR) but not driver mutations. Direct transition to overt PMF, AML, or death occurred in 15.2, 4.7, and 17.3% of patients, respectively. The risk of AML was the highest in the first 5 years (7%), but leveled off thereafter. Conversely, the probability of death from overt PMF or AML increased more rapidly over time, especially when compared to death in the pre-PMF state without disease progression. The probability of being alive with pre-PMF status decreased to 70 and 30% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. This study highlights the aspects of the clinical course and estimates of disease progression in pre-PMF.

[The prognostic value of ASXL1 mutation in primary myelofibrosis. Literature review and clinical case description]

Primary myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that occurs de novo, characterized by clonal proliferation of stem cells, abnormal expression of cytokines, bone marrow fibrosis, hepatosplenomegaly as a result of extramedullary hematopoiesis, symptoms of tumor intoxication, cachexemia, peripheral blood leukoerythroblastosis, leukemic progression and low survival. Primary myelofibrosis is a chronic incurable disease. The aims of therapy: preventing progression, increasing overall survival, improving quality of life. The choice of therapeutic tactics is limited. Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only method that gives a chance for a cure. The role of mutations in a number of genes in the early identification of candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is being actively studied. The article describes the clinical case of the detection ofASXL1gene mutations in a patient with prefibrous primary myelofibrosis. The diagnosis was established on the basis of WHO criteria 2016. The examination revealed a mutation ofASXL1. Interferon alfa therapy is carried out, against the background of which clinico-hematological remission has been achieved. Despite the identified mutation, the patient is not a candidate for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Given the unfavorable prognostic value of theASXL1mutation, the patient is subject to active dynamic observation and aggressive therapeutic tactics when signs of disease progression appear.

Splicing Anomalies in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Paving the Way for New Therapeutic Venues

Since the discovery of spliceosome mutations in myeloid malignancies, abnormal pre-mRNA splicing, which has been well studied in various cancers, has attracted novel interest in hematology. However, despite the common occurrence of spliceosome mutations in myelo-proliferative neoplasms (MPN), not much is known regarding the characterization and mechanisms of splicing anomalies in MPN. In this article, we review the current scientific literature regarding "splicing and myeloproliferative neoplasms". We first analyse the clinical series reporting spliceosome mutations in MPN and their clinical correlates. We then present the current knowledge about molecular mechanisms by which these mutations participate in the pathogenesis of MPN or other myeloid malignancies. Beside spliceosome mutations, splicing anomalies have been described in myeloproliferative neoplasms, as well as in acute myeloid leukemias, a dreadful complication of these chronic diseases. Based on splicing anomalies reported in chronic myelogenous leukemia as well as in acute leukemia, and the mechanisms presiding splicing deregulation, we propose that abnormal splicing plays a major role in the evolution of myeloproliferative neoplasms and may be the target of specific therapeutic strategies.

Prefibrotic Myelofibrosis Presenting with Multiple Cerebral Embolic Infarcts and the Rare MPL W515S Mutation

Acquired, activating mutations of MPL W515 are recognised driver mutations of the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), namely, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis. The most common mutation at this codon is W515L with several other mutations also described at a lower frequency. Of these less common mutations, MPL W515S has only been reported sporadically with limited information on clinicopathological associations. We describe the case of an elderly man with persistent thrombocytosis presenting with an ischemic cerebral event. Bone marrow biopsy showed evidence of prefibrotic myelofibrosis with targeted sequencing demonstrating the presence of the rare MPL W515S mutation. Thrombolytic and cytoreductive therapies resulted in a favorable outcome and follow-up. This case provides additional, necessary, and phenotypic data for the rare MPN-associated MPL W515S mutation.

Mutant calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Recurrent mutations in calreticulin are present in ∼20% of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Since its discovery in 2013, we now have a more precise understanding of how mutant CALR, an endoplasmic reticulum chaperone protein, activates the JAK/STAT signaling pathway via a pathogenic binding interaction with the thrombopoietin receptor MPL to induce MPNs. In this Spotlight article, we review the current understanding of the biology underpinning mutant CALR-driven MPNs, discuss clinical implications, and highlight future therapeutic approaches.

The new WHO classification for essential thrombocythemia calls for revision of available evidences

In the 2016 revised classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms pre-fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) was recognized as a separate entity, distinct from essential thrombocythemia (ET). Owing that the majority of cases falling in the pre-PMF category were previously diagnosed as ET, one may question about the need to re-evaluate the results of epidemiologic, clinical, and molecular studies, and the results of clinical trials in the two entities. Based on a critical review of recently published studies, pre-PMF usually presents with a distinct clinical and hematological presentation and higher frequency of constitutional symptoms. JAK2V617F and CALR mutations in pre-PMF patients are superimposable to ET, whereas non-driver high-risk mutations are enriched in pre-PMF compared with ET. Thrombosis is not significantly different, whereas bleeding is more frequent in pre-PMF. Median survival is significantly shorter in pre-PMF and 10-year cumulative rates progression to overt myelofibrosis is 0-1% vs. 10-12%, and leukemic transformation is 1-2% vs. 2-6%, in ET and pre-fibrotic-PMF, respectively. Most patients fall in the lower prognostic IPSS group in which observation alone can be recommended. Patients at intermediate risk may require a symptom-driven treatment for anemia, splenomegaly or constitutional symptoms while cytoreductive drugs are indicated in the high-risk category.

Validation of the IPSET score for thrombosis in patients with prefibrotic myelofibrosis

Pre-fibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are characterized by similarly increased rate of thrombotic events, but no study specifically analyzed risk factors for thrombosis in pre-PMF. In a multicenter cohort of 382 pre-PMF patients collected in this study, the rate of arterial and venous thrombosis after diagnosis was 1.0 and 0.95% patients/year. Factors significantly associated with arterial thrombosis were age, leukocytosis, generic cardiovascular risk factors, JAK2V617F and high molecular risk mutations, while only history of previous thrombosis, particularly prior venous thrombosis, was predictive of venous events. The risk of total thromboses was accurately predicted by the the international prognostic score for thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia (IPSET) score, originally developed for ET, and corresponded to 0.67, 2.05, and 2.95% patients/year in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories. IPSET was superior to both the conventional 2-tiered score and the revised IPSET in this cohort of pre-PMF patients. We conclude that IPSET score can be conveniently used for thrombosis risk stratification in patients with pre-PMF and might represent the basis for individualized management aimed at reducing the increased risk of major cardiovascular events. Further refinement of the IPSET score in pre-PMF might be pursued by additional, prospective studies evaluating the inclusion of leukocytosis and/or adverse mutational profile as novel variables.

Novel lysyl oxidase inhibitors attenuate hallmarks of primary myelofibrosis in mice

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) that usually portends a poor prognosis with limited therapeutic options available. Currently, only allogeneic stem cell transplantation is curative in those who are candidates, while administration of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib carries a risk of worsening cytopenia. The limited therapeutic options available highlight the need for the development of novel treatments for PMF. Lysyl oxidase (LOX), an enzyme vital for collagen cross-linking and extracellular matrix stiffening, has been found to be upregulated in PMF. Herein, we evaluate two novel LOX inhibitors, PXS-LOX_1 and PXS-LOX_2, in two animal models of PMF (GATA1low and JAK2V617F-mutated mice). Specifically, PXS-LOX_1 or vehicle was given to 15- to 16-week-old GATA1low mice via intraperitoneal injection at a dose of 15 mg/kg four times a week for 9 weeks. PXS-LOX_1 was found to significantly decrease the bone marrow fibrotic burden and megakaryocyte number compared to vehicle in both male and female GATA1low mice. Given these results, PXS-LOX_1 was then tested in 15- to 17-week-old JAK2V617F-mutated mice at a dose of 30 mg/kg four times a week for 8 weeks. Again, we observed a significant decrease in bone marrow fibrotic burden. PXS-LOX_2, a LOX inhibitor with improved oral bioavailability, was next evaluated in 15- to 17-week-old JAK2V617F-mutated mice at a dose of 5 mg/kg p.o. four times a week for 8 weeks. This inhibitor also resulted in a significant decrease in bone marrow fibrosis, albeit with a more pronounced amelioration in female mice. Taking these results together, PXS-LOX_1 and PXS-LOX_2 appear to be promising new candidates for the treatment of fibrosis in PMF.

Clinical and molecular profile of a Brazilian cohort of patients with classical BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Background

The classical BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are Polycythemia Vera (PV), Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) and Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF). In developing countries, there are few reports that truly reveal the clinical setting of these patients. Therefore, we aimed to characterize a single center MPN population with a special focus on the correct diagnosis based on the recent review of the WHO criteria for the diagnosis of myeloid neoplasms.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed data from medical records of patients with classical BCR-ABL1-negative MPNs diagnosed from January 1997 to October 2017 and followed at the University Hospital of Ribeirão Preto Medical School.

Results

A total of 162 patients were assessed, 61 with PV, 50 with ET, and 51 with PMF. The mutational status analysis revealed that 113 (69.3%) harbored the JAK2V617F mutation, 23 (14.1%), the CALR mutation, and 12 (7.4%) had a triple-negative status. None of the patients were found to have mutations on the thrombopoietin receptor gene (MPL), including some ET and PMF patients who were not tested. Among the PV patients, 57 (93.5%) were positive for the JAK2V617F mutation, one (1.6%) presented an in-frame deletion JAK2 exon 12 mutation and one (1.6%) presented a missense JAK2 exon 9 mutation, not previously described. The overall survival was lower in the triple-negative patients with PMF, when compared to the JAK2V617F or CALR-mutated (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

The frequency of somatic mutations and survival in our cohort, stratified according to the respective disease, was consistent with the literature data, despite some limitations. Further prospective epidemiological studies of MPN cohorts are encouraged in developing countries.

Impact of 2016 WHO diagnosis of early and overt primary myelofibrosis on presentation and outcome of 232 patients treated with ruxolitinib

The 2016 WHO criteria identified early primary myelofibrosis (PMF) as an individual entity with milder clinical features and better outcome compared with overt PMF. Here, we compared early and overt PMF patients treated with ruxolitinib in terms of baseline clinical/laboratory characteristics, response, and toxicity to treatment. We observed that early-PMF patients achieve better and more stable spleen and symptoms responses, with significantly lower rates of hematological toxicities. No differences in overall and leukemia-free survival were detected between the two cohorts. The application of 2016 WHO criteria is crucial to identify those PMF patients who deserve a stricter monitoring during treatment.

Gene expression profiling distinguishes prefibrotic from overtly fibrotic myeloproliferative neoplasms and identifies disease subsets with distinct inflammatory signatures

The Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) share similar molecular characteristics in that they frequently harbor hotspot mutations in JAK2, CALR or MPL, leading to activated JAK/STAT signaling. However, these MPN have distinct symptoms, morphology, and natural histories, including different tendencies to progress to fibrosis. Although the role of inflammation in tissue fibrosis is well recognized, inflammatory gene expression in bone marrows involved by MPN has been understudied. We analyzed the expression of inflammatory genes by directly measuring RNA transcript abundance in bone marrow biopsies of 108 MPN patients. Unsupervised analyses identified gene expression patterns that distinguish prefibrotic (grade 1–2) MPN from overtly fibrotic (grade 2–3) MPN with high sensitivity and specificity in two independent cohorts. Furthermore, prefibrotic and overtly fibrotic MPN are separable into subsets with different activities in biological pathways linked to inflammation, including cytokines, chemokines, interferon response, and toll-like receptor signaling. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that MPN with overt fibrosis is associated with significant inflammatory gene upregulation in the bone marrow, revealing potential roles for multiple pro-inflammatory signaling networks in the development of myelofibrosis and suggesting potential therapeutic mechanisms to alleviate this process in the bone marrow microenvironment.

Targeted next-generation sequencing in blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms

Among 248 consecutive patients with blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-BP), DNA collected at the time of blast transformation was available in 75 patients (median age, 66 years; 64% men). MPN-BP followed primary myelofibrosis in 39 patients, essential thrombocythemia in 20 patients, and polycythemia vera in 16 patients. A myeloid neoplasm-relevant 33-gene panel was used for next-generation sequencing. Driver mutation distribution was JAK2 57%, CALR 20%, MPL 9%, and triple-negative 13%. Sixty-four patients (85%) harbored other mutations/variants, including 37% with ≥3 mutations; most frequent were ASXL1 47%, TET2 19%, RUNX1 17%, TP53 16%, EZH2 15%, and SRSF2 13%; relative mutual exclusivity was expressed by TP53, EZH2, LNK, RUNX1, SRSF2, and NRAS/KRAS mutations. Paired chronic-blast phase sample analysis was possible in 19 patients and revealed more frequent blast phase acquisition of ASXL1, EZH2, LNK, TET2, TP53, and PTPN11 mutations/variants. In multivariable analysis, RUNX1 and PTPN11 mutations/variants were associated with shorter survival duration; respective hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1-3.8) and 3.0 (95% CI, 1.1-6.6). An all-inclusive multivariable analysis confirmed the prognostic relevance of RUNX1 mutations (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-5.5) and also showed additional contribution from a treatment strategy that includes transplant or induction of complete or near-complete remission (HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.5). The current study points to specific mutations that might bear pathogenetic relevance for leukemic transformation in MPN and also suggest an adverse survival effect of RUNX1 mutations.

New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis

OPINION STATEMENT

Seven years after the approval of the Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) inhibitor ruxolitinib, it remains the only drug licensed for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Patients who discontinue ruxolitinib have a dismal outcome, and this is, therefore, an area of significant unmet need. Given the central role that JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) activation plays in disease pathogenesis, there have been many other JAK inhibitors tested, but most have been abandoned, for a variety of reasons. The JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib has recently been resurrected, and there has been a resurgence of interest in the failed JAK1/2 inhibitor momelotinib, which possibly improves anemia. Pacritinib, a non-myelosuppressive JAK2-selective inhibitor, is currently in a dose-ranging study mandated by regulatory authorities. A plethora of other targeted agents, most backed by preclinical data, are in various stages of investigation. These include epigenetic and immune therapies, agents targeting cellular survival, metabolic and apoptotic pathways, the cell cycle, DNA repair, and protein folding and degradation, among others. However, at this time, none of these is close to registration or even in a pivotal trial, illustrating the difficulties in recapitulating the clinical disease in preclinical models. Most current clinical trials are testing the addition of a novel agent to ruxolitinib, either in the frontline setting or in the context of an insufficient response to ruxolitinib, or attempting to study new drugs in the second-line, "ruxolitinib failure" setting. Emerging data supports the addition of azacitidine to ruxolitinib in some patients. Other strategies have focused on improving cytopenias, through amelioration of bone marrow fibrosis or other mechanisms. This is important, because cytopenias are the commonest reason for ruxolitinib interruption and/or dose reduction, and dose optimization of ruxolitinib is tied to its survival benefit. The activin receptor ligand trap, sotatercept, and the anti-fibrotic agent, PRM-151, have shown promise in this regard.

Characteristics of myeloproliferative neoplasms in patients exposed to ionizing radiation following the Chernobyl nuclear accident

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) driver mutations are usually found in JAK2, MPL, and CALR genes; however, 10%-15% of cases are triple negative (TN). A previous study showed lower rate of JAK2 V617F in primary myelofibrosis patients exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation (IR) from Chernobyl accident. To examine distinct driver mutations, we enrolled 281 Ukrainian IR-exposed and unexposed MPN patients. Genomic DNA was obtained from peripheral blood leukocytes. JAK2 V617F, MPL W515, types 1- and 2-like CALR mutations were identified by Sanger Sequencing and real time polymerase chain reaction. Chromosomal alterations were assessed by oligo-SNP microarray platform. Additional genetic variants were identified by whole exome and targeted sequencing. Statistical significance was evaluated by Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's rank sum test (R, version 3.4.2). IR-exposed MPN patients exhibited a different genetic profile vs unexposed: lower rate of JAK2 V617F (58.4% vs 75.4%, P = .0077), higher rate of type 1-like CALR mutation (12.2% vs 3.1%, P = .0056), higher rate of TN cases (27.8% vs 16.2%, P = .0366), higher rate of potentially pathogenic sequence variants (mean numbers: 4.8 vs 3.1, P = .0242). Furthermore, we identified several potential drivers specific to IR-exposed TN MPN patients: ATM p.S1691R with copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity at 11q; EZH2 p.D659G at 7q and SUZ12 p.V71 M at 17q with copy number loss. Thus, IR-exposed MPN patients represent a group with distinct genomic characteristics worthy of further study.

Management of Myelofibrosis-Related Cytopenias

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cytopenias, particularly anemia, are frequently encountered in patients with myelofibrosis. Management of cytopenias in myelofibrosis can be very challenging because current therapeutic interventions are only of modest efficacy and ruxolitinib, the only approved drug for myelofibrosis, is myelosuppressive. Yet, dose optimization of ruxolitinib is important for its survival benefit in patients with advanced disease. We sought to summarize the data on treatments for cytopenias available at present and review promising agents in development and emerging strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The activin receptor ligand traps hold considerable promise for the treatment of anemia and could represent an attractive combination strategy with ruxolitinib. Low-dose thalidomide, which could offset both anemia and thrombocytopenia caused by ruxolitinib, represents another potential partner for ruxolitinib. The anti-fibrotic agent PRM-151 produced sustained improvements in cytopenias in some patients, and further data on this drug are eagerly awaited. Finally, several preclinical leads with translational potential are worthy of clinical investigation as strategies to halt/reverse bone marrow fibrosis and thereby improve cytopenias. Cytopenias remain a significant hurdle in myelofibrosis management, but several novel investigational agents hold considerable promise for the future.

Primary myelofibrosis: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that is often but not always accompanied by JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutations; additional disease features include bone marrow stromal reaction including reticulin fibrosis, abnormal cytokine expression, anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH), constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of PMF is based on bone marrow morphology. Presence of JAK2, CALR, or MPL mutation, expected in ∼ 90% of the patients, is supportive but not essential for diagnosis. The revised 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system distinguishes "prefibrotic" from "overtly fibrotic" PMF; the former might mimic ET in its presentation and it is prognostically relevant to distinguish the two.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Two new prognostic systems for PMF have recently been introduced: GIPSS (genetically inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 (mutation- and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system). GIPSS is based exclusively on mutations and karyotype. MIPSS70+ version 2.0 utilizes both genetic and clinical risk factors. GIPSS features four and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 five risk categories. MIPSS70+ version 2.0 requires an online score calculator (http://www.mipss70score.it) while GIPPS offers a lower complexity prognostic tool.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Observation alone is advised for MIPSS70+ version 2.0 "low" and "very low" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 56%-92%); allogeneic stem cell transplant is the preferred treatment of choice for "very high" and "high" risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 0-13%); treatment-requiring patients with intermediate-risk disease (estimated 10-year survival 30%) are best served by participating in clinical trials. All other treatment approaches, including the use of JAK2 inhibitors, are mostly palliative and should not be used in the absence of clear treatment indications. Conventional treatment for anemia includes androgens, prednisone, thalidomide and danazol, for symptomatic splenomegaly hydroxyurea and ruxolitinib and for constitutional symptoms ruxolitinib. Splenectomy is considered for drug-refractory splenomegaly and involved field radiotherapy for nonhepatosplenic EMH and extremity bone pain.

JAK2 (and other genes) be nimble with MPN diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy

Now that the spectrum of somatic mutations that initiate, propagate, and drive the progression of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) has largely been defined, recent efforts have focused on integrating this information into clinical decision making. In this regard, the greatest progress has been made in myelofibrosis, in which high-molecular-risk mutations have been identified and incorporated into prognostic models to help guide treatment decisions. In this chapter, we focus on advances in 4 main areas: (1) What are the MPN phenotypic driver mutations? (2) What constitutes high molecular risk in MPN (focusing on ASXL1)? (3) How do we risk-stratify patients with MPN? And (4) What is the significance of molecular genetics for MPN treatment? Although substantial progress has been made, we still have an incomplete understanding of the molecular basis for phenotypic diversity in MPN, and few rationally designed therapeutic approaches to target high-risk mutations are available. Ongoing research efforts in these areas are critical to understanding the biological consequences of genetic heterogeneity in MPN and to improving outcomes for patients.

Prefibrotic myelofibrosis: treatment algorithm 2018

Prefibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) is a distinct entity among chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm diagnosed according to the revised 2016 WHO classification. The clinical picture is heterogeneous, ranging from isolated thrombocytosis, mimicking essential thrombocythemia (ET), to symptoms of high-risk PMF. Retrospective studies showed that survival of patients with pre-PMF is worse than that of ET and better than overt PMF. Whilst a specific prognostic score is lacking, the International Prognostic Scoring System is able to predict survival in pre-PMF patients, yet failing to separate intermediate-1 and -2 groups, and can be used in clinical practice. Each patient should be evaluated for, and interventions adapted to, both life-expectancy and the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. In low-risk patients with expected long survival, observation only is recommended; in cumulated intermediate-1 and -2 risk cases, whose median survival is projected at more than 10 years, treatment is based on symptoms; in high risk cases, with median survival lower than 5 years, intensive management is required. A pragmatic approach to address the risk of bleeding and thrombosis includes: no treatment or low-dose aspirin in asymptomatic patients; aspirin or oral anticoagulation if previous arterial or venous thrombosis, and hydroxyurea as first-line cytoreduction in case of thrombocytosis or leukocytosis.

Myelofibrosis Treatment Algorithm 2018

Two novel prognostic systems for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) were recently unveiled: GIPSS (genetically inspired prognostic scoring system) and MIPSS70 (mutation-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for transplant-age patients). GIPSS is based exclusively on genetic markers: mutations and karyotype. MIPSS70 includes mutations and clinical risk factors. In its most recent adaptation, the prognostic value of MIPSS70 has been bolstered by the inclusion of a three-tiered cytogenetic risk stratification and use of hemoglobin thresholds that are adjusted for sex and severity (MIPSS70+ version 2.0). GIPSS features four, MIPSS70 three, and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 five risk categories. MIPSS70 is most useful in the absence of cytogenetic information. MIPSS70+ version 2.0 is more comprehensive than MIPSS70 and is the preferred model in the presence of cytogenetic information. Both MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+ version 2.0 require an online score calculator (http://www.mipss70score.it). GIPPS offers a lower complexity prognostic tool that reliably identifies candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplant (GIPSS high-risk disease) or long-term observation with little or no therapeutic intervention (GIPSS low-risk disease). Ultimately, we favor a step-wise prognostication approach that starts with GIPSS but also considers MIPSS70+ version 2.0 for confirming the most appropriate treatment approach for the individual patient.

Ruxolitinib in elderly patients with myelofibrosis: impact of age and genotype. A multicentre study on 291 elderly patients

Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/2 inhibitor that may control myelofibrosis (MF)-related splenomegaly and symptoms and can be prescribed regardless of age. While aging is known to correlate with worse prognosis, no specific analysis is available to confirm that ruxolitinib is suitable for use in older populations. A clinical database was created in 23 European Haematology Centres and retrospective data on 291 MF patients treated with ruxolitinib when aged ≥65 years were analysed in order to assess the impact of age and molecular genotype on responses, toxicities and survival. Additional mutations were evaluated by a next generation sequencing (NGS) approach in 69 patients with available peripheral blood samples at the start of ruxolitinib treatment. Compared to older (age 65-74 years) patients, elderly (≥75 years) showed comparable responses to ruxolitinib, but higher rates of drug-induced anaemia and thrombocytopenia and worse survival. Nonetheless, the ruxolitinib discontinuation rate was comparable in the two age groups. Number and types of molecular abnormalities were comparable across age groups. However, the presence of high molecular risk (HMR) mutations significantly affected survival, counterbalancing the effect of aging. Indeed, elderly patients with <2 HMR mutated genes had a comparable survival to older patients with ≥2 HMR mutations. Given that responses were not influenced by age, older age per se should not be a limitation for ruxolitinib administration. NGS analysis of HMR mutations also confirmed a strong predictive value in elderly patients.